"FIRST, DO NO HARM."
“The physician must be able to tell the antecedents, know the present, and foretell the future — must mediate these things, and have two special objects in view with regard to disease, namely, to do good or to do no harm.”
~ Greek physician Hippocrates, from his writing, "Of the Epidemics".
FROM HIS "HIPPOCRATIC OATH":
“I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.”
BY NO MEANS DO I EXPECT ANYONE TO AGREE WITH MY PERSONAL TAKE ON VACCINES, BUT, BY-ALL-THE-GODS, PLEASE WATCH AND DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AS I HAVE FOR THE PAST 60+ YEARS.
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T CHECK OUT THE CREDENTIALS OF THOSE WHO DO RESEARCH OR WORK IN ANY CAPACITY FOR THE CDC, LET ME ASSURE YOU THAT THE CREDENTIALS OF ALMOST ALL PHYSICIANS, RESEARCHERS, SCIENTISTS WHO DISAGREE WITH THE CDC ARE FAR MORE IMPRESSIVE THAN WHAT THE CDC CAN HIRE!
HOW MANY OF YOU LISTENED TO TESTIMONY PRESENTED TO CONGRESS IN JUNE OF 2011 BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND PARENTS OF VACCINE-INJURED, OR VACCINE-KILLED CHILDREN? [SEE VIDEO BELOW]
SOME WILL FIND THESE TESTIMONIES BOTH SHOCKING AND HEARTBREAKING, BUT THEY ARE ALL DOCUMENTED TRUTHS.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEVER SHOWS THIS!
WHY NOT?
DO THEY PUT ADVERTISERS BEST INTERESTS ABOVE THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF CHILDREN, OF HUMAN BEINGS?
WHY WOULD WE TRUST ANYONE WHO PUTS PROFITS FIRST?
IN TESTIMONY BEFORE CONGRESS, 1999, PLEASE LOOK CLOSELY AT THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED BY STUDIES PRESENTED TO THE CONGRESSMEN AT THAT TIME:
"By means of vaccine policy (1), the federal government is effectively making critical medical decisions for an entire generation of American children.
The mechanism is a public-private partnership.
"Recommendations" issue from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a small group whose members have incestuous ties (2) with agencies that stand to gain power, or manufacturers that stand to gain enormous profits, from the policy that is made.
Even if such members recuse themselves from specific votes, they are permitted to participate in discussions and thus influence the decision.
Conclusions
Public policy regarding vaccines is fundamentally flawed.
It is permeated by conflicts of interest.
It is based on poor scientific methodology (including studies that are too small, too short, and too limited in populations represented), which is, moreover, insulated from independent criticism.
The evidence is far too poor to warrant overriding the independent judgments of patients, parents, and attending physicians, even if this were ethically or legally acceptable.
Indeed, evidence is accumulating that serious adverse reactions are being ignored.
Although this statement has focused on hepatitis B vaccine, similar questions should be raised about others as well."
- Dr. Jane M. Orient, Executive Director of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).
I HOPE YOU WILL READ THAT ENTIRE DOCUMENT.
AMAZINGLY, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S OWN WEB PAGE FOR VACCINE INJURY CLAIMS ACTUALLY GIVES A TABLE OF INJURIES FOR EACH DRUG.
MANY HAVE BEEN SHOCKED TO SEE THIS.
ANAPHYLAXIS AND VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE ARE LISTED MANY TIMES AS "COVERED CONDITIONS" AFTER INJECTION OF VACCINES.
WHAT THE FEDS DO NOT STATE IS THAT ANAPHYLAXIS CAN BE FATAL AND THAT THIS VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE CAN AND HAS LED TO "SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH".
"Fatal drug anaphylaxis may be increasing, but rates of fatal anaphylaxis to venom and food are stable. "
ANOTHER CONDITION LISTED AS APPEARING AFTER VACCINATIONS IS INTUSSUSCEPTION.
"Intussusception (in-tuh-suh-SEP-shun) is a serious condition in which part of the intestine slides into an adjacent part of the intestine. This "telescoping" often blocks food or fluid from passing through. Intussusception also cuts off the blood supply to the part of the intestine that's affected, which can lead to a tear in the bowel (perforation), infection and death of bowel tissue. Tissue death can lead to a tear (perforation) in the intestinal wall, which can cause an infection of the lining of the abdominal cavity (peritonitis).
Peritonitis is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate medical attention.
Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children younger than three (3).
ENCEPHALOPATHY. IS ALSO MENTIONED 26 TIMES IN THAT "VACCINE INJURY TABLE".
THIS ONE IS VERY DIFFICULT TO PROVE TO THE VACCINE COURT.
THEIR CRITERIA FOR PAYING FOR THIS INJURY IS MADDENING.
"One of the following neurologic findings referable to the CNS: Focal cortical signs (such as aphasia, alexia, agraphia, cortical blindness); cranial nerve abnormalities; visual field defects; abnormal presence of primitive reflexes (such as Babinski's sign or sucking reflex); or cerebellar dysfunction (such as ataxia, dysmetria, or nystagmus); or Evidence of an inflammatory process in the brain (central nervous system or CNS inflammation) must include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (>5 white blood cells (WBC)/mm3 in children >2 months of age and adults; >15 WBC/mm3 in children <2 months of age);
FEW MAY HAVE READ THE 'FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS" ABOUT PETITIONS FOR VACCINE INJURIES, FOUND <HERE>.
DID YOU KNOW THAT JUST FROM 2006 TO 2017, ALMOST SEVEN THOUSAND (6,467) PETITIONS WERE ADMITTED TO THE 'VACCINE COURT' AND 4,450 WERE 'COMPENSATED'?
THAT MEANS FEWER THAN 50% WHO PETITIONED THIS ONE-MAN COURT WERE HEARD.
THE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT VERY HARD TO OBTAIN JUSTICE.
"Since 1988, over 21,051 petitions have been filed.
6,792 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,381 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.2 billion."
WHERE DID THAT $4.2 BILLION COME FROM?
FROM TAXPAYER MONEY, SINCE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (aka, WE, THE PEOPLE) SHIELD VACCINE MAKERS FROM LAWSUITS BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS CALLED "THE NATIONAL CHILDHOOD INJURY ACT OF 1986".
WHO DECIDES ON COMPENSATIONS? NOT A JURY! "A special master of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims makes a decision to compensate or not compensate the petitioner based on evidence presented by both sides."
THERE WAS OTHER DAMNING TESTIMONY ABOUT VACCINE HAZARDS GIVEN TO CONGRESS NUMEROUS TIMES.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2003...
September 10, 2003
Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness
U.S. House Government Reform CommitteeU.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
“The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?”
"There is frank admission that the limitations of technology and lack of scientific knowledge means there can be no guarantee the vaccines will not be contaminated with substances that could prove harmful to humans one day.
Nevertheless, there are plans to set allowable thresholds for adventitious agent contamination of vaccines being made out of cancer cells that would contain residual DNA and RNA.
(Attachment 9: Excerpts from May 12, 2000 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript and Attachment 10: Excerpts from May 16, 2001 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript)
I do not think Congress or the public understands any of this.
There should be a much wider discussion in the larger scientific community outside of federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in Congress and by the public at large before decisions are made to proceed with producing vaccines that use cancer cells and have legally allowable thresholds of adventitious agent contamination.
"Past is often prologue. So much can be learned from understanding the mistakes of the past so that the same mistakes are not made in the future.
Outstanding questions about the links between vaccines, government vaccine policies and the epidemic of chronic disease in our children, including autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, diabetes and, as we have discussed today, cancer, are not going away.
Questions about the links between vaccines that U.S. military soldiers are required to take, including anthrax and smallpox vaccines, and the subsequent death or permanent health problems being suffered by those previously healthy, young recruits are not going away.
They will never go away when the main defense of industry and government health officials is that when anything bad happens after vaccination it is just a coincidence.
I can tell you, the American public, especially parents, are not buying it.
And they shouldn’t buy it, especially when the kind of evidence that you will hear today suggests official government and industry denials are simply a way of avoiding taking responsibility for failing to do everything they can to minimize the risks of vaccines.
We owe it to our children and grandchildren to do everything we can to find out the truth about vaccine risks and make the mass vaccination system as safe as it can be."
DID YOU KNOW THAT JUST FROM 2006 TO 2017, ALMOST SEVEN THOUSAND (6,467) PETITIONS WERE ADMITTED TO THE 'VACCINE COURT' AND 4,450 WERE 'COMPENSATED'?
THAT MEANS FEWER THAN 50% WHO PETITIONED THIS ONE-MAN COURT WERE HEARD.
THE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT VERY HARD TO OBTAIN JUSTICE.
"Since 1988, over 21,051 petitions have been filed.
6,792 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,381 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.2 billion."
WHERE DID THAT $4.2 BILLION COME FROM?
FROM TAXPAYER MONEY, SINCE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (aka, WE, THE PEOPLE) SHIELD VACCINE MAKERS FROM LAWSUITS BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS CALLED "THE NATIONAL CHILDHOOD INJURY ACT OF 1986".
WHO DECIDES ON COMPENSATIONS? NOT A JURY! "A special master of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims makes a decision to compensate or not compensate the petitioner based on evidence presented by both sides."
THERE WAS OTHER DAMNING TESTIMONY ABOUT VACCINE HAZARDS GIVEN TO CONGRESS NUMEROUS TIMES.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2003...
September 10, 2003
Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness
U.S. House Government Reform CommitteeU.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
“The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?”
"There is frank admission that the limitations of technology and lack of scientific knowledge means there can be no guarantee the vaccines will not be contaminated with substances that could prove harmful to humans one day.
Nevertheless, there are plans to set allowable thresholds for adventitious agent contamination of vaccines being made out of cancer cells that would contain residual DNA and RNA.
(Attachment 9: Excerpts from May 12, 2000 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript and Attachment 10: Excerpts from May 16, 2001 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript)
I do not think Congress or the public understands any of this.
There should be a much wider discussion in the larger scientific community outside of federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in Congress and by the public at large before decisions are made to proceed with producing vaccines that use cancer cells and have legally allowable thresholds of adventitious agent contamination.
"Past is often prologue. So much can be learned from understanding the mistakes of the past so that the same mistakes are not made in the future.
Outstanding questions about the links between vaccines, government vaccine policies and the epidemic of chronic disease in our children, including autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, diabetes and, as we have discussed today, cancer, are not going away.
Questions about the links between vaccines that U.S. military soldiers are required to take, including anthrax and smallpox vaccines, and the subsequent death or permanent health problems being suffered by those previously healthy, young recruits are not going away.
They will never go away when the main defense of industry and government health officials is that when anything bad happens after vaccination it is just a coincidence.
I can tell you, the American public, especially parents, are not buying it.
And they shouldn’t buy it, especially when the kind of evidence that you will hear today suggests official government and industry denials are simply a way of avoiding taking responsibility for failing to do everything they can to minimize the risks of vaccines.
We owe it to our children and grandchildren to do everything we can to find out the truth about vaccine risks and make the mass vaccination system as safe as it can be."
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND THAT 'ANAPHYLAXIS IS NOT ALWAYS PROPERLY DIAGNOSED, NOT ALWAYS REPORTED, AND IS SOMETIMES MISCODED'.
"Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that has a rapid onset and can cause death.1,2 In the past, the term anaphylactic reaction referred to symptoms triggered by immunoglobulin (Ig) E–dependent activation of immune effector cells, whereas anaphylactoid reactions were clinically similar to anaphylactic reactions but were not mediated by antigen-specific IgE.
Although some experts have advocated that the term anaphylactoid be eliminated, other influential clinical practice guidelines consensus documents continue to use the term anaphylactoid – thus, anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions will be discussed as a single entity in this chapter. 2
Published incidence and prevalence data are likely inaccurate because anaphylaxis is underdiagnosed, underreported, and miscoded. 3,4
Some of the most recent data suggests that the incidence is approximately 50 to 200 episodes per 100,000 person-years with a lifetime prevalence ranging between 0.05% and 2%. 5
It is estimated that up to 1,500 fatalities are caused by anaphylaxis per year in the United States. 6
Both the incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis have been increasing, with a disproportionate increase in cases seen in children and younger patients.7
With children especially, a five-fold increase in hospital admissions for food-associated anaphylaxis has been noted over the past decade. 8
CONCLUSIONS:
Anaphylaxis is a common medical condition affecting both adult and pediatric patients and its incidence and prevalence continue to increase, especially in younger people.
Risk factors affecting the incidence of anaphylaxis have been identified."
SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME AND VACCINES Crib deaths nearly disappeared in Japan in 1975 when first inoculations were postponed until the 24th month of life. The "insult" leading to crib deaths Kalokerinos found, was an inoculation.
The maker, Connaught Labs’ 1986 DTP vaccine insert reads, “Sudden infant death has occurred in infants following administration”.
MOST "STUDIES" THE CDC REFER TO AS VALID EVIDENCE THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE, IN THE CASE OF WHISTLEBLOWERS' REVELATIONS, WERE SKEWED, THEIR DATA "MASSAGED" TO FERRET OUT ANYTHING THAT WOULD SLOW OR STOP THE SALES OF THESE DRUGS.
WE ALL REMEMBER THE DISCREDITED CDC/WAKEFIELD REPORT, BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER STUDIES IN SEVERAL NATIONS WHICH ALSO SHOWED VACCINE INJURY IN CHILDREN.
WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION NOW AND IT'S PAST TIME WE FACED THE FACTS OF WHAT VACCINES HAVE DONE AND CONTINUE TO DO TO OUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN, TO US.
HOW POWERFUL ARE THE 'FORCES' AGAINST THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES?
LET'S LOOK BRIEFLY AT THE "HANNAH POLING CASE".
IN 2008, THE HUFFINGTON POST CARRIED AN ARTICLE TITLED,
"The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read", Posted February 26, 2008.
IT DIDN'T TAKE LONG FOR HUFFPOST TO SCRUB THAT FROM THEIR DATABASE AND POST A NOTE FROM THEIR EDITOR THAT STATED VACCINES ARE SAFE.
BUT WHAT THAT ARTICLE REVEALED NEEDS TO BE READ, SO I FOUND IT IN ARCHIVES ONLINE, <HERE>.
BY DAVID KIRBY FOR HUFFINGTON POST:
"Below is a verbatim copy of the US Government concession filed last November in a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims, with the names of the family redacted. It is the subject of my post yesterday.
Every American should read this document, and interpret for themselves what they think their government is trying to say about the relationship, if any, between immunizations and a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
If you feel this document suggests that some kind of link may be possible, you might consider forwarding it to your elected representatives for further investigation.
[FROM THAT COURT DOCUMENT]:
" '4.According to the medical records, CHILD consistently met her developmental milestones during the first eighteen months of her life. The record of an October 5, 1999 visit to the Pediatric Center notes that CHILD was mimicking sounds, crawling, and sitting. Pet. Ex. 31 at 9. The record of her 12-month pediatric examination notes that she was using the words "Mom" and "Dad," pulling herself up, and cruising. Id. at 10.
At a July 19, 2000 pediatric visit, the pediatrician observed that CHILD "spoke well" and was "alert and active." Pet. Ex. 31 at 11. CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had regular bowel movements and slept through the night. Id.
At the July 19, 2000 examination, CHILD received five vaccinations - DTaP, Hib, MMR, Varivax, and IPV. Id. at 2, 11.
According to her mother's affidavit, CHILD developed a fever of 102.3 degrees two days after her immunizations and was lethargic, irritable, and cried for long periods of time. Pet. Ex. 2 at 6. She exhibited intermittent, high-pitched screaming and a decreased response to stimuli. Id. MOM spoke with the pediatrician, who told her that CHILD was having a normal reaction to her immunizations. Id.
According to CHILD's mother, this behavior continued over the next ten days, and CHILD also began to arch her back when she cried. Id.
On July 31, 2000, CHILD presented to the Pediatric Center with a 101-102 degree temperature, a diminished appetite, and small red dots on her chest. Pet. Ex. 31 at 28. The nurse practitioner recorded that CHILD was extremely irritable and inconsolable. Id. She was diagnosed with a post-varicella vaccination rash. Id. at 29.
Two months later, on September 26, 2000, CHILD returned to the Pediatric Center with a temperature of 102 degrees, diarrhea, nasal discharge, a reduced appetite, and pulling at her left ear. Id. at 29.
On November 1, 2000, CHILD received bilateral PE tubes. Id. at 38.
On November 27, 2000, CHILD was seen at the Pediatric Center with complaints of diarrhea, vomiting, diminished energy, fever, and a rash on her cheek. Id. at 33.
At a follow-up visit, on December 14, 2000, the doctor noted that CHILD had a possible speech delay.
CHILD was evaluated at the Howard County Infants and Toddlers Program, on November 17, 2000, and November 28, 2000, due to concerns about her language development. Pet. Ex. 19 at 2, 7. The assessment team observed deficits in CHILD's communication and social development. Id. at 6. CHILD's mother reported that CHILD had become less responsive to verbal direction in the previous four months and had lost some language skills. Id. At 2.
Dr. Zimmerman referred CHILD to the Krieger Institute's Occupational Therapy Clinic and the Center for Autism and Related Disorders ("CARDS"). Pet. Ex. 25 at 40.
She was evaluated at the Occupational Therapy Clinic by Stacey Merenstein, OTR/L, on February 23, 2001. Id. The evaluation report summarized that CHILD had deficits in "many areas of sensory processing which decrease[d] her ability to interpret sensory input and influence[d] her motor performance as a result." Id. at 45.
CHILD was evaluated by Alice Kau and Kelley Duff, on May 16, 2001, at CARDS. Pet. Ex. 25 at 17. The clinicians concluded that CHILD was developmentally delayed and demonstrated features of autistic disorder. Id. at 22.
ANALYSIS
Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the facts of this case, as presented by the petition, medical records, and affidavits.
After a thorough review, DVIC has concluded that compensation is appropriate in this case.
In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, respondent recommends that compensation be awarded to petitioners in accordance with 42 U.S.C. ยง 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii).
DVIC has concluded that CHILD's complex partial seizure disorder, with an onset of almost six years after her July 19, 2000 vaccinations, is not related to a vaccine-injury."
IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM ARTICLE'S AUTHOR, DAVID KIRBY:
PS: On Friday, February 22, HHS conceded that this child's complex partial seizure disorder was also caused by her vaccines.
Now we the taxpayers will award this family compensation to finance her seizure medication. Surely ALL decent people can agree that is a good thing.
By the way, it''s worth noting that her seizures did not begin until six years after the date of vaccination, yet the government acknowledges they were, indeed, linked to the immunizations of July, 2000, - DK"
HANNAH'S CASE IS BUT ONE OF TENS OF THOUSANDS WITH SIMILAR INJURY, MOST NEVER MAKING IT TO "VACCINE COURT".
CAN ANYONE WHO HAS NEVER FACED A CHILD'S LIFELONG ILLNESS OR DEATH DUE TO VACCINES EVEN IMAGINE THE ANGUISH WHEN THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY BY VACCINE MANUFACTUERERS?
TODAY, ONLY CERTAIN CASES THAT OCCURRED AFTER 2009 CAN FILE PETITIONS TO THE COURT.
THIS RULES OUT HOW MANY THOUSANDS MORE?
WHAT IS REVEALED IN ALL WHISTLEBLOWER REPORTS IS SOMETHING MANY OF US WHO WORKED IN THE MEDICAL PROFESSION TRIED TO CONVEY TO PARENTS AND OTHERS THROUGHOUT OUR CAREERS BY HANDING PACKAGE INSERTS TO ANYONE CONSIDERING VACCINES.
"JUST READ!" WE SAID.
OF THOSE WHO READ THE ENTIRE PACKAGE INSERTS OF EACH VACCINE, I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT, IN ANY GIVEN YEAR, FEWER THAN 10% WENT ON TO ACCEPT THE VACCINES FOR THEIR CHILDREN OR THEMSELVES.
YOU NOW HAVE ACCESS ONLINE TO THOSE PACKAGE INSERTS.
PLEASE READ THEM!
Package Inserts and Manufacturers for some US Licensed Vaccines and Immunoglobulin
WHAT PATIENTS/PARENTS SAID MOST OFTEN AFTER READING WAS WHAT WE ALL SAID WHEN FIRST WE GLIMPSED THESE INSERTS:
"WHY DON'T THE VACCINE MANUFACTURERS MAKE ALL OF THIS PUBLIC INFORMATION? HOW DO THY GET AWAY WITH IT?"
DRUG COMPANIES, LIKE ALL OTHERS WHO SELL PRODUCT, ARE IN IT FOR PROFIT, SO ANYTHING THAT SHOWS THAT PRODUCT IN A BAD LIGHT IS ALMOST NEVER MADE PUBLIC OR POINTED OUT UNLESS/UNTIL "ENOUGH" PEOPLE HAVE BEEN INJURED AND/OR KILLED BY IT.
THINK ABOUT THAT.
THINK ABOUT PRODUCT "RECALLS" YEARS AFTER DANGEROUS PRODUCTS WERE MARKETED AND THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS FOUND OF COVER-UPS FROM THEIR BEGINNINGS.
THINK ABOUT THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY, THE MAKERS OF DDT, AGENT ORANGE, ASBESTOS.
THINK ABOUT THE SV-40 TAINTED POLIO VACCINE THAT HAD THAT KNOWN MONKEY VIRUS IN IT THAT NOW SHOWS UP IN A MAJORITY OF HUMANS ON PLANET EARTH...A VIRUS THAT DISRUPTS OUR DNA, IS PASSED ON TO ONE'S CHILDREN...A CARCINOGEN.
ONCE UPON A TIME, THE CDC INCLUDED ON ITS OWN WEBSITE THE FACT THAT SV40 HAS BEEN FOUND IN SEVERAL HUMAN CANCERS.
THERE IS ARCHIVED PROOF OF THAT AS A CAPTURED SCREENSHOT <HERE>.
IN JULY, 2013, THE REFERENCE TO THE LINK BETWEEN SV40 AND CANCER BECAME PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.
THE CDC THEN REMOVED THAT INFORMATION.
WHY?
"Cancer has risen exponentially since the 1960s, and by 2002 there were 61 reports from 49 different laboratories across the world suggesting an increased incidence of certain cancers caused by SV40.
The British journal The Lancet revealed SV40 WAS responsible for over 25,000 cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma each year.
By 2003, 60 more labs had been identified which demonstrated a connection to the SV40 virus and cancer."
"Recently, several studies have reported the detection of DNA from simian virus 40 (SV40), a macaque polyomavirus, in tumor tissues obtained from non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients.
SV40 contaminated poliovirus vaccines administered to millions (ABOUT 95 MILLION) of individuals in 1955–1962.
A link between SV40 and NHL is biologically plausible because SV40 causes hematological malignancies in laboratory rodents."
CONCLUSIVE, PEER-REVIEWED EVIDENCE, 2003
"Abstract
Simian virus 40 (SV40) has been detected in human tumors in over 40 different laboratories.
Many of these reports linked SV40 to human mesotheliomas."
THE ATLANTIC LOOKED INTO SV-40 AND CANCER IN 2000, BUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA IGNORED THAT, TOO.
FOR YEARS, DECADES, MANY TRIED TO WARN THE PUBLIC ABOUT EACH OF THOSE PRODUCTS AND WERE RIDICULED, OSTRACIZED, CRUCIFIED IN THE PRESS, MADE TO LOOK LIKE TINFOIL-HAT-WEARING LUNATICS.
IT'S THE SAME WITH DRUGS AND VACCINES.
COMPANIES MUST PROTECT THEIR MONEY-MAKERS AND MAINTAIN "PUBLIC TRUST".
THE U.S. IS NOW #1 IN THE WORLD FOR FIRST-DAY INFANT MORTALITY.
In 1983, children received up to 23 doses of 8 DIFFERENT vaccines before the age of eighteen.
Today children receive as many as 69 doses of 16 different vaccines, all given by the age of eighteen.
MOST OF THESE VACCINES ARE GIVEN TO CHILDREN BY AGE SIX, AND AT LEAST 20 OR SO ARE GIVEN BEFORE AGE TWO.
PARENTS WERE NOT SHOWN PACKAGE INSERTS, WERE UNAWARE OF THE SUPPRESSED STUDIES, HAD NO WAY OF KNOWING ABUT THE MULTITUDE OF VACCINE INJURIES AND DEATHS REPORTED ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE AND PERHAPS DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THAT VACCINE MANUFACTURERS HAD BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.
DID YOU KNOW HOW MANY FOREIGN NATIONS HAVE BANNED MANY OF THESE VACCINES, OR THE PRESSURE APPLIED TO THEM BY U.S. AND U.N. ORGANIZATIONS TO GET BACK ON THE VACCINE BANDWAGON?
MANY U.S. DOCTORS ACTUALLY FOUGHT THE U.N. BAN ON THE MERCURY PRESERVATIVES USED IN VACCINES, ALTHOUGH MERCURY IS A LONG-KNOWN KILLER!
WHY?
WERE THEY JUST PAID WHORES TO THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY?
THEY COULD NOT HAVE BEEN THAT STUPID AND UNREAD, SO I'M LEFT TO THINK THEY WERE EITHER COERCED OR WILLINGLY BECAME PARTY TO THE LIES?
"In 1960 Bernice Eddy, a government researcher, discovered that when she injected hamsters with the kidney mixture on which the vaccine was cultured, they developed tumors.
Eddy's superiors tried to keep the discovery quiet, but Eddy presented her data at a cancer conference in New York. She was eventually demoted, and lost her laboratory.
The cancer-causing virus was soon isolated by other scientists and dubbed SV40, because it was the fortieth simian virus discovered.
Alarm spread through the scientific community as researchers realized that nearly every dose of the vaccine had been contaminated.
In 1961 federal health officials ordered vaccine manufacturers to screen for the virus and eliminate it from the vaccine. Worried about creating a panic, they kept the discovery of SV40 under wraps and never recalled existing stocks. For two more years millions of additional people were needlessly exposed -- bringing the total to 98 million Americans from 1955 to 1963."
AS I HAVE WRITTEN HERE BEFORE, I AND 15 MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY ALL HAD THAT CONTAMINATED POLIO VACCINE, AS DID ALL 70+ MEMBERS OF MY GRADUATING CLASS.
I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MY FIRST CANCER AT AGE 19.
WITHIN 20 YEARS, MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF MY CLASSMATES HAD BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AND MOST OF THOSE HAD DIED, AS HAD 7 FAMILY MEMBERS.
ALL BUT TWO OF THOSE INOCULATED MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY, INCLUDING BOTH PARENTS AND MY ONLY SIBLING, DIED AFTER CANCER DIAGNOSES.
I RECEIVED MY 4th DIAGNOSIS IN 2016, AND MY 5th JUST THIS YEAR.
AS I STATED IN MY 2016 BLOG ON THE SV-40 IN THE POLIO VACCINE,
"NOW, EVEN ALL THAT MAY NOT SEEM PROOF ENOUGH TO MANY THAT THE OLD POLIO VACCINES WERE, CAN BE, HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE DANGEROUS.
FOR THOSE, ALLOW ME TO PRESENT AN ANALOGY, A HYPOTHETICAL EXPERIMENT:
LET'S IMAGINE THAT I HAVE A PISTOL AND THAT PISTOL CONTAINS AN AMAZINGLY HUGE NUMBER OF 1,000 CHAMBERS INTO WHICH A BULLET MAY BE PLACED.
YOU CAN SEE THE MANY CHAMBERS ON THE CYLINDER.
WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE, WHAT I DO NOT TELL YOU, IS INTO HOW MANY OF THOSE CHAMBERS I HAVE PLACED A BULLET.
I ASK YOU TO "TRUST ME" AND JUST PLACE THE BARREL OF THAT PISTOL AGAINST YOUR OR YOUR CHILD'S TEMPLE AND SQUEEZE THE TRIGGER.
WILL YOU TRUST ME THAT NO HARM WILL COME TO YOU OR YOUR CHILD?
EVEN IF I WERE YOUR CLOSEST AND MOST TRUSTED FRIEND, WOULD YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER?
WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THERE WAS ONE ROUND IN THAT WEAPON, BUT IT WAS A BLANK, HARMLESS?
WOULD YOU ABSOLUTELY TRUST ME TO BE HONEST ABOUT THAT, EVEN IF I WAS YOUR SIBLING, A PARENT, YOUR MINISTER/PRIEST/WHATEVER?
THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT WE EACH DO WHEN WE ACCEPT ANY SUBSTANCE INTO OUR FRAGILE HUMAN BODIES WITHOUT KNOWING ALL THE POSSIBLE WAYS THAT CAN AFFECT US.
IN THE ABOVE HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION, HOW MANY WOULD REALLY PULL THE TRIGGER?
HOW MANY WOULD DO SO IF YOU WERE ALLOWED TO EXAMINE THE WEAPON YOURSELF AND SAW IT CONTAINED ONE BULLET, BUT THEN YOU HAD TO SPIN THAT CYLINDER AFTER YOU SAW THE SHELL?
IS THIS MERELY PARANOIA ON THE PART OF THOSE WHO REQUIRE 100% PROOF THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE?
WOULD YOU FEEL YOU WERE PARANOID IF YOU DEMANDED TO EXAMINE THAT WEAPON AND THEN DECIDED NOT TO FIRE IT?
UNLIKE THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, WE CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW WHETHER OR NOT A YEAR, 10 YEARS, 20 YEARS OR MORE MAY PASS AND THEN ONE DAY EVIDENCE WILL COME TO LIGHT THAT CONFIRMS OUR DOUBTS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF "ALL" VACCINES.
WILL EVEN ONE VACCINE BE SHOWN TO CAUSE SOME FATAL REACTION, SOME DEBILITATING COMPLICATION WHICH THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF BUT CHOSE NOT TO REVEAL?
THAT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE.
AND THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS THE SINGLE BULLET IN THAT 1000-CHAMBERED GUN.
I WILL NOT RISK IT!
I WILL NOT!
YOU HAVE A MERE WHISPER OF HOPE IF YOU OR A LOVED ON HAVE BEEN INJURED OR KILLED BY VACCINE.
IT'S HARD AS HELL TO PROVE IT BUT THOUSANDS HAVE!
READ <HERE> TO SEE WHAT IT ENTAILS TO APPLY TO THE "VACCINE INJURY COURT" AND MAY YOU NEVER NEED TO TRY TO SEE JUSTICE DONE AFTER SUCH INJURIES OR DEATH OF SOMEONE YOU LOVE.
AS ANOTHER WRITER SAID (SOMEONE WHOM I ALMOST NEVER AGREE WITH, BTW) :
"If vaccines are such wonderful, miraculous things to be injected into children, then why do they still contain undeniably toxic ingredients?
The CDC openly lists these ingredients on its website. The continued use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde and aluminum in vaccines is not in dispute. Not even vaccine advocates deny this fact.
Mercury, for example, has no safe level of exposure via injection. To inject a child with any amount of mercury -- even a single microgram -- is highly unethical and irresponsible. "...there are no existing guidelines for safe exposure to ethylmercury, the metabolite of thimerosal," says National Toxicology Programs in its own documents
If the CDC and the drug companies really wanted to win the vaccine wars, so to speak, all they would have to do is take the poisons out of the vaccines!
If that really happened, most of the resistance to vaccines would fade away, and vaccines would be welcomed by a much larger segment of health-conscious consumers."
[NOTE: THE GOVERNMENT'S PDF HE REFERRED TO IN HIS ARTICLE WAS DELETED, LINK IS A DEAD-END, BUT FORTUNATELY, THE INTERNET'S WAYBACK MACHINE SAVED IT AND IT CAN BE ACCESSED <HERE>.]
WE ARE UP AGAINST CORPORATE GIANTS DETERMINED TO MAKE EVER-INCREASING PROFITS FROM THEIR LITTLE-STUDIED VACCINES AND DRUGS.
WE FACE PEOPLE IN THAT INDUSTRY WHO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TIME AND TIME AGAIN FOR LYING TO US, FOR HIDING FACTS AND TRUTH.
THEIR MASSIVE WEALTH ALLOWS THEM TO HIRE HIGH-POWERED ATTORNEYS, CONGRESSIONAL LOBBYISTS, MEDICALLY TRAINED "SPOKESMEN" TO CONVINCE THE MASSES TO "JUST TRUST US".
VERY FEW OF US HAVE LABORATORIES TO CONFIRM THE SAFETY OF THESE PRODUCTS.
WHEN WHISTLEBLOWERS STEP FORWARD TO WARN US, WE REALLY SHOULD PAY ATTENTION.
REMEMBER, PLEASE, THAT IMAGINARY GAME OF "RUSSIAN ROULETTE"...EVEN WITH 999 EMPTY CHAMBERS, THE RISK IS TOO GREAT TO PULL THE TRIGGER, ISN'T IT?
______________________________
FURTHER READING:
1- How Vaccine Safety Is Undermined and Suppressed
PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2019 BY A PHYSICIAN WHOM I HAVE TRUSTED AND ADMIRED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, A MAN WHO RISKED IT ALL TO HAND US TRUTHS THAT HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FOR DECADES.
I NEVER BLINDLY "FOLLOW" ANYONE, BUT DIG UNTIL I CAN'T DIG MORE TO UNCOVER FLAWS IN THEIR WORK, IN THEIR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, IN THEIR FACTS.
ON THIS ISSUE, I FIND NO FAULT IN THIS MAN'S STATED FACTS, BUT, PLEASE, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
DOES HE "SELL PRODUCT"?
HE DOES, BUT NO PUBLISHED INFORMATION FOUND IN HIS FREELY-OFFERED ARTICLES REQUIRES A PURCHASE OF ANYTHING.
HE GIVES IT AWAY.
QUESTION EVERYTHING, MY FRIENDS, EVEN ME, EVEN YOURSELVES, AS I HAD TO BEGIN DOING, LONG, LONG AGO.
2- IF SV-40 IS A "WAR MACHINE", WHAT OTHER AGENTS IN VACCINES MIGHT ALSO BE WAR MACHINES?
"SV40 is the smallest perfect war machine ever," Dr. Michele Carbone murmurs. "He's so small. But he's got everything he needs."
In 1994, Carbone, an Italian pathologist who worked at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland, along with Dr. Harvey Pass, the chief of thoracic surgery at NCI, and Dr. Antonio Procopio, a professor of experimental pathology in Italy who had worked for three years at the National Institutes of Health (NHI), published the results of their experiment in one of the world's leading cancer-research journals.
Carbone had been urged on two renowned pathologists, Umberto Saffiotti, the chief of the NCI's Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, and Harold L. Stewart, a former director of pathology at the NCI who was once the head of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Carbone had just finished a series of experiments in which he had injected the virus into dozens of hamsters. Every one of them developed mesothelioma and died within three to seven months.
Others at the National Institutes of Health -- including some of the scientists who had been around at the time of the contamination scare -- were less receptive to the novel theory.
They told Carbone that the last thing anyone wanted to hear was that the exalted polio vaccine was linked to cancer. Too much was at stake. Implicating a vaccine contaminant in cancer -- even if the contamination occurred some forty years ago -- might easily shake public confidence in vaccines in general. And besides, everyone knew that asbestos was the cause of mesothelioma.
Two very recent studies, at that time, from Finland and Turkey, had found no SV40 in domestic mesothelioma samples but did find it, respectively, in American and Italian samples. The authors observed that their negative findings lend support to the theory that contaminated polio vaccine is associated with the disease: neither Turkey nor Finland used SV40-contaminated vaccines.
Today Finland has one of the lowest rates of mesothelioma in the Western world.
The virus has also been located in other kinds of tumors.
More than a dozen laboratories have found SV40 in various kinds of rare brain and bone tumors.
In 1996 Carbone reported that he had found SV40 in a third of the osteosarcomas (bone cancers of a type that afflicts about 900 Americans a year) and nearly half of the other bone tumors he tested -- research that has since been confirmed by numerous laboratories. The virus has also been detected in pituitary and thyroid tumors.
In 1995 Janet Butel, the chairman of the department of molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, in Texas, and her chief collaborator, John Lednicky, also a Baylor virologist, reported that they had found SV40 in a number of children's brain tumors. Butel and Lednicky reported that DNA sequencing revealed that the virus was not a hybrid but rather authentic SV40 -- the same as the SV40 found in monkeys. In the fall of 1996 an Italian research team, led by Mauro Tognon, of the University of Ferrara, announced that it had found SV40 DNA in a large percentage of brain and neurological tumors, including glioblastomas, astrocytomas, ependymomas, and papillomas of the choroid plexus.
In 1996 Tognon and his collaborators reported that they had also found the virus in 45 percent of the sperm samples and 23 percent of the blood samples they tested from healthy people.
3- AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT PACKAGE INSERTS STATE:
IN THE PACKAGE INSERT FOR 'PNEUMOVAX', THE CLEAR ADMISSIONS ARE STATED:
"Routine revaccination ("BOOSTERS") of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23- valent vaccine, is not recommended."
BUT EVERY YEAR WE'RE TOLD TO GO GET ANOTHER 'SHOT'.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of PNEUMOVAX.
(NOBODY KNOWS IF THEY WILL HAVE SUCH A REACTION UNTIL AFTER THE VACCINE IS ADMINISTERED!)
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS: Use caution and appropriate care for individuals with severely compromised cardiovascular and/or pulmonary function in whom a systemic reaction would pose a significant risk.
(NEITHER SHOULD ANYONE ON CHEMOTHERAPY OR RADIATION 'TREATMENT'S FOR CANCER BE GIVEN VACCINES DUE TO THEIR COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS WHICH CAN'T HANDLE LIVE VIRUSES. YET I VERY PERSONALLY KNOW OF AT LEAST FIVE SUCH PATIENTS WHO WERE ADMINISTERED THOSE VACCINES FOR FLU AND/OR PNEUMONIA, ALL OF WHOM WERE DEAD WITHIN A WEEK!)
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS:
Pregnancy: No human or animal data are available. Use only if clearly needed.
Pediatrics: PNEUMOVAX is not approved for use in children younger than 2 years of age because children in this age group do not develop an effective immune response to capsular types contained in the polysaccharide vaccine.
Geriatrics:
"For subjects aged 65 years or older in a clinical study systemic adverse reactions, determined by the investigator to be vaccine-related, were higher following revaccination (33.1%) than following initial vaccination (21.7%). Routine revaccination of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23-valent vaccine, is not recommended."
4- VITAMIN D 800% MORE EFFECTIVE THAN VACCINES TO PREVENT THE FLU.A clinical trial led by Mitsuyoshi Urashima and conducted by the Division of Molecular Epidemiology in the Department of Pediatrics at the Jikei University School of Medicine Minato-ku in Tokyo found that vitamin D was extremely effective at halting influenza infections in children. The trial appears in the March, 2010 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Am J Clin Nutr (March 10, 2010). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094).
[According to the conclusion], vitamin D appears to be 800% more effective than vaccines at preventing influenza infections in children.
5- ON THIMEROSAL, FROM THE FEDS' OWN PAPER:
"Prior to the recent approval of additional thimerosal-free or thimerosal-reduced vaccines, an infant may have received a total mercury dose from vaccines as much as 187.5 µg during the first 6 months of life. In special populations, influenza vaccine may be administered at 6 months of age, which would increase the total dose to approximately 200 µg. (PG. 2)
Although thimerosal has been used in the U.S. as a preservative in vaccines and other licensed products since the 1930s, limited data are available on the toxicology of thimerosal and its metabolite ethylmercury. In humans, the only well-established hazard of thimerosal at doses found in vaccines is delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.
At very high doses, the identified hazards of thimerosal include neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
Only one published study evaluated the effect of thimerosal in vaccines on blood levels of mercury. This study measured the total mercury blood levels before and after hepatitis B vaccination in a small number of term and preterm newborn infants and suggested that a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine may produce small but measurable increases in blood levels of mercury.
This “screening analysis” found weak (relative risk less than 2) but statistically-significant associations between exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6 months and tic disorders, attention deficit disorders (ADD), and speech and language disorders.
Only limited data were available on the reproductive and teratogenic effects of thimerosal. In one study of pregnant rats and rabbits receiving intraperitoneal injections and ocular instillations, no teratological effects or evidence of maternal toxicity were observed, but dose related embryoand fetal lethality was found.
GOD HELP US...
//WW
AS I HAVE WRITTEN HERE BEFORE, I AND 15 MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY ALL HAD THAT CONTAMINATED POLIO VACCINE, AS DID ALL 70+ MEMBERS OF MY GRADUATING CLASS.
I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MY FIRST CANCER AT AGE 19.
WITHIN 20 YEARS, MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF MY CLASSMATES HAD BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AND MOST OF THOSE HAD DIED, AS HAD 7 FAMILY MEMBERS.
ALL BUT TWO OF THOSE INOCULATED MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY, INCLUDING BOTH PARENTS AND MY ONLY SIBLING, DIED AFTER CANCER DIAGNOSES.
I RECEIVED MY 4th DIAGNOSIS IN 2016, AND MY 5th JUST THIS YEAR.
AS I STATED IN MY 2016 BLOG ON THE SV-40 IN THE POLIO VACCINE,
"NOW, EVEN ALL THAT MAY NOT SEEM PROOF ENOUGH TO MANY THAT THE OLD POLIO VACCINES WERE, CAN BE, HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE DANGEROUS.
FOR THOSE, ALLOW ME TO PRESENT AN ANALOGY, A HYPOTHETICAL EXPERIMENT:
LET'S IMAGINE THAT I HAVE A PISTOL AND THAT PISTOL CONTAINS AN AMAZINGLY HUGE NUMBER OF 1,000 CHAMBERS INTO WHICH A BULLET MAY BE PLACED.
YOU CAN SEE THE MANY CHAMBERS ON THE CYLINDER.
WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE, WHAT I DO NOT TELL YOU, IS INTO HOW MANY OF THOSE CHAMBERS I HAVE PLACED A BULLET.
I ASK YOU TO "TRUST ME" AND JUST PLACE THE BARREL OF THAT PISTOL AGAINST YOUR OR YOUR CHILD'S TEMPLE AND SQUEEZE THE TRIGGER.
WILL YOU TRUST ME THAT NO HARM WILL COME TO YOU OR YOUR CHILD?
EVEN IF I WERE YOUR CLOSEST AND MOST TRUSTED FRIEND, WOULD YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER?
WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THERE WAS ONE ROUND IN THAT WEAPON, BUT IT WAS A BLANK, HARMLESS?
WOULD YOU ABSOLUTELY TRUST ME TO BE HONEST ABOUT THAT, EVEN IF I WAS YOUR SIBLING, A PARENT, YOUR MINISTER/PRIEST/WHATEVER?
THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT WE EACH DO WHEN WE ACCEPT ANY SUBSTANCE INTO OUR FRAGILE HUMAN BODIES WITHOUT KNOWING ALL THE POSSIBLE WAYS THAT CAN AFFECT US.
IN THE ABOVE HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION, HOW MANY WOULD REALLY PULL THE TRIGGER?
HOW MANY WOULD DO SO IF YOU WERE ALLOWED TO EXAMINE THE WEAPON YOURSELF AND SAW IT CONTAINED ONE BULLET, BUT THEN YOU HAD TO SPIN THAT CYLINDER AFTER YOU SAW THE SHELL?
IS THIS MERELY PARANOIA ON THE PART OF THOSE WHO REQUIRE 100% PROOF THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE?
WOULD YOU FEEL YOU WERE PARANOID IF YOU DEMANDED TO EXAMINE THAT WEAPON AND THEN DECIDED NOT TO FIRE IT?
UNLIKE THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, WE CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW WHETHER OR NOT A YEAR, 10 YEARS, 20 YEARS OR MORE MAY PASS AND THEN ONE DAY EVIDENCE WILL COME TO LIGHT THAT CONFIRMS OUR DOUBTS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF "ALL" VACCINES.
WILL EVEN ONE VACCINE BE SHOWN TO CAUSE SOME FATAL REACTION, SOME DEBILITATING COMPLICATION WHICH THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF BUT CHOSE NOT TO REVEAL?
THAT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE.
AND THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS THE SINGLE BULLET IN THAT 1000-CHAMBERED GUN.
I WILL NOT RISK IT!
I WILL NOT!
YOU HAVE A MERE WHISPER OF HOPE IF YOU OR A LOVED ON HAVE BEEN INJURED OR KILLED BY VACCINE.
IT'S HARD AS HELL TO PROVE IT BUT THOUSANDS HAVE!
READ <HERE> TO SEE WHAT IT ENTAILS TO APPLY TO THE "VACCINE INJURY COURT" AND MAY YOU NEVER NEED TO TRY TO SEE JUSTICE DONE AFTER SUCH INJURIES OR DEATH OF SOMEONE YOU LOVE.
AS ANOTHER WRITER SAID (SOMEONE WHOM I ALMOST NEVER AGREE WITH, BTW) :
"If vaccines are such wonderful, miraculous things to be injected into children, then why do they still contain undeniably toxic ingredients?
The CDC openly lists these ingredients on its website. The continued use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde and aluminum in vaccines is not in dispute. Not even vaccine advocates deny this fact.
Mercury, for example, has no safe level of exposure via injection. To inject a child with any amount of mercury -- even a single microgram -- is highly unethical and irresponsible. "...there are no existing guidelines for safe exposure to ethylmercury, the metabolite of thimerosal," says National Toxicology Programs in its own documents
If the CDC and the drug companies really wanted to win the vaccine wars, so to speak, all they would have to do is take the poisons out of the vaccines!
If that really happened, most of the resistance to vaccines would fade away, and vaccines would be welcomed by a much larger segment of health-conscious consumers."
[NOTE: THE GOVERNMENT'S PDF HE REFERRED TO IN HIS ARTICLE WAS DELETED, LINK IS A DEAD-END, BUT FORTUNATELY, THE INTERNET'S WAYBACK MACHINE SAVED IT AND IT CAN BE ACCESSED <HERE>.]
WE ARE UP AGAINST CORPORATE GIANTS DETERMINED TO MAKE EVER-INCREASING PROFITS FROM THEIR LITTLE-STUDIED VACCINES AND DRUGS.
WE FACE PEOPLE IN THAT INDUSTRY WHO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TIME AND TIME AGAIN FOR LYING TO US, FOR HIDING FACTS AND TRUTH.
THEIR MASSIVE WEALTH ALLOWS THEM TO HIRE HIGH-POWERED ATTORNEYS, CONGRESSIONAL LOBBYISTS, MEDICALLY TRAINED "SPOKESMEN" TO CONVINCE THE MASSES TO "JUST TRUST US".
VERY FEW OF US HAVE LABORATORIES TO CONFIRM THE SAFETY OF THESE PRODUCTS.
WHEN WHISTLEBLOWERS STEP FORWARD TO WARN US, WE REALLY SHOULD PAY ATTENTION.
REMEMBER, PLEASE, THAT IMAGINARY GAME OF "RUSSIAN ROULETTE"...EVEN WITH 999 EMPTY CHAMBERS, THE RISK IS TOO GREAT TO PULL THE TRIGGER, ISN'T IT?
______________________________
FURTHER READING:
1- How Vaccine Safety Is Undermined and Suppressed
PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2019 BY A PHYSICIAN WHOM I HAVE TRUSTED AND ADMIRED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, A MAN WHO RISKED IT ALL TO HAND US TRUTHS THAT HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FOR DECADES.
I NEVER BLINDLY "FOLLOW" ANYONE, BUT DIG UNTIL I CAN'T DIG MORE TO UNCOVER FLAWS IN THEIR WORK, IN THEIR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, IN THEIR FACTS.
ON THIS ISSUE, I FIND NO FAULT IN THIS MAN'S STATED FACTS, BUT, PLEASE, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
DOES HE "SELL PRODUCT"?
HE DOES, BUT NO PUBLISHED INFORMATION FOUND IN HIS FREELY-OFFERED ARTICLES REQUIRES A PURCHASE OF ANYTHING.
HE GIVES IT AWAY.
QUESTION EVERYTHING, MY FRIENDS, EVEN ME, EVEN YOURSELVES, AS I HAD TO BEGIN DOING, LONG, LONG AGO.
2- IF SV-40 IS A "WAR MACHINE", WHAT OTHER AGENTS IN VACCINES MIGHT ALSO BE WAR MACHINES?
"SV40 is the smallest perfect war machine ever," Dr. Michele Carbone murmurs. "He's so small. But he's got everything he needs."
In 1994, Carbone, an Italian pathologist who worked at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland, along with Dr. Harvey Pass, the chief of thoracic surgery at NCI, and Dr. Antonio Procopio, a professor of experimental pathology in Italy who had worked for three years at the National Institutes of Health (NHI), published the results of their experiment in one of the world's leading cancer-research journals.
Carbone had been urged on two renowned pathologists, Umberto Saffiotti, the chief of the NCI's Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, and Harold L. Stewart, a former director of pathology at the NCI who was once the head of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Carbone had just finished a series of experiments in which he had injected the virus into dozens of hamsters. Every one of them developed mesothelioma and died within three to seven months.
Others at the National Institutes of Health -- including some of the scientists who had been around at the time of the contamination scare -- were less receptive to the novel theory.
They told Carbone that the last thing anyone wanted to hear was that the exalted polio vaccine was linked to cancer. Too much was at stake. Implicating a vaccine contaminant in cancer -- even if the contamination occurred some forty years ago -- might easily shake public confidence in vaccines in general. And besides, everyone knew that asbestos was the cause of mesothelioma.
Two very recent studies, at that time, from Finland and Turkey, had found no SV40 in domestic mesothelioma samples but did find it, respectively, in American and Italian samples. The authors observed that their negative findings lend support to the theory that contaminated polio vaccine is associated with the disease: neither Turkey nor Finland used SV40-contaminated vaccines.
Today Finland has one of the lowest rates of mesothelioma in the Western world.
The virus has also been located in other kinds of tumors.
More than a dozen laboratories have found SV40 in various kinds of rare brain and bone tumors.
In 1996 Carbone reported that he had found SV40 in a third of the osteosarcomas (bone cancers of a type that afflicts about 900 Americans a year) and nearly half of the other bone tumors he tested -- research that has since been confirmed by numerous laboratories. The virus has also been detected in pituitary and thyroid tumors.
In 1995 Janet Butel, the chairman of the department of molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, in Texas, and her chief collaborator, John Lednicky, also a Baylor virologist, reported that they had found SV40 in a number of children's brain tumors. Butel and Lednicky reported that DNA sequencing revealed that the virus was not a hybrid but rather authentic SV40 -- the same as the SV40 found in monkeys. In the fall of 1996 an Italian research team, led by Mauro Tognon, of the University of Ferrara, announced that it had found SV40 DNA in a large percentage of brain and neurological tumors, including glioblastomas, astrocytomas, ependymomas, and papillomas of the choroid plexus.
In 1996 Tognon and his collaborators reported that they had also found the virus in 45 percent of the sperm samples and 23 percent of the blood samples they tested from healthy people.
3- AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT PACKAGE INSERTS STATE:
IN THE PACKAGE INSERT FOR 'PNEUMOVAX', THE CLEAR ADMISSIONS ARE STATED:
"Routine revaccination ("BOOSTERS") of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23- valent vaccine, is not recommended."
BUT EVERY YEAR WE'RE TOLD TO GO GET ANOTHER 'SHOT'.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of PNEUMOVAX.
(NOBODY KNOWS IF THEY WILL HAVE SUCH A REACTION UNTIL AFTER THE VACCINE IS ADMINISTERED!)
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS: Use caution and appropriate care for individuals with severely compromised cardiovascular and/or pulmonary function in whom a systemic reaction would pose a significant risk.
(NEITHER SHOULD ANYONE ON CHEMOTHERAPY OR RADIATION 'TREATMENT'S FOR CANCER BE GIVEN VACCINES DUE TO THEIR COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS WHICH CAN'T HANDLE LIVE VIRUSES. YET I VERY PERSONALLY KNOW OF AT LEAST FIVE SUCH PATIENTS WHO WERE ADMINISTERED THOSE VACCINES FOR FLU AND/OR PNEUMONIA, ALL OF WHOM WERE DEAD WITHIN A WEEK!)
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS:
Pregnancy: No human or animal data are available. Use only if clearly needed.
Pediatrics: PNEUMOVAX is not approved for use in children younger than 2 years of age because children in this age group do not develop an effective immune response to capsular types contained in the polysaccharide vaccine.
Geriatrics:
"For subjects aged 65 years or older in a clinical study systemic adverse reactions, determined by the investigator to be vaccine-related, were higher following revaccination (33.1%) than following initial vaccination (21.7%). Routine revaccination of immunocompetent persons previously vaccinated with a 23-valent vaccine, is not recommended."
4- VITAMIN D 800% MORE EFFECTIVE THAN VACCINES TO PREVENT THE FLU.A clinical trial led by Mitsuyoshi Urashima and conducted by the Division of Molecular Epidemiology in the Department of Pediatrics at the Jikei University School of Medicine Minato-ku in Tokyo found that vitamin D was extremely effective at halting influenza infections in children. The trial appears in the March, 2010 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Am J Clin Nutr (March 10, 2010). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094).
[According to the conclusion], vitamin D appears to be 800% more effective than vaccines at preventing influenza infections in children.
5- ON THIMEROSAL, FROM THE FEDS' OWN PAPER:
"Prior to the recent approval of additional thimerosal-free or thimerosal-reduced vaccines, an infant may have received a total mercury dose from vaccines as much as 187.5 µg during the first 6 months of life. In special populations, influenza vaccine may be administered at 6 months of age, which would increase the total dose to approximately 200 µg. (PG. 2)
Although thimerosal has been used in the U.S. as a preservative in vaccines and other licensed products since the 1930s, limited data are available on the toxicology of thimerosal and its metabolite ethylmercury. In humans, the only well-established hazard of thimerosal at doses found in vaccines is delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.
At very high doses, the identified hazards of thimerosal include neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.
Only one published study evaluated the effect of thimerosal in vaccines on blood levels of mercury. This study measured the total mercury blood levels before and after hepatitis B vaccination in a small number of term and preterm newborn infants and suggested that a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine may produce small but measurable increases in blood levels of mercury.
This “screening analysis” found weak (relative risk less than 2) but statistically-significant associations between exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6 months and tic disorders, attention deficit disorders (ADD), and speech and language disorders.
Only limited data were available on the reproductive and teratogenic effects of thimerosal. In one study of pregnant rats and rabbits receiving intraperitoneal injections and ocular instillations, no teratological effects or evidence of maternal toxicity were observed, but dose related embryoand fetal lethality was found.
Methylmercury, an organic mercurial similar to ethylmercury, has been associated in some studies with subtle neurodevelopmental abnormalities at low doses.
GOD HELP US...
//WW
