WAR IN THE COURTS AFTER ELECTION 2016, NO MATTER WHO WINS

AS THE ABOVE CAPTURED SCREENSHOT FROM THE NBC AFFILIATE STATION WRCB IN CHATTANOOGA, TN, SHOWS, VOTERS NEED NOT BOTHER GOING TO THE POLLS AS HILLARY'S VICTORY WAS ALREADY "REPORTED' A WEEK BEFORE ELECTION VOTES ARE COUNTED.
"The page was pulled directly from the WorldNow.com content management platform utilized by major networks like NBC, CBS, ABC and Fox and appears to be a non-public staging area for news and election results.

The original page has since been reset.

In addition to national results, another page at the WorldNow.com FTP server appeared to show the State-By-State Presidential election results.
This page is also accessible in archive format at WayBack Machine."

I CHECKED AROUND AND THE QUESTIONABLE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE "TRUTH OR FICTION"  IN THEIR DENIAL THAT THIS IS WHAT WE ACTUALLY SEE, STATED:
"In response to public outcry, WRCB TV clarified that “all news organizations test their election graphics” ahead of elections, and there was nothing fishy about it:

WNEM, a CBS affiliate from Michigan, displayed a test graphic with slightly different results. Clinton edged Trump, 41.1 million votes to 40.7 million, in that one. It probably came from a different elections service provider."

THEY DO OFFER A BETTER SCREENSHOT OF THE TENNESSEE STATION'S SITE AT
https://8295-presscdn-0-5-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Screen-Shot-2016-11-03-at-4.15.13-PM.png

OOPS! WORLDNOW AND NBC JUMPED THE GUN!

THIS IS NOT "CONSPIRACY THEORY, FOLKS, IT'S JUST A FACT HERE IN AMERICA, INC.

THERE IS NO VALID REASON TO PLAY ROUND WITH ELECTION RESULTS...JUST WAIT FOR THE NUMBERS TO COME IN "LIVE".

ASK YOURSELVES AND ANSWER WITH ALL HONESTY, PLEASE....
IF THE ABOVE APPEARED ON YOUR TV OR COMPUTER SCREENS NEXT WEDNESDAY MORNING, WOULD YOU QUESTION IT?

WOULD YOU HAVE ANY WAY OF KNOWING WHEN OR IF YOUR NEWS MEDIA LIES TO YOU?

THE MAP BELOW IS ABOUT THE BIAS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, HOW SOME VOTERS IN SOME STATES SEE THEIR VOTE COUNT A BIT OR A LOT MORE THAN A VOTER IN ANOTHER STATE AND IS EXPLAINED FAR BELOW, AT END OF BLOG AT THE TRIPLE ASTERISKS***.
AS YOU CAN SEE, TRUMP WOULD HAVE TO TAKE THE "GRAY STATES" IN ORDER TO WIN, SAITH THE EXPERTS, SAITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

CHANCES ARE VERY SLIM TO NONE THAT ANY OF US "COMMON CITIZENS" WILL EVER SIT IN THAT "COLLEGE".

..
WE'VE SEEN "RED FLAGS", PROBABLY FALSE FLAGS, RAISED IN THE HEADLINES FOR THE PAST SEVERAL WEEKS, AND MORE OFTEN AND MORE LOUDLY, EVER SINCE THE FBI DECLARED ITS NEW LOOK INTO CLINTON EMAILS... FRANTIC "WARNINGS" ISSUED BY OUR WHORISH MAINSTREAM MEDIA ABOUT EXPECTED CYBER ATTACKS, ABOUT 'TERRORIST ATTACKS', ABOUT MALFUNCTIONING VOTING MACHINES, ABOUT ELECTION FRAUD. ABOUT STATES ALLOWING "ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS" TO VOTE, ABOUT THE NEW VOTER I.D. LAWS KEEPING MILLIONS AWAY FROM THE POLLS...THE LIST OF EXCUSES AND THE ENSUING 'WARNING' IS TOO LONG AND GROWING.

"AMERICAN ELECTIONS THREATENED BY POWERFUL OUTSIDE FORCES"

NO, DEAR READERS, NO, IT'S INSIDE FORCES, RABID POLITICIANS SO INTENT ON 'WINNING' THAT THEY HAVE TURNED INTO CUTTHROAT MANIACS WHO WILL KILL EACH OTHERS GRANDMA IF THAT MEANS THEY WIN.

EACH "TEAM" IS ASSEMBLING AN ARMY OF ATTORNEYS THE LIKES OF WHICH WE HAVE NEVER SEEN BEFORE.
IT WILL BE A FIGHT TO THE DEATH IN AMERICA'S BROKEN "JUSTICE SYSTEM" NO MATTER WHO IS DECLARED THE ELECTION WINNER.
PREPARE YOURSELVES FOR IT, FOLKS.

IT WILL BE UGLY.

WHEN THE GOP MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FOUGHT SO HARD TO PREVENT OBAMA FROM NAMING A REPLACEMENT FOR THE CONSERVATIVE DECEASED JUSTICE SCALIA, WE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THERE WILL BE A FIGHT ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT OVER NEXT WEEK'S ELECTION RESULTS.

IT WILL WRECK OUR NATION IF WE ALLOW IT, SO WE MUST NOT ALLOW IT.
WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER "ELECTION 2000" TO CREATE CHAOS ENOUGH FOR MARTIAL LAW.

Reuters has reported that the Democrats have already filed election-related FEDERAL lawsuits in four key swing states.
The Washington Post and ABC, Australia reported same 4 days ago.

"The federal lawsuits in four battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania — arrived just over a week before Election Day.

These issues were also likely to continue playing out in court. In another potentially key legal filing this week, a federal judge on Monday ordered the Republican National Committee — which is still under a consent decree issued in 1982 — to turn over “all agreements” between the committee and the Trump campaign “regarding voter fraud, ballot security, ballot integrity, poll watching, or poll monitoring.”

This case could have huge ramifications on the last-minute strategies of both parties, said election law expert Rick Hasen of the University of California at Irvine.

The lawsuits in all four states, which included similar allegations, cited a Bloomberg Businessweek report that quoted an anonymous Trump official as saying that the campaign had “three major voter suppression operations underway.” In the report, the official said the campaign was seeking to drive down turnout among African American voters.

The Trump and Clinton campaigns did not respond to requests for comment about the lawsuits, nor did the Republican National Committee or Democratic National Committee."

SPINELESS CRETINS!
WELL, IN REALITY, SOME "BATTLEGROUND STATES" STRUGGLING TO HELP THEIR CHOSEN CANDIDATES TO WIN THIS THING HAVE MADE A FINE MESS OF THINGS ON THEIR OWN.
Battleground states still fighting over voting laws, potential Election Day confusion

YOU SEE, EACH STATE GOVERNMENT GETS TO DECIDE WHAT "VOTING LAWS" IT WANTS, AND IF A STATE HAS A HEAVY MAJORITY OF VOTERS FOR EITHER PARTY, THAT'S THE WAY THEIR ELECTION LAWS LEAN, WHETHER THEY ADMIT IT OR NOT.
A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY STATE WANTS TO SEE THOSE WHO NORMALLY VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS HAVE, SHALL WE SAY, AN ADVANTAGE IN CASTING THEIR VOTES EASILY, AND DITTO FOR STATES WHO WANT TO SEE A REPUBLICAN WIN.

THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT CITIZENS OF THOSE STATES DON'T GET TO VOTE ON VOTER LAWS...THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS DECIDE THAT FOR THEM.
WELL, ANYWAY, HERE COME THE LEGAL BATTLES, THE AFTER-ELECTION 'NUCLEAR WAR".

GIRD UP THY LOINS, AMERICANS, IT'S GOING TO BE BRUTAL!


In a recent article entitled "Clinton, Trump Prepare for Possibility of Election Overtime", Bloomberg discussed the armies of lawyers that Clinton and Trump are both assembling for this election.

November 1, 2016 
"Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are arming up for a possible post-Election Day battle.
Clinton is assembling a voter protection program that has drawn thousands of lawyers agreeing to lend their time and expertise in battleground states, though the campaign isn’t saying exactly how many or where. It is readying election observers in Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada and Arizona to assess any concerns -- including the potential for voter intimidation -- and to verify normal procedures.

The Republican National Lawyers Association, which trains attorneys in battleground states and in local jurisdictions where races are expected to be close, aims to assemble 1,000 lawyers ready to monitor polls and possibly challenge election results across the country. Hedge fund manager Robert Mercer, one of Trump’s biggest backers, has sunk $500,000 into the group, its biggest donation in at least four presidential elections, Internal Revenue Service filings show.

“We are fighting for open, fair and honest elections,” the association’s executive director, Michael Thielen, said in an e-mail.

Most discussion about the potential for a contested election until now has revolved around the premise of a Trump loss, his contention that the election is “rigged” and his refusal to say ahead of time that he would concede. But since FBI Director James Comey’s controversial disclosure on Friday that he is reviewing newly discovered e-mails possibly related to an investigation of Clinton, several polls have shown the race tightening considerably."

JUST IN CASE HILLARY OR TRUMP SHOULD LOSE, THERE ARE SEVERAL PREFABRICATED EXCUSES BOTH THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND THEIR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS ARE READY TO OFFER BEFORE EVERY COURT IN AMERICA TO CONTEST ELECTION RESULTS AND POSSIBLY KEEP THE OPPOSING CANDIDATE OUT OF THE OVAL OFFICE.

JUST AS IN 2000, THE AMERICAN VOTERS WILL MOST LIKELY BE 'OVERRULED', NO MATTER WHICH "SIDE" WINS, AND THE OUTCOME OF THE PRETEND ELECTION WILL YET AGAIN BE DECIDED BY THE COURTS, IF NOT BY THE DAMNABLE 'ELECTORAL COLLEGE', WHICH WAS SET UP TO KEEP AMERICANS FROM CHOOSING THE PRESIDENT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

BEFORE WE PROCEED TO THE LIST OF EXCUSES FOR FILING SUIT, FOR MY FOREIGN READERS, HERE'S HOW IT WORKS, OUR "ELECTION PROCESS":
"Each state releases an unofficial vote on election night that is made official after a post-election canvass confirms the accuracy.
When a state certifies its official result, that determines the slate of Electoral College electors who meet Dec. 19.
Congress accepts that vote on Jan. 6 to declare a president-elect."

IT'S MORE COMPLEX THAN THAT, SUCH AS HOW THOSE ELECTORAL VOTES ARE 'DECIDED', BY WHOM, AND WHO APPOINTS THOSE ELECTORAL COLLEGE FOLKS, BUT SUFFICE IT TO SAY THAT WHEN OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE TO EACH OTHER GRIPING ABOUT HOW DUMB, HOW UNEDUCATED THE AVERAGE CITIZENS WERE BACK THEN, THEY ALSO MUST HAVE REALIZED THAT THOSE SAME "UNEDUCATED" VOTERS WOULD ALSO NOT BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT HOW THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SHAFTS EVERY VOTER IN AMERICA.

INDEED, MOST AMERICANS ARE STILL UNAWARE OF THIS FACT.

BUT NOW, THIS ELECTION,WE'RE TOLD THAT "OUTSIDE INFLUENCES" CAN STEAL THE ELECTION, AND GULLIBLE AMERICANS ARE FALLING FOR THESE LAME EXCUSES AHEAD OF THE VOTE COUNT BECAUSE EACH PARTY SO WANTS TO WIN THAT THEY'D BLAME GOD FOR A LOSS.

IN THE BLOOMBERG ARTICLE WE WERE OFFERED THREE 'SCENARIOS' THAT COULD SPELL A LEGAL BATTLE ROYAL POST-ELECTION DAY:

#1- a blowout; (Where the overwhelming majority is called into question by the opposing side which screams, "NO WAY! WE WERE AHEAD THERE!")

#2- an election in which the race in one or more states needed for one of the candidates to get the 270 electoral votes needed to win is too close to call and recounts are needed, as in Florida in 2000;

#3- a close race where the unofficial vote shows a winner but there are questions about whether uncounted absentee or provisional ballots could change the outcome, as in Ohio in 2004, when John Kerry waited until the morning after the election to concede.

The losing candidate’s ability to contest the results with a recount depends in part on how close the unofficial results are and where. The nation’s capital and 20 states, including a handful of battleground states, call for an automatic recount if the margin is narrow enough, such as 0.5 percent or fewer of the total votes cast in Florida, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

A losing candidate can ask for a recount in 43 states, while a few states will only consider that request if the race falls within a certain margin, according to NCSL. Political party officers can seek recounts in at least five states, and voters can seek recounts in at least 17 states.

HERE'S WHAT ELSE AMERICA HAS BEEN TOLD COULD HAPPEN AND WHAT WE ARE EXPECTED TO BELIEVE HAPPENED IF ELECTION DAY DISSOLVES IN ABSOLUTE AND UTTER CHAOS AND RIOTS IN THE STREETS. I'VE CUT THE LIST DOWN TO THE TOP 4:

1~"THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING! THEY'LL HACK INTO VOTING MACHINES, HACK ELECTION RESULTS AND GIVE THE ELECTION TO TRUMP!"

ONE SILLY ARTICLE EVEN CLAIMED:
Vladimir Putin is trying to hack the election.

Meanwhile, Julian Assange and even some of our own boys in "national security" have called BS...

NO, THE RECENT HACKS DID NOT DEFINITELY COME FROM RUSSIA, THERE IS NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THEY DID, AND CHINA HAS BEEN BUSTED MOST OFTEN FOR HACKING INTO AMERICA'S LOUSY, LEAKY 'SECURITY SYSTEM',

SOME "INSIDER EXPERTS" SAY IT DEFINITELY CAME FROM WITHIN THE U.S.

SHOULD WE GUESS WHO MAY HAVE SET UP THIS CHARADE, OR JUST ASSUME BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES ARE GUILTY?

THE NSA (NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY) ITSELF MAY BE THE CULPRIT.
US government whistleblower William Binney threw his hat into the DNC hack ring by stating that the Democratic National Committee’s server was not hacked by Russia but by a disgruntled U.S. intelligence worker.

The motivation of the hacker…concern over Hillary Clinton’s disregard of national security secrets when she used a personal email and consistently lied about it.
Breitbart reports further…

Binney referenced testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2011 by then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in which Meuller spoke of the FBI’s ability to access various secretive databases “to track down known and suspected terrorists.”
[MY NOTE: FOLLOWING THAT LINK TO "TESTIMONY", MOST WILL BE SURPRISED BY WHAT THE FBI CHIEF DISCUSSED BEFORE CONGRESS THAT DAY. WHAT A READ! WHAT A VERY TANGLED WEB!]

Binney surmised that the hack of the DNC could have been coordinated by someone inside the U.S. intelligence community angry over Clinton’s compromise of national security data with her email use.

"And the other point is that Hillary, according to an article published by the Observer in March of this year ,has a problem with NSA because she compromised Gamma material.

[AND WHAT A GRAND, IN-DEPTH, VERY EXPLANATORY ARTICLE THAT IS!
IT DOES, HOWEVER, LEAN HEAVILY IN FAVOR OF TRUMP, BUT IS MORE THAN WORTH THE READ FOR THE INFORMATION COMING STRAIGHT FROM THE NSA WHICH MOST AMERICANS ARE NOT AWARE OF. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.]

Now 'GAMMA' is the most sensitive material at NSA. And so there were a number of NSA officials complaining to the press or to the people who wrote the article that she did that. She lifted the material that was in her emails directly out of Gamma reporting.

That is a direct compromise of the most sensitive material at the NSA. So she’s got a real problem there. So there are many people who have problems with what she has done in the past."

AS THE OBSERVER POINTED OUT:
"The Federal Bureau of Investigation examination of email-gate, pursuant to provisions of the Espionage Act, poses a major threat to Ms. Clinton’s presidential aspirations."

SO, GIVEN THAT, GIVEN THAT CLINTON'S LAXNESS ALONE WOULD HANG HER, PERHAPS, WHY WOULD RUSSIA HACK INTO ANYTHING AND SLOW DOWN THAT PROCESS?

BINNEY, WITH OVER 30 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH OUR "NATIONAL SECURITY" BOYS, SHOULD KNOW WHAT'S MOST LIKELY, SHALL WE IMAGINE?

FEW AMERICANS MAY HAVE HEARD OF THIS WHISTLEBLOWER, BUT HE SPOKE OUT EVEN BEFORE SNOWDEN DID.

"Over a year before Edward Snowden shocked the world in the summer of 2013 with revelations that have since changed everything from domestic to foreign US policy but most of all, provided everyone a glimpse into just what the NSA truly does on a daily basis, a former NSA staffer, and now famous whistleblower, William Binney, gave excruciating detail to Wired magazine about all that Snowden would substantiate the following summer.

Binney was an architect of the NSA’s surveillance program. He became a famed whistleblower when he resigned on October 31, 2001, after spending more than 30 years with the agency. He referenced testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2011 by then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in which Meuller spoke of the FBI’s ability to access various secretive databases “to track down known and suspected terrorists.”

2~ THE FBI HAS INTENTIONALLY TRIED TO SWAY THE ELECTION BY FOCUSING ON CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL.

Journalists Blast The FBI For Meddling In 2016 Election
UMMM, NO, FIRST, THE FBI HAS BECOME A JOKE TO MANY AMERICANS AND COULDN'T INFLUENCE VOTERS IF IT TRIED.

SECONDLY, WHAT SHOULD THE FBI DO WHEN IT UNCOVERS EVIDENCE?
JUST HOLD ONTO IT UNTIL THE POSSIBLE CRIMINAL ASKS THEM TO USE IT TO INVESTIGATE?
THEY ACTUALLY STUMBLED ONTO THE NEW EVIDENCE AND WHEN THEY FOUND IT, THEY REPORTED IT TO CONGRESS... WITHOUT ASKING HILLARY IF THAT WAS OKAY WITH HER.

LASTLY, IT ISN'T ONE EMAIL SCANDAL INVESTIGATION, IT'S FIVE SEPARATE BUT CONNECTED INVESTIGATIONS.
FIVE.

AND IT ISN'T THE FBI TRYING TO SWAY ANYTHING, IT'S THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TRYING TO SWAY ELECTION OUTCOME , REPEATEDLY, AS YOU WILL SEE DOCUMENTED BELOW.
"There are, in fact, not one but five separate FBI investigations which involve members of Clinton's inner circle or their closest relatives - the people at the center of what has come to be known as Clintonworld.

The five known investigations are into: (1) Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin's estranged husband sexting a 15-year-old and what classified material he may have in his personal computer; (2) the handling of classified material by Clinton and her staff on her private email server;
(3) questions over whether the Clinton Foundation was used as a front for influence-peddling; (4) whether the Virginia governor broke laws about foreign donations; and (5) whether Hillary's campaign chairman's brother did the same."


WELL, THERE SHOULD NOW BE A 6th INVESTIGATION INTO HOW MUCH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAKED TO JOHN PODESTA ABOUT FBI AND CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HILLARY.

IT HAS BEEN PROVEN, AFTER ALL, THAT PETER KADZIK FREQUENTLY SENT PODESTA "HEADS-UP" EMAILS ABOUT WHAT WAS HEADED HILARY'S WAY IN TERMS OF THE INVESTIGATION.
SEEMS HIS SON WANTED A SPOT IN THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN.

"Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Peter Kadzik, who essentially serves as the Justice Department's lobbyist to Congress, sent the email in question to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta from a private Gmail account on May 19 last year with the subject line, "Heads up."

The exchange is one of tens of thousands of emails stolen from Podesta's Gmail account and published by WikiLeaks in recent weeks.

It's unclear how Kadzik learned of the FOIA filing, which was submitted by Department of Justice attorneys representing the State Department in ongoing lawsuits.
Kadzik previously worked for Podesta as a lawyer, and additional emails released by WikiLeaks suggest the two men were friends."

AND WHY WOULDN'T THERE BE A 7th INVESTIGATION REGARDING HILLARY BEING FED AUDIENCE QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE OF THOSE TOWNHALL DEBATES TO GIVE HER AN EDGE OVER TRUMP?
AFTER ALL, OLD DONNA BRAZILE, 'INTERIM' DNC CHAIRWOMAN, WAS FIRED BY CNN FOR THAT, ALTHOUGH WE'RE TOLD SHE RESIGNED.

IT WAS RESIGN OR BE FIRED, JUST LIKE BILLY BUSH'S CHOICE AT NBC AFTER HIS PART IN THOSE TRUMP LEAKS ABOUT THE DON SEXUALLY EXPLOITING WOMEN.
[BTW, HOW MANY AMERICANS ARE AWARE THAT BILLY IS GEORGE BUSH SENIOR'S NEPHEW?
SINCE ALL THE BUSH MEN HAVE COME OUT STRONGLY AGAINST TRUMP, DARE WE WONDER IF BILLY WAS A WILLING "LEAK" REGARDING THOSE TAPES, A LEAK THAT COULD HAVE COST TRUMP THE ELECTION?
YOU JUST DON'T CROSS "DADDY BUSH" AND GET AWAY WITH IT.]
CNN COVERED ITS OWN BEHIND RE: BRAZILE BY SAYING:
"CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate. We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor."
JUST LIKE THE CHAIRWOMAN BEFORE HER...

Brazile holds that interim position because WikiLeaks previously revealed DNC emails that suggested the previous chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL), and her underlings worked in various ways to rig the Democratic primary against Clinton’s challenger, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Brazile is a longtime member of the Clinton inner circle, who worked on Bill Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 1992 and 1996, as well as Al Gore’s 2000 campaign.

HER ATTEMPTED COVERUP OF THE FACT THAT SHE DID SEND THOSE "HEADS-UP" EMAILS, JUST AS KADZIK DID, WAS PROVEN TO BE LIES BY A BREITBART ARTICLE WHICH REVEALED:

"As with the previous emails Brazile attempted to dismiss as fakes, this one includes an automatically inserted statement that it was “sent from Donna’s iPad.”

The next day, CNN’s town hall debate did, indeed, include this question from a woman in the audience:

THE KADZIK AND BRAZILE EMAILS ARE JUST A FEW OF MANY SENT TO THE CLINTON TEAM BY GOVERNMENT INSIDERS.
IT REALLY IS RAMPANT.

IRONICALLY, CNN REPORTED:
November 2, 2016
"Several [emails] published by WikiLeaks in recent weeks raise questions about the coziness between the Clinton campaign and government officials.

Last month, the group published an email in which Brian Fallon -- a former spokesman for the Department of Justice now working for the Clinton campaign -- indicated he has spoken with "DOJ folks" about pending FOIA litigation.

And on Wednesday, an email emerged showing communication between a State Department spokeswoman and top Clinton aides about how the State Department would respond to reports about the former Secretary's emails.

This particular exchange was from March 1, 2015 -- one day before Clinton's private server was first revealed by The New York Times, and about a month before the official launch of her presidential campaign.
The spokeswoman outlined the State Department's response to the upcoming report, indicating that the press office had incorporated input from the Clinton aides.
The email was forwarded to Palmieri, who in turn forwarded it to Podesta.
"You may have already heard from other channels, but NYT will have a story tomorrow on HRC's Benghazi emails," Palmieri wrote, along with speculation about how the reporter learned of the server.
"Better now than April," she added.

3~ ELECTION FRAUD, VOTER FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD! 
WE WERE ROBBED!
A REPLAY OF EVERY ELECTION IN WHICH ONE SIDE FEARS THE OTHER SIDE WILL WIN...ALL ELECTIONS....CLAIM THAT MYTHICAL FAIRY TALE, "ELECTION/VOTER FRAUD". 
DEBUNKED FOR AT LEAST 20 YEARS NOW, IT'S STILL A STRAW GRASPED BY THE LOSING SIDE EVERY TIME, GOING INTO AND COMING OUT OF ELECTIONS, TO TELL THEMSELVES AND THEIR CAMPAIGN FUNDERS  IT WAS NOT THEIR FAULT THEY LOST.
7 papers, 4 government inquiries, 2 news investigations and 1

9 Facts That Blow Up the Voter Fraud Myth | Mother Jones

Myth of Voter Fraud | Brennan Center for Justice


JUST GIVE IT UP, PLEASE.
VOTERS VOTED AGAINST YOU, POLITICAL WHORES.
ACCEPT IT.

4~ THE TERRORISTS ARE COMING!
THERE WILL BE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON ELECTION DAY EVE AND AT THE POLLS, MAYBE, PROBABLY, THE MEDIA SINCERELY HOPES?

~Sources: U.S. intel warning of possible al Qaeda attacks in U.S. Monday

~State, city officials confirm election terror threats

~NYC confirmed as target for potential Election Day eve attack
~FBI warns of possible pre-Election Day terror attacks | Fox Ne

BS, BS, BS!
ELECTION DAY OR ELECTION EVE HOLDS NO BIGGER THREAT OF THE DREADED, OFT-REPEATED CRIES OF ALARM TO INSTILL FEAR AMONGST THE MASSES THAN ANY OTHER DAY IN AMERICA.

WHY THE HELL WOULD TERRORISTS GIVE A RIP WHO WINS WHEN SAID TERRORISTS WANT TO SEE EVERY AMERICAN DEAD, EVERY DAY, AND HOPE TO MAKE THAT A REALITY 365 DAYS A YEAR?

THE SAME SCARE TACTICS ARE ISSUED EVERY NEW YEAR'S DAY, EVERY 4TH OF JULY AND EVERY ANNIVERSARY OF 9/11.

BUT IF FEAR-MONGERING KEEPS PEOPLE AWAY FROM THE POLLS, THEN WHO WOULD BENEFIT MOST...REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS?

AMERICANS ARE OFTEN TOLD THAT MEN LIKE SNOWDEN, ASSANGE, MANNING ARE TRYING TO "BRING DOWN AMERICA".

THAT'S SIMPLY A DAMNED LIE.

THEY'RE TRYING TO SHOW US ALL WHAT REALLY GOES ON IN BACK ROOMS OF CONGRESS, INSIDE OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, INSIDE FEDERAL AGENCIES, INSIDE THAT OVAL OFFICE THAT RIPS OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDSAND DENIES US ALL OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO RUN THIS SHOW AS THE GROUP KNOWN AS "WE, THE PEOPLE".

WE, THE PEOPLE, ARE SUPPOSED TO BE IN CHARGE OF THINGS.
WE WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE THE CHOICE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS, THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE WHAT WE SAY, THINK, DO, BELIEVE AS OUTLINED IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

ONE-BY-ONE, ESPECIALLY SINCE 9/11, WE'VE SEEN EVERY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT WE ONCE HAD TORN FROM US AND REINVENTED AND SOLD AS THE "NEW" WAY FOR AMERICA, THE "NEW" PATH WE MUST ALL ACCEPT AND UNQUESTIONINGLY FOLLOW.

THE SMITHSONIAN, OF ALL SOURCES, ASKED IN 2011:
"Are employees of sensitive agencies like the NSA, the CIA and the FBI who leak information to the news media patriotic whistleblowers who expose government abuses—or lawbreakers who should be punished for endangering national security?"

I MOST SINCERELY HOPE YOU GO READ ALL THAT ARTICLE JUST TO SEE HOW OFTEN, HOW MUCH WE'VE BEEN DUPED, FOOLED, LIED TO, AND HOW SUCH THINGS WERE REVEALED BY BRAVE SOULS WHO WERE ARRESTED, TRIED, CONDEMNED, WHOSE CAREERS AND LIVES WERE RUINED SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WANTED US ALL TO KNOW WHAT WAS REALLY HAPPENING IN AMERICA

I DO NOT BELIEVE, DO NOT SEE ONE BIT OF PROOF, THAT ANY OF THEM HAD THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA IN MIND WHEN THEY BLEW THEIR WHISTLES TO ALERT US OF CRIMES AGAINST AMERICA, AGAINST ALL OF US.

THEIR NUMBERS ARE FEW BECAUSE OTHERS WHO KNOW OTHER THINGS HAVE SEEN THEIR RUIN, THEIR PUNISHMENT FOR ENLIGHTENING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, FOR SHOWING "AVERAGE CITIZEN" WHAT TRAITOROUS MEANS OUR OWN GOVERNMENT WILL GO TO TO BECOME OUR UNQUESTIONED DICTATORS, TYRANTS, THE LIKES OF WHICH WE HAD A REVOLUTION TO BE RID OF JUST 240 YEARS AGO.
SEEING WHAT HAPPENS TO "WHISTLEBLOWERS" MAY HAVE KEPT SOME FROM ACTUALLY SAVING AMERICA FROM DESTRUCTION ON MANY LEVELS.

THEY VALUED THEIR FREEDOM AND LIVES MORE THAN THEY VALUED AMERICA AS A NATION, OR US AS FREE AND INDEPENDENT CITIZENS WHO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND THAT OUR ELECTEDS PAY ATTENTION TO THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, WHO HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE INFORMED WHY OUR 'LEADERS' MAKE THE LAWS, WHY THEY MAKE THEIR CHOICES THAT INFLUENCE ALL OF US.

WE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO SUE OR GO THROUGH A DOZEN CHANNELS TO GET INFORMATION, THAT "FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA)" SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO BE PASSED...WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON, AS CITIZENS, AS VOTERS, AS AMERICANS, DAMN IT!

IT'S OUR GREAT NATION AND OUR FREEDOMS WE SHOULD ALL PUT FIRST, THAT "GREATER GOOD", NOT OUR OWN BEHINDS OR THE POLITICAL CAREERS OR THE PARTY WINS.

IF I LIVE TO SEE THE IMPENDING LAWSUITS AND LEGAL WRANGLINGS THAT SURELY WILL COME AFTER THE ELECTION THIS YEAR, MAY I ALSO HAVE THE STRENGTH AND THE MEANS TO GET TO EITHER OF OR BOTH OF THE CANDIDATES AND AT LEAST SPIT IN THE FACE OF WHOMEVER STARTS THAT CRAP!

AS MANY A PARENT SAID TO US KIDS WHO GREW UP IN THE 1940s AND 1950s, "I'LL TAKE A LIMB TO YOU AND BEAT YOUR BRITCHES OFF IF YOU DARE..."

I WOULD INDEED DO JUST THAT.


3 DAYS UNTIL 'ELECTION DAY'....





______________________________________

***ELECTORAL COLLEGE BIAS PROVEN.

In the state of Texas, residents of the Lone Star State get one Electoral College vote for every 722,871 residents.
There are 711,723 Californians for every Electoral College vote the state casts each presidential election. Behind these two, Florida weighs in with 1 vote in the Electoral College for every 699,009 Floridians in the state. New York claims one Electoral College vote for every 699,520 people who dwell within the state, a similar number to what is reported by North Carolina.

Meanwhile, other states have their citizens wield a lot more influence on Election Day.

For example, there’s only one Electoral College vote per 195,369 residents of Wyoming.

For the land of Bernie Sanders, there’s one Electoral College vote per 208,680 Vermonters.

Washington DC residents are lionized by the press for not getting a vote. But that’s not the case, as the district gets three Electoral College voters, which is one per 224,076 residents, a much more favorable ratio than Florida’s. There’s also Alaska (1 Electoral College votes per 246,144 people) and North Dakota (252,309 residents for each Electoral College vote the state gets) who are getting a good deal on this electoral flaw.

But the system also does violate that spirit of fairness that leads to a “one person one vote system,” especially if a Delaware citizen’s vote is worth twice that of a Georgian’s. Perhaps it is time to do away with the Electoral College. Already, presidential candidates camp out in a handful of states, ignoring the majority of states, which are seen as “uncompetitive.” That’s why both parties crisscross North Carolina, but rare touch South Carolina, even though everyone’s vote should matter as much,

[The author of the above, John A. Tures, is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Ga.]