Translate

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE? CONGRESS IS OBSOLETE?

Many of you may have seen this as it was breaking, but it bears repeating given the dirty-dealings up on the Hill recently.

Mar 7, 2012,WASHINGTON—Under question from Sen. Sessions at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing today, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey indicated that "international permission," rather than Congressional approval, provided a 'legal basis' for military action by the United States.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5zNwOeyuG84



Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s testimony asserting that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military, words which effectively declare Congress a ceremonial relic, have prompted Congressman Walter Jones to introduce a resolution that re-affirms such behavior as an “impeachable high crime and misdemeanor” under the Constitution.

 Judge Andrew Napolitano addressed an exchange on Wednesday between Sen. Sessions and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta regarding the Obama Administration's apparent belief that "international permission," but not congressional approval, is a necessary precondition for any military action by the United States.
 Listen to the videos carefully.

Listen to what Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton had to say about this. He was appalled by Panetta's statements, too!

AGAIN AND AGAIN PANETTA REITERATES THAT NATO/THE U.N./FOREIGN APPROVAL, NOT CONGRESS, CAN OKAY AMERICAN MILITARY INTERVENTION ANYWHERE ON EARTH! THAT IS NOT WHAT OUR CONSTITUTION SAYS!
Congressman Walter Jones was right to call such behavior an “impeachable high crime and misdemeanor” under the Constitution!

Here's an "official military map of the whole world, showing zones of responsibility"...
 [See a larger version here:  World Divided   ]
"Responsibility'? NO, it's how the armies of the world have divvied up the planet! One military group okays another's presence, or not?
They don't need Congress to approve WAR...IT IS WAR TO ATTACK ANOTHER NATION, A PURE ACT OF WAR!



What will it take for Americans to say "ENOUGH!"?
It's sliding way south, folks, and if we don't erect an impenetrable barrier to TREASON now, it's going to roll right over us!

Did you know there was a "minor attempt" at a military coup this year? And SEVERAL years past?  Did you know that Rupert Murdoch actually tried to BUY the U.S. Presidency just last year? Maybe that's why the man he wanted for the Oval Office was taken down by scandal? The man Murdoch offered to bankroll for the 2012 election? General David Petraeus That's the next blog...

Monday, December 24, 2012

The Dumbing-Down of America: Back to the Caves?

The dumbing-down of America began in earnest back in the 1930s with FDR's 'plan' to subjugate American citizens by means of 'social welfare'. Just prior to that, Wilson and friends forced  a 'central bank' onto Americans, the Federal Reserve, owned and operated NOT by our own citizens, OR our own government, but mostly by FOREIGN bankers, the upper .01% of the world's mega-rich. Together, the welfare state and the banking elite began to grab power from the American people. The money of the ultra-wealthy bought, yes, LITERALLY BOUGHT political figures, financed their rise to power in our Congress, in the White House, and in every small town's elected offices in America. This banking conglomerate managed to install those who became ingratiated to them, or, as even Mitt Romney once suggested, "politicians who owed them". They moved on to make the federal government responsible for the education of American youth, and gradually, stealthily made students anything BUT educated.

The average high school senior can't even balance a checkbook. Faced with financial decision-making, 'Little Johnny/Jane' can't even manage their allowances, they grow up to have little or no concept of economics, have no clue how to prepare for paying mortgages, loans, or plan for retirement, so is it any wonder we've seen a new all-time high of foreclosures, bankruptcies, and collapse of the American economic system? Our children, for the past 80 years, simply have NOT been given proper, if any, instruction in the basics of personal finance, or how to manage their lives successfully once they are out in the REAL world.
They can't read well, can't spell, can't write because of the poor quality of their so-called 'education', and a terrible thing called phonics. A recent president of the United States required phonetic spelling on his teleprompter! An entire nation of people have been DUMBED-DOWN! America threw out the old system of education, known as the Trivium learning method.

Emperor Julian of Rome, on June 17, 362 A.D., decreed that all teachers in the empire must be examined, endorsed and sanctioned by the emperor. His primary purpose was to use the educational system as a propaganda weapon for the formation of public opinion.
Immediately thereafter he declared Christians to be insane and demented because of their contradictory views and practices; and refused to allow them to be teachers. His aim was to turn all schools into centers of pagan religion. The effect was to "forbid masters of rhetoric and grammar to instruct Christians." Julian "considered such studies conducive to the acquisition of argumentative and persuasive power." Augustine wrote, "Was he [Julian] not a persecutor that forbade the Christians to be taught the liberal arts [Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric]?" (The City of God, by Saint Augustine of Hippo. 18:52)
The parallels between Julian's actions and our modern socialized education are startling.
Federal legislation requires that all school teachers in the socialized schools be examined, endorsed and sanctioned by the Federal Department of Education.
  "The Congress declares it to be the policy of the United States that...this title builds upon what has been learned: [including]...The disproven theory that children must first learn basic skills [=GRAMMAR & LOGIC] before engaging in more complex tasks [=RHETORIC] continues to dominate strategies for classroom instruction, resulting in emphasis on repetitive drill and practice.... A school wide program shall include the following components: ...help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum [=RHETORIC BASED] rather than remedial drill and practice [GRAMMAR & LOGIC]."
That is how we came under 'Outcome-Based Education' (O. B. E.). It is mandated in all socialized schools. Federal legislation was formulated to forbid the teaching of the Trivium, the educational system that produced the great thinkers of past times, declaring it to be a "disproven theory." Let us recall that SOCRATES, PLATO, ARISTOTLE all applied the Trivium form of education. What does THAT prove? Nothing, obviously, to our Congress.
Gone are the days when a student had to learn to actually read real words, or learn basic skills in order to complete an education. Today, a music instructor doesn't even have to ask students to learn to READ music...they just teach them a song which they memorize and play back, mindless of how the song came into being.
Today's educational system makes things so simple, so FAST, that any student, with minimal effort can 'graduate'. "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND" means what it says! In spite of poor performance, even if they can't read, write, or do basic sums, even if they don't know what verbs, logic, or interest rates are, just push them through, make certain they don't engage in INDEPENDENT thought, instill in them the horrors of questioning authority, make them all "team-players", and foremost, make sure they realize they OWE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT/THE STATE for all that they have received in the halls of higher learning!
Emperor Julian would be proud of America's educational achievements. He would jump for joy that we have fashioned mindless automatons who line up nicely, who do as they are told, in the manner that pleases the "gods" up on yon HILL. 'POLITICAL correctness' rules! Think about that term..."POLITICALLY correct"! We've traded all our independent thought and logic for that, for politics!

The average citizen in America can't quote the very short Declaration of Independence, have no idea what the Articles of Confederation were, can't say how many Constitutional Amendments there are, nor WHAT those are, can't name the Presidential Cabinet members, all Supreme Court Justices, don't know the names of all their state's federal or local officials, have no clue what bills are before Congress, never read that Patriot Act, don't know how to contact the very people they installed as their representatives in government without looking it up. We, the people don't have a clue what the boys up on Capitol Hill are planning for us, what new laws they're enacting, what kinds and how much PAYOLA they're taking from PACs, from lobbyists, from bankers, from Wall Street 'Big Names', from people connected to the criminal element, from foreign 'investors'. We just don't make it our business to know how our nation is being governed!
We couldn't care less about honest American history, world history, or anything resembling philosophy. We don't know when our political "parties" were formed, or on what basis, nor how they've METASTASIZED into the cancerous growths we see today that are tearing this country apart. Most don't even know where the phrases "left wing/right wing" or "liberal/conservative" came from, nor do we imagine life without the "GREAT DIVIDE" that separates not only our House of Representatives and Senate, but every wee burg in America, and often even families.
"DADDY WAS A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT AND THAT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR ME!"

FACTS become the most frightful things we can encounter, worse than those monsters 'neath our beds, for FACTS may, MAY INDEED, prove us WRONG! We can't be wrong! We are Americans, and more than that, we are DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN Americans! DIVIDED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE HAVE FAILED, BUT DIVIDED WE MUST SURELY BE! That's the way we were 'taught"! That's just the "American Way", by all the gods that ever were! It IS "us" against "them"!
If you're not "my kind", you are the ENEMY!

Most Americans don't know a 'red herring' from a tuna fish can. They can't, therefore, recognize the many ways logic can be employed to MANIPULATE MINDS. Logic, TO MOST, is just one of those "hard, boring classes they made me take", and once free of the burden of having to THINK LOGICALLY, the human mind is ripe for the plucking!
One of the definitions of propaganda is: '"The organized attempt through communication to affect belief or action or inculcate attitudes in a large audience in ways that circumvent or suppress an individual's adequately informed, rational, reflective judgment.'"
A statement can be illogical without being propagandist, and we may, at one time or another, all make logical mistakes. The difference is that propagandists deliberately manipulate logic in order to promote their cause. That is why it is CRUCIAL to learn about both logic and propaganda.

The Nazi Propaganda Ministry, headed by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, took control of ALL forms of communication in Germany, EVERYTHING: newspapers, magazines, books, public meetings, rallies, art, music, movies, and radio. Viewpoints in any way threatening to Nazi beliefs or to the regime were censored or eliminated from all media. Some books were completely removed from classrooms by 'censors', and textbooks, newly written to agree with the FATHERLAND, were brought in to teach students blind obedience to the party, love for their dictator, Hitler, and antisemitism. After-school meetings of the Hitler Youth and the League of German Girls trained children to be faithful to the Nazi party. German propagandists were known for their ability to create extensive and varied forms of propaganda, using words and images that were carefully chosen and deliberately used to give life to old anti-Semitic prejudices, to elicit opportunistic tendencies, to quickly quench dissent, and turn neighbor against neighbor, child against parent.
Hitler is often quoted as saying, “What good fortune for governments that people do not
think.”
Writer Max von der Grün told what impact the German propaganda machine had on
him during his service in the German army:
"'It is easy to understand that if, for whatever reasons, these words are hammered into a
person’s brain every day, they soon become a part of his language, and he does not
necessarily stop and think about where they come from and why they were coined in
the first place.'" [Max von der Grün, Howl Like the Wolves: Growing Up in Nazi Germany (New York: William Morrow,1980), pg. 76.]

Isn't that what's happening in America right now?
Surely you don't really think "communists and fascists" are the only ones who use propaganda? REALLY? You're WRONG!

"'Lead this people into war, and they'll forget there was ever such a thing as tolerance. To fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fiber of national life, infecting the Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street."
WHO SAID THAT? WOODROW WILSON, about 1916. Surprised?
With the help of a propaganda apparatus that was unparalleled in world history, Wilson forged a nation of immigrants into a fighting whole, purely by PROPAGANDA!
[See a fine presentation of this incredible organized machine here:http://www.propagandacritic.com/articles/ww1.cpi.html] [Some of the following is quoted from that article.]
On April 13, 1917, Wilson created the 'Committee on Public Information (CPI)' to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. He hired a journalist known as a "muckraker" to head this effort, George Creel. This CPI implemented "voluntary guidelines" for the news media and helped to pass the 'Espionage Act of 1917' and the 'Sedition Act of 1918'. The CPI never had explicit enforcement power, but it nonetheless "enjoyed censorship power which was tantamount to direct legal force." Like modern reporters who participate in Pentagon press pools, journalists grudgingly complied with the official guidelines in order to stay connected to the information loop from the White House.
Behold America's finest propaganda machine as it was born!
 "'Censorship was only one thing CPI's did. With the sophistication of a modern advertising agency, the CPI examined different ways by which information made its way to the population, then flooded these channels with pro-war material. The CPI's domestic division was composed of 19 sub-divisions, and each focused on a PARTICULAR type of propaganda.
One of the most important elements of the CPI was the Division of News, which distributed more than 6,000 press releases and acted as the primary conduit for war-related information. According to Creel, on any given week, more than 20,000 newspaper columns were filled with material gleaned from CPI handouts. Realizing that many Americans glided right past the front page and headed straight for the features section, the CPI also created the Division of Syndicated Features and recruited the help of leading novelists, short story writers, and essayists. These popular American writers presented the official line in an easily digestible form, and their work was said to have reached twelve million people every month.'"
HOW EASY TO SUBJUGATE THE MINDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS! IT IS MUCH EASIER TO DO THAT TODAY, AFTER 80 YEARS OF DUMBING-DOWN AMERICANS!

RE-EDUCATE YOURSELVES, AMERICANS! LEARN THE TRICKS USED TO MAKE YOU STUPID!
Here are some good examples of how faulty logic can trick you into believing LIES...read, LEARN, OR PERISH!

1. Podunk Community College should not require a freshman writing course. Harvard does not require a freshman writing course and the students there get along just fine without it.

        False Analogy. It is false because the two items do not have strong enough similarities to predict that what happens in one will happen in the other.

2. Everyone wants to get married someday. A good self-concept is important in attracting a husband or wife. Therefore, everyone should develop a good self-concept.

        False Premise. This example starts a logical statement with an assumption that is false; not everybody wants to get married. So even if the conclusion drawn is valid, the argument it is built on is not.

3. Suds 'n Spuds is a great restaurant: you can see how shining clean the kitchens are!

        Distraction or "Red Herring." This example distracts the audience from far more important criteria used to establish whether or not a restaurant is good. Even if - to invent a name - Monsieur Taco has a shining clean kitchen, it might well be a lousy restaurant with horrible food and an awful waitstaff!

4. Ms. Bauer is an incompetent math teacher. She always wears blue jeans.

        Ad hominem. "Against the person." Instead of evaluating any faults in teaching technique/theory/pedagogy, it calls attention to things about the teacher as a person which are UTTERLY unrelated to her performance and abilities.

6. Look at this fourteen-year-old child who has run away from home to hide her shame ... pregnant, unwashed, friendless, penniless, at the mercy of our social service agencies. Can you still claim that sex education should be taught in high school?

        Appeal to Pity. Tear-jerking description. Question is posed so disagreement would appear heartless. Similar to (yet different from) Red Herring, above.

7. Suds 'n Spuds is a great restaurant; no one has reported someone dying of poisoning yet!

        Appeal to Ignorance. Your argument on something is supposedly true because its opposite has not been proven true. ("See that door move on its own?! Zoinks! GHOSTS! Run, Scooby!") Similarly, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

8. Either we continue to build nuclear weapons or we will fall prey to the Russians (or Taliban or Chinese or Iraqis or whomever).

        Either/Or Fallacy. Writer pretends only two choices exist.

9. It has been proven that all heroin addicts smoked marijuana in their youth. Therefore, smoking marijuana leads to heroin addiction.

        Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. "After this, therefore because of this." Heroin addicts probably really started on mother's milk; does it lead to heroin? Other examples: "The cock crows, then the sun comes up, therefore the cock is responsible for raising the sun every morning" and "President Reagan's peacetime military buildup - for which we're all still paying - led to the fall of Communism."

13. Students who take earth science instead of physics are lazy. Susie took earth science instead of physics. Lazy Susie should be kicked out of school.

        Non Sequitur. "It does not follow." Even if we were to believe the premise ("students who take earth science instead of physics are lazy"), there is nothing in the line of reasoning that indicates lazy students should be kicked out of school; let poor Susie alone!

14. Juan is an impressive speaker because he always touches his listeners deeply.

        Circular Reasoning or "Tautological Reasoning." The very meaning of "impressive" includes the idea of touching someone deeply - intellectually or emotionally. In an argument this is ineffective and absurd, just as "he is handsome because he is good looking" would be.

18. No, you vegans cannot order a bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwich with peanut butter instead of bacon! Then everyone would start wanting substitutions on their BLT sandwiches.

        Slippery Slope. One instance will inevitably lead to many more? NOT necessarily so!

[For the entire article, see: https://www.msu.edu/~jdowell/135/FaultyLogic.html]

Now, here's where we are today...the vast majority of us don't have a clue what's going on up on Capitol Hill. We may not even know the names of those up there! We stopped questioning much of anything and instead BLINDLY ACCEPT what the propaganda mills, what our "elected officials" tell us. They tell us by means of the mainstream media. ALL OF THAT MEDIA IS OWNED BY JUST SIX MEGA-CORPORATIONS, JUST SIX!!! SO, HOW CAN WE EVER HOPE TO HEAR/READ THE TRUTH WHEN ALL WE ARE FED IS PROPAGANDA BY SIX CORPORATIONS WHO BUY OUR POLITICIANS AND WRITE THEIR AGENDAS FOR THEM?
<<The six corporations that collectively control U.S. media today are Time Warner, Walt Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.  Together, the "big six" absolutely dominate news and entertainment in the United States.  But even those areas of the media that the "big six" do not completely control are becoming increasingly concentrated. For example, Clear Channel now owns over 1000 radio stations across the United States.  Companies like Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are increasingly dominating the Internet.
But it is the "big six" that are the biggest concerns.  When you control what Americans watch, hear and read you gain a great deal of control over what they think.  They don't call it "programming" for nothing.>>
PROGRAMMING THE AMERICAN MIND
[ http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/who-owns-the-media-the-6-monolithic-corporations-that-control-almost-everything-we-watch-hear-and-read ]
"'THEY DON'T CALL IT PROGRAMMING FOR NOTHING'"!

BECOME DE-PROGRAMMED, AMERICA! UNPLUG FROM THE MATRIX! THINK! EXIST AS INDIVIDUALS, NOT AS PART OF A MINDLESS COLLECTIVE!
TO HELL WITH POLITICAL PARTIES, AND ALL ELSE THAT SERVES TO KEEP US DIVIDED AND AT EACH OTHERS THROATS! IF WE DON'T STAND UP TO THE LIES AND TREASON GOING ON IN AMERICA, WE'LL SOON BE GROWING OUR NAILS, SHARPENING OUR TEETH, AND WIND UP BACK IN CAVES PLOTTING HOW TO TAKE OUR NEIGHBOR'S FOOD AND FIRE!
WAKE UP! RESISTANCE HAS NEVER BEEN FUTILE!

Sunday, December 23, 2012

GUN CONTROL: A FALSE DEBATE

"Criminals are killing people, not law-abiding gun owners,"
 Newark, NJ, Mayor Cory Booker said on ABC's 'This Week' .
"I don't know if anybody here has seen somebody shot. I have," Booker said. 
"I don't know if anybody here has had to put their hand in somebody's chest and try to stop the bleeding so somebody doesn't die. I have. And the what frustrates me about this debate is it's a false debate. It's a false debate...I'm not afraid of law-abiding citizens who buy a gun," he said. "Buy the guns you want... Listen to me, the people dying in Chicago, the people dying in Newark are not being done with law-abiding gun owners," Booker continued. "We do not need to go after the guns. A law-abiding mentally stable American, that's not America's problem."
GUN CONTROL IS A FALSE DEBATE

This sentiment has been echoed the past week by many sane, rational people, some of whom don't even own a gun!
Poll after poll SHOWS how Americans really feel about a new ban on guns. The following 'poll results' can be found at:  http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm
  :
Do you think teachers and school staff members should be allowed to carry guns as a means of deterring school shootings like the one in Connecticut?
Yes, absolutely. Anyone who wants to carry should be allowed to.
20%    
Yes, but only select teachers and staff who pass a psychological evaluation.
40%    
No, under no circumstances should we put guns in schools.
32%    
Undecided.
8%
60% favor somebody carrying a weapon in schools!


Which of the following statements comes closer to your overall view? Government and society can take action that will be effective in preventing shootings like the one in Connecticut from happening again. Shootings like the one in Connecticut will happen again regardless of what action is taken by government and society."
 Can be effective action: 46%   
Will happen regardless:     53%
Unsure: 2%         
53% know it won't matter what LAWS we enact! CRIMINALS DON'T OBEY LAWS!!!
 BTW, THE ABOVE PERCENTAGES ADD UP TO 101%..YOU SEE HOW IT GOES
?

"Have the shootings in Connecticut made you more likely to support stricter gun control laws, less likely to support stricter gun control laws, or has your opinion on gun control not changed as a result of the shootings in Connecticut?"
NO CHANGE: 50%
LESS LIKELY:7%
MORE LIKELY: 43%
TRANSLATION: 57% REALIZE GUN CONTROL LAWS JUST DON'T WORK!

"Do you think that stricter gun control laws would have done a lot to prevent the violence that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, done a little, or had no effect on preventing the violence in the school ?"
NO EFFECT:50%
LITTLE EFFECT: 16%
MUCH EFFECT: 26%
IT DEPENDS/UNSURE: 8%
66% KNOW IT WOULD HAVE HAD LITTLE OR NO EFFECT!

:"Would you support or oppose a law requiring a nationwide ban on the sale of handguns, except to law enforcement officers?"
     Support              Oppose     Unsure          
        27%                     71%             2%
  HELLO! WHAT PART OF 71% IS NOT UNDERSTOOD?
   
A 65.9% majority in the Dec. 16 Statesman Journal poll results do NOT not want tighter gun control laws.  Dec 21, 2012
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20121222/OPINION/312220036/Response-gun-control-poll-appalling
WHINE ALL YOU WANT, THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS REALIZE WE CAN'T HOPE THAT TAKING LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS' GUNS AWAY WILL STOP CRIMINALS!!! NEVER HAS, NEVER WILL, FACE IT!

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994  failed to reduce the average number of victims per gun murder incident or multiple gunshot wound victims. [Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, March 1999]
GET THE FACTS!
http://www.gunbanfacts.com/Get_the_Facts/Ban_Supporters_Wrong/violent_crime_decrease.aspx

Many studies of gun control have been conducted with the expectation that they would validate gun control in terms of reducing crime. After all, it's an article of faith among gun control supporters that "more guns [means] more crime." However, studies by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress, the National Academy of Sciences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and others have found no evidence that gun control reduces crime in this country or abroad. As pointed out by a prominent criminologist who supported gun control, crimes depend more on a criminal's intent than upon the weapon available.
In its annual report on crime nationwide, the FBI lists factors that determine the type and amount of crime in jurisdictions throughout the country. The FBI doesn't list gun ownership levels or gun control laws among its list of crime factors that determine the type and level of crime in a jurisdiction.


DO WE PROFILE WHITE MEN, AGES 18-25, TOO? THE VAST MAJORITY OF MASS MURDERERS HAVE BEEN JUST THAT, YOU KNOW!
December 23, 2012: CNN's Don Lemon discusses the possibility of profiling white men in an attempt to prevent gun violence and decrease the amount of mass shootings. Lemon argues that white males between the ages of 18 and 25 were behind nearly all recent mass killings.

PROFILE YOUNG WHITE MALES?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/12/23/cnns_don_lemon_on_gun_control_should_we_start_profiling_white_men.html


 DON'T BE DUPED, AMERICA! IF WE BAN ANY GUNS, CRIMINALS WILL STILL HAVE THEM, AND WE WILL BE AT THEIR MERCY, AND AT THE MERCY OF OUR QUESTIONABLE GOVERNMENT. IF YOU THINK WASHINGTON'S ELECTEDS ARE ON YOUR SIDE, GO READ THE PATRIOT ACT, ALL OF IT! THEN READ WHAT THIS CONGRESS HAS ADDED TO IT THAT TAKES AWAY YOUR CITIZEN'S RIGHTS. GO AHEAD, EDUCATE YOURSELVES, AND STOP MINDLESSLY ACCEPTING WHAT YOU'RE TOLD TO THINK!


Thursday, December 20, 2012

FISCAL CLIFF FEAR-MONGERING PROPAGANDA

CONGRESS GOES HOME FOR CHRISTMAS:aka, LET THE LOWER 98% OF TAXPAYERS EAT 'CAKE'!

<<Republicans refused to support legislation that would allow taxes to rise on the most affluent households in the country. >>

[YEAH, 'PUBLICANS, JUST KEEP SUCKING-UP TO THAT UPPER 2%! I'LL REMEMBER YOU NEXT ELECTION!!! YOU'RE THE REASONS I WROTE IN RON PAUL & THEN TORE UP MY VOTER REGISTRATION CARD! YOU OUGHT TO BE ASHAMED, BUT MONEY BURNS CONSCIENCE COMPLETELY UP, DOESN'T IT?
YOU ARE INDEED WALL STREET'S ELITIST WHORES! ]


<<Within minutes, dejected Republicans filed out of the basement meeting room and declared there would be no votes to avert the “fiscal cliff” until after Christmas. With his “Plan B” all but dead, the speaker ['OL' BONER'] was left with the choice to find a new Republican way forward or to try to get a broad deficit reduction deal with President Obama that could win passage with Republican and Democratic votes.

What he COULD NOT DO was blame Democrats for failing to take up legislation he could not even get through his own membership in the House.

“The House did not take up the tax measure today because it did not have sufficient support from our members to pass,” Mr. Boehner said.

Recalcitrant conservatives were balking on allowing taxes to rise on incomes over $1 million a year. >>
[OVER A MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR???
WHAT ABOUT THE 75% OF AMERICANS WITH INCOMES UNDER $50,000 A YEAR, THE 45% WHO MAKE LESS THAN $25,000 A YEAR?  WHAT ARE THEY, FODDER TO FEED IN TAX DOLLARS TO THE GREAT WAR MACHINE & WALL STREET PUPPET-MASTERS WHO FEED ON WAR? HOW LONG WILL THE GOP EXPECT MIDDLE-CLASS AMERICA TO SHOULDER THE ENORMOUS TAX BURDEN ALREADY IMPOSED ON THEM??? SELF-SERVING SCUM-BAGS! SURE, SAVE YOUR OWN, THROW THE REST OF AMERICA TO THE SHARKS!]


<<Stymied, Republican leaders called a recess around 7 p.m. Members streamed in and out of the whip’s office, munched on Chick-fil-A sandwiches (regular and spicy) and professed uncertainty over what comes next. >>

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/us/politics/house-moves-toward-vote-on-boehners-backup-plan.html

SACRIFICE THE 'LOWER CLASSES'


http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article37731.html
NO CLIFF! JUST ANOTHER LOAD OF SHEEP MANURE

FISCAL CLIFF FEAR-MONGERING PROPAGANDA
<<Last year, the big bogeyman wasn't the fiscal cliff... it was the debt ceiling. President Obama called the debt ceiling issue "financial Armageddon." Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner called it a "catastrophe." Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said it was "calamitous."

But I told you it was just "The Great Debt Ceiling Hoax."

And what happened? Well, investors got scared... Stocks bottomed out in early October 2011... And the market is now about 26% higher than it was then.

To put an end to the phony drama of the debt ceiling hoax, President Obama signed the Budget Control Act of 2011 into law on August 2, 2011. That law created what's now being sold to us as the "fiscal cliff."

So guess what they'll do this time? The most likely outcome is that our government will create another law to prevent the so-called fiscal cliff from ever arriving. But even if it does... it will never be as important as the idea of buying great companies at good prices... and then holding them for years, while collecting ever-increasing dividends.

No matter what happens with the "fiscal cliff," people will continue to drink Coke. They'll continue to use computers powered by Microsoft software. They'll continue to eat burgers from McDonald's. They'll continue to use IT services from IBM.

If you want an idea that'll help you cut through the noise and make great, winning bets when everybody else is panicked, this is it.

Business trumps politics. It's been true for at least a century now... and it will continue for at least a few more.>>

[LIKE THIS BRAVE SOUL SAID, GOLDMAN SACHS CALLS THE SHOTS!!! AND CONGRESS JUST KISSES THAT BEHIND!!!]


MORE INTERVIEWS OF THIS YOUNG MAN HERE:

Trader Alessio Rastani on the BBC says get ready for Market Crash live
Uploaded on Sep 29, 2011

Alessio Rastani on Frost over the World with Sir David Frost.



Tuesday, December 18, 2012

GUN CONTROL WILL NOT FIX IT

***UPDATE, 08/25/2013 AT TRIPLE ASTERISKS ***BELOW

In Nov. 2010, new stats on death in America was published and reported by .stpeteforpeace.org. Their site linked study after study to the facts...there are worse killers out there than criminals with guns!

On average, there are 32 gun homicides each day in the U.S. 32. 11,680 a year.
What could kill MORE people than guns? MANY things!

~PRESCRIPTION PAIN PILLS kill more than 18,000 people a year, according to estimates by the Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence at Brandeis University.
[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2011-04-25-fight-painkillers-with-prescription-monitoring.htm]
~Smoking related deaths:  443,000/year due to cigarette smoking and 49,400/year due to second hand smoke.
~Obesity related deaths: 300,000/year.
~Deaths due to lack of health care: 101,000/year.
~An estimated 15,000 Medicare patients die EACH MONTH,of "adverse events" that happen in hospitals, says a government study" . That's 180,000 a year!!!  "Reducing the incidence of adverse events in hospitals is a critical component of efforts to improve patient safety and quality care" in the U.S., the inspector general wrote.
~ On average in 2009, 93 people were killed on the roadways of the U.S. each day. That's 33,945 in a year.

ALL of the ABOVE kill more than gun crimes.
See this amazing little chart to see how guns rank in the "killing of Americans".
WHAT KILLS AMERICANS?

What logical conclusion may we draw from these statistics?
MAYBE that cultural conditions, not gun laws, are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate. Young adults in Washington, D.C., are subject to strict gun control, but no social control, and they commit a staggering amount of armed crime. Young adults in Zurich, Switzerland are subject to minimal gun control, but strict social control, and they commit almost NO crime.
The gun crime rate in Switzerland is so low that statistics are not even kept!

So, do we ban pain pills, fatty foods, tobacco, hospitals, doctors, automobiles???
What next? Knives, rocks, sticks, tire irons, golf clubs, human fists, human feet???
ALL OF THOSE THINGS HAVE BEEN USED TO KILL AMERICANS!


Any person with criminal intent, one who is "emotionally unbalanced", one who may be called "criminally insane", or just plain old determined to kill others will ALWAYS find a way to accomplish that! Before there were guns, before there were weapons of iron or steel, human beings were bashing one another's brains out with rocks!


So why are things so different in Switzerland? Let's look at Switzerland for a bit.
In 1978, Switzerland refused to ratify a Council of Europe Convention on Control of Firearms. Since then, Switzerland has been pressured by other European governments, which charge that it is a source for terrorist weapons. As a result, in 1982 the central government proposed a law barring foreigners in Switzerland from buying guns they could not buy in their own countries and also requiring that Swiss citizens obtain a license to buy any gun, rather than just handguns.

Outraged Swiss gun owners formed a group called "Pro Tell," named after national hero William Tell. In 1983, the Federal Council (the executive cabinet) abandoned the restrictive proposal because "the opposition was too heavy" and suggested that the cantons regulate the matter. A few months earlier, the Cantonal Council of Freiburg had already enacted such a law by a one-vote margin. A popular referendum overturned the law the next year, by a 60%-40% vote.

Whatever the effect of Swiss guns abroad, they are not even a trivial crime problem domestically. Despite all the guns, and virtually EVERY home in that country has guns, the murder rate is a small fraction of the American rate, and is less than the rate in Canada or England, which strictly control guns, or in Japan, which virtually prohibits them. The gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept!

Go have a read about Switzerland. You will be astounded!
GUNS IN EVERY HOME

GUN CONTROL HAS FAILED IN GREAT BRITAIN AND AUSTRALIA
"The Centre for Defence Studies, King's College, London, recently issued a study titled Illegal Firearms in the UK, examining the effect of gun control measures in the United Kingdom. In the years since the ban was enacted, the criminal use of firearms has increased by 40%."
September 2, 2001
GUN CONTROL FAILS IN THE UK

    "Whilst the change in the law on handguns has reduced the number, it does not appear to have been difficult for criminals to get hold of them whenever they want." — Police Superintendents' Association, Hampshire Branch.

Imagine that! Law abiding Britons are disarmed, but criminals have no trouble getting weapons "whenever they want". Are we supposed to be surprised by that? Thomas Jefferson would not have been surprised:

    "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Can it be supposed that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity...will respect the less important and arbitrary ones... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." — Jefferson, quoting Enlightenment philosopher Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment", 1764.

The International Crime Victims Survey, released by the Dutch Ministry of Justice in February, 2001 found the three countries with the most draconian handgun bans recently enacted — the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada — to be among the top five countries in the world with the most frequent incidents of criminal violence (the U.S. ranked ninth). And while violent crime showed a declining trend in America, the trend was found to be increasing in the U.K. and Australia.
DARE WE IMAGINE THINGS WILL TURN OUT BETTER IN THE USA?
One definition of INSANITY is doing the SAME thing over and over, expecting different results.
Gun control, disarming of the law-abiding citizenry, never worked in Germany, Great Britain, Australia, Canada, or Japan.
GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, LUNATIC CRIMINALS ARE!

A guy named Rick Toledo made this point in an online discussion following the Aurora theater shooting: "We have 2 rooms: lock 2 men in one room and leave them there for 40 years. Chances are that one will kill the other with his bare hands. Second room fill with all types of guns, lock it up, and after 40 years no gun will attack the other. Point: GUNS DON'T KILL, PEOPLE DO!"

In a PBS program on gun control, DAVID KOPEL made the point that:
    "Gun control laws are dangerous because they don't do a very good job of taking guns away from people who shouldn't have them. They're more effective at taking guns out of the hands of people who can and should use them, if they chose to, for lawful protection. Laws tend to change the behavior most effectively of law-abiding people who have some connection to society. And the problem is, when you discourage those people from owning guns, you're making public safety worse off. Guns in the hands of good people improve things."

Since the tragedy in Connecticut some of our politicians have made some incredible statements.

A statement attributed to Press Secretary Ari B. Adler, spokesman for Michigan House Speaker Jase Bolger:

   " It is the belief of many representatives in our caucus that it is criminals who have no intention of following any law that are the perpetrators of such heinous crimes as school shootings. Strict gun-control laws do not stop criminals from committing evil acts, they merely infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens who might be able to take action against evil if given the chance."

A spokesman for Sen. Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican, told the Tampa Bay Times:
      "The challenge with gun laws is that, by definition, criminals do not follow the law. For example, Connecticut’s gun laws, some of the strictest in the nation, were not able to prevent this atrocity."

GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, CRIMINALS ARE! AND IF A CRIMINAL COMES TO MY DOOR, ARMED, WITH INTENT TO KILL, I WANT TO HAVE A GUN TO FIGHT BACK WITH!
I have to wonder what is wrong with people who DON'T want the ability to SURVIVE AN ATTACK on themselves or their family!


***UPDATE 08/25/2013***

Bob Barr, a former member of Congress, reports on what you were NOT told about that UN "Arms Treaty" your own CONGRESS loved enough to accept for you!
He ought to know, he was part of that pig herd...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/19/barr-the-un-comes-after-americas-guns/?page=2
August 19, 2013
<<According to experts familiar with this process, the mere act of signing the treaty — a responsibility that would fall to Secretary of State John Kerry — would “obligate” the U.S. government as a signatory not to act “contrary to” its terms. Those “terms” are, to quote Ross Perot, the “devil in the detail” — found not only within the four corners of the document itself, but in companion, foundational documents on which it is based.

For example, a 2006 U.N. report (authored by an American academic, Barbara Frey) lays out with frightening clarity where advocates of the approach reflected in the Arms Trade Treaty are coming from. According to this Eurocentric worldview, there is no “right” to self-defense, and the national government is obligated to restrict civilian ownership of firearms, including determining which citizens properly “understand” firearms and might, therefore, be permitted to possess them.

Another important but little-known set of documents that reveal the true purposes of the treaty were crafted by the U.N. Coordinating Action on Small Arms. These include the International Small Arms Control Standard, which is developing “modules” on gun control to serve as “model legislation” for countries that sign on to the treaty. The most relevant of these is the one titled, “National controls over the access of civilians to small arms and light weapons.”

One need read no further than the introduction to this missive to understand its goal. The operative focus is strict regulation of civilian possession of firearms by the “central” or national government. This is necessary because “some civilians misuse small arms” by using them illegally or “improperly stor[ing]” them. The document bases this notion of government control of firearms and ammunition on “international law” — an inaccurate interpretation of such body of laws, but one that fits conveniently the U.N.’s agenda.


From this global perspective, the International Small Arms Control Standard module then directs, in excruciating detail, the manner in which national governments should restrict access to firearms and ammunition:

Restricting civilian possession of firearms only to those “at the lowest risk of misusing them.”
Limiting sales and other transfers of firearms only to commercial transactions at licensed “sales premises” (in other words, no transfers at gun shows).

Only persons licensed and periodically relicensed by the national government could possess firearms.

All firearms must be registered with the national government.

All persons wishing to possess a firearm must pass a rigorous exam administered by the national government.

All firearms must be stored in locked containers separate from ammunition, and “bolted to a heavy or immovable object.”

Only a predetermined number of firearms and rounds of ammunition may be possessed by a properly licensed civilian.

Magazine capacity is limited to 10 rounds.

Possession of a firearm may only occur after a seven-day waiting period.

[THE NEXT 2 ITEMS ARE THE "KILLSHOTS" FOR AMERICANS (PUN INTENDED.]
No civilian could own or possess a firearm for self-defense unless he first demonstrates a clear and convincing need.
Individuals licensed to own firearms are subject to periodic and random inspections of their homes or businesses.
In order to be granted a license to possess a firearm, an individual must secure recommendations from “responsible members of society,” attesting to their “suitability to possess a small arm.”

The above list is by no means exhaustive of the restrictions in the U.N. model legislation, which is designed to limit the possession of firearms and ammunition to the smallest possible number of civilians, and it provides clear insight into where this process is going. If CONGRESS [YES, CONGRESS COULD HAVE STOPPED THIS INSANITY!] fails to take swift action to prohibit the administration from implementing any part of the Arms Trade Treaty or taking any action pursuant to it, we now know exactly where we are headed.>>
FOR WHERE WE ARE HEADED, SEE THE 2 VIDEOS BELOW...
GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.!!!

"An armed man is a citizen. A disarmed man is a subject."


***UPDATE, 08/25/2013***

Bob Barr, a former member of Congress, reports on what you were NOT told about that UN "Arms Treaty" your own CONGRESS loved enough to accept for you!
He ought to know, he was part of that pig herd...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/19/barr-the-un-comes-after-americas-guns/?page=2
August 19, 2013
<<According to experts familiar with this process, the mere act of signing the treaty — a responsibility that would fall to Secretary of State John Kerry — would “obligate” the U.S. government as a signatory not to act “contrary to” its terms. Those “terms” are, to quote Ross Perot, the “devil in the detail” — found not only within the four corners of the document itself, but in companion, foundational documents on which it is based.

For example, a 2006 U.N. report (authored by an American academic, Barbara Frey) lays out with frightening clarity where advocates of the approach reflected in the Arms Trade Treaty are coming from. According to this Eurocentric worldview, there is no “right” to self-defense, and the national government is obligated to restrict civilian ownership of firearms, including determining which citizens properly “understand” firearms and might, therefore, be permitted to possess them.

Another important but little-known set of documents that reveal the true purposes of the treaty were crafted by the U.N. Coordinating Action on Small Arms. These include the International Small Arms Control Standard, which is developing “modules” on gun control to serve as “model legislation” for countries that sign on to the treaty. The most relevant of these is the one titled, “National controls over the access of civilians to small arms and light weapons.”

One need read no further than the introduction to this missive to understand its goal. The operative focus is strict regulation of civilian possession of firearms by the “central” or national government. This is necessary because “some civilians misuse small arms” by using them illegally or “improperly stor[ing]” them. The document bases this notion of government control of firearms and ammunition on “international law” — an inaccurate interpretation of such body of laws, but one that fits conveniently the U.N.’s agenda.


From this global perspective, the International Small Arms Control Standard module then directs, in excruciating detail, the manner in which national governments should restrict access to firearms and ammunition:

Restricting civilian possession of firearms only to those “at the lowest risk of misusing them.”

Limiting sales and other transfers of firearms only to commercial transactions at licensed “sales premises” (in other words, no transfers at gun shows).

Only persons licensed and periodically re-licensed by the national government could possess firearms.

All firearms must be registered with the national government.

All persons wishing to possess a firearm must pass a rigorous exam administered by the national government.

All firearms must be stored in locked containers separate from ammunition, and “bolted to a heavy or immovable object.”

Only a predetermined number of firearms and rounds of ammunition may be possessed by a properly licensed civilian.

Magazine capacity is limited to 10 rounds.

Possession of a firearm may only occur after a seven-day waiting period.

No civilian could own or possess a firearm for self-defense unless he first demonstrates a clear and convincing need.

Individuals licensed to own firearms are subject to periodic and random inspections of their homes or businesses.

In order to be granted a license to possess a firearm, an individual must secure recommendations from “responsible members of society,” attesting to their “suitability to possess a small arm.”

The above list is by no means exhaustive of the restrictions in the U.N. model legislation, which is designed to limit the possession of firearms and ammunition to the smallest possible number of civilians, and it provides clear insight into where this process is going. If Congress fails to take swift action to prohibit the administration from implementing any part of the Arms Trade Treaty or taking any action pursuant to it, we now know exactly where we are headed.>>
DID YOU GET ALL THAT?
DO YOU SEE WHAT THIS WILL LEAD UP TO?
IF NOT, I CAN'T IMAGINE WHY NOT!

GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.!!!

"An armed man is a citizen. A disarmed man is a subject."


FINAL WARNING...CHILLING!
                                                    http://youtu.be/JXm5hklbBsA

"In our world, there will be no emotions except: fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement . . . there will be no loyalty except loyalty to the party; but always, there will be the intoxication of power. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy that is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face . . . forever."
                                                      http://youtu.be/sDbWtbCHt7g
FULL MOVIE, GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984
A 1954 BLACK-AND-WHITE FILM

Saturday, December 15, 2012

TELL THE CHILDREN

What can we tell the children after yet another mass shooting?
What can we say to those who survived this time?
How can innocent minds conceive of all the madness about them?
How can we speak to such innocence?

If we value love the most, we will speak to them of love.
We'll tell them that we love them, and some may say that love conquers all.
Love might indeed, if we allowed it, if we believed in it enough to make it so.
Love is, at the least, a healing balm, for wounds of all kinds, applied properly, with the utmost
tenderness.
We might hold them close and assure them that, with love, we will do all within our
power to protect them, to secure safe places for them, to watch over them day and night,
to always be, as much as we can, a shield between them and harm.
We might say that most people in the world love children, want only the best for children,
value children, and will be there for children like those teachers were.
Tell the children that there are far more people who love children than who don't.

The truth is always best when dealing with children.
Have you ever noticed how "brutally honest" children are with other children?
I don't think that when most children point out flaws in or problems with others that they do so with malice. That's just the way it IS in a child's mind. There ARE differences among us, and children see those differences, and may casually speak of them. If they find something less than pleasant, something unusual, or something that troubles them, unless they have been severely suppressed by adults from speaking their minds, they just say so.
To say that another child is mean, or ugly, or unlikeable, or any other thing is simply the honesty of a child, based on his/her immature understanding of others in the world. Children live quite simply as they grow toward the teen years. Things really are "black or white", "good or bad", "right or wrong" in their minds. They don't need "shades of gray" just yet. They don't see a need for "political correctness", nor psychological mind games, nor of subjugating others by ridicule or by any other tool in an adult's tool box for living.
I wonder WHY we ever change that.
Simple is good.

Tell the children the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. They can handle it! Truth creates strength. And, in case you haven't noticed,  they'll likely never trust you again once they catch you in a lie!
The truth is, there have always been and shall always be people in this world who, for whatever reason (insanity, hate, plain old viciousness) will hurt other people, or even kill other people. That's just the way it is and, try as we will, we may never, ever figure out why. Tell the children that we just don't know WHY yet. It is merely a fact of life, sadly, regrettably, but there it is. Some people will hurt or kill children. But, they are fewer in number than those who won't hurt, who won't kill the innocent.
Just as one rainy day doesn't ruin a week of mostly sunshine, nor one rotten apple spoil an entire orchard, so, too, we must realize one murderer doesn't mean that all of humanity harbor murderous intent. That children should know this, that we must communicate this to them, doesn't mean we should make it into anything but a pure truth. It's just a truth, like fire CAN burn, or that even the edge of a paper CAN cut you.
You see, there really ARE 'monsters' out there. One MAY cross our paths today, but most likely won't, and every day that there are no monsters is a really good day.

Tell the children that we will listen.
Whatever they have to say, we will just listen, not interrupt, just focus on what they're telling us, just LISTEN, until they're done with the telling. Tell them it's important to us to hear ALL of what they have to say, that their thoughts turned into words are of great importance to us, have incredible value to us.
We can, we MUST just listen to them! And not 'preach', not use our pat answers, our premeditated cookie-cutter responses on children. EACH child is vastly different in emotional makeup, in their ability to sort things out, in their comprehension of what is going on about them. Each one needs varying degrees of explanation, of instruction, of patience, and of our time and attention.
We can't file them into a room of counselors, apply the same technique to ALL, and hope for a good outcome! Little Johnny is NOT Little Janey, nor will he EVER be! Each child is unique, so let us deal with each uniquely.
After they have finished talking, and we have diligently listened with all the respect they are due, then perhaps we could just ask THEM what THEY think can be done, or ought to be done. Get THEIR opinions of what might come next, of how THEY want to handle this.
Do they want to just scream for a bit? Do they want to weep? Do they need to DO something to feel better, and WHAT? If we approach them with THEIR feelings in mind, and deeply listen, we just may reach a new level of 'social justice', of how to get past such a waking nightmare, of how to HELP avoid the next one. Children often have fantastically wondrous ideas on such things. Maybe the reduced simplicity of their ideas and thoughts shock us, but if so, then perhaps we've forgotten our own youth, and possibly we need to lean more toward a child's concept of living and life...simplistic, honest, straightforward.

Tell the children that this is a NEW day, and the day of killing is over now. This new day probably will NOT have killing in it. Children will be safe today. TODAY is today, not yesterday, not tomorrow.

On THIS day we'll hold them, love them, listen to them, allow them to express to us what THEY need to go forward.

Tell the children that we're very sorry that this type of thing exists in our world, and that they can help all of us make the world better. Tell them that love can do many more things than hate can. Tell them that understanding takes a lot of time and hard work, but that, together, we CAN get there....even from here.
Tell the children, "You are our finest treasures. We will do all we can to keep you from harm. We love you all more than words can say."



Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Their "sin"? They, unlike us, did exactly what they should.



Above photo was posted to the following website & many others since then. I warn you, there's WORSE than this on that page!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/12/1168994/-628-Wolves-Slaughtered-this-Fall-Ecological-Disaster-Extreme-Cruelty

REPORTEDLY, the article states this photo was "'found on a Facebook hunting page from Wisconsin. The person who put this on wrote that he knew the person who did it (killing all the wolves), would not divulge his name because of the illegal nature of the hunt, it was in WI in Nov of 2012, and was done because a dairy farmer said he was being harassed by these animals."

Some CRIMINAL killed these wolves ILLEGALLY!
TO WHOMEVER did this:
You're probably sitting somewhere even now hoping that whomever posted this photo NEVER posts your name! You did the CRIME, but you don't want to PAY for that crime, naturally. You prove yourself a coward by hiding the fact that you did this ! Your morals, your ethics, are obviously much lower than whale excrement in the deepest part of the Mariana Trench.
To the shaking-in-his-boots, TERRIFIED 'human' who ILLEGALLY killed these wolves, simply out of FEAR and out of "feeling harassed", may you some day know the feeling these animals knew as your miserable bullets found them, robbed them of their very short lives ...
Can wolves ask "WHY?" Humans can, and so I ask...WHY?

NO, NO, I don't wish you death...I wish you a long, though ignoble life , and a realization of how fleeting life is for lower animals, a realization that YOU were the intruder!
May your life be a continual, never-ending, awakening of your criminal acts! May you, as YOU are HUNTED, by law enforcement, by whomever can take you to JAIL for this CRIME, come to grips with the senselessness of what you've done!

It was YOU who harassed them by your very presence in their ancient domain. Their ancestors were here LONG before yours crawled naked out of caves on another continent! Their line was established for thousands of years in THIS land, THEIR land,  before yours came running to the "New World' with their tails between their legs, whining about persecution, too weak to stay and stand their ground in their own lands! If a man won't stand up in defense of his OWN country, what hope is there for him in another's land?
Those old scared and trembling ancestors of yours did not long remember how 'persecution' felt, did they? They forgot what it was like to be singled out for abuse and abasement.
I have to assume they came to this continent and forgot all about persecution, as apparently NONE of them passed on much of any worth to you on not persecuting others, did they, O, CRIMINAL?
But we must ask how cowards can hope to teach courage. How can the fearful teach anything but more fear? How can the bottom-feeders look gladly upward to the light ? For 500+ years the offspring of those who came here 'persecuted' has meant DEATH, DESTRUCTION, UNNATURAL CHAOS.
There is no honor amongst your breed,  those who kill merely because they can!It makes me wonder who was actually doing the persecuting back in the 'old countries'.

If you have offspring, did you once dream that they'd admire you for this? Maybe you did, and maybe they do. I wouldn't be surprised. Violent men tend to beget violent men, as it becomes a family traddition.
But you ARE afraid of PROSECUTION, aren't you, criminal?

For tens of thousands of years, before the boats arrived on these shores, other people lived with thousands upon thousands of predator animals. Who knows how many?
They, too, lived with WOLVES, wolves of all types.
When the Europeans came, they found so many wolves, large cats, bears and other 'scary' animals that their hearts almost failed them for FEAR. They were SCARED. They called this 'new' land WILD. They vowed to "TAME THE WILDERNESS"... too afraid to simply learn to live IN it, WITH it. What a sad lot! Such cannot live successfully even amongst others of like minds.
The newcomers determined that all that was WILD must DIE....so let it be written so let it be done...
And it HAS been, almost...it's almost ALL done now!
How very different the European "illegal aliens", the  invaders were, and yet are, from the original people of this land who held that ALL life deserved life, that ALL life had a place to live.
Even amongst my generation, the hunters now in my own family, EAT all that we kill, and NEVER kill for sport! How can ANYONE kill for "SPORT"? What "sport" is there in taking a life just for the sake of killing?

How can ANYONE set up shop in the middle of a place that has been known for thousands of years to harbor wolves and then whine & complain that wolves live there?
Aren't there enough places BARREN of wolves for the likes of you to choose from? Isn't there enough desolate land void of "scary animals" for you to find a few hundred acres?
DID ANYONE FORCE YOU TO GO LIVE THERE? Did it ever occur to you that by encroaching on the natural order of that place, you INVITED 'harassment'? By your choosing to reduce the range of natural hunting grounds, and by bringing in your herds you were simply replacing what you moved out of YOUR way with something a wolf would see as FOOD?

How can a person with viable brain cells imagine that wolves know the difference between a "domestic" animal and a wild one? Everything that moves, almost, is PREY to predators! Wolves know that from birth! Pups chase butterflies, anything that moves, because if it moves, it may be FOOD.
THAT'S CALLED NATURAL INSTINCT! IT'S JUST WHAT ALL OF NATURE DOES, ALL BUT MAN! Hadn't you heard of that BEFORE you set up house in WOLF COUNTRY?

Of all that has life, from lowly amoeba and plankton, all the way up to the top of the food chain (HUMAN BEINGS) we alone go against all nature. It seems humans are born with a self-destruct device that they can choose to bring online, and once they decide to do so, they push that big red button from cradle to grave. There is no help nor hope for those who stand in the way of those who choose this path.
If anyone dares disagree, condemns, or casts even a disgusted look in their direction, let there be war!
Some humans  seem driven to not only dominate nature and all in it, even fellow human beings, but also hike their legs and urinate in its face along the way. It's not enough to bring all other life into subjugation, no; such people must also clear all signs of it from their path~ the rocks and trees, ALL the plants, ALL the animals, and all that is not just like them.
"CLEAR THE WAY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, CLEAR THE WAY FOR 'MANIFEST DESTINY'! LET US BUILD A TOWER TO THE HEAVENS, BRING DOWN 'THE GODS'! MAN MUST RULE!"

"Too often we excuse those who are willing to build their own lives on the shattered dreams of others" ~ Robert F. Kennedy

"Usually, terrible things that are done, with the excuse that progress requires them, are not really progress at all, but just terrible things".~ Russell Baker

"Mortals are easily tempted to pinch the life out of their neighbour's glory, and think that such killing is no murder." ~George Eliot


DID YOU GET MONEY FOR THEIR HIDES, LAW-BREAKER? THEIR CLAWS, THEIR TEETH, THEIR TAILS, YOU CRIMINAL? DID YOU PROFIT OFF YOUR ILLEGAL KILLS?
OR DID YOU JUST LET THEM HANG THERE AND ROT? I HOPE THE SMELL OF THEM NEVER LEAVES YOUR MEMORY! I HOPE JUSTICE FINDS YOU EVERY DAY, IN SOME WAY, OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN! MAY YOUR SORROWS BE MULTIPLIED BY A THOUSAND TIMES A THOUSAND FOR EACH OF THE LIVES YOU STOLE, SHOULD YOU NEVER SEE THE ERROR OF THIS ACT. MAY YOU NEVER KNOW PEACE NOR SECURITY EVER AGAIN IF YOU DON'T ADMIT TO WHAT YOU'VE DONE AND CONTINUE TO HIDE FROM JUSTICE
IN THAT CASE, BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID, YOU QUIVERING, SPINELESS HUMAN!
BUT KNOW THIS: YOU WILL ANSWER FOR IT SOME DAY!JUSTICE EVENTUALLY COMES TO ALL




Troops must NOT insult Taliban OR speak up for women!

Proposed Army manual tells G.I.s not to insult Taliban, speak up for women

HANG ON!!! HAVEN'T TWO THREE 'PRESIDENTS TOLD US WE'RE THERE TO FURTHER HUMAN RIGHTS? JUST ANOTHER LIE TO CRANK THE WAR MACHINE THEN, OBVIOUSLY!
Seriously, with the CIA running the show, all they want is TROOPS TO GUARD THOSE POPPY FIELDS?

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME, YOU BUNCH OF WORMS!!!!

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/12/proposed-army-manual-tells-gis-not-to-insult-taliban-speak-up-for-women/#ixzz2EsOFNXA2

A proposed new handbook for Americans serving in Afghanistan warns them not to speak ill about the Taliban, advocate women’s rights or criticize pedophilia, and the general in charge is not happy with it.
The draft of the newest Army handbook seems to suggest that ignorance of Afghan culture is to blame for deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the coalition forces, according to The Wall Street Journal, which got a peek at the 75-page document. But its message of walking on eggshells around the locals is not going over well with U.S. Marine Gen. John Allen, the top military commander in Afghanistan.
"Gen. Allen did not author, nor does he intend to provide, a foreword," said Col. Tom Collins, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan. "He does not approve of its contents."

"Many of the confrontations occur because of [coalition] ignorance of, or lack of empathy for, Muslim and/or Afghan cultural norms, resulting in a violent reaction from the [Afghan security force] member," the Journal quotes the draft handbook as saying.
The version reviewed by the Journal is still subject to revisions,  Lt. Gen. David Perkins, commander of the Army's Combined Arms Center at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., told the Journal.
The study, based on interviews with 600 members of the Afghan security forces and 200 American soldiers, painted a grim portrait of opposing cultures with simmering disdain for their counterparts.

"DISDAIN FOR THEIR COUNTERPARTS"????
WELL, ONLY SINCE THE INCEPTION OF ISLAM!!! DUHHHH!
CONVERT OR PERISH...IT'S ALL IN THE QU'RAN, SIMPLE ENOUGH FOR A CHILD TO UNDERSTAND...THAT'S SIMPLY THE WAY IT IS.
THE WAR BETWEEN ISLAM & THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS RAGED FOR MANY HUNDREDS OF YEARS!
DID OUR BRAIN-DEAD WAR-MONGERS ON "THE HILL" EVER REALLY THINK GOING OVER THERE WOULD CHANGE THAT?
RUSSIA, FRANCE, EVERYONE WHO EVER WENT IN THAT BIG SANDLOT TO "BRING CHANGE" HAS LEFT WITH THEIR TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS!
THOSE IN THE MIDDLE EASTERN NATIONS DON'T WANT CHANGE!!!
LEAVE THEM TO THEIR OWN DEVICES, JUST GET OUT & STAY OUT!
KARZAI HIMSELF HAS REPEATEDLY SAID THE TALIBAN IS NO THREAT THERE, & EVEN SAID TWICE THAT HE MIGHT JOIN THE TALIBAN, WAAAAY BACK IN 2010!!!
KARZAI MAY JOIN TALIBAN

TURN OUT THE LIGHTS, MR. PRESIDENT! THIS PARTY'S OVER!!!
BRING 'EM HOME FOR CHRISTMAS!!!

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H.L. Mencken

Now the President and interventionists in Congress are claiming there's a "crisis" in Syria. They claim President Bashar al-Assad is about to use "weapons of mass destruction" against his own people.
DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR?

ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
    Would YOU write a check to support a Syrian rebel group?
    Do YOU want your taxes used to support them?
    Would YOU be willing to fight alongside them?
    Would YOU want our children or grandchildren to be sent for this purpose?
    Do YOU want our armed forces to go to Syria?

If your answer say "no" , please write a letter to Congress!
It's very simple to do when you use sites like POPVOX or  use DownsizeDC.org's "Stop Policing the World" campaign here:
https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/world-police/
NO THANKS, NO GETTING INVOLVED IN SYRIA! NO!!!!
The hardwired message says...

    Defend America only. Do not manipulate or police the world.

DDC added these comments, which you may borrow from or copy...

    I DO NOT CONSENT to our Syria policy.

  
    Tell Obama to send those troops home. Declare neutrality in Syria's civil war.

    Protecting the Syrian people from al-Assad's chemical weapons is the pretext for Obama's move.

    I'm skeptical...

    After Iraq, Libya, and countless other wars, why should I believe my so-called "government?"

    Assad may be brutal, but his downfall will NOT necessarily end the civil war. The divided rebels -- some moderate, SOME WITH AL QAEDA TIES -- will surely continue to struggle for power. http://bit.ly/VeaiGU

    Should our troops be tossed into that hornets nest? How will they tell friend from foe?

    Have you learned nothing from Iraq or Afghanistan (not to mention Vietnam)?

    Or from Libya, where the rebels we helped "thanked" us by bombing our embassy?

    If the rebel cause is so important to you...

    * Donate your OWN money to them. Don't force me to do it with taxes.

    * Better yet, you fight alongside them.

    Have the U.S. armed forces defend America only.

    Deny funds for the rebels and explicitly deny authorization for war. Impeach the President if he ignores you. Only Congress has the authority to declare war.

Sincerely,
[your name here]

DOES WASHINGTON REALLY BELIEVE ONE MORE WAR WILL HELP THE ECONOMY?
LIKE THE CLINTON TEAM SAID, "IT IS ABOUT THE ECONOMY, STUPID!"

The “Wanta Plan” & The Global Security Fund

AN UNBELIEVABLE TALE Ashley Mote raised an issue in EU Parliament:
“Mr. President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild.

This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. 

It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services.  
I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. 
To that question I now add another: what are the European Union”s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions?”


There are 13 videos of Mr. Mote's questioning off this link.

FREE YOUR MINDS & THINK A MINUTE?
Well, maybe a few minutes...It won't hurt but a wee bit, trust me! 


Ashley Mote, after raising these questions, was then set up and accused of fraud.

So what exactly is the Global Security Fund? 
And what was/is it’s purpose?
Well, believe it or not,  the so-called ‘Global Security Fund’, consisting of off-balance sheet USG (U.S. Government) funds originally worth $27.5 trillion raised from 200+ international banks, is a fund which was set up to finance the ‘management’ of the ‘post-Cold War’ environment.

The accumulated value of these funds, held offshore in bank accounts linked to Title 18, Section 6 US Government intelligence corporations established under President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, is now believed to exceed $70 trillion.
The original $27.5 trillion amount was raised from the 200+ banks at a deep discount for 20 years at 7.5% per annum.

This is a particularly big deal when various foreign countries are rooting for the “Wanta Plan” to rescue the U.S. like the Marshall Plan did for Europe post WWII, because it will help save them as well. 

This is a key event of our lives going on right here: the missing 70 TRILLION dollars connected to the criminal endeavors of Clinton-Bush crime team Presidents with the Federal Reserve. 

That side of the group wants a destruction of the U.S. to continue the NWO (New World Order-- a phrase both Bush presidents used in dozens of speeches, and all presidents since have touted as the best thing since sliced bread.) 

The other side–all the rest of U.S. with many foreign countries and banks–wants the injection of the U.S. 70 trillion that would wipe out U.S. debt in literally weeks. 

If the U.S. is taken down, if our downward spiral,continues, economically speaking, the nefarious blocking of the “Wanta Plan” shows that it is intentional. 
Blocking the U.S. getting these trillions has been the prime directive of the Bush side of this shell game for decades.

There is no doubt that this is one of the great enigmas of our time. 
The existence of a fabulous fund of money, whose administrator is the former agent of the US Federal Reserve and Somali ambassador, Leo Wanta, has the investigators divided. 

In the 1980s, under the Reagan Administration, Leo Wanta worked as a consultant and secret agent of the Federal Reserve. The absolute confidence which came to be placed in him during his career led the Administration to put him in charge of an immense fund of money, set aside for a hypothetical war with the Soviet Union, or, as it turned out, for helping to destroy it. 

HOW LEE EMIL WANTA HELPED SINK THE RUSSIANS

"Beginning in the early-1980s, President Ronald Reagan and a small group of his closest advisors initiated a plan to destabilize the Russian ruble. 
Reagan recruited his most-trusted intelligence agent Leo Emil Wanta to perform this delicate task. 
Wanta had served the U.S. intelligence community as a Treasury agent, in arms dealing and in other “sensitive” matters. 
He was chosen for this mission, not only for his loyalty to the president, but also for his unfailing honesty. In addition to his responsibilities in carrying out this covert financial coup against the former Soviet Union. 

Wanta was also instrumental in thwarting an attempted assassination of President Reagan “in the White House”—yet another event that went unreported by the media.

What remained a part of the official media coverup of this failed assassination were numerous pertinent facts. 

Would-be Reagan assassin John Hinkley’s father, John, Sr. was a former oil-business associate and golfing buddy of George H.W. Bush.

Bush was suspiciously absent during the event and, according to accounts of various White House staffers, was resentful of Alexander Haig’s “I’m in control” proclamations.

The evening of the assassination attempt, John Hinkley’s brother and his wife were “dinner guests” at the home of the Vice-President’s son, Neil Bush, of Silverado Savings and Loan fame. 

Coincidence?

With an initial investment of $150 billion, borrowed from the U.S. Treasury and, thus, the American people, Wanta purchased rubles from contacts in the Netherlands.
According to Wanta, the ruble was valued at $1.20 on the international currency market at the time.

 By purchasing rubles in above-normal quantities, his company, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., of Vienna, Austria and other locations, was able to acquire them far below the standard exchange rates. 
His company was also trading with U.S. dollars and other currencies.

Wanta described purchasing rubles at various prices ranging “from 18 to 23 cents on the dollar.” AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., would then resell the rubles at higher rates to other investors in the financial markets. Dollars were converted into rubles, rubles into yen (or other currencies) and the process would be repeated, over and over again, until the Soviet banks could no longer bear the pressure of cashing in their own currency. 
According to Wanta, “the accounts were distributed throughout secret offshore accounts and had doubled in value every two years.”

It should be emphasized that the plan  Wanta designed was perfectly legal. 

The same strategy is employed every day by investors throughout the world. 

Wanta’s plan differed though, in that his goal, at the bequest of President Reagan, was to cause a financial collapse of the Soviet Union. 

 His repeated purchase of “discounted rubles” enabled him to profit with an advantage not available to others in the financial markets – but was and is still legal. 

The plan was carried out under Executive Order 12333.

(EO 12333, UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES is a comprehensive executive order, easily found on the Internet, that was signed by President Reagan on December 4, 1981.)"  


[NOTE: THE ABOVE WAS REPORTED IN THE JANUARY 2007 IDAHO OBSERVER BY DON NICOLOFF. THE ARTICLE HAS BEEN RIDICULED AND SUMMARILY DISMISSED BY THE VAST MAJORITY WHO HAVE READ IT. IT IS A FACT THAT MANY OF THE CLAIMS CANNOT BE PROVEN...NOR CAN SOME BE DISPROVEN.
THE ARTICLE DID SET MANY TO THINKING, AND I WAS ONE OF THOSE. ]


HERE'S ANOTHER:

“Veterans Today” is aligned behind a series of causes, one of them involves a confidant and adviser to President Ronald Reagan. This adviser’s name is Lee Wanta, whose story was once only told by a handful of bloggers. His story is now known around the world and being validated more everyday in numerous ways.
[A] great number of previously secret documents  are now emerging which fully support Ambassador Wanta’s claims, "
Audio was inadvertently left on Ambassador Wanta’s DC Embassy answering machine. In this Audio, two major Beltway Political Fixers, Former Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist and Former South Dakota State Senator Sheldon Songstad continued talking after they attempted to reach Ambassador Wanta for a conference call.
About six minutes and twenty seconds of the last part of their conversation was recorded on Ambassador Wanta’s Washington DC Embassy answering machine.  
HERE IS THAT TAPE, AMD THAT IS INDEED IDENTIFIABLE AS SUNDQUIST AND SONGSTAD. 

When Ambassador Wanta listened to his messages the following morning after Labor Day 2014, he was stunned at what he heard.

These two men called Ambassador Wanta wanting to discuss what they could do for him as far as helping him get his money. In this prior conversation, Senator Songstad called himself a “Puppetmaster”.
Yes, this audio recording immediately neutralizes all the numerous lies and false claims of all those skeptics who have been discounting Ambassador Wanta’s claims for many years.
Here you have a respected former Governor and a State Representative expecting and demanding a massive personal payoff in Billions of US Dollars.
Remember, this recording was made and released way back in early September, 2014.
More than a few current and former Intel Officers thought this recording’s public release would set off an instant Political Firestorm like Watergate.
This has not happened with PuppetGate, but Attorney Eric Holder did resign immediately after the US Department of Justice was provided the Audio recording and associated evidence.
It is obvious to anyone who carefully listens to this audio recording that Former South Dakota State Senator Sheldon Songstad is bragging that Wanta better come forth with the billions of dollars they claim he owes them or “else”. 
Then they went on to discuss how  Songstad could arrange to have his folks find Wanta. And they also discussed whether or not Ambassador Wanta had Federal Protection.  Normally this kind of voice-grammed and identified recording would result in a felony indictment and a major RICO investigation of bribery, payoffs and influence peddling inside Congress and the Beltway.
 Wanta provided a copy of this recording to the Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Cauldwell of the US Department of Justice. 
Please call the US Department of Justice and politely ask them to please move ahead with indictments of Former Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist and Former South Dakota State Senator Sheldon Songstad and initiate a major RICO investigation of influence peddling and bribery in Congress. You may want to ask to speak to Assistant US Attorney General Cauldwell or his Secretary and leave a message." 

AS CRAZY AS ALL THAT SOUNDS, AND WITH 'VETERANS TODAY' BEING RENOWNED AS A 'LUNATIC OUTPOST', THERE WAS A TAPE PLAYED ON A NATIONALLY SYNDICATED RADIO, AND WANTA DID SUBMIT IT TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
CONSIDER THIS: IF WANTA HAD CONCOCTED THIS AND FORGED A TAPE WHICH HE SUBMITTED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, WOULDN'T THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAVE BAGGED AND TAGGED HIM AND THROWN HIM UNDER A FEDERAL PRISON FOR THAT FORGERY AND LIE?
YOU CAN DO A LOT OF TIME IN AMERICA FOR THAT SORT OF THING!
BUT WANTA IS STILL FREE!
NO CHARGES!
THAT INTRIGUED ME. 
ALSO CONSIDER THE FACT THAT WANTA HAS ACCUSED A LOT OF POWERFUL PEOPLE OF SOME REALLY SERIOUS THINGS, HAS SAID THINGS LIKE THIS ABOUT TWO POLITICAL FIGURES, BUT ALSO MORE DAMNING THINGS ABOUT FORMER PRESIDENTS, BUT I CAN'T FIND ONE SINGLE LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST WANTA FOR EVEN DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER, LET ALONE SLANDER OR LIBEL. 
IF YOU WERE ONE OF THOSE WHOM HE'S SAID SOME OF THIS STUFF ABOUT, AND IT WASN'T TRUE, WOULDN'T YOU BE SEEKING LEGAL RECOURSE?

BUT NO ONE HAS.
ISN'T THAT INTERESTING?
2007 CONTINUED:
"At the end of the Cold War, the money should have been used for the benefit of the general population, Wanta says.


The figure was 25 trillion dollars at the outset, but, with interest owed over the years, the amount today is 70-75 trillion dollars. 

To avoid these funds being liberated, Leo Wanta, who afterwards, WE ARE TOLD,  became "an ambassador, for Somalia" was imprisoned in Switzerland and the United States, and was repeatedly poisoned when in prison. 

Wanta's effects, including 18 US Treasury instruments worth $18 billion, were removed from him - and the official assets worth $18 billion face value have disappeared. Following an urgent intervention by the late Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, Mr Wanta was suddenly released, but was then taken, still in shackles, to Geneva airport and flown to New York. 

Wanta was jailed for a WISCONSIN state income tax charge, a tax bill of about $14,000 that he did not owe, dating back to 1982 - despite the fact that he had been living mainly abroad on US intelligence business, working directly for the President of the United States, for many years. He was accordingly extradited to Wisconsin, where he was jailed....same sort of thing that happened to Ashley Mote in the UK.

None of this deterred Leo Wanta, after he was released from prison, from continuing to claim his legal right as administrator of this immense fund, through the AmeriTrust Group Inc. 

The reference which shows this fund is said to be title 18 USC Section 6 offshore bank accounts, authorized under President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333. "

[ MY NOTE: AS THIS INFORMATION HAS BEEN DEEMED QUESTIONABLE, WHAT DOES TITLE 19, SECTION 6 REALLY SAY?
FROM CORNELL LAW:

18 U.S. Code § 6 - Department and agency defined


The term “department” means one of the executive departments enumerated in section 1 of Title 5, unless the context shows that such term was intended to describe the executive, legislative, or judicial branches of the government.
The term “agency” includes any department, independent establishment, commission, administration, authority, board or bureau of the United States or any corporation in which the United States has a proprietary interest, unless the context shows that such term was intended to be used in a more limited sense.

IT APPEARS THE AUTHOR OF THE 2007 ARTICLE QUOTED ABOVE WAS IN ERROR AND MAY REFER TO :
31 U.S. Code § 5318A - Special measures for jurisdictions, financial institutions, international transactions, or types of accounts of primary money laundering concern. 


The Secretary of the Treasury may require domestic financial institutions and domestic financial agencies to take 1 or more of the special measures described in subsection (b) if the Secretary finds that reasonable grounds exist for concluding that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, 1 or more financial institutions operating outside of the United States, 1 or more classes of transactions within, or involving, a jurisdiction outside of the United States, or 1 or more types of accounts is of primary money laundering concern, in accordance with subsection (c).

OR, IT MAY HAVE ERRED AND ACTUALLY MEANT THIS?
(f) Classified Information.— In any judicial review of a finding of the existence of a primary money laundering concern, or of the requirement for 1 or more special measures with respect to a primary money laundering concern, made under this section, if the designation or imposition, or both, were based on classified information (as defined in section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act (18 U.S.C. App.), such information may be submitted by the Secretary to the reviewing court ex parte and in camera. This subsection does not confer or imply any right to judicial review of any finding made or any requirement imposed under this section.

THERE IS THIS, MENTIONED IN THE "PATRIOT ACT":
Section 1956(c)(7) of title 18 of the U.S. Code was amended to further include specific acts of unlawful activity in relation to money laundering. 

The amendment gives the court the power to freeze bank accounts and property so they can satisfy a judgement under 18 USC § 1956.

THAT WOULD SURELY APPLY TO THE WANTA FUNDS OFFSHORE, WITH MINIMAL TWEAKING.
AND IF "JUNIOR BUSH" HELPED "DADDY BUSH" OUT WITH THOSE AMENDMENTS, HELPED MAKE SURE THE EX-VICE PRESIDENT UNDER REAGAN COULD LAY HANDS ON THOSE OFFSHORE FUNDS, ALL THE BETTER, RIGHT? <end "MY NOTE">]

BACK TO 2007
"In 2003, a federal jury in Alexandria, Virginia, confirmed Wanta’s status as frontman administrator, and recognized the rights of the American people over this immense amount of money. Among his many opponents in the higher spheres there was a certain CIA agent, Hillary Rodham Clinton and former president of the United States and ex-director of the CIA, George Bush senior, both of whom manage accounts derived from these funds." 

[NOTE: IS THIS MUCH TRUE?
YES. VIRGINIA COURT DOCUMENTS DO, IN FACT, EXIST. 
SEE PDF FILES BY <CLICKING HERE> ]

Secret service agents were authorized to manipulate these funds by order of title 16, section 6 USG relating to corporations for the manipulation of funds for intelligence purposes operations. They could do so and deny any link with these services, in order to safeguard their status as secret service agents.  

An international issue

This money, originally intended for anticommunist action as we have said, does not belong to the United States alone. Under the protocols dictated by the Reagan Administration, each of the following states should receive five thousand million dollars: Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico and Spain. Additionally, thirty billion dollars were to be paid to the Russian Federation. 
China, in turn, is owed thirty billion dollars by virtue of other agreements reached with the United States Tax Office relating to the Leo Wanta funds. Apparently this arises from China’s purchase of treasury bonds from the United States.

The Funds, it should be explained, are handled by means of instruments known as CHIPS (New York Clearing House Interbank Payments System). During the years of negotiations and court cases, when agreements were reached on various occasions both with Leo Wanta and with the countries involved, the CHIPS turned out to be hollow. That is, they existed as accountancy entries but when it came to liquidating them there was no money backing them. 
This was because the banks holding them had siphoned off the money to other accounts by means of the false payees we have mentioned, angering the countries who were to be beneficiaries. During the years that Wanta was denied access to the funds, Clinton, Bush and accomplices had used complex financial systems to spirit them away."

[NOTE: An analysis published by International Currency Review in February 2005 of the initial amounts which were misdirected from the Fed, inter alia directly into private offshore bank accounts, found that an estimated $742.5 billion had been misappropriated. ]

"Reports from British analyst Christopher Story indicate that these funds were on the agenda at recent G-8 summits, and that their non-payment has led to China ceasing to use the dollar in its oil transactions, essentially, with its main supplier, the Islamic republic of Iran. 

Particular reports by Story reveal that last June these funds, supposedly to be used in state terrorism operations should have been returned to Wanta’s jurisdiction, under the supervision of the International Court of Justice of The Hague, 


Ever since then, however, an endless succession of delays and interruptions have occurred, all placing obstacles in the way of the liberation of these funds, which would be sufficient to solve the greater part of the problems in the world.

Currently, many banks worldwide have frozen the secret accounts of these 1,500 operators, so that the conspirators can no longer operate with the funds as before, when they traded using the tax free accounts. British member of the European Parliament, Ashley Mote, is the only such figure to speak out publicly on the issue of these funds. Story’s reports further indicate that these funds, hidden away in secret accounts, are being paid to terrorist organizations."

Federal Reserve Board Impedes The Wanta Plan:

Bernanke Defies The US Treasury & The People

New ‘Marshall Plan For America'  Sabotaged By The Fed

7-20-2006

The Federal Reserve Board, a private corporation owned mainly by foreign interests dominated by Germany, is dubiously blocking the [opening small] crediting of $4.5 trillion of repatriated offshore funds that were transferred into the United States in May and June 2006, in fulfillment of an agreement reached last year between the US authorities and the US financial engineering genius, Leo Wanta, which would transform the financial and economic outlook for the US Treasury, the US economy, the American people, and the whole world.

In so doing, the Federal Reserve, which under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 [H.R. 3723]* “protecting proprietary economic information, and for other purposes”, is not even entitled to knowledge of the agreements and intended transactions, is in breach of a large number of statutes  rendering the Fed’s Chairman, Dr Ben Bernanke, an American of German extraction, and senior Fed officers, liable to severe consequences, not excluding being picked up in front of TV cameras by Federal Marshals.

At the G-8 Meeting in St Petersburg, one subject dominated the discussions behind-the-scenes: The Wanta Plan. This is the new name for the long-awaited Settlement with Leo Wanta, the distinguished US Treasury/Secret Service financial genius chosen by President Reagan to develop and implement financial strategies for the transformation [ahem, the financial destruction] of the USSR under Gorbachëv.

[The origins of the money was a U.S. state terrorism cache that has been illegally held from being repatriated--and it was siphoned off to help only the Clinton and Bush families demolish the U.S. instead. Wanta however still is fighting for its repatriation, which would change the U.S. and global financial arrangements overnight. With interest, the billions for it have become mega-trillions sitting there, legally U.S. Treasury money property all this while. The treasonous network called the Federal Reserve wants to keep this saving of America--and the world economy--from happening.]

Under a revised agreement reached with the White House and the US Treasury, finalised in November 2005 and signed in December, Leo Wanta, the Trustor of giga-funds raised internationally and held offshore, agreed to implement a financial strategy to rehabilitate the finances of the US Federal Government.

The Wanta Plan is of greater relative importance, by an order of magnitude, even than the Marshall Plan, under which war-torn Europe was rehabilitated in the later 1940s."

Read more here:
http://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/the-wanta-plan-the-global-security-fund/
TAKE IT FOR WHATEVER IT'S WORTH TO YOU.

AS ALSO THIS WEBSITE WHICH OFFERS MORE EXTENSIVE "FACTS" IN THE WANTA CASE. <CLICK HERE>

AND THEN THERE'S THIS VIDEO:




David Noel James, Baron James of Blackheath 
In November 2010 Lord James claimed in the House of Lords that he had been approached by a secretive "megarich" organisation, which James referred to only as 'Foundation X', willing to lend billions of pounds, interest-free, to the UK government.
James attracted some press and blog attention after a speech in the House of Lords on 1 November 2010, in which he claimed to have been approached by an unnamed organisation wishing to fund massive public works projects in the UK with vast currency reserves backed by gold bullion. 

"Fed Fraud" speech
James attracted some press attention after another speech in the House of Lords on 16 February 2012, in which he claimed a massive $15 trillion money-laundering fraud from the United States Federal Reserve in the name of "Yohannes Riyadi" – a man who may or may not exist. James offered to provide evidence and asked for an official investigation (Hansard, transcription 16 February 2012, Column 1016, from 5.20 pm).
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201212/ldhansrd/text/120216-0002.htm#12021643000172

THE TWO VIDEOS OF BARON JAMES ADDRESSING HIS CONCERNS: 
https://youtu.be/HgJMSqLVhEc

https://youtu.be/1aWTsxS

ANY CONNECTION OF FOUNDATION X OR THE FEDERAL RESERVETO THE MISSING WANTA FUNDS?
THAT'S A STRETCH.

ARE THERE "WANTA FUNDS"? 
IF NOT, PERHAPS SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR. 

TWO LAST BITS OF "MYSTERY"...

BACK-TO-BACK CONVENIENT FIRES On 13th July 2006, an Iron Mountain document storage warehouse located at Bow, East London, adjacent to the City of London, caught fire and continued burning for three days. 

And on the preceding evening (12th July), the Iron Mountain warehouse located in the Cyrville Industrial Area, Ottawa, Canada, also mysteriously burned to the ground. 

The Iron Mountain fires have been described as panic measures by criminalist foreign cadres to destroy the evidence of the massive serial financial fraud that has been exposed by International Currency Review and its associated intelligence publications.  

SOME OF THOSE INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO GEORGE BUSH, SR. 

SECOND "MYSTERY": SUDDEN DEATH
THE ENGLISH INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST CHRISTOPHER STORY WHO WROTE SO MUCH ABOUT WANTA AND HAD TRIED FOR YEARS TO EXPOSE BUSH SENIOR FOR THE CRIMINAL HE THOUGHT HE WAS....

HE WAS AN ADVISER TO MARGARET THATCHER.
"a government adviser specialising in intelligence and economic affairs, who is perhaps best known for his collaboration withKGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn on the 1995 book The Perestroika Deception.."

HE WAS NOT CONSIDERED A "NUTCASE". 

In 1963, he formed his own publishing company specialising in intelligence and founded "World Reports Limited" that year.

Since 1970, Story edited and published International Currency Review, which has included the World Bank, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank of England amongst its subscribers.

Story became an economic adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and in 1991, a year after her resignation, he published Soviet Analyst due to his continued scepticism about Mikhail Gorbachev, perestroika and the official version of events in the Soviet Union.  Soviet Analyst was a respected journal whose previous editors included Robert Conquest and Tibor Szamuely.  

In 2002, Story published The European Union Collective, which applied Story's analysis to the European Union. He was also critical of the German intelligence establishment, pointing out its Nazi origins.  

HE HAD BEGUN TO UNCOVER WIDE-SCALE BRIBERIES WITHIN THE EUROPEAN  UNION'S FINANCIERS, PAID WITH...OFFSHORE SLUSH-FUND MONIES.  

HIS VIDEOS RELATING TO THAT CAN BE SEEN <HERE> 

HE DEEPLY BELIEVED WHAT LEO WANTA SAID.

HE ALSO BELIEVED GEORGE BUSH, SR. WAS A CRIMINAL, CALLED HIM "GODFATHER BUSH".

HE IS THE MAN WHO WROTE MUCH OF WHAT IS QUOTED ABOVE. 
HE WAS A GOOD FRIEND TO ASHLEY MOTE.

STORY WAS FOUND DEAD 14th July 2010, JUST 4 DAYS AFTER HE WROTE PUBLICLY THAT HE WAS TARGETED FOR ASSASSINATION. 

HE WROTE: 
"We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor. We have proof that they are surprised that the Editor is not dead." 

HIS CLOSEST FRIENDS BELIEVE HE MAY HAVE BEEN POISONED.