Translate

Thursday, October 29, 2015

VACCINES LINK TO AUTISM ESTABLISHED

THE MEDIA WON'T REPORT THE ALMOST 90 CASES THAT HAVE BEEN PAID MILLIONS IN COMPENSATION FOR CHILDREN CONTRACTING AUTISM IMMEDIATELY AFTER CHILDHOOD VACCINES. 
THAT AUTISM WAS LISTED AS A SIDE EFFECT, A RESULT OF VACCINES IS EASILY FOUND IN COURT DOCUMENTS.

THAT AUTISM WAS PREVIOUSLY LINKED TO THE HEPATITIS B VACCINE WAS EVIDENCED IN A STUDY TITLED "Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002", WHICH CAN BE ACCESSED 
<HERE>, in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 

Volume 73Issue 24, 2010.

"The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. 


Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. 

Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. 

Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk."


There are 100 Research papers supporting Vaccine/Autism Causation!



And Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease
"All these findings plausibly implicate Al adjuvants in pediatric vaccines as causal factors contributing to increased rates of autism spectrum disorders in countries where multiple doses are almost universally administered."

GET LINKS TO THOSE 97 OTHER STUDIES <HERE>.

GIVEN THE SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE, CONGRESS DOES NOTHING!


CONGRESS WON'T CALL THE PHYSICIAN/RESEARCHER WHO WORKED FOR THE CDC FOR ABOUT 18 YEARS AND TURNED OVER THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW THE WELL-KNOWN AUTISM LINK TO VACCINES.

ONE CONGRESSMAN, JUST ONE,  HAS CALLED FOR AN INVESTIGATION OF THE CDC ABOUT THE AUTISM/VACCINE LINK... BILL POSEY.



Posey went on to say that parents should have “the best information available to them” when making decisions about their children’s health. 
“They should be able to count on Federal Agencies to tell them the truth. For these reasons I bring the following matter to The House Floor.”
“In August 2014 Dr. William Thompson a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention worked with a whistleblower attorney to provide my office with documents related to a 2004 CDC study that examined the possibility of a relationship between mumps, measles, rubella vaccines and autism.”

READ MORE OF WHAT WAS INCLUDED IN POSEY'S PRESS RELEASE <HERE>.

The CDC's Dr. William Thompson, whistleblower to Dr, Brian Hooker on the MMR study and lead author on another on mercury in vaccines, has probably ruined more than a few of his colleagues' August vacations at Hilton Head. 


CNN...MAJOR FAUX PAS
Dorit Reiss on CNN made an off.message comment: 
"Even if his [Brian Hooker's] claims about the study were correct, which is doubtful, it would show that for most of the population, MMR does not cause autism." 

(I imagine a Merck guy yelling in her ear, "Dammit, Dorit, don't ever say it's OK if the MMR just makes a few thousand black boys autistic! Do you really want this job?") 

WELL, LOOK NOW, DORIT, THE MAN WAS CORRECT, CDC LIED!  
THOMPSON'S "LEAK" WAS NOT THE FIRST!



More broadly, these "leaks" in the bulwark of conventional wisdom have been coming for a long time, and not just from people on the inside with information to share.

Leaks like the original Verstraeten study at the CDC that found a high risk of autism for infants who got the most ethyl mercury by the first month of life, as opposed to the least.

Leaks like the CDC cover-up of the soaring autism rate in Brick Township, N.J.

Leaks like all the evidence from low-and-no-vaccine populations with low-to-no autism. 

Leaks like the Hannah Poling case, which the government conceded was triggered by autism, but buried by obfuscation. Leaks like the "Unanswered Questions" study showing autism all over the place in unacknowledged vaccine "court" rulings.

PLEASE, READ ABOUT HANNAH <HERE> .
ALSO, SEE THE CBS REPORT ON THIS CASE <HERE>.

Leaks like the SafeMinds parents identifying autism as a "novel form of mercury poisoning" more than a decade ago. 

Leaks like the Merck scientists who came forward to say the company faked data to make its mumps vaccine look effective.

Leaks like the unwillingness of the public health authorities to even study the issue.

Leaks like the connection PROVEN between the first cases of autism reported in the medical literature, in 1943, and the families' exposure to the new ethyl mercury vaccines and fungicides. 

I'm talking about leaks like all the parents of children on the other side of the elevated-risk stats – MMR shots at 12 months, illness, regression, autism.

Leaks like parents who saw it with other vaccines, at other times - parents who were willing to share what happened to try to keep it from happening again.

THESE PARENTS HAVE HAD TO LIVE WITH THE FACT OF THEIR HEALTHY CHILDREN BEING ROBBED OF A GOOD QUALITY LIFE BY THOSE TRUSTED VACCINES!
THEY LIVE WITH THE TRUTH.

These leaks are becoming a flood, and the flood a tidal wave, just like the autism tidal wave, and the wave is washing away the whole wall of denial built by the same people who just about now are running out of fingers and toes to plug them with.

[PLEASE NOTE: More on DR. WILLIAM THOMPSON'S struggle to get Congressional and media attention about the newest CDC coverup  further along in this blog.
FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO SKIP TO THE RESULTS BY THE CDC STUDY THAT PROVED THE LINK BETWEEN VACCINES AND AUTISM, SCROLL DOWN TO THE TRIPLE ASTERISKS *** ]

NOR WILL CONGRESS CALL VACCINE MANUFACTURERS IN TO INVESTIGATE, AT LEAST QUESTION THEM ABOUT ALL THE RECENT WHISTLEBLOWERS AND THOSE THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF PROOF,  EVEN THOUGH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS PAID OUT BILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS FOR SETTLEMENTS FROM VACCINE INJURIES AND/OR DEATHS FROM VACCINES. 


WHY AREN'T VACCINE MANUFACTURERS MADE TO PAY FOR THESE INJURIES?

They have complete immunity for their products thanks to the  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, that means you and I, the taxpayers of this country, are paying this bill, thanks to a "tax' put on every vaccine shot. 

NO ONE CAN SUE A VACCINE MANUFACTURER FOR INJURY.
THE FEDS HAVE SET UP A FEDERAL "VACCINE COURT" FOR THAT WHERE EACH INJURED PARTY HAS TO FACE THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.

OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TAXES VACCINES UNDER THAT 'ACT', BUT THAT DOESN'T COVER THE COST OF LAWSUITS.

MANY HAVE INDEED WON LAWSUITS.
THE LARGEST PAYOUT EVER CAME in 2011...$61 MILLION TO ONE CHILD'S FAMILY.

"How much has this so-called "Vaccine Court" paid out in damages since it went into operation in 1989?  The answer to that question is somewhere in the neighborhood of $3 billion dollars.  


The law firm of Maglio, Christopher, and Toale lists 291 cases they have successfully handled for vaccine injuries, including one in which the family of the plaintiff, a girl born in August 2005 and identified only as S.M., was injured by her two month diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine.
 (Case No. 08-463V in the United States Court of Federal Claims)  

According to court documents, within hours after this vaccination, the child started to have seizures, abnormal breathing, irregular heartbeats, and at one point her heart stopped beating and it took six minutes of CPR to revive her.  

The child now has a seizure disorder, encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, and suffers from "cognitive delays."  
In July of 2011 the child's family was awarded $61 million dollars to care for their daughter. 


Do we think that the $3 billion dollars paid out by this so-called court represents an accurate representation of the damages caused by vaccines? 

 Let's do a little thought experiment and compare the underreporting of drug reactions to adverse vaccine reactions.  
A 2004 systematic review of 37 studies on the issue reported in the journal Drug Safety found that on average, there was a 94% underreporting of adverse drug reactions. 

 If we use that as our standard then that $3 billion dollars becomes $50 billion dollars.
But I think that's a low estimate.  

In the case of drug reactions, you have a previously healthy person who takes a drug, the effects of which can be immediately noticed.  

The drug reaction detection rate is far above what one would expect for newborn children who cannot speak nor relay symptoms in any way and depend on those who care for them, parents who are rarely qualified physicians themselves, who do not know what may be a reaction to an injection and what isn't.

if drug reactions are 94% UNREPORTED/underreported, what may we imagine the percentage of unreported vaccine reactions are?

How many infants may have died from just allergic reaction to one of the many components in vaccines and have been classified as "sudden infant death syndrome" or "heart failure" or... something besides the real cause?


How many infants are now suffering irreversible damages that are not attributed to the vaccines they received prior to onset of their physical afflictions?

WE WILL NEVER KNOW, WILL WE?

EVERYONE, INCLUDING MOST PHYSICIANS, ARE COVERING UP FOR THE BIG PHARMACEUTICAL/VACCINE MANUFACTURERS AND IGNORING TOO MANY SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS THAT POINT TO VACCINES AS THE CAUSE OF DEATH OR INJURY, ESPECIALLY IN NEWBORNS AND THOSE UNDER AGE 2.

WHY IS IT THAT MANY EUROPEAN AND ASIAN NATIONS' MEDIA AND GOVERNMENTS HAVE DONE NUMEROUS ARTICLES, ISSUED MANY WARNINGS, BANNED MANY VACCINES AND THEIR MEDICAL EXPERTS HAVE DONE STUDIES THAT HAVE SHOWN FOR YEARS THE DANGERS INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN MAY FACE FROM VACCINES, BUT AMERICAN MEDIA, AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND AMERICAN MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS DO ALL THEY CAN TO HIDE THOSE STUDIES AND FINDINGS FROM ALL OF US?

MONEY, MY FRIENDS, LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY.
PROFITS.


VACCINES ARE A BOOMING BUSINESS, AND SINCE THOSE WHO MAKE THE VACCINES CAN'T BE SUED FOR DAMAGES OR DEATHS, THEY CAN KEEP AMERICANS BUSY LINING UP FOR MORE AND MORE VACCINES EVERY YEAR!

ONE NEWSPAPER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM DID AN ARTICLE ON HOW VACCINES BECAME SUCH A BIG BUSINESS. 

"For companies like Glaxo, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck & Co., Novartis AG and Pfizer Inc., the fear of a pandemic has translated into a financial windfall that has been years in the making. Worldwide, nearly 1 billion doses of H1N1 vaccine were ordered in 2009."

While that U.K. article is mainly about flu vaccines, vaccines shown to be virtually ineffective, it does show how easily the public can be whipped into a frenzy to get "protection" from some pathogen that vaccines promise to keep at bay.


Few ask about or are told all of the possible side effects, known symptoms of a bad reaction to the vaccines, and fewer still will blame any ill effects on the vaccine.

THE PUBLIC JUST BLINDLY TRUSTS...PHYSICIANS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, MAKERS OF VACCINES AND THEIR PROTECTION AGENCIES TO MAKE SURE ALL IS WELL.

ALL IS NOT WELL.
ALL HAS NOT BEEN WELL SINCE THE VERY FIRST VACCINES MADE SO MANY ILL AND EVEN CAUSED CANCERS IN THOSE, LIKE MYSELF, WHO GOT THOSE FIRST POLIO VACCINES.

"The road to the truth is a rigorous one, meaning that when life or money is on the line, people are going to lie.  Getting to the truth is a struggle because the natural human inclination is to avoid admitting you have done something wrong.  That's why we make somebody take an oath to tell the truth, and threaten them with jail if they commit perjury. 

 That's why we have adverse witnesses, allow attorneys to cross-examine witnesses with merciless questions, and require companies and individuals to produce any and all documents which may bear on the issue.  And again, if somebody fails to produce these documents, there are severe consequences.
And none of that happens in the so-called "Vaccine Court." 

Witnesses are not compelled to appear, companies do not have to produce documents, and even requests to view the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, a system paid for by your tax dollars, is forbidden to us.  We are told that this is because we trust the pharmaceutical companies and the government agencies to be "self-policing."  

We don't even trust the police to be "self-policing."  Let's say this court reduces those complaints by another ninety percent.  

The true damage from vaccine injuries SHOULD BE GIVEN AS AROUND $5 TRILLION DOLLARS.  
If we can imagine that even 90% of injuries and/or deaths from vaccines are not reported, not diagnosed, the damages would run into the TRILLIONS if they WERE!  
If we compare a relatively well-understood event like the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown we see that experts can vary widely in their estimate of damage, from a low of 4,000 deaths to 985,000 deaths.  Thus, it shouldn't come as a surprise that estimates of vaccine damage can range from a low of $50 billion dollars to a high of $5 trillion dollars. 

And what about the mantra parroted by both government officials and pharmaceutical companies that 'vaccines have never been shown to cause autism'?

  I suggest you look up the case of Hannah Poling who was awarded $20 million dollars for the development of a seizure disorder and autism (her parents were on CNN and Dr. Poling was even interviewed by CNN's chief medical reporter, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a fact Dr. Gupta seems to have conveniently forgotten, but can still be found on YouTube) or the wonderfully researched article "Unanswered Questions from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program" and published in the Pace University Environmental Law Review (March 2011) which revealed that the government has paid out damages in at least 83 vaccine injury cases in which autism was one of the listed injuries. 


In my school district of 30,000 students we have approximately 45 "Special Day Classes" and if we are in-line with current autism estimates, about 600 students with autism.  

That's not counting all of the other students with various behavioral problems and chronic illnesses, which are in all likelihood linked to a similar pattern of immune dysfunction caused by vaccine exposure.  

MIT researcher, Dr. Stephanie Seneff estimates that if current trends continue, 1 in 2 children will have autism by 2025."

HALF OF ALL OUR CHILDREN WILL HAVE A DIAGNOSIS OF AUTISM!
THAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!
SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!

THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES IS SLOWLY LEAKING OUT, THANKS TO WHISTLEBLOWERS AND FOREIGN MEDICAL STUDIES.

As the MMR whistleblower issue blows up, here's one thing that's worth remembering: 
The SPECIFIC manipulation of data being alleged is that the CDC covered up a risk for autism in black males who got the MMR shot earlier than 36 months. 

That is appalling, and raises terrible echoes of the nation's public health officials and their odious Tuskegee study of untreated black males with syphilis.

ARE OUR CHILDREN JUST "LAB RATS" TO THESE PEOPLE?
DO THEY JUST WANT HUMAN GUINEA PIGS?


OR ARE PROFITS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE HEALTH AND WELL BEING OF INFANTS, TODDLERS, ALL OUR CHILDREN?

TIME AND TIME AGAIN, THE PROFITS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO COME FIRST.
DATA HAS BEEN HIDDEN, MANIPULATED, DELETED SO THAT VACCINES, LIKE SO MANY BAD DRUGS, CAN STAY ON THE MARKET.


OUR OWN CONGRESS EVEN PASSED A LAW THAT PROTECTS THOSE DAMNABLE PROFITS...BECAUSE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS THE BIGGEST DEALER IN VACCINES.
THE CDC COVERUP EXPOSED
*** After Dr. Brian Hooker’s requests through the Freedom of Information Act for original MMR study documentation, a CDC Immunization Safety Researcher, Dr. William Thompson has buckled under the pressure of his conscience, and come forth as a whistle blower. 
These documents demonstrated a 340% increase in the incidence of autism in African American boys, expunged from the final study results in a violent act of scientific fraud.  In response to this now recovered letter from Dr. Thompson addressing this finding, the CDC retroactively altered the data to eliminate the signal of harm.  
In light of this 2004 letter confirming CDC awareness and suppression of these findings, CDC head, Dr. Julie Gerberding committed perjury before moving onto her position at Merck in the Vaccine Division. 


Results

When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.

Conclusions

The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

WE'VE KNOWN SINCE 1947!!!

DPT Vaccine Causes Brain Inflammation
  By 1947, the first reports of brain inflammation and chronic brain damage, including death, after pertussis vaccination were published (Brody, 1947; Byers and Moll, 1948). 

In 1955, Niels Low showed that the EEG (electroencephalogram) of infants sometimes was altered by the DPT shot. 
He concluded that "mild, but possibly significant, cerebral reactions occur in addition to the reported very severe neurological changes."

  By 1982, numerous reports of CNS dysfunction following DPT vaccination had appeared in the medical literature (Berg, 1958; Strom, 1960, 1967; Dick, 1967, 1974; Kulenkampff, 1974; Stewart, 1977, 1979). 

In 1981, Pediatrics published a UCLA/FDA study by Cody et al revealing that 1 in 875 DPT shots in the U.S. is followed by a convulsion or collapse/shock reaction.

 Finally, after more than 40 years of evidence in the medical literature that the DPT vaccine was causing brain inflammation and CNS damage in previously healthy children, this fact was confirmed by medical science in the 1981 National Childhood Encephalopathy Study (NCES) and in 1991 and 1994 by the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (IOM).

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO STOP THIS?
WHY WON'T PEOPLE DECIDE TO ERR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION AND PROTECT OUR CHILDREN?

AND WHY WON'T THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THAT VACCINE MANUFACTURERS, THE CDC, FDA, ET AL, BE CHARGED WITH, AT THE LEAST, CHILD ENDANGERMENT, AND AT THE MOST... HOW ABOUT PREMEDITATED MURDER?





No comments:

Post a Comment