Translate

Sunday, December 13, 2020

FDA DOCUMENT SHOWS DEATH PLUS 21 POSSIBLE SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS TO COVID VACCINE




I wouldn't call this a "bombshell" as the site I found this screenshot did.

These "possible adverse effects might apply to any vaccine, or, some would apply to aspirin.
I've seen "possible adverse outcomes" that ran 10 pages long. 

What may make this information a "bombshell" to some may be the fact that MAINSTREAM MEDIA, FDA, LITTLE TONY FAUCI, DR. BIRX, THE WHO AND THE CDC HAVEN'T CALLED ATTENTION TO THESE POSSIBLE EFFECTS, HAVEN'T MENTIONED THAT IT MIGHT TAKE YEARS FOR SOME OF THEM TO SHOW UP, OR JUST MIGHT KILL THE IMMUNE COMPROMISED, THE ELDERLY AND SOME WITH PRE-EXISTING SERIOUS CONDITIONS OR CONGENITAL ILLNESSES WITHIN MINUTES OF INJECTION.

WHY NOT MAKE THESE THINGS AS WELL KNOWN AS THE INFLATED DEATH STATS THEY KEEP PUSHING IN OUR FACES?

WHY NOT FOREWARN THE POPULACE SO THEY CAN MAKE A BETTER INFORMED DECISION TO TAKE OR REJECT THE VACCINE?

IN FACT, THEY SHOULD "MANDATE" THAT ALL CITIZENS READ THIS, MAKE SURE WE'RE PROPERLY INFORMED.

THE SAME WARNINGS, WHATEVER YOU WISH TO CALL THEM, MAY BE FOUND ON PAGE 16 IN A PDF BY THE FDA TITLED "Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation" .

THAT'S NO LONGER ON THE FDA OR CDC SITE, BUT IT WAS ARCHIVED ONLINE IN ITS ENTIRETY.

"Coordinated planning and conduct of surveillance activities such as near real time surveillance/ RCA between FDA, CDC, CMS, VA, and DOD" [page 24 of the pdf]

View the full powerpoint presentation from the FDA website here.


"CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness", it reads.

MONITORING BY WHAT?
COUNTING VACCINE DEATHS AS COVID DEATHS? 

IF THEY COULD JUST GET MORE THAN 7,000 PATIENTS ON THOSE VENTILATORS AND THEN MISUSE THE 'VENTS' LIKE THEY DID IN THE BEGINNING, MAYBE THEY COULD KILL MORE THAN BY VACCINE? 
[See also
NYC doctor says high ventilator settings damage coronavirus patients’ lungs]

100,000 ICU beds were available in March this year.
We had over 60,000 ventilators. 
But we have just 7,000 or so patients in need of both of those in ALL America. 
19,442 were listed as being in ICU nation-wide. 6,867 were on ventilators.
We had less than 20,000 people who needed to be hospitalized in serious condition.

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the vaccine's side effects are "no walk in the park," and Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health, has stressed the need for a broad-based outreach campaign to discuss the reality of side effects, as patients might not come back for the required second dose if the side effects take them by surprise.


NO APOCALYPSE BY COVID   
Pandemics have come and gone around the globe for centuries, but in recent history they've been used as points of manipulation that have profited corporations, particularly pharmaceutical companies.

The 2005 bird flu epidemic, for example, was predicted to kill from 2 million to 150 million people. It killed just 98 people, globally, in 2005, 115 in 2006 and 86 in 2007.
 No one in the U.S. died from this infection. 

In 2006, 2007 and again in 2008, hyped warnings over the bird flu were repeatedly exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear and line the pocketbooks of industry and various vested individuals. 

In 2009, there was the swine flu hoax, the vaccination campaign for which, as mentioned, turned into a disaster.

The summer of 2012 was again filled with dire predictions of bird flu sufficiently mutating to cause a human pandemic, immediately followed by urgent calls for fast-tracked vaccines.

None of these pandemics ever turned into the global killers we were told to expect, and COVID-19 is no different. As mentioned in the Tea Room many times now, there's no evidence of excess deaths due to this novel virus.

The COVID-19 pandemic differs from previous ones, however, in that it's being used not just to enrich drug companies and justify the existence of gain-of-function research, but also to usher in a "reset" of the entire global economy by technocrats.

While failing economies around the world are blamed on the pandemic, the central bank system has been faltering for some time and is now on its last leg.

The global debt load is now so high, countries cannot even pay off the interest, and thus the system no longer works.
 It needs to be "reset," but rather than ditching the central bank system and resetting it to something stable (such as returning to a gold-backed system), the technocrats in charge are ushering in an all-digital centralized currency that will give them total control over the finances of every human on earth.

The Great Reset abolishes the US Constitution & English Bill of Rights

What's more, the economic reset is only one part of this all-encompassing totalitarian takeover. The COVID-19 vaccine fits into the scheme by providing an excuse to track and trace everyone's whereabouts, and connect this medical surveillance together with the digital economy.

World Bank documents indicate that the Covid-19 project may be planned to continue until March 2025. Their slogan is “Build Back Better”, but for whom?

You can learn more about this in "What You Need to Know About the Great Reset."


Doctors petition EU to stop all COVID vaccine studies due to grave risks

The renowned doctors mention infertility in women, increased vulnerability to the coronavirus, as well as allergic or even fatal reactions as risks associated with COVID vaccine studies.


Due to significant safety concerns, a former vice president and chief scientist for pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, has joined a prominent German physician and past head of a local public health department in petitioning for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 vaccine studies in Europe.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, who held Pfizer’s most senior research position in the field of allergy and respiratory medicines prior to his departure in 2011, and epidemiologist and pulmonary specialist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed their petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is responsible for approving drugs in the European Union at large.

According to a report from 2020News, the two doctors “demand that the studies — for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers — should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.”       

The petitioners point out that PCR tests, which have been broadly used around the world as a means of detecting the COVID-19 virus, are known by experts to lack accuracy, and are thus unsuitable for a serious study. As an alternative, they demand that something called “Sanger sequencing” must be used.

Without such a change, “neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary [level of] certainty,” which is why, they affirm, due to this factor alone, “testing the vaccine on humans is unethical.”

They also demand that “risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses,” must be excluded by means of animal experiments prior to tests being performed on human beings. Such dangers include:
--Infertility in Women
--Increased vulnerability to the virus
--Allergic or even fatal reactions
--Unacceptable risk of long-term effects


“The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects.” As a hastily developed vaccine for the swine flu caused many cases of narcolepsy over the last decade, the doctors point out that if the vaccine is used without sufficient study, millions of healthy people will be exposed to unacceptable risks.

In this video footage, Offit, Hotez and even Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions, "vaccine enhancement," when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune responses.


No Accountability for Vaccine Harm/Death

As noted by Barbara Loe Fisher,
co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), based on the historical failures of past coronavirus vaccines, a fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine could become one of the biggest public health disasters in history.

No one involved will be held accountable or face any repercussions if millions are harmed or die from this new vaccine, just as GlaxoSmithKline was not held accountable for the narcolepsy cases caused by their vaccine, Pandemrix. Instead, they will all continue to profit while an unsuspecting public will beta test yet another potentially dangerous vaccine.

Even if severe side effects are rare, when you're talking about vaccinating some 7 billion people, even a tiny percentage will translate into millions of people affected. 

Early in the COVID-19 scenario, Dr. Peter Hotez, of Baylor College of Medicine, testified before Congress about the dangers of accelerating coronavirus vaccine development, saying "(The) unique safety problem of coronavirus vaccines" was discovered 50 years ago while developing the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine."

He went on to stater that this "‘paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon' means vaccinated people may still develop the disease, get sicker and die."

Researchers had seen this same "enhanced immune response" during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1950s.    


In a subset of Italian COVID-19 patients, only 0.8% of patients had no comorbidities.  


Solicited serious adverse events -- 10-fold increase on second dose in ederly, compared to 3.6-fold for those under 55

Among the 18-55 year-old participants, there were 370 solicited serious adverse events (SSAEs) in the vaccinated group and 73 in the unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated, 18% experienced SSAEs; in the placebo group, only 3% did, implying that SSAEs can be expected at a rate five times greater in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

These included severe fatigue, headache, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle and joint pain. 
Whether these conditions represent instances of pathogenic priming, identifying individuals who are now at higher risk of serious morbidity and mortality if they become infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown, but given past studies, seems likely.

In the over 55 group, which was a smaller group, there were 60 SSAEs in the vaccinated group and 24 in the unvaccinated. Of the vaccinated, 6.5% experienced SAEs, compared to 1.4% in the unvaccinated, implying a 4.46% increased risk overall of SSAEs due to vaccination.


THINK HOW MANY ELDERLY ARE AT RISK IF THEY TAKE THE VACCINE.
JUST THINK, PERIOD. 

DO WE SACRIFICE A DOZEN, 100, 1,000, 1,000,000 "FOR THE GREATER GOOD", USE THE MASSES AS LAB RATS?

THINK AGAIN OF THAT HYPOTHETICAL 100 CHAMBERS GUN, ONE BULLET, SPIN THE CYLINDER....AT WHOSE HEAD WOULD YOU PULL THAT TRIGGER? 
NOT YOUR OWN, NOT YOUR CHILD'S, NOT AT ANYONE, RIGHT? 

THEN WHY SHOOT AN UNTESTED VACCINE WITH EVEN A 1 IN 100 CHANCE OF DOING HARM OR CAUSING DEATH INTO ANYONE?  

I AM 70+ YEARS OLD.
I REFUSE THIS VACCINE. 

HOW LONG WILL WE BE ALLOWED TO REFUSE IT? 

TIME ALONE WILL TELL. 







//WW

1 comment:

  1. "Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial"
    The Lancet article states:
    "In the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peaked by day 28 (median 157 ELISA units [EU], IQR 96–317; n=127) and remained elevated to day 56 (119 EU, 70–203; n=43) in participants who received only one dose, and increased to a median of 639 EU (360–792) at day 56 in the ten participants who received a booster dose."
    REMEMBER, 2 'SHOTS' AR REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE EVEN THIS 'IMMUNITY'.
    A small number (four [4%] of 98) participants had neutralising antibody titres greater than 8 against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein before vaccination (Marburg VN) and 11 (4%) of 270 participants had high ELISA titres at baseline, representing possible prior asymptomatic infection."
    THIS IS WHY ANTIBODY TESTING IS IMPORTANT, TO CATCH THAT ASYMPTOMATIC GROUP, BUT THE WHO & CDC SAY "DON'T GET TESTED FOR ANTIBODIES!'
    WHY NOT?
    BECAUSE THE ASYMPTOMATIC MAKE UP 70%-80% OF INFECTED HUMANS & THAT WOULD MEAN A VERY LOW "DEATH RATE".
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31604-4/fulltext#seccestitle150

    ReplyDelete