Saturday, December 24, 2016

AMERICA, FINAL NATION TO TURN AGAINST ISRAEL





ABOUT THE U.N. , PLEASE SEE:Robert Herzstein, Historian Who Linked a U.N. Leader to Nazi War Crimes

AND: Kurt Waldheim’s veiled ties to Nazi war crimes.

AND: One Global Government | Huffington Post

SHORT, TO THE POINT...OBAMA OBVIOUSLY LOATHES BOTH NETANYAHU AND ISRAEL AND, IN HIS FINAL DAYS AS PRESIDENT, HE FULLY INTENDS TO 'BRING DOWN ISRAEL', AS FAR AS HE CAN.

IN A HUGE GESTURE OF SAUDI BUTT-KISSING, AS A WET KISS IN THE MOUTH TO ALL OPEC NATIONS, OBAMA ROLLED ON ISRAEL, THREW NETANYAHU RIGHT UNDER THAT BUS WE CALL THE UNITED NATIONS...THE U.N...BIGGEST TERRORIST GROUP ON THIS PLANET.

NO OTHER PRESIDENT HAS DONE WHAT OBAMA HAS DONE.
AND NO ONE WILL EVER FORGET THIS DAY.

"The White House’s decision to break with decades of U.S. policy and allow the U.N. Security Council to condemn Israeli settlements is the culmination of years of bad blood between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“The Obama administration not only failed to protect Israel against this gang-up at the U.N., it colluded with it behind the scenes,” Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.

Rhodes disputed that claim, saying that Obama only informed his national security team Friday morning of his decision to abstain from the vote. He said the U.S. had no role in drafting the resolution.

Since 1980, the U.S. has vetoed settlement-related resolutions at the U.N.

The move could backfire on Obama by emboldening Netanyahu and Trump to pursue hard-line policies toward Palestinians that contradict the president’s approach.

“As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th,” Trump tweeted after the vote.

Rhodes denied the president’s decision would have any bearing on Trump’s policies, which he said were set long before Friday’s vote.

But he also struggled to explain how it would improve the situation in the Middle East.

Instead, the decision appeared to be one final chance for Obama to flex his muscles on the world stage in front of Trump, who has publicly taken stances on foreign policy at odds with the current administration.

“There is one president at a time,” Rhodes said. “President Obama is the president of the United States until Jan. 20 and we are taking this action, of course, as U.S. policy.”

While the Security Council resolution does not carry practical consequences, it could give Palestinians a precedent to point to on settlement construction in future talks with the Israelis.

Critics say the move could embolden Israel’s numerous enemies and invite new international pressure against the Jewish state.
It also deepened an emerging split in the Democratic Party over Israel, which many Jewish groups worry could weaken bipartisan support for the country.

Incoming Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the vote “frustrating, disappointing and confounding” and said it will move Israel farther from peace.

Yediot Aharonot, one of Israel’s largest newspapers, called the vote “the lowest moment in the relations between the Israeli government and the Obama administration."

The vote also kick-started an effort by some Senate Republicans to reduce U.S. financial assistance to the U.N.

Any withdrawal of financial support would be a rebuke to the president’s vision."

HIS "VISION"?
ARE WE ASSIGNING YET MORE SUPER POWERS TO OBAMA?
HIS VISION?
IS THE MAN A SEER, A PROPHET?

HIS "VISION" HAS BEEN AND IS NOW TO SEE ISRAEL DO WHAT AMERICA HAS SURELY NEVER DONE AND WHAT NO OTHER NATION THAT HAS WON A WAR HAS DONE...GIVE BACK CONQUERED TERRITORY.

WILL OBAMA BE THE PREZ WHO GIVES BACK ALL THE STOLEN LAND TO THE AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES?

WILL THE NATIONS OF EUROPE NOW REMOVE THEIR "SETTLEMENTS" FROM LANDS THEY WON AT WAR?

WILL ALL NATIONS NOW INSTITUTE A "TWO-STATE SOLUTION" LIKE THEY INSIST ISRAEL DO?

WILL WE HAVE A 'UNITED STATES/UNION OF INDIGENOUS TRIBES' IN PLACE OF JUST "AMERICA"?

WILL AMERICA REMOVE ITS "SETTLEMENTS" FROM MANHATTAN AND MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW "STATE" THERE?
HELL NO!
NO WAY!

WILL ENGLAND EVER RELEASE SCOTLAND TO THE SCOTS?

WILL THE OFFSPRING OF ALL CONQUERORS NOW GO BACK WHERE THEIR ANCESTORS ORIGINATED FROM?

NO!

BUT THE NATIONS WHO WON'T DO ANY OF THIS WANT ISRAEL TO DO ALL OF THAT.

ISRAEL, WHO HAS CONQUERED THE SAME LANDS OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN FOR OVER 5,000 YEARS, MUST SHARE WHAT LITTLE SHE HAS LEFT AFTER GIVING IN TO SUCH DEMANDS SINCE BEFORE SHE BECAME A MODERN NATION.

ISRAEL, WHO GAVE BACK THE DAMNED SINAI PENINSULA, WHO AGREED FOR OVER 2/3rds OF HER ORIGINAL LAND TO BECOME "TRANSJORDAN", WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE NEW HOMELAND FOR ALL MUSLIMS/ARABS WHO DIDN'T WISH TO LIVE INSIDE ISRAEL.
ISRAEL, WHO ISN'T "ALLOWED" TO CLAIM JERUSALEM AS HER CAPITAL EVEN THOUGH NATIONS ALL AROUND HER WROTE IN THEIR HISTORIES THAT JERUSALEM WAS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL.

JORDAN'S KING STOPPED "NEW PALESTINE" FROM HAPPENING, NOT ISRAEL!

ISRAEL,SMALLEST OF THE SMALL, CARVED UP AND GIVEN AWAY TO ALMOST ANYONE WHO WANTED A PIECE AFTER BRITAIN AND THE "LEAGUE OF NATIONS" RENEGED ON THEIR ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.

ONLY ISRAEL.

ONLY ISRAEL MUST MOVE ASIDE AGAIN TO MAKE ROOM FOR A FAKE PEOPLE WITH A FAKE CLAIM TO ANYTHING.

THE (SO-CALLED) "SOVEREIGN NATIONS" THAT ARE THE INDIGENOUS TRIBES HERE IN THE U.S. HAVE ASKED FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS FOR WHAT OBAMA AND THE OTHER WORLD LEADERS ARE ALL SET TO HAND THE TERRORISTS IN GAZA, GOLAN, WEST BANK... AMERICA'S "DISPLACED PEOPLE" WERE REFUSED ONE MILE OF RETURNED LANDS!

NO, AMERICA WON'T GIVE BACK ONE INCH, BUT WILL DEMAND THAT ISRAEL GIVE UP HALF HER TINY SPIT OF LAND...AGAIN.

THE DAMNED U.N. HAS MOUTHED THE WORDS FOR DECADES THAT IT WILL HELP THE INDIGENOUS TRIBES IN AMERICA GET JUSTICE, GET BACK AT LEAST SOME OF THEIR LANDS.

THEY LIED, BUT THEN THE U.N. WAS BUILT ON LIES.

AND WHERE THE U.N.'S BLUE HELMETS GO, MURDER, RAPES, SODOMY, THEFT, MUTILATIONS, SEX SLAVERY, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, DESTRUCTION ALWAYS FOLLOWS.

ASK ANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD TO PUT UP WITH BLUE HELMETS OVER THEM.
READ THE FACTS AS REPORTED BY THE PEOPLE AFFECTED BY THEIR PRESENCE.

**PLEASE NOTE**: YOU WILL FIND "MAINSTREAM MEDIA" ARTICLES IN THE SHORT LIST BELOW, BUT AS I AND OTHERS HAVE DEMONSTRATED, MAINSTREAM MEDIA, ALL OF THEM, HAVE BEEN BUSTED THOUSANDS OF TIMES WRITING "BS", GARBAGE, "FAKE NEWS", SO KEEP THAT IN MIND.
AND TOO, AS I SAID A FEW BLOGS BACK, THE AUTHOR OF THE TEA ROOM DOESN'T GIVE A RAT'S BEHIND WHO TELLS THE TRUTH, MSM OR "ALTERNATIVE NEWS", LET'S JUST HAVE THE TRUTH, EVEN IF IT KILLS US.
I'LL CITE "ALTERNATIVE MEDIA" IF IT EXPOSES EVEN ONE WEE LIE.
NOBODY IS FORCED TO READ HERE, RIGHT?

Whistleblower Targeted for Exposing UN Troops Raping Children


UN Panics Amid Growing Scandal on Child Rape by “Peace” Troops


Vile sex abuse by UN peacekeepers is leaving the United Nations in tatters


UN s Role in Nation Building: From the Congo to Iraq ...... Getting Away with Murder, Mutilation and Rape, New Testimony from Sierra Leone (PDF)


The UN's Heritage Heist | Observer


What's the point of peacekeepers when they don't keep the peace


The Criminalization of the United Nations


UN Corruption and Lies as UN Employee Arrested for Aiding Hamas


Lies covered by the United Nations. Deafening silence on the depleted uranium



Exposing the great 'poverty reduction' lie OF THE U.N.


IN A PURE MOCKERY OF ISRAEL, THE U.N. ALLOWED THE CREATION OF ITS OWN "ARK OF THE COVENANT", FILLED WITH ITS AGENDAE, ITS "COMMANDMENTS" FOR A 'NECESSARY GLOBAL GOVERNANCE'... THE "EARTH CHARTER" OF THE U.N.'S AGENDA 2030, OR AGENDA 21.

The Ark of Hope, a 49” x 32” wooden chest was , created as a place of refuge for the Earth Charter document, an international peoples treaty for building a just, sustainable, and peaceful global society in the 21st century. The Ark of Hope also provides refuge for the Temenos Books, Images and Words for Global Healing, Peace, and Gratitude.
The Earth Charter’s 16 principles are the guiding vision behind the creation of these books.
The Ark of Hope was created for a celebration of the Earth Charter held at Shelburne Farms, Vermont on September 9, 2001.


The Earth Charter history begins with this:

Preamble: "We stand at a critical moment in Earth’s history, a time when humanity must choose its future. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and fragile, the future at once holds great peril and great promise.

To move forward we must recognize that in the midst of a magnificent diversity of cultures and life forms we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny.

We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice, and a culture of peace.

Towards this end, it is imperative that we, the peoples of Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations."

THAT "UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS" ?
THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO ISRAEL.
ISRAELIS HAVE NO "HUMAN RIGHTS", BUT TERRORISTS DO, ESPECIALLY  ANY WHO CALL THEMSELVES 'PALESTINIANS' AND ESPECIALLY "PALESTINIANS" WHO FIRE ROCKETS AT, OR IN OTHER WAYS KILL ISRAELIS, AND THE TERRORISTS WHO WEAR BLUE HELMETS HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS TO MAIM, ENSLAVE, MURDER, RAPE, SODOMIZE AND STEAL.

ONLY ISRAEL HAS NO "UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT" TO ANYTHING....



No comments:

Post a Comment