MOM GETS JAIL OVER REFUSAL TO VACCINATE SON

THIS WILL BE SHORT.
I'VE WRITTEN VOLUMES ON VACCINATIONS AND PARENTAL RIGHTS.

I'VE WRITTEN ABOUT THE STATE TAKING AWAY OUR CHILDREN, TAKING AWAY OUR RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT'S BEST FOR THEM.

MY STANCE ON THIS, BASED PURELY ON DOCUMENTED RESEARCH AND THE INFORMATION FROM PACKAGE INSERTS IN EACH BOX THAT COMES WITH A BOTTLE OF VACCINE, FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE AND FROM ALMOST 30 YEARS 'IN PRACTICE' IN THE MEDICAL FIELD, HAS ALWAYS BEEN CLEAR: 
I WOULDN'T VACCINATE A DOG WITH HUMAN VACCINES.

BEFORE I HAD ANY MEDICAL TRAINING, WE VACCINATED ALL OUR CHILDREN AND ALMOST LOST TWO OF THEM IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE VACCINES.

VACCINES ARE NOT HARMLESS.

IF VACCINES ACTUALLY WORK, NO ONE WHOSE CHILDREN ARE VACCINATED SHOULD BE THE LEAST CONCERNED ABOUT THOSE CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT VACCINATED.

I REPEAT, YOUR VACCINATED CHILD SHOULD HAVE FULL IMMUNITY FROM ANY DISEASE AN UNVACCINATED CHILD MIGHT CONTRACT, YOU POOR GULLIBLE, UNINFORMED LITTLE SHEEP.

IT IS NONE OF YOUR DAMNED BUSINESS WHAT OTHER PARENTS DECIDE FOR THEIR CHILDREN.
LEAVE THEM THE HELL ALONE?
TRY IT.

NO ONE WHO IS ANTI-VACCINE IS TRYING TO HAND YOU JAIL TIME FOR VACCINATING YOUR OFFSPRING, THOUGH, PERSONALLY, WHEN A PARENT IS PROPERLY INFORMED, MAKES THE CHOICE TO VACCINATE ANYWAY AND THAT CHILD DIES OR IS DISABLED, I BELIEVE THAT PARENT IS JUST AS GUILTY AS THE VACCINE MANUFACTURERS AND SHOULD BE IMPRISONED, BUT THAT'S JUST MY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. IT'S WHAT I BELIEVE.

IF YOU ARE 100% CONVINCED THAT VACCINES WILL PROTECT YOUR CHILD, WHY WORRY ABOUT THEM GETTING ANYTHING A VACCINE IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT?

YOU HAVE YOUR BELIEFS AND THE CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES ALL THE RIGHT TO HAVE THEIRS.

IN THE CASE CITED HERE, ONE PARENT WAS PRO-VACCINE, THE OTHER HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS THAT DID NOT AGREE WITH VACCINATIONS.
SHE WAS THE PRIMARY CUSTODIAN OF THE CHILD.

NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE OUTCOME MIGHT HAVE BEEN IF SHE HAD UPHELD HER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AGAINST THE WILL OF THE FATHER.

INSTEAD, SHE FOOLISHLY AGREED TO VACCINATE THE CHILD.
WHEN SHE DID NOT DO SO, SHE WENT TO JAIL AND LOST PRIMARY CUSTODY AND WHILE SHE WAS IN JAIL, THE FATHER HAD THE CHILD VACCINATED

TOO MANY TIMES CHILDREN BECOME PAWNS IN A VICIOUS GAME PLAYED BY COMBATIVE EX-SPOUSES.

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY IT ISN'T ALLOWABLE FOR VACCINES TO BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE CHILD REACHES AN AGE WHEN HE/SHE CAN DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHETHER OR NOT TO BE VACCINATED.
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT ANY CHILD PROVIDED ALL THE DOCUMENTATION REGARDING VACCINES WOULD CHOOSE TO BE VACCINATED. 
SOME MIGHT, BUT I THINK THEY WOULD BE FEW.

SUCH AN UNVACCINATED CHILD POSES NO THREAT TO VACCINATED CHILDREN IF, BIG IF, VACCINES WORK.

IT'S THE DOUBT THAT VACCINES WORK, ISN'T IT?
ISN'T IT THAT PARENTS WHO SHOT THEIR KIDS UP WITH GOD-KNOWS-WHAT ARE SCARED THOSE VACCINES DON'T AND WON'T PREVENT DISEASE?

ADMIT IT, YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN VACCINES EITHER IF YOU'RE AFRAID YOUR VACCINATED KID CAN BE INFECTED BY AN UNVACCINATED KID.
THAT'S HYPOCRISY!

THAT'S UNMITIGATED HYSTERIA  AND THAT THIS TYPE OF STATE OR FEDERAL INTERVENTION CAN BE ENFORCED IS HEINOUS, TO SAY THE LEAST.
THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT GRANT SUCH RIGHTS TO ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY OR TO CONGRESS.

HAD WE NOT BEEN WITHIN 3 MINUTES OF AN EMERGENCY ROOM AND LIFE-SAVING CAPABILITIES FOUND ONLY IN HOSPITAL SETTINGS, TWO OF OUR CHILDREN MOST DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE DIED FROM ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS.

WOULD THE FATHER HAVE STILL BEEN SATISFIED HAD THIS CHILD DIED?
WOULD THE HYSTERICAL PRO-VACCINE CROWD HAVE REJOICED FOR ANOTHER CHILD VACCINATED AFTER ANOTHER DEATH BY VACCINE?

MANY FAMILIES HAVE A GENETIC TENDENCY TO BE EXTREMELY "ALLERGIC" TO SUBSTANCES FOUND IN VACCINES.

PARENTS OF FRESHLY VACCINATED CHILDREN WHO DIED HAVE WON LAWSUITS FOR WRONGFUL DEATH.

PARENTS OF CHILDREN SEVERELY DISABLED AFTER VACCINES HAVE ALSO WON LAWSUITS.

DOESN'T THAT TELL IDIOTS WHO DEMAND ALL PARENTS VACCINATE THEIR CHILDREN ANYTHING?

YES, VACCINES HAVE KILLED, HAVE ALMOST KILLED, HAVE RENDERED CHILDREN MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY DISABLED FOR LIFE.

MY GENERATION WAS GIVEN THE MONKEY-VIRUS-INFESTED SALK VACCINE FOR POLIO.

THAT VACCINE CONTAINED THE VIRUS SV40.
SV40 IS FOUND IN MANY CANCEROUS TUMORS.
IT WAS FOUND IN MINE.
PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES AGREE SV40 CAN, HAS, DOES CAUSE CANCERS IN MANY, AND HAVE STATED SO.

"These data suggest that there may be an increased incidence of certain cancers among the 98 million persons exposed to contaminated polio vaccine in the U.S."

98 MILLION!

OUR FAMILIES WERE INVITED TO GET FREE VACCINES AS WELL.
MANY DID.

I SAW 40% OF MY GRADUATING CLASS DIE OF CANCER BEFORE THEY REACHED AGE 30.
I LOST MY PARENTS, MY ONLY SIBLING, THREE OF MY FOUR GRANDPARENTS, FOUR COUSINS, AN UNCLE AND ALL THOSE FRIENDS TO ONE DAMNED VACCINE.

IT TOOK DECADES FOR THE CDC TO ADMIT THAT THAT PARTICULAR SERIES OF VACCINES WAS CONTAMINATED WITH MONKEY VIRUS, THAT THE MANUFACTURER WAS AWARE OF IT AND DID NOT DISCLOSE THE FACT.

THAT PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY WAS KNOWINGLY HIDING THIS HORRIFIC FACT FOR DECADES.
I AM IN MY 4th BATTLE AGAINST CANCER TODAY. 

DON'T YOU DARE TRY TO TELL ME VACCINES ARE HARMLESS!  

IF YOU WISH TO TAKE SUCH A KNOWN RISK WITH YOUR CHILD, FINE, BUT I PITY THAT CHILD.

BUT IF OTHERS DECIDE AGAINST TAKING EVEN A ONE-IN-A-BILLION CHANCE THAT THEIR CHILD WILL BE KILLED OR HARMED, THEN WHY CAN'T THE PRO-VACCINE SCREAMERS SIMPLY SIT DOWN, SHUT UP AND GO ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THEIR POOR VACCINATED CHILDREN WILL BE SAFE FROM HARM?

NO, PRO-VACCINE PEOPLE ARE CONTROL FREAKS BY MAJORITY.
THEY SIMPLY WANT TO CONTROL WHAT OTHERS DO.

OR ELSE THEY ARE WILLFULLY IGNORANT OF WHAT THOSE INSERTS FOUND WITH EVERY BATCH OF VACCINE STATES...IT CAN CAUSE DEATH, IT CAN CAUSE HORRIBLE PROBLEMS.

IGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE.

CRAMMING YOUR BELIEFS DOWN ANOTHER'S THROAT FOR THE PLEASURE OF IT IS, AT BEST, PURELY EVIL.

MY PERSONAL OPINION, MY BLOG, MY WAY.
IF YOU DON'T LIKE THAT, DON'T READ HERE!
IF YOU DON'T WANT ME TELLING YOU THE TRUTH, DON'T YOU DARE TRY TO TELL ME ANYTHING.
AS A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, I BOTH REFUSED VACCINES AND REFUSED TO ADMINISTER VACCINES.
AND WHEN I PROVIDED THE ENCLOSED LITERATURE FROM THOSE VACCINES, MADE PARENTS READ IT ALL, NOT ONE PARENT EVER SAID TO ME, "GO AHEAD AND GIVE MY CHILD THE VACCINE".
NOT ONE.

THIS IS AN ATROCITY, A BREACH OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
AND IT IS 100% UNNECESSARY.


MOM GETS JAIL OVER REFUSAL TO VACCINATE SON


A Michigan mother has lost primary custody of her child after she was jailed for five days for not following through on an agreement to vaccinate her 9-year-old son.

Oakland County Judge Karen McDonald ruled Wednesday that Rebecca Bredow, 40, of Ferndale would no longer have primary custody of the boy, but would share joint custody with her ex-husband, James Horne.

Horne wanted his son vaccinated and Bredow agreed to do so last November but didn't follow through. The mother said vaccinations go against her religious beliefs.

Bredow was found in contempt of court last week and sent to jail for five days. The judge also granted temporary custody to Horne and ordered the boy to be vaccinated. He received four immunizations on Monday.
Bredow’s attorney said she was “devastated” when she found out her son was vaccinated.

OUR CHILDREN ARE OUR CHILDREN.
THE STATE DID NOT HAVE ANY PART IN THEIR CONCEPTION AND HAS NO PART IN WHAT WE CHOOSE TO DO TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM POSSIBLE HARM.




//WW