TODAY, THREE MORE POLICE OFFICERS WERE SHOT AND KILLED AND OTHERS WOUNDED IN BATON ROUGE, A SITE OF LONG-RUNNING PROTESTS OVER THE SHOOTING OF A BLACK MAN THERE ON JULY 7th.
"One suspect is dead, and possibly two more being sought, following a shooting Sunday morning (July 17) that killed three police officers and injured three others in Baton Rouge.
The shooting took place around 9 a.m. outside -- and possibly inside -- the B-Quik convenience store on Airline Highway near Old Hammond Highway.
Officers exchanged gunfire with the deceased suspect, who was shot dead outside a fitness center near B-Quik, Mckneely said. Police have not approached the suspect's body, and are waiting for a bomb unit to check for possible explosives.
Federal authorities have joined state and local police in the investigation.
The wounded officers are with the Baton Rouge Police Department and East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office, Mayor Kip Holden said, and have been taken to Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center.
"It's like a nightmare all over again," Holden said."
WILL THIS BECOME OUR "NEW NORM" IN AMERICA AS EACH RACE DECIDES TO "RETALIATE"?
I HAVE WATCHED THE ONGOING RACIAL TENSION AND WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED TRUTHFULLY AS A "RACE WAR" FOR OVER 6 DECADES, SINCE, AS A CHILD, THE HORRIFYING REALITY OF IT HIT ME IN THE FACE.
THEN, AT THAT VERY YOUNG AGE, IT TERRIFIED ME.... IT WOULD TERRIFY ANYONE TO LOOK OUT FROM THE BACK SEAT OF A CAR AS WE TOPPED A HILL AND SEE, AS WE DROVE BY, A BLACK MAN'S HEAD AFFIXED TO THE TOP OF A FENCE POST, TO SEE THE CRUDE SIGN HANGING BELOW THAT SEVERED HEAD AND SIMILAR SIGNS ALL ALONG THAT ROAD THAT READ , "NI___ER, DON'T GET CAUGHT ON SAND MOUNTAIN AFTER DARK!"
MY BELOVED GRANDFATHER LIVED ATOP THAT MOUNTAIN ANDI KNEW NO ONE CONSIDERED HIM WHITE...HE WAS CLEARLY "AMERICAN INDIAN", AS WAS MY MOTHER, AND IN THOSE DAYS, THAT JUST MEANT "COLORED".
THEY WERE NOT WHITE.
IN THOSE TIMES AND ESPECIALLY IN THAT PART OF AMERICA, EVEN NOW, THE WORD "NEGRO" WAS COMMON, AS WAS THE RACIAL SLUR THAT ALSO BEGAN WITH AN "N".AS ANYONE CAN SEE WHO LOOKS INTO AMERICA'S HISTORY, THERE WERE ALL TYPES OF "NI--ERS", ACCORDING TO 'WHITE SUPREMACISTS'....
AN INDIAN WAS A RED ONE, AN IRISHMAN WAS A GREEN ONE, AN ASIAN WAS A YELLOW ONE, ARABIC PEOPLE WERE CALLED SAND ONES, AND ANY PEOPLE FROM SOUTH OF AMERICA'S SOUTHERN BORDER WERE RIVER ONES (IN REFERENCE TO THE RIO GRANDE) OR WERE CALLED "MIGGERS", WITH REFERENCE SPECIFICALLY TO 'MEXICANS'.
IF YOU WERE NOT WHITE OR DID NOT"LOOK" WHITE OR WERE NOT PERCEIVED AS WHITE, YOU WERE SOME TYPE OF "N"WORD.
SO MY MOTHER AND HER PARENTS WERE SEEN AS "COLORED", WHILE MY DAD, WHO HAD ONLY ONE "FULL-BLOOD INDIAN" GRANDPARENT, WAS SEEN AS...YEAH, WHITE.
I SAW TWO CROSSES BURNING IN YARDS IN MY YOUNGER DAYS, DOZENS DURING THE UNREST IN 3 SOUTHERN STATES WHEN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AND DESEGREGATION BEGAN.
I SAW TWO BLACK MEN HANGING FROM TREES.IT ALL SEEMED LIKE A NIGHTMARE FROM WHICH WE WOULD NEVER AWAKEN.
MY BEST FRIEND MY FIRST YEAR OF COLLEGE LIVED JUST 3 MILES FROM WHERE THE BODIES OF THE THREE CIVIL RIGHTS WORKERS WERE FOUND IN AUGUST, 1964.
SIX DECADES FROM THAT FIRST LOOK AT THE HORROR OF THE RACE WAR, I CAN'T SAY I AM SHOCKED THAT WE ARE STILL WAGING THAT WAR TODAY, AS WE CAN SEE FROM HEADLINES BELOW.
July, 2015, Miami, Florida
[A]t Mt. Zion Baptist Church [in Miami] , Nation of Islam head Louis Farrakhan said he was looking for “10,000 fearless men” to “rise up and kill those who kill us; stalk them and kill them and let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling!”
{Video of that "sermon" is posted to the site linked above so no one can say this is not what Farrakhan meant. He is quite explicit in asking for "martyrs".]
Farrakhan said,
“I’m looking for 10,000 in the midst of a million. Ten thousand fearless men who say death is sweeter than continued life under tyranny. Death is sweeter than continuing to live and bury our children while the white folks give our killers hamburgers.
Death is sweeter than watching us slaughter each other to the joy of a 400-year-old enemy.
Death is sweeter.
The Quran teaches persecution is worse than slaughter.
Then it says retaliation is prescribed in matters of the slain.
Retaliation is a prescription from God to calm the breasts of those whose children have been slain.
So if the federal government won’t intercede in our affairs, then we must rise up and kill those who kill us; stalk them and kill them and let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling!”
The official newspaper of the Nation of Islam, founded in 1979 by Farrakhan, “The Final Call,” published the sermon excerpt as part of its “Justice Or Else” theme of the 20th anniversary of the Million Man March event set for October 10, in Washington, D.C."
One year later, I have to wonder if the call by Farrakhan was answered again by a military veteran of Afghanistan, a young Black man who shot a total of 12 Dallas policemen, killing five before he was killed by a robotic bomb in a parking garage from which he fired the shots.
.
DALLAS, July 8, 2016
— A military veteran who said his goal was to kill white police officers opened fire Thursday night in downtown Dallas, leaving five
officers dead and seven wounded before the police killed him with a
remote-controlled explosive delivered by a robot, officials said.
The
gunfire erupted just before 9 p.m., aimed at officers who were
monitoring a demonstration by thousands of people protesting the fatal
shootings earlier in the week of black men by police officers in Minnesota and Louisiana.
The peaceful march quickly gave way to chaos and screams as terrified people, including families with children, ran for cover, while police officers with guns drawn ran the other way, toward the shooting, and returned fire. Two civilians were wounded by gunfire.
The peaceful march quickly gave way to chaos and screams as terrified people, including families with children, ran for cover, while police officers with guns drawn ran the other way, toward the shooting, and returned fire. Two civilians were wounded by gunfire.
During
a standoff that lasted for hours after the attack, the sniper said he
wanted to kill more officers, claimed — apparently falsely — to have
planted explosives in the area, and told police negotiators that “he was
upset about Black Lives Matter,” the Dallas police chief, David O. Brown, said on Friday.
“He
said he was upset about the recent police shootings,” Chief Brown said.
“The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.”
“The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.”
The attack was the deadliest for law enforcement officers in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001.
The
police arrested three people, but there was some uncertainty about the
number of gunmen.
At first, officials said that multiple snipers had carried out a coordinated ambush of the officers — some of whom were shot in the back, the chief said — but later, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said that the suspect killed by the police, identified as Micah Johnson, 25, appeared to be the sole gunman and to have no links with any international terrorist organizations.
At first, officials said that multiple snipers had carried out a coordinated ambush of the officers — some of whom were shot in the back, the chief said — but later, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said that the suspect killed by the police, identified as Micah Johnson, 25, appeared to be the sole gunman and to have no links with any international terrorist organizations.
Searching
the gunman’s home on Friday, “detectives found bomb-making materials,
ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat
tactics,” the Dallas Police Department said in a statement."
HERE'S WHAT WE AMERICANS ARE TOLD SET OFF THE LATEST ROUND OF THE RACE WAR:
1~ THE SHOOTING OF PHILANDO CASTILE
• On Wednesday evening, (July 6, 2016) a police officer fatally shot a black man, Philando Castile, 32, during a traffic stop in Falcon Heights, Minn., a suburb of St. Paul, the state capital. The AFTERMATH was streamed on Facebook Live by Mr. Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, a passenger in the car, along with her 4-year-old daughter.
• St. Paul has been convulsed by protests. Demonstrators gathered around the home of Gov. Mark Dayton, who said he was shaken by the video. “Would this have happened if the driver were white, if the passengers were white?” he asked. “I don’t think it would have.”
• Mr. Castile had notified the police officer that he had a gun on him, and was a licensed gun owner. Whether this information affected the shooting is not clear. Mr. Castile’s girlfriend said he was trying to retrieve his license and registration when the officer opened fire.
THE SHOOTING OF ALTON STERLING THE DAY BEFORE...
• On Tuesday morning (July 5, 2016), two police officers fatally shot a black man, Alton B. Sterling, 37, in Baton Rouge, the capital of Louisiana, while trying to arrest him. The shooting was captured on video that drew widespread attention after it was released online on Wednesday.
[While I won't post that video, I will tell you that the man killed was on the ground with a policeman's knee in his chest and was shot at point-blank range multiple times.
Abdullah Muflahi, the owner and manager of the Triple S Store where the shooting happened, told the press that Sterling wasn’t holding a weapon, though witnesses called police to the scene because Mr. Sterling had brandished a pistol in the parking lot — and his hands weren’t close to his pockets — during the altercation.]
HERE'S WHAT WE AMERICANS ARE TOLD SET OFF THE LATEST ROUND OF THE RACE WAR:
1~ THE SHOOTING OF PHILANDO CASTILE
• On Wednesday evening, (July 6, 2016) a police officer fatally shot a black man, Philando Castile, 32, during a traffic stop in Falcon Heights, Minn., a suburb of St. Paul, the state capital. The AFTERMATH was streamed on Facebook Live by Mr. Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, a passenger in the car, along with her 4-year-old daughter.
• St. Paul has been convulsed by protests. Demonstrators gathered around the home of Gov. Mark Dayton, who said he was shaken by the video. “Would this have happened if the driver were white, if the passengers were white?” he asked. “I don’t think it would have.”
• Mr. Castile had notified the police officer that he had a gun on him, and was a licensed gun owner. Whether this information affected the shooting is not clear. Mr. Castile’s girlfriend said he was trying to retrieve his license and registration when the officer opened fire.
THE SHOOTING OF ALTON STERLING THE DAY BEFORE...
• On Tuesday morning (July 5, 2016), two police officers fatally shot a black man, Alton B. Sterling, 37, in Baton Rouge, the capital of Louisiana, while trying to arrest him. The shooting was captured on video that drew widespread attention after it was released online on Wednesday.
[While I won't post that video, I will tell you that the man killed was on the ground with a policeman's knee in his chest and was shot at point-blank range multiple times.
Abdullah Muflahi, the owner and manager of the Triple S Store where the shooting happened, told the press that Sterling wasn’t holding a weapon, though witnesses called police to the scene because Mr. Sterling had brandished a pistol in the parking lot — and his hands weren’t close to his pockets — during the altercation.]
• There have been protests and a vigil, but the city has otherwise remained calm.
• Mr. Sterling had a long criminal history, but it is not clear whether the officers knew that when they tried to arrest him.
RETALIATION BEGINS....
HOURS LATER, IN GEORGIA, A YOUNG WHITE POLICE OFFICER WAS LURED TO AN APARTMENT COMPLEX BY A 911 CALL AND SHOT BY THE 911 CALLER, WHOSE RACIAL IDENTITY IS TENTATIVELY LISTED AS "ASIAN".
BOTH THE SHOOTER AND THE OFFICER WERE IN CRITICAL CONDITION BUT EXPECTED TO LIVE..
SIMILAR SHOOTING IN MISSOURI ON JULY 8.
"A suburban St. Louis police officer was "ambushed" during a traffic stop Friday in Ballwin, Mo., and critically injured after he was shot at least once from behind as he walked to his patrol car, authorities said.
The suspect is Antonio Taylor, who authorities say is a 31-year-old black man. Taylor was paroled in early 2015 after serving time on a weapons charge. He has been charged with assault of a police officer, armed criminal action and a felon in possession, St. Louis County police Chief Jon Belmar said at a news conference.
Taylor is being held on $500,000 cash bond and is expected to be arraigned on the felony charges Monday morning.
Authorities said the officer, who was white, was a nine-year law enforcement veteran.
The officer was walking to his car after the initial conversation with the motorist he stopped for speeding when that driver "advanced quickly" on him from behind, firing at least three shots, Scott said. The officer "had no chance at all" to pull his handgun and "was completely helpless," Scott said, noting the encounter was recorded by the police car's dashcam.
After the shooting, Belmar said, the suspect sped away before an officer from another police department spotted the car about six kilometres away. The suspect abandoned the vehicle and fled on foot before being arrested about five minutes later, Belmar said."
ANOTHER SIMILAR SHOOTING NEAR ATLANTA, GEORGIA...
Atlanta-area shooting
July, 8, 2016
Georgia police said officer Brian McKenzie was on routine patrol when gunshots were fired from a blue Ford Explorer shortly before 1 a.m.
Friday, just a few hours after the Dallas sniper attack.Police say a 21-year-old Georgia man will likely face charges including aggravated assault on a police officer after they say he opened fire on an officer from a passing vehicle.
Suspect Victor Alonzo Majia Nunez, 21, from Riverdale, Ga., was apprehended after a short pursuit in Roswell, which is about 32 kilometres north of Atlanta, early Friday. Police said he will likely face charges including aggravated assault on a police officer.
The officer, a member of the agency's drunk driving task force, didn't immediately know whether the shots were fireworks or gunshots but quickly realized that "gunshots were coming his way," said Roswell police Det. Zachary Frommer.
Multiple shots were fired, but none connected with the officer or his patrol car.
In a news release, Roswell police said a motive isn't available.
Police said the suspect is speaking with investigators but "his co-operation has been limited."
ANOTHER SHOOTING IN TENNESSEE, JULY 7.
One woman [ a 44-year-old mother of 3) died and three others, including one police officer, were injured in the rampage.
The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation said in a news release that initial conversations with the suspect, 37-year-old Lakeem Keon Scott, revealed he was troubled by several incidents across the U.S.
Scott, who is black, was wounded in the shootout with police, remains hospitalized and has not yet been charged.
All those shot were white, police confirmed.
The announcement comes just hours after 12 officers were shot at a Black Lives Matter protest in Dallas by a man who police say declared he was angry about police shootings of black men and wanted to exterminate whites. Five of the officers died.
The shooting spree in Tennessee began around 2:20 a.m. Thursday, July 7, 2016."
"NOT THE KU KLUX KLAN"?
A black man was found hanging from a tree in Atlanta's Piedmont Park early in the morning of 7 July 2016, and officials have now referred the case to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Police were first called to the scene at around 5 in the morning to find the unidentified man's body. The Fulton County medical examiner's office ruled the death a suicide, which police said was consistent with their findings.
However, in the wake of a violent week rife with racial tensions and the ensuing outcry both on and off social media, Atlanta mayor Kasim Reed announced later that day that the FBI would be looking into his death in a statement saying that:
I am deeply saddened by the loss of a young man’s life last night in Piedmont Park. This disturbing event demands our full attention. The Atlanta Police Department (APD) is conducting a robust investigation into his death and I have asked to receive regular briefings on the status of the investigation. We have also referred the case to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Everything we have seen suggests that there was no foul play involved, but I want to state clearly and unequivocally that we will not prejudge the circumstances surrounding this young man's death. APD will share all evidence discovered in the course of the investigation. We ask for the public’s support and cooperation as we work to resolve this matter.Law enforcement officials said that there was no truth to the rumors that the Ku Klux Klan was distributing materials at the park that night, or that they were involved with the man's death in any way..."
IN AMERICA, WE HAVE "RADICAL GROUPS" OF EVERY RACE WHO ARE MORE THAN WILLING, EVEN HUNGRY, TO CONTINUE THE RACE WAR FOREVER, OR UNTIL THEIR RACE IS THE ONE LEFT IN POWER.
ON THE "WHITE SIDE" ARE THE KU KLUX KLAN, THE AMERICAN NAZI PARTY, AND OTHER "WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUPS".
ON THE BLACK SIDE ARE THE BLACK PANTHERS, THE NATION OF ISLAM AND OTHER "BLACK SUPREMACY GROUPS".
COMPARED TO THE ABOVE NAMED FOUR GROUPS, "SUPREMACY GROUPS" OF OTHER RACES FADE.
WHILE MANY ARE AWARE OF THE "HISPANICS VERSUS BLACKS" GANGS IN AMERICA, THE "SKINHEAD" WHITE GANGS, ETC, NONE ARE AS POPULAR OR AS WELL-POPULATED AS THE "TOP FOUR".
IN THE DAYS FOLLOWING THE TWO SHOOTINGS OF BLACK MEN, SOME OTHER BLACK MEN CALLED FOR REASON, CALLED FOR COMMON SENSE, CALLED FOR AN END TO THE RACE WAR, AS DID SEVERAL WHITE LEADERS.
MR. LARRY ELDER, AN ATTORNEY, WRITER AND TV AND RADIO PERSONALITY, PRESENTED THE ACTUAL STATISTICS ON "WHITE-ON-BLACK" CRIMES AND SHOCKED ALL WHO WERE WATCHING, PROBABLY, WHEN HE SAID THAT THE "BLACK LIVES MATTER ORGANIZATION" IS A LIE.
American basketball star Charles Barkley, also a Black man, agrees with Elder and went a step further in condemning the reactions of the Black community after the recent shootings.
While being interviewed on The Dan Le Batard Show on Tuesday, the 53-year-old TNT Sports commentator expressed that most instances of racial profiling are due to the racial stereotypes that are upheld by the African-American community.
“There’s a lot of people at fault [for these deaths],” Barkley stated to the ESPN host, also making mention of the five Dallas police officers who were killed during a Black Lives Matter protest last Wednesday. “The cops have made some mistakes, [and] black people have made some mistakes. That doesn’t give us the right to riot and shoot cops; we need the cops, especially in the black community. We, as black people, have got to do better.”
Barkley also seemed to take issue with the Black Lives Matter movement for ignoring instances of black-on-black crime while instead focusing on the victims of police brutality, such as Sterling and Castile, who were gunned down by law enforcement less than 24 hours apart last week.
[ Part of that video can be seen <HERE>.]
Rev. Tony Evans, a Black pastor of a very large church with over 8,000 members has an uncommon message for all who care to hear it.
After the Dallas shootings, he wrote:
"Gone must be the days of only pointing fingers at others to fix what they may never fix. Our nation’s ills are not merely the result of corruption or racism, although these are evil. Our troubles can also be traced directly to ineffective Christians. One of the real tragedies today is that the church as a whole has failed to advance God’s kingdom light, equity, love and principles in our land in order to be a positive influence and impact for good in the midst of darkness, fear and hate.
We must do better. We must unite. We must stand together and commit to one another that we will usher in a wave of change, justice, life, safety, rightness, equity and dignity for all. And above all, we must not let fear nor hatred divide us. Peace, unity, love and non-violence should be our rallying cry and the catalyst for change in our nation."
IN AN APRIL, 2015 INTERVIEW WITH DR. DARRELL BLOCK EVANS SAID :
“When 70 percent plus of your children are being born out of wedlock and the fathers are not there to tend to them, you've got chaos in the community.
That's crime, that's unemployment and most of these kids are going to be raised in poverty. So and that's something we control.
That's something we control.
The White man is not making you do that.
He’s not forcing you into that position.
That’s a convenient out.
In slavery when we did not have laws on our side, the community on our side, the government on our side, the broader community on our side, our families were a lot stronger.
We were a lot more unified and we made a lot more progress. We’re going through regression right now and a lot of that is because of decision-making we are responsible for.
.And so since some things may not change, may not change in your lifetime or you know the defense keeps shifting and you don't know what's coming next, your job is to come up with a plan that overrides that. And our God is a great coach and he's got a great playbook. He's got a great plan and we have in the past overcome it and now we need not to regress. We have regressed as a people and much of that is our fault. ”
THE POINT THOSE THREE MEN ABOVE WERE MAKING IS THAT, WHEN EVERYONE KEEPS CALM AND DECIDES TO USE RESTRAINT OVER CHAOS, MAKES THE CHOICE TO WORK THINGS OUT AND NOT KEEP WAGING WAR AGAINST EACH OTHER, THINGS GET DONE THAT MAKES EVERYONE FEEL UNITED, NOT DIVIDED, AND ALLOWS ALL OF US TO SEE THAT NONE OF US ARE PERFECT, NO 'RACE' AND NO SOCIAL CLASS IS ENTIRELY TO BLAME FOR ALL THESE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROBLEMS WE'RE SURROUNDED BY AND NO SINGLE RACE CAN SOLVE THOSE PROBLEMS WITHOUT THE HELP OF ALL OTHER AMERICANS.
POLITICS, RADICAL 'HATE GROUPS' MEMBERS AND THE AMERICAN PRESS KEEP THE RACE WAR FIRES STOKED...IT KEEPS AMERICANS DIVIDED JUST AS DURING THE CIVIL WAR, KEEPS US FROM FOCUSING ON WHAT THE CROOKS IN OFFICE ARE DOING WRONG AND KEEPS AMERICANS FROM DEMANDING THEY STOP DOING THE THINGS THAT ARE DESTROYING THE COUNTRY....
LIKE UNDECLARED "WARS" THAT FEED PROFITS INTO OUR MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, A MACHINE BUILT WITH AMERICAN MILITARY BLOOD AND THE BLOOD OF THOSE SLAIN ABROAD...
LIKE PRINTING WORTHLESS PAPER MONEY AND MAKING US A DEBTOR NATION PARTIALLY OWNED BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS WHO OWN OUR 'TREASURY NOTES, BUY STOCK IN OUR COMPANIES, WHO ARE ALLOWED TO BUY UP OUR LAND AND TO WHOM WE TURN FOR SO MANY GOODS THAT AMERICA NO LONGER CREATES BECAUSE OF AMERICAN COMPANIES CLOSING THEIR DOORS HERE TO MOVE SOMEWHERE "CHEAPER" FOR THEM TO OPERATE IN, BUT THE GOODS THEY PRODUCE THERE CARRY HIGHER AND HIGHER PRICE TAGS BACK HOME....
LIKE REGULATING US TO A STANDSTILL AND PASSING UNCONSTITUTIONAL "BILLS" THAT THE NEXT GROUP OF CROOKS IN OFFICE KEEP ON THE 'BOOKS'...
LIKE SETTING THE MIDDLE CLASS AGAINST THOSE THE ADMINISTRATION OF OLD FDR MANAGED TO ENSLAVE TO THE FEDERAL 'WELFARE' SYSTEM....YEAH, EVERY PRESIDENT SINCE THE CREATION OF THAT SYSTEM HAS KEPT IT RUNNING WHILE USING EMPTY PROMISES OF "FIXING THE SYSTEM" TO WIN VOTES.
NOBODY IS GOING TO FIX ANYTHING BECAUSE THE ELITE NEED A SERFDOM, THEY NEED SERVANTS AND SLAVES TO RUN THE SHOW HERE JUST AS THEY NEEDED THEM WHEN THEY WROTE THAT CONSTITUTION THAT SAID WE'D BE A NATION OF EQUALS BUT ALSO MADE PROVISIONS FOR THE SLAVE TRADE AND FOR RETURN OF RUNAWAY SLAVES.
THOSE WHOM AMERICANS LOOKED TO AS LEADERS LIED IN 1787 AND THOSE IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS IN AMERICA ARE STILL LYING TODAY.
WE CAN SEE HOW THEY LIED WHEN WE LOOK AT THAT 'ELECTORAL COLLEGE' THEY CREATED THAT TAKES TRUE GOVERNANCE OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE VOTING MAJORITY AND PLACES IT RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THOSE "LIKE" THEM.
WHEN THEY CREATED A REPUBLIC, IN WHICH THE MAJORITY OF THE NATION'S POPULATION DOES NOT MAKE THE RULES BUT "CONGRESS" DOES, WE SHOULD HAVE SEEN THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL.
WHEN THEY DECIDED AMERICANS WERE TOO UNEDUCATED TO CAST AN "INFORMED" VOTE THEN AND THEY'RE AFRAID FOR US TO HAVE THE POWER OF DECIDING HOW THIS NATION IS RUN NOW BY ABOLISHING THE DAMNABLE ELECTORAL COLLEGE NOW, WE OUGHT TO HAVE SEEN WHAT THEIR REAL AGENDA CALLED FOR...A NATION OF SERFS INDEBTED TO THEIR MASTERS.
WITH CONTROL OF ALL OUR MAJOR MEDIA IN THE HANDS OF JUST SIX POWERFUL MEN/COMPANIES, THEY TELL US WHAT TO BUY, WHAT TO THINK, HOW TO VOTE, WHO TO TRUST, WHAT TO DO EVERY WAKING MINUTE OF OUR LIVES.
THEY'VE REPROGRAMMED US TO FOLLOW THEIR ORDERS WITHOUT QUESTION... AND SO WE DO.
WE CALL IT THE "TWO-PARTY SYSTEM", FROM WHICH WE DAILY GET OUR 'MARCHING ORDERS', SOME TO MARCH "LEFT", SOME TO MARCH "RIGHT", BUT ALWAYS AGAINST ONE ANOTHER.
AS FOR THE RACE WAR QUESTION, THAT CAULDRON OF POISON IS STIRRED AND RE-STIRRED EVERY SINGLE DAY, AS ARE ALSO THE KETTLES THAT HOLD ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF CLASS WARFARE, GENDER INEQUALITY, AND THE NEWEST POTS, THE ONE TO DESTROY FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND TO DISARM THE POPULACE SO THAT WE HAVE NO MORAL STANDARDS TO DEFEND AND SO WE'RE EASIER TO MANAGE.
AS LONG AS THEY CAN KEEP US AT EACH OTHER'S THROATS, THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH BRINGING AMERICA TO ITS KNEES BEFORE THEM.
THEIR "WAR ON DRUGS" ALONE SHOULD PROVE TO EVEN THE MOST SKEPTICAL WHAT THEIR TRUE INTENT WAS ALL ALONG.
THOSE IN POWER HAVE MADE GOOD USE OF DRUGS TO FURTHER BREAK DOWN AMERICAN SOCIETY.
WHEN SO MANY INSTANCES HAVE "COME TO LIGHT" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S AND THE CIA/DEA AND OTHER AGENCIES' INVOLVEMENT IN DRUG-RUNNING, IN IMPORTING DRUGS TO AMERICA, I CAN'T FATHOM HOW THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS MISSED THE "BIG REVEAL"... THE DRUG DEALERS AT THE TOP OF THE HEAP ARE MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR THOSE WHO WORK FOR IT!
"By 1943, the nations of the “free world” were relying on America for their opium derivatives, under the guardianship of Harry Anslinger, the Commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN).
Federal drug law enforcement’s relationship with the espionage establishment matured with the creation of CIA’s predecessor organization, the Office of Strategic Services. Prior to the Second World War, the FBN was the government agency most adept at conducting covert operations at home and abroad.
As a result, OSS chief William Donovan asked Anslinger to provide seasoned FBN agents to help organize the OSS and train its agents to work undercover, avoid security forces in hostile nations, manage agent networks, and engage in sabotage and subversion."
[SEE <HERE> AND <HERE> FOR A RELEASED CONGRESSIONAL REPORT AND THEN FOR AN 'INVESTIGATIVE REPORT' BY THE NEW YORK TIMES THAT FOUND SUCH AGENCIES WERE INDEED DEALING IN DRUGS.]
AND DO LOOK, PLEASE, AT WHERE THE WORST DRUG PROBLEMS ARE.
LOOK AT THE STATS... THEN YOU WILL SEE WHO IS TARGETED BY OUR "WAR ON DRUGS", WHO IS IN THE FEDERAL BULLSEYE.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD, ESTABLISHED HERE IN THE U.S. BY MARGARET SANGER, WAS AND IS SIMPLY EUGENICS AT WORK....SANGER WAS ONE OF THE MOST RACIST PEOPLE WHO EVER LIVED, POSSIBLY WORSE THAT HITLER, WHOM SHE OPENLY ADMIRED.
HER MANY PAMPHLETS AND SPEECHES ARE FULL OF RACIST COMMENTS AND DIRECTIVES WITH THE GOAL OF ELIMINATING AS MANY BLACKS AND UNDESIRABLES AS IS POSSIBLE UNDER THE GUISE OF "PLANNED PREGNANCIES".
ALL IT TAKES IS A GOOGLE SEARCH WITH THE WORDS "MARGARET SANGER RACIST REMARKS" TO FIND HER OWN WORDS ON THE TOPIC OF JUST WHICH RACE THE SUPERIOR RACE IS.
FOR YEARS, AMERICA'S PRISON SYSTEM HAS FOUND WAYS TO STERILIZE "CERTAIN" MEN AND WOMEN OF "CERTAIN" RACES.
SEE <THIS ARTICLE> AND ALSO <THIS PEER-REVIEWED STUDY>, THEN RESEARCH FOR YOURSELVES TO FIND MORE.
"Many of the stereotypes that fueled 20th century sterilization abuse remain in vogue today.
Dr. James Heinrich, who performed tubal ligations of women in prisons, stated that this practice saved the state money because his involuntary clients were likely to have “unwanted children as they procreated more.”
Such a callous attitude could have been uttered by superintendents in the 1930s, who worried about the economic burden of “defectives,” or by the obstetrician at USC/LA County who purportedly spoke to his staff about “how low we can cut the birth rate of the Negro and Mexican populations in Los Angeles County.”
'NATIVE AMERICANS' WERE ALSO TARGETS OF COVERT, UNINFORMED GOVERNMENT STERILIZATIONS.
SEE THE <ARTICLE HERE> AND <ANOTHER ONE HERE>.
IS AMERICA BUILT ON RACISM?
EVERY ELECTION MOST CANDIDATES AT LEAST HINT THAT THAT MAY BE THE CASE, BUT THEY CAN "FIX" THAT...LIKE BERNIE SANDERS WAS GOING TO DO.
Bernie Sanders, candidate for president of the U.S., has said that the United States was “created…on racist principles.”
He said that the American Constitution was "anti-slavery" but that slavery was kept as a "local institution".
Sanders, like all politicians looking to get VOTES from the MINORITIES, who are actually about 46% of America now, may have said something entirely different in private.
Many of our office-seekers have been caught by 'open microphone' or by words recorded in private meetings, etc, which show their disdain/disgust for not only minorities, but the poor in America.
Now and then such privately uttered racist/bigot comments make "the news", but Americans soon forget.
MOST of our politicians are elitists, part of that magical "TOP 10%" of wealthy Americans with deep connections to the big corporations because that's where the BIG money comes from that feeds their political campaigns.
Once in office, they are expected to "pay back" all that BIG MONEY by passing legislation that benefits NOT THE VOTERS, BUT CORPORATE AMERICA, the "BOSSES" of the working class, if you will.
Well, Bernie Sanders angered many people with his statement about America being founded on racist principles, but was he correct about the Constitution being "anti-slavery"?
NO. HE WAS WRONG ON THAT.The words "slave" and "slavery" were never used in the Constitution, but references were made.
FIRST ALLUSION TO SLAVERY IN THE CONSTITUTION....
"The first indication of slavery in the Constitution appears in Article I, Section 2. This is the three-fifths clause that explains the apportionment of representation and taxation. It reads:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.WERE SLAVES COUNTED AS "THREE-FIFTHS PERSONS".
YES.
"Although the word slavery is not mentioned, "all other Persons" implies it.
The clause explicitly makes reference to all other social or economic classes of the time, namely free people, bound servants, and Indians. The only economic class it does not refer to by name is that of slaves. This proves the reluctance of the Founders to include slavery in the Constitution."
HOWEVER..."They (slaves) were included as people in the total number of those to be represented and taxed, not as the possession of a master. If they had not been included, they then may have been viewed as property, but since they were included, they were considered humans."[JUST AS 'OBVIOUSLY', AMERICAN INDIANS WERE NOT.]
"This proportion was meant to imply an estimate of the slave’s wealth-producing capacity. Slaves were not considered capable of producing as much wealth as a free man might have the opportunity to produce. A free man could choose his occupation, while a slave was only part of the whole production power of a plantation or a household. These considerations point to the widespread belief that slave labor was relatively insufficient."
[NOTE: PAY ATTENTION, PLEASE, TO THE NEXT STATEMENT, AS IT WILL SHOW YOU WHAT REALLY CAUSED THE CIVIL WAR HERE...NOT FREEING SLAVES,BUT COUNTING THEM AS PART OF THE POPULATION.]
"The implementation of the three-fifths clause augmented representation in the South in the House of Representatives by 30 percent or more.
Obviously for representation purposes the South favored the three-fifths clause, but it preferred that the Slaves not be counted in taxation. More people to account for meant more taxes to pay. But, overall they favored it because of the legislative advantage it gave them. The three-fifths clause was just one of the compromises that allowed the states to unite under a common set of laws. As Alexander Hamilton later remarked, "no union could have possibly been formed" without the federal ratio. Once it had been adopted it was accepted as the standard. And, it remained the standard until it was repealed by the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868.
The second section of that amendment no longer called for representation to be apportioned partly by those bound to service or "all other Persons." Representation then counted "the whole number of persons in each State" (excluding Indians not taxed)."
SECOND ALLUSION TO SLAVES IN THE CONSTITUTION....
The framers of the Constitution clearly refer to the slave trade in Article I, Section 9. Once again it is not mentioned by word, but it is implied. This section deals with issues of importation and taxation of the slave trade.
It reads:
The Migration and Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.This is a clause which must be carefully read and analyzed. It implies much more than a mere surface reading will bring to attention.
First, the phrase "Migration and Importation of such Persons" implies the slave trade.
Goods may be called imports, but if people are referred to as imports, it can mean nothing other than slavery. "States now existing" can mean only the original thirteen colonies which were already established at the ratification of the Constitution.
This clause could not pertain to any states formed after the Constitution was established. Therefore, any territories that were later created could not participate in the importation of slaves.
Also, the phrase "shall think proper to admit" implies that the states are free to choose to import slaves.
The clause then goes on to explain that the migration or importation of slaves cannot be prohibited by Congress prior to the year 1808.
However, a tax or duty can be imposed on the importation of slaves as long as it does not exceed ten dollars per person. The provisions in Section 9 guard against amendment or changes to the slave trade. Otherwise Congress would have had the right to regulate the trade by the powers expressed in Section 8 to lay and collect taxes and duties and to REGULATE commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with Indian tribes.
[SLAVES, AFTER ALL, WERE IMPORTED FROM FOREIGN NATIONS.]
For the first eight decades of our country’s life, the 'devil’s bargain' struck in 1787 because so many Americans wanted and depended on slaves, warped almost every aspect of national politics and national life.
This clause was critical to the southern states’ acceptance of the Constitution. South Carolina and Georgia persuaded the Constitutional Convention that they, along with North Carolina, would not accept the Constitution without the guarantee of the protection of the slave trade. It is just one more indication of the issues and compromises the Framers had to wrestle with in order to create and preserve the Union."
A THIRD REFERENCE TO SLAVES WITHOUT USING THE WORD...
"The next reference to slavery in the Constitution is found in Article IV, Section 2. This is the fugitive-slave clause which reads:
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom Service or Labour may be due.This clause explains that no person held in service (which implied slavery) or labor in one state, and under that state’s laws, can escape into another state and be relieved of his services.
Even if a slave escapes to a free state with laws prohibiting slavery, he still must be returned to his rightful owner to whom he owes his services in the slave state.
He is still a slave no matter where he is, as long as he belongs to his master.
This point would later be discussed in the opinion of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision. This clause "…became the basis for the more notorious kind of federal intervention in behalf of the institution."
It provided for the enforcement of returning slaves anywhere in the Union to their rightful master.
Oddly enough, this clause was not considered a significant issue in the Constitutional Convention.
It was introduced late in the proceedings and aroused little debate.
It was readily accepted by unanimous approval.
BUT ABRAHAM LINCOLN CALLED OUR ATTENTION TO WHAT THAT DECISION MEANT:
"Study the Dred Scott decision...
That decision may be reduced to three points. The first is, that a negro can not be a citizen. That point is made in order to deprive the negro in every possible event, of the benefit of that provision of the U. S Constitution which declares that: “The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all previleges and immunities of citizens in the several States.”
The second point is, that the U. S constitution protects slavery, as property, in all the U. S. territories, and that neither congress, nor the people of the territories, nor any other power, can prohibit it, at any time prior to the formation of State constitutions.
This point is made, in order that the territories may safely be filled up with slaves, before the formation of State constitutions, and thereby to embarrass the free states[.]"
SUBTLE AVOIDANCE OF THE WORDS "SLAVE AND SLAVERY"...
The Constitution neither authorized or prohibited slavery, BY NAME.
The Framers had not expected to outlaw slavery, but came to the Convention to create a Constitution for the country as they knew it existed and also as is would exist in the future.
Since slavery was part of the Union, it had to be dealt with tactfully, and the Framers chose to do this by not explicitly using the words "slave" or "slavery," but by creating several compromises."
ASIDE FROM THE CONSTITUTION, IS THERE OR IS THERE NOT A LONG HISTORY OF RACISM IN AMERICA?
WELL, AMERICA WELCOMED ONLY "FREE WHITE PERSONS" IN 1790 WHO COULD HOPE TO BE "NATURALIZED" AS U.S. CITIZENS, AND THAT HELD UP FOR 133 YEARS...
By 1923, courts had vindicated a "common-knowledge" standard, concluding that "scientific evidence" was incoherent."
AND TODAY?
The 2000 U.S. census states that racial categories "generally reflect a SOCIAL definition of race recognized in this
country. They do not conform to any biological, anthropological or
genetic criteria."
It defines "white people" as "people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
I WONDER OFTEN HOW MANY AMERICANS ARE AWARE OF THIS 'DEFINITION' OF 'WHITE'.
The 1990 US Census Public Use Microdata Sample lists "Caucasian" or "Aryan" ancestry responses as subgroups of "White" but the 2005 PUMS codes (Public Use Microdata Sample) do not.
The U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation also categorizes "white people" as "people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
In an attempt to facilitate the job of law enforcement officers, the FBI employs the term "race" to summarize the general appearance of individuals whom they are attempting to apprehend.
It defines "white people" as "people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
I WONDER OFTEN HOW MANY AMERICANS ARE AWARE OF THIS 'DEFINITION' OF 'WHITE'.
The 1990 US Census Public Use Microdata Sample lists "Caucasian" or "Aryan" ancestry responses as subgroups of "White" but the 2005 PUMS codes (Public Use Microdata Sample) do not.
The U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation also categorizes "white people" as "people having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
In an attempt to facilitate the job of law enforcement officers, the FBI employs the term "race" to summarize the general appearance of individuals whom they are attempting to apprehend.
- In an attempt to facilitate the job of law enforcement officers, the FBI employs the term "race" to summarize the general appearance of individuals whom they are attempting to apprehend.
Source: Boundless. “Legal Definition of Race.” Boundless Sociology. Boundless, 26 May. 2016. Retrieved 09 Jul. 2016 from https://www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/race-and-ethnicity-10/race-79/legal-definition-of-race-471-8183/
In many countries, such as France, the state is legally banned from maintaining data based on race, so the police issue wanted notices to the public that include labels like "dark skin complexion. "HOWEVER...
"Racial profiling refers to the use of an individual's race or ethnicity by law enforcement personnel as a key factor in deciding whether to engage in enforcement (e.g., make a traffic stop or arrest)."
IF YOU'VE NOT BEEN IN A POSITION TO BE SEEN AS "COLORED" IN THE DEEP SOUTH, "COLORED" BEING ANY RACE BUT WHITE, YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW WHAT "COLOREDS" HAVE ENDURED..."INDIANS", "MEXICANS/LATINOS", BLACKS, ASIANS, AND ANYONE OBVIOUSLY JEWISH (AS ORTHODOX JEWS WHO DRESS 'DIFFERENTLY' AND HAVE BEARDS OR PEYOTS, SIDELOCKS)... AND MANY WERE THE MEN WHO HID THEIR IRISH ANCESTRY, AS THE IRISH WERE NOT FAVORED IN MANY COMMUNITIES "DOWN SOUTH" AND ELSEWHERE AND WERE OFTEN REFERRED TO DEROGATORILY AS "MACKEREL SNAPPERS".
THAT "N"-WORD WAS SPOKEN EVERYWHERE IN PUBLIC, EVEN WHEN ADDRESSING THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES "DOWN SOUTH".
IT WAS A BLANKET EXPRESSION FOR ALL NON-WHITES, EVEN THOUGH JEWS, SPANIARDS, ITALIANS, JEWISH PEOPLE AND THE IRISH ARE LISTED GENETICALLY AS "CAUCASIANS".
I WAS BORN AND REARED HERE IN THE SOUTH, SO YOU MAY CONSIDER ME AN 'EXPERT' ON SOUTHERN WAYS AND MINDSETS.... (TYPED GRINNING)
WHILE THERE IS AN ONGOING RACE WAR, MORE AND MORE I FIND THAT THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS DON'T AGREE TO IT, DON'T WANT TO SEE IT CONTINUED, WANT OUT OF THE VICIOUS CYCLE THAT PITS "US" AGAINST "THEM".
SOME AMERICANS WILL NEVER EVEN WANT THE RACE WAR TO END, BUT THEY ARE NO LONGER THE MAJORITY.
AS "MINORITY RACES" ARE SET TO BECOME THE MAJORITY HERE IN AMERICA, AND AS THAT WHITE MAJORITY IS REPLACED BY THE RACES WHO HAVE SO LONG FELT "SUPPRESSED" BY WHITE AMERICA, ONE CAN ONLY WONDER WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT.
- The population younger than 5 stood at 49.9 percent minority in 2012.
- For the first time in more than a century, the number of deaths now exceeds births among white Americans. This "natural decrease" occurred several years before the government's original projection, a sign of the white population decline soon to arrive.
A RATHER NICE LITTLE ARTICLE ON THE USE OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA TO CREATE FEAR AND UNQUESTIONED OBEDIENCE OF THE MASSES CAN BE FOUND <HERE>.
QUOTING:
"Power is almost invariably abused by those who have it because it is co-opted by the ego, and all egos are ultimately insane, even the seemingly well-adjusted ones.
As the old saying goes: Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Human psychology actually encourages disparity in power: those who have power always seem to want more; and those who feel powerless invariably try to supplicate protection from those with power, without realizing that they are only disempowering and thus endangering themselves further in the process.z
Indeed, democracy is now more of a national branding than it is a type of government. Take the United States, for example: this once great nation clings to its moniker "the land of the free" when in fact it is closer to a police state where the only freedoms are now superficial ones — what to buy, what music to listen to, what television show to watch and what fast food to eat.
These choices are not real freedom, but the semblance of freedom.
Real freedom involves more important choices such as: what type of government we want and its level of involvement in our lives; what type and level of public healthcare to have; what checks and balances to place on the corporate, banking and military sectors; how much we are willing to allow media monopolies which distort our view of the world with its incessant propaganda; and the balance between privacy and safety. These types of choices have the biggest ramifications for society, but they are simply not choices given to the electorate."
IF YOU REMEMBER NOTING ELSE, FELLOW AMERICANS, REMEMBER THIS:
"A HOUSE DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF CANNOT STAND."
TO ME, A MAJOR KEY TO ENDING THE RACE WAR IS KNOWLEDGE, AND THAT IS HAD BY QUESTIONING EVERYTHING....EVERY SINGLE THING, ALL THAT WE'RE TOLD BY MAJOR MEDIA AND OUR IGNOBLE LEADERS.
WE NEED TO TALK WITH ONE ANOTHER MORE, STOP SWALLOWING ALL THE CRAP WE'RE FED BY THOSE WHOSE TASK IT IS TO FUEL AND REFUEL THE UNDYING AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, CLASS WAR, GENDER WAR AND RACE WAR.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER AND WE'VE BEEN DUMBED-DOWN FOR TOO LONG, MY FRIENDS.
OUR GULLIBILITY AND APATHY ARE LITERALLY KILLING MANY OF US ACROSS AMERICA TODAY.
_______________________________
POSTSCRIPT:
SEVERAL YOUTUBE CHANNELS HAVE SPRUNG UP AS A RESULT OF THE VIDEO THAT MISS REYNOLDS LIVE-STREAMED TO HER FACEBOOK PAGE AFTER MR. CASTILE WAS SHOT.
SOME OF THESE ARE POSTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY WHO TOOK EXCEPTION TO MISS REYNOLDS' EMOTIONLESS COMMENTS AND FAILURE TO RENDER AID OR PERHAPS JUST HOLD THE HAND OF EITHER HER DYING 'BOYFRIEND' OR TERRIFIED CHILD IN THE BACK SEAT.
WHILE IT IS TRUE THAT MUCH MORE ON MISS REYNOLDS CAN BE SEEN IN VIDEOS SHE MADE OF HERSELF UP TO JULY 4TH, VIDEOS THAT WERE ALSO LIVE-STREAMED TO HER FACEBOOK PAGE TWO DAYS BEFORE THIS SHOOTING. THOSE VIDEOS MUST IN NO WAY DETRACT FROM THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE ARISEN ABOUT THE SHOOTING OF CASTILE.
ALL THEY DO IS CAST DOUBT ON MISS REYNOLD'S CHARACTER AND CREDIBILITY, AS MANY COMMENTS FROM SEVERAL BLACK VIEWERS STATE.
AS HER CONTINUED LIVE-STREAMING TO FACEBOOK FROM THE BACK SEAT OF A SQUAD CAR AFTER THE SHOOTING TELLS HER FACEBOOK FOLLOWERS, THE COUPLE DID HAVE MARIJUANA INSIDE THE CAR WHERE HER 4-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER WAS A PASSENGER, AS THE CHILD WAS IN OTHER VERY GRAPHIC VIDEOS THAT WERE ALSO STREAMED TO FACEBOOK.
STILL, THESE VIDEOS SHOULD NOT BE USED TO DISPARAGE MR. CASTILE.
HE WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING MISS REYNOLDS CHOSE TO DO OR FILM FOR HER FACEBOOK FOLLOWERS.
TO USE HER SELF-MADE VIDEOS TO STEREOTYPE OTHER BLACK INDIVIDUALS IS WRONG, EVEN WHEN COMING FROM MEMBERS OF HER OWN RACE.
THE ISSUE MUST REMAIN WHETHER OR NOT MR. CASTILE WAS MURDERED "IN COLD BLOOD", NOT WHETHER MISS REYNOLDS IS A NARCISSIST GUILTY OF CHILD ABUSE.
THAT HAS NOT ONE BIT OF BEARING ON THIS CASE WHICH IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.
No comments:
Post a Comment