CLINTON WAS 'THE CANCER OF THE DNC' SAID DNC INSIDER

Warren agrees DNC was rigged against Sanders

[NOTE: JUST FOUND THIS IN MY DRAFTS AND CAN'T IMAGINE WHY I DIDN'T POST IT WHEN I FIRST WROTE MOST OF IT, IN AUGUST...SO, DID YOU SEE THIS ON MSM?] 

TWO WELL-KNOWN DEMOCRATS (GABBARD & BRAZILE) HAVE RECENTLY MADE A FEW HEADLINES FOR REVEALING THE HILLARY CLINTON TAKEOVER OF THE DNC AND THE PARTY'S SCREWING OF OLD BERNIE SANDERS.

THREE HAVE SAID HILLARY'S FINANCIAL INFLUENCE RIGGED THE 2016 ELECTION IN HER FAVOR. (ADD ELIZABETH WARREN)

ONE OF THEM WENT SO FAR AS TO CALL HILLARY AND HER TEAM A "CANCER" INSIDE THE PARTY.

Tulsi Gabbard (born April 12, 1981) is an American politician and military combat veteran serving as the U.S. Representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district. She is a member of the Democratic Party.

Elected in 2012, Gabbard became the first Samoan American and Hindu member of Congress.
Gabbard served in the Hawaii House of Representatives from 2002 to 2004. Elected at age 21, she was the youngest woman to be elected to a state legislature. Gabbard served in a field medical unit of the Hawaii Army National Guard in a combat zone in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 and was deployed to Kuwait from 2008 to 2009.
Gabbard was a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2013 to 2016, when she resigned to endorse Senator Bernie Sanders for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination. 

Gabbard privately accused Debbie Wasserman Schultz of violating the DNC's duty of neutrality by favoring Hillary Clinton. This later became public in leaked emails published by WikiLeaks.
Gabbard is a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president of the United States in 2020.

Donna Brazile is the former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, briefly serving as the interim chair of the Democratic National Committee in spring 2011, and again from July 2016 to February 2017.

A WikiLeaks e-mail dump in 2016 revealed that Brazile had sent e-mail messages to the Clinton campaign sharing upcoming debate questions with Clinton. Brazile never apologized and said that her conscience was "very clear". She later commented: "If I had to do it all over again, I would know a hell of a lot more about cybersecurity."

On October 31, 2016, The New York Times reported: "CNN has severed ties with the Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, after hacked e-mails from WikiLeaks showed that she shared questions for CNN-sponsored candidate events in advance with friends on Hillary Clinton's campaign."

Aug 28, 2019
"Dem Prez Candidate Tulsi Gabbard Accuses 'DNC And Corporate Media' Of Rigging 2020 Election: 'Trying to Hijack Entire Election Process'."   

Nov 3, 2017
Tulsi Gabbard: "DNC Rigged the Presidential Primary and Damaged the Party."
Tulsi Gabbard just guaranteed the Democratic National Committee will never allow her to become their nominee and she did so by telling the truth in a newly released 1:46 minute video (the second video above) explaining to her supporters why she may decide to "boycott" the next Democrat debate, despite the fact that she has qualified for it.

Gabbard brutally reminds voters of how the DNC and their partners in corporate media rigged the 2016 primary against Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton.

She informs supporters that they are at it again, saying that in 2020 the DNC and the corporate media are trying to "hijack the entire election process."    

From the online transcript: 

"Earlier today we heard from Donna Brazile** that what many people had

suspected for a long time has turned out to be true.

The DNC secretly chose their nominee over a year before the primary elections

even occurred. 
This shines a light on how deeply broken our campaign finance laws

are and how they've weakened individual candidates while strengthening and

empowering political parties and special interests.

These laws essentially allowed the Clinton campaign to bypass individual

campaign contribution limits by funneling millions of dollars through

the DNC and state parties, taking control of the DNC in the process, along with the

recent retaliatory purge of Bernie Sanders and Keith Ellison supporters from

the DNC's executive committee.

This is just further evidence that the DNC needs to be completely overhauled to

take our party back from the special interests of a powerful few and put it back

in the hands of the people.

We must bring about real campaign finance reform. 

We must get rid of the undemocratic system of super-delegates.

We must implement open or same-day registration in democratic primaries to

actually encourage voter engagement.

We must care more about people than protecting the status quo.

No more games, no more retaliation, no more picking of winners and losers.

We must act now to take back our party, a party that belongs to the people,

and fight for a new path forward that is open, transparent and accountable,

and that strengthens our democracy." 

SWEET, BUT HOW CAN WE BREAK IT TO GABBARD THAT AMERICA IS NOT NOW, NOR WAS IT EVER INTENDED TO BE, A "DEMOCRACY"? 
WHAT WE HAVE IS A "CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC".
THE OLD FOUNDERS NEVER WANTED A DEMOCRACY BECAUSE THEY CONSIDERED THAT TO BE "MOB RULE".  

 

She also spoke out in May of 2016.  (ABOVE) 

The woman is consistent in her message...the DNC is owned by Clinton money and that money cancels all other candidates.
They are simply betrayed and kicked aside by the DNC.

She's been saying the same thing for the past three years.

HOW HAS SHE ESCAPED "SUICIDE"? 

Bernie Sanders supporter, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), who resigned her position as vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee to endorse the Vermont senator, tells CBS News that while people warned her not to defy the Clintons, she doesn't fear potential retaliation.

Gabbard also discussed the state of the primary fight and stressed that Sanders still has a path to the Democratic nomination despite trailing Hillary Clinton in delegates.
Gabbard joined CBS News' Demarco Morgan to discuss the 2016 Democratic race.

She also blew a whistle on Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor and revealed Harris' failures to seek JUSTICE, rather than a win in court, called Harris' alleged stance on prison reform to question, marking Harris as a hypocrite.

You can watch one of those videos <HERE>.

Democrat voters have not forgotten, nor forgiven the DNC for what they did to Sanders in 2016, and Gabbard just ripped the scab off the wound to make it bleed all over again.
Gabbard is also correct in calling out the "corporate media" as the propaganda arm of the DNC and of working hand-in-hand with them.

Multiple liberal outlets, like NBC News, have pushed the ludicrous but familiar Russia propaganda angle with claims that Russia is "now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat who earlier this month declared her intention to run for president in 2020," meaning Gabbard.

Gabbard is by no means the only one to point out the behind-the-scenes manipulations that went on in the Democratic Party once Hillary came aboard as a candidate...AGAIN. 


NOVEMBER 2, 2017, POLITICO MAGAZINE

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC 
** Donna Brazile is the former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee.

What follows is excerpted from her book "Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House" published November, 2017 by Hachette Books, a division of Hachette Book Group. Copyright 2017 Donna Brazile.

BRAZILE PASSES THE BUCK. "IT WASN'T ME!"    

" 'My predecessor, Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had not been the most active chair in fundraising at a time when President Barack Obama’s neglect had left the party in significant debt. As Hillary’s campaign gained momentum, she resolved the party’s debt and put it on a starvation diet. It had become dependent on her campaign for survival, for which she expected to wield control of its operations.

Debbie was not a good manager. She hadn’t been very interested in controlling the party—she let Clinton’s headquarters in Brooklyn do as it desired so she didn’t have to inform the party officers how bad the situation was. How much control Brooklyn had and for how long was still something I had been trying to uncover for the last few weeks.

By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart. 

The Saturday morning after the convention in July, I called Gary Gensler, the chief financial officer of Hillary’s campaign. He wasted no words.
He told me the Democratic Party was broke and $2 million in debt.

On the phone Gary told me the DNC had needed a $2 million loan, which the [HILLARY] campaign had arranged.

“No! That can’t be true!” I said. “The party cannot take out a loan without the unanimous agreement of all of the officers.” 

Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.
“That was the deal that Robby struck with Debbie,” he explained, referring to [Clinton] campaign manager Robby Mook. “It was to sustain the DNC. We sent the party nearly $20 million from September until the convention, and more to prepare for the election.”

[T]he states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as “essentially … money laundering” for the Clinton campaign, Hillary’s people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady.

I kept asking the party lawyers and the DNC staff to show me the agreements that the party had made for sharing the money they raised, but there was a lot of shuffling of feet and looking the other way.

When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF), and Hillary for America (HFA).

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.
Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.


THE GRAND EXCUSE

The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity. 

I had to keep my promise to Bernie. I was in agony as I dialed him. Keeping this secret was against everything that I stood for, all that I valued as a woman and as a public servant.

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.' ”


CANCER IS A GOOD DESCRIPTIVE WORD HERE, ISN'T IT? 

Donna Brazile Calls Clinton Fundraising a "Cancer" | Time


ALMOST IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE BRAZILE DISCLOSURE, ELIZABETH WARREN AGREED WITH HER ASSESSMENT! 

AS THE WASHINGTON POST ACTUALLY  REPORTED, November 2, 2017:  Update: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who comes from the Sanders wing of the party, just told CNN in response to Brazile's op-ed that the she believes the 2016 Democratic primary was "rigged."


WHAT "THE CANCER" COST THE DEMOCRATS  

AS NEWSWEEK REPORTED APRIL 15, 2019: "Post election numbers showed that 12 percent of Sanders' voters who voted for him in the primary, voted for Donald Trump in the general election against Hillary Clinton, with some claiming those voters gave Trump the "margin of victory" in key states he needed to beat Clinton.

A 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey found fewer than 80 percent of those who voted for Sanders during the Democratic primaries followed up and voted for Clinton in the general election. At least 12 percent of Sanders supporters cast a vote for Trump that November.

"They gave him the margin of victory in three critical states that gave Donald Trump the presidency: Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania," Thiessen continued. "He needs to get those voters back. So for example, in Pennsylvania, 16 percent of Sanders supporters voted for Donald Trump. That's a total of about 116,000 voters, Trump won by 44,000 votes. So in all those states it was the Sanders supporters who gave Trump the margin of victory and gave him the presidency if you just do the math."

A recent Emerson College poll indicates that up to 26 percent of "Bernie Bros" would cast their vote for Trump over Warren in 2020.

 Said one Bernie fan to the Washington Examiner, “If the DNC screws him [Sanders] again, like it's already looking like they will, I'll stay home on voting day. Hell, I may vote for Trump just to make sure their candidate loses.”
The Examiner also quoted Sanders supporter Keith Ward, a Pennsylvania resident: ""If they cheat again, I have told people I will vote for Trump.'” 

BRENNAN AND CLAPPER FEELING THE HEAT

 Back in March, 2019 John Brennan claimed that he relied on "bad information" and that he may have been misled about the extent of President Trump's connections to Russia.

“Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Brennan said. “I am relieved that it’s been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election.”

WHAT?
HE ADMITTED THERE WAS NO CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY TRUMP?

YES, YES, HE DID.

Brennan still maintained that there were inappropriate attempts to communicate with the Kremlin but said he was “not all that surprised that the high bar of criminal conspiracy was not met.”

As for James Clapper, he recently went on CNN, where he is a paid contributor now, and basically spilled what his defense is going to be for his actions as DNI under Obama, which is "We just did what our Commander in Chief told us to do."

It is worth mentioning that the report in question was the January 2017 DNI report, issued by Clapper, titled "Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections."

In that report, despite Clapper saying above that they compiled information from "all the reporting that we could, that we had available," only three agencies' intelligence was considered and documented in that 2017 report which claimed they had a high level of confidence that Russia interfered in order to help Trump win the election.

Those agencies were the FBI, led by former Director James Comey, who has been found to have violated FBI policies and guidelines, the CIA, and the NSA.

Only those three agencies provided their assessments and analysis, while Clapper's office issued the final report.

Interesting that Comey, Clapper and Brennan are also having their actions reviewed as part of the Barr/Durham investigation.  
Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham is questioning whether these former intel agency heads used the unverified and "salacious" Steele Dossier for that intelligence assessment report, ordered by Obama.

"The dossier -- if you believe that foreign interference is wrong in our elections, then you should be upset by the fact that the Democratic National Committee hired a former British spy to investigate Trump by getting dirt on him from Russia. The Steele dossier is a bunch of political garbage, unverified to this day.
Why was it included in the intel assessment? Did Brennan have anything to do with that? Because it is salacious garbage," Graham said.

"So we're going to find out about all of this, and Barr should be going to Italy and the U.K. and Australia, trying to find out if their intelligence services were working with the CIA or the FBI to investigate the Trump campaign."

The corruption that ran rampant through multiple intelligence agencies, at the highest of levels, is being investigated, as well as the possible FISA abuses, and we are seeing the key players, Clapper and Brennan acting very nervous, defensive and/or belligerent, as they wait for the hammer to drop.

While they may not know exactly what is in the Inspector General's (IG) report, nor how much Barr and Durham already know, before they are scheduled to be questioned, the nature of the investigations mean they have some idea of what is coming, which may explain why they are trying to play victim on MSNBC and CNN.

The level of nervousness being displayed is indicative that the IG, Barr and Durham are all over the target.

STEPHEN MILLER DEFINES THE 'DEEP STATE': 

"The deep state is a collection of permanent bureaucrats enmeshed inside the federal government who can’t be fired or removed — at least historically, have not been able to be — because of misguided civil service laws. They believe they know better than you, and your listeners, and the voters how the country ought to be run. At this moment in time, the deep state has a knife aimed at the heart of American democracy, and that’s what you’re seeing playing across your TV screens and newspapers pages and online, with these so-called whistleblowers, who are, of course, in fact, angry hate-filled rage-driven bureaucrats determined to take down the President of the United States and illicitly and improperly using the Whistleblower Protection Act in order to effectuate their designs."

"Miller continued, “One of the gravest threats that we face today — and I can’t emphasize this enough — to our republican form of government is the unelected deep state, and I’ll explain what I mean by that. The Constitution of the United States, Article II, states very clearly that, and this is a quote, ‘The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.’
What that means is that the whole executive power is vested in one democratically elected person: the president. The president, who is accountable to the voters — the president, who is accountable to the American people, holds and wields the executive power. Every other person in the federal government in the executive branch is an extension of his authority, is acting as an extension of his authority delegated to them. They have no independent authority.

So when a deep state bureaucrat says, ‘I don’t want Donald Trump to be president. I don’t want to effectuate his policies. I don’t want to carry out his agenda, so I will do the opposite,’ they’re violating the Constitution and they’re taking away the power of the American people to elect who heads the executive branch and what policies they implement."

“The last point I’ll make about this is the why,” Miller said. “Why? Because this president dared to disrupt two-party betrayal of the American people over many decades: betrayal on trade, betrayal on China, betrayal on foreign policy, betrayal on our southern border, betrayal on our economy, decade after decade, year after year, administration after administration. This president dared to stand up to defy that betrayal — was elected to end that betrayal — but the people who profited like parasites off of that betrayal are now the ones trying to prevent him from executing the agenda that the American people installed him to execute. That’s the situation we find ourselves in today.” 


WHAT THE TEA ROOM SEES AS A MORE DANGEROUS CANCER THAN CLINTON IS THE WALL STREET-OWNED, OUTRAGEOUSLY BIASED MAINSTREAM MEDIA (MSM). 

JUST AS OUR ENTIRE CONGRESS ARE PROSTITUTES TO INDUSTRY, SO IS THE MEDIA.  
WE CAN WATCH THEM EACH NEW DAY SCRAMBLING AND TRIPPING OVER ONE ANOTHER IN AN ATTEMPT TO BECOME THE 'FAVORITE WHORE' OF BOTH POLITICIANS AND INDUSTRY. 

AS I ASKED A FRIEND RECENTLY, "WHY DO YOU THINK THE U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYS THOUSANDS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS, 'AD-MEN', BEHAVIORAL SCIENTISTS?" 

ANSWER?
BECAUSE IT TAKES AN ARMY OF THOSE TO FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE  MOST OF THE TIME. 

AS POOR OLD GEORGIE BUSH, JR, SAID, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED." 







___________________________

Interesting facts about Gabbard: 
In July 2004, Gabbard was deployed for a 12-month tour in Iraq, serving as a specialist with the Medical Company, 29th Support Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, completing her tour in 2005. 
In March 2007, she graduated from the Accelerated Officer Candidate School at the Alabama Military Academy. Gabbard was the first woman to finish as the distinguished honor graduate in the Academy's 50-year history.
She was commissioned as a second lieutenant and assigned to the 29th Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the Hawaii Army National Guard, this time to serve as an Army Military Police officer.
She was deployed to Kuwait from 2008 to 2009. There, as a primary trainer for the Kuwait National Guard, she was among the first women ever to set foot inside a Kuwait military facility. She was also the first woman to be honored for outstanding work in its training program.   
On October 12, 2015, Gabbard was promoted from captain to major at a ceremony at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific.

She continues to serve as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard.






//WW