Friday, December 4, 2020

ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE ARE NOT SPREADING COVID-19: STUDY OF 9 MILLION+ PEOPLE. GLOBAL RESET IN PROGRESS





Covid-19: four-fifths of cases are asymptomatic
Chinese authorities began publishing daily figures on 1 April on the number of new coronavirus cases that are asymptomatic, with the first day’s figures suggesting that around four in five coronavirus infections caused no illness. 
(THIS WAS IN APRIL, THE INITIAL REPORT, NOT THE MASSIVE LATER STUDY OF OVER 9 MILLION.)

Tom Jefferson, an epidemiologist and honorary research fellow at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, said the findings were “very, very important.”

He told The BMJ (a British  organization and journal), “The sample is small, and more data will become available. Also, it’s not clear exactly how these cases were identified. But let’s just say they are generalisable. 
And even if they are 10% out, then this suggests the virus is everywhere. 

If—and I stress, if—the results are representative, then we have to ask, ‘What the hell are we locking down for?’”

WHAT INDEED? 

BASED ON THE NEWER FINDINGS, ASYMPTOMATIC, COVID-POSITIVES DO NOT SPREAD THE VIRUS. 

During a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others.

"We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts, and they're not finding secondary transmission … it's very rare, and much of that is not published in the literature," Van Kerkhove said.

Just one day later, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO's emergencies program, backpedaled Van Kerkhove's statement, saying the remarks were "misinterpreted." (4) 
Needless to say, when you're trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network, it's no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever. 

Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to Others

According to media reports, COVID-19 "cases," meaning positive PCR test results, NOT actual medically-treated/needed a doctor real cases, are soaring across the U.S. and around the world, leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave.

However, as detailed in several recent articles, PCR tests are being used incorrectly, resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission.

In reality, the vast majority of people who end up with a positive test will not develop symptoms and aren't infectious. Needless to say, if you're not infectious, you pose no health risk to anyone

In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery, 87.9% of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms. 

Another study 3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston. After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there, researchers conducted symptoms assessments and testing among all guests residing at the shelter over a two-day period.

Of 408 people tested, 147, or 36%, were positive, yet symptoms were conspicuously absent. Cough occurred in only 7.5% of cases, shortness of breath in 1.4% and fever in 0.7%. All symptoms were "uncommon among COVID-positive individuals," the researchers noted.

Most recently, a study (5) in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan, China.

The city had been under strict lockdown between January 23 and April 8, 2020. 

Between May 14 and June 1, 2020, 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing. In all, 92.9% of the entire city population participated in the testing. 
Of these, 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients.

Not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive.

In all, there were zero symptomatic cases and only 300 asymptomatic cases detected. (The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000.) 

Additionally, of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 individuals (0.310%) tested positive again, but none were symptomatic. 

As noted by the authors: (6)
"Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and re-positive cases, indicating no 'viable virus' in positive cases detected in this study … 

The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years …

The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below (0.124/10,000), and the highest among the elderly aged 60 years and above (0.442/10,000). 
The asymptomatic positive rate in females (0.355/10,000) was higher than that in males (0.256/10,000)."

Asymptomatic People Have Low Viral Load

Interestingly, when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a "hot" or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. 
Still, none of their contacts had been infected.

In other words, even though 'asymptomatics' were (or had been) carriers of apparently live virus, they still did not transmit it to others. 
As noted by the authors, "there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts." 

They further added: (7)

"Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding, which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2.

In the present study, virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases, and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative, indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious."

Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious Either

The same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection.

"Results of virus culturing and contract [sic] tracing found no evidence that re-positive cases in recovered COVID-19 patients were infectious, which is consistent with evidence from other sources," the authors said. (8)

The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be weakening over time, and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak.

What does all of this tell us? 

It tells us there's no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise. 

Remember, as demonstrated in Portugal when their court ruled the PCR test was illegal to use to quarantine, the more people you test using a PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold, the more false positives you'll get.

Using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive (noninfectious) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic. 
Remember that the PCR's inventor was enraged that his test was being used to "prove" AIDS was caused by HIV.

It's what keeps the pandemic narrative going, when in fact it's over. 
We're PEAKING, and then it will become another 'memorable' pandemic, one for the history books. 


CDC Uses Questionable Sources to Counter China Study

Interestingly, the same day the China study came out, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance (9,10) on mask-wearing, claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions. 

Where did they get that from?

The two references listed as support for that claim include a study (11) from July 2020, and CDC data that haven't even been published yet. (12) 
It just says it was "submitted" for publication sometime in 2020, therefore, we are unable to provide any source link. 

The CDC makes no mention of the China study, which included nearly 10 million individuals.

CNN, which reported the CDC's update, parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it's so important to wear a mask, also made no mention of the landmark study from China. 

How odd, don't you think? 
It's almost as though the CDC doesn't want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people.

German Lawyers Sue Fact-Checkers Over Censorship

Many doctors, scientists and lawyers have now become wise to the fact that it is these flawed tests, and their fraudulent use, that is keeping the fear narrative alive — and they're taking action.

In the video linked above, Ben Swann talks to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,13 a consumer protection trial lawyer 14 and founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss (15,16,17) which is seeking to expose how fraudulent testing has been and how it continues to be used to engineer the appearance of a dangerous pandemic when in fact there is none.

The committee is now filing the first of many lawsuits to come, this one against so-called fact-checkers on social media. They opted to file a defamation lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German Congress and the Council of Europe who has been an outspoken critic of PCR testing, as it cannot be used to diagnose infection.

Social media companies have labeled Wodarg's statements as "false," and by filing a defamation suit, the burden of proof now falls on the fact checkers to prove that they are correct. 
In other words, to win, the fact checkers must prove that PCR tests diagnose active infection. 

The scientific evidence proves they don't, so this case could turn out to be pivotal in the fight against the big tech censorship that keeps the fear-mongering alive.


COVID-19 Pandemic — The Greatest Psyop in History?

While Fuellmich and his team make no claims about WHY the pandemic is being kept alive using fraudulent science, they are unequivocal in their assertion that it is, in fact, a fake pandemic and that it has had devastating health and economic consequences around the world.

For the why, we have to turn to the geopolitical scene to see what narratives have rolled out in tandem with the pandemic. 

What we find is that leaders across the world are now calling for a "reset" of the global economy in the wake of the destruction brought by the pandemic. In reality, of course, it is the global response to the pandemic that created the economic devastation, not the virus itself.

Either way, the call to "build back better" is being heard around the world, and such plans include the elimination of conventional capitalism, free enterprise and private ownership, replacing them with a technocratic resource-based economic system in which energy and social engineering run the economy rather than pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand.

Leaders are also calling for invasive health surveillance, and there appear to be plans in place to use biometric surveillance via vaccines, all of which feed into the technocratic system in which this kind of mass surveillance is not only paramount but also foundational.

The reason surveillance is so crucial is because the functioning of this system hinges on artificial intelligence-driven social engineering and manipulation of the masses. Unless people are locked into what could be described as a digital prison, they won't comply with what's coming.

Hook everyone up to a digital centralized banking system, a digital ID and a social credit score, however, and few will have the fortitude to object or speak out against the unelected rulers. 

Your entire life could easily be upended with the push of a button.

We've already seen how many people have not only been de-platformed for speaking out against one thing or another this past year, they've also had their digital payment accounts closed down, effectively destroying their ability to earn a living. 

Imagine if there were nothing but a centralized digital currency system and your accounts got shut down. How would you live?

Fear Is a Highly Effective Manipulation Tool

No person in their right mind would agree to this Great Reset plan if they were aware of all the details and its ultimate implications for humanity as a whole. 

So, to roll it out, they had to use psychological manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool there is.

What is this “Great Reset”?

In a nutshell, the Great Reset refers to a global agenda to monitor and control the world through digital surveillance.

As explained by journalist James Corbett in his October 16, 2020, Corbett Report, the Great Reset is a new “social contract” that ties every person to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, and a social credit ID that will end up dictating every facet of your life.

It’s about “getting rid of capitalism” and free enterprise, and replacing them with so-called “sustainable development” and “stakeholder capitalism” — terms that belie their nefarious, anti-humanity intents. As noted in the book, “Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order”:

The Tea Room previously mentioned the "rise of the technocrats". 

Justin Trudeau is calling the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity for a reset as per the World Economic Forum, and parroting the ‘build back better’ line which Joe Biden just so happened to use as a campaign slogan. 

SOME "OPPORTUNITY"! 

As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin, there's an entire school of public health research that focuses on identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into accepting desired public health measures.

By adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix, you can bring an individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which you can no longer think logically — and in this state, you are more easily manipulated. 

Del Bigtree noted that what's missing from the COVID-19 conversation is the actual death rate.

"If COVID is a deadly virus, what should we see when cases increase?" he asks. The answer, of course, is an increase in deaths. However, that's not what's happening.

Aside from a small bump at the beginning, when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes, the death rate has remained relatively flat while positive test rates have dramatically risen and fallen in intervals.

In a video, Bigtree features a November 4, 2020, tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests (aka "cases") in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red, since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020. As you can see, there's no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths.

YOU HAVE TO LOOK CLOSELY TO EVEN SEE THAT ELUSIVE RED "DEATH RATE" LINE ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE GRAPH.

THIS IS THE STARK REALITY THE MEDIA AND MANY POLITICIANS NEVER CALL ATTENTION TO. 

THAT IS A THIN, RED LINE COMPARED TO "CASES".

The following graphic illustrates the central role of fear-mongering for the successful roll-out of the Great Reset.




Testing asymptomatic people and isolating people who test positive even when they have no symptoms is a key strategy that keeps the fear level high. 

There simply aren't enough hospitalized COVID-19 patients to keep the ruse going, and far too few actually die to make the chosen narrative work. 
That's why we hear nothing about those statistics anymore.

Instead, all we hear about are the "cases" — the positive tests which have no bearing on mortality rates. 

Fear of asymptomatics also drives the narrative that we must all wear face masks everywhere we go, because you don't know who might be infected and not know it. 

It instills fear of others, as even seemingly healthy people might make you deathly ill.

The featured study from Wuhan demonstrates the fallacy of such fears. 

People who test positive but have no symptoms are not infectious and pose no risk to others. They don't need to wear masks and they don't need to be isolated. 

In short, we don't need to fear each other.

There’s not a single area of life that is left out of this Great Reset plan. 

The planned "reform" will affect everything from government, energy and finance to food, medicine, real estate, policing and even how we interact with our fellow human beings in general.

Privacy protections, of course, are a major hurdle in this plan, which is why every effort is made to get people to loosen their views on the right for privacy. 

In the U.S., we also have the Constitution that stands in the way, which is why efforts to undermine, circumvent, ignore or nullify it are increasing.

“To sum it up, the desired end result is a giant, joyless, highly controlled global conveyor of everything and everybody where privacy is tremendously expensive, dissent is unthinkable, and spiritual submission is mandatory.

It’s like a 24/7 medicated reality, except the medications are both chemical and digital, and they are reporting you back to the mother-ship, which can then punish you for bad behavior by, say, blocking your access to certain places or by putting a hold on your digital bank account — perhaps without any human intervention at all.” 


YOU CAN'T BUY, YOU CAN'T SELL, YOU CAN'T WORK OR ACCESS ANY OF YOUR FINANCES AND THERE IS NOWHERE YOU CAN GO THAT ISN'T UNDER SURVEILLANCE. 
TRAVEL IS FORBIDDEN TO THE NON-COMPLIANT ANYWAY. 
TAKE THAT FLAWED PCR TEST, GET YOUR FALSE POSITIVE RESULT, BE TRACKED, TAKE THE VACCINE...OR ELSE.  

GET ONBOARD THE GLOBAL RESET TRAIN. 

BUT IF YOU COMPLY, YOU ARE FOREVER OWNED.  






________________________

Sources, etc





--And with humble thanks to the Mercola Organization's many well-documented articles and insights. 


--By Klaus Schwab’s own admission, the world must “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies” — in short, he says, ever industry must “be transformed… we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

In a warning of the rollercoaster of change we can expect if this plan goes ahead, Schwab continues: “The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles. Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.”

As the WEF puts it of the coming technocracy that would rule our lives: “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

There is nothing new about the Great Reset. Schwab and his acolytes have been talking about it for years. Chinese Coronavirus – or rather the draconian, liberty-sapping measures taken by governments in order to combat it – has merely accelerated the process.

Schwab’s book,“COVID-19: The Great Reset” also urges industry leaders and decision makers to “make good use of the pandemic” and “not letting the crisis go to waste.” Incidentally, the owner of Time magazine and founder of Salesforce, Mark Benioff, is also a board member of the World Economic Forum, so he’s clearly familiar with the reset plan.

The problem is that while the plan is being sold as a way to, finally, make life fair and equitable for all people, the required sacrifices do not apply to the technocrats running the system. Ultimately, the Great Reset will result in two tiers or people: the technocratic elite, who have all the power and rule over all assets, and the rest of humanity, who have no power, no assets and no say-so in anything.


//WW
at

No comments:

Post a Comment