ABOVE: SATELLITE POSITIONS FOR THE 5G NETWORK...THEY'LL BLANKET THE EARTH.
20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth.
The first two 5G test satellites were launched by SpaceX in February of 2018. Hundreds of other satellites are expected to be launched in 2019.
The full set of 20,000 satellites could be put in orbit during the next two years.
To put this into perspective, as of September 2017 there were 1,738 operating satellites into orbit around the Earth. This means the number of satellites will be 11 times greater than the current number.
PEOPLE NEED TO FOCUS MORE ON THE HAZARDOUS MILLIMETER WAVES BEAMED FROM SATELLITES AND TOWERS.
Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.
In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.
As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.
The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth.
The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites.
5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones
These satellites will use the same type of phased array antennas as will be used by the ground-based 5G systems.
This means that they will send tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth and each device will send a beam of radiation back to the satellite. "SKYNET" IS HERE., AND WE HAD NO SAY IN IT.
HUMANS TOO SUSCEPTIBLE TO HEIGHTENED RADIATION UPTAKE AND PAIN
Research from a team of Israeli physicists has found that there are new problems to consider with exposure to millimeter waves. When the wavelength of the energy approaches the dimensions of our biological structures, i.e. our skin and sweat ducts, previous assumptions about the safety of energy radiation are no longer valid. The research shows that, with millimeter waves, our sweat ducts actually act like little antennas, which means we would absorb more of this energy into our bodies.
Other research has demonstrated that short-term exposure to low-intensity millimeter waves affects human cell membranes and could even result in the proliferation of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
WE'RE GUINEA PIGS ONCE AGAIN
The use of sub-terahertz (Millimeter wave) communications technology (cell phones, Wi-Fi, network transmission antennas) could cause humans to feel physical pain via nociceptors, "stated Dr. Yael Stein, MD, who wrote a letter to the Federal Communications Commission about 5G Spectrum Frontiers.
Seeing as there has been virtually no research on long-term exposure to millimeter waves, the large-scale deployment of 5G technology is a massive experiment, and we're the guinea pigs.
There's no opting out of 5G--in fact it will become more ubiquitous than wireless technology is right now. As Verizon boasts on its website, the "Internet of Things" will thrive on 5G technology.
The Internet of Things refers to the expanding number of devices, appliances, utilities, and other technologies that collect, transmit, and share data through the internet. Essentially, many processes that have not previously relied on the internet will start to once 5G roles out: switching lightbulbs on or off with a smartphone app, driverless cars--even "smart cities" that will use wireless networks to collect and analyze data about the environment, traffic, water, transit, lighting, waste management, security, and parking.
Devra Lee Davis, Founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute is very concerned for the children.
"I love my devices as much as anyone else but I don't want to the health of my grandchildren at risk. I don't want to put them in harm's way.
We now know that the skin, our largest organ does respond to 5g, and in fact our sweat ducts can act as antennas that can receive signals.
5G has not been tested for safety. The fact that it can interact with our sweat ducts may have much more profound meaning for our overall health and well-being.
The idea that we're going to saturate this country with a network that has never been tested is appalling. I am joining with many other scientists from around the world now to express concerns.
We must evaluate these things before we roll out the technology no matter how attractive it is for us to have faster downloads of video games, pornography or virtual reality. The question we have to ask ourselves is it worth endangering the health of our children?"
Dr. Davis' group - Environmental Health Trust - explains:
Israeli research studies presented at an international conference reveal that the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons form the foundation of the latest network - branded as 5G - that will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of the Internet of Things.
Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands.
Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics, Hebrew University, Israel recently detailed how human sweat ducts act like an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths.
Scientists cautioned that before rolling out 5G technologies that use these frequencies, research on human health effects needed to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.
[Dr. Davis notes] "This work shows that the same parts of the human skin that allow us to sweat also respond to 5G radiation much like an antenna that can receive signals. We need the potential adverse health impacts of 5G to be seriously evaluated before we blanket our children, ourselves and the environment with this radiation."
There are now many thousands of peer-reviewed medical and epidemiological studies that show, illustrate or correlate, adverse biological effects with use of mobile phone technology or WIFI.
Using frequencies even higher than 5 GHz (and up to 100 GHz) will compress the timeframe in which cancers and other biological effects show themselves within society.
It is anyone's guess on what might happen in terms of biological safety yet it is clear to see that the pulsed nature of these high frequency, high signal intensity signals do not harbor good news for humanity, particularly in relation to the functioning of our DNA.
Millimeter-wave-emitting devices will saturate our environment, and the fact that we're plunging head-first into deploying this technology without knowing the health consequences is shocking.
Scientists worldwide are calling for a halt to the 5G roll-out.
The European Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER ) issued a statement identifying 14 emerging issues to bring to the attention of the Commission services including 5G, E-cigarette and chronic diseases, They prioritized 5G impact as “high.”
The SCHEER statement “Potential effects on wildlife of increases in electromagnetic radiation“ states, “On the horizon, a new generation of even shorter high frequency 5G wavelengths is being proposed to power the Internet of Things (IoT).
The IoT promises us convenient and easy lifestyles with a massive 5G interconnected telecommunications network. However, the expansion of broadband with shorter wavelength radiofrequency radiation highlights the concern that health and safety issues remain unknown.
Controversy continues with regard to harm from current 2G, 3G and 4G wireless technologies.
5G technologies are far less studied for human or environmental effects” (Russell, 2018).” and concludes, “5G networks will soon be rolled out for mobile phone and smart device users. How exposure to electromagnetic fields could affect humans remains a controversial area, and studies have not yielded clear evidence of the impact on mammals, birds or insects. The lack of clear evidence to inform the development of exposure guidelines to 5G technology leaves open the possibility of unintended biological consequences.”
TOP-NAME SCIENTISTS IN 42 NATIONS CALL FOR MORATORIUM ON 5G.
Scientists from all over the world have issued a 2017 declaration called the 5G Appeal calling for a moratorium on the increase of 5G cell antennas citing human health effects and impacts to wildlife. This follows the EMF Scientists Appeal in 2015 calling for immediate action by the United Nations- now signed by over 240 scientists in 42 nations.
“We recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry…RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”
SOME OF THOSE WHO HAVE FAR MORE INFORMATION ON THIS THAN WE 'COMMON CITIZENS' DO ARE ALSO PROTESTING 5G DEPLOYMENT.
TWO VIDEOS FROM TWO U.S. SENATORS OPPOSED TO THE ROLL-OUT WITHOUT FURTHER STUDIES (VIDEOS):
Senator Patrick Colbeck cited health concerns as reason to slow the roll-out of 5G
U.S. SENATOR BLUMENTHAL RAISED CONCERNS OVER 5G
Other bills seek to gather information about national security threats to 5G. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s authorization bill, S. 1589, and the similar House bill, H.R. 3678, require the director of national intelligence to submit a report to Congress addressing “(1) the threat to United States national security posed by the global and regional adoption of fifth-generation (5G) wireless network technology built by foreign companies; and (2) the effect of possible efforts to mitigate the threat.”
TO BLANKET THE EARTH WITH SATELLITES, TO BEAM RADIATION TO EVERY CELLPHONE ON EARTH, TO INSTALL ANTENNAS EVERY 500 FEET NEAR WHERE OUR CHILDREN LIVE AND PLAY, TO INFLICT UNKNOWN DAMAGE TO HUMAN DNA, TO RISK UPPING THE RISKS OF CANCER IN TH WORLD'S POPULATION, TO NOT UNDERSTAND THE THREAT THAT TERRORISTS CAN USE THIS SYSTEM AGAINST US, TO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENTLY STUDIED HOW EASY IT WOULD BE TO MAKE 5G INTO A WEAPON, TO NOT HAVE STUDIED THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON HUMANS OR DOMESTIC ANIMALS IS ALL AN INSANE LUNGE INTO THE UNKNOWN.
THE POWERS THAT BE WHO ALLOW THIS, WHO ENCOURAGE THIS UNPROVEN TECHNOLOGY'S RELEASE MUST BE COMPLETELY MAD.
OR DO THEY JUST HAVE ULTERIOR MOTIVES?
TO ME, ANYONE WHO WOULD DO THIS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND POSSIBLY CHARGED WITH INTENT TO COMMIT EITHER A TERRORIST ACT OR A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
WHY AREN'T WE ALL SICK OF BEING HUMAN GUINEA PIGS?
--Investigate Europe: 5G The Mass Experiment: A must watch video and investigative report.
----PERHAPS MOST DAMNING...
Wireless Companies warn investors of risks but neglect to inform consumers and neighbors living near towers.
Crown Castle (a company building small cell infrastructure throughout the USA) has a statement in their 2016 10-K Annual Report that says: “If radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets or equipment on our wireless infrastructure are demonstrated to cause negative health effects, potential future claims could adversely affect our operations, costs or revenues… We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.”
Read similar warnings from Crown Castle, Verizon and other wireless companies in their Annual Reports.
--U.S. regulators and the wireless industry are pushing back against a plan under discussion by the Trump administration to build a secure 5G network -- possibly with government control -- amid concerns about China and cybersecurity.
The Republican head of the Federal Communications Commission issued a statement in opposition to any government control, suggesting that the wireless industry is best positioned “to drive innovation and investment.”
--PC Magazine, “The Problem with 5G.” August 22, 2018
--Computer World: “Why 5G will disappoint everyone”
--SmartCities Dive: Grassroots coalition asks FCC to slow 5G expansion over health concerns 9/2018
--The West Australian: “Radiofrequency expert warns 5G radiation could be carcinogenic Is 5G technology safe? One of the world’s leading radiofrequency experts isn’t so sure, and warns it could be carcinogenic.”
--NRDC: “5G and the FCC Five Reasons You Should Care”
1. 5G “small” cell antennas are to be placed in neighborhoods everywhere.
Sides of buildings
2. The radiation from small cells is not small.
Wireless antennas emit microwaves — non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation — and essentially function as cell towers. Each installation can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously. Examples of how small cells are not small include:
They increase electromagnetic radiation near homes.
They have refrigerator-sized (and larger) equipment cabinets.
Property values drop after a cell tower is built near homes.
Taller and wider poles are needed for the antennas.
Fixtures weigh hundreds of pounds.
--Read the published research on 5G and health here.
--Statement by U.S. Conference of Mayors CEO & Executive Director Tom Cochran on FCC’s Order Proposing to Usurp Local Property Rights Sept. 10th, 2018 | United States Conference of Mayors
--Peleg M, Nativ O, Richter ED. Radio frequency radiation-related cancer: assessing causation in the occupational/military setting. Environmental Research Vol 163, 2018, pp 123–133.
--Hardell, L. and M. Carlberg. Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones. Rev Environ Health 28:97-106, 2013.
--Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Carlberg M et al. Biomed Res Int. (2017)
--EHTs webpage that lists these and more protective ordinances.
--Fiber optics is the solution and the safe alternative to 5G.
Worldwide, many regions are investing in wired fiber optic connections which are are safer, faster, more reliable, provide greater capacity, and are more cyber-secure. Read “Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks,” by the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy