Saturday, May 18, 2013

VACCINES: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

VACCINES REALLY ARE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!
THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING, THE FACTS ARE INDISPUTABLE...
VACCINES KILL, MAIM, LEAVE VICTIMS PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY DEVASTATED, AND THEIR MAKERS HAVE KNOWN THIS FOR OVER 60 YEARS IN SOME INSTANCES!
FOR THE SAKE OF OUR CHILDREN, PLEASE WATCH THESE VIDEOS, READ THESE FINDINGS, AND ASK YOURSELF IF YOU STILL THINK WE NEED VACCINES.
LISTEN TO TESTIMONY PRESENTED TO CONGRESS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND PARENTS OF VACCINE-INJURED, OR VACCINE-KILLED CHILDREN.
THESE ARE BOTH SHOCKING AND HEARTBREAKING, BUT THEY ARE ALL DOCUMENTED TRUTHS!
MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEVER SHOWS THIS!
WHY NOT?



HAVING VACCINE-INDUCED ANTIBODIES IN YOUR BODY DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE IMMUNE!
IF IT DID, WE WOULD NOT HAVE "BOOSTER" VACCINES!
TRUE IMMUNITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BEING VACCINATED.
DON'T YOU FIND IT ODD THAT PEOPLE WHO HAD ALREADY HAD CHILDHOOD DISEASES WEREN'T REQUIRED TO GET THE INITIAL "MMR" VACCINE?
DO YOU NOT FIND IT ODD THAT THESE AMERICAN VACCINES ARE BANNED IN SOME COUNTRIES?
PLEASE PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT THIS VIDEO IS TELLING US!


THE U.S. IS NOW #1 IN THE WORLD FOR FIRST-DAY INFANT MORTALITY.
26 DOSES OF 9 DIFFERENT VACCINES IN THE FIRST YEAR OF LIFE JUST MIGHT BE AT THE ROOT OF THAT, YES?
AND YET WE WONDER WHY CHILDHOOD MORTALITY RATES HAVE RISEN?

U.S. DOCTORS ACTUALLY FOUGHT THE U.N. BAN ON THE MERCURY PRESERVATIVES USED IN VACCINES!
YES, THEY DID!
<<The bans on mercury products and processes is being developed at meetings organized by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). The goal is to create a binding global treaty in which countries agree to end mercury pollution and toxic mercury exposures to humans and the environment. In the United States, children are given single-dose vaccines, which do not contain thimerosal, A TYPE OF MERCURY.
However, thimerosal is still used in some influenza vaccines, and it would be used in a pandemic, when there is a need for swift, mass distribution of a vaccine.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/17/us-doctors-fight-un-ban-on-preservative-in-vaccine/#ixzz2TgX8D5xd

TOXIC MERCURY, YES, WE KNOW MERCURY IS TOXIC, EVEN IN SMALL AMOUNTS, SO WHY PUT THAT IN VACCINES?
TAKE THREE GUESSES WHY!
SURE, WE'RE TOLD WHAT GOES INTO VACCINES IS NOT THE TOXIC FORM OF MERCURY, SO LET'S ASK CONGRESS IF THEY'LL LINE UP TO GET "VACCINES" WITH THAT IN IT?
THAT SHOULD EMPTY THE CONGRESSIONAL CHAMBERS AT RECORD SPEED!

VACCINES FOR POLIO GIVEN TO US IN THE 1950s HAVE BEEN REVEALED TO HAVE BEEN CONTAMINATED WITH MONKEY DNA, AND IS THE ORIGIN OF OUR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO A MYRIAD OF CANCERS, SO IF YOU GOT THE 1950s VACCINE AND WERE PERHAPS THE FIRST IN YOUR FAMILY TO GET ANY CANCER, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WONDER WHY ANY LONGER.

THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN I CAN EXPRESS. IT IS A LENGTHY, EYE-OPENING ARTICLE FROM THE ATLANTIC MAGAZINE.
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY, THEN GO READ ALL THE ARTICLE.
The Virus and the Vaccine
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/02/002bookchin.htm
<<In 1993 Michele Carbone,Carbone had a hunch he wanted to explore. He asked Harvey Pass, the chief of thoracic surgery at the National Cancer Institute, in Bethesda, Maryland, to help him find out if the deadly cancer mesothelioma could be caused by a virus -- a monkey virus, known as simian virus 40, or SV40, that had widely contaminated early doses of the polio vaccine, but that had long been presumed to be harmless to people.
Mesothelioma was virtually unheard of prior to 1950, but the incidence of the disease has risen steadily since then. Though it is considered rare -- accounting for the deaths of about 3,000 Americans a year, or about one half of one percent of all domestic cancer deaths -- the disease is particularly pernicious. Most patients die within eighteen months of diagnosis. >>

[NOTE: WHEN DID THE AIDS STUDIES IN AFRICA BEGIN? 1950s.
WHEN DID EYEWITNESSES SAY MONKEY KIDNEYS WERE EXPORTED TO THE U.S.? 1950s.
WHEN DID WE GET THE CONTAMINATED POLIO VACCINES? 1950s.
AND NOW WE KNOW THAT SALK UNWITTINGLY USED SOME OF THOSE MONKEY KIDNEYS AND SOME SAY ALSO THEIR SPINES WERE USED.
WE DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE AGAINST OUR GOVERNMENT FORCING POLIO VACCINES ON SCHOOL CHILDREN...BUT WE'RE PASSING THAT ONTO OUR OWN OFFSPRING, AND THEY PASS IT ON TO THEIRS!

EXTREMELY REVEALING DATA, URGENTLY IMPORTANT!
CONTINUING THE ATLANTIC STORY OF HOW WE FOUND OUT ABOUT PRESENT-DAY CANCER-CAUSING SV40:
<<Harvey Pass listened as Michele Carbone described for him the history of the early polio vaccine. A breakthrough in the war against polio had come in the early 1950s, when Jonas Salk took advantage of a new discovery: monkey kidneys could be used to culture the abundant quantities of polio virus necessary to mass-produce a vaccine. But there were problems with the monkey kidneys. In 1960 Bernice Eddy, a government researcher, discovered that when she injected hamsters with the kidney mixture on which the vaccine was cultured, they developed tumors. Eddy's superiors tried to keep the discovery quiet, but Eddy presented her data at a cancer conference in New York. She was eventually demoted, and lost her laboratory. The cancer-causing virus was soon isolated by other scientists and dubbed SV40, because it was the fortieth simian virus discovered.
Alarm spread through the scientific community as researchers realized that nearly every dose of the vaccine had been contaminated. In 1961 federal health officials ordered vaccine manufacturers to screen for the virus and eliminate it from the vaccine. Worried about creating a panic, they kept the discovery of SV40 under wraps and never recalled existing stocks. For two more years millions of additional people were needlessly exposed -- bringing the total to 98 million Americans from 1955 to 1963.
Even though the virus became a widely used cancer-research tool, because it caused a variety of tumors so easily in laboratory animals, for the better part of four decades there was virtually no research on what SV40 might do to people.
Carbone had just finished a series of experiments in which he had injected the virus into dozens of hamsters. Every one of them developed mesothelioma and died within three to seven months. The results made Carbone wonder if SV40 might also play a role in human mesothelioma. He had come to see Pass because he had heard that the senior surgeon had meticulously saved tumor tissue from every one of the dozens of mesothelioma surgeries he had performed, and now had one of the largest collections of mesothelioma biopsies in the world. Carbone asked Pass if he could look for SV40 DNA in Pass's tumor-tissue samples, using a sophisticated molecular technique, known as polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, to extract tiny fragments of DNA from the frozen tissue and then amplify and characterize them.
Pass realized that the implications were potentially significant. Only a handful of viruses have been directly associated with human cancers, and none of them are simian in origin.
If SV40 was linked to mesothelioma in people, might it also cause bone and brain cancers in human beings, as it had done in hamsters? What if the monkey virus could spread from person to person? And if the virus was cancer-causing, or oncogenic, what was one to make of the fact that millions of Americans had been exposed to it as part of a government-sponsored vaccination program?

On a spring afternoon in 1993, with Pass's mesothelioma samples in hand, Carbone called an old friend, Antonio Procopio, a professor of experimental pathology in Italy who had worked for three years at the NIH. "I asked him if he was willing to do this crazy project with me," Carbone says. "I told him I could not pay him or his expenses." A month later Procopio arrived in Bethesda. "We had no money," Carbone recalls. "He slept in my house for six months, and we worked day and night."

It turned out that Pass's samples were loaded with the monkey virus: 60 percent of the mesothelioma samples contained SV40 DNA; the nontumor tissues used as controls were negative. Moreover, Carbone found that in most of the positive samples he tested, the monkey virus was active, producing proteins -- suggesting to Carbone that the SV40 was not just an opportunistic "passenger virus" that had found a convenient hiding place in the malignant cells but was likely to have been involved in causing the cancer.
In 1994 Carbone, Pass, and Procopio published the results of their experiment in Oncogene, one of the world's leading cancer-research journals. They proposed SV40 as a possible co-carcinogen in human mesothelioma. It was the first time researchers had put forward hard evidence that the all-but-forgotten vaccine contaminant might cause cancer in human beings.
The virus has also been located in other kinds of tumors.
More than a dozen laboratories have found SV40 in various kinds of rare brain and bone tumors.
In 1996 Carbone reported that he had found SV40 in a third of the osteosarcomas (bone cancers of a type that afflicts about 900 Americans a year) and nearly half of the other bone tumors he tested -- research that has since been confirmed by numerous laboratories. The virus has also been detected in pituitary and thyroid tumors. >>

[NOTE:THAT 1950s MONKEY VIRUS IS REPLICATING IN HUMANS, SPREADING FROM MOTHER TO CHILD!
THE HORRORS UNLEASHED BY THOSE AIDS RESEARCHERS IN 1950, THOSE WHO CREATED THIS THING, WHETHER ACCIDENTALLY OR ON PURPOSE, WILL CONTINUE TO PLAGUE HUMANITY FOREVER, UNLESS SOMEONE FINDS A WAY TO STOP THE REPLICATION IN HUMANS!]

<<Recent research also indicates that SV40 has gained a secure foothold in the human species. In 1996 Tognon and his collaborators reported that they had also found the virus in 45 percent of the sperm samples and 23 percent of the blood samples they tested from healthy people, suggesting that the monkey virus could spread through sexual contact or unscreened blood products. In 1998 the presence of SV40 antibodies in human blood samples was reported by Butel, who tested several hundred American blood samples and found antibodies to SV40 in about 10 percent of them. Butel's laboratory also tested samples from children born from 1980 to 1995 -- decades after the contaminated vaccine was removed from the market. A surprising six percent tested positive -- offering evidence that the virus may now be spreading from person to person, including from mother to child. >>
LET THAT REALLY SINK IN...

HOW EXPERIMENTS WITH THE HIV/AIDS BIOWEAPON, YES, IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A BIOWEAPON, OF THAT THERE IS NO DOUBT, LED TO OTHER VACCINES AS WEAPONS...AND US AS TARGETS:
I'VE WRITTEN ABOUT THIS BEFORE [SEE: http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/01/global-population-reduction-eugenics.html], HAVE RESEARCHED THIS FOR OVER 25 YEARS.
FEW WILL RECALL THAT SOME OF THE GROUP WHO "TESTED" THE AIDS VIRUS IN AFRICA TRIED TO WARN THE WORLD WHAT HAD BEEN UNLEASHED.
I RECALL WATCHING A HUGH DOWNS PROGRAM ON WHICH THREE SCIENTISTS WHO WERE THERE IN AFRICA TRIED TO EXPLAIN THE DANGERS. THOSE THREE DIED OF AIDS LATER, REMEMBER? THEY WERE VERY UPSET DURING THE PROGRAM.
IF ANYONE CAN POINT ME TO THAT PROGRAM NOW, I WOULD BE MUCH OBLIGED AS IT WAS BEFORE THE AGE OF THE INTERNET AND COMPUTERS.
I KNOW THAT IS ONE REASON DOWNS BECAME AN ADVOCATE FOR MORE RESEARCH INTO AIDS/HIV.

THIS IS THE MAN HIRED TO FIND A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON THAT HAD NO POSSIBLE CURE. HE AND HIS COLLEAGUES DID A GOOD JOB!
PLEASE, PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION TO THE DOCUMENTATION PRESENTED BY THE MAN QUESTIONING DR. GALLO, AND LISTEN TO THE END OF THIS VIDEO.
GALLO KNEW HE WAS EXPOSED, THAT HIS EARLY PAPERS SHOW HE KNEW, BUT LOOK AT THE WAY HE DISMISSES THIS CONCERNED CITIZEN! HE KNOWS THAT MANY OF HIS PEERS HAVE TESTIFIED AGAINST HIM! PERHAPS HIS ARROGANCE COMES FROM HIS KNOWING OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER PROSECUTE HIM BECAUSE THEY ORDERED THE HIV TESTS AND PAID FOR THE RESULTS? IF HE IS GUILTY, SO IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!

CONGRESS INVESTIGATED THE KEY HIV RESEARCH AS A FRAUD IN 1990-1994!
HOW MANY REMEMBER THAT?
<<Key HIV research had been investigated for scientific fraud by powerful US scientific institutions and by Congress between 1990 to 1994. Why is this not widely known? These inquires reported major errors in this research, with some errors so serious that they said they made it impossible to repeat the key HIV experiments and verify them.

Peter H. Duesberg, Ph.D., professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, a well-credentialed scientist, has long made a hard-driving attack on the accepted view that AIDS is an infectious disease caused by HIV. Duesberg , an early researcher in the field of retroviruses, asserts that HIV, like virtually all retroviruses, is harmless. He finds that HIV meets NONE of the usual criteria (such as the six laws of virology) used to establish that a microbe causes disease. But if that is so, why do scientists persist in saying that AIDS is an epidemic caused by HIV? As Duesberg tells it, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention needed a serious epidemic to justify its continued existence, and by naming AIDS a single contagious disease, it created an atmosphere of public fear that brought it increased funding and power. The biomedical establishment took note. Having failed to find a viral cause of cancer, Duesberg says, virus hunters needed a new disease, and AIDS was it.
The HIV-AIDS connection was then announced by Robert Gallo, head of a retrovirus lab at the National Cancer Institute, at a 1984 press conference rather than demonstrated in a peer- reviewed scientific paper. Further, Duesberg charges, the pharmaceutical companies exploited the situation by bringing back highly toxic failed cancer drugs, such as AZT, which, he says, destroys the immune system and causes AIDS-like symptoms. Duesberg cites other scientists who have questioned the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, among them several Nobel laureates, including Kary Mullis (for Chemistry), the author of this book's foreword. Duesberg's own theory is that AIDS is linked to the use of immunity-suppressing illicit drugs (such as crack and ``poppers''), and he urges investigation along these lines. One need not accept Duesberg's drug hypothesis, however, to be persuaded that the serious charges he makes deserve serious answers.
[SEE DUESBERG'S BOOK, 'INVENTING THE AIDS VIRUS']

[SEE ALSO: AIDS And the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry Into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic, a book by Alan Cantwell...YOU CAN READ SOME OF THAT BOOK HERE: http://tinyurl.com/ahrxovz

<<The disturbing and fiercely disputed theory that the Aids virus was unleashed "accidentally" by western medical researchers in Africa in the 1950s gained new impetus yesterday, with the emergence of fresh witness testimony about the use of chimpanzees in an African mass vaccination trial.

Ed Hooper, a writer who has spent a decade seeking the source of the epidemic, told an international conference on the origins of Aids in London that the new evidence was the "smoking gun" in support of his claim that Aids crossed from chimps to humans when doctors used their kidneys to prepare an experimental oral polio vaccine (OPV).

In his book 'The River', published last year, Mr Hooper argued that the sites of most of the earliest known cases of AIDS, in the former Belgian colonies of the Congo, Rwanda and Burundi, coincided with the sites of mass vaccinations with an experimental polio vaccine called CHAT between 1957 and 1960. The vaccine was produced by a team led by US virologist Hillary Koprowski.

Mr Hooper argues that there is powerful circumstantial evidence that the makers of CHAT had used local chimps, instead of the more commonly used rhesus monkeys, to supply the kidneys used to make early polio vaccines.

The surviving researchers, led by Dr Koprowski, say that they used captured chimps to test, not make, the vaccine. Yet there is a baffling lack of documentation on what was going on in the African facilities. >>

AND THERE ARE EYE WITNESSES WHO HAVE TESTIFIED THAT LOCAL MONKEYS' KIDNEYS WERE INDEED REMOVED AND SENT TO THE U.S. AND THAT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE KEPT SECRET.
[SEE: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/sep/12/medicalresearch.infectiousdiseases]

YOU WON'T FIND SUCH EVIDENCE REPORTED HERE IN AMERICA, NOT IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA!
YOU WILL ALSO BE HARD-PRESSED TO FIND THE FOLLOWING IN ANY ARTICLE IN ANY NEWS MEDIA IN AMERICA!
YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO "PANIC", YOU SEE, SO IT IS HIDDEN FROM YOU!

THAT MONKEY VIRUS IS IN 2/3rds OF ALL NEW, YES, NEW CANCER PATIENTS!
<<SV-40 has appeared in 61% of all new cancer patients -- patients too young to have received the contaminated vaccine being administered forty years ago! Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, has recently isolated fragments of the SV-40 virus in human bone cancers and in a lethal form of lung cancer called mesotheliomas. He found SV-40 in 33% of the osteosarcoma bone cancers studied, in 40% of other bone cancers, and in 60% of the mesotheliomas lung cancers.
Researchers from the Institute of Histology and General Embryology of the University of Ferrara, lead by Dr. Fernanda Martini, discovered SV-40's presence in a variety other tumors. They found the rhesus monkey virus in 83% of choriod plexus papillomas, in 73% of ependymomas, in 47% of astrocytomas, in 50% of glioblastomas, and in 14% of meningiomas.

SV-40 also has been found in 23% of blood samples and 45% of sperm fluids taken from normal individuals! Researchers have determined the SV-40 virus can be transmitted sexually and through blood transfusions. >>
http://rense.com/general3/polio.htm

TELL ALL YOU CAN OF THE DANGERS, INFORM THOSE WHO MAY NEVER KNOW OTHERWISE!
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY FROM THOSE WHO INFLICTED THIS ON US!
HELP MAKE SURE THIS STOPS NOW AND IS NEVER REPEATED!
TELL THE GOVERNMENT YOU REFUSE TO VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN, THAT YOU REFUSE TO TAKE ANY VACCINE THEY PRESENTLY HAVE ON THE MARKET!

I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THEY DIDN'T KNOW, AND I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THEY EVER INTENDED ANYTHING BUT TO UTILIZE THIS TO REDUCE WORLDWIDE POPULATION LEVELS.

TOXINS ARE IN OUR VACCINES, OUR FOOD, OUR WATER, OUR AIR.
EACH DAY THEY INCREASE, EACH YEAR NEW AND 'IMPROVED' ONES ARE FOUND.
THE RESEARCH INTO BIOLOGICAL WARFARE HAS INCREASED, INCREASED, NOT LESSENED, AS EACH NATION TRIES TO FIND BETTER WAYS TO DESTROY "THE ENEMY", BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENEMY MAY JUST BE US!
WHETHER WE JUST GOT IN THE WAY OR WE WERE TARGETED, WE MAY NEVER KNOW, BUT NOW WE KNOW WHAT'S OUT THERE, HOW IT WAS DELIBERATELY CREATED, HOW TOO MANY KNEW FOR US TO EVER EXCUSE WHAT HAS BEEN DONE.

"We have the technology to make vaccines in human cell lines that are clean," said Dr. Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center, one of the first to discover SV-40 inside human tumors.

Until then we can only hope that researchers continue their work, regardless of the repercussions. Millions of people are already infected with SV-40 and are in danger. Many cancers do not develop until mid-life. Future generations must be protected. We must prohibit any future contamination of the world population, whether for our own good or not, by SO-CALLED 'well-meaning' governmental agencies.
VACCINES ARE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!

THIS FILM, "HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?" ASKS QUESTIONS THAT WE ALL DESERVE ANSWERS TO!
THESE ARE NOT AMATEURS, NOR CRACKPOTS! THEY ARE VERY CONCERNED PHYSICIANS, SCIENTISTS, PEOPLE WHO KNOW WE'VE BEEN PERHAPS IRREVERSIBLY INJURED BY VACCINES, BY THOSE WHO WERE TRYING TO FIND A WAY TO EXTERMINATE OTHER HUMAN BEINGS. PLEASE LISTEN CAREFULLY, AND JUST THINK!




SOURCES, OTHERS, THOSE I DID NOT CITE ABOVE:
THERE IS ABSOLUTE EVIDENCE OF THE FACT THAT VACCINES KILL AND DESTROY WITHIN THESE SOURCES, MANY PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES ARE LISTED, ALL ARE WELL-WRITTEN.
READ TO LEARN, FOR KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!

~http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/vaccines-safety-a-crime-against-humanity/?utm_source=www.GreenMedInfo.com&utm_campaign=f917bd334b-Greenmedinfo&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_193c8492fb-f917bd334b-86725962

~A RICH SOURCE OF SCIENTIFIC, PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH/STUDIES ON VACCINES.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-all

~http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/02/002bookchin.htm

~http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/02/002bookchin2.htm

~http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/02/002bookchin3.htm





No comments:

Post a Comment