UNLIKE WHAT 'GLOBALISTS' SUCH AS THOSE I LIST BELOW HAVE HAMMERED INTO US, OR THOSE GOING HYSTERICAL OVER 'CLIMATE CHANGE', WE HAVE TO SIMPLY WATCH FOR THINGS THAT WORK IN NATURE AND APPLY THEM.
TO ME, COMMON SENSE ALMOST ALWAYS TRUMPS SCIENCE.
IN SPITE OF EVERYTHING, I SEE HOPE, AND I TAKE IT WHEREVER I CAN FIND IT. CAN WE REVERSE WHAT WE'VE DONE AND "SAVE THE WORLD", AS THE MAN IN THE VIDEO ABOVE SUGGESTS?
DO WE WANT TO?
IF WE WANT TO, IF ENOUGH OF US WANT TO, WE CAN.
AND THE POOREST, MOST HOPELESS AMONG US CAN LEAD THE WAY.
EDUCATING THE MASSES BEATS HELL OUT OF "CULLING THE HERD".
THERE ARE OTHERS ACCOMPLISHING THIS SAME THING.
IN AUSTRALIA...
IN CHINA...
IN SPAIN, EGYPT AND INDIA...
FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE GLOBALIST AGENDA
A 1974 PAPER PRESENTED TO PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON STATED THAT AMERICA MUST DO TWO THINGS; CONTROL THE WORLD'S POPULATION GROWTH AND CONTROL AMERICAN FOOD SUPPLY, WHICH IS CRITICAL TO FEED THE "THIRD WORLD".
CONTROL THE FOOD, CONTROL THE WORLD.
AS LONG AS THERE HAVE BEEN HUMAN BEINGS, THERE HAVE BEEN BATTLES TO OWN AND CONTROL FOOD SUPPLIES.
FROM FORAGING CAVEMEN, TO NOMADIC TRIBES, TO THE MONARCHIES OF EUROPE, TO TODAY'S WORLD'S 'SUPER-POWERS, CONTROL OF FOOD SOURCES (AND WATER SUPPLIES) IS CRUCIAL TO 'POWER'.
THE ONE WITH THE MOST MARBLES WINS, RIGHT?
NATIONAL SECURITY STUDY MEMORANDUM 200 (NSSM 200) WAS COMMISSIONED BY NIXON IN APRIL, 1974 AND PRESENTED TO HIM IN DECEMBER,1974 BY HENRY KISSINGER.
(THAT LAST LINK IS TO THE ENTIRE MEMORANDUM, FOR THOSE WHO ACTUALLY READ TO LEARN.)
IT OUTLINED "AN INADEQUACY OF WORLD FOOD SUPPLIES" AND HOW AMERICA COULD TURN THAT TO OUR ADVANTAGE.
"Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to US security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.
The countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.
It also raises the question of whether the US should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states deemed constructive in use of population control measures."
THE 'PAPER' , AS YOU MAY SEE, SUBTLY SUGGESTS THAT WE SEND U.S. FOODS, IF AT ALL, TO THE "COMPLIANT" NATIONS, AND THEN SUGGESTS A REPEAT OF THE 1972 CROP FAILURES IN THE U.S. COULD BE REPEATED.
"The coincidence of adverse weather in many regions in 1972 brought per capita production in the LDCs back to the level of the early 1960s.
At the same time, world food reserves (mainly American) were almost exhausted, and they were not rebuilt during the high production year of 1973.
A repetition under these conditions of 1972 weather patterns would result in large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades -- a kind the world thought had been permanently banished."
WELL, IT JUST SO HAPPENS WE HAVE BECOME EXPERTS AT "WEATHER MODIFICATION", SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN MERRILY ACCOMPLISHING SINCE THE 1940S, AND WE HAVE AN "AGENCY" TO HANDLE THOSE 'MODIFICATIONS'.
"The mission of the North American Weather Modification Council (NAWMC) is to advance the proper use of weather modification technologies..."
WE CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO MILITARY USAGE OF WEATHER MODIFICATION, THAT'S 'TOP SECRET', BUT WE DO KNOW THEY BRAGGED TO CONGRESS THAT THEY'RE ON TOP OF THAT GAME.
WHAT WE DO HAVE ARE RELEASES OF INFORMATION DUE TO THAT GOOD OLD 'FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT' (FOIA) AND THE CIA 'MAKING NICE' AND LISTING A FEW OF THOSE RELEASES FOR US ON THEIR CIA LIBRARY PAGE.
YOU CAN SAFELY BET THE FARM THAT ALL WE FIND IN THAT 'LIBRARY' DOESN'T EVEN SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF WHAT ACTUALLY EXISTS RE: WEATHER MODIFICATION AND 'GEOENGINEERING'.
NO WAY WILL ENTITIES LIKE 'DARPA' LIST THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
ON ANOTHER SITE WE FIND "A Summary of the U.S. Navy Program and FY 1967 Progress in Weather Modification and Control, 1967".
EVEN BEFORE KISSINGER PRESENTED NIXON WITH 'A PLAN', WE'D USED WEATHER MODIFICATION IN VIET NAM FAIRLY SUCCESSFULLY.
IF YOU'D CARE TO EXPLORE THIS FURTHER, I FOUND A 'FRIENDLY' WEBSITE <HERE> THAT LAYS OUT THE BASICS OF "WEATHER MODDING".
BACK TO HOW KISSINGER AND COMPANY PLANNED TO TIE 'PROPER COMPLIANCE TO POPULATION REDUCTION' TO OUR SHARING AMERICA'S BOUNTY OF FOOD WITH THOSE "LDCs"...OR NOT.
[WE MUSTN'T FORGET ANOTHER 'PAPER' PREPARED FOR JIMMY CARTER BY ANOTHER SET OF 'EXPERTS' AND WITH KISSINGER'S HELP IN 1975,THE DEPOPULATION STUDY CALLED "GLOBAL 2000".
QUOTING: "Unfortunately population growth may be slowed for reasons other than declining birth rates. As the world's populations exceed and reduce the land's carrying capacity in widening areas, the trends of the last century or two toward improved health and longer life may come to a halt.
Hunger and disease may claim more lives-especially lives of babies and young children. More of those surviving infancy may be mentally and physically handicapped by childhood malnutrition.
The time for action to prevent this outcome is running out. Unless nations collectively and individually take bold and imaginative steps toward improved social and economic conditions, reduced fertility, better management of resources, and protection of the environment, the world must expect a troubled entry into the twenty-first century."
'KISSY AND KREW' WERE ON A ROLL.
FROM NSSM 200:
"Populations with a high proportion of growth.
The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs (LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES) , are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,' ‘imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other, often foreign, influences blamed for their troubles"
“Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of [U.S.] needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth.”
“In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
COERCION IS PRECISELY WHAT IT IS, AS ANYONE CAN PLAINLY SEE.
COMPLY WITH POPULATION REDUCTION OR WE CAN'T (WON'T) FEED YOU.
GLOBALISTS WILL EXCUSE ANYTHING IN ORDER TO "CULL THE HERD".
CHINA MAY HAVE BEEN FIRST TO COME UP WITH SUCH A PLAN OF DISPOSING OF CHILDREN, AS I ATTEMPTED TO SHOW IN MY BLOG, "DYING ROOMS AND BABY BOXES".
UNWANTED INFANTS COULD BE LEFT AT 'ORPHANAGES' WHERE THEY WOULD BE PLACED IN "DYING ROOMS" AND LEFT TO STARVE.
THERE IS A DOCUMENTARY ON THAT BUT I WON'T POST IT AGAIN AS IT IS TERRIBLY GUT-WRENCHING.
YOU CAN WATCH IT IF YOU CAN STOMACH IT AND, ADMITTEDLY, IT IS IMPORTANT TO BE AWARE SUCH PRACTICES EXIST(ED), BUT I JUST WON'T DISPLAY IT IN ANOTHER BLOG. ONCE SHOULD SUFFICE.
SURPRISINGLY, TO ME AT LEAST, SOME SOUTH KOREANS ALSO DISPOSE OF THEIR UNWANTED CHILDREN, IF WE BELIEVE INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS FROM THAT COUNTRY.
ONE MAN AND HIS WIFE FOUND A WAY TO SAVE A FEW CAST-OFF BABIES IN SOUTH KOREA AND WE CAN SEE THE EVIDENCE OF BABY ABANDONMENT THERE IN THE FILM, "THE BABY BOX".
HOW MANY OTHER NATIONS HAVE SUCH PRACTICES I DO NOT KNOW.
I DID FIND A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BULGARIA'S ABANDONED CHILDREN, WHICH MADE ME WONDER EVEN MORE, HOW MANY, HOW OFTEN, AND WHY CHILDREN ARE CONSIDERED 'DISPOSABLE'.
DOCUMENTARIES OF BRAZIL'S STREET CHILDREN BEING HUNTED DOWN AND SOME KILLED AS THEY SLEPT BEGAN TO SURFACE BEFORE 1990.
AS THE BALTIMORE SUN WROTE:
"Why, Pope John Paul II wanted to know, are there so many small children living on the streets in Brazil?
And how could a society tolerate these children being murdered by death squads in the pay of businessmen wanting to clean up their neighborhoods?"
CHILD ABUSE HAS BEEN CITED AS ONE REASON EVEN VERY YOUNG CHILDREN RUN AWAY.
I FOUND SUCH PRACTICES TO BE MORE PREVALENT IN HUMAN HISTORY AND TODAY THAN I IMAGINED.
I CANNOT COMPREHEND IT.
CHILDREN HAVE BECOME TARGETS, PREY.
WHY?
BECAUSE THEY ARE "EASY MARKS".
KISSINGER TARGETED THEM.
“No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion... abortion, legal and illegal, now has become the most widespread fertility control method in use in the world today."
ABORTION SIMPLY FOR FERTILITY CONTROL?
ABSOLUTELY.
WHY USE ABORTION TO REDUCE POPULATIONS?
BECAUSE THE UNBORN CAN'T DEFEND THEMSELVES OR LODGE COMPLAINTS OF GENOCIDE OR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY OR EVEN CALL ATTENTION TO THEIR PLIGHT...THE UNBORN ARE EASY TARGETS. THEY CAN'T FIGHT BACK.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ROE V. WADE WAS UPHELD BY THE SUPREME COURT AND ABORTION 'LEGALIZED' ON JANUARY 22, 1973, SO KISSINGER, ET AL, COULD POINT TO THAT 'LEGALIZATION' AND NOT HAVE TO DEFEND ILLEGAL ABORTIONS ANYMORE.
VERY CONVENIENT TO DEPOPULATION PLANS.
WHAT ABOUT POPULATION ELIMINATION TO HANDLE THE "THREAT" KISSINGER WARNED OF?
WELL, YES, MANY HAVE ADVOCATED FOR STRAIGHT OLD 'ELIMINATION'.
UNESCO, THE U.N., ADVOCATES FOR CHILD EUTHANASIA, STATING THAT EVERY CHILD HAS A RIGHT TO DIE".
CHILD EUTHANASIA IS COMMON NOW IN BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS AND CANADA IS CONSIDERING IT.
ARTICLES <LIKE THIS ONE> FROM HUFFINGTON POST APPEAL TO "ENDING A CHILD'S SUFFERING".
HOW MUCH WOULD A CHILD SUFFER KNOWING HIS/HER DEATH WAS PREFERABLE TO THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/HER CARE?
In an interview with the UNESCO Courier for November 1991 the famed oceanographer JACQUES COUSTEAU said:
"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal to the degree of development.
One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes.
The damage is directly linked to consumption.
Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer….
This is a terrible thing to say.
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.””
HOW ABOUT WE JUST DON'T ACCEPT THAT, AND DON'T SAY IT?
EVEN ABORTION FALLS FAR SHORT OF CREATING THIS 'DESIRABLE NUMBER' OF 350,000 DAILY ELIMINATIONS.
IN THE U.S. ABORTIONS ARE TAKING OUT 'ONLY' ABOUT 2,400 LIVES SO FAR TODAY, AND 103,000 DAILY, AS OF THIS WRITING, WORLDWIDE.
BUT THE COUNTER IS RUNNING AS I TYPE.
THERE WERE 'ONLY' 785,000 ABORTIONS HERE LAST YEAR AND 'ONLY' 34 MILLION WORLDWIDE IN 2018.
INTERESTINGLY, AND SADLY, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (W.H.O.) GAVE A FIGURE OF 56 MILLION ABORTIONS IN 2014, MAKING ABORTION THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH, AS EVEN 'SNOPES' HAD TO ADMIT.
SNOPES ADMITTED THAT HEART DISEASE PLUS STROKES WOULD COME IN SECOND TO ABORTIONS AT A TOTAL OF 15 MILLION CARDIAC/STROKE DEATHS.
DEATHS BY CANCER DIDN'T QUITE MAKE IT TO 600,000 PER YEAR.
(U.S. TOTAL)
CANCER IS "BIG BUSINESS, HIGHLY PROFITABLE.
THAT'S WHY ANY KNOWN CURE IS SQUELCHED, RIDICULED, MADE ILLEGAL.
MANY, AND MORE EACH DAY, GLEEFULLY LOOK FORWARD TO RIDDING THE WORLD OF "UNDESIRABLES", OF THE POOR, OR 'CERTAIN' RACES, THE ELDERLY.
--David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times Book Review Section, October 22, 1989, as saying, "Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn't true...We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth...Until such time as homosapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."
-- Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
--In "Remembering Silent Spring and Its Consequences", Professor J. Gordon Edwards quoted from a speech by Victor Yanconne, founder of the Environmental Defense Fund.
In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told to him by a reporter who had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far greater use of more toxic pesticides.
Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way as any."
When asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing of people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because organophosphate acts locally and only kills farm workers and most of them are Mexicans and Negroes."
--On April 5, 1994 the Los Angeles Times quoted Cornell University Professor David Pimentel, speaking to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, saying that, "The total world population should be no more than 2 billion rather than the current 5.6 billion."
--In "The Impact of Science on Society", Bertrand Russell said, "At present the population of the world is increasing...War so far has had no great effect on this increase... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others...If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full...the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others."
THE QUEEN OF ELIMINATION?
--In 1939, Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood), organized 'the Negro Project', designed to eliminate members of what she believed to be an "inferior race."
She justified her proposal because, in her own words, "the masses of Negroes... particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit..."
She then went on to reveal that she intended to "hire three or four colored ministers to travel to various black enclaves to propagandize for birth control...The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
“All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class,” she stated again and again.
"Every jail, hospital for the insane, reformatory and institution for the feebleminded cries out against the evils of too prolific breeding among wage-workers.
The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
KISSINGER AND THE TEAM HAD A LOT OF BACKERS ON THEIR POPULATION CONTROL/EUGENICS, AND LOOKING AT THE "LIST OF 13 LDC NATIONS" THEY NAMED, IT'S EASY TO SEE THAT ALL ARE POPULATED BY 'MINORITY RACES' (EVEN THOUGH LATINOS/HISPANICS ARE INCLUDED IN THE BROAD GROUP "CAUCASIANS").
IT TOOK ME ALMOST 20 YEARS TO COME TO THIS CONCLUSION AND IT DID NOT COME EASILY, BUT THE FACTS DON'T LIE, AND THE FACTS ARE NOW EVIDENT AND EASY TO FIND THANKS TO THIS THING WE CALL 'THE WORLDWIDE WEB'.
THE GLOBAL AGENDA IS TO ELIMINATE THIRD WORLD POPULATIONS FIRST.
As Henry Kissinger wrote in that NSSM 200, "Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."
USING WARS AND UPRISINGS TO CULL POPULATIONS
HAVE YOU EVER KNOWN OF A TIME IN HISTORY THAT CHILDREN STARTED A WAR? AND YET, THEY ARE ALWAYS THE MOST INNOCENT VICTIMS OF WAR.
Governments keep the REALITY of war hidden because it is hideous.
Governments spend MILLIONS to keep the photos and videos of the results of war out of the public's sight.
They spend MILLIONS on the media propaganda FOR war, to convince the citizenry that war is GOOD, NECESSARY, that wars are for the "RIGHT" reasons.
To allow citizens to see war's gruesome consequences — the small shattered bodies of dead children, the SUFFERING of our youngest, the incomprehensible chaos of war — is to risk eroding popular support for war.
WHETHER DECLARED OR NOT, WARS DECIMATE MANY POPULATIONS.
BUT NEVER "ENOUGH" TO KEEP THOSE POPULATION NUMBERS DOWN 'SUFFICIENTLY'.
THE SENSELESS DEATH OF ONE'S CHILDREN EATS AWAY AT PEOPLE LIKE A FAST-SPREADING CANCER.
THIS WE MAY ALL AGREE ON, IF OUR OWN CHILDREN WERE SUBJECTED TO WAR, IF OUR OWN CHILDREN DIED OR WERE INJURED, OR TRAUMATIZED FOREVER BY WAR, WE WOULD DAMN WELL WANT SOMEBODY TO 'PAY'!
WE WOULD NEVER REST NOR SLEEP UNTIL WHOEVER KILLED OR INJURED OUR INNOCENTS 'PAID' FOR DOING SO!
AND THAT MEANS MORE WAR, AND THEN MORE WAR, AND STILL WE WAR.
A 'NEW' KIND OF WAR?
In April 1997, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen stated in a United States Department of Defense news briefing that...
“OTHERS ARE ENGAGING EVEN IN AN ECO-TYPE OF TERRORISM WHEREBY THEY CAN ALTER THE CLIMATE, SET OFF EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES REMOTELY THROUGH THE USE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES."
”(Source: Department of Defense News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen)
-- The U.S. has been accused of causing the 2011 earthquake/tsunami in Japan.
-- Hugo Chavez and others accused the U.S. of causing the worst Haitian earthquake in history.
-- The U.S. military’s Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX-1) was ordered to set sail out of its berth in Hawaii on March 23, 2013 on what the United States Department of Defense (DoD) claims to be routine sea trials. However in light of recent events in the Philippines – typhoon Haiyan – microwave data from the devastated region gives evidence that the SBX-1 was ordered deployed by the U.S. government (Barack Obama) to the Pacific to complement other U.S. military controlled steerable phased array radar systems.
-- Mar 05, 2002 -- The earthquake that shook Central and South Asia last Sunday might have been triggered by super-modern weapons intensively used by the U.S. aviation in the seismically dangerous areas of Afghanistan, a source in a Moscow geophysical research center has said.
I DON'T LIKE TO IMAGINE WHAT WE'VE DEVELOPED SINCE THEN.
-- IN 1996, THE U.S. MILITARY BOASTED THAT "WE OWN THE WEATHER".
THEY SEEMED QUITE CONFIDENT.
TODAY, THEY HAVE A COLLEGE FOR THAT.
-- STEERING HURRICANES IS POSSIBLE.
IF, AS THE MILITARY BOASTED, WE, OR SOME OTHER NATIONS, EVER DO OWN THE WEATHER, IMAGINE THE CONTROL OVER FOOD CROPS!
WHOEVER WAS ABLE TO DO THAT COULD CREATE FLOODS, OR DROUGHTS, STEER STORMS TO DEVASTATE CERTAIN AREAS' CROPS, MAYBE CREATE BLIZZARD CONDITIONS TO SHUT DOWN AIRPORTS, HIGHWAYS, SHIPPING LANES TO STOP FOOD DISTRIBUTION, OR CAUSE THE DEATHS OF MILLIONS OF FOOD ANIMALS.
WAR, OLD STYLE OR NEW, CANNOT DEPOPULATE AT THE RATE KISSINGER, COUSTEAU, SANGER OR BILL GATES HAVE FORESEEN US NEEDING TO ATTAIN POPULATION DECLINE.
RECENT BODY COUNTS FROM ONGOING WARS.
TOTAL IRAQI'S KILLED IN AMERICAN WARS (1990-PRESENT) ?
ABOUT 3 MILLION, WHICH INCLUDES ABOUT 500,000 CHILDREN, SOME DUE TO OUR EMBARGOES WHEN SADDDAM WAS STILL IN POWER, SOME FROM OUR USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM THERE, MANY FROM BOMBS, MORTAR ATTACKS.
MANY OF OUR OWN MILITARY ALSO CAME HOME WITH GRAVE ILLNESSES, GENETIC DAMAGE FROM THAT DEPLETED URANIUM AND LATER SAW THEIR CHILDREN BE BORN WITH BIRTH DEFECTS BECAUSE OF IT.
CIVILIAN DEATHS IN AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN TOTALED "LESS THAN A MILLION", WE'RE TOLD, BUT WE'RE STILL CARRYING OUT DRONE STRIKES AND FIRING AWAY FROM HELICOPTERS THERE, SO WE MUST WAIT FOR FINAL COUNTS FOR WHO KNOWS HOW MANY MORE YEARS?
LIBYA?
'FEWER THAN 22,000'
SYRIA?
SYRIA IS BY NO MEANS OVER.
MANY DIE THERE EVERY DAY, BUT 'CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES SAY 400,000 TO 570,000 HAVE BEEN KILLED SO FAR.
YEMEN?
Yes, we are still aiding Saudi Arabia as they shell Yemen every single day. The U.S. is part of a coalition that has been bombing Yemen since 2015.
Yes, we help them enforce the embargo that continues to starve women and children to death there.
Even UNOCHA and the WHO acknowledge substantial underreporting of war deaths in Yemen, and the ratio between the WHO’s passive reports and actual deaths appears to be toward the higher end of the range found in other wars, which has varied between 5:1 and 20:1. Estimated that about 175,000 people have been killed – 15 times the numbers reported by the WHO and ACLED – with a minimum of 120,000 and a maximum of 240,000.
SOMALIA?
Just in the time period of 2007 to 2008, the most trusted count was 16,210.
Since 2006, somewhere between 500,000 and 850,000, with most likely about 650,000 violent deaths.
HAS THE "WAR ON TERROR" PRODUCED LESS TERROR?
NO, IT HASN'T.
IT'S PRODUCED MORE WAR.
The Massacres in Africa
What really happened to Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994 is a shocking story.
After the Christian Tutsis were disarmed by governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically massacre the defenseless Christians beginning in April 1994 and continuing until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu forces created a state of terror within the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered thousands.
The United Nations immediately convened hearings on Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the "civil war had come to an end."
In reality, there was no civil war, since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder.
In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline Albright also insisted that the word "genocide" not be used, and that United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene.
In the three terrifying months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a million Tutsi Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued.
Tens of thousands of were murdered in churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in hospitals and schools.
On several occasions, United Nations soldiers stationed in Rwanda actually handed helpless Christians over to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces.
At the end of the carnage in late July 1994, the American government rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid.
USING 'MEDICINE' TO ELIMINATE 'SOME'
-- ACCUSATIONS BY CATHOLIC BISHOPS THAT VACCINES STERILIZE WOMEN
In October 2014, a group of concerned Catholic bishops in Kenya released a statement claiming a tetanus vaccine program aimed at women entering or in their childbearing years was in actuality a stealth attempt to sterilize women en masse for unstated reasons.
Among questions raised by the group in its statement about the tetanus vaccine campaign in Kenya were why the vaccines were considered necessary if no “tetanus crisis in Kenya” had been declared, why the vaccine was offered primarily to women between the ages of 14 and 49, why boys and men were not targeted by the campaign, and why tetanus was “prioritized” over other illnesses affecting citizens of Kenya:
"We are not convinced that the government has taken adequate responsibility to ensure that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit is not being used by the sponsoring development partners.
This has previously been used by the same partners in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy. Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy.
When injected as a vaccine to a non-pregnant woman, this Beta HCG sub unit combined with tetanus toxoid develops antibodies against tetanus and HCG so that if a woman’s egg becomes fertilized, her own natural HCG will be destroyed rendering her permanently infertile. In this situation tetanus vaccination has been used as a birth control method.
We retain that the tetanus vaccination campaign bears the hallmarks of the programmes that were carried out in Philippines, Mexico and Nicaragua. We would want to participate in ensuring that the vaccines to be administered are free of this hormone."
A Catholic doctors’ group in Kenya echoed the concerns of the bishops, and an anti-abortion site quoted Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi as saying:
"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen. They were all laced with HCG.
This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored."
-- William W. Thompson, PhD, Senior Scientist with the CDC has stepped forward and admitted the 2004 paper entitled “Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta,” which has been used repeatedly by the CDC to deny the MMR-autism connection, was a fraud.
Dr. Thompson has admitted the 340% increase in boys receiving the MMR vaccine “on time,” as opposed to delayed, was buried by himself, Dr. DeStefano, Dr. Bhasin, Dr. Yeargin-Allsopp, and Dr. Boyle … Dr. Thompson first called and spoke with Dr. Brian Hooker, who then revealed the information to the Autism Media Channel.
-- The Infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study
The influence of population control advocates can be seen in the Tuskegee Study, a scientific research program in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited by the U.S. Public Health Service in 1932.
The participants were told that they would be treated for their infections but instead had all effective medicine withheld. The black men were actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, and the bodies of their wives and children, were systematically ravaged by disease.
The men who conceived this Nazi-style study justified their atrocity by saying that scientists needed to learn how untreated syphilis progressed in the human body.
For forty years-from 1932 until 1972-the genocidal Tuskegee Study continued. It was not until 1972, after one newspaper finally broke the story, that the study was finally terminated. By that time, only 125 of the original 400 men survived. According to Margaret Sanger's1 sense of morality, experiments on "human weeds" were fully justified in the name of "science."
To this day, 25 years after the end of that grotesque human experiment, none of the perpetrators of that atrocity has ever been accused or indicted of a crime.
SIMILAR, OFTEN MORE BRUTAL AND HORRIFYING 'STUDIES' WERE CARRIED OUT ON INFANTS, PATIENTS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, ON OUR OWN MILITARY RECRUITS, AND ON CITIZENS WHO LIVED NEAR THE 'NUCLEAR TEST RANGES' WHEN AMERICA FREQUENTLY DETONATED NUCLEAR BOMBS.
THE TEA ROOM HAS CAREFULLY DOCUMENTED ALL THIS BEFORE IN SEVERAL ARTICLES LIKE <THIS>, <THIS> AND <THIS>.
BUT USING MEDICINES/VACCINES CAN'T TAKE OUT 350,000 PER DAY...UNLESS THEY START PUTTING FAR MORE HIGHLY TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN IT.
BOTTOM LINE?
JUST AS IN HITLER'S GERMANY, THE GLOBAL ELITE OF TODAY HAVE NO DESIRE TO CONTINUE ALLOWING THE 'BREEDING' OF THOSE THEY CONSIDER "UNFIT", THOSE WHO ARE UNDESIRABLE.
THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS, THE ONLY "DESIRABLES" ARE THE GLOBAL ELITE, THOSE IN POWER, THOSE WHO RUN THE SHOW ON EVERY LEVEL OF HUMAN EXISTENCE.
THE REST OF US ARE UNWELCOME "PARASITES", "USELESS EATERS" AND MUST BE ELIMINATED.
BUT HOW?
BY CONTROL OF FOOD AND WATER SUPPLIES.
EVERY DAY I GET EMAIL UPDATES FROM THE USDA ON FOOD "RECALLS", AND ON COMPANIES DISCOVERED TO BE VIOLATING FOOD HANDLING LAWS, AND ON THOSE OPERATING FACILITIES ENGAGED IN ABUSIVE PROCESSING OF LIVE FOOD ANIMALS, ETC.
HOW VERY SIMPLE IT WOULD BE TO ERADICATE LARGE HUMAN POPULATIONS WITH A FEW "ACCIDENTS" THAT POISONED MILLIONS OF CONSUMERS IN A MATTER OF HOURS OR DAYS.
WHAT IF THE USDA JUST DIDN'T ISSUE ANY RECALLS?
WE HAVE NO WAY OF CHECKING THE CONTENT NOR THE QUALITY OF OUR FOODS.
WE BLINDLY TRUST THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO FEED US.
WORLD FOOD SUPPLY IS DOMINATED BY JUST 10 COMPANIES.
The agriculture and food production industry employed more than one billion people as of last year, or a third of the global workforce. While the industry is substantial, a relatively small number of companies wield an enormous amount of influence.
In its 2013 report, “Behind the Brands,” Oxfam International focused on 10 of the world’s biggest and most influential food and beverage companies. These corporations are so powerful that their policies can have a major impact on the diets and working conditions of people worldwide, as well as on the environment. Based on the report, these are the 10 companies that control the world’s food.
These are the 10 companies that control the world’s food, according to 24/7 Wall St.:
1- Associated British Foods plc
> Revenue: $21.1 billion
> Advertising spending: N/A
> Profits: $837 million
> Employees: 112,652
2- The Coca-Cola Company
> Revenue: $46.9 billion
> Advertising spending: $3.0 billion
> Profits: $8.6 billion
> Employees: 130,600
3- Groupe Danone S.A.
> Revenue: $29.3 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.2 billion
> Profits: $2.0 billion
> Employees: 104,642
4- General Mills, Inc. (NYSE: GIS)
> Revenue: $17.9 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.1 billion
> Profits: $1.8 billion
> Employees: 43,000
5- Kellogg Company (NYSE: K)
> Revenue: $14.8 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.1 billion
> Profits: $1.8 billion
> Employees: 30,277
6- Mars, Incorporated
> Revenue: $33.0 billion
> Advertising spending: $2.2 billion
> Profits: N/A
> Employees: 60,000
Mars is the the only one of the world’s 10 largest food companies that is privately owned.
7- Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDLZ)
> Revenue: $35.3 billion
> Advertising spending: $1.9 billion
> Profits: $3.9 billion
> Employees: 107,000
In 2012, Kraft Foods split into two separate companies, Kraft Foods Group and Mondelez.
8- Nestle S.A.
> Revenue: $103.5 billion
> Advertising spending: $3.0 billion
> Profits: $11.2 billion
> Employees: 333,000
By many measures, Nestle is the largest of the 10 food companies.
NEITHER OXFAM NOR WSJ REPORTED THAT NESTLE, MORE THAN THE OTHER FOOD GIANTS COMBINED, HAS BEEN EMBROILED IN FIGHTS OVER ITS WATER USE ABUSES FOR A LONG, LONG TIME.
NESTLE'S GREED FOR WATER IS 'LEGEND'.
--The fight to stop Nestlé from taking America's water to sell ...
--NESTLE FIGHTS FEDS OVER WATER RIGHTS
Nestle has been draining that land of water for over 100 years!
--FIGHTING FLORIDA FOR WATERNestlé is asking to take over 1.1 million gallons of water a day from the ecologically fragile Santa Fe River without paying for it. The company requested a permit from the Suwannee River Management District which would renew their right to pump water from the springs, as they've been doing since 1998.
--Nestlé corporate greed deprives Canadian indigenous community
--Nestlé and the Privatization of Water - Global Research
9- PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP)
> Revenue: $66.4 billion
> Advertising spending: $2.5 billion
> Profits: $6.7 billion
> Employees: 274,000
10- Unilever Group
> Revenue: $68.5 billion
> Advertising spending: $7.4 billion
> Profits: $6.7 billion
> Employees: 174,381
WHAT FOODS ARE PLANTED, HOW MUCH IS PLANTED, HOW IT'S GROWN, HARVESTED, TRANSPORTED, THE PRICE OF FOOD, ALL ARE CONTROLLED BY THESE TOP 10.
WHO CONTROLS THE WORLD'S FRESH WATER SUPPLIES?
BRAZIL IS HOME TO THE LARGEST FRESH WATER SUPPLY, BUT SEEMS NOT TO CARE TO STOP POLLUTING IT.
REMEMBER THE CONCERNS ABOUT ATHLETES SWIMMING, BOATING IN BRAZIL'S WATER WHEN THEY HOSTED THE OLYMPICS?
RUSSIA TAKES 2nd PLACE, BUT IS ALSO POLLUTING ITS MASSIVE LAKE BAIKAL INTO A RADIOACTIVE SEWER.
THE U.S.A. COMES IN AT 3rd, BUT WE, TOO, HAVE MANAGED TO POLLUTE ABOUT 2/3rds OF ALL OUR FRESH WATER SOURCES.
The majority of rivers and streams in this country can't even support healthy aquatic life and the trend is going in the wrong direction.
IT'S TRUE THAT SUPPLIES OF POTABLE WATER DECREASE EACH YEAR AND THE PEOPLE WITHOUT IT ARE SUFFERING FROM ITS LACK.
Global water consumption is doubling every 20 years, and the United Nations expects demand to outstrip supply by more than 30 percent come 2040. In the late 1990s the World Bank infamously required scores of impoverished countries—most notably Bolivia—to privatize their water supplies as a condition of desperately needed economic assistance.
In the U.S., federal funds for repairing water infrastructure—most of which was built around the same time that Henry Ford built the first Model T—are sorely lacking. The Obama administration secured just $6 billion for repairs that the EPA estimates will cost $300 billion.
Looks like Trump will do a bit less than NOTHING about America's water pollution OR water infrastructure.
"Markets don't care about the environment," says James Olson, an attorney who specializes in water rights. "And they don't care about human rights. They care about profit."
TO SAY THAT WATER IS LIFE IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT, BUT IT CAN ALSO MEAN DEATH IF IT'S POISONED.
ALL IT WOULD TAKE IS A FEW DROPS OF THE "RIGHT" SUBSTANCE IN RESERVOIRS, LAKES, STREAMS, RIVERS, TO WIPE OUT MILLIONS IN UNDER AN HOUR.
HOW WOULD WE PREVENT THAT?
WHO IS GUARDING AGAINST SUCH AN ACT?
SO, WE CONTROL THE FOOD AND THE WATER TO A GREAT EXTENT AND THEN WE SANCTION AND EMBARGO OTHER NATIONS, REFUSING TO RENDER AID, REFUSING SHIPMENTS OF EMERGENCY FOODS AND WATER, EVEN TO THEIR CHILDREN.
SUCH A THING SEEMS CRIMINAL, MAINLY BECAUSE THERE ARE CHILDREN IN EVERY NATION.
VENEZUELA IS THE MOST RECENT NATION FEELING THE WRATH F THE USA.
On November 2014, the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a final rule amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to impose license requirements on the export, re-export, or transfer (in-country) of certain items to or within Venezuela when intended for a "military end use" or "military end user."
Embargoes sanctions (CRIMEA - REGION OF UKRAINE, CUBA, IRAN, NORTH KOREA, SUDAN, and SYRIA) prohibit ALL transactions (including imports and exports) without a license authorization.
RUSSIA AND OCCUPIED CRIMEA
“As part of a series of sanctions announced by the United States, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced that it is expanding its export restrictions on items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in response to Russia’s continued actions in southern and eastern Ukraine.
Effective immediately, BIS will deny pending applications for licenses to export or re-export any high technology item subject to the EAR to Russia or occupied Crimea that contribute to Russia’s military capabilities. In addition, the Department is taking actions to revoke any existing export licenses which meet these conditions. All other pending applications and existing licenses will receive a case-by-case evaluation to determine their contribution to Russia’s military capabilities.
The United States will continue to adjust its export licensing policies toward Russia as warranted by Russia’s actions in Ukraine.
We urge Russia to honor the commitments it made in Geneva on April 17 to deescalate the situation in Ukraine.”
[Source: U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).]
THIS, AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OFF A COUP AGAINST UKRAINE TO UNSEAT AND EJECT THEIR DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.
Totally Embargoed countries:
-- Cuba,
-- Iran,
-- Syria
BUT WE FREELY AND HAPPILY TRADE WITH CHINA, A COUNTRY WITH ONE OF THE MOST HEINOUS RECORDS FOR VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND GENOCIDE?
DITTO FOR SAUDI ARABIA AND OTHER OPEC NATIONS.
Targeted sanctions countries:
-- Crimea - Region of Ukraine,
-- Iraq,
-- North Korea,
-- Russian industry sector
Prohibited countries:
--Belarus,
--Cuba,
--Eritrea,
--Iran,
--North Korea,
--Syria,
--Venezuela.
--(c) U.N. Arms Embargoed countries:
--Burma,
--Côte d'Ivoire,
--Congo,
--Eritrea,
--Iraq,
--Iran,
--Lebanon,
--Liberia,
--Libya,
--People's Republic of China,
--Somalia,
--The Republic of the Sudan
HERE'S THE DEAL, AND IT APPLIES TO ALL NATIONS...
KISS AMERICA'S ENTIRE BIG OLD BACKSIDE AND AGREE WITH OUR 'POLICY' OR BE STARVED OUT OF EXISTENCE.
YOU KNOW AND I KNOW THAT IS TRULY WHAT IT AMOUNTS TO.
EITHER NATIONS COMPLY WITH OUR "POLICIES" OR WE ENACT TRADE EMBARGOES, SANCTIONS, PROHIBITIONS.
[NOTE: TO ONLY CHRISTIANS READING HERE:
DOES ALL OF THIS, IN ANY WAY, REMIND YOU OF THE "MARK OF THE BEAST" ...
THE DEMAND THAT ONE TAKES THE MARK OR ISN'T ALLOWED TO BUY AND SELL?]
KISSINGER FORESAW AN EASIER TIME OF DEPOPULATING THE PLANET THAN REALITY HAS AFFORDED.
BARRING A METEOR STRIKE, A MASSIVE 'CME' FROM THE SUN, SOME NATURAL DISASTER WE HAVEN'T YET CONCEIVED OF, MAYBE A WORLDWIDE SUPER-PANDEMIC, THEN ONLY A GLOBAL NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST OR WORLDWIDE INTENTIONAL STARVING OR POISONING OF THE MASSES CAN POSSIBLY ERADICATE ENOUGH PEOPLE TO SATISFY THAT IMAGINED NEED TO REDUCE US ALL DOWN TO A "MANAGEABLE" 500 MILLION TO ONE BILLION SOULS.
THE 'POWERS THAT BE' FEEL MORALLY JUSTIFIED IN CULLING THE WORLD POPULATION.
WHEN?
TODAY?
(Except the awful part about the elephants.)
"How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change" -- Allan Savory
//WW
No comments:
Post a Comment