Translate

Thursday, January 17, 2019

5G NETWORK & MILITARY CROWD CONTROL WEAPONS , SAME FREQUENCY. SAME GOAL?




Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data.
However, 5 G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation.

CELLPHONES, LIKE THE INTERNET, WERE DEVELOPED FOR THE MILITARY.
WHAT COULD GO WRONG, RIGHT?




ABOVE IMAGE: CELLPHONE RADIATION PENETRATES INTO A CHILD'S BRAIN
MORE EXTENSIVELY THAN INTO AN ADULT'S.
THE YELLOW AREA IS HARDEST HIT, THEN THE RED.

In May 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma.
RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen.

Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened this association.

In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation.
On the contrary, ambient levels have increased.





ABOVE: THE 5G NETWORK IS ON THE SAME WAVELENGTH/FREQUENCY OF MILLIMETER WAVES AS THE CROWD CONTROL WEAPONS USED BY THE MILITARY AND POLICE.
[SEE: US Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program FAQS
http://jnlwp.defense.gov/About/Frequently-Asked-Questions/Active-Denial-System-FAQs/ AND
A Narrative Summary and Independent Assessment of the Active Denial System The Human Effects Advisory Panel
http://jnlwp.defense.gov/Portals/50/Documents/Future_Non-Lethal_Weapons/HEAP.pdf]  

Without long-term testing, without giving Americans both sides of the picture, Verizon just announced that 5G networks will be tested in 11 U.S. cities.

AT&T recently added to its plans on the launch of commercial 5G services in the US by identifying three additional cities in which it will deploy a standards-based mobile service by the end of the year. The cities are Charlotte and Raleigh, N.C., and Oklahoma City, reports rcrwireless.com.
In 2016, AT&T began testing in Austin, Texas, and expanded testing to Waco, Texas.

Verizon planned to launch in Sacramento and Los Angeles, California.

Sprint is planning to launch in the first half of 2019 and has listed New York, Phoenix, Kansas City, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington as target markets.

These 5G networks will involve the deployment of millions of antennas nationwide, thousands in each city, because 5G's millimeter waves cannot easily travel through buildings or other obstacles.

Proposed installations have led to public outcry in residential areas where homeowners do not want antennas mounted in their yards or near schools.

Several researchers have raised concerns that current regulations are not adequate to protect public health.

“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed…. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, a National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radio frequency radiation.

WHY THE CONCERN?

PERHAPS OF SECONDARY CONCERN (CANCER BEING PRIMARY) IS THE FACT THAT 5G IS IN THE WAVELENGTH USED BY MILITARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR CROWD CONTROL.

WHO WANTS TO BE CONTROLLED?


OTHER HARMFUL EFFECTS

EMFs (electromagnetic frequencies) are likely to contribute to neurological and neuropsychiatric problems, heart and reproductive problems, including but not limited to cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer's and infertility.

"Repeated Wi-Fi studies show that Wi-Fi causes oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload.
Excessive calcium signaling produced by EMF exposures also has important roles in producing pathophysiological effects of EMFs, including each of the effects listed above.

For the past 25 years, the industry has claimed that non-ionizing radiation is harmless and that the only radiation worth worrying about is ionizing radiation.

This paper is not focused on anecdotal reports but rather on 23 controlled, scientific studies of such health-related effects in animals, cells including human cells in culture and in human beings."

THAT EMFs ARE HARMLESS IS A LIE.

Over the past 14 years a series of epidemiological studies have found that low level electromagnetic fields [even as low as 1 μT (1 micro Tesla) produced by 60 Hz power lines can be correlated with increased incidence of certain diseases.

The correlation is strongest for those who have lived or worked in this environment for many years. For example, an increased risk of cancer has been found among children who lived for several years close to power distribution lines
[SOURCES: Wertheimer, N. and Leeper, E. "Electrical Wiring Configurations and Childhood Cancer" AM J EPIDEMIOLOGY, 109, 273-284 (1979); also, Savits, D. A. et al., "Case Control Study of Childhood Cancer and Exposure to 60-Hertz Magnetic Fields, " AM J EPIDEMIOLOGY, 128, 10-20 (1988); also London, D. A. et al. "Exposure To Electric and Magnetic Fields And Risk of Childhood Leukemia", AM. J. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 135, 1069-1070 (1992); also, Milham, S. Jr., "Increased Mortality in Amateur radio Operators Due to Lymphatic and Hematopoietic Malignancies," AM. J. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 128, 1175-1176 (1988).]

The research indicates that children from high electromagnetic field exposure homes have a 50 percent greater risk of developing cancer, particularly leukemia, lymphomas, and nervous system tumors.
Other data also show that men working in electrical jobs, such as electricians and telephone lineman are at higher risk for brain tumors and other cancers.

In a recent study in the Los Angeles area, S. Preston-Martin and collaborators at the University of Southern California found that men who had worked for 10 Years or more in a variety of electrical occupations had a ten times greater chance of getting brain tumors than men in the control group.
[SEE: Preston-Martin, S., and Mack, W. and Peters, Jr. "Astrocytoma Risk Related to Job Exposure to Electric and Magnetic Fields," presented at DOE contractors Annual Review, Denver Colorado, Nov. 5-8, 1990.]





[LINK TO MUCH LARGER IMAGE OF THE ABOVE http://emrabc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/mmW.jpg ]

AN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP FROM NEW ZEALAND MINCED NO WORDS WHEN CONDEMNING THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) FOR ITS ONE-SIDEDNESS AND FOOT-DRAGGING FAILURE TO HONESTLY ASSESS AND WARN PEOPLE OF THE HAZARDS OF THE 5G NETWORK AND ELECTROMAGNETIC FREQUENCIES (EMF) IN GENERAL:

"The WHO EMF Project, by itself, has no expertise whatsoever to evaluate biological and health effects of RF-EMF.
In everything that WHO EMF Project does the dominating role plays ICNIRP. In fact, it looks that the whole WHO EMF Project is a “front” organization for implementing of the opinions of ICNIRP members.

ICNIRP is a “private club”-like organization where current members select new members, based on their standing in the research arena and on their opinions on biological and health effects of EMF. This “self-selection” process led to a very “unhealthy” situation where all ICNIRP members have the same scientific opinion on the biological and health effects of EMF.

This is a clear-cut conflict-of-interest situation when the members of ICNIRP, while evaluating scientific evidence, may give preferential “treatment” to their own scientific opinions.

When there is nobody to contest these opinions with alternative explanations, because all ICNIRP members have similar opinions, the final opinion will be skewed and is likely to be scientifically biased.

As always, new technology will be implemented (5G) and any research into biological and health effects will be conducted post-factum, as it was done with 1G, 2G, 3G and 4G technologies. All this is “allowed” because in 1980s the US FDA permitted commercialization of the first mobile phones without health testing due to low-power exclusion rule…"

THEY AREN'T ALONE IN CALLING OUT THE ICNIRP.

157 scientists and medical doctors together with 86 non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) from all over the world are calling for more protective limits for exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless technologies.

In a joint statement, THE EMF CALL, they conclude that the ICNIRP guidelines are unscientific and do not protect against harmful health effects including cancer.

"The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issued draft Guidelines on 11th July 2018 for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (EMF) (100 kHz to 300 GHz).
The guidelines are inadequate to protect humans and the environment, as they only protect against acute thermal effects from very short and intense exposure.
They do not protect against cancer, reproductive harm, or effects on the nervous system, although the preponderance of the peer-reviewed research has found adverse effects from chronic exposure at intensities below the ICNIRP limits.

In May, 2011, the World Health Organization’s cancer agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), concluded that radiofrequency radiation in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz is a “possible” human carcinogen (Group 2B).

However, the ICNIRP ignores this as well as the increasing evidence in recent years for carcinogenicity."

I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO CONSIDER BELIEVING SOMETHING THAT VERY FEW OF YOU MAY WANT TO BELIEVE.

I BASE THIS REQUEST ON HUNDREDS OF PEER REVIEWED STUDIES, ON MY OWN 15+ YEARS OF RESEARCH, READING INCESSANTLY ON THE SUBJECT, DIGGING FOR FACTS, AND APPLYING COLD, HARD LOGIC.

I ASK YOU TO CONSIDER THIS MAINLY FOR THE SAKE OF CHILDREN.
FEW WILL READ PAST THIS PARAGRAPH.

WHY?

BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO CONSIDER FACTS IF THOSE FACTS ARE CONTRARY TO WHAT THEY CURRENTLY BELIEVE.

In “The Enigma of Reason,” a book by cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber, according to their theory of reasoning, reason’s primary strengths are justifying beliefs we already believe in and making arguments to convince others.

While this kind of reasoning helps us cooperate in a social environment, it does not make us particularly good at truth-seeking.

It also makes us fall prey to a number of cognitive biases, like confirmation bias, or the tendency to search for information that confirms what we already believe.

LEARNING, i.e., THE GETTING OF KNOWLEDGE, AS I HAVE SAID ON THIS BLOG FROM THE BEGINNING, REQUIRES US TO OPEN OUR MINDS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF FACTS WE MAY FIND DISTASTEFUL, FRIGHTENING OR SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE. WE LEARN SO THAT WE DO NOT PERISH.

I LIKE "DOUBTING THOMASES", THOSE WHO QUESTION EVERYTHING. IT'S A FINE THING TO DO.

SO, FOR ALL WHO DO SO, TRY THIS FOR YOURSELVES...

DO A WEB SEARCH FOR THE PHRASE, "peer reviewed articles hazards of electromagnetic fields".
YOU MAY GET THE SAME RESULTS I DO: "About 18,500 results."

YOU WILL ALSO READ MANY "CONCLUSIONS" SIMILAR TO THE FOLLOWING WHICH JUST WILL NOT EITHER ABSOLUTELY CONFIRM OR ABSOLUTELY DENY THE RISKS TO HUMAN HEALTH CAUSED BY EMF.


"There is insufficient information on the biological and health effects of EMF exposure of human populations and experimental animals to provide a rigorous
basis for establishing safety factors over the whole frequency range and for all frequency modulations."
MAY I SUGGEST THAT "THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION" BECAUSE THE INDUSTRY ITSELF DOESN'T WANT INFORMATION TO BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE.

WHY WOULD SUCH IMPORTANT INFORMATION BE WITHHELD, OR GO UNRESEARCHED?

MONEY, PROFITS.

A LOT OF $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

In 2017, around 1.54 billion smartphones were sold worldwide.

In the United States alone, sales of smartphones are projected to be worth around $55.6 billion U.S. dollars.

The average person spends about $80 per month for their phone bill.

A typical smartphone, including equipment, usage bills and apps, costs EACH AMERICAN a staggering $75,000 over a lifetime.

Every 10 years, we can expect to pay $12,559 for the convenience of owning a cell phone.

IF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROVED THAT THIS TECHNOLOGY COULD, PROBABLY WOULD, KILL US, THINK HOW MUCH MONEY WOULD BE LOST BY THOSE IN THE BUSINESS IF WE DECIDED TO NO LONGER USE THIS TECHNOLOGY.
THEIR  FINANCIAL LOSS WOULD BE ASTRONOMICAL!

NONE OF THE 'STUDIES' THAT STRADDLED THE FENCE ON HOW SAFE WIRELESS DEVICES ARE ADDRESS THE PROFITS MADE BY THOSE WHO SELL WIRELESS DEVICES, OR SELL MONTHLY PLANS, ERECT CELL TOWERS, BUILD NETWORKS, PROVIDE SATELLITES, OR DEVELOP NEW TECHNOLOGY EVERY YEAR.

IT ALSO DOESN'T ADDRESS THE ADVERTISING COSTS PAID BY OTHER COMPANIES WHO THROW ALL THOSE ADS AT US VIA THE NETWORKS.

KA-CHING, MY FRIENDS, IT'S A LOT OF LOOT!
REMEMBER HOW MANY DECADES WE WERE TOLD THAT LEAD PAINT AND PIPES, DDT, AGENT ORANGE, ASBESTOS AND CIGARETTES WERE PERFECTLY SAFE?

YEAH, IT'S LIKE THAT.

NO MEGA-CORPORATION WANTS TO GET HAULED INTO COURT BY MILLIONS OF CONSUMERS AND HAVE TO PAY DAMAGES ...AND LOSE AN ENTIRE INDUSTRY.

THE EVIDENCE IS THERE, BUT WE JUST DON'T 'READ ALL ABOUT IT' IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA BECAUSE SOME OF THEIR BIGGEST PAYING ADVERTISERS ARE CELL PHONE COMPANIES AND COMPANIES BUILT AROUND THAT.

THE DANGERS ARE TRULY REAL.
Lennart Hardell, Swedish oncologist with long-term research in this area stated:"The roll-out of 5G, the fifth generation of telecommunication technology will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Thus, in addition to the urgent need for new guidelines on current exposure a moratorium on the roll-out of 5G should be implemented."
The Appeal, which has been signed by more than 240 scientists who have published over 2,000 peer-reviewed papers on EMF and biology or health, calls for strengthening of EMF guidelines, especially to protect children and pregnant women.
For more information about the Appeal, see https://emfscientist.org.

IF YOU GO READ JUST A DOZEN OR SO OF THE STUDIES THAT HAVE MOST DEFINITELY FOUND LINKS BETWEEN CANCERS, HEART PROBLEMS, PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS, MEMORY LOSS, BRAIN INJURY, FATIGUE, ETC, AND OUR WIRELESS DEVICES AND THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION THEY EMIT, YOU MAY SEE WHY WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED.

HERE'S THREE TO GET YOU STARTED.

1--"When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer?"
Magda Havas B.Sc., Ph.D.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.
    
"There IS sufficient scientific evidence of cellular damage caused by NON-IONIZING RADIATION (NIR) well below thermal guidelines.

Free radicals CAN and DO cause cancer and non-ionizing radiation CAN and DOES increase free-radicals.

While IONIZING RADIATION (IR) directly damages DNA, NIR interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer.

Furthermore, free-radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use, occupational exposure to NIR (ELF EMF and RFR), and residential exposure to power lines and RF transmitters including mobile phones, cell phone base stations, broadcast antennas, and radar installations."    

2--"Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans"

-Tumor-promoting effects of RF-EMF exposed mice have been reported in 2010.

-We have replicated the study with higher numbers of mice per group.

-We could fully confirm the previous results, thus the effects are reproducible.

-Apparently, no clear dose–response relationship is evident.

-We hypothesize that metabolic changes are responsible for the effects observed.

Previously published results from a pilot study with carcinogen-treated mice, however, suggested tumor-promoting effects of RF-EMF (Tillmann et al., 2010). We have performed a replication study using higher numbers of animals per group and including two additional exposure levels (0 (sham), 0.04, 0.4 and 2 W/kg SAR).

We could confirm and extend the originally reported findings.

Numbers of tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher than in sham-exposed controls. In addition, lymphomas were also found to be significantly elevated by exposure.Our findings may help to understand the repeatedly reported increased incidences of brain tumors in heavy users of mobile phones."

3--ONE FINAL RECENT STUDY, BUT I COULD LIST HUNDREDS THAT DISAGREE WITH THOSE THAT STATE CELL PHONE USE, EMF, ETC, HAVE NO EFFECT ON HUMANS.

THIS ONE IS VERY CONVINCING.

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study is following more than 11,000 9- and 10-year-olds at 21 sites throughout the United States.

The initial results were presented in December by study director Gaya Dowling, PhD, on CBS’ “60 Minutes.”

The interviews and data from the NIH (National Institute of Health) study have already revealed:

(1) MRIs found significant differences in the brains of some kids who use smartphones, tablets, and video games more than seven hours a day, including premature thinning of the cortex, the wrinkly outermost layer of the brain that processes information from the five senses.

(2) kids who spend more than two hours a day on screens got lower scores on thinking and language tests.

FROM CBS' 60 MINUTES:
The iPhone was introduced in 2007. Smartphones gained widespread usage among young people by 2012.

Jean Twenge says she was startled to find that in the four years that followed, the percentage of teens who reported drinking or having sex fell. But the percentage who said they were lonely or depressed spiked. It's possible other factors may have played a role, but Twenge says she wasn't able to identify any that correlated as closely as the growing popularity of the smartphone and social media.

Jean Twenge: It's not just the loneliness and depression from these surveys. It's also that ER visits for self harm like cutting have tripled among girls age 10 to 14.

Anderson Cooper: What are teens doing on their phones that could be connected to depression?

Jean Twenge: It could be anything. There's kind of two different schools of thought on this. That it's the specific things that teens are doing on their phones that's the problem. Or it could be just the sheer amount of time that they're spending on their phones that is the problem.

Dr. Dimitri Christakis at Seattle Children's Hospital was the lead author of the American Academy of Pediatrics' most recent guidelines for screen time. They now recommend parents, "avoid digital media use, except video chatting, in children younger than 18 to 24 months."

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that college students who limited their screen time to less than 30 minutes a day were less lonely and depressed, even after just three weeks.

The American Academy of Pediatrics updated their media guidelines a couple years ago based on recent research. Their suggestions include:
For children under 18 months old, NO screen time.
For children 2 to 5 years old, less than one hour per day of high-quality programming is recommended, with parents watching along.

WE HAVE BECOME HUMAN GUINEA PIGS YET AGAIN, MUCH AS WE WERE DURING THE CREATION OF THE BOMB AND 'NUCLEAR ENERGY'.

YET AGAIN, THOSE CREATING THIS NEW 'MONSTER' KNOW IT'S HARMFUL TO HUMANS BUT ARE PUSHING IT INTO OUR LIVES ANYWAY.

WE HAVE NO VOICE IN THE MATTER...NOR DO OUR CHILDREN.

THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY IS ALL AROUND US ALREADY, BUT 5G IS MOVING INTO OUR BACK YARDS, UP CLOSE AND TOO PERSONAL. 
GIVEN HOW MISERABLY THE FDA HAS FAILED TO PROTECT US IN THE AST WHY WOULD WE TRUST THEM ON THIS?

Montgomery County, MD records show that the FDA previously rejected a provider’s request to place a cell tower near one of its (FDA's) locations due to concerns about the radiation’s adverse impacts upon the FDA’s testing of sensitive medical devices like pacemakers (pages 66 – 69).

Should we really trust the FDA’s decision to blow off PEER-REVIEWED research results when others say we shouldn’t:

National Toxicology Program Publishes Final Cell Phone Radiation Study Reports  

Cell Phone Radiation Leads to Cancer, Says U.S. NTP in Final Report  

Statement by Ronald Melnick PhD on the National Toxicology Program Final Reports on Cell Phone Radiation  

“Clear Evidence of Cancer” from Cell Phone Radiation: U.S. National Toxicology Program Releases Final Report on Animal Study  

Replicated research shows that Millimeter waves – used by the Department of Defense in crowd control weapons – interacts with human skin and eyes.   

Research studies presented at an international conference reveal that the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons form the foundation of the latest network – branded as 5G – that will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of 'the Internet of Things'.
Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands (which act as antennas).

Scientists cautioned that before rolling out 5G technologies which use these frequencies, research on long-term human health effects needed to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected. “If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games, etc, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers,” stated Dr. Devra Davis, President of the Environmental Health Trust.

Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data.

However, 5 G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation.

“Most people are unaware that these waves are cycling several billion times per second. 75 GHz is in fact 75,000,000,000 cycles per second,“ stated Davis about these frequencies rapidly penetrating the skin.

For years, the U.S., Russian and Chinese defense agencies have been developing weapons that rely on the capability of this SAME electromagnetic technology to induce unpleasant burning sensations on the skin as a form of crowd control.

Millimeter waves are utilized by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems (ADS)

Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai has pointed to research that was commissioned by the U.S. Army to find out why people ran away when the ADS beam touched them.

THEY HAD DONE SO LITTLE RESEARCH THAT EVEN THEY DIDN'T KNOW!
His research studies, presented at an international conference, reveal that the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons form the foundation of the latest network – branded as 5G – that will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of the Internet of Things.

Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands.

Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics, Hebrew University, Israel recently detailed how human sweat ducts act like an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths."

Scientists have long cautioned that before rolling out 5G technologies that use these frequencies, research on human health effects needed to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.
“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed…. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.

THERE ARE MANY U.S. PATENTS FOR 'NERVOUS SYSTEM MANIPULATION' USING ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES AND DIRECTIONAL WAVES THAT VERY FEW AMERICANS ARE AWARE OF.

Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors. U.S. Patent # US 6506148 B2.

"Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors

Abstract

Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.

It has been found that the resonance can be excited not only by externally applied pulsed electric fields, as discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,782,874, 5,899,922, 6,081,744, and 6,167,304, but also by pulsed magnetic fields, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,935,054 and 6,238,333, by weak heat pulses applied to the skin, as discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,800,481 and 6,091,994, and by subliminal acoustic pulses, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,302. Since the resonance is excited through sensory pathways, it is called a sensory resonance. In addition to the resonance near ½ Hz, a sensory resonance has been found near 2.4 Hz. The latter is characterized by the slowing of certain cortical processes, as discussed in the '481, '922, '302, '744, '944, and '304 patents."

HURRY IT UP BEFORE THE 'PEASANTS' FIND OUT?

AS REUTERS REPORTED: "In October, 2018, the FCC voted to open additional spectrum for use by unlicensed devices in the 6 GHz band, or five times the current spectrum available.

Unlicensed devices include things such as Wi-Fi routers, connected home appliances, baby monitors, fitness trackers, garage door openers and cordless landline phones.

President Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum directing the Commerce Department to develop a long-term comprehensive national spectrum strategy to prepare for the introduction of next-generation 5G wireless networks.

The White House also said Trump is withdrawing presidential memorandums on spectrum signed by then-President Barack Obama in 2010 and 2013.

AT&T Inc, Verizon Communications Inc, Sprint Corp and T-Mobile US Inc are working to acquire spectrum."   

WELL, EVEN FORBES NOTICED HOW MUCH AND TO WHAT PARTY THE WIRELESS GIANTS PAID INTO CAMPAIGN CHESTS DURING ONE ELECTION (2012):
"In the list below, a red cell phone indicates that the company leans Republican, while a blue cell phone is Democratic. If donations were evenly split between the two parties, or politicking was minimal, the company received a purple cell phone.

AT&T, VERIZON AND T-MOBILE ALL CONTRIBUTED HEAVIER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE FINALLY GOING TO GET WHAT THEY PAID FOR,YES?

WHAT DO WE GET? 
READ THE STUDIES.
WE EACH DECIDE WHAT 5G IS WORTH TO US.





________________________________
FURTHER READING AND WAYS TO PROTECT YOURSELVES AND YOUR LOVED ONES

--Wireless devices have become the integral part of our everyday life. These devices are being used for many purposes such as for Internet and Telecommunication.

Being a theoretical approach, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of wireless devices on human body.
These devices emit the harmful radiations which cause the diseases like male infertility, brain tumor, hearing impairment, effect on eyes, etc. Besides, these radiations severely affect other various parts of human body.
This study investigated three major diseases, i.e., brain tumor, male infertility and hearing impairment. The survey/investigations have been conducted from number of medical practitioners working in various hospitals and medical centers of District Sukkur and Khairpur Mirs’. The results, collected through interviews and survey, show the intensity of harm of different wireless devices; Mobile phone is the most effective device with 96%, Bluetooth Device 32%, Laptop 54%, Tablet PC 14% and Wireless router 20%.

We observed that the mobile phone is more dangerous for our health, as doctors believed that wireless devices such as cell phones, laptop, wireless router, wireless headphone, cell phone tower, Bluetooth devices and tablet pc is cause of the disease of brain tumor, male infertility, heart disease, effect on fetus, hearing impairment, eye problems, immune system, leukemia, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. It is suggested that one should avoid the use of wireless devices or to minimize the timing as possible to save the human health.

Recommendations

• According to our survey the wireless devices emit radiations are harmful to human health so there are some recommendations that one should use one’s cell phone when it is necessary.
• Don’t put the cell phone in a pant and shirt pocket.
• Don’t use the cell phone for long-term which is harmful to health because doctors suggesting the use of cell phone for 1 hour in a day which cause of brain tumor within 10 years.
• Avoid the long time conversation, use head phone when you have to talk for long call.
• Avoid using the wireless gadget like cell phone, laptop, tablet pc, wireless keyboard and mouse so on.
• Don’t place the laptop on a lap when it is connected to Wi-Fi because it is harmful for sperms and also effect on the fetus, specially pregnant women avoid to use tablet, PC, laptop and cell phone.
• Don’t use wireless devices in schools and colleges because it is harmful for the children and it is suggested that use the land line phone and DSL.
• Each and every one should know about the effects of these wireless radiations on human body, in this regard public awareness programs may be designed and executed as soon as possible by the concerned authorities.
• Government should take an action on cell phone towers existing in or near populated areas because cell phone towers emit the harmful radio waves which are a cause of human health problems.
• The installation of towers in the populated area may be banned and if they are already installed, should be removed immediately to save the people from their dangerous effects of radiations.


--World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack

So what else can you do about any of this insanity? 

Contact the following organizations and raise some hell.

--Hypothetical question:
WHAT IF... WHAT IF AS FAST AS THEY CAN PUT UP CELL TOWERS/ANTENNAE FOR THIS, CITIZENS TOOK THEM OUT?
WHAT IF...?


--. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest.


--FROM PSYCHOLOGY TODAY:
"Multiple studies have shown atrophy (shrinkage or loss of tissue volume) in gray matter areas (where “processing” occurs) in internet/gaming addiction (Zhou 2011, Yuan 2011, Weng 2013,and Weng 2012). Areas affected included the important frontal lobe, which governs executive functions, such as planning, planning, prioritizing, organizing, and impulse control (“getting stuff done”). Volume loss was also seen in the striatum, which is involved in reward pathways and the suppression of socially unacceptable impulses. A finding of particular concern was damage to an area known is the insula, which is involved in our capacity to develop empathy and compassion for others and our ability to integrate physical signals with emotion. Aside from the obvious link to violent behavior, these skills dictate the depth and quality of personal relationships.

Compromised white matter integrity: Research has also demonstrated loss of integrity to the brain’s white matter (Lin 2012, Yuan 2011, Hong 2013 and Weng 2013). “Spotty” white matter translates into loss of communication within the brain, including connections to and from various lobes of the same hemisphere, links between the right and left hemispheres, and paths between higher (cognitive) and lower (emotional and survival) brain centers. White matter also connects networks from the brain to the body and vice versa. Interrupted connections may slow down signals, “short-circuit” them, or cause them to be erratic (“misfire”)."
--NOW ADD THIS TO THE ABOVE ABOUT WHITE MATTER ABNORMALITIES:
"White matter abnormalities in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study"   

The prefrontal cortex, including the anterior cingulate cortex, is involved in emotional regulation by down-regulating the activity of the amygdala and related limbic structures [5, 19]. Functional neuroimaging studies of adolescents with GAD have shown increased activation in the lateral prefrontal cortex [10, 20, 21], medial prefrontal cortex [21] and anterior cingulate cortex [10] while viewing noxious stimuli. One study [14] found that adult GAD patients exhibited increased activation to angry expressions in the lateral frontal cortex, whereas another study [22] suggested that adult GAD patients showed decreased activation to emotional conflict in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex compared with healthy controls. The limited structural neuroimaging studies have shown a sub-threshold decrease of gray matter volume in bilateral ventrolateral cortex in pediatric anxiety patients [18], and a larger volume of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in adult GAD patients [15]. In addition, a functional connectivity study [22] has revealed the aberrant functional connection between amygdala and the prefrontal cortex, suggesting neural correlates for emotion regulation deficits in adults with GAD. Taken together, all the available neuroimaging evidence suggests an abnormality of the neural circuitry, including the amygdala and prefrontal cortex, in both adult and adolescent GAD patients.Most studies investigate abnormalities of gray matter, while few focus on the integrity of white matter.

IS THIS WHY IT SEEMS THE ENTIRE WORLD HAS GONE MAD?



//WW
Posted by at

1 comment:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)