WHY?
BECAUSE CONGRESS PASSED LEGISLATION PROTECTING VACCINE MANUFACTURERS FROM LAWSUITS AFTER THEY THREATENED TO STOP MAKING VACCINES IF CONGRESS DID NOT PASS SUCH A 'LAW'.
THE MANUFACTURERS GOT TIRED OF PAYING COMPENSATION AND FIGHTING AMERICANS IN COURTS, SO CONGRESS BASICALLY SAID,
"OH, PLEASE, PLEASE, KEEP MAKING VACCINES AND WE'LL LET TAXES PAY FOR YOUR CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN (AND OTHERS)."
AND SO, NOW VACCINE MANUFACTURERS COULD KILL A MILLION A DAY WITH NO WORRIES.
AND, BECAUSE SO FEW KNOW ABOUT THIS RECOURSE IN THE FACE OF VACCINE INJURY OR DEATH BY VACCINE, BECAUSE GETTING A CASE BEFORE THIS "COURT" IS SO DIFFICULT, AND THE PROCESS OF TRIAL IS SO LONG, OUR GOVERNMENT IS CONFIDENT IT WILL NEVER HAVE TO COUGH UP MUCH POCKET CHANGE AT ALL.
MANY WHO FILE JUST GIVE UP OR RUN OUT OF MONEY TO CONTINUE THE FIGHT.
UNLIKE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, AMERICAN CITIZENS GET NO HELP FROM UNCLE SAM WHEN VACCINES COST THEM LOVED ONES OR THE HEALTH OF LOVED ONES IS FOREVER DAMAGED BY VACCINES.
THERE IS NO TAX MONEY FOR ATTORNEYS FOR 'AVERAGE JOE OR JANE'.
IT'S BEEN A WINNING BET FOR UNCLE SAM AFTER HE WAGERED THIS "COURT" WOULD NOT BE OVERLY COSTLY TO HIM...ONLY A LITTLE OVER $3 BILLION IN CLAIMS HAVE BEEN PAID BY THE FEDS SINCE THIS "COURT" BEGAN IN 1988.
It's called The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
It pays claims from a special fund reserved for vaccine injuries.
That fund, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund, currently holds over $3.5 billion, largely because the U.S. Government refuses to even hear cases related to autism which would quickly deplete the fund.
(See: How the Government has Earned $3.5 BILLION from the Claim that Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism.)
OVER 15,900 CASES HAVE BEEN FILED AND 13,976 CASES HAVE BEEN ADJUDICATED.
ONLY A LITTLE OVER 4,000 CASES HAVE BEEN "COMPENSATED" AND NOT ONE VACCINE MANUFACTURER WILL EVER BE THE ADMITTED OR PROVEN KILLER OR CAUSE OF HARM IN ANY OF THEM.
MOST SETTLEMENTS ARE OUT-OF-COURT SETTLEMENTS AND NOT ONE VACCINE MANUFACTURER GETS A GUILTY VERDICT.
THE COURT REFUSES TO HEAR CASES INVOLVING AUTISM.
MOST CASES DRAG ON FOR YEARS.
EVEN THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE (GAO) HAS COMPLAINED THAT THE COURT DOES NOT DO ENOUGH TO HELP VICTIMS OF VACCINES!
<CLICK HERE TO SEE THEIR STATEMENTS>
BUT THE GAO DID NOT INTERVIEW A SINGLE PERSON WHO HAS PETITIONED THE COURT FOR HELP!
NOT ONE!
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORTED SOME FAILURES OF THE GAO AND THE COURT BUT FAILED TO REPORT THE SEVERITY OF THE FAILINGS.
Wayne Rohde and Louis Conte wrote:
"The report demonstrates that the GAO did not go far enough in examining the inherent conflicts of interest which impair the program and the on-going injustices inflicted upon people with vaccine injuries.
The authors of this article have interviewed hundreds of families over the past seven years about their experiences with the NVICP. Based on our work, as detailed in our books and published articles, the NVICP is no longer a viable justice venue for the vaccine injured as Congress intended.
The NVICP really ought to stand for The National Vaccine Injury Concealment Program. The GAO would have been better informed had they reached out to petitioners and investigated the issues that families are experiencing. In contrast to the number of interviews with federal staff, the sampling of families with direct contact with the VICP was dismal.
An analysis of the history of the program demonstrates that the Office of the Secretary has utterly failed to undertake reasonable efforts to inform the public about the NVICP since the program commenced in 1988.
The initial failure in this regard was the Secretary’s duty to alert the public about the filing deadline for pre-act petitions for those injured by vaccines prior to the establishment of the NVICP. The original deadline was October 1990. Those who claim injury from the DPT, polio, or other vaccine they received in the 1940’s, 50’s, 60’s, 70’s or early 80’s had an opportunity to file a claim for compensation.
There are quarterly reports on vaccine injuries and death settlements from the U.S. vaccine court, but those are seldom, if ever, reported in the mainstream media.
117 cases in the past quarter.
The Depart of Justice issues a report on vaccine injuries and deaths every quarter to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (click on “Meeting Book PDF – 11 MB” and start reading at page 51.).
This March 5, 2015 report states that there were 117 cases for vaccine injuries and deaths compensated from 11/16/2014 to 2/15/2015.
92 of the settlements were listed in the report, giving the name of the vaccines, the injury, and the amount of time the case was pending before settlement.
Five of those settlements were for deaths linked to vaccines, with three deaths related to the flu shot.
73 of the 92 settlements were for injuries and deaths due to the flu shot, and the majority of flu shot injuries were for Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
AND FOR THE MOST INFORMATIVE WEBSITE REGARDING THIS "VACCINE COURT" AND THE FULL LIST OF THE 117, <GO HERE>.
In November of 2014 the Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued the first report on America’s “Vaccine Court,” known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), in almost 15 years.
Most citizens of the United States are not even aware that there is something called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and that if you suffer harm or death due to a vaccine, that you cannot sue the manufacturer of the vaccine, but you must sue the Federal Government and try to obtain compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund, which is funded by taxes paid on vaccines.
The settlements represented by vaccine injuries and deaths included in the Department of Justice (DOJ) report probably represent a small fraction of the actual vaccine injuries and deaths occurring in America today.
WHILE MOST PEOPLE KNOW VACCINE MANUFACTURERS ARE "ABOVE THE LAW", FEW KNOW THEY CAN STILL FILE A CASE IF SOMETHING WENT HORRIBLY WRONG AFTER A VACCINE.
SADLY, ALL THE CASES WHICH HAVE BEEN FILED, AND EVEN THE ONES THAT WERE COMPENSATED, HAVE DONE NOTHING TO CHANGE THE VACCINE MANUFACTURERS' DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE , OR MAKE THEM CORRECT KNOWN PROBLEMS.
AFTER ALL, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND TAXES ARE PAYING FOR THE MISTAKES EACH MANUFACTURER MAKES, WHETHER THEY ARE INTENTIONAL AND REPEATED YEAR AFTER YEAR OR NOT.
THEY NEVER EVEN SAY, "I'M SO SORRY FOR THE LOSS OF YOUR BABY/CHILD/FAMILY MEMBER."
BIAS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
By the mid-1990’s, officials working in the program, particularly Dr. Geoffrey Evans, Director of the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation (now retired), publicly disclosed a bias against awarding compensation fearing that doing so could be interpreted by the public as questioning the safety of the vaccine program.
“I’m not going to say that awarding too many people will undermine vaccine safety, but I look on the Internet, and I see that our statistics are taken out of context,” says Evans, the medical director of the compensation program. “And so it’s important that the table reflect what we think is really caused by the vaccines.”
Dr. Evans’ comments show an inherent conflict within HHS – promoting vaccines while administering the program to compensate the injured victims of that program – had impacted his Division’s perspective on compensation in a manner Congress had not intended.
Instead of putting news of the vaccine injury compensation fund on TV or in newspapers, the "division" ordered brochures made to distribute to only physicians!
They did not want to "scare the people away from vaccines".
They did not want BAD PRESS!
Myron Levin, an investigative reporter from the LA Times newspaper, in his 2004 article, “Vaccine Injury Claims Face Grueling Fight”, pointed out the following:
Some see this as a natural result of federal health officials’ fierce devotion to the immunization program – and their fear that if enough injuries were acknowledged, people would be afraid to get their shots.
Universal immunization is a fundamental mission of HHS.
[NOTE: That is a fairly good article, hope you can read more of it.]One of its branches, the FDA, licenses vaccines, and another, the CDC, promotes their use with such slogans as “Vaccination: An Act of Love.”
SIMPLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST... SELL IT, HIDE THE DAMAGES, NEVER TELL PUBLICLY THAT THOUSANDS ARE SUING TO GET JUSTICE!
NEW VACCINES ADDED TO LIST OF THOSE THAT CAUSE INJURY, BUT NO PUBLIC STATEMENTS MADE!
Fainting is a typical reaction from the Gardasil HPV vaccine, admitted by the drug manufacturer, but other injuries paid out of the Vaccine Compensation Program are less publicized, such as autoimmune diseases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Multiple Sclerosis, and others. Current cases include “Primary Ovarian Failure”, or premature menopause.
DID YOU KNOW THESE FACTS?
NO!
IT'S BEEN HIDDEN!
When Hepatitis A, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), and influenza vaccines were added to the Program, the lack of public awareness continued.
As pointed out in the recent GAO report, several of the vaccines recently added to the Program did not have their associated injuries added to the Vaccine Injury Table.
Injuries from these vaccines were known from surveillance reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and from the Institute of Medicine.
The public doesn’t need to know?
The attempt to misdirect the public and maintain the status quo is clear.
Ignored is the reality that vaccines are mandated on children throughout the country.
Every parent in the United States has a right to know that vaccine injuries occur and that the only legal recourse in the vast majority of instances is the NVICP.
Congress mandated the Secretary of Health and Human Services to inform the public of the existence of NVICP – not just medical insiders attending medical conferences – because they wanted the public to know that vaccine injuries happen.
BUT WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE TO MAKE SURE THE PUBLIC KNOWS?
NOTHING, UNTIL PRESIDENT OBAMA DECIDED TO ISSUE THESE QUARTERLY REPORTS!
AND CONGRESS WASN'T IN ON THAT!
This failure is not minor.
Every family in the country has been denied the information that they SHOULD have.
TO HIDE ALL THIS FROM PUBLIC SCRUTINY IS BASE, CRIMINAL, AND INTENTIONALLY SO!
The largest purchaser of vaccines is the CDC, purchasing over $4 billion worth of vaccines a year.
In addition, the U.S. Government holds patents on some vaccines, and earns royalties on them, such as the Gardasil vaccine.
Julie Gerberding was in charge of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, which includes the years the FDA approved Gardasil as a vaccine. Soon after she took over the CDC, she reportedly completely overhauled the agency’s organizational structure, and many of the CDC’s senior scientists and leaders either left or announced plans to leave.
Some have claimed that almost all of the replacements Julie Gerberding appointed had ties to the vaccine industry.
Gerberding resigned from the CDC on January 20, 2009, and is now the president of Merck’s Vaccine division, a 5 billion dollar a year operation, and the supplier of the largest number of vaccines the CDC recommends (article here).
DOES THAT GIVE YOU ANY NEW INSIGHT AT ALL AS TO WHAT'S REALLY HAPPENING HERE?
VACCINES ARE A VERY BIG BUSINESS AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS IN THE VACCINE BUSINESS.
WHY WOULDN'T IT PROTECT OTHERS WHO ARE?
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES MAKE HUGE DONATIONS TO CAMPAIGN 'WAR CHESTS' OF CONGRESSIONAL AND PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.
CONNECT THE DOTS!
AS I HAVE WRITTEN BEFORE, I HAVE NEVER IN MY 60+ YEARS OF LIFE WITNESSED SUCH A RABID ATTACK ON A GROUP OF PEOPLE IN MY LIFE AS WE ARE CURRENTLY WITNESSING IN THIS FRENZIED, FANATICAL PUSH IN THE MEDIA AND IN "MEDICAL SCIENCE" TO FORCE, TO FORCE UPON ANTI-VACCINE PARENTS A MANDATE TO SUBJECT THEIR INNOCENT CHILDREN TO EVERY VACCINE KNOWN TO MAN!
IT'S BEYOND DISCONCERTING...IT'S FRIGHTFUL!
IF YOU ARE A PARENT WHO OBJECTS TO VACCINES, WHETHER ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS OR BASED ON YOUR CONCERN FOR THE WELL-BEING OF YOUR BELOVED CHILDREN, PLEASE KNOW THAT OTHERS ARE ALSO STRUGGLING TO PRESERVE THE RIGHT OF CHOICE.
FOR NOW, WE MAY STILL CHOOSE NOT TO VACCINATE...FOR NOW.
A NEW, INCREDIBLE FREE RESOURCE FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT CHOOSE TO VACCINATE!
DO YOU WANT 'PEER-REVIEWED' STUDIES FOR YOUR BATTLE AGAINST MANDATORY VACCINES?
HOW ABOUT 300 PAGES OF SUCH STUDIES, ALL FOUND ON PUBMED?
FROM THE GENTLEMAN WHO OWNS 'GREENMEDINFO.COM', THE ALWAYS GENEROUS SAYER JI, COMES AN OFFER TO FREELY DOWNLOAD AND SHARE A PDF DOCUMENT THAT WILL GIVE YOU 300 PAGES OF PEER-REVIEWED PUBMED STUDIES!
READ HIS REASONS WHY HE'S OFFERING THIS:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/200-evidence-based-reasons-not-vaccinate-free-research-pdf-download
Read, download, and share this document widely to provide the necessary evidence-based counterbalance to the pro-vaccination propaganda that has globally infected popular consciousness and discussion like an intractable disease.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gpub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf
Also, please sign the Whitehouse petition: "Prohibit Any Laws Mandating the Force and Requirement of Vaccinations of Any Kind."
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/prohibit-any-laws-mandating-force-and-requirement-vaccinations-any-kind/HW1B3YKz
Although the petition needs no more signatures to be responded to by President Obama, sign it anyway to show support for the 140,000 people who have already signed.
THE BASIC FACTS THAT MANY WILL DENY ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Vaccines are toxic.
- Vaccines contain substances poisonous to humans (i.e. mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum, etc.) Vaccine package inserts contain this and other information required by law to be disclosed to the public. Although these inserts are produced for consumers, doctors do not make them available to their patients.
- Vaccines are grown on and contain foreign tissue and altered genetic material of both human and animal origin.
2. Immunization (the act of injecting vaccines) depresses and disables brain and immune function. Honest, unbiased scientific investigation has shown vaccinations to be a causative factor in many illnesses including:
- Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (aka SIDS, crib or cot death)
- Developmental disorders (autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, etc.)
- Immune deficiency (i.e. AIDS, Epstein Barre Syndrome, etc.)
- Degenerative disease (i.e. muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, cancer, leukemia, lupus, fibromyalgia, etc.)
3. The high rate of adverse vaccine reactions is being ignored and denied by conventional medicine.
- Prior to 1990, doctors were not legally required to report adverse reactions to the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
- Adverse reactions are considered "normal", are ignored or diagnosed as other diseases. Even with this poor system, reported damage is substantial.
- Despite their current legal obligation, less than 10% of doctors report the damage they witness to the CDC.
- Throughout history, many prominent medical and non-medical health professionals around the world have voiced their vehement opposition to vaccination calling it scientific fraud.
4. Mass Vaccination Programs systematically and recklessly endanger the public while disregarding our rights.
- Since vaccination breaks the skin, it is technically a surgery. All surgeries by law require informed consent. Informed consent is rarely attained before vaccines are administered.
- Doctors vaccinate the unwitting and uninformed. The vaccine manufacturers' package inserts which contain biased industry claims and the bare minimum required by law to reveal are not routinely made available to consumers so that they can make a more informed choice.
- Double-talk and unethical enforcement such as threats, intimidation and coercion are used to ensure vaccination compliance.
5. There is no proof that vaccinations are safe or effective.
- There are no control group studies. Authorities consider that "to not vaccinate" is unethical and have refused to study unvaccinated volunteers. If control studies were done according to honest science, vaccination would be outlawed.
- Studies which have been done are not designed to eliminate the examiners bias. Authorities who compile and report disease statistics work closely with and have a vested interest in companies which produce the vaccines. In other industries, this kind of bias is not tolerated. Injuries and deaths in these studies are attributed to anything but vaccination to skew the results and make it appear that vaccines have some merit.
6. Laws allow drug companies to violate the public trust.
- In private vaccine damage suits, information is revealed condemning vaccines as deadly.
- Vaccine manufacturers use "gag orders" as a leverage tool in vaccine damage legal settlements to restrict the plaintiff from disclosing to the public the truth about the dangerous nature of vaccines. Our government has allowed these unethical tactics to be used which jeopardize public welfare.
7. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1987 is a pacifier.
- This compensation program pretends to acknowledge the existence of vaccine damage by making "right" the wrongs done. Nothing in this Act attempts to avert these adverse events from happening in the future.
- This Act is the result of vaccine producers pressuring the government to "immunize" them from private lawsuits which can run an average of $4 million per case.
- The fund is made up of tax added into the cost to the consumer of each vaccine, thereby making vaccine consumers pay for one another's and perhaps their own injury; the vaccine manufacturers have made themselves quite "immune" from accountability. In recent years it has become even more difficult to be compensated through this program due to the parameters for determining vaccine damage changing and coroners now ruling out vaccine damage and charging the parents with Shaken Baby Syndrome.
8. Private insurance companies, which do the best liability studies, have totally abandoned coverage for damage to life and property due to:
- Acts of God
- Nuclear war and nuclear power plant accidents
- Vaccination
9. Vaccination is not emergency medicine.
- It is claimed that vaccines avert a possible future risk and yet people are pressured to decide on the spot. A doctor's use of fear and intimidation to force compliance is not ethical. Vaccines are drugs with potential serious adverse reactions. Time and forethought should be given before a decision is made.
10. There is no law enforcing vaccination for babies or anyone else.
- Vaccination is linked with school attendance but is not compulsory. Exemptions from vaccinations, although restricted and monitored, are part of every state public health law and can be expanded by public pressure.
- Departments of Health, Education and the American Medical Association personnel profit from the sale of vaccines. They keep the existence of and details about exemptions relatively unknown.
[SOURCE: SAYING NO TO VACCINES, by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny]
No study of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other AGENCY in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (which now numbers over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year of a child's life).
IF VACCINES ARE BETTER THAN NO VACCINES, WHY NOT ALLOW VERY INDEPENDENT STUDIES TO BE DONE IN THIS COUNTRY AS THEY HAVE BEEN DONE IN OTHER NATIONS?
AN ONGOING STUDY IN GERMANY HAS NOW GIVEN US A LOOK AT SOME LONG-TERM FINDINGS!
THE PRELIMINARY STUDY, RELEASED IN SEPTEMBER, 2011, WAS BASED ON 8,000 UNVACCINATED CHILDREN AND COMPARED THEIR HEALTH TO THE GENERAL POPULATION (MOST OF WHOM WERE VACCINATED).
COMPARISON AFTER COMPARISON WAS MADE...ALLERGIES, OTITIS MEDIA, MIGRAINES, DERMATITIS, EVEN AUTISM, AND THE OVERALL PRELIMINARY FINDING FROM GERMANY (September, 2011) IS THAT UNVACCINATED CHILDREN WERE FIVE TIMES AS HEALTHY AS THOSE WHO RECEIVED VACCINES.
VACCINATED CHILDREN EXHIBITED, OVERALL, FIVE TIMES AS MANY ILLNESSES AND PROBLEMS WITH HEALTH.
SIMILAR STUDIES IN NEW ZEALAND ( 226 children were vaccinated and 269 were unvaccinated) AND HONG KONG SHOWED ALMOST IDENTICAL RESULTS.
From the New Zealand study:
“While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers.”
Interestingly, the New Zealand study uncovered data that showed a marked prevalence
for tonsillitis and tonsillectomies in vaccinated children.
ONE OF THOSE SOUGHT-AFTER 'PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES' WAS PUBLISHED IN THE OXFORD JOURNAL IN MARCH, 2012, THAT SHOWED A MARKED INCREASE IN NON-INFLUENZA RESPIRATORY VIRUSES IN FLU-VACCINATED CHILDREN.
THAT 'PEER-REVIEWED STUDY' RAISED QUITE A STIR, EVEN IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA!
IF WE LOOK BACK AT THE "OUTBREAK" IN CANADA AND THE U.S. OF JUST SUCH A 'RESPIRATORY VIRUS' LAST YEAR JUST AS SCHOOLS WERE REOPENING AND KIDS WERE BEING VACCINATED, WE MAY SEE A CONNECTION?
MOST WON'T, SOME WILL.
The Canadian press recently broke the story that new research confirms initial findings that the flu vaccine appeared to actually increase people's risk of getting sick with H1N1, and cause more serious bouts of illness to boot.
According to the Vancouver Sun:
"Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results."
HOW MANY OF US WERE SURPRISED WHEN ABC REPORTED THE SAME THING AND ALSO MENTIONED THE HONG KONG STUDY?
'What was a bit surprising when we looked at some of the data from Canada and Hong Kong in the last year is that people who have been vaccinated in 2008 with the seasonal or ordinary vaccine seemed to have twice the risk of getting swine flu compared to the people who hadn't received that vaccine,' [Professor Collignon from the Australian National University] said.
ANU microbiologists say it is the opposite of what vaccines should do.
'It is particularly relevant for children because it is a condition they call original antigenic sin, which basically means if you get infected with a natural virus, that gives you not only protection against that virus but similar viruses or even in fact quite different flu viruses in the next year.'
'We may be perversely setting ourselves up that if something really new and nasty comes along, that people who have been vaccinated may in fact be more susceptible compared to getting this natural infection.'"
"...it is the opposite of what vaccines should do" ?
REALLY?
NOT IF VACCINES ARE BEING USED TO REDUCE THE WORLD'S 'TROUBLESOME' POPULATION!
Research published in the Journal of Virology in November of last year also confirmed that the seasonal flu vaccine may actually weaken children's immune systems and increase their chances of getting sick from influenza viruses not included in the vaccine. Further, when blood samples from 27 healthy, unvaccinated children and 14 children who had received an annual flu shot were compared, the former unvaccinated group naturally built up more antibodies across a wider variety of influenza strains compared to the latter vaccinated group – which is exactly what Professor Collignon referred to in the quote above.
NATURAL IMMUNITY PROVIDES THE MOST PROTECTION!
When children are born, they develop natural immunity to a large variety of microorganisms that they breathe, eat, and touch. The immune responses initiated by cells lining their airways, skin and intestines are very important in creating "memory" and protection against the microorganisms they naturally come into contact with every day. That primary line of defense is a very important step in the maturation of your child's immune system – and it's bypassed when he/she gets a vaccine.
With vaccination, you are merely creating an antibody, but as the Journal of Virology study showed, the unvaccinated children actually built up more antibodies against a wider variety of flu virus strains than the vaccinated children!
Vaccines usually do not impart long-term immunity because they don't create the kind of memory that occurs when you go through the process of a natural immune response.
Natural exposure does not necessarily lead to symptoms of infection – it is possible for your immune system to respond and for you to obtain natural immunity without actually getting sick, if your immune system is functioning well. In fact, vaccines do NOT strengthen the healthy functioning of your immune system, but actually weaken it.
PLEASE, PLEASE NOTE!
CURRENT FEDERAL LAW MANDATES THAT YOUR PHYSICIAN MUST TELL YOU EVERYTHING THAT IS IN THOSE VACCINE PACKAGE INSERTS, BUT YOU NEED TO ASK POINTEDLY, SO NO PHYSICIAN CAN DENY YOUR QUERY!
All Americans should know that if your doctor does not provide the CDC Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) sheet, or directly discuss the potential symptoms of side effects of the vaccination you or your child is about to receive BEFORE vaccination takes place, it is a violation of federal law.
Remember, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 requires doctors and other vaccine providers to:
Give written vaccine benefit and risk information to the person or guardian of the person before vaccination takes place (and, ethically, a doctor should be willing to discuss and answer all questions the patient or parent has about vaccination).
Keep a permanent record of all vaccines given and the manufacturer's name and lot number.
Enter serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths that occur after vaccination in the patient's permanent medical record.
File an official report of all serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
If a vaccine provider fails to inform, record or report, it is a violation of federal law, and I would encourage anyone who is injured from a vaccine, who did not receive the proper warnings, to use the legal system to hold the physician responsible.
THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW!
IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE, LET THEM GIVE US ALL THE INFORMATION THAT THEY HAVE!
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD?
IF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DECIDES TO TAKE OUR OWN CHILDREN FROM US AND FORCE THEM TO BE VACCINATED AGAINST OUR WILL, WE SHOULD CONSIDER LEAVING THIS NATION AND SEEKING REFUGE ELSEWHERE.
IF VACCINATIONS WORK, IF THEY ARE SO EFFECTIVE, THEN WHAT PARENT WITH A VACCINATED CHILD SHOULD CONCERN HIMSELF/HERSELF WITH WHETHER OURS ARE VACCINATED OR NOT?
THEY MADE THEIR CHOICES!
ALL AMERICANS SHOULD BE AFFORDED THE SAME RIGHT TO CHOICE!
SOME SOURCES PERHAPS NOT HYPERLINKED ABOVE:
- Vancouver Sun September 10, 2012
- ABC News March 5, 2011
- Journal of Virology 2011 Nov;85(22):11995-2000
- MetroNews September 9, 2012
**No copyright is claimed in [content copied] and to the extent that material may appear to be infringed, I assert that such alleged infringement is permissible under fair use principles in U.S. copyright laws. Material quoted is used only to inform and educate. The material used has been properly cited.
This website is always happy to remove any quoted content if contacted by original authors and asked to remove it.
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment