HOW OLD SHOULD A CHILD BE BEFORE HE/SHE IS PREPARED TO MAKE THE DECISION TO END HIS/HER LIFE?
HOW OLD IS OLD ENOUGH FOR A CHILD TO "CONSENT" TO BEING MOLESTED BY A PEDOPHILE?
Perhaps the most heinous organization in America is Nambla.
Nambla is short for the 'North American Man-Boy Association' and their identifying banner statement is “sex before 8 or it is too late”.
"The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is sanctioning a sexual revolution that will culminate in the legalization and whole-hearted support of transgenderism but will also support the legalization of pedophilia.
“For the first time, work on this issue will be effectively institutionalized at the Human Rights Council,” the UN said….”
Ironically, the praise for the child rapist came even as the UN’s “peace” armies were facing global outrage for systematically raping and sexually exploiting children around the world.
Years ago, I wrote about the fact that the North American Man-Boy Association (NAMBLA) was advocating for the legalization of pedophilia. Their identifying banner statement is “sex before 8 or it is too late”.
FROM THE TELEGRAPH, UK:
“Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation.
“At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”
The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July.
It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.
Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”
Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.
The New York Times is on record (here as well) saying the pedophilia is not a crime.
The ACLU is actively defending Nambla and pedophile advocates.
Salon published a piece titled I’m a pedophile, but not a monster
We’ve nipped around the edges for years. We allow 13 and 14 year old girls to get abortions without any police involvement. We’ve enacted “Romeo and Juliet” laws that sexualize young women and give older sexual predators a literal “Get Out of Jail Free” card. We saw GOP women side with the abortion industry in defeating a bill that would have required any woman asking for an abortion based on rape or incest to report the incident to the police. In short, all the ground work has been laid for making pedophilia a legitimate sexual activity.
The real agenda is hardly a secret. “This UN-LGBT Enforcer will travel the world imposing the sexual revolution on peoples and churches and countries who do not want it,” explained Austin Ruse, president of the Center for Family and Human Rights, or C-Fam. “It will be under the guise of protecting LGBT people from discrimination. But that is a lie. The purpose will be aimed at anyone who believes in traditional sexual morality and to stamp out that belief. The New United Nations LGBT Enforcer will determine, without a doubt, that your religious beliefs are nothing more than hate.”
Breitbart observed:
"Horrifyingly, there are signs of a new pedophile acceptance movement forming on the Left. Just as Allen West warned, the gay rights movement is being used as a template. First comes the argument that pedophiles are just “born that way,” absolving them of any moral responsibility for their desires. Then comes the argument that pedophiles are just normal people, like the rest of us, but somehow impoverished or victimised by their own condition.
Inevitably, our society’s current ostracisation of pedophiles will be portrayed as an injustice: an oppression from which pedophiles must be liberated, or for which they deserve our sympathy. And woe to the oppressors! Quietly, in progressive columns and academies around the world, progressives are losing their footing and sliding down that slippery slope. Publications like Salon are abetting the turpitude.
The unfortunate truth is that pedophiles and their sympathizers are USING the homosexual rights playbook. The same arguments Anthony Kennedy (and I have no evidence that Kennedy is a pedophile) made in deciding Lawrence vs. Texas and hammered home in Obergefell vs. Hodges can be applied directly to pedophiles. The fact that we already allow 13 and 14 year old girls sufficient agency to decide to take birth control pills or get an abortion without parental consent is a de facto death blow to state age of consent laws. Once consent is taken as something that is inherent in one’s humanity, ephebophilia (or pedophilia-lite) will be all the rage and it will just be a hop-skip-and-jump to full blown legalization of pedophilia.
The unfortunate thing is that on the progressive side of the spectrum, where the urge to use whatever it takes to scratch that insatiable itch in your nether regions, there is already an an underlying current of pedophilia evident in movies and television that needs just a tiny nudge to take off. And when this happens you will see pedophilia mainstreamed into HBO, Showtime, and the edgy Hollywood and Indie movies that are featured at Cannes and Sundance.
https://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism/normalizing-pedophilia-2-wesley-j-smith/
In our growing hedonistic culture, pedophilia is in the process of being normalized, downgraded by some from a severe sexual perversion into a mere ”orientation.”
The Atlantic–mainstream media!–has two articles that push us in that direction.
First, “I Pedophile,” by David Goldberg–a Canadian journalist convicted for viewing child pornography–argues that his obsession with children is a “sexual orientation:”
The main query that I am convinced will always be without an answer is why I am a pedophile. It is the equivalent of trying to determine why someone is heterosexual or gay. We don’t choose our sexual orientations. If we could, believe me, no one would choose mine.
Then, he says incarceration isn’t the right approach to child porn consumers:
'I am not advocating the cross-generational lifestyle. In fact, there is never an instance when an adult should engage in sexual behavior with a child. But until we as a society learn that help for those who view child pornography is a far better alternative to incarceration, we are doomed to see the continued proliferation of this problem. Scientists don’t know for certain if there is a correlation between viewing child pornography and offending against children. Wouldn’t it be nice to get pedophiles help before we find out for certain?'
“Cross generational lifestyle?” Watching child porn is “offending against children!”
Goldman says he is “lucky” to have been caught in Canada and given only a 90-day jail sentence. Otherwise he would have had to spend time with “hardened” criminals. But who is a more hardened criminal than someone who victimizes children?
It’s one thing for a pedophile to rationalize his perversion. It is another for ”experts” in treating the condition to claim that pedophilia is a sexual orientation."
Secondly, from the Atlantic's, “What Can Be Done About Pedophilia?”
“Sexual orientation” means different things in different contexts. When they say “sexual orientation,” most people mean a sexual interest that is inborn and unchangeable. No one chooses to be sexually attracted to children, although people do choose whether they act on their sexual attractions. Therapists have been attempting to turn pedophiles into non-pedophiles for a very long time, but no one has presented any objective evidence of any enduring change in sexual interests.
In the U.S, relativism has even seeped into the military. As was recently reported, American soldiers in Afghanistan are now being instructed to ignore the sexual abuse of boys by Afghan allies. Campaigners against religious barbarism like the UK’s National Secular Society have condemned the relativism at the heart of radical left-wing identity politics, but to no avail.
SEE ALSO: Sex Abuse by UN “Peace” Troops Becoming Global Scandal
It is particularly crucial to protect children from pedophiles in the age of the internet, when adults have unprecedented access to minors via internet forums, chat rooms and gaming. Children get phones and tablets earlier and earlier, and nearly all kids play such social games.
Twenty-first century pedophiles aren’t hanging around school gates with candy: they’re lurking online, like Sarah Nyberg. And parents are in some cases decades behind the times when it comes to protecting their little ones."THE U.N. WILL "PROPERLY EDUCATE CHILDREN" TO ACCEPT PEDOPHILIA.
"Partnering with the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), an arm of the Kinsey Institute, UNESCO has compromised any reputation it may have had as an independent and reputable organization.
The Kinsey Institute was founded by sexologist Alfred Kinsey, who studied human sexual behaviors in the 1940s and 1950s. Kinsey has been accused of promoting pedophilia, citing his research that documented adults helping to bring children and infants to orgasm. The Kinsey Institute created SIECUS in 1964, an organization that received $1.6 million in federal funding between 2002 and 2009.
UNESCO admits that many of the new controversial guidelines were authored by a former director of SEICUS.
UNESCO’s newest guidelines introduced in September of last year faced heavy opposition as they suggested promoting legal abortion and masturbation for children as young as five. Though the opposition was strong enough to force the organization to withdraw its guidelines, similar ones were quietly introduced last December.
While the guidelines have been dubbed “a model of age-appropriate sex education,” UN members staunchly opposed them last week."
UN whistleblower who exposed sexual abuse by peacekeepers is exonerated
"The confidential report – entitled Sexual Abuse of Children by International Armed Forces – contained details about the rape and sodomy of starving and homeless young boys by French peacekeepers at the camp. The interviews with children had been carried out by a member of staff from the office of the high commissioner for human rights in 2014, and a staff member from Unicef, but no action had been taken by the UN and the information was not passed to the French until Kompass decided to act."
United Nations whistleblower Anders Kompass, a human-rights official who exposed international so-called peacekeepers raping and exploiting children in Africa on a UN “peace” mission, announced this week that he would be leaving the scandal-plagued international organization for good. Citing the “complete impunity” for officials and the “lack of accountability” that is “entrenched” in the UN, Kompass said it was “impossible” for him to continue working there. The implications of the resignation for the UN are enormous, and suggest that the problems plaguing the organization are systemic.
Indeed, the UN has come under major fire in recent months over its ongoing and systematic persecution of whistleblowers who expose everything from child rape and exploitation to corruption and the transfer of technology to tyrants.
The situation has become so bad — and so obvious — that the U.S. Congress was forced to hold hearings into the issue of UN retaliation against those who blow the whistle earlier this year. American lawmakers praised UN whistleblowers, including Kompass, during and after the hearings.
They also threatened to cut off funding for UN agencies unless and until proper protections were put in place. So far, though, as Kompass' resignation shows, the problems continue, and impunity reigns.
CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO DIE?
UNICEF lobbies Canadian Parliament to allow euthanasia for CHILDREN
UNICEF, A UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION, WANTS EUTHANASIA OF CHILDREN TO BE ALLOWED, "SAME AS FOR ADULTS", BUT SUGGESTS THERE NEED NOT BE A "TERMINAL ILLNESS" INVOLVED, AND THAT EUTHANASIA FOR THE MENTALLY ILL SHOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED.
May 27, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — UNICEF Canada is pushing for assisted suicide and euthanasia for children — or “mature minors” — arguing that this conforms with the Charter, Canadian legal precedent and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
That would include euthanasia or assisted suicide for mature minors who suffer from a non-terminal illness or disability, according to UNICEF Canada’s policy director Marvin Bernstein.
UNICEF, or United Nations Children’s Fund (originally, Emergency Fund) is a UN organization that is, according to its website, “on a mission to reach every child and ensure their well-being, no matter where they are in this world.”
“There’s no limit to the lengths UNICEF will go, the risks we’ll take or the depth of our commitment to save children’s lives,” it reads. “We are committed to take action, save, rehabilitate and watch over children, with a special attention to the most vulnerable and excluded groups.”
AND YET THEY'RE PUSHING FOR EUTHANASIA FOR CERTAIN CHILDREN?
UNICEF also supported the recommendation by the joint parliamentary committee that mature minors be eligible for assisted suicide or euthanasia in the second of a two-stage legislative roll-out, “which would come into force no later than three years after the first stage is enforced,” noted Bernstein.
But UNICEF Canada further proposed that in the three-year interim, children be allowed to petition a Superior Court to be allowed assistance to kill themselves, or to killed by lethal injection.
That recommendation was “so we don't have an unfair prejudicial situation continuing for three years with no remedy that can be accessed by mature minors,” Bernstein said.
“Do you not see a major problem with the consideration of allowing vulnerable children to request assisted death?” Conservative Manitoba Senator Don Plett asked.
“Have these children, in your opinion, reached their full potential?”
There “may be children who are experiencing irremediable conditions, intolerable and enduring suffering,” replied Bernstein, “and they should have the right when they reach a point of sufficient maturity to make some determinations for themselves.”
UNICEF Canada supports euthanasia and assisted suicide in cases where the children are NOT suffering from terminal illness, Bernstein told the committee, adding: “I think it should be the same criteria…applied to adults and children.”
Tricked by UNICEF - | National Review
"Americans mostly know UNICEF through the “trick or treat for UNICEF” campaigns.
The “trick” is on the donors who think that UNICEF is all about helping poor children."
Belgium extends "right-to-die" to terminally ill children
HAS THE ENTIRE WORLD GONE COMPLETELY MAD?
WHO IS LEFT TO HELP THE CHILDREN?
WHO CARES ANYMORE IF CHILDREN SUFFER AND DIE?
I DO, AND I ALWAYS WILL.
______________________________________
Related Articles:
--American College of Pediatricians: Transgender Agenda Hurts Children
We will provide enough police for historic child abuse criminal investigation, says Nick Clegg
06 Jul 2014
Home Office to publish review into links with Paedophile Information Exchange within weeks
07 Jul 2014
Westminster 'paedophile ring': now where does the investigation go?
15 Nov 2014
Anonymous hackers turn fire on global paedophile menace
23 Jan 2015
Rolf Harris: Footage emerges of him joking with Jimmy Savile
01 Jul 2014
Jimmy Savile: pressure grows for full inquiry into historic child abuse
29 Jun 2014
//WW
No comments:
Post a Comment