SILENT WAR: AMERICA 10X MORE CONTAMINATED THAN JAPAN!!

“There is no safe amount of radiation.  Even small amounts do harm.”

~Linus Pauling PhD, Nobel Laureate 

It is becoming clear that the consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster could be catastrophic because the system protecting the more that 11,000 spent fuel rods that must be constantly cooled has been jeopardized. Just one curie can be fatal and there is a total of 336 million curies of energy in these rods; 134 million is in the form of cesium 137.

Last year, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and 3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences showed that radiation on the West Coast of North America could end up being 10 times higher than in Japan:

'This is somewhere between 10 and 85 times what happened in Chernobyl. Almost no cleanup has been done and none is planned that we know about. '

"The fallout is poisoning our food, water, air, soil, sea and sea life. It is imperative that we prepare to protect ourselves and our loved ones from this potential radiation damage."

[NOTE: THERE ARE SOME VERY IMPORTANT LINKS AND VIDEOS NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THIS BLOG, BUT TRY TO READ THROUGH EVERYTHING. IF YOU DO NOTHING ELSE, DOWNLOAD THE BOOK, 'THE CODE KILLERS', AT THE LINK PROVIDED AND WATCH THE VIDEOS.] 

C-137 is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in nature due to the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts.

ON AUGUST 19, 2013, TEPCO went from reporting 2600 / 3800 becquerels per liter of contaminated leakage to 80 million becquerels of radiation per liter in ground water at Fukushima.
80 MILLION Bq/L... THIS WAS REPORTED BY REUTERS, VOICE OF AMERICA, AND OTHER MAJOR NEWS SOURCES....BRIEFLY...
JAPAN TODAY NEWS DID THE CALCULATION ON THAT 300,000 LITERS RELEASED INTO THE GROUND AND OCEAN:
Calculations: Roughly 300 metric tons = Roughly 300,000 liters × 80 million Bq of beta radiation per liter = Roughly 24,000,000,000,000 Bq of total beta radiation (24 trillion Bq)

24 TRILLION Bq TOTAL RADIATION RELEASED IN A MATTER OF DAYS! JUST DAYS!
IN APRIL OF 2013, PRIOR TO THIS, TEPCO ADMITTED TO ANOTHER 120,000 LOST LITERS OF CONTAMINATED WATER FROM ITS TANKS.

That 80 MILLION Bq/L translates to roughly 0.08 GRAYS...per liter...and they released over 300,000 liters...every day...or more.
That area is off-the-charts toxic...lethal...deadly.

How much radiation does it take to make us sick?
Six Gray units (one gray unit is equivalent to one Sievert or 100 RADS) can be lethal and just one Gray is enough to cause acute radiation sickness that is characterized by nausea and vomiting within 6 hours of exposure. 
A curie (Ci) is a huge denomination—one curie equals 37 billion becquerel

One Gray = 1000 millisieverts or 1 Sievert

SOME HAVE SAID, "Oh, you get higher radiation doses on a long airplane flight."
0.05 mSv = 0.00005 Bq
IS ANY RADIATION A GOOD THING?
1500+ LEADING WORLD SCIENTISTS THINK NOT!
Perhaps you've swallowed this deception, but realize that it is a deception, a RED HERRING of the worst degree, and ignores Pauling and over 1500 leading scientists who began raising the alarm over our radiation-contaminated environment way back in the 1970s!

According to a 1972 study that examined the effect of injected C-137 in small dogs, a dose of merely 3800 Ci/kg is absolutely LETHAL to beagles -- within three weeks, no less.
[NOTE:1 Ci = 37,000,000,000 Bq]
A human baby is about the size of a beagle!!!

Assuming that the average ADULT human is, say, five to ten times the mass of a fully-grown beagle, one would infer that a breathtakingly lethal dose to a human being would require no more than 38,000 Ci/kg. 

California Rain Water Sample of March 27, 2011, by UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKLEY:   0.46 Bq/L.

THE MISCONCEPTION OF "LOWER THAN YOU GET ON AN AIRPLANE FLIGHT" GOES STRAIGHT DOWN THE SEWER WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ACTUAL NUMBERS, DOESN'T IT?
 0.46 Bq/L in rain water, found just days after the Fukushima disaster, is a hell of a lot more than 0.00005 Bq...face it!
AND THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATING, GROWING EVERY DAY!

IN SPITE OF WHAT YOU MAY HAVE READ/HEARD: "'C-137 has only ever been released into the environment a handful of times in the ENTIRE history of the planet.'"

C-137 IS NOT "NATURALLY-OCCURRING IN THE ENVIRONMENT"!!!
WE HUMANS PUT IT THERE WITH OUR NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING!
IT CAN ONLY FORM FROM FISSION REACTIONS!

REMEMBER..."'C-137 is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in the environment due to the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts.'"

SO, WHAT ARE CURRENT LEVELS FROM FUKUSHIMA?
HERE ARE THE NUMBERS FROM THE PAST WEEK:
A record high level of 710,000 becquerels PER LITER of beta-ray sources, such as radioactive strontium, was detected per liter of water in an observation well at the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.
The previous high reading of 550,000 becquerels per liter was found in water sampled Nov. 9 at the same well.
TEPCO detected 400,000 becquerels per liter at the same well on Oct. 17. The level  has been rising in recent days. 

GO BACK TO WHAT BERKELEY FOUND IN 2011:
0.46 Bq/L IN RAIN WATER.
COMPARE THAT TO 710,000 Bq/L AT FUKUSHIMA LAST WEEK.
DO YOU SEE WHERE WE ARE IN THIS?

Radiation Measurements

	Radioactivity	Absorbed Dose	Dose Equivalent	Exposure
Common Units	curie (Ci)	rad	rem	roentgen (R)
SI Units	becquerel (Bq)	gray (Gy)	sievert (Sv)	coulomb/kilogram (C/kg)

The danger of C-137 is deceptively profound.
Its true lethality is very much a function of its AGGREGATION -- in quantities of water, in food, and, most perilously, in the human body, which is manifestly UNABLE to expel C-137 (except in cases where Prussian Blue has been administered in a timely fashion, which is clearly NOT taking place -- or even being seriously discussed, insofar as I can tell -- here in the U.S., or, for that matter, anywhere, NOT EVEN IN FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE.)  

PLEASE NOTE: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission still requires plants to report radiation releases in rem, while the rest of the world uses sieverts. For the record, one rem is equivalent to one-hundredth of a sievert. 
WHY NOT REPORT LIKE THE REST OF THE WORLD REPORTS? 

Just six days after the disastrous meltdowns struck four reactors at Fukushima on March 11, 2011, scientists detected the plume of toxic fallout had arrived over American shores.  Subsequent measurements by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found levels of radiation in air, water, and milk hundreds of times above normal across the U.S.  The highest detected levels of Iodine-131 in precipitation in the U.S. were as follows (normal is about 2 picocuries I-131 per liter of water):  Boise, ID (390); Kansas City (200); Salt Lake City (190); Jacksonville, FL (150); Olympia, WA (125); and Boston, MA (92).

“Fukushima fallout appeared to affect all areas of the U.S., and was especially large in some, mostly in the western part of the nation,” wrote researchers with the Radiation and Public Health Project in their peer-reviewed paper published in Open Journal of Pediatrics. 

An interesting fact for people living on the US west coast is also included in the UNSCEAR [United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation] report: only about 5% of the directly discharged radiation was deposited within a radius of 80 km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station. The rest , 95%, was distributed in the Pacific Ocean.
3-D simulations had already been carried out for the Pacific basin, showing that the emissions would reach the North American coastline, with uncertain consequences for food safety and health of the local population.
BUT OUR GOVERNMENT SOUNDED NO REAL ALARMS!!!
WHY NOT?

Last year, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and 3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences showed that radiation on the West Coast of North America could end up being 10 times higher than in Japan:
AMERICA WILL BE 10 TIMES AS POLLUTED AS JAPAN !!!
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT. 

 (ii) The subsequent pace of dilution is strongly reduced, owing to the eastward advection of the main tracer cloud towards the much less energetic areas of the central and eastern North Pacific. (iii) The magnitude of additional peak radioactivity should drop to values comparable to the pre-Fukushima levels after 6–9 years (i.e. total peak concentrations would then have declined below twice pre-Fukushima levels). (iv) By then the tracer cloud will span almost the entire North Pacific, with peak concentrations off the North American coast an order-of-magnitude higher than in the western Pacific.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Fuku1.jpg

The half life of cesium-137 is so long that it produces more damage to humans. Figure 4 gives the examples of the distribution of the impact strength of Cesium-137 at year 1.5 (panel (a)), year 3.5 (panel (b)), and year 4 (panel (c)).  It is worth noting that [because] the current near the shore cannot be well reconstructed by the global ocean reanalysis, some nuclear pollutant particulate tracers may come to rest in near shore areas, which may result in additional uncertainty in the estimation of the impact strength.

SLATE MAGAZINE REPORTED:

< If the radiation leaves the air and enters a person, animal, or object, the units switch again. The raw amount of radiation that an object absorbs is expressed in either rad (customary) or gray (SI). As with sieverts and rem, one gray equals 100 rad.

So where do sieverts and rems fit into this whole picture? They provide a measure of the potential harm caused by radiation in a sample of living tissue. That's different from measuring the amount of energy or rate of emission, because different types of radiation affect the body in different ways. Alpha particles, for example, are 20 times more dangerous to human tissue than gamma rays at the same dosage level. And certain tissue types are more sensitive to radiation than others. A blast of radiation to the spleen, for example, will cause more damage than the same dose to the brain, because splenic tissue divides and multiplies much faster. Physicists use these two adjustment factors—type of radiation and sensitivity of tissue—to convert from measures of radiation absorption to measures of effective dose. Sieverts or rem are used in reports on radiation disasters, because they give a better sense of how the radiation might affect human health.  

While effective dose is a great step forward from the days when we simply measured the quantity of radiation absorbed by a patient, it's still a rather inexact science. Researchers can't perform randomized trials on the effects of radiation, because it's unethical to give people cancer. As a result, the tables health physicists use to convert between gray and sieverts (or between rad and rem) are constantly changing to reflect new data. >

“Not much time remains before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity are immeasurably diminished.  We, the undersigned senior members of the world's scientific community, hereby warn all of humanity of what lies ahead.  A great change in the stewardship of the earth is required.”
~Warning to Humanity
issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists
signed by 1500 scientists, from 69 nations 

Epidemiologist Joseph Mangano and internist/toxicologist Janette Sherman have published a peer reviewed study  - primarily of infants - in the U.S. in the first 14 weeks after the Fukushima Daiichi mass meltdowns, explosions and fires in the December 2011 edition of the International Journal of Health Services.
The authors say the statistically significant increase in deaths is comparable to the 16,500 excess deaths recorded in the U.S. in the 17 weeks following the Chernobyl accident in 1986.

The authors issued an early alert back in April about what they were finding after just a few weeks of beginning the study, which was dismissed by the usual suspects as mere statistical anomalies that had nothing to do with levels of iodine-131 (and cesium-134, cesium-137 and strontium-90) in contamination plumes from northeastern Japan. Yet the EPA, during its few weeks of monitoring of fallout as the plumes transversed North America, found high levels in air, water and milk in many places. For instance, iodine-131 was detected in precipitation falling on Boise, Idaho at nearly 200 times 'normal'.
"Deaths are seen across all ages, but we continue to find that infants are hardest hit because their tissues are rapidly multiplying, they have undeveloped immune systems, and the doses of radioisotopes are proportionally greater than for adults."

Dr. Sherman, an adjunct professor at Western Michigan University, was a contributing editor of 'Chernobyl - Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment', published by the NY Academy of Sciences in 2009. 

Venerated Canadian scientist David Suzuki recently issued perhaps the most ominous warning yet about Fukushima's contamination of the planet.

   “Fukushima is the most terrifying situation I can imagine,” he said.
   “You have a government that is in total collusion with TEPCO, the energy company. They're   lying through their teeth.”
   “They don't know what to do The Japanese government has too much pride to admit that.”

Suzuki cited Tokyo University research pegging the chance of another 7+ magnitude earthquake by 2016 at 70 percent.
“If, in fact, the fourth plant goes under an earthquake, and those rods are exposed, it's bye-bye Japan,” he warned, “and everybody on the west coast of North America should evacuate. Now if that isn't terrifying, I don't know what is.”

Australian physician Dr. Helen Caldicott says that the nuclear industry has friends in high places and a vested interest in distorting the facts.
“I don't care if they criticize us,” she told me. “David (Suzuki) has hesitated to get into the whole nuclear debate, but he's a careful scientist.
“TEPCO is trying to move those damaged rods by crane manually, which has never, ever been done before; usually fuel rods are moved by computer control. If two fuel rods happened to touch, there could be a fission reaction releasing huge amounts of radioactive gases. This would be a catastrophe. The radiation would circle the Northern Hemisphere.”
“Pro-nuclear advocates... make guesses about radiation exposure using OLD data, not the newest scientific information we have. They underestimate it grossly to keep their industry going. The predictions are so dire that no one wants to face them. They want to practice psychic numbing.”

Dr. John Apsley reported on increased deaths in North America that he believes are associated with the Fukushima catastrophe, and the leaking of radiation. Dr.Apsley has long spoken about the effects of radioactive iodine exposure on thyroid function. Once radioactive iodine hits the thyroid its function is permanently impaired which in turn suppresses the immune system, he explained. CDC data shows a significant increase in death rates attributable to radioactive iodine given off by the Fukushima disaster, he added.

Apsley is concerned that moving unit 4 may cause another criticality event involving radioactive iodine.
'Should this happen the West Coast will be hit in six days followed by the East Coast within nine days, he cautioned, noting that increase deaths in infants and the elderly will follow wherever rain dumps the radioactive iodine.'

At least 14,000 Deaths Suspected Due to Radiation From Fukushima.
There was a spike in infant mortality rates within the first 10 weeks of the catastrophe in cities across the US, and the radiation contamination likely came through rainfall, he said, adding that infants were particularly susceptible because of their reduced thyroid function.

It's in the rain and in the wind...it will continue to be in the rain and wind because the contamination just keeps leaking into our atmosphere, our ocean, getting into our food chain.
 
Because of the prevailing winds at the time of the Fukushima incident, the west coast of the United States has been exposed to serious levels of radioactive fall-out. Hardest hit were Colorado and Wyoming. Surprisingly, Jacksonville, Florida falls into this category, too, due to wind currents.
One of the hardest hit states in the nation is Pennsylvania because of the intense rainfall they had in the area approximately 3 weeks after the explosion. This rainfall carried tremendous amounts of radiation into the area.

Vancouver, Canada has also experienced a 60% increase in infant death rates.

The radiation that's made its way to North America is settling into the ground and being absorbed into the food we eat.

THE OCEAN DOES NOT DILUTE RADIATION OF THIS LEVEL!!!
While many people assume that the ocean will dilute the Fukushima radiation, a 1955 U.S. government report concluded that the ocean does NOT adequately dilute radiation from nuclear accidents, and there could be “pockets” and “streams” of highly-concentrated radiation.
CITING THAT FINDING, nuclear expert Robert Alvarez – senior policy adviser to the Energy Department’s secretary and deputy assistant secretary for national security and the environment from 1993 to 1999 – wrote yesterday:

    "'According to a previously secret 1955 memo from the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission regarding concerns of the British government over contaminated tuna, “dissipation of radioactive fall-out in ocean waters is not a gradual spreading out of the activity from the region with the highest concentration to uncontaminated regions, but that the process results in scattered pockets and streams of higher radioactive materials in the Pacific. We can speculate that tuna which now show radioactivity from ingested materials [this is in 1955, not today's exact same findings] have been living in or have passed through, such pockets; or have been feeding on plant and animal life which has been exposed in those areas.'”

 [PLEASE ALSO VISIT THIS 'READING ROOM' TO LEARN MORE ABOUT EFFECTS OF "LOW-LEVEL" RADIATION: http://www.radiation.org/reading/index.html on excess deaths]

Because of the huge amounts of radioactive water Tepco is dumping into the Pacific Ocean EVERY SINGLE DAY, NON-STOP, and the FACT that the current pushes water from Japan to the West Coast of North America, at least some of these radioactive “streams” or “hot spots” WILL, WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, end up impacting the West Coast...OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

IT WILL ALSO CONTINUE TO SHOW UP IN OUR RAIN AND IN THE JET STREAM OVER NORTH AMERICA.

NOTHING ANY "EXPERT" CAN SAY WILL MAKE THAT GO AWAY.
FUKUSHIMA CONTINUES CONTAMINATING ALL OF US EVERY DAY!

THERE IS NOTHING 'NATURAL' ABOUT THIS MUCH RADIATION, NOR IS ANY LIVING ORGANISM "EVOLVED' TO HANDLE THESE LEVELS.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "SAFE LEVELS" OF ANY RADIATION.
RADIATION CHANGES THINGS IN A VERY BAD WAY AT THE CELLULAR, AT THE DNA LEVELS!
THIS IS NOT LIKE SWALLOWING SALT WATER, THROWING UP, AND BEING OKAY!
THIS STUFF STAYS IN OUR BONES, IN OUR VERY HUMAN CELLS.

An animated graphic from the University of Hawaii’s International Pacific Research Center shows the projected dispersion of debris from Japan:

In addition to radioactive debris, MIT says that seawater which is itself radioactive HAS BEGUN hitting the West Coast.

SO, WHY WON'T OUR GOVERNMENTS STEP IN WITH SOME TRUTH FOR ALL OF US?
ARE THEY TRYING TO KEEP US FROM PANICKING?
DO THEY SIMPLY NOT GIVE A TINKER'S EARTHEN DAM?

The Congressional Research Service HAS admitted:
Transport by ocean currents is much slower, and additional radiation from this source might eventually also be detected in North Pacific waters under U.S. jurisdiction, even months after its release. Regardless of slow ocean transport, the long half-life of radioactive cesium isotopes means that radioactive contaminants could remain a valid concern for YEARS." 

PACIFIC OCEAN BECOMING DEVOID OF LIFE

1~ NOAA DECLARES UNUSUAL MORTALITY EVENT IN CALIFORNIA, MAY, 2013
California Sea Lion Unusual Mortality Event in California
Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (as amended), an Unusual Mortality Event (UME) has been declared for California sea lions in California from January 2013 through the present.
Elevated strandings of California sea lion pups have been observed in Southern California in the following counties:
    Santa Barbara County
    Ventura County
    Los Angeles County
    Orange County
    San Diego County  
Sea lions will eat a lot of different prey items: octopus, squid, small sharks. But their bread and butter is herring. Herring catches have also plummeted.
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/health/mmume/images/csl_strandings_graph_may19.jpg  

2~ Sea turtles are washing up dead on the PACIFIC beaches of Central America and scientists don't know why.
In one area of El Salvador's coast, dogs that started eating dead turtles stopped breathing and died almost instantly.
Fertility is yet another issue: in September scientists in Honduras said turtles on one beach laid 40 per cent fewer eggs. 

3~ Giant Oarfish washing ashore in California. Scientists testing for radiation levels.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-23/oar-fish/5039218
Oct. 23, 2013
After the Fukushima nuclear disaster, there were accounts of several of the animals washing ashore.
“One dead oarfish is odd,” California Sea Grant Director James Eckman said. “Two is a pattern.”
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/oct/23/la-jolla-scientists-look-mystery-giant-sea-serpent/ 

4~ IF EVERYTHING IS FINE, WHY AREN'T THE WORLD'S GOVERNMENTS TESTING FOOD FISH?
Tuna, salmon, herring, shad, sardines, anchovies...ALL NUMBERS HAVE DRASTICALLY DECREASED, MANY SHOW DISEASE COMMON TO RADIATION POISONING.

Associated Press reports that both scientists and native elders in British Columbia say that sockeye numbers have plummeted:
Sockeye salmon returns plunge to historic lows. 

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/08/is-fukushima-irradiating-tuna-salmon-and-herring-on-the-west-coast-of-north-america.html

“We’ve never seen anything like this in all these years I’ve done this. I’ve asked the elders and they have never seen anything like this at all.” [said Chief Wilf Adam]
Mel Kotyk, North Coast area director for the Department said department scientists don’t know why the return numbers are so low…. “When they went out to sea they seemed to be very strong and healthy and in good numbers, so we think something happened in the ocean.” 

The Globe and Mail, Aug 13, 2013 : Independent fisheries scientist Alexandra Morton is raising concerns about a disease she says is spreading through Pacific herring causing fish to hemorrhage. “Two days ago I did a beach seine on Malcolm Island [near Port McNeill on northern Vancouver Island] and I got approximately 100 of these little herring and they were not only bleeding from their fins, but their bellies, their chins, their eyeballs. “It was 100 per cent … I couldn’t find any that weren’t bleeding to some degree. "

Vancouver 24 hrs, Aug 11, 2013: [Morton] says Fisheries and Oceans Canada [FOC] is ignoring the problem. According to emails from FOC, the federal authority had asked the marine biologist to send in 20 to 30 herring in September 2011, saying that would be “more than sufficient for the lab to look for clinical signs of disease and provide sufficient diagnostics.” She did, and hasn’t heard back since. FOC officials did not respond to a request for comment by the 24 hours presstime. 

5~ Major news outlets have reported that large numbers of sea stars living off of the west coast of North America appear to be "melting"…
     Divers were out in Puget Sound waters Saturday to see if they can help solve a mystery. Scientists are trying to figure out what’s causing one species of starfish to die in parts of Puget Sound and the waters off of Canada.

    Seattle Aquarium biologists Jeff Christiansen and Joel Hollander suited up in scuba gear in their search for answers.  “We’re going to look for both healthy and potentially diseased sea stars,” Christiansen explained. “We’ve got some sea stars that look like they’re melting on the bottom.”

    The same thing is happening in the waters near Canada and nobody’s sure why.

6~ KILLER WHALE POPULATIONS DYING
Something is also causing a huge spike in the death rate for killer whales living off of the coast of British Columbia…

    A Vancouver Aquarium researcher is sounding the alarm over “puzzling” changes he’s observed in the killer whale pods that live off the southern British Columbia coast.

    Dr. Lance Barrett-Lennard says he fears changes in the ocean environment are prompting odd behaviour and an unusually high mortality rate.

    Barrett-Lennard says the southern resident orca pod, which is found in the Salish Sea between Vancouver Island and the B.C. mainland, has lost seven matriarchs over the past two years, and he’s noticed a lack of vocalizations from the normally chatty mammals.

Once again, scientists do not know why this is happening.

7~ LARGE SEA MAMMALS FOUND WITH SKIN LESIONS AND MISSING FUR IN ALARMING NUMBERS
-Polar bears, seals and walruses along the Alaska coastline are suffering from fur loss and open sores…

    Wildlife experts are studying whether fur loss and open sores detected in polar bears in recent weeks is widespread and related to similar incidents among seals and walruses.

    The bears were among 33 spotted near Barrow, Alaska, during routine survey work along the Arctic coastline. Tests showed they had “alopecia, or loss of fur, and other skin lesions,” the U.S. Geological Survey said in a statement. 

WALRUSES RECENTLY CROWDED ONTO A SMALL ISLAND AND STOPPED FEEDING RATHER THAN SWIM IN THE PACIFIC.
SOME MIGRATORY WHALES ARE USING THE FAR NORTH NEWLY OPENED ARCTIC WATERS TO GET TO THE ATLANTIC RATHER THAN USE TRADITIONAL ROUTES AROUND THE TIP OF SOUTH AMERICA.

EVERYTHING THAT LIVES IN THE PACIFIC KNOWS IT'S TOXIC!

8~ PLANKTON SHOWS HIGH LEVELS OF RADIOACTIVE CESIUM 
Experts have found very high levels of cesium-137 in plankton living in the waters of the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and the west coast.

9~ Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…

• 73 percent of mackerel tested
• 91 percent of the halibut
• 92 percent of the sardines
• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish 
10~ North America's most common birds are vanishing. "NATURE CANADA" HAS LONG REPORTED ON NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS.
HERE'S WHAT THEY'VE NOTICED:
1. Egg laying is occurring earlier.
2. Migration times are shifting.
3. Bird behaviour and their environment are becoming mismatched.
4. Distributions are changing.
5. Ecological communities are disrupted
6. Extinction risks are on the rise. Migratory birds are particularly vulnerable. 

Is it really so unreasonable to wonder if Fukushima could be causing ALL of this?

According to the New York Times, the latest releases from Fukushima contain “much more contaminated water than before”, and the flow of contaminated water will not stop until 2015 at the earliest…

    "The latest releases appear to be carrying much more contaminated water than before into the Pacific. And that flow may not slow until at least 2015, when an ice wall around the damaged reactors is supposed to be completed."

And that same article explained that cesium-137 is entering the Pacific at a rate that is “about three times as high” as last year…

The magnitude of the recent spike in radiation, and the amounts of groundwater involved, have led Michio Aoyama, an oceanographer at a government research institute who is considered an authority on radiation in the sea, to conclude that radioactive cesium 137 may now be leaking into the Pacific at a rate of about 30 billion becquerels per year, or about three times as high as last year. He estimates that strontium 90 may be entering the Pacific at a similar rate.

VERY SHORT AND TO-THE-POINT, HERE ARE A FEW THINGS THAT "LOW-LEVEL" RADIATION DOES TO THE HUMAN BODY:
http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter1.html
~ Radiation causes infertility. The global fertility rate has dropped by nearly half since 1955.

~ Radiation weakens the immune system. A hundred nation study on quality of health found the United States was number 1 in 1943. By 1992, the United States was number 100, according to a U.S. Public Health Statistics Report. Globally, health is deteriorating with the incidence of cancer, heart disease, allergies and infectious diseases increasing.

~ Even at low levels radiation may increase mutations of bacteria and virus. Mutations are causing the appearance of new diseases such as Reye's Syndrome, Legionnaires' Disease and Lyme Disease.

~ Large-scale breakdown of the protective ozone layer in the  stratosphere was initiated in 1958 by high atmosphere bomb tests, and continues due to releases from nuclear power plants and reprocessing plants. Radioactive Krypton-85 goes to the stratosphere where it greatly enhances CFC ozone damage. THIS ALLOWS OUR SUN'S HARMFUL RAYS TO PENETRATE TO US.
IT ALSO DEPLETES OUR OXYGEN LEVELS.

~ WE GET LESS OXYGEN. WE HAVE LESS FOOD.
Trees and other land plants provide about half our oxygen, and plankton provides the rest. Phytoplankton, the base of the marine food chain, is declining.
In The Petkau Effect, Ralph Graeub describes how radioactivity has harmed the natural balance.

LIKE IT OR NOT, WE DEPEND ON "LOWER LIFE FORMS" TO LIVE!
WHEN THEY GO, WE GO!


The duty to endure
gives us the right to know.
                    -JEAN ROSTAND

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/ 
"'The nation could survive if there were a few more infants that died shortly before or after birth. It could even survive if there were many more adults who would die of cancer or heart disease at age seventy rather than at eighty. But no nation could survive in the long run if it continuously damaged the mental ability of its newborn children, especially in an age where verbal and mathematical skills were increasingly essential to the functioning of a high-technology society. And since fewer children were being born, and the advances of modern medicine had increased greatly their chances of survival to adulthood even if they were physically and mentally handicapped, it would not take much more than a few generations for a nation with nuclear plants near its cities or sources of milk and water to destroy its health, its productivity, and thus its ability to compete with others who used less biologically damaging ways to meet their needs for energy. '"

TRUTH SLOWLY COMES OUT OF JAPAN
A recent report explains that the Japanese government deceived and withheld pertinent information from the mayor of a city 12 miles downwind of the nuclear plant — the mayor literally had to take matters into his own hands and bravely urge an evacuation of his city just last night for the people’s own protection — and he did this in direct opposition to the official government position  
Mayor Katsunobu Sakurai, Mayor of Minamisoma, population 71,000, says that immediately after the earthquake and tsunami, government officials ignored his calls asking for advice on how to handle the situation. Minamisoma, which sits a mere 12 miles downwind from the Fukushima plant, was devastated by the tsunami, and many of its residents are still missing, according to a recent report in the UK Daily Mail.

Japanese doctors who have been treating those afflicted by the massive radiation released when the plant was damaged by a major earthquake-caused tsunami on March 11, 2011, know that their patients have radiation sickness, but they are being prevented from discussing it publicly. 

Japan is offering pregnant women and their children “a new, very good house” — for free!  The only problem?  IT’S IN FUKUSHIMA! 
Back in 2011 and 2012 some high ranking Japanese bureaucrats decided it was safe to truck radioactive debris and incinerate them in the City Council incinerating plants in and around Tokyo. Their over zealous desire for cleanliness but under appreciation of radioactive isotopes have left a horrendous legacy for Tokyo residents and beyond.

Dr. Christopher Busby, British scientist, PhD in chemical physics at the University of Kent, researching Raman spectro-electrochemistry:
Analysis and findings of radioactivity in apartment in central Tokyo. 2012

 It shows the presence of 130000Bq/kg radio Caesium in the dust plus enriched Uranium and, for the first time, Lead-210/Polonium-210. The apartment was evacuated from the Tuesday after the catastrophe and the machine switched off; and the family returned 5 months later.



DO, PLEASE DO, DOWNLOAD THIS FREE BOOKLET.
'THE CODE KILLERS'
THOUGH IT IS A LARGE DOWNLOAD DUE TO GRAPHICS, IT IS LESS THAN 60 PAGES OF READING.
AND NOTE THAT IT IS FREELY DISTRIBUTED AND THE AUTHOR INVITES YOU TO DO SO.
IT WILL HOPEFULLY SHOW YOU HOW WE'VE ALL BEEN LULLED INTO COMPLACENCY ON THE NUCLEAR EFFECTS ON OUR FRAGILE HUMAN BODIES.
NO RADIATION LEVEL IS "SAFE"...THAT'S JUST AN ABOMINABLE DAMNED LIE!
http://www.acehoffman.org/books/TheCodeKillers.pdf

JAPANESE ACTIVISTS ARE TRYING TO LET THE WORLD KNOW HOW THEIR GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO COVER-UP THIS DISASTER. 
MOTHERS ARE BEGGING PEOPLE TO TAKE THEIR CHILDREN TO SAFETY.
PARENTS REPORT HAVING TO WATCH THEIR CHILDREN SUFFER BECAUSE DOCTORS CAN'T CALL WHAT THEY HAVE "RADIATION SICKNESS".
DOCTORS ARE BESIDE THEMSELVES TRYING TO TREAT WHAT THEY ARE TOLD BY THEIR PRIME MINISTER DOES NOT EXIST.

IN THE VIDEO BELOW, THIS SCIENTIST REITERATES THAT THERE IS NO SAFE RADIATION...THE CHILDREN ARE AFFECTED THE WORST...AND ARE AFFECTED FOREVER.
THAT GOES FOR OUR OWN CHILDREN, OUR GRANDCHILDREN!!!!

FUKUSHIMA, ACCORDING TO THOSE WHO HAVE STUDIED IT EVEN BRIEFLY FOR A FEW MONTHS, IS MANY TIMES WORSE THAN CHERNOBYL.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO CALCULATE HOW HORRIBLY DEADLY IT IS TO ALL OF US.

BELOW, Dr. Helen Caldicott...

Dr. Helen Caldicott, AUSTRALIAN PHYSICIST, on how the Fukushima cover-up is CRIMINAL in scope...

Uploaded on Apr 18, 2011

Stream of radioactive clouds from 11 March - 5 April, 2011, YES, 2011.

THIS IS HOW FAST THE RADIATION MOVED...IT ARRIVED HERE IN LESS TIME THAN WE'VE BEEN TOLD.
IT'S STILL ARRIVING HERE, EVERY DAY...EVERY DAY.

HIGH LEVELS OF RADIATION IN RAIN,  Aug 14 2011.
THESE LEVELS WERE DANGEROUS JUST 5 MONTHS AFTER THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.
HIGHER LEVELS THAN THESE WERE MEASURE BY INDEPENDENT SOURCES ALL ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, BEGINNING IN MARCH, 2011.
AREAS OF HEAVY RAIN RECEIVED HIGHER DOSES OF RADIATION.

THE VIDEO ABOVE AND THE ONE BELOW WILL HOPEFULLY BETTER EXPLAIN THE DANGER OF RADIATION DOSES TO OUR HUMAN BODIES.  WHILE WE'RE TOLD NOT TO WORRY, NOT TO BE THE LEAST CONCERNED, AFTER WATCHING THESE VIDEOS, YOU MAY JUST DECIDE HOW MUCH WE'VE BEEN LIED TO... AND DEMAND CHANGES IN REPORTING RADIATION LEVELS HERE IN AMERICA, INC...?

What is really happening when radiation damages the body, in large or small doses, is a very complex microscopic assault on living tissue.  Certain elements concentrate in certain organs: Iodine in the thyroid, strontium in bones, astatine in the brain, etc..  If the percentage of radioactive strontium isotopes goes up compared to non-radioactive strontium isotopes (as it is in Japan today), the radioactive strontium will concentrate in bones and teeth.  And, sometime in the future, the incidence of bone cancer and leukemia will increase.

THIS IS A WAR WITHOUT A DECLARATION OF WAR, AND WE ARE THE VICTIMS OF THIS SILENT WAR, ALL OF US. 
OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING ALMOST NOTHING BUT COVERING THIS UP, HIDING FACTS AND TRUTH FROM ALL OF US.
WE ARE ON OUR OWN IN THIS WAR. 
OUR ONLY ALLIES ARE EACH OTHER. 
PLEASE SPREAD THE TRUTH TO ALL YOU LOVE. 
EVERYONE DESERVES TO KNOW.