Friday, December 19, 2014

CUBA, CHINA., AMERICA. THE HYPOCRISY OF OUR CONGRESS.

WHEN OLD "WEEPING JOHN" BOEHNER TWEETED,

"Relations with the Castro regime should not be revisited, let alone normalized, until the Cuban people enjoy freedom – & not 1 second sooner" I HAD TO JUST SIT HERE AND WONDER AT HIS HYPOCRISY, HE WHO OWNS MEGA-STOCKS IN CORPORATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF OR HAVE ADMITTED TO THE SAME "HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS" HE BEMOANS CUBA AS GUILTY OF!  HE OWNS STOCKS IN COMPANIES THAT DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE FREEDOM OF THE CHEAP WORKERS THEY HIRE IN NATIONS THAT HAVE VIOLATED FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS FOR CENTURIES, SOME FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS!
AND OTHER CONGRESSMEN OWN SIMILAR STOCKS!

'OPEN SECRETS' TOOK A LOOK AT BOOZY BOEHNER'S STOCK PORTFOLIO AND WE CAN CLEARLY SEE 'JOHN BOY' PROFITS FROM HIS COMPANIES THAT WORK OUT OF CHINA AND OTHER NATIONS THAT GRANT AMERICA CHEAP, UNPROTECTED WORK FORCE,

One glance at Boehner’s assets portfolio via Open Secrets reveals that Boehner is making a bundle from corporations that are actively exploiting workers and racking up human rights violations in China, a nation led by communists with a long history of human rights abuses, as well as other countries such as Burma and perhaps even Iran. In other words, it really doesn’t seem as if Boehner is all that concerned about people enjoying freedom.
1) Walmart. Boehner owns somewhere between $15,000 and $50,000 in Walmart stock, despite the fact that it’s arguably one of the worst offenders in terms of sweatshops and labor violations in China. In addition to running shoddy factories, workers were paid less than the 41-cents-per-hour minimum wage.
2) Apple. I wonder if Boehner used an iPhone to send out his tweet about Cuba. It doesn’t really matter because at the end of the day, Boehner owns up to $50,000 in Apple holdings. And unless you haven’t read any news for the last three years, you probably already know about this story:
The spate of suicides made headlines around the world. Last May, seven young Chinese workers producing Apple iPads for consumers across the globe took their own lives, prompting an investigation into working conditions at the Foxconn factory in Shenzhen, southern China.
3) Dell. Boehner also owns a pile of Dell stock. What’s Dell doing in China?
Undercover filming by China Labour Watch and DanWatch reveals a number of apparent breaches of Chinese labour laws at Dell subcontractor Mingshuo Computers, which operates a 156,000m2 factory in Jiangsu province, south of Shanghai. […]
The report claims that “tens of thousands” of underage workers are employed by Pegatron, Mingshuo’s parent company, and that over a third of the workers on the floor where the investigator worked were between the ages of 16 and 18.
4) Chevron. Boehner also holds five-figures worth of stock in this energy company. In addition to doing business in China, it might interest Boehner to know that Chevron has been desperately trying to circumvent U.S. sanctions in order to work with with “evil empire” nation Iran.
Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) negotiated with the Iranian government about developing Iraq-Iran cross-border oilfield, in direct violation of U.S. sanctions against Tehran, according to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
But Iran doesn’t have any human rights issues, does it? 
Elsewhere, in Burma, there’s the following story involving Unocal, which was soon after absorbed by Boehner’s Chevron:
The plaintiffs were Burmese peasants who suffered a variety of egregious violations at the hands of Burmese army units that were securing the pipeline route. These abuses included forced relocation, forced labor, rape, torture, and murder. In addition to EarthRights International (ERI), counsel for the plaintiffs included Paul Hoffman, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Hadsell & Stormer, and Judith Brown Chomsky.
After Chevron merged with Unocal, the violations continued.  
5) Exxon-Mobil. Yes, Boehner is also heavily invested in these guys, too. And which nation with a colossally awful human rights record is Exxon-Mobil doing business with? Saudi Arabia, of course.The Daily Banter‘s Michael Luciano wrote the following about the Saudis:
Women are prohibited from driving an automobiles, and those who are caught doing so are arrested. In August, at least eight people were beheaded, mostly for crimes such as “drug trafficking, adultery, apostasy and ‘sorcery.’”
But we totally can’t open an embassy in Havana because of… what again, Mr. Boehner? Oh, that’s right. Freedom."
[DAMN FINE ARTICLE, THAT!]
THE HYPOCRITES AND/OR BRAINLESS IN THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT PARTIES WHO ARE SCREAMING THAT WE SHOULD NOT LIFT THE EMBARGO, ALLOW TRAVEL TO, OR TRADE WITH THAT COMMUNIST COUNTRY, CUBA, MUST HAVE BLINDERS ON REGARDING THE BIGGEST COMMUNIST NATION ON EARTH AND ITS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS...CHINA, CHINA, TO WHOM THE U.S. OWES...TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS...CHINA, WHICH OWNS A LARGE CHUNK OF AMERICA.

HELLO, LIARS AND CONS ON THE HILL, YOU FORGOT ABOUT CHINA?

AND THEN THERE ARE THE MIDDLE EASTERN NATIONS, ESPECIALLY SAUDI ARABIA, ESPECIALLY KUWAIT, WHO REDEFINE "HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS", BUT YOU DON'T MENTION THEM, EITHER, AS NATIONS WE SHOULD EMBARGO, REFUSE TO TRADE WITH?

NO, THE INDIGNATION  FEIGNED BY THE LOUDEST NAY-SAYERS TO THE END OF THE CUBAN EMBARGO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CUBA.
 IT'S WHO SAID, "LET'S END THE EMBARGO."

IF OBAMA HAD DECIDED TO OPEN TRADE WITH HEAVEN ITSELF, THE SCREAMS FROM CONGRESS WOULD HAVE BEEN EQUALLY DEAFENING.

"TO HELL WITH ANYTHING/EVERYTHING THAT BLACK MAN WANTS TO DO!
HOW DARE HE?
THE MAN IS A MUSLIM KENYAN!
HE'S OUT TO DESTROY WHITE AMERICA!"

WE'VE HEARD SUCH STATEMENTS SINCE DAY 1 OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION.

NEVER MIND THAT CRUZ WAS BORN IN CANADA TO A CUBAN 'IMMIGRANT' FATHER, OR THAT McCAIN WAS BORN IN PANAMA, AND CERTAINLY NEVER MIND THAT THE REST OF THE PACK UP ON 'THE HILL' ARE OFFSPRING, THE "ANCHOR-BABIES" ,OF 'ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS', i.e., THE "BOAT PEOPLE" OF THE MAYFLOWER AND OTHER SHIPS FROM EUROPA.

TO GET A REAL "AMERICAN" IN OFFICE, WE'D HAVE TO TURN TO THE INDIGENOUS TRIBES, WHAT'S LEFT OF THEM, AND SELECT FROM THOSE "ORIGINAL PEOPLE", AND MAYBE LEARN AN "ORIGINAL LANGUAGE"?
AN IROQUOIAN, GIDUWV, OR SIOUAN DIALECT WOULD HAVE TO BE THE LANGUAGE OF AMERICA, YES?
V, YUNEGV, V?

BUT LET'S COMPARE CHINA TO CUBA.
AND LET'S JUST SEE HOW MUCH THE U.S. HELPS CHINA VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS EVERY YEAR.
LET'S SEE IF AMERICA IS ACTUALLY ENCOURAGING CHINA TO REMAIN A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATOR.
(HINT: YES, YES WE DO ENCOURAGE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CHINA!)

LET'S SEE IF CHINA OWNING A BIG PIECE OF THE AMERICAN PIE HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH CONGRESS BEING JUST FINE WITH AMERICA "TRADING WITH AN ENEMY STATE"!

TWO MAJOR ISSUES IMMEDIATELY COME TO MIND:

#1 ~ INFANTICIDE, OR "GENDERCIDE" IN CHINA

In my mind, China's most horrific human rights violations are committed against the unborn or the newborn of the "wrong" gender. 

China has long had a 'one-child policy", and parents there seemed to want male children, so it was perfectly understandable that pregnant women, on learning they were carrying a female, got an abortion, or, having delivered a female, simply threw the newborn out like one would the trash.
Missionaries to China have long reported abandoned, tossed-aside female babies there, and some have devoted themselves to their rescue.

China has a history of female infanticide spanning 2000 years. CUBA DOES NOT.
 Reproductive rights in Chinese society have been co-opted by the government as a component of a broader push towards socialist modernization.

The denial of these fundamental rights is seen by the government as a necessary societal sacrifice for the preservation of the state.
This powerful state loyalty creates a ripe environment for a pervasive fertility policy, regardless of the ramifications. 

When Christian missionaries arrived in China in the late sixteenth century, they noticed the practice of female infanticide, and witnessed newborns being thrown into rivers or onto rubbish piles. 
During the 19th century female infanticide was practiced in the majority of China's provinces. 

THIS PRACTICE HAS BEEN WELL-DOCUMENTED IN TODAY'S CHINA.
LITTLE HAS CHANGED IN 2000 YEARS! 


On 25 September 1980 in an "open letter", the Politburo of the Communist Party of China requested that members of the party, and those in the Communist youth league, lead by example and have only one child.

 (See Joseph Farah, "Cover-up of China's gender-cide", Western Journalism Center/FreeRepublic, September 29, 1997.) Farah referred to the gendercide as "the biggest single holocaust in human history."

Although China eased restrictions of the one-child rule for rural families, few trusted the government, it appears, and the gendercide continued.

BUT AMERICA IS FINE WITH THAT!
AMERICA TRADES FREELY WITH A CHINA THAT BASICALLY ENCOURAGES ABORTION OF FEMALE FETUSES.


#2~ ETHNIC CLEANSING?
CHINA DOES THAT!

NOT A PROBLEM.
AMERICA UNDERSTANDS...COLONISTS,ET AL, VERSUS INDIANS, AFTER ALL....

Millions, yes, LITERALLY MILLIONS of 
Tibetan farmers and herders, an ethnic minority in China,  have been rounded up like animals themselves and sent off to what China calls "a mass rehousing-and-relocation policy" that forces them into socialist work villages. 
We might call them prison camps here.


WHAT ABOUT CUBA ON THIS ISSUE? 

'The government continues to rely on arbitrary detention to harass and intimidate individuals who exercise their fundamental rights. 

The Cuban Commission for Human Rights and National Reconciliation—an independent human rights group the government views as illegal—received over 3,600 reports of arbitrary detentions from January through September 2013, compared to approximately 2,100 in 2010.  

Dozens of political prisoners remain in Cuban prisons according to local human rights groups, which estimate that there are more political prisoners whose cases they cannot document because the government prevents independent national or international human rights groups from accessing its prisons."  

In November, Cuba was re-elected to a seat on the UN Human Rights Council, defeating Uruguay for a regional position despite its poor human rights record and consistent efforts to undermine the council’s work to respond to human rights violators. 

The Code for Children, Youth and Family states that a parent who teaches ideas contrary to communism can be sentenced to three years in prison."

CUBA'S PRISONS EACH HOLD DOZENS TO THOUSANDS IN VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, AS COMPARED TO MILLIONS HELD IN CHINA, BUT ONE IS TOO MANY.
THAT THE U.S. MAINTAINS CLOSE RELATIONS WITH CHINA AND NOT WITH CUBA, DOES NOT MAKE SENSE WHEN BOTH ARE GUILTY OF THE SAME THING, AND IT IS HYPOCRITICAL TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL, EVEN FOR CONGRESS, TO MAINTAIN THERE'S ANY  REASON CHINA MAY BE EXCUSED. 


Torture is common in Chinese prisons/prison camps, and China still refuses  to recognize a clause in an anti-torture agreement they signed with the U.N. that allows the United Nations to investigate suspected torture, thus eliminating the enforcement mechanism. 

In essence, they say they won't torture, but they do, just like, ummm, America.
Human Rights Watch notes that there exists in China such "new programs" as 'new' legal-aid services to victims of domestic violence, for disabled children and other at-risk groups.

These services are illegal according to Chinese "State Law", so their creators/organizers, under said "Law" , face imprisonment. 

What's the point in creating programs to help the victims of human rights violations if you go to jail for doing so, if anyone who seeks help can also go to jail for doing so?

For a brief time, human rights violations and the truth of life inside china slowly leaked out to the international community by means of the internet.
But the Chinese Communist Party has VERY recently moved to make it easier to charge activists and Internet critics as part of a crackdown on free expression. 


Some call what the Communist government put in place "THE GREAT FIREWALL OF CHINA".
It virtually ended our peeks inside the "Great Dragon", "Red China".

It seems one big rule in china is "Thou shalt NOT cast China in a bad image, even if the image is an honest one."
I feel those would-be truth-sayers' pain.
It's almost to that point here in America, thanks to the "Patriot Act' and the incessant spying by our NIA on OUR internet activities and OUR phone conversations here in America!
A lot of US are labeled "potential terrorists" when WE speak out against our brand of "communist parties", against our own "regimes".

A QUICK COMPARISON ON MAJOR ISSUES:

~CHINA HAS A ONE-CHILD POLICY THAT "LOOKS THE OTHER WAY" WHEN WOMEN ELECT TO ABORT OR DISPOSE OF FEMALE FETUSES/NEWBORNS.
CUBA HAS NEVER BEEN GUILTY OF THIS.

~CHINA RESTRICTS RELIGIONS, PUNISHES THE RELIGIOUS SEVERELY.
CUBA WELCOMES POPES, HAS CHURCHES EVERYWHERE, ALLOWS WORSHIP, BUT NOT "RELIGIOUS INTERFERENCE IN GOVERNMENT".

~CHINA SEVERELY PUNISHES HOMOSEXUALS.
CUBA NO LONGER DOES.

~CHINA COMMITS ETHNIC CLEANSINGS.
CUBA IS NOT REALLY FOND OF ITS BLACKS, BUT DOES NOT ROUND THEM UP AND HERD THEM OFF TO LABOR CAMPS.

~CHINA WELCOMES AMERICAN BUSINESSES AND PROVIDES THEM WITH WORKERS WHO HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS, WHO WORK FOR PENNIES AN HOUR.
CUBA HAS NO AMERICAN-OWNED BUSINESSES (TECHNICALLY).
AS AN ISLAND NATION, IT HAS LITTLE INDUSTRY AT ALL, IMPORTS ALMOST EVERYTHING.

~CHINA'S GOVERNMENT  IS STILL CONTROLLED BY MALES.
CUBA HAS WOMEN IN ALMOST HALF ITS HIGH-LEVEL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY POSTS.

~CHINA EDUCATES AND PROVIDES HEALTH CARE TO WHOMEVER IT WILL. SOME ETHNIC GROUPS RECEIVE NONE.
CUBA PROVIDES FREE EDUCATION AND FREE HEALTH CARE TO ALL. 

IT DOES MONITOR PATIENTS AND STUDENTS FOR "POLITICAL REACTIONISM". 
IT ALSO LEAVES NO TREATMENT OPTIONS OPEN IN TREATING SOME ILLNESSES.
HOWEVER, BOTH HAVE PRODUCED VERY FINE PHYSICIANS, SOME OF THE BEST ON THE PLANET.

~CHINA SEVERELY RESTRICTS TRAVEL BY "TOURISTS".
CUBA HAS FEW TOURISTS AND ANY FROM NATIONS ALLIED TO AMERICA ARE CAREFULLY WATCHED.
BOTH NATIONS USE SEPARATION OF FAMILIES AS A FORM OF PUNISHMENT.

IT MAY BE INTERESTING TO YOU TO KNOW THAT:
Since November 1966, the Cuban Adjustment Act provides automatic permanent residency for almost all Cubans arriving legally or illegally after one year and one day in the US. 
No immigrant from any other nation has this privilege. 
Controversy over this policy centers around the loss of Cuba's scientists, professionals, technicians and other skilled individuals.  

 In 
1995 the US government entered into an agreement with the Cuban government to resolve the emigration crisis that created the Mariel Boatlift of 1980, when Castro opened the docks to anyone who wanted to leave. 
The result of the negotiations was an agreement under which the United States was required to issue 20,000 visas annually to Cuban emigrants.
  
This quota is rarely filled; the 
Bush administration has refused to comply with the act, issuing only 505 visas to Cubans in the first six months of 2003. It has also blocked some Cubans who have visas.  


~CHINA DOES NOT ALLOW FREE PRESS, FREE SPEECH, UNRESTRICTED INTERNET USAGE .
CUBA DOES NOT EITHER. 


CUBA OWNS NO AMERICAN LAND.
THAT IS NOT ALLOWED!
BUT CHINA?
HOW MUCH OF AMERICA DOES CHINA ALREADY OWN?
WELL, DEBT-WISE, OVER $1 TRILLION. 

FORBES, 2013, ESTIMATED A TRILLION, BUT DIDN'T TAKE MUCH INTO ITS ADDITION PROCESS.
TREASURY NOTES HELD BY CHINA ARE JUST THE TIP OF THE OLD ICEBERG.  


CHINESE SNAPPING UP AMERICAN PROPERTY    
The Chinese are on a real estate buying spree all over America as they are now the dominant 'buyers' of investment green cards. 
This is occurring as private equity buyers and hedge funds exit the buy-to-rent business en masse and, as Mike Krieger explains, are desperate to pitch American property to anyone willing to keep Housing Bubble 2.0 inflated... it seems Zillow is more than happy to enable that as "Zillow agreed to make its U.S. property listings available to Chinese consumers through a partnership with a Beijing-based website." 

China is on the way to becoming the dominant land owner in the entire country, and that is starting to alarm a lot of people.  Do we really want a foreign superpower to physically own so much of our territory?
In other cases, the Chinese are gaining control over vast tracts of U.S. territory by buying up our large corporations.
For example, when the Chinese purchased Smithfield Foods, they suddenly owned 460 large farms and became the top employer in dozens of communities all over the United States… 

IT IS INEVITABLE, ECONOMIC MINDS SAY, THAT CHINA BECOMES DOMINANT OVER THE U.S.!  

The President of the St. Louis Federal Reserve recently stated that “attitudes in the U.S. are going to have to change” because America “will not permanently be the global leader”
That’s according to Federal Reserve Board of St. Louis President James Bullard, who spoke to the Wall Street Journal on the sidelines of a conference during a recent visit to Hong Kong.

“Attitudes in the U.S. are going to have to change, because the U.S. will not permanently be the global leader,” Mr. Bullard said.

In fact, Bullard insists that it is inevitable that the U.S. will end up playing second fiddle to communist China…
In that case, “the U.S. would be playing a role to China similar to the role the U.K. plays to the U.S. today,” Mr. Bullard said. “People think it’s 50-75 years away but it’s probably only 25 or 20 years away, something like that.”
And this is one of the guys that is running the U.S. economy?

DEFINE "HUMAN RIGHTS"
"In the U.S., Europe, and many other parts of the world, the idea of human ‘rights’ means things like freedom of religion, assembly, voting rights, anti-discrimination provisions to protect minorities and people with disabilities, and the like. 


On these measures, China FAILS.  

 "There is endemic local corruption, abuses of political opponents, restrictions on free expression and assembly, abuses of property rights, discrimination against people who are out of favor with the government, no real voting rights as that idea is understood in the West, and so on."      

These types of human rights abuses are deemed necessary by the state to preserve "social stability," Human Rights Watch says:
Historically, China has used "re-education through labor" — forced labor camps — as a means of punishment.
In addition, the disabled face discrimination in employment and education opportunities.

Workplace safety is a major concern in China, where migrant workers cannot get residence permits that allow them access to education and other social services, and where women can be punished, including being forced to have abortions, for violating government family planning laws.
China remains an authoritarian state without truly free expression and democratic choice, and where political dissidents and those who practice civil disobedience face harsh penalties [OR DEATH].

Meanwhile, China executes thousands of people a year and imprisons or forces labor on hundreds of thousands [TO MILLIONS] of others with scant due process. Finally, many groups — ethnic minorities, the disabled, and migrant workers, to name a few — remain marginalized by the state. 


LET'S HEAR IT FOR CHINA?
REALLY, CONGRESSMEN, CHINA IS A GREAT TRADE PARTNER BUT NOT WEE CUBA?
CHINA, AMERICA'S BELOVED PART-OWNER.
CHINA, WHERE HUNDREDS OF U.S. BUSINESSES FLOCK TO CASH-IN ON "SLAVE LABOR WAGES", WHERE THE RULE FOR MANUFACTURING GOODS IS "THERE IS NO RULE". 
Between 1983 and 1999, the profits of the Top 200 firms grew 362.4 percent, while the number of people they employed grew by only 14.4 percent. Profits AND production BOTH ROSE, but the Big Boys were using almost the same percentage of workers to make goods and profits. 

TAKING JOBS TO CHINA PAID, KEEPS PAYING THE CORPORATIONS !
 

CHINA is a great place to do business if you want high profits! 

 A wage slave in CHINA can't quit an oppressive job to find a less slave-like job, because in China's present society, almost all jobs involve wage-slavery. So the options are obey and stay, quit/try to quit and die of starvation, or become a vagrant, which is illegal in China.
THE BIG CORPORATIONS LOVE CHINA BECAUSE OF THEIR "ANYTHING GOES" (AS LONG AS WE SAY SO) TAKE ON CREATING GOODS.

"Worker abuse is still commonplace in many of the Chinese factories that supply Western companies..."

EXAMPLE  1:
AMERICAN COMPANIES KNOWINGLY HIRE CHILDREN AND PAY "SLAVE LABOR WAGES" JUST AS KNOWINGLY WHEN THEY MOVE JOBS TO CHINA.

55 cents an hour is a "high-paying" job in China when American businesses come to town.
55 cents an hour is the new "minimum wage" that Big American companies love to pay overseas, but in some instances, that 55 cents is a half DAY's pay elsewhere!
American business CEOs know how to find CHEAPER labor, labor that will never demand higher wages, nor demand safe working conditions.

AS THE NEW YORK TIMES REPORTED:  
"In the Pearl River Delta region near Hong Kong, for example, factory workers lose or break about 40,000 fingers on the job every year, according to a study published a few years ago by the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.
Pushing to keep America's big corporations honest, labor groups regularly smuggle photographs, videos, pay stubs, shipping records and other evidence out of factories that they say violate local law and international worker standards. 

In 2007, factories that supplied more than a dozen corporations, including Wal-MartDisney and Dell, were accused of unfair labor practices, including using child labor, forcing employees to work 16-hour days on fast-moving assembly lines, and paying workers less than minimum wage. (Minimum wage in this part of China is about 55 cents an hour.)

In December, 2007 two nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, documented what they said were abuse and labor violations at 15  factories that produce or supply goods for Wal-Mart — including the use of child labor at Huanya Gifts, a factory here in Guangzhou that makes Christmas tree ornaments."   

IF THEY FOUND 15, HOW MANY WERE NOT FOUND?
TRAVEL IS VERY RESTRICTED INSIDE CHINA, AND SUSPECTED MEMBERS OF THE PRESS ARE CAREFULLY WATCHED.
WHAT AMERICANS DON'T SEE, THEY WON'T KNOW ABOUT, RIGHT?
RIGHT.
BUT, EVEN KNOWING, LOOK WHO CARES!
CAN WE HAVE A SHOW OF HANDS?
WHO CARES?
EXAMPLE 2:
In China dogs, especially a breed known as "raccoon dogs" are skinned ALIVE to create fur trim for clothing and accessories.
The Humane Society of America has reported this to Congress...who...

doesn't give a damn.

But Congress didn't really want American consumers to know this nasty little fact.

You see, way, way back in 1951, it was CONGRESS that created a loophole for big business on this, so, although in 2000, Congress passed legislation that prohibits importing or exporting dog and cat fur, CONGRESS KNEW THERE'S A LOOPHOLE, HAS NEVER ENFORCED THE BAN, AND NO MAJOR CORPORATION HAS BEEN CALLED TO TASK BY OUR GOVERNMENT FOR CONTINUING TO TRADE IN DOG AND CAT. JUST QUIETLY CONTINUE AND DON'T GET CAUGHT. 

OUR GOVERNMENT WON'T BE MONITORING WHAT'S FUR AND WHAT FUR IT IS!
CONGRESS MADE YOU A LOOPHOLE OVER 50 YEARS AGO!
CARRY ON!
MAKE PROFITS!

U.S. Rep Jim Moran (D-Va.),  is the lead sponsor of legislation that would remove the 1951 loophole THAT CONTINUES TO ALLOW THIS.AT LEAST SOMEONE TRIED.

The resolution unanimously passed the House of Representatives on July 28, 20S140. 
Georgia U.S. Congressman Hank Johnson was one of 170 sponsors. 
It has STILL NOT gone before the U.S. Senate.  

The Humane Society reached out-of-court settlements in March 2010 with Lord & Taylor, Macy's, Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue to stop advertising garments as faux fur that are trimmed with coyote or dog pelts. 

The settlements came after a District of Columbia judge in February fined Neiman Marcus $25,000 for advertising items as faux that were actually trimmed with raccoon dog, the St. Petersburg Times reported.
BUT IT IS NOT JUST THIS "FAUX FUR' ISSUE.
CHINA ALLOWS A HOST OF CONTAMINANTS AND TOXINS, INCLUDING HUMAN EXCREMENT AND HEAVY METALS IN ITS "MANUFACTURING", IN ITS EXPORTS.
TIME AND TIME AGAIN CHINA HAS HAD TO FACE RECALLS DUE TO HARM OR FATALITY CAUSED BY THEIR EXPORTS.
THEY JUST DON'T REGULATE THINGS LIKE GROUND-UP PLASTICS USED IN FOOD PRODUCTS, ETC.

LOOKING AT ALL THE ABOVE, ONE JUST MIGHT QUESTION WHY AMERICA TRADES WITH CHINA....
AND WHY OUR CONGRESSMEN WANT TO CONTINUE DOING SO.
AND WHY CUBA COULD POSSIBLY BE SEEN AS "WORSE THAN COMMUNIST CHINA" BY ANYONE WITH A VIABLE BRAIN.
THEY ARE CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH!

DOES ANYONE BESIDES ME WONDER WHY AMERICA'S BUSINESSES AND THOSE WHO MAKE IT EASY FOR THOSE BUSINESSES TO MOVE TO CHINA (OUR CONGRESSMEN) DON'T SEND ARMIES INTO CHINA, RUSSIA, CUBA, ALL COMMUNIST NATIONS TO RESCUE THE BILLIONS WHO SUFFER FROM HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE THERE?
WE SEEM TO ONLY SEND IN AMERICAN FORCES TO MUSLIM NATIONS.
DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY?
I'LL TELL YOU ANYWAY....
BECAUSE IF AMERICA WAS TO TREAT ANY COMMUNIST NATION AS IT HAS TREATED MUSLIM NATIONS, THOSE COMMUNIST NATIONS (CHINA AND RUSSIA) WOULD SIMPLY NUKE AMERICA INTO A FINE RADIOACTIVE POWDER, THAT'S WHY!

CUBA IS 90 MILES OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA!
90 MILES!
IN ALL THESE 60+ YEARS, AMERICA HAS NOT SENT IN RESCUE TEAMS TO "BRING DEMOCRACY" TO CUBA...POPULATION 11,100,000, WITH A COMBINED MILITARY FORCE OF JUST 60,000 AS OF 2003.
AMERICA COULD TAKE OVER CUBA FAR MORE EASILY THAN IT DID IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, ANY OTHER NATION HALFWAY AROUND THE WORLD, BUT NOT ONCE HAVE WE GONE A SHORT 90 MILES TO DO SO!
WHY?
BECAUSE BIG, BAD CHINA SAID WE'D BETTER NOT DO THAT!
RUSSIA SAID, "NO, NO!"


BUT WHILE WE TRADE NICELY WITH BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA, BOTH WHO HAVE VOWED TO ERADICATE US, WE JUST MUST NOT DO THE SAME WITH....CUBA?

THAT IS HYPOCRISY, AT ITS WORST.
AND WE REALLY SHOULD LET THE HYPOCRITES IN WASHINGTON, UP ON "THE HILL" AND IN THAT OVAL OFFICE KNOW THAT WE SEE THE HYPOCRISY.  


WE SEE THAT $$$$$$$$$$$$ TALKS, AND THAT THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR WAR DETERS A LOT OF "SANCTIONS, EMBARGOES, AND IMPORTS BANS"....
$$$$$ AND NUKES MAKE US DELIGHTED TO TRADE WITH CHINA AND RUSSIA.
BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA HAVE HACKED INTO OUR MILITARY'S SECURITY SYSTEMS, HAVE HACKED INTO OUR POWER GRID, HAVE STOLEN "STATE SECRETS", HAVE PAID AMERICANS TO SPY FOR THEM, HAVE  WAGED COLD WAR AND REAL WAR AGAINST US, HAVE KILLED AMERICANS ABROAD, AND BOTH COMMIT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY, BUT THEY ARE OUR BUSINESS PARTNERS....
AND CUBA IS....INCONSEQUENTIAL...UNTIL THAT BLACK PRESIDENT MENTIONS IT...

CUBA IS USELESS TO WALL STREET.
CUBA CAN'T LOAN US MONEY.
IT DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH CONSUMERS TO INTEREST AN AMERICA CONTROLLED BY BIG BUSINESS.
TOO BAD, CUBA.



SOURCES NOT LINKED ABOVE:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/business/worldbusiness/05sweatshop.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

https://www.du.edu/korbel/hrhw/researchdigest/china/InfanticideChina.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment