THE HEMLOCK TEA ROOM & LADIES' EMPORIUM
OCTOBER 21, 2012 - December 24, 2020
Grateful for all who have read here.
//ww
Thursday, December 24, 2020
THE TEA ROOM, WITH DEEPEST REGRET, IS CLOSED
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
THE 'MANDATES' ARE NOT WORKING. TIME FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.
Even though common mask materials block most of the droplets that spread the virus, that may not be enough. Social distancing is not working. One can walk through "clouds" of the virus left by passersby several minutes ago.
Those tiniest droplets can travel on the wind and wind up in unprotected eyes, on skin, on clothing and shoes, on shopping bags and purses, on hair...and then go home with us.
THE PROBLEM WITH THIS "FINDING" IS THAT THE PEOPLE IN THE GIF UP THERE DO NOT STAND STILL.
THEY MOVE THROUGH THE "DROPLETS" AND SO THERE'S SIMPLY NO WAY TO STOP THE SPREAD OF THIS ULTRA-TINY VIRUS BY ANY MEANS KNOWN...EXCEPT BY ABSOLUTE SOLITARY ISOLATION OF EVERY HUMAN ON EARTH.
ANY VOLUNTEERS???
MASKS DO HELP CONTAIN SOME OF THE VIRUS, BUT "SOME" IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH, UNFORTUNATELY, AS FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SHOWED..
In Physics of Fluids, by AIP Publishing, researchers tested how five different types of mask materials impacted the spread of droplets that carry the coronavirus when we cough or sneeze.
Every material tested dramatically reduced the number of droplets that were spread. But at distances of less than 6 feet, enough droplets to potentially cause illness still made it through several of the materials.
A single sneeze can carry up to 200 million tiny virus particles, depending on how sick the carrier is.
Larger droplets, with sizes around 5-10 microns, are the most common. These droplets are still quite small, however.
To compare, a human hair is about 70 microns in diameter.
Even smaller droplets, those below 5 microns, are possibly more dangerous. These can become aerosolized and remain suspended in the air for long periods.
The study also did NOT account for leakage from masks, whether worn properly or improperly, which can add to the number of droplets that make their way into the air.
High speed camera shown above, captures how different types of face masks work or don't.
UNSW in Sydney, Australia confirmed that even speaking generates substantial droplets. Coughing and sneezing (in that order) generate even more.
A 12-layered cloth mask is about as protective as a surgical mask, but both reduce infection risk by just 67%.
Above: "Why 6 Feet May Not Be Enough To Protect Yourself From Coronavirus" By the TODAY Show, USA.
HOWEVER: "In Missouri, two infected hairdressers kept working while infectious, but wore a mix of cloth and surgical masks, as did their 139 clients. No client was infected."
WHAT NONE OF THESE STUDIES ADDRESSED WAS INFECTION THROUGH THE EYES AND HOW WE CAN BE INFECTED BY HAVING CONTAMINATED CLOTHING (INCLUDING SHOES, PURSES, ETC) THAT BRINGS INFECTION INTO OUR HOMES.
COVID FOUND ON FOOD
CHINA has found SARS-CoV-2 on imported foods and in air particles (from the aerosol effect?).
SARS-CoV-2 has been detected on shrimp from Saudi Arabia, fish from India, beef and chicken from Brazil, pork from Germany, salmon from Norway and shrimp from Ecuador.
Brazilian chicken — either the food or its packaging — has also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, as did squid from Russia.
At least nine Chinese provinces have reported finding SARS-CoV-2 RNA in frozen imported food since July 2020.
Finding LIVE virus on frozen food package suggests the virus can survive in cold supply chains.
It was not clear whether the dock workers contracted the virus from the packaging of frozen food. Still, the CDC warned those handling frozen products not to have direct contact with the goods.
WHEN "PLAN A" FAILS, DON'T KEEP USING PLAN A
Considering we cannot hide from the virus, the least destructive path forward would be to implement the advice given by the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” to encourage the development of herd immunity.
OR...JUST SAY NO! STOP BOWING AND STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
CARRIED FARTHER BY AIR POLLUTION
SARS-CoV-2 has also been found on particles of air pollution. According to The Guardian,[4] scientists are investigating to determine whether the virus might be able to spread over long distances this way. It’s still unknown whether the virus can remain viable if hitching a ride on particles of pollution, or whether this route would distribute sufficient quantities to actually make someone sick if they inhaled it.
Also according to The Guardian: [5]
“Italian scientists used standard techniques to collect outdoor air pollution samples at one urban and one industrial site in Bergamo province and identified a gene highly specific to COVID-19 in multiple samples. The detection was confirmed by blind testing at an independent laboratory …
A statistical analysis [6,7] by Setti’s team suggests higher levels of particle pollution could explain higher rates of infection in parts of northern Italy before a lockdown was imposed, an idea supported by another preliminary analysis. [8] The region is one of the most polluted in Europe.
The potential role of air pollution particles is linked to the broader question of how the coronavirus is transmitted. Large virus-laden droplets from infected people’s coughs and sneezes fall to the ground within a meter or two.
Considering we cannot hide from the virus, the least destructive path forward would be to implement the advice given by the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” to encourage the development of herd immunity.
OR...JUST SAY NO! STOP BOWING AND STAND UP FOR YOUR FREEDOM!
CARRIED FARTHER BY AIR POLLUTION
SARS-CoV-2 has also been found on particles of air pollution. According to The Guardian,[4] scientists are investigating to determine whether the virus might be able to spread over long distances this way. It’s still unknown whether the virus can remain viable if hitching a ride on particles of pollution, or whether this route would distribute sufficient quantities to actually make someone sick if they inhaled it.
Also according to The Guardian: [5]
“Italian scientists used standard techniques to collect outdoor air pollution samples at one urban and one industrial site in Bergamo province and identified a gene highly specific to COVID-19 in multiple samples. The detection was confirmed by blind testing at an independent laboratory …
A statistical analysis [6,7] by Setti’s team suggests higher levels of particle pollution could explain higher rates of infection in parts of northern Italy before a lockdown was imposed, an idea supported by another preliminary analysis. [8] The region is one of the most polluted in Europe.
The potential role of air pollution particles is linked to the broader question of how the coronavirus is transmitted. Large virus-laden droplets from infected people’s coughs and sneezes fall to the ground within a meter or two.
But much smaller droplets, less than 5 microns in diameter, can remain in the air for minutes to hours and travel further …
Researchers say the importance of potential airborne transmission, and the possible boosting role of pollution particles, mean it must not be ruled out without evidence.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s October 5, 2020, scientific brief [9,10] on SARS-CoV-2 points out the virus can spread either through large respiratory droplets (which is the only potential benefit of wearing a mask) or through small airborne particles that “can remain suspended for many minutes to hours and travel far from the source on air currents.
Researchers say the importance of potential airborne transmission, and the possible boosting role of pollution particles, mean it must not be ruled out without evidence.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s October 5, 2020, scientific brief [9,10] on SARS-CoV-2 points out the virus can spread either through large respiratory droplets (which is the only potential benefit of wearing a mask) or through small airborne particles that “can remain suspended for many minutes to hours and travel far from the source on air currents.
”In 2019, researchers discovered bacteria can be carried thousands of miles through the air, [11] which complicates the containment of bacterial outbreaks. Other studies have demonstrated that antibiotic-resistant bacteria can scatter long distances by piggybacking on feedlot dust. [12]
An article [13] by BGR, published in April 2020, found walkers, runners and cyclists may need to maintain a distance of up to 66 feet in order to avoid exposure when exercising outdoors. BGR writes: [14]
“The research, [15] which was conducted by an international team including scientists in Belgium and the Netherlands, studied the impacts of current social distancing mandates when applied to outdoor exercise …
Outdoor trails present a unique challenge, as individuals are breathing heavily and potentially even coughing or sneezing along the way.
An article [13] by BGR, published in April 2020, found walkers, runners and cyclists may need to maintain a distance of up to 66 feet in order to avoid exposure when exercising outdoors. BGR writes: [14]
“The research, [15] which was conducted by an international team including scientists in Belgium and the Netherlands, studied the impacts of current social distancing mandates when applied to outdoor exercise …
Outdoor trails present a unique challenge, as individuals are breathing heavily and potentially even coughing or sneezing along the way.
If a second person is following behind, even at what would be considered a ‘safe’ distance for indoor interaction, they would quickly come into contact with particles in the air that could contain the virus …
Based on the simulations and data, the team suggests that individuals who are walking outdoors should maintain a minimum of four meters (13 feet) of separation.
Runners and casual bikers should try to stay at least 10 meters apart (33 feet), and fast cyclists should attempt to remain at least 20 meters (66 feet) from others using the same trails.
The researchers also note that avoiding the direct path of the person in front of you is vital, even when maintaining these distances.”
Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide
The irony here is that the authors make it sound as though you can somehow avoid the virus provided you follow certain rules, like staying a certain distance away and avoiding having another person directly in front of you.
Nowhere to Run, Nowhere to Hide
The irony here is that the authors make it sound as though you can somehow avoid the virus provided you follow certain rules, like staying a certain distance away and avoiding having another person directly in front of you.
Logic would tell you that once the virus is in the air, it’s going to move with the air in whatever direction the air is moving.
Can you hide from the wind, from air?
Can you hide from the wind, from air?
If these studies tell us anything, it’s that we cannot hide from this virus. We cannot separate ourselves from others far enough to where transmission risk is eliminated.
And, as detailed by Denis Rancourt in a July 2020 interview, the research clearly shows that masks cannot prevent the spread of airborne viruses, so you hiding behind a mask won’t do you much good either.
If air can flow through the mask, the virus can flow through as well.
All a mask can do is limit the spread of large contaminated respiratory droplets.
The failure of masks is also evident in recent CDC data [16,17,18] showing that 71% of COVID-19 patients reported “always” wearing a cloth mask or face covering in the 14 days preceding their illness; 14% reported having worn a mask “often.”
The failure of masks is also evident in recent CDC data [16,17,18] showing that 71% of COVID-19 patients reported “always” wearing a cloth mask or face covering in the 14 days preceding their illness; 14% reported having worn a mask “often.”
In all, 85% of COVID-19 patients had been diligent about mask use, yet this did not protect them from the virus.
Isn't Peaceful Civil Disobedience Required?
With COVID-19 fatality rates [21,22,23] as low as they are, mandatory mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns and business shut-downs are not only ineffective and almost pointless, but these measures are also causing a global economic collapse and unbelievable stress on society as a whole.
It appears the only justification, then, is for this strategy is to increase fear, tyranny and transfer of power to the technocratic elite.
Now, so-called “health passports” are being rolled out, and it’s only a matter of time before COVID-19 vaccination will be required for travel.
“I was talking with my U.K. colleagues who are saying the U.K. is similar to where we are now, because each of our countries have that independent spirit,” Fauci said on stage during a discussion with other health experts at Washington National Cathedral. “I can understand that, but now is the time to do what you’re told.”
{Shove that in your ear, treasonous Wuhan Fauci. Go learn how to get a baseball across home plate.}
Overall, it seems the best way to avoid a much more harrowing fight down the road is to engage in civil disobedience NOW, because once the Great Reset is fully implemented, dissent will no longer be possible.
WHEN YOU SEE GOVERNORS, MAYORS, THE SUPER-HYPOCRITICAL FAUCI, CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS LIKE PELOSI AND FEINSTEIN, OUT AND ABOUT WITHOUT MASKS, DOESN'T IT OCCUR TO YOU THEY KNOW MASKS AREN'T REALLY NECESSARY?
WHEN YOU SEE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE TELLING US TO "STAY HOME, WEAR MASKS, DON'T GET TOGETHER WITH FAMILY FOR THE HOLIDAYS" VACATIONING IN THE ISLANDS OR AT MEXICAN RESORTS, GOING TO SALONS, ATTENDING PARTIES AND FAMILY GATHERINGS, ISN'T IT CLEAR THAT SOCIAL DISTANCING ISN'T SOMETHING THEY SEE AS NECESSARY?
WHEN THEY CLOSE CHURCHES BUT LEAVE OUR MILITARY IN PACKED BARRACKS ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE, SHUT DOWN SMALL BUSINESSES BUT LEAVE 'SUPER-STORES' LIKE TARGET, WALMART, HOME DEPOT AND OTHERS WIDE OPEN, CAN'T YOU SEE IT'S MAINLY ABOUT DELETING "THE LITTLE GUYS", THE "AVERAGE CITIZENS", WHILE MAKING THE "BIG GUYS" RICHER?
DO AS YOU CHOOSE, BUT I'M FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.
MY PERSONAL "MEDICAL EXPERTS" TELL ME THIS IS LIKELY MY LAST CHRISTMAS.
AT ALMOST 75 YEARS OLD, I'VE ALREADY BROKEN RECORDS FOR SURVIVAL WITH THIS "RARE" CANCER AND THE NUMBER OF 'METASTASES' TO DATE, SO YOU CAN BET THE FARM THAT I'M GOING TO ENJOY CHRISTMAS VISITS FROM SOME OF MY CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN BEGINNING TOMORROW, AND MASKS BE DAMNED!
WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED, BUT WE'RE NOT COMPLETELY UNDER THE BOOT, YET.
I DON"T INTEND TO EVER BE THERE!
YES, I'VE HAD THE VIRUS TWICE NOW (ACCORDING TO BOTH PCR TESTS AND SERUM ANTIBODY TESTS) AND IF I HAVE IT 10,000 MORE TIMES, I WON'T HAVE MISSED A MOMENT WITHOUT FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
NOTHING WILL STOP MY FREE CHOICE OF HOW TO BEST LIVE MY LIFE.
I INTEND TO GIVE UP NONE OF MY FREEDOM, NOT ONE OF MY RIGHTS.
_________________________
- Sources and References
1, 2 Food Safety News November 16, 2020
Isn't Peaceful Civil Disobedience Required?
With COVID-19 fatality rates [21,22,23] as low as they are, mandatory mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns and business shut-downs are not only ineffective and almost pointless, but these measures are also causing a global economic collapse and unbelievable stress on society as a whole.
It appears the only justification, then, is for this strategy is to increase fear, tyranny and transfer of power to the technocratic elite.
Now, so-called “health passports” are being rolled out, and it’s only a matter of time before COVID-19 vaccination will be required for travel.
For months, many have been saying “It’s just a mask. What’s the big deal? Wear it so we can end this pandemic.”
Soon, that will be replaced with “It’s just a vaccine. What’s the big deal? Take it so we can all go back to normal.”
Alas, there will be no going back to normal unless we make a fuss and refuse to be scared into complete submission.
Soon, "normal" will mean that we're all sheepishly complying with whatever we're told to comply with, no matter how bizarre, freedom-robbing, unconstitutional, or ludicrous the demands become.
Alas, there will be no going back to normal unless we make a fuss and refuse to be scared into complete submission.
Soon, "normal" will mean that we're all sheepishly complying with whatever we're told to comply with, no matter how bizarre, freedom-robbing, unconstitutional, or ludicrous the demands become.
It’s becoming increasingly clear that "the Great Reset" is anything but the promised utopia.
What they’re trying to get us to accept is a dystopian nightmare of an existence where there is neither privacy nor any real freedom to speak of.
Getting us to don our masks is nothing more than a soft indoctrination. It’s teaching us to obey without question — a perfect example of which is when "Dr." Anthony Fauci recently stated that it’s time for Americans to abandon their independent spirit and “do what you’re told.” [24]
Getting us to don our masks is nothing more than a soft indoctrination. It’s teaching us to obey without question — a perfect example of which is when "Dr." Anthony Fauci recently stated that it’s time for Americans to abandon their independent spirit and “do what you’re told.” [24]
“I was talking with my U.K. colleagues who are saying the U.K. is similar to where we are now, because each of our countries have that independent spirit,” Fauci said on stage during a discussion with other health experts at Washington National Cathedral. “I can understand that, but now is the time to do what you’re told.”
{Shove that in your ear, treasonous Wuhan Fauci. Go learn how to get a baseball across home plate.}
Overall, it seems the best way to avoid a much more harrowing fight down the road is to engage in civil disobedience NOW, because once the Great Reset is fully implemented, dissent will no longer be possible.
WHEN YOU SEE GOVERNORS, MAYORS, THE SUPER-HYPOCRITICAL FAUCI, CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS LIKE PELOSI AND FEINSTEIN, OUT AND ABOUT WITHOUT MASKS, DOESN'T IT OCCUR TO YOU THEY KNOW MASKS AREN'T REALLY NECESSARY?
WHEN YOU SEE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE TELLING US TO "STAY HOME, WEAR MASKS, DON'T GET TOGETHER WITH FAMILY FOR THE HOLIDAYS" VACATIONING IN THE ISLANDS OR AT MEXICAN RESORTS, GOING TO SALONS, ATTENDING PARTIES AND FAMILY GATHERINGS, ISN'T IT CLEAR THAT SOCIAL DISTANCING ISN'T SOMETHING THEY SEE AS NECESSARY?
WHEN THEY CLOSE CHURCHES BUT LEAVE OUR MILITARY IN PACKED BARRACKS ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE, SHUT DOWN SMALL BUSINESSES BUT LEAVE 'SUPER-STORES' LIKE TARGET, WALMART, HOME DEPOT AND OTHERS WIDE OPEN, CAN'T YOU SEE IT'S MAINLY ABOUT DELETING "THE LITTLE GUYS", THE "AVERAGE CITIZENS", WHILE MAKING THE "BIG GUYS" RICHER?
DO AS YOU CHOOSE, BUT I'M FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.
MY PERSONAL "MEDICAL EXPERTS" TELL ME THIS IS LIKELY MY LAST CHRISTMAS.
AT ALMOST 75 YEARS OLD, I'VE ALREADY BROKEN RECORDS FOR SURVIVAL WITH THIS "RARE" CANCER AND THE NUMBER OF 'METASTASES' TO DATE, SO YOU CAN BET THE FARM THAT I'M GOING TO ENJOY CHRISTMAS VISITS FROM SOME OF MY CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN BEGINNING TOMORROW, AND MASKS BE DAMNED!
WE'VE BEEN SCAMMED, BUT WE'RE NOT COMPLETELY UNDER THE BOOT, YET.
I DON"T INTEND TO EVER BE THERE!
YES, I'VE HAD THE VIRUS TWICE NOW (ACCORDING TO BOTH PCR TESTS AND SERUM ANTIBODY TESTS) AND IF I HAVE IT 10,000 MORE TIMES, I WON'T HAVE MISSED A MOMENT WITHOUT FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
NOTHING WILL STOP MY FREE CHOICE OF HOW TO BEST LIVE MY LIFE.
I INTEND TO GIVE UP NONE OF MY FREEDOM, NOT ONE OF MY RIGHTS.
_________________________
- Sources and References
1, 2 Food Safety News November 16, 2020
13, 14 BGR April 9, 2020
24 NY Post November 13, 2020
-- The Mercola Organization.
BE FREE!
SQUEEZE EVERY DROP OF LIFE FROM YOUR SHORT TIME ON THIS GOOD EARTH!
//WW
-- The Mercola Organization.
BE FREE!
SQUEEZE EVERY DROP OF LIFE FROM YOUR SHORT TIME ON THIS GOOD EARTH!
//WW
Saturday, December 19, 2020
TWO VIEWS ON AN EVENT IN CHINA IN 2019 THAT 'MAY HAVE SPREAD SARS-CoV-2'
Above: Opening ceremonies of the seventh Military World Games, in Wuhan, China, October 18, 2019
FIRST, the 'American Version':
Did the Military World Games Spread COVID-19?
The October 2019 event, held in Wuhan, China, appears to have been a vector for spreading the disease in the U.S. and around the world.
Less than a month before data shows the first Chinese citizen became ill with coronavirus, nearly 300 members of the U.S. military, Department of Defense, and support personnel attended the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China.
When the games ended, they returned to at least 219 home bases in 25 states, without ever being screened for possible COVID-19 infection.
(We didn't know it existed yet in October, did we?)
According to the Pentagon, there was no reason to do so then, or subsequently.
A spokesperson issued a terse email response to the question, saying there was no screening because the event—held from October 18 to 27, 2019—“was prior to the reported outbreak.”
The spokesperson cited December 31, 2019, as the critical outbreak day and that no testing was deemed necessary for any possible exposure prior to February 1, 2020.
Since that email, Pentagon officials have repeatedly declined to speak on or off the record regarding the subject.
Contrary to the Pentagon’s insistence, however, an investigation of COVID-19 cases in the military from official and public source materials shows that a strong correlation exists in COVID-19 cases reported at U.S. military facilities that are home bases of members of the U.S. team that went to Wuhan.
Before March 31, when the Pentagon restricted the release of information about COVID-19 cases at installations for security reasons, infections occurred at a minimum of 63 military facilities where team members returned after the Wuhan games.
A strong correlation exists in COVID-19 cases reported at U.S. military facilities that are home bases of members of the U.S. team that went to Wuhan.
Additionally, the U.S. team used chartered flights to and from the games via Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
Washington was one of the earliest states to show a spike in COVID-19.
“I do think that it is a concern that these people were not tested, especially going into an area that might be a center, a huge probability,” Dr. Ravina Kullar, an infectious diseases expert and epidemiologist based out of Santa Monica, California, said in an interview.
“It may have happened before December, that is the unknown factor,” Kullar said. “We still don’t know who is patient zero. The Chinese government is not being transparent enough.”
She stressed that the Chinese have not cooperated with the international community in sharing critical information, which is one more reason the Pentagon should have tested the athletes.
“I feel strongly about going with a high prevalence to get tested,” she said.
New data continues to emerge that COVID-19 had already infected people in Wuhan in mid- or early November of 2019, weeks after the games’ conclusion.
Recent research released from Harvard and Boston University suggests COVID-19 might have been present in China as early as last August, well before the illness was first publicly identified in Wuhan on December 31.
Athletes who participated from other nations—both U.S. allies like France and Italy and adversaries like Iran—have reported suffering from COVID-19 symptoms.Some Iranian athletes died from COVID-19, including some who were in Wuhan, according to news reports not verified by Tehran.
The Pentagon’s reluctance to test athletes returning from Wuhan was not unique. No other nation’s military appears to have tested their participants in the 2019 World Military Games specifically for COVID-19. French doctors examined their athletes upon their return from the games as part of overall exams.
When asked why the athletes and support staff who had been in China were not screened as a precaution once the COVID-19 threat was known in January, Defense Secretary Mark Esper said at the end of an April 14 press conference: “I am not aware of what you are talking about.”
The question and response were not included in the Pentagon’s official written transcript of the briefing, as is the normal procedure.
The official video of the briefing goes silent when the question is asked and Esper can be seen—but not heard—reacting to the question.
The full audio and video exchange remains on the C-SPAN video of the event.
Spokespersons for the various service branches, all of which were represented in Wuhan, either declined to comment on the subject or said that no COVID-19 screening was required for anyone with possible exposure prior to February.
The 2019 Military World Games, branded the “Peace Games,” was the largest military sports event ever held in China. More than 9,000 athletes representing the militaries of more than 100 countries competed in 27 sports, ranging from golf to parachuting.
The issue of testing the athletes and support personnel, who spent weeks preparing for and participating in the games at what is generally acknowledged as ground zero for COVID-19, has grown in importance since medical reports have questioned the official start date for the outbreak. A handful of global news outlets have highlighted the issue.
Scores of athletes from other nations, including France and Italy, who participated in the games reported symptoms consistent with COVID-19 upon their return to their home countries.
In retrospect, some doctors said those athletes suffered from COVID-19 and in some cases infected others, according to news reports.
French Olympic silver medal–winning pentathlete Elodie Clouvel and her boyfriend fell ill after taking part in the Wuhan games. Asked on local TV channel Television Loire 7 on March 25 if she was worried about the prospect of potentially having to spend the summer in Japan for the Olympics, Clouvel said, “No because I think that with [Valentin Belaud, her partner] we have already had the coronavirus, well the COVID-19.”
Clouvel, 31, went on to explain: “We were in Wuhan for the World Military Games at the end of October. And afterwards, we all fell ill. Valentin missed three days of training. Me, I was sick too … I had things I had never had before. We weren’t particularly worried because no one was talking about it yet.”
She added, “A lot of athletes at the World Military Games were very ill. We were recently in touch with a military doctor who told us, ‘I think you had it because a lot of people from this delegation were ill.’”
Renowned Italian fencer Matteo Tagliariol told Corriere della Sera newspaper that he fell ill almost immediately after his return from Wuhan:
“When we arrived in Wuhan we almost all got sick,” said Tagliariol. “But the worst was the return home. After a week I had a very high fever, I felt that I wasn’t breathing,” added Tagiariol, 37. “The sickness didn’t even go away with antibiotics, I recovered after three weeks and remained debilitated for a long time. Then my son and my partner got sick. When they started talking about the virus, I said to myself: I got it too.”
WHY SUCH A TESTY PENTAGON REACTION AND MEDIA SILENCE ABOUT THIS?
BECAUSE, IRONICALLY, the Chinese government has accused the U.S. military of importing COVID-19 to China during the Wuhan games—feeding "disproven rumors" that the virus was there simultaneously with the athletes.
Chinese Diplomat Accuses US of Spreading Coronavirus
In his Thursday tweets, Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), accused the U.S. of spreading the virus to the city of Wuhan in Hubei province, the epicenter of China's coronavirus outbreak.
"It's possible that the U.S. military brought the virus to Wuhan. The U.S. has to be transparent and make public its figures. The U.S. owes us an explanation," he added.
Zhao's comments echoed a rumored conspiracy, widely circulated in China, that U.S. military personnel had brought the virus to China during their participation of the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan last October.
That conspiracy theory followed suspicion raised by U.S. Senator Tom Cotton and others that the virus had originated from the Wuhan P4 lab, a high-security biochemical lab affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
"It's possible that the U.S. military brought the virus to Wuhan. The U.S. has to be transparent and make public its figures. The U.S. owes us an explanation," he added.
Zhao's comments echoed a rumored conspiracy, widely circulated in China, that U.S. military personnel had brought the virus to China during their participation of the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan last October.
That conspiracy theory followed suspicion raised by U.S. Senator Tom Cotton and others that the virus had originated from the Wuhan P4 lab, a high-security biochemical lab affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
It also mirrors the arguments raised by some in the United States — including prominent lawmakers — that SARS-nCoV-2 might have been bio-engineered.
Zhao's comments also came one day after U.S. National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien asserted an initial cover-up of the virus in China "cost the world community two months" and exacerbated the global outbreak.
In response to O'Brien's claim, another MOFA spokesman, Geng Shuang, Thursday called it a "smear on the Chinese government and its people.
Zhao's comments drew a whirlwind of mixed reaction on Twitter.
Some people, apparently from China, agreed with Zhao's assessment, while others called him a "shame."
"When will the U.S. stop escaping reality? This is outrageous," Lin Shaojing wrote in response to Zhao's tweet.
Zhao's narratives likely suggest China is trying to shift the blame, since public resentment toward the leadership's mishandling of the outbreak hasn't subsided, he said.
"So, one answer is to … certainly accusing the U.S. of being responsible of everything [so] as to call on the people to point to another threat and enemy for diversion of the people's resentment," Cabestan said.
Also, the Communist leadership is likely divided over how to ease public anger
The U.S. came in 35th in the Military World Games, behind nations like Iran, Finland, and Slovenia. That in itself was unusual.
IT APPEARS TO ME THAT BOTH CHINESE AND AMERICAN DIPLOMATS, POLITICIANS AND SCIENTISTS KNOW FULL WELL THAT EACH NATION HAS THE CAPABILITY AND MOTIVATION TO BIO-ENGINEER AND THEN UNLEASH BIOLOGICAL PATHOGENS ON ONE ANOTHER.
IT'S WHAT SUPER-POWERS DO.
FIRST-STRIKE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE NUCLEAR.
A PHRASE COMES TO MIND...
"'You ain't seen nothin' yet!'"
BTW, AFTER "EXPERTS" SAID A VACCINE WAS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR HERD IMMUNITY, Fauci "warned the world" a few weeks ago that COVID-19 protection won’t last very long. He reiterated the idea during a Q&A discussion on Monday with Director of the National Health Institutes, Dr. Francis Collins. “We do not know how long antibodies offer protection,” Fauci said. “With this spike protein that’s being presented in the way that we do it with primes and in some cases boosts, we’re going to assume that there’s a degree of protection, but we have to assume that it’s going to be finite. It’s not going to be like a measles vaccine.”
WUHAN FAUCI SHOULD KNOW, RIIIIGHT?
_________________________________________
Above: COMMON RED BLOOD CELLS, INFECTED, SHOWING WHAT'S CALLED "THE CORONA EFFECT"...NOT A CORONA VIRUS.
The “Corona Effect” is the oxidation of the cellular membrane and genetic mutations which gives rise to cellular pleomorphism or biological transformation and the appearance of “crowning”, “spiking” and “knobbing” projections as the microzymas or anatomical indestructible matter changes its form and its function.”
READ MORE <HERE>.
AND HERE.
NO, I DON'T AGREE WITH ALL YOUNG SAYS, BUT IT MAY BE A START IN UNRAVELING THE "MYSTERY".
//WW
Friday, December 18, 2020
COVID RULES ARE NOT ABOUT PUBLIC HEALTH. THEY'RE ABOUT CONTROL.
..
From Dr. Robert O. Young - "The Terrain Theory vs. The Germ Theory"
“If your goldfish is sick, do you first go to treat it with a vaccine...or do you change the water?”
We can ask the same about Covid.
WHY DON'T WE "CHANGE THE WATER"?
We can do that by ENHANCING IMMUNE SYSTEMS, NOT BY WEAKENING IMMUNITY BY INJECTING USELESS VACCINES THAT WON'T PROTECT US AGAINST MUTATIONS AND VARIANTS.
When "the leading expert" on public health, little Dr. Fauci, screams, "Wear masks! Social distance!", and then is captured on video like this, it is not about your health.
Laissez les bons temps rouler, right, Tony?
He said he'd let his mask down to re-hydrate, but we see no liquid in his hands.
SOME WANT ALL OF US TO REPLACE MASKS BETWEEN SIPS AND BITES WHILE DINING OUT.
WHERE'S THE WATER BOTTLE, TONY?
WHAT ABOUT YOUR WIFE THERE?
Fauci made several excuses for his hypocrisy,
just as Pelosi and others have.
When Congressmen and elected state officials tell you to STAY HOME and WEAR MASKS, but THEY still meet in their offices and in chamber, or travel, or vacation, or go to beauty salons with and WITHOUT masks, it's not about your health.
When those same electeds tell you you can't gather with your own families for the holidays, but encourage the 'protests' turned riots and lootings by hordes of unrelated criminals, and refuse to jail those who do so, it is NOT about public health.
When the State tells you it’s safe to go to Home Depot to buy a hammer but dangerous to go to a small garden center and buy a plant, it’s not about your health.
When the State bans going to a dentist for a checkup because its unsafe, but deems an abortion visit safe, it’s not about your health.
When the State prevents you from buying garden seeds because it’s dangerous, but allows the sale of lottery tickets, cigarettes and booze, it’s not about your health.
When the State tells you it’s dangerous to go golf alone, fish alone or be in a motor boat alone, but the Governor of Michigan's husband goes boating, New York's governor and NYC's mayor and Michigan's governor can get stage make-up done, and hair done for 5 TV appearances a week, it’s not about your health.
When the state puts you IN a jail cell for walking in a park with your child because it’s too dangerous, but lets criminals OUT of jail cells for their health- It’s not about YOUR health!
When the state tells you it’s too dangerous to get treated by a doctor for chiropractic or physical therapy treatments or go to chemotherapy, yet deems a WALMART super-center store a safe "essential business"- It’s not about your health!
When the State lets you go to the crowded mega-chain grocery stores or hardware stores but DEMANDS mail-in voting, IT IS NOT ABOUT YOUR HEALTH.
WAKE UP PEOPLE — If you think this is all about your health you’re mistaken!
Please open your eyes! Stop being led like blind sheep.
The 2017-2018 seasonal flu killed 80,000.
CDC ESTIMATED 45 million people were sick with influenza in 2017-2018, with 21 million people going to a health care provider, 810,000 hospitalizations, and 61,000 deaths from influenza (Table 1).
[NOTE: OTHER SITES, EVEN CDC SITES, GIVE DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF DEATHS, POSSIBLY BECAUSE OF THE TIME THEY WERE WRITTEN.]
CDC ESTIMATED 45 million people were sick with influenza in 2017-2018, with 21 million people going to a health care provider, 810,000 hospitalizations, and 61,000 deaths from influenza (Table 1).
[NOTE: OTHER SITES, EVEN CDC SITES, GIVE DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF DEATHS, POSSIBLY BECAUSE OF THE TIME THEY WERE WRITTEN.]
2017-18: 11 million cases of influenza in children, 28 million cases of influenza in working age adults (aged 18-64 years), and 6 million cases in adults aged 65 years and older.
WHY WASN'T CONGRESS, THE CDC, THE WHO DOING MORE TO PROTECT THE YOUNGER POPULATION AND THE REST OF US THEN???
The number of cases of influenza-associated illness that occurred during 2017-2018 was the highest since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, when an estimated 60 million people were sick with influenza.
More than 46,000 hospitalizations occurred in children (aged < 18 years).
THERE WAS NO LOCKDOWN, SCHOOLS WERE NOT REQUIRED TO CLOSE THEN.
WHY WASN'T IT ABOUT OUR HEALTH THEN?
WHY WASN'T CONGRESS, THE CDC, THE WHO DOING MORE TO PROTECT THE YOUNGER POPULATION AND THE REST OF US THEN???
The number of cases of influenza-associated illness that occurred during 2017-2018 was the highest since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, when an estimated 60 million people were sick with influenza.
More than 46,000 hospitalizations occurred in children (aged < 18 years).
THERE WAS NO LOCKDOWN, SCHOOLS WERE NOT REQUIRED TO CLOSE THEN.
WHY WASN'T IT ABOUT OUR HEALTH THEN?
The "common flu" infects 5–15% of the global population (340 million – 1.6 billion) EACH YEAR and kills 290,000 – 650,000 people EVERY year, according to the World Health Organization.
THERE ARE VACCINES FOR FLU, BUT THE INFECTIONS AND DEATHS CONTINUE, EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
THERE ARE VACCINES FOR FLU, BUT THE INFECTIONS AND DEATHS CONTINUE, EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
AS OF APRIL, 2020, 0.000336% OF THE WORLD HAD CV-19.
0.0693% OF THE INFECTED HAD DIED. ONLY THE 2009 NEWER DEFINITION OF "PANDEMIC" ALLOWED THE W.H.O. TO DECLARE COVID-19 AS A PANDEMIC.
WHY DON'T WE YET HAVE A SAFE, MORE EFFECTIVE VACCINE THAT HAS A BETTER PROTECTION RATE TO PREVENT THE DEADLY GLOBAL KILLER INFLUENZA?
IF IT'S ABOUT OUR HEALTH, WHY ISN'T MORE DONE TO PROTECT THE GREATER NUMBER OF PEOPLE FROM INFLUENZA AND STOP THE MANY THOUSANDS TO MILLIONS OF DEATHS YEARLY ?
20%-30% OF COMMON COLDS ARE CAUSED BY CORONAVIRUSES.
NO CURE FOR COMMON COLD.
THE SPANISH FLU, AN H1N1 FLU OF 1918, IS NOW ESTIMATED TO HAVE INFECTED 500 MILLION AND KILLED AS MANY AS 100 MILLION PEOPLE GLOBALLY AND IS IN THE SAME VIRUS FAMILY AS SWINE FLU AND THIS SEASON'S H1N1, TYPE A FLU.
A CDC PDF DOCUMENT ASKS,
"Why Did the 1918 Virus Kill So Many Healthy Young Adults?"
BUT I DON'T FIND A PDF ASKING WHY CV-19 IS NOT KILLING THE VERY YOUNG TODAY.
SARS1 HAS A DEATH RATE OF 9.6% TO 11% AND MERS HAS A DEATH RATE OF 34.3% TO 39%% AND BOTH ARE CORONAVIRUSES LIKE CV-19.
BUT DURING THE OUTBREAKS/PANDEMICS OF THOSE, DID WE GO INTO LOCKDOWN?
NO.
THE U.S. HAD CASES OF BOTH MERS AND SARS.
WERE WE MANDATED TO COME TO A NATIONAL STANDSTILL?
NO.
WHY NOT THEN; WHY NOT IN THE 2002-2003, 2009-2010 PANDEMICS, OR DURING THE HISTORICALLY LETHAL 2017-2018 FLU SEASON... AND WHY NOW?
IS IT ABOUT OUR HEALTH?
IS IT REALLY ABUT OUR HEALTH?
NO, NO, IT IS NOT.
When we break out of the Orwellian mind control, it’s suddenly obvious that...
-“Quarantine is actually “House Arrest.”
-“Social Distancing is actually “forced Isolation.”
-Mask-wearing is seen by many experts and studies as not only useless (except as a symbol of our subjugation), but dangerous.
-The “New Normal” is not a natural normal of healthy, sovereign and thriving individuals in majority-agreed, voluntary compliance, but a global technocratic, biological, medical and political totalitarian police state... an ILLEGAL type of MARTIAL LAW.
If this so-called “Pandemic” that the billionaire globalists have been predicting, planning, conducting pandemic exercises, perpetrating and profiting from were what they say, why would they need to:
-Fabricate exaggerated and faulty models and exaggerated death rates.
-Use unreliable PCR tests.
-Exaggerate “case” numbers when the actual mortality rate is minuscule.
-Pretend all standing hospitals, "field hospitals" and emergency medical ships were overwhelmed when they were not.
-Censor/ban/defame differing data and opinions?
WE SAY..."NO!!! GO TO HELL!"
________________________________
FURTHER READING:
-- Read Nobel laureate Dr. Kary Mullis' book, "The Polymerase Chain Reaction" (PCR).
Many people say they can feel it.
We’re heading toward some sort of a major conflict, a global civil war, but what are the sides?
Is it Left vs. Right, Conservative vs. Liberal?
East vs. West?
Mask vs. no mask?
Vax vs. no vax?
Black vs. white?
Male vs. female?
Rich vs. poor?
These are the “divide and conquer” battles the elite want to dupe us into while they conceal the real battle – in which they would be vastly outnumbered and immediately defeated if humanity were sufficiently aware.
And that is...the struggle between those who want to be truly free and those who want to continue to steal our freedom from us.
This is the real meaning of “compliance.”
This is like Germany in the 1940s, the USSR in the 1950s and China in the 1960s – except worse, because this is global and it includes surrendering not only our rights and freedom but our very DNA and potentially our lives.
If we lose this one, there is no one else to rescue us, no place to run to, no place to hide.
This is up to us and the time to awaken and stand up for our freedom is right now.
IT IS NOT ABOUT YOUR HEALTH.
IT'S ABOUT COMPLIANCE AND THE END OF SOVEREIGN NATIONS AND SOVEREIGN CITIZENS WITH BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
Humanity CAN STILL, FOR NOW, connect globally and take action within a few days or weeks.
Imagine if we all connected around true freedom, beneficial scientific breakthroughs and voluntary collaboration.
Whether we live in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North/South America or some tiny island nation, WE CAN STILL REACH ONE ANOTHER ONLINE...FOR NOW, BUT HOW MUCH LONGER UNTIL EVEN THAT IS TAKEN AWAY?
This world-wide fraud is so obvious – for anyone who dares to think critically and connect the dots... that people everywhere ARE questioning and waking up by the hundreds of millions to the control and fraud agenda for global domination – the "ONE World Order, the Great Reset".
Let me show you once again all it takes to DEFEAT this...when the would-be world-controllers say, "HEAR AND OBEY!"...
WE SAY..."NO!!! GO TO HELL!"
AND WE NEVER BOW AGAIN!
________________________________
FURTHER READING:
-- Read Nobel laureate Dr. Kary Mullis' book, "The Polymerase Chain Reaction" (PCR).
Dr. Mullis does not see the relevance for testing antibodies by PCR, which he invented, when the virus such as HIV or COVID - 19 have not been isolated, purified, genetically and biochemically tested and then viewed under electron microscopy.
Once these steps have been completed, the isolated and purified virus needs to be tested again by following the scientific method for verification of any disease causing germ.
The tests are called Koch's postulates and Farr's law.
1. The germ must be found in all cases of the disease. 2. The germ must be isolated from the host and grown in pure culture.
3. The purified germ must cause the disease again in another host.
4. The germ must then be isolated from the newly infected host.
It is very important for you to know that the PCR testing does not identify the existence of ANY specific virus. So, what you get is a guess. This is NOT science.
-- Force global vaccination: New England Journal Of Medicine Promotes Mandatory Vaccinations, Tells States How To Do It, Says people refusing MANDATORY coronavirus vaccines should be severely punished, locked in their homes and fired from their jobs.
1. The germ must be found in all cases of the disease. 2. The germ must be isolated from the host and grown in pure culture.
3. The purified germ must cause the disease again in another host.
4. The germ must then be isolated from the newly infected host.
It is very important for you to know that the PCR testing does not identify the existence of ANY specific virus. So, what you get is a guess. This is NOT science.
-- Force global vaccination: New England Journal Of Medicine Promotes Mandatory Vaccinations, Tells States How To Do It, Says people refusing MANDATORY coronavirus vaccines should be severely punished, locked in their homes and fired from their jobs.
https://www.technocracy.news/new-england-journal-of-medicine-promotes-mandatory-vaccinations/
-- Justify and impose total surveillance: A DARPA-Funded Implantable Biochip to Detect COVID-19 Could Hit Markets by 2021.
-- Justify and impose total surveillance: A DARPA-Funded Implantable Biochip to Detect COVID-19 Could Hit Markets by 2021.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/darpa-covid-19-vaccine-implant-mrna/271287/
-- Don't Want To Talk To Contact Tracers? There’s A Subpoena For That.
-- Don't Want To Talk To Contact Tracers? There’s A Subpoena For That.
https://www.technocracy.news/wont-talk-to-contact-tracers-theres-a-subpoena-for-that/
---Bill Gates Negotiated $100 Billion Contact Tracing Deal With Democratic Congressman Sponsor of Bill Six Months BEFORE Coronavirus Pandemic.
https://truepundit.com/?s=EXCLUSIVE%3A+Bill+Gates+Negotiated+%24100+Billion+Contact+Tracing
-- VIDEO: Event 201: The Coronavirus Simulation.
--Operation Dark Winter All Roads Lead to Dark Winter.
https://www.unz.com/wwebb/all-roads-lead-to-dark-winter/
---Bill Gates Negotiated $100 Billion Contact Tracing Deal With Democratic Congressman Sponsor of Bill Six Months BEFORE Coronavirus Pandemic.
https://truepundit.com/?s=EXCLUSIVE%3A+Bill+Gates+Negotiated+%24100+Billion+Contact+Tracing
-- VIDEO: Event 201: The Coronavirus Simulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQt7pcVlcEM
-- How could the CDC Make That Mistake?
-- How could the CDC Make That Mistake?
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/611935/
-- The bio-weapons lab at Ft. Detrick, Maryland closed: Deadly Germ Research Is Shut Down at Army Lab Over Safety Concerns.
-- The bio-weapons lab at Ft. Detrick, Maryland closed: Deadly Germ Research Is Shut Down at Army Lab Over Safety Concerns.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/health/germs-fort-detrick-biohazard.html
-- Dr. Meryl Nass: Why Is Protecting COVID-19's Origin so Important?
-- Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research.
-- Dr. Meryl Nass: Why Is Protecting COVID-19's Origin so Important?
-- Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research.
-- Harvard’s Charles Lieber arrested for Wuhan activities Acclaimed Harvard Scientist Is Arrested, Accused Of Lying About Ties To China.
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/28/800442646/acclaimed-harvard-scientist-is-arrested-accused-of-lying-about-ties-to-china
//WW
Wednesday, December 16, 2020
BUSTED! EcoHealth Alliance President & Employees Emails Show One Covid 'Conspiracy' Was REAL.
"Conspiracy Theory" About EcoHealth and a Lancet Article on COVID-19 Now A Proven Fact.
Ecohealth Alliance Orchestrated Key Scientists’ Statement on “Natural Origin” of SARS-CoV-2
466 pages of new email correspondence were released under FOI and obtained by the U.S. Right to Know group which exposed the letter in the Lancet was organised and authored by EcoHealth Alliance.
[Page 253 in that release first mentions the Lancet article.]
EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulatecoronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
[THIS WAS FAUCI's 'GO-TO' GROUP TO CONTINUE THE 'GAIN-OF-FUNCTION' STUDIES THAT HAD BANNED IN AMERICA BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. THIS IS WHO HE HANDED THAT OFF TO.]
The emails obtained via public records requests show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement”.
Daszak is now leading The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission charged with getting to the bottom of SARS-CoV-2’s origin — a role for which he is clearly too conflicted to perform in an unbiased manner.
The scientists’ letter appeared in The Lancet on February 18, just one week after the World Health Organization announced that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus would be named COVID-19.
The 27 authors “strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” and reported that scientists from multiple countries “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.”
[BUT NO GENETIC STUDY CAN FIND IT IN NATURE!
[BUT NO GENETIC STUDY CAN FIND IT IN NATURE!
In recent months, researchers in various countries have suggested that cases may have gone unnoticed long before December 2019, based on analysis of wastewater or blood samples.
Scientists agree that the disease has an animal origin.
"The big question is what led it to jump into humans," Etienne Simon-Loriere told AFP. Simon-Loriere said it was not yet possible to completely rule out the idea that the virus escaped accidentally...
Others have voiced concern that the agency may have allowed China to dictate the terms of an international investigation into the origins of the virus.]
Scientists agree that the disease has an animal origin.
"The big question is what led it to jump into humans," Etienne Simon-Loriere told AFP. Simon-Loriere said it was not yet possible to completely rule out the idea that the virus escaped accidentally...
Others have voiced concern that the agency may have allowed China to dictate the terms of an international investigation into the origins of the virus.]
The Lancet letter included no scientific references to refute a lab-origin theory of the virus.
Flinders’ University Professor Nikolai Petrovsk stated, “Science is all about truth or transparency, and unfortunately, we don’t see any of that reflected in these emails.
Flinders’ University Professor Nikolai Petrovsk stated, “Science is all about truth or transparency, and unfortunately, we don’t see any of that reflected in these emails.
”Here we have a situation with a serious pandemic, in fact WHO at that time were refusing to call it a pandemic, and we have a group of scientists, based at a particular institute who are implicated at least in very similar gain of function research to what may have created a virus like this, seeking to really, unfortunately, deceive the readers of these journals.
“That this is a letter that has not come from an individual or a single institute, but the emails clearly indicate the desire to cover that up and say this is coming from a group of scientists around the world when that was not in fact the case.
“So, on scientific principles, that really doesn’t stand up.”
Several of the authors of that Lancet statement also have direct ties to the EcoHealth Alliance that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest.
Several of the authors of that Lancet statement also have direct ties to the EcoHealth Alliance that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest.
One 'scientist' who signed, Linda Saif, asked via email whether it would be useful “to add just one or 2 statements in support of why nCOV is not a lab generated virus and is naturally occuring? Seems critical to scientifically refute such claims!”
Daszak responded, “I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.”
[THAT CAN BE FOUND ON PAGE 266 OF THE FOIA RELEASE.
Daszak responded, “I think we should probably stick to a broad statement.”
[THAT CAN BE FOUND ON PAGE 266 OF THE FOIA RELEASE.
Feb 6, 2020 10:23:12 PM EST]
Growing calls to investigate the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 have led to increased scrutiny of EcoHealth Alliance. The emails show how members of EcoHealth Alliance played an early role in framing questions about possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2 as “crackpot theories that need to be addressed,” as Daszak told The Guardian.
Although the phrase “EcoHealth Alliance” appeared only once in The Lancet statement, in association with co-author Daszak, several other co-authors also have direct ties to the group that were not disclosed as conflicts of interest. Rita Colwell and James Hughes are members of the Board of Directors of EcoHealth Alliance, William Karesh is the group’s Executive Vice President for Health and Policy, and Hume Field is Science and Policy Advisor.
The statement’s authors also claimed that the “rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins.” Today, however, little is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and investigations into its origins by the World Health Organization and The Lancet COVID-19 commission have been shrouded in secrecy and mired by conflicts of interests. Peter Daszak, Rita Colwell, and The Lancet Editor Richard Horton did not provide comments in response to our requests for this story.
A link to the entire batch of EcoHealth Alliance emails can be found here: EcoHealth Alliance emails: University of Maryland (466 pages)
U.S. Right to Know is posting documents obtained through public freedom of information (FOI) requests for our Biohazards investigation in our post: FOI documents on origins of SARS-CoV-2, hazards of gain-of-function research and biosafety labs.
Reposted with permission from U.S. Right to Know."
Signatories of the Lancet article affiliated with EcoHealth:
--Dr. Peter Daszak, President, EcoHealth Alliance;
--Dr. Jim Hughes, Professor Emeritus, Emory University;
--Dr. Rita Colwell, former Director of National Science Foundation;
--Dr. Ralph Baric, Professor, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill;
--Dr. Linda Saif, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University;
--Dr. Billy Karesh, Executive Vice President, EcoHealth Alliance;
--Dr. Linfa Wang, Professor, Duke-NUS Medical School;
--Dr. Hume Field, Honorary Professor, The University of Queensland
We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the front-line!
References given?
ALL FROM THE WUHAN LAB 'SCIENTISTS' PAPERS.
Zhou's papers are perhaps especially biased.
References:
1. Peng Zhou et al., A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable batorigin. Nature, (2020).
2. R. Lu et al., Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus:
implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet, (2020).
3. N. Zhu et al., A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. New
England Journal of Medicine, (2020).
4. L. Ren et al., Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a
descriptive study. Chin Med J. Epub ahead of print, (2020).
Peng Zhou's research while affiliated with Wuhan Institute Of Virology and other places
Peng Zhou's research while affiliated with Wuhan Institute Of Virology and other places
The Washington Post wrote that US embassy scientists and diplomats in Beijing visited the laboratory and met with Shi.
They then sent warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety practices and management as it conducted research on coronaviruses from bats.
According to the Post, the cable “warns that the lab’s work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic”.
China hasn’t exactly been transparent about the source of the virus and hasn’t allowed international experts to visit ground zero and start investigations into the origin of the pandemic.
Finding out what really happened and how the virus jumped to humans is critical for managing the illness, future treatment and vaccine research, and preventive measures that could block the same species from infecting humans with a different pathogen. Having a clear picture of the origin of COVID-19 isn’t about assigning blame to China or a different country. Although China attempted to change the origin story a few times so far, suggesting that the pandemic might not have started in Wuhan.
The WHO disclosed recently that the investigation would have two phases. During the first stage, the actual WHO team won’t be present on the ground in Wuhan and will only review the data that Chinese researchers provide.
The WHO mission plan reveals that nearly 1,200 specimens were collected from the market, which had 653 sellers who commercialized all sorts of animals. Of the 336 animals sampled, none tested positive for the virus. But 8% of the environmental swabs that included drains and sewage carried the virus. The report also notes that a survey in spring showed that 14% of Wuhan cats tested positive for the virus. Meanwhile, the only animal known to pass the coronavirus to humans is the mink.
"Dr. Peter Chumakov from the Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, said, "In China, scientists at the Wuhan Laboratory have been actively involved in the development of various coronavirus variants for over ten years."
Chumakov added the scientists were studying the coronavirus' pathogenicity and not deliberately creating a manmade killer.
The professor says it is possible the Wuhan scientists were aiming to make a HIV vaccine and created ‘variants of the virus… without malicious intent’."
NOBEL PRIZE-WINNING SCIENTIST WHO DISCOVERED HIV SAYS CORONAVIRUS WAS CREATED IN LABORATORY
Jun 4, 2020
Interviewed on the CNews channel in France, Montagnier asserted that the virus had been designed by molecular biologists. Stating that it contains genetic elements of HIV, he insisted its characteristics could not have arisen naturally.
Montagnier suggested that possibly the goal had been to make an AIDS vaccine. Labeling the virus as “a professional job…a very meticulous job,” he described its genome as being a “clockwork of sequences.”
“There’s a part which is obviously the classic virus, and there’s another mainly coming from the bat, but that part has added sequences, particularly from HIV – the AIDS virus,” he said.
October 2019 antibody tests from Italy are more perplexing. They indicate the virus was present in the [Italian] community much earlier, which means it either left China many months before we thought or it actually did originate somewhere else.
But not everyone is convinced that the data paints an accurate picture, with some researchers calling for more analysis to provide better answers."
MEANWHILE, CHINA KEEPS CASTING BLAME ON OTHER NATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN:
BEIJING, Nov. 22 (Xinhua) -- As COVID-19 disrupts the lives of tens of millions across the world, one question remains elusive: where did the virus come from?
Apart from Italy, there have also been other reports about the virus being discovered elsewhere earlier in 2019.
Spanish virologists discovered traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months prior to the virus outbreak in China.
And in Brazil, a study detected the coronavirus in human sewage in Santa Catalina, Brazil, in samples collected in Nov. 2019."
[Xinhua News Agency or New China News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China. The CCP tells them what to write and they obey.]
NOT A "WORLD-KILLING VIRUS
Around 80% of people with COVID-19 recover without specialist treatment.
These people may experience mild, flu-like symptoms.
However, 1 in 6 people may experience severe symptoms, such as trouble breathing.
Over at Vox, Kelsey Piper concluded that gain-of-function research in contagious viruses is probably too dangerous to continue:
"The cost-benefit analysis for pathogens that might kill the people exposed or a handful of others is vastly different from the cost-benefit analysis for pathogens that could cause a pandemic — but our current procedures don’t really account for that. As a result, allowing gain-of-function research means running unacceptable risks with millions of lives. It’s high time to rethink that."
Gain-of-function research is when researchers take an existing virus or pathogen and make it more potentially dangerous — either more contagious, more likely to kill a human host, or both.
Over at Vox, Kelsey Piper concluded that gain-of-function research in contagious viruses is probably too dangerous to continue:
"The cost-benefit analysis for pathogens that might kill the people exposed or a handful of others is vastly different from the cost-benefit analysis for pathogens that could cause a pandemic — but our current procedures don’t really account for that. As a result, allowing gain-of-function research means running unacceptable risks with millions of lives. It’s high time to rethink that."
Gain-of-function research is when researchers take an existing virus or pathogen and make it more potentially dangerous — either more contagious, more likely to kill a human host, or both.
NEWSWEEK ONCE DARED REPORT THAT..."The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat corona viruses" ...[AFTER they were banned here.]
U.S. intelligence, after originally asserting that the coronavirus had occurred naturally, conceded last month that the pandemic may have originated in a leak from the Wuhan lab. (At this point most scientists say it's possible—but not likely—that the pandemic virus was engineered or manipulated.)"
Thomas Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins, declared that “laboratory systems are not infallible, and even in the greatest laboratories of the world, there are mistakes.”
In May 2018, with leaders in the White House and Congress who had never dealt with a major epidemic, Inglesby and his colleagues at Johns Hopkins University hosted an exercise in Washington DC called 'Clade X'.
It featured a respiratory virus that was engineered in a laboratory. One early lesson of this simulation was that travel bans didn’t stop the virus from gaining ground. Infections spread rapidly below the radar because half of the people infected showed few or no symptoms.
[THAT'S SIMPLY CRAP LOGIC! YOU HAVE MILLIONS INFECTED IN CHINA BUT YOU WELCOME TRAVELERS FROM CHINA?
NO, YOU BLOCK ENTRANCE AND THAT WAY NEITHER ASYMPTOMATIC NOR SYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE COME IN TO INFECT!
DID THEY GET THEIR MEDICAL CREDENTIALS FROM INSIDE CEREAL BOXES?]
Medical supplies ran short, and hospitals were overwhelmed. Federal and state leaders issued conflicting messages. More than 20 months passed before a vaccine was available."
[WHAT A FEAT OF MAGIC PREDICTIONS, YES?]
Jeremy Konyndyk, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development in Washington DC, disagrees [with the morons].
"We have a strong end game once there is a vaccine, and we have a strong opening game if countries contain an outbreak when case numbers are low,” he says. But insufficient attention is devoted to harnessing and coordinating enough health workers and biomedical resources to efficiently test people, treat them, find their contacts and quarantine them. This is precisely the conundrum that the United States finds itself in right now."
REMEMBER THE FIASCO THAT ENSUED WHILE CDC DEVELOPED THEIR VERY OWN TEST, REFUSING TO USE ALREADY AVAILABLE TESTS, THEN FINDING CV-19 CONTAMINATION IN THEIR OWN BIG LAB IN ATLANTA, MAKING THEIR TEST RESULTS FALSE-POSITIVE?
Sky News Australia presented "COVID-19: Ground Zero" – an investigation into what caused the killer coronavirus and how China managed to bury the truth for so long.
South China Morning Post news editor Josephine Ma told Sky News her government covered up more than 200 cases of coronavirus in 2019, delaying global warnings and allowing the spread of the virus to leak into other countries.
SEE IT AS YOU CHOOSE.
THE TRUTH IS THERE IN THE EMAILS, THE INVESTIGATIONS, THE STATEMENTS FROM INSIDE CHINA.
YOU CAN EVEN BELIEVE IT CAME FROM SPACE
In the emails FOIA release, I found an email from one 'Ted Steele' on page 350 both interesting and a bit whacko.
"We are the only scientific analysts and pundits who have got it right from the Get-go: our explanation is consistent with all the genetic, immunologic, epidemiologic, geophysical, astrophysical and astrobiological data and observations.
– the principles and key turning point analyses were largely assembled earlier ( 40 years ago) by Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor N Chandra Wickramasinghe, and now updated here by Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe ( in his 81 st year) and his active colleagues for the COVID-19 pandemic ( see URLs to recent comprehensive reviews at end of list below) . Their 1979 book “Diseases from Space” is obligatory reading, a scientific masterpiece written for the general intelligent reader – both Fred and Chandra should have been awarded the Nobel years ago, but human frailty, clay feet, jealously, envy and cowardice made sure that did not happen."
THE ENTIRE BUSINESS OF "COVID, COVID!" HAS BEEN A WORSE SCAM THAN '60 MINUTES' REVEALED THE SWINE FLU WAS.
YOU CAN EVEN BELIEVE IT CAME FROM SPACE
In the emails FOIA release, I found an email from one 'Ted Steele' on page 350 both interesting and a bit whacko.
"We are the only scientific analysts and pundits who have got it right from the Get-go: our explanation is consistent with all the genetic, immunologic, epidemiologic, geophysical, astrophysical and astrobiological data and observations.
– the principles and key turning point analyses were largely assembled earlier ( 40 years ago) by Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor N Chandra Wickramasinghe, and now updated here by Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe ( in his 81 st year) and his active colleagues for the COVID-19 pandemic ( see URLs to recent comprehensive reviews at end of list below) . Their 1979 book “Diseases from Space” is obligatory reading, a scientific masterpiece written for the general intelligent reader – both Fred and Chandra should have been awarded the Nobel years ago, but human frailty, clay feet, jealously, envy and cowardice made sure that did not happen."
Yours sincerely,
Ted Steele
WHAT DID TED, et al, SUGGEST AS THE CAUSE OF THE WUHAN OUTBREAK TO THE LANCET THAT WAS REJECTED 3 TIMES?
THIS:
WHAT DID TED, et al, SUGGEST AS THE CAUSE OF THE WUHAN OUTBREAK TO THE LANCET THAT WAS REJECTED 3 TIMES?
THIS:
Comment on the Origin of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus
Authors: Edward J. Steele, N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, Jiangwen Qu, Robert Temple, Gensuke Tokoro, Reginald M. Gorczynski
"Analysis of all genetic, epidemiological and geophysical and astrophysical data suggest the alternate hypothesis that nCoV-2019 arrived via a meteorite, presumed carbonaceous meteorite, that struck North East China on October 11 2019.
Authors: Edward J. Steele, N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, Jiangwen Qu, Robert Temple, Gensuke Tokoro, Reginald M. Gorczynski
"Analysis of all genetic, epidemiological and geophysical and astrophysical data suggest the alternate hypothesis that nCoV-2019 arrived via a meteorite, presumed carbonaceous meteorite, that struck North East China on October 11 2019.
We then assume the viral debris and particles then made land fall in the Wuhan and related regions about a month to six weeks later resulting in first cases of the viral pneumonia caused by nCoV-2019 emerging in Wuhan regions late November 2019-early December 2019."
That's right, Ted, I mean Edward J.
Atta boy!
Origin mystery solved!
Yaaay!
Origin mystery solved!
Yaaay!
ECOHEALTH AND FAUCI, ANYONE CONNECTED TO THE SCAM, SHOULD BE INDICTED.
OH, BTW,
Pfizer CEO Not Sure Whether COVID Can Still Transmit after Vaccine Is Given
December 4, 2020
__________________________
OTHER SOURCES/REFERENCES:
1 US District Court for the District of Columbia Case No. 20-cv-3196 (PDF)
2 USRTK.org November 5, 2020
3, 11 USRTK November 18, 2020
4 GM Watch November 19, 2020
5 The Lancet March 7, 2020; 395(10226): E42-E43
6, 9, 10 USRTK Email February 6, 2020
7, 8 USRTK Email February 8, 2020
12 EcoHealth Alliance November 23, 2020
13 Twitter Alina Chan November 23, 2020
14 Institute of Medicine. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories 2011.
15 The Guardian December 4, 2014
16 CIDRAP July 1, 2016
17 Reuters February 15, 2012
18 CIDRAP June 20, 2014
19 New York Times, July 9, 2014
20 New York Times, June 20, 2014
21 Popular Mechanics July 31, 2014
22 Reuters June 21, 2014
23 GAO.gov August 2016, High-Containment Laboratories Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate Risk (PDF)
24 Consortium News August 30, 2017
25 WJLA January 22, 2020
26 NPR November 7, 2014
27 New York Times December 19, 2017 (Archived)
28 Asia Times April 6, 2020
29 USA Today May 28, 2015
30 Slate April 11, 2014
31, 32, 33, 34 Medium November 16, 2020
35 National Review April 16, 2020
36 mBio 2012 Sep-Oct; 3(5): e00360-12
37 The Human Fatality Burden of Gain of Function Flu Research: A Risk Assessment by Lynn Klotz (PDF)
38 BMC Medicine 2013; 11, Article number 252
39 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists February 25, 2019
40 Scoop February 26, 2020
41 Boston Magazine September 9, 2020
//WW
1 US District Court for the District of Columbia Case No. 20-cv-3196 (PDF)
2 USRTK.org November 5, 2020
3, 11 USRTK November 18, 2020
4 GM Watch November 19, 2020
5 The Lancet March 7, 2020; 395(10226): E42-E43
6, 9, 10 USRTK Email February 6, 2020
7, 8 USRTK Email February 8, 2020
12 EcoHealth Alliance November 23, 2020
13 Twitter Alina Chan November 23, 2020
14 Institute of Medicine. Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories 2011.
15 The Guardian December 4, 2014
16 CIDRAP July 1, 2016
17 Reuters February 15, 2012
18 CIDRAP June 20, 2014
19 New York Times, July 9, 2014
20 New York Times, June 20, 2014
21 Popular Mechanics July 31, 2014
22 Reuters June 21, 2014
23 GAO.gov August 2016, High-Containment Laboratories Improved Oversight of Dangerous Pathogens Needed to Mitigate Risk (PDF)
24 Consortium News August 30, 2017
25 WJLA January 22, 2020
26 NPR November 7, 2014
27 New York Times December 19, 2017 (Archived)
28 Asia Times April 6, 2020
29 USA Today May 28, 2015
30 Slate April 11, 2014
31, 32, 33, 34 Medium November 16, 2020
35 National Review April 16, 2020
36 mBio 2012 Sep-Oct; 3(5): e00360-12
37 The Human Fatality Burden of Gain of Function Flu Research: A Risk Assessment by Lynn Klotz (PDF)
38 BMC Medicine 2013; 11, Article number 252
39 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists February 25, 2019
40 Scoop February 26, 2020
41 Boston Magazine September 9, 2020
//WW