ALEXANDER VINDMAN'S BOSSES ALL TURNED ON HIM. HE WAS A LEAKER WHO BYPASSED CHAIN OF COMMAND.

ABOVE: VINDMAN TOLD CONGRESS HE WAS AFRAID OF REPRISAL, NEEDED EXTRA SECURITY, THE ARMY STATED IT MIGHT MOVE TO A MILITARY BASE, BUT THEN, SOON AFTER HIS TESTIMONY, AS HE AND HIS TWIN WENT BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO WORK, IN CIVILIAN CLOTHES, HE POSED FOR CAMERAS AND WAITED TO BE RECOGNIZED. CBS, WHO TOOK THIS VIDEO, SAID HE WAS CLEARLY WANTING TO BE SEEN. 

VINDMAN TOOK OFFENSE AT THE CIVILIAN CONGRESSMAN NUNES CALLING HIM "MISTER" INSTEAD OF BY HIS MILITARY RANK.
AS MANY HAVE SINCE POINTED OUT, IT ISN'T IMPERATIVE NOR EVEN EXPECTED THAT CIVILIANS DO THAT.

HOWEVER, WHEN REP. SCHIFF MISIDENTIFIED VINDMAN AS "COLONEL" INSTEAD OF LIEUTENANT COLONEL" (See minute 01:45 of the hearing testimony.), VINDMAN DID NOT CORRECT HIM.

THIS GAVE VINDMAN AN AUTOMATIC PROMOTION IN RANK, FROM O-5 TO O-6, WHICH HE IN NO WAY HAS ATTAINED.

VINDMAN ALSO DID NOT CORRECT ANDRE CARSON'S GROSS ERROR WHEN HE CONSTANTLY REFERRED TO AMBASSADOR TO THE E.U., SONDMAN AS AMBASSADOR SOLOMON.

THERE IS NO AMBASSADOR SOLOMON. 

THE ONE AND ONLY 'SOLOMON' IN THIS ENTIRE SCENARIO, IN ALL OF THE TESTIMONIES, REFERRED TO JOHN SOLOMON, AN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST WITH WHOM VINDMAN ALSO HAD 'ISSUES'.

SINCE VINDMAN DIDN'T CORRECT CARSON ON SOMETHING AS IMPORTANT AS A MAN'S REAL NAME, IDENTIFYING THE RIGHT AMBASSADOR, ONE CAN SEE THAT HE HAD NO QUALMS ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT AN AMBASSADOR HE KNEW  DOESN'T EXIST AND ANSWERING A LONG SERIES OF QUESTIONS ABOUT A MYTHICAL 'SOLOMON', UNDER OATH, WHICH, IN MY OPINION, MAKES HIM GUILTY OF PERJURY. 

I'M SURE HE WON'T FACE CHARGES FOR THAT, BUT, SERIOUSLY, HIS CORRECTING NUNES ON THE LT. COLONEL THING WAS FAR LESS IMPORTANT TO THE HEARINGS THAN PROPERLY IDENTIFYING SOMEONE HE SAYS HE SPOKE WITH MANY TIMES, SONDMAN, NOT 'SOLOMON'.

AS SPECIAL FORCES MILITARY VETERAN TIM KENNEDY SAID:
"Correcting a civilian about how to be a addressed is a for sure way to make everyone in the military think you are a douche bag."

VINDMAN WAS CRITICIZED AHEAD OF HIS 'TESTIMONY' BY MANY WITHIN THE STATE DEPARTMENT WHO CALLED HIM A CHRONIC 'LEAKER' (Morrison), SAID HE WASN'T UP TO THE TASK (Fiona Hill, beginning at about minute 39:35 of her questioning by Rep. Castor**), AND THAT HE OFTEN BROKE THE CHAIN OF COMMAND.

HE WAS DISSED BY FELLOW U.S. RANGERS WHO CALLED HIM LAZY AND A CHOW THIEF, RIDICULED BY MILITARY TOP BRASS FOR APPEARING IN UNIFORM AND DEMANDING A CIVILIAN CALL HIM 'LT. COLONEL' WHEN NOTHING IN MILITARY PROTOCOL DEMANDS THAT. 

VINDMAN CAME OFF AS NOT ONLY A "DRAMA QUEEN" WITH A HYPER-INFLATED EGO WHO DREAMS OF GRANDEUR, BUT ALSO AS AN ATTENTION WHORE", CHRONICALLY, LIKE SCHIFF, CHECKING TWITTER FOR COMMENTS ABOUT HIMSELF, ESPECIALLY, IT SEEMS, AFTER THE PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS.

“The Rangers in the private groups are all calling him fat colonel,” one source told Cernovich, “You need to get this story out.”

ALSO, AS MANY IN THE MILITARY AND SOME IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT POINTED OUT, VINDY DOESN'T WEAR THAT UNIFORM TO WORK, HE WEARS A SUIT AND TIE.

WHEN ASKED WHY HE DRESSED IN UNIFORM TO TESTIFY, VINDY SAID BECAUSE HE "FELT MARGINALIZED".

Congressman Chris Stewart (R-UT) partially raised this after Vindman’s remarks to Nunes, asking, “Do you always insist on civilians calling you by your rank?” Vindman answered that he “thought it was appropriate to stick with” his rank today, and while he didn’t think Nunes was trying to be disrespectful, he "explained" that “the attacks that I’ve had in the press, on Twitter, have kind of eliminated the fact that, or either marginalized me, as a military officer.”

SO, HE'S ALSO GOT A LITTLE "CINDERELLA SYNDROME"?

AND HE JUST ISN'T GOOD AT PLAYING THE VICTIM. TOO MUCH EGO. 

VINDMAN ADMITTED HE CHANGED THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT; HE HAD TO ADMIT IT, HE WAS BUSTED. 

HOW MANY MORE DID HE "EDIT"?
The accuracy of ALL transcripts Vindman touched is now in question. 
He changed it to match HIS talking points, not what Trump actually said.

HIS SUPERIOR, MORRISON, CONTRADICTED VINDMAN REPEATEDLY. 
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.) asked Tim Morrison, former NSC senior official and Vindman's former boss, about the July 25 Trump-Zelensky call, to which Morrison had listened.

“Did you hear President Trump make a demand of anything that would constitute a crime?”

“No, sir,” Morrison said.

“Is it fair to say that as you were listening to the call, you weren’t thinking, ‘Wow, the president is bribing the president of Ukraine?’ That never crossed your mind?” Ratcliffe asked.

“It did not, sir,” Morrison said.

“Or that he was extorting the president of Ukraine or doing anything improper?” Ratcliffe continued.

“Correct, sir,” Morrison said.  

VOLKER'S TESTIMONY ALSO CONTRADICTED VINDMAN. 

"Former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker repeatedly denied that quid pro quo took place during the July 25 call between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky."

“I didn’t think” a quid pro quo “was actually there,” Volker, the first impeachment inquiry witness, testified, referring to the call.

Volker testified that he believed that Ukraine did not become aware of the hold on U.S. aid until Politico published a story on the matter, based on leaked information, on August 28, more than a month after the July 25 call.  

House investigators asked Volker, “Did President Trump ever withhold a meeting with President Zelensky or delay a meeting with President Zelensky until the Ukrainians committed to investigate the allegations that you just described concerning the [2016] presidential election?”

“The answer to the question is no …. there was no linkage like that,” Volker said.


FOR HIS ACTIONS, VINDY COULD FACE COURT-MARTIAL, ALTHOUGH THE ARMY HAS STATED IT SUPPORTS HIM.

How the Army officer who testified against Trump could end up in a court-martial.

“It’s not far-fetched,” Sean Timmons, a managing partner at Tully-Rinckey, said. “It’s a murky issue.”

In any case, Vindman’s testimony would need to be limited to avoid disclosing anything out of order, Timmons said.

A spokesman for the National Security Council, Vindman’s official command, declined to comment on whether he might face an Article 15 investigation.

Beyond any possible legal fallout, Timmons added, it’s more likely that Vindman has torpedoed his career by testifying before Congress.

“...the reality is, whistleblowers often face retaliation through subterfuge,” he said.

Because it’s unlikely Vindman will remain a member of the NSC staff, his service record will have a big gash in it from being moved mid-assignment, Timmons said.

His rater, who signs off on his officer evaluation report, is also likely a senior civilian official, who could give him a less-than-stellar review that might affect his competitiveness for promotion to full colonel. And then, of course, if he’s not promoted, he’ll eventually be forced to retire.

AS SOMEONE POINTED OUT, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A MEMBER OF THE MILITARY DOES NOT FILE A GRIEVANCE WITH THEIR COMMANDER AND INSTEAD GOES TO A CONGRESS-PERSON?

What happens if you 'go down the proper chain of command and first file a grievance' and then still aren't happy?

Vindman did NONE of this.

HE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE FILED A GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE MILITARY, DONALD J. TRUMP, WHO WAS HIS AND EVERY OTHER OFFICER'S "SUPERIOR OFFICER". 

"The Chain of Command is the basic principle around which every military in the world is wrapped. The Chain of Command is the lifeblood of the services. It is the route of communications that has the military unit working as a team: information goes up the Chain, and Commands and Instruction go down the Chain. It is also the Order of Command (and Responsibility) of the actions of the Unit."
"Remember, Lt. Col. Vindman and his Testimony in front of the Congressional intelligence Committee? He had a Grievance, remember?

How to File a Military Congressional Complaint  
In order to make a Grievance to Congress..or a specific member of the house of Representatives the Military member must first File the Grievance with their Direct Commander.

First we must remember that Vindman did not file a Grievance with his military commander.

I think after reading the next few paragraphs it will show that Lt. Col. Vindman did not follow UCMJ rules either.

*When you make a Congressional complaint, the congressman's staffer first sends it to the Service congressional liaison office. Most of the work is done by staffer's or operatives at the congressman's local field office. That office then sends it through the bureaucratic channel to your commanding officer for an answer.

The SJA for the commanding officer, the same SJA reviewing your case, will assist you to prepare a response. The most frequent response to a congressional inquiry is that you are 'going to have a fair trial, you are or will be represented by a military lawyer or can hire a civilian', and that your rights will be protected. That's about the best you can expect. That response then goes BACK UP the bureaucratic chain to the congressman's office. You will, in most cases, get a nice letter from your Congress-person saying "thanks for your inquiry, here's the Army's answer."

That's the best news. It can and usually does get worse from there.

That is not what happened in Vindman's Grievance is it?

He did not follow the rules and took his complaint/grievance right to the Intelligence Committee."

Another person pointed out that, under oath, Vindman admitted (1) he knowingly altered an official State Dept.document, (2) that he had UNREPORTED contact with the Ukranian government, and (3) he did NOT report to Morrison.

 All of this appears to be prosecutable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Whether or not they decide to push that button and officially end his career remains to be seen.


  REP. CHUCK SCHUMER TWEETED ON NOV. 22 THAT "Vindman and whistleblowers like him are patriots.They are standing up for the Constitution they swore an oath to defend. They don’t deserve these disgraceful attacks, and they must be protected from reprisals."

THAT OUTS VINDMAN AS A "WHISTLEBLOWER", BUT LET'S CALL HIM WHAT HE IS...A CHRONIC LEAKER WHO PROBABLY LEAKED FOR ATTENTION AND THE MISSING 'RECOGNITION' HE SEEMS TO THINK HE DESERVED.

BTW, DID SCHUMER'S REMARK INCLUDE 'CHELSEA' MANNING?
ISN'T WHAT VINDMAN DID AND THE WAY HE DID IT VERY SIMILAR TO MANNING'S SKIPPING THE FILING OF A GRIEVANCE, WHEN MANNING DIDN'T GO TO HIS SUPERIOR. ("HIS" because Manning had not changed names or gender at that time.)

ALSO, BTW, VINDMAN FREAKED OUT AFTER HIS INITIAL CLOSED-DOOR TESTIMONY AND DEMANDED EXTRA SECURITY PROTECTION, WAS APPARENTLY GOING TO BE MOVED TO AND HOUSED AT A MILITARY BASE, IF NECESSARY.

ANOTHER LT. COLONEL NAMED OLIVER NORTH NEVER ASKED FOR THAT KIND OF 'PROTECTION' AS HE TESTIFIED AGAINST REAGAN. 

AS A LEAD-IN TO WHAT HIS MILITARY SUPERIOR SAYS ABOUT VINDMAN, NOTICE HIS RESPONSE TO GOLDMAN'S QUESTION, AND REMEMBER, HE'S LIVED IN THE U.S. SINCE HE WAS 3 YEARS OLD. IT WAS A SARCASTIC, SNIDE REPLY. 

Daniel Goldman: (09:22)
Colonel Vindman, what languages do you speak?

Lt Col Vindman: (09:24)
I speak Russian and Ukrainian and a little bit of English.

WHAT A CUTE RESPONSE, RIGHT?

Vindman has a history of ridiculing America in front of Russian military officers.

LTC Alexander Vindman, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Ukraine, made fun of his adoptive nation to Russian army officers in 2013, according to retired Army LTC Jim Hickman.

"Do not let the uniform fool you,” Hickman said of Vindman in a series of Twitter posts, “he is a political activist in uniform.”

Vindman was detailed from the Pentagon to Trump’s National Security Council staff in 2018 as a Ukraine and Russia expert.

According to Hickman, Trump’s future accuser-in-uniform was already known as a politicized officer as far back as 2013, a year before the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

“Vindman, who was a major at the time, was sitting in one of the classrooms talking to the US & Russian soldiers, as well as the young officers & GS [civil service] employees about America, Russia, and Obama,” Hickman said in his October 31 tweets.

The incident took place at the Joint Multinational Simulations Center in Germany from July 15-24, 2013.“I know LTC Alex Vindman from a Combined U.S.-Russian exercise called Atlas Vision in Grafenwoher, [Germany],” Hickman said.

“He [Vindman] worked with the Russian Embassy and I was assigned to the JMTC (Joint Multinational Training Command), within USAREUR (U.S. Army Europe). He worked coordination w/the Russian 15th Peacekeeping Brigade, and I was in charge of all Simulations planning, as well as assisting the USAREUR Lead Planner as the Senior Military Planner.”

Hickman witnessed the incident firsthand and says he verbally reprimanded Vindman. Other witnesses were present.

“He was apologetic of American culture, laughed about Americans not being educated or worldly, and really talked up Obama and globalism to the point of uncomfortable,” Hickman said about Vindman.

“He would speak with the Russian soldiers and laugh as if at the expense of the US personnel,” Hickman said.

“It was so uncomfortable and unprofessional, one of the GS [civil service] employees came and told me everything . . . . I walked over and sat within earshot of Vindman, and sure enough, all was confirmed.

“One comment truly struck me as odd, and it was with respect to American’s falsely thinking they’re exceptional, when he said, ‘He [Obama] is working on that now.’ And he said it with a snide ‘I know a secret’ look on his face. I honestly don’t know what it meant, it just sounded like an odd thing to say,” according to Hickman.

Bashed America ‘in front of subordinates’ and ‘Russians’

“Regardless, after hearing him bash America a few times in front of subordinates, Russians, and GS Employees, as well as hearing an earful about globalization, Obama’s plan, etc., I’d had enough,” Hickman recalled.

“I tapped him on the shoulder and asked him to step outside. At that point I verbally reprimanded him for his actions, and I’ll leave it at that, so as not to be unprofessional myself,” said Hickman.
‘Not your professional field-grade officer’

“The bottom line is LTC Vindman was a partisan Democrat at least as far back as 2012. So much so, junior officers and soldiers felt uncomfortable around him,” Hickman said. “This is not your professional, field-grade officer, who has the character & integrity to do the right thing.”

Hickman’s former boss at the Joint Multinational Simulation Center in Grafenwoehr has since gone on the record to corroborate his story.

YES, VINDMAN ADMITS HE BROKE THE CHAIN OF COMMAND. 

"Vindman told Adam Schiff during his testimony on Tuesday that he went around his chain of command.

Vindman confessed that he told Ukrainian President Zelensky to “stay out of US politics” during his trip there in April."

Vindman did not tell his superiors about this message to the Ukrainian leader.

Vindman also testified earlier to the House Intel Committee in his basement hearing that he “thought” the President was wrong in his policy with Ukraine.
So he later told Ukrainians to ignore the President.

Vindman SHOULD have reported everything to his boss, Russian expert Tim Morrison, who told investigators on Tuesday that Vindman was a leaker, a liar and could not be trusted.

Counsel Castor: Were there concerns Col. Vindman leaked information?

Tim Morrison: Yes…

Tim Morrison: …”If he had concerns about the content of a call that was something I should have been notified of.

Counsel Castor: Did he become frustrated that he was cut out of some of the Ukraine portfolio?

Tim Morrison: Yes.

VINDMAN ADMITTED CHANGING THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE TWO PRESIDENTS, BUT SAID, "It’s “not accurate” but “I wouldn’t describe it as false.”

EVEN CBS POINTED OUT FLAWS IN VINDMAN'S 'TESTIMONY'. 

Vindman said that the Ukrainians first became aware of the pause in U.S. military aid in "mid-August," so the issue being discussed in the July 25 call was NOT about ["quid pro quo"] since the Ukrainians were unaware of a holdup in both their aid AND Lebanon's aid.

"They ask me, is this true, what we need to do, type of thing. So my impression was they were under pressure," Vindman said, according to the transcript. He responded to them that there was an "ongoing review".

AGAIN WITH HIS IDIOTIC, HEAVILY BIASED "MY IMPRESSIONS". 

OTHER WITNESSES FROM STATE DEPT. WERE AWARE OF THE 'HOLDUP' ON UKRAINE'S AID PLUS 3 SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES, PAKISTAN'S AND LEBANON'S AID WAS A NORMAL PROCESS WHILE BEING REVIEWED TO SEE IF SUCH AID WAS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF AMERICA'S FOREIGN AID POLICIES.
THEY HAD UNTIL SEPT. 11 TO RELEASE ALL THAT AID AND THEY MADE THE DEADLINE, BUT CHOSE NOT TO RELEASE PAKISTAN'S AID.

WHY DIDN'T ANY DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN HOWL ABOUT THAT?


LIKE KENNETH STARR SAID ON OCT. 30: 

“He [Trump] did nothing that sounds in the nature of a corrupt bargain.”
“There were 17 people on the phone, including the secretary of state, so the president was so open, and shall I say transparent, about it that that goes to his intent. There was no corrupt bargain or attempt to achieve a corrupt bargain.”

Starr went on to say the Ukrainian military aid in the equation was NOT held up; it was, in fact, delivered by the end of the fiscal year, totally within the legal time frame.

“We need to ratchet down the conversation because of the evils of impeachment,” Starr stated. “Impeachment has become a terrible, terrible thorn in the side of the American democracy and the conduct of the American government since Watergate. We need to get rid of this ‘let’s go to impeachment immediately,’ let’s at least have a reasoned and deliberate conversation about some lesser kind of response.”

“Right now, the Democrats have embarked on quite an unusual and unorthodox process. Time will tell, but fundamental norms of fairness are not being observed at this stage,” he said. “Once this sinks into the public conscience, as it’s bound to do, because the procedures are so unorthodox, so unusual, such a substantial departure from history that the American people will eventually understand that and that they will either care about it, as I think they will, or they will brush it off and say ‘Well, they should not have done this, but they did.'”

Starr said on “America’s Newsroom” on Monday that history will be harsh with the Democrats handling of the impeachment inquiry into President Trump. “The text of the Constitution just entrusts [impeachment] to the good judgment, whether it’s being exercised or not, to the House of Representatives,” Starr said.

“But history will, I think, judge this not well. It should judge it not well. [You] didn’t have a full debate on the floor of the House—and that just lends itself to, ‘Then to let’s go to court and have this litigated.’

“And of course, the chairman then says, ‘You go to court, you’re in contempt.'”


TODAY, AWARD-WINNING *INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST JOHN SOLOMON ADDRESSED VINDMAN'S CLAIM THAT SOLOMON'S PUBLISHED ARTICLES WERE ALL FALSE.
IN 28 'POINTS' HE SHOWED HOE TRUE ALL THAT HE UNCOVERED ABOUT UKRAINE IS. 

VINDMAN JUST KEEPS PLAYING OUT OF HIS LEAGUE IN HIS EFFORTS TO GAIN ATTENTION AND MORE THAN THAT "15 MINUTES OF FAME".

[U]nder oath to Congress, he [Vindman] asserted [that] all the factual elements in my columns at The Hill about Ukraine were false, except maybe my grammar.

Here are his exact words:

“I think all the key elements were false,” Vindman testified.

WHAT VINDY 'THINKS', 'FEELS', 'DECIDES', WHAT HIS 'IMPRESSIONS' ARE DON'T MATTER A HILL OF BEANS WHEN COMPARED TO FACTS AND TRUTH DURING CONGRESSIONAL IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS.

HAD ANYONE OFFERED THIS KIND OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED, HE'D HAVE GOTTEN OFF SCOTT-FREE, AND THE HOWL OF 'GIVE US PROOF' WOULD HAVE GONE UP FROM EVERY DEMOCRAT ON THE HILL.

BUT THIS IS HATED TRUMP, BAD ORANGE MAN, SOMEONE THAT MANY HAVE SAID SHOULD BE ASSASSINATED, BEHEADED, SHOT, BASED ON HEARSAY EVIDENCE, THIRD- TO FIFTH-HAND HEARSAY. 

THE CRIME WAS THE SHARING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WITH SOMEONE WHO HAD NO RIGHT TO IT, NO CLEARANCE FOR RECEIVING IT.

It’s always been and still is a crime to share classified information with people not 'CLEARED', not legally authorized to receive that information.

We’ve been told from the beginning of this ordeal that the "whistle-blower" himself did not have the proper clearance to access the phone call.


Adam Schiff: (09:07)

Colonel, you’ve described this [ July 25th call] as a demand, this favor that the president asked. What is it about the relationship between the president of the United States and the president of Ukraine that leads you to conclude that when the president of the United States asks a favor like this, it’s really a demand?

A. Vindman: (09:25)
Chairman, the culture I come from the, the military culture. When a senior asks you to do something, even if it’s polite and pleasant, it’s not to be taken as a request. It’s to be taken as an order. In this case, the power disparity between the two leaders, my impression is that in order to get the White House meeting President Zelensky would have to deliver these investigations.

HELLO, MORON, THE PRESIDENCY IN NEITHER COUNTRY IS MILITARY. NEITHER NATION IS RUN BY THE MILITARY. BOTH MEN ARE DULY ELECTED SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE NATIONS. BOTH ARE COMMANDERS IN CHIEF OF THEIR MILITARIES, BUT DO NOT PERFORM THEIR PRESIDENTIAL DUTIES IN A MILITARY ROLL. 
BOTH ARE EQUALLY 'HEADS OF STATE'. THEIR TITLES ARE PRESIDENT, NOT GENERALISSIMO. 

POOR, PATHETIC, POUTY, POMPOUS 'WANNABE KING', VINDY REALLY BLEW THAT 'CONCLUSION', AND LET'S CALL IT WHAT IT WAS, HIS OBVIOUS CHOICE TO SEE THINGS HIS WAY, ALTHOUGH AS OTHERS IN STATE DEPT. POINTED OUT, HIS 'IMPRESSIONS' DON'T MAKE A DAMN. TRUMP DIDN'T USE VINDMAN'S SILLY "TALKING POINTS" AND VINDY WAS PISSED THAT HE WAS 'SLIGHTED'. 

A SMALL TENNESSEE NEWSPAPER HAS POINTED OUT SEVERAL FACTS IN THIS CASE THAT MAINSTREAM MEDIA REFUSES TO POINT OUT.

"Ukraine says it has been investigating corruption including at Burisma in 2018 before Zelensky was even standing for election, and was looking for U.S. help to root it out, not the other way around. Where is the quid pro quo...? In a time machine?"   

Daniel Goldman: (07:27)

Did you discuss at all, at any point, their concerns about the hold on security assistance?


Lt Col Vindman: (07:36)

To the best of my recollection, in the August timeframe, the Ukrainian Embassy started to become aware of the hold on security assistance and they were asking if I had any comment on that or if I could substantiate that.


Daniel Goldman: (07:53)

And that was before it became public, is that right?


Lt Col Vindman: (07:57)

Yes.

REALLY BIG LIE!


AS AMBASSADOR TAYLOR STATED IN HIS TESTIMONY,

"Ukrainian officials found out about the hold on aid on Aug. 29, 2019, after an article appeared in Politico."

TAYLOR THEN SPOKE TO AMBASSADOR TO THE E.U., SONDLAND, ON SEPT. 8.

TEXTS BETWEEN THE TWO SHOW THAT SONDLAND TOLD TAYLOR HE WAS WRONG ABOUT QUID PRO QUO.

UKRAINE RECEIVED ITS AID ON SEPT. 11, 2019.
IT WAS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RELEASED WHEN TAYLOR "BECAME CONCERNED".


AS L.A. TIMES WROTE OCT. 1, 2019,
BOTH FORMER PRESIDENT POROSHENO AND CURRENT PRESIDENT ZELENSKY HAVE STATED THAT THEY FELT NO PRESSURE, NONE, FROM TRUMP ABOUT ANYTHING AND THAT IF ANY SUCH PRESSURE HAD BEEN ATTEMPTED, THEY WOULD HAVE DISMISSED IT AND DONE WHAT WAS BEST FOR UKRAINE. 

"Petro Poroshenko, who was Ukraine’s president until May and dealt with both the Obama and Trump administrations, said in a rare interview with The Times on Tuesday that he never felt pressure from President Trump or his personal attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani to open questionable corruption investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden.

“There are many people abroad and in Ukraine who would like to pressure me,” Zelensky said. “However, I am president of independent Ukraine and I think it is impossible to influence me.”


WOULD-BE SUPERSTAR VINDY WAS ALSO BLOWN OUT OF THE WATER BY WHITE HOUSE ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF MICK MULVANEY.

"Let me be clear," Mulvaney wrote, Oct. 18, "there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukrainian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 election. The president never told me to withhold any money until the Ukrainians did anything related to the (DNC) server.”)

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told a press briefing at the White House on October 17, 2019, there was nothing nefarious about holding up Congressionally approved military aid for Ukraine.

"President Trump is not a big fan of foreign aid, never has been, still isn't," Mulvaney said:

Doesn't like spending money overseas, especially when it's poorly spent, and that is exactly what drove this decision.

I've been in the office a couple times with him talking about this. He said look, Mick, this (Ukraine) is a corrupt place. Everybody knows it's a corrupt place.

By the way, put this in context. This is on the heels of what happened in Puerto Rico when we took a lot of heat for not wanting to give a bunch aid to Puerto Rico because we thought that place was corrupt. And by the way, turns out we were right. So put that as your context.

We actually did an analysis of what other countries were doing in terms of supporting Ukraine.

And what we found out was that--and I can't remember if it's zero or near zero dollars from any European countries for lethal aid.
You've heard the president say this, that we give them tanks and the other countries give them pillows. That's absolutely right, that as vocal as the Europeans are about supporting Ukraine, they are really, really stingy when it comes to lethal aid. And they weren't helping Ukraine. And then still to this day are not. And the president did not like that.

"We do that all the time with foreign policy," Mulvaney responded. "We were holding up money at the same time for, what was it, the Northern Triangle countries (Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador). We were holding up aid at the Northern Triangle countries so that they -- so that they would change their policies on immigration."

Mulvaney pointed to the ongoing investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe now being conducted by Connecticut Attorney General John Durham at the request of Attorney General William Barr:

"That's an ongoing investigation, right?" Mulvaney asked. "So, you're saying the president of the United States, the chief law enforcement person, cannot ask somebody to cooperate with an ongoing public investigation into wrongdoing? That's--that's--that's just bizarre to me that you would think that you can't do that."

Asked again about Trump's mention of the Bidens, Mulvaney said, "No, the money held up had absolutely nothing to do with Biden.
"I was involved with the--the process by which the money was held up temporarily, okay?" Mulvaney explained. "Three issues for that; the corruption in the country, whether or not other countries were participating in the support of the Ukraine, and whether or not they were cooperating in an ongoing investigation with our Department of Justice. That's completely legitimate."

Mulvaney told reporters he was not on the Trump-Zelensky phone call, although someone in his office was. "No one raised any difficulty with me on the call at all. I understand that, in fact, no one on the call in here thought there was any difficulty with it."


"FUNNY HOW EVERYTHING SPOKEN OF BY VP PENCE IN HIS SEPT. 1, 2019 VISIT TO POLAND, IN A VERY SIMILAR SITUATION TO UKRAINE, WAS NOT SEEN BY ANYONE AS TRUMP PRESSURING POLAND OR WITHHOLDING AID TO POLAND EVEN THOUGH POLAND HAD TO WAIT A BIT FOR ITS AID, TOO.

VP PENCE, WHEN ASKED ABOUT UKRAINE: "But as President Trump had me make clear, we have great concerns about issues of corruption. And, fortunately, President Zelensky was elected decisively on an anti-corruption message. And he and I discussed yesterday that as he’s assembled his cabinet, and as his parliament has convened, that even in the early days, he informed me that there have been more than 250 bills filed for — that address the issue of public corruption and really restoring integrity to the public process. I mean, to invest additional taxpayer [money] in Ukraine, the President wants to be assured that those resources are truly making their way to the kind of investments that will contribute to security and stability in Ukraine."     

DITTO FOR FOUR OTHER NATIONS' AID PLUS LEBANON'S HOLD ON ITS AID, WHICH WAS PLACED AND RELEASED OR DENIED IN THE SAME TIME FRAME AS UKRAINE'S.

Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale confirmed Wednesday evening at the House Intelligence Committee that aid to Lebanon was held up at the same time, and in the same way, as aid to Ukraine.

Responding to questions from Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX), Hale agreed that President Trump had a general skepticism of foreign aid and wanted to overhaul the way it was handled, as part of his “America First” policy.

He also agreed that delays on aid are not uncommon, and confirmed his earlier testimony that aid to Lebanon had been held up by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the White House, as had aid to Pakistan and to the “Northern Triangle” countries (El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras) until it was later released. The Lebanon hold remains in effect.

The Pakistan aid was held up because of “unhappiness over the policies and behavior of the Pakistani government toward certain proxy groups that were involved in conflicts with the United States,” Hale said.

Hale also confirmed that when aid was withheld from Lebanon, there was no reason given — just as with Ukraine. Asked whether that was “not uncommon,” Hale said it is “not the normal way that we function,” but that “[I]t does happen.”

Ratcliffe concluded: “The assertion has been made that President Trump’s Ukraine policy changed when there was a pause in the aid, or the aid was withheld. Is that an accurate statement?”

Hale said: “That was not the way I understood things to be happening at the time — we were not given an explanation.”


WILL THE DEMOCRATS NOW SCREAM FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO LEBANON'S AID, PAKISTAN'S, NORTHERN TRIANGLE NATIONS'? 

NO, BECAUSE NONE OF THOSE HOLDS ENTAIL THE DEMS HAVING TO DEFEND OBAMA, BIDEN, KERRY OR HILLARY LIKE THE UKRAINE CONNECTION DOES.


AS I WROTE IN A PREVIOUS BLOG, THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WAS GUILTY OF AIDING A COUP AGAINST A DULY-ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UKRAINE. THEY NAMED THE MAN THEY WANTED AS HIS SUCCESSOR.

SINCE 2014, THEY DEMANDED EACH UKRAINIAN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR BE FIRED AND YOVANOVITCH DEMANDED IN MARCH 2019 THAT ANOTHER BE FIRED.

 HER DEMAND WAS POSTED TO OUR OWN EMBASSY'S WEBSITE!

On March 5, 2019, YES, 2019, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch called to have anti-corruption prosecutor Nazar Kholodnytskyi fired in a speech to the Ukraine Crisis Media Center, saying, “To ensure the integrity of anticorruption institutions, the Special Anticorruption Prosecutor must be replaced,” she said, accusing Kholodnytskyi of corruption. 

"To ensure the integrity of anticorruption institutions, the Special Anticorruption Prosecutor must be replaced. Nobody who has been recorded coaching suspects on how to avoid corruption charges can be trusted to prosecute those very same cases.

Those responsible for corruption should be investigated, prosecuted, and if guilty, go to jail."  

NO MATTER WHOM THE UKRAINE CHOOSES, AMERICA WANTS THEM FIRED...FOR 5 LONG YEARS NOW.

AND EVERY PROSECUTOR HAS MENTIONED REOPENING THE BURISMA INVESTIGATION, THE MONEY WITHHELD BY MEMBERS OF THE OBAMA ADMMINISTRATION, AND BURISMA LEADS TO HUNTER BIDEN AND JOHN KERRY'S STEPSON AND WHO ELSE?

THE CURRENT PROSECUTOR, THE ONE DIRECTLY BEFORE HIM HAVE BOTH SAID THAT JOE BIDEN REAPED FINANCIAL BENEFITS FROM BURISMA.

EACH HAS ALSO STATED THAT THE U.S. EMBASSY IN KIEV WITHHELD FUNDS FOR THOSE INVESTIGATIONS.

UKRAINIAN MPs HAVE, SINCE 2016, ASKED THAT YOVANOVITCH BE REPLACED.

HOW MANY TIMES WILL AMERICA DEMAND UKRAINIAN PROSECUTORS BE FIRED TO COVER-UP THESE ALLEGATIONS, TO STOP INVESTIGATIONS FROM BECOMING MAINSTREAM HEADLINES?   

AS FOR VINDY...HE SHOT HIMSELF IN THE FOOT.   
HE'S OUT, WAY OUT.   










_____________________________________


FURTHER READING AND FOOTNOTES:

-- ANOTHER LOOK AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT'S PAST FAILURES SHOWS US THE CAUSE OF TODAY'S?
NOTHING CHANGES. CROOKS COME AND CROOKS GO. LIARS IN, LIARS OUT, NEW SET OF LIARS?

38 People Cited for Violations After State Department Investigates Hillary Clinton Emails.
October 19, 2019 
"A State Department investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server has found that more than 500 security violations took place on her watch.

Thirty-eight individuals, who committed 91 violations among them, could be identified as violators and face punishment, Fox News reported.

In total, the investigation uncovered 588 violations, but 497 of them could not be traced back to a specific individual.

According to the report, the review was hindered by a number of factors including missing emails, the Washington Examiner reported.

Another factor was the time gap of five to nine years between the time emails were sent and investigators interviewed current and former State Department employees about them.

The report listed as a “serious” challenge the fact that many people the investigation wanted to reach were unresponsive or could not be contacted.



-- Impeachment Hearing Transcript Series

November 13: Bill Taylor, George Kent Testimony Transcript

November 15: Marie Yovanovitch Testimony Transcript

November 19 AM: Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams Testimony Transcript

November 19 PM: Kurt Volker, Tim Morrison Testimony Transcript

November 20: Gordon Sondland Testimony Trancript

November 21: Fiona Hill, David Holmes Testimony Transcript




--Vindman's unclassified but redacted "secret" testimony Oct. 29, 2019


--* Solomon has received a number of prestigious awards for investigative journalism, among them the 2008 Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award and the Society of Professional Journalists' National Investigative Award together with CBS News' 60 Minutes for Evidence of Injustice; in 2002, the Associated Press's Managing Editors Enterprise Reporting Award for What The FBI Knew Before September 11, 2001, and the Gramling Journalism Achievement Award for his coverage of the war on terrorism; in 1992, the White House Correspondents' Association's Raymond Clapper Memorial Award for an investigative series on Ross Perot.

-- ** Fiona Hill: (40:41)
"I did not feel that he [Vindman] had the political antenna to deal with something that was straying into domestic politics.
Fiona Hill: (41:36)
Some people in my office have worked at the highest levels of advisory positions and Mr. Morrison had come from Capitol Hill, he knew politics inside out. And we said that Colonel Vindman did not and we were concerned about how he would manage what was becoming a highly charged and potentially partisan issue, which had not been before.

Fiona Hill: (42:45)
I mean we did pull him [Vindman] back from the meeting in the oval office. And subsequently we were very concerned about these political aspects to this and we did not feel Colonel Vindman was justifiably alarmed when he realized that there was this highly political aspect of the meeting that we were looking for eventually with President Zelensky.
Fiona Hill: (50:57)
And I’ve learned since from Mr. Holmes’ rendition here today, that Colonel Vindman has already warned the Ukrainians or in fact President Zelensky no less to stay out of American politics, domestic politics.
Fiona Hill: (01:47:58)
Mr. Eisenberg took it all very seriously. He said, for example, that Colonel Vindman should feel free … He said this to me … in future to go and bring any concerns to him about these meetings. Similarly myself and any others, if there was any subsequent followup in terms of these issues being raised again with any of the parties in the future.



"Yonavo#itch"
https://tennesseestar.com/2019/10/10/commentary-removed-u-s-ambassador-to-ukraine-wanted-the-same-prosecutor-who-was-investigating-burisma-bidengate-fired-too/



HOROWITZ REPORT. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/lary-c-johnson-here-is-what-the-horowitz-report-should-conclude/






//WW

IS THIS WHY THE WHISTLEBLOWER WON'T BE TESTIFYING?

BECAUSE HE MAY HAVE VIOLATED LAWS AND CAPITALIZED ON HIS 'LEAKS'.

THIS COMPLAINT WAS FILED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2019.

WHEN DID SCHIFF "MAKE IT CLEAR THE WHISTLEBLOWER WILL NOT BE TESTIFYING" AS THE REPUBLICANS REQUESTED?

NOVEMBER 10, 2019. 

A complaint recently filed with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) reportedly alleges that the “whistleblower” who triggered the partisan impeachment inquiry may have broken federal law by indirectly soliciting money from mainly anonymous sources, potentially including foreigners, via a GoFundMe page.

The GoFundMe page in question has raised over $227,000 so far. In collaboration with impeachment whistleblower lawyers from the Compass Rose Legal Group, Whistleblower Aid helped start the GoFundMe page in question back in September.

Filed on November 8, the complaint alleges that the leaker that sparked the impeachment probe is capitalizing on his position within the intelligence community to generate funds in violation of the law.

IT'S A MEDIA CIRCUS AND SCHIFF IS CHIEF CLOWN, A GAME OF CHESS AND SCHIFF CAN'T EVEN PLAY CHECKERS, A CHARGE THAT NEEDS HARD EVIDENCE AND NOT HEARSAY AND SCHIFF FAILS TO PROVIDE IT.

SOMEBODY GET THE DEMOCRATS A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS.

BY THE WAY, THE FIRST U.S. CONGRESSMAN NAMED CIARAMELLA ON NOV.11, BUT MISSPELLED HIS NAME IN THE TWEET. 

REP. DAN BISHOP NEEDS AN EDITOR.

SCHIFF NEEDS PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION AND A BIG, STRONG "KEEPER".

IF ANYONE LIKED SCHIFF, THEY'D INTERVENE BEFORE HE GOES POSTAL. 


WHAT'S COMING UP WILL BE A TRIAL FOR IMPEACHMENT, ATTENDED BY A JUDGE, CHIEF  JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.
THE JURY WILL BE THE U.S. SENATE. 

WASHINGTON POST MADE A CASE FOR TRUMP'S RIGHTS WHEN THEY WROTE,
"Under the Constitution, the House has the sole power of impeachment and the Senate the sole power to TRY impeachment charges, with a two-thirds majority required for CONVICTION."

IT IS A TRIAL, THE CRIMES TRUMP IS CHARGED WITH ARE "HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS" AND TRUMP WILL BE TRIED BECAUSE THIS IS A TRIAL, AND THERE CAN BE A CONVICTION. 

THANKS, WaPo, YOU MADE THE CASE QUITE WELL THAT JUST AS RAND PAUL AND LINDSAY GRAHAM, BOTH OF WHOM HAVE LAW DEGREES, STATED,  “The founders of our country clearly set out in the Bill of Rights to ensure that government would not deprive anyone of their rights without a fair opportunity to defend themselves. Confronting one’s accuser is integral to this. Rights in the Bill of Rights are not limiting. They certainly should apply to the president of the United States as much as to any other citizen. This right to face your accuser is fundamental to fairness."

THEN WaPo STATES...
"The president’s lawyers would have the opportunity to defend him from any charges in a Senate trial."

THERE ARE THOSE WORDS AGAIN, SOME OF THE SAME WORDS AS ARE FOUND IN THE CONSTITUTION'S CONFRONTATION CLAUSE!
"LAWYERS...DEFEND...CHARGES...TRIAL". 
IT BECOMES A TRIAL AND ALL CITIZENS CAN CONFRONT ACCUSERS AT TRIAL.
THE CONSTITUTION EXCLUDES NO ONE FROM THAT RIGHT...NOT EVEN DONALD TRUMP.  

OLD WaPo GOES ON TO ADMIT, "Neither the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998 (ICWPA) nor any related statutes guarantees anonymity for whistleblowers."

SO, IF HE DOES NOT REMAIN ANONYMOUS, AND SINCE HE WAS NAMED BY A U.S. CONGRESSMAN ON NOVEMBER 11th, HE IS NO LONGER ANONYMOUS, AND SINCE HE ACCUSES THE PRESIDENT OF "HIGH CRIMES", THIS FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER CAN, ASSUREDLY, BE ASKED TO FACE THE MAN HE ACCUSED OF THOSE CRIMES, YES?

LOGIC ALONE DICTATES TRUMP'S RIGHTS AS A U.S. CITIZEN, PERIOD, THE END,  AND THAT IS ANOTHER REASON THE DEMOCRATS ARE PULLING CIARAMELLA'S ''TESTIMONY', THAT AND THEY KNOW IT'S MERELY HEARSAY EVIDENCE.


EVEN New York Times columnist Bret Stephens has repeatedly intimated that, to him, “high crimes and misdemeanors” requires ordinary criminality. He recently wrote, “I struggle to see exactly what criminal statute Trump violated with the [Ukraine] call.”

'THE ATLANTIC' REACHED FOR THE SAME BRASS RING THAT WaPo DID AND THEY ALSO FAIL.
"Moreover, the founders, both during the ratification period and afterward, identified multiple noncriminal acts they believed to be impeachable. At the Virginia ratifying convention, James Madison and Wilson Nicholas said abuse of the pardon power would be impeachable. Impeachment, some founders said, would also follow from receipt of foreign emoluments or presidential efforts to secure by trickery Senate ratification of a disadvantageous treaty. During the first Congress of 1789, Madison even argued that presidents could be impeached for “wanton removal of meritorious officers.”

DEAR ATLANTIC, WHAT THE OLD FOUNDERS "SAID" AND WHAT'S CLEARLY STATED IN THE CONSTITUTION ARE NOT THE SAME.

WHAT THEY "SAID" WASN'T WRITTEN INTO THE CONSTITUTION NOR RATIFIED BY THE STATES. WHAT THEY "SAID" OR "ARGUED" DOESN'T MEAN DOODLY-SQUAT.

THE CHARGE, C-H-A-R-G-E, OF HIGH CRIMES, C-R-I-M-E-S,  WHICH CONVENES A TRIAL IN THE SENATE COURT (OR IN A COURTROOM ANYWHERE), MEANS THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE MUST APPLY.

ONE LEGAL "EXPERT" STATED "The text of the Sixth Amendment literally limits its applicability to criminal prosecutions,” Steve Vladeck (a CNN stooge-puppet) said. “Impeachment is not a criminal prosecution.”
THE HELL IT ISN'T, STEVIE!
TRUMP IS ACCUSED OF "HIGH CRIMES" WHICH MAKES THIS THING A DEFINITE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. TO BE FOUND GUILTY WOULD DAMNED SURE BRAND TRUMP AS A CRIMINAL.

AS USA TODAY WROTE, "The Senate would acquit or convict the president."

WHO CAN, BY LAW, BY THE CONSTITUTION, ACQUIT OR CONVICT ANY CITIZEN OF THE U.S. OF CRIMES?
A JURY OF HIS PEERS.

REHNQUIST WAS WRONG, WASN'T HE?
THE SENATORS DO BECOME JURORS AND THE SENATE BECOMES A COURTROOM.

BUT THERE WILL PROBABLY NOT BE A "STAR WITNESS"...THE HEARSAY EVIDENCE FROM A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, ANOTHER CIA AGENT WHO HATES TRUMP AND STARTED A CAMPAIGN TO IMPEACH HIM IN 2017, A CHEAP WHORE LEAKER, AN ACCUSER AFRAID TO FACE THE ACCUSED.





//WW

YEARLY UPDATE TO THE TEA ROOM

FOR ALL NEW READERS: ABOUT THE TEA ROOM

1- I MODERATE ALL COMMENTS.
VERY FEW MAKE IT TO THE INTENDED POSTS.
WHY?

~ I DELETE ANONYMOUS COMMENTS.
IF YOU USE A PSEUDONYM, THAT'S FINE, BUT NO ANONYMOUS.
RARELY, ONE WILL ESCAPE ME AS I MAY HIT THE WRONG BUTTON, BUT RARELY.

~ I DELETE COMMENTS LACED WITH EXTREME VULGARITIES.
MY GRANDCHILDREN SOMETIMES READ HERE; NO NEED TO FEED THEM GARBAGE. MILD EXPLETIVES ARE PASSABLE, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM MY OWN POSTS.

~ I DELETE ALL COMMENTS WITH HYPERLINKS TO BUSINESSES, "SERVICES", PORN OR DATING SITES, ETC, OR TO OFF-TOPIC VIDEOS.
GIVE IT UP, YOU WHO KEEP TRYING, IT'LL NEVER POST HERE.

THAT LEAVES FEW COMMENTS THAT I'LL PASS, BUT JUST AS I DON'T ALLOW ADVERTISEMENTS, I DIDN'T CREATE THIS BLOG FOR POPULARITY.

2- I DON'T ALLOW THIS BLOG TO BE 'COUNTED', DON'T ALLOW 'ROBOT CRAWLERS', NOTHING THAT WILL MAKE THIS BLOG SEEM "POPULAR."
IT'S HERE FOR 'INCONVENIENT TRUTHS'.

IF YOU EVER SEE A 'COUNT' OF MY BLOG ANYWHERE, LET ME KNOW.
IT WILL STOP, OR SO SAYS MY ATTORNEY.

3- SOME SAY I USE AN 'ALTERNATIVE NEWS STYLE'.
I USE WHAT I PLEASE AND DON'T CARE WHO LIKES IT.
NOBODY IS FORCED TO READ HERE, NOBODY GOT AN INVITATION TO THIS WEBSITE.
DON'T LIKE IT? DON'T COME BACK.
MY BLOG, MY WAY.

4- ALL CAPS. I LIKE ALL CAPS BUT I'M ALSO 'HALF BLIND'.
IT'S SIMPLY EASIER AND FASTER TO USE CAPS.
AFTER OVER 60 YEARS TYPING, I STILL 'HUNT AND PECK'.
SCREW "QWERTYUIOP".

NOW AND THEN, ON 'GOOD DAYS', I MAY DO A BLOG WITHOUT ALL CAPS, BUT RARELY.

5- HIGHLIGHTED, COLORED AND BOLD TEXT.
WHY?
FOR 'INFLECTION'. SEE DEFINITION AT WEBSTER'S.
SINCE WE CAN'T SPEAK FACE-TO-FACE, I CAN'T 'STRESS' WORDS ANY OTHER WAY.
YES, SOMETIMES I OVERDO IT.
WHINING ABOUT IT WON'T CHANGE HOW I TYPE.

HANDING ME THAT BULLSH*T ABOUT "INTERNET ETIQUETTE" WILL DO NOTHING TO CHANGE IT AND I'LL JUST THINK, "WHAT A %#@& JERK. I'M 70+ YEARS OLD AND DO AS I BLOODY WELL PLEASE."

6- I ABHOR ALL POLITICIANS EQUALLY, THOUGH IT MAY NOT APPEAR THAT I DO.
I CURSE ALL POLITICAL PARTIES AS CREATIONS TO KEEP THIS NATION IN A CONSTANT STATE OF CIVIL WAR.
I SEE ALL IN CONGRESS AS CHEAP WHORES, SOLD OUT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.
TRUTH WOULD CHOKE THEM TO DEATH IF THEY TOLD IT AND HONOR WILL NEVER BE A CONCEPT THEY UNDERSTAND.

THEY ALL SWORE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND PROMISED TO BE FAITHFUL SERVANTS TO US, "WE, THE PEOPLE".

THEY PROMISED TO PROTECT AMERICA AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC... NOT ENGAGE US IN UNDECLARED WARS ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE AGAINST PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT OUR ENEMIES UNTIL WE MADE THEM SO.

THEY LIED ON ALL COUNTS.

AS IS SAID IN THE SOUTH, "I WOULDN'T RAISE A LEG TO PISS ON THEM IF THEY WERE ON FIRE AND MY BLADDER WAS ABOUT TO BURST."

7- APPLY #6 TO MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND MULTIPLY THAT BY TWO.
WOULDN'T INSULT MY BACKSIDE BY USING ANY MAJOR NEWSPAPER IN AMERICA  AS TOILET PAPER.
I GREW UP PULLING NEWS OFF THOSE OLD TELETYPE MACHINES AT MY FATHER'S RADIO STATIONS IN THE 1950s, AND SAW THEN HOW QUICKLY 'NEWS' WAS CHANGED BY THE AP AND UPI, HOW STORIES WERE 'SPUN', MANIPULATED, 'KILLED' WITHIN A MINUTE SOMETIMES.
ONE FINE DAY, THE TOP NEWS ANNOUNCER GATHERED ALL THOSE 'KILLED' NEWS ITEMS AND READ THEM LIVE, ON AIR. I WAS SO PROUD OF HIM.
STILL, MOST NEWS THEN WAS GOOD JOURNALISM.

I'M OFTEN ALMOST RELIEVED THAT MY DAD, YOUNGER BROTHER, UNCLES AND ALL THE DEDICATED RADIO AND NEWSPAPER JOURNALISTS I GREW UP ADMIRING DIDN'T LIVE TO SEE THE MANURE THAT PASSES FOR NEWS NOW.
THEY ACHIEVED THEIR EXCELLENCE WITHOUT THE AID OF COMPUTERS OR INTERNET SEARCHES, BUT THEY WERE DEDICATED TO PROVIDING TRUTH TO THOSE THEY SERVED, EVEN IF THEY HAD TO RISK LIFE AND LIMB AND DRIVE 500 MILES TO GET IT.
MOST SETTLED FOR NO LESS.

I TRY TO DISCOVER FACTS BY 'GOING TO THE PEOPLE' WHERE NEWS IS MADE, LOCAL NEWS SOURCES, EVEN CALLING LOCAL OFFICIALS AND RANDOM PEOPLE SOMEONE MAY KNOW.
EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS ARE BEST.

EVEN THEN, I QUESTION EVERYTHING, CHECK AND DOUBLE-CHECK, DIG UNTIL NOTHING REMAINS TO DIG INTO.

I NEVER USE GOOGLE AS A SEARCH ENGINE, NOR BING.

I OFTEN USE FOREIGN LANGUAGE SEARCHES, JUST IN CASE THERE'S NO TRANSLATION.

IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR MORE CONTENT LIKE YOU FIND ON YOUR FAVORITE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE.

AS I SAID RECENTLY TO A SELF-BLINDED MAINSTREAM MEDIA FANATIC, I DON'T CARE IF TRUTH COMES OUT OF HELL VIA SATAN, JUST GET TO THE TRUTH.

YES, I READ SPUTNIK, TASS, RUSSIA TODAY, AL JAZEERA, 3 ISRAELI SOURCES ONLINE, BBC, GUARDIAN-UK, SEVERAL "UNKNOWNS" IN SOUTH AMERICA AND EUROPE, ASIA (ESPECIALLY JAPAN TIMES AND ASAHI SHIMBUN), A DAILY NEWS FROM EGYPT, AUSTRALIAN '7NEWS' AND OTHERS OUT OF AUSTRALIA, IRISH TIMES, SEVERAL IN CANADA, TWO FROM MEXICO, AND AFRICANEWS.

I READ NOTHING BUT FOREIGN NEWS MEDIA FROM ABOUT 2 a.m. EACH MORNING UNTIL ABOUT 10 a.m.

AFTER CHORES, I READ NATIONAL NEWS FROM USUALLY 2 p.m. UNTIL IT STARTS BEING REDUNDANT OR UNTIL  2 a.m. ARRIVES, AS I AM A LIFELONG, HAPPY INSOMNIAC WHO REQUIRES THE MOST MINIMAL SLEEP.

I READ NEWS EXCEPT ON WEEKENDS. THOSE ARE RESERVED FOR OTHER STUDIES.
I FEEL THAT I AM WELL READ RE:NEWS, CURRENT AFFAIRS, EVEN 'SCANDALS'.

I'VE HAD A FAIR SHARE OF READERS SUGGEST I AM A CONSPIRACY THEORIST. 
Conspiracy theory is a term that was originally a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy.
 To conspire means “to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end.” 
 The term “conspiracy theory” is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from “the people”.

SO,YEAH, WELL, ARE CONSPIRACY THEORIES JUST CRAZY IDEAS SOME FOLKS HAVE?

LET'S TRY HISTORY TO SEE.

MOST SAID FDR DIDN'T KNOW THE JAPANESE WOULD BOMB PEARL HARBOR, OR THAT A COUP WAS ATTEMPTED TO TAKE FDR OUT (THE BUSINESS PLOT).
MOST MAY DOUBT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD EVER WELCOME FORMER NAZIS TO AMERICA TO HEAD OUR SPACE PROGRAM, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND OUR NATIONAL 'RESEARCH LABS (operation paperclip) , OR USE OUR ENLISTED MEN (AND THE REST OF US) AS HUMAN GUINEA PIGS, NOR WOULD WE EVER BE SPIED ON AND BE UNDER CONSTANT SURVEILLANCE, THAT INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS WOULD WRITE SUCH A THING AS THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN (SAYING THAT WORLD PEACE WOULD NEVER BE ACCEPTABLE),  THAT THE CIA WOULD NEVER DO SUCH THINGS AS OPERATION GLADIO, MK-Ultra, PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD, ENGAGE IN DEALING DRUGS IN LOS ANGELES AND ARKANSAS, CREATE A 'HEART ATTACK GUN' THAT GOLDWATER REVEALED TO THE WORLD ALONG WITH A LONG LIST OF PEOPLE THE CIA HAD ASSASSINATED (SEE CHURCH COMMITTEE) ,THAT OUR MILITARY WOULDN'T STOOP TO SOMETHING LIKE OPERATION KEELHAUL, OPERATION NORTHWOODS, OR KILLING CIVILIANS FOR SPORT IN IRAQ, OR USING DEPLETED URANIUM IN AMMO & MISSILES,  THAT THE FBI INFILTRATED AND MANIPULATED THE WOMEN'S RIGHTS MOVEMENT, VIET NAM PROTEST GROUPS, THE NAACP, MARTIN LUTHER KING'S GROUP.
IMPOSSIBLE TO THINK THAT A PRESIDENT WOULD EVER OKAY SUCH A THING AS IRAN-CONTRA, WATERGATE, THE GULF OF TONKIN AFFAIR, FAST AND FURIOUS, OVERTHROW R KILL DULY-ELECTED HEADS OF NATIONS.
SURELY NO DRUG COMPANIES ALLOWED KNOWN CONTAMINANTS IN VACCINES NOR WOULD OUR FDA APPROVE UNTESTED, KNOWN HARMFUL MEDICINES, AND LET'S NOT FORGET ASBESTOS.
WEREN'T THE ENRON COVER-UP AND THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY'S LIES, OR GEORGE W. BUSH'S LIES ABOUT WMDs BELIEVABLE?
HISTORY NOW TELLS US THAT THOSE ALLEGED 'SMALLPOX BLANKETS' WERE REAL, WERE USED MANY TIMES AGAINST INDIANS, AND YES, SOME OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS DID KEEP 'BREEDING BOOKS' ON THEIR SLAVES AND THAT CERTAINLY DNA EVIDENCE SHOWS JEFFERSON SIRED A FEW CHILDREN BY AT LEAST ONE OF HIS SLAVES.

ALL THOSE WERE CONSIDERED CONSPIRACY THEORIES BEFORE THEY WERE PROVEN TO BE AND ARE KNOWN NOW TO BE CONSPIRACY FACTS.
PEOPLE CONSPIRED TO COMMIT HORRIBLE ACTS, ALWAYS HAVE, ALWAYS WILL. INCONVENIENT TRUTHS, PERHAPS, BUT TRUTHS NONETHELESS.

WHY DO I READ SO MUCH?
BECAUSE LOVE OF BOOKS WAS INSTILLED IN ME BY AGE 4 AND I'M ALSO JUST ABOUT 'CHAIR-BOUND', SO READING HELPS PASS THE TIME I USED TO SPEND OUTDOORS. BUT I MANAGE SEVERAL SETS OF EXERCISE A DAY/NIGHT TO AVOID THOSE NASTY BLOOD CLOTS THAT COME FROM TOO MUCH SITTING.
IT HAS ITS PLUSES, BEING SO CONFINED, AND IT'S EASY TO FOCUS ON THOSE AND BE CONTENT.

8- YES, I AM A 'TREE-HUGGING HIPPIE', A 'NATURE FREAK', A JOHN MUIR 'WORSHIPER', ETC.
AS SUCH, AND ALSO BECAUSE I LOST THREE PEOPLE WHOM I LOVED WITH ALL MY HEART TO THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY RADIATION, I TRULY HATE NUCLEAR ANYTHING.

EVER SINCE I SAT AND LISTENED TO OPPENHEIMER REGRET THAT HE'D HELPED BRING IT UPON THE WORLD, HEARD JOHN GOFMAN EXPLAIN WHY HE HATED IT (TWO OF THE GREAT MINDS OF THE MANHATTAN PROJECT), AND HEARD THE STORIES ONE UNCLE TOLD WHO WORKED IN THE 'NUCLEAR INDUSTRY', RADIATION HAS BEEN AN ABOMINATION TO ME.

THIS SHOULD EXPLAIN MY MANY, MANY ARTICLES ON THE CURSED 'NUCLEAR ENERGY', NUCLEAR 'ACCIDENTS'.

9- YES, I AM AN ANIMAL LOVER, ADMITTEDLY TO THE POINT THAT I WOULD BE HONESTLY HARD-PRESSED TO DECIDE WHOM TO RESCUE IF BOTH AN ANIMAL AND AN UNKNOWN ADULT HUMAN WERE IN GRIEVOUS PERIL AND ONE WOULD HAVE TO DIE IF I COULD RESCUE ONLY ONE. IF IT WERE A CHILD AND NOT AN ADULT, I'D SAVE THE CHILD.
IT'S A FLAW IN MY CHARACTER, PERHAPS, BUT I HAD TO FACE THE FACT AT A VERY EARLY AGE THAT SOME (NOT ALL) HUMANS ARE THE MOST VICIOUS PREDATORS, THE MOST TERRIBLE MONSTERS ON EARTH.
IT DEVELOPED FROM THERE AS I ACQUIRED 'PETS' AND WAS BLESSED TO STUDY MARINE BIOLOGY.
HOWEVER, ORGANIZATIONS LIKE 'PETA', THE 'HUMANE SOCIETY', 'SPCA' ARE 'SWORN ENEMIES' BECAUSE THEY USE ANIMALS TO MAKE PROFITS AND FILM THEIR SUFFERING TO MAKE BIGGER PROFITS.

10- BECAUSE OF ALL THE ABOVE AND ALL MY FLAWS AND FAILINGS TO TRULY "LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF", I CANNOT, WITH CLEAR CONSCIENCE, CALL MYSELF A REAL CHRISTIAN, WHICH IS SOMEONE WHOM WE CAN LOOK AT AND SEE A LIKENESS OF THE CHRIST, WHOM I DO 'BELIEVE IN', BUT I AM SOLIDLY FOR CHRISTIANS, IF THEY ARE REAL. 
I MADE A LIFELONG STUDY OF ALL THE EARTH'S 'RELIGIONS', TOOK WORLD RELIGIONS AS A 'MINOR' IN COLLEGE, STILL READ ALONG THOSE LINES ALL WEEKEND, EVERY WEEKEND.
I ONCE SET OUT TO 'PROVE' THAT ALL RELIGIONS WERE MERELY MYTHS.
THAT WAS A FOOLISH GOAL AND, TRY AS I MIGHT TO ATTAIN IT, I HAD TO ADMIT I WAS WRONG, IN THE CASE FOR CHRISTIANITY.

11- I AM ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT TO THE BONE.
I LIKE INDEPENDENCE TOO MUCH TO SEE THE NEED TO BE GOVERNED.
HUMANS DID WELL ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT KINGS AND OTHER RULERS FOR A LONG,. LONG TIME AND WERE SURELY HAPPIER THAN WE ARE TODAY.

WHEN BUSH, JR,WAS IN OFFICE, MANY ACCUSED ME OF BEING DEMOCRAT.
WHEN OBAMA REIGNED, MANY SAID I WAS REPUBLICAN, WHILE OTHERS SAW ME DEFENDING HIM.
BEFORE TRUMP WAS 'ELECTED' BY THE CURSED ELECTORAL COLLEGE, WHICH I DESPISE, I OFTEN WROTE WORSE 'RANTS' AGAINST HIM THAN I DID HILLARY.

BUT TO MY ASTONISHMENT, EVEN AFTER DEMOCRATS SEVERELY AND INCESSANTLY LECTURED TRUMP THAT HE'D HAVE TO ACCEPT AN "ELECTORAL LOSS", WHO WENT ABSOLUTELY CRAZY WHEN HILLARY LOST?

IT DEFIED THE IMAGINATION.

THAT HAD NOT HAPPENED WHEN GORE WON THE POPULAR VOTE BUT LOST TO BUSH, JR. EVEN THOUGH EVERYONE KNEW GORE WAS CHEATED OUT OF THE FLORIDA WIN BECAUSE JEB BUSH WAS IN CHARGE DOWN THERE, BUSH CRONIES CONTROLLED THE LUDICROUS SEARCH FOR 'HANGING CHADS' AND 'ASSOCIATES OF CHENEY' (aka, CHENEY) OWNED THE DAMNED VOTING MACHINES.
NO RIOTS, NO SCREAMING 'SUICIDE VIDEOS', NO BEATING GOP SUPPORTERS IN THE STREETS, NO 4-YEAR CALLS FOR BUSH'S DEATH OR IMPEACHMENT, EVEN WHEN HE LIED ABOUT IRAQ AND 'WMDs'... NONE OF THAT!

THE HYPOCRISY AND BLIND FANATICISM OF BOTH 'PARTIES' ASTOUNDS ME.
IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC AND REASON.

THE CURRENT LEVEL OF HATRED I SEE IN AMERICA TODAY, BECAUSE OUR NATION IS DIVIDED JUST ABOUT 50-50 BY 'PARTY LINES', IS UNPRECEDENTED. 

IF TRUMP WINS, WE'LL SEE WAR IN THE STREETS AND HEAR WAILINGS THAT RUSSIA INTERFERED.
IF HE LOSES, WE'LL PROBABLY ALSO SEE WAR IN THE STREETS, THOUGH WE DIDN'T WHEN OBAMA BECAME KING.

12- THE HYPOCRISY OF THE CRIES OF "RACISM".
RACISM HAS EXISTED SINCE THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE RACE AND IT EXISTS IN EVERY RACE AND, LIKELY, ALWAYS WILL, BECAUSE OF HUMAN PRIDE.
EVERYONE LIKES TO THINK 'THEIR PEOPLE' ARE THE BEST.
EVERY RACE WANTS TO BE 'TOP OF THE HEAP'.
MY LONG-TIME READERS KNOW THAT I ENJOY ( I ADMIT I DO) "RACE-BAITING WHITE FOLKS" BY A FEW YEARLY REFERENCES TO EUROPEAN INVADERS WHO COMMITTED THE 'AMERICAN GENOCIDE' AGAINST MY ANCESTORS, THE 'NOBLE SAVAGES', THE 'RED MAN'.
I CAN TURN OUT A REAL HOOT OF A 'RANT' ON THAT TOPIC AND DO SO JUST TO SHOW HOW IT FEELS TO BE SPOKEN OF AS A HEINOUS, INFERIOR LOT OF  UNWELCOME CRIMINALS AND KILLERS.
IT CAN GET UGLY.

BUT UGLY IS GOOD IF IT DRIVES HOME A POINT...WE ARE ALL CREATED EQUAL AND WE'VE ALL HAD EQUAL RIGHTS EVER SINCE THE CONSTITUTION WAS RATIFIED AND SLAVES WERE FREED.
NOBODY IN AMERICA IS MORE "SPECIAL" THAN THE NEXT GUY.
NEITHER IS ANYBODY LESS THAN THE NEXT. 

I RECALL THE VERY YEAR THAT SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS, OVERNIGHT, BECAME REPUBLICANS, WHOM THEY HAD SPAT ON FOR 100 YEARS.
IT WAS ALL OVER JFK GETTING THE NOD FROM THE DNP.

I WAS VERY AWARE WHEN THE KKK REFUSED TO ALLOW REPUBLICANS TO JOIN, BUT THE NEXT WEEK THEY WERE REPUBLICANS AND WERE RECRUITING FROM AMONGST THE GOP VOTERS.

OUR HISTORY BOOKS IN THE 1950s WERE PROUD THAT ALL THOSE CONFEDERATE STATUES WERE OF "NOBLE DEMOCRATS".
LONG AFTER THE PARTIES FLIP-FLOPPED, "OLD DIXIE" STILL PROUDLY WAVED IN THE YARDS OF THOSE 'CONVERTED' REPUBLICANS, WHO USED TO BE DEMOCRATS.

HOW CAN IT ESCAPE ANYONE WHO CAN READ AT 5th GRADE LEVEL THAT TWO OF WHAT WERE CALLED THE MOST RACIST GOVERNORS IN AMERICA, GEORGE WALLACE AND ROSS BARNETT, WERE BOTH DEMOCRATS?

WHO CAN DOUBT THAT THE "BLACK PANTHERS" WERE FREAKING RACISTS FROM THE START, THAT THE 'MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD' IS, THE KKK, GANGS INFILTRATING THE U.S. FROM MEXICO AND HUNDREDS OF OTHER MORE SUBTLE ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN ETHNIC GROUPS HERE.

I SEE NO CURE FOR IT AND I'VE LOOKED HARD FOR ONE.

13- PEDOPHILES, CHILD MOLESTERS/ABUSERS WILL NEVER, EVER BE WELCOME IN THE TEA ROOM.
MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE I AM FOR CHILDREN, ALWAYS, ALL CHILDREN, EVERY SINGLE ONE.

BY THE WAY, I DON'T CARE IF ONE 'IDENTIFIES' AS FEMALE, MALE, NEUTRAL OR AS A SPOTTED OWL, NO CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18 SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO SEX-CHANGE, AND, TO BE BRUTALLY HONEST, I DON'T THINK 90-95% OF HUMANS ARE CAPABLE OF MAKING SANE, RATIONAL, COMPLETELY LOGICAL DECISIONS LIKE THAT UNTIL THEY'RE 40.
TOO MUCH HORMONAL AND 'SUPER-EGO/ID' INTERFERENCE, TOO LITTLE COMMON SENSE AND PROPER EDUCATION, TOO MUCH "I WANT" AND NOT NEARLY ENOUGH "WHAT'S REALLY, REALLY BEST FOR ME IN THE LONG RUN".

THINK BACK...HOW MANY WANTED TO GROW UP TO BE ONE THING TODAY AND ANOTHER THING THE NEXT DAY, AND YET ANOTHER THING AT AGE 18, 21?

HOW MANY FOUND "TRUE LOVE" AT AGE 15 AND WANTED TO MAYBE PAR-BROIL THAT LOVE WITHIN A YEAR AND INVITE NEW LOVE OVER FOR DINNER?

SO NO, NO CHEMICAL CASTRATIONS, NO HORMONE THERAPY TO BEGIN THE REVERSAL PROCESS UNTIL THAT KID'S HEAD CLEARS MAYBE YEARS AFTER PUBERTY.
SURE, SURE, LET THEM WEAR WHATEVER CLOTHES THEY LIKE, CALL THEMSELVES BY A NEW NAME, ETC, BUT NO TO STRIPPING THEM OF ANYTHING THEY JUST MIGHT WISH THEY HAD BACK IN 10 OR 20 YEARS.
PEOPLE CHANGE. WAIT FOR THEIR FINAL CHANGE. BE SURE, NOT SORRY.


14- WE EACH HAVE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO OUR PERSONAL WORLD VIEW, OUR BELIEFS, OUR CHOSEN PHILOSOPHIES, EVERYTHING.
UNDERLINE EACH... MAKE IT ALL, AND DON'T FORGET THAT.

IF YOU WANT TO LIVE AS A HERMIT, SOCIAL BUTTERFLY, CHRISTIAN, ATHEIST, DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, NONE OF THE ABOVE, OR AS A POLLIWOG IN A MOUNTAIN STREAM, GO FOR IT!
SO WILL ALL THE REST OF US. 
BUT REMEMBER...FIRST, DO NO HARM. 
SECONDLY, STAY OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S BUSINESS, TEND ONLY TO YOUR OWN.
STAY BUSY PERFECTING SELF.

THIRD, THE SUN IS THE CENTER OF OUR GALAXY, NOT ME, NOT YOU.
WE REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT'S AT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, BUT IT 'AIN'T' ME AND IT AIN'T YOU.
STAY HUMBLE.

AS MUCH AS YOU CAN, BE AT PEACE.
ALLOW OTHERS TO HAVE PEACE AS WELL.

WE'RE ALL SPECIAL IN SOME WAY OR WAYS, BUT NO ONE IS MORE SPECIAL THAN OTHERS.

WE EACH HAVE ONE JUST PLANET TO EXIST ON, ONE LIFE TO LIVE, ONE DAY APPOINTED TO LEAVE IT ALL BEHIND AND BE NO MORE HERE.

TREASURE EVERY MINUTE.

IF YOU'RE STILL READING, WELCOME TO THE TEA ROOM. 

MY BLOG, MY WAY, A PLACE WHERE I TRY TO LEARN SO I DO NOT PERISH IN IGNORANCE, WHERE I LEAVE SOME THOUGHTS AND INFORMATION FOR ANYONE WHO HAPPENS BY. 

DO I WANT EVERY READER TO AGREE WITH ME, ACCEPT WHAT I WRITE AS INFALLIBLE FACT?

HELL NO! 

I CAN BE WRONG.
SO CAN YOU. 
WHAT I WRITE IS HOW I SEE THINGS, THROUGH MY OWN EYES, AND YOU CAN'T LOOK AT ANYTHING EXCEPT THROUGH YOUR EYES. 

BUT IF ANY WORD HELPS TO MAKE YOU QUESTION EVERYTHING, SEEK MORE KNOWLEDGE, FEEL THAT YOU CAN HANDLE ANY TRUTH JUST FINE, OR THAT THERE ARE WRONGS IN THIS WORLD THAT YOU CAN HELP MAKE RIGHT, THEN COLOR ME CONTENT.








//WW

CULL WORLD POPULATION?

TO EVERY HUMAN PROBLEM, THERE IS A SOLUTION. ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS RECOGNIZE THE SOLUTIONS AND DEDICATE OURSELVES TO DOING WHAT'S REQUIRED.

UNLIKE WHAT 'GLOBALISTS' SUCH AS THOSE I LIST BELOW HAVE HAMMERED INTO US, OR THOSE GOING HYSTERICAL OVER 'CLIMATE CHANGE', WE HAVE TO SIMPLY WATCH FOR THINGS THAT WORK IN NATURE AND APPLY THEM.

TO ME, COMMON SENSE ALMOST ALWAYS TRUMPS SCIENCE.
IN SPITE OF EVERYTHING, I SEE HOPE, AND I TAKE IT WHEREVER I CAN FIND IT. CAN WE REVERSE WHAT WE'VE DONE AND "SAVE THE WORLD", AS THE MAN IN THE VIDEO ABOVE SUGGESTS?
DO WE WANT TO?
IF WE WANT TO, IF ENOUGH OF US WANT TO, WE CAN.

AND THE POOREST, MOST HOPELESS AMONG US CAN LEAD THE WAY.

EDUCATING THE MASSES BEATS HELL OUT OF "CULLING THE HERD".

THERE ARE OTHERS ACCOMPLISHING THIS SAME THING.
IN AUSTRALIA...

IN CHINA...

IN SPAIN, EGYPT AND INDIA...

FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE GLOBALIST AGENDA

A 1974 PAPER PRESENTED TO PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON STATED THAT AMERICA MUST DO TWO THINGS; CONTROL THE WORLD'S POPULATION GROWTH AND CONTROL AMERICAN FOOD SUPPLY, WHICH IS CRITICAL TO FEED THE "THIRD WORLD". 
CONTROL THE FOOD, CONTROL THE WORLD. 
AS LONG AS THERE HAVE BEEN HUMAN BEINGS, THERE HAVE BEEN BATTLES TO OWN AND CONTROL FOOD SUPPLIES.

FROM FORAGING CAVEMEN, TO NOMADIC TRIBES, TO THE MONARCHIES OF EUROPE, TO TODAY'S WORLD'S 'SUPER-POWERS, CONTROL OF FOOD SOURCES (AND WATER SUPPLIES) IS CRUCIAL TO 'POWER'.

THE ONE WITH THE MOST MARBLES WINS, RIGHT?


NATIONAL SECURITY STUDY MEMORANDUM 200 (NSSM 200) WAS COMMISSIONED BY NIXON IN APRIL, 1974 AND PRESENTED TO HIM IN DECEMBER,1974 BY HENRY KISSINGER. 
(THAT LAST LINK IS TO THE ENTIRE MEMORANDUM, FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY READ TO LEARN.)

IT OUTLINED "AN INADEQUACY OF WORLD FOOD SUPPLIES" AND HOW AMERICA COULD TURN THAT TO OUR ADVANTAGE. 

"Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to US security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.

The countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.

It also raises the question of whether the US should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states deemed constructive in use of population control measures."

THE 'PAPER' , AS YOU MAY SEE, SUBTLY SUGGESTS THAT WE SEND U.S. FOODS, IF AT ALL, TO THE "COMPLIANT" NATIONS, AND THEN SUGGESTS A REPEAT OF THE 1972 CROP FAILURES IN THE U.S. COULD BE REPEATED. 
 "The coincidence of adverse weather in many regions in 1972 brought per capita production in the LDCs back to the level of the early 1960s.
At the same time, world food reserves (mainly American) were almost exhausted, and they were not rebuilt during the high production year of 1973.

A repetition under these conditions of 1972 weather patterns would result in large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades -- a kind the world thought had been permanently banished."

WELL, IT JUST SO HAPPENS WE HAVE BECOME EXPERTS AT "WEATHER MODIFICATION", SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN MERRILY ACCOMPLISHING SINCE THE 1940S, AND WE HAVE AN "AGENCY" TO HANDLE THOSE 'MODIFICATIONS'.

"The mission of the North American Weather Modification Council (NAWMC) is to advance the proper use of weather modification technologies..."

WE CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO MILITARY USAGE OF WEATHER MODIFICATION, THAT'S 'TOP SECRET', BUT WE DO KNOW THEY BRAGGED TO CONGRESS THAT THEY'RE ON TOP OF THAT GAME.

WHAT WE DO HAVE ARE RELEASES OF INFORMATION DUE TO THAT GOOD OLD 'FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT' (FOIA) AND THE CIA 'MAKING NICE' AND LISTING A FEW OF THOSE RELEASES FOR US ON THEIR CIA LIBRARY PAGE. 

YOU CAN SAFELY BET THE FARM THAT ALL WE FIND IN THAT 'LIBRARY' DOESN'T EVEN SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF WHAT ACTUALLY EXISTS RE: WEATHER MODIFICATION AND 'GEOENGINEERING'.

NO WAY WILL ENTITIES LIKE 'DARPA' LIST THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS.

ON ANOTHER SITE WE FIND  "A Summary of the U.S. Navy Program and FY 1967 Progress in Weather Modification and Control, 1967". 

EVEN BEFORE KISSINGER PRESENTED NIXON WITH 'A PLAN', WE'D USED WEATHER MODIFICATION IN VIET NAM FAIRLY SUCCESSFULLY.         
IF YOU'D CARE TO EXPLORE THIS FURTHER, I FOUND A 'FRIENDLY' WEBSITE <HERE> THAT LAYS OUT THE BASICS OF "WEATHER MODDING".


BACK TO HOW KISSINGER AND COMPANY PLANNED TO TIE 'PROPER COMPLIANCE TO POPULATION REDUCTION' TO OUR SHARING AMERICA'S BOUNTY OF FOOD WITH THOSE "LDCs"...OR NOT.

[WE MUSTN'T FORGET ANOTHER 'PAPER' PREPARED FOR JIMMY CARTER BY ANOTHER SET OF 'EXPERTS' AND WITH KISSINGER'S HELP IN 1975,THE DEPOPULATION STUDY CALLED "GLOBAL 2000". 

QUOTING: "Unfortunately population growth may be slowed for reasons other than declining birth rates. As the world's populations exceed and reduce the land's carrying capacity in widening areas, the trends of the last century or two toward improved health and longer life may come to a halt.
Hunger and disease may claim more lives-especially lives of babies and young children. More of those surviving infancy may be mentally and physically handicapped by childhood malnutrition.

The time for action to prevent this outcome is running out. Unless nations collectively and individually take bold and imaginative steps toward improved social and economic conditions, reduced fertility, better management of resources, and protection of the environment, the world must expect a troubled entry into the twenty-first century."

'KISSY AND KREW' WERE ON A ROLL.

FROM NSSM 200:
"Populations with a high proportion of growth.

The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs (LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES) , are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,' ‘imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other, often foreign, influences blamed for their troubles" 
“Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of [U.S.] needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth.” 

“In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”

COERCION IS PRECISELY WHAT IT IS, AS ANYONE CAN PLAINLY SEE.
COMPLY WITH POPULATION REDUCTION OR WE CAN'T (WON'T) FEED YOU. 

GLOBALISTS WILL EXCUSE ANYTHING IN ORDER TO "CULL THE HERD".

CHINA MAY HAVE BEEN FIRST TO COME UP WITH SUCH A PLAN OF DISPOSING OF CHILDREN, AS I ATTEMPTED TO SHOW IN MY BLOG, "DYING ROOMS AND BABY BOXES".

UNWANTED INFANTS COULD BE LEFT AT 'ORPHANAGES' WHERE THEY WOULD BE PLACED IN "DYING ROOMS" AND LEFT TO STARVE. 

THERE IS A DOCUMENTARY ON THAT BUT I WON'T POST IT AGAIN AS IT IS TERRIBLY GUT-WRENCHING.
YOU CAN WATCH IT IF YOU CAN STOMACH IT AND, ADMITTEDLY, IT IS IMPORTANT TO BE AWARE SUCH PRACTICES EXIST(ED), BUT I JUST WON'T DISPLAY IT IN ANOTHER BLOG. ONCE SHOULD SUFFICE. 
SURPRISINGLY, TO ME AT LEAST, SOME SOUTH KOREANS ALSO DISPOSE OF THEIR UNWANTED CHILDREN, IF WE BELIEVE INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS FROM THAT COUNTRY.
ONE MAN AND HIS WIFE FOUND A WAY TO SAVE A FEW CAST-OFF BABIES IN SOUTH KOREA AND WE CAN SEE THE EVIDENCE OF BABY ABANDONMENT THERE IN THE FILM, "THE BABY BOX".

HOW MANY OTHER NATIONS HAVE SUCH PRACTICES I DO NOT KNOW.

I DID FIND A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BULGARIA'S ABANDONED CHILDREN, WHICH MADE ME WONDER EVEN MORE, HOW MANY, HOW OFTEN, AND WHY CHILDREN ARE CONSIDERED 'DISPOSABLE'. 
DOCUMENTARIES OF BRAZIL'S STREET CHILDREN BEING HUNTED DOWN AND SOME KILLED AS THEY SLEPT BEGAN TO SURFACE BEFORE 1990.
AS THE BALTIMORE SUN WROTE:

"Why, Pope John Paul II wanted to know, are there so many small children living on the streets in Brazil? 
And how could a society tolerate these children being murdered by death squads in the pay of businessmen wanting to clean up their neighborhoods?"
CHILD ABUSE HAS BEEN CITED AS ONE REASON EVEN VERY YOUNG CHILDREN RUN AWAY.     

I FOUND SUCH PRACTICES TO BE MORE PREVALENT IN HUMAN HISTORY AND TODAY THAN I IMAGINED.
I CANNOT COMPREHEND IT. 

CHILDREN HAVE BECOME TARGETS, PREY.
WHY?
BECAUSE THEY ARE "EASY MARKS". 

KISSINGER TARGETED THEM. 

“No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion... abortion, legal and illegal, now has become the most widespread fertility control method in use in the world today."

ABORTION SIMPLY FOR FERTILITY CONTROL?
ABSOLUTELY. 
WHY USE ABORTION TO REDUCE POPULATIONS?

BECAUSE THE UNBORN CAN'T DEFEND THEMSELVES OR LODGE COMPLAINTS OF GENOCIDE OR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY OR EVEN CALL ATTENTION TO THEIR PLIGHT...THE UNBORN ARE EASY TARGETS. THEY CAN'T FIGHT BACK. 

PLEASE NOTE THAT ROE V. WADE WAS UPHELD BY THE SUPREME COURT AND ABORTION 'LEGALIZED' ON JANUARY 22, 1973, SO KISSINGER, ET AL, COULD POINT TO THAT 'LEGALIZATION' AND NOT HAVE TO DEFEND ILLEGAL ABORTIONS ANYMORE. 
VERY CONVENIENT TO DEPOPULATION PLANS.  

WHAT ABOUT POPULATION ELIMINATION TO HANDLE THE "THREAT" KISSINGER WARNED OF?
WELL, YES, MANY HAVE ADVOCATED FOR STRAIGHT OLD 'ELIMINATION'.

UNESCO, THE U.N.,  ADVOCATES FOR CHILD EUTHANASIA, STATING THAT EVERY CHILD HAS A RIGHT TO DIE".

CHILD EUTHANASIA IS COMMON NOW IN BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS AND CANADA IS CONSIDERING IT.

ARTICLES <LIKE THIS ONE> FROM HUFFINGTON POST APPEAL TO "ENDING A CHILD'S SUFFERING".
HOW MUCH WOULD A CHILD SUFFER KNOWING HIS/HER DEATH WAS PREFERABLE TO THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/HER CARE? 


In an interview with the UNESCO Courier for November 1991 the famed oceanographer JACQUES COUSTEAU said:           
"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal to the degree of development.

One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes.
The damage is directly linked to consumption.

Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer….

This is a terrible thing to say.
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.””

HOW ABOUT WE JUST DON'T ACCEPT THAT, AND DON'T SAY IT? 


EVEN ABORTION FALLS FAR SHORT OF CREATING THIS 'DESIRABLE NUMBER' OF 350,000 DAILY ELIMINATIONS.

IN THE U.S. ABORTIONS ARE TAKING OUT 'ONLY' ABOUT 2,400 LIVES SO FAR TODAY, AND 103,000 DAILY, AS OF THIS WRITING, WORLDWIDE.

BUT THE COUNTER IS RUNNING AS I TYPE.

THERE WERE 'ONLY' 785,000 ABORTIONS HERE LAST YEAR AND 'ONLY' 34 MILLION WORLDWIDE IN 2018. 

INTERESTINGLY, AND SADLY, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (W.H.O.) GAVE A FIGURE OF 56 MILLION ABORTIONS IN 2014, MAKING ABORTION THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH, AS EVEN 'SNOPES' HAD TO ADMIT. 

SNOPES ADMITTED THAT HEART DISEASE PLUS STROKES WOULD COME IN SECOND TO ABORTIONS AT A TOTAL OF 15 MILLION CARDIAC/STROKE DEATHS.

DEATHS BY CANCER DIDN'T QUITE MAKE IT TO 600,000 PER YEAR.
(U.S. TOTAL)

CANCER IS "BIG BUSINESS, HIGHLY PROFITABLE.
THAT'S WHY ANY KNOWN CURE IS SQUELCHED, RIDICULED, MADE ILLEGAL.

MANY, AND MORE EACH DAY, GLEEFULLY LOOK FORWARD TO RIDDING THE WORLD OF "UNDESIRABLES", OF THE POOR, OR 'CERTAIN' RACES, THE ELDERLY.

--David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times Book Review Section, October 22, 1989, as saying, "Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true...We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth...Until such time as homosapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."

-- Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

--In "Remembering Silent Spring and Its Consequences", Professor J. Gordon Edwards quoted from a speech by Victor Yanconne, founder of the Environmental Defense Fund.
In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told to him by a reporter who had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far greater use of more toxic pesticides.
Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way as any."
When asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing of people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because organophosphate acts locally and only kills farm workers and most of them are Mexicans and Negroes."

--On April 5, 1994 the Los Angeles Times quoted Cornell University Professor David Pimentel, speaking to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, saying that, "The total world population should be no more than 2 billion rather than the current 5.6 billion."

--In "The Impact of Science on Society", Bertrand Russell said, "At present the population of the world is increasing...War so far has had no great effect on this increase... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others...If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full...the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." 
THE QUEEN OF ELIMINATION?
--In 1939, Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood), organized 'the Negro Project', designed to eliminate members of what she believed to be an "inferior race."

She justified her proposal because, in her own words, "the masses of Negroes... particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit..."

She then went on to reveal that she intended to "hire three or four colored ministers to travel to various black enclaves to propagandize for birth control...The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

“All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class,” she stated again and again.

"Every jail, hospital for the insane, reformatory and institution for the feebleminded cries out against the evils of too prolific breeding among wage-workers.

The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

KISSINGER AND THE TEAM HAD A LOT OF BACKERS ON THEIR POPULATION CONTROL/EUGENICS, AND LOOKING AT THE "LIST OF 13 LDC NATIONS" THEY NAMED, IT'S EASY TO SEE THAT ALL  ARE POPULATED BY 'MINORITY RACES' (EVEN THOUGH LATINOS/HISPANICS ARE INCLUDED IN THE BROAD GROUP "CAUCASIANS").

IT TOOK ME ALMOST 20 YEARS TO COME TO THIS CONCLUSION AND IT DID NOT COME EASILY, BUT THE FACTS DON'T LIE, AND THE FACTS ARE NOW EVIDENT AND EASY TO FIND THANKS TO THIS THING WE CALL 'THE WORLDWIDE WEB'.

THE GLOBAL AGENDA IS TO ELIMINATE THIRD WORLD POPULATIONS FIRST.

As Henry Kissinger wrote in that NSSM 200, "Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."


USING WARS AND UPRISINGS TO CULL POPULATIONS

HAVE YOU EVER KNOWN OF A TIME IN HISTORY THAT CHILDREN STARTED A WAR? AND YET, THEY ARE ALWAYS THE MOST INNOCENT VICTIMS OF WAR. 

Governments keep the REALITY of war hidden because it is hideous.
Governments spend MILLIONS to keep the photos and videos of the results of war out of the public's sight.

They spend MILLIONS on the media propaganda FOR war, to convince the citizenry that war is GOOD, NECESSARY, that wars are for the "RIGHT" reasons.  
To allow citizens to see war's gruesome consequences — the small shattered bodies of dead children, the SUFFERING of our youngest, the incomprehensible chaos of war — is to risk eroding popular support for war. 

WHETHER DECLARED OR NOT, WARS DECIMATE MANY POPULATIONS.
BUT NEVER "ENOUGH" TO KEEP THOSE POPULATION NUMBERS DOWN 'SUFFICIENTLY'.
THE SENSELESS DEATH OF ONE'S CHILDREN EATS AWAY AT PEOPLE LIKE A FAST-SPREADING CANCER.

THIS WE MAY ALL AGREE ON, IF OUR OWN CHILDREN WERE SUBJECTED TO WAR, IF OUR OWN CHILDREN DIED OR WERE INJURED, OR TRAUMATIZED FOREVER BY WAR, WE WOULD DAMN WELL WANT SOMEBODY TO 'PAY'!

WE WOULD NEVER REST NOR SLEEP UNTIL WHOEVER KILLED OR INJURED OUR INNOCENTS 'PAID' FOR DOING SO!
AND THAT MEANS MORE WAR, AND THEN MORE WAR, AND STILL WE WAR.

A 'NEW' KIND OF WAR?
In April 1997, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen stated in a United States Department of Defense news briefing that...
“OTHERS ARE ENGAGING EVEN IN AN ECO-TYPE OF TERRORISM WHEREBY THEY CAN ALTER THE CLIMATE, SET OFF EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES REMOTELY THROUGH THE USE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES."

”(Source: Department of Defense News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen)

AND HE KNEW THAT WE HAD (AND STILL ARE), TOO.

-- The U.S. has been accused of causing the 2011 earthquake/tsunami in Japan.  

-- Hugo Chavez and others accused the U.S. of causing the worst Haitian earthquake in history. 

-- The U.S. military’s Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX-1) was ordered to set sail out of its berth in Hawaii on March 23, 2013 on what the United States Department of Defense (DoD) claims to be routine sea trials. However in light of recent events in the Philippines – typhoon Haiyan – microwave data from the devastated region gives evidence that the SBX-1 was ordered deployed by the U.S. government (Barack Obama) to the Pacific to complement other U.S. military controlled steerable phased array radar systems.
 
-- Mar 05, 2002 -- The earthquake that shook Central and South Asia last Sunday might have been triggered by super-modern weapons intensively used by the U.S. aviation in the seismically dangerous areas of Afghanistan, a source in a Moscow geophysical research center has said.

YES, ALL OF THAT COMES FROM SOME SHADY SOURCES, BUT WE DID AGREE NOT TO USE "WEATHER MODIFICATION" TO ATTACK OTHER NATIONS...WAY BACK IN 1978! 

I DON'T LIKE TO IMAGINE WHAT WE'VE DEVELOPED SINCE THEN.

-- IN 1996, THE U.S. MILITARY BOASTED THAT "WE OWN THE WEATHER". 
THEY SEEMED QUITE CONFIDENT.

TODAY, THEY HAVE A COLLEGE FOR THAT. 

-- STEERING HURRICANES IS POSSIBLE. 

IF, AS THE MILITARY BOASTED, WE, OR SOME OTHER NATIONS, EVER DO OWN THE WEATHER, IMAGINE THE CONTROL OVER FOOD CROPS!

WHOEVER WAS ABLE TO DO THAT COULD CREATE FLOODS, OR DROUGHTS, STEER STORMS TO DEVASTATE CERTAIN AREAS' CROPS, MAYBE CREATE BLIZZARD CONDITIONS TO SHUT DOWN AIRPORTS, HIGHWAYS, SHIPPING LANES TO STOP FOOD DISTRIBUTION, OR CAUSE THE DEATHS OF MILLIONS OF FOOD ANIMALS.


WAR, OLD STYLE OR NEW, CANNOT DEPOPULATE AT THE RATE KISSINGER, COUSTEAU, SANGER OR BILL GATES HAVE FORESEEN US NEEDING TO ATTAIN POPULATION DECLINE.


RECENT BODY COUNTS FROM ONGOING WARS.

TOTAL IRAQI'S KILLED IN AMERICAN WARS (1990-PRESENT) ?
ABOUT 3 MILLION, WHICH INCLUDES ABOUT 500,000 CHILDREN, SOME DUE TO OUR EMBARGOES WHEN SADDDAM WAS STILL IN POWER, SOME FROM OUR USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM THERE, MANY FROM BOMBS, MORTAR ATTACKS.

MANY OF OUR OWN MILITARY ALSO CAME HOME WITH GRAVE ILLNESSES, GENETIC DAMAGE FROM THAT DEPLETED URANIUM AND LATER SAW THEIR CHILDREN BE BORN WITH BIRTH DEFECTS BECAUSE OF IT.

CIVILIAN DEATHS IN AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN TOTALED "LESS THAN A MILLION", WE'RE TOLD, BUT WE'RE STILL CARRYING OUT DRONE STRIKES AND FIRING AWAY FROM HELICOPTERS THERE, SO WE MUST WAIT FOR FINAL COUNTS FOR WHO KNOWS HOW MANY MORE YEARS? 

LIBYA?
'FEWER THAN 22,000'

SYRIA?
SYRIA IS BY NO MEANS OVER.
MANY DIE THERE EVERY DAY, BUT 'CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES SAY 400,000 TO 570,000 HAVE BEEN KILLED SO FAR.

YEMEN?
Yes, we are still aiding Saudi Arabia as they shell Yemen every single day. The U.S. is part of a coalition that has been bombing Yemen since 2015.
Yes, we help them enforce the embargo that continues to starve women and children to death there.
Even UNOCHA and the WHO acknowledge substantial underreporting of war deaths in Yemen, and the ratio between the WHO’s passive reports and actual deaths appears to be toward the higher end of the range found in other wars, which has varied between 5:1 and 20:1. Estimated that about 175,000 people have been killed – 15 times the numbers reported by the WHO and ACLED – with a minimum of 120,000 and a maximum of 240,000. 

SOMALIA? 
Just in the time period of 2007 to 2008, the most trusted count was 16,210.
Since 2006, somewhere between 500,000 and 850,000, with most likely about 650,000 violent deaths.

HAS THE "WAR ON TERROR" PRODUCED LESS TERROR? 
NO, IT HASN'T. 

IT'S PRODUCED MORE WAR. 

The Massacres in Africa

What really happened to Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994 is a shocking story.

After the Christian Tutsis were disarmed by governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically massacre the defenseless Christians beginning in April 1994 and continuing until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu forces created a state of terror within the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered thousands.

The United Nations immediately convened hearings on Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the "civil war had come to an end."

In reality, there was no civil war, since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder.

In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline Albright also insisted that the word "genocide" not be used, and that United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene.
In the three terrifying months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a million Tutsi Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued.

Tens of thousands of were murdered in churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in hospitals and schools.
On several occasions, United Nations soldiers stationed in Rwanda actually handed helpless Christians over to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces.

At the end of the carnage in late July 1994, the American government rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid.


USING 'MEDICINE' TO ELIMINATE 'SOME' 


-- ACCUSATIONS BY CATHOLIC BISHOPS THAT VACCINES STERILIZE WOMEN

In October 2014, a group of concerned Catholic bishops in Kenya released a statement claiming a tetanus vaccine program aimed at women entering or in their childbearing years was in actuality a stealth attempt to sterilize women en masse for unstated reasons.

Among questions raised by the group in its statement about the tetanus vaccine campaign in Kenya were why the vaccines were considered necessary if no “tetanus crisis in Kenya” had been declared, why the vaccine was offered primarily to women between the ages of 14 and 49, why boys and men were not targeted by the campaign, and why tetanus was “prioritized” over other illnesses affecting citizens of Kenya:

"We are not convinced that the government has taken adequate responsibility to ensure that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit is not being used by the sponsoring development partners.

This has previously been used by the same partners in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy. Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy.

When injected as a vaccine to a non-pregnant woman, this Beta HCG sub unit combined with tetanus toxoid develops antibodies against tetanus and HCG so that if a woman’s egg becomes fertilized, her own natural HCG will be destroyed rendering her permanently infertile. In this situation tetanus vaccination has been used as a birth control method.

We retain that the tetanus vaccination campaign bears the hallmarks of the programmes that were carried out in Philippines, Mexico and Nicaragua. We would want to participate in ensuring that the vaccines to be administered are free of this hormone."

A Catholic doctors’ group in Kenya echoed the concerns of the bishops, and an anti-abortion site quoted Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi as saying:

"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen. They were all laced with HCG.

This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored."



-- William W. Thompson, PhD, Senior Scientist with the CDC has stepped forward and admitted the 2004 paper entitled “Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta,” which has been used repeatedly by the CDC to deny the MMR-autism connection, was a fraud. 

Dr. Thompson has admitted the 340% increase in boys receiving the MMR vaccine “on time,” as opposed to delayed, was buried by himself, Dr. DeStefano, Dr. Bhasin, Dr. Yeargin-Allsopp, and Dr. Boyle … Dr. Thompson first called and spoke with Dr. Brian Hooker, who then revealed the information to the Autism Media Channel.


-- The Infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study

The influence of population control advocates can be seen in the Tuskegee Study, a scientific research program in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited by the U.S. Public Health Service in 1932.

The participants were told that they would be treated for their infections but instead had all effective medicine withheld. The black men were actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, and the bodies of their wives and children, were systematically ravaged by disease.

The men who conceived this Nazi-style study justified their atrocity by saying that scientists needed to learn how untreated syphilis progressed in the human body.

For forty years-from 1932 until 1972-the genocidal Tuskegee Study continued. It was not until 1972, after one newspaper finally broke the story, that the study was finally terminated. By that time, only 125 of the original 400 men survived. According to Margaret Sanger's1 sense of morality, experiments on "human weeds" were fully justified in the name of "science."

To this day, 25 years after the end of that grotesque human experiment, none of the perpetrators of that atrocity has ever been accused or indicted of a crime. 
SIMILAR, OFTEN MORE BRUTAL AND HORRIFYING 'STUDIES' WERE CARRIED OUT ON INFANTS, PATIENTS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, ON OUR OWN MILITARY RECRUITS, AND ON CITIZENS WHO LIVED NEAR THE 'NUCLEAR TEST RANGES' WHEN AMERICA FREQUENTLY DETONATED NUCLEAR BOMBS.

THE TEA ROOM HAS CAREFULLY DOCUMENTED ALL THIS BEFORE IN SEVERAL ARTICLES LIKE <THIS>, <THIS> AND <THIS>. 

BUT USING MEDICINES/VACCINES CAN'T TAKE OUT 350,000 PER DAY...UNLESS THEY START PUTTING FAR MORE HIGHLY TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN IT.

BOTTOM LINE? 

JUST AS IN HITLER'S GERMANY, THE GLOBAL ELITE OF TODAY HAVE NO DESIRE TO CONTINUE ALLOWING THE 'BREEDING' OF THOSE THEY CONSIDER "UNFIT", THOSE WHO ARE UNDESIRABLE.
THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS, THE ONLY "DESIRABLES" ARE THE GLOBAL ELITE, THOSE IN POWER, THOSE WHO RUN THE SHOW ON EVERY LEVEL OF HUMAN EXISTENCE.
THE REST OF US ARE UNWELCOME "PARASITES", "USELESS EATERS" AND MUST BE ELIMINATED.

BUT HOW?
BY CONTROL OF FOOD AND WATER SUPPLIES. 

EVERY DAY I GET EMAIL UPDATES FROM THE USDA ON FOOD "RECALLS", AND ON COMPANIES DISCOVERED TO BE VIOLATING FOOD HANDLING LAWS, AND ON THOSE OPERATING FACILITIES ENGAGED IN ABUSIVE PROCESSING OF LIVE FOOD ANIMALS, ETC.

HOW VERY SIMPLE IT WOULD BE TO ERADICATE LARGE HUMAN POPULATIONS WITH A FEW "ACCIDENTS" THAT POISONED MILLIONS OF CONSUMERS IN A MATTER OF HOURS OR DAYS.

WHAT IF THE USDA JUST DIDN'T ISSUE ANY RECALLS? 

WE HAVE NO WAY OF CHECKING THE CONTENT NOR THE QUALITY OF OUR FOODS.
WE BLINDLY TRUST THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO FEED US.  

WORLD FOOD SUPPLY IS DOMINATED BY JUST 10 COMPANIES. 

The agriculture and food production industry employed more than one billion people as of last year, or a third of the global workforce. While the industry is substantial, a relatively small number of companies wield an enormous amount of influence.

In its 2013 report, “Behind the Brands,” Oxfam International focused on 10 of the world’s biggest and most influential food and beverage companies. These corporations are so powerful that their policies can have a major impact on the diets and working conditions of people worldwide, as well as on the environment. Based on the report, these are the 10 companies that control the world’s food.
These are the 10 companies that control the world’s food, according to 24/7 Wall St.:


1- Associated British Foods plc
> Revenue: $21.1 billion
> Advertising spending: N/A
> Profits: $837 million
> Employees: 112,652

2- The Coca-Cola Company
> Revenue: $46.9 billion
> Advertising spending: $3.0 billion
> Profits: $8.6 billion
> Employees: 130,600

3- Groupe Danone S.A.
> Revenue: $29.3 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.2 billion
> Profits: $2.0 billion
> Employees: 104,642

4- General Mills, Inc. (NYSE: GIS)
> Revenue: $17.9 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.1 billion
> Profits: $1.8 billion
> Employees: 43,000


5- Kellogg Company (NYSE: K)
> Revenue: $14.8 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.1 billion
> Profits: $1.8 billion
> Employees: 30,277

6- Mars, Incorporated
> Revenue: $33.0 billion
> Advertising spending: $2.2 billion
> Profits: N/A
> Employees: 60,000

Mars is the the only one of the world’s 10 largest food companies that is privately owned.


7- Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDLZ)   
> Revenue: $35.3 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.9 billion
> Profits: $3.9 billion
> Employees: 107,000

In 2012, Kraft Foods split into two separate companies, Kraft Foods Group and Mondelez.


8- Nestle S.A.
> Revenue: $103.5 billion
> Advertising spending: $3.0 billion
> Profits: $11.2 billion
> Employees: 333,000

By many measures, Nestle is the largest of the 10 food companies.  
NEITHER OXFAM NOR WSJ REPORTED THAT NESTLE, MORE THAN THE OTHER FOOD GIANTS COMBINED,  HAS BEEN EMBROILED IN FIGHTS OVER ITS WATER USE ABUSES FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.
NESTLE'S GREED FOR WATER IS 'LEGEND'.

--The fight to stop Nestlé from taking America's water to sell ...

--NESTLE FIGHTS FEDS OVER WATER RIGHTS
Nestle has been draining that land of water for over 100 years!

--FIGHTING FLORIDA FOR WATERNestlé is asking to take over 1.1 million gallons of water a day from the ecologically fragile Santa Fe River without paying for it. The company requested a permit from the Suwannee River Management District which would renew their right to pump water from the springs, as they've been doing since 1998.

--Nestlé corporate greed deprives Canadian indigenous community

--Nestlé and the Privatization of Water - Global Research

9- PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP)
> Revenue: $66.4 billion
> Advertising spending: $2.5 billion
> Profits: $6.7 billion
> Employees: 274,000 

10- Unilever Group
> Revenue: $68.5 billion
> Advertising spending: $7.4 billion
> Profits: $6.7 billion
> Employees: 174,381


WHAT FOODS ARE PLANTED, HOW  MUCH IS PLANTED, HOW IT'S GROWN, HARVESTED, TRANSPORTED, THE PRICE OF FOOD, ALL ARE CONTROLLED BY THESE TOP 10. 

WHO CONTROLS THE WORLD'S FRESH WATER SUPPLIES?

BRAZIL IS HOME TO THE LARGEST FRESH WATER SUPPLY, BUT SEEMS NOT TO CARE TO STOP POLLUTING IT.
REMEMBER THE CONCERNS ABOUT ATHLETES SWIMMING, BOATING IN BRAZIL'S WATER WHEN THEY HOSTED THE OLYMPICS?

RUSSIA TAKES 2nd PLACE, BUT IS ALSO POLLUTING ITS MASSIVE LAKE BAIKAL INTO A RADIOACTIVE SEWER.

THE U.S.A. COMES IN AT 3rd, BUT WE, TOO, HAVE MANAGED TO POLLUTE ABOUT 2/3rds OF ALL OUR FRESH WATER SOURCES.

The majority of rivers and streams in this country can't even support healthy aquatic life and the trend is going in the wrong direction.

IT'S TRUE THAT SUPPLIES OF POTABLE WATER DECREASE EACH YEAR AND THE PEOPLE WITHOUT IT ARE SUFFERING FROM ITS LACK.

Global water consumption is doubling every 20 years, and the United Nations expects demand to outstrip supply by more than 30 percent come 2040.  In the late 1990s the World Bank infamously required scores of impoverished countries—most notably Bolivia—to privatize their water supplies as a condition of desperately needed economic assistance. 
In the U.S., federal funds for repairing water infrastructure—most of which was built around the same time that Henry Ford built the first Model T—are sorely lacking. The Obama administration secured just $6 billion for repairs that the EPA estimates will cost $300 billion.
Looks like Trump will do a bit less than NOTHING about America's water pollution OR water infrastructure.

"Markets don't care about the environment," says James Olson, an attorney who specializes in water rights. "And they don't care about human rights. They care about profit." 
TO SAY THAT WATER IS LIFE IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT, BUT IT CAN ALSO MEAN DEATH IF IT'S POISONED.  

ALL IT WOULD TAKE IS A FEW DROPS OF THE "RIGHT" SUBSTANCE IN RESERVOIRS, LAKES, STREAMS, RIVERS, TO WIPE OUT MILLIONS IN UNDER AN HOUR.  

HOW WOULD WE PREVENT THAT?
WHO IS GUARDING AGAINST SUCH AN ACT?

SO, WE CONTROL THE FOOD AND THE WATER TO A GREAT EXTENT AND THEN WE SANCTION AND EMBARGO OTHER NATIONS, REFUSING TO RENDER AID, REFUSING SHIPMENTS OF EMERGENCY FOODS AND WATER, EVEN TO THEIR CHILDREN.

SUCH A THING SEEMS CRIMINAL, MAINLY BECAUSE THERE ARE CHILDREN IN EVERY NATION.

VENEZUELA IS THE MOST RECENT NATION FEELING THE WRATH F THE USA. 

On November 2014, the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a final rule amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to impose license requirements on the export, re-export, or transfer (in-country) of certain items to or within Venezuela when intended for a "military end use" or "military end user."

Embargoes sanctions (CRIMEA - REGION OF UKRAINE, CUBA, IRAN, NORTH KOREA, SUDAN, and SYRIA) prohibit ALL transactions (including imports and exports) without a license authorization.


RUSSIA AND OCCUPIED CRIMEA

“As part of a series of sanctions announced by the United States, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced that it is expanding its export restrictions on items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in response to Russia’s continued actions in southern and eastern Ukraine.

Effective immediately, BIS will deny pending applications for licenses to export or re-export any high technology item subject to the EAR to Russia or occupied Crimea that contribute to Russia’s military capabilities. In addition, the Department is taking actions to revoke any existing export licenses which meet these conditions. All other pending applications and existing licenses will receive a case-by-case evaluation to determine their contribution to Russia’s military capabilities.
The United States will continue to adjust its export licensing policies toward Russia as warranted by Russia’s actions in Ukraine.
We urge Russia to honor the commitments it made in Geneva on April 17 to deescalate the situation in Ukraine.”

[Source: U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).]
THIS, AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OFF A COUP AGAINST UKRAINE TO UNSEAT AND EJECT THEIR DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.  

Totally Embargoed countries:
-- Cuba,
-- Iran,
-- Syria

BUT WE FREELY AND HAPPILY TRADE WITH CHINA, A COUNTRY WITH ONE OF THE MOST HEINOUS RECORDS FOR VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND GENOCIDE?

DITTO FOR SAUDI ARABIA AND OTHER OPEC NATIONS. 

Targeted sanctions countries:

-- Crimea - Region of Ukraine,
-- Iraq,
-- North Korea,
-- Russian industry sector 


Prohibited countries:

--Belarus,
--Cuba,
--Eritrea,
--Iran,
--North Korea,
--Syria,
--Venezuela.
--(c) U.N. Arms Embargoed countries:
--Burma,
--Côte d'Ivoire,
--Congo,
--Eritrea,
--Iraq,
--Iran,
--Lebanon,
--Liberia,
--Libya,
--People's Republic of China,
--Somalia,
--The Republic of the Sudan

HERE'S THE DEAL, AND IT APPLIES TO ALL NATIONS...
KISS AMERICA'S ENTIRE BIG OLD BACKSIDE AND AGREE WITH OUR 'POLICY' OR BE STARVED OUT OF EXISTENCE.

YOU KNOW AND I KNOW THAT IS TRULY WHAT IT AMOUNTS TO.

EITHER NATIONS COMPLY WITH OUR "POLICIES" OR WE ENACT TRADE EMBARGOES, SANCTIONS, PROHIBITIONS.

[NOTE: TO ONLY CHRISTIANS READING HERE:
DOES ALL OF THIS, IN ANY WAY, REMIND YOU OF THE "MARK OF THE BEAST" ...
THE DEMAND THAT ONE TAKES THE MARK OR ISN'T ALLOWED TO BUY AND SELL?] 

KISSINGER FORESAW AN EASIER TIME OF DEPOPULATING THE PLANET THAN REALITY HAS AFFORDED. 

BARRING A METEOR STRIKE, A MASSIVE 'CME' FROM THE SUN, SOME NATURAL DISASTER WE HAVEN'T YET CONCEIVED OF, MAYBE A WORLDWIDE SUPER-PANDEMIC, THEN ONLY A GLOBAL NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST OR WORLDWIDE INTENTIONAL STARVING OR POISONING OF THE MASSES CAN POSSIBLY ERADICATE ENOUGH PEOPLE TO SATISFY THAT IMAGINED NEED TO REDUCE US ALL DOWN TO A "MANAGEABLE" 500 MILLION TO ONE BILLION SOULS. 
THE 'POWERS THAT BE' FEEL MORALLY JUSTIFIED IN CULLING THE WORLD POPULATION.

WHEN? 

TODAY? 

ONE OF THE MOST POSITIVE AND HOPEFUL VIDEOS I EVER WATCHED.
(Except the awful part about the elephants.)
"How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change" -- Allan Savory





//WW