Translate

Friday, August 30, 2013

THE U.N. / UNICEF ATTACKS ANTI-VACCINE WEBSITES, PARENTS

THIS IS A VERY LENGTHY UPDATE TO "RIGHT TO REFUSE VACCINES, OUR RIGHT TO LIVE", MY BLOG OF April 20, 2013, http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/04/right-to-refuse-vaccines-our-right-to.html, AND BEGINS WITH A VERY RECENT ARTICLE BY SAYER JI, FOUNDER OF GREENMEDINFO.COM, WHOSE WEBSITE IS ONE OF THOSE THAT CAME UNDER ASSAULT FROM UNICEF, THE UNITED NATIONS' "CHILDREN'S FUND".
THE TEA ROOM IS MOST GRATEFUL FOR MR. JI APPROVING A FULL COPYING OF HIS ARTICLE TO THIS SITE.
GREENMEDINFO IS PERHAPS THE MOST EXACTING, IMPECCABLY RESEARCHED AND TRUSTWORTHY WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET TODAY.
PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES BACK UP WHAT YOU FIND THERE, AND YOU WILL FIND NO 'CONSPIRACY THEORY', NO 'MODIFIED' TRUTHS THERE, EVER.
MR. JI INSISTS ON HONESTY AND INTEGRITY IN REPORTING.

AS YOU WILL SEE, THIS WAS MUCH TOO BIG AN UPDATE TO POST WITHIN MY OLDER BLOG, BUT IT IS AN UPDATE ONLY.

PLEASE, READ MR. JI'S ARTICLE CAREFULLY, AND PLEASE PASS IT ON TO AS MANY AS YOU LOVE OR EVEN CARE FOR.

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/unicef-surveils-defames-health-sites-over-vaccines-greenmedinfo-motheringcom
"UNICEF Surveils, Defames Health Sites Over Vaccines - GreenMedInfo, Mothering.com, Mercola.com, Natural News..."
<<A stunning new report reveals that the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) has been monitoring independent health sites and their users in an attempt to identify 'anti-vaccine influencers' and their effect on lackluster vaccine uptake.
A newly fashioned United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) working paper tracking "the rise of online anti-vaccination sentiments in Central and Eastern Europe" identifies independent health websites, including GreenMedInfo.com, Mercola.com, NaturalNews.com and VacTruth.com, as contributing to lackluster vaccine uptake.
The UNICEF report, titled "Tracking anti-vaccination sentiment in Eastern European social media networks," obtained data using "state-of-the-art social medial monitoring tools," and confirmed that parents are using social media networks to decide whether to vaccinate their children.
The 47-page report attempts to answer the following questions:
  • Why parents are refusing vaccination?
  • What are the concerns about vaccines?
  • What are their ideals/perceptions?
  • Who is influencing the discussion?
  • Which networks are being used?
  • Where are they located?
  • How to respond?
Opening with the Mark Twain quote: "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes," the report lists the following 'anti-vaccine influencers' shaping the online conversation:
UNICEF's opening reference to the "lie" (misinformation) spread by the above-mentioned web-based organizations indicates that while the document purports to be analytical and descriptive, it has proscriptive and defamatory undertones, and only thinly conceals an agenda to discredit opposing views and voices.

The report's data-gathering methodology is described as follows:
"Researchers have selected social media channels, languages and formulated key word strings for online searches from 1 May till 30 June 2012.  Messages from over 22,300 participants using English, Russian, Romanian and Polish were monitored by volume (using mentions, views, postings), by channels through which users exchange content, by engagement (how users respond, like, share) and by sentiment analysis to detect positive and negative attitudes."
The authors of the report note 'ethical considerations' in gathering and analyzing the web usage behavior and data of 22,300 tracked users, but claim that by not publishing the specific IP data in their report that their work does not break any laws, even if it may violate 'moral' codes of those who were subject to uninformed surveillance.
Their main findings are reported:
  • In all four languages, blogs are the most frequently used channel followed by Facebook. Twitter is the second largest channel in Russian.
  • Most of the interactions are taking place in forums. While female audiences tend to focus on issues such as developmental disabilities, chemical and toxins, and side effects; men focus on arguments around conspiracy theories and religious/ethical beliefs. Participants discussing anti-vaccination sentiments are 56 % female and 44 % male.
  • During the observed time period, more messages in English are recorded using key words stemming from conspiracy theories, distrusts against governments and pharmaceutical industry. Religious and ethical beliefs, distrust against U.S. and western governments drive the Russian language discussions.
  • Anti-vaccination opinion leaders in the online world show varying characteristics. Some have no college education while others are in the medical field (such as nurses). Often they appear well educated in alternative medicine and subscribe to social channels of homeopaths and alternative medicine advocates.
According to the report: "The study reveals the urgent need to invest further in analyzing vaccine hesitancy, and immunization partners to develop joint strategies to tackle with this trend."
The report also makes the following recommendations:
 "International agencies and other partners will need to combine forces and support governments to reverse this counterproductive trend and develop common strategies to promote immunization, as one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions known in the world." [emphasis added]
While this report appears to have the objectivity and credibility long associated with world governmental health agencies, UNICEF does little to conceal its willingness to partner with, and accept money from, corporations who may have a vested interest in discrediting valid information about the unintended, adverse health effects of vaccines and/or their lack of effectiveness, such as

According to the report: "The study reveals the urgent need to invest further in analyzing vaccine hesitancy, and immunization partners to develop joint strategies to tackle with this trend."
The report also makes the following recommendations:
 "International agencies and other partners will need to combine forces and support governments to reverse this counterproductive trend and develop common strategies to promote immunization, as one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions known in the world." [emphasis added]
While this report appears to have the objectivity and credibility long associated with world governmental health agencies, UNICEF does little to conceal its willingness to partner with, and accept money from, corporations who may have a vested interest in discrediting valid information about the unintended, adverse health effects of vaccines and/or their lack of effectiveness, such as manufacturers of vaccines themselves. They openly advertise their willingness to support national- and multi-national corporation's "cause-marketing initiatives," a marketing phenomenon widely criticized by public interest groups, and which in the case of the breast cancer industry has produced monstrosities such as the Smith and Wesson's Pink Handgun, and KFC's now defunct "Buckets for the Cure."
As an example of UNICEF's lack of insulation from conflicts of interest, in June of this year, they partnered with one of the world's largest vaccine manufacturers, Merck & Co., who pledged $500 million "to decrease maternal mortality, HIV and tuberculosis prevalence in South Africa." President and CEO of the U.S. Fund for UNICEF Caryl Stern was quoted in a June 2012 Vaccine New Daily article as saying, "Merck is a valued partner that is helping to bring us closer to a day when ZERO children die of preventable causes."[1] Merck, while being considered by UNICEF as a "valuable partner," can hardly be claimed as a credible source of information on the safety and effectivencess of its products, as exemplified by the 2011 decision by the U.S. Justice Department that Merck would be forced to pay $950 million to resolve criminal charges and federal civil claims associated with the fraudulent marketing of its deadly drug Vioxx.  This is only the tip of the iceberg of Merck's many legal problems. Learn more here
Another organization UNICEF has partnered with and accepted substantial financial contributions from is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who has actively supported the online surveillance of so-called "anti-vaccine" groups, as we documented in an Aug. 29th, 2012, report: "Gates Foundation Funds Surveillance of Anti-Vaccine Groups":

[A]$100K grant was recently disbursed to Seth C. Kalichman, professor at the Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, for "Establishing an Anti-Vaccine Surveillance and Alert System," which intends to "establish an internet-based global monitoring and rapid alert system for finding, analyzing, and counteracting misinformation communication campaigns regarding vaccines to support global immunization efforts."
The Gates foundation is notorious for focusing its charitable contributions on Global Polio Eradication initiatives, while neglecting to emphasize with equal fiscal enthusiasm sustainable solutions to preventing morbidity and mortality associated with infectious disease vectors, namely, improved nutrition, sanitation and hygiene.
Ironically, UNICEF's own vaccine-based programs to combat child deaths from disease in West Africa appear to reduce survival relative to areas outside the reach of their programs. According to a 2010 BBC News report, "Unicef spent $27m (£17m) rolling out vaccinations, vitamin A pills and bed nets to protect against malaria from 2001 to 2005 in areas of 11 countries. The researchers studied parts of Ghana, Mali and Benin and said children often survived better outside the UN scheme." Indeed, the most well-known criticism of UNICEF is that it has done very little to decrease child mortality (in sub-Saharan Africa it has actually increased) underscoring why its focus on promoting vaccination, and now monitoring and perhaps targeting "anti-vaccine" organizations, is profoundly misguided.
Ultimately, UNICEF's new report is more than an objective analysis of so-called "anti-vaccine" organizations, but a concerning bit of propaganda aimed at dissuading the millions who visit alternative health sites daily from obtaining information that was not underwritten and/or ghostwritten by the very industries who stand to gain most by hiding the well-known adverse health effects of their products, and who have managed to transform many governmental health agencies – and we can see, even global ones -- into their cheerleading, marketing, liability protection and now surveillance divisions.
[1] Vaccine News Daily, Merck for Mothers contributes to UNICEF's South African efforts, June 4th, 2013>>

[AUTHOR INFORMATION:
Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation.
He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is widely recognized as the most widely referenced health resource of its kind.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.]
Copyright Footer
<END SAYER JI ARTICLE>

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO CALL ATTENTION TO TWO OTHER ARTICLES BY MR. JI:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/has-drug-driven-medicine-become-form-human-sacrifice
"Has Drug-Driven Medicine Become A Form of Human Sacrifice?"
AND
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-law-forbids-medicinal-use-natural-substances
"Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances"


UNICEF, THE FDA, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ALL THE SAME, ARE ALL TRYING TO FORCE US TO HAVE VACCINES, TAKE DRUGS, SIGN ONTO THE INTERNATIONAL CODEX ALIMENTARIUS, AND ALL ARE VERY HEAVILY INTO POPULATION REDUCTION.[SEE MY BLOG, "GLOBAL POPULATION REDUCTION : EUGENICS FOR US"
http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/01/global-population-reduction-eugenics.html ]

NOW PLEASE UNDERSTAND, UNICEF IS NOT THE CONCERNED, ALTRUISTIC ORGANIZATION IT CLAIMS TO BE, NEVER WAS, NEVER WILL BE!
HERE'S PROOF...
<<While no one can argue with the fact that UNICEF does work to improve living conditions for some children in need, their assistance goes to those who already have families.  Those without, not so much.This year, if the spirit moves you to send holiday cards that will make a difference, there are many other alternatives to supporting UNICEF, which has lost its moral compass and has turned orphans into collateral damage in service of a political agenda.>>
[Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/red-thread-adoptive-family-forum/2011/dec/5/why-i-wont-buy-unicef-holiday-cards/#ixzz2dQ3N489P ]

Recently, major news outlets such as U.S. News have begun to investigate UNICEF's practice of giving huge cash payments to developing countries in exchange for their closure of their international adoption programs, and have even labeled UNICEF a "villain" for the extent of its negative impact on orphans!
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/17/bureaucracy-keeps-adopted-children-stuck-in-international-limbo

PHYSICIANS, PEDIATRICIANS IN MANY OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE PROTESTED AGAINST UNICEF'S VACCINATION POLICIES, AND ALSO SAID THAT CHILD MORTALITY RATES IN VACCINE-PUSHED NATIONS HAVE DRASTICALLY INCREASED, BUT HAVE WE READ ABOUT THAT IN OUR NEWS?
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/bharati.html
<<I think we have to call for a boycott of the entire vaccination procedure to make the political mandarins to sit up and take notice. It is a dastardly and heinous act to continue with the vaccination process without making provision for informed consent, introducing a physicians warranty of vaccine safety, compensation in case of adverse effects and without any long term studies on the effects of vaccines, specially when the so called "misinformation" about vaccine dangers circulating amongst dissenters, even within the medical community, is turning out to be a fact rather than rumour. The issue of heavy metals in vaccines is yet to be resolved. Countries putting the maximum emphasis on vaccines have the highest rate of infant mortality.  We also do not understand how the voices of Indian doctors are not being heard and instead "foreign experts" dictate terms in matters of vaccination policy in India. Who are these "experts" and what influence do they yield to dictate terms? What are these "experts" doing to ensure compensation and treatment for the millions of vaccine damaged children? What are they doing to educate the public about vaccine dangers?
"'You cannot take the "First do no harm" medical oath and push vaccines at the same time. This is ludicrous. This is madness. This is utter stupidity.'"- Quoted from "Vaccination: Fact of the Matter" by Jagannath Chatterjee, http://www.whale.to/v/vaccination89.html>>
[SEE also: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/third-world-duped-on-polio-eradication/]

UNICEF DEVOTED TO POPULATION CONTROL/FEWER CHILDREN
http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MjQyNg
<<UNICEF is, undoubtedly, the most well known and, probably, the most popular UN agency among Americans. The organization received $282 million from the United States alone in 2002. What is not well known, however, is UNICEF's evolution from a life affirming, child saving and Nobel peace prize-winning foundation to a contraceptive-distributing, abortion-performing and sterilization-providing partner of some of the world's most notorious "family planning" organizations.
There was major controversy in the UN - so much so that the organization's structure was threatened. The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF were reluctant to join in the debate. WHO was unsure about the health effects of the pill and UNICEF did not want to act before WHO. Controversy within UNICEF itself threatened to split the Executive Board in the spring of 1966. It was proposed that UNICEF funds would be spent on providing women with access to family planning in those countries where the government requested it but that UNICEF would not offer any advice nor provide supplies or equipment to make them. Opponents argued "it would be wrong for UNICEF to depart from its original mandate of saving children in order to engage in activities to prevent them from being born".  The proposal was withdrawn and the issue tabled for a year.
The Population Information Program was the responsibility of George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, D.C. until July 1, 1978 and then that of John Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. These Reports clearly outline UNICEF's involvement with population control throughout that time frame.>>

DOES UNICEF AND OTHERS PROFIT FROM FORCE-SELLING VACCINES?
IS SNOW REALLY WHITE?

For First Time, Unicef Reveals Differences in Prices It Pays Drug Companies for Vaccines
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/health/28vaccine.html?_r=0

"UNICEF using African refugee crisis to target 300,000 Kenyan children for vaccination"
http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/unicef-using-african-refugee-crisis-to-target-300000-kenyan-children-for-vaccination-natural-news/#.UiAQyX_hctI
SURE, GIVE MERCURY-CONTAINING VACCINES TO CHILDREN WITH ALREADY COMPROMISED IMMUNE SYSTEMS, WHO ARE ALSO MALNOURISHED, AND GET WHAT?
MORE CHILDREN DYING?

UNICEF'S DIRTY TRICKS
A Liberian actor has filed a $25 million lawsuit against UNICEF for alleged child abuse over his starring role aged 13 in a fundraising film as a murderous child soldier who tortures his victims.
March 28  2013, http://www.africareview.com/News/Unicef+sued+for+child+abuse/-/979180/1733062/-/12n1vqjz/-/index.html
<<Mike James, now 28, says he and other cast members have been “stigmatised as rebels, killers, cannibals and drug addicts” after being recruited for the 1997 film Soldier Boy and made to act out eating human body parts.>>
UNICEF MADE MILLIONS OFF THAT "DOCUMENTARY, BUT PAID ITS 'STAR' A MEAGER $300!
HE WAS AN ACTOR!

UNICEF-DRILLED WELLS HAVE CREATED ARSENIC POISONING PROBLEM
Up to 75 million at risk from tainted water.
75 MILLION!
<<The arsenic crisis in Bangladesh was caused by the sinking of over one million wells by foreign aid agencies and the Bangladeshi government from the 1970s. The effort - intended to reduce the incidence of water-borne disease in the region - has instead put millions of Bangladeshis at risk of poisoning. "Bangladesh makes the Chernobyl disaster look like a Sunday-school picnic," says Richard Wilson, a Harvard University expert on arsenic poisoning.
The problem was not noticed until victims began showing external symptoms of arsenic poisoning: calluses on the palms and soles of feet, leading to skin cancers.
Most of the wells were sunk by UNICEF, the United Nations Children's Fund, in the 1970s and 1980s. The Bangladeshi government considered suing UNICEF..."Most hydrogeologists worth their salt would have known about it," claims John McArthur, a sedimentologist at University College London, who points out that reports of chronic arsenic poisoning started to emerge from neighbouring, and geologically similar, West Bengal in the mid-1980s. >>
http://www.nature.com/news/2001/011011/full/news011011-14.html
UNICEF CLAIMS IT HAD NO IDEA...ETC, ETC.

UNICEF's, shall we use the phrase 'partner in crime', the World Health Organization (WHO) recently made NON-mainstream media news :
"News Rounds: Physicians Criticize WHO Over Fukushima, MSF Treats Youngest MDR TB Patient, UNICEF Sued, ICC Case Helped Kenyatta"
March 12, 2013
http://www.humanosphere.org/argolinkroundups/news-rounds-physicians-criticize-who-over-fukushima-msf-treats-youngest-mdr-tb-patient-unicef-sued-icc-case-helped-kenyatta/
<<Activists fault WHO report on Fukushima radiation (AFP) – Activist physicians on Monday accused the World Health Organization of downplaying the health impact of nuclear fallout from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. In a New York symposium marking the two-year anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear plant meltdown in Japan, the physicians took issue with WHO’s conclusion in a recent report that it did not expect a significant surge in cancer in Japan or elsewhere due to radiation leaks.>>
[SEE: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jf8lGEn8o5yIxnqBNgyafYXXeCOg?docId=CNG.5c91690b1a678beaa8d07563d6976a93.6c1]
WHAT IS UNICEF DOING FOR THE CHILDREN OF FUKUSHIMA, BY THE WAY?

UNICEF’s collusion with the Guatemalan government and media in their case against Intercountry Adoptions...THEY WON'T ALLOW ADOPTIONS BY "FOREIGNERS" EVEN THOUGH THIS MEANS CHILDREN LANGUISH AND EVEN DIE IN "ORPHANAGES" AND OTHER FACILITIES, OR GROW UP WITHOUT PARENTS OR A REAL HOME. WHEN NO ONE STEPS UP TO ADOPT WITHIN A NATION WHY NOT ALLOW ADOPTIONS BY OTHERS?
http://illicittrafficking.wordpress.com/tag/unicef/

UNDER THE GUISE OF VACCINATING NIGERIANS, UNICEF ADMINISTERED CONTAMINATED VACCINE THAT CAUSES STERILIZATION
March 2004: <<The UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria's youth against polio was found to be a front for sterilizing the nation. Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, took samples of the vaccine to labs in India for analysis where evidence was found of serious contamination. The vaccines contained toxic substances that have direct effects on the human reproductive system.
UNICEF is no friend of children.>>
[SOURCES: "UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds", LifeSiteNews.com, Kaduna, Nigeria, March 11, 2004.
AND
State Secret:Thousands Secretly Sterilized, May16, 2005, http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/forum/main-square/1280-state-secret-thousands-secretly-sterilized.html ]

UNICEF WANTS TO LEGALIZE PROSTITUTION
June 2003: A high-ranking official with UNICEF called for the legalization of prostitution and for UNICEF to make condoms available to "everybody, everywhere and at all times". Urban Jonsson, UNICEF Eastern and Southern African Regional Director urged that UNICEF take actions to "de-criminalize sex-work and facilitate the organization of sex-workers [since] when sex-workers are organized, they are in a stronger position to negotiate safer sex with their clients." Mr. Jonsson also stated "Abstinence is simply not a realistic option for most young people today."
[SOURCE: "Top UNICEF Official Calls for Legalized and Unionized Prostitution", C-Fam/LifeSiteNews.com, New York, June 5, 2003 ]

YEAH, THAT UNICEF!
NICE FOLKS, YES?
NO!!!
SO NOW, THEY ATTACK CREDIBLE, DEDICATED NATURAL HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL WEBSITES THAT SIMPLY OFFER FACTUAL RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC DATA THAT SHOWS THE REAL DANGERS AND THE TRUTH OF VACCINES?
WHY?
THERE IS AMPLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT PARENTS, OR SINGLE ADULTS, WHO DON'T WANT VACCINES FOR THEIR CHILDREN OR THEMSELVES ON THE IMPECCABLY DOCUMENTED GREENMEDINFO.COM WEBSITE. USE THEIR RESEARCH TOOLS AND SEARCH THEIR ARTICLES, SUPPORT THEM ANY WAY YOU CAN.

ANOTHER PLACE TO TURN TO FOR FACTS IS...
http://vactruth.com/2013/08/21/pharmaceutical-spy-tactics/
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS A MUST-READ ON THE ABOVE WEBSITE, I SINCERELY HOPE.
<<Pharma Collects Data on Your Vaccine Concerns
According to a recent news article, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) hired a text analytic software company, called Luminoso, to find out what parents were most concerned about with vaccines.
The news article stated information on two websites were collected, BabyCenter.com and WhattoExpect.com. In similar NSA-like-fashion, neither the website owners nor parents were aware of their information being anonymously collected.However, unlike the NSA, GlaxoSmithKline and others are probably not doing anything illegal – even though their behavior is still very chilling.[Reported on: http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/05/01/glaxo-mined-online-parent-discussion-boards-for-vaccine-worries/] >>
THINK, PLEASE!
WHY, WHY DO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES SPEND BILLIONS MORE ON ADS THAN ON RESEARCH?
WHY THE HARD-SELL?

Also read, if you care about truth in this matter at all, "The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry", found here: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhealth/42/42.pdf

Are vaccines safe?
Do they actually PREVENT people from contracting the diseases they claim to target?
We've explored this before, so see my blog linked at the very beginning of this update,
and be advised that the answer to both is, in too many cases, NO.

AND WHO IS COMPLICIT WITH BIG PHARMA AND UNSAFE DRUGS AND VACCINES?
WHO APPROVES THESE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASSURING US ALL IS WELL?
THE FDA, AND ONLY THE FDA CAN SIGN-OFF FOR THE RELEASE OF ANY AND ALL DRUGS HERE!
WITHOUT THE FDA, THERE WOULD BE NO DRUGS ON THE MARKET, AND NO VACCINES!
The FDA has the supporting research, much done by nations which now BAN some of the heavily-pushed 'vaccines', some by their OWN scientists, research that has been peer-reviewed, that has shown to be FACTUAL...vaccines can KILL, maim, destroy health, and have, and will continue to.
The lawsuits are too numerous for these attacks on people's health to be "coincidence", to be 'scientifically unproven', to be wrong!
No, what is WRONG is that the FDA long ago subjugated itself to the pharmaceutical industry, rolled-over for 'Big Pharma', and even a presidential candidate saw that.
I CAN FIND NO MAINSTREAM COVERAGE OF THIS  SO...
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-fda-and-big-pharma-are-in-bed-together/

A 2006 survey of 997 FDA scientists revealed that forty percent feared "retaliation" for voicing safety concerns over prescription drugs in public. These are ALL scientists CONNECTED to the FDA!
Over one-third of those SAME scientists didn't even feel comfortable expressing safety concerns inside the agency with colleagues, behind closed doors!
What should this tell us?
It has only been the daring courage of a FEW independent FDA scientists over the years, taking a stand despite what they have described as intense intimidation and censorship from the FDA's own top officials, who have stood up and warned the American public about dangerous prescription drugs... like Vioxx.
<<Merck:With a long list of deaths to its credit, and more than $5.5 billion in judgments and fines levied against it, it was five years before Merck made its $30-billion recall of the painkiller Vioxx. After the drug was withdrawn, and 60,000 had already died, Merck picked up the pieces painlessly by getting a new drug fast-tracked and on the market.
That drug is Gardasil, a vaccine that so far has been linked to thousands of adverse events and at least 49 unexplained deaths. It's a situation that the FDA and CDC have been denying repeatedly, even as the adverse reports mount.
[SEE MY BLOG: "PROVEN DANGERS OF HPV/GARDASIL AND HEPATITIS B VACCINES", http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/05/proven-dangers-of-hpvgardasil-and.html]

Baxter: Dozens of recalls of products that caused deaths and injuries, at least 11 different guilty pleas to fraud and illegal sales activity, more than 200 lawsuits – many of them stemming from selling AIDS-tainted blood to hemophiliacs – and more than $1.3 billion in criminal fines and civil penalties.
REMEMBER BAXTER'S NAME WHEN THE FLU VACCINE HAD THE WHISTLE BLOWN ON IT?"Baxter To Develop Swine Flu Vaccine Despite Bird Flu Scandal.
The fox has been given the duty of guarding the henhouse."April 27, 2009<<A U.S. based pharmaceutical company that just weeks ago was involved in a scandal involving vaccines tainted with deadly avian flu virus has been chosen to head up efforts to produce a vaccine for the Mexican swine flu that has seemingly migrated into the U.S. and Europe.
Baxter confirmed over the weekend that it is working with the World Health Organization on a potential vaccine to curb the deadly swine flu virus that is blamed for scores of deaths in Mexico and has emerged as a threat in the U.S., reports the Chicago Tribune.>>
WORKING WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION...SISTER AGENCY TO UNICEF!
DARLING OF THE FDA!
WE KNOW BAXTER HID FACTS BUT LET'S TRUST THEM AGAIN?
INSANITY!
BUT ON THEY GO!

Pfizer: In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the antipsychotic Geodon, the antibiotic Zyvox, and the anti-epileptic Lyrica. In a study recently released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA), officials emphasized that people should not assume there's no risk in prescribed medicines. The truth is, the only way to avoid all risk, including death, from prescription drugs is to not take them at all.>>
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/26/prescription-drugs-number-one-cause-preventable-death-in-us.aspx

Literally tens of millions of Americans have been harmed by such obvious FDA negligence over the last decade, and well over one million have been killed by FDA-approved prescription drugs, some of which were later found to have been approved based on FRAUDULENT  'scientific' data.
The FDA, like too much of mainstream medicine, or what we erroneously call 'medicine', seems to have abandoned public safety, ethics, and scientific integrity in favor of MAKING MONEY for shareholders, and getting more money from our own 'Federal Corporation', WHAT WE CALL our government.
We can sanely and honestly say, given the facts and consumer-won class action lawsuits before us, that the FDA has become the single greatest threat to the health and safety of the American people, a greater threat than any so-called 'terrorist group'! NO 'terrorist organization' has yet been complicit in the death of a MILLION American citizens, has it?
A shocking 18.4 % of the 997 FDA scientists in the 2006 survey report that they "...have been asked, for non-scientific reasons, to inappropriately exclude or alter technical information or their conclusions in a FDA scientific document."
61% of these surveyed scientists reported that they knew of cases where "Department of Health and Human Services or FDA political appointees have inappropriately injected themselves into FDA determinations or actions."
Can you imagine that? I can!
POLITICIANS in high places are influencing the FDA, making themselves almost the same as a criminal gang of thugs, who strong-arm 'legislation', who interfere with that agency every chance they get.
Even when the FDA has been found negligent, been caught cheating on research results, their handlers, their pals in political circles have done little but gently slap their hands with a wink and a nod, and NOTHING GETS FIXED!
If you or I did the SAME things that politicians and Big Business/Big Pharma are doing to make the FDA their slave agency, we'd be tried for treason, or for terrorist acts, no doubt about it!
Read the entire BUSH2 "Patriot Act" or NDAA of this president's regime if you doubt that. It's IN BOTH! YOU CAN'T "BUY-OUT" A THING LIKE THE FDA, BUT SOME HAVE!
53% of surveyed scientists think the FDA sometimes provides INACCURATE information on drugs to the American people!
THIS IS JUST INFORMATION "FROM THE HORSES' MOUTHS", AMERICA.

<<Understand this very clearly, no medical drug in America can be released for public use until and unless the FDA states it is safe. The FDA is the agency responsible for every such decision on every drug. The buck stops there.
The revelations of ongoing knowledge to be found at the FDA website page stagger the mind. Here is yet another implication: what about all the studies on drugs that are published in prestigious medical journals, month after month? These studies unequivocally claim the drugs are safe. What level of fraud must exist for such peer-reviewed studies to attain the false status of medical fact?

Perhaps this quote from Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, will clarify that aspect of the scandal:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”>>
(Marcia Angell, MD, The New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009)
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/05/17/hidden-in-plain-view-fda-murder/

Remember how America responded after the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon on 9/11?
The media whipped us into a frenzy after 9/11, made us demand retribution, got us to agree to a war in TWO nations that had NOTHING to do with the attack on America then. We were screaming for heads to roll, patriotism became a good word once again.
There were less than 3,000 lives lost on 9/11, plus the just under 5,000 American military men and women killed in the 'war' that the Department of Defense ADMITS to.
I'm only mentioning American citizens because so few care to know how many foreign CIVILIANS have died, or how many of THEIR military members.
The point is, we SCREAMED for those responsible for the initial loss of the 2,996 to be captured and killed. Though our government swore they'd get those responsible, they never did, never will. The hijackers were, all but four, Saudi nationals, we were told, remember? Have we attacked Saudi Arabia, or any Saudi except for allegedly hunting for Bin Laden? The other 4 were from Egypt, Lebanon, and 2 from the United Arab Emirates, we were told, remember? NONE were from Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan, not a one.
Yes, we screamed for justice over 9/11, but 9/11 is repeated almost every week by those that die from drug "treatments" and "vaccines" here in America!
WHY, AMERICA, WHY DON'T YOU SCREAM FOR RETRIBUTION FOR A MILLION DEATHS OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE?
IF ANOTHER NATION WAS DOING THIS AND IT WAS MADE KNOWN TO US, WE WOULD CALL IT GENOCIDE, AND HAVE!
WHY DON'T WE CALL IT THAT ALOUD, JUST CALL IT WHAT IT IS?
OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA ALMOST NEVER COVER THE DAILY DEATHS BY PRESCRIPTIONS OR VACCINES!
WHY didn't we read more about little 8-weeks-old "Baby Stacy", a premature twin who died after she was given NINE (9) vaccines in ONE day? Her twin sister, Lesly, somehow survived.
[SEE: "Christina England Vactruth Baby Dies After 9 Vaccines in One Day" http://vactruth.com/2012/01/19/baby-dies-after-first-shots/ ]

WHY didn't Americans read in OUR news what the Australian News reported in August of 2012, that there had been 2,136 reports of adverse events and ten (10) deaths reported following injection with CSL’s Fluvax and Fluvax Junior, the vaccine that replaced Panvax in 2010?
[The Australian News: "10 Deaths linked to the anti flu vaccine" http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/deaths-linked-to-anti-flu-vaccines/story-e6frg8y6-1226441791947 ]
<<‘Fluvax is used for about half the nation’s estimated 6 million flu vaccinations each year. But the number of reported side-effects for Fluvax is five times higher than the other three most popular brands of flu vaccines together.’>>

<< In February, Linda Morin reported that she was suing Merck, the manufacturers of Gardasil, along with three doctors, pediatrician Guylaine Larose, neurologist Amelie Nadeau and her family doctor, Lynne Nadeau for the sum of $197,000. Ms. Morin stated that she had found her 14 year-old daughter Annabelle dead in the bathtub after she had received her second Gardasil vaccination.  [SEE: Thaddeus Baklinski LifeSiteNews, " Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil vaccination",  http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/parents-sue-after-quebec-teen-dies-following-gardasil-vaccination/ ]

When people die by the thousands every week from prescription drugs/vaccines, why doesn't mainstream media cover it?
The discovery of a page, on the FDA’s own website from the year 2000, 13 years ago, proves the FDA is fully aware that the drugs it certifies as safe have been killing Americans, at the rate of 100,000 per year, and that they knew of OVER 2 MILLION "adverse drug reactions , ADRs, in that same one year time frame!
[SEE:http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/DrugInteractionsLabeling/ucm114848.htm ]
Don't these deaths matter?
Maybe the stories of these senseless deaths just don't sell enough copies, or garner a big enough audience?
Maybe they don't think pain, death, or suffering is valid except in combat, or some sort of disaster?
I APPLAUD ONE RENSE.COM AUTHOR WHO ASKED:
<<I have to wonder: Would the people demand reform if the FDA actually conducted nuclear bombing raids on U.S. cities? Would lawmakers finally stand up and say the FDA should stop bombing our cities? Or would the FDA brush off the critics and simply slap a black-box warning label on the side of the B2 stealth bomber that said, "Warning: This bomb may kill you," and then continue the bombing runs? Why isn't the FBI conducting armed raids on the [FDA] agency right now and marching these criminals away in handcuffs?>>
In a June 2010 report in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, study authors said that in looking over records that spanned from 1979 to 2006 (the most recent year available) they found that, of 62 million death certificates, almost a quarter-million deaths were coded as having occurred IN A HOSPITAL setting due to medication errors.
THOSE ARE JUST HOSPITAL DEATHS!
Adverse drug reactions cause injuries or death in 1 of 5 hospital patients.
WHY NO WAR ON THIS? WE HAVE A WAR ON EVERYTHING ELSE!
[SEE: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/06/03/are-hospitals-really-more-deadly-in-july-when-novice-doctors-arrive/#.Uh_9g3_hctI ]

"'Meanwhile, the FDA pursues an agenda of attacking nutritional supplements, and the latest federal regulations classify these supplements as “potentially dangerous”—despite the fact that supplements have a record of safety that is astonishing.'" ~ Jon Rappoport, candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. Worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.

I SAW THE QUESTION ASKED OVER AND OVER IN MANY ARTICLES, "WHO HAS EVER DIED FROM A LACK OF VIOXX, OR OTHER DRUG?"
PEOPLE DIE FROM DISEASE, DRUGS ONLY TREAT SYMPTOMS OF DISEASE!

I GRADUATED FROM A SMALL-TOWN HIGH SCHOOL IN THE DEEP SOUTH, 78 IN THE SENIOR CLASS.
WE WERE ALL GIVEN THOSE FIRST POLIO VACCINES, THEN A FINAL SUGAR CUBE DRENCHED IN THE VIRUS.
ONCE I READ ABOUT THE CONTAMINATION OF THOSE EARLY VACCINES WITH CANCER-CAUSING AGENTS, I BEGAN TO INQUIRE OF THE CLASS HISTORIAN ABOUT THE HEALTH OF OUR CLASSMATES. AFTER 15 YEARS FROM THE START OF THAT INQUIRY, WE LEARNED THAT 56 OF US HAD FACED SOME FORM OF CANCER, 5 HAD DIED, MANY OF US HAD MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF CANCER, SOME WERE STILL BATTLING THAT KILLER.
YOU TELL ME WHAT THE ODDS OF THAT ARE THAT OVER 3/4ths OF AN ENTIRE CLASS WOULD GET SOME FORM OF CANCER..
MY ONLY SON HOVERED BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH FOR WEEKS FOLLOWING ONE TETANUS VACCINE, AS HAD HIS GREAT-GRANDFATHER AND GREAT-UNCLE.
AFTER MORE THAN 20 YEARS OF LOOKING INTO THIS, I WILL NEVER AGREE TO BE VACCINATED FOR ANYTHING EVER AGAIN.
WE HAVE THAT RIGHT, YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT...FOR NOW.

DOWNLOAD TRUTH!
http://my.vactruth.com/downloads/
Vaccine-Tricks (DIRTY TRICKS THAT IS!)
Vaccine-Ingredients (YOU WILL BE AMAZED WHAT'S IN THOSE!)
vaccination-exposed (BE WARNED!)

http://vactruth.com/doc/vt-book-list-v2.1.pdf
Books to read about vaccines.

SOURCES NOT CITED ABOVE:
http://www.amednews.com/article/20091026/profession/310269981/6/

http://jetlib.com/news/tag/journal-of-general-internal-medicine/

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/26/prescription-drugs-number-one-cause-preventable-death-in-us.aspx

http://rense.com/general72/fdasown.htm
"Rate of undesirable events at beginning of academic year: retrospective cohort study," abstract, BMJ, Oct. 13 (http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/oct13_1/b3974/)

"Early In-Hospital Mortality following Trainee Doctors' First Day at Work," PloS One, Sept. 23 (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3adoi%2f10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0007103)

"The 'July Phenomenon': Is Trauma the Exception?" abstract, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, September (http://journalacs.org/article/s1072-7515(09)00511-0/)

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/05/17/hidden-in-plain-view-fda-murder/

"It's the biggest man-made epidemic in the United States...PRESCRIPTION DRUG DEATHS
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/14/health/gupta-accidental-overdose



















Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)