Translate

Sunday, February 18, 2018

MUELLER INDICTMENT OF RUSSIANS: 2016 ELECTION OUTCOME WAS NOT AFFECTED




THE DEPARTMENT OF 'JUSTICE' (DOJ) HAS OBTAINED INDICTMENTS AGAINST 13 RUSSIAN CITIZENS (OR REASONABLE FACSIMILES?) BUT FAILED TO MENTION THAT SNOWDEN AND A LOT OF OTHERS THEY'VE 'INDICTED' WHO RESIDE IN RUSSIA WON'T BE BOARDING PLANES HEADED FOR THE U.S.
SO, NO, THEY WILL NEVER BE TRIED HERE UNLESS THE DOJ PEFORMS
THE "IN ABSENTIA" TRICK.
SORRY, DOJ, THE RUSSIANS ARE NOT COMING!



AND, BTW, NO AMERICANS WERE FOUND GUILTY OF 'KNOWINGLY' CONSPIRING WITH THOSE MYSTERIOUS RUSSIANS NOR WAS THE ELECTION OUTCOME AFFECTED BY ANY OF THIS MESS.
(LISTEN CLOSELY AT ABOUT 5 MINUTES INTO THIS VIDEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEElrAhB3Uc )

ADD TO THIS THE LEGAL OPINION BY JUDICIAL EXPERTS THAT MUELLER DOES NOT HAVE ANY EVIDENCE OF TRUMP 'COLLUDING' WITH RUSSIANS NOR DOES MUELLER HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT, AND ONE WOULD HOPE THIS LUNACY IS ENDED.

Nearly two decades ago, a professor at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law. was asked by then-independent counsel Kenneth Starr asked to evaluate whether a federal grand jury could indict a sitting president — in that case, Bill Clinton. He was told that yes, he could. Here's what that same man says about Mueller indicting Trump:

"In my assessment, the “case” against Trump right now amounts to a mountain of innuendo built on a foundation of loose sand. The facts so far do not come close to making an obstruction case against the president, and for now there is no evidence that he engaged in any underlying crime.

If and when Mueller comes up with something that might create an indictable case, though, he is apt to run into serious questions about the limitations of his office, questions that [Kenneth] Starr did not face."

Starr COULD have indicted Bill Clinton.
Nothing in the Constitution forbids that, but Congress and the Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in their quiet rewriting (shredding is a better word) of the Constitution, enacted 'laws' and upheld them that have now come back to haunt them.
Mueller simply can't do what Starr and those before him could have done had they chosen to.
Congress would have to pass new laws, "reinterpret" the Constitution to make Trump prosecutable.
The SCOTUS would have to backtrack and do their own "reinterpretation" of that same great old document.




PERHAPS, TO REPAY THE DOJ, PUTIN WILL SPILL THE BEANS AND SHOW THE WORLD WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
MAYBE ASSANGE WILL CRANK UP THE HEAT FROM WIILEAKS? 


THE ACCUSATIONS THAT MUELLER WAS AND STILL IS A "DIRTY COP" BEGAN IN EARNEST IN 2001. 


MUELLER WAS 'TOP COP' WHEN WE SAW 9/11 UNFOLD, REMEMBER.
OUR 'INTELLIGENCE' AGENCIES FAILED ON THAT ONE, TOO, AS DID BUSHKIN #2.


BUT ONWARD HE PRESSES, BECAUSE HE'S BEEN ASSIGNED TO FIND WITCHES, AND WITCHES HE WILL FIND.  

Since taking over the investigation, Mueller's team has charged four Americans once affiliated with the Trump campaign or administration, and 13 Russians and three Russian companies involved in ALLEGED U.S. election interference.



HAVE YOU READ THE 37 PAGES IN THIS INDICTMENT, THE PRESS RELEASE BY THE DOJ?
IF YOU HAVE AND READ CAREFULLY, YOU MIGHT STILL BE LAUGHING, OR RAGING.

THE DOJ 's MAGICAL INDICTMENT IS ABOUT AS MEANINGFUL AS THE "INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS" WHO HAVE 'INDICTED' SEVERAL OF OUR FORMER PRESIDENTS AND VICE PRESIDENTS FOR WAR CRIMES.

THEY CAN'T FORCE RUSSIA TO SEND US THE INDICTED RUSKIES, IF, BIG IF, THEY EVEN EXIST.


THE DOJ HAS CREATED A THREE-RING CIRCUS WITH THE FBI AND NSA AND ARE SIMPLY INVITING US TO COME SEE THE CIRCUS.

DID IT ESCAPE THE DOJ THAT OLD HILLARY ACTUALLY BEAT THE ORANGE DUDE, TRUMP?
CLINTON WON THE GENERAL ELECTION; SHE GOT THE MOST POPUULAR VOTES!
IT WAS THAT ABOMINATION CALLED THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE THAT GAVE THE PRESIDENCY TO TRUMPKIN!

SO, HOW IS THIS PISS-POOR EXCUSE FOR "PROOF" OF ELECTION TAMPERING RELEVANT TO THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE?

I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE INDICTMENT THAT STATES THE "ELECTORS" OF THE NEFARIOUS 'COLLEGE' WERE INFLUENCED BY RUSSIANS.
THAT ALONE SHOULD END THIS BOONDOGGLE, THIS SMOKESCREEN TO MAKE THE MASSES FORGET THE ELECTION TAMPERING THE DNC AND OBAMA HIMSELF MAY HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH.

WHY DIDN'T WHAT ROSENSTEIN ADMITTED MAKE HEADLINES IN THE NY TIMES, WASHINGTON POST AND AT CNN?
 

"Dept. of 'Justice' Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in his statement to the press, around the 5:00 minute mark in the above video, stated that there is "no allegation in this indictment that ANY American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity.

There is NO allegation in the 37-page indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."

According to the indictment, the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm, started interfering as early as 2014 in U.S. politics, extending to the 2016 presidential election. The defendants, "posing as U.S. persons and creating false U.S. personas," operated social media groups designed to attract U.S. audiences by stealing U.S. identities and falsely claiming to be U.S. activists.
"Over time, these social media accounts became defendants' means to reach significant numbers of Americans for purposes of interfering with the U.S. political system," the indictment reads."   


ACTUALLY, THIS BEGAN IN LATE 2013, IF YOU READ THE INDICTMENT, RE: DEFENDANT KRYLOVA ON PAGE 8, DEFENDANT BOVDA ON PG.9, WHO WERE ALREADY HERE BY THE BEGINNING OF 2014, i.e. IN 2013, AND THE RUSKIE MADNESS WAS IN FULL SWING BY EARLY 2014, BEING "FIRMLY ESTABLISHED" BY APRIL THAT YEAR.

The following statement negates Mueller's whole investigative mandate of "collusion," where the indictment asserts, "Russians also communicated with 'UNWITTING individuals' associated with the Trump campaign and OTHER political activists to coordinate activities."
WHAT 'OTHERS'?
THE CLINTON , SANDERS AND STEIN SUPPORTERS.
YES, AMERICA, THE INDICTED 13 RUSSIANS WERE 'COMMUNICATING' WITH ALL GREEDY LITTLE OUT-TO-WIN-AT-ANY-COST POLITICAL PARTIES, OR SO SAYS THE DOJ.
THEY ALL TOOK THE BAIT, EVERY SINGLE 'PARTY' IN AMERICA.
  

The indictment also offers examples of the Russians setting up pro-Hillary Clinton rallies as well, as part of their general plan to "sow discord." Even more astounding is that this Russian effort, according to the indictment (Page 3), started in 2014, ONE YEAR BEFORE TRUMP WAS OFFICIALLY IN THE 'RACE'.

HOW, THEN, CAN THE DOJ SAY THE RUSKIES WERE HERE TO HELP TRUMP IN 2014?
AFTER ALL, AREN'T WE TOLD NOW THAT THE RUSSIANS PROVIDED 'INTEL' IN THAT DOCUMENT HILLARY'S TEAM BOUGHT TO SMEAR TRUMP?
WASN'T IT RUSSIANS THAT "SECRET BRITISH AGENT" COLLECTED HIS 'INTEL' FROM?
NOBODY IS MENTIONING THAT MUCH ANYMORE.
WHY NOT?

THE DNC/CLINTON CAMPAIGN BOUGHT, PAID FOR A DOCUMENT THAT CAME, IN PART, STRAIGHT FROM THE HANDS OF RUSSIANS

(
Reminder: 2014 was during the whole Ukraine/Russia conflict, where the UNITED STATES MEDDLED to support the ouster of the pro-Russia, duly elected President of Ukraine.)

DARE WE IMAGINE THE ENTIRE 'RUSSIA MEDDLING IN OUR ELECTION', IF THAT CAN EVER BE PROVEN BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, WAS PAYBACK FOR OUR RESPONSE IN THE UKRAINE?
NO, GASP!, SURELY NOT!

AND HOW MANY HAVE CHOSEN TO FORGET AMERICA'S MEDDLING IN THE ISRAELI ELECTION?

(SEE The U.S. Has Been Meddling In Other Countries' Elections For A Long Time ...)


(AND THIS:
Obama’s Meddling in Foreign Elections: Six Examples )


IT'S ALL AN INTERNATIONAL GAME OF CHESS AND WHEN ANY PLAYER TOPS THE OTHER PLAYERS, THE ONES WHO WERE TOPPED SET UP A HOWL.

Read, but do read carefully, slowly, several times, maybe, the DOJ press release and that pathetic "indictment" for yourselves, watching for "double-speak":
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/grand-jury-indicts-thirteen-russian-individuals-and-three-russian-companies-scheme-interfere  


THERE SHOULD BE AN INDICTMENT OF WHOMEVER WROTE THIS 'PIECE OF CRAP' FICTIONAL ACCOUNT.
IT'S SO FULL OF HOLES IT BOGGLES THE LOGICAL MIND.
SURELY SOME RECENT HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT ON AN ACID TRIP WROTE THIS THING.

AFTER OVER 6 MONTHS OF WASTED TAXPAYER MONEY AND WASTED TIME, NO INDICTMENT OF TRUMP. NOR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE.


So, Mueller is not going to bust Trump, Congress is not going to impeach Trump, Trump is, obviously, not going to go the Nixon route and go home.
What does that leave?
ONLY the "Lincoln/JFK solution"?
Yeah, that.


Neither Hillary Clinton nor Bernie will ever be in that oval office, and IF Americans were smart, NO current career/professional politicians would ever be there.

Time to CLEAN HOUSE, and Senate, and flush the big toilet we call Washington, D.C.
TIME TO REALLY PUT AMERICA FIRST, NOT POLITICAL PARTY, NOT WALL STREET'S WHIMS, JUST AMERICA AND AMERICANS.

(BTW, a bit related to all this:
Mueller’s ‘Pit Bull’ Andrew Weissmann Busted for Withholding Evidence in Previous Case)

"Excellent point and question asked by Nick Short from Security Studies Group and Michelle Malkin Investigates'
verified Twitter account
: "From #Mueller indictment, 2 of the Russians were able to enter U.S. on travel visas which they received after applying for them through the State Dept in 2014. From June 4, 2014 - June 26, 2014 they traveled around the US.
Who was head of the FBI & State Dept at this time again?"

The answer to that would be former Secretary of State John Kerry (2013 to 2017) and former FBI Director James Comey (2013 to 2017)."

BUT, LOOKING AT THE DATES ON THE INDICTMENTS, ALL OF THE 13 HAD ENTERED THE U.S. DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION!

JOHN KERRY'S DEPT.OF STATE WELCOMED THEM, GRANTED THEIR VISAS.
AND WHERE WERE OUR "INTELLIGENCE" AGENCIES THEN?
HOW CONVENIENT THEY CAN TRACK DOWN THESE SPECIFIC 13 NOW, PROVIDE SUCH IN-DEPTH TINIEST DETAILS ABOUT THE RUSSIANS METHODOLOGY, EVEN QUOTE THEIR PRIVATE EMAILS TO FRIENDS/FAMILY, BUT COULD NOT DO SO PRIOR TO THIS WEEK, RIGHT?


On page 12 of the indictment, the DOJ sets forth the exact methods used, when they were used, how they were used on WHICH 'social media' to 'attract and sway' political opinion.
HOW does the DOJ now suddenly know this, but claims not to have known it while this alleged interference was going on?

WOULDN'T THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE PERSONAL COMPUTERS OF THE 'DEFENDANTS' TO PROVE, WITHOUT A DOUBT, BY THE DATA EXTRACTED FROM HARD DRIVES IN THOSE SPECIFIC COMPUTERS AND FOUND IN POSSESSION OF SAID RUSSIANS, IN ORDER TO HAVE A REAL CASE AGAINST THESE 13 PEOPLE?

COULDN'T ANY PERSON IN AMERICA PRETEND TO BE RUSSIAN AND OPEN ACCOUNTS UNDER FICTITIOUS NAMES ON ANY SOCIAL MEDIA TO LAY DOWN A FALSE TRAIL FOR THE KEYSTONE COPS AT NSA, DOJ, CIA, FBI, ETC, TO "FIND"?

WITHOUT THOSE COMPUTERS, ISN'T THIS ALL SPECULATION, A FAIRY TALE THEY HOPE TO SELL TO ENOUGH MEMBERS OF THE "LEFT WING" TO REIGNITE THE OUTCRIES AND PRODUCE MORE RIOTING IN THE STREETS?

ANYTHING TO DISTRACT FROM WHAT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATON DID AND/OR ALLOWED TO BE DONE.
ANYTHING TO SAVE CLINTON FROM BEING CHARGED.
AFTER ALL, HER HUSBAND WAS NEVER CHARGED FOR LYING UNDER OATH DURING THE CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO HIS LEWINSKY PROBLEM.


HOW did they discover names of 13 SPECIFIC Russians only now, after OVER 4 YEARS from the time it all began "on social media" when the DOJ itself makes clear that everything related to the Russian team was deleted/destroyed and that those Russians were so good at fooling everyone here that they even conned banks into opening accounts?

If they're THAT good at it, how could they be dumb enough to leave a VERY HANDY trail right to their doors in Russia?


MORE IMPORTANTLY, this entire fiasco ASSUMES that American voters, dedicated as they are to each cursed political party, could be swayed, en masse, to change their votes, to flip 180 degrees, to let social media sites dictate to them how to vote.

Does the DOJ REALLY think Americans are that naive, that easily swayed, that DUMB?
Obviously so, and they also think we're dumb enough to swallow this newest hat trick.


Who ARE these 13 Russians, do they REALLY EXIST?
How do we know the DOJ isn't making all this up as they go along?
MIGHT these "Russians" have REALLY been NSA, CIA, FBI, or even DOJ or DNC employees PRETENDING to be Russians?

COULDN'T THIS ALL BE A RUSE TO KEEP OBAMA, KERRY, HILLARY, OTHERS IN THE DOJ AND FBI OUT OF JAIL?
COULD ANY OF THOSE 'PLAYERS' ACTUALLY HAVE DONE THIS THEMSELVES, OR ASSIGNED THAT TASK TO 'STAFF'?

IF THIS WAS ORCHESTRATED BY THE OBAMA TEAM TO HELP CLINTON WIN, WHAT BETTER WAY TO COVER THAT TRAIL THAN BY MEANS OF USING THE DOJ TO SUDDENLY FIND THESE MYTHICAL RUSSIANS AND SAVE THE DAY FOR TEAMS OBAMA/CLINTON?

What did we miss when those 'SUPER-SECURE' NSA computers were ALLEGEDLY 'hacked' by, yes, Russians again, or what was in those thousands of "deleted/lost" Clinton/Podesta/Weiner emails that some have suggested RUSSIANS handed over to Wikileaks?

What was really on the computer allegedly "stolen" out of that FBI agent's SUV?

How is it that the emails, etc, between the TWO FBI 'lovers' were ALL "lost" one day, but miraculously were 'rediscovered' on devices taken directly from those 2 lovers days later?
Did those few days give 'someone' time to reshuffle that deck and remove more incriminating emails?

When such things begin "disappearing", my first thoughts are "WHY did they 'disappear and WHAT are they covering up THIS time?"


On page 13, it is alleged that for 4 days, one 'Russian' communicated with an unnamed Texas politicical 'activist' and learned from that ONE person that they should "concentrate their efforts on purple states like Colorado, Virginia and Florida".


THE KEYSTONE COPS OF THE DOJ REALLY SELL RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE SHORT ON THIS, DON'T THEY?
THEY WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT REAL RUSSIAN AGENTS WOULD NOT BE WELL AWARE OF SUCH A MUNDANE PIECE OF INFORMATION AS WHICH STATES COULD COST HILLARY OR TRUMP THE ELECTION?

WHAT AMERICAN WOULD BELIEVE THAT REAL RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE AGENTS WOULD NEED TO "LOCATE" THE ONE PERSON IN ALL AMERICA, IN TEXAS, WHO COULD HAND THEM THE "HOLY GRAIL" THAT WOULD SWAY AMERICAN VOTERS BY TELLING THEM WHAT OST OF THE WORLD ALREADY KNOWS, THAT SOME STATES ARE MORE CRUCIAL FOR A CANDIDATE TO WIN THAN OTHERS?
"PURPLE STATES" HAVE BEEN CALLED THAT FOR A LONG TIME BEFORE 2016.

NOT ONLY THAT, BUT IT APPEARS THAT THE DOJ BELIEVES THAT AMERICANS SIGN INTO FACEBOOK, TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM TO VISIT 'POLITICAL ACTIVISTS' PAGES AND OBTAIN THEIR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO THINK CORRECTLY AND VOTE WITH THE BLESSINGS OF SAID 'ACTIVISTS'.
THE DOJ IS CRAZY, OBVIOUSLY.

ANY CASUAL FIRST-TIME VISITOR TO THE SOCIAL MEDIA SITES MENTIONED BY THE DOJ COULD REVEAL THE TRUTH.
AMERICANS "SHARE" FROM THEIR "HOME PAGES" ON FACEBOOK, WHICH IS FULL OF SO MUCH CRAP THAT FEW SIFT THROUGH IT ALL JUST TO BE PROPERLY "POLITICALLY INFORMED".
SOCIAL MEDIA IS FOR SOCIALIZING, POSTING SELFIES, MAYBE EVEN "LOOKING FOR LOVE", TALKING ABOUT THE BIG GAME (FOOTBALL, BASKETBALL, BASEBALL), PROMOTING ONESELF OR ONE'S BUSINESS, SO FEW TAKE SOCIAL MEDIA SERIOUSLY.

LUDICROUS AND STUPID ARE NOW REDEFINED BY THE DOJ.
THEY ARE BLATANTLY OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE REALITY OF SOCIAL MEDIA.

THE REST OF THIS 'INDICTMENT' SHOULD BE AN EVEN BIGGER EMBARRASSMENT TO THE DOJ.

PAGE 18 ACTUALLY QUOTES AN INSTAGRAM POST FROM A 'PERSONA' KNOWN AS "BLACKTIVIST" TELLING ANYONE WHO CARED TO READ IT TO VOTE FOR JILL STEIN, FOR PEACE.
IT'S A SAD LITTLE POST THAT WOULD AFFECT ALMOST NO ONE IN THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES.
WHO WOULD CHANGE THEIR VOTE BASED ON SUCH CHILDISH DRIVEL?

THE INDICTMENT CITES NUMEROUS 'ADS' PURCHASED BY THE RUSSIANS, AS IF THOSE WHO ARE USING SOCIAL MEDIA PAY ATTENTION TO ADS?

HOW MANY READING THIS GO ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND CLICK ON ADS, OR CONSIDER THEM CHOCK-FULL OF PERTINENT, RELIABLE INFORMATION, RELY ON THOSE TO FORMULATE THEIR POLITICAL VIEWPOINT, DECIDE HOW THEY'LL VOTE?
ANYONE?
ANYONE YOU KNOW?

CAN THE DOJ PRODUCE/PROVE THE NUMBER OF "HITS" ON ALL THOSE ADS, THOSE TWITER POSTS?
HOW SIMPLE WOULD IT BE FOR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES TO CLICK ON THOSE ADS TO UP THE HIT COUNT?
I'D WAGER THEY CAN'T, OR WON'T BE PRODUCING INCONTROVERTIBLE, HARD EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT TO SUPPORT THEIR SILLY CLAIMS.
 THE TOTALS WOULD BE FAR TOO FEW TO "STEAL AN ELECTION" FROM OLD HILLARY.

PAGE 19 STATES THAT THESE CLEVER RUSSIANS WERE ABLE TO CREATE BANK ACCOUNTS AND GET CREDIT CARDS USING ALIASES, PRETENDING TO BE AMERICAN CITIZENS?
WOW! WHERE DO WE GO TO SIGN UP FOR THOSE?
WHAT BANKS AND CREDIT CARD COMPANIES ARE DUMB ENOUGH OR TRUSTING ENOUGH NOT TO CHECK OUT APPLICATIONS THOROUGHLY?

THE 37-PAGE DOJ FAIRY TALE IS MORE POORLY WRITTEN THAN THE WORST 'DETECTIVE STORY' I HAVE EVER SAT AND LAUGHED AT OR GRIMACED TO SEE IN PRINT.
THE DOJ REALLY NEEDS BETTER WRITERS, AND PEOPLE MORE IN TOUCH WITH THE REALITY OF "SOCIAL MEDIA" AND HOW IT INFLUENCES ANYONE.


PAGE 21 IS A REAL DOOZY
.
MY, MY, MY, WHAT A REACH!
WHAT A JOKE! 
THE RUSSIANS, WE ARE ASKED TO BELIEVE, "USED" ALREADY ESTABLISHED, REAL AMERICAN GROUPS AND CREATED "BEING PATRIOTIC" ON FACEBOOK, AND WRANGLED THEIR WAY INTO A TWITTER ACCOUNT CALLED @MARCH_FOR_TRUMP', AND UNNAMED "OTHER ACCOUNTS" TO "ORGANIZE PRO-TRUMP RALLIES".

DOJ HAS THE FINEST DETAILS OF THIS, NOW, SUDDENLY, EVEN STATING THAT THE RUSKIES PAID FOR SIGNS TO BE MADE FOR THE MARCH FOR TRUMP RALLY.
OH, THE HORROR, RIGHT?

I FELL OFF MY CHAIR LAUGHING AT THAT ONE; RUSSIAN AGENTS TELLING THE RALLY ORGANIZERS THEY NEED SIGNS AND A MEGAPHONE AND PAYING FOR THEM, AND PAYING "UNNAMED" PEOPLE TO ATTEND THE RALLY?

THEY THEN TURNED TO THE RUSKIES HELPING WITH A RALLY CALLED "FLORIDA GOES TRUMP", WHICH ALSO GARNERED WAY FEWER ATTENDEES THAN WAS NEEDED TO CHANGE THE FINAL VOTE IN FLORIDA IN FAVOR OF TRUMP.
ONE CAN LOOK AT ANY LOCAL MEDIA REPORTS OF THOSE 'RALLIES' TO SEE HOW FEW ATTENDED.

WE'RE TOLD ON PAGE 23 AND ASKED TO BELIEVE THAT THESE CRAFTY RUSKIES EVEN PAID ONE GUY TO BUILD A CAGE ON A FLATBED TRUCK AND ANOTHER TO DRESS AS HILLARY IN PRISON GARB?
BAAA HAAA HAAA! THAT'S RICH!

HOW MANY OTHERS WHO WERE NEVER CONTACTED BY THE RUSSIANS AND NEVER PAID A DIME DID THE SAME THING WAY BEFORE THE ELECTIONS WHEN BENGHAZI WAS THE MAIN TOPIC?

HOW MANY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS THOUGHT THAT BOTH OBAMA AND HILLARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED FOR THAT MESS, HMMM?
MAYBE IT WAS BENGHAZI THAT CHANGED SOME MINDS ABOUT HILLARY, YES?
WHAT NOW, INDICT A DOZEN LIBYANS?

THOSE RALLIES THEN, FAILURES THAT THEY WERE, AND A FEW ADS , POSTS TO SOCIAL MEDIA AND EMAILS ARE WHAT SWAYED THE 2016 ELECTION, ROBBED HILLARY OF THE PRESIDENCY?
NOT A CHANCE!
NO LOGICAL WAY DID THAT HAPPEN.
DO THE MATH, DOJ, AND SEE HOW BADLY YOU FAILED ON THIS ONE. 

AND A REMINDER: HILLARY CLINTON WON THE ELECTION IF WE'D GONE BY POPULAR VOTE. SHE GOT MORE VOTES THAN TRUMP, BUT NO ONE IS INVESTIGATING THAT, ARE THEY?
NO ONE IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA HAS SEEN FIT TO PUBLISH IN BOLD HEADLINES:
"RUSSIA DIDN'T HELP DEFEAT HILLARY! SHE WON THE POPULAR VOTE!" 



PAGE 24 ABSOLUTELY HANGS THE DOJ's OWN MYTHICAL 'EVIDENCE' OF ALL THIS BY STATING THAT... "Defendants and their co-conspirators deleted and destroyed data, including emails, social media accounts and other EVIDENCE of their activity."

REALLY, DOJ?
THEN HOW THE HELL DID YOU CLOWNS GET THOSE EMAILS, ALL THIS EVIDENCE IF THEY DESTROYED IT?
TIME MACHINE, BLACK MAGIC, SEANCES, WHAT?


YOU'D HAVE TO HAVE THEIR COMPUTERS TO RETRIEVE THAT "DELETED/DESTROYED" EVIDENCE AND YOU DO NOT HAVE THOSE.

WOULD RUSSIAN 'SPIES' BE DUMB ENOUGH TO LEAVE THOSE COMPUTERS HERE IN THE U.S.?
WOULD THEY RISK BOARDING A PLANE KNOWING THAT HOMELAND 'SECURITY' COULD SNATCH THOSE COMPUTERS, CELL PHONES, ANY DEVICES AND NEVER GIVE THEM BACK?
DID YOU FORGET THAT PART, DOJ, YOU BUMBLING, LYING CLOWNS?

IT'S STATED ON PAGE 24 THAT FACEBOOK WAS WORKING WITH THE 'SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE OF THE U.S. DOJ' TO TRACK DOWN THE HEINOUS (IMAGINARY?) RUSKIES.
IS ZUCKERBERG A DEMOCRAT?
WHAT ABOUT FACEBOOK BEING ACCUSED BY MAYBE MILLIONS OF BEING ANTI-TRUMP?
SHOULD WE BE CONCERNED ABOUT FACEBOOK BIAS?

ALSO ON PAGE 24 WE'RE HANDED THE CHILDISH FANTASY THAT ONE OF THESE DEVIOUS RUSSIAN AGENTS WROTE HOME BOASTING OF HER SUCCESS HERE, STATING HOW DUPED AMERICANS WERE BY HER SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS, EVEN SAYING SHE AND COLLEAGUES HAD BEEN 'BUSTED'???
WHAT?
THAT WOULD BE DUMB ON A WHOLE NEW LEVEL, YES?
LUDICROUS!

BUT LOOK AT PAGE 25!
ALL OF A SUDDEN, THOSE RUSKIES ARE SUPPORTING HILLARY WITH A RALLY AND ASKING AMERICANS TO SAVE AMERICAN MUSLIMS WHILE QUOTING HILLARY AS SAYING THAT SHARIA LAW WILL BE GOOD FOR AMERICA?

WHAT BONE-DEEP IMBECILE WOULD FALL FOR THAT ONE?
IT WOULD BE POLITICAL SUICIDE FOR OLD CLINTON TO MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT.
IT WOULD ALSO TAKE SOMEONE WITHOUT SYNAPSES IN THEIR BRAINS TO BUY THIS QUOTE AS ANYTHING BUT GARBAGE.
AMERICANS ARE NOT AS DUMB AS YOU IMAGINE, DOJ!
SUCH A THING WOULD HAVE ONLY ANGERED AND REALLY RALLIED HILLARY LOVERS.
FACE IT, DOJ, WORSE "DIRTY TRICKS" HAVE BEEN PLAYED BY 'LEGITIMATE ENTITIES', REAL AMERICANS FOR OVER 200 YEARS HERE IN THE USA.

DIRTY TRICKS DURING ELECTIONS BY EACH SIDE ARE EXPECTED.
IT HAPPENED IN THE 1800's, IT HAPPENED IN THE 1900s, AND IT WILL FOREVER BE THE SAME.
IT'S CALLED CAMPAIGN SMEARS AND MUD-SLINGING, WHEREIN DEVOTEES OF EACH PARTY TRY THEIR BEST TO MAKE THE OTHER SIDE LOOK LIKE DEMONIACS AND MONSTERS.
NOTHING NEW HERE, DOJ, FAIL, FAIL, FAIL!

ON PAGE 26, ITEM #70 OF THE COMICAL INDICTMENT, IF ANYONE READS THAT AND DOESN'T SEE IMMEDIATELY THAT IT'S A FARCE, THEN OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM IS INDEED A MISERABLE FAILURE AND THERE ARE NO DISCERNING AMERICANS WHO CAN SPOT A SPOOF.
LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE!
HIGH SCHOOL CRAP!
PATHETIC, DOJ!
I ALMOST PITY YOU.
HOWEVER, IF INDEED, AS STATED, A FEW OVER 8,000 RESPONDED TO THIS CALL TO RALLY , TELL US HOW THAT CHANGED THE ELECTION FOR HILLARY, OR TRUMP?
PEOPLE ATTENDING RALLIES ALSO DOES NOT GUARANTEE ANYONE ATTENDING WILL GO VOTE!
LOOK HOW FEW IN AMERICA EVER GO VOTE.
VOTER TURNOUT HIT A 20-YEAR LOW IN 2016 WITH BARELY HALF OF QUALIFIED VOTERS CASTING BALLOTS, BUT...

Only 9% of America Chose Trump and Clinton as the Nominees ...


PAGES 30 THROUGH 35 WHINE ABOUT HOW THE BANKS AND CREDIT CARD COMPANIES WERE DUPED, DEFRAUDED.
HOW ABOUT THEY CHANGE THAT TO "WHY DIDN'T THOSE BANKS AND CARD COMPANIES MORE THOROUGHLY AND DILIGENTLY CHECK OUT THE PEOPLE APPLYING FOR BOTH?"
WHERE WAS THEIR SECURITY, THEIR RULES FOR OPENING ACCOUNTS?
DOES THIS TELL US NOT TO TRUST AMERICAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS?
YES, YES IT DOES.

IF ANYBODY CAN JUST APPLY FOR AND GET A BANK ACCOUNT OR CREDIT CARD IN AMERICA WITHOUT THOSE 'INSTITUTIONS' DOUBLE- OR TRIPLE-CHECKING PROOF OF IDENTITY, LOOKING FOR IDENTITY THEFT, WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.
TIF THE BANKS, ETC, DID SO, THEN THE BANKS AND CARD COMPANIES SHOULD SUE THE DOJ FOR DEFAMATION, OR MAYBE JUST FOR POINTING OUT TO ALLOF US WHAT MISERABLE SECURITY FAILURES THEY ARE?

IF WHAT THE DOJ ALLEGES, IF IT'S AS EASY AS THAT TO FOOL BANKS AND CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, MAYBE WE SHOULD GO BACK TO BURYING OUR MONEY IN MASON JARS IN OUR BACK YARDS.

SINCE THE DOJ WAS KIND ENOUGH TO STATE THAT STEIN, SANDERS AND CLINTON SUPPORTERS ALSO 'FELL FOR THE RUSE OF THE RUSSIANS, WHEN MIGHT WE EXPECT MUELLER AND OTHER WITCH-HUNTERS TO INDICT SOME FROM THE HILLARY TEAM, SOME SANDERS PEOPLE OR THE GULLIBLE IN STEIN'S CREW?
IF THOSE WERE DUPED 'UNKNOWINGLY', MAYBE THE SAME CAN BE SAID OF THE TRUMP GANG?

WHEN WILL HILLARY BE INDICTED FOR THE URANIUM 1 DEAL WITH RUSSIA?
OR BECAUSE SHE BOUGHT A PARTIALLY RUSSIAN-PREPARED DOCUMENT WITH WHICH SHE HOPED TO HANG TRUMP?

THAT THE FBI MAY HAVE USED WHAT RUSSIANS TOLD THAT BRIT "SPY" TO OBTAIN FISA COURT WARRANTS FOR WIRETAPPING TRUMP TOWER, ETC, SHOULD HAVE NEGATED THIS ENTIRE MUELLER WITCH HUNT.
WE TAXPAYERS WOULDN'T BE OUT BILLIONS ON A POINTLESS "INVESTIGATION". 

HAD HILLARY SIMPLY HAVE GRACIOUSLY CEDED DEFEAT AND MOVED ON IN HER LIFE, HAD HER SUPPORTERS TAKEN THE ADVICE SO MANY GAVE TRUMP SUPPORTERS WHEN THEY THOUGHT HILLARY WAS A SHOO-IN AS PREZ, TO JUST ACCEPT THE RESULTS AND MOVE ON, WE WOULDN'T BE WHERE WE ARE TODAY WITH CRAZY PEOPLE ALL ACROSS AMERICA STILL TRYING TO FIND A WAY TO MAKE HILLARY QUEEN.

AND MAYBE THE DOJ WOULD BE PREPARING ANEW SET OF INDICTMENTS FOR TEAM HILLARY, INCLUDING THEIR WOULD-BE QUEEN?

 THE LOSERS CAN HOPE THAT THE  DOJ WILL ASSIGN THE SAME HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT THE TASK OF PREPARING THOSE INDICTMENTS.
(I DON'T THINK WE'LL SEE SUCH INDICTMENTS IN MY LIFETIME.)

IF ANYONE CAN TOP THE FAILURE OF THIS INDICTMENT TO CONTAIN ABSOLUTE PROVABLE FACTS OR TOP IT FOR DRIVEL, I'LL BE ALMOST IMPRESSED.
GOOD LUCK, KID.

AS FOR THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, THEY DON'T WANT JUSTICE, THEY WANT TRUMP OUT, AS DOES THE FBI.
THE DOJ MADE A FATAL ERROR ON THIS ONE.
THEY IMAGINED THAT AMERICANS ARE DUMBER THAN DIRT.
WE'RE NOT.

YOU CAN "FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME AND SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME", BUT THE DOJ HAS PERHAPS LEARNED THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO FOOL THE BRAIN-DEAD?
WE SEE THROUGH THIS SCHEME.
AND AN AWAKENING AMERICA IS ABOUT TO SEE MORE CLEARLY THAN EVER BEFORE.







___________

[FORGIVE ME HERE, BUT I HAD TO SWITCH OFTEN TO ALL-CAPS DUE TO EYE STRAIN AND TO HASTEN AN END TO THIS POST WITHOUT SQUINTING AND CORRECTING TYPOS EVERY PARAGRAPH. READ IT OR DON'T, BUT I WON'T BE PUBLISHING ANY COMMENTS BITCHING ABOUT ALL-CAPS.]


//WW

Friday, February 9, 2018

FUKUSHIMA RADIATION SPIKES AGAIN. IT IS A GLOBAL THREAT AND MUST BE STOPPED.







Record high fatal radiation levels, hole in reactor detected at crippled Fukushima plant   
Feb. 2, 2017

I HAVE TRIED FOR DAYS TO POST THIS AND WILL KEEP TRYING UNTIL IT ALL POSTS OR THEY HAUL MY OLD BODY OUT OF THIS CABIN.
I ASK YOU TO FORGIVE HOW IT POSTS WHENEVER IT DOES.
I AM WEARY, IT HAS BEEN A HARD FEW DAYS HERE.
THE 'FORMATTING' AND 'PRESENTATION' BE HANGED, AND TO HELL WITH TYPOS AND ANYTHING ELSE BUT THE TRUTH THAT THIS IS HOW IT IS, NOTHING NEAR FUKUSHIMA  IS "BETTER" AND WHAT IS THERE IS SPREADING ALL OVER PLANET EARTH, ENCROACHING UPON US ALL LITTLE-BY-LITTLE.

JUST READ THE WORDS OF THOSE STILL HOPING SOMEONE IN THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY CAN STOP THIS, CAN RESCUE THEM, THEIR CHILDREN, SAVE THEIR WORLD.

IF THIS IS MY FINAL POST, SO BE IT, BUT REMEMBER THESE PEOPLE AND SPREAD THEIR WORDS AND DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO MAKE IT ALL GO AWAY, TO PRESERVE WHAT CAN BE PRESERVED.

FUKUSHIMA IS REAL, IT'S AN ONGOING DISASTER, THE PEOPLE THERE NEED THE WORLD TO KNOW THE TRUTH SO MAYBE THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN TO OTHERS.

END THE LUNACY OF NUCLEAR "ENERGY", CITIZENS OF EARTH.
SAVE YOURSELVES, PLEASE.

//WW




Radiation leaks at Fukushima pose a global threat

4th Feb 2018


https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/radiation-leaks-at-fukushima-pose-a-global-threat/3326417/


LETHAL levels of radiation have been detected at Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant, seven years after its destruction by an earthquake and tsunami.

The Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), which is responsible for the plant clean-up, made the discovery in a reactor containment vessel last month.

The energy firm found eight sieverts per hour of radiation, and 42 units were also detected outside its foundations.

A sievert is defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection as the probability of cancer induction and genetic damage from exposure to a dose of radiation.

One sievert is thought to carry a 5.5 per cent chance of eventually developing cancer.

Experts told Japanese state broadcaster NHK World exposure to that volume of radiation for just an hour could kill, and another warned the leaks could lead to a "global" catastrophe if not tackled properly.

It came as Tepco said the problem of contaminated water - pooled around the plant's three reactors - seeping into the ground had caused a major headache in its efforts to decommission the plant.

Tepco has admitted it could be 2020 before the contamination issue is resolved. Only then can it move onto the second stage of removing nuclear debris at the site, including the damaged reactors.

Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit director Richard Black said the high levels of radiation found in and around the reactor last month were "expected" and unlikely to pose a danger.   

"Although the radiation levels identified are high, a threat to human health is very unlikely because, apart from workers at the site, no one goes there," he said.

"The high readings from fuel debris would be expected - the higher reading from the foundations, if confirmed, would be more of a concern as the cause is at present unclear. But as officials indicate, it might not be a genuine reading anyway.

"What this does demonstrate is that, seven years after the disaster, cleaning up the Fukushima site remains a massive challenge - and one that we're going to be reading about for decades, never mind years."

But Mycle Schneider, an independent energy consultant and lead author of the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, says that Tepco "hasn't a clue what it is doing" in its job to decommission the plant.

He added the contaminated water leaking at the site could end up in the ocean if the ongoing treatment project failed, causing a "global" disaster, he told The Independent.

"Finding high readings in the reactor is normal, it's where the molten fuel is, it would be bizarre if it wasn't," he said.

"I find it symptomatic of the past seven years, in that they don't know what they're doing, Tepco, these energy companies haven't a clue what they're doing, so to me it's been going wrong from the beginning. It's a disaster of unseen proportions."

Mr Schneider said the radiation leaks could have global consequences.

"This is an area of the planet that gets hit by tornadoes and all kinds of heavy weather patterns, which is a problem," he said.

"When you have waste stored above ground in inappropriate ways, it can get washed out and you can get contamination all over the place ... if it contaminates the ocean, there is no local contamination - the ocean is global, so anything that goes into the ocean goes to everyone."

He added: "It needs to be clear that this problem is not gone, this is not just a local problem. It's a very major thing."

The Independent contacted Tepco for comment, but the energy giant had not responded at the time of publication.         
Lethal radiation amounts still detected at crippled Fukushima plant 7yrs after disaster

Mirage News

An inspection of the Fukushima nuclear plant has detected extremely high amounts of radiation, says operator TEPCO. Just an hour of exposure would be lethal. A remote-controlled inspection detected 42 Sieverts (Sv) per hour of radiation outside the foundations of the crippled Unit 2 of the plant,

'Global Consequences' of Lethal Radiation Leak at Destroyed Japan Nuclear Plant

3 days ago -
Since the disaster, numerous studies and reports have emerged showing the operator's failures in handling the now-crippled plant.


IT WAS THE SAME LAST YEAR...
Feb 8, 2017
- The radiation levels at Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant are now at "unimaginable" levels.   
Radiation at Japan's Fukushima Reactor Is Now at 'Unimaginable levels'   


Fukushima - MSN.com


https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/topicpage?q=FUKUSHIMA     

6 days ago - Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lethal levels of radiation detected in leak seven years after plant meltdown in Japan.


Fushima December 27, 2017
FUKUSHIMA NCLEAR WASTE GROWS BIGGER EVERY DAY.
AND WITH MORE WASTE, THERE WILL BE MORE AND MORE RADIATION.  

http://www.dianuke.org/video-fukushima-nuclear-waste-crisis-getting-bigger-every-passing-day/

Adopting a return to normal policy, the Japanese government undertook an unprecedented decontamination program for areas of Fukushima contaminated by the triple reactor meltdown in March 2011. Fukushima prefecture is 70 percent mountainous forest which has not and cannot be decontaminated, with decontamination efforts focussed along roads and in towns, farmland and in narrow areas around peoples houses. The result has been that the Japanese authorities have produced a nuclear waste crisis, with over 7 million tons of waste located in 147,000 locations (as of August 2017). The Japanese government is determined to force people back to their homes despite the on-going radiation risks and the vast volumes of nuclear waste.  


WE'VE BEEN WARNED BY THOSE WHO ARE THERE SINCE 2011, BUT MANSTREAM MEDIA KEEPS SWEEPING THEIR CONCERNS AND THE HONEST FACTS UNDER THE RUG.
Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War: The Unspoken Crisis of ...
         https://www.asia-pacificresearch.com/fukushima...nuclear...nuclear-radiation/56277076 days ago - After the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, radioactive contamination of tea leaves and processed tea has been found over a wide area around Tokyo. (See 5 More Companies Detect Radiation In Their Tea Above Legal Limits Over 300 KM From Fukushima,

Scandal: Japan Forces Top Official To Retract Prime Minister’s Revelation Fukushima Permanently Uninhabitable


Emergency Special Report: Japan’s Earthquake, Hidden Nuclear Catastrophe
– by Yoichi Shimatsu – 2011-03-13

The tendency to deny systemic errors – "in order to avoid public panic" – is rooted in the determination of an entrenched Japanese bureaucracy to protect itself.

An Unexpected Mortality Increase in the US Follows Arrival of Radioactive Plume from Fukushima, Is there a Correlation?
– by Dr. Joseph J. Mangano, Dr. Janette Sherman – 2011-12-20

Radioactive rain causes 130 schools in Korea to close — Yet rain in California had 10 TIMES more radioactivity


AS ONE PERSON COMMENTED ON THE DIANUKE WEBSITE:
"The conventional medical-dental industries and the nuclear-military industries (=the radiation cartel) have been, for well over half a century , perpetually lying about, and minimizing, the true toxicity of ionizing radiation (e.g resorting to false sneaky comparisons between radiation exposure from sunlight or an airplane flight to a dental or medical x-ray or the exposure to nuclear fallout, etc. to deliberately deceive the unwitting public) to avoid culpability for the huge number of deaths and injuries that they're responsible for (discussed and well referenced in the book "The Mammogram Myth" by Rolf Hefti).
The distortions and disinformation about the alleged safety of (low dose) radiation or the purported lack of much harm to people, whether from medical x-rays or fallout from disaster sites such as Chernobyl or Fukushima, continues to this day. The real danger and damage caused by Chernobyl and Fukushima are much higher than the officialdom wants the public to believe."


HOW MANY WHO ARE RIGHT THERE IN THE CENTER OF THIS HAVE PLEADED WITH US FOR YEARS TO HELP THEM? HOW MANY PARENTS, JAPANESE PHYSICIANS, SCIENTISTS, JOURNALISTS, FARMERS, PEOPLE WHO LOVE THEIR COUNTRY, AND EVEN EX-PRIME MINISTERS, THREE OF THEM, HAVE TRIED TO MAKE IT CLEAR TO THE WORLD THAT THIS IS A NIGHTMARE WITH NO ENDING, AN ONGOING NUCLEAR DIASTER THAT WRAPS AROUND THE GLOBE?

BUT ABE, TEPCO, THE NUCLEAR 'ENERGY' GOONS ALL OVER THE WORLD HAVE MANAGED TO CONTROL THE PRESS, KEEP THE FACTS FROM BEING KNOWN, CALM THE MASSES, AND THEY CONTINUE TO SELL THE LIE THAT FUKUSHIMA IS FINE.

"COME, WORLD, COME TO THE SHINZO ABE OLYMPICS, BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE EXTINCTION EVENT KNOWN AS FUKUSHIMA'S DAI'ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. EAT THE TOXIC FOOOD, DRINK THE TOXIC WATER, BREATHE THE TOXIC AIR AND GO HOME AND WAIT FOR YOUR CANCERS TO DEVELOP."

BELOW, HERE, OTHERS WHO ARE STRUGGLING THERE IN JAPAN TODAY TRY AGAIN TO TELL US WHAT'S REALLY HAPPENING.
SOME OF THIS IS LENGTHY, SOME IS A BIT TECHNICAL, BUT READ WHAT THEY SAID, PLEASE, IF ONLY TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEY TRIED TO WARN US.


Tokyo Not Fit For Human Habitation - YouTube

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb94rEERjpM


A MOTHER IN TOKYO PLEADS FOR HELP
Published on Jan 29, 2018


"I am standing here to tell you that the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe is not over. I evacuated to Kansai three years after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Where do you think I evacuated from? I evacuated from Tokyo. Do you know that Tokyo has serious radioactive contamination?? Tens of millions of people in East Japan live with radioactive contamination now.
My daughter was 5 years old at the time of the accident She was a cheerful and active girl. But after one year since the accident, her health conditions became bad and she was troubled by strange symptoms.
She told me, "Mommy, I feel so bad, I have no power, My hands hurt, my legs hurt, my body hurts."

In fact, my daughter became so sick that she could not live a normal life at all.
At that time I met a doctor who was working with the issue of radiation exposure in the metropolitan area. He said, if sick children are moved to the west away from contaminated eastern Japan, some of them might recover health.
According to his examinations after the accident, the number of white blood cells of children living in the metropolitan area was decreasing. And he added that neutrophils among white blood cells were particularly badly decreasing. And as we found out later, our two children also had the same condition.
Today, the doctor is saying that for every ten children in Tokyo, nine of them have below standard numbers of neutrophils.
When I consulted the doctor about my daughter, he clearly stated that she was affected by the radiation exposure.
And he gave me advice to move my daughter.

In any case, I tried to move my sick daughter out of Tokyo.
Whenever we stayed in a place where there was no radioactive contamination, she became very well. But when we returned to Tokyo, she became sick again. We did not have the option to stay in Tokyo, we just fled from Tokyo and came here.

Living in East Japan means living with many radioactive materials, and it is not a place where people can live in good health.
So, as evacuees from eastern Japan, we are calling for evacuation to West Japan.

Our existence here is not broadcasted on the radio nor published in newspapers. So, I am telling you about it now.
After the accident, we were told that radiation was not a problem and health damages would not occur. But it was not true.
Many of us have evacuated from East to West due to various health problems. Many people are getting sick today in East Japan. People are dying without noticing that it is due to radiation. Many Japanese can not face this nuclear catastrophe.

Now my daughter is 12 years old. She's healthy and enjoys everyday life. She has good friends and says she wants to continue living here forever.
My daughter wrote this , It says she wants to stay here with her friends forever.

She is very afraid that nuclear power plants now get restarted and may have another accident. If that happens, she will have to move away from here again. If another nuclear accident happens, she knows that she can not live in this country anymore.

And accidents are not the only ones that threaten her. This is a basic issue but after the accident, our government has not confined radioactive materials to one place.
On the contrary, our government has a policy of diluting toxic radioactive waste by mixing it with water, cement or other materials, and making it look harmless.

And the Japanese government now allows incineration of highly contaminated nuclear waste of up to 8000 Bq/kg, 80 times as high as before the Fukushima accident. It's all to reduce the enormous amount of nuclear waste. But as conscientious scientists say, we should never burn radioactive materials. It should never have been allowed.

We don’t seem to be able to stop this crazy, irresponsible way of our government.
I hope that my daughter can live in her beloved country where she was born and raised. Please try to know what is going on in Japan now.
We are telling the world that the nuclear disaster is far from being over."
https://www.facebook.com/100011331077...

In addition Dr Shigeru Mita closed his medical practice in Tokyo in 2014 and left the city, declaring it "not fit for human habitation" when he found that all his child patients of 10 years old and under had reduced neutrophils and other illnesses due to "chronic internal exposure to low dose ionising radiation":
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Tokyo_contami...


A JAPANESE CITIZEN AND SCIENTIST SHOWS US THE TRUTH
January 31, 2018

An appeal from Etsuji Watanabe, member of the Japanese anti-radiation citizen-scientist group ACSIR (Association for Citizens and Scientists Concerned about Internal Radiation Exposures)

Yuko Kato: Evacuee from Fukushima, member of the Kansai plaintiff group for compensation against TEPCO and government.

Ruiwen Song: Taiwanese freelance journalist

The Japanese government has created foreign language websites which provide the information about radiology in general and the radiological situation in Fukushima. Journalists around the world, our friends and acquaintances living abroad are continually asking us whether the information that these Japanese central and local government websites present to the international community is correct or not. The following is our answer.

[Question 1]
The stories uploaded on these websites give people the impression that worrying about radiation is unnecessary. As for this impression, has Fukushima now really become a safe place to live or visit?  

[Answer]
First of all, Japanese anti-nuclear activists and evacuees from contaminated areas in Fukushima and Kanto, have been warning people all over the world NEVER to trust what the Japanese government is saying about both radiology in general and the specific radiological health effects caused by the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster (hereafter Fukushima accident) following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami on March 11th, 2011.

Prime-minister Shinzo Abe and the Japanese government as a whole including Fukushima prefectural government have repeatedly declared that "with regard to health-related problems (of the Fukushima accident), I (Abe) will state in the most emphatic and unequivocal terms that there have been no problems until now, nor are there any at present, nor will there be in the future." (Abe’s statement at a news conference). See the Japanese government website below.
http://japan.kantei.go.jp/96_abe/statement/201309/07argentine_naigai_e.html

 This claim is completely fabricated and false. In making these claims, the Japanese government is blatantly ignoring the vast number of studies in radiological sciences and epidemiology that have been accumulating historically. By engaging in this behavior, the Japanese government has been systematically deceiving the public, both nationally and internationally.

Just think of the amount of radioactivity released during the Fukushima accident. As you know, one of the standards used to assess the extent of radioactive releases and longtime human health effects is the levels of cesium 137 (Cs137) released into the environment. Based on the Japanese government data (which is an underestimate), the Fukushima accident released 168 times the Cs137 discharged by the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. This amount is almost the equivalent to the total atmospheric nuclear explosions conducted by the United States on the Nevada test ground. The Nevada desert is not designated as a residential area, but the Japanese government has recommended evacuated residents return to live in areas with radiation levels of up to 20 mSv/year. By removing economic support for evacuees, the Japanese government has forced many people who had evacuated from these areas to return.

We estimate that in the Fukushima accident approximately 400-600 times the Cs137 were released into the atmosphere by the atomic bomb blast in Hiroshima. Roughly 20% of the Cs137, or 80-120 Hiroshima-equivalents, were deposited on Japan. Of this, the decontamination efforts have only been able to retrieve five Hiroshima-equivalents. The waste from decontamination efforts is typically stored all over Fukushima mostly in mountainous heaps of large plastic bags. This means that 75-115 Hiroshima-equivalents of Cs137 still remain in Fukushima, surrounding prefectures, and all over Japan.

In addition, the Japanese government is now planning to reuse the retrieved contaminated soil under 8000Bq/kg in public works projects all over Japan. This self-destructive program has now been partially started without any announcements as to where the contaminated soil are and will be reused, under the pretext of "avoiding damage caused by harmful rumors". This project is tantamount to scattering lethal fallout of Cs137 equivalent to about 5 times that of Hiroshima bomb all over Japan. The Japanese government is literally behaving like a nuclear terrorist.

Do you really imagine that Fukushima prefecture and surrounding areas, contaminated as they are to levels similar to the Nevada test site, is really a safe place for people to permanently live, or for foreign tourists to visit and go sightseeing?

Regrettably, we must conclude that it is not, for either residents or tourists the situation in Fukushima is not safe.


[Question 2]
These websites also point out that the international annual dose limit for the public is at 1mSv, but this level is easily exceeded by only one CT-scan, insinuating that this 1mSv standard is set too low and thus not a useful indicator.
 
[Answer]
CT-Scans are often cited as if they had no radiation risks, But this is not true. A recent study clearly shows that every CT-scan (about 4.5mSv irradiation) increases the risk of cancers in children by 24%. See the website below.
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2360
In Fukushima the allowable level of radiation per year for residents is now 20mSv. Can you imagine having 4-5 CT-scans every year?
  
[Question 3]
One of the websites states: "In Fukushima, the indoor radiation doses are now so reduced that no radioactive cesium can be found in the air. Therefore, no radioactive particles can invade the human body during breathing." What do you think of this statement?

[Answer]
The Japanese government also ignores the long term peril caused by "hot particles" ――micron-and- nano-sized radioactive particulates――which, if inhaled or absorbed into the human body, may lead to many kinds of cancers and other diseases including cardiac failure. We should consider internal irradiation to the cells near the radiation sources to be 500 times more dangerous than external irradiation because particles inside the body radiates very near or even inside cells, causing intensive damage to DNAs and other cell organs such as mitochondria.

[Question 4]
These websites explain that there exists not only artificial but also natural radioactivity, thus people are living in an environment surrounded by radiation all the time in everyday life.

[Answer]
One of the main tactics that the Japanese government often uses to propagate the "safety of low level irradiation" is to compare artificial radioactivity with natural radioactivity. But this logic is a methodological sleight of hand. It is crystal-clear that even exposure to natural radioactivity has its own health risks. Cancers sickened and killed people long before artificial radioactivity was used. For example, Seishu Hanaoka, one of the founders of Japan’s medicine, carried out 152 breast cancer surgeries from 1804 to 1836.  

Both kinds of radioactivity have their own health risks. Risks caused by artificial radioactivity should not be compared but be added to the natural radioactivity risks as they both lead to the accumulation of exposure.
  
For example, potassium 40 (K40) is a typical natural radioactive nuclide. According to the Japanese government, the average internal exposure dose for adults from K40 is about 4,000Bq/year or 0.17mSv/year. See the website below (in Japanese).
http://www.kantei.go.jp/saigai/pdf/g31_siryou5.pdf
    
The ICRP risk model (2007) allows us to estimate the approximate risk posed by K40. The calculation shows that K40 is responsible for approximately 4,000 cancer cases and 1,000 deaths every year. If the same amount of radiation was added to that of K40 in the human body by artificial sources, the cancers and mortalities would be doubled to 8,000 and 2,000 a year, respectively. Based on the ECRR (2010) model, which criticizes the ICRP risk model as a severe underestimate, these figures should be multiplied by 40, reaching 320,000 and 80,000, respectively.
  
The extract you cite from the Fukushima government website is completely fake: "In Fukushima, the indoor radiation doses are now so reduced that no radioactive cesium can be found in the air. Therefore, no radioactive particles can invade the human body during respiration". Reports from civic radiation measurement stations refute this claim. For example, dust collecting paper packs of vacuum cleaners used in Iwaki City, Fukushima prefecture, are radiologically measured and 4,800-53,900Bq/kg radioactive cesium was detected in Oct-Dec 2015. See the website below (in Japanese).
http://www.iwakisokuteishitu.com/pdf/tsushin011.pdf
    
[Question 5]
One of the websites says that the Fukushima prefecture has conducted whole-body counter screenings of the 170,000 local population so far but cesium was rarely detected." Does this mean that we can safely consume food from Fukushima, and Fukushima residents are no longer being exposed internally to radiation?
    
[Answer]
This is a typical example of demagogy by the Japanese government: vague expressions lacking specific data, using the words "safe and secure" without clear explanation. In reality, the government has not publicized any data indicating serious irradiation of the population. For example, you mentioned the Fukushima prefectural government website saying that whole-body counter screenings of 170,000 members of the local population have found radioactive Cs only in very few cases. However, the fact that no specific number is given makes the statement suspicious.
  
These statistics, more than likely, exclude many firefighters or other municipal employees who, at the time of accident, helped local residents evacuate from a lot of contaminated areas surrounding the defunct Fukushima plant. These people were subjected to serious radiation doses.
    
Civic groups’ efforts for the disclosure of information has recently prompted city officials near the defunct plant to disclose the fact that it conducted whole-body counter check-ups on about 180 firefighters, nurses and municipal employees. According to Koichi Ohyama, a member of the municipal assembly of Minami Soma, the screening conducted in July, 2011, showed almost all of these people tested positive in Cs. The maximum Cs137 dose among the firefighters was as high as 140,000 Bq. This data reveals a part of the reality of irradiation but it is only a tiny part.
    
[Question 6]
The government websites suggest that no health effects from irradiation have been reported in Fukushima. Is this true? Or have any symptoms appeared that indicate an increase in radiation-induced diseases in Fukushima?
    
[Answer]
One example is the outbreak of child thyroid cancer, but the Japanese government has been denying the relationship with irradiation from radioactive iodine released from the Fukushima disaster.
    
Japan’s population statistics reflect the health effects from the Fukushima disaster radioactivity. The following data clearly show that diseases increasing in Fukushima are highly likely to have been radiation-induced.
    
[Question 7] The Fukushima prefecture website says, "After the Fukushima accident, the Japanese government has introduced the provisional standards for radioactive iodine and cesium. The Fukushima prefectural government subsequently strictly regulated distribution and consumption of food with levels of radioactivity exceeding the provisional standards. Now we have had this new much stricter standard. The distribution and consumption of food exceeding this new standard has been continuously regulated; therefore any food on the market is safe to consume." Is it true?
    
[Answer] As for food contamination, the Japanese government has also tried to cover up the real picture. First, the current government standard for radioactivity in food, 100Bq/kg, is dangerously high for human health, especially for fetuses, infants, children and pregnant women. Even six and a half years after the accident, the Agriculture Ministry of Japan as well as many civic radioactivity measurement stations all over the country have reported many food contamination cases, although the frequency is evidently reduced.
     
The Japanese government has underestimated the danger presented by internal irradiation. But, we must consider two important factors. (1) The wide range of difference in personal radio-sensitivity. According to Professor Tadashi Hongyo (Osaka University Medical Faculty), the maximum difference is as wide as 100 times in terms of biological half-life of Cs137. (2) Recent studies denying that the so-called biological half-life decrease curve actually exists. According to the new model, daily food contamination can cause concentrations to accumulate as time passes. Even a daily 1Bq internal radiation dose from food cannot be safe for human health (details below).
    
Our recommendation is to be cautious of food or produce from Fukushima and the surrounding areas, and, even if contamination levels are said to have now generally decreased, to avoid jumping to the conclusion that all the food is fit to eat.
   
[Question 8] We would like to ask about the situations in prefectures surrounding Fukushima. A television program once reported, "As for the safety of Tochigi and Gunma prefectures, few people are raising concern about health effects of radiation." Is it true that the prefectures somewhat distant from the Fukushima Daiichi plant are now safe with no human risk?
    
[Answer] Regarding the radioactive contamination in prefectures surrounding Fukushima, you can refer to the following website.
http://www.gowest-comewest.net/statement/20170825english.html
This article examines the contamination in the Tokyo metropolitan area, but conditions are the same or more serious in Tochigi or other prefectures north of Tokyo, nearer to the defunct Fukushima Daiichi plant.
     
Another example is the statistics of stillbirth and neonatal mortality in Fukushima and the surrounding five prefectures (Tochigi, Gunma, Ibaragi, Miyagi, Iwate) shown below.
      
Perinatal mortality in not only Fukushima prefecture but also neighboring prefectures rose 15.6% just 10 months after the accidents. This clearly indicates the existence of some kind of human health damage from radiation.
     
[Question 9] We would like to ask about the decontamination efforts by famers living in Fukushima and neighboring prefectures. Should we think highly of the farmers measuring the amount of radiation deposited on the surface of soil to create radiation maps for farms, or washing the radiation from the surface of every single tree off the radiation with high-pressure washers? The farmers said that while these methods have been shown to be radiologically effective, their produce did not sell well, because consumers are still feeling anxious about health risks. Does the problem of radioactive food contamination in Japan just end up in whether each consumer personally believes it safe or not?
      
[Answer] We must raise a question that, despite the government’s decontamination efforts, a huge amount of radioactive materials deposited in mountainous areas remain untouched. Now they are re-dispersing and re-depositing over wide areas of Fukushima and surrounding prefectures via winds, cars, trains, river water, pollen, spores, emissions from incinerators, in the form of radioactive dusts and particulates, among many others. For an example, see the following website.
http://www2.jpgu.org/meeting/2015/PDF2015/M-AG38_all_e.pdf


So I regret to say that, although these farmers’ endeavors you mentioned are very precious and respectable, they are not sufficient to completely eliminate the risk of radiation exposure from food. The problem exists objectively in the nuclear materials deposited on and in soil, algae, plants, houses, buildings, forests, animal and human bodies, not subjectively in the consumers’ sentiment or psychology.
    
[Question 10] Japanese experts have recently pitched a cultivation method that can remove cesium by intensive use of potassium fertilizer. Is this method effective at all? Do you have any doubt about their claims?
     
[Answer] They seem to be among those experts who have been criticizing the general public’s tendency to demand "zero irradiation risk" as an obstacle to Fukushima reconstruction.
     
As you know, cesium (Cs) has chemically similar characteristics to potassium (K). So it is true that higher levels of application of potassium fertilizer lowers the plant’s absorption, and therefore concentration, of radioactive Cs, decreasing Cs137/134 concentrations in produce, often to below the government standard of 100Bq/kg. But the following problems remain: (1) This procedure can prevent Cs transfer from the soil to produce only partly, not completely; (2) This process raises the potassium concentration in the produce and therefore heightens the burdens on certain human organs such as kidneys, the heart and the nervous system, causing new health risks; (3) Heightened concentration of potassium also leads to the heightened concentration of radioactive K40, so the reduced risk of radioactive Cs lead to an increased risk of internal irradiation by K40.
    
[Question 11] Even if cesium concentration was reduced by applying more potassium fertilizer than usual, strontium contamination would remain. In Japanese government’s international press campaign as to the Fukushima accident, almost nothing has been said about strontium. If you have any information on strontium contamination, let us know.
     
[Answer] We regret that the information about strontium that you are asking for is very limited and searching for it is also a challenge for us. The Japanese government and research institutes under the government have reported very limited data regarding strontium contamination. But it is important that the Japanese government admits the fact of strontium contamination within 80km from the defunct Fukushima plant. See the website below.
http://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/ja/contents/6000/5048/24/5600_110930_rev130701.pdf

   
The US Department of Energy data on the strontium contamination of soil in Japan and its visualization (in Japanese) can be seen on the websites below.
https://energy.gov/downloads/us-doennsa-response-2011-fukushima-incident-data-and-documentation
       
[Question 12] Some Japanese experts say, "the Japanese government has declared that no health effects from irradiation below 100mSv (or 100mSv/year) have been confirmed." Some farmers have established a private food standard of 20Bq/kg, much lower than the Japanese government standard of 100Bq/kg. Do you think that doses under 100mSv or under 20Bq/kg are safe and secure?
      
[Answer] As you mentioned, the Japanese government claims that no scientific studies verify that irradiation of 100mSv or less poses a threat to human health, suggesting that irradiation under 100mSv has no risk. This, however, is false. The government is fabricating this information. In fact, very many scientific studies have already confirmed and proven health effects induced by irradiation under 100mSv. For example, see the websites below.
            
Background Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-Based Nationwide Cohort Study

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1408548/
   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198200
   
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2360
   
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766784
   
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050947/
   
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696975/
    

 The Japanese government is using the term "100mSv" in a deliberately ambiguous and confusing manner. The expression 100mSv can have three meanings: (1) a one-time irradiation dose, (2) cumulative irradiation doses, or (3) annual irradiation doses. So 100mSv is not the same as, nor equal to the 100mSv/year that you mentioned in parenthesis. The latter amounts to a 1Sv in cumulative dose over 10 years (which is an up to 10% lethal dose), and 5Sv over 50 years (which is a 50% lethal dose). The present government standard for evacuees to return, 20mSv/year, means that living there for 5 years leads to a cumulative dose of 100mSv, at which the Japanese government admits clear health risks.
      
Regarding 20Bq/kg as some farmers’ private food standard, it is critical to pay serious attention to the extraction process of Cs from tissues. Japanese-Canadian non-organic biochemist Eiichiro Ochiai points out in his book "Hiroshima to Fukushima, Biohazards of Radiation" (2014) that, based on the Leggett model, the Cs concentration injected in tissues at one time diminishes relatively quickly for about 10 days in most tissues. After that, processes slow down, tending to become steady. He writes: the decrease of the overall Cs level in the body does not follow an exponential decay curve (p.83). This means that consecutive intake of Cs, even in very low levels, results in the accumulation of Cs in the body. (Incidentally, Ochiai’s book can be downloaded for free from the website below.)
https://archive.org/details/HiroshimaToFukushima
     
Regarding the Leggett model, see the website below.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14630424


Yuri Bandazhevsky considers over 10Bq/kg of radioactive Cs concentrations in the body to be unsafe because even this low level can possibly cause abnormal electrocardiographic pattern in babies, metabolic disorders, high blood pressure, cataracts, and so on.
    
Therefore, we can conclude unequivocally that neither the irradiation under 100mSv nor the privately set 20Bq/kg food standard are safe and secure."


LISTEN TO THOSE WHO ARE THERE.
READ EVERYTHING YOU CAN FIND ABOUT THIS. 

WE LEARN OR WE PERISH.


ALL THE BEST AND THANK YOU ALL FOR READING HERE OVER THE YEARS.
I AM HUMBLY GRATEFUL. 
.



__________________

ADDENDUM:

PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING:


1- YOU IN THE E.U., BE VERY AWARE OF THIS, FOR WHEN IT IS ALLOWED, RADIOACTIVE FOODS WILL LIKELY NOT BE LABELED AS COMING FROM THE AFFECTED PROVINCES IN JAPAN.
ONCE RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES ARE INGESTED OR INHALED, THEY WILL AFFECT YOU FOR YEARS AND WILL HARM YOUR DNA.


2-
Radioactive leak at Indira Gandhi International Airpor's cargo terminal 

A leak of radioactive substance, which had come from Turkey, was detected at the cargo complex of the Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) here .

DID THE MADMAN ERDOGAN TAKE NUKES FROM THE AMERICAN BASE HE HELD HOSTAGE THERE FOR DAYS? IS THAT WHAT WAS IN THIS "CARGO"? IS THAT WHY THE U.S. IS CATERING TO HIS EVERY DEMAND SINCE HE RAIDED OUR AIRBASE THERE?
REMEMBER WHAT WE LEARNED YEARS AGO ABOUT THE U.S. MILITARY HAVING "SUITCASE NUKES". RESEARCH THAT.
QUESTION EVERYTHING! 


3- YOU IN THE U.S., WATCH THIS WEBSITE AND READ YOUR FOOD LABELS.
THE FDA IS COMPLICIT WITH MANY, WHOEVER OFFERS THEM THE MOST $$$ GARNERS THE MOST "FAVORS".
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_621.html
Import Alert 99-33
Published Date: 01/24/2018    
Revisions to this Import Alert dated January 23, 2018 is to add Koshiabura under the listing for the NIIGATA PREFECTURE, which was inadvertently omitted from the 11/20/2017 revision.
     
4-
Experts doubt lifting of Japan food ban 
    
Jan 11, 2018 - Many countries and regions, including China, the U.S., South Korea, Singapore and the EU, have curbed imports of food products from areas near the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant over fears of potential contamination, although some have recently eased their restrictions.

5- AMERICAN COMPANIES CAN USE FOODS FROM JAPAN AND NOT HAVE TO LABEL IT AS COMING FROM JAPAN. THEY CAN THEN EXPORT THOSE FOOD ITEMS ANYWHERE ON EARTH.
WHAT YOU MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT U.S. FOOD LABELING LAW CAN HARM YOU.


"Under §304 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1304), every imported item must be conspicuously and indelibly marked in English to indicate to the "ultimate purchaser" its country of origin." According to the U.S. Customs, generally defined the "ultimate purchaser" is the last U.S. person who will receive the goods in the form in which it was imported.  

However, if the goods are destined for a U.S. based processor where they will undergo "substantial transformation", then that processor or manufacturer is considered the ultimate purchaser. The law authorizes exceptions to labeling requirements, such as for articles incapable of being marked or where the cost would be "economically prohibitive." 

 This does not apply to food 'processed' in the US with ingredients from other countries. Processed food includes milk, juice, dry foods and dietary supplements/vitamins. FDA website states: 1. An imported product, such as shrimp, is peeled, deveined and incorporated into a shrimp dish, such as "shrimp quiche." The product is no longer identifiable as shrimp but as "quiche." The quiche is a product of the US. So labeling it as "product of the USA" would not be a violation of the FFD&C Act. (Whether or not it violates *CBP’s* requirements would need to be asked.) 2. An imported product, such as shrimp, is peeled and deveined. It is labeled as "Imported by" or "Distributed by" a firm in the USA. Such labeling would not violate the FFD&C Act, but it would not meet the *CBP’s* requirement for country of origin labeling. The product would also have to be clearly identified as to country of origin. 

In 2009, the Canadian government launched a challenge to mCOOL at the
World Trade Organization (WTO).[4] The Canadian federal government argued before the WTO that American "country of origin" labelling rules (COOL) actually worked to the detriment of the meat industry on both sides of the border by increasing costs, lowering processing efficiency and otherwise distorting trade across the Canada-U.S. border. Mexico made similar claims.
  
In 2011, Canada said the WTO ruled in Canada's favor.
[5] The US said the panel affirmed the right of the United States to require country of origin labeling for meat products.[6] Canada and Mexico are asking the WTO for another review and permission to impose more than $2 billion a year in retaliatory tariffs, and the governments involved will be notified confidentially of the WTO decision on June 20, which will be made public a month later.[7][needs update]

  
In May 2015, the WTO upheld its previous ruling that the U.S. COOL requirements discriminated against Canadian and Mexican livestock.
[8] The two countries asked the WTO to authorize US$3 billion in retaliatory tariffs against U.S. imports.[8] In December 2015, the WTO determined the impact of the COOL requirements on the Canadian and Mexican economies at $1.1 billion and authorized Canada and Mexico to impose $781 million and $228 million, respectively, in retaliatory tariffs against U.S. imports.[8]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-9"[9]
    

OTHER THINGS I FOUND WHILE RESEARCHING FOR THIS ARTICLE THAT ARE ALSO IMPORTANT TO KEEP AN EYE ON:
Live Jet stream wind map of world radiation Fallout USA Healthy


 Jan 27, 2018 - "Did you know today is a bad day to be outside did your front page mention the heavy amount of radioactive particles in the air today that came from the death plumes from Fukushima 4 days ago?
It took The soviet union 500,000 workers to decommission Chernobyl.
Chernobyl was much smaller and was only 30 % melted down.
Fukushima has 3 reactors complete meltdowns that ran on mox fuel.. Enriched uranium weapons grade. Doing the math it would take 5 million kamikazes to save the world."


Russian navy detected 2 nuclear explosions underneath Fukushima Diaechi Japan nuclear reactors. The first blast was over a size 5, the second detonation was around a 3.8. Moscow has classified "Fukushima" as a top priority.


URANIUM 'BUCKY BALLS' ARE STILL CROSSING THE PACIFIC FROM JAPAN.
http://miami-water.com/blog/3379/scientists-baffled-in-breaking-the-bucky-ball-radioactive-encased-carbon-particles/


Concrete Nuclear Dome Is LEAKING RADIOACTIVE Waste Into The ...

3 days ago - The nuclear waste dome on Runit Island northeast of Australia is leaking. The site is pouring nuclear radioactive waste from 43 tests directly into the ocean 



A new branch of chemistry must emerge to understand this composite carbon encased particle and its properties and behavior. It will take decades for bio science to begin to comprehend the cellular effects of the FBB.
Japan’s population declines by record 244,000 in 2013

"America's Chernobyl": The Hanford Site, a Beautiful Disaster - Seven ...   

Jan 7, 2018 - It was late 1942, and the future officer in charge of the Hanford nuclear site on Washington's Columbia River, Colonel Franklin T. Matthias, was high above ... project, and the very real possibility of contaminating nearby Knoxville with radioactive material, that the project should be moved further west to a more remote area.]]]

"One Typhoon Away From Full Breach" - US Nuke-Test Dome Leaking






 








//WW












Tuesday, February 6, 2018

HANFORD NUCLEAR SITE LEAKING HIGH RADIATION LEVELS AGAIN




NOTHING CONTAINING THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF NUCLEAR WASTE AT HANFORD CAN LAST UNTIL THE ESTIMATED DATES FOR THE SITE TO BE CLEANED UP. STORAGE TANKS, CONCRETE, EVERYTHING IS CRUMBLING FROM THE RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORED IN THEM.

AND NOW, YET ANOTHER LEAK OF PLUTONIUM AND AMERICIUM.
 

ABOVE: THIS IS HOW THEY STORE RADIOACTICVE WATER AT HANFORD, IN DUMPSTERS WITH TARP COVERINGS, AND DUMP THEM THEY HAVE...ILLEGALLY.

THE WORLD CAN LOOK AT AMERICA'S FAILURE, THE HANFORD NUCLEAR 'SUPER SITE" IN WASHINGTON STATE, AND SEE WHAT WE FACE WITH FUKUSHIMA'S DISASTER.

DECADES OF INTENTIONAL DEADLY RELEASES OF RADIATION IN 'TESTS' AND "VENTINGS", CARELESS HANDLING OF NUCLEAR WASTE, FOLLOWED BY MORE DECADES OF EVER-GROWING LEAKS, WHILE WORKERS AND RESIDENTS DOWNWIND AND DOWNSTREAM DIE, YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR.

LAST MONTH, AND CONTINUING INTO THIS MONTH, NEW HIGH LEVELS OF ALPHA RADIATION FROM PLUTONIUM AND AMERICIUM HAVE BEEN DETECTED WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS OF HANFORD, LEVELS EXCEEDING WHAT THE FEDS ALLOW BY FROM 5 TO 10 TIMES.

WHAT IS NEVER ADDRESSED BY PROPONENTS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY IS THAT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT ALLOWS DOESN'T ADDRESS BIOACCUMULATION.
IT ONLY ADDRESSES WHAT'S ALLOWED FOR A YEAR FROM MEASURABLE ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION.

RADIATION SETTLES INTO SOIL, FALLS IN RAIN, GETS INTO WATER SUPPLIES, CAN BE MEASURED IN CROPS, IN MILK FROM BOTH ANIMALS AND HUMANS, ON SURFACES, IN ROADSIDE DITCHES, IN PUDDLES.
WHEN HUMANS ARE EXPOSED LIKE THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR, WHAT'S ALLOWED IS EXCEEDED MANY TIMES OVER.

HANFORD'S DARK HISTORY...

For 40 years plutonium buttons for nuclear warheads were manufactured inside the PFP.

Hanford is not a nuclear power plant.
It is a 586 square mile federally owned, decommissioned nuclear weapons facility near Richland, Washington, a town built for Hanford scientists and workers.

From 1943 to 1988 workers produced plutonium for the secret Manhattan Project and later to bolster the country’s nuclear stockpile throughout the Cold War.

During that period, the project expanded to include nine nuclear reactors and five large plutonium processing complexes, which produced plutonium for most of the more than 60,000 weapons built for America's. nuclear arsenal.

Since 1988, Hanford has been a nuclear clean up site only, HOWEVER, besides the cleanup project, Hanford also hosts a commercial nuclear power plant, the Columbia Generating Station, and various centers for scientific research and development, such as the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the LIGO Hanford Observatory. 

Since 2003, radioactive materials are known to be leaking from Hanford into the environment.

Hanford is considered the most contaminated place in the Western Hemisphere.

Decades of manufacturing left behind (AT THAT TIME) 53 million U.S. gallons (200,000 m3) of high-level radioactive waste stored within 177 storage tanks, an additional 25 million cubic feet (710,000 m3) of solid radioactive waste, and 200 square miles (520 km2) of contaminated groundwater beneath the site.

An enormous volume of water from the Columbia River was required to dissipate the heat produced by Hanford's nuclear reactors. From 1944 to 1971, pump systems drew cooling water from the river and, after 'treating' this water, returned it to the river.

Before its release into the river, the used water was held in large tanks known as retention basins for up to six hours.

Long-lived isotopes are not affected by this retention, and several terabecquerels entered the river every day.
The federal government kept knowledge about these radioactive releases secret.

Radiation was later measured 200 miles (320 km) downstream as far west as the Washington and Oregon coasts, which means the Pacific Ocean was also contaminated by Hanford.   

Were coastal residents warned?
NO.  
NOR WERE PEOPLE DOWNWIND OR DOWNSTREAM... FOR DECADES.
 

The plutonium separation process resulted in the release of radioactive isotopes into the air, which were carried by the wind throughout southeastern Washington and into parts of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and British Columbia.

Downwinders were exposed to radionuclides, particularly iodine-131, with the heaviest releases during the period from 1945 to 1951.

These radionuclides entered the food chain; hazardous fallout was ingested by communities who consumed radioactive food and milk unaware of the danger.

In 2007, the Hanford site represented 60% of high-level radioactive waste by volume managed by the U.S. Department of Energy.

THIS ONE SITE COSTS TAXPAYERS OVER A BILLION DOLLARS TO 'MAINTAIN' EVERY YEAR.
AND THEN THERE'S WHAT WE'RE PAYING PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR CLEANUP BUT WHO HAVEN'T MANAGED TO CLEAN UP ANYTHING IN ALL THESE YEARS. 

AS TIME REPORTED IN 2015:
"Corporate contractors hired to clean up Hanford have made hundreds of millions of dollars in fees and surcharges, and, since little has been accomplished, the tab promises to mount for decades. Since 1991, the US Department of Energy has missed every target for remediation of Hanford’s deadly nuclear waste. Highly radioactive fluids are seeping toward the Columbia River watershed, while in the past two years 54 clean-up workers have fallen ill from mysterious toxic vapors.

THE D.O.E. DOESN'T CARE ABOUT HUMAN WELFARE, JUST NUKES.
Last fall, seeking to finally get some action, Washington State sued the DOE to speed up the timeline and make the project safer—but, on Dec. 5, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice rejected the request. The express schedule was too expensive, they said, despite the fact that the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration is planning to spend a trillion dollars in 30 years to create a new generation of more accurate, deadly weapons. In fact, the DOE spends more money now in real dollars on nuclear weapons than it did at the height of the Cold War.

(DO READ ALL OF TIME'S ARTICLE IF YOU GET A CHANCE.
SEE HOWTHE BOMB TOOK PRECEDENCE OVER OUR HEALTH AND SAFETY.)

NOBODY KNOWS WHAT WAS SIMPLY BURIED IN HOLES AND TRENCHES AT HANFORD BEFORE THE BIG NUKE BOYS DECIDED TO ADMIT HOW DEADLY THEIR WASTE AND THEIR 'PRODUCT' IS, AND HOW VERY, VERY LONG IT WILL POLLUTE EVERYTHING NEAR IT.

WHERE DID TIME, EROSION, CARELESSNESS TAKE ALL THAT HASTILY BURIED WASTE FROM THAT ERA?
NO ONE KNOWS.

ANY RECORDS OF WHAT WENT INTO THAT GROUND OR INTO THE COLUMBIA RIVER FROM HANFORD'S EARLY DAYS HAS EITHER BEEN "LOST" OR NEVER EXISTED.

IN AUGUST, 2017 ....
An Investigation is taking place at the Hanford nuclear facility in Washington state, after contractors were caught on film dumping thousands of gallons of radioactive liquid and attempting to bury the evidence at the site.

The dumping by WRPS workers happened in August and violated several state and federal laws.

Videos obtained by Seattle’s KING-TV investigators show workers at the Hanford facility’s Plutonium Finishing Plant dumping liquids from large metal containers with labels reading: “Caution: radioactive materials.”

The workers are employed by Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), the organization responsible for cleaning approximately 53 million gallons of high-level radioactive and chemical waste stored in the containers at Hanford. 

A contract shows the company would earn $58,333 for each hose that was removed, for a total of more than $1 million dollars, if they finished the project by September 30.
WRPS dumped the toxic liquid in order to meet their deadline, said Tom Carpenter, executive director at Hanford Challenge, a watchdog organization working to keep contractors working at the facility accountable.
“They are here for the money and that’s it,” Carpenter told KING. “This fee structure ignores human nature, which is to take shortcuts to get the money without any accountability unless they get caught.”

After seeing the recent footage of workers dumping the toxic waste at the site, state Representative Gerry Pollet  said, “It’s a crime. I’m convinced by looking at this that you’re witnessing a criminal violation of several statues, not just one.” 

In August, the company tested more than 300 workers, and found 20 percent tested positive for radiation contamination. 


WHICH BRINGS US TO LAST MONTH...From Seattle Times, 5 days ago.                
A state official, citing elevated readings of radiation across the Hanford site, sends a letter of concern to the federal Energy Department.


IT'S REAL. ANOTHER 'NEW' LEAK.

From U.S. NEWS and WORLD REPORT
Jan. 25, 2018

New Tests Show Hanford Workers Exposed to Radiation 

Hanford Nuclear Reservation - Special coverage at The Spokesman ... 

Jan 25, 2018
- More radioactive contamination triggers management change at Hanford. Tue., Jan. 30, 2018, 9:12 a.m.. The Department of Energy is replacing the managers of a critical radioactive clean-up project after the continued spread of contamination on the Hanford site.
HERE'S WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE NEWEST LEAKS:

February 4, 2018


The Washington State Department of Health has sent a
strongly worded letter of concern to the U.S. Energy Department about elevated readings of radioactive contamination that state monitoring has found across the Hanford Site.  

The highest measurements were in November and December, according to the letter sent Tuesday by Clark Halvorson, assistant secretary of the state Department of Health. Air samples, in some locations, had concentrations of americium and plutonium at five to 10 times federal emission standards for a yearlong exposure.  

The particles are assumed to be from a demolition project at a plutonium finishing plant, where work has been
suspended since December due to the spread of contamination.

 Since then, more than 270 workers concerned about their health have requested bioassays to test for radioactive exposure. Results released so far have covered 109 workers and found that two tested positive for having inhaled or ingested radioactive particles.

Halvorson’s five-page letter to the Energy Department said there is no indication of a health threat off the site, but "if work resumes without better controls a risk to the public may develop."


I'VE ASKED THIS BEFORE, BUT WHY DO THESE "OFFICIALS" PRETEND THAT RADIATION LEAKS JUST HOVER OVER THE NUKE SITES AND DON'T DRIFT DOWNWIND OR DOWNSTREAM, DON'T GET INTO OUR ATMOSPHERE AND RAIN DOWN ON SOME CITY FAR AWAY, DON'T ENTER WATER SOURCES, SOIL AND THEN ENTER OUR BODIES, OR THAT FALLOUT FROM ALLOWED DAILY "VENTINGS" DOESN'T AFFECT CROPS, ANIMALS, HUMANS THAT IT EVENTUALLY TOUCHES?

WHY LIE?
WHY PRETEND?

THE COMPLICITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT US AND THOSE WHO DON'T GIVE A DAMN IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IS CRIMINAL.
The letter reflects the more hands-on approach the state health department is taking amid concern over the federal response. Test results indicate the contamination spread over months of cleanup work at the
plutonium finishing plant.

 MONTHS!
THEY KNEW ABOUT IT FOR MONTHS, SO WHY DID THEY CONTINUE TO ALLOW IT FOR MONTHS?


BECAUSE THAT CRUMBLING CESSPOOL HAS BEEN LEAKING DEADLY PLUTONIUM AND OTHER RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS NOW.
THE DAMAGE IS ALREADY DONE AND CAN'T BE UNDONE.

THEY HAVE NO INTENTION OF ENFORCING ONE DAMNED THING.
FINES WILL BE PAID, MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL DIE, THE AREA AROUND HANFORD WILL BE TOXIC FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR AND FUND NUCLEAR "ENERGY". 

Americium and plutonium give off hard-to-detect alpha radiation.     
It was found up to 10 miles away from the demolition site, a spread Halvorson described as "troubling because of its greater potential for damage … in biological tissue and the potential for LIFELONG internal contamination.

His letter to Doug Shoop, manager of the Energy Department’s Richland Operations Office, requests that federal officials provide a lot of additional information, including worker bioassay results, to the state by March 9.


THE LETTER REMINDS SHOOP THAT CARS LEFT HANFORD IN DECEMEBER OF 2017 CARRYING ALPHA RADIATION THAT CONTAMINATED UNTOLD AREAS AROUND HANFORD.

IT STATES THAT ALPHA PARTICLES ARE HARD TO DETECT AND REMINDS SHOOP THAT...
"From a dosimetry perspective, spread of alpha contamination is troubling because of its GREATER potential for damage (per unit of energy deposited) in biological tissue and the potential for LIFELONG INTERNAL CONTAMINATION.
Allowing alpha contamination off-site is a serious and uncommon issue that we believe should be preventable through best management practices." (EMPHASIS/ALL CAPS, MINE.)

RADON GAS, SAME SITE, DIFFERENT GROUP OF WORKERS AFFECTED IN EARLY JANUARY.


Radon Gas Forces More Than 100 Hanford Workers To Move | KUOW ...

Jan 19, 2018 -
The discovery of an "overwhelming presence" of radon gas has forced more than 100 workers at the Hanford Site to move their offices Thursday. This follows a series of radioactive contamination issues at that same demolition project on the southeast Washington nuclear site.

IN MAY OF LAST YEAR, ANOTHER FAILURE AT HANFORD.

Tunnel collapses at Hanford nuclear waste site in Washington state ...  
May 9, 2017 - Hundreds of workers at the Department of Energy's Hanford nuclear site in Washington state had to “take cover” Tuesday morning after the collapse of 20-foot-long portion of a tunnel ... Many contaminated pieces of equipment, including the rail cars, have simply been left in the tunnels, he said.

JUST SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO THE CONTAMINATED CARS LEAVING THE SITE, ON JUNE 8, 2017, ANOTHER MAJOR LEAK, ANOTHER FAILURE, ANOTHER 'MISTAKE' BY THE CLOWNS PAID TO CLEAN UP THIS NUCLEAR GARBAGE PILE.

K
ing5.com | Tests show Hanford workers inhaled radioactive plutonium
Aug 3, 2017 - On June 8, approximately 350 Hanford workers were ordered to “take cover” after alarms designed to detect elevated levels of airborne radioactive contamination went off. It was quickly determined that radioactive particles had been swept out of a containment zone at the plutonium finishing plant (PFP)

At the time Hanford officials...[and] officials from the U.S. Dept. of Energy, which owns Hanford, and the contractor in charge of the demolition,
CH2M Hill, downplayed the seriousness of the event with statements including, it appeared “workers were not at risk”, “(the alarm went off) in an area where contamination is expected” and there was “no evidence radioactive particles had been inhaled” by anyone.

The KING 5 Investigators have discovered those statements are incorrect.
An internal CH2M Hill email sent to their employees on July 21 was obtained by KING. It states that 301 (test kits) have been issued to employees and of the first 65 workers tested, a “small number of employees” showed positive results for “internal exposures” (by radioactive plutonium).

Sources tell KING the “small number of employees” is twelve. Twelve people out of 65 is 20 percent. Still outstanding are 236 tests.

A communication specialist with CH2M Hill
sent a statement that more positive results are expected. “We expect additional positive results because analytical tests like a bioassay can detect radiological contamination at levels far lower than what field monitoring can detect,” said Destry Henderson of CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company.

Several veteran Hanford workers were surprised by the number of people with internal contamination from a single event.

“I’ve worked there for 27 years and I’ve never seen this many people contaminated internally,” said one employee with radiation expertise who did not want to be identified.

“When I first heard the number I couldn’t believe it... So, when I heard that many, that’s just amazing,” said Mike Geffre who retired from Hanford after working at the site for 26 years.

“In 36 years I’ve not seen this many people with internal exposure,” said another Hanford worker who wished to remain anonymous. “It’s a monstrous deal. And the workers know it, but they don’t want to say anything. They’re afraid.”

EXACTLY.  
THEY'RE AFRAID.   
FEW HAVE EVER BLOWN THE WHISTLE AT HANFORD AND THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERED THE CONSEQUENCES.
   
In August 2014, OSHA ordered the facility to rehire a contractor and pay $220,000 in back wages for firing them for whistleblowing on safety concerns at the site. 

Several Hanford workers and four radiation experts consulted by KING 5 said the messaging from the contractor and the DOE is “misleading” and doesn’t explain the actual danger to employees.

A 2014 report by the DOE Savannah River National Laboratory initiated by 'Washington River Protection Solutions' found that DOE's methods to study vapor releases were inadequate, particularly, that they did not account for short but intense vapor releases.


NO SUCH THING AS A SAFE AMOUNT OF RADIATION AND ALPHA RADIATIONCANNOT BE COMPARED TO AIRPLANE FLIGHTS, BANANAS OR MEDICAL PROCEDURES!

“There’s no safe amount of plutonium you can inhale or ingest,” said
Dr. Marco Kaltofen of the Nuclear Science and Engineering Program, Dept. of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
“If you fly from Seattle to DC, you’re in the air for 6 hours and you’re done. With plutonium, the exposure is IN YOUR BODY for days, months or even years. A millionth of a gram of plutonium has a measurable risk of causing a lethal lung cancer. Alpha particles damage or destroy DNA and can cause cancer,” said Kaltofen.

PHSICIANS NOT ON FEDERAL PAYROLL EXPLAIN THE FALLACY OF THE "NO WORSE THAN A CHEST X-RAY OR CT SCAN", THE BS THAT WE'RE TOLD EVERY TIME THERE'S A LEAK AT A NUKE PLANT.

“If I get a chest x-ray or CT scan, that’s a different type of radiation,” said Dr. Erica Liebelt, Medical and Executive Director of the
Washington Poison Center. “(But) you have concerns about (alpha) radiation disrupting the cells and causing genetic disruption in the cells and cellular damage. And that’s what causes the increased risk for cancers in three organs: lungs, liver, and bone,” said Liebelt, who is also a board certified toxicologist.

This is not the first breach of containment of radioactive contaminates from the PFP demolition project. In January work was halted after a spread of radioactive contamination was discovered outside the plant.
After that event, CH2M Hill reported that nasal smears taken from workers immediately following the incident found no evidence of inhaled contamination.

Medical experts said nasal smears are one of the best diagnostic procedures to check for contamination.
In the June 8 incident, the contractor did not administer those tests.
When KING 5 asked CH2M Hill why they skipped that step, the spokesperson did not answer the question.

TELLING IT LIKE IT IS...
Site workers who spoke with KING are worried that appropriate controls are not in place to keep them safe.

“They should never have this many people exposed, and what happens the next time around?” said a veteran worker, who did not want to be identified for fear of retaliation. “A lot of people are concerned that they will have another contamination spread and it may cause damage to the environment and to people.” 

It is not clear why many of the workers near the demolition project on June 8 were NOT wearing full respiratory protection. Some long-time workers said utilizing the gear is expensive, slows down the work and could jeopardize CH2M Hill finishing the demolition on time.
The contractor is
under pressure to finish by Sept. 30 as per a legally binding agreement
with the state of Washington. 

“It’s money in their pockets and a feather in their cap to get (the job) done. So, they’ll get [it] done, but at what expense?” said one experienced Hanford worker who did not want to be identified.
[Copyright 2017 KING]


BACK TO THE WASHINGTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S FAILURE TO ALERT RESIDENTS AND OFFER TESTING TO THOSE NEAR THE FACILITY.

The department also said it has taken steps to stabilize the contaminates [sic] and also announced a change of leadership with the private contractor performing the work.

In a note to Hanford employees, Shoop downplayed safety concerns. He wrote that even if a worker stayed "around the clock" at a site with the highest reading, his or her radiation exposure would still be under an annual control limit.

Tom Carpenter, executive director of watchdog group Hanford Challenge, says the demolition project is responsible for one of the most serious spreads of radioactive material in the decades of cleanup work at Hanford.

"I have never seen the state Department of Health takes this tone, and request this kind of information. I think it’s totally appropriate," Carpenter said. "This is a big deal."

 The 586-square-mile Hanford site has been the focal point of a decades-long cleanup in the aftermath of plutonium production for nuclear weapons that began at the end of World War II and continued through the Cold War era.

The finishing plant encompassed more than 60 buildings and produced hockey-puck-sized pieces of plutonium that were shipped to weapons-production complexes elsewhere in the United States. The demolition work that is now suspended has focused on a facility that reclaimed plutonium.

Halvorson’s letter said the state warned federal officials back in June of air- monitoring results at a Hanford public access point that found americium 241 concentrations at levels more than triple federal standards for a yearlong exposure. A round of worker bioassay tests conducted in the summer found contamination in 31 people. 

State officials expected that things would improve in late 2017 — but they didn’t, as the boundary maps for the radiation contamination spread "drastically" from the original commitments made in the demolition plans. 

Halvorson, in his letter, notes that the monitoring shows the frequency of air samples showing elevated radioactivity "has trended upward."

A potential radioactive leak was reported in 2013; the clean up for that one leak was estimated to have cost $40 billion with $115 billion more required.

Removal of the leaking storage tanks was slated for 2018 but was extended in 2008 to 2040...while they sit there and leak. 

The state threatened to sue in 2008, so the Bush (Jr) administration cut the budget on the cleanup.

Take that, Washington state.
Just sit there and glow in the dark, eat your radiation-poisoned food and shut up.


THE WATCHDOG GROUP, COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPERS, IS TRYING AGAIN TO FORCE THE FEDS TO MAKE THINGS SAFER.

I WISH THEM WELL, BUT DOUBT THE FEDERAL GOVERNEMENT WILL EVER PUT HUMAN LIVES OVER 'BIG NUKE'. THE NUCLEAR ENERGY BOYS SIMPLY DONATE TOO MUCH $$$ TO CAMPAIGN CHESTS.  

Take Action: Comment on Radioactive Capsules at Hanford ...

Jan 26, 2018 - With one click, you can weigh-in on an important cleanup decision that decides the fate of 1,936 highly radioactive capsules at Hanford.

The Waste Encapsulation Storage Facility (WESF) houses capsules of cesium and strontium in aging concrete pools.

The Oregon Department of Energy and others have warned that high radiation levels may undermine the integrity of the concrete at WESF. According to the Oregon Department of Energy’s comments on WESF, removal of capsules to dry storage should be “a top Hanford priority.” The agency has warned that loss of cooling water at WESF could result in a major radioactive release into the environment, endangering workers, the environment, and future generations.



HANFORD IS AN ONGOING NIGHTMARE, BUT A FEW DAYS AGO, FUKUSHIMA REMINDED US THAT IT'S STILL KING WHEN IT COMES TO THE HIGHEST RADIATION READINGS IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD. 

SEE MY NEXT BLOG LATER TODAY FOR THAT STORY.
 


Fukushima - MSN.com      


7 days ago - Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lethal levels of radiation detected in leak seven years after plant meltdown in Japan.


LETHAL DOESN'T BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT.









//WW