Wednesday, January 28, 2015

THEORY OF EVOLUTION FALLS APART

THAT WAS A REAL "HEADLINE" OF A NEWS ARTICLE I CAME ACROSS, WHICH LED ME TO DOZENS, THEN HUNDREDS OF OTHER ARTICLES THAT EITHER REJOICE AT OR BEMOAN THE FAILING OF SCIENCE TO BACK-UP, TO GIVE TRUE CREDIBILITY TO THAT OLD "DARWIN'S THEORY".
WELL, IT WAS JUST A THEORY, AFTER ALL.
SCIENTISTS HAVE HAD YEARS TO PROVE IT, BUT SIMPLY CANNOT.

AND, A LOT OF THOSE WHO ONCE HELD STOCK IN EVOLUTION ARE SELLING OUT AND LEARNING TO APPLY TRUTH AND REASON THAT THEY HAVE FOUND WORKS MUCH BETTER THAN "THEORY"!

SO, LET'S LOOK AT WHY EVOLUTION IS STILL NOTHING BUT A THEORY.

1~ THE MYTH OF "MACRO-EVOLUTION"
Until I was a freshman college student, I, too, fell for the "Theory of Evolution".
Then I got access to some really good microscopes and chose genetics as a field of study.
Even back in the late 1960s, scientists across the globe had started to see what I saw.... that there is a BIG difference between simple VARIATION (micro-evolution) within species, and ALL NEW AND IMPROVED, ADDED GENETIC CODES (macro-evolution)!

NO, "VIRGINIA", WE DID NOT SEE EVEN ONE SPECIES OF BACTERIA, ALGAE, FRUIT FLIES, OR FROGS BECOMING SOMETHING NEW!
THEY WERE THE SAME AS THE EARLIEST ONES EVER KNOWN!

HERE'S HOW EVOLUTIONIST USE TRICKS TO KEEP FROM ADMITTING FAILURE OF THE THEORY:

Every breeder of plants or animals knows that there are absolute lines drawn in how FAR we can push variation by "selective breeding", that if you try to push beyond those lines , those natural limits, you will wind up with STERILE LINES that fizzle out completely.

Evolutionists want you to ignore this!
They want you to believe that, since the beginning of time, all species have engaged in selective breeding to create NEW LIFE FORMS, something far removed from the original parents.
That does NOT happen in breeding anything that can be fertile and continue its line.

For example, The types of bird beaks, the colors of butterfly wings, leg sizes of cats, etc. are all naturally occurring, encoded variations.
ALL these are programmed by ANCIENT codes within the gene pools and "adaptive mechanisms" of organisms!

Might a finch that moves to a new location eventually reproduce until its offspring 100 years down the line develop a longer or shorter beak for whatever reason?
SURE!
Does that finch EVER become a crocodile?
NO!
Does that finch EVER become anything BUT a FINCH, even after 10,000 years?
NO!

But, the trick used by evolutionists to get us to fall for that theory of a fish becoming a human goes like this:
Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens so slowly, over thousands of generations, maybe even tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands.
 
WHY WOULD IT TAKE THAT LONG?

A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood.
They say it took "countless"  thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds to MAYBE thousands of "candidates that could, possibly, maybe produce a human as we know humans today.

REALLY?

Then how to explain why something with as SHORT a "generational span" as, say, BACTERIA, have NOT changed into something HIGHER on the evolutionary ladder?
A bacteria species with a lifespan of as little as 12 minutes to a day or two SHOULD be able to pull off becoming at least a cockroach in a million years, right?
Even in a 100,000 years, or a thousand years, IF WE GO BY THE FALSE REASONING OF THE THEORISTS, in the time it took HUMANS to evolve, the bacteria of the world should have evolved into WHAT?
ANYTHING?
SOMETHING ELSE?
BUT THEY HAVE NOT!

Nor have fruit flies, such as are found in ancient pieces of amber, evolved into anything new!
A fruit fly may live 9 days, if it's lucky, so again comparing that generational span to humans, fruit flies SHOULD have become , oh, maybe BIRDS by now, yes?
NO, no, fruit flies are STILL fruit flies!

And great apes are still great apes, and monkeys are still monkeys.

In spite of diligently searching, neither I nor you, after m
any years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world, will be able to  show that evolution is happening today.

IF IT HAPPENED IN OUR PAST AND ONLY TOOK A FEW THOUSAND GENERATIONS TO MAKE MAN FROM PROTOZOA, WHERE THE HELL ARE THE BIRDS FROM FRUIT FLIES, OR COCKROACHES FROM BACTERIA?
THEY SHOULD HAVE SHOWED UP BY NOW!

Natural selection SHOULD have selected something of a higher order for bacteria by NOW!
Shouldn't fish have groen legs and walked upright by NOW?

Let's just face the facts, shall we?

There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria).  They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc.
There is MUCH variation in bacteria.  
There are many mutations (in fact, evolutionists say that smaller organisms have a faster mutation rate than larger ones!) 
But they never turn into anything new.  They always remain bacteria.  
Fruit flies are much more complex than already complex single-cell bacteria.  Scientists like to study them because a generation (from egg to adult) takes only 9 days.  In the lab, fruit flies are studied under every conceivable condition.
There is much variation in fruit flies.
There are many mutations.
But they never turn into anything new.  They always remain fruit flies.  
I must reiterate: Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is just NOT happening today.

YES, species are full of variations, mutations, but that is what is called "micro-evolution".

NO, macro-evolution, old species turning into NEW species has NEVER been demonstrated.

The genetic encoding is just not available!

SCIENCE ITSELF ADMITS THIS!
FROM 
Reznick, David N., Robert E. Ricklefs. 12 February 2009. Darwin's bridge between microevolution and macroevolution. Nature, Vol. 457, pp. 837-842.:
"Macroevolution posed a problem to Darwin because his principle of descent with modification predicts gradual transitions between small-scale adaptive changes in populations and these larger-scale phenomena, yet there is little evidence for such transitions in nature.  Instead, the natural world is often characterized by gaps, or discontinuities.  One type of gap relates to the existence of 'organs of extreme perfection', such as the eye, or morphological innovations, such as wings, both of which are found fully formed in present-day organisms without leaving evidence of how they evolved."-

BECAUSE THEY DID NOT "EVOLVE"!

2~ MUTATIONS CREATED MAN FROM POND SCUM.
This old trick might work if it took JUST ONE GENE to make and control one "NEW" part.
IT JUST DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY!
EACH PART of living creatures is constructed of intricate components with connections that all need to be in place for the thing to work, and EACH of the simplest parts are controlled by MANY genes that have to act in the PROPER SEQUENCE.
Natural selection would not, COULD NOT, choose parts that did not have all their components existing, in place, connected, and regulated because the parts would not work otherwise! 
To fall for this trick used by evolutionists, 
ALL the right constructive mutations (and NONE, NOT EVEN ONE of the destructive ones) must happen AT THE EXACT SAME TIME AND COMPLETELY BY CHANCE.

 That is physically impossible.
THAT IS LIKE ASKING US TO BELIEVE THAT IF WE TOSS ALL THE INGREDIENTS FOR A CHOCOLATE CAKE INTO AN OVEN, IN A PAN, WE JUST MAY WIND UP WITH A POT ROAST!
HEY! MUTATIONS HAPPEN!

To illustrate just how hopeless it is, imagine this: on the ground are all the materials needed to build a house (nails, boards, shingles, windows, etc.).  We tie a hammer to the wagging tail of a dog and let him wander about the work site for as long as you please, even millions of years.

The swinging hammer on the dog is as likely to build a house as mutation/natural selection is to make a single new working part in an animal, let alone CREATE AN ENTIRELY NEW CREATURE FROM ANCIENT GENETIC CODES.
Only mutations in the reproductive (germ) cells of an animal or plant would be passed on.
Mutations in the eye or skin of an animal would not matter.
Mutations in DNA happen fairly often, but most are repaired or destroyed by mechanisms in animals and plants.

Here's another thing science knows:
All 
KNOWN mutations in animal and plant germ cells are neutral, harmful, or fatal.  

But evolutionists, if not honest, are perhaps eternally optimistic.
They believe that the necessary MILLIONS of PURELY BENEFICIAL mutations DID take place and created every type of creature that ever existed.
HOWEVER, they cannot explain why that ceased, why it is NOT happening NOW.

TO SEE HOW THEIR OWN EXPERIMENTS FAILED TO CONVINCE EVOLUTIONISTS THAT SUCH AN UNIMAGINABLE NUMBER OF MUTATIONS WOULD (A) HAVE TO TAKE PLACE, AND (B) REMAIN FIXED AND ALSO SPREAD ("SWEEP") THROUGH AN ENTIRE POPULATION OF A SPECIES, READ:

Hernandez, Ryan D., Joanna L. Kelley, Eyal Elyashiv, S. Cord Melton, Adam Auton, Gilean McVean, 1000 Genomes Project, Guy Sella, Molly Przeworski. 18 February 2011. Classic Selective Sweeps Were Rare in Recent Human Evolution. Science, Vol. 331, no. 6019, pp. 920-924.

WHAT DID EVOLUTIONISTS THEMSELVES FIND?"In contrast to expectation," their test detected nothing, but they could not quite bring themselves to say it.

Sweeps, THEY WROTE INSTEAD, "were too infrequent within the past 250,000 years to have had discernible effects on genomic diversity." 

REALLY?
YES, REALLY!


ANOTHER 35-year-long experiment by evolutionists shows how things really work.

[SEE 
Burke, Molly K., Joseph P. Dunham, Parvin Shahrestani, Kevin R. Thornton, Michael R. Rose, Anthony D. Long. 30 September 2010. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment withDrosophila. Nature, Vol. 467, pp. 587-590.]
THIS TIME, Instead of waiting for natural selection,
researchers FORCED selection on hundreds of generations of fruit flies.
They used 
variation to breed fruit flies that develop from egg to adult 20% faster than normal.
But, as usual when breeding plants and animals, there was a down side.

In this case the fruit flies weighed less, lived shorter lives, and were less resistant to starvation.  There were many mutations, but none caught on, and the experiment ran into the 
limits of variation.
They again did not want to face facts and so wrote that  "Despite decades of sustained selection in relatively small, sexually reproducing laboratory populations, selection did not lead to the fixation of newly arising unconditionally advantageous alleles."
"The probability of fixation in wild populations should be even lower than its likelihood in these experiments."

You may have heard of the famous Lenski experiment. 
Dr. Richard E. Lenski is an evolutionary biologist who began a long-term experiment on February 24, 1988 that continues today.

It looks for genetic changes in 12 initially identical populations of Escherichia coli bacteria that have been adapting to conditions in their flasks for over 60,000 generations.
60,000 generations!

The findings so far?
"Mutations that result in a gain of novel information have NOT been observed."

A NOBEL PRIZE-WINNER TELLS US A TRUTH:
Francois Jacob won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965, along with two others, for discoveries concerning genetic control of enzyme and virus synthesis.  The work of Francois Jacob dealt mainly with the genetic mechanisms existing in bacteria and bacteriophages, and with the biochemical effects of mutations. 

He wrote, "Evolution does NOT produce novelties from scratch. It works on what ALREADY EXISTS, either transforming a system to give it new functions or combining several systems to produce a more elaborate one."

"But these were merely variations on previous themes.  A sequence of a thousand nucleotides codes for a medium-sized protein.
The probability that a functional protein would appear de novo by random association of amino acids is practically zero.  
In organisms as complex and integrated as those that were already living a long time ago, creation of entirely new nucleotide sequences could not be of any importance in the production of new information."

3~ THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ... WHO KNOWS?
Evolutionists don't like to talk about "origin of life" research because it has been such a dead-end, but if chemicals never assembled themselves into the first living thing, evolution could never get started.  
So to keep hope alive, every once in a while over the last 60 years they have announced discoveries that supposedly bring us closer to "understanding how life on Earth began".

However, the main lesson scientists have learned over those decades is that the long molecules (polymers) that allow biological creatures to work must be isolated in PURE concentrations for there to be any chance of success.
Unfortunately, that can only happen in biochemistry labs, computer simulations, and living cells.

In all other settings, the products are unusable due to contamination, unwanted reactions with other chemicals, and minuscule concentrations that quickly fall apart.
OOPS!

B
iochemist David Deamer, in 2005, poured a concoction of organic chemicals into a pool of hot water.
He was just trying to make the walls of a cell, like the plastic case of a phone without the electronics inside.
JUST THE WALLS OF A CELL, A CELL WITHOUT FUNCTION.

Did it work?  "
NO!
AND NO SAID HIS COLLEAGUES, OTHER BIOCHEMISTS!
"The answer was a resounding no." said another origin-of-life researcher.  "The clays and metal ions present in the Siberian pool blocked the chemical interactions."
"Deamer's demonstration that we cannot translate lab results to natural settings is valuable."
"This provocative insight explains why the origin-of-life field has been short on progress over the past half-century".
 
[SEE--Shapiro, Robert. 4 August 2011. Life's beginnings. Nature, Vol. 476, pp. 30-31.]


SCIENCE SLOGS ON...

An interview with Steven A. Benner, Ph.D. Chemistry, Harvard, prominent origin-of-life researcher and creator of the Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, was posted on Huffington Post on December 6, 2013.  

In it he said, "We have failed in any continuous way to provide a recipe that gets from the simple molecules that we know were present on early Earth to RNA."
"The first paradox is the tendency of organic matter to devolve and to give tar.  If you can avoid that, you can start to try to assemble things that are not tarry, but then you encounter the water problem, which is related to the fact that every interesting bond that you want to make is unstable, thermodynamically, with respect to water.  
If you can solve that problem, you have the problem of entropy, that any of the building blocks are going to be present in a low concentration; therefore, to assemble a large number of those building blocks, you get a gene-like RNA -- 100 nucleotides long -- that FIGHTS entropy.
And the fourth problem is that even if you can solve the entropy problem, you have a paradox that RNA enzymes, which are maybe catalytically active, are more likely to be active in the sense that destroys RNA rather than creates RNA."
FAIL!
FAIL!
ANOTHER FAIL!
Two other prominent "origin-of-life" researchers have laid out their vision of how life arose from chemicals in an 8-steps experiment.

THEY ARE STILL TRYING TO CREATE THE FIRST TWO NECESSARY STEPS:
1.  Start with a molecule capable of copying itself.  "The first protocells contained RNA (or something similar to it) and little else". 

2.  A fatty acid bubble forms around the self-copying molecule, which then makes a copy of itself with nucleotides that filter through the bubble.  "Molecules as large as nucleotides can in fact easily slip across membranes as long as both nucleotides and membranes are simpler, more 'primitive' versions of their modern counterparts."
[SEE 
Ricardo, Alonso, Jack W. Szostak. September 2009. Life on Earth. Scientific American, pp. 54-61.]  
FAIL, FAIL, ANOTHER FAIL!

SO HOW AND WHEN AND WHERE DID THE BASIC BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE ORIGINATE ?
SCIENCE CANNOT FIND THOSE ANSWERS!
THEY JUST DO NOT KNOW! 
AND THEY CANNOT DUPLICATE THE PROCESS, THAT IS TO SAY, THEY CANNOT "MAKE THEIR OWN FERTILE DIRT". 

4~ GO TO "LEAPS AND BOUNDS"?
There are two versions of evolution theory.

The main version proposes that many tiny changes over millions of years made new creatures.
It is called the Modern Synthesis or Neo-Darwinian evolution.
But "major transitions in biological evolution show the same pattern of sudden emergence of diverse forms at a new level of complexity."  
"The principal 'types' seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features of the respective new level of biological organization.  No intermediate 'grades' or intermediate forms between different types are detectable."

Since the fossil record does NOT show long series of tiny changes between one type of creature and another, some evolutionists, GRASPING AT A FINAL STRAW, proposed a "modification" to evolution theory.
It says that change occurred by occasional LEAPS (punctuated equilibrium), not gradually.
However, each hypothetical beneficial mutation could only make a slight change.  Any more than that would be so disruptive as to cause death.
So punctuated equilibrium is NOT REALLY about big leaps.
NO!
It envisions a lot of slight changes over thousands of years, then NOTHING HAPPENS FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS!

 Evolutionists say with a straight face that no fossils have been found from a leap because thousands of years is too fast in the billions of years of "geologic time" to leave any.
Yet without fossils there is no evidence that any leaps ever happened, and of course there is no evidence that leaps or gradual changes beyond variation are happening today in any of the millions of species that still exist.

IS THIS SCIENTIFIC "DOUBLE-SPEAK?
WHY, YES, YES IT IS!
All fossils are of COMPLETE animals and plants, not works in progress, NOT  "under construction". 

If evolution's continuous morphing were really going on, every fossil would show change underway throughout the creature, with parts in various stages of completion.
WE HAVE NEVER FOUND SUCH FOSSIL EVIDENCE!
For every successful change there SHOULD be many more that lead to nothing.
The whole process is random trial and error, without direction.
So every plant and animal, living or fossil, should be covered inside and out with useless growths and have parts SHOWING they were, at that time, UNIQUE FROM ALL OTHERS, "under construction", EVOLVING.
THAT IS NOT FOUND IN THE FOSSIL RECORD!
IT SIMPLY IS NOT THERE!

 
Even Charles Darwin had a glimpse of the problem in his day.  He wrote in his book 'On the Origin of Species':
   "The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on Earth must be truly enormous.  Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?  Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." 


WHERE ARE THE FLAGELLATED BACTERIA WITHOUT FLAGELLA?
WHERE ARE THE FLAGELLATED BACTERIA WITH STUBS OF "EMERGING" FLAGELLA?
NOWHERE!
THEY NEVER EXISTED!

WHERE ARE THE FRUIT FLIES WITHOUT COMPLEX, COMPLETELY FUNCTIONAL EYES?
WHERE ARE THE "EVOLVING SPECIES" OF MAMMALS BEFORE THEY "EVOLVED" A METHOD FOR CLOTTING BLOOD?
THERE ARE NONE!


The gradual morphing of one type of creature to another that evolution predicts is nowhere to be found.  
There should have been MILLIONS, BILLIONS of transitional creatures if evolution were true.
IF IT WERE TRUE...IF...

In the "tree of life" that evolutionists have dreamed up, gaps in the fossil record are especially huge between single-cell creatures, complex invertebrates (such as snails, jellyfish, trilobites, clams, and sponges), and what evolutionists claim were the first vertebrates, fish.  

In fact, 
there are NO FOSSIL ANCESTORS AT ALL, NOT ONE, for complex invertebrates or fish.

That alone is fatal to the theory of evolution.
The fossil record shows that evolution never happened.
DARWIN ALL BUT SAID SO HIMSELF!
ALMOST, HE RECANTED HIS "THEORY".
"Darwin argued that the incompleteness of the fossil record gives the illusion of an explosive event, but with the eventual discovery of older and better-preserved rocks, the ancestors of these Cambrian taxa would be found.  Studies of Ediacaran and Cambrian fossils continue to expand the morphologic variety of clades, but the appearance of the remains and traces of bilaterian animals in the Cambrian remains abrupt."   

AS DARWIN FEARED,  there are no fossils for any of these.


HOW TO EXPLAIN "DE-EVOLUTION"?
WHAT ABOUT CREATURES FROM 500 MILLION YEARS AGO THAT APPEAR MORE COMPLEX THAN THEIR MODERN-DAY COUNTERPARTS?  

Fossil compound eyes from the Lower Cambrian, where the first complex creatures suddenly appear in the fossil record, have been found in the Emu Bay Shale of South Australia.
These fossils are supposedly about 515 million years old.
They may be corneas of Anomalocaris that were shed during moulting.

The lenses are packed tighter than Lower Cambrian trilobite eyes, "which are often assumed to be the most powerful visual organs of their time."  
  "Each eye has over 3,000 large ommatidial lenses".
"The arrangement and size-gradient of lenses creates a distinct [forward] 'bright zone'... where the visual field is sampled with higher light sensitivity (due to larger ommatidia) and possibly higher accuity".  
This indicates "that these eyes belonged to an active predator that was capable of seeing in low light."
HERE'S WHERE THINGS GET "UNEXPLAINABLE FOR EVOLUTIONISTS"

"The eyes are more complex than those known from contemporaneous trilobites and are as advanced as those of many living forms" today, such as the fly in this picture, "revealing that some of the earliest arthropods possessed highly advanced compound eyes". 


When the earliest form is the most complex, there is no evolution!  
Coelacanth disappeared from the fossil record with the last of the dinosaurs.  That was supposedly 65 million years ago.
In the early 1900s, evolutionists touted it as the first walking fish, the transition between fish and tetrapods.  

That is, until 1938 when one was found ALIVE AND UNABLE TO WALK!

  Evolution theory says that pressures from competition and the environment force changes over time.  In chapter 9 of his book, Darwin wrote of ancestor species in general: "If, moreover, they had been the progenitors of these orders, they would almost certainly have been long ago supplanted and exterminated by their numerous and improved descendants."

Yet we find a coelacanth today, alive and unchanged like many "living fossils".
Where is the evolution?

Evolutionists tell us a certain dragonfly has not shown up in the fossil record for 250-300 million years!
But DOZENS of the "A
ncient Greenling Damselfly" live near Melbourne, Australia.  

"
The damselfly, part of the dragonfly group Odonata, is the only living representative of the family Hemiphlebiidae. Its ancient predecessors are found solely in 250-300 million-year-old fossil records from Brazil to Russia." 
[SEE: Smith, Bridie. January 5, 2010. Found: fossil-linked, listed damselfly. www.theage.com.au (newspaper website)] 

UNCHANGED IN 250 MILLION YEARS!
DECLARED EXTINCT?

How about the Platypus?
Only the wizards of evolution could call it a "transitional creature", between ducks and mammals.
The furry platypus has a duck-like bill, swims with webbed feet, and lays eggs.

IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN JUST A PLATYPUS!

Evolutionists always point to Archaeopteryx as the great example of a transitional creature, appearing to be part dinosaur and part bird.

However, it is a fully formed, complete animal with no half-finished components or useless growths.  

Most people know "the stereotypical ideal of Archaeopteryx as a physiologically modern bird with a long tail and teeth".  
Research now "shows incontrovertibly that these animals were very primitive". 
 "Archaeopteryx was simply a feathered and presumably volant [flying] dinosaur.  Theories regarding the subsequent steps that led to the modern avian condition need to be reevaluated." 
[SEE: Erickson, Gregory, et al. October 2009. Was Dinosaurian Physiology Inherited by Birds? Reconciling Slow Growth in Archaeopteryx. PLoS ONE, Vol. 4, Issue 10, e7390.]

OOPS!

The "Tree of Life" is falling down!

New discoveries are bringing down the whole notion of a "tree of life", as passages from an article in the mainstream magazine New Scientist show:



  "The tree-of-life concept was absolutely central to Darwin's thinking, equal in importance to natural selection, according to biologist W. Ford Doolittle of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.  Without it the theory of evolution would never have happened."  "For much of the past 150 years, biology has largely concerned itself with filling in the details of the tree. 

 'For a long time the holy grail was to build a tree of life,' says Eric Bapteste, an evolutionary biologist at the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris, France.  
"A few years ago it looked as though the grail was within reach."
"But today the project lies in tatters, torn to pieces by an onslaught of negative evidence.  Many biologists now argue that the tree concept is obsolete and needs to be discarded.  

'We have no evidence at all that the tree of life is a reality,' says Bapteste.  That bombshell has even persuaded some that our fundamental view of biology needs to change."  
"The problems began in the early 1990s when it became possible to sequence actual bacterial and archaeal genes".  

"As more and more genes were sequenced, it became clear that the patterns of relatedness could only be explained if bacteria and archaea were routinely swapping genetic material with other species - often across huge taxonomic distances".  

" 'There's promiscuous exchange of genetic information across diverse groups,' says Michael Rose, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Irvine."  "As early as 1993, some were proposing that for bacteria and archaea the tree of life was more like a web. 

 In 1999, Doolittle made the provocative claim that 'the history of life cannot properly be represented as a tree'.
 'The tree of life is not something that exists in nature, it's a way that humans classify nature,' he says."

"Recent research suggests that the evolution of animals and plants isn't exactly tree-like either."  
"A team at the University of Texas at Arlington found a peculiar chunk of DNA in the genomes of eight animals - the mouse, rat, bushbaby, little brown bat, tenrec, opossum, anole lizard and African clawed frog - but NOT in 25 others, including humans, elephants, chickens and fish.  

This patchy distribution suggests that the sequence must have entered each genome independently by horizontal transfer." 
 "HGT [horizontal gene transfer] has been documented in insects, fish and plants, and a few years ago a piece of snake DNA was found in cows." 

 "Biologist Michael Syvanen of the University of California, Davis, compared 2000 genes that are common to humans, frogs, sea squirts, sea urchins, fruit flies and nematodes.  
In theory, he should have been able to use the gene sequences to construct an evolutionary tree showing the relationships between the six animals.  

He failed."

ANOTHER FAIL!

HOW MANY MORE FAILS BEFORE DARWIN ROLLS OVER IN HIS GRAVE AND SCIENCE SAYS, "ENOUGH OF THAT ILL-FOUNDED MALARKEY!"?

THE TRICKS, MANIPULATIONS, ERRORS IN LOGIC, OUTRIGHT FALLACIES AND DEDICATED "BAIT-AND-SWITCH" THAT EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE USED FOR DECADES ARE ALL CRUMBLING AROUND THEM.
IF I, AS A LOWLY COLLEGE FRESHMAN, COULD LOOK AT THE DATA, PEER INTO A MICROSCOPE AND SEE THE LIE OF IT, WHAT HOLDS THE EVOLUTIONISTS TOGETHER?

Violating the lawThe theory of Evolution violates two laws of science.

 1~ The 
Second Law of Thermodynamics (law of increasing entropy) says that things which start out concentrated together spread out over time.  

If you heat one room in a house, then open the door to that room, eventually the temperature in the whole house evens out (reaches equilibrium).  
Knowing how far this evening-out has progressed at any point in time tells you the entropy.  Entropy can measure the loss of a system's ability to do work.  

Entropy is also a measure of disorder, and that is where evolution theory hits an impenetrable wall.  

Natural processes proceed in only one direction, toward equilibrium and disorder.  Things fall apart over time, they do not get more organized.  We can overcome this by making a machine and adding energy, but the Second Law prevents such a machine from assembling spontaneously from raw materials.
When confronted with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, evolutionists usually use two tricks to try to escape.  

The first is to state that "it only applies to closed systems, and biological creatures are open systems, so it doesn't affect evolution" (they actually intend to say isolated, not closed, but we know what they mean).  
The fact is that the Second Law applies to all systems, open or closed, and to all actions and chemical reactions, from molecules to galaxies.  The words "except for..." are not in this universal law.  
A thermodynamics system is simply any part of the universe we want to study.  If we are doing an experiment in a bottle, the inside of the bottle is our system and the bottle itself is the "walls" of the system.  There are only 3 kinds of systems: (1)if no energy or matter can pass through the walls, it is an isolated system; (2) if energy can pass through but matter cannot, it is a closed system; (3) if both energy and matter can pass through the walls, it is an open system.  

YOU AND I ARE OPEN SYSTEMS.
You eat food (which comes from outside yourself) and your body survives and grows.  

Evolutionists believe that all we need is an open system with sufficient energy flowing into it for evolution to succeed.  
If that were so, you could just stand right behind a jet engine as the aircraft prepares for takeoff, absorb that blast of energy, and evolve to a higher life form. 

 In reality, of course, you would be incinerated because absorbing energy without a mechanism to convert it to a useful form and employ it is destructive or useless. 
 The mechanism must be very specific.  

Sticking food in your ear will not work; it must go into your mouth and through the digestive system.  
And the mechanism must be in place and functioning first, before energy is added, or the energy is wasted. 

 The "closed system" ploy is just an attempt to avoid dealing with the Second Law because the Law prohibits any functioning biological mechanism from falling together by pure chance, without assistance or plan, using only the properties of matter.
2~The second trick they use is to say that "when you freeze water, the disordered molecules become beautifully ordered ice crystals or snowflakes.  If water can bypass the Second Law and organize its molecules by a natural process, why not the chemicals of life?"  At room temperature, water molecules are bouncing off each other and you have water.  When you take away heat and they freeze, water molecules stick to each other with weak molecular bonds, forming ice crystals and snowflakes because of the shape of the H2O molecule.  The same thing happens if you put a bunch of weak magnets in a jar and shake it.  The magnets bounce around.  When you stop, the magnets stick together.  They are at a lower energy level.  There is order, yet no complexity - just a simple repetitive structure that does not do anything.  The Second Law is not bypassed or violated.  

But guess what.  Amino acid molecules that form proteins, and nucleotide molecules that form DNA and RNA resist combining at any temperature. 
 To combine, they need the help of mechanisms in a living cell or a biochemist in an organic chemistry laboratory. 

 It means that nothing happens in the primeval soup, the pond of chemicals where evolutionists believe life began.

DNA is made of only right-handed versions of nucleotides, while proteins are made of only left-handed versions of amino acids.  Yet any random chemical reaction that produced nucleotides or amino acids would make an equal mix of left and right-handed versions of each.  

Even if the thousands of nucleotides needed to form a DNA molecule, or the hundreds of amino acids needed to form a protein molecule were able to combine from the mix, they would be a jumble of left and right-handed versions that could not function at all.  

This is the problem of "chirality", and evolutionists have never been able to solve it.


PROTEINS CLINCH IT!

Making and folding proteins goes on continuously throughout the body. 

 Misfolding can lead to more than proteins that don't work. 
 In humans, bunches of them (aggregates) can lead to diseases such as Alzheimer's, Huntington's, or sickle cell.  
"Proteins are so precisely built that the change of even a few atoms in one amino acid can sometimes disrupt the structure of the whole molecule so severely that all function is lost."1  

All proteins stick (bind) to other molecules.  But each can bind to only a few of the thousands it encounters.  
"An average protein in a human cell may interact with somewhere between 5 and 15 different partners."  
Their shapes fit each other like a hand in a glove.  
"Proteins can form enormously sophisticated chemical devices."  

"The most impressive tasks are carried out by large protein assemblies formed from many protein molecules." 
 "Each of the central processes in a cell... is catalyzed by a highly coordinated, linked set of 10 or more proteins."1 

 The parts of a cell where proteins are made (ribosomes) are themselves made of many different proteins.  
"The complexity of living organisms is staggering." 

  In the face of this breathtaking complexity, evolutionists have tried to find the basic things necessary for a cell to function.  

So far they have found 17 general categories1:
  • Replication, recombination, and repair
  • Transcription
  • Cell cycle control, mitosis, and meiosis
  • Defense mechanisms
  • Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
  • Signal transduction mechanisms
  • Intracellular trafficking and secretion
  • Translation
  • Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
  • Energy production and conversion
  • Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
  • Amino acid transport and metabolism
  • Nucleotide transport and metabolism
  • Coenzyme transport and metabolism
  • Lipid transport and metabolism
  • Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
  • Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism 

Each category requires many proteins. 

 All have to be in place and working together or the cell is wrecked.

So evolutionists have to believe that for each protein, PURE BLIND CHANCE laid out long strings of amino acids that fold themselves into the exact shapes needed to interact with other specialized proteins and, where needed, get help from chaperone proteins which themselves appeared by chance.  

The necessary proteins cannot be invented one at a time.  Either they are all there, ready to work together, or nothing happens and they disintegrate.  Yet even if it could design proteins, mutation-natural selection would only work on one at a time sporadically over many years.  

Considering just the complexity of proteins, the notion of creating them with mutation-natural selection is as silly as asking someone to build a television set with a spoon and a toothbrush. 

 If Darwin had known what we have learned about proteins, he probably would have abandoned the theory of evolution.

Darwin himself wrote in chapter 6 of On the Origin of Species that "natural selection can act only by the preservation and accumulation of infinitesimally small inherited modifications, each profitable to the preserved being... If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."


OH, IT'S BROKEN DOWN ALRIGHT!
BUT BROKEN AS IT IS, SOME WILL CLING TO THIS MAD-HATTER'S THEORY UNTIL THEY DIE.
NEW FACTS, OLD PROOF, NOTHUNG WILL DETER THESE DEDICATED EVOLUTIONISTS.
THERE ARE INNUMERABLE RESOURCES FOR YOU TO READ AND EXPLORE FOR YOURSELVES TO SEE WHY WE SHOULD FINALLY DISCARD EVOLUTION AND GET TO THE FACTS.
I LIST MANY BELOW.
READ, LEARN.

MY FINAL QUOTE IS FROM A MAN I MET AND WHOM I ADMIRED ALL MY LIFE.. HE WAS THE GUIDING FORCE IN AMERICA'S SPACE PROGRAM.

"
To be forced to believe only one conclusion -- that everything in the universe happened by chance -- would violate the very objectivity of science itself. 
Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system of the human eye?  

Some people say that science has been unable to prove the existence of a Designer...  They challenge science to prove the existence of God.  
But, must we really light a candle to see the sun?"
--
Wernher von Braun 1912 - 1977




Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes..

OTHER SOURCES NOT CITED ABOVE:

1. Alberts, Bruce, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter. 2008. Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th edition. Garland Science, New York.
2. Anderson, G. M. 1996. Thermodynamics of Natural Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto.
3. Baker, Monya. 10 February 2011. Genomes in Three Dimensions. Nature, Vol. 470, pp. 289-294.
4. Balleza, Enrique, Elena R. Alvarez-Buylla, Alvaro Chaos, Stuart Kauffman, Ilya Shmulevich, Maximino Aldana. June 2008. Critical Dynamics in Genetic Regulatory Networks: Examples from Four Kingdoms. PLoS ONE, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1-10.
5. Bergman, Jerry. August 2000. Do any vestigial organs exist in humans? Technical Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 95-98.
6. Brandman, Onn, Tobias Meyer. 17 October 2008. Feedback Loops Shape Cellular Signals in Space and Time. Science, Vol. 322, No. 5900, pp. 390-395.
7. Carninci, Piero, Jun Yasuda, Yoshihide Hayashizaki. 2008. Multifaceted mammalian transcriptome. Current opinion in Cell Biology, Vol. 20, pp. 274-280.
8. Cemic, Ladislav. 2005. Thermodynamics in Mineral Sciences. Springer, New York.
9. Coates, Michael I. 26 March 2009. Beyond the Age of Fishes. Nature, Vol. 458. pp. 413-414.
10. Dagan T., W. Martin. 2006. The tree of one percent. Genome Biology, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 118.
11. Dekker, Job. 28 March 2008. Gene Regulation in the Third Dimension. Science, Vol. 319, pp. 1793-1794.
12. Doolittle, W. Ford, Eric Bapteste. February 13, 2007. Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 104, No. 7, pp. 2043-2049.
13. Doolittle, W. Ford. 25 June 1999. Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree. Science, Vol. 284, No. 5423, pp. 2124-2128.
14. Duke University Medical Center. "Evolution Of The Human Appendix: A Biological 'Remnant' No More." ScienceDaily 21 August 2009. Retrieved 12 September 2009 <http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2009/08/090820175901.htm>.
15. Fahraeus, Robin, Marc Blondel. 2008. Editorial: RNA-assisted protein folding. Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 967-969.
16. Franze, Kristian, Jens Grosche, Serguei N. Skatchkov, Stefan Schinkinger, Christian Foja, Detlev Schild, Ortrud Uckermann, Kort Travis, Andreas Reichenbach, Jochen Guck. May 15, 2007. Muller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina. PNAS Vol. 104, No. 20, pp. 8287-8292. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611180104
17. Gillooly, James F., Andrew P. Allen, Geoffrey B. West, James H. Brown. January 4, 2005. The rate of DNA evolution: Effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102, No. 1, pp. 140-145.
18. Gish, Duane T., PhD. Biochemistry. January 2007. A Few Reasons an Evolutionary Origin of Life Is Impossible. Impact #403, Acts and Facts, Institute for Creation Research.
19. Glass, John I., Nacyra Assad-Garcia, Nina Alperovich, Shibu Yooseph, Matthew R. Lewis, Mahir Maruf, Clyde A. Hutchison III, Hamilton O. Smith, J. Craig Venter. January 10, 2006. Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 425-430.
20. Jacob, Francois. June 10 1977. Evolution and Tinkering. Science, New Series, Vol. 196, Issue 4295, pp. 1161-1166.
21. Khalturin K, Anton-Erxleben F, Sassmann S, Wittlieb J, Hemmrich G, et al. 2008. A novel gene family controls species-specific morphological traits in Hydra. PLoS Biol 6(11): e278. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060278
22. Koonin, Eugene V. 12 February 2009. Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics. Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1011-1034.
23. Koonin, Eugene V. 20 August 2007. The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution. Biology Direct, Vol. 2:21, pp. 1-17.
24. Labin, A.M., E. N. Ribak. 16 April 2010. Retinal Glial Cells Enhance Human Vision Acuity. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 104, No. 15, pp. 158102-1 to 4. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.158102
25. Labin, Amichai M., Shadi K. Safuri, Erez N. Ribak, Ido Perlman. 8 July 2014. Muller cells separate between wavelengths to improve day vision with minimal effect upon night vision. Nature Communications, Vol. 5, No. 4319, pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5319
26. Lawton, Graham. 21 January 2009. Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life. New Scientist Magazine, issue 2692.
27. Lee, Michael S.Y., James B. Jago, Diego C. Garcia-Bellido, Gregory D. Edgecombe, James G. Gehling, John R. Paterson. 30 June 2011. Modern optics in exceptionally preserved eyes of Early Cambrian arthropods from Australia. Nature, Vol. 474, pp. 631-634.
28. Lewis Julian. 17 October 2008. From Signals to Patterns: Space, Time, and Mathematics in Developmental Biology. Science, Vol. 322, pp. 399-403.
29. Lowe, Craig B., Gill Bejerano, David Haussler. May 8, 2007. Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 104, No. 19, pp. 8005-8010.
30. Lunyak, Victoria V., Gratien G. Prefontaine, Esperanza Nunez, Thorsten Cramer, Bong-Gun Ju, Kenneth A. Ohgi, Kasey Hutt, Rosa Roy, Angel Garcia-Diaz, Xiaoyan Zhu, Yun Yung, Lluis Montoliu, Christopher K. Glass, Michael G. Rosenfeld. July 13, 2007. Developmentally Regulated Activation of a SINE B2 Repeat as a Domain Boundary in Organogenesis. Science, Vol. 317, No. 5835, pp. 248-251.
31. Makalowski, Wojciech. May 23, 2003. Not Junk After All. Science, Vol. 300, No. 5623, pp. 1246-1247.
32. Makeyev, Eugene V., Tom Maniatis. 28 March 2008. Multilevel Regulation of Gene Expression by MicroRNAs. Science, Vol. 319, pp. 1789-1790.
34. Pace, John K. II, Clement Gilbert, Marlena S. Clark, Cedric Feschotte. November 4, 2008. Repeated horizontal transfer of a DNA transposon in mammals and other tetrapods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, No. 44, pp. 17023-17028.
35. Pilcher, Helen. 19 January 2013. Genes from nowhere: Orphans with a surprising story. New Scientist, No. 2900, pp. 38-41.
36. Prigogine, Ilya, Gregoire Nicolis, Agnes Babloyants. 1972. Thermodynamics of Evolution. Physics Today, Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 23-44.
37. Reichenbach, Andreas, Andreas Bringmann. May 2013. New functions of Muller cells. Glia, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 651-678. DOI: 10.1002/glia.22477
38. Richardson, Michael K., James Hanken, Mayoni L. Gooneratne, Claude Pieau, Albert Raynaud, Lynne Selwood, Glenda M. Wright. July 1997. There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anatomy and Embryology, Vol. 196, No. 2, pp. 91-106.
39. Shu, D.-G., S. Conway Morris, J. Han, Z.-F. Zhang, K. Yasui, P. Janvier, L. Chen, X.-L. Zhang, J.-N. Liu, Y. Li, H.-Q. Liu. 30 January 2003. Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. Nature, Vol. 421, pp. 526-529.
40. Smith, H.F., R.E. Fisher, M.L. Everett, A.D. Thomas, R. Randal Bollinger, W. Parker. October 2009. Comparative anatomy and phylogenetic distribution of the mammalian cecal appendix. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1984-1999. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01809.x
41. Smith, Heather F., William Parker, Sanet H. Kotze, Michel Laurin. 2013. Multiple independent appearances of the cecal appendix in mammalian evolution and an investigation of related ecological and anatomical factors. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 16 pages. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2012.12.001
42. Szell, Marta, Zsuzsanna Bata-Csorgo, Lajos Kemeny. 2008. The enigmatic world of mRNA-like ncRNAs: Their role in human evolution and in human diseases. Seminars in Cancer Biology, Vol. 18, pp. 141-148.
43. van Steensel, Bas, Job Dekker. October 2010. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 1089-1093.
44. Weaver, Robert F. 2008. Molecular Biology, Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. 660-680.
45. Wissler, Lothar, Jurgen Gadau, Daniel F. Simola, Martin Helmkampf, Erich Bornberg-Bauer. January 24, 2013. Mechanisms and dynamics of orphan gene emergence in insect genomes. Genome Biology and Evolution Advance Access. doi:10.1093/gbe/evt009
46. Wood, Richard D., Michael Mitchell, John Sgouros, Tomas Lindahl. 16 February 2001. Human DNA Repair Genes. Science, Vol. 291, No. 5507, pp. 1284-1289.
47. Wu D-D, Irwin DM, Zhang Y-P. 2011. De Novo Origin of Human Protein-Coding Genes. PLoS Genet 7(11): e1002379. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002379
48. Zhu, Min, Wenjin Zhao, Liantao Jia, Jing Lu, Tuo Qiao, Qingming Qu. 26 March 2009. The oldest articulated osteichthyan reveals mosaic gnathostome characters. Nature, Vol. 458, pp. 469-474.

AND THE INVALUABLE RESOURCE OF 
Debunking Evolution:Problems between the theory and reality
John Michael Fischer
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html

AND 
The Scientific Case Against Evolution
http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/search?q=evolution

















Saturday, January 24, 2015

91,000 AMERICAN SOLDIERS.LEFT BEHIND

More than 83,000 Americans are STILL missing from World War II, the Korean War, the Cold War, the Vietnam War and the 1991 Gulf WarAdd AT LEAST 8,000 MIA/POWs from World War 1.


THAT GIVES A TOTAL OF OVER 91,000 MISSING AMERICAN SERVICEMEN!
AND WE STILL HAVE NO "OFFICIAL" MIA STATS FOR THE "COLD WAR ERA". 


SOURCE FOR THE ABOVE STATEMENT?
U.S. Department of Defense , Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office


HERE ARE THEIR STATISTICS:  


Today, more than 73,000 Americans remain unaccounted for from WWII.

More than 7,500 Americans remain unaccounted for from the Korean War.

~ Today, more than 1,600 Americans remain unaccounted for from the Vietnam conflict.

~ Today, 126 service members remain unaccounted for from the Cold War.

 ~ The current number of personnel missing from operations in Iraq and the Persian Gulf being actively pursued by DPMO is five - two service members from Desert Storm, and three DoD contractors from Iraqi Freedom. 

~ LIBYA
DPMO continues to pursue the fullest possible accounting of one serviceman lost in 1986 during Operation El Dorado Canyon in Libya.

THAT TOTAL GIVEN BY THE D.O.D. DOES NOT INCLUDE WORLD WAR 1.
ADD AT LEAST 8,000 MIA/POWs FROM THAT WAR, STILL ON FOREIGN SOIL.

THE DATA CITED ABOVE IS THE "OFFICIAL" COUNT BY OUR GOVERNMENT, BUT "OFFICIAL" COUNTS ARE OFTEN MISLEDAING, AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW.


An Examination of U.S. Policy Toward POW/MIAs
By the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Republican Staff
 Thursday, May 23, 1991 
"The interim conclusions are very disturbing. After examining hundreds of documents relating to the raw intelligence, and interviewing many families and friends of POW/MIAs, the Minority Staff concluded that, despite public pronouncements to the contrary, the real, internal policy of the U.S. government was to act upon the presumption that all MIAs were dead.

As a result, the minority Staff found, any evidence that suggested an MIA might be alive was uniformly and arbitrarily rejected, and all efforts were directed towards finding and identifying remains of dead personnel, even though the U.S. government's techniques of identification were inadequate and deeply flawed.In each case, the same dismaying scenario appears: On the Communist side, the regimes denied holding U.S. prisoners, contrary to may credible reports, while in fact they were holding the U.S. POW/MIAs as slave laborers and as reserve bargaining chips to get diplomatic recognition and financial assistance. On the U.S. side, our government downplayed or denied the report of POW/MIAs, and failed to take adequate steps to prove or disprove the reports, while elements in our government pursue policies intended to make diplomatic recognition and financial support of the revolutionary regimes possible."
CONCLUSION?
INTENTIONALLY AND KNOWINGLY LEFT BEHIND!


No man left behind?
The United States Senate Subcommittee Report on Prisoners of War documents with irrefutable evidence that American POWs were knowingly left behind by the federal government in communist prison camps at the end of World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Indochina and the Gulf War, all with the full knowledge and approval of every sitting president at that time and every president thereafter.



Ranking member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Senator Jesse Helms discovered during the examination of U.S. policy toward POW/MIAs that our government had been knowingly leaving our sons behind in the hands of those communists that he had so ardently fought against. He wrote about the on-going investigation of the issue, saying that "It was not, and was never intended to be, a search for specific POW/MIAs." 
But rather, Helms continued in his report, "it was an attempt to ascertain whether the agencies of the U.S. government responsible for POW/MIAs were doing the job they were supposed to do—that is, to find any POW/MIAs who might still be alive." 

AT THE END OF WORLD WAR 2, DWIGHT EISENHOWER ORDERED THAT SOMETHING CALLED "OPERATION KEELHAUL" BE PUT INTO EFFECT.
[See: http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/03/operation-keelhaul-hidden-allied.html]

 ALLIED FORCES TURNED MILLIONS, AN ESTIMATED 2 TO 5 MILLION, OF REFUGEES OVER TO SOVIET TROOPS, KNOWING THEY WOULD EITHER BE KILLED, OR SERVE OUT THEIR LIVES IN RUSSIAN GULAGS, AND THIS NUMBER INCLUDED OVER 20,000 AMERICAN TROOPS, AND 30,000 BRITISH TROOPS THAT EISENHOWER AND HIS BRITISH COUNTERPARTS ABANDONED TO THEIR FATE IN RUSSIA

 NEITHER ALLIED NATION INVOLVED IN THIS WILL OPEN THE FILES OF THIS ALLIES-CREATED HOLOCAUST AFTER 60 YEARS!
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS MADE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ARE DENIED, CITING "NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS".
AMERICAN TROOPS PERISHED INSIDE RUSSIA WONDERING WHY RESCUE NEVER CAME.
WE WOULD KNOW NOTHING OF THIS HAD NOT A FEW SURVIVED.

OPERATION KEELHAUL ACCOUNTS FOR 20,000+  MISSING FROM WORLD WAR 2.
THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF OTHERS.

WE SHALL NEVER FORGET
Remembering Those We Left Behind 

Navy Captain Eugene Baker "Red" McDaniel, who survived 6 years as a POW in North Vietnam, sums up the issue: "I was prepared to fight, to be wounded, to be captured, and even prepared to die, but I was not prepared to be abandoned."

McDaniel continues:
 “After having asked for over 3,700 men, they gave us their list, the Vietnamese list of 591, which I happened to be one of. We accepted that list and came home in four groups. 591 men. And on April 13, 1973, and this is public record, the US government said, ‘they’re all dead!’. Well, my question is, what happened to those other 3,109 that we asked for between March of 73 and April 73, when we declared them all dead. What happened to those men?”

And, why would the United States government declare American prisoners of war dead less than 21 days after US sources reported to UPI that as many as 100 were still alive (in Laos), and after the United States originally asked for 3,700 men?

BUT THOUSANDS FROM THE VIETNAM WAR ERA WERE LEFT BEHIND.
EVEN RONALD REAGAN ADMITTED THAT!
[See: "Reagan Admitted Hundreds of POWs Left Behind," NewsMax.com, September 2002, p. 50. ]

[Another revealing story appeared in the article "Robert Garwood Says Vietnam Didn't Return Some American POWs" by Bill Paul in Wall Street Journal, and another documentation of those abandoned in Vietnam on "60 Minutes", "Dead or Alive" produced by Monica Jensen-Stevenson.]

ABANDONED, LEFT BEHIND!
This is what happened to over 30,000 American servicemen, beginning in WW I and continuing through the first Gulf War. 
With the exception of the Gulf War, all were left behind in the hands of Communist regimes, whose brutality exceeded by any measure that demonstrated by the Nazis in World War II. 

THEY WERE NOT ABANDONED BY THEIR IMMEDIATE COMRADES IN ARMS, BUT BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!

U.S. SENATOR HERBERT H. KOHL wrote in 1992: "[Military] service is based on a belief in, and trust of, their government: that it will train them well, equip them superbly, and do everything it reasonably can to protect them and care for them. It is the credibility of those promises which the POW/MIA issue strains. For if, after all, the government does not keep its promises, then why should our soldiers honor their pledge to follow orders, even at the risk of their own lives.

 This Report [Final Report of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs] demonstrates that the government has not kept its promises to those who served in Vietnam. Even more disturbing, is the evidence which suggests - strongly suggests - that the government failed to keep its promises to those who served in World War II, the Korean War, and the Cold War as well."

As explained by Colonel Millard Peck, who ran the DIA POW/MIA office 1989-1991, 

   "The issue is being manipulated by unscrupulous people in the Government, or associated with the Government . [They] have maintained their distance and remained hidden in the shadows. This issue is being manipulated and controlled at a higher lever, not with the goal of resolving it, but more to obfuscate the question of live prisoners, and give the illusion of progress through hyperactivity. From what I have witnessed, it appears that any soldier left in Vietnam, even inadvertently, was, in fact, abandoned years ago, and that the farce that is being played is no more than political legerdemain done with "smoke and mirrors", to stall the issue until it dies a natural death." 

SO MANY HAVE COME FORWARD ON THE TRUTH OF THIS THAT THOSE IN THE PENTAGON AND ON CAPITOL HILL SHOULD HAVE DIED OF SHAME, GUILT, REMORSE , OR MAYBE SHOULD HAVE BEEN HANGED AS TRAITORS TO AMERICA LONG AGO!

THE ABANDONMENTS DURING WORLD WAR 1

STATISTICS VARY REGARDING MIA/POWs FROM WORLD WAR 1;
ONE SITE LISTS POW/MIA AT 7,470.SOME SITES ESTIMATE AS MUCH AS 4 TIMES THAT NUMBER.

In 1920, shortly after WW I, Russia experienced a devastating famine.
Many were dying of starvation.

Just prior to this famine, the Russians had denied holding ANY American captives. 
When the Russians asked for food and medical assistance, a sharp U.S. official gave them an offer they could not refuse: "release the American prisoners and we will send you food. "
Russian officials agreed to return the Americans when the food shipments commenced. We started shipping food, and they released 100 men. 
Then, they stopped. 
No more were released, but the U.S. continued shipping food, ignoring the Russian failure to release ALL hostages.
 The official position pronounced by the State Department was that no American servicemen were still held captive.

THAT WAS A LIE!

In 1921, the New York Times reported that:
the American prisoners held by the Soviet Government of Russia have been told by the Bolsheviks that they are held because the United States government has not made vigorous demands for their release .
"Captives' Release Repeatedly Sought," The New York Times, Apr 18, 1921.

PLEASE, READ MORE HERE:
http://www.ojc.org/powforum/examin/ovrvw01.htm

I can understand the problems of data-gathering for this war.
65 million from 30 nations fought in it.
Over 6 million Allied troops died.
"Missing in Action" was a new phrase, but we really ought to have concrete facts on the STILL missing!

MORE ABANDONED AFTER WORLD WAR 2

Following the victory in Europe in 1945, both Presidents Roosevelt and Truman sent directives to U.S. command in Europe that said there would be "no criticism of treatment [of American POWs] by the Russians" and that there would be "no retaliatory action to Russian failure to cooperate," which referred to Russian failure to give the United States access to American POWs in the German POW camps the Russians had captured. 
As a result, only 4,165 American prisoners were released, those from the one camp visited BY THE AMERICAN MILITARY/GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES (the POW camp at Reisa).

The remaining KNOWN 21,000 Americans prisoners in German camps taken over by the Russians were abandoned to the Russians. 
They were shipped to Russia to fates worse than death. 
Records were then falsified by U.S. and British intelligence in an effort to hide what had happened. 

Following the Korean "Conflict", Colonel Philip J. Corso, who was on Eisenhower's White House staff and was in charge of the POW issue, stated in Senate and House hearings in 1992 and 1996 that Eisenhower made the decision to leave the missing American POWs behind after he, Corso, had explained to Eisenhower that thousands were missing, that US intelligence knew they had been shipped to Russia and China, and that achieving their return would be difficult. 

U.S. policy was clear, he explained.
"We couldn't put pressure on the Soviet Union or the satellites, we couldn't - they had our prisoners and we couldn't put pressure on them. That was it. Our policy forbids us from doing it. If you did it, you were disobeying national policy."   

In implementing this policy, U.S. executive agencies - State, Intelligence, and Defense - subsequently denied any American POWs were left behind. This is still taking place today. 

EISENHOWER ESTIMATED THE RUSSIA-BOUND AMERICAN POWs AT 25,000!
HE KNEW! 

"General Eisenhower was aware that Americans were being held prisoner in the Soviet Union just weeks after the end of the war. In a secret message dated May 9, 1945, sent to General George Marshall in Washington, he estimated the number of prisoners being held at 25,000. "

IKE WROTE THEM ALL OFF!

THE KOREAN "CONFLICT"
American POW’s taken from the Korean War were also transported to the Soviet Union. This fact was confirmed in a secret memo to the US Embassy in Moscow from then Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, advising the Soviets that the United States was indeed aware that U.S. POW’s from Korea were being held INSIDE the Soviet Union.

Also verifying this is a "Combined Reconnaissance Activities Report," dated February 24, 1953, as well as a CIA report dated July 15, 1951, which also mentions 78 American POW’s from Korea being held in a camp in China.

Former Defense Intelligence Agency Director Daniel Graham had this to say, “The Soviets would come with a list of specialties and look and pick among the POW’s being held in North Korea and then ship them out.”

Shortly after a special Senate Select Committee for POW/MIA Affairs was established to investigate the missing American POW/MIAs issue in late 1991, information from a top-level Czech official who had defected to the United States in 1968 was brought to their attention. 

This source, Major General Jan Sejna, had been personally involved in sanitizing the Korean War hospital that Corso (see above) had targeted in North Korea. 

Corso explained that the hospital was built for the purpose of conducting medical experiments on captured Americans. The Americans were used as guinea pigs for testing the effects of high radiation exposure.and in testing the effects of chemical and biological warfare agents in the development of an important new class of chemical warfare agents.

They were also used as live cadavers upon which the Korean military doctors could practice various operations such as amputations and organ removal. Finally, they were used in graduated torture experiments to determine the limits of psychological and physiological "stress" the Americans could endure. 

Several thousand Americans were killed in the North Korean hospital.
WE KNOW THAT!


Sejna monitored the Czech participation and the operational results. He also had a 20-year record following his defection in providing valuable information to U.S. and allied intelligence. At the time he defected, 1968, and through the end of the Vietnam War, U.S. intelligence NEVER questioned him regarding American POW/MIAs, notwithstanding many obvious reasons for doing so. 

When Sejna's possible appearance before the U.S. Senate began to surface, the response of the various executive agencies was not to learn what Sejna knew, but to discredit him, silence him, bury his testimony. 

None of this was a case of examining what Sejna had to say and then rejecting it as not credible. No, in all cases none of those involved wanted to know. Their only mission was to silence Sejna, discredit him so that no one would get interested in what he knew, and seek the help of enemy foreign intelligence services who also would not want Sejna's information to draw attention. 

In 1996, Congressman Bob Dornan asked Sejna to testify before Dornan's House committee, which Sejna agreed to do. 

This is when a 1992 DIA memo surfaced. It was signed by DIA director, Lt. Gen. Clapper. The memo stated that when Sejna's knowledge about what happened to American POWs began to surface, Sejna was subjected to a 4-hour hostile polygraph, during which he "showed no signs of deception."  

HE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH!     
Another internal DIA memo surfaced in which the intelligence directorate of DIA offered to help debrief Sejna and corroborate his testimony. 

The memo was written by a senior analyst who had worked with Sejna on several projects, including international terrorism, and knew how open he was and how valuable the information he had provided over twenty years had been. 
Their offer, needless to say, was not accepted.
Nor did Sejna hesitate in fulfilling his decision to testify before Dornan's committee about what he knew after he was threatened three times that he would be killed if he testified.
 The last threat came before he left home on the very morning he was to testify. 
Slightly less than a year following his testimony, he was dead. 

WHAT CAME OF HIS TESTIMONY?
NOTHING!  
CIA intelligence reports dated March 9, 1988, indicates that at least some American POW’s from the Korean War may still be alive.

 It states, “11 Caucasians, possibly American prisoners, were seen on a farm north of P’Yongyang.”
WHY HAVEN'T WE GONE TO GET THEM?

THE UNDECLARED WAR IN VIETNAM
HOW MANY BRANDED AS DESERTERS WERE NOT DESERTERS?
MIA, POW, "KIA, NO BODY RETRIEVED"...THOUSANDS LEFT BEHIND!

What are the chances that American POW’s from Vietnam were also shipped to the Soviet Union and CHINA?

Testimony before the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs in 1991 by a former Soviet KGB official and a former Vietnamese General, suggests American POW’s were interrogated by the Soviets.

Committee member, Senator Robert Smith, explains the significance of this admission, “All the American POW’s who came home, never gave any indication that they were ever interrogated by Russians. So, if that’s the case, where are all the ones who were?”

Smith and the Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA affairs, Senator John Kerry, were appointed to a joint US/Russian Commission to comb KGB files for answers regarding the fate of American prisoners from World War II, Korea and Vietnam. 

IT MAY SHOCK YOU TO KNOW THAT HUNDREDS OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF MISSING SERVICEMEN AS WELL AS OTHERS IN THE MILITARY AND IN CONGRESS HAVE LONG SAID THAT JOHN KERRY AND JOHN McCAIN ARE THE MOST VOCAL AND THE BIGGEST OBSTACLES AGAINST RECOVERY OF AMERICA'S MISSING IN ACTION AND UNACCOUNTED-FOR POWs! 

Evidence   

Former President George Bush Sr., “There’s no hard evidence of prisoners being alive.”
Former Congressman and former consultant to the Defense Intelligence Agency, Bill Hendon, strongly disagrees with the former President as he furiously lists cases of documented sightings to the Senate Committee: “49 in North Vietnam, 200 in North Vietnam, 4 in South Vietnam, 184 in Vietnam, 70 to 80 in North Vietnam, a ‘truck load’ in North Vietnam, 2 in Laos, ‘a group’ in North Vietnam, 50 in Laos, 230 in Vietnam from the CIA, and 219 more in Vietnam from a Vietnamese doctor who testified that he took care of them.”
Testifying before then Senator Al Gore and the Senate Rules Committee in 1991, Former Congressman Hendon stated that evidence is overwhelming that American POW’s are still alive. In his testimony, he quoted as saying, “Many of the reports are, I believe, highly reliable. 50 in Laos, double-polygraph confirmed, 6 in Laos, double-polygraph confirmed. The accounts are highly specific as to location.”

In a futile attempt to buy freedom for America’s POW’s, a then-secret letter dated February 1, 1973, was sent to the North Vietnamese Prime Minister from Henry Kissinger. 
The letter stated that the United States was willing to pay $3.2 billion dollars over five years for returned POWs. 

While this offer was being made by the Executive Branch, Congress was busying itself investigating the torturous treatment received by our servicemen at the hands of their Communist captors.  

April 6, 1973: Angered by reports of torture, the US Senate voted 88-3 to bar any financial aid to North Vietnam. 

April 12, 1973: The Pentagon declared ALL American POW’s dead.

EYEWITNESSES, POWs WHO RETURNED TO THE U.S, KNOW BETTER!

Many former American POW’s testified to being tortured any number of ways throughout a given day FOR YEARS ON END. 

BUT THEY HAD MANAGED TO SOMEHOW SURVIVE, AND THEY KNEW OTHERS, UNACCOUNTED FOR, HAD ALSO SURVIVED!
Some who would much later testify before Congress had been POWs for 8 long years!

Many of them also testified that they knew of other POWs who had NOT been released, WHO WERE ALIVE WHEN THEY WERE RELEASED BY VIETNAM! 

The ruling held, ALL AMERICAN POWs ARE OFFICIALLY DEAD!
BUT NOW WE KNOW THAT WASN'T TRUE!

Former National Security Agency analyst Jerry Mooney says the United States government knew from the beginning that it would be difficult to get all American POW’s returned home because the Vietnamese considered them to be ‘war criminals’, not ‘prisoners of war’. Mr. Mooney also says the US intelligence community, behind the scenes, was keeping track of American POW’s. He is further quoted as saying, “While the overt side of government, the policy side, had declared them dead just to calm down the American people, the highest national requirement, from the highest levels of government, remained on the books in the intelligence community. And that requirement was to: ‘Identify, Search for, Locate and Bring Home’ these POW’s.” 

THE COLD WAR ERA
Similarly, there has been no attempt to identify or count those captured during the 40-year Cold War. These missing Americans includes not only those captured while on missions in or over enemy territory but also hundreds if not thousands of men and women who were abducted in neutral and friendly countries and then taken away behind the Iron and Bamboo curtains. These captives may number in the thousands, but no one in Washington has cared enough to even try and add up the totals. 

NO "official" count for MIAs.
Over the years, historians, researchers and independent journalists have made a compelling case that, during the Cold War, thousands of U.S. POWs were moved among Soviet, Chinese and North Korean labor camps, where they toiled and died under the worst conditions.
BECAUSE OF "NATIONAL SECURITY", OUR GOVERNMENT SAYS, THEIR NAMES MAY NEVER BE RELEASED!

Throughout the years, the message to the American public has remained the same; there is no hard evidence the American POW’s are still being held. However, the operational side of government was directed to keep looking and keep identifying POW’s.  

Some former intelligence chiefs have shared Mooney’s belief that American prisoners are still alive in SE Asia.  

October 1985: Former CIA Director, William Casey, told a group of five US Congressmen, “Everyone knows they’re there, but there’s no public support to get them out. What do you want, another hostage crisis? We messed up. It’s my job to see that we don’t mess up again.”

October 9, 1985: Former National Security Advisor to President Ronald Reagan, Robert McFarland, made this remark before a luncheon group in New York, “There have to be Americans there. There is more that we ought to be doing.”

June 1985: The former head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency publicly stated his belief that as many as 50 to 60 American POW’s are being held in SE Asia.

In 1986, a Pentagon Commission concluded that American prisoners are still being held as "there is a large volume of evidence." 

In a recent interview, Rep. Bob Dornan recalls his trip to Hanoi in an attempt to win the freedom of America’s POW’s. He quotes himself as saying to the Vietnamese officials, “Let’s talk turkey about getting our guys out. You know what one of the Communists said to me? And I’ve never said this on camera before – he said, ‘you raise a million and then we’ll talk’. That’s what he said to me and I’ll polygraph on it!”

Former Air Force Intelligence Officer, Lt. Col. Al Shinkle, has tracked American POW’s in Laos for two decades. 
He says he has discovered 324 of the 500 pilots shot down over Laos were still alive.

He details a conversation he had with the Laosian Ambassador to Thailand in December 1985, “I asked him if they did indeed have American prisoners of war and he said yes, we have them in large numbers. When I asked him if they were available for recovery, he said yes, they were for sale.”

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan declared the POW/MIA issue would be America’s highest priority. In a letter to a POW family member dated May 19, 1982 from the President, he states, “I know there is a perception that little action is taking place, but this is because the operations that are going on are of a covert nature.”

VICTIM OF THE COVER-UP
Seventeen years after American involvement ended, the Vietnam War claimed yet another victim. Marion Shelton was the matriarch of the POW/MIA movement. 
Her husband, Col. Charles Shelton, was known to have been captured alive when his plane went down over Laos in April 1965. To this day, he is the only official prisoner of war listed by the United States government.  
Unanswered questions and 25 years of waiting to be reunited with her husband proved too much for Marion Shelton to bare. She had lost faith in her government. Washington, she believed, had failed her.  
Feeling hopeless and alone, Marion Shelton took her own life in September 1990.

FAMILIES LIED TO!

In 1986, Dr. William Maples, a Physical Anthropologist at the University of Florida, told members of Congress that a number of Anthropologists had examined several similar sets of remains and agreed, they were unidentifiable.

Why then, did the Army tell family members that these were the remains of their loved ones when they were not identifiable?

Jerry Dennis sent his six-foot, Caucasian brother off to war, but was surprised when the Army returned the remains of a five-foot-five Oriental. 
He says, “The helicopter Mark was in uses JP4 or JP5 unleaded fuel. This body had been blown-up with American grenades and burned with regular gasoline. Dog tags pinned to the blanket wrapped around the body were burned by simply holding a book of matches underneath them.”  

Cover-Up  

Senator John Kerry (D-MA): “Has anyone ever held you back or restrained your efforts to find somebody, or diverted information that you have provided or covered-up any information that you have provided?”
Bill Bell, from the Pentagon’s POW/MIA Office in Hanoi: “Yes Sir.”

When a picture turned-up in 1991 of three men that some thought were American POW’s, the hopeful family members were grateful to hear that three sets of fingerprints were taken off the photo. However, when each of the families requested the fingerprint card from the files the Army keeps, they were told the cards had mysteriously vanished from all offices throughout the various levels of government.

There has been a cover-up by elements within the United States government.

What is the reason for it?

When did it start and why?

John Sommer, the Executive Director of the American Legion says the Communists have been more forthcoming with information than the Pentagon. In his testimony, he is quoted as saying, “We actually get more hard information from the Vietnamese than we have from the Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense or any other American entity involved with this issue.” 

Marine Private Bobby Garwood, a POW returned in 1981, wasn't given a hero’s welcome by any measure.

After he testified to being just one of 70 or 80 other American POW’s still being held, he was arrested and charged with aiding and abetting the enemy. 

One of the most deplorable, yet representative examples of the ongoing cover-up is what happened to Bobby Garwood, who was captured while on a "secret" mission for a U.S. general in intelligence.

He did not return from the mission, became MIA only a week prior to his scheduled return to the States, and was soon listed as a deserter.

Evidently no one wanted to tell what really happened and explain why he was sent into a known hostile region without an armed escort.

Later, U.S. intelligence painted him as a deserter and instigated a special forces mission to assassinate him.

Fortunately, it was not successful. 

When informed in 1978 that Garwood was still a prisoner, the State Department discarded the message.

Only when Garwood managed to get a second message out in 1979 was he released. 
He managed to slip a note to a Finnish executive who was in Hanoi. 
The Finn made the note public and Garwood was released to avoid embarrassment. 
Upon his return, the Marine Corps put him on trial for behavior unbecoming a prisoner of war and seized all his back pay. Then they prevented those who could attest to his prisoner status, such as the former North Vietnamese official Colonel Tran Van Loc, from telling the truth at the trial. 

Former POW Colonel Ted Guy later explained, "Garwood had to be discredited so that he would not be believed."
Among other things, Garwood had personally witnessed roughly 100 American POWs still in captivity in Vietnam in 1979, as reported by the Wall Street Journal's Bill Paul in a feature news story in 1984. 

"The head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Gen. Tighe, tried to stop the court martal after Garwood was released. He believed Garwood was telling the truth and that Garwood should be carefully debriefed because of his valuable knowledge about missing Americans.

But, no one else in the government wanted to know what Garwood knew, especially the Marine Corps brass. Later, after he retired, Tighe himself debriefed Garwood and attested to the reliability and importance of Garwood's knowledge. Then, the government did its best to discredit Gen. Tighe. "

WHY?

Four years later Tighe testified to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and repeated that "living prisoners remained in captivity in Indochina.  The intelligence that led him to that conclusion, Tighe told the committee, 'was among the most detailed of human reporting I have ever seen ....  It is high quality human intelligence.' "

THE "GULF WARS", 1991-2015
THE FIRST GULF WAR

You may read that there are "only three" of our troops still MIA in Iraq from Bush Sr's first Gulf War.
That's a LIE!

There are very many DISPUTED remains that were returned to families who KNOW those remains are NOT their loved ones!
There are those listed as "KIA" whose bodies were NEVER recovered, MANY!

Have a look at this website that documents all this:
GULF WAR POW/MIA, KIA/BNR, and ReturneesU.S. Military, Civilians and Foreign Nationals

Read about one wife's struggle to have her husband's REAL remains found and turned over to her:

Her story leads us to NINE other grieving families who NEVER got their loved ones' remains.

"Out of a crew of fourteen, five were identified, and the other nine families had 
to accept 'apportioned remains'. There were no returned bodies "

HOW MANY MORE?
A March 18 (1991) Newsweek article reported that eleven Green Berets disappeared during scouting and sabotage missions in Iraq, although the Pentagon has not listed them
 on MIA reports and refuses to discuss the event.



The soldiers were part of special operations forces that infiltrated Iraq during Operation Desert Storm to locate missile launchers, pinpoint air targets, and steal enemy
equipment, Newsweek reported.

IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN

I sat once for almost 10 hours listening to 3 young men just back from Iraq.
They were high school friends and all had been in Iraq at about the same time.
TWO of them had, for months, been assigned to helping load the remains of fallen comrades for return to America from Iraq.
The other had wound up in Germany for a year before he shipped home, where he often watched the flag-draped coffins of men who had died at military hospitals in Germany get loaded.

ALL THREE SAID THE SAME THING:
"AS MANY BODIES AS WE SAW LOADED EVERY DAY, THE NUMBERS GIVEN BY THE D.O.D. HAVE TO BE FAKE!
FIGURE IT OUT!
IF WE EACH SAW 20 TO 50 EVERY DAY FOR 2 OR 3 YEARS, ALL OF US AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, WHAT WOULD THE REAL COUNT BE?
WHY THE HELL AREN'T THEY TELLING THE TRUTH?"

Remember when, briefly, most news agencies picked up on the online death toll from the Gulf wars being over 72,000?
It was because the Department of Veterans Affairs had posted that on one of their own websites!

HERE IS ONE OF THOSE REPORTS, BUT THERE WERE MANY:
.<BEGIN QUOTE>

(August 19, 2008) -- According to an official Department of Veterans Affairs Gulf War Information Systems Report dated August 2007, more than THREE AND A HALF MILLION US troops who took part in the Gulf War since 1990 are dead or disabled.

On page 7 of the official report under the title Compensation and Pension Statistics August 2007, on line six of the chart the total Veterans who have been granted "Claims Granted Service Connection" is 1,201,104 Gulf War Veterans.

A total of 1,603,743 claims have been filed (line 3).

The trillions of dollars cost of this illegal war in financial terms is one thing, in regard to killing and disabling millions of US citizens, it is entirely another matter.

However, how many Gulf War Veterans are dead?

Statistics on Page 6 of the official report are shown below with the added DEAD GULF WAR VETERANS line: 

Category Conflict Theater Deployed Era Total 
Service Members: 6,838,541

Veteran Deaths; 74,871

Estimated Living Veterans: 4,525,866

DEAD GULF WAR VETERANS; 2,312,67

The official Department of Veterans Affairs report can be found at 
http://www1.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/GWVIS_Aug2007.pdf  

[NOTE: DON'T BOTHER GOING TO THAT SITE, IT HAS BEEN REPLACED, WITH AN ERROR MESSAGE GIVEN, BUT OTHER SITES DID COPY IT AND IT IS AVAILABLE ONLINE.]


The VA report defines the listed categories as follows:

CONFLICT -- Desert Shield / Desert Storm Other Deployments in the 1st Year Only Starting 2nd Year from 8/2/90 to 7/31/91

THEATER Gulf War Region 8/1/91-Present   
DEPLOYED -- CONFLICT + THEATER. Active Duty and Activated Reserve Forces Only from 8/2/90 - to Present   

ERA -- Service Members Not Deployed in the Gulf War region from 8/2/90 - Present
Service Members All Veterans who served on or after August 2, 1990, the start of the Gulf War.   

Veteran Deaths -- Veterans who died while listed in VBA’s Compensation and Pension Master Record (CPMR) and the Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator Subsystem (BIRLS).   

Estimated Living Veterans -- Service Members in active service on or after August 2, 1990 and who have not died.   

What is confusing is the enormous difference between the deaths listed amongst the deployed versus the non-deployed troops. 

How is it that three times more troops are dying and being disabled outside of the Gulf War region?  

We believe this is because the troops are immediately evacuated out of the Gulf when they are injured.

The VA report indicates that 2,312,675 US troops who were on active duty between August 1990 and August 2007, have died. 

Clearly millions of soldiers on active duty in and from 1990 are not dead of old age or natural causes by 2007. 

We believe the injured troops are rushed back to the US before they are dead.  
Injured troops naturally are no longer on active duty, conveniently they die when they are no longer active and not counted amongst those "dying in Iraq."

Evacuated troops are conveniently not counted as dead in the Gulf or Iraq, because they died in transit or died once they were back in the good old USA." 

<END QUOTE>

THE VETERANS AFFAIRS PEOPLE HAD ANSWERS READY.
TOTAL DEAD INCLUDED ALL WHO HAD DIED, SOME OF "NATURAL CAUSES", SOME FROM "ACCIDENTS", SOME OF WOUNDS, AND STILL OTHERS FROM SUICIDE.
THEIR STATISTICS WERE MISINTERPRETED, THEY SAID! 


THE "OFFICIAL" COUNT OF KILLED IN ACTION, "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" IS STILL LISTED AS AROUND 6,000.

THINK!
IF WE'VE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT THIS, SURELY WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT THERE BEING "ONLY THREE KNOWN, PROVEN MILITARY MIA/POWs FROM ALL GULF WARS WHO REMAIN UNACCOUNTED FOR"?

ASK A RETURNING GULF WAR VETERAN.

POW files

There's a myth in Washington that virtually all the government's POW documents have been declassified and are available to the public. Bush, in 1992, issued the first declassification directive. Clinton, after taking office in 1993, said he had speeded up Bush's executive order, later announced that was completed.

NO, IT NEVER WAS!

NOT TRUE!
Try finding any of the C.I.A.'s key operational files on POWs in the National Archives or the Library of Congress. Try finding satellite imagery of POW distress signals.

Where are the missing memos and cables on the Vietnamese ransom offers? T
he truth is that the most significant files, from the highest levels of government and the intelligence community, were not covered by the Bush and Clinton executive orders and remain under lock and key.

(Not that declassifying files necessarily brings them to light. The Pentagon, for example, says it sent stacks of declassified National Security Agency documents to the Library of Congress. But here is how one researcher, Roger Hall, described the situation in a letter to The Washington Times:"... the material has been deliberately mislabeled and scattered into different categories. Those who wish access to these documents are thwarted by the deliberate and malicious concealment of information. There is no way for any average citizen — or expert — doing research on the POW/MIA issue to find this particular material.")

Those Nixon tapes

And then there are the Nixon tapes. Nixon refused, when the Senate POW committee asked him, to produce the tapes from 1973 (yes, that's right, the Watergate tapes from the Oval Office) that are believed to contain his conversations with Brent Scowcroft and others on the tactics of how to present the prisoner story to the public. One can understand how the late president and his advisers feared being accused of dishonor had they told us the awful reality: That in 1973 they felt compelled by the circumstances to accept the peace accords even though many of our prisoners were still captive. But that was 21 years ago — and still we are denied the truth.

Over time there have been Pentagon officers, some in key posts, who tried to tell the truth. Their reports found the Defense Intelligence Agency to be permeated by a "mind-set to debunk." And when the reports leaked out, the debunking machine would shift into high gear once again. Sometimes these officers were defamed as malcontents or worse.

Why has there been no wide and sustained public outcry over this national scandal?
The answer is simplicity itself.

 When the Vietnam war ended, almost everyone in America wanted to forget Vietnam, erase it, bury it. They still do. The soldiers who came home were reviled as baby killers. We shunned them because, as a culture, we have been imbued with the notion that winning is the only thing. Indeed, we have never been taught how to cope with losing anything, let alone a war. There was no constituency for the truth, no powerful lobby to stir Congress. MIA families don't command many votes.

World Wars 1 and 2 were "long ago and far away", romanticized by film and press, with almost NO ONE asking where the missing were.

Most American citizens recognize that we LOST the Korean Conflict, and most will NOT see the "Cold War" as a war at all.

It's over, let's just forget it and move on.

Except for those of us who STILL want to know where our loved ones are, what happened to them, why didn't someone bring them home?  
No, no one who is STILL searching for a beloved son, daughter, husband, brother, fiend will EVER forget!

NONE of us should ever forget the 91,000-plus missing, still missing Americans who are lost, left behind, abandoned by the government that sent them off to war.

These 91,000 deserve our respect, and we should finally ...

BRING THEM ALL HOME!

LET US NEVER FORGET THEM!



SOURCES:
For a start on how factual the above is, see corroborating evidence in the following many sources: 

~Missing In Action: Trail of Deceit by Larry J. O'Daniel, "

~Robert Garwood Says Vietnam Didn't Return Some American POWs" by Bill Paul in Wall Street Journal,

~60 Minutes, "Dead or Alive" produced by Monica Jensen-Stevenson,

"We Can Keep You Forever" produced by Ted Landreth,

~"A Chain of Prisoners: From Yalta to Vietnam by John M. G. Brown and Thomas G. Ashworth,

~"Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POWs in Vietnam" by Monica Jensen-Stevenson and William Stevenson,

~"An Examination of U.S. Policy Toward POW/MIAs "by Foreign Relations Republican Staff,

~"The Bamboo Cage: The Full Story of the American Servicemen still held hostage in South-East Asia" by Nigel Cawthorne,

~"After the Hero's Welcome: A POW Wife's Story of the Battle Against a New Enemy" by Dorothy McDaniel,

~"Missing in Action: The Soviet Connection" produced by Ted Landreth,

~"Americans Abandoned" produced by Red McDaniel,

~Numerous Newsday articles by Sydney H. Schanberg,

~"Soldiers of Misfortune: Washington's Secret Betrayal of American POWs in the Soviet Union" by James D. Sanders, Mark A. Sauter, and Cort Kirkwood,

~"Moscow Bound: Policy, Politics and the POW/MIA Dilemma" by John M. G. Brown,

~"The Men We Left Behind: Henry Kissinger, the Politics of Deceit and the Tragic Fate of POWs After the Vietnam War" by Mark Sauter and Jim Sanders,

~"Last Seen Alive: The Search for Missing POWs from the Korean War" by Laurence Jolidon,

~"Left Behind" and "One Returned" radio interview tapes produced by Dr. Stanley Monteith,

~"The Medusa File" by Craig Roberts,

~"Leading the Way" and "Everything We Had" by Al Santoli,

~"Why Didn't You Get Me Out" by Frank Anton,

~"Spite House: The Last Secret of the War in Vietnam "by Monika Jensen-Stevenson,

~"Code-Name Bright Light " by George J. Veith,:

~"One Day Too Long: Top Secret Site 85 and the Bombing of North Vietnam" by Timothy N. Castle,

~"Trails of Deceit " by Larry O'Daniel, 

~"Korean Atrocity: Forgotten War Crimes" by Philip D. Chinnery,

~" Betrayed " by Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.

SOURCES FROM WHICH I HAVE QUOTED AND/OR COLLECTED DATA:
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.  

~Americans Abandoned, POW/MIA’s in Vietnam
Researched and originally produced by the American Defense Institute, and reproduced and distributed by The Liberty House.

~The Long Goodbye
By Joseph D. Douglass Jr. 

~
http://www.propublica.org/article/missing-in-action-us-military-slow-to-identify-service-members

~http://www.warhistoryonline.com/

~http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/sep/29/john-scocos/tens-thousands-us-service-members-missing-wisconsi/

~http://www.pownetwork.org/gulf/index_gulf_war.htm  

~http://armedforcesmuseum.com/interesting-facts-about-world-war-i/

[A VERY INTERESTING READ ON WW1]

~http://www.mrfa.org/pow_mia.htm

~http://www.pbs.org/greatwar/resources/casdeath_pop.html

~http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/30/world/pow-and-mia-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-fast-facts/

~http://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/military/veterans-related.html

~http://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/military/veterans-related.html

~http://www.jpac.pacom.mil/

~vetstribute.com/thelonggoodbye/abandoned.htm

~http://www.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/wwi/century/

~http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/pows_still_in_laos_142.html