Saturday, September 28, 2019

BUSTED! THE CDC CAUGHT IN VACCINE LIES...AGAIN

"FIRST, DO NO HARM."
The physician must be able to tell the antecedents, know the present, and foretell the future — must mediate these things, and have two special objects in view with regard to disease, namely, to do good or to do no harm.”
~ Greek physician Hippocrates, from his writing, "Of the Epidemics". 

FROM HIS "HIPPOCRATIC OATH": 
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.”

THE SUPPRESSED AND MUCH-MALIGNED FILM BELOW IS ONLY AVAILABLE 'FOR FREE' UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 2019, AND I BEG YOU, AT LEAST WATCH THIS FILM. SHARE IT WITH ANYONE YOU CAN. JUST WATCH IT AND THINK.

BY NO MEANS DO I EXPECT ANYONE TO AGREE WITH MY PERSONAL TAKE ON VACCINES, BUT, BY-ALL-THE-GODS, PLEASE WATCH AND DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AS I HAVE FOR THE PAST 60+ YEARS.




FOR THOSE WHO DON'T CHECK OUT THE CREDENTIALS OF THOSE WHO DO RESEARCH OR WORK IN ANY CAPACITY FOR THE CDC, LET ME ASSURE YOU THAT THE CREDENTIALS OF ALMOST ALL PHYSICIANS, RESEARCHERS, SCIENTISTS WHO DISAGREE WITH THE CDC ARE FAR MORE IMPRESSIVE THAN WHAT THE CDC CAN HIRE!

HOW MANY OF YOU LISTENED TO TESTIMONY PRESENTED TO CONGRESS IN JUNE OF 2011 BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND PARENTS OF VACCINE-INJURED, OR VACCINE-KILLED CHILDREN? [SEE VIDEO BELOW] 

SOME WILL FIND THESE TESTIMONIES BOTH SHOCKING AND HEARTBREAKING, BUT THEY ARE ALL DOCUMENTED TRUTHS.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEVER SHOWS THIS!
WHY NOT?
DO THEY PUT ADVERTISERS BEST INTERESTS ABOVE THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF CHILDREN, OF HUMAN BEINGS?
WHY WOULD WE TRUST ANYONE WHO PUTS PROFITS FIRST? 




IN TESTIMONY BEFORE CONGRESS, 1999, PLEASE LOOK CLOSELY AT THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED BY STUDIES PRESENTED TO THE CONGRESSMEN AT THAT TIME:

"By means of vaccine policy (1), the federal government is effectively making critical medical decisions for an entire generation of American children.
The mechanism is a public-private partnership.

"Recommendations" issue from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a small group whose members have incestuous ties (2) with agencies that stand to gain power, or manufacturers that stand to gain enormous profits, from the policy that is made.

Even if such members recuse themselves from specific votes, they are permitted to participate in discussions and thus influence the decision. 

Conclusions

Public policy regarding vaccines is fundamentally flawed.


It is permeated by conflicts of interest.
It is based on poor scientific methodology (including studies that are too small, too short, and too limited in populations represented), which is, moreover, insulated from independent criticism.

 The evidence is far too poor to warrant overriding the independent judgments of patients, parents, and attending physicians, even if this were ethically or legally acceptable.

Indeed, evidence is accumulating that serious adverse reactions are being ignored.

Although this statement has focused on hepatitis B vaccine, similar questions should be raised about others as well."

- Dr. Jane M. Orient, Executive Director of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

I HOPE YOU WILL READ THAT ENTIRE DOCUMENT

AMAZINGLY, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S OWN WEB PAGE FOR VACCINE INJURY CLAIMS  ACTUALLY GIVES A TABLE OF INJURIES FOR EACH DRUG.
MANY HAVE BEEN SHOCKED TO SEE THIS.

ANAPHYLAXIS AND VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE ARE LISTED MANY TIMES AS "COVERED CONDITIONS" AFTER INJECTION OF VACCINES.

WHAT THE FEDS DO NOT STATE IS THAT ANAPHYLAXIS CAN BE FATAL AND THAT THIS VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE CAN AND HAS LED TO "SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH".
"Fatal drug anaphylaxis may be increasing, but rates of fatal anaphylaxis to venom and food are stable. "

ANOTHER CONDITION LISTED AS APPEARING AFTER VACCINATIONS IS INTUSSUSCEPTION.

"Intussusception (in-tuh-suh-SEP-shun) is a serious condition in which part of the intestine slides into an adjacent part of the intestine. This "telescoping" often blocks food or fluid from passing through. Intussusception also cuts off the blood supply to the part of the intestine that's affected, which can lead to a tear in the bowel (perforation), infection and death of bowel tissue. Tissue death can lead to a tear (perforation) in the intestinal wall, which can cause an infection of the lining of the abdominal cavity (peritonitis).

Peritonitis is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate medical attention.

Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children younger than three (3).

 ENCEPHALOPATHY. IS ALSO MENTIONED 26 TIMES IN THAT "VACCINE INJURY TABLE". 

THIS ONE IS VERY DIFFICULT TO PROVE TO THE VACCINE COURT. 
THEIR CRITERIA FOR PAYING FOR THIS INJURY IS MADDENING. 
 "One of the following neurologic findings referable to the CNS: Focal cortical signs (such as aphasia, alexia, agraphia, cortical blindness); cranial nerve abnormalities; visual field defects; abnormal presence of primitive reflexes (such as Babinski's sign or sucking reflex); or cerebellar dysfunction (such as ataxia, dysmetria, or nystagmus); or  Evidence of an inflammatory process in the brain (central nervous system or CNS inflammation) must include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (>5 white blood cells (WBC)/mm3 in children >2 months of age and adults; >15 WBC/mm3 in children <2 months of age); 

FEW MAY HAVE READ THE 'FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS" ABOUT PETITIONS FOR VACCINE INJURIES, FOUND <HERE>.

DID YOU KNOW THAT JUST FROM 2006 TO 2017, ALMOST SEVEN THOUSAND (6,467) PETITIONS WERE ADMITTED TO THE 'VACCINE COURT' AND 4,450 WERE 'COMPENSATED'?
THAT MEANS FEWER THAN 50% WHO PETITIONED THIS ONE-MAN COURT WERE HEARD. 

THE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT VERY HARD TO OBTAIN JUSTICE.   
"Since 1988, over 21,051 petitions have been filed.
6,792 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,381 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.2 billion."


WHERE DID THAT $4.2 BILLION COME FROM?
FROM TAXPAYER MONEY, SINCE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (aka, WE, THE PEOPLE) SHIELD VACCINE MAKERS FROM LAWSUITS BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS CALLED "THE NATIONAL CHILDHOOD INJURY ACT OF 1986".
WHO DECIDES ON COMPENSATIONS? NOT A JURY! "A special master of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims makes a decision to compensate or not compensate the petitioner based on evidence presented by both sides."    

THERE WAS OTHER DAMNING TESTIMONY ABOUT VACCINE HAZARDS GIVEN TO CONGRESS NUMEROUS TIMES.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2003...

September 10, 2003

Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness
U.S. House Government Reform Committee
U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.

“The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?”


 "There is frank admission that the limitations of technology and lack of scientific knowledge means there can be no guarantee the vaccines will not be contaminated with substances that could prove harmful to humans one day.

Nevertheless, there are plans to set allowable thresholds for adventitious agent contamination of vaccines being made out of cancer cells that would contain residual DNA and RNA. 
 (Attachment 9: Excerpts from May 12, 2000 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript and Attachment 10: Excerpts from May 16, 2001 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript)

 
I do not think Congress or the public understands any of this.
There should be a much wider discussion in the larger scientific community outside of federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in Congress and by the public at large before decisions are made to proceed with producing vaccines that use cancer cells and have legally allowable thresholds of adventitious agent contamination.

"Past is often prologue. So much can be learned from understanding the mistakes of the past so that the same mistakes are not made in the future. 

Outstanding questions about the links between vaccines, government vaccine policies and the epidemic of chronic disease in our children, including autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, diabetes and, as we have discussed today, cancer, are not going away.

Questions about the links between vaccines that U.S. military soldiers are required to take, including anthrax and smallpox vaccines, and the subsequent death or permanent health problems being suffered by those previously healthy, young recruits are not going away.

They will never go away when the main defense of industry and government health officials is that when anything bad happens after vaccination it is just a coincidence.

I can tell you, the American public, especially parents, are not buying it.


And they shouldn’t buy it, especially when the kind of evidence that you will hear today suggests official government and industry denials are simply a way of avoiding taking responsibility for failing to do everything they can to minimize the risks of vaccines.  

We owe it to our children and grandchildren to do everything we can to find out the truth about vaccine risks and make the mass vaccination system as safe as it can be."  


CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND THAT  'ANAPHYLAXIS IS NOT ALWAYS PROPERLY DIAGNOSED, NOT ALWAYS REPORTED, AND IS SOMETIMES MISCODED'.

"Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that has a rapid onset and can cause death.1,2 In the past, the term anaphylactic reaction referred to symptoms triggered by immunoglobulin (Ig) E–dependent activation of immune effector cells, whereas anaphylactoid reactions were clinically similar to anaphylactic reactions but were not mediated by antigen-specific IgE.

Although some experts have advocated that the term anaphylactoid be eliminated, other influential clinical practice guidelines consensus documents continue to use the term anaphylactoid – thus, anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions will be discussed as a single entity in this chapter.
 2

Published incidence and prevalence data are likely inaccurate because anaphylaxis is underdiagnosed, underreported, and miscoded. 3,4

Some of the most recent data suggests that the incidence is approximately 50 to 200 episodes per 100,000 person-years with a lifetime prevalence ranging between 0.05% and 2%. 5

It is estimated that up to 1,500 fatalities are caused by anaphylaxis per year in the United States. 6

Both the incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis have been increasing, with a disproportionate increase in cases seen in children and younger patients.7

With children especially, a five-fold increase in hospital admissions for food-associated anaphylaxis has been noted over the past decade. 8

CONCLUSIONS:    
Anaphylaxis is a common medical condition affecting both adult and pediatric patients and its incidence and prevalence continue to increase, especially in younger people.
Risk factors affecting the incidence of anaphylaxis have been identified."  


SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME AND VACCINES 
Crib deaths nearly disappeared in Japan in 1975 when first inoculations were postponed until the 24th month of life.   The "insult" leading to crib deaths  Kalokerinos found, was an inoculation


The maker, Connaught Labs’ 1986 DTP vaccine insert reads, “Sudden infant death has occurred in infants following administration”.   


MOST "STUDIES" THE CDC REFER TO AS VALID EVIDENCE THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE, IN THE CASE OF WHISTLEBLOWERS' REVELATIONS, WERE SKEWED, THEIR DATA "MASSAGED" TO FERRET OUT ANYTHING THAT WOULD SLOW OR STOP THE SALES OF THESE DRUGS.

WE ALL REMEMBER THE DISCREDITED CDC/WAKEFIELD REPORT, BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER STUDIES IN SEVERAL NATIONS WHICH ALSO SHOWED VACCINE INJURY IN CHILDREN.   

WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION NOW AND IT'S PAST TIME WE FACED THE FACTS OF WHAT VACCINES HAVE DONE AND CONTINUE TO DO TO OUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN, TO US.

HOW POWERFUL ARE THE 'FORCES' AGAINST THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES?
LET'S LOOK BRIEFLY AT THE "HANNAH POLING CASE".     


IN 2008, THE HUFFINGTON POST CARRIED AN ARTICLE TITLED,   
"The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read", Posted February 26, 2008.       
IT DIDN'T TAKE LONG FOR HUFFPOST TO SCRUB THAT FROM THEIR DATABASE AND POST A NOTE FROM THEIR EDITOR THAT STATED VACCINES ARE SAFE.

BUT WHAT THAT ARTICLE REVEALED NEEDS TO BE READ, SO I FOUND IT IN ARCHIVES ONLINE, <HERE>.     

BY DAVID KIRBY FOR HUFFINGTON POST:

"Below is a verbatim copy of the US Government concession filed last November in a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims, with the names of the family redacted. It is the subject of my post yesterday.

Every American should read this document, and interpret for themselves what they think their government is trying to say about the relationship, if any, between immunizations and a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.

If you feel this document suggests that some kind of link may be possible, you might consider forwarding it to your elected representatives for further investigation.

[FROM THAT COURT DOCUMENT]:
" '4.According to the medical records, CHILD consistently met her developmental milestones during the first eighteen months of her life. The record of an October 5, 1999 visit to the Pediatric Center notes that CHILD was mimicking sounds, crawling, and sitting. Pet. Ex. 31 at 9. The record of her 12-month pediatric examination notes that she was using the words "Mom" and "Dad," pulling herself up, and cruising. Id. at 10.

At a July 19, 2000 pediatric visit, the pediatrician observed that CHILD "spoke well" and was "alert and active." Pet. Ex. 31 at 11. CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had regular bowel movements and slept through the night. Id.

At the July 19, 2000 examination, CHILD received five vaccinations - DTaP, Hib, MMR, Varivax, and IPV. Id. at 2, 11.

According to her mother's affidavit, CHILD developed a fever of 102.3 degrees two days after her immunizations and was lethargic, irritable, and cried for long periods of time. Pet. Ex. 2 at 6. She exhibited intermittent, high-pitched screaming and a decreased response to stimuli. Id. MOM spoke with the pediatrician, who told her that CHILD was having a normal reaction to her immunizations. Id.

According to CHILD's mother, this behavior continued over the next ten days, and CHILD also began to arch her back when she cried. Id.

On July 31, 2000, CHILD presented to the Pediatric Center with a 101-102 degree temperature, a diminished appetite, and small red dots on her chest. Pet. Ex. 31 at 28. The nurse practitioner recorded that CHILD was extremely irritable and inconsolable. Id. She was diagnosed with a post-varicella vaccination rash. Id. at 29.

Two months later, on September 26, 2000, CHILD returned to the Pediatric Center with a temperature of 102 degrees, diarrhea, nasal discharge, a reduced appetite, and pulling at her left ear. Id. at 29.

On November 1, 2000, CHILD received bilateral PE tubes. Id. at 38.

On November 27, 2000, CHILD was seen at the Pediatric Center with complaints of diarrhea, vomiting, diminished energy, fever, and a rash on her cheek. Id. at 33.

At a follow-up visit, on December 14, 2000, the doctor noted that CHILD had a possible speech delay.

CHILD was evaluated at the Howard County Infants and Toddlers Program, on November 17, 2000, and November 28, 2000, due to concerns about her language development. Pet. Ex. 19 at 2, 7. The assessment team observed deficits in CHILD's communication and social development. Id. at 6. CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had become less responsive to verbal direction in the previous four months and had lost some language skills. Id. At 2.

Dr. Zimmerman referred CHILD to the Krieger Institute's Occupational Therapy Clinic and the Center for Autism and Related Disorders ("CARDS"). Pet. Ex. 25 at 40.

She was evaluated at the Occupational Therapy Clinic by Stacey Merenstein, OTR/L, on February 23, 2001. Id. The evaluation report summarized that CHILD had deficits in "many areas of sensory processing which decrease[d] her ability to interpret sensory input and influence[d] her motor performance as a result." Id. at 45.

CHILD was evaluated by Alice Kau and Kelley Duff, on May 16, 2001, at CARDS. Pet. Ex. 25 at 17. The clinicians concluded that CHILD was developmentally delayed and demonstrated features of autistic disorder. Id. at 22.


ANALYSIS
       
Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the facts of this case, as presented by the petition, medical records, and affidavits.

After a thorough review, DVIC has concluded that compensation is appropriate in this case.   
In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, respondent recommends that compensation be awarded to petitioners in accordance with 42 U.S.C. ยง 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii).

DVIC has concluded that CHILD's complex partial seizure disorder, with an onset of almost six years after her July 19, 2000 vaccinations, is not related to a vaccine-injury."   
IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM ARTICLE'S AUTHOR, DAVID KIRBY:   

PS: On Friday, February 22, HHS conceded that this child's complex partial seizure disorder was also caused by her vaccines.

Now we the taxpayers will award this family compensation to finance her seizure medication. Surely ALL decent people can agree that is a good thing.

By the way, it''s worth noting that her seizures did not begin until six years after the date of vaccination, yet the government acknowledges they were, indeed, linked to the immunizations of July, 2000, - DK"


HANNAH'S CASE IS BUT ONE OF TENS OF THOUSANDS WITH SIMILAR INJURY, MOST NEVER MAKING IT TO "VACCINE COURT". 

CAN ANYONE WHO HAS NEVER FACED A CHILD'S LIFELONG ILLNESS OR DEATH DUE TO VACCINES EVEN IMAGINE THE ANGUISH WHEN THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY BY VACCINE MANUFACTUERERS? 
   
TODAY, ONLY CERTAIN CASES THAT OCCURRED AFTER 2009 CAN FILE PETITIONS TO THE COURT.
THIS RULES OUT HOW MANY THOUSANDS MORE? 

WHAT IS REVEALED IN ALL WHISTLEBLOWER REPORTS IS SOMETHING MANY OF US WHO WORKED IN THE MEDICAL PROFESSION TRIED TO CONVEY TO PARENTS AND OTHERS THROUGHOUT OUR CAREERS BY HANDING PACKAGE INSERTS TO ANYONE CONSIDERING VACCINES.
"JUST READ!" WE SAID.


OF THOSE WHO READ THE ENTIRE PACKAGE INSERTS OF EACH VACCINE, I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT, IN ANY GIVEN YEAR, FEWER THAN 10% WENT ON TO ACCEPT THE VACCINES FOR THEIR CHILDREN OR THEMSELVES.

YOU NOW HAVE ACCESS ONLINE TO THOSE PACKAGE INSERTS.
PLEASE READ THEM! 


Package Inserts and Manufacturers for some US Licensed Vaccines and Immunoglobulin

WHAT PATIENTS/PARENTS SAID MOST OFTEN AFTER READING WAS WHAT WE ALL SAID WHEN FIRST WE GLIMPSED THESE INSERTS:
"WHY DON'T THE VACCINE MANUFACTURERS MAKE ALL OF THIS PUBLIC INFORMATION? HOW DO THY GET AWAY WITH IT?"

DRUG COMPANIES, LIKE ALL OTHERS WHO SELL PRODUCT, ARE IN IT FOR PROFIT, SO ANYTHING THAT SHOWS THAT PRODUCT IN A BAD LIGHT IS ALMOST NEVER MADE PUBLIC OR POINTED OUT UNLESS/UNTIL "ENOUGH" PEOPLE HAVE BEEN INJURED AND/OR KILLED BY IT.

THINK ABOUT THAT.
THINK ABOUT PRODUCT "RECALLS" YEARS AFTER DANGEROUS PRODUCTS WERE MARKETED AND THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS FOUND OF COVER-UPS FROM THEIR BEGINNINGS.

THINK ABOUT THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY, THE MAKERS OF DDT, AGENT ORANGE, ASBESTOS.

THINK ABOUT THE SV-40 TAINTED POLIO VACCINE THAT HAD THAT KNOWN MONKEY VIRUS IN IT THAT NOW SHOWS UP IN A MAJORITY OF HUMANS ON PLANET EARTH...A VIRUS THAT DISRUPTS OUR DNA, IS PASSED ON TO ONE'S CHILDREN...A CARCINOGEN.

ONCE UPON A TIME, THE CDC INCLUDED ON ITS OWN WEBSITE THE FACT THAT SV40 HAS BEEN FOUND IN SEVERAL HUMAN CANCERS.

THERE IS ARCHIVED PROOF OF THAT AS A CAPTURED SCREENSHOT <HERE>.

IN JULY, 2013, THE REFERENCE TO THE LINK BETWEEN SV40 AND CANCER BECAME PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.


THE CDC THEN REMOVED THAT INFORMATION.
WHY?
"Cancer has risen exponentially since the 1960s, and by 2002 there were 61 reports from 49 different laboratories across the world suggesting an increased incidence of certain cancers caused by SV40.

The British journal The Lancet revealed SV40 WAS responsible for over 25,000 cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma each year.

By 2003, 60 more labs had been identified which demonstrated a connection to the SV40 virus and cancer."   

"Recently, several studies have reported the detection of DNA from simian virus 40 (SV40), a macaque polyomavirus, in tumor tissues obtained from non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients.

SV40 contaminated poliovirus vaccines administered to millions (ABOUT 95 MILLION) of individuals in 1955–1962.

A link between SV40 and NHL is biologically plausible because SV40 causes hematological malignancies in laboratory rodents."

CONCLUSIVE, PEER-REVIEWED EVIDENCE, 2003

"Abstract 
       
Simian virus 40 (SV40) has been detected in human tumors in over 40 different laboratories.
Many of these reports linked SV40 to human mesotheliomas."

THE ATLANTIC LOOKED INTO SV-40 AND CANCER IN 2000, BUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA IGNORED THAT, TOO.  

FOR YEARS, DECADES, MANY TRIED TO WARN THE PUBLIC ABOUT EACH OF THOSE PRODUCTS AND WERE RIDICULED, OSTRACIZED, CRUCIFIED IN THE PRESS, MADE TO LOOK LIKE TINFOIL-HAT-WEARING LUNATICS.

IT'S THE SAME WITH DRUGS AND VACCINES. 

COMPANIES MUST PROTECT THEIR MONEY-MAKERS AND MAINTAIN "PUBLIC TRUST". 

THE U.S. IS NOW #1 IN THE WORLD FOR FIRST-DAY INFANT MORTALITY.   
In 1983, children received up to 23 doses of 8 DIFFERENT vaccines before the age of eighteen. 

Today children receive as many as 69 doses of 16 different vaccines, all given by the age of eighteen.

MOST OF THESE VACCINES ARE GIVEN TO CHILDREN BY AGE SIX, AND AT LEAST 20 OR SO ARE GIVEN BEFORE AGE TWO.


PARENTS WERE NOT SHOWN PACKAGE INSERTS, WERE UNAWARE OF THE SUPPRESSED STUDIES, HAD NO WAY OF KNOWING ABUT THE MULTITUDE OF VACCINE INJURIES AND DEATHS REPORTED ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE AND PERHAPS DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THAT VACCINE MANUFACTURERS HAD BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. 

DID YOU KNOW HOW MANY FOREIGN NATIONS HAVE BANNED MANY OF THESE VACCINES, OR THE PRESSURE APPLIED TO THEM BY U.S. AND U.N. ORGANIZATIONS TO GET BACK ON THE VACCINE BANDWAGON?

MANY U.S. DOCTORS ACTUALLY FOUGHT THE U.N. BAN ON THE MERCURY PRESERVATIVES USED IN VACCINES, ALTHOUGH MERCURY IS A LONG-KNOWN KILLER!   
WHY? 

WERE THEY JUST PAID WHORES TO THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY? 
THEY COULD NOT HAVE BEEN THAT STUPID AND UNREAD, SO I'M LEFT TO THINK THEY WERE EITHER COERCED OR WILLINGLY BECAME PARTY TO THE LIES? 



"In 1960 Bernice Eddy, a government researcher, discovered that when she injected hamsters with the kidney mixture on which the vaccine was cultured, they developed tumors. 
Eddy's superiors tried to keep the discovery quiet, but Eddy presented her data at a cancer conference in New York. She was eventually demoted, and lost her laboratory.
The cancer-causing virus was soon isolated by other scientists and dubbed SV40, because it was the fortieth simian virus discovered.
Alarm spread through the scientific community as researchers realized that nearly every dose of the vaccine had been contaminated.

In 1961 federal health officials ordered vaccine manufacturers to screen for the virus and eliminate it from the vaccine. Worried about creating a panic, they kept the discovery of SV40 under wraps and never recalled existing stocks. For two more years millions of additional people were needlessly exposed -- bringing the total to 98 million Americans from 1955 to 1963."    
AS I HAVE WRITTEN HERE BEFORE, I AND 15 MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY ALL HAD THAT CONTAMINATED POLIO VACCINE, AS DID ALL 70+ MEMBERS OF MY GRADUATING CLASS.   

I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MY FIRST CANCER AT AGE 19.

WITHIN 20 YEARS, MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF MY CLASSMATES HAD BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AND MOST OF THOSE HAD DIED, AS HAD 7 FAMILY MEMBERS.

ALL BUT TWO OF THOSE INOCULATED MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY, INCLUDING BOTH PARENTS AND MY ONLY SIBLING, DIED AFTER CANCER DIAGNOSES.   

 I RECEIVED MY 4th DIAGNOSIS IN 2016, AND MY 5th JUST THIS YEAR.


AS I STATED IN MY 2016 BLOG ON THE SV-40 IN THE POLIO VACCINE

"NOW, EVEN ALL THAT MAY NOT SEEM PROOF ENOUGH TO MANY THAT THE OLD POLIO VACCINES WERE, CAN BE, HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE DANGEROUS.


FOR THOSE, ALLOW ME TO PRESENT AN ANALOGY, A HYPOTHETICAL EXPERIMENT:

LET'S IMAGINE THAT I HAVE A PISTOL AND THAT PISTOL CONTAINS AN AMAZINGLY HUGE NUMBER OF 1,000 CHAMBERS INTO WHICH A BULLET MAY BE PLACED.

YOU CAN SEE THE MANY CHAMBERS ON THE CYLINDER.

WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE, WHAT I DO NOT TELL YOU, IS INTO HOW MANY OF THOSE CHAMBERS I HAVE PLACED A BULLET.


I ASK YOU TO "TRUST ME" AND JUST PLACE THE BARREL OF THAT PISTOL AGAINST YOUR OR YOUR CHILD'S TEMPLE AND SQUEEZE THE TRIGGER.

WILL YOU TRUST ME THAT NO HARM WILL COME TO YOU OR YOUR CHILD?

EVEN IF I WERE YOUR CLOSEST AND MOST TRUSTED FRIEND, WOULD YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER?

WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THERE WAS ONE ROUND IN THAT WEAPON, BUT IT WAS A BLANK, HARMLESS?
WOULD YOU ABSOLUTELY TRUST ME TO BE HONEST ABOUT THAT, EVEN IF I WAS YOUR SIBLING, A PARENT, YOUR MINISTER/PRIEST/WHATEVER? 

THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT WE EACH DO WHEN WE ACCEPT ANY SUBSTANCE INTO OUR FRAGILE HUMAN BODIES WITHOUT KNOWING ALL THE POSSIBLE WAYS THAT CAN AFFECT US.

IN THE ABOVE HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION, HOW MANY WOULD REALLY PULL THE TRIGGER?

HOW MANY WOULD DO SO IF YOU WERE ALLOWED TO EXAMINE THE WEAPON YOURSELF AND SAW IT CONTAINED ONE BULLET, BUT THEN YOU HAD TO SPIN THAT CYLINDER AFTER YOU SAW THE SHELL?
IS THIS MERELY PARANOIA ON THE PART OF THOSE WHO REQUIRE 100% PROOF THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE?

WOULD YOU FEEL YOU WERE PARANOID IF YOU DEMANDED TO EXAMINE THAT WEAPON AND THEN DECIDED NOT TO FIRE IT?


UNLIKE THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, WE CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW WHETHER OR NOT A YEAR, 10 YEARS, 20 YEARS OR MORE MAY PASS AND THEN ONE DAY EVIDENCE WILL COME TO LIGHT THAT CONFIRMS OUR DOUBTS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF "ALL" VACCINES. 
WILL EVEN ONE VACCINE BE SHOWN TO CAUSE SOME FATAL REACTION, SOME DEBILITATING COMPLICATION WHICH THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF BUT CHOSE NOT TO REVEAL?   
THAT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE. 

AND THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS THE SINGLE BULLET IN THAT 1000-CHAMBERED GUN.

I WILL NOT RISK IT!
I WILL NOT! 


YOU HAVE A MERE WHISPER OF HOPE IF YOU OR A LOVED ON HAVE BEEN INJURED OR KILLED BY VACCINE. 

IT'S HARD AS HELL TO PROVE IT BUT THOUSANDS HAVE! 

READ <HERE> TO SEE WHAT IT ENTAILS TO APPLY TO THE "VACCINE INJURY COURT" AND MAY YOU NEVER NEED TO TRY TO SEE JUSTICE DONE AFTER SUCH INJURIES OR DEATH OF SOMEONE YOU LOVE. 

AS ANOTHER WRITER SAID (SOMEONE WHOM I ALMOST NEVER AGREE WITH, BTW) :

"If vaccines are such wonderful, miraculous things to be injected into children, then why do they still contain undeniably toxic ingredients?
The CDC openly lists these ingredients on its website. The continued use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde and aluminum in vaccines is not in dispute. Not even vaccine advocates deny this fact.

Mercury, for example, has no safe level of exposure via injection. To inject a child with any amount of mercury -- even a single microgram -- is highly unethical and irresponsible. "...there are no existing guidelines for safe exposure to ethylmercury, the metabolite of thimerosal," says National Toxicology Programs in its own documents

If the CDC and the drug companies really wanted to win the vaccine wars, so to speak, all they would have to do is take the poisons out of the vaccines!   
If that really happened, most of the resistance to vaccines would fade away, and vaccines would be welcomed by a much larger segment of health-conscious consumers."

[NOTE: THE GOVERNMENT'S PDF HE REFERRED TO IN HIS ARTICLE WAS DELETED, LINK IS A DEAD-END, BUT FORTUNATELY, THE INTERNET'S WAYBACK MACHINE SAVED IT AND IT CAN BE ACCESSED <HERE>.]


WE ARE UP AGAINST CORPORATE GIANTS DETERMINED TO MAKE EVER-INCREASING PROFITS FROM THEIR LITTLE-STUDIED VACCINES AND DRUGS. 

WE FACE PEOPLE IN THAT INDUSTRY WHO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TIME AND TIME AGAIN FOR LYING TO US, FOR HIDING FACTS AND TRUTH.   

THEIR MASSIVE WEALTH ALLOWS THEM TO HIRE HIGH-POWERED ATTORNEYS, CONGRESSIONAL LOBBYISTS, MEDICALLY TRAINED "SPOKESMEN" TO CONVINCE THE MASSES TO "JUST TRUST US".   

VERY FEW OF US HAVE LABORATORIES TO CONFIRM THE SAFETY OF THESE PRODUCTS. 

WHEN WHISTLEBLOWERS STEP FORWARD TO WARN US, WE REALLY SHOULD PAY ATTENTION.  



REMEMBER, PLEASE, THAT IMAGINARY GAME OF "RUSSIAN ROULETTE"...EVEN WITH 999 EMPTY CHAMBERS, THE RISK IS TOO GREAT TO PULL THE TRIGGER, ISN'T IT?  






______________________________

FURTHER READING:

1- 
How Vaccine Safety Is Undermined and Suppressed  
PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2019 BY A PHYSICIAN WHOM I HAVE TRUSTED AND ADMIRED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, A MAN WHO RISKED IT ALL TO HAND US TRUTHS THAT HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FOR DECADES.  


I NEVER BLINDLY "FOLLOW" ANYONE, BUT DIG UNTIL I CAN'T DIG MORE TO UNCOVER FLAWS IN THEIR WORK, IN THEIR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, IN THEIR FACTS.

ON THIS ISSUE, I FIND NO FAULT IN THIS MAN'S STATED FACTS, BUT, PLEASE, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. 


DOES HE "SELL PRODUCT"?
HE DOES, BUT NO PUBLISHED INFORMATION FOUND IN HIS FREELY-OFFERED ARTICLES REQUIRES A PURCHASE OF ANYTHING.
HE GIVES IT AWAY.

QUESTION EVERYTHING, MY FRIENDS, EVEN ME, EVEN YOURSELVES, AS I HAD TO BEGIN DOING, LONG, LONG AGO. 



2- IF SV-40 IS A "WAR MACHINE", WHAT OTHER AGENTS IN VACCINES MIGHT ALSO BE WAR MACHINES? 

"SV40 is the smallest perfect war machine ever," Dr. Michele Carbone murmurs. "He's so small. But he's got everything he needs."

In 1994, Carbone, an Italian pathologist who worked at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland, along with Dr. Harvey Pass, the chief of thoracic surgery at NCI, and Dr. Antonio Procopio, a professor of experimental pathology in Italy who had worked for three years at the National Institutes of Health (NHI), published the results of their experiment in one of the world's leading cancer-research journals.


Carbone had been urged on two renowned pathologists, Umberto Saffiotti, the chief of the NCI's Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, and Harold L. Stewart, a former director of pathology at the NCI who was once the head of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Carbone had just finished a series of experiments in which he had injected the virus into dozens of hamsters. Every one of them developed mesothelioma and died within three to seven months.

Others at the National Institutes of Health -- including some of the scientists who had been around at the time of the contamination scare -- were less receptive to the novel theory.

They told Carbone that the last thing anyone wanted to hear was that the exalted polio vaccine was linked to cancer. Too much was at stake. Implicating a vaccine contaminant in cancer -- even if the contamination occurred some forty years ago -- might easily shake public confidence in vaccines in general. And besides, everyone knew that asbestos was the cause of mesothelioma.

Two very recent studies, at that time, from Finland and Turkey, had found no SV40 in domestic mesothelioma samples but did find it, respectively, in American and Italian samples. The authors observed that their negative findings lend support to the theory that contaminated polio vaccine is associated with the disease: neither Turkey nor Finland used SV40-contaminated vaccines.
Today Finland has one of the lowest rates of mesothelioma in the Western world.

The virus has also been located in other kinds of tumors.
More than a dozen laboratories have found SV40 in various kinds of rare brain and bone tumors.

In 1996 Carbone reported that he had found SV40 in a third of the osteosarcomas (bone cancers of a type that afflicts about 900 Americans a year) and nearly half of the other bone tumors he tested -- research that has since been confirmed by numerous laboratories. The virus has also been detected in pituitary and thyroid tumors.

In 1995 Janet Butel, the chairman of the department of molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, in Texas, and her chief collaborator, John Lednicky, also a Baylor virologist, reported that they had found SV40 in a number of children's brain tumors. Butel and Lednicky reported that DNA sequencing revealed that the virus was not a hybrid but rather authentic SV40 -- the same as the SV40 found in monkeys. In the fall of 1996 an Italian research team, led by Mauro Tognon, of the University of Ferrara, announced that it had found SV40 DNA in a large percentage of brain and neurological tumors, including glioblastomas, astrocytomas, ependymomas, and papillomas of the choroid plexus.

In 1996 Tognon and his collaborators reported that they had also found the virus in 45 percent of the sperm samples and 23 percent of the blood samples they tested from healthy people.

3- AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT PACKAGE INSERTS STATE:

  IN THE PACKAGE INSERT FOR 'PNEUMOVAX', THE CLEAR ADMISSIONS ARE STATED:         
 "Routine revaccination ("BOOSTERS") of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23- valent vaccine, is not recommended."      
BUT EVERY YEAR WE'RE TOLD TO GO GET ANOTHER 'SHOT'. 



CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of PNEUMOVAX.


(NOBODY KNOWS IF THEY WILL HAVE SUCH A REACTION UNTIL AFTER THE VACCINE IS ADMINISTERED!) 

 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS: Use caution and appropriate care for individuals with severely compromised cardiovascular and/or pulmonary function in whom a systemic reaction would pose a significant risk. 

(NEITHER SHOULD ANYONE ON CHEMOTHERAPY OR RADIATION 'TREATMENT'S FOR CANCER BE GIVEN VACCINES DUE TO THEIR COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS WHICH CAN'T HANDLE LIVE VIRUSES. YET I VERY PERSONALLY KNOW OF AT LEAST FIVE SUCH PATIENTS WHO WERE ADMINISTERED THOSE VACCINES FOR FLU AND/OR PNEUMONIA, ALL OF WHOM WERE DEAD WITHIN A WEEK!) 


 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS:
Pregnancy
: No human or animal data are available. Use only if clearly needed.

Pediatrics: PNEUMOVAX is not approved for use in children younger than 2 years of age because children in this age group do not develop an effective immune response to capsular types contained in the polysaccharide vaccine.

Geriatrics:
"For subjects aged 65 years or older in a clinical study systemic adverse reactions, determined by the investigator to be vaccine-related, were higher following revaccination (33.1%) than following initial vaccination (21.7%). Routine revaccination of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23-valent vaccine, is not recommended."

4- VITAMIN D 800% MORE EFFECTIVE THAN VACCINES TO PREVENT THE FLU.A clinical trial led by Mitsuyoshi Urashima and conducted by the Division of Molecular Epidemiology in the Department of Pediatrics at the Jikei University School of Medicine Minato-ku in Tokyo found that vitamin D was extremely effective at halting influenza infections in children. The trial appears in the March, 2010 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Am J Clin Nutr (March 10, 2010). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094).

[According to the conclusion], vitamin D appears to be 800% more effective than vaccines at preventing influenza infections in children.    


5- ON THIMEROSAL, FROM THE FEDS' OWN PAPER: 

"Prior to the recent approval of additional thimerosal-free or thimerosal-reduced vaccines, an infant may have received a total mercury dose from vaccines as much as 187.5 µg during the first 6 months of life. In special populations, influenza vaccine may be administered at 6 months of age, which would increase the total dose to approximately 200 µg. (PG. 2)

Although thimerosal has been used in the U.S. as a preservative in vaccines and other licensed products since the 1930s, limited data are available on the toxicology of thimerosal and its metabolite ethylmercury. In humans, the only well-established hazard of thimerosal at doses found in vaccines is delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.
At very high doses, the identified hazards of thimerosal include neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

Only one published study evaluated the effect of thimerosal in vaccines on blood levels of mercury. This study measured the total mercury blood levels before and after hepatitis B vaccination in a small number of term and preterm newborn infants and suggested that a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine may produce small but measurable increases in blood levels of mercury.

This “screening analysis” found weak (relative risk less than 2) but statistically-significant associations between exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6 months and tic disorders, attention deficit disorders (ADD), and speech and language disorders.

Only limited data were available on the reproductive and teratogenic effects of thimerosal. In one study of pregnant rats and rabbits receiving intraperitoneal injections and ocular instillations, no teratological effects or evidence of maternal toxicity were observed, but dose related embryoand fetal lethality was found.

Methylmercury, an organic mercurial similar to ethylmercury, has been associated in some studies with subtle neurodevelopmental abnormalities at low doses.





GOD HELP US...

//WW

Friday, September 27, 2019

NASA ON EARTH'S MAGNETIC POLE REVERSAL

NASA WAS DOING A GOOD JOB OF REPORTING ON THIS WAY BACK IN 2003. 

"Scientists have long known that the magnetic pole moves. James Ross located the pole for the first time in 1831 after an exhausting arctic journey during which his ship got stuck in the ice for four years. No one returned until the next century. In 1904, Roald Amundsen found the pole again and discovered that it had moved--at least 50 km since the days of Ross.

The pole kept going during the 20th century, north at an average speed of 10 km per year, lately accelerating "to 40 km per year," says Newitt.

Sometimes the field completely flips. The north and the south poles swap places. Such reversals, recorded in the magnetism of ancient rocks, are unpredictable. They come at irregular intervals averaging about 300,000 years; the last one was 780,000 years ago. Are we overdue for another? No one knows.



Why is Earth's magnetic shield weakening?



NORTHROP GRUMMAN HAS A VERY MATTER-OF-FACT ARTICLE ABOUT ALL THIS THAT BEGINS...

"Geomagnetic reversal effects are natural and spectacular, but they could also destroy the world as we know it.
While that may sound dramatic, renowned science journalist Alanna Mitchell’s book “The Spinning Magnet“ revealed that the next time Earth’s magnetic field flips, it could seriously damage the electric infrastructure that defines our modern civilization.

Scientific American noted that in the past 200 million years, reversals have taken place approximately every half-million years. The last reversal happened around 780,000 years ago, so we’re due for a flip.

What Does the Future Hold?

The good news is that we have plenty of time to prepare. The bad news? The magnetic field is much weaker, as low as a tenth of its normal strength, according to Futurism. A gradual change could mean that we’ll have years without the invisible protective shield between Earth and space.

With a weak electromagnetic field, radiation from space could possibly make some regions of Earth uninhabitable and cause entire species to go extinct. But first, according to Mitchell, we would have problems with sensitive orbiting satellites, which control electric grids and could cause “a domino run of blackouts that could last for decades.”

It’s not all doom and gloom, though. We don’t know whether this will occur in our lifetime. Even if it does, the flip could take hundreds of years, and geomagnetic reversal effects would be mostly gradual."

Earth's magnetic field is what protects our planet from harmful space radiation. 
In a pole reversal, we'd lose 90% or so of that shielding. 
No one knows how we'd survive that.

NASA HAS WRITTEN VOLUMES ON THIS TOPIC OVER THE YEARS, SOME NOW ARCHIVED, SOME NEW.

IT'S NOT "ALARMIST" MATERIAL, JUST FACTS.
IT'S HAPPENED BEFORE AND IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN.

AS NEWSWEEK REPORTED IN 2018
 "Cosmic radiation expert Daniel Baker, director of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, believes that the next pole reversal could likely render some areas of the planet unlivable."

SOME, BUT LIKELY NOT ALL.

HOW DOES ANYONE PREPARE FOR SUCH AN EVENT?
NO ONE REALLY KNOWS, BUT WE DO KNOW EARTH HAS SURVIVED SUCH FLIPS IN THE PAST.

AN ARCHIVED "MASTER LIST" OF ARTICLES FROM NASA ON 'THE GREAT MAGNET EARTH' CAN BE ACCESSED <HERE>




IN 2017, SALON (AND OTHER NEWS AGENCIES) REPORTED: "Without a magnetic field, our atmosphere would slowly be stripped away by harmful radiation, and life would almost certainly not exist as it does today."


DID YOU KNOW THAT OVER AN EXPANDING AREA OF OUR WORLD, THIS POLE REVERSAL IS ALREADY A REALITY?
IT'S CALLED THE 'SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY' AND IT'S GROWING EACH YEAR.


FROM THE GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER IN MARYLAND, THIS ARCHIVED STUDY HELPS EXPLAIN THE BASICS, A BIT OF THE HISTORY AS TO HOW WE CAME TO REALIZE THE POLES HAVE FLIPPED.   

Get a Straight Answer

Questions submitted by e-mail to the author of "The Great Magnet, the Earth." Some of them (marked ***) came in response to an earlier site "The Exploration of the Earth's Magnetosphere" and are also found there in the question-and-answer section. Only some of the questions that arrive are listed, either because they keep coming up again and again--on the reversal of the Earth's magnetic field, for instance--or because the answers add extra details, which might interest other users.

A pole reversal: Scientists discuss an anomaly in the Earth’s magnetic field.
"A magnetic field collapse is centered in a huge expanse of the Southern Hemisphere, extending from Zimbabwe to Chile, known as the South Atlantic Anomaly.

The magnetic field strength is so weak there that it’s a hazard for satellites that orbit above the region – the field no longer protects them from radiation which interferes with satellite electronics.

And the field is continuing to grow weaker, potentially portending even more dramatic events, including a global reversal of the magnetic poles. Such a major change would affect our navigation systems, as well as the transmission of electricity.

These analyses reveal an astounding feature: There’s a patch of reversed polarity beneath southern Africa at the core-mantle boundary where the liquid iron outer core meets the slightly stiffer part of the Earth’s interior. In this area, the polarity of the field is opposite to the average global magnetic field. If we were able to use a compass deep under southern Africa, we would see that in this unusual patch north actually points south.

This patch is the main culprit creating the South Atlantic Anomaly.
 In numerical simulations, unusual patches similar to the one beneath southern Africa appear immediately prior to geomagnetic reversals.


EXACT MAGNETIC NORTH HAS MOVED MORE THAN 600 MILES FURTHER NORTH SINCE IT WAS FIRST PEGGED.
THE MOVEMENT HAS INCREASED FROM 10 MILES PER YEAR IN THE 1800s (19th CENTURY) TO ABOUT 28 TO 40 MILES PER YEAR NOW.
NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHY.

OUR ENTIRE MAGNETIC FIELD IS WEAKENING. 
2,000 YEARS AGO, EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD WAS MANY TIMES STRONGER THAN IT IS NOW.
AGAIN, NO ONE KNOWS WHY.
IT HAS DROPPED 10% SINCE WE FIRST ACQUIRED THE ABILITY TO MEASURE IT.

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, FEB. 1, 2018:
"Electromagnetic disruptions in space can also be incredibly damaging to the technologies we depend on.

There was a near miss in 2012 from an absolute super-storm that the sun let loose. This massive, once-in-150-years event happened to be released when the sun was facing away from our Earth. Had it been a week or two earlier, it would have been directly facing our planet and the forensic analysis suggests that we would have been sent back to the Victorian age in terms of our electrical systems had that happened.

The fact that it was such a near miss and so well recorded by satellites allowed scientists to go to the governments and academics and say, “Look, this was a really close thing. It could have completely destroyed our electronic systems, shouldn’t we start preparing for that?” 

The North magnetic pole is absolutely running through the Northern Hemisphere at 55 kilometers a year to the northwest. That’s an indicator that something unusual is happening inside the core. We also know that the dipole is weakening fairly dramatically.

Does that tell us that a reversal is at hand?
Scientists simply do not have enough information to make that conclusion. What they say is that it’s incontrovertible the poles will reverse again at some point."

READING ALL THIS, I WAS REMINDED YET AGAIN OF THE VERY HARSH REALITY THAT WE MODERN HUMANS FACE, THAT DAMNED FEW WILL BE AT ALL PREPARED FOR: TOTAL LOSS OF ELECTRICITY FOR PERHAPS DECADES.

IT'S NOT A MATTER OF "IF", BUT WHEN, AND WHEN IS UP FOR GRABS.

NOT AT ALL BEING AN ALARMIST, BUT I HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT THIS BEFORE AND FEW SEEMED READY TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.

MAYBE IT'S TIME TO GET AS READY AS WE CAN BE?
BUT HOW?

What is an Electromagnetic Field?

While magnetism is fascinating, it has also been historically misunderstood. According to Physics.org, Earth’s magnetic field exists because the planet’s solid iron core is surrounded by liquid metal.

According to NASA, the flow of liquid iron in Earth’s core creates electric currents that generate the magnetic field. This electromagnetic field provides an invisible shield that blocks solar and cosmic rays.

Flip-flopping Poles

Earth’s magnetic poles have reversed many times in the past, but scientists can’t predict when the next reversal will occur. In other words, a magnetic field flip is coming, we just don’t know when.

Scientific American noted that in the past 200 million years, reversals have taken place approximately every half-million years. The last reversal happened around 780,000 years ago, so we’re past due for a flip.

What are the potential outcomes of swapped North and South Poles?

Compass needles would be wrong, and animals that use Earth’s magnetic field for navigation — such as birds, salmon, sea turtles, whales and butterflies — could get temporarily disoriented, according to National Geographic.

Mitchell warns that a reversal could destroy anything electronic, including home appliances, satellites, wireless devices and the electric grids that make all these items work.

In an essay on Undark.org, author Alanna Mitchell wrote, “We have blithely built our civilization’s critical infrastructure during a time when the planet’s magnetic field was relatively strong, not accounting for the field’s bent for anarchy.”


New Study Shows How Rapidly Earth's Magnetic Field Is Changing

"According to scientists' best estimates, the field is now weakening around 10 times faster than initially thought, losing approximately 5 percent of its strength every decade. But they don't really know why, or what that means for our planet.

But despite the overall message being 'don't panic', scientists still know relatively little about our magnetic field, so in 2013, ESA launched a trio of satellites called Swarm, which measure Earth's magnetic field from signals coming from Earth's core, mantle, crust, oceans, ionosphere, and magnetosphere.

Using that data and those from other satellites, they've just released the clearest map so far of exactly how our magnetic field is changing - where it's weakening and strengthening - and what's causing those shifts. Importantly, it reveals just how fast these changes are taking place.


MY PRIMARY CONCERN IS THE INCREASED COSMIC RADIATION'S EFFECT ON BOTH THE UNBORN AND THOSE OF US ALREADY ALIVE WHEN THIS HAPPENS.

SECONDLY, HOW WOULD WE HIGH-TECH HUMANS GET ENOUGH FOOD TO SURVIVE SANS ELECTRICITY AND OUR VEHICLES, ALMOST ALL OF WHICH WOULD HAVE ELECTRIC COMPONENTS BLOWN TO HELL?

AFTER ALL, MOST FOLKS CAN'T EVEN BUILD A DECENT FIRE TO COOK OVER, AND FOOD SUPPLIES WOULD TAKE DAYS TO WEEKS TO ARRIVE, NOT A GOOD THING WHEN WE THINK ABOUT REFRIGERATION BEING GONE, AND IF FOOD WOULD STILL BE AVAILABLE WHEN FARMERS WOULD HAVE TO RESORT TO OLD METHODS OF GROWING AND HARVESTING.

THIRD, HOW MANY LIVES WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE WE WOULD NO LONGER HAVE THE ABILITY FOR "ADVANCED MEDICAL TREATMENTS"?

FOURTH, HOW WOULD WE COMMUNICATE?

ALL SOMETHING TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER, NOT JUST BECAUSE OF THE POLE FLIP, BUT BECAUSE OF THE TRUE REALITY THAT WE CAN ALSO EXPERIENCE ANOTHER "CARRINGTON EVENT" AT ANY TIME THAT OUR SUN SENDS OUT SUCH A BLAST AGAIN, OR IF SOME 'ENEMY' LAUNCHES AN ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE ATTACK ON US.

IT PAYS TO BE ALWAYS PREPARED, PEOPLE OF EARTH.
IT'S NECESSARY TO CONSIDER SUCH THINGS.
DENIAL WON'T MAKE IT GO AWAY, BUT WHAT WE CAN ACTUALLY DO TO PREPARE IS ABSOLUTELY UP FOR GRABS.







//WW

Sunday, September 22, 2019

UFOs FILMED BY PILOTS, ASTRONAUTS, LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AND SCIENTISTS


"Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. "
~ President Ronald Reagan, address to the U.N. 1987 
WHAT DID OLD RONNIE KNOW THAT WE DON'T? 



ABOVE: OCTOBER 30, 1938.  PANIC CAUSED BY A RADIO READING OF  'WAR OF THE WORLDS'. 



"Beaming searchlights illuminated the night sky, all of them converging on one thing...
a UFO, then the barrage of tracer fire from anti-aircraft artillery, all of the rounds aiming at the invading craft. The "giant UFO" would take direct hit after hit, yet without damage."

THE TWO INCIDENTS ABOVE SEEM TO HAVE SET THE STAGE AS AN EXCUSE FOR THE GOVERNMENT/MILITARY/NASA, ETC,TO KEEP 'CIVILIANS' IN THE DARK ABOUT UFO ORIGINS.
THIS IS A VERY EXPANSIVE TOPIC AND I WILL HAVE TO DIVIDE IT INTO AT LEAST TWO PARTS, THIS BEING THE FIRST PART.
'PART 1' IS TO SHOW YOU HOW WELL-DOCUMENTED MANY OF THESE ENCOUNTERS HAVE BEEN, BY WHAT CREDIBLE EYEWITNESSES, BY HOW MANY SAW THESE FACE-TO-FACE.


NASA's Scott Carpenter:
"At no time, when the astronauts were in space, were they alone: there was a constant surveillance by UFOs."   


WHY THE BIG COVER-UP?  
In earlier decades, such concerns were openly discussed among American citizens and government officials.
In 1960, for example, Representative Leonard G. Wolf of Iowa entered an "urgent warning" from former CIA Director Vice Admiral R.E. Hillenkoetter right into the Congressional Record that "certain dangers are linked with unidentified flying objects."

Wolf cited Gen. L.M. Chassin, NATO coordinator of Allied Air Service, warning that,
"if we persist in refusing to recognize the existence of the UFOs, we will end up, one fine day, by mistaking them for the guided missiles of an enemy - and the worst will be upon us."
Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, was the third Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) from 1947 to 1950, and the first Director of the CIA, which was established in September 1947.

Hillenkoetter was one of the first intelligence chiefs to make public his conviction that UFO’s were real.”
On August 22, 1960, he stated, 
“I am aware that hundreds of military and airline pilots, airport personnel, astronomers, missile trackers and other competent observers have reported sightings . . . These UFOs are interplanetary devices systematically observing the earth, either manned or under remote control, or both.”

Such warnings, such talk, surely did NOT create panic then and likely would barely turn a head today, so why the continued denial until they're busted, as the Navy was recently?

In a recent interview, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, Christopher Mellon, has argued that UFOs are not something new and that the government has known about their existence for quite some time.

Mellon will participate in a new UFO series on the History channel called ‘Unidentified,’ which will look to build on several topics discussed in a recent New York Times article.

And he's been the subject of jokes and lambasting since he opened his mouth.

BUT NOBODY PANICKED! 


                 


Before the 3 videos from our own Navy pilots were shown publicly, FOX NEWS, JAN. 9, 2017, aired the above video by the Chilean Navy.

Chile has openly investigated UFO sightings for many years.
"Chilean Navy declassifies and releases 2014 video of mysterious flying object."

Russia and the U.K. have also both, at least partially, disclosed their searches for the explanation behind the thousands of sightings in each of those nations.

BUT THE DISCLOSURE BY THE NAVY SEEMS TO BE THE HOT TOPIC. 

Several U.S. Navy pilots spotted UFOs while training over the East Coast in 2014 and 2015,
And they had video proof of three such sightings.

[Note: The pilots' language gets a bit raunchy in places.]   

As you'll see below in the three Navy videos, National Geographic and a few of the major news media have also been convinced that "something's out there" due to the overwhelming evidence they saw for themselves across America.

But what is it...who is it? 








   
The pilots told the paper they saw “strange objects” with “no visible engine or infrared exhaust plumes” reaching at least 30,000 feet and flying at hypersonic speeds almost daily while training off the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt.

“These things would be out there all day,” said Lt. Ryan Graves, an F/A-18 Super Hornet pilot who has been with the Navy for 10 years and who said he reported the sightings to the Pentagon and Congress.       

“Keeping an aircraft in the air requires a significant amount of energy. With the speeds we observed, 12 hours in the air is 11 hours longer than we’d expect.”     

The unidentified flying objects were seen performing maneuvers that were “beyond the physical limits of a human crew,” like stopping rapidly, turning instantly or immediately accelerating at hypersonic speeds, the pilots said.       

The sightings were reported to the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), which, as The Post exclusively reported earlier this month, confirmed it still investigates claimed sightings of alien spacecraft.

In late 2014, a Super Hornet pilot said he almost hit one of the objects — which he said looked like a sphere encasing a cube — and an official mishap report was filed.

Another pilot, Lt. Danny Accoin, said he could identify a flying object on his radar, missile system and infrared camera but couldn’t actually see it in his helmet camera.

“I knew I had it, I knew it was not a false hit,” Accoin said. But still, “I could not pick it up visually.”

A minute-long video included in the article appears to show two encounters with the enigmatic phenomena. In one of the clips, pilots appear confused by what they’re seeing on their radar screens.

“Look at that thing. It’s rotating,” one of them said.

At first the pilots interviewed in the report thought the objects were part of a top-secret drone program.

But after the near-collision, they changed their minds, reasoning that government officials knew there were fighter pilots in the area and would not send drones to get in the way.

Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher said it’s unclear what caused the sightings detailed in the article.

Gradisher’s statement appears to mark the first time that the Navy has acknowledged that the objects in the videos are in fact real, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported Tuesday.

PEOPLE magazine also featured two of the three videos in an article on September 10 this year.

The Times report comes after the Navy, in April, sent out a new classified guidance for how to report the “unexplained aerial phenomena.”

“There were a number of different reports,” Gradisher said. "Some cases could have been commercial drones," he added.

But in other cases, “we don’t know who’s doing this, we don’t have enough data to track this. So the intent of the message to the fleet is to provide updated guidance on reporting procedures for suspected intrusions into our airspace.”

Neither Graves or the other pilots nor the Department of Defense would speculate on what the objects were.

“We’re here to do a job, with excellence, not make up myths,” one pilot said.

MEANWHILE, IN THE CIVILIAN WORLD... HERE ARE A FEW OF THE POSSIBLY THOUSANDS OF VIDEOS AVAILABLE FOR OUR SCRUTINY, THE FEW BELOW ARE WHAT MOST WOULD CONSIDER BETTER DOCUMENTED THAN MOST, MORE CREDIBLE. 

The policemen in the video below said about the same thing the Navy pilots said, just doing their jobs, no hype intended, no 'glory' sought. But they know what they all saw was NOT anything they'd seen before, just like those pilots said.  


ABOVE VIDEO, published by NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC on Dec 22, 2008.

Police Confirmed UFO Sighting:   
FIVE police officers at five different locations in Illinois in one brief period of time in 2008. Many residents also called into their police stations to report this very strange object, which was described as "big as a football field" and completely noiseless.
At first, police mocked the 911 calls about the UFO sighting--but then they saw it too.


VIDEO BELOW, CARDIFF, WALES, 20 June 2008;          
"Welsh police confirmed that one of their helicopter crews had spotted an "unusual aircraft" flying over Cardiff earlier this month.
An investigation into the sighting had been launched, they said.At the time of the incident, the helicopter with three men on board was waiting to land at the St. Athan RAF base near Cardiff.   



ABOVE: REPORTED BY CBS, MARCH 28, 2018:
"Pilots in two different planes reported seeing a mysterious object over Arizona last month. The exchange with air traffic control...."


THE TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO SIGHTINGS

NBC DID A SERIES ON TRUMBULL WHICH CAN BE VIEWED IN THREE PARTS:

PART 1

PART 2 

PART 3 

COMPLETE POLICE AUDIO OF CALLS ABOUT THE UFO

TRUMBULL IS ONE OF THE BEST-DOCUMENTED SIGHTINGS TO DATE.



I READ IN A FEW PLACES THAT WE'RE AVERAGING AT LEAST A DOZEN UFO REPORTS A DAY NOW. I WAS SURPRISED IT'S SO FEW. 

More than 130,000 documents describing MILITARY investigations of UFO activity over American airspace are now online
Have a look.   

WE'VE ALL HEARD OF PROJECT BLUE BOOK BY NOW, RIGHT?
THE WHOLE SHEBANG IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES. 


Among some of the UFO cases the Project Blue Book Collection touches on are the "Exeter Incident," "the Kenneth Arnold sighting" from 1947 and "the Mantell crash," from 1948.
There are 'better' ones. 


The Mantell UFO incident was among the most publicized early UFO reports. The incident resulted in the crash and death of 25-year-old Kentucky Air National Guard pilot, Captain Thomas F. Mantell, on 7 January 1948, while in pursuit of a UFO.

On 7 January 1948, Godman Field at Fort Knox, Kentucky received a report from the Kentucky Highway Patrol of an unusual aerial object near Maysville, Kentucky. Reports of a westbound circular object, 250 feet (76 m) to 300 feet (91 m) in diameter, were received from Owensboro, Kentucky, and Irvington, Kentucky.

At about 1:45 p.m., Sgt Quinton Blackwell saw an object from his position in the control tower at Fort Knox. Two other witnesses in the tower also reported a white object in the distance. Base commander Colonel Guy Hix reported an object he described as "very white," and "about one fourth the size of the full moon ..
It remained stationary, seemingly, for one and a half hours." Observers at Clinton County Army Air Field in Ohio described the object "as having the appearance of a flaming red cone trailing a gaseous green mist" and observed the object for around 35 minutes. Another observer at Lockbourne Army Air Field in Ohio noted, "Just before leaving it came to very near the ground, staying down for about ten seconds, then climbed at a very fast rate back to its original altitude, 10,000 feet, leveling off and disappearing into the overcast heading 120 degrees. Its speed was greater than 500 mph in level flight."
Four P-51 Mustangs of C Flight, 165th Fighter Squadron Kentucky Air National Guard already in the air—one piloted by Mantell—were told to approach the object. Blackwell was in radio communication with the pilots throughout the event.

One pilot's Mustang was low on fuel, and he quickly abandoned his efforts. Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt (the first head of Project Blue Book) notes that there was some disagreement amongst the air traffic controllers as to Mantell's words as he communicated with the tower: some sources reported that Mantell had described an object "[which] looks metallic and of tremendous size,"
Only one of Mantell's companions, Lt. Albert Clemmons, had an oxygen mask, and his oxygen was in low supply. Clemmons and a Lt. Hammond called off their pursuit at 22,500 feet (6,900 m). Mantell continued to climb, however.
According to the Air Force, once Mantell passed 25,000 feet (7,600 m) he supposedly blacked out from the lack of oxygen (hypoxia), and his plane began spiraling back towards the ground. A witness later reported Mantell's Mustang in a circling descent. His plane crashed at a farm south of Franklin, Kentucky, on the Tennessee-Kentucky state line.


Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, 1965   

The Kecksburg UFO incident occurred on December 9, 1965 at Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, USA. A large, brilliant fireball was seen by thousands in at least six U.S. states and Ontario, Canada. It streaked over the Detroit, Michigan/Windsor, Ontario area, reportedly dropped hot metal debris over Michigan and northern Ohio, starting some grass fires and caused sonic booms in Western Pennsylvania.
In a small town 40 miles North of Pittsburgh, residents saw a fiery object crash into the town's woods.
Others from Kecksburg, including local volunteer fire department members, reported finding an object in the shape of an acorn and about as large as a Volkswagon Beetle. Writing resembling Egyptian hieroglyphics was also said to be in a band around the base of the object.
Witnesses further reported that intense military presence, most notably the United States Army, secured the area, ordered civilians out, and then removed the object on a flatbed truck.
At the time, however, the military claimed they searched the woods and found "absolutely nothing". 
In December 2005, just before the 40th anniversary of the Kecksburg incident, NASA released a statement reporting that experts had examined metallic fragments from the area and determined they were from a Russian satellite that re-entered the atmosphere and broke up.
"The damaged spacecraft remained in orbit for 16 days and reentered the Earth's atmosphere on 9 December 1965."

NASA then changed that story and said the Russian satellite had reentered and burned earlier than the incident at Kecksburg.
In the end, NASA, in a letter to journalist Leslie Kean, said that TWO BOXES of their findings were lost in the 1990s. (IF IT WAS 'NOTHING BUT A METEOR, WHY 2 BOXES?) 

Kean had filed a Freedom of Information Act request in 2003 which was subsequently fought by the space agency.

That Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against NASA to turn over its Kecksburg investigations ended in 2009, according to SPACE.com.
As a result, the government did not force NASA to hand over any documents that would explain what became of the object removed from the Pennsylvania woods.

 
CHICAGO'S O'HARE UFO SIGHTING, NOV. 7, 2006  

   
At approximately 16:15 CST on Tuesday November 7, 2006, federal authorities at Chicago O'Hare International Airport received a report that a group of twelve airport employees were witnessing a metallic, saucer-shaped craft hovering over Gate C-17.

The object was first spotted by a ramp employee who was pushing back United Airlines Flight 446, which was departing Chicago for Charlotte, North Carolina. The employee apprised Flight 446's crew of the object above their aircraft. It is believed that both the pilot and co-pilot also witnessed the object.

Several independent witnesses outside of the airport also saw the object. One described a "blatant" disc shaped craft hovering over the airport which was "obviously not clouds." According to this witness, nearby observers gasped as the object shot through the clouds at high velocity, leaving a clear blue hole in the cloud layer. The hole reportedly seemed to close itself shortly afterward.

According to the Chicago Tribune's Jon Hilkevitch, "The disc was visible for approximately two minutes and was seen by close to a dozen United Airlines employees, ranging from pilots to supervisors, who heard chatter on the radio and raced out to view it." So far, no conclusive photographic evidence of the UFO has surfaced, although it was reported to Hilkevitch that one of the United Airlines pilots was in possession of a digital camera at the time of the sighting and may have photographed the event.

Both United Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) first denied that they had any information on the O'Hare UFO sighting until the Chicago Tribune, which was investigating the report, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

The FAA then ordered an internal review of air-traffic communications tapes to comply with the Tribune FOIA request which subsequently uncovered a call by the United supervisor to an FAA manager in the airport tower concerning the UFO sighting.
On February 11, 2009 The History Channel aired an episode with the title Aliens at the Airport in which they reconstructed the incident.

THE HOLLOMAN LANDING: 1955 EISENHOWER MEETING WITH EXTRATERRESTRIALS AT HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
Holloman AFB is in New Mexico, about 120 miles from the well-known Roswell incident site.
The reports of Ike's meeting at Holloman are (or WERE) more detailed than the ones provided for the Edwards AFB meeting.       
Approximately 300 people saw Air Force One land at Holloman AFB and taxi back out to the end of the runway. Shortly after the plane landed, the pilot instructed the tower to turn off all radar while the president’s plane was on the tarmac. Shortly after Air Force One landed, and the radar was turned off, three round objects were seen in the sky. One landed about 200 feet in front of Air Force One, another hovered over the area as though keeping watch, and a third one disappeared from visibility.       
A man, presumed to be Eisenhower, descended the steps of Air Force One.     
He was seen shaking hands with a being at the door of the saucer, then entering the unusual saucer-shaped aircraft. Ike was in the saucer for about 45 minutes. 
When he left, he was not wearing a hat and was clearly visible to many observers. All witnesses recognized him as President Eisenhower.
In 1964 there was, allegedly, a second landing of another craft, and since then, locals and "UFOlogists" have reported sighting around Holloman of various UFOs.
In 1971, writer/composer Robert Emenegger was asked by some combination of the Air Force and/or DoD to produce a film about UFOS using only official DoD and NASA source material. He was allegedly promised footage of a 1964 landing at Holloman Air Force Base.
Even though they lied, Emenegger, with Rod Serling as narrator, produced the film "UFOs Past Present and Future".

THE ONLY MENTION OF HOLLOMAN  STARTS AT MINUTE 77:59, ENDS AT 81:26.
NOTHING ABOUT EISENHOWER. .

"Virtually all researchers who believe that there is official interaction with alien species, agree that an official landing took place on 24 april 1964 at Holloman AFB in New Mexico. Most refer to this event as the Holloman landing. What the researchers do not agree on is whether this was the first such official landing or not.

The majority, including the Serpo material, nowadays seems to think so. Others, including Val Valerian (who quotes a scientist claiming to have been present at the event), Bob Frissell and several sources in the Branton material, mention 20 February 1954 as the date of the first such landing, and Edwards AFB as its location. Timothy Good on the other hand refers to probably two meetings at Holloman AFB: a first one took place in Feb. 1955, and may have been followed by another one in April 1956.

MANY YEARS AGO THERE WAS A VIDEO OF IKE MEETING ALIENS, BUT HE APPEARED EXTREMELY TENSE, SCARED ACTUALLY, AND CONTRARY TO REPORTS ON THAT FILM SINCE THEN, HE WASN'T SHOWN ENTERING THE ALIEN AIRCRAFT.
IF ANYONE HAS THAT OLD FILM, PERHAPS COPIED AND SAVED, PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT AND SHARE IT WITH US.
I REGRET THAT I DIDN'T SAVE IT, BUT I DIDN'T REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS 'REAL'.

IT INTERESTED ME BECAUSE, AS A CHILD, I HEARD MY DAD AND RETIRED MILITARY UNCLE SPEAK ABOUT IKE'S BETRAYAL OF AMERICA IN THE 'TREATY' HE SIGNED THAT DAY, WHICH ALLEGEDLY, ALLOWED THEM TO COLLECT HUMANS AND ANIMALS FOR "RESEARCH" AND PROVIDE A LIST OF NAMES OF ANY HUMAN THEY TOOK. UNCLE SAID IKE PUT 'DAMNED TECHNOLOGY' ABOVE HUMAN LIFE.
I ASSUMED THEY WERE JOKING AND WASN'T CLEAR ON WHAT TECHNOLOGY REALLY MEANT.
THAT CONVERSATION WAS ALSO THE FIRST TIME I HEARD THE PHRASE "MAJIC 12" (MAJIC, NOT 'MAJESTIC', NOT "MJ-12", AND I ASSUMED THEY MEANT THE WORD 'MAGIC').
IN 1964, DAD GAVE ME HIS COPY OF 'PROJECT BLUE BOOK' AND TOLD ME TO READ. I DID.
(HAVE I MENTIONED I HAD A VERY STRANGE CHILDHOOD?) 
AFTERWARDS, THE UFO SIGHTINGS TOOK ON NEW MEANING, BUT IT WASN'T UNTIL ABOUT 1992 THAT I GAINED A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF "MJ-12".
NOT SURE IF I BELIEVE THAT, YET.

STACKING THE DECK OF EVIDENCE 

When the Air Force finally made Blue Book's 'Special Report #14' public in late 1955, they claimed that the report scientifically proved that UFOs did not exist.
Others said that the report actually proved that the "unknowns" were distinctly different from the "knowns" at a much higher significance level.
The Air Force also incorrectly claimed that only 3% of the cases studied were unknowns, instead of the actual 22%. They further claimed that the 3% would likely disappear 'if more complete data were available'.
Critics countered that the Air Force had ignored the fact that the analysts had already thrown such cases into the category of "insufficient information", whereas both "knowns" and "unknowns" were deemed to have plenty of sufficient information to make a better determination. Also the "unknowns" appeared to represent higher quality cases, had better information and witnesses.
In short, the Air Force set Sign, Grudge and Blue Book up to FAIL. 

A 1979 French GEPAN report stated that about a quarter of over 1,600 closely studied UFO cases defied explanation, stating, in part, "These cases ... pose a real question."
France issued another report in 1999, the COMETA report, which stated that UFOs as alien technology was merely "quasi-certain", but urged studying what 'prospective scenarios for defense and security' we might employ in the event alien crafts were real.

When GEPAN's successor SEPRA closed in 2004, 5800 cases had been analyzed, and the percentage of inexplicable unknowns dropped to about 14%.
HOWEVER, the head of SEPRA, Dr. Jean-Jacques Velasco, found the evidence of extraterrestrial origins so convincing in those "unknowns", that he wrote a book about it in 2005.

Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a science consultant to Blue Book, was the only scientist involved with government/military UFO studies from the beginning to the end. He was well aware of Project Sign, Project Grudge, and Blue Book.
Project Sign was first disclosed to the public in 1956 by the book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, who had headed 'Grudge', then Blue Book. Hynek liked Ruppelt, considered him'honest'.
We're told that ALL files for Sign were declassified in 1961.
Who can say that with certainty? 

But many snubbed Hynek, called him a nutcase, etc.
He held a Ph.D. in astrophysics, was a noted astronomer at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
He was among the first to conduct scientific analysis of UFO reports, especially of trace evidence purportedly left by UFOs. He also coined the phrase "close encounters".

In April 1953, Hynek wrote a report for the Journal of the Optical Society of America titled "Unusual Aerial Phenomena," which contained one of his best-known statements:

"Ridicule is not part of the scientific method, and people should not be taught that it is. The steady flow of reports, often made in concert by reliable observers, raises questions of scientific obligation and responsibility. Is there ... any residue that is worthy of scientific attention? Or, if there isn't, does not an obligation exist to say so to the public—not in words of open ridicule but seriously, to keep faith with the trust the public places in science and scientists?"
In Hynek and Vallee's 1975 book 'The Edge of Reality', Hynek published a stereoscopic photograph of a UFO he took during a flight. According to the book, the object stayed in sight long enough for Hynek to unpack his camera from his luggage and take two exposures.

HE NAILED IT ON RIDICULE, BUT SOME STILL TRIED TO DISCREDIT HIM. WHY? 
The Mysterious UFO Incident above Gosford, Australia in 1994        

On early Christmas morning near the city of Gosford, Australia, the first sighting occurred. According to testimony from former Air Traffic Controller Lindsay Carter, it was a quiet morning as he headed north from Sydney.

Peering out his front windshield, Carter saw about a half-mile away, a silver, metallic object in the sky. The object was crossing from South to North.

Another eyewitness to the object was housewife June O'Hare, who saw the UFO move over the water. The object was surrounded by lights.

By New Year's Eve, numerous calls were made to local authorities reporting a UFO, according to Sgt. Bob Wenning. All of the callers reported a huge, ball-shaped object with bright lights on the bottom. Witnesses observed the UFO sucking up water from the lake.

Other witnesses claimed to have watched the unknown object move over the waters for as long as 15 minutes.
The appearance of the UFO near Gosford has never been explained.
TOO MANY WITNESSES? 


THE TWINING MEMO 

FOLLOWING THE ROSWELL INCIDENT, a letter was sent out from Air Material Commands (AMC) in response to a request from Brigadier General George Francis Schulgen. As a result of the opinions expressed by Twining, Gen Schulgen issued his now famous Collection Memorandum.

Gen. Twining requested that investigations be conducted that might shed some light on the recent rash of Flying Saucer sightings. In response to the Schugen Collection Memorandum, The Walker Memo was sent to see what field offices could find.

Some proponents view this letter as proof that the Air Force knows that extraterrestrial UFOs exist. The closest the the letter comes to considering alien origin is the opinion that [there is] "The possibility that some foreign nation has a form of propulsion possibly nuclear, which is outside of our domestic knowledge." However, the proponents tend to ignore, or dismiss as an "obvious lie" dictated by the Super Secret Roswell Conspiracy, the instruction that his commanders should consider: "The lack of physical evidence in the shape of crash recovered exhibits which would undeniably prove the existence of these subjects." 

FROM THAT MEMO: 

"It is the opinion that:

a. The phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious.
b. There are objects probably approximating the shape of a disc, of such appreciable size as to appear to be as large as man-made aircraft.
c. There is a possibility that some of the incidents may be caused by natural phenomena, such as meteors.
d. The reported operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability (particularly in roll), and motion which must be considered evasive when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar, lend belief to the possibility that some of the objects are controlled either manually, automatically or remotely.
e. The apparent common description is as follows:-

(1) Metallic or light reflecting surface.
(2) Absence of trail, except in a few instances where the object apparently was operating under high performance conditions.
(3) Circular or elliptical in shape, flat on bottom and domed on top.
(4) Several reports of well kept formation flights varying from three to nine objects.
(5) Normally no associated sound, except in three instances a substantial rumbling roar was noted.
(6) Level flight speeds normally above 300 knots are estimated."
It is recommended that:-

a. Headquarters, Army Air Forces issue a directive assigning a priority, security classification and Code name for a detailed study of this matter to include the preparation of complete sets of all available and pertinent data which will then be made available to the Army, Navy, Atomic Energy Commission, JRDB, the Air Force Scientific Advisory Group, NACA, and the RAND and NEPA projects for comments and recommendations, with a preliminary report to be forwarded within 15 days of receipt of the data and a detailed report thereafter every 30 days as the investigation develops. A complete interchange of data should be affected.

THE BROOKINGS REPORT 

The Brookings Institution 
Washington, D. C. 
November 30, 1960   
Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs

[NOTE: BROOKINGS WAS A MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO THE COVER-UP OF THE ATOMIC BOMB, RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT, HARM TO HUMANS, ETC, SO BE AWARE OF JUST WHO BROOKINGS IS AS YOU READ THESE FEW SNIPPETS FROM THAT LENGTHY REPORT.]  

INTRODUCTION: GOALS AND METHODS  

1. In November 1959 the National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracted with the Brookings Institution to “undertake... the design of a comprehensive and long-term program of research and study regarding the social, economic, political, legal, and international implications of the use of space for peaceful and scientific purposes.”

2. The long-term program of research set out in the report (and briefly outlined in this Summary) includes:

a. Sufficient description and evaluation of speculations on the implications of space activities to provide a basis for judging which implications may have sufficient impact on human affairs to merit research.

b. Specification of criteria for selection of high priority research.

c. Specification, when feasible of high priority research areas for initiating a long-range research program; specification of other research areas which will extend the utility of the initial research; and specification of research which may become central under later circumstances.

d. Suggestions as to methods, persons, and organizations that might assist the conduct of research. (The suggestions are made chiefly through footnote citations of pertinent publications and projects and are therefore not included in this Summary, which carries no footnotes.)

e. Suggestions on the organization and function of a NASA research capability to implement the program (Chapter 2).

VI. IMPLICATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS AND PERSONNEL USE

3. If space activities expand and some development and launching facilities are established independently of military reservations, state regulations regarding siting and control of dangerous space operations or health hazards may affect space activity planning. States may promote testing, launching, and research facilities for space activities to attract and retain academic personnel and bring good students to the universities, and as inducement to industry.
All of these possibilities may present federal­-state regulation and control problems as well as opportunities to expand space activities; study should be undertaken to anticipate and resolve the problems.    
 
IX. ATTITUDES AND VALUES

The general public

1. As with other matters not central to day-to-day living, the public, considered as a whole, is probably only selectively attentive to and knowledgeable about space activities. The relationship between the impact of events on indifferent or only occasionally interested people and their attitudes and values is but partly understood and needs further study.

2. It has been alleged that the “public” is optimistic about space activities. If this is so and if the optimism is widespread, the present support it generates for the space program may not be lasting if the difficulties inherent in space efforts have not been appreciated enough to make the failure of specific projects understandable. The resulting disillusionment may be a serious factor in reducing public support as space efforts become more grandiose, the consequences of payoff more exciting, and the losses from failure more dramatic. On the other hand, this optimism, if it exists, may produce a state of mind tolerant of failures. The factors affecting optimism, realism, and tolerance of frustration need more study as an aid in preparing for this situation. The roles of the promoter spokesman and the mass media in encouraging expectations of great and imminent accomplishments are integral to this problem area and would benefit from research.  

3. The conviction that space activities will broaden man's horizons are presently based on the perspectives and special interests of a relatively few people in western societies. The claim may be justified, but there is need for research to assist understanding of the conditions under which innovations broaden or narrow perspectives in various cultures.

For example, sufficient emphasis on space as the proper expression of man's highest aspirations may result in the evolution of a broadly based belief that this is so. But whether or not this is likely to be the case cannot now be decided in view of our limited understanding of how new ideas disseminate through societies. If and as horizons were broadened as a result of space activities, other aspirations would compete with them for attention and resources, and continuous study would be required to evaluate the appropriate position of space in this competition.   

4. Though intelligent or semi-intelligent life conceivably exists elsewhere in our solar system, if intelligent extraterrestrial life is discovered in the next twenty years, it will very probably be by radio telescope from other solar systems. Evidences of its existence might also be found in artifacts left on the moon or other planets.

The consequences for attitudes and values are unpredictable, but would vary profoundly in different cultures and between groups within complex societies; a crucial factor would be the nature of the communication between us and the other beings. Whether or not earth would be inspired to an all-out space effort by such a discovery is moot: societies sure of their own place in the universe have disintegrated when confronted by a superior society, and others have survived even though changed. Clearly, the better we can come to understand the factors involved in responding to such crises the better prepared we may be.     

5. Man-in-space programs in their early days will confront some groups with value conflicts over the proper circumstances for risking life, family integrity, etc. Arguments are already intense on the merits, or lack of them, of investing heavily in man-in-space efforts. Later efforts may expose astronauts to living conditions with which many of the public cannot, or will be reluctant to identify.

The threat and isolation of space thus emphasized may repel many people, especially as urban living becomes ever more the life pattern, and support for these efforts, therefore, might be less forthcoming. In some people, however, the adventures of the astronauts may fire a latent pioneer spirit; support for man-in-space programs might be strong among this group -- but it also might be displaced by their newly stirred personal pioneer aspirations. There may be possibly profound effects on attitudes and values if through the astronaut experiences it is found that the extraordinary abilities sometimes displayed under conditions of extreme physical or emotional stress can be made available to man for use in-more normal circumstances.

However, it should be kept in mind that intense solar radiation and heavy-particle cosmic rays may make more than an occasional manned essay into deep space too dangerous to be practical during the time period under examination. If so, the consequences for attitudes and values are not clear. Understanding of the impact of the man-in-space program on attitudes and values in general, and on those toward the program itself in particular would benefit from a series of studies of public expectations and beliefs as these change over time.

Since commitment of effort to competing programs for social betterment fundamentally depends on attitudes and values about their relative merits, a research area with potentially profound implications for society and space activities, which is also urgent for policy purposes, concerns the development of:

Systematic methods for assigning priorities between competing scientific and social efforts (where competition may be over the long term and involve personnel, money, public support, and conflicting attitudes and values).

A variety of more specific studies on public opinion and values as affected by space activities will depend on research providing trend data describing:

• The state of knowledge, values, and attitudes regarding space activities, both on-going and contemplated; and what assumptions, expectations, and values underlie the attitudes and interpretations of this knowledge. What are the effects over time of new knowledge and events on attitudes toward space activities, and what are the effects of the sources of information on the acceptability of the information?
         
In view of the conflicting attitudes and values so far expressed about the Mercury program, and in view of the possible favorable and unfavorable consequences of astronaut launchings, it is urgent to plan studies that would provide information on what the public needs to know and would assist in interpreting public reactions by determining:

• Present public knowledge and expectations about and underlying attitudes toward, the Mercury program and the astronauts. These should be continuing studies so that the impact of events can be anticipated, evaluated, and planned for.

While the discovery of intelligent life in other parts of the universe is not likely in the immediate future, it could nevertheless happen at any time. Whenever it does occur its consequences for earth attitudes and values may be profound. Hence a long-term research effort, which would aid in preparing for this possibility, could usefully begin with:

A continuing determination of emotional and intellectual understanding and attitudes regarding the possibility and consequences of discovering intelligent extraterrestrial life.


SO, PEOPLE OF EARTH, IT'S NOT JUST THAT WE MAY PANIC, IT'S THAT WE NEED A LITTLE MANIPULATION TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE 'THE RIGHT ATTITUDE'.



THE BROOKINGS REPORT IS VERY DISCONCERTING TO ME.
BROOKINGS ITSELF IS A MAJOR TOOL USED BY THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TO FIND WAYS TO DO AS THEY PLEASE WITHOUT CATCHING FLAK FROM US 'DUMB' CITIZENS. 


AS I END THIS PART 1 BLOG, I'LL JUST MENTION A FEW MORE SIGHTINGS FOR YOU TO EXPLORE FOR YOURSELVES SO YOU GET AN IDEA WHY I FEEL A BIT OVERWHELMED WHEN CHOOSING WHICH ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT FOR US TO CONSIDER. 
SOME GO WAY BACK IN TIME, OTHERS HAPPENED RECENTLY. 


--AURORA, TEXAS UFO, APRIL, 1897
, 'THE GREAT AIRSHIP MYSTERY', REPORTED IN THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS  AND FORT WORTH REGISTER, A TALE COMPLETE WITH FRAGMENTS OF THE DOWNED ALIEN CRAFT, STRANGE DOCUMENTS FOUND ON THE CHARRED BODY WRITTEN IN 'HIEROGLYPHICS," AND BURIAL OF ITS PILOT. (BTW, THE FIRST DIRIGIBLE FLIGHT IN THE U.S. DIDN'T OCCUR UNTIL 1903.)

--HEGBEN LAKE, MONTANA, AUGUST 1949. 
THE AIR FORCE WAS ALL OVER THE CRASH OF SEVEN UFOs THERE, BUT REFUSE TO RELEASE BUT HALF THE DATA THEY GATHERED.

--THE SIERRA MADRE CRASH, LATE 1940s, REPORTED (BARELY) IN THE LOS ANGELES FREE PRESS, WITNESS BEING ONE DR. LUIS ALVAREZ, WHO WORKED ON THE MANHATTAN PROJECT, WAS LATER A 1968 NOBEL PRIZE WINNER AND WAS A PROFESSOR AT BERKLEY IN 1984. HE REFUSED TO BE INTERVIEWED AGAIN.

--UFOs OVER THE WHITE HOUSE, 1952

When a slew of saucer-like sightings was reported over Washington, D.C. in 1952, the Air Force blocked its own investigator from checking them out.
Two separate radar confirmations and visuals by military and civilians.

--1980 CASH/LANDRUM ENCOUNTER, TEXAS
A landmark case in the history of UFOs is the 1980 Cash-Landrum incident which occurred in the Piney Woods of Texas. This case marked the only time that any American citizen has sued the United States of America for damages received from a UFO. This extraordinary case is only rivaled in Texas by the 1957 UFO landings at Levelland.
23 HELICOPTERS in pursuit, radiation burns to victims.

--THE LIGHTS ABOVE THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE, 2001
HUNDREDS OF EYEWITNESSES AND FAA CAUGHT IN A LIE THAT THEY HAD NO RADAR ON THE EVENT.

--USS NIMITZ ENCOUNTER, 2004     
For two weeks, the crew tracked objects that appeared at 80,000 feet and then plummeted to hover right above the Pacific Ocean. 
Black Aces Commander David Fravor and Lt. Commander Jim Slaight of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 attempted to intercept the craft, but it accelerated away, re-appearing on radar 60 miles away. It moved three times the speed of sound and more than twice the speed of the fighter jets.

--OREGON SIGHTINGS, 2017 
SEVERAL DIFFERENT AIRLINES' PILOTS REPORTED UFOs AND HAD RADAR CONFIRMATION.

--2018 MULITPLE UFOs REPORTED OVER IRELAND BY SEVERAL IRISH PILOTS. 
IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY INVESTIGATING. 
AND THEN THERE ARE THE REPORTS MADE BY NASA's OWN ASTRONAUTS, MOST WITH PHOTOS AND/OR VIDEO. 

1- JOHN GLENN, FIRST AMERICAN IN SPACE 
2- FRANK BORMAN 
3- JAMES LOVELL   
4- JAMES McDIVITT 
5, 6, 7- APOLLO 11 ASTRONAUTS, NEIL ARMSTRONG, MICHAEL COLLINS,
AND BUZZ ALDRIN
8, 9,10- SKYLAB 3's OWEN GARRIOTT, JACK LOUSMA, AND ALAN BEAN 
11- GORDON COOPER 
12- ED WHITE
13- DONALD SLAYTON
14- ROBERT WHITE
15- NASA X-15 PILOT, JOSEPH WALKER 
16- EUGENE CERNAN
17- SCOTT CARPENTER
18- WALTER SCHIRRA
19- STORMY MUSGRAVE
20- WINSTON SCOTT 
21- FRANKLIN CHANG DIAZ
22- BRENT JETT
23, 24, 25- APOLLO 16 ASTRONAUTS THOMAS MATTINGLY, CHARLES DUKE AND JOHN YOUNG. 
26- EDGAR MITCHELL
27- AL WORDEN


OTHER EYEWITNESSES, MANY WITH PHOTOS/VIDEO.

WITNESSES LIKE...a Major General of the Belgian Air Force; a retired astrophysicist and space research engineer from the National Center for Space Studies, the French equivalent of NASA; a retired Air France Captain; an astronomer, working for the French Centre National de Ia Recherche Scientifique from 1963 to 1998 who contributed to the French COIvIETA report, a three year military study on UFOs and National Security released in 1999; a retired General of the Iranian Air Force; the head of the Aviation branch of the Army of Chile assigned to research anomalous aerial phenomena; a retired pilot of the Peruvian Air Force; a British civilian airliner captain; an investigator for the British Ministry of Defence;  a pilot of the United States Air Force, retired; a retired colonel of the USAF; the Division Chief of the Accidents, Evaluations and Investigations Division of the FAA in Washington, for 6 years.

MANY OF THEIR ENCOUNTERS MAKE THE NAVY BOYS' RUN-INS WITH UFOs LOOK MILD. 


LIKE I SAID AND LIKE ALL THE ABOVE KNOW, UFOs ARE REAL, BUT WHO'S PILOTING THEM, AND WHY ARE THEY HERE? 










//WW