Friday, January 31, 2014

FUKUSHIMA POISONING THE PLANET, TOP PHYSICIANS, SCIENTISTS

MORE AND MORE PHYSICIANS AND SCIENTISTS ARE SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE HORRORS OF WHAT WILL BEFALL OUR PLANET THANKS TO THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER...THE ONGOING, NEVER-ENDING DISASTER....THE HIDDEN REASON FOR SO MANY DEATHS SINCE 2011.

"…the American Joint Committee on Cancer is working to revise the staging criteria for all cancers, including thyroid cancer, which is the fastest-increasing malignancy among both men and women in the U.S."
from News-Medical.net dateline June 17, 2015


THYROID CANCER IN AMERICA HAS INCREASED SO DRAMATICALLY THAT SOME ARE CALLING IT AN EPIDEMIC.

YET THE EPA, ET AL, TOLD US WE DIDN'T NEED TO TAKE ANY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT THAT AFTER THE JAPANESE NUCLEAR DISASTER!
THEY WARNED CITIZENS ON "NEEDLESSLY USING POTASSIUM IODIDE TABLETS" BECAUSE OF FEAR OF RADIATION HARM.



Scientists: Test West Coast for Fukushima radiation
 USA TODAY 12:53 p.m. EDT March 9, 2014

"Buesseler and other scientists are calling for more monitoring. 
No federal agency currently samples Pacific Coast seawater for radiation, 
he said.
"I'm not trying to be alarmist," Buesseler said. "
We can make predictions, we can do models. 
But unless you have results, how will we know it's safe?"
Cesium 134 serves as a fingerprint for Fukushima, Buesseler said.

Government Reacts to Fukushima Radiation Crisis By Raising Acceptable Radiation Standards  … Instead of Fixing Anything


"2 weeks after the Fukushima accident, we reported that the government responded to the nuclear accident by trying to raise acceptable radiation levels and pretending that radiation is good for us.
And there are so many new leaks that even the mainstream press is starting to admit that Fukushima was never fixed.

Radiation from Fukushima is slamming Tokyo, as well as the West Coast of North America.

Fukushima radiation is showing up in fish on the West Coast of the United States.  Scientists are starting to sound the alarm as to additional human deaths and health problems on the U.S. West Coast due to Fukushima radiation, and an epidemic of injuries to sealife.

An investigation by Associated Press found that 75 percent of all U.S. nuclear sites have leaked radioactive tritium.

In fact, whistleblowers at the Nuclear Regulator Commission say that the risk of a major meltdown at U.S. nuclear reactors is much higher than it was at Fukushima.

So what has the American government done to protect us?
It has pressured the Japanese government to re-start its nuclear program, and is allowing Fukushima seafood to be sold in the U.S.

And U.S. nuclear regulators actually weakened safety standards for U.S. nuclear reactors after the Fukushima disaster.  

As we noted 6 months after Fukushima melted down:
American and Canadian authorities have virtually stopped monitoring airborne radiation, and are not testing fish for radiation. (Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by raising “acceptable” radiation levels.) 
 The failure of the American, Canadian and other governments to test for and share results is making it difficult to hold an open scientific debate about what is happening. 

According to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) [a government whistleblower support group], that means agencies responding to radiation emergencies may permit many more civilian fatalities.

“In soil, the PAGs allow long-term public exposure to radiation in amounts as high as 2,000 millirems,” PEER advocacy director Kirsten Stade said in a press release.

This would, in effect, increase a longstanding 1 in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period.”

Former MSNBC host Cenk Uygur has admitted that while he was at MSNBC he was instructed not to warn the public about the radiation coming from Fukushima

“I was on MSNBC at the time when this happened, I said, “Don’t trust what the Japanese government is saying, they’ll say trust what the electric power company is saying. 
Go, go, go, get outta there. Get as far away from that plant as you can. It’s literally a core meltdown.” 
 And they always don’t want people to panic, so they were always like, “Oh it’s going to be okay.” [...] 
I’m like, “You’re crazy man, don’t be anywhere near that reactor.” 

And I remember at the time, of course not at The Young Turks, but on cable news, people were like, “Hey Cenk, you know, I don’t know that you want to say that, because the official government position is that it’s safe.” 

Oh, is that the official government position? 
Now go explain that to the people who served on the USS Ronald Reagan.”

It was discovered back in 1978, that even the smallest amount of radiation will cause cancer and genetic damage, and this is according to many researchers and scientists studying this and reporting on this, around the world. 

(But the nuclear industry keeps lying and deceiving the public about this, saying the opposite.)  

Dr. Johanes Ude (professor of Catholic moral theology and friend of Albert Schweitzer) said that the use of nuclear energy is a CRIME against humanity. Building and defending the lie that nuclear power is harmless is a CRIME against humanity.


Dr. Charnosenko (in charge of cleanup of Chernobyl) says that in the future, the negative consequences of atomic energy will be disastrous.


He says that nuclear power is the MOST DANGEROUS technology that humankind has discovered up to now. 

Nuclear experts and the corporate owned mass media say that these accidents have no consequences, and this is a lie. 


#3 reactor and spent fuel pool at Fukushima contained over a TON of plutonium. (This means it was a breeder reactor) 

Plutonium is a very dangerous substance that can turn into nano particles very easily in case of a nuclear accident. 
After an accident, plutonium nano dust rises into the air, gets carried by the wind and then goes around the world, where we inhale it or eat it with food or drink it with water.



"Experts" say that Chernobyl was not REALLY dangerous. 
Actually, it was a special reactor, designed to make pure weapons bomb grade plutonium. 
This was and still is a huge secret that was covered up by the Soviets. 
Fuel rods were only in the reactor for a short time, compared to a normal nuclear reactor. There was hardly any radioactivity in the reactor, when it exploded. 

The graphite, plutonium, uranium, cesium and other radioactive nano particles went way up in the air and went around the world. 

This accident, with just one reactor, and with no spent fuel pool, plus hardly any radiation in the fuel, killed over one million people (just in Russia), which has been documented by scientific studies. 



For other reactors, such as the GE nuclear reactors, this is and will not be the same case of low radiation amounts. 

In case of a future nuclear accident, millions of people will die, because more radiation will be released, much more than Chernobyl.
 (Fukushima is one example of how millions will die.)

It does not matter if the civilian nuclear industry or the military creates a radioactive particle. 
Radiation is radiation and it is extremely dangerous.

“…there is no safe level of exposure to ionising radiation, and the search for quantifying such a safe level is in vain.”Rosalie Bertell, PhD.

IAEA Admits: There Is No Such Thing As ‘Safe’ Levels Of Radiation 

June 2 — PUTRAJAYA: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) today admitted there is no such thing as “safe” levels of radiation. However , it told the Consumer Association of Penang that some radiation levels could be justified.
Mohideen also said that the IAEA’s radiation standards were merely an “international consensus” as studies had not found a safe level of radiation.
He also cited a study from the National Academy of Science which said that one out of five workers would suffer from cancer if exposed to what the IAEA deemed an allowable radiation level.

JUSTIFIED? HOW CAN CANCER-CAUSING AGENTS KNOWINGLY RELEASED UPON MANKIND BE JUSTIFIED?
NO, NO IT IS NOT JUSTIFIED!
IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!
IT IS MORALLY AND ETHICALLY WRONG!


"There is no safe dose of radiation"
~ Prof. Edward P. Radford, Physician and Epidemiologist


Dr. John Gofman, Professor Emeritus at the University of California, Berkley:
"Licensing a nuclear power plant is in my view, licensing random premeditated murder. 
First of all, when you license a plant, you know what you're doing--so it's premeditated. 
You can't say, "I didn't know." 

Second, the evidence on radiation-producing cancer is beyond doubt. 
I've worked fifteen years on it [as of 1982], and so have many others. 

It is not a question any more: radiation produces cancer, and the evidence is good all the way down to the lowest doses. "

Here is another equally revealing quote from an article well worth reading by Professor Chris Busby entitled "Deconstructing Nuclear Experts":
"The nuclear industry is waging a war against humanity." 

This war has now entered an endgame which will decide the survival of the human race. 
Not from sudden nuclear war.
 But from the on-going and incremental nuclear war which began with the releases to the biosphere in the 60s of all the atmospheric test fallout, and which has continued inexorably since then through Windscale, Kyshtym, 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl, Hanford, Sellafield, La Hague, Iraq and now Fukushima, accompanied by parallel increases in cancer rates and fertility loss to the human race."

The widespread ignorance over the true dangers associated with "internal radiation exposures" make it possible for CNN's Sanja Gupta and similar "experts" to (mis)inform the public with all earnestness that radiation associated with the Fukushima meltdown and atmospheric release are of no concern, and is why those who wish to exercise the precautionary principle are often labeled "fear mongers" or "radiophobes."

In 2003 the ECRR released a new radiation exposure model, which will forever transform the way we view the nuclear industry and its affect on human health:

In that report the ECRR showed that the older models of radiation risk used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), were clearly wrong and profoundly minimized the adverse health consequences associated with nuclear reactor meltdowns or the use of depleted uranium for military armour and munitions.  

When the ECRR compared its results to that of the ICRP for total number of deaths resulting from the nuclear project since 1945 the ICRP results in 1,173,600 deaths from cancer. 

The ECRR model predicts 61,600,000 deaths from cancer, 1,600,000 infant deaths and 1,900,000 fetal deaths. 

In addition the ECRR predicted a 10% loss of life quality integrated over all diseases and conditions in those who were exposed over the period of global weapons fallout.

MULTIPLE RADIATION LINKS, ACTUAL READINGS, HERE:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/page/greenmedinfocom-why-there-no-safe-level-radiation-fukushima

The inferior physician treats the disease once it occurs.
The mediocre physician prevents the disease from coming back.
The superior physician prevents the disease from ever occurring.
~ Chinese Proverb 

WHO WILL PREVENT MORE DEATHS FROM FUKUSHIMA?
OBVIOUSLY NOT THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT...NOR OUR OWN!

Even low-level radioactivity is damaging, says meta-analysis of published studies
Even the very lowest levels of radiation are harmful to life, scientists have concluded in the Cambridge Philosophical Society’s journalBiological Reviews.
“It also provides evidence that there is no threshold below which there are no effects of radiation." 

11 Facts About The Ongoing Fukushima Nuclear Holocaust


Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War: The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation


In the words of renowned novelist Haruki Murakami:
“This time no one dropped a bomb on us … We set the stage, we committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives.”
“Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various food chains (for example, into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow’s meat and milk, then humans). Entering the body, these elements – called internal emitters – migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer”. ( Fukushima: Nuclear Apologists Play Shoot the Messenger on Radiation, The Age,  April 26, 2011

Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…
• 73 percent of the mackerel
• 91 percent of the halibut
• 92 percent of the sardines
• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

An EU-funded study concluded that Fukushima released up to 210 quadrillion becquerels of cesium-137 into the atmosphere.
AND THAT WAS THE EARLIER NUMBERS...ADD TO THAT EVERY DAY THAT PLANT EXISTS!

WAY BACK IN 2013, TEPCO ITSELF FOUND AND REPORTED...

"Record outdoor radiation level that ‘can kill in 20 minutes’ detected in December, 2013 at Fukushima.
TEPCO measured radiation at eight locations around the pipe with the highest estimated at two locations - 25 Sieverts per hour and about 15 Sieverts per hour, the company said. "

NASA SCIENTISTS DETECTED AND REPORTED IN 2012 THAT "ANOMALOUSLY HIGH LEVELS" OF POLONIUM-210, Pb-210, AND RADIOACTIVE IODINE  WERE DETECTED IN SOUTHERN STATES, AT THE NASA STENNIS CENTER, IN THE PEARL RIVER, IN RAINFALL, JUST 11 DAYS AFTER THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.

THEY WARNED THEN THAT WE WOULD BE AT HIGH RISK FOR FUTURE HEALTH PROBLEMS, AND ADDRESSED THE THYROID CANCER AND LEUKEMIA RISKS.
WHAT MAJOR NEWS MEDIA HEADLINED THAT?
NONE!
READ THAT STUDY <HERE>.

AFTER THE WINDSCALE FIRE AT THE PLUTONIUM FACTORY IN ENGLAND IN 1957, BRITISH SCIENTISTS SOUNDED A HIGH ALARM ABOUT HOW DANGEROUS POLONIUM-210 WAS.

210-Po WAS WHAT CAUSED THE DEATH OF THAT RUSSIAN SPY AND WAS BLAMED FOR THE DEATH OF YASSER ARAFAT, REMEMBER?
OUR MEDIA DOWNPLAYS ALL OTHER RADIONUCLIDES EXCEPT THAT CESIUM-137.

NO PUBLIC DATA ON CESIUM-134 WHICH CAN ONLY BE FROM THE DAIICHI MELTDOWN, , OR ANY OTHER RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANT RELEASED INCESSANTLY OVER THE PAST 4 YEARS FROM THE DAIICHI FACILITY.

OUR MEDIA KEEP FOCUSING ON WASTEWATER RELEASES INTO THE PACIFIC AND HOW HARMLESS THAT IS, BUT DAIICHI IS LEAKING INTO THE ATMOSPHERE, THE GROUNDWATER, THE SOIL, CONSTANTLY, ALL THE TIME.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/WHOI-Cesium.jpg

AND NOT ONE ATOM OF ANY OF THAT RADIATION IS HARMLESS!

EVEN THE EPA IS HAVING TO ADMIT THAT BECAUSE THERE IS TOO MUCH HISTORICAL DATA FROM THE MANHATTAN PROJECT, FROM THE OLD ATOMIC ENERGY GROUP, FROM OTHER GOVERNMENT STUDIES NOW DECLASSIFIED TO PROVE WE'VE ALWAYS KNOWN THAT ONE PARTICLE OF RADIATION ENTERING THE HUMAN BODY CAUSES A CASCADE, AND THE LONGER IT STAYS IN A HUMAN BODY, THE WORSE THE OUTCOME.

IN SPITE OF THE CALL FOR BETTER MORE INTENSE AND CONSTANT MONITORING FROM TOP SCIENTISTS AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, DESPITE RESIDENTS OF CALIFORNIA COASTAL TOWNS AND INDIGENOUS TRIBES FROM CANADA AND ALASKA BRINGING PETITIONS TO THE EPA AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO TEST THEIR AIR, SOIL AND WATER, THE EPA INSTEAD SHUT DOWN A THIRD OF ALL MONITORING SITES THE DAY AFTER THE EXPLOSIONS IN JAPAN!
IT WILL NOT FUND NEW STUDIES!
WHY NOT?

THOUGH IT PROMISED TO CONTINUE MONITORING IT HAS NOT UPDATED SINCE JUNE, 2011 ON ITS "RADNET" SITE!
"This site contains information and data from March 11, 2011 to June 30, 2011. EPA has returned to routine RadNet operations.
This site will continue to be available for historical and informative purposes."

THEY GAVE EXCUSES WHY THEY HAVE STOPPED MONITORING IN <THIS DOCUMENT HERE>

PLEASE DON'T FALL FOR THE DOWNPLAYING OF THIS GLOBAL DISASTER...IT IS NOT GOING AWAY AND IGNORING IT WILL NOT HELP ANY OF US.

PASS THIS ON:
THERE IS NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION, NONE.
THERE IS NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION, NONE. 

                                  THERE IS NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION, NONE.

ABOUT THAT "NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVEL OF CESIUM"...
THERE IS NO SUCH THING!

"
Caesium-137 is unique in that it is totally anthropogenic
Unlike most other radioisotopes, caesium-137 is not produced from its non-radioactive isotope, but from uranium. 

It did not occur in nature before nuclear weapons testing began

By observing the characteristic gamma rays emitted by this isotope, it is possible to determine whether the contents of a given sealed container were made before or after the advent of atomic bomb explosions. 

This procedure has been used by researchers to check the authenticity of certain rare wines, most notably the purported “Jefferson bottles”."
2,053 nuclear tests occurred between 1945 and 1998...


THERE'S YOUR DAMNED "NATURAL BACKGROUND RADIATION "SOURCE!

THEN WE HAD CHERNOBYL AND NOW FUKUSHIMA, AND EVERY DILAPIDATED LEAKING NUCLEAR FACILITY ACROSS THE GLOBE.

AND IT JUST KEEPS COMING AT US DAY AFTER DAY.



Above-ground nuclear tests – which caused numerous cancers to the “downwinders” – were covered up by the American, French and other governments for decades. See thisthisthisthisthis and this.
But the amount of radiation pumped out by Fukushima dwarfs the amount released by the nuclear tests.

CALL YOUR LYING CONGRESSMEN AND MAKE THEM DO SOMETHING, OR AT LEAST MAKE THEM TELL THE TRUTH FOR ONCE IN THEIR POLITICAL LIVES!


WE HAVE A RIGHT TO FACTS, AND TRUTH.


THIS IS THE ONLY WORLD WE HAVE....IT NEEDS OUR HELP.


 

THE PERFECT POISON...WHEAT, CARDIOLOGIST SAYS

AND HE ISN'T THE ONLY ONE SAYING SO...
CBS, YES, CBS, REPORTED ON THE FINDINGS IN JUNE OF LAST YEAR, BUT IT CAUSED FEW RIPPLES AS PERHAPS NO ONE WANTS TO BELIEVE WE ARE BEING POISONED BY THE "STAFF OF LIFE", OUR MAIN GRAIN....WHEAT.
SEVERAL STUDIES HAVE POINTED TO THE TOXICITY AND BRAIN DAMAGING EFFECTS OF TODAY'S WHEAT.
ALTHOUGH THE FACTS ARE OUT THERE, MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS TOO BUSY REPORTING ON JUSTIN BEEEEBURR TO PICK THIS VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE UP AND RUN WITH IT.
WHAT WE GET FROM AMERICA'S WHEAT FIELDS ISN'T WHAT WAS GROWN HERE IN THE PAST. LIKE SO MANY "ENHANCED" FOODS, WHEAT IS ONE OF THE "FRANKENFOODS" WE ALL NEED TO READ AND LEARN MORE ABOUT.

(CBS News) Modern wheat is a "perfect, chronic poison," according to Dr. William Davis, a cardiologist who has published a book all about the world's most popular grain.
Davis said that the wheat we eat these days isn't the wheat your grandma had: "It's an 18-inch tall plant created by genetic research in the '60s and '70s," he said on "CBS This Morning." "This thing has many new features nobody told you about, such as there's a new protein in this thing called gliadin. It's not gluten. I'm not addressing people with gluten sensitivities and celiac disease. I'm talking about everybody else because everybody else is susceptible to the gliadin protein that is an opiate. This thing binds into the opiate receptors in your brain and in most people stimulates appetite, such that we consume 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year."
Asked if the farming industry could change back to the grain it formerly produced, Davis said it could, but it would not be economically feasible because it yields less per acre.
SO, YOU SEE, PROFIT MEANS MORE THAN THE HEALTH OF AMERICANS, AS USUAL.
THINK ABOUT  THAT FOR A FEW MINUTES!
SURE, IT MAY YIELD LESS, BUT IF WHAT YIELDS HIGHER IS A POISON TO HUMAN BODIES, WHO WANTS A HIGHER YIELD?
THINK ABOUT THAT....

However, Davis said a movement has begun with people turning away from wheat - and dropping substantial weight.
"If three people lost eight pounds, big deal," he said. "But we're seeing hundreds of thousands of people losing 30, 80, 150 pounds.
Diabetics become no longer diabetic; people with arthritis having dramatic relief.
People losing leg swelling, acid reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, depression, and on and on every day."

To avoid these wheat-oriented products, Davis suggests eating "real food," such as avocados, olives, olive oil, meats, and vegetables. "(It's) the stuff that is least likely to have been changed by agribusiness," he said. "Certainly not grains. When I say grains, of course, over 90 percent of all grains we eat will be wheat, it's not barley... or flax. It's going to be wheat.
"It's really a wheat issue."

Some health resources, such as the Mayo Clinic, advocate a more balanced diet that does include wheat. But Davis said on "CTM" they're just offering a poor alternative.
"All that literature says is to replace something bad, white enriched products with something less bad, whole grains, and there's an apparent health benefit - 'Let's eat a whole bunch of less bad things.' So I take...unfiltered cigarettes and replace with Salem filtered cigarettes, you should smoke the Salems. That's the logic of nutrition, it's a deeply flawed logic. What if I take it to the next level, and we say, 'Let's eliminate all grains,' what happens then?
"That's when you see, not improvements in health, that's when you see transformations in health."

[FULL INTERVIEW AND VIDEO ON THE CBS WEBSITE HERE:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/modern-wheat-a-perfect-chronic-poison-doctor-says/ ]

GREENMEDINFO.COM RECENTLY HAD A FINE ARTICLE ABOUT THIS AS WELL, AND, AS ALWAYS, ITS FOUNDER, SAYER JI, PROVIDES IMPECCABLE DOCUMENTATION.
YOU CAN READ THAT HERE:
'Gluten Brain': Wheat Cuts Off Blood Flow To Frontal Cortex


<<Starting with a 1997 case study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine involving a 33-year-old patient, with pre-existing diagnosis of 'schizophrenic' disorder, who first came to medical attention for severe diarrhea and weight loss (classical symptoms of gluten intolerance), brain scan technology determined that cerebral hypoperfusion (decreased blood flow to the brain) was occurring within the patient's frontal cortex.[i] A gluten free diet resulted not only in the normalization of intestinal damage and autoantibodies, but the return of blood flow to the frontal cortex, and the resolution of schizophrenic symptoms. 
Then, in 2004, a follow up study was performed to verify if the 1997 case study was just a fluke, or perhaps a widespread effect of untreated celiac disease. Published in the American Journal of Medicine, researchers from the Institute of Internal Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy, compared 15 untreated celiac patients without neurological or psychiatric disorders other than anxiety or depression, with 15 celiac patients who were on a gluten-free diet for almost 1 year, and 24 healthy volunteers of similar sex and age. All subjects underwent cerebral single photon emission computed tomography examination.
The results were remarkable, with dramatically increased incidence of impaired brain blood flow in untreated celiac patients,>>

SO...WAS THE NEW WHEAT CREATED JUST TO GIVE US ALL "GLUTEN BRAIN"?
AND IF TOP MEDICAL JOURNALS PRINTED THESE FINDINGS, SHOULDN'T WE BE CONCERNED ENOUGH TO TRY NOT EATING WHEAT TO SEE IF THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN OUR OWN LIVES?

 IF YOU DON'T READ ANYTHING ELSE ABOUT WHAT PROBLEMS WHEAT CAN CAUSE IN THE HUMAN BODY, PLEASE READ A FEW LINKS FROM THIS ARTICLE:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/guide/health-guide-wheat-and-gluten-research


<<But anecdotes and "subjective experience" aside, the type of clinical research that constitutes "Truth," with a capital T, from the perspective of the dominant medical establishment, can be found on the National Library of Medicine's biomedical database known as MEDLINE. This vast bibliographic archive contains over 21 million citation entries, which as of time of this writing, contains 9,776 references to gluten. >>

SOMETHING THAT HUMAN BEINGS COUNTED ON TO SUSTAIN LIFE FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS HAS BEEN CHANGED INTO SOMETHING THAT WREAKS HAVOC ON MILLIONS OF LIVES EACH YEAR. FROM "SIMPLE" ALLERGIES TO LIFE THREATENING ILLNESSES TO BRAIN DYSFUNCTION...WHY AREN'T ALL MAINSTREAM MEDIA SITES BLARING THIS IN HEADLINES ALL OVER THE INTERNET?

IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU LOVE HAS "UNEXPLAINABLE" ILLNESS, WHY NOT TRY CUTTING OUT ALL WHEAT FOR EVEN ONE MONTH?
IT JUST MAY BE ONE OF THE BEST THINGS YOU EVER DID. 

AND WHAT CAN REPLACE WHEAT IN OUR DIETS?
WHAT DOESN'T CARRY SUCH TOXINS?

MAIL ONLINE HAS SOME SUGGESTIONS:
Check carefully as if there's even a trace of wheat or gluten in your food you won't get a fair test of whether wheat is your problem or not.
If it turns out you are intolerant to wheat, avoiding it will make you feel better and leaving it out will start to become second nature.
However you'll have to make sure you include other whole grain foods in your diet as these are healthy sources of fibre that cut risk of bowel disease and cardio-vascular disease.
Good sources other than brown rice you can experiment with are buckwheat, millet, amaranth and quinoa. These are available from health food stores.
If you feel you need specialist help, ask your GP to refer you to a state registered dietitian.

LIVESTRONG.COM HAS AN EVEN BETTER ARTICLE, WHICH I HIGHLY RECOMMEND:
How to Replace Wheat
<< There is an abundance of grains to choose from when replacing wheat in your diet, especially if you are only replacing wheat and are not concerned with gluten that is found in wheat, rye, barley and some oats. Replacing wheat is a manageable task if you are committed to avoiding certain foods and open to trying new alternatives. >>

LOOK, WE DON'T KNOW IF A THING CAN HELP OR HURT UNTIL WE SEE IT FOR OURSELVES.
EVERYONE, EVERY HUMAN SYSTEM IS DIFFERENT, BUT IF CUTTING OUT WHEAT COULD DRAMATICALLY MAKE LIFE BETTER, INSURE BETTER HEALTH, SMALL PRICE TO JUST CUT IT OUT, ISN'T IT?

THIS ARTICLE WAS A REAL EYE-OPENER FOR ME:
Gliadin: The Universal Human Poison
GLIADIN...FOUND IN THE NEW WHEAT, BUT NOT IN ANCIENT WHEAT GRAINS...
WE MUST WONDER WHY THE CHANGE...IS IT REALLY JUST FOR PROFITS?
IF SO, SHAME ON THOSE WHO OFFER IT TO THE WORLD...

BE WELL, AND THANKS FOR READING.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

CALIFORNIA DEMANDS RADIATION TESTING/MONITORING

CALIFORNIA COUNTIES ARE DEMANDING THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA SENDS MONITORING DEVICES AND BEGINS TESTS ON FOODS.
FINALLY, PEOPLE ARE TAKING FUKUSHIMA'S CONTINUAL LEAK SERIOUSLY.

MANY ALONG THE WEST COAST OF THE USA HAVE ALREADY SEEN THE RADIATION SPIKES AND FOOD/AIR/WATER/SOIL/HUMAN CONTAMINATION FOR THEMSELVES, BUT NOW THEY'RE DEMANDING ATTENTION FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

Mendocino County Board of Supervisors action minutes, Oct. 22, 2013: [...] Board Action: Upon motion by Supervisor McCowen, seconded by Supervisor Pinches, and carried unanimously; IT IS ORDERED that Consent Calendar items 4(a – t) are approved/rejected as follows: [...] Approval of Letter to President Obama Calling for International Assistance to Address the Continuing Fukushima Crisis – [Sponsors:] Supervisors McCowen and Gjerde — Approved
Fukushima Crisis – [Sponsors:] Supervisors McCowen and Gjerde — Approved
SOURCE: Fukushima Response Campaign; “Kudos to Charlie for taking Fukushima to the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors”
Draft of Mendocino County’s Letter to President Obama: Deteriorating conditions at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear complex clearly constitute an international crisis of epic proportions that requires the highest level of international scientific and technological assistance in an effort to minimize the continuing damage to international health and safety. [...]  We therefore call upon you to issue an Executive Order directing all appropriate federal agencies to assist in leading an international effort to avert what appears to be a looming catastrophe of unprecedented dimensions. [...] the reactor cores from units 1, 2, and 3 have melted down and are widely believed to have penetrated the floor of the reactor buildings. [...] Groundwater also flows freely through the site resulting in the uncontrolled discharge of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean. [...] In addition to the requested Executive Order, we also call upon you to assure that the federal government is conducting all appropriate monitoring and testing to assess the level and impacts of radioactive contamination to west coast communities and the near shore marine environment. [...]  >> View the County’s letter to President Obama here
Just a few miles to the south, Marin County officials have also taken action: TV: Officials near San Francisco to monitor Fukushima plume, concerns for environment and food supply -- Supervisor: The risks to Californians are concerning -- Commissioner: We can't rely on Japan or Tepco -- Will waves of cesium and strontium pollute coast? (VIDEO)
As did the city of Berkeley, California: Watch: Berkeley unanimously passes Fukushima resolution -- Officials: "Very serious... I'm quite sobered by it"; "I’m glad we're taking a stand"; State should get involved; Affects entire coast, we all need to get together and take action; "Work of activists... is paying off with public support" (VIDEO)
And the city of Fairfax, California: California town passes Fukushima resolution: "Urgent international rescue" needed at site -- "Poses health and safety concerns to America's West Coast" -- "Much greater contamination is likely"     

MIT Center for International Studies — Ken Buesseler, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Oct 24, 2013 (at 31:30 in): This is a timeline from early on to about 1 year later. This is what we published using Tepco’s data to point out, a couple of features here, you see it going up — this is 50 million Bq/m³. I studied Chernobyl, we’d never seen things above 1,000 Bq/m³ in the ocean. This is why we called it an unprecedented accident. When the health physics people started looking at this they said yeah this of concern. When you’re up here, you might have mortality effects directly on organisms living in the ocean. 
WHY USE TEPCO DATA?  TEPCO HAS LIED SINCE DAY 1. 
JUST CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
IT IS A VERY POSSIBLE WORLDWIDE LIFE-ENDING EVENT!

“Radionuclides from Fukushima due to hit West Coast any day now” — Senior Scientist: “Really bizarre” U.S. gov’t not testing for it — Concerned officials contacting him about threat November 24, 2013  

ONE READER COMMENTED
<<
Even though this could be a start to get the snowball rolling downhill, It will not matter what these folks do. Nothing will be done to make this issue any more public than it already is by the govt. They would have to admit to incompetence, malfeasance, and total dereliction of all the govt agencies for the last three years.
Of course, it is no secret they all have been missing in action for three yeas and counting now anyways. One has to wonder just how much US Tax money is wasted paying these no-good-for-nothings to do nothing for the American People.>>

AND ANOTHER READER OBSERVED;
<<NOT LOCALIZED TO WEST COAST . . .
Nuclear radiation is flowing in the jet stream through all of North America.
Constantly, non-stop, 24/7.
Forever>>

AND A VERY ASTUTE READER ASKED THE QUESTION WE ALL SHOULD BE ASKING:
<<If they want to tell us what exactly is going on, it is only a matter of money and force. If you have more than the rottenchildkiller banksters who own them all, and can out bid their overall population elimination agenda, you would know the real numbers and how bad this is. Got a few trillion laying around, and the US army to do your bidding? Don't forget the major lying dying news media. You can not hype the truth, unless you pay them off too. A real serious question that all these talking glove puppets need to be asked is, IS IT TOO LATE TO FIX THIS potential Extinction Level Event? Yes, or No mr congress >>

EXACTLY!
IS IT SIMPLY TOO LATE?

SOME TALK ABOUT THE WATER, THE WATER, AN HOW THE OCEAN WILL DILUTE THE DANGER.
NO, NO IT WON'T.
IT WILL JUST KEEP COMING ON EVERY TIDE. 

ALASKA HAS ALSO BEEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE HARD-HIT:

Alaska: 28% of polar bears with skin lesions & hair loss, thyroids tested by gov’t… like symptoms in seals & walrus — Surprisingly high mortality of musk ox, weak immune system suspected — High rate of embryo deaths & bad eggs for geese.
http://enenews.com/hunter-concern-seals-walrus-pacific-conditions-never-before-scientists-lesions-reproductive-system-thyroid-systs-retained-placenta


AND THE AIR....OUR AIR IS JUST AS POISONOUS OR MAYBE MORE SO THAN THE OCEAN. THE RAIN THAT FALLS ON ALL OF US, THE SNOW, ALL THAT FALLS ON US AND ON OUR CROPS, OUR FOOD ANIMALS, INTO OUR FRESH WATER SUPPLIES.
DOESN'T ANYONE IN OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANT TO MAN-UP AND TELL THE WORLD THE TRUTH?
DO WE HAVE TO BE LIKE JAPANESE OFFICIALS AND LIE ABOUT THE MAGNITUDE OF THIS THING?

.DOES "AVOIDING MASS PANIC" MAKE IT OKAY TO LET US ALL DIE THINKING THINGS ARE JUST FINE?

CALIFORNIA IS DEMANDING TESTING.
WE ALL SHOULD DEMAND TESTING, AND WE SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT IT'S DONE BY SOMEONE WHO ISN'T OWNED BY OUR GOVERNMENT! 

AMERICANS CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH...BUT WE CAN'T HANDLE GENOCIDE.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

VACCINES HARM CHILDREN, VACCINES AND AUTISM

This Study Reveals Children are Being Vaccinated With Toxic Levels of Aluminum Causing Neurological Damage and Autism

BE SURE TO GO TO http://vactruth.com/ OFTEN TO READ THE FACTS, TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES.

BELOW IS PART OF THAT ARTICLE...

Do you know what is coming through that needle?

One recent study shows your children may be
injected with toxic levels of aluminum. The result
could be a life-long neurological injury to
your child.

You can count on these two facts:

    1. You can never unvaccinate your child, ever.
    2. No medical professional or vaccine manufacturer will take responsibility for a vaccine harming your child.

Get the facts, now. Read this story now and see if vaccines are right
for your child.

OF ALL THE THINGS THAT NEVER MAKE IT INTO MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THAT NEVER GET THE ATTENTION THAT A CELEBRITY GETS WHEN THEY  GET ARRESTED, OR SOME SPORTS TEAM GETS WHEN IT WINS SOME GAME, THIS STORY, THESE FACTS BEING NEGLECTED, EVEN HIDDEN BY OUR NEWS OUTLETS SEEMS CRIMINAL.

I WONDER WHY OUR INNOCENT CHILDREN, OUR DUTIFULLY COMPLIANT MILITARY, AND ALL WHO MAKE THE DECISION TO GET THESE VACCINES AND SUFFER FROM THAT DECISION ARE NOT AS IMPORTANT TO MAINSTREAM MEDIA AS THE ANTICS OF A SILLY YOUNG SINGER, OR THE SCORES OF THE LATEST PLAYOFFS?

WE SHOULD ALL DEMAND THAT SUCH FACTS, SUCH ARTICLES BE CARRIED ON FRONT PAGES ACROSS THIS NATION.
OUR HEALTH, OUR CHILDREN'S LIVES, THE LONG-TERM HEALTH OF OUR BRAVE MILITARY WARRIORS, OUR AGED POPULATION, THE WELL-BEING OF ALL OF US ARE AT STAKE HERE...WE ALL NEED TO BE TOLD THESE THINGS, AND OFTEN. 
PLEASE GO READ THIS ARTICLE AND PASS IT ON.
WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDE IF WE WANT TO TAKE THE RISK OF VACCINES FOR OURSELVES AND OUR CHILDREN.
.
A recent study conducted by Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic revealed that the more vaccines that children receive containing the adjuvant aluminum, the greater their chance is of developing autism, autoimmune diseases and neurological problems in the future.

In 2013, in their paper, published by Springer Science+Business Media, titled Aluminum in the Central Nervous System: Toxicity in Humans and Animals, Vaccine Adjuvants, and Autoimmunity, they revealed that during a 17-year period, the rates of autism had increased significantly in countries that had the most vaccinations containing the adjuvant aluminum. 

A Highly Significant Correlation

The researchers compared the number of vaccines recommend by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the period from 1991 – 2008 and the changes in the autism rates during the same period.
They wrote:

“The data sets, graphed against each other, show a pronounced and statistically highly significant correlation between the number vaccines with aluminum and the changes in autism rates. Further data showed that a significant correlation exists between the amounts of aluminum given to preschool children and the current rates of autism in seven Western countries. Those countries with the highest level of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines had the highest autism rates.” [1]

They revealed that:

“The observed correlation between the number of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and ASD was further tested using Hill’s criteria and met eight of nine of these indicating that vaccines containing aluminum are highly likely to be at least partially causal for autism.”
pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of aluminum in vaccines in children; and aluminum in vaccines
Professor Shaw and Dr. Tomljenovic continued their paper by adding that:

“There are other links between aluminum exposure/toxicity and ASD. These include the following: A pilot study showed higher than normal aluminum levels in the hair, blood and/or urine of autistic children; children are regularly exposed to higher levels of aluminum in vaccines per body weight than adults; practically, nothing is known about the has been linked to serious neurological impairments, chronic fatigue and autoimmunity.”

This was explained in depth by pediatrician Robert Sears, in his excellent article published in the magazine Mothering in 2008.

Dr. Sears is another professional exceptionally worried about the effects of aluminum on children’s health. In an article warning mothers about the dangers of vaccinations containing the adjuvant, titled Is Aluminum The New Thimerosal? Dr. Sears explained that aluminum is added to vaccinations to help them work more efficiently.

He stated that although this would not normally be a problem because aluminum is a naturally occurring element found everywhere in our environment, including our food, water, air and soil, he had become worried about the effects that aluminum was having on children’s health. He began to wonder if anyone had ever actually tested the safe level of injected aluminum.

During his research, he came across a number of extremely worrying documents. However, few were as worrying as the one written by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). Describing the document in depth, Sears wrote:

“The source of the daily limit of 4 to 5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of body weight quoted by the ASPEN statement seems to be a study that compared the neurologic development of about 100 premature babies who were fed a standard IV solution that contained aluminum, with the development of 100 premature babies who were fed the same solution with almost all aluminum filtered out. The study was prompted by a number of established facts: that injected aluminum can build up to toxic levels in the bloodstream, bones, and brain; that preemies have decreased kidney function and thus a higher risk of toxicity; that an autopsy performed on one preemie whose sudden death was otherwise unexplained revealed high aluminum concentrations in the brain; and that aluminum toxicity can cause progressive dementia.”

He continued by giving some extremely alarming facts, of which few parents are aware:

“However, none of these documents or studies mentions vaccines; they look only at IV solutions and injectable medications. Nor does the FDA require labels

on vaccines warning about the dangers of aluminum toxicity, although such labels are required for all other injectable medications. All of these studies and label warnings seem to apply mainly to premature babies and kidney patients. What about larger, full-term babies with healthy kidneys?”

He explained:

“However, these documents don’t tell us what the maximum safe dose would be for a healthy baby or child, and I can’t find such information anywhere. This is probably why the ASPEN group suggests, and the FDA requires, that all injectable solutions be limited to 25 mcg; we at least know that that level is safe.”

If this is so, then why do the recommended childhood vaccinations include far above the recommend amounts? According to Dr. Sears, the levels of aluminum included in childhood vaccinations are as follows:

    DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis): 170–625 mcg, depending on
    manufacturer
    Hepatitis A: 250 mcg
    Hepatitis B: 250 mcg
    Hib (for meningitis; PedVaxHib brand only): 225 mcg
    HPV: 225 mcg
    Pediarix (DTaP–hepatitis B–polio combination): 850 mcg
    Pentacel (DTaP–Hib–polio combination): 330 mcg
    Pneumococcus: 125 mcg (emphasis added)

You do not have to be medically qualified to understand that these levels far exceed the safe levels recommended by ASPEN...

Conclusion

Aluminum, as these papers have demonstrated, is extremely toxic, especially when children are repeatedly vaccinated with vaccines containing aluminum over the recommended limits. The FDA and ASPEN recommend 25 mcg to be a safe limit and yet, as Dr. Sears has shown in his article, many of the childhood vaccinations contain aluminum far in excess of this amount.


MY CONCLUSION IS THAT WE'VE BEEN HAD FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

REMEMBER WHEN WE WERE FINALLY TOLD THAT THOSE POLIO VACCINES WE ALL LINED UP FOR IN THE 1950s WERE CONTAMINATED AND COULD BE THE CAUSE OF SUCH ELEVATED CASES OF CANCER IN THOSE OF US WHO WERE IN THAT GROUP OF VACCINATED STUDENTS?

WHAT ELSE HAVEN'T WE BEEN TOLD...AND WHY?
DEMAND ANSWERS, DEMAND FACTS BE REVEALED.
DEMAND YOUR RIGHT TO REFUSE THESE VACCINES.
SOMEONE YOU LOVE IS DEPENDING ON YOU....PLEASE READ AND THINK ABOUT IT.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Multiple Infant Vaccines Linked To Higher Infant DEATH

A new study published in the journal Vaccine has brought to light an extremely disturbing though still virtually unreported dark side to immunization campaigns within low-income countries, namely, the observation that infant mortality sometimes increases when the number of co-administered vaccines increases; a finding diametrically opposed to the widely held belief that vaccination is always a life-saving intervention, and that the more vaccines administered to infants the better.  

New Study Links DTP and Yellow Fever Vaccines To Infant Deaths

The new observational study from the West African country Guinea-Bissau titled, "Co-administration of live measles and yellow fever vaccines and inactivated pentavalent vaccines is associated with increased mortality compared with measles and yellow fever vaccines only,"[i] opens with a reference to the already consistent observation in the biomedical literature that the co-administration of inactivated diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine and live attenuated measles vaccine (MV) increases mortality compared with receiving MV only.  [ii] [iii] 

The purpose of the new investigation was to determine whether co-administration of pentavalent vaccine (PV) with MV and yellow fever vaccine (YF) had similar negative effects. Both PV and YF vaccines were introduced in Guinea-Bissau in 2008, with PV containing 5 vaccine antigens in one shot (DTP-H. Influenza type B-Hepatitis B).
The study findings emerged from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in 2007-2011, where researchers administered vitamin A at routine vaccination contacts among children aged 6-23 months in urban and rural Guinea-Bissau. A total of 2331 children were randomized to placebo, receiving either live vaccines only (MV or MV+YF) or a combination of live and inactivated vaccines (MV+DTP or MV+YF+pentavalent).
When mortality was compared, the adjusted mortality rate ratio (MRR) for co-administered live and inactivated vaccines compared with live vaccines only was over three times greater (3.24 (1.20-8.73). When MV+YF+pentavalent was compared with MV+YF only, the adjusted MRR was almost eight times greater (7.73 (1.79-33.4)) for the combination of the three vaccines versus two.
The researchers concluded:
"In line with previous studies of DTP, the present results indicate that pentavalent vaccine co-administered with MV and YF is associated with increased mortality." 

Pentavalent and Yellow Fever Vaccines Already Linked To Fatalities

This finding takes on a more disturbing light when one considers that by the end of 2013, largely through the efforts of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI), pentavalent vaccines will have reached close to 200 million children in 72 developing countries. GAVI also states that yellow fever vaccines have been administered to 60 million children, "averting an estimated 160,000 future deaths." Pentavalent vaccines have already created widespread controversy by being linked to clusters of infant deaths in every Southeast and South Asian country where they have been introduced, including Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and India. Similarly, yellow fever vaccines have been linked to deaths as far back as 2001, when 7 people were found contracting yellow fever and dying from the vaccine itself.  The obvious question then emerges: Could both the pentavalent and yellow fever vaccines actually be increasing mortality despite GAVI's position that they are a life-saving intervention that presumably should be administered to every at risk child in the developing world?
What adds additional weight to this concern is that there is already a well-established history of DTP (and oral polio) vaccines being linked to increased morbidity and mortality in low-income countries, starting with this 2000 BMJ article also in a population of vaccinated infants from Guinea-Bissau that found recipients of one dose of DTP or polio vaccines had higher mortality than children who had received none of these vaccines. A 2011 study of Guinea-Bissau females found DTP vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls.[iv] Clearly the vaccines can cause significant harm. Another far more recent study published this year in the journal Tropical Medicine and International Health found that DTP vaccination is responsible for higher mortality among Indian girls. Another 2005 study on vaccinated female infants in India found that those who receive both the tuberculosis vaccine Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and DTP experience significantly higher mortality than those who receive only one of the two vaccines.[v]

Given the multitude of studies showing vaccine-induced harm, including increased infant mortality, especially for DTP vaccines, one wonders how global vaccination campaigns can blatantly promote them as infallibly effective and extremely safe.

Evidence That Vaccines Are Toxic Exposures

It has been hypothesized that this association with DTP vaccines and increased mortality may be due to the Th2-polarising effect of the aluminum phosphate adjuvant in the vaccine, as well as the chronic inflammation caused by the intramuscular administration of the vaccine at the site of injection, [vi] but another obvious explanation is that the vaccines themselves are toxic exposures, with the more vaccines given to infants the higher the likelihood of synergistic toxicity and resultant morbidity and mortality.
Exactly this possibility was raised by a 2011 study published in the journal Human and Experimental Toxicology titled, "Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?",[vii] which brought to the fore the fact that, "The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important indicators of the socio-economic well-being and public health conditions of a country.  The US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year-the most in the world-yet 33 nations have lower IMRs." The study found that there is a highly statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.
With the ongoing expansion of immunization schedules in the U.S. and globally, justified by the idea that more vaccines, and more vaccine antigens combined within each injection, will confer greater overall benefit to health (that far outweigh the risks of the vaccines themselves), and by 'vaccine safety' spokespersons such as Paul Offit claiming as many as 10,000 vaccines can be administered to a child at once safely, this new study indicates quite the opposite is true.


[i] Ane Bærent Fisker, Henrik Ravn, Amabelia Rodrigues, Marie Drivsholm Ostergaard, Carlito Bale, Christine Stabell Benn, Peter Aaby. Co-administration of live measles and yellow fever vaccines and inactivated pentavalent vaccines is associated with increased mortality compared with measles and yellow fever vaccines only. An observational study from Guinea-Bissau. Vaccine. 2013 Dec 7. pii: S0264-410X(13)01663-0. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.074.
[ii] J Agergaard, E Nante, G Poulstrup, J Nielsen, K L Flanagan, L Østergaard, C S Benn, P Aaby.Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls. A randomised trial from Guinea-Bissau. Vaccine. 2011 Jan 10;29(3):487-500. Epub 2010 Nov 18. PMID: 21093496
[iii] Peter Aaby, Sidu Biai, Jens Erik Veirum, Morten Sodemann, Ida Lisse, May-Lill Garly, Henrik Ravn, Christine Stabell Benn, Amabelia Rodrigues. DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in Guinea-Bissau. Vaccine. 2007 Jan 26;25(7):1265-9. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
[iv] J Agergaard, E Nante, G Poulstrup, J Nielsen, K L Flanagan, L Østergaard, C S Benn, P Aaby. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls. A randomised trial from Guinea-Bissau. Vaccine. 2011 Jan 10;29(3):487-500. Epub 2010 Nov 18. PMID: 21093496
[v] Lawrence H Moulton, Lakshmi Rahmathullah, Neal A Halsey, R D Thulasiraj, Joanne Katz, James M Tielsch. Evaluation of non-specific effects of infant immunizations on early infant mortality in a southern Indian population. Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Oct;10(10):947-55. PMID: 16185228
[vi] Mogens Helweg Claesson. Immunological Links to Nonspecific Effects of DTwP and BCG Vaccines on Infant Mortality. J Trop Med. 2011 ;2011:706304. Epub 2011 May 5. PMID: 21760811
[vii] Neil Z Miller, Gary S Goldman. Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011 May 4. Epub 2011 May 4. PMID: 21543527






Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.