THE BENGHAZI ATTACK: ROOT CAUSE

1~ THE CIA HAD A HUGE OPERATION GOING ON OUT OF THE BENGHAZI "EMBASSY". LOCALS SAW WHAT WAS GOING ON THERE EVERY DAY.
LOCAL LIBYANS HAD BEEN HIRED TO HELP GUARD THE COMPOUND THERE AND SOME WERE PLEDGED TO JIHAD.

2~ STEVENS KNEW THE LOCALS WERE ONTO THE CIA'S INTERROGATION OF MUSLIM PRISONERS THERE AND HAD ASKED FOR BACKUP.
HE OBVIOUSLY SUSPECTED THAT SOME OF THOSE HIRED LIBYAN GUARDS WOULD TURN ON THE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI.
STEVENS HAD ALSO BEEN ENLISTED TO HELP BROKER ARMS DEALS IN LIBYA AND SYRIA, BY WAY OF TURKEY.
HE SUSPECTED HE'D BEEN OUTED FOR THAT OR WAS ABOUT TO BE.

3~ A MOVIE, A CHEAPLY MADE VIDEO HAD BEEN SEEN BY MANY MUSLIM "EXTREMISTS" AND THERE HAD BEEN RIOTS ELSEWHERE BECAUSE OF THE MOVIE.

4~ THE PENTAGON HAS ADMITTED TO SUPPORTING THE ARMS DEALS GOING ON AT THE TIME. EVEN GENERAL DEMPSEY HAS TESTIFIED TO THAT.

5~ THE CIA DROPPED THE BALL WHEN IT PASSED ON AND BELIEVED FALSE REPORTS ABOUT THE RIOTS REGARDING THE MOVIE.
THE CIA ITSELF BELIEVED ERRONEOUS MAINSTREAM MEDIA REPORTS OF RIOTS IN BENGHAZI!
PURE PROOF OF ALL THE ABOVE CAN BE FOUND IN DOCUMENTS FROM THE SENATE HEARINGS ON THE BENGHAZI "INVESTIGATION" [PRESENTED BELOW IN DETAIL] WHICH DID NOT RAISE HELL ABOUT THE MILITARY AND CIA SCREW-UPS EVERY STEP OF THE WAY TO THE BENGHAZI MURDERS OF STEVENS AND THE OTHERS!
THE LAME-BRAINED COMMITTEE REFUSED TO REPORT PUBLICLY, ON PRIME-TIME TV WHAT THEY NOW KNOW!
THEY DON'T WANT TO GIVE THE FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS CLOSURE, BUT WOULD RATHER CONTINUE THEIR WITCH-HUNT IN OTHER DIRECTIONS!

IF WE LEAVE OUT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS A CIA INTERROGATION SITE THERE, A PLACE WHERE RECENTLY SOME VERY HIGHLY THOUGHT-OF MUSLIM PRISONERS HAD BEEN HELD, AND IF WE LEAVE OUT THE KNOWN FACT THAT STEVENS HAD BEEN ENLISTED TO HELP BROKER ARMS TRADE IN LIBYA AND SYRIA, THAT THERE HAD BEEN RIOTS OVER THAT STUPID MOVIE ALL OVER THE MIDDLE EAST, THEN WE ARE LEFT WITH THE SAME THING THAT CAUSED THE ATTACKS ON AMERICAN INSTALLATIONS (WHETHER EMBASSY OR MILITARY COMPLEX, AGAINST POLITICAL OR MILITARY PEOPLE OR 'JUST' AN AMERICAN CITIZEN ABROAD) ANYWHERE IN THE MIDDLE EAST, AS IN THE BEIRUT ATTACKS DURING REAGAN'S TERMS IN OFFICE...

AMERICA AND AMERICANS ARE VIEWED BY THE MUSLIM WORLD, IN GENERAL, AS SATAN INCARNATE.

THIS MEANS AMERICA AND AMERICANS ARE TO BE HATED AND DRIVEN OUT EVERYWHERE, UNLESS AMERICA/AMERICANS SUBMIT TO ISLAM, BE 'CONVERTED' AND ACCEPT THAT SUCH A CONVERSION REALLY OFFERS THEM NOT MUCH HOPE AT ALL OF ANY ETERNAL 'REWARD' BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT BORN AND REARED AS GOOD MUSLIMS.
ISLAM DEMANDS SUBMISSION TO ISLAM BY ALL OTHER RACES AND RELIGIONS AND PEOPLES.
WE EITHER SUBMIT TO THE "TRUE RELIGION", THE "PURITY" OF ISLAM OR WE ARE INFIDELS WHO MUST BE WIPED OUT.

I HAVE SEVERAL TIMES POSTED THE VERY WORDS OF THE QUR'AN THAT SAY THIS.

<<The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.>>

The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief. 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." 
According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. 
Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.
HISTORY WILL SHOW THIS TO BE FACT.

BUT IT IS ORDERED IN THEIR HOLY TEXT TO DO SO.
"Infidels now are they who say, `God is the Messiah, Son of Mary' . . . They surely are Infidels who say, `God is the third of three;' for there is no God but one God" (Sura 5:76,77)

"Whoso desireth any other religion than Islam, that religion shall never be accepted from him, and in the next world he shall be among the lost" (Sura 3:79).

"When ye encounter the infidels, strike off their heads till ye have made a great slaughter among them, and of the rest make fast the fetters" (Sura 47:4).

"And when the trumpet shall be sounded, . . . They whose balances shall be heavy, shall be the blest. But they whose balances shall be light,—these are they who shall lose their souls, abiding in hell for ever" (Sura 23:3-5).

"Islam declared the WAR ON TERRORISM - over 1,400 years ago!"
It should also be noted the usage of the word "Fitnah" in the same verse denotes a horrible condition, not unlike what we find today when there is terrorism and tyranny against the moral and just society at large. It would be easy to properly understand the meaning as, "Engage them in combat, even killing them, until the state of "Fitnah" (terrorism) no longer exists in the society and people are free to worship Allah by their choice."

<<If you are an American Infidel, Political Islam wants to either subjugate/convert you to Islam. or kill you. >>

I REJECT ANY AMERICANIZED VERSION OF THE QUR'AN OR ANY TEACHINGS OF THE AMERICANIZED MUSLIMS.
SUCH ARE CONSIDERED AS 'INFIDELS' BY MOST IN THE ISLAMIC NATIONS OF EARTH.

THE LINKS TO THE QUR'AN QUOTES WILL SHOW UP TO 4 DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THAT TEXT, FOR COMPARISON, BUT THE AMERICANIZED MUSLIMS WANT TO IGNORE THE TEXTS AND TELL US THAT THEY DON'T MEAN WHAT THEY MEAN!

IF THE AMERICANIZED MUSLIMS WERE TO EVER SET FOOT BACK IN A NATION SUCH AS IRAN OR SAUDI ARABIA, AND TRY TO LIVE THERE AS THEY DO HERE (AGAIN, I SPEAK IN GENERALITIES) THEY WOULD VERY QUICKLY EITHER CHANGE THEIR 'RELAXED' AND POLLUTED FORM OF ISLAM OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.

WHETHER WE WANT TO OR NOT, WE MUST FACE THE FACTS: AMERICANS ARE DESPISED BY THOSE WHO LIVE BY EVERY JOT AND TITTLE OF THE QUR'AN THAT IS TAUGHT INSIDE THE MIDDLE EASTERN NATIONS, THOSE THAT ADHERE TO THE STRICTEST, OR, AS THEY THEMSELVES SAY, THE "PUREST" FORM OF ISLAM.

SUCK IT UP, AMERICA, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE SEE YOU AS ABOMINATIONS!
YOU AND YOUR BELIEFS ARE IMPURITIES THAT WILL POLLUTE ISLAM.
YOU AND YOUR BELIEFS CORRUPT EVERYTHING.
YOU AND YOUR BELIEFS MUST BE STAMPED OUT, ERADICATED AS ONE ERADICATES ANY DISEASE OR VERMIN.
IF YOU WILL NOT SUBMIT TO ISLAM AND SUBJECT YOURSELF TO ITS TEACHINGS, YOU ARE A TARGET FOR EXTERMINATION!

I SAY THIS WITH ALL SINCERITY, THIS NEXT SENTENCE IS SIMPLY THE TRUTH...
THERE IS NOTHING "PERSONAL" IN THE NEED TO EXTERMINATE ALL WHO WILL NOT CONVERT TO ISLAM, BUT IS ONLY ONE OF THE DEEPEST OF THEIR RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS, MERELY WHAT IS REQUIRED, WHAT MUST BE.

WE CAN COMPARE THIS TO THE BELIEF OF CHRISTIANS, THAT IF ONE DOES NOT BELIEVE ON JESUS CHRIST, ONE WILL GO TO HELL.
THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT CHRISTIANS DON'T GENERALLY (OR AT LEAST, NOT AS OPENLY) SET OUT TO ANNIHILATE OTHERS WHO DON'T BELIEVE JESUS WAS THE SON OF GOD AND SAVIOR OF THE WORLD.
BENGHAZI: PROOF POSITIVE AS TO WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO CAUSE THE ATTACK!
AGAIN, WE ARE PRESENTING THESE AS REASONS ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT ALL INFIDELS MUST BE ERADICATED OR AT LEAST RUN OUT OF ISLAMIC NATIONS.

1~ THE BENGHAZI 'EMBASSY' COMPOUND HAD LONG BEEN KNOWN BY LOCALS TO HOUSE A CIA INTERROGATION CENTER. EVERYONE NEARBY HAD SEEN PRISONERS BROUGHT INTO THE COMPOUND OVER THE YEARS.
Paula Broadwell’s comment claiming that the CIA had several Libyan militiamen held captive at the compound in Benghazi:

"Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted."

Naturally, the Obama administration promptly came out with a denial of any such prison’s existence.

IF THE WHITE HOUSE ADMITTED THIS, IT WOULD ALSO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT THE MILITARY AND CIA HAD SNUBBED OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE ORDER BANNING SUCH AN INSTALLATION FOR "ADVANCED INTERROGATION" AND THIS WOULD HAVE LED TO THE REVEAL ON THE MILITARY COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST OBAMA THAT FAILED, WHICH WOULD HAVE UNLEASHED HELL IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA!

<<Either the intelligence community, or else the Obama Administration itself, has been ignoring Executive Order 13491, issued January 22, 2009, which states (in part) “The CIA shall close as expeditiously as possible any detention facilities that it currently operates and shall not operate any such detention facility in the future.” >>
2~ U.S. MEDDLING IN LIBYAN AFFAIRS: <<While the US continues to debate and determine whom to blame and what “failures” led to the attack on the US Embassy compound and CIA safe house in Benghazi, nowhere is anyone considering the fact the event was the result of US meddling into the affairs of foreign states or the fact it was the US who is responsible for the death of Libya’s former leader.
The intelligence and security failure at the United States Embassy Compound in Benghazi Libya is being spun in so many different ways by the US press and politicians all with an agenda of their own to promote, and even with the deaths of 4 people involved, they are still refusing to look at the real root causes which led to the disaster.

What really happened in Benghazi was the result of long running US meddling in the affairs of sovereign nations and in particular in the Muslim world. An area they have shown time and time they have no clear understanding about and even less respect for. The attack in Benghazi was an attack on one of the CIA’s largest operations in the region. This is clear from the fact that Steven’s death was a secondary event in the attack on the compound. They attackers were after what was in the compound, not Stevens.
This was also underlined by the fact that over half of the US personnel evacuated from Benghazi were CIA, the sheer number of them surprising even to Libyan officials and the fact that a CIA safe house was also attacked at the same time.

The most conclusive evidence we have as to the nature of the attack was what was taken from the embassy compound. The UK’s Independent reported that: “… missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans… while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.”
The same article states that the US knew 48 hours before the attack that American missions could be attacked but failed to do anything about it.
[AGAIN, HAD THEY ACTED WHEN THEY COULD THEY WOULD STILL HAVE BEEN OUTED AS DISOBEYING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER, AN ACT OF TREASON!]

The US media and the US government have completely missed the entire point and in their self-serving myopia and have failed to honor their dead with the truth and look at the real cause behind the Benghazi incident. Not the situational and technical causes but the real root cause.

If the US were truly loved as liberators and the bringers of democracy, as they would like the world to believe, some politicians even painting the picture of the Benghazi incident as a sign of success, then in reality they would not need armed guards and security at all.
Sure Benghazi was an intelligence failure but the failure was not with the “Intelligence Community” but with the simple intelligence to understand that if you kill and attack and humiliate a people long enough they are going to hit back.>>

3~ ARMS DEALS, TAKING FROM LIBYA TO GIVE TO SYRIAN "REBELS", INCLUDING 200 STINGER MISSILES! <<Radio host Laura Ingraham asked John Boehner on January 24, 2013 about Senator Rand Paul’s questioning to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. [pAUL] asked if the secretary was aware of U.S. involvement in the procuring of weapons that were transferred, bought or sold to Turkey out of Libya. Clinton, seemingly confused, told Paul "nobody [had] ever raised" the issue with her before.
Boehner replied to Ingraham, “I’m somewhat familiar with the chatter about this and the fact that these arms were moving towards Turkey, but most of what I know about this came from a classified source and I really can’t elaborate on it.” >>

<<And did the Pentagon, Senator [John] McCain continued, support the recommendation by Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Petraeus “that we provide weapons to the resistance in Syria? Did you support that?”
“We did,” Mr. Panetta said.
“You did support that,” Mr. McCain said.
“We did,” General Dempsey added.>>

WEAPONS-RUNNING...IT WAS ANOTHER "FAST AND FURIOUS", ANOTHER IRAN-CONTRA.
THE MILITARY/CIA MIX WAS CONDUCTING "OPERATIONS" OUT OF BENGHAZI THAT WERE NOT ALLOWED!  
One theory is that the CIA was transferring weapons to the rebels, while another suggested the State Department was moving weapons out of Libya.  
4~ FAILURE OF CIA AND MILITARY INTELLIGENCE
TIME MAGAZINE JUST REPORTED ON THE CIA FAILURE!
May 8, 2014
A Benghazi Scandal That’s Already Been Revealed: The CIA Believed A Media Mistake
<<Analysts relied on news reports of protests, fueling the scandal and revealing the agency's struggle to accurately collect and assess public information, according to a Senate Intelligence Committee on report on Benghazi
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on Benghazi reveals a key source of the bad intelligence that made it into Ambassador Susan Rice’s famous talking points: the media incorrectly reported that before the attack on Sept. 11, 2012 there were protests outside the U.S. facilities in Benghazi when there weren’t.
And the CIA believed those reports, resulting in talking points that were delivered to Ambassador Susan Rice, who told the nation on several Sunday news programs Sept. 16 that the attacks in Benghazi were “a spontaneous reaction” to protests that had occurred on the same day in Cairo against an anti-Islamic video published in the U.S.

To draw up those talking points, the CIA relied on at least six early press reports that said the Benghazi attacks grew out of protests against an anti-Muslim film that had appeared on the Internet, according to the SSCI report. The source of the mistake looks clear in retrospect. For starters, violence targeting U.S. diplomatic facilities did take place in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia in reaction to the video. Protests against the film occurred in over 40 countries around the world. Furthermore, reporters for western news organizations interviewed people at the scene after the attacks in Benghazi who said they were angry about the same film. And Libyan government officials repeated the reports. (A TIME story on Sept. 12 referred to “protests” in Benghazi against the film).

The subsequent analyses produced by the CIA and others in the U.S. intelligence community were likewise affected by the initial reporting in the media, the SSCI report finds:

    [A]pproximately a dozen [intelligence] reports that included press accounts, public statements by [terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia] members, HUMINT reporting, DOD reporting, and signals intelligence all stated or strongly suggested that a protest occurred outside of the Mission facility just prior to the attacks.

The most famous of these reports formed the basis of talking points provided to members of Congress by the CIA Sept. 15, 2012

 Last month the CIA’s former deputy director, Michael Morrell, testified in front of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that it was only after the Libyan government said on Sept. 18 that video footage showed no protests that the CIA concluded they had got it wrong.

This lead to Finding #9 of the SSCI report:

    In finished reports after September 11, 2012, intelligence analysts inaccurately referred to the presence of a protest at the Mission facility before the attack based on open source information and limited intelligence, but without sufficient intelligence or eyewitness statements to corroborate that assertion. The IC took too long to correct these erroneous reports, which caused confusion and influenced the public statements of policymakers.>>

CNN EVEN ISSUED A REPORT ON THE CIA PRESENCE BEING A MITIGATING CAUSE OF THE ATTACK!

The exclusive report alleges there were “dozens” of CIA operatives in the so-called annex of the U.S. consulate the night of the attack, and that operatives involved in the mission have been regularly polygraphed — as often as once a month — since in order to prevent them from speaking out to the media or Congress.
“You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation,” an anonymous source describes.
The report also reveals, ostensibly for the first time, that as many as 35 Americans were present during the attack, 21 of whom were working in the CIA-run annex.

Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/watchwomanonthewall/2013/08/benghazi-bombshell-cnn-report-alleges-consulate-full-of-cia-agents.html#vISIKPu9WJpzjBys.99

August 1st, 2013
The exclusive report alleges there were “dozens” of CIA operatives in the so-called annex of the U.S. consulate the night of the attack, and that operatives involved in the mission have been regularly polygraphed — as often as once a month — since in order to prevent them from speaking out to the media or Congress.

“You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation,” an anonymous source describes.

The report also reveals, ostensibly for the first time, that as many as 35 Americans were present during the attack, 21 of whom were working in the CIA-run annex.

The exclusive report alleges there were “dozens” of CIA operatives in the so-called annex of the U.S. consulate the night of the attack, and that operatives involved in the mission have been regularly polygraphed — as often as once a month — since in order to prevent them from speaking out to the media or Congress.
“You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation,” an anonymous source describes.
The report also reveals, ostensibly for the first time, that as many as 35 Americans were present during the attack, 21 of whom were working in the CIA-run annex.

Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/watchwomanonthewall/2013/08/benghazi-bombshell-cnn-report-alleges-consulate-full-of-cia-agents.html#vISIKPu9WJpzjBys.99

The Wall Street Journal reported similar information about the number of CIA employees all the way back in November, and CNN itself reported those details — in the same space as the new report — back in May.

One theory is that the CIA was transferring weapons to the rebels, while another suggested the State Department was moving weapons out of Libya.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/watchwomanonthewall/2013/08/benghazi-bombshell-cnn-report-alleges-consulate-full-of-cia-agents.html#vISIKPu9WJpzjBys.99

THINK!
THINK ABOUT THIS:
10 USC § 888 - Art. 88. Contempt toward officials
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN WORSE, TELLING AMERICANS THAT THERE HAD BEEN A FAILED MILITARY COUP AGAINST OBAMA, THAT THE CIA/PENTAGON WAS ARMS-TRADING AMONG SEVERAL NATIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST PLUS HAD A WELL-STAFFED, FORBIDDEN CIA INTERROGATIONS CENTER AT THE BENGHAZI EMBASSY COMPOUND, THAT PERHAPS BOTH THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE CIA WERE GUN-RUNNING TO INSTIGATE THE OUSTER OF SYRIA'S ASSAD (WHICH OBAMA HAD CLEARLY NOT WANTED TO HAPPEN) AS HAD BEEN DONE TO LIBYA'S GADDAFI, OR TO JUST SAY IT WAS ALL BECAUSE OF JIHADISTS WHO WERE ANGRY ABOUT THAT STUPID MOVIE?  WE HAD A STAND-OFF, A STAND-OFF THAT HAS BEEN THERE EVER SINCE OBAMA WAS ELECTED THE FIRST TIME.
WE HAD A MIX OF CLANDESTINE AGENCIES AND MILITARY PERSONNEL WHO WERE DOING FORBIDDEN THINGS AT AN AMERICAN EMBASSY.
WE HAD THE CIA/PENTAGON FRONT-LINERS WHO WERE AND ARE OPPOSED TO OBAMA IN A REALLY BIG WAY, ENOUGH SO TO TRY AND OUST HIM, STRUGGLING AGAINST THE FEW WHO SAW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AS TREASONOUS.

AND THEN WE HAD DEDICATED JIHADISTS OPPOSED TO ANY INFIDELS, ANY OUTSIDERS BEING PRESENT IN THEIR NATION, AMONG THEIR PEOPLE, KNOWING THEY WERE PROBABLY USING TORTURE TO INTERROGATE THOSE PRISONERS.

THERE WERE TRAITORS ON BOTH SIDES.
THERE WERE ISLAMIC TRAITORS THAT PASSED INFORMATION TO OTHER JIHADISTS ABOUT THE BENGHAZI EMBASSY, AND THERE WERE AMERICAN TRAITORS ENGAGED IN ARMS DEALS, FORBIDDEN INTERROGATION, AND PACKING THAT "EMBASSY" FULL OF CIA AGENTS.

DID YOU NOT NOTICE HOW DOCILE THOSE WHO WERE FIRED OR WHO "RESIGNED" WERE AFTER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION MOVED IN ON THEM?
THEY KNEW THEY COULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON AGAINST A SITTING AMERICAN PRESIDENT!
THEY KNEW THAT ANOTHER IRAN-CONTRA DEAL WOULD INCITE MANY AMERICANS.
THEY KNEW THAT MOST AMERICANS WERE OPPOSED TO THE MILITARY ADVANCING INTO SYRIA, OUSTING YET ANOTHER MIDDLE EASTERN HEAD OF STATE!

BUT OBAMA HAD TO KNOW MUCH MORE THAN WE MAY THINK HE KNEW.
HE WAS WELL AWARE OF THE MILITARY'S HATRED OF HIM.
HE SURELY KNEW THAT ROUGHLY HALF OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC MIGHT JUST SIDE WITH THE MILITARY, AS THEY HAVE. 

THE CAUSE OF THE BENGHAZI ATTACK WAS NOT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.NOR DID HE ONCE ISSUE A "STAND-DOWN" ORDER, AS EVEN THE REPUBLICANS HAVE HAD TO ADMIT.
IF HE LIVES OUT THIS TERM, IT WILL BE A SURPRISE TO ME! 

AND IF ANY OTHER NON-WHITE, ANY FEMALE, ANYTHING THAT IS NOT A "CONSERVATIVE GOOD OL' BOY" IS ELECTED AS PRESIDENT, THAT ONE CAN EXPECT THE SAME FROM THE PENTAGON, CIA, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN AMERICA WHO WILL NOT STAND FOR ANYONE BUT A WALL STREET-KISSING, BOOT-LICKER TO BIG BUSINESS AND LOVER OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TO SIT IN THAT OVAL OFFICE.
NEVER WILL A "PACIFIST", A "PEACENIK" BE ALLOWED TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT.

THEY KILLED KENNEDY, DIDN'T THEY, THOSE WHO SAW HIS END TO WAR AS A THREAT TO THE ELITISTS WHO CONTROL EVERYTHING WITHIN OUR BORDERS?

WHO NEEDS JIHADISTS WHEN WE HAVE WORSE TO MAKE SURE WE ARE AT WAR FOREVER, SO THE OIL CAN BE APPLIED TO THE WHEELS OF INDUSTRY. SO THAT WE CAN BE HANDED OFF TO THE U.N. AND BE RULED BY THEIR LAWS?

OBAMA AVERTED THE MILITARY COUP ATTEMPT, BUT THE PUPPET-MASTERS ARE NOT DONE WITH HIM YET.
THOSE WHO CONTROL THE CENTRAL BANKS WILL RECOVER FROM THIS AND TAKE BACK THE REINS OF OUR NATION.
AFTER ALL, THOSE WHO CONTROL THE MONEY ALSO CONTROL THE FOOD, WATER, EVERYTHING WE NEED TO SURVIVE!


RELATED POSTS:
http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2014/05/military-coup-failed-against-obama-and.html

http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2014/04/us-torture-tactics-at-guantanamo-abu.html

http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2014_05_01_archive.html