Translate

Friday, March 6, 2015

MASTER RACE OF THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
~Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)


"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."
~New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922


"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
~Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

WHO FORMED THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION?
IT WAS FORMED BY A VERY WEALTHY MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, THE CFR.


DAVID ROCKEFELLER, WITH HELP FROM ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, AND
CONTRIBUTING "SEED MONEY" TO ITS CREATION WERE THE KETTERING FOUNDATION, THE FORD FOUNDATION, AND INTERNATIONAL BANKERS FROM FRANCE, ENGLAND, CANADA, AND LET'S NOT FORGET THE U.N.'S "IMF" (INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND).


BEFORE THIS CREATION, DECADES BEFORE ROCKEFELLER HAD THE POLITICAL CLOUT TO FORM SUCH A "COMMISSION", HIS FOUNDATION STUCK ITS FINGERS INTO A PIE THAT FEW ARE AWARE OF...
ROCKEFELLER FOUND A WAY TO CORNER THE MARKET ON THE NEW POST-WORLD WAR TWO "PHARMACEUTICAL INVESTMENT BUSINESS".

WHY WOULD HE CHOOSE THIS NEW 'INDUSTRY' OVER ALL OTHERS?
BECAUSE THE AMERICAN EUGENICS MOVEMENT ADVOCATED THE USE OF CHEMICAL STERILIZATION OF THE "UNFIT MASSES"..... "FOR THE BENEFIT OF MANKIND".


IT WAS THE 1920s WHEN THE LINKS BETWEEN THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT (POPULATION REDUCTION BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY), EMERGING BIG PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND LABS, AND THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION WERE FORMED.

THE HISTORY OF THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION HAS MANY TWISTS AND TURNS, BUT, I ASSURE YOU, EACH ONE IS IMPORTANT.
HOW IT WAS BORN OF AN ELITE MEMBERSHIP, SET ON "RACIAL PURITY" AND THE GOVERNING OF THE WORLD BY THE "FIT" MUST BE UNDERSTOOD.


Just as Rockefeller developed his monopoly on oil, he chiseled out his supremacy in the business of medicine.

In its first years of existence, Rockefeller's  pharmaceutical investment business faced a 'mortal threat' : vitamins and other micronutrients promoted and endorsed by public health programs would prohibit the development of any sizable investment business based on patented drugs. 
The elimination of unwanted competition from natural micronutrients therefore became a question of life and death for the pharmaceutical business.
But HOW?

It would take a small army of Rockefeller trained and dedicated "scientists", media moguls,  and public relations experts years to discredit and dissuade Americans from the idea of PREVENTING disease, but Rockefeller money was able to do so, and to buy a few members of Congress and heads of Federal agencies along the way.
He would later do the same things to push the vaccine agenda, Planned Parenthood, genetically modified organisms, and "crop science".

A small group of very powerful Americans created, throughout the 1920s, a startling agenda, the monopolization of American medicine, and with that, a way to reduce the population of planet Earth to a "manageable number", which would be overseen by a global elite dedicated to creating a "Master Race", dedicated to ridding society of  "UNDESIRABLES", of "CERTAIN RACES", of the "DEFORMED, DISEASED, FREAKS AND CRIMINALS" whom they saw as barriers to a better world.

FIRST, ESTABLISH A FOOTHOLD  
In 1938, the Dulles brothers, John Foster and Allen, the law firm which represented John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil in 1911, when the Supreme Court of the U.S. found Rockefeller and his Trust guilty of corruption, illegal business practices and racketeering, engineered the partnership between John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil and I.G. Farben, Germany's leading industrial organization which held the patent on the gas that killed millions of people in Hitler's concentration camps.
 I.G. Farben and the Third Reich were inseparable partners, and the Rockefellers were partners with I.G. Farben.

Through this partnership, having become dedicated to the "Master Race Plan", Rockefeller invested heavily in German genetics research...funding various German eugenics programs, including the laboratory of Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a lab that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.

[IMPORTANT NOTE: THE DULLES LAW FIRM HELPED THE CARNEGIE INSTITUTE CREATE, IN 1904, THE LABORATORY WHERE THE RESEARCH FOR THE AMERICAN BREEDERS' ASSOCIATION WAS CARRIED OUT. THIS WAS THE COMPLEX AT COLD SPRING HARBOR ON LONG ISLAND. JOHN FOSTER DULLES LATER DIRECTED THE OFFICE OF STRATEGIC SERVICE (THE OSS, PRECURSOR TO THE CIA).

 "'John D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, America's wealthiest oil and railroad magnates, invested more than $11 million-an extraordinary fortune at that time-in funding this facility. Soon thereafter, in 1909, the first genetics laboratory was established at the Rockefeller Institute and directed by Dr. Phoebus Aaron Theodor Levene.'" 

This secretive, powerful union was forming between some very influential people: the Rockefeller family, Prescott Bush (George H. W. Bush's father who was investigated, as searchable files in the U.S. National Archives reveal, when the firm he worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman, acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s.The company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act.), William Draper III, the royal family in England, and a few other financiers who would inspire the eugenics agenda.

While eugenics is defined simply as the study of the genetic differences between the races, genetics and genetic engineering became the means by which this elite group hoped to control the population, the "breeding" of the world.

Their desire for "racial purity" led to the racial hygiene laws and the study of the genetic predisposition for diseases among the races.

NEXT STEP, MAKE IT SO! 
IF YOU ARE "GENETICALLY UNFIT", THERE IS A BREEDERS' ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA WHO WANTS TO TAKE YOU OUT OF THE GENE POOL.

Senior public health officials and legislators are adopting the theories of a coterie of scientists who trace anti-social behavior to DNA and recommend that the most efficient way to improve society is by screening out and sterilizing people diagnosed as genetically unfit.

The racist agenda that you think Hitler came up with were, in fact, born about 1928, the "brainchild" of this small elitist group aiming for population reduction and supremacy of the "master race". 

AMERICAN BREEDERS WANT TO BREED A SELECT FEW!   

THE "AMERICAN BREEDERS' ASSOCIATION" (NOW CALLED THE AMERICAN GENETIC ASSOCIATION, OR "AGA"), AFTER EXTENSIVE RESEARCH, PUBLISHED ITS RESULTS IN 1914, AND FOUND THAT THE IMMEDIATE NEED FOR A BETTER WORLD RESTED SOLELY IN CONTROLLING THE "BREEDING STOCK" OF HUMANITY.
REMEMBER, THIS GROUP WAS FUNDED WITH MILLIONS FROM ROCKEFELLER, CARNEGIE, AND HARRIMAN, TO NAME A FEW.


[THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT THIS LINK:
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/556985/Bulletin10A.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

I WARN YOU, IT IS A GRISLY, CHILLING, VERY DISTURBING THING TO READ. ]


TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF UNDESIRABLES BREEDING, THE STUDY OFFERED SOLUTIONS, AND STRONGLY ADVOCATED FOR THE TOP TWO, SEGREGATION AND STERILIZATION, OF THOSE IT DEEMED "UNFIT TO BREED".

OH, BY THE WAY, TAKE NOTE THAT ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL SERVED AS CHAIRMAN,
 WILLIAM H. WELCH, VICE CHAIRMAN, AND CHARLES B. DAVENPORT, SECRETARY AND RESIDENT DIRECTOR.   

EUTHANASIA WAS DEEMED"SOLUTION #8". JUST A FEW QUOTES FROM THAT DOCUMENT TO SHOW YOU WHERE THIS THING WAS HEADING:

~ "It is the purpose of the committee to investigate all phases of the

problem of cutting off the supply of defectives..."  

~ "The specific problems, then, now before this committee may be
classified as follows: 

1. Medicine: Standards and methods for determining the type
of degenerates proposed for eugenical segregation or sterilization. 
The relation of sterilization to the spread of venereal diseases. Sterilization
as a therapeutic agent. The classification and determination of human
defects.  

2. Physiology: Comparative effects of the various forms of sterilization 
on normal and the different types of abnormal individuals, both 
male and female, at different ages, in respect to nutrition, growth, 
temperament, primary sex organs, secondary sexual characteristics, 
voice and physiological reactions.  

3. Surgery: Technical and popular description of the various
methods employed in sterilizing both males and females. 
Seriousness and difficulty of the operations. 
Preparation and convalescence. 
Possibility of restoring the procreatory function in sterilized persons."  

~ "CHAPTER I.
THE PROBLEM. 
THE SOCIALLY INADEQUATE IN THE AMERICAN POPULATION. 

For the purposes of eugenical study and in working out a policy
of elimination, it seems fair to estimate the anti-social varieties of the
American people at 10 percent of the total population; but even this
is arbitrary. "

~ "CHAPTER II.
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOCIALLY UNFIT FROM DEFECTIVE
INHERITANCE: 

Individual misfits in the social fabric are sometimes classified as
“the Defective, the Dependent, and the Delinquent.” Sometimes this
classification of “the three D’s” is recast and increased to the five D’s
by adding the “Deficient” and the “Degenerate” classes. 
In this classification: 

1, a tramp or a pauper would be called a Dependent;  
2, an Idiot or an imbecile would be called a Deficient;  
3, the manic depressive or the senile dement would be called a Defective;  
4, the thief or the truant would be called a Delinquent;  
5, a sadist or a moral imbecile would be called a Degenerate." 

THE "RESEARCH" POINTED TO THE NORDIC RACE AS THE MOST FIT, THE MOST DESIRABLE OF ALL RACES TO CARRY ON AS A MASTER RACE.  

"This group alone, they believed, was fit to inherit the earth. In the process, the movement intended to subtract emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East Europeans, Jews, dark-haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists."  

REMEMBER, THIS WAS PUBLISHED IN 1913-1914, BEFORE HITLER DECIDED TO USE IT TO "PURIFY" GERMANY!

Hitler was merely an admirer of this scheme. 
Hitler even wrote a fan letter to American eugenic leader Madison Grant calling his race-based eugenics book, 'The Passing of the Great Race' , his "bible."  

During the Reich's early years, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler's plans as the logical fulfillment of their own decades of research and effort. 


California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda for American consumption. They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits, such as an August 1934 display at the L.A. County Museum, for the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association. 

The American Council of Learned Societies, created in 1919. which from the beginning derived most of its support from the General Education Board and then from the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) , received the first of many additional grants to support fellowships in "HUMANISTIC STUDIES".  


Eugenic breeders believed American society was not ready to implement an organized lethal solution ("SOLUTION #8"). But many mental institutions and doctors practiced improvised medical lethality and passive euthanasia on their own. 

One institution in Lincoln, Illinois, fed its incoming patients milk from tubercular cows, believing a eugenically strong individual would be immune. 
Thirty to forty percent annual death rates resulted at Lincoln. Some doctors practiced passive eugenicide one newborn infant at a time. Others doctors at mental institutions engaged in lethal neglect.
Nonetheless, with eugenicide marginalized, the main solution for eugenicists was the rapid expansion of forced segregation and sterilization, as well as more marriage restrictions. California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, 

California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which were on women. The state's two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.
Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. 
In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense.  

Beginning in 1933 and extending for more than 20 years, RF spent about $1.5 million in identifying and assisting 300 scientists and scholars from Nazi Germany to settle in friendly locations; many were relocated to U.S. universities.

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, IN ITS "OPERATION PAPERCLIP", WOULD SPIRIT OUT OF NAZI GERMANY SOME OF ITS TOP SCIENTIFIC MINDS WHO WOULD, LIKE WERNHER VON BRAUN, TAKE THE U.S. INTO SPACE, ADVANCE AMERICA'S MILITARY STANDING, AND STRENGTHEN OUR NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM.  

MANY OF THESE NAZI SCIENTISTS BROUGHT WITH THEM THE STRONG DESIRE TO CONTINUE THEIR "RESEARCH" ON HOW BEST TO RID THE WORLD OF "UNDESIRABLES", THE RACIALLY UNFIT.  

SO, HERE IS THE LINK, DECADES OLD, BETWEEN A GROUP OF VERY WEALTHY, VERY POWERFUL MEN, DETERMINED TO CREATE A SOCIETY VOID OF THE GENETICALLY IMPURE AND MANY OF THE SAME MEN PLUS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, ECONOMISTS, MEGA-CORPORATIONS, BANKERS, AND POLITICAL ALLIES WHO WORKED TO CREATE AN INTERNATIONAL GROUP TO DICTATE  POLICY AND FORMA "ONE WORLD" GOVERNMENT...
HERE WERE THE BEGINNINGS OF THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION.  


"The world is governed by very different personages from
what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."
— BENJAMIN DISRAELI

"We are grateful to The Washington PostThe New York TimesTime Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years."  

"But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.  
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." 

~ David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991. 

"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent."  
~Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950 

"THERE MUST BE A NEW WORLD ORDER!" 
ORGANIZING THE RULING ELITE            

Zbigniew Brzezinski, United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981, a professor at Columbia University, and a Rockefeller advisor who was a specialist on international affairs, left his post to organize the group along with:

*Henry D. Owen (a Foreign Policy Studies Director with the Brookings Institution)

*George S. Franklin (Fluent in Russian, Mr. Franklin toured the Soviet Union in the late  1950's to learn what the people thought of their Government, the United States and the possibility of war. He held various Federal Government posts from 1940 to 1944.) 

*Robert R. Bowie (of the Foreign Policy Association and Director of the Harvard Center for International Affairs)

*Gerard C. Smith (Salt I negotiator, Rockefeller in-law, and its first North American Chairman)

*Marshall Hornblower (former partner at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering)

*William Scranton (former Governor of Pennsylvania)

*Edwin Reischauer (professor at Harvard University, and United States Ambassador to Japan from 1961-1966)

*Max Kohnstamm (European Policy Centre)

*Tadashi Yamamoto (Japan Center for International Exchange)

Other founding members included Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker, both later heads of the Federal Reserve system.  

WHAT A POWERFUL LIST OF NAMES, ISN'T IT!  

In many ways the origins of the Trilateral Commission stem from the reorganization and reconstruction of the political and economic order following the resolution of World War II.  

1944
The United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference held July 1-22, 1944 at the Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, commonly known as the Bretton Woods Conference, brought together delegates from all the allied nations to stabilize and regulate the international monetary and financial order.

The Bretton Woods accords established the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  

A period of significant economic growth followed particularly in the regions of Western Europe and Japan where the redevelopment of infrastructure and the expansion of trade exports increased their relative economic power.

In March 1972, speaking before Chase Bank investment forums in Montreal, London, Brussels and Paris, David Rockefeller called for “an international commission for peace and prosperity composed of private citizens drawn from the NATO countries and Japan to examine such vital fields as international trade and investment; environmental problems; control of crime and drugs; population control; and assistance to developing nations.”

 Rockefeller considered Japan as an essential member of the international
community and viewed a commission as a mechanism for including the Japanese in the international dialogue.

Kettering Foundation and Ford Foundation immediately stepped up to provide extra funding for the new commission, but the initial seed monies were provided by David Rockefeller.

Rockefeller defined the Commission’s primary focus as bringing “the best brains in the world to bear on the problems of the future.”

"....THE BEST BRAINS IN THE WORLD..."  

THE BEST BRAINS ENGINEERED BY GENETICS, BY "PROPER SELECTIVE BREEDING"?
OF COURSE!
IT'S FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND....ISN'T IT?

In 1979, Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, published his autobiography 'With No Apologies'.  
He stated:  
"In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power -- political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community.  

What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."

In 1981, researcher Laurie K. Strand stated in the book People's Almanac #3: 

"The Trilateral Commission's tentacles have reached so far in the political and economic sphere that it has been described by some as a cabal of powerful men out to control the world by creating a supernational community dominated by the multinational corporations."

Since the Carter administration, Trilateralists have held these very influential positions in EVERY administration:  
~Six of the last eight World Bank Presidents;  
~Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the United States (except for Obama and Biden);  
~over half of all US Secretaries of State;  
~and three quarters of the Secretaries of Defense.  

BUT THAT'S JUST FOR STARTERS!   

The top leadership of the media is also saturated with members of the Trilateral Commission who are able to selectively suppress or actively manipulate the stories that are fed to us every day.  

They include:

- David Bradley, Chairman, Atlantic Media Company   

- Karen Elliot House, former Senior Vice President, Dow Jones & Company, and Publisher, the Wall Street Journal   

- Richard Plepler, Co-president, HBO   

- Charlie Rose, PBS   

- Fareed Zakaria, Editor, Newsweek   

- Mortimer Zuckerman, Chairman, US News & World Reports 

There are many other top-level media connections due to corporate directorships and stock ownership.  

Obama appointed eleven members of the Trilateral Commission to top-level and key positions in his administration within his first ten days in office. 
Other presidents before him have done the same.
WHY?  

AN OLD FAMILIAR FACE           
Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973, has been Obama’s principal foreign policy advisor.
He also served as a counsellor to Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966–1968 and held the position of United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981.

Why should that bother us?
 In his 1971 book, 'Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era',  Brzezinski states that, “The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”  

[This thoroughly TRASHES the basic concepts of nation-state, national sovereignty and the role of the government in society, to champion a vision of a world governed by international or "WORLD" banks and transnational corporations.]  

Oddly, he was an advisor to Republican presidents as well, notably to Ronald Reagan and acted as liaison to the Middle East when Regan was arming the  Afghan mujahaddin network.

In 1985, under the Reagan administration, Brzezinski served as a member of the President's Chemical Warfare Commission.
From 1987 to 1988, he worked on the U.S. National Security Council–Defense Department Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy.
From 1987 to 1989 he also served on the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

In 1988, Brzezinski was co-chairman of the George H.W. Bush National Security Advisory Task Force and endorsed Bush for president.

A very similar portrait can be painted of another Trilateralist, Henry Kissinger.
He was born with the name Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Fürth, Bavaria, Germany, in 1923 during the Weimar Republic.

In 1955, Kissinger was made the nuclear weapons study group director for the Council of Foreign Relations by Nelson Rockefeller. This is not a government agency.
That same year (1955), Kissinger finished his Ph.D. thesis at Harvard, entitled 'The Meaning of History' in which he describes the contemporary evolution of the New World Order

On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, "National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests." The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. 

 It paid special attention to 13 "key countries" in which the United States had a "special political and strategic interest": India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia.
It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.

There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that "population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline," even if such measures were adopted.  

A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: "There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."  

"Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now," the document continued, adding, "Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?"  

"It is questionable," Kissinger wrote, "whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis." Consequently, "large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished," was foreseeable.  

And the famines did indeed come...we made certain of that!
Basically, Kissinger liked the ideas of using food as a weapon, withholding it when necessary to create depopulating "famines", and to develop highly destructive microorganisms to destroy human immune systems, packaged for for germ warfare, and declared them more effective than, and an alternative to, nuclear weapons.  

Of course the U.S. must create the organisms, and then test them "where the hand of America will not show"...starting with AFRICA, where both HIV/AIDS and EBOLA had their beginnings. 
Coincidence? 
Think again. 

"The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer."

That is a quote from a meeting, actually, minutes from a meeting, in Turkey, where KISSINGER was talking to his Turkish counterpart, and shows maybe the spirit of how he was conducting the foreign policy of this country.

"THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKES A LITTLE LONGER"...?
THINK ABOUT THAT!

This site, http://www.augustforecast.com , also has many papers analyzing various aspects of the Trilateral Commission’s hegemony in the United States and elsewhere, since it’s founding in 1973. 
You would do well to read them.

WITH A RING IN OUR NOSES, WITH FEAR BEING USED AS A WEAPON AGAINST US, WE HAVE BEEN DUPED INTO OUR CURRENT MINDSET, ONE WHICH INCESSANTLY LOOKS FOR A "SAVIOR" OF OUR NATION.

WE WANT SECURITY, AND HAVE SACRIFICED OUR FREEDOMS TO GET WHAT WE THINK IS SECURITY.

WHAT WE REALLY HAVE IS A GROUP OF POWERFUL ELITISTS WHO SEE US AS LESSER BEINGS.

WE ARE THE HERD, AND WE MUST BE MANAGED AS ONE.
WE MUST BE CULLED.
THE AMERICAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION LIVES.
EUGENICS, GENE MANAGEMENT, CREATION OF A "SUPER RACE" IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY...THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

THOSE WHOM THE EUGENICISTS AND TRILATERALISTS DEEM UNFIT WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXTERMINATED, BY STERILIZATION, OR BY WAR, OR BY LAB-CREATED PLAGUES, VACCINES, GMO FOODS, "CROP MANAGEMENT" CHEMICALS AND PESTICIDES THAT HANG IN OUR AIR, ADDITIVES TO OUR DRINKING WATER, AND EVEN THE "MEDICINES" WE TAKE...THOSE WITH WARNINGS SO LONG THEY HAVE TO BE PRINTED ON PACKAGE INSERTS THAT MOST DOCTORS REMOVE BEFORE GIVING PATIENTS A 'SAMPLE' TO TAKE HOME.  

IT'S A VERY TWISTED, COMPLEX WEB OF DECEIT.

WE WILL BE PITTED AGAINST ONE ANOTHER FOR RACIAL, POLITICAL, SOCIOLOGICAL AND EVEN RELIGIOUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL DIFFERENCES.

THERE WILL BE WARS, LONG, UNENDING WARS, INTERNAL ONES AND PRETEND ONES, AND MANIPULATED ONES, FOR THERE MUST BE WAR IN ORDER FOR THE GLOBAL ELITE TO PROFIT, AND TO FURTHER REDUCE OUR NUMBERS.

“Why, of course the people don’t want war … But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy.      

All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” 
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror.
 [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”. 
– Josef Stalin  

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.  
– Adolph Hitler

AND SO IT GOES...

WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY....IT COMES FROM WITHIN.


Sunday, March 1, 2015

RADIATION FROM HANFORD AND INFANT MORTALITY

A MOTHER'S PLEA: "REMEMBER THESE BABIES
FROM JUST ONE CEMETERY, SO MANY DEAD BABIES"


ANOTHER STORY FROM A HANFORD VICTIM.
THERE ARE THOUSANDS.
THERE ARE NEW ONES EVERY YEAR!


PART 2 OF A DOCUMENTARY PROVING HANFORD KNEW THE DESIGN WOULD FAIL BUT WENT AHEAD WITH THE FACILITY ANYWAY.

"America's Fukushima"
NEVERENDING HANFORD
http://www.newsweek.com/americas-fukushima-243996

NOVEMBER 21, 2013
"If disaster strikes Richland, it will be because the federal government (namely, the Department of Energy) allowed 56 million gallons of radioactive waste to fester in this sandy soil, where some say it is rife for an explosion. And, critics charge, the DOE has watched its prime contractor on the site, Bechtel, grossly overcharge the American public for a waste-treatment plant so poorly built that, once it's finished (if it ever gets finished), feeding nuclear material through it could cause a catastrophe."

HANFORD IS "AMERICA'S FUKUSHIMA", BUT NOTHING IS BEING DONE TO STOP  IT...JUST LIKE IN JAPAN.

THE DEATHS CONTINUE, THE BIRTH DEFECTS CONTINUE, JUST AS AT THE CHERNOBYL SITE, THE FUKUSHIMA SITE, EVERY SITE WHERE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ARE LEAKING, CONSTANTLY LEAKING.  

FROM NSNBC INTERNATIONAL, APRIL 24, 2014

400 % Spike in Rare Birth Defects Near Leaking Hanford Nuclear Site


The Washington State Health Department is trying to identify the cause of an unusually high number of rare birth defects in south central Washington, around the leaking Hanford nuclear site.
While the Washington State Health Department stress the need for a detailed study of the cluster, there is little doubt about the cause for the alarming rate of the severe birth defects among local residents who are pointing at the leaking Hanford nuclear site.

February 2013, Governor Jay Inslee drew attention to the fact, that at least six of the tanks, which are containing radioactive waste, were leaking. The alarm was raised, after decreasing radioactivity levels were observed within the tanks, while no elevated levels were observed outside of the double shell tanks themselves. The situation developed into a scandal due to federal authorities failure to respond in due time and, according to critics, with appropriate measures.
[VERY IMPORTANT! Note: Are you a resident of Yakima, Franklin, or Benton county? Are or have you been working at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation? Have you / your family or loved ones been affected? Do you have important information to share? – nsnbc international has launched an in-depth investigation and we are asking you to come forward. We guarantee name protection for whistleblowers. You can contact our editor in chief by e-mail, Skype or phone at: e-mail: nsnbc.wordpress@gmail.com, SkypeID: nsnbc.international – or phone +45 322 177 31]

According to the Walla Walla coroner’s website, they have ‘unclaimed’ remains of nearly 100 cremated babies95% of the babies died between 1946 and the 1970s (56 of 57 boys33 of 36 girls). “Hanford produced its first plutonium on Nov 6, 1944 [until] the reactor shutdown in the 1970s.” -Source

THE BABY TOOTH PROJECT FOR DETECTING RADIATION LEVELS       
The initial impetus for the Baby Tooth Survey came from an article in the British scientific journal Nature by Dr. Herman M. Kalckar, a Johns Hopkins University biochemist (and former research fellow in the laboratory of Carl and Gerty Cori at the Washington University School of Medicine from 1940 to 1943).  

Kalckar suggested that primary teeth, as they were extracted or shed, might provide valuable information as to the absorption of radioactive elements by the body.  He proposed an International Milk Teeth Radiation Census, which would “contribute important information concerning the amount and kind of radiation received by the most sensitive section of any population, namely, the children.”

Washington University School of Dentistry professors Harold L. Rosenthal, John T. Bird, and John E. Gilster conducted the scientific study of the baby teeth.  
They found that the radioactive strontium-90 levels in the baby teeth of children born from 1945 to 1965 had risen 100-fold and that the level of strontium-90 rose and fell in correlation with atomic bomb tests.  

Early results from the Baby Tooth Survey, and a U. S. Public Health Service study that showed an alarming rise in the percentage of underweight live births and of childhood cancer, helped persuade President John F. Kennedy to negotiate a treaty with the Soviet Union to end above-ground testing of atomic bombs in 1963.

BUT IN PLACES NEAR HANFORD THE BOMBS HAVEN'T STOPPED GOING OFF.  

The following statements are from residents who live near Hanford.
They all appeared in the documentary "Deadly Deception: General Electric, Nuclear Weapons, and Our Environment"
(Academy Award Winner for Best Documentary Short: 1991: 29 mins.)

June Casey: And then I started losing my hair, and I had long, naturally-curly hair. I then had to start wearing a wig, and have since lost two babies, one through miscarriage and the other through stillbirth.

Tom Bailey (Mesa, Washington): The next house, cancer. This house, a man and a woman lived here by the name Voss. 

Jack Voss died of cancer and his wife gave birth to a deformed child. 
She drowned the child in the bathtub and then committed suicide that same day.

 Down the road a little further here, the next household, the father died of cancer, the mother has leukemia right now, and the daughter has thyroid cancer.

Tom Bailey: This is the north corner of it here, beginning with the Weinberger household. 
The 1973 March of Dimes poster child was born there with no eyes. 

The family back in behind here, the boy and his wife just had a child born with no skull. 

America's Atomic Time Bomb: Hanford Nuclear Waste Still Poses Serious Risks    

The lambs were born without eyes or mouths. Some had legs that had grotesquely grown together; others had no legs at all. Many were stillborn. Thirty-one were lost in a single night.

As chronicled by journalist Michael D'Antonio in his 1993 book Atomic Harvest, their tale is one of thousands of horror stories that took place in the area surrounding Hanford, Washington, the site of America's first full-scale plutonium production facility.
The site haunts the locals to this day -- and imperils them.

The US Department of Energy (DOE) recently revised its timetable for Hanford's decontamination, the biggest environmental cleanup in American history. 

The end date was moved back, once again. 
It now hopes to finally wrap up this Herculean task by September 2052 -- 2052, more than 108 years after Hanford was opened.

"Death Maps"
Back in the 1960s, Juanita Andrewjewski, a farmer's wife, created a "death map" of the area near her house -- with crosses for heart disease and circles for cancer. Soon, the map was strewn with crosses and circles; at one point, there were 67 of them.

The farmers in the area and people in Richland and the two neighboring towns, Pasco and Kennewick -- known collectively as the Tri-Cities -- are among the most highly radiated humans on earth.

It is a horrifying legacy. 
Fifty-two buildings at Hanford are contaminated, and 240 square miles are uninhabitable due to the radioactivity that has seeped into the soil and groundwater: uranium, cesium, strontium, plutonium and other deadly radionuclides. 

Altogether, more than 204,000 cubic meters of highly radioactive waste remain on site -- two-thirds of the total for the entire US.

Radioactive Clouds
The plants also emitted radioactive clouds, which were carried by the wind all the way to Oregon, Idaho and Montana and even up into Canada. 

The people affected by the fallout, the so-called "downwinders," suffered the most during the initial phase, between 1945 and 1951, when they were irradiated with iodine-131, which slipped into the food chain through livestock, milk and eggs.
In addition, thousands upon thousands of workers, residents and farmers were deliberately contaminated -- for testing purposes.

On December 3, 1949, Hanford physicists released a highly radioactive cloud through the smokestack of the so-called T-Plant, the world's largest plutonium factory at the time. 

The radiation was almost 1,000 times more than what was released during the 1979 meltdown at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the worst nuclear accident in American history. 

Fallout from the experiment, which was called "Green Run," drifted all the way to California. 
People wondered why they suddenly got sick.

Studies would eventually show that some babies at Hanford were radiated twice as much as the children of Chernobyl. 

Before the "Green Run," Tom Bailie, the 2-year-old son of a farmer loved to play in the fields. 
But then he suffered an inexplicable paralysis; later, he wouldn't be able to father children. 
His entire family died of cancer.

Last year, there were 210 earthquakes in the Hanford area, the strongest measuring 3.0. 
But the fact that they aren't so severe does little to reassure environmentalists. 

"The leaking underground tanks and the contaminated groundwater moving toward the river mean a radioactive future for the river unless the mess can be cleaned up in time to avoid a serious radiological disaster," says Glen Spain, a regional director for the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA). 
"The legacy of vast amounts of nuclear waste … is still a ticking time bomb."

 A 1990 DOE analysis of downwinders showed that newborns and infants were highly contaminated because of milk.

Illnesses related to Nuclear Waste Exposure:
Cancers of the bile ducts, bone, brain, breast, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver (primary site, but not if cirrhosis or hepatitis B is indicated), lung (including bronchioloalveolar cancer), pancreas, pharynx, ovary, salivary gland, small intestine, stomach, thyroid, urinary tract (kidney/renal, pelvis, urinary bladder, and urethra) Leukemia (except chronic lymphocytic leukemia) Lymphomas (except Hodgkin’s disease) Multiple myeloma (cancer of plasma cells), Acute Radiation Syndrome.

WE KNOW THAT RADIATION CAUSES BRAIN TUMORS IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS

HERE IS THE CONCLUSION OF JUST ONE OF SCORES OF STUDIES:  

" In this group of intracranial meningiomas in individuals <30 years, ionizing radiation was a risk factor and tumors were more common in females. A higher percentage of WHO grade II and III tumors at presentation and recurrence was noted. Recurrent tumors were more common in patients with higher WHO grade and in radiation-induced meningiomas."

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - Jan 1988


BECAUSE HANFORD OFFICIALS AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES HAVE FOUGHT FOR DECADES TO AVOID BLAME, TO DENY THAT ANY DIED BECAUSE OF HANFORD, AND BECAUSE OFFICIAL CAUSES OF DEATH WERE OFTEN INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING OR FAILED TO CONSIDER THE RADIATION AS A CAUSE OF DEATH, WE CAN ONLY ESTIMATE THAT THOUSANDS OF BABIES DIED AS A RESULT OF HANFORD RADIATION.

HOW MANY THOUSANDS ARE CURRENTLY DYING NO ONE CAN SAY, BUT THE STORY WE SAW IN THE VIDEO AT THE TOP OF THIS BLOG , THE DEATHS OF HUNDREDS OF BABIES IN ONE COUNTY ALONE, MULTIPLIED BY THE NUMBER OF COUNTIES THAT RECEIVED LETHAL DOSES OF RADIATION EVERY YEAR SINCE HANFORD CAME ONLINE MAKES ONE WEEP.

WHAT AN UNNECESSARY WASTE OF LIVES!
WHAT A CONTINUING TRAGEDY!


WE NEED TO DO ALL WE CAN TO MAKE THIS SITUATION KNOWN, TO HELP ALL WHO HAVE BEEN AND ARE NOW AFFECTED BY THIS.
WE NEED TO CALL OUR CONGRESSMEN.  

IF YOU KNOW OF ANYONE AFFECTED BY THIS, PASS THIS ON SO THEY CAN CONTACT ONE OF THE ORGANIZATIONS SEEKING AN END TO THE KILLING.

[PLEASE, IF YOU FIND A BROKEN LINK, LET ME KNOW!]

FOR LEGAL HELP IN THE WASHINGTON/OREGON STATES AREA, SEE 
http://eahjlaw.com/contact-us.html

For NV, Utah, etc, see:
http://www.downwindersprogram.com/downwinders.php

SUPPORT

INFORMATION

Thursday, February 26, 2015

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH AND VACCINES

THIS IS THE MOST CHILLING ACCOUNT OF THE "POSSIBLE" RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN "UNEXPLAINABLE", "UNKNOWN CAUSE", AND "SUDDEN INFANT DEATH"  AND VACCINES THAT I HAVE EVER READ, AND I HAVE READ HUNDREDS!

THIS IS SOMETHING EVERY PARENT OR WOULD-BE PARENT NEEDS TO READ, RE-READ, AND CAREFULLY CONTEMPLATE.

HAVING RETIRED FROM THE FIELD OF MEDICINE, AFTER ALMOST 30 YEARS OF A PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH VACCINE MANUFACTURERS, RESEARCHERS, PEDIATRICIANS, AND HOSPITAL STAFF IN SEVERAL STATES, I CAN DO LITTLE BUT OFFER MY OPINION, ONE I HAVE HELD SINCE FIRST I READ THE STATISTICS, 28 YEARS AGO THAT VACCINES NOT ONLY CAN KILL, BUT DO KILL, AND THAT THAT SEEMS TO BE ONE OF THEIR PRIMARY REASONS FOR BEING IN EXISTENCE.

HAVING FIRST-HAND BRUSHES WITH NEAR-DEATH SITUATIONS IN WHICH MY FRESHLY VACCINATED FOUR CHILDREN PRESENTED WITH ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS TO VACCINES, I ASSURE YOU THAT THE AMOUNT OF TIME I HAVE DEVOTED TO RESEARCH MYSELF AMOUNTS TO AS MUCH AS 4 HOURS PER DAY FOR VERY EXTENDED TIME PERIODS, AND TOTALS MORE THAN 6,000 HOURS OF DILIGENT READING AND INQUIRY INTO INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON THE SUBJECT.

I CAN ALSO ASSURE YOU THAT THOSE WITHIN THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY ARE PRIVY TO MUCH MORE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE HARM VACCINES CAN CAUSE THAN THE VAST MAJORITY OF PARENTS WILL EVER BE AWARE EXISTS.

WHEN HOSPITAL STAFF REFUSE A VACCINE AND CAUSE THE HOSPITAL TO BE SHUT-DOWN BECAUSE OF THEIR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH MANDATORY VACCINATION,, ALL CITIZENS NEED TO TAKE NOTE.
[CLICK HERE FOR A FOX NEWS ARTICLE] 

WHEN A NURSES UNION SUES TO BLOCK MANDATED VACCINES, TAKE NOTE! 
[HERE IS THAT LINK...CLICK]

WHEN A LONG-TIME PEDIATRICIAN, A MAN MOST RESPECTED IN HIS FIELD, SUDDENLY REFUSES TO GIVE VACCINES AND TRIES TO PUBLICLY WARN PARENTS OF THE DANGERS, LISTEN TO HIM!
[ARTICLE AND VIDEO HERE.]

AND ANOTHER: SEE THIS.

THERE ARE MANY LIKE THESE TWO.

THE CDC ITSELF ACKNOWLEDGES THAT VACCINES CAN AND DO POSE SERIOUS HEALTH RISKS AND SIDE EFFECTS.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm

JUST READING THESE "POSSIBILITIES" MAY GIVE YOU NIGHTMARES.
BUT MANY BELIEVE THE RISKS ARE WORTH IT. 

WHAT ANGERS ME ABOUT THIS REPORT FROM CDC IS THAT IT DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL THE WARNINGS FROM THE MANUFACTURERS OF THESE VACCINES.
THE CDC IS WITHHOLDING PERTINENT INFORMATION FROM PARENTS THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRES DRUG/VACCINE MANUFACTURERS TO MAKE PUBLIC!
WHY IS THAT?
WHY NOT TELL THE WHOLE STORY?

MY STANCE IS THAT THOSE WHO DO NOT WANT TO RISK LOSING A CHILD TO THE KNOWN HARMFUL, POSSIBLY FATAL EFFECTS OF VACCINES SHOULD BE LEFT ALONE TO REAR THEIR CHILDREN WITHOUT THEM.

THOSE WHO DO CHOOSE TO VACCINATE THEIR CHILDREN SHOULDN'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT THEIR KIDS CONTRACTING WHAT THEY HAVE VACCINATED THEM AGAINST, SHOULD THEY?

IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO RAIL AGAINST THE UNVACCINATED IF YOUR CHILD IS SO SAFE WITH VACCINES IN HIS SYSTEM, DOES IT?

IF YOU READ THE NEWS REPORTS OF THE LATEST "OUTBREAK" OF MEASLES, THEN MAYBE, JUST MAYBE YOU SAW THAT IT WAS VACCINATED KIDS SPREADING THIS STRAIN OF MEASLES AS WELL AS UNVACCINATED WHO CONTRACTED IT.

THE CDC ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES THAT VACCINES ARE NOT AT ALL 100% EFFECTIVE.
THEY THEMSELVES HAVE SAID THIS YEAR'S FLU VACCINE IS A FAILURE. 

THE ENTIRE MEDICAL COMMUNITY IS HIGHLY AWARE OF THE MULTITUDE OF RISKS WITH VACCINES.
JUST ONE SMALL WARNING WITH ASSOCIATED TREATMENT PLANS FOR MANAGING KNOWN ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINES CAN BE FOUND IN THIS ENLIGHTENING PDF FROM MASSACHUSETTS: READ HERE.

WHEN DEATH IS A POSSIBLE RISK RELATED TO VACCINES OR INGESTED MEDICATIONS, NO MATTER HOW SMALL ONE MAY PERCEIVE THE THREAT, WE MUST ALLOW ALL HUMAN BEINGS THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE!

PLEASE, GO READ THIS ENTIRE STUDY FROM WHICH I OFFER EXCERPTS BELOW.
FOR ME, IT IS THE MOST POINT-BLANK STUDY OUT THERE AND ASKS THE BEST QUESTIONS I HAVE SEEN A STUDY ASK IN A LONG, LONG TIME.

BECAUSE I LOVE ALL CHILDREN, I HOPE YOU WILL AT LEAST CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN THE FOLLOWING STUDY AND IN THOSE WHICH IT CITES IN THE REFERENCE SECTION.

THE EVIDENCE IS MOUNTING, AND I BELIEVE THAT IS WHY THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES HAVE BEGUN SUCH A BLATANT, ALMOST CRIMINAL ONSLAUGHT AGAINST PARENTS WHO NEVER INTEND TO VACCINATE THEIR CHILDREN, AND AGAINST ADULTS (ESPECIALLY MILITARY PERSONNEL AND THE ELDERLY?) WHO ALSO WANT TO REFUSE VACCINES.

BIG PHARMA AND ITS SUPPORTERS ARE FIGURATIVELY CRUCIFYING PARENTS AND ADULTS WHO SIMPLY DO NOT WANT VACCINES!
ONE MUST ASK WHY!

THE DAY WE TAKE AWAY HUMAN RIGHTS, BEGIN TO TAKE CHARGE OF EVERY HUMAN BEING'S BODY, FORCE ALL PEOPLE TO LINE UP FOR VACCINATIONS, I HOPE THE SUN EXPLODES AND TAKES OUT THE PLANET RATHER THAN SEE SUCH A TRAVESTY, SUCH A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!
THAT IS HOW STRONGLY I SUPPORT EVERY PERSON'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

ALLOWING ALL THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE VACCINES OR NO VACCINES IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ALLOWING PEOPLE TO CHOOSE WHOM THEY LOVE/MARRY, WHERE THEY LIVE, WHAT RELIGION THEY ADHERE TO, OR THE CHOICE OF HAVING NO RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION AT ALL.

TO MALIGN, BADGER, HUMILIATE OR FORCE CHOICES ON OTHERS IS NO DIFFERENT IF IT APPLIES TO RACISM, GENDER IDENTITY OR VACCINES.

[NOTE: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.]

FULL TEXT CAN BE FOUND AT THE SITE LINKED BELOW:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
I HAVE PROVIDED THE REFERENCE LIST TO EACH NUMBER IN [BRACKETS].
Despite the United States spending more per capita on health care than any other country,[4] 33 nations have better IMRs. Some countries have IMRs that are less than half the US rate: Singapore, Sweden, and Japan are below 2.80. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “The relative position of the United States in comparison to countries with the lowest infant mortality rates appears to be worsening.”[5]
Nations differ in their immunization requirements for infants aged less than 1 year. In 2009, five of the 34 nations with the best IMRs required 12 vaccine doses, the least amount, while the United States required 26 vaccine doses, the most of any nation. To explore the correlation between vaccine doses that nations routinely give to their infants and their infant mortality rates, a linear regression analysis was performed.

The US infant mortality rate of 6.22 infant deaths per 1000 live births ranked 34th.

It appears that at a certain stage in nations' movement up the socio-economic scale—after the basic necessities for infant survival (proper nutrition, sanitation, clean water, and access to health care) have been met—a counter-intuitive relationship occurs between the number of vaccines given to infants and infant mortality rates: nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates give their infants, on average, more vaccine doses. This positive correlation, derived from the data and demonstrated in Figures 1 and ​and 2,2, elicits an important inquiry: are some infant deaths associated with over-vaccination?

Are some deaths that are listed within the 130 infant mortality death categories really deaths that are associated with over-vaccination? Are some vaccine-related deaths hidden within the death tables?

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, ‘Crib death’ was so infrequent that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In the United States, national immunization campaigns were initiated in the 1960s when several new vaccines were introduced and actively recommended. For the first time in history, most US infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines.[14] Shortly thereafter, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term—sudden infant death syndrome.[15,16] In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category—for SIDS—to the ICD. SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant which remains unexplained after a thorough investigation. Although there are no specific symptoms associated with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system.[17] By 1980, SIDS had become the leading cause of postneonatal mortality (deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the United States.[18]

In 1992, to address the unacceptable SIDS rate, the American Academy of Pediatrics initiated a ‘Back to Sleep’ campaign, convincing parents to place their infants supine, rather than prone, during sleep. From 1992 to 2001, the postneonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6%. However, other causes of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) increased. 

For example, the postneonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation in bed’ (ICD-9 code E913.0) increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2%. 
The postneonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation-other’ (ICD-9 code E913.1-E913.9), ‘unknown and unspecified causes' (ICD-9 code 799.9), and due to ‘intent unknown’ in the External Causes of Injury section (ICD-9 code E980-E989), all increased during this period as well.[18] (In Australia, Mitchell et al. observed that when the SIDS rate decreased, deaths attributed to asphyxia increased.[19] Overpeck et al. and others, reported similar observations.)[20,21]

A closer inspection of the more recent period from 1999 to 2001 reveals that the US postneonatal SIDS rate continued to decline, but there was no significant change in the total postneonatal mortality rate. 
During this period, the number of deaths attributed to ‘suffocation in bed’ and ‘unknown causes,’ increased significantly. 

According to Malloy and MacDorman, “If death-certifier preference has shifted such that previously classified SIDS deaths are now classified as ‘suffocation,’ the inclusion of these suffocation deaths and unknown or unspecified deaths with SIDS deaths then accounts for about 90 percent of the decline in the SIDS rate observed between 1999 and 2001 and results in a non-significant decline in SIDS”[18] (Figure 3).  

Is there evidence linking SIDS to vaccines?

Although some studies were unable to find correlations between SIDS and vaccines,[22–24] there is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. 
For example, Torch found that two-thirds of babies who had died from SIDS had been vaccinated against DPT (diphtheria–pertussis–tetanus toxoid) prior to death. 
Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours of vaccination; 13% within 24 hours; 26% within 3 days; and 37%, 61%, and 70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively. 
Torch also found that unvaccinated babies who died of SIDS did so most often in the fall or winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months—the same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. 
He concluded that DPT “may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. 

A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.”[25]
 Walker et al. found “the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization.”[26]
 Fine and Chen reported that babies died at a rate nearly eight times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT vaccination.[27]

Ottaviani et al. documented the case of a 3-month-old infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly shortly after being given six vaccines in a single shot: 
“Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby.” Without a full necropsy study in the case of sudden, unexpected infant death, at least some cases linked to vaccination are likely to go undetected.[28]

Vaccine composition
[ALL PARENTS MUST ASK, RESEARCH!]

This analysis calculated the total number of vaccine doses received by children but did not differentiate between the substances, or quantities of those substances, in each dose. Common vaccine substances include antigens (attenuated viruses, bacteria, toxoids), preservatives (thimerosal, benzethonium chloride, 2-phenoxyethanol, phenol), adjuvants (aluminum salts), additives (ammonium sulfate, glycerin, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, potassium chloride), stabilizers (fetal bovine serum, monosodium glutamate, human serum albumin, porcine gelatin), antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin B), and inactivating chemicals (formalin, glutaraldehyde, polyoxyethylene). 
For the purposes of this study, all vaccine doses were equally weighted.


References
1. Wegman ME. Infant mortality in the 20th century, dramatic but uneven progress. J Nutr 2001; 131: 401S–408S [PubMed]

2. Beck MA. The role of nutrition in viral disease. J Nutri Biochem 1996; 7: 683–690

3. Scrimshaw NS, SanGiovanni JP. Synergism of nutrition, infection, and immunity: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 66: 464S–477S [PubMed]

4. Anderson GF, Hussay PS, Frogner BK, Waters HR. Health spending in the United States and the rest of the industrialized world. Health Affairs 2005; 24: 903–914 [PubMed]

5. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Recent trends in infant mortality in the United States. NCHS Data Brief (CDC), no 9. Hyattsville, MD, USA: National Center for Health Statistics, 2008. [PubMed]

6. Kent MM. Premature births help to explain higher infant mortality rate. Population Reference Bureau. www.prb.org/articles/2009/prematurebirth.aspx (accessed December 2009).

7. Xu Jiaquan, Kochaneck KD, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: preliminary data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 58: 6

8. CIA Country comparison: infant mortality rate (2009). The World Factbook. www.cia.gov (accessed 13 April 2010).

9. WHO/UNICEF Immunization Summary: A Statistical Reference Containing Data Through 2008 (The 2010 Edition). www.childinfo.org

10. Up-to-date European vaccination schedules may be found here: www.euvac.net (accessed 13 April 2010).

11. WHO International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1979.

12. WHO International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1992.

13. CDC Table 31. Number of infant deaths and infant mortality rates for 130 selected causes, by race: United States, 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57: 110–112

14. Iannelli V. Immunization timeline. Keep Kids Healthy. keepkidshealthy.com (accessed 21 April 2010)

15. Bergman AB. The “Discovery” of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. New York, NY, USA: Praeger Publishers, 1986.

16. MacDorman MF, Rosenberg HM. Trends in infant mortality by cause of death and other characteristics, 1960-88 (vital and health statistics), Volume 20 Hyattsville, MD, USA: National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Government Printing, 1993.

17. National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics of the United States 1988, Volume II, Mortality, Part A. Washington, DC, USA: Public Health Service, 1991.

18. Malloy MH, MacDorman M. Changes in the classification of sudden unexpected infant deaths: United States, 1992-2001. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1247–1253 [PubMed]

19. Mitchell E, Krous HF, Donald T, Byard RW. Changing trends in the diagnosis of sudden infant death. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2000; 21: 311–314 [PubMed]

20. Overpeck MD, Brenner RA, Cosgrove C, Trumble AC, Kochanek K, MacDorman M. National under ascertainment of sudden unexpected infant deaths associated with deaths of unknown cause. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 274–283 [PubMed]

21. Byard RW, Beal SM. Has changing diagnostic preference been responsible for the recent fall in incidence of sudden infant death syndrome in South Australia? J Pediatr Child Health 1995; 31: 197–199 [PubMed]

22. Vennemann MM, Butterfass-Bahloul T, Jorch G, Brinkmann B, Findeisen M, Sauerland C, et al. Sudden infant death syndrome: no increased risk after immunisation. Vaccine 2007; 25: 336–340 [PubMed]

23. Stratton K, Almario DA, Wizemann TM, McCormick MC. Immunization safety review: vaccinations and sudden unexpected death in infancy. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2003.

24. Silvers LE, Ellenberg SS, Wise RP, Varricchio FE, Mootrey GT, Salive ME. The epidemiology of fatalities reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system 1990-1997. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10: 279–285 [PubMed]

25. Torch WC. Diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). American Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25-May 1, 1982. Neurology 32(4): pt. 2

26. Walker AM, Jick H, Perera DR, Thompson RS, Knauss TA. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunization and sudden infant death syndrome. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 945–951 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

27. Fine PE, Chen RT. Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 121–135 [PubMed]

28. Ottaviani G, Lavezze AM, Matturri L. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Archiv 2006; 448: 100–104 [PubMed]

29. CDC About the sudden unexpected infant death investigation (SUIDI) reporting form. Department of Health and Human Services (accessed 20 May 2010).

30. GlaxoSmithKline Rotarix® (Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral) Oral Suspension. Product insert from the manufacturer (April 2008): 6.

31. FDA Center for biologics evaluation and research, vaccines and related biological products advisory committee meeting (20 February 2008): 127–128

32. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Behind international rankings of infant mortality: how the United States compares with Europe. NCHS data brief, no 23 Hyattsville, MD, USA: National Center for Health Statistics, 2009. [PubMed]

33. Euro-Peristat Project, with SCPE, Eurocat, Euroneostat European Perinatal Health Report: Data for 2004 (The 2008 Edition): Table 3.1:40 www.europeristat.com


AMERICAN TEENS JOIN ISIS

MY PREVIOUS BLOG EXPLORED THE VERY REAL POSSIBILITY THAT AMERICA MAY SOON SEE SUICIDE BOMBERS IN OUR MALLS, IN OUR OWN TOWNS, BUT I BRIEFLY TOUCHED ON THE APPEAL, THE "GLAMOR" OF THESE TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS TO OUR OWN SUSCEPTIBLE CHILDREN.

WE REALLY MUST EXPLORE THIS AND FIND WAYS TO SAFEGUARD OUR CHILDREN SO THEY DON'T BECOME LIKE THE KNOWN 23 SWEDISH YOUNG PEOPLE OF OVER 150 FROM THAT NATION WHO RAN OFF TO JOIN ISIS AND ARE NOW CASUALTIES OF THAT ERROR OF JUDGMENT.
THEY JOINED ISIS AND PERISHED.


AMERICAN TEENS HEAD FOR SYRIA
Three Denver teenage girls , aged 16, 17, and 18recently skipped school and flew to Germany to join ISIS before being sent home. 

A 19-year-old American nurse aid who planned to travel to the Turkish border to marry an ISIS member she met on the Internet was stopped at  Denver International Airport.

A suburban Chicago teen was arrested before boarding a flight to Turkey to join ISIS fighters in Iraq and Syria.

Why are American teenagers drawn to the Islamic terror group?
ISIS excels at recruiting American teens.
 Here are four reasons why:

1- Appeal to sense of identity and place - 
According to news and FBI reports, ISIS (or IS) typically preys on Western youth who are disillusioned and have no sense of purpose or belonging. Much like criminal gangs, IS offers disaffected teens a chance to join a group that gives them purpose and meaning.

IS offers structure and a defined place in the Caliphite society they have created. Such a surrounding can be appealing for someone who feels he is adrift in the world.

2. Appeal to a sense of religious obligation – 
IS appeals to a sense of religious duty and a youthful desire to express religious sentiments that make people feel connected to each other.

Many of these young people are new converts to Islam. Fighting a Jihad with IS serves as a proving ground for their new beliefs and, if they survive, a confirmation of the new “higher power” at their extremist fingertips.

Furthermore, IS’s publicized successes and their declared aspirations to dominate the world and impose Sharia law also appeals to these young religious zealots.

3- Use of sophisticated internet propaganda.
 According to Matthew Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, ISIS now operates the most sophisticate propaganda machine of any terrorist organization.
"It turns out timely, high-quality media, and it uses social media to secure a widespread following."

4- ISIS' jihadi brides recruitment appeals to young women.  
TEENS AS YOUNG AS 13 CAN LOOK FORWARD TO BEING BRIDES.
Hundreds of young Western women have been reportedly wooed by IS fighters to become “jihadi brides” , but what makes them go?
Their "sisters", for one, those whom ISIS uses in propaganda videos that tell stories of romance, sisterhood among the young brides, offer stability, even luxury, and reverence.
The idealism of the "revered wife" is sold hard to naive young females who have never seen a Muslim family home.
But, they're eager to be loved, needed, "revered".
The young virile men pictured in ISIS videos who are supposedly "looking for a bride" send naive girls' hearts pounding.

The departures to join ISIS are less the whims of adolescents and more the conclusions of months of work by organized radical recruitment networks that specifically target young people in search of an identity and a sense of belonging, of being important.

WHAT SHOULD ALL THIS TELL US?
THAT MORE AND MORE OF AMERICA'S YOUTH FEEL AS IF THEY DON'T BELONG, AREN'T APPRECIATED, HAVE NO SENSE OF PURPOSE WITHIN THEIR OWN FAMILIES, OR WITHIN SOCIETY IN GENERAL?

IS IT JUST TOO HARD IN AMERICA FOR YOUNG PEOPLE TO COMPETE WITH OTHERS TO BE "POPULAR", TO BE A PART OF THE "RIGHT CLIQUE"?

IF SO, THEN ISN'T IT THAT, AS CHRIS DICKEY SAID, "Their drive is a deadly combination of youthful fantasies and aspirations to “be someone” ?

OR ARE THEY SIMPLY DUPED BY LACK OF FACTUAL INFORMATION, LACK OF MATURITY, A DESIRE FOR "ADVENTURE"?
IS IT LIKE SOME HOLLYWOOD MOVIE, SOME VIDEO GAME, SOME ROMANTIC NOTION OF HELPING THE "UNDERDOG"?

ISIS PORTRAYS ITSELF QUITE WELL AS A DEDICATED RELIGIOUS GROUP OUT TO "FIX THE WORLD", SOMEONE WHO WILL RESTORE ORDER TO WHAT THE KIDS MAY SEE AS CHAOS, REPLACE SHALLOWNESS WITH A DEEP SENSE OF TRUE PURPOSE.
WHAT A "NOBLE CAUSE" TO BECOME PART OF, RIGHT?
"TOGETHER, WE CAN RULE THE WORLD"?

HOW CAN WE COMBAT THAT?
HOW CAN WE MONITOR AND HELP OUR CHILDREN SO THAT THEY DON'T FALL VICTIM?

We here in America, our media, our table-talk, have painted most current heads of state in Middle Eastern nations as monsters.
We have vilified Assad of Syria, after we did the same of Hussein of Iraq, Gaddafi of Libya, Mubarak of Egypt, Ahmadinejad of Iran, and led the efforts that have killed half of those "monsters".
Our children see this and may then see nothing wrong with being a part to ridding the world of such terrible people.
ISIS promises to set it all right, to be a ruling force that will improve the world.

TOO LATE WE MAY HAVE REALIZED WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO TELL THE REST OF THE WORLD WHO SHOULD RULE THEM WHEN OUR OWN NATION IS AS DIVIDED AND PITTED AGAINST ONE ANOTHER AS IT IS.
WE REALLY HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
NO ONE HAS DIED AFTER APPOINTING US "KING OF THE WORLD".

THERE IS PLENTY FOR YOUNG PEOPLE TO DO TO MAKE AMERICA A BETTER PLACE TO LIVE, SO LET'S POINT THEM IN THAT DIRECTION.

OF COURSE THEY WANT A SENSE OF PURPOSE, AND WE CAN GIVE THEM THAT RIGHT HERE!
THERE ARE PLENTY OF ORGANIZATIONS STRUGGLING TO HELP OTHERS IN AMERICA.
INTRODUCE YOUR CHILDREN TO THOSE OPPORTUNITIES.
HELP THEM GET INVOLVED.
ENCOURAGE THEM TO BECOME LEADERS HERE, ON HOME SOIL.
THEY CAN STILL HELP SEND FOOD, MEDICINE, SUPPLIES TO THE PEOPLE IN OTHER NATIONS WITH WHICH THEY MAY "IDENTIFY".
THEY DON'T HAVE TO TRAVEL THOUSANDS OF MILES TO "SERVE HUMANITY".

IF IT'S A RELIGIOUS CALLING THEY FEEL, LET THEM FIND A CHURCH, SYNAGOGUE, MOSQUE TO ATTEND.
LET THEM GET MORE DEEPLY INVOLVED WITH THEIR PEERS IN THOSE SETTINGS, BUT CAREFUL OF FANATICAL IDEOLOGIES IN ANY OF THOSE.
FAMILIARIZE YOURSELVES WITH WHAT IS BEING PREACHED, TAUGHT.
HOW MUCH DO YOU REALLY KNOW ABOUT THIS MESS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, ABOUT ISIS AND THE OTHER "RADICAL ISLAMIST" ORGANIZATIONS?
TIME TO LEARN!

THERE IS A FAIR ARTICLE ON "
Why and how Westerners go to fight in Syria and Iraq"
HERE:


DO YOU REALLY HAVE A DEEP UNERSTANDING OF THE TEACHINGS OF THE UNTRANSLATED QUR'AN?
YOU MUST BE AWARE THAT THERE DOES NOT EXIST AN "ACCEPTABLE" TRANSLATION OF THAT BOOK BY ANY ISLAMIC NATION ON THIS PLANET...NOT ONE.
TO TRANSLATE IT INTO ANY "HERETICAL" LANGUAGE IS AN AFFRONT, IS LOATHED.
THE QUR'AN IS THE TRUE QUR'AN ONLY IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE!
ANY IMAM WILL TELL YOU THAT ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN "APPROVED" IN ORDER TO WIN CONVERTS, BUT NONE ARE ACCEPTABLE!
ALL CONVERTS ARE SCHOOLED IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE, ARE EXPECTED TO LEARN AND USE ARABIC.
[SEE: http://www.meforum.org/717/assessing-english-translations-of-the-quran ]

I CAN SIT HERE AND TELL YOU ALL DAY THAT, HAVING LIVED IN THE MIDDLE EAST, I KNOW THAT "RADICAL ISLAM" IS SIMPLY ISLAM, PERIOD, THE END.
YOU WILL HAVE TO GO FIND THAT OUT FOR YOURSELVES.

WHAT WE KNOW OF HERE AS "AMERICAN MUSLIMS", THE TRADITIONAL, DEEPLY DEDICATED  ISLAMIC NATIONS OVERSEAS CALL "HERETICS" OR "APOSTATES", AND, SURPRISING AS IT MAY BE, AMERICAN MUSLIMS ARE MARKED BY ISIS AS THEIR NUMBER ONE TARGET ONCE THEY CAN GET OVER HERE AND DEAL WITH ALL OF US IN THE "NATION OF SATAN".

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "AMERICANIZED ISLAM" AND PURE ISLAM AS LIVED IN NATIONS LIKE IRAN, IS AS DIFFERENT AS MIDNIGHT ON A STORMY NIGHT AND SUNSHINE AT NOON ON A CLOUDLESS DAY.
THERE IS NO COMPARISON, I ASSURE YOU.  


WHO IS "APOSTATE" TO ISIS?
"Denying the holiness of the Koran or the prophecies of Muhammad is straightforward apostasy. But Zarqawi and the state he spawned take the position that many other acts can remove a Muslim from Islam. These include, in certain cases, selling alcohol or drugs, wearing Western clothes or shaving one’s beard, voting in an election—even for a Muslim candidate—and being lax about calling other people apostates. Being a Shiite, as most Iraqi Arabs are, meets the standard as well, because the Islamic State regards Shiism as innovation, and to innovate on the Koran is to deny its initial perfection. (The Islamic State claims that common Shiite practices, such as worship at the graves of imams and public self-flagellation, have no basis in the Koran or in the example of the Prophet.) That means roughly 200 million Shia are marked for death.
So too are the heads of state of every Muslim country, who have elevated man-made law above Sharia by running for office or enforcing laws not made by God."  


But Muslims who call the Islamic State un-Islamic are typically, as the Princeton scholar Bernard Haykel, the leading expert on the group’s theology, told me, “embarrassed and politically correct, with a cotton-candy view of their own religion” that neglects “what their religion has historically and legally required.” Many denials of the Islamic State’s religious nature, he said, are rooted in an “interfaith-Christian-nonsense tradition.”


SOME FIGURES ON WHAT PERCENTAGE BY NATION THE MUSLIM PEOPLE THERE SEE "RADICAL ISLAM" AS THE REAL ISLAM CAN BE FOUND HERE:
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/09/04/myth-tiny-radical-minority/

STATEMENTS BY ISIS ITSELF ARE ALSO VERY REVEALING.
THEY INTEND TO PUNISH SEVERELY ALL WHO HAVE NOT ADHERED TO THE TEACHINGS OF THEIR PROPHET!
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "MODERATE MUSLIM" IN ISLAMIC STATES ABROAD!

HAVE WE FORGOTTEN THE NEWS REPORTS AND LIVE VIDEOS FROM THOSE DEVOUT MUSLIM NATIONS AFTER OUR 9/11 TRAGEDY?
THERE WAS DANCING IN THE STREETS, CELEBRATIONS, PEOPLE SENDING ONE ANOTHER GIFTS IN SAUDI ARABIA, GAZA, EGYPT, IRAN, IRAQ, KUWAIT, PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN, JORDAN....
DID YOU FORGET THAT?  


THEY DID THE SAME THING AFTER THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING.  


"Historian John Philip Jenkins writes, “As late as the eleventh century, Asia was still home to at least a third of the world’s Christians and perhaps a tenth of all Christians lived in Africa.  What happened to this thriving, intellectually vibrant Christianity?  It was virtually wiped out by violent Islamic persecution, especially during the fourteenth century, due to ethnic and religious cleansing.”  Islam became known as “the religion of the sword,” and for good reason."

AMERICA BECAME "THE GREAT SATAN" AROUND 1979, AND JIHAD WAS DECLARED AGAINST US TIME AFTER TIME.

NEVER FORGET THIS.

WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO TO SAFEGUARD AMERICA'S YOUNG PEOPLE FROM ISIS?  


GENTLE STEERING, DEDICATED PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT BEATS RAIL-ROADING AND MICRO-MANAGING YOUR CHILDREN.

TAKE TIME TO SIT DOWN WITH THEM AND JUST TALK ABOUT THINGS.
LET THEM KNOW THEY'RE LOVED, NEEDED, AND THAT YOU RESPECT THEIR OPINIONS, EVEN IF YOU DON'T ALWAYS AGREE WITH THEM.

IF YOUR CHILD IS ONE OF THOSE "LONERS", SEEMS TO LACK A HEALTHY SOCIAL LIFE, TRY TO FIND OUT WHY.   

MAYBE YOU JUST HAVE A CONTEMPLATIVE BUT HAPPY INTROVERT ON YOUR HANDS, IN WHICH CASE, NO PROBLEM.
BUT IF YOU HAVE AN UNHAPPY CHILD, DO TRY TO FIND OUT WHY AND HOW YOU CAN BEST HELP.

SOMETIMES ALL A CHILD NEEDS TO "FIT IN" IS AN EASY FIX.
SOMETIMES ALL A CHILD CAN DO JUST WON'T BE ENOUGH, FOR WHATEVER REASON.
WE NEED TO KNOW WHICH OF THESE IS THE CASE AND HELP THEM DEAL WITH IT.
CHILDREN CAN TREAT OTHER CHILDREN QUITE HORRIBLY.
IF YOU RECALL, GROWING UP WAS NOT THE EASIEST THING.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES CAN MAKE IT SEEM DOWNRIGHT IMPOSSIBLE.

BE HONEST.
DON'T SUGAR-COAT THINGS.
DON'T TREAT YOUR CHILDREN LIKE FRAGILE GLASS.
THEY CAN HANDLE HONESTY MUCH BETTER THAN THE MILDEST FORMS OF DECEIT.

IN OUR HURRY-UP WORLD WE NEED TO FIND TIME, QUALITY TIME, BE ABLE TO GIVE AS MUCH UNDIVIDED ATTENTION AS WE CAN TO REARING OUR CHILDREN, TO PROVIDING THEM A STABLE, LOVING ENVIRONMENT THEY CAN ALWAYS TRUST IS REAL.

IF YOU WERE A JOCK, AN OVER-ACHIEVER, THE CENTER OF ATTENTION, A RAVING BEAUTY, A "SUPER-STAR", THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO MAKE YOUR CHILD INTO THE SAME TYPE OF BEING.
LET YOUR KIDS BE THEMSELVES, WHOMEVER THEY ARE.
THEY'LL GO THROUGH STAGES, JUST LIKE WE DID, AND MAY JUST WIND UP A "CHIP OFF THE OLD BLOCK", BUT DON'T MAKE THAT A PREREQUISITE TO YOUR LOVING THEM AND BEING PROUD OF THEM AS INDIVIDUALS.

YOU CAN PUSH A CHILD, BUT YOU CAN ALSO PUSH A CHILD SO FAR AWAY THAT YOU MAY NEVER GET HIM/HER BACK.

THAT IS NOT TO SAY YOU HAVE TO REAR A "SPOILED BRAT".
THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP IS ONE IN WHICH PARENTS ARE "FRIENDLY DICTATORS". 
THERE WILL BE HOUSE RULES, "LAWS OF THE REALM".
BUT THERE IS NO NEED FOR A TASKMASTER, AN UNYIELDING TYRANT WHEN IT COMES TO REARING A HEALTHY CHILD.

MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS TO KNOW WHERE AND WITH WHOM YOUR CHILD SPENDS TIME.
YOU CAN DO THAT WISELY, SUBTLY, WITHOUT APPEARING MEDDLESOME.
KEEP A VIGILANT EYE ON SOCIAL MEDIA CONTACTS, ON HOW MUCH TIME YOUR KIDS SPEND THERE.ISIS IS EVERYWHERE ONLINE!

CHILDREN ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO PEER PRESSURE, TO GOING ALONG WITH THE CROWD, TO PULLING THE WOOL OVER PARENTS' EYES.
YOU DID THE SAME, MOST LIKELY.
REMEMBER THAT.
REMEMBER WHAT YOU DID AND HOW YOU DID IT!

WATCH FOR WARNING SIGNS.
STAY INFORMED.


PLEASE ALSO READ:

http://muslimmatters.org/2014/12/02/apostasy-among-muslims-in-the-united-kingdom/
A WARNING NOT TO PUT CULTURE OVER RELIGION.
NO MATTER WHERE A MUSLIM LIVES, THE QUR'AN IS THE ONLY TRUE LAW AND ACCEPTABLE WAY OF LIFE.


http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/
A VERY IN-DEPTH ARTICLE, QUITE AN EYE-OPENER.