"Steve Pieczenik Admits It Was Him Who Leaked Emails To Wikileaks NOT Russian Hackers"
Dr. Steve Pieczenik, 73, appeared on camera for the first time in 25 years to disclose what he calls the “Clinton Takeover” occurring in the United States.
On November 1, Pieczenik uploaded a shocking video (SHOWN ABOVE) entitled, “The Hillary Clinton Takeover Of The United States” to his YouTube channel.
Pieczenik says Hillary Clinton and associates has effected a civilian coup. Pieczenik said over fifteen other intelligence organizations have staged a silent “counter-coup” over the internet. Steve says Assange was formidable in providing the emails he gave to him in order to undermine Hillary and Bill Clinton.
Pieczenik said both the coup and counter-coup has unfolded on the internet.
“This is probably the first time in any country where a coup was initiated through the internet. And a counter-coup was initiated through the internet… I am just a small part of something bigger than myself. It was the brave men and women who are in the FBI, the CIA, the Director of Intelligence, the military intelligence, and men and women in fifteen other intelligence organizations who are sick and tired of seeing this corruption in the White House and in the Justice Department and the intelligence system. And we decided that there was something we had to do in order to save the Republic.”
SCROLLING THROUGH "OTHER NEWS", THE ABOVE JUMPED OFF THE PAGE AND I COULD BUT HURRIEDLY BEGIN TO "DIG" FOR FACTS AS I RECALLED ALL I HAD READ FROM "INSIDE SOURCES" THAT ALSO STATED THE RUSSIANS NEVER WERE THE SOURCE OF THE "LEAKS".
I HAD JUST FINISHED READING THE VERY RECENT RELEASE, UNPRECEDENTED RELEASE, BY THE FBI OF NEW DOCUMENTS ABOUT THE CLINTON EMAILS.
IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THOSE, GO TO https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-01-of-05/view
BUT WHO IS STEVE PIECZENIK?
I EXPECTED TO FIND SOME 'KOOK', SOME MYTH-MAKING NUT-JOB, BUT INSTEAD
I WAS, ADMITTEDLY, SHOCKED TO DISCOVER WHO HE IS.
HE WAS OUR DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE UNDER HENRY KISSINGER (FORD ADMINISTRATION), CYRUS VANCE (CARTER ADMINISTRATION) AND JAMES BAKER (REAGAN/BUSH I ADMINISTRATIONS).
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE:
At the Department of State, he served as a "specialist on hostage taking", was credited with devising successful negotiating strategies and tactics used in several high-profile hostage situations, including the 1976 TWA Flight 355 hostage situation and the 1977 kidnapping of the son of Cyprus' president.
He was also involved in 'negotiations' with the kidnappers of Italy's Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978 and later said that Moro was "sacrificed for the stability of Italy". In 1978, Pieczenik was listed as "a psychiatrist and political scientist in the U.S. Department of State whose credentials and experiences are probably unique among officials handling terrorist situations"
Pieczenik holds a PhD. in international relations that he obtained from MIT while studying at Harvard Medical School and is a Harvard-trained psychiatrist, an M.D..
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Mary McGrory described Pieczenik as "one of the most 'brilliantly competent' men in the field of terrorism".
In 1982, Pieczenik was mentioned in an article in The New York Times as "a psychiatrist who has treated C.I.A. employees"
NOT THE FIRST TIME HE'S BLOWN THE WHISTLE...
Pieczenik, writing for the Washington Post in 1981,stated that he was present and heard a senior United States official in the Department of State Operations Center give permission for the attack by Afghan forces that led to the death of United States Ambassador Adolph Dubs in Kabul, Afghanistan, in 1979.
PLEASE UNDERSTAND, THIS IS A LONG AND WINDING TRAIL, BUT, IN THE END, PERHAPS YOU WILL SEE THAT "IT ALL ADDS UP".
THE PUZZLE PIECES ALL FALL INTO PLACE, THINGS BEGIN TO MAKE SENSE, AND WE FIND DEATH IN THE MIDDLE OF IT ALL.
BELOW ARE JUST SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF ALL THIS, AS I CANNOT PRESENTLY SIT AND TYPE FOR AS LONG AS IT WOULD TAKE TO SHOW YOU EVERY LINK, EVERY DETAIL OF THIS...MAYBE LATER I CAN, BUT TODAY THE BODY SAYS "NO!".
REMEMBER THAT WHEN CLINTON WAS FIRST ACCUSED OF USING A PRIVATE SERVER AND HAVING CLASSIFIED EMAILS ON THAT SERVER, WE WERE TOLD THAT WAS "CONSPIRACY THEORY", JUST AS THOSE WHO STATED OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT IRAQ DID NOT HAVE WMDs AS BUSH SAID WERE CALLED "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS".
JUST AS WE LEARNED THE FACTS, TOO LATE, ABOUT THE GULF OF TONKIN LIES FROM THE LBJ ADMINISTRATION DAYS, THE IRAN CONTRA FACTS THAT CAME TO LIGHT WHEN REAGAN WAS IN OFFICE, THE GUN-RUNNING OF THE CIA, THE DRUG-RUNNING BY THE CIA, ALL TURNED OUT TO BE TRUTHS, REALITY.
PERHAPS, JUST PERHAPS, WE CAN NOW LEARN WHAT HAS JUST BEEN PREVENTED BY MEN FROM 17 U.S. INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES...17.
IT BEGINS TO COME UNDONE...
DROPPED BY THE CFR
Pieczenik was a former member of the notorious Council for Foreign Relations (CFR), but was dropped from that ignoble list in 2012.
One can only surmise why.
After all, in 1992, he did publicly state to Newsday that, in his professional opinion, then-president George H.W. Bush was clinically depressed, called Barack Obama an "obsessional pathological liar" in 2011, stating also that Osama Bin Laden was known to have died of Marfan's Syndrome in 2001.
In short, he is not controllable nor intimidated by political powers... a man after my own heart.
He is also a concert pianist and has been since age 8 and speaks five languages, including Russian.
And he writes books that have sold millions of copies.
Not your average guy.
After being lauded as an expert, a credible source, "brilliantly competent" for decades, why would he suddenly be doubted and disparaged as a "nutcase"?
Because now he's saying Hilary Clinton has attempted to steal an election and was engaged in what can only be called a "silent coup attempt" against the American government?
He became so convinced of this that he joined with others in the intelligence community to expose her, and that is how we got to read the Democratic National Committee's internal emails.
Pieczenik, even with his background in government and with his credentials, his past reputation as a trustworthy, noble servant of the federal government, admits he, with a little help from his friends, put those emails into Julian Assange's capable hands.
At almost the same time, another once very respected former diplomat has come forward with the admission that he flew to America to receive the emails and hand-delivered the downloaded emails on thumb-drive to a (presumed) Wikileaks staff member.
This man is a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
'Washington Times' is one of the few American media where you can read this.
The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 14, 2016 :
CRAIG MURRAY said that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.
“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
Mr. Murray said the leakers were motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”
QUESTIONS STILL REMAIN...SOME ARE STILL NOT BUYING "THE RUSSIANS DID IT".
WASHINGTON (Sinclair Broadcast Group)
Thursday, December 15th 2016
Questions still remain over how WikiLeaks got access to the cache of emails that it released drip by drip throughout the election season.
Craig Murray, a former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan and self-described "close associate" of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, says it was a disgruntled insider who leaked the emails.
According to Murray, the personal emails of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta and the cache of emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), were obtained by an insider who then passed the information on to Wikileaks through a series of intermediaries, including Murray himself.
According to Nicholas Weaver, a network security expert at U.C. Berkeley's computer science institute. The only information that could confirm that chain of custody would come from the NSA or CIA, and it is highly unlikely they could make that information public without compromising sources and methods.
The Washington Post ran a story leaking a secret CIA assessment that Russia had intentionally interfered in the 2016 election...
BUT, according to the same leaked report, the FBI official attending the classified briefing disagreed with the CIA and would not corroborate their assessment."
Meanwhile that Wednesday, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence had to cancel a closed-door classified briefing on the issue of suspected Russian interference after U.S. intelligence agencies refused to cooperate.
Rep. Devin Nunes, California Republican and committee chairman, requested that the FBI, CIA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and National Security Agency provide witnesses, in part in response to reports last week in The Washington Post and The New York Times that intelligence agencies think the Kremlin deliberately tried to push the election to Mr. Trump, something not supported by post-election testimony to the panel.
But according to Fox News, “agencies refused to provide representatives for the session.”
WHAT IF THEY REFUSED TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE CAUGHT IN LIES, DIDN'T WANT TO PERJURE THEMSELVES?
WHAT IF THEY WERE WAITING TO SEE WHOM OF THEIR COLLEAGUES WERE IN ON THE "COUNTER-COUPS"?
REMEMBER HOW VEHEMENT THE FBI WAS THAT CLINTON HAD COMMITTED, IN ESSENCE, TREASON AND WAS PROSECUTABLE, AND THEIR MANY STATEMENTS THAT THERE WAS NO PROOF THE EMAILS CAME FROM A RUSSIAN HACK?
THEN, SO SUDDENLY THAT MOST AMERICANS FOLLOWING THE UNWINDING SAGA WERE SHOCKED, THEY REVERSED THAT AND AGREED WITH THE CIA, AS DID THE NSA WHO ALSO HAD PREVIOUSLY STATED IT LOOKED LIKE AN INSIDE JOB.
COMEY'S HEAD WAS DEMANDED, THERE WAS TALK OF PURGING THE NSA...BUT WHY?
ADD THIS PIECE OF THE PUZZLE...
PIECZENIK, MURRAY, ASSANGE AND A FEW OTHERS HAVE HINTED AT, HAVE ALL BUT STATED THAT YOUNG SETH RICH, A DNC EMPLOYEE, WAS THE SOURCE OF THE EMAILS.
MURRAY SAID, “The SOURCE had LEGAL access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
LEGAL ACCESS AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE DNC TASKED WITH COMPUTER OPERATIONS.
IN AN INTERVIEW AUGUST 8, 2016, WITH A DUTCH TV STATION, "NOS", A VERY CREDIBLE PUBLIC BROADCAST STATION, ASSANGE ALLUDED TO SOURCES SOMETIMES GIVING THEIR LIVES TO EXPOSE SCANDALS. HE ALSO OFFERED A $20,000 REWARD FOR THE CAPTURE OF SETH'S KILLER(S).
Here is what they said in the videotaped interview conducted in English:
Assange: “Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, often very significant risks. There’s a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just two weeks ago, for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington. So…”
Anchor: “That was just a robbery, I believe, wasn’t it?”
Assange: “No, there’s no finding. So, ah – “
Anchor: “What are you suggesting? What are you suggesting?”
Assange: “I am suggesting that our sources, ah, take risks and they, they become concerned to see things occurring like that.”
Anchor: “But was he one of your sources then, I mean?”
Assange: “We don’t comment on who our sources are.”
Anchor: “But why make the suggestion about a young guy being shot in the streets of Washington?”
Assange: “Because we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States. Our sources, ah, our sources face serious risks, that’s why they come to us so we can protect, ah, their anonymity.”
Anchor: “But it’s quite something to suggest a murder. That’s basically what you are doing.”
Assange: “Well, others have suggested that. We investigated to understand what happened in that situation, with Seth Rich. I think it is a concerning situation. There is not a conclusion yet. We wouldn’t be willing to say a conclusion yet, but we are concerned about it. More importantly, a variety of WikiLeaks sources are concerned when that kind of thing happens.”
THE MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF SETH RICH...
Rich, a data anaylist, had worked as the DNC’s Voter Expansion Data Director since 2014.
He was the DNC's Director of Communications.
Rich, only 27, was shot on July 10, 2016 at 4:15 in the morning near a Washington D.C. neighborhood where he lived, said CBS News.
Some are also raising questions about the August death of Shawn Lucas, who served the DNC with a lawsuit alleging fraud in the presidential race.
The New York Daily News quoted police as saying, “There is no immediate indication that robbery was a motive in the attack…but it has not been ruled out as a possibility.”
Rich’s mother told NBC Channel 4 in Washington D.C. that her son’s “hands were bruised, his knees are bruised, his face is bruised, and yet he had two shots to his back, and yet they never took anything.”
Rich was discovered by police who were patrolling the area and was conscious and breathing at first, said CNN. He was talking on the phone with his girlfriend when the shooting occurred and told her not to worry about it when she heard a noise, said NBC 4.
There is a $25,000 reward being offered in the Rich murder case."
THAT MENTION OF SHAWN LUCAS...
On July 3, 2016, Shawn Lucas and filmmaker Ricardo Villaba served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., in the fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters.
This was before Wikileaks released documents proving the DNC was working against the Sanders campaign during the 2016 primary.
Lucas was found dead on his bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on the evening of 2 August 2016. Paramedics responding to her 911 call found no signs of life."
It was not until November that the coroner ruled the death an "accident"...from an overdose or combination of three prescription drugs.
The lawsuit that took Shawn to the DNC that day was filed by “a group made up predominantly of Bernie Sanders supporters” and alleges Wasserman Schultz “rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton,” says UPI.
[MY NOTE: I USE THE LINK TO THE PARTICULAR STORY ABOVE BECAUSE IT HAS A VIDEO OF SHAWN SERVING THE PAPERS. THE ACCOUNT OF HIS DEATH CAN BE FOUND ON WHAT MOST CONSIDER "VALID NEWS SITES", aka, MAINSTREAM MEDIA...THE REAL "FAKE NEWS" MEDIA.]
RIGHT AFTER THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE MADE TRUMP PRESIDENT, GOING AGAINST ALL CALLS TO GIVE IT TO HILLARY, A FEDERAL JUDGE SAID THE EMAIL CASE WOULD BE REOPENED, AS THE TEA ROOM REPORTED PREVIOUSLY.
AND, IN ONE LAST PUSH, THE FBI, JUST LAST WEEK, OPENED THE FBI VAULT TO DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE PUBLIC UNTIL 2041.
ANOTHER FIRESTORM HAS ENSUED.
PERHAPS THEY DID SO BECAUSE, AGAIN, AS I PREVIOUSLY SHOWED, THE NYPD CHIEF WHO FIRST CONFISCATED THE HUMA ABEDIN/ANTHONY WEINER LAPTOP THREATENED TO RELEASE WEINER'S EMAILS AND OTHER EMAILS FOUND ON THAT LAPTOP IF SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T BECAUSE HE WAS SO "DISGUSTED" BY WHAT HE SAW.
CNN reported The Federal Bureau of Investigation obtained a warrant to search emails in connection to Hillary Clinton’s private server. Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s emails were on former congressman, Anthony Weiner’s laptop — with data showing those emails went through Clinton’s server, according to law enforcement officials.
The warrant was issued two days after FBI Director James Comey disclosed the discovery of more emails, according to CNBC. Law enforcement sources informed that the emails were linked to Weiner’s estranged wife, Huma Abedin.
WE WERE TOLD THAT THE WHITE HOUSE HAD WARNED THE RUSSIANS IN JUNE, 2016 NOT TO INTERFERE WITH OUR ELECTIONS.
THERE WAS NOTHING IN RUSSIAN MEDIA AT THAT TIME TO SUPPORT THIS.
SURELY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN "RETURN FIRE" HAD OBAMA CALLED PUTIN UP LAST SUMMER , AS HE SAID, AND TOLD HIM TO "CUT IT OUT".
NO, OBAMA STARTED WAILING IT WAS RUSSIANS IN OCTOBER.
The White House said Mr. Obama waited until October, just weeks before the election, to raise concerns about Russia’s involvement because he didn’t want to appear to be playing politics with the issue.
The administration eventually did issue warnings to state election officials and said there was no evidence of Russian interference via the internet on Election Day.
“Given the interconnected nature of our society and our economy, the United States is in a unique position, vis-a-vis the rest of the world, because we rely on 21st-century communications technology for just about everything, in a way that lots of other societies and economies and countries don’t,” he said.
WHICH MEANS, AS WE HAVE SEEN HAPPEN, TEENAGERS CAN HACK THE USA'S AGENCIES.
JOHN McCAIN, IN THE MEANWHILE COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES AND ACCEPTED DOCUMENTS FROM A FOREIGN AGENT AND HANDED THOSE DOCUMENTS TO OTHERS, UNSUPPORTED ALL OF THEM, MERELY BECAUSE, AS HE HAS SAID MANY TIMES, HE HATES TRUMP.
HE WANTED TO RUIN HIM, WANTED ONE LAST CHANCE TO KEEP TRUMP OUT OF OFFICE.IN AN INTERVIEW WITH CNN, McCAIN HUNG HIMSELF WITH HIS STATEMENTS:
‘I did what any citizen should do. I received sensitive information and handed it to the FBI,’ he told CNN – the network which broke the story that the document existed.
I don’t know if it is credible or not but the information I thought deserved to be delivered to the FBI, the appropriate agency of government.’
He added: ‘It doesn’t trouble me because I don’t know if it is accurate or not. I have no way of corroborating that.
‘The individual gave me the information. I looked at it. After receiving that information I took it to the FBI.’
He added that he was now aware from media reports that the FBI was apparently already in possession of the information. ‘
OR DID MCCAIN DO IT BECAUSE HE'S AFRAID WHAT MIGHT BE MADE KNOWN IF THOSE ANTHONY WEINER EMAILS ARE RELEASED, AFRAID LIKE SO MANY IN WASHINGTON? WHAT'S IN THOSE EMAILS THAT SO DISGUSTED THE NYPD THAT THEY DEMANDED THEY BE MADE PUBLIC?
IT ALL POINTS BACK TO THE DECADES OLD "CHILD SEX SCANDAL" THAT ALMOST ROCKED THE GEORGE BUSH #1 ADMINISTRATION, THE FORGOTTEN FRANKLIN CASE?
MAYBE "PIZZA-GATE" IS REAL?
HOW MANY CONGRESSMEN HAVE BEEN BUSTED, AFTER ALL, FOR ILLICIT AFFAIRS WITH AND SOLICITATIONS OF YOUNG INTERNS, ETC?
HOW MANY HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BY THE PRESS IN THE PAST?
HOW MANY HAVE LEFT OFFICE BECAUSE OF THAT?
AS PIECZENIK PUT IT:
“We’re going through a major, major transition and quite frankly, a second American Revolution. We do not have guns, we do not have weapons, we do not have intent to kill anybody, we do not intend to harm anybody. But we, the American public, and those of us who have served as veterans and in the intelligence service like myself, will stop the Clintons from assuming power that they don’t deserve.”
REMEMBER WHEN A MILITARY COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST OBAMA WAS REVEALED?
HEADS IN HIGH PLACES ROLLED AFTER THAT.
I HAVE TO ASK, IN LIGHT OF THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT, WAS THAT "ATTEMPTED MILITARY COUP" JUST THE ANGRY CLINTONS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS TRYING TO GET RID OF OBAMA?
WERE HILLARY'S SCREAMS OF RAGE THAT OBAMA HAD COST HER THE ELECTION BASED ON HER LOSS TO HIM PREVIOUSLY?
WE MAY NEVER KNOW THE COMPLETE TRUTH, BUT WE CAN CONTINUE TO LOOK FOR IT AND HOPE TO FIND IT.