UNICEF DEMANDS EUTHANASIA FOR CHILDREN, SAME AS ADULTS

UNICEF, A UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION, WANTS EUTHANASIA OF CHILDREN TO BE ALLOWED, "SAME AS FOR ADULTS", BUT SUGGESTS THERE NEED NOT BE A "TERMINAL ILLNESS" INVOLVED, AND THAT EUTHANASIA FOR THE MENTALLY ILL SHOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED.


By extending its euthanasia law to minors in 2014, Belgium has fueled the international debate on this issue.
In fact, Medicine does not always have something to offer when it comes to a child’s serious disease.
Nevertheless, should euthanasia be considered a viable solution?

ABUSE OF EUTHANASIA IN THE UK, INFANTS ALLOWED TO DIE
An article that was written by Sue Reid and Simon Caldwell and published on November 28 in the Daily  Mail newspaper in the UK under the title:
"Now Sick Babies go on Death Pathway: Doctor's haunting testimony reveals how children are put on end-of-life plan" explains how babies with disabilities were intentionally killed through the abuse of the Liverpool Pathway.

The article stated:

Sick children are being discharged from NHS hospitals to die at home or in hospices on controversial ‘death pathways’. 

Until now, end of life regime the Liverpool Care Pathway was thought to have involved only elderly and terminally-ill adults. 

But the Mail can reveal the practice of withdrawing food and fluid by tube is being used on young patients as well as severely disabled newborn babies.

One doctor has admitted starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in the neonatal unit of one hospital alone. 

Writing in a leading medical journal, the physician revealed the process can take an average of ten days during which a  baby becomes ‘smaller and shrunken’."

WHAT, IN GOD'S NAME, HAVE WE COME TO?

May 27, 2016  (LifeSiteNews) — UNICEF Canada is pushing for assisted suicide and euthanasia for children — or “mature minors” — arguing that this conforms with the Charter, Canadian legal precedent and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

That would include euthanasia or assisted suicide for mature minors who suffer from a non-terminal illness or disability, according to UNICEF Canada’s policy director Marvin Bernstein.

UNICEF, or United Nations Children’s Fund (originally, Emergency Fund) is a UN organization that is, according to its website, “on a mission to reach every child and ensure their well-being, no matter where they are in this world.”
“There’s no limit to the lengths UNICEF will go, the risks we’ll take or the depth of our commitment to save children’s lives,” it reads. “We are committed to take action, save, rehabilitate and watch over children, with a special attention to the most vulnerable and excluded groups.”

AND YET THEY'RE PUSHING FOR EUTHANASIA FOR CERTAIN CHILDREN?
LIARS!

Bernstein reiterated UNICEF Canada’s pro-euthanasia position during the Senate legal committee’s hearings into the Liberal government’s controversial euthanasia law, Bill C-14.

The legislation amends the Criminal Code in light of the Supreme Court’s February 2015 Carter ruling, which ruled the current ban on assisted suicide and euthanasia violates the Charter, and comes into effect June 6.

Carter ruled “competent adults” had a Charter right to seek assisted suicide or euthanasia, and Bill C-14 limited eligibility to be killed in this way to persons aged 18 and over.

The bill’s eligibility criteria also include that the individual have a grievous and irremediable disease or disability that causes unendurable suffering, is in an advanced state of irreversible decline, and his or her natural death is reasonably foreseeable.

“UNICEF believes that this right should be extended to mature minors who are competent to make end-of-life decisions for themselves,” Bernstein told the committee May 12, “but with additional potential safeguards as a measure of last resort.”

The Supreme Court had given “competent, mature minors” “the rights to make health and survival-related decisions” in its 2009 AC v Manitoba  ruling, which found that it was “arbitrary” to assume anyone under age 16 was not competent to make medical decisions, he said.

[HOW MANY 16-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN ARE QUALIFIED TO UNDERSTAND AND DECIDE ON SUCH A THING WHEN MOST COLLEGE GRADUATES CAN ONLY READ ON AN 8TH GRADE LEVEL?

CAN A 16-YEAR-OLD RESEARCH AND CONSIDER ALL OPTIONS?
ARE ALL OPTIONS CONSIDERED EVEN BY HIS/HER FAMILY?]

UNICEF also supported the recommendation by the joint parliamentary committee that mature minors be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia in the second of a two-stage legislative roll-out, “which would come into force no later than three years after the first stage is enforced,” noted Bernstein.

The three-year period “would allow sufficient time for informed research and broad-based consultation to occur and the appropriate safeguards and due care considerations to be identified.”

But UNICEF Canada further proposed that in the three-year interim, children be allowed to petition a Superior Court to be allowed assistance to kill themselves, or to killed by lethal injection.

That recommendation was “so we don't have an unfair prejudicial situation continuing for three years with no remedy that can be accessed by mature minors,” Bernstein said.

“Do you not see a major problem with the consideration of allowing vulnerable children to request assisted death?” Conservative Manitoba Senator Don Plett asked. 

 “Have these children, in your opinion, reached their full potential?”

There “may be children who are experiencing irremediable conditions, intolerable and enduring suffering,” replied Bernstein, “and they should have the right when they reach a point of sufficient maturity to make some determinations for themselves.”

If “a competent adult has the right to access medical assistance in dying, based upon a certain set of circumstances and conditions, that should not be denied, not to all children, but to mature minors,” he added.

UNICEF Canada supports euthanasia and assisted suicide in cases where the children are NOT suffering from terminal illness, Bernstein told the committee, adding: “I think it should be the same criteria…applied to adults and children.”

As for assisted suicide or euthanasia for children who suffer from mental illness, not permitted under Bill C-14 in its current form, “UNICEF is not suggesting psychological suffering, in and by itself, be the litmus test in terms of terminating life and making those decisions for young people,” he said.

Extending euthanasia and assisted suicide for mature minors was among three contentious recommendations in the joint parliamentary committee’s February 2016 report.

MPs are expected to vote on C-14 on May 31, after which it goes to the Senate, which has signalled it will overhaul the bill.

The Senate committee’s pre-study report of May 17 endorsed the use advance directives, but recommended dropping further consideration of euthanasia solely for mental illness, and for mature minors."

ONE READER OF THAT ARTICLE COMMENTED:

"The thin edge of the wedge - just as in the early days of pro-abort lobbying where they said "Only in cases where the life of the mother is threatened (or mental health was at risk)."
Now we have demands that abortion be made legal for any reason and at any stage of pregnancy right up until the pre-born child is due to be born.
You can see where this is eventually going - legalizing euthanasia for any reason for those of any age. 
Another bare-faced goal of the population control Global Elitist clique."

ANOTHER WROTE:
"So pray tell when did euthanasia and assisted suicide become agents of a child's well-being? This is pure evil."

HEAR, HEAR!
---
Tricked by UNICEF - | National Review

Americans mostly know UNICEF through the “trick or treat for UNICEF” campaigns.
 The “trick” is on the donors who think that UNICEF is all about helping poor children.

UNICEF has been a major financier of Palestinian “summer camps” which encourage children to become suicide bombers. One such camp is named for Wafa Idris, a female suicide bomber.

During the late 1990s, UNICEF served as a propaganda organ of the Saddam Hussein regime.
Relying solely on Iraqi government statistics, UNICEF and the Saddam government co-authored a report asserting that over a million children in Iraq died because of U.N. sanctions.
A map on the first page of the report depicted Kuwait as a province of Iraq.

UNICEF’s focus on politics and political correctness has come at the expense of saving the lives of the approximately ten million children under the age of five who die each year from preventable causes.

A 2003 UNICEF report praised the North Korean dictatorship:
"the particular strength of the DPRK’s policy framework lies in its comprehensiveness, integration and consistency in addressing the interests of children and women."

The organization today still promotes and funds the pro-terrorist Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership and Rights Activation.  

UNICEF also “partners” with the Palestinian Red Crescent Society, which uses ambulances to transport terrorists and their weapons, and whose personnel have participated in suicide bombings.

UNICEF’s executive board includes China (whose forced abortion policy is neither pro-life, nor pro-choice, nor pro-child) and Bhutan (where children are among the many victims of the regime’s human rights abuses). 

UNICEF has doled out unaccountable money to the North Korean regime."

"UNICEF's public record reveals that it promotes abortion, abortifacient drugs, and all methods of population control technology, without any limitation at all.  
 
 It collaborates all of the time with an inter-agency partnership that's composed of UNICEF, the World Bank, the United Nations Development Program, the World Health Organization, the UN Fund for Population Activities, International Planned Parenthood, and the Population Council.  

Together, these groups produce a major initiative, and that is the legalization of abortion within all public and private maternal and health programs in the developing countries. 

The World Bank basically provides the money.  The other groups do the dirty work.

 UNICEF has international networks which are major conduits for abortion propaganda, abortion drugs and devices, and for mass sterilizations. 

The UNFPA has been denied funding by the U.S. Congress because of its involvement in the genocidal abortion and sterilization program in China.  
 
UNICEF denies parents' rights and responsibilities.  

Under their U.N." treaty", children would be given special rights apart from their parents and families, like the right to have contraceptives, to have an abortion, to view pornography - and the list goes on and on.  

And all of this would be O.K. and legal over parental objections. 
UNICEF is strongly pushing for the United States to ratify this U.N. Convention. Behind the mask of UNICEF is a clear track record of operations which fund abortion, abortion drugs, contraceptives, sterilization, and mandatory state-control of family life. 

Just maybe those of you who have been in the habit of contributing money to UNICEF might give that a long second thought."
UNICEF CAUGHT RED-HANDED IN MASS STERILIZATION TECHNIQUE

"Two UN organizations, the WHO and UNICEF, have just been caught red-handed administering “tetanus vaccines” laced with sterilizing agents to girls and women in Kenya.  

And as you will see below, this is not the first time that this has happened.  Apparently there is a well-coordinated international program to use vaccines to secretly sterilize women in poor countries all over the planet.  

The United States needs to immediately demand a full investigation of the UN vaccine program.   

There have always been anecdotal stories of women all over the globe being unable to have children after receiving UN vaccines.  

But now we have scientific proof.  Lab tests that were recently conducted found an antigen that causes miscarriages in the vaccines that were being given to girls and women in Kenya.  

A story that was posted on Life Site News about this caused shockwaves all over the Internet.  The following is an excerpt from that report…

Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF.
Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

So exactly what is HCG?  
When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body’s own antibody response to the HCG, resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections."
The UN has dedicated massive amounts of resources to supporting the “one-child policy” in China.


And in India, UN money is often used to provide financial incentives to women to volunteer for sterilization.
At this point, approximately 37 percent of all married women in the nation of India have been sterilized.  That is an absolutely astounding number. 


CHILD EUTHANASIA?

CHILDREN ALLOWED TO MAKE ADULT DECISIONS APART FROM THEIR CARETAKER PARENTS?

MANDATORY STERILIZATION, ABORTIONS ON DEMAND BY UNDERAGE CHILDREN WHO MIGHT DIE FROM THOSE PROCEDURES?


  SUPPORT UNICEF?
I DON'T THINK SO.

I WANT TO PROTECT CHILDREN, NOT HAND THEM OVER TO THE U.N.

______________________

SEE ALSO:The Belgian case of euthanasia for children, solution or problem?

"One of the most relevant arguments against the decriminalisation of euthanasia is the slippery slope argument, which trivialises the act of ending the life, implying the risk of misuse of the practice and the elimination of the most vulnerable patients ^9,32. It is even suggested the possibility that a focus on the idea of “relief of suffering” could evolve into a “relief of abnormality,” slipping to the danger of using perfection as a standard ³⁰. From the example of the adoption of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands, it can be concluded that there wasn’t an abusive increase in numbers nor, apparently, the extent of the practices to vulnerable patients. On the contrary, there was an intensification of symptom relief, that is, the improvement of palliative care ³³.
The Belgian Law of 2002 was accompanied by an increase in all types of end-of-life medical practice (attributing the increase of euthanasia to a likely increase in the number of reported cases), with exception from involuntary euthanasia, and an extension of these practices to vulnerable groups ³⁴ was not verified. On the other hand, some authors mentioned the reduction of the legal scrutiny over time and the delegation of the practices to nursing professionals ³⁰.

-“From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite”

 
-“Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control”
-“Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations”