Sunday, March 30, 2014

AMERICAN THINK TANKS AND PHILANTHROPISTS , POWER AND WAR

"Over 400 years ago, the Florentine statesman Niccolo Machiavelli engaged in a profound study of methods used by various rulers to attain power... The findings of Machiavelli and other students of power decree that to obtain power it is essential to ignore the moral laws of man and of God; that promises must be made only with the intention to deceive and to mislead others to sacrifice their own interests; that the most brutal atrocity must be committed as a matter of mere convenience; that friends or allies must be betrayed as matter of course as soon as they have served their purpose. But, it is also decreed that these atrocities must be kept hidden from the common people except only where they are of use to strike terror to the hearts of opponents; that there must be kept up a spurious aspect of benevolence and benefit for the greater number of the people, and even an aspect of humility to gain as much help as possible." ~E. C. Knuth in his book "The Empire of the "City"  

"The only force more ruthless and cynical than the business of big politics is the politics of big business." 

WHO ARE THE BENEVOLENT IN AMERICA (SAME NAMES SHOW UP ALL AROUND THE WORLD)?
WHO ARE THE GENEROUS ONES WHO DECIDE FOR US ALL?
WHY, IT'S THE MEGA-RICH WHO CAN AFFORD TO DONATE MILLIONS, FUND ENTIRE UNIVERSITIES, GIVE US THOSE SECRETIVE THINK TANKS, AND...WARS.

WHEN MOST PEOPLE THINK OF AMERICAN THINK TANKS, NAMES LIKE
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
MAY COME UP.
THOSE ARE MERELY SOME OF THE BETTER-KNOWN ORGANIZATIONS.

I KNOW OF OVER 1,815 THINK TANKS, 393 LOCATED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.. SEVERAL NEAR THE U.N. IN NEW YORK.
THE "TOP 50" THINK TANKS ARE LISTED HERE, AND I HOPE YOU DELVE INTO THE DEPTHS OF THEIR MEMBERSHIP, WHO FUNDS THEM, AND HOW THEY DICTATE POLICY AND THOUGHT IN AMERICA.
IT WILL BE A MOST REWARDING AND REVEALING STUDY.

MOST OF THE NAMES SEEM BENIGN, EVEN KINDLY, BUT THE VAST MAJORITY ALL HAVE COMMON THREADS, COMMON SUPPORTERS, AND COMMON AGENDA.
WELL, IF THESE GROUPS ARE CALLED "THINK TANKS", SURELY THOSE WHO "THINK" INSIDE THEM SHOULD BE LISTENED TO RIGHT?
IT MIGHT BE OKAY FOR THEM TO TELL US HOW AND WHAT TO THINK, MAYBE, YES? NO?


LET'S LOOK DEEPER...
THAT "GROUP OF THIRTY",,, The Bellagio Group, formed by Austrian economist Fritz Machlup, was the immediate predecessor to THAT.
Other former members include
The Former Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan,
Swiss banker and previous CEO of Deutsche Bank, Josef Ackermann,
Former deputy Bank of England governor, Rupert Pennant-Rea,
Former Bundesbank President, Karl Otto Pöhl.
MAYBE YOU'RE OKAY WITH GLOBAL BANKERS HEADING AN AMERICAN THINK TANK...I AM NOT.
WHO FUNDS WAR?
BANKS FUND WARS.
WHO OWNS THE BANKS?

THE SAME SMALL GROUP OF VERY RICH WHO HAVE ALMOST ALWAYS HELD THAT POWER. 

"The bankers control the world's major corporations, media, intelligence agencies, think tanks, foundations and universities." ~ Henry Makow 

KINDLY OLD CARNEGIE, OF THE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT?
WHAT A GRAND OLD MAN, YES?
NOT AT ALL.

"As first laid out with the Global Vision in 2007, the Carnegie Endowment aspires to be the first global think tank."
FOUNDED IN 1910 BY DEDICATED INTERNATIONALIST, ANDREW CARNEGIE WHO CLAIMED TO BE OPPOSED TO WAR.
Carnegie was one of more than 50 members of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club, which has been blamed for the Johnstown Flood that killed 2,209 people in 1889.

THE CAUSE OF THE FLOOD WAS FAILURE OF A DAM THAT CARNEGIE AND HIS HUNTING GROUP HAD SHODDILY PATCHED AND NEGLECTED, HAD PUT MORE PRESSURE ON THAT IT WAS CAPABLE OF STANDING.
THE DAM BROKE, THE 2.209 SOULS WERE LOST.
JUST 3 YEARS LATER CARNEGIE'S STEEL MILL PLANT IN HOMESTEAD, PENNSYLVANIA WAS THE SITE OF A BLOODY LABOR DISPUTE THAT LASTED 142 DAYS. CARNEGIE REFUSED TO PASS ON CORPORATE PROFITS TO WORKERS WITH WAGE RAISES.
10 MEN, THAT WE ARE AWARE OF, DIED.
CARNEGIE FLED THE U.S. TO SCOTLAND AFTER THE FIGHTS BEGAN.

CARNEGIE WAS RENOWN FOR MANIPULATING THE STOCK MARKET, AND HE WAS ALSO KNOWN AS A "ROBBER BARON"...
Robber barons CREATED monopolies by paying their workers very little, and selling their products for less than competitors. They would drive other companies out of business, and then buy the failed companies up.  Once they had bought the companies, they would drive prices very high, and stop making a good quality product.  In this way, robber barons such as Vanderbilt and Rockefeller made their fortunes.  Another tactic used was vertical integration.  Carnegie made best use of this idea.  The robber baron of steel, he controlled everything to do with the steel industry. 
Carnegie emphatically resisted government intrusion in commerce, as well as government-sponsored charities. Carnegie believed the concentration of capital was essential for societal progress and should be encouraged... FOR THE RICH...FOR THE TOP 1% ESPECIALLY.

AND CARNEGIE FINANCED WAR, MADE BILLIONS FROM WAR.


THERE IS EVEN A MILITARY COLLEGE THAT BEARS HIS NAME, AND THE NAME OF ANOTHER "THINK TANK" FOUNDER/FUNDER, MELLON.
Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh is one of the largest academic military contractors in the country. Many of the software guidance systems, general communications networking systems and robotics technology used in Iraq were developed at CMU. So much so that some have nicknamed CMU, Carnegie Military University.
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. - See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.N71BoReo.dpuf
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. - See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.N71BoReo.dpuf
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. - See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.N71BoReo.dpuf
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. - See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.N71BoReo.dpuf
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. - See more at: http://hnn.us/article/1796#sthash.N71BoReo.dpuf
WAR REDUCES POPULATIONS, TOO, BUT NOT AS QUICKLY AS EUGENICISTS WANT.

THE "PHILANTHROPISTS", THE KINDLY OLD 'GENTLEMEN' WHO FUNDED AMERICA'S THINK TANKS, UNIVERSITIES, MEGACORPORATIONS AND POLITICIANS, WHO BOUGHT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, WHO DECIDE WHAT ALL THAT MONEY DOES EVERY DAY... THE MORGANS, ROCKEFELLERS, CARNEGIES, VANDERBILTS, ROTHSCHILDS, ASTORS, LEHMANS, GOLDMAN SACHS, SCHRODERS, MELLONS...

FEW AMERICANS ARE AWARE OF SOME OF THE SECRETS OF THESE NICE OLD FAMILIES, LIKE THE ROCKEFELLERS, FOR EXAMPLE.
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in BEFORE, YES, BEFORE he went to Auschwitz

THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
BROOKINGS, 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO, WAS MUCH TALKED ABOUT WHEN IT CAME OUT FOR WAR AGAINST IRAN.
<<...any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context (…) The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer- one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal.’>>
[SEE http://www.globalresearch.ca/nuclear-deal-with-iran-prelude-to-war-not-breakthrough/5359835?print=1]
THE ABOVE IS ABSOLUTELY FROM THE BROOKINGS "LET'S THINK ABOUT IT" ARTICLE "WHICH PATH TO PERSIA?"
YOU MAY GO READ THE ENTIRE REPORT HERE : http://www.scribd.com/doc/108902116/brookings-institution-s-which-path-to-persia-report

IT WAS THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION ON THIS WEBSITE A BIT OVER 3 YEARS AGO:

February 13, 2011
The Smith Richardson Foundation funds a bizarre myriad of globalist pet projects including studies on geoengineering, nation building, meddling in the Caucasus region, and even studies, as of 2009, to develop methods to support "indigenous democratic political movements and transitions" in Poland, Egypt, Cuba, Nepal, Haiti, Vietnam, Cambodia, Zimbabwe, and Burma. Also acknowledged by the report is the Crown Family Foundation out of Chicago.
The Brookings Institute itself is a creation of the notorious globalist funding arms including the Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation, all who recently had been involved in the fake "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy. Today, Brookings boasts a full complement of support and funding from America's biggest corporations. Upon the Brookings Institution's board of trustees http://www.brookings.edu/about/Trustees.aspx  one will find a collection of corporate leaders from Goldman Sachs, the Carlyle Group, the insurance industry, Pepsi (CFR), Alcoa (CFR), and various CFR affiliated consulting firms like McKinsey & Company.

Full details can be found within the pages of their 2010 annual report here.  http://www.brookings.edu/%7E/media/Files/about/annualreport/2010/2010_complete.pdf
The West has no intention of striking any lasting deal with Iran, as nuclear capabilities, even the acquirement of nuclear weapons by Iran was never truly an existential threat to Western nations or their regional partners. The West’s issue with Iran is its sovereignty and its ability to project its interests into spheres traditionally monopolized by the US and UK across the Middle East. Unless Iran plans on turning over its sovereignty and regional influence along with its right to develop and use nuclear technology, betrayal of any “nuclear deal” is all but inevitable, as is the war that is to shortly follow.

Motivations Should be Obvious
We must look into the minds of those that shape US foreign policy and sweep aside the distracting rhetoric they feed us. US foreign policy is shaped by organizations like the Brookings Institute which consist of members of the largest corporations and banks on earth. These corporations are not only disinterested in security, but thrive on the war and conflict insecurity breeds. (See "War is a Racket" http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2010/11/for-veterans-day-usmc-general-butler.html and Eisenhower's Warning http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY&feature=youtube_gdata_player .)

The globalists run think-tanks all over the world like Brookings where their policy wonks generate an immense amount of strategic doctrine. This doctrine then converges to form a general consensus. Knowing the details of this doctrine beforehand can give us clues as to what to look for on the geopolitical chessboard as their gambits play out.
Brookings’ agenda is brazenly imperial. It’s pro-corporate. It’s anti-populist. It feigns concern about inequality. It supports government of, by and for privileged elites alone. Expect Ben Bernanke to fit right in.
That's right, the former Federal Reserve chief is NOW with Brookings...
Starting to get the real picture of how all this fits together?

WE'VE BEEN WARNED SINCE THE FOUNDING OF AMERICA NOT TO ALLOW THESE POWERFUL PEOPLE TO GAIN CONTROL OF AMERICA...BUT MONEY TALKS. 

"Ever since the days of Henry Ford, the Economic Elite have needed a thriving US middle class to increase growth and profits, but now, in the global economy, they view the US middle class as obsolete. They increasingly look globally for profits and they would rather pay cheap labor in countries like China and India." ~ David DeGraw

"The intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 is One World Government and a one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists. In this One World system, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, and famines, until one billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military. Those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws and targeted for elimination."
~John Coleman in his book " The Committee of 300: The Conspirator's Hierarchy"  

The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." ~ George Orwell in his book "1984" 

"In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world's richest and most powerful men financing a movement which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth, men like the Rothschids, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, and Milners. But obviously these men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical to assume that if they financed it and do not fear it, it must be because they control it." ~ Gary Allen in his book "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" . 

SEE IF YOU KNOW WHO MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT TO A U.S. PRESIDENT: 
"Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge-back for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. 

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. 

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call "Social Insurance." 

Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America."
~ Edward Mandell House, 1913, in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson before the Federal Reserve Act was passed,
22 YEARS BEFORE WE SAW THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT... EERIE, ISN'T IT?

BY THE WAY, HOUSE WAS A VERY DEDICATED MARXIST...AND WILSON WAS LATER PERHAPS MOST REGRETFUL THAT HE ALLOWED HOUSE TO MANIPULATE HIM AND THE PRESIDENCY AS HE DID...PERHAPS.
HOUSE WAS ALSO THE ONE WHO DREAMED UP THAT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS.

AND OUR TRILATERAL COMMISSION...
Zbigniew Brzezinski, ANOTHER ADMIRER OF MARX. 

Zbigniew Brzezinski
’s Between Two Ages was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. What happened, quite simply, is that David Rockefeller read the book. And, in 1973, Mr. Rockefeller launched the new Trilateral Commission whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with communist countries."  

On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."

On page 83, he states: "Marxism, disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."  

WHAT IF...WHAT IF, AS WE HAVE BEEN WARNED SINCE AT LEAST THE EARLY 1800s, AMERICA REALLY IS OWNED, REALLY IS JUST A CORPORATION, REALLY IS ALMOST TO THE END OF THE PATH TO GLOBALIZATION, THE END OF THE REPUBLIC?

"Our own government no longer acts in its own interest; we no longer win any wars we fight; and we constantly tie ourselves to international agreements, pacts and conventions." ~
John McManus 

The only force more ruthless and cynical than the business of big politics is the politics of big business.

A politician is someone who promises you a bridge, even when there is no river.

Men wage war for profit...

MEN WAGE WAR FOR PROFIT... WHICH MEN?
WHO?
THINK ABOUT IT...BUT DON'T RELY ON AMERICA'S THINK TANKS TO HELP YOU THINK. 





































Saturday, March 29, 2014

FBI WANTED BOSTON BOMBER TO BE THEIR INFORMANT ?

WE KNOW, AND THE FBI ITSELF HAS ADMITTED, THE AGENCY HAS RECRUITED TERRORISTS BEFORE. AND INFORMANTS ABOUND ON FBI PAYROLLS.
THOSE ARE KNOWN FACTS.
DID THEY TRY TO RECRUIT THE OLDER BROTHER ACCUSED IN THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING?
THE FAMILY SAYS YES.
"Somebody clearly framed them. I don't know who exactly framed them, but they did. They framed them. And they were so cowardly that they shot the boy dead," Anzor Tsarnaev told Reuters.The parents of two brothers police say planted bomb-filled backpacks in crowds watching the Boston Marathon  say their sons are being framed for the deadly blasts. 
THE FAMILY HAS SAID ALL ALONG THAT THE FBI HAD PAID MORE THAN ONE VISIT TO THEIR HOME.

"We base this on information from our client's family and other sources that the FBI made more than one visit to talk with (Tamerlan's parents) and Tamerlan, questioned Tamerlan about his internet searches, and asked him to be an informant," the defense motion states.
During a manhunt, Police shot and killed Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.
April 28, 2012
NEW YORK TIMES

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.
When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat.
This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of themselves — too sure, perhaps.


Lawyers for accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev asserted Friday that his older brother and alleged accomplice had been encouraged by the FBI to be an informant and to report on the Chechen and Muslim community, according to court records.

“We base this on information from our client’s family and other sources that the FBI made more than one visit to talk with Anzor [his father], Zubeidat [his mother] and Tamerlan, questioned Tamerlan about his Internet searches, and asked him to be an informant, reporting on the Chechen and Muslim community.
In court requests filed late Friday, the defense lawyers sought a court order to force prosecutors to turn over a list of records, including reports related to the fatal shooting of MIT police Officer Sean Collier, the Watertown confrontation, and any evidence that an MBTA police officer was shot by fellow officers, rather than by Dzokhar Tsarnaev, who the lawyers say was unarmed.

In court documents filed Friday, defense lawyers asked the judge overseeing the case for an order requiring the government to turn over all records of the FBI's contacts with Tsarnaev's older brother, Tamerlan. He was interviewed by FBI agents in response to a concern expressed by the Russian government that he might become radicalized.
"We seek this information based on our belief that these contacts were among the precipitating events for Tamerlan's actions during the week" of the bombings, the lawyers aid.
No trial date has yet been set. 

VETERANS TODAY ALSO DID AN ARTICLE ON THE FBI AND 'FALSE FLAG EVENTS'.
I WON'T ARGUE WITH AMERICAN VETERANS.


FBI and false flag war against America

Here’s how it works: Informants report to their handlers on people who have, say, made statements sympathizing with terrorists. Those names are then cross-referenced with existing intelligence data, such as immigration and criminal records. FBI agents may then assign an undercover operative to approach the target by posing as a radical. Sometimes the operative will propose a plot, provide explosives, even lead the target in a fake oath to Al Qaeda. Once enough incriminating information has been gathered, there’s an arrest-and a press conference announcing another foiled plot.
If this sounds vaguely familiar, it’s because such sting operations are a fixture in the headlines. Remember the Washington Metro bombing plot? The New York subway plot? The guys who planned to blow up the Sears Tower? The teenager seeking to bomb a Portland Christmas tree lighting? Each of those plots, and dozens more across the nation, was led by an FBI asset.”


As for the army of informants, most are paid up to $100,000 either “per head” or “per case,” for the terrorists they themselves recruited, too often those profiled as unable to care for themselves, much less hatch complex paramilitary operations.
Thus, we see that COINTELPRO operations, the long discredited program that ran for nearly 50 years organizing church and synagogue burnings, lynchings, bombings and assassinations through infiltration of “radical groups,” often anti-war or civil rights organizations, have not only continued but expanded to the point they are, in fact, the primary function of the FBI.

ARTICLE FROM BUSINESS INSIDER:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has busted an impressive number of homegrown terror plots over the past decade, but many people don't realize how these plots materialize. In some cases, they are hatched not from a cave-dwelling fanatic, but actually from the Bureau itself.

The FBI targets the "disgruntled few" who would participate in a terrorist plot if given the opportunity, according to Aaronson.

In many cases, the FBI recruits potential terrorists and provides them with plans, equipment, and weapons — before finally shutting them down and getting credit for thwarting another attack.

AND THEN THERE ARE MANY WHO SAY NEITHER BROTHER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE BOMBING AND OFFER EVIDENCE ABOUT WHO DID...

OPERATION URBAN SHIELD, SCHEDULED BY HOMELAND SECURITY
An attempted cover for the actual false flag event that allegedly killed three people back in April, the DHS-funded drill, known as "Operation Urban Shield," was intended to take place during the summer, according to the Boston Globe - that is until the "real" event beat it to the punch. But the drill itinerary so closely resembles what actually occurred the day of the bombings that even the mainstream media source responsible for bringing it to light could not help but point out this incredible "coincidence," which bears all the classic marks of a government-initiated false flag attack.

"The scenario had been carefully planned: A terrorist group prepared to hurt vast numbers of people around Boston would leave backpacks filled with explosives at Faneuil Hall, the Seaport District, and in other towns, spreading waves of panic and fear," explains the Boston Globe. "The hypothetical terrorist group was even given a name: Free America Citizens, a home-grown cadre of militiamen whose logo would be a metal skull wearing an Uncle Sam hat and a furious expression."
You can view photos of the men with skull hats who were hired to work the Boston Bombing false flag attack here:
http://www.naturalnews.com

VETERANS TODAY OFFERED SOME DISTURBING EVIDENCE THAT POINTS AWAY FROM THE TWO BROTHERS AS WELL...

WILL WE EVER KNOW THE TRUTH?
SHOULDN'T WE WANT/DEMAND THE TRUTH, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS?






CHINA BUYING OIL IN TEXAS, CANADA, IRAQ, SUDAN

CHINA IS BUYING ALL THE OIL IT CAN, ANYWHERE IT CAN, BUT, FOR NOW, CHINA IS LOSING OIL IN SUDAN, SOUTH SUDAN, BECAUSE OF THE CIVIL WAR.
THIS COMES AFTER ITS HUGE LOSSES IN LIBYA AFTER GADDAFI WAS KILLED.

BUT WHILE CHINA MAY BE FEARFUL OF LOSING MORE OIL FIELDS, BETWEEN 3 MILLION AND 4.7 MILLION SUDANESE PEOPLE ARE FACING A FOOD CRISIS.
<<More than one million people have been forced from their homes by the ongoing conflict in South Sudan, the UN says.
Of these, 803,200 have been displaced within the country, and another 254,000 have fled to neighboring countries.
In its report, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said the conflict had caused "a serious deterioration in the food security situation" leaving around 3.7 million people at high risk.
"Fighting between government and opposition forces has continued, especially in Jonglei, Unity and Upper Nile state, where towns and rural areas have been ravaged by the violence," it added.
The UN estimates that 4.9 million are in need of humanitarian assistance, but it warned that "the remote and dispersed placement sites make it difficult to reach many of South Sudan's conflict-affected people".>>
SPEND BILLIONS FOR OIL OR FOR FOOD FOR HUMAN BEINGS?
THE WHOLE WORLD CHOOSES OIL, INCLUDING THE U.S.!


CHINA'S NEWLY ACQUIRED OIL FIELDS AT RISK
<<Some of the largest oil fields China operates are in areas controlled by fighters backing Riek Machar, the country's vice-president until he was sacked in July.
Oil production has already dropped by 20% since the onset of the conflict three weeks ago and more than 300 Chinese workers have been evacuated.
China invested some $20bn (£12bn) in Sudan before it split into two countries in 2011, according to Chinese media reports.
Another $8bn was pledged to President Kiir during his visit to China the year following secession, to be used for infrastructure projects and the oil sector.
The heavy investment seems to have borne fruit, as in the first 10 months of 2013, China imported 1.9 million tonnes of oil (nearly 14 million barrels) from South Sudan, twice as much as China imports from Nigeria each year.

The spectre of their Libyan experience also weighs heavily on the Chinese minds - project after project now lies deserted [IN LIBYA] because of heavy fighting during the Arab Spring uprising of 2011, inflicting huge losses on China.
Two years ago, China suffered heavy losses in its Libyan projects, including infrastructure, telecommunications and oil.
Many constructions were halted and sites looted or destroyed during the revolution which toppled long-time leader Muammar Gaddafi.
The total loss was estimated by several Chinese media reports to be in the region of $20bn, although no official figures exist.

More than half of China's investment in the overseas oil sector is found in areas which are considered unstable, including Iran, Nigeria, Sudan, South Sudan and Venezuela. .

Some Chinese oil workers kidnapped in Sudan died during rescue efforts.

A stronger yuan would also make OIL purchases cheaper for theChinese. The People’s Bank of China said on June 19 it may allow the yuan to move higher, abandoning the 6.83 yuan peg to the dollar adopted during the global financial crisis to shield exporters. The yuan climbed 0.4 percent to 6.7976 per dollar in the first trading day after the announcement.

“One of the advantages the big Chinese oil companies have is government support, it’s an open secret,” said Gideon Lo, an energy analyst at DBS Vickers Hong Kong Ltd. “The government establishes high-level contacts with oil-producing countries. Once this is done, the oil companies can come in and negotiate.”

OIL OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND
PetroChina Co., which vies with Exxon Mobil Corp. as the world’s biggest company by market value, wants half its oil to come from overseas by 2020, Chairman Jiang Jiemin said in March. Less than a tenth comes from abroad now.

China Petrochemical, known as Sinopec Group, agreed to buy a 9 percent stake in Syncrude Canada Ltd. for $4.65 billion, or $650 million more than the high end of an estimate by Macquarie Securities.
Sinopec bought Addax Petroleum Corp. last year for C$8.3 billion ($7.9 billion), gaining licenses in Nigeria, Gabon and Cameroon. Chinese oil companies also have African assets in Kenya, Niger, Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, Mauritania, Libya, Tunisia, Sudan and Chad.

CHINA ALSO BOUGHT INTO A TEXAS OIL FIELD LAST YEAR.
China’s state owned petrochemical giant Sinochem (SHA: 600500) acquired a 40 percent in Wolfcamp, a well-known shale oil and gas field in the Permian Basin of Texas.
Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) of Irving, Texas said this week that it sold a 40 percent stake in its Wolfcamp field for a total price of $1.7 billion. 

WHO REAPED THE BIGGEST REWARDS FROM THE IRAQ OIL FIELDS TAKEOVERS?
CHINA.

Since the American-led invasion of 2003, Iraq has become one of the world’s top oil producers, and China is now its biggest customer.
“The Chinese are the biggest beneficiary of this post-Saddam oil boom in Iraq,” said Denise Natali, a Middle East expert at the National Defense University in Washington.
Michael Makovsky, a former Defense Department official in the Bush administration who worked on Iraq oil policy said, The Chinese had nothing to do with the war, but from an economic standpoint they are benefiting from it, and our Fifth Fleet and air forces are helping to assure their supply.”

“The financial firepower that the Chinese companies have is a factor,” Tom Deegan, Hong Kong-based head of energy and infrastructure at lawyers Simmons & Simmons, said. “They have access to capital and finance through Chinese banks which have the liquidity.

Unlike the executives of Western oil giants like Exxon Mobil, the Chinese happily accept the strict terms of Iraq’s oil contracts, which yield only minimal profits. China is more interested in energy to fuel its economy than profits to enrich its oil giants.
Chinese companies do not have to answer to shareholders, pay dividends or even generate profits. They are tools of Beijing’s foreign policy of securing a supply of energy for its increasingly prosperous and energy hungry population. “We don’t have any problems with them,” said Abdul Mahdi al-Meedi, an Iraqi Oil Ministry official who handles contracts with foreign oil companies. “They are very cooperative. There’s a big difference, the Chinese companies are state companies, while Exxon or BP or Shell are different.”
“They offer a lot of capital and a willingness to get in quickly and with a high appetite for risk,” said Badhr Jafar, president of Crescent Petroleum, an independent oil and gas company based in the United Arab Emirates and a big gas producer in Iraq. He said the Chinese were vital to Iraq’s efforts to expand oil production, adding, “They don’t have to go through hoops to get people on the ground and working.”

I MUST AGREE WITH ONE WHO COMMENTED ON THE IRAQ/CHINA OIL DEAL, FOR HIS ANGER WAS DIRECTED IN THE PROPER DIRECTION...
HE SAID:
<<So, we borrowed billions from China, and thousands died, in an unnecessary war, that results in the US providing, and still protecting, a new energy supply for China, as their manufacturing displaces ours. And, we put Iran's allies in power in Iraq, allowing the passage of arms and fighters to defend our adversary the Assad regime in Syria, expanding Iran's influence, reducing Iran's defense costs (with Saddam gone), and freeing up Iranian resources for their nuclear weapons development program.

Sounds like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz engineered a major strategic defeat for the United States. Loss of lives, military capability, billions of dollars, influence and safety. And they markedly strengthened our adversaries, [BOTH] economic and terrorist. All while trashing the US economy. Talk about multi-tasking! When will Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz be nominated for the awards they deserve?>>

YES, THAT'S ABOUT THE RESULTS THAT CAME OF IT; AMERICA BEGAN A SORT OF ECONOMIC "DEATH SPIRAL" DOWNWARD...AND CHINA MARCHES EVER ONWARD TO THE TOP OF THE HEAP, IN MANUFACTURING, ACQUIRING OIL FIELDS, ACQUIRING DIAMONDS, AND GOLD.

The U.S. is on its way out as the world’s No. 1 oil importer, according to energy market researchers at Woods Mackenzie.  That coveted (or not so coveted) title will belong to none other than China. 
“The price China pays will far outstrip the peak cost ever incurred by the U.S. of $335 billion annually with U.S. import spend falling to only $160 billion annually by 2020,” Wood Mackenzie said in a press release last week.
This isn’t the greatest news for China, to be honest. It might be supportive of oil futures, but oil is the most costly, volatile fossil fuel around. The government wants to go green. The turning point for Chinese crude oil imports to surpass the US will be around 2017.

HOW CAN THE CHINESE ECONOMY AFFORD SUCH ENORMOUS EXPENDITURES AND STILL KEEP CLIMBING TO THE TOP OF THE GLOBAL MARKET?
MAYBE AMERICA SHOULD HIRE SOME OF THE MINDS THAT ARE SKYROCKETING CHINA TO THE TOP?
BUT THEY ARE NOT FOR HIRE...

Friday, March 28, 2014

SECRET STERILIZATION OF AMERICAN WOMEN, WOMEN IN AFRICA, PHILIPPINES,INDIA....

Science has provided a means of categorizing and victimizing those in society deemed unworthy of continued existence. Its influence in academic and political circles has created a pervasive social bigotry that rewards extermination over reform. The failure to embrace the racial and cultural diversity of ANY country has left a wake of destruction and oppression in minority populations all over the globe.
ALL NATIONS HAVE ENGAGED IN SOME FORM OF CONCEALED STERILIZATION, EITHER IN THE DISTANT PAST OR AS RECENTLY AS TODAY.
SUCH A THING IS ONGOING AND THERE SEEMS NO LET-UP.

WE MAY TELL OURSELVES THAT THE DAYS OF WOMEN BEING CONSIDERED CHATTEL ARE OVER, BUT THE DATA SAYS OTHERWISE.
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS DICTATE BIRTH CONTROL TO THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLD'S CHILD-BEARING FEMALES.
OFTEN, WOMEN HAVE NO SAY-SO AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEY WILL GAVE CHILDREN.
THEY ALSO HAVE NO SAY-SO WHEN IT COMES TO SECRETIVE STERILIZATION, WHETHER ORDERED BY A HUSBAND, OR DONE UNDER THE GUISE OF THE W.H.O./UNICEF/BILL GATES ORGANIZATIONS, THE 3 GREATEST PROPONENTS OF EUGENICS AND POPULATION REDUCTION THAT EXIST TODAY.

IS THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION SECRETLY STERILIZING AFRICAN WOMEN ...AGAIN?

A concerning new report from the head cardinal of the Catholic Church in Kenya alleges that a WHO/UNICEF sponsored tetanus vaccination campaign may conceal an agenda of forced contraception for over 2 million Kenyan women.
From Nyeri, in the Central Highlands of Kenya, Cardinal John Njue has said that there was “something fishy about [the vaccines].”
He asked: “What is the rationale of a tetanus vaccine for women only?” and said he would be confronting the Government on the matter, the Daily Nation newspaper reported on Monday.
The initiative was announced last April, and sees free vaccinations given ONLY to women aged between 13 and 49 years old.
The vaccination campaign began in September of last year, is in the second of a planned three phases, and now covers 60 districts in that country. The final round is slated to begin in September of this year. 
The main questions the Church raised for discussion were:
1 - Is there a tetanus crisis on women of child-bearing age in Kenya? If this is so, why has it not been declared?

2- Why does the campaign target women of 14 - 49 years?

3- Why has the campaign left out young girls, boys and men even if they are all prone to tetanus?

4- In the midst of so many life-threatening diseases in Kenya, why has tetanus been prioritized?

"Information in the public domain indicates that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit has been used in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy. Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy".
The Church's concerns are not without legitimate basis in vaccine fact and history, with previous suspicions being raised over tetanus immunization campaigns in the underdeveloped world concealing a forced 'family planning' agenda.

Not only has a birth control vaccine been known to exist for over twenty years using tetanus toxoid as a carrier, but it was heralded in the mid-90's as "A new family planning tool to slow population growth."
The development of a tetanus-based contraceptive vaccine began in 1975 by Dr. Gursaran Talwar, Director of India's National Institute of Immunology, and after $4.5 million of funding and 17 years later a working vaccine was created, whose mechanism of action has been described as follows:

    "The vaccine works by "convincing" a woman's body that a11 is unchanged when, in fact, an egg has been fertilized.  After conception occurs, a woman produces a hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) that helps to prepare the uterus for pregnancy. The prototype vaccine, made from hCG coupled to a biochemical carrier, neutralizes hCG by stimulating antibodies against the hormone. Without hCG the embryo can't anchor in the uterus, making pregnancy impossible. The biochemical carrier makes the hCG immunologically visible to women's immune system." [http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/23163/1/109028.pdf]

Additionally, in 1995, a report published in Vaccine Weekly described the case of a priest, president of Human Life International based in Maryland, who petitioned Congress to investigate reports of women in developing countries, such as Mexico, the Philippines and in Nicaragua, receiving contraceptive tetanus vaccines laced with chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG). The report stated that the anti-fertility vaccine was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and other organizations including "UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities."
While sparse safety research has been published on tetanus toxoid vaccines effectiveness and safety, especially when administered to pregnant women, the tetanus vaccine, when administered through the multi-antigen DTwP, which contains diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antigens together, has been linked to a wide range of adverse health effects.
At the very least, given the established dangers and ongoing controversy associated with vaccinating pregnant women, and the well-know abortive properties associated with vaccines, especially in veterinary vaccines, a red flag of caution should be raised and critical inquiry as to what the real risks and benefits of this campaign in Kenyan women of child-bearing age really are.
[Sources: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/deadly-truth-about-flu-vaccines-and-pregnancy
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/vaccination-abortion ]

AN ENLIGHTENING ARTICLE ON FORCED STERILIZATION HERE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization 

Human population control is the practice of artificially altering the rate of growth of a human population. Historically, human population control has been implemented by limiting the population's birth rate, usually by government mandate, and has been undertaken as a response to factors including high or increasing levels of poverty, environmental concerns, religious reasons, and overpopulation.

The United States was the first country to concertedly undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics.
The 27 states where sterilization laws remained on the books  in 1956 were: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin.
The North Carolina sterilization program especially targeted women, young girls, and blacks.
Regarding Informed Consent and Sterilization Dr. Louis Hellman, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs in the Public Health Service, presented statistics confirming that 150,000 low income people were sterilized in the United States by means of federal grant money.

In 1970, George Bush Sr.'s administration started and ran a program that sterilized Native American women without their knowledge and against their will.
George Herbert Walker Bush, started his public career as a strong supporter of family planning and acted on those beliefs as a congressman. He was the chief Republican author of the Family Planning Act of 1970, considered a keystone of congressional support for population control. Of his role in the legislation, Bush wrote, “We took the lead in Congress in providing money and urging–in fact, even requiring–that in the United States, family planning services be available for every woman.”

The sterilization of minors is another problem which GAO investigators could have looked into, but did not pursue. There are special consent forms for cases where women under 21 are to be sterilized, but IHS did not use such forms. Thirty six women under 21 were sterilized without proper consent between 1973-76 (Akwesasne, 1977: 4).

There is justification of the cries of GENOCIDE when it comes to forced sterilizations.
 From the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide emerged a list of acts that constitute genocide. Article II states:

    In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, such as...imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group... (Whalen, 1989: 169).

It is interesting to point out that these measures were adopted by the United Nations Center for Human Rights in 1948, but were not adopted by the United States until 1988.

From an anthropological perspective, Steve Polgar comments on population policies, international and national:

    ...it helps those who want to reduce foreign aid, since exporting propaganda techniques for 'zero population growth' or consulting on how to 'weaken' the family is much cheaper than providing significant development assistance or establishing fairer prices for imported products (Polgar, 1972: 208).

One of the people who initiated the government investigation into the Indian Health Service's sterilization policy was Dr. Connie Uri, a Choctaw Indian Physician working at the Claremore, Oklahoma Indian Health Service facility.
Dr. Uri noticed in the hospital records that a large number of sterilization surgeries had been performed. This prompted her to conduct her own interviews with the women involved and she found that many had received the operation only a day or two after childbirth.
The hospital records showed that both tubal ligation and hysterectomies were used in sterilization. Dr. Uri commented that "in normal medical practice, hysterectomies are rare in women of child bearing age unless there is cancer or other medical problems".

In one study conducted on the Navajo Reservation and sponsored by the Public Health Service, researchers reported: From 1972 to 1978 we observe a 130% increase in the number of induced abortions performed. During this time the ratio of abortions per 1,000 deliveries has increased from approximately 34 to 77 (an increase of 126%).
The statistics concerning Navajo sterilization were also addressed by a Public Health Service sponsored study, which found that "between 1972 and 1978, the percentage of interval sterilization has more than doubled from 15.1 per cent in 1972 to 30.7 per cent in 1978."

What may be the most disturbing aspect of the investigations followed: it was physicians and healthcare professionals in the IHS who coerced these women. It was they who abandoned their professional responsibility to protect the vulnerable through appropriate, non-eugenic indications for surgery and informed consent prior to the procedures.
[Indian Health Service] officials in the Albuquerque and Aberdeen areas said they do not monitor the consent procedures in contract care, nor are doctors required to follow federal regulations."

The General Accounting Office notified the Indian Health Service that it should implement better consent procedures. Some Indian Health Service Area Directors were pressured by local Indians and by Indian physicians and staff to suspend certain nurses and to move the hospital administrators to another post. Other than that, however, there was little else done by government officials.

Outraged by the level of governmental inaction, Indian people accused the Indian Health Service of making genocide a part of its policy. For the Indian Health Service, this was a serious accusation, as the purpose of this agency was to somehow alleviate the terrible health conditions in Indian communities. The Indian Health Service defended itself by relying on the inaccurate sterilization figures provided by the General Accounting Office.
In reality, however, the accusation of genocide was not far off base. As Thomas Littlewood stated in his book on the politics of population control, "non-white Americans are not unaware of how the American Indian came to be called the vanishing American . . . this country's starkest example of genocide in practice."

From a statistical point of view, the reality of the devastation of Native American women victimized by sterilization can be observed through the comments of Senator Abourezk himself: "given the small American Indian population, the 3,400 Indian sterilization figure [out of 55,000 Indian women of childbearing age] would be compared to sterilizing 452,000 non-Indian women."
These breeches in ethics took place in America.
The record for such immoral activities has already been questioned in light of California’s record with forced sterilization from 1909 through 1979, ALSO subsidized through federal funding. Approximately 20,000 similar operations were performed in that State (mostly on African-Americans and Latinos),

The elite wage war on the world for resources with one hand, while the other hand is holding the scalpel “to fight poverty” after making so many people dependent on State welfare.    While we were being entertained by television in the 1970′s and being LIED to by the media, this is what was really going on. 
And it’s still going on all over the world. 
And they had to turn morality upside down over the last few decades in order to continue this program to its logical conclusion, so that individual human life is more and more degraded and we are more and more able to rationalize and ignore the evil and tyranny that is going on.

    “Before 1969 (following Nixon’s election as president) funding of sterilizations (as well as abortion) had been banned by the federal government. Between 1969 and 1974, HEW increased its family planning budget from $51 million to more than $250 million, Torpy found. HEW records reveal that between 192,000 and 548,000 women were sterilized each year between 1970 and 1977, compared to an average of 63,000 a year between 1907 and 1964, a period which included the zenith of the eugenics movement.

    “Torpy reports that during 1977 Dr. R.T. Ravenholt, director of the United States Agency for International Development (office for population control), said that the United States hoped to sterilize 25 per cent of the world’s roughly 570 million fertile women. Ravenholt linked such control measures to the “…normal operation of U.S. commercial interests around the world.” These statements were published in a news story in the St. Louis Dispatch.” 
India’s Poorest Women Coerced Into Sterilization
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-11/india-s-poorest-women-coerced-into-sterilization.html

<<The main reason Devi had agreed to be sterilized at all was because the $10 she received -- equivalent to about a week’s wages for a poor family -- would help feed her three children.

“I did it out of desperation,” said Devi, 25, as she lay on the concrete floor recuperating at the clinic in the state of Bihar. “We’re so poor, we need the money. Health officials came to our home. They told us it would be best.”

When it comes to family planning, women are on the front lines in India, which has carried out about 37 percent of the world’s female sterilizations. Government-imposed quotas and financial incentives for doctors mean 4.6 million women were sterilized last year, many for cash payments and many in the unsanitary and rudimentary conditions that greeted Devi. Vasectomies, by contrast, accounted for just 4 percent of all sterilizations.

“India has the most coercive birth control methods in the world after China,” Abhijit Das, director of the Center for Health and Social Justice in New Delhi, said in an interview. “Family planning has become a system of quotas and human beings are the targets.” >>


[see also http://cbhd.org/content/forced-sterilization-native-americans-late-twentieth-century-physician-cooperation-national-

http://www.whale.to/b/sterilisation_usa.html 

http://canadianliberty.com/?p=3876

http://books.google.com/books?id=wYrCfs-O2ccC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=secret+sterilization+American+Indians&source=bl&ots=hOXKj4TZe1&sig=AsjIs71tok1eODAVspZKfFDXPDg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uaQ1U53ZD4WQyQGX7IGACw&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCjgK#v=onepage&q=secret%20sterilization%20American%20Indians&f=false ]

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

2 SECURITY BREACHES AT 1 WORLD TRADE CENTER. 3 TOWER JUMPERS AND TEEN BOY.

VIDEO ALSO HERE:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/four-people-world-trade-center-jumping-video-arrested-162443900.html
The incriminating video, which was filmed last September, had been kept a secret until James Brady and Andrew Rossig turned themselves in on Monday. According to the New York Times, Brady and Rossig felt that their stunt made clear the need for more vigilance and security at the city's tallest tower.

"We just kind of walked in," said parachutist Rossig, 33. "It's supposed to be the most secure building in the world. God forbid it was somebody else getting in there with a real intention to harm New Yorkers," he added.
The base-jumping crew climbed to the top of 1 World Trade Center at 3 a.m. on September 30th of last year. The entire experience was filmed from the jump to a shockingly good landing in the quiet city streets.
In the video, it looks like the jumpers are in the clear when they make theie landing, but they were not. A Goldman Sachs building security guard actually saw them folding up their chutes and called the police.

Four people, including the three jumpers and an accomplice, will be charged with both trespassing and burglary. 

The ease of access to the tower was demonstrated once again last week when Justin Casquejo, a 16-year-old boy, walked past sleeping security at the 1 World Trade Center and marched his way to the top. 

Just before dawn this past Sunday, a skinny New Jersey teen with a daredevil’s love of heights allegedly wiggled through a one-by-one-foot hole in the fence surrounding One World Trade Center. He made his way past two security guards and went all the way up to the symbolic spire of America’s tallest building, built to be an icon of freedom.
For two hours, the 16-year-old, identified as Justin Casquejo from Weehawken, took in the panoramic view and snapped photos of the glistening night-lit landscape, authorities said, as first reported by the New York Post. When he made his way back down, a construction worker stopped him and called Port Authority police, who took him into custody and charged him with misdemeanor trespassing. His cellphone and camera were confiscated.
Justin is no longer in custody, however.
According to the criminal complaint, the teen had canvassed ground zero and planned his exploit carefully.
“I walked around the construction site and figured out how to access the Freedom Tower rooftop,” he told police afterward. “I found a way up through the scaffolding, climbed onto the sixth floor, and took the elevator up to the 88th floor. I then took the staircase up to 104th (floor). I went to the rooftop and climbed the ladder all the way to the antenna.”
After he apparently found the small opening in the perimeter fence, an unsuspecting elevator operator brought Justin – who was without ID and may have donned construction apparel – to the 88th floor. Here, the teen walked passed a sleeping security guard before making his way to the spire.
The elevator operator has since been reassigned, and the sleeping guard was fired.

ANY WONDER SO MANY STILL QUESTION HOW FAR IN ADVANCE OF THE 9/11 ATTACKS THE TWIN TOWERS' SECURITY MAY HAVE BEEN BREACHED?
DID, AS SOME FIREFIGHTERS, POLICEMEN, AND SURVIVORS HAVE SAID, SOMEONE PLANT EXPLOSIVE DEVICES INSIDE THE TOWERS BEFORE 9/11? 

IT IS A SURE THING THAT SOMEONE COULD DO SO TODAY!

WE MAY NEVER KNOW HOW MANY TIMES SUCH SECURITY BREACHES HAVE OCCURRED...AFTER ALL, THIS IS EMBARRASSING FOR ALL INVOLVED IN THE SECURITY OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER.

IT HAPPENED BEFORE...
NEWS OF SUCH LAX SURFACED PRIOR TO AND AFTER 9/11.

FEW ARE AWARE THAT ONE OF THE BUSH BOYS, MARVIN, WAS A PRINCIPAL OF THE COMPANY IN CHARGE OF SECURITY AT THE TWIN TOWERS. THE COMPANY HE HELD INTEREST IN, STRATESEC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SERCUACOM) , WAS THE VERY COMPANY THAT CALLED OFF HEIGHTENED SECURITY 5 DAYS BEFORE THE "ATTACKS".
NOR DO BUT A FEW KNOW THAT STRATESEC WAS ALSO BACKED BY A KUWAITI COMPANY CALLED KuwAm.
MARVIN BUSH ALSO SERVED ON THAT COMPANY'S BOARD.
IT WENT BELLY-UP IN 2002...
<<Stratesec, was delisted from the American Stock Exchange in July 2002 due to inability to make financing payments to ES Bankest, its primary shareholder, and other financial problems.
Securacom listed among its clients Washington Dulles International Airport, Hewlett-Packard, EDS, United Airlines, Gillette, MCI, the World Trade Center, and other facilities including hospitals, prisons, corporations, utilities, and universities>>

BUT BEFORE THAT...
<<After the 1993 bombing, a company called Stratesec was responsible for the overall integration of the new WTC security system.  In the few years leading up to 9/11, Stratesec also had contracts to provide security services for United Airlines, which owned two of the planes that were destroyed on 9/11, and Dulles Airport where American Airlines Flight 77 took off.>>

OH, BTW, THE POWER WAS DOWN IN TOWER 2 THE WEEKEND BEFORE THE "ATTACKS". NO SECURITY CAMERAS, NO ALARMS, NO ELECTRONIC SECURITY LOCKS, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING AND GOING WHO WERE "WORKING ON THE PROBLEM".
WHO WAS CHECKING CREDENTIALS?
WHO WAS EXAMINING TOOL BAGS, ETC?
NO ONE CAN REMEMBER THAT.

NO ONE REMEMBERS AND ALL SECURITY TAPES/RECORDS OF THAT WEEKEND WERE LOST.<<Surveillance tapes and maintenance logs are among the missing evidence as investigators try to figure out why the World Trade Center collapsed, federal officials said Monday. ... The lost records probably contain vital information that could help answer questions, Sunder said. Investigators are trying to locate copies of many destroyed documents from the building's owners and city agencies. [FortWayne.com] >>

FIREFIGHTERS AND OTHERS TRYING TO RESCUE VICTIMS AS WELL AS SURVIVORS DO REMEMBER MANY LOCKED DOORS, LOCKED DOORS THAT LED TO STAIRWELLS THAT COULD HAVE SAVED ALMOST EVERYONE, AND THE ROOF DOORS WERE LOCKED, WHICH IS WHY NO ONE WAS RESCUED FROM EITHER ROOF.
<<Authorization and the means to unlock those heavy steel doors came from a security center located on the 22nd floor. But the security center wasn’t able to help. Falling debris knocked it out almost as soon as the first airliner hit the tower. . . .>>
NO FAILSAFE ON THAT?
JUST THE ONE MEANS OF UNLOCKING ALL THE DOORS?
I CAN UNDERSTAND THE ROOF BEING LOCKED, BUT THE STAIRWELL DOORS?
WHY, WHY WOULD STAIRWELL DOORS EVER BE LOCKED IN A HIGH-RISE BUILDING?

NO ONE UNDERSTANDS TO THIS DAY WHY SECURITY TOLD PEOPLE AFTER THE FIRST 'PLANE' HIT TO STAY PUT, WHY THERE WERE ANNOUNCEMENTS TELLING THOSE WHO HAD BEGUN TO FLEE FOR THEIR LIVES TO "GO BACK TO WORK".
"Michael Cartier, 24, of Jackson Heights, said his sister Michelle, who worked in Tower One, told him that after the first plane struck, "'People began to evacuate, but an announcement over the intercom said everything was all right, no need to evacuate.'

""If this is true," Michael Cartier said, "they told people to go back to their desks. There should be an investigation."

"Officials of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which runs the Trade Center, declined to discuss the evacuation. "I have no comment on anything relating to that incident," said Ernesto Butcher, the chief operating officer.

"...Dan Baumbach, a software engineer who lives in Merrick, had an 80th-floor office at One World Trade Center, where he saw the flying debris and knew it was time to move.

"But heading down the stairs, he and four other co-workers suddenlycame upon 100 others, who were told by a building official, "We'llget you out; be calm, just stay here."

""There was no way we were going to stay there," said Baumbach, 24, who was then warned: "You can try it, but it's at your own risk."

"Many stayed. Baumbach did not.

'If they had continued on and exited the building, all of their lives would have been spared. As it was, that's not the way it happened. "As soon as we reached the concourse level, the security guard stopped us and said, 'Where are you going?' Stanley explained about seeing the fire in Tower One. According to Stanley, the guard said, "Oh, that was just an accident. Two World Trade is secured. Go back to your office."' [Mercola]

WHO WERE THOSE PEOPLE TELLING EVERYONE TO STAY PUT, TO GO BACK TO THEIR DESKS? SECURITY?
WHAT WERE THEY TRYING TO "SECURE"? THE DEATHS OF THOUSANDS?

September 12, 2001NEW YORK NEWSDAY
The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, as an article in New York Newsday reported about  the removal of bomb-sniffing dogs just five days before the attack. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.
WHILE THE SECURITY COMPANY HUNTLEIGH WAS SUED OVER LAX SECURITY AT LOGAN AIRPORT ON 9/11,
HUNTLEIGH SHARED THOSE DUTIES WITH OTHERS...WITH WHOM?
I'M STILL TRYING TO FIND THAT OUT.

WELL, DIDN'T
STRATESEC/SECRACOM LIST UNITED AIRLINES AND DULLES INTERNATIONAL AS CLIENTS?
5 HIJACKERS FLEW OUT OF DULLES, AND HIJACKERS FLEW ON UNITED...
United Airlines Flights 175 and 93 and American Airlines Flights 77 and 11 were hijacked. WHY WASN'T STRATESEC SUED AS WELL?

SECURITY AT WTC?
WASN'T SO MUCH PRIOR TO 9/11, DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE MUCH NOW.
LAX...SHODDY...
WHY?











http://www.mjbarkl.com/locked.htm

MISSING MALAYSIAN FLIGHT 370 COULD HAVE LANDED

Wall Street Journal reporter Andy Pasztor made news today with his story that missing Malaysian Airlines flight 370 could have flown for four more hours after its last confirmed contact, based on information routinely relayed from its Rolls Royce engines.
Investigators Believe Plane Flew On for Total of Up to Five Hours

Malaysian officials denied that today. But Pasztor also claims that American investigators are debating whether “something weird and bizarre” and still unexplained happened in the cockpit, and that the Boeing 777 did not crash when it dropped off the radar, but may have landed.

Throughout the roughly four hours after the jet dropped from civilian radar screens, these people said, the link operated in a kind of standby mode and sought to establish contact with a satellite or satellites. These transmissions did not include data, they said, but the periodic contacts indicate to investigators that the plane was still intact and believed to be flying.

The disclosure that the plane kept transmitting has raised a host of new questions and possibilities about what happened aboard the widebody jet carrying 239 people, which vanished from civilian air-traffic control radar over the weekend, about one hour into a flight to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur.

U.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe.
The investigation remains fluid, and it isn't clear whether investigators have evidence indicating possible terrorism or sabotage.

As of Wednesday it remained unclear whether the plane reached an alternate destination or if it ultimately crashed, potentially hundreds of miles from where an international search effort has been focused.
On Thursday, Malaysian aviation officials said the flight could have flown for several hours after its last contact, but they said they had received no data indicating this.
A total flight time of five hours after departing Kuala Lumpur means the Boeing 777 could have continued for an additional distance of about 2,200 nautical miles, reaching points as far as the Indian Ocean, the border of Pakistan or even the Arabian Sea, based on the jet's cruising speed.

Corrections & Amplifications
U.S. investigators suspect Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 flew for hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, based on an analysis of signals sent through the plane's satellite-communication link designed to automatically transmit the status of onboard systems, according to people familiar with the matter. An earlier version of this article and an accompanying graphic incorrectly said investigators based their suspicions on signals from monitoring systems embedded in the plane's Rolls-Royce PLC engines and described that process.

MANY HAVE SET FORTH THE THEORY THAT THIS PLANE WAS HIJACKED, THAT IT LANDED SOMEWHERE, OR THAT, IN THE PROCESS OF THE HIJACKING, IT WENT DOWN SOMEWHERE INLAND, NEAR WHATEVER SITE IT WAS HEADED FOR.
WHAT ABOUT THE ACARS BEING INTENTIONALLY DISABLED AFTER ONE OF THE PILOTS SAID GOODNIGHT?
<<Authorities have said someone on board the plane first disabled one of its communications systems - the Aircraft and Communications Addressing and Reporting System, or ACARS - about 40 minutes after takeoff. Around 14 minutes later, the transponder that identifies the plane to commercial radar systems was also shut down. The fact that both systems went dark separately offered strong evidence that the plane's disappearance was deliberate.>>
<<Even though the ACARS system was disabled on Flight 370, it continued to emit faint hourly pulses that were recorded by a satellite. The last "ping" was sent out at 8:11 a.m. - 7 hours and 31 minutes after the plane took off. That placed the jet somewhere in a huge arc as far north as Kazakhstan in Central Asia or far into the southern Indian Ocean.>>

THAT MALAYSIAN OFFICIALS OR ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO DECLARE ALL THOSE ABOARD DEAD WITHOUT ONE REAL SHRED OF PROOF SEEMS WRONG TO ME.
<<While many people believe the plane has crashed, there is a small possibility it may have landed somewhere and be relatively intact. Affendi, the air force general, and Hishammuddin, the defense minister, said it was possible for the plane to "ping" when it was on the ground if its electrical systems were undamaged.>>

WHAT IF THEY LOOKED INLAND, AROUND THE PAKISTANIS BORDER, AROUND THE ARABIAN SEA? WHY ARE THEY SO FIXATED ON THE INDIAN OCEAN?

BOTH PILOTS ARE BEING SCRUTINIZED AND MANY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN RAISED ABOUT THEIR MENTAL STATUS LEADING UP TO THAT FATEFUL FLIGHT.
The pilot of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 made a mystery call just minutes before takeoff in Kuala Lumpur. This information comes on the heels of a revelation that files had been deleted on Feb. 3 from Shah’s home flight simulator, just over a month before MH370 vanished.

Investigators are trying to answer these questions: If the two pilots were involved in the disappearance, were they working together or alone, or with one or more of the passengers or crew? Did they fly the plane under duress or of their own will? Did one or more of the passengers manage to break into the cockpit or use the threat of violence to gain entry and then seize the plane? And what possible motive could there be for diverting the jet?

Fariq has drawn great scrutiny after the revelation that he and another pilot invited two women boarding their aircraft to sit in the cockpit for a flight from Phuket, Thailand, to Kuala Lumpur in 2011.

Whoever disabled the plane's communication systems and then flew the jet must have had a high degree of technical knowledge and flying experience, putting one or both of the pilots high on the list of possible suspects, Malaysian officials and aviation experts said.
Zaharie, the captain, was a supporter of a Malaysian opposition political party that is locked in a bitter dispute with the government, according to postings on his Facebook page and a friend, Peter Chong, who is a party member.

REPORTS TODAY OF YET ANOTHER "POSSIBLE" DEBRIS FIELD SHOULD NOT STOP SOMEONE, ANYONE, FROM LOOKING INLAND.
<<NEW satellite images have found about 122 objects floating in the southern Indian Ocean, raising hopes that the search for MH370 may be narrowing in on the plane’s resting place.
The objects, measuring from one metre to 23 metres long, were picked up on a French satellite four days ago and sent to the Australian search coordinators yesterday.
Even if the search does find verifiable wreckage from MH370 on the surface, geologist Robin Beaman said underwater volcanoes would probably hamper efforts to recover the black box flight recorder from the depths.>>
SEE, WHEN THEY SAW THEM 4 DAYS AGO, WHY WAIT THIS LONG TO SEND THEM TO THE SEARCH TEAM?
TIME IS ALMOST UP FOR ANY HOPE OF RECOVERY OF THE AIRLINER'S BLACK BOX.
"We investigated a couple of visual contacts that actually just turned out to be marine mammal activity. So unfortunately didn't find anything further to report today," said Flying Officer Peter Moore.

Malaysia announced Monday that a mathematical analysis of the final known satellite signals from the plane showed that it had crashed in the sea, killing everyone on board.
Malaysia has been criticized over its handling of the search, though it is one of the most perplexing mysteries in aviation history. Much of the most strident criticism has come from relatives of the 153 Chinese missing, some of whom expressed outrage that Malaysia essentially declared their loved ones dead without recovering a single piece of wreckage.
IT'S TOO SOON TO JUST DECLARE EVERYONE DEAD AND END THE SEARCH.
IF IT WERE OUR LOVED ONES ON THAT FLIGHT, WOULD WE GIVE UP UNTIL AT LEAST SOME BODIES WERE FOUND?
I WOULDN'T.
MALAYSIA KEEPS SENDING MIXED MESSAGES WHICH IS MADDENING!
But one of the main complaints from families - mixed messages from Malaysia - continued Wednesday. Two days after Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said there were no survivors, Hishammuddin allowed for the possibility that some people aboard the plane might still be alive.
"If (the debris) is confirmed to be from MH370, then we can move on to deep sea surveillance search and rescue, hopefully, hoping against hope," he said.
BUT THEN, MALAYSIAN POLICE ARE NOT RULING OUT A "SUICIDE MISSION" BY ONE OR BOTH PILOTS!
Malaysian police say they remain focused on several key possibilities: hijacking, sabotage, and psychological issues or personal problems of the passengers and/or crew.
“This has been a deliberate act by someone on board who had to have had the detailed knowledge to do what was done ... Nothing is emerging that points to motive,” they said.
An analysis of the flight’s routing, signalling and communications reportedly shows that it was flown “in a rational way”.

THERE IS CERTAINLY NOT MUCH "RATIONAL" ABOUT MALAYSIA'S SAYING ONE THING ON ONE DAY AND SOMETHING ELSE ON ANOTHER DAY.
I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT ALL THE FAMILIES OF THE MISSING CREW AND PASSENGERS ARE GOING THROUGH.
SOMEHOW AUTHORITIES MUST FIND A WAY TO END ALL THE SPECULATION AND GIVE US PROOF, CONCRETE PROOF OF WHAT HAPPENED.
HOW ELSE CAN ANY RELATIVE OF THESE 239 SOULS EVER REST?
THERE MUST BE INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE TO END THIS!