Sunday, January 6, 2013


 Given the daily increase in population, the depletion of natural resources that is currently straining our ability to feed, clothe and shelter the world's population, our downgraded economies, and since we can't add new lands to farm, or oceans to harvest, or renew resources within our earth.... NOW WHAT?

Hitler gave a few a whirl back when he was busy with the 'solution' to the Jewish 'problem', and from those days arose Margaret Sanger.

As an avid supporter of the Eugenics Movement and a great admirer of Adolf Hitler, Margaret Sanger would be proud of what she has wrought.
It's called 'Planned Parenthood', and yes, it sounds just fabulous...on the surface...but track it back to its origins and realize as I had to, that it is simply a means of both population reduction and population control, aka EUGENICS. 

Margaret Sanger was one of the most notorious RACISTS ever to influence American public opinion. She barely hid the truth of her utter contempt of non-white races.
Here, in her own words, she seems much different than a caring person out to help the impoverished, pregnant women of the world.

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. 

The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal.
We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if
it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."  

-- Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255
Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith
Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in
Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth
Control in America . New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

"Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying
... demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism ...  
[Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the
world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of
others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead
weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the
stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world,
it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant ... We are paying
for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing,
unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born
at all."  

-- Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization , 1922. Chapter on "The
Cruelty of Charity," pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library

"Today eugenics is suggested by the most diverse minds as the most
adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and
social problems. 

"I think you must agree ... that the campaign for birth control is not
merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims
of eugenics ... 

Birth control propaganda is thus the entering wedge for the
eugenic educator.

"As an advocate of birth control I wish ... to point out that the
unbalance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit,' admittedly
the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the
inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes.

 In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feebleminded,
the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be
held up for emulation. 

"On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and
discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective."  

-- Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda."
Birth Control Review , October 1921, page 5.

One more then:
"[Slavs, Latin, and Hebrew immigrants are] human weeds ... a
deadweight of human waste ... [Blacks, soldiers, and Jews are a] menace to
the race." 

"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent
Multiplication of this bad stock."   

-- Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review .

There are other quotes, in her own words, in this pdf:

So, perhaps you see what a nice tool, what a nice plan 'Planned Parenthood' is for those in favor of eugenics, applied to 'certain' races?

I agree 100% that our planet's rapidly growing population is more than a bit 'scary', if you will, but to use that to erase people, to subject them to forced anything?

What if the people she was so against was US?
 I think maybe it WAS!


1974 National Security Memorandum #200, BY Henry Kissinger
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."Depopulation, also known as eugenics, is quite a big deal today, but let's define it as we should: It is the deliberate killing off of large segments of living populations. Such was proposed for 'Third World countries' under President Carter's administration by the National Security Council's Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy.

Ah, the NSC! What a group!
<<The National Security Council is chaired by the President.
Its regular attendees (both statutory and non-statutory) are the Vice President (statutory), the Secretary of State (statutory), the Secretary of Treasury (non-statutory), the Secretary of Defense (statutory), and the National Security Advisor (non-statutory).

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the statutory military advisor to the Council, the Director of National Intelligence is the statutory intelligence advisor, and the Director of National Drug Control Policy is the statutory drug control policy advisor. The Chief of Staff to the President, Counsel to the President, and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy are also invited to attend any NSC meeting. The Attorney General and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget are invited to attend meetings pertaining to their responsibilities.
The heads of other executive departments and agencies, as well as other senior officials, are invited to attend meetings of the NSC when appropriate.>>

There have been some pretty shady characters on that "council" in the past!
Go research it sometimes!
They hit the news recently for this:

 A secret National Security Council panel may pursue the killing of an individual who has been called a suspected terrorist.  []
 In this case, no public record of this decision or any operation to kill the suspect will be made available. 
 No laws govern criteria for killing such suspects, nor mandate the existence of the panel.   

The High Value Detainee Interrogation Group reports to the NSC.

Depopulation policy became the top priority under the NSC agenda,
U.S. policymakers like Gen. Alexander Haig, Cyrus Vance, and Ed Muskie jumped on this like starving dogs on bones. According to an NSC spokesman at the time, the United States "shared the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the population crisis is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation."  

Those are strong words! 

They meant them! 
Kissinger handed them the means to reduce global population (by controlling the FOOD) and by 1975, Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department's Office of Population Affairs. 
The depopulation "GLOBAL 2000" document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared. 
It should come as little surprise that this policy was established under President Carter with 'help' from the likes of Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, but their utter dedication to implementing it was almost warlike! 
They pushed it HARD!

Kissinger was born Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Fürth, Bavaria, Germany, in 1923 during the Weimar Republic. Just before the end of WWII, by some odd twists of 'fate', young Kissinger became a sort of  'godfather' to 'Project Paperclip' which was the hasty removal of approximately 2,000 Nazis out of Germany before the war's end, along with vast fortunes.
Most people think all the Nazis went to the Nuremberg trials. 


Most were fined about $5,000 and jailed for a few years, then released to join their colleagues in America working for the CIA and intelligence for American science and industry. 

We have available to any of us declassified documents to prove that 2,000 came to the U.S. and 11,000 went to France. 
Seven books have been written about that very fact.  

In 1955 Kissinger was made the nuclear weapons study group director for the Council of Foreign Relations by Nelson Rockefeller. 

This is not a government agency.  


That same year (1955), Kissinger finished his Ph.D. thesis at Harvard entitled "The Meaning of History" in which he describes the contemporary evolution of something called the New World Order. 

You can pull his thesis off the shelf in the stacks in the library at Harvard, see for yourself, in his own words, how he was thinking even back then. 

Going ahead 13 short years to 1968, Henry Kissinger was appointed National Security Advisor, which made him the most powerful man in American intelligence, overseeing the FBI, CIA and foreign policy. 

What a meteoric rise!   

Moving on to this 1974 National Security Memorandum #200...the entire pdf is here: 
The government is happy for you to read it. 

Shows no signs of being redacted.
A few "highlights":  

<< "What are the stakes? We do not know whether technological developments will make it possible to feed over 8 much less 12 billion people in the 21st century. We cannot be entirely certain that climatic changes in the coming decade will not create great difficulties in feeding a growing population, especially people in the LDCs who live under increasingly marginal and more vulnerable conditions. 

There exists at least the possibility that present developments point toward Malthusian * conditions for many regions of the world." 

"The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries [see National Commission on Materials Policy, Towards a National Materials Policy: Basic Data and Issues, April 1972]. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. 

Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States. . . . 

The location of known reserves of higher grade ores of most minerals favors increasing dependence of all industrialized regions on imports from less developed countries. The real problems of mineral supplies lie, not in basic physical sufficiency, but in the politico-economic issues of access, terms for exploration and exploitation, and division of the benefits among producers, consumers, and host country governments". 

"Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth". 

"Populations with a high proportion of growth. The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. 

These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,' ‘imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other-often foreign-influences blamed for their troubles" [Chapter V, "Implications of Population Pressures for National Security].

"We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs. 

Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this country. 
"Third World" leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the credit for successful programs. I
n this context it is important to demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have worked and can work within a reasonable period of time.">> 

The report advises, "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."

Across the lesser pond, "Lord" Bertrand Russell also had a PLAN...He called his 

"The Impact of Science on Society". 
Here are a few of his ideas on controlling populations: 

“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.” – p62  

“War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. 
If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. 

There would be nothing in this to offend the conscience of the devout or to restrain the ambition of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.” – p116 – p117 

“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton. 
 (The Aztecs kept a domesticated alien tribe for the purposes of cannibalism. Their regime was totalitarian)” – p63

Seems a bit "sick" doesn't it?

 *[Thomas *Malthus, referred to in Kissinger's PLAN, wrote in 1798 that there will always be more people in the world than can be fed, hence the need for wars and diseases. 


A few terms that have crept into many posts, forums, news feeds lately have greatly disturbed me.
See if these are familiar to you...




  1. wow....just wow....

    1. That I am OFFENDED at how the poor, the 'underprivileged', those seen in THIS once-great nation as USELESS EATERS is a terrible understatement.
      I am INCENSED by it!
      I am NEVER going to accept that fellow-Americans of ANY "station in life', ANY race, creed or culture is HUNGRY, is doing without BASIC NEEDS, medicine, ANY HELP , should be ignored, or shunned, or despised!
      I reject in toto all claims to SUPREMACY, to "MANIFEST DESTINY", to right to dominance!
      This applies not only to humans, but other species, who, in the belief system I ascribe to, have the SAME rights as we do, but they have no VOICE!
      I loan them mine!
      I will always loan my voice to the abused & downtrodden.
      When it was ME, no one loaned me theirs...I LEARNED from that!

      We learn, or we perish...

  2. Nature will take care of all that is not in balance ...Despite the best made plans of Humankind.

  3. @ DEWEY BOYD...Having watched things quite closely for almost 70 years now, I have to say that nature is losing against humanity.
    She's in terrible disarray.
    She is considerably UNBALANCED.
    As her actual territory has shrunk, as less and less land is "wild" with fewer and fewer species of wildlife, wild plants, as we see one species extinction after another and changes that are simply beyond repair, I feel that, unless mankind is the next species to 'go extinct', nature will just have to go belly-up.
    Old Stephen Hawking just predicted this would happen within 100 to 1,000 years....that humankind would cause the demise of Planet Earth.
    That seems optimistic.
    Nature DID have a means of balancing things, once upon a time, but not anymore.
    Still, I will agree that, if we don't completely obliterate 'nature', she MIGHT recover to some extent, but there's no bringing back the thousands of species we've lost over the past 100or so years.
    And mankind will either have to leave the planet or perish with it.
    I saw that the Inuit are once again trying to get someone, anyone to look at their evidence that the sun and moon are out of their past positions.
    They believe the earth has either changed its orbit or the celestial bodies have.
    Maybe it's that "pole shift" science has said we'll see again as we have in times long past.
    All over the world animals, plants and humans struggle to survive.
    We'll just have to wait and see who/what does.