THIS STORY HAS MORE TWISTS AND TURNS THAN AN AMERICAN SOAP OPERA.
THE THING CAN BE UNRAVELED, BUT IT TAKES AWHILE, SO PLEASE BEAR WITH ME.
[AS FOR BACK TO THE "ALL-CAPS", BEFORE ANYONE WHINES ABOUT IT, BROKE MY NEW GLASSES FIRST DAY OUT, LONG STORY...REPLACEMENT NEXT WEEK.]
ON FEB. 6, IT WAS REPORTED IN SEVERAL MIDDLE EAST NEWS SOURCES THAT THE SAUDI-LED "COALITION" OF 33 SUBSERVIENT NATIONS (MAKING 34 NATIONS INVOLVED) WILL NOW SEND MERCENARIES, OR "COALITION TROOPS" INTO SYRIA TO MORE OR LESS RESCUE THOSE "SYRIAN REBELS", WHICH THE U.S. LOVES AND HAS HELPED, EVEN IF SOME OF THEM WEAR THAT ISLAMIC STATE ARMBAND.
CNN WAS ONE OF A FEW WHO PICKED UP ON THE REACTION FROM THE IRANIAN POINT OF VIEW.
Iran commander mocks Saudi offer to intervene in Syria
CNN, VIA TEHRAN (FNA)
"Saudi sources told the CNN channel that the 150,000-strong army is now stationed in Saudi Arabia and will soon be dispatched to Syria.
They also said that Morocco, Turkey, Bahrain, the
UAE and Qatar will also deploy their forces to Syria through the Turkish
borders, and Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei will dispatch mercenaries
to Saudi Arabia too.
On Thursday, the Saudi Defense Ministry said it
stood ready to deploy ground troops to Syria to allegedly aid the US-led
anti-ISIL, also known as Daesh, coalition.
Both Tehran and Moscow have issued stern warnings
to Riyadh, stressing that the Saudi intruders, who in fact intend to
rescue the terrorists that are sustaining heavy defeats these days, will
be crushed in Syria.
Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps
(IRGC) Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari said Saudi Arabia doesn’t have
the guts to send its armed forces to Syria.
“They claim they will send troops (to Syria) but I
don’t think they will dare do so. They have a classic army and history
tells us such armies stand no chance in fighting irregular resistance
forces,” Jafari told reporters in Tehran on Saturday.
“This will be like a coup de grâce for them.
Apparently, they see no other way but this, and if this is the case,
then their fate is sealed,” he added.
Jafari, said this is just cheap talks, but Iran welcomes the Saudi decision if they decide to walk on this path."
LET THE SABERS RATTLE...HOWEVER...
THINGS REALLY ARE FALLING FURTHER APART.
"Syria’s conflict is getting increasingly dicey.
LET THE SABERS RATTLE...HOWEVER...
THINGS REALLY ARE FALLING FURTHER APART.
"Syria’s conflict is getting increasingly dicey.
Farcical peace talks collapsed.
Resuming them is doubtful.
Chances for diplomatic resolution are nil.
Russia’s
aerial campaign aiding Syrian ground forces continues unrelenting,
Putin committed to combating all terrorist groups until defeating or
reducing them to a shadow of their peak strength – enabling government
troops to contain their remnants.
Turkey and/or Saudi Arabia would never act unilaterally on their own against Syria without US approval or complicity."
On Friday, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter welcomed Riyadh’s willingness to send combat troops to Syria, saying:
JUST PRIOR TO THIS DEVELOPMENT FRIDAY, IT SURELY DID APPEAR THAT AMERICA DECLARED OVERT WAR ON RUSSIA...MAYBE YOU MISSED THAT?“That kind of new is very welcome. I look forward to discussing (it) with…Saudi defense minister (Mohammad bin Salman) next week – that and other kinds of contributions that Saudi Arabia can make.”
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced on February 2nd that he approves of US ‘Defense’ Secretary Ash Carter’s proposal to quadruple US armaments and troops in Europe, against ‘Russian aggression’.
Secretary Carter said earlier that same day, in his announcement of America’s arming for war against Russia:
We are reinforcing our posture in Europe to support our NATO allies in the face of Russia’s aggression. In Pentagon parlance, this is called the European Reassurance Initiative and after requesting about $800 million for last year, this year we’re more than quadrupling it for a total of $3.4 billion in 2017.
That will fund a lot of things: more rotational US forces in Europe, more training and exercising with our allies, more preposition and war-fighting gear and infrastructure improvements to support all this.
And when combined with US forces already in and assigned to Europe – which are also substantial – all of this together by the end of 2017 will let us rapidly form a highly capable combined arms ground force that can respond across that theater, if necessary.
Russia and China are our most stressing competitors.
They have developed and are continuing to advance military
system[s]
that seek to threaten our advantages in specific areas.
And in
some case[s], they are developing weapons and ways of wars that
seek to
achieve their objectives rapidly, before they hope, we can respond.
Because of this and because of their actions to date, from Ukraine to the South China Sea, DOD has elevated their importance in our defense planning and budgeting.Since he is a Secretary of ‘Defense’ instead of a Secretary of Offense, he immediately added:
While we do not desire conflict of any kind with either of these nations – and let me be clear.....That’s all there was to the assertion there; he didn’t finish the sentence, nor even the thought.
But in this offhand way, he did at least try to give the impression that the US is never an aggressor – for example: that, though the US is expanding NATO right up to Russia’s borders, Russia is being the ‘aggressor’ to move troops and weapons up to those borders – up to Russia’s own borders
The US is preparing for a face-off, an armed confrontation with Russia.
BUT THE PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT, THE VERY PLAN OBAMA IS USING, WAS WRITTEN IN 1957, BY KERMIT "KIM" ROOSEVELT, THE GRANDSON OF TEDDY ROOSEVELT.
JUST A HISTORICAL FACT, FOLKS.Kermit Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt’s grandson, planned and headed the CIA coup to overthrow Iran’s progressive secular democratic anti-communist President Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953, and to replace him with the puppet, Shah Reza Pahlevi, so as to continue Western oil companies’ control over Iran’s oil and gas.
Roosevelt then went on to plan four years later, in 1957, the invasion of Syria by the U.S., along with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey; exactly the plan that U.S. President Barack Obama has been placing into action ever since Obama first stepped into the White House:
Back in 1957, there was no Assad dynasty in Syria, but only the Ba’ath Party,
which was, and is, the only effective non-sectarian, or non-theocratic,
political force in Arabic countries; so America’s oil companies used the Islamic forces in order to grab Middle Eastern oil, and to
be able to use Syria as the vital pipeline route for it into Europe (the
world’s largest energy-market).
The Ba’athists refused to cooperate
with any such plan for foreign control over their national resources.
This was the basis for America’s determination to overthrow the Ba’athists, and replace them with their enemies, the Islamists.
(This
was likewise one reason for America’s wars against the Ba’athist Saddam
Hussein.)
Kim’s plan, just like his earlier and successful plan to take over Iran, enjoyed the full backing of both of the Dulles brothers — Allen Dulles who ran Eisenhower’s CIA, and John Foster Dulles who ran Eisenhower’s State Department.
Whereas U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower was ultimately forced to cancel Kim’s plan because only Turkey was willing to participate in it, Obama was able to get the royals of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to perform as Kim had planned for them to.
BUT IT HAS TAKEN 59 YEARS OF CAREFUL MANIPULATION AND PLANNING, OF ROMANCING EACH NATION IN TURN, IN PLAYING ONE ISLAMIC SECT AGAINST ANOTHER UNTIL WE HAVE A "SCORE, SCORE! THE U.S. FINALLY SCORES!"
[THE TEA ROOM HAS TO WONDER IF AMERICA'S "COALITION" PARTNERS REALIZE HOW CLOSE SOME OF THEM HAVE COME TO BEING JUST LIKE SYRIA, MARKED FOR WAR. IN 1927, AMERICA WAS PLANNING TO INVADE AND CONQUER CANADA AFTER ALL, IN A MOVE AGAINST GREAT BRITAIN. THAT WAS CALLED "WAR PLAN RED". SEVERAL "COLOR-CODED" WAR PLANS WERE DRAWN UP DIRECTLY AFTER WW1, FOR IRELAND, MEXICO, INDIA, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, MUCH OF LATIN AMERICA, ETC. SEE "WAR PLAN RAINBOW" AT GLOBAL SECURITY'S WEBSITE.]
Are the die cast?
IF RUSSIA TAKES THE BAIT, YES.
IF PUTIN DECIDES ASSAD IS WORTH THE GAMBLE OF A LONG NUCLEAR WINTER...
IF HE DECIDES TO ALSO RETHINK THE UKRAINE...
How has it come to this, the world on the brink of World War 3 just because the "Super Powers" are moving from a cold war back to a dangerous "King of the Hill" stance that will mean a very HOT war?
WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT ABOUT THAT MIDDLE EAST SANDLOT THAT MAKES ANOTHER WORLD WAR SEEM A LOGICAL RISK TO NUCLEAR-CAPABLE NATIONS?
WHY ARE SMALLER, LESS INFLUENTIAL NATIONS ALIGNING WITH THE TWO BIG PLAYERS, RUSSIA AND THE U.S.?
AS THE OPPOSING FACTIONS INSIDE SYRIA ENDED THEIR "PEACE TALKS" SUDDENLY, WAS IT BECAUSE BOTH SIDES REALIZED THE FINAL PUSH IS COMING?
SAUDI ARABIA AND TURKEY ARE NOW POISED TO LAUNCH THOUSANDS OF GROUND TROOPS INTO SYRIA.
IT'S A VERY SMELLY SITUATION.
MANY HAVE COMPLAINED OF "SMELLING A RAT", AND THEY WERE CORRECT.
IT'S A WAR THAT HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR BY THE U.S. FOR ALMOST 60 YEARS.
THE ISLAMIC STATE AND SYRIA ARE JUST THE TWO MOST RECENT PAWNS IN THE GAME.
OIL, GOLD, DIAMONDS, EVER MORE PRECIOUS WATER RESOURCES, LAND ON WHICH TO GROW FOOD, RAISE FOOD ANIMALS, ALL THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF EVERY NATION ARE DAILY COVETED AND BARTERED FOR, STOLEN AND BOUGHT, ALWAYS SOUGHT AFTER BY THOSE WITH INSATIABLE GREED, THE ONES WHO WOULD NOT BE SATISFIED IF THEY HAD IT ALL.
ISN'T THIS WHY WARS ARE FOUGHT?
"HE WHO CONTROLS THE WEALTH CONTROLS EVERYTHING."
ACTUALLY, THAT CHANGED IN 2015 TO JUST 62 PEOPLE WHO NOW OWN HALF THE WORLD'S WEALTH.
WELL, THE WEALTH OWNERS HAVE OBVIOUSLY CALLED "TIME'S UP" ON SYRIA AND RUSSIA,YET AGAIN.
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME SYRIA HAS BEEN THE TARGET OF A"TAKE-DOWN" AS WE SAW IN KERMIT ROOSEVELT'S 1957 PLAN.
THAT SAUDI ARABIA IS SENDING IN A BUNCH OF MERCENARIES IS NOT SURPRISING AS IT IS A NATION "MARKED"BY THE ISLAMIC STATE FOR EXTERMINATION, BUT IT JUST SEEMS UTTERLY INSANE THAT THE HOUSE OF SAUD WILL BE ALIGNED WITH THE "I.S." WHO IS DETERMINED TO KILL THEM ALL.
"ISIS", OR IS,OR ISIL, OR DAESH, DEPENDING ON WHO'S REPORTING, IS AN AVOWED ULTRA-PURIST WAHHABI MUSLIM GROUP, THE SAME WAHHABI SECT AS THE HOUSE OF SAUD ALSO PURPORTED TO BE UNTIL IT BECAME INCONVENIENT FOR THEM TO ADMIT THAT.
THE LEADER OF THE ISLAMIC STATE, AS WE HAVE SHOWN BEFORE, HAS VOWED TO KILL EVERY MEMBER OF THE SAUDI MONARCHY AS HERETICS AND INFIDELS BECAUSE THEY ALLOW WORSHIP OF THE "BLACK STONE", THE "Hajarul Aswad", THE CORNERSTONE OF THE KAABA, WHICH ISIS SWEARS TO OBLITERATE, AND BECAUSE THE SAUDI MONARCHS ALLOW OTHER MUSLIM SECTS TO MAKE PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA, WHICH ISIS HAS ALSO SWORN TO ALLAH TO DESTROY.
BUT, EVEN GIVEN ALL THAT ANIMOSITY AND THAT SWORN JUSTICE THAT ISIS SAYS IT WILL METE OUT TO THE HOUSE OF SAUD AND TO ALL WHO HAVE WORSHIPED THE BLACK STONE, OR MADE PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA, SAUDI ARABIA WILL STILL BACK ISIS NOW, AND ANY AND ALL WHO ARE AGAINST ASSAD IN SYRIA, ALL WHO DESPISE IRAN, ALL WHO COZY UP TO RUSSIA.
AND WHILE SAUDI ARABIA PAYS TO TRAIN THEIR MERCENARY ARMY TO LAUNCH AGAINST ASSAD, THEY ARE STILL BOMBING THE SUPREME HELL OUT OF YEMEN AND KILLING INNOCENT CHILDREN, WOMEN AND OTHER CIVILIANS THERE EVERY DAY.
[BTW, WHILE THE REPREHENSIBLE U.N. CLAIMS TO BE AN ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO THE EQUALITY OF ALL NATIONS, ANYONE CAN LOOK AND SEE WHICH NATIONS LITERALLY GET AWAY WITH MURDER, GENOCIDE, ETHNIC CLEANSING, ILLEGAL INVASIONS, AND WHICH ONES AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WITHOUT THE BLOODY U.N. SCREAMING 'FOUL'.]
IF ANY NATION APPEARS TO BE, IN ANY WAY, AFFILIATED WITH IRAN, THE HOUSE OF SAUD WILL FINANCE THE ENDEAVOR TO DESTROY THEM AND TO ATTACK IRAN BY ANY MEANS AVAILABLE, EVEN IF IT MEANS HELPING ISIS, WHO WILL DEFINITELY CARRY OUT ITS PLANNED ANNIHILATION OF THE HOUSE OF SAUD AND ALL "IDOL- WORSHIPERS" AT FIRST OPPORTUNITY.
JUST LIKE WHEN SAUDI ARABIA SILENTLY AND STEALTHILY FUNDED USAMA (OSAMA) BIN LADEN, THE SAUDI MONARCHY HAS DONE AS THE USA HAS AND PLAYED ALL ENDS AGAINST THE MIDDLE...THE MIDDLE BEING SYRIA AND IRAN.
WHILE WASHINGTON HAS SACRIFICED KERRY TO BUTT-KISSING THE IRANIAN LEADERS, IT ALSO SENT HIM TIME AFTER TIME TO ROMANCE SAUDI ARABIA.
IT'S A DISGUSTING DISPLAY OF HYPOCRISY AND DOUBLE-CROSS ON OUR PART, BUT "ALL IS FAIR IN LOVE AND WAR", RIGHT?
OBVIOUSLY, EITHER IRAN AND THE SAUDIS ARE BLISSFULLY UNAWARE THAT THEY ARE BEING PLAYED LIKE VIOLINS BY AMERICA AND ITS "COALITION", OR ELSE IT IS THEIR TENDENCY TO DO THE SAME THAT MAKES THEM JUST ACCEPT IT AND KEEP DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST...CALL THE SHOTS FOR OTHERS IN AN AGE-OLD PROXY WAR, USE THEIR 'ALLIES' TO FIGHT FOR THEM .
HAVING CONTROL OF THOSE 33 OTHER NATIONS, ALONG WITH ALL THE OIL FIELDS, OBVIOUSLY DOES MAKE THE SAUDI MONARCH "KING OF THE WORLD".
OR SO AMERICA AND ITS OTHER COALITION NATIONS HAVE ALLOWED HOUSE OF SAUD TO BELIEVE... LET'S JUST SAY IT... "IT JUST AIN'T SO!"
BACK TO 2006, WHEN THINGS REALLY, REALLY BEGAN TO ESCALATE.
The Map of the “New Middle East”
A relatively unknown map of the Middle East, NATO-garrisoned Afghanistan and Pakistan, has been circulating around strategic, governmental, NATO, policy and military circles since mid-2006.
It has been causally allowed to surface in public, maybe in an attempt to build consensus and to slowly prepare the general public for possible, maybe even cataclysmic, changes in the Middle East.
This is a map of a redrawn and restructured Middle East identified as the “New Middle East.”
The term “New Middle East” was introduced to the world in June 2006 in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who was credited by the Western media for coining the term) in replacement of the older and more imposing term, the “Greater Middle East.”
This shift in foreign policy phraseology coincided with the inauguration of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Terminal in the Eastern Mediterranean.
AS THE MAP'S LEGEND SHOWS, SAUDI ARABIA, IRAN, TURKEY, QATAR, KUWAIT, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, THE U.A.E., AND ISRAEL ALL LOSE TERRITORY IN AMERICA'S REDRAWN MIDDLE EAST.
Although the map does not "officially" reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for senior military officers.
This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.
This “New Middle East” seems to be based on several other maps, including older maps of potential boundaries in the Middle East extending back to the era of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson and World War I.
The map is showcased and presented as the brainchild of retired Lieutenant-Colonel (U.S. Army) Ralph Peters, who believes the redesigned borders contained in the map will fundamentally solve the problems of the contemporary Middle East.
The map was a key element in the retired Lieutenant-Colonel’s book, Never Quit the Fight, which was released to the public on July 10, 2006 and was also published, under the title of Blood Borders: How a better Middle East would look, in the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal with commentary from Ralph Peters.
It should be noted that Lieutenant-Colonel Peters was last posted to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, within the U.S. Defence Department, and has been one of the Pentagon’s foremost authors with numerous essays on strategy for military journals and U.S. foreign policy.
ACCORDING TO PETERS:
"The concept of a redrawn Middle East has been presented as a “humanitarian” and “righteous” arrangement that would benefit the people(s) of the Middle East and its peripheral regions.
International borders are never completely just. But the degree of injustice they inflict upon those whom frontiers force together or separate makes an enormous difference — often the difference between freedom and oppression, tolerance and atrocity, the rule of law and terrorism, or even peace and war.
The most arbitrary and distorted borders in the world are in Africa and the Middle East. Drawn by self-interested Europeans (who have had sufficient trouble defining their own frontiers), Africa’s borders continue to provoke the deaths of millions of local inhabitants. But the unjust borders in the Middle East — to borrow from Churchill — generate more trouble than can be consumed locally."
HOWEVER, THOSE DESIGNATED AS LOSING TERRITORY MAY NOT AGREE TO DO SO.
THAT PRESENTS A WEE PROBLEM.
WHAT TO DO?
USE IN-FIGHTING AMONG MUSLIM SECTS TO U.S. ADVANTAGE, FAN THOSE FLAMES, DIVIDE AND CONQUER.
Many of the problems affecting the contemporary Middle East are the result of the deliberate aggravation of pre-existing regional tensions.
Sectarian division, ethnic tension and internal violence have been traditionally EXPLOITED by the United States and Britain in various parts of the globe including Africa, Latin America, the Balkans, and the Middle East.
Iraq is just one of many examples of the Anglo-American strategy of “divide and conquer.” Other examples are Rwanda, Yugoslavia, the Caucasus, and Afghanistan.
Western-style “Democracy” has been a requirement ONLY for those Middle Eastern states which do not conform to Washington’s political demands.
Invariably, it constitutes a pretext for confrontation.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan are examples of UNDEMOCRATIC states that the United States has no problems with because they are firmly aligned within the Anglo-American orbit or sphere.
Additionally, the United States has deliberately blocked or displaced genuine democratic movements in the Middle East... from Iran in 1953 (where a U.S./U.K. sponsored coup was staged against the democratic government of Prime Minister Mossadegh) to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, the Arab Sheikdoms, and Jordan where the Anglo-American alliance supports military control, absolutists, and dictators in one form or another, AND HAS HELPED THOSE NATIONS PUT DOWN REBELLION AND ATTEMPTS AT OVERTHROWING THEIR MONARCHIES.
IF WE JUST LOOK BACK ON THE SYRIA ALIGNMENT, WE SEE THAT AMERICA REALLY DIDN'T MAKE SOLID MOVES THERE UNTIL HOUSE OF SAUD SET UP ITS WAIL THAT BAD OLD ISLAMIC STATE WANTED TO BEHEAD ALL THE SAUDI MONARCHS AND BLOW MECCA INTO POWDER.
THE SAUDI WHINE GOT AMERICA HOPPING TO CRANK UP VERY SUPERFICIAL EFFORTS AGAINST ISIS/ISIL, ALL THE WHILE MAKING LITTLE "BLUNDERS" THAT ARMED THE ISLAMIC STATE BETTER AND BETTER.
"OOPS! HOW DID ISIS GET THOSE AMERICAN WEAPONS AND VEHICLES? WE DROPPED THOSE FOR THE OTHER GUYS!"
RIGHT, OKAY, SURE.
WELL, THE FIRST TO BALK WAS TURKEY, PERHAPS.
According to Turkish press releases on September 15, 2006, the map of the “New Middle East” was displayed in NATO’s Military College in Rome, Italy.
It was additionally reported that Turkish officers were immediately outraged by the presentation of a portioned and segmented Turkey
The Turkish Chief of Staff, General Buyukanit, contacted the U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Peter Pace, and protested the event and the exhibition of the redrawn map of the Middle East, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
TOUGH...NOT TURKEY'S CALL (PUN INTENDED).
ANOTHER TURN OF EVENTS, GOING WAY BACK.... TO 1997.
The following are important excerpts and passages from former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperatives.
Brzezinski (ZB) also states that both Turkey and Iran, the two most powerful states of the “Eurasian Balkans,” located on its southern tier, are “potentially vulnerable to internal ethnic conflicts [balkanization],” and that, “If either or both of them were to be destabilized, the internal problems of the region would become unmanageable.
If either or both of them were to be destabilized, the internal problems of the region would become unmanageable, while efforts to restrain regional domination by Russia could even become futile. ”
It seems that a divided and balkanized Iraq would be the best means of accomplishing this.
Taking what we know from the White House’s own admissions; there is a belief that “creative destruction and chaos” in the Middle East are beneficial assets to reshaping the Middle East, creating the “New Middle East,” and furthering the Anglo-American road map in the Middle East and Central Asia:
[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY WHAT "ZB" HAD TO SAY. IT'S VERY ENLIGHTENING.]
ZB: "Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power." (- p. xiii).
"In Europe, the Word “Balkans” conjures up images of ethnic conflicts and great-power regional rivalries. Eurasia, too, has its “Balkans,” but the Eurasian Balkans are much larger, more populated, even more religiously and ethnically heterogeneous.
They are located within that large geographic oblong that demarcates the central zone of global instability (…) that embraces portions of southeastern Europe, Central Asia and parts of South Asia [Pakistan, Kashmir, Western India], the Persian Gulf area, and the Middle East.
The traditional Balkans represented a potential geopolitical prize in the struggle for European supremacy. The Eurasian Balkans, astride the inevitably emerging transportation network meant to link more directly Eurasia’s richest and most industrious western and eastern extremities, are also geopolitically significant.
Moreover, they are of importance from the standpoint of security and historical ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and more powerful neighbors, namely, Russia, Turkey, and Iran, with China also signaling an increasing political interest in the region.
But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals, including gold.
The world’s energy consumption is bound to vastly increase over the next two or three decades.
Estimates by the U.S. Department of Energy anticipate that world demand will rise by more than 50 percent between 1993 and 2015, with the most significant increase in consumption occurring in the Far East.
The momentum of Asia’s economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy, and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea.
Access to that resource and sharing in its potential wealth represent objectives that stir national ambitions, motivate corporate interests, rekindle historical claims, revive imperial aspirations, and fuel international rivalries.
The situation is made all the more volatile by the fact that the region is not only a power vacuum but is also internally unstable."
GOOD SUMMARY BY ZB, RIGHT?
Brzezinski offers the alternative to a world in chaos UNLESS the U.S. controls the ENTIRE planet by whatever means are necessary and are likely to succeed.
"BY WHATEVER MEANS"...
HE LAID IT ALL RIGHT OUT THERE....14 YEARS BEFORE 9/11, BUT AFTER DADDY BUSH MADE HIS MOVE AGAINST IRAQ.
LITTLE GEORGIE BUSH, JR., WAS A "MOP-UP PUPPET", AS IS OBAMA.
"The key to controlling Eurasia," says Brzezinski, is controlling the Central Asian Republics. And the key to controlling the Central Asian republics is Uzbekistan."
Thus, it comes as no surprise that Uzbekistan was forcefully mentioned by President George W. Bush in his address to a joint session of Congress, just days after the attacks of September 11, as the very first place that the U.S. military would be deployed.
YES, UZBEKISTAN....NOT PAKISTAN, NOT SAUDI ARABIA, BOTH COMPLICIT IN HIDING AND HELPING THAT ROGUE USAMA BIN LADEN WHO WAS TAGGED AS THE [ALREADY DEAD] MASTERMIND OF THE ATTACK ON AMERICA, BUT WE SENT TROOPS INTO ALMOST UNHEARD OF UZBEKISTAN.
WHY SEND AMERICAN TROOPS TO UZBEKISTAN?
WHAT DID THEY DO TO DESERVE THAT?
READ AGAIN WHAT ZB WROTE...UZBEKISTAN IS THE KEY TO THE ENTIRE REGION...BUT HOW?
ZB: "How America 'manages' Eurasia is critical.
Eurasia is the globe's largest continent and is geopolitically axial.
A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions.
A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent.
About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of the world's GNP and about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)
"...To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." (p.40)
THOSE ARE AMERICA'S 3 GOALS, GLEANED FROM HISTORY, FROM ANCIENT CONQUERORS, WHOM OUR REAL PUPPET-MASTERS IDENTIFY WITH, WHOM THEY CLAIM BLOOD RELATIONS TO, WHOM THEY SEEK TO BEST BY FINALLY BRINGING ALL THE WORLD TO ITS KNEES BEFORE THEM.
CLEVERLY, THEY CREATED THE U.N. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, "IN THE NAME OF GLOBAL PEACE".Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., a former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner, said in an interview on November 6, 2001,
"The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), The Trilateral Commission (TC) - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller- have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years.
They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."
That was sort of on the right track but way off home plate.
Koeppl didn't look far enough back in history, and he set too much stock in how good the CFR and TC would be at orchestrating anything, given the U.N.'s trump card claim as the only possible "Ruler of the World".
When our village idiots agreed to join ranks with the U.N., the old "League of Nations", little did they know they were selling themselves down the river, or that the U.N. had "dibs" on the Middle East, and the rest of the globe.
IT'S SIMPLY "CONQUEST FOR FUN AND PROFIT" , THANKS TO "THINKERS" LIKE PNAC (PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY) AND AMERICA HAS BECOME A BIG PLAYER.
THE ORIGINAL PLAN TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER THE MIDDLE EAST MAY HAVE BEGUN BEFORE EITHER OBAMA OR GWB WERE BORN, DURING WORLD WAR ONE.
BACK IN TIME AGAIN...TO THE TRAP WE FELL INTO
"There's a quote often attributed to Allen Dulles after it was noted that the final 1964 report of the Warren Commission on the assassination of JFK contained dramatic inconsistencies.
Those inconsistencies, in effect, disproved the Commission's own final conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone on November 22, 1963.
Dulles, a career spy, Wall Street lawyer, the CIA director whom JFK had fired after the 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco - and the Warren Commission member who took charge of the investigation and final report - is reported to have said, "The American people don't read."
THERE'S THAT OLD FOUNDING FATHERS' ELITIST MINDSET SHOWING UP AGAIN..."AVERAGE AMERICAN'S ARE TOO DUMB TO TRUST WITH A REAL VOTE. LOOK, THEY CAN'T EVEN READ! LET'S JUST SET SOME OF OUR OWN GUYS OVER THEM, KEEP THEM PACIFIED AND RUN THINGS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN."
LESS THAN 50 YEARS AFTER WASHINGTON ENDED HIS PRESIDENCY AND WENT HOME TO HIS PLANTATION, JUST A SHORT TIME AFTER AMERICA GAINED HER INDEPENDENCE [WHICH IS A MYTH] , IN 1832,THAT GREAT INDIAN-KILLER, THAT WORLD-CLASS THIEF WHO MANAGED TO STEAL THE LAST OF THE INDIAN LANDS EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI AND SEND THE EASTERN TRIBES PACKING WEST OF THAT RIVER TO, WHAT HE ONCE HOPED ALOUD, WAS THEIR DEATH, OLD ANDY JACKSON SWORE TO ERADICATE THE BANKING CARTEL WHICH HE SAW 184 YEARS AGO AS THE "SHADOW GOVERNMENT", THOSE WHO INCESSANTLY PUSHED FOR WARS AND INTERNAL CONFLICT, THOSE RICH ENOUGH TO CALL THE SHOTS WITH BRIBES IN THE RIGHT HANDS.
WHAT JACKSON SAW AND HATED WAS THE BEGINNINGS OF WHAT WE NOW KNOW AS THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
CENTRAL BANK OF AMERICA.
FEW AMERICAN ARE AWARE THAT THE FED IS OUR THIRD CENTRAL BANK...YES, OUT THIRD!
FROM THE PDF WRITTEN BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE ITSELF, "Historical Beginnings ... The Federal Reserve":
"The Federal Reserve System is the third central banking system in United States history. The First Bank of the United States (1791–1811) and the Second Bank of the United States (1817–1836) each had a 20-year charter.
Both banks issued currency, made commercial loans, accepted deposits, purchased securities, maintained multiple branches and acted as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury.
The U.S. Federal Government was required to purchase 20% of the bank capital stock shares and to appoint 20% of the board members (directors) of each of those first two banks "of the United States."
WHAT DID THAT MEAN?
Each bank's majority control was placed squarely in the hands of wealthy investors who purchased the remaining 80% of the stock.
ABE LINCOLN WAS A MAN WITH MANY FAULTS, BUT HE ALSO SAW THAT THE CENTRAL BANK CREATED UNPAYABLE DEBT.
"When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at 30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback.
This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.
"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." -- The London Times responding to Lincoln's Greenback notes
WELL, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, THE LONDON BANKERS GATHERED THEIR ARMY OF PROPAGANDISTS, PUSHERS, MINIONS AND MANIPULATED THEIR WAY BACK INTO AMERICA.
LINCOLN WAS ASSASSINATED AND THE GREENBACK DIED.
AS ALWAYS, CONGRESS HAD ALREADY RUSHED TO HELPED THE BANKERS REGAIN POWER BEFORE LINCOLN COULD SET US FREE FROM ETERNAL DEBT.
In 1863, as a means to help finance the Civil War, a system of national banks was instituted by the National Currency Act. The banks each had the power to issue standardized national bank notes based on United States bonds held by the bank. The Act was totally revised in 1864 and later named as the National-Bank Act, or National Banking Act, as it is popularly known. The administration of the new national banking system was vested in the newly created Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and its chief administrator, the Comptroller of the Currency. The Office, which still exists today.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE, CREATED BY SECRET MEETING BY A GROUP OF CONTROL-SEEKING ELITISTS, A FINANCIAL COUP THAT RENDERED AMERICA AN ETERNAL DEBTOR NATION, IS ABOUT TO FUND YET ANOTHER WAR, AND WILL FUND ALL SIDES, AS ALWAYS.
ACROSS THE GLOBE, THE BANKING CARTEL IS DANCING FOR JOY.
A WHOLE NEW GENERATION OF SLAVES IS THEIRS!
Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, CLOSE associate of the Rockefellers let slip the truth, but few have read his words even today, 81 years after he proudly wrote them in his autobiography, "From Farmboy to Financier":
"Despite my views about the value to society of greater publicity for the affairs of corporations, there was an occasion, near the close of 1910, when I was as secretive, indeed, as furtive as any conspirator.
None of us who participated felt that we were conspirators; on the contrary we felt we were engaged in a patriotic work.
We were trying to plan a mechanism that would correct the weaknesses of our banking system as revealed under the strains and pressures of the panic of 1907.
I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyl Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.
… Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted.
If it were to be exposed publicly that our particular group had gotten together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of passage by Congress. Yet, who was there in Congress who might have drafted a sound piece of legislation dealing with the purely banking problem with which we were concerned?"
They hid the truth from congress and from the american people, but he felt "patriotic"?
They conned Congress, but were "patriots"?
BULLS**T! THEY WERE SLAVE-MAKERS!
THEY CREATED A MASTER FOR A NATION OF SLAVES!
They created a private institution that would for 81 years thumb its nose at Congressional inquiry, that would, for all time, keep its boot firmly on the necks of all American citizens and work and plan with other "Central Banks"to create recessions, depressions, devalue currency, inflate economies, manipulate markets, and make sure each nation was indebted in a way none could ever, ever pay down.
FROM 1791 TO 2016...
225 LONG YEARS OF BEING OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY A HANDFUL OF POWERFUL MEN WHO HOLD THE PURSE STRINGS OF THE WORLD'S WEALTH... FROM THE BIRTH OF AMERICA UNTIL TODAY, THE SAME OLD "MASTERS"...MEN PUSHING INCESSANTLY FOR WAR, FOR CONFLICT, KEEPING NATIONS PITTED AGAINST OTHER NATIONS, KEEPING THE WHEELS OF INDUSTRY OILED WITH BLOOD.
YOU WERE WRONG, ALLEN DULLES, YOU ROTTEN, TRAITOROUS CRIMINAL, SOME AMERICANS DO READ!
AND, TODAY, THANKS TO THE INTERNET AND THAT ALMOST WORTHLESS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, WE CAN READ A HELLUVA LOT MORE THAN WE WERE EVER EXPECTED OR INTENDED TO READ.
WE CAN READ AND WILL READ IN YOUR OWN WORDS, THE WORDS OF THOSE WHO WROTE OR SPOKE THEM, THE WORDS THEY IMAGINED THEY HAD HIDDEN WELL ENOUGH SO AS NOT TO CAUSE A PROBLEM WHILE THEY RETRAINED AMERICANS TO NEVER QUESTION THEIR LEADERS, THE ELITE, THE "BOSSES", THOSE "BETTER THAN POOR, DUMB AVERAGE JOE AND JANE".
WE CAN READ THIS:
"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing.
The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin.
The Bankers own the Earth.
Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again.
However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in.
But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." -- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain
AND WE CAN READ THIS, SOMETHING ELSE FEW REALIZE:
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest.
Benjamin Franklin, acting as the colonies' representative to Britain, argued against this move in 1763.
___________________________
POSTSCRIPT AND FURTHER READING:
KNOWLEDGE GIVES POWER, CHANGES FEAR OF THE UNKNOWN AND THE ENSUING PANIC OFTEN CAUSED BY THAT INTO CALM RESOLVE.
FEAR KEEPS US FROM THINKING RATIONALLY, FROM FINDING LOGICAL SOLUTIONS, FROM FORMULATING VIABLE PLANS.
IN THE YEARS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING WORLD WAR TWO, AMERICANS WERE "COCK-SURE" OF THEMSELVES, HAD DEFEATED THE ENEMY, WERE ON TOP OF THE WORLD.
WE SAW A NATIONAL ECONOMIC BOOM FOR A TIME, THE AMERICAN DREAM WAS REALIZED BY MANY A 'JOHNNY' WHO CAME MARCHING HOME, HURRAH, HURRAH!
AND THEN, WE STARTED TO BECOME COMPLACENT, AND WHY NOT?
WHAT COULD GO WRONG?
OUR FEARLESS LEADERS HAD LED US TO VICTORY!
SURELY THEY'D LEAD US ON TO EVEN BETTER DAYS, RIGHT?
THOSE WHOSE "god" IS GREED, IS POWER ABSOLUTE, SAW THE OPPORTUNITY IN ALL THAT AND GRABBED THE REINS OF THE NATION AND BEGAN TO STEER US INTO THE GREAT VOID OF APATHETIC, UNQUESTIONING COMPLIANCE.
SINCE THEY HAD "SAVED" US, WE OWED THEM SOME RESPECT, WE OWED THEM A REWARD OF AT LEAST LOYALTY, WE OWED THEM, PERIOD.
AND THE DEBT GREW, AND WE SAW WE'D NEVER PAY THE DEBT BUT THE "MASTERS" SAID NOT TO WORRY, THEY'D EXTEND OUR "CREDIT" .
AND SO, HERE WE ARE.
BUT, ONCE AGAIN, A FEW REALLY GOOD MEN HAVE SOUNDED OUT NEW WARNINGS..."WAKE UP, AMERICA, YOU'VE BEEN DUPED!"
SOME LISTENED, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUTH WAS SCARY, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUTH HURT.
BUT NOT ENOUGH LISTENED.
AND THOSE WHO HAD NOT HEARD THE WARNINGS BEGAN TO LOATHE THOSE WHO HAD, DERIDING THEM, DENYING THERE WAS ANYTHING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT, UNTIL FEWER AND FEWER REPEATED THE WARNINGS.
AND SO, HERE WE ARE. WE'RE HEADING INTO A SILENT SLAUGHTER OF THE LAMBS, THE DOCILE SHEEP WHO STILL THINK THINGS ARE JUST FINE, THAT WE CAN TRUST OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR BANKS AND OUR ELITE CLASS AND THE U.N. GLOBALISTS AND THE "INTELLIGENTSIA", THE EXPERTS, TO HANDLE THINGS FOR US.
THEY'LL BE CALLING UP OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS TO WAR AGAIN SOON, QUADRUPLING THE U.S. FORCES OVERSEAS.
WHEN WE KISS THEM GOODBYE, WE REALLY SHOULD APOLOGIZE TO THEM...FOR NOT HEEDING THE WARNINGS...AGAIN...AND AGAIN...AND AGAIN...
THAT WILL NOT SAVE THEIR LIVES, NOR BRING THEM BACK SAFELY TO US, BUT, AFTER ALL, THEY'LL BE "TAKEN CARE OF", RIGHT?
AND THIS NEW WAR WILL BE A "RIGHTEOUS" ONE, RIGHT?
AND IF THEIR BLOOD IS SPILLED ON THE SANDS OF SYRIA, OR IRAQ, OR ANYWHERE THEY'RE SACRIFICED TO, THEY'LL DIE AS PATRIOTS, YES?
THIS IS NECESSARY, RIGHT?
RIGHT...OR WRONG?
WHAT DOES YOUR HEART SAY, YOUR CONSCIENCE?
=======
~ The redrawing and partition of the Middle East
~ MORE ON DR. KOEPPL, FROM THE MAN WHO CONDUCTED THAT 2001 INTERVIEW:
"Brzezinski's book is sublimely arrogant.
While singing the praises of the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND and the WORLD BANK, which have economically terrorized nations on every continent, and while totally ignoring the worldwide terrorist actions of the U.S. government that have led to genocide; cluster bombings of civilian populations from Kosovo to Laos to Iraq to Afghanistan; the development and battlefield use of both biological and chemical agents such as Sarin gas; and the financial rape of entire cultures, it would leave the reader believing that such actions are for the good of mankind.
While singing the praises of the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND and the WORLD BANK, which have economically terrorized nations on every continent, and while totally ignoring the worldwide terrorist actions of the U.S. government that have led to genocide; cluster bombings of civilian populations from Kosovo to Laos to Iraq to Afghanistan; the development and battlefield use of both biological and chemical agents such as Sarin gas; and the financial rape of entire cultures, it would leave the reader believing that such actions are for the good of mankind.
While seconded from the German defense
ministry to NATO in the late 1970s, Dr. Johannes Koeppl
traveled to Washington
on more than one occasion.
He also met with Brzezinski in
the White House on more than one occasion.
His other Washington
contacts included Steve Larabee from the CFR, John J. McCloy,
former CIA Director, economist Milton Friedman, and officials
from Jimmy Carter's Office of Management and Budget.
He is the
first person I have ever interviewed who has made a direct
presentation at a Bilderberger conference and he has also
made numerous presentations to sub-groups of the Trilateral
Commission.
That was before he spoke out against them.
His fall was rapid after he realized that
Brzezinski was part of a group intending to impose a world
dictatorship.
"In 1983/4 I warned of a take-over of world
governments being orchestrated by these people.
There was
an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and selected
leaders were not being chosen based upon character but upon
their loyalty to an economic system run by the elites and
dedicated to preserving their power.
"All we have now are pseudo-democracies."
In 1983, Koeppl warned, through Op-Ed pieces
published in NEWSWEEK and elsewhere, that Brzezinski and
the CFR were part of an effort to impose a global dictatorship.
His fall from grace was swift. "It was a criminal society
that I was dealing with. It was not possible to publish
anymore in the so-called respected publications. My 30 year
career in politics ended."
"The people of the western world have been
trained to be good consumers; to focus on money, sports
cars, beauty, consumer goods. They have not been trained
to look for character in people.
Therefore what we need
is education for politicians, a form of training that instills
in them a higher sense of ethics than service to money.
There is no training now for world leaders.
This is a shame
because of the responsibility that leaders hold to benefit
all mankind rather than to blindly pursue destructive paths.
"We also need education for citizens to
be more efficient in their democracies, in addition to education
for politicians that will create a new network based upon character and social intelligence."
Koeppl, who wrote his 1989 doctoral thesis
on NATO management, also authored a 1989 book - largely
ignored because of its controversial revelations - entitled
"The Most Important Secrets in the World."
He maintains
a German language web site at www.antaris.com and he can be
reached by email at jbk@antaris.com.
As to the present conflict Koeppl expressed
the gravest concerns, "This is more than a war against terrorism.
This is a war against the citizens of all countries. The
current elites are creating so much fear that people don't
know how to respond. But they must remember. This is a move
to implement a world dictatorship within the next five years.
There may not be another chance."
~ UNDERSTANDING "FALSE FLAGS" IN MODERN TIMES
~ All Wars Are Banker Wars
~You thought Syria couldn't get much worse. Think again
~ HOW THE FED FINANCED WW1
The result of all these machinations was a significant inflation, which varied between 13% and 20% for most of the war, up from the 1% inflation rate experienced in the Fed's first year. By 1920 a dollar would buy about half the goods it was capable of purchasing in 1914.
~ Trillion Dollar Coin
No comments:
Post a Comment