Translate

Friday, September 18, 2020

WW2: AMERICAN POWs AND RUSSIAN DISSIDENTS HANDED OVER TO RUSSIA BY AMERICA & BRITAIN

ESTIMATES OF AMERICAN POWs, CAPTURED BY THE NAZIS AND "LIBERATED" BY THE RUSSIAN RED ARMY, WHICH TOOK THEM TO POW/LABOR CAMPS IN RUSSIA AFTER STALIN BROKE THE SECRET YALTA AGREEMENT, RANGE FROM 20,000 TO OVER 100,000. 
ONLY A HANDFUL WERE EVER SEEN AGAIN.

IN A TOP SECRET AGREEMENT AT YALTA, CHURCHILL, FDR AND STALIN MADE A DEAL THAT IS STILL CLASSIFIED IN ALL THOSE NATIONS AS "TOP SECRET" TODAY...70 YEARS AFTER THEIR WAR CRIMES, 30 YEARS AFTER THE  BETRAYAL WAS DISCLOSED.


THE LEADERS LIED AND HID THEIR CRIMES FOR DECADES.
When FDR died and Truman took over, he did NOTHING to rescue our betrayed troops.
That would have exposed what was done by FDR.



GENOCIDE SO TERRIBLE IT WAS COMPLETELY HIDDEN FOR ALMOST 40 YEARS  AND IS STILL CLASSIFIED "TOP SECRET" TODAY BY ALL NATIONS INVOLVED.   

Operation Keelhaul was a forced repatriation of former Soviet Armed Forces POWs of Germany to the Soviet Union, carried out in Northern Italy by British and American forces between 14 August 1946 and 9 May 1947.
Also caught up in this top secret operation were some 5 million innocent civilians, some who were Christian ethnic groups opposed to communist rule, who had fled Russia and other communist nations at the outset of the war. 



Allied armies, especially England’s and America's, assisted the Russian Red Army to ethnically cleanse 5,115,709 Eastern Europeans during population transfers under the top secret Yalta Agreement of February 1945.


The top signature on the British and American sponsored holocaust was that of unelected British premier Winston Spencer Churchill. His signature was followed by that of U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The last signature on this hellish document is that of Josef Stalin, one of the most notorious mass killers in history.

Of the on-going removal of millions of people collected from 20 or more nations, one hapless ethnic group was that of the Cossack. 
Once a mighty ethno-race, the Cossack people have since been reduced to something similar to the scattered, devastated tribes of Native Americans.



THE COMMANDING GENERALS OF EACH NATION WERE CHARGED TO CARRY OUT 'KEELHAUL' AND THEY DID. 

ONE GENERAL CONDEMNED THE ENTIRE THING...GEORGE S. PATTON. HE WAS WILLING TO MARCH ON RUSSIA, OR QUIT THE MILITARY THAT HE LOVED AND BLOW THE WHISTLE ON THE WHOLE SHAM, BUT THEN, SUDDENLY, HE WAS DEAD OF A VERY MYSTERIOUS, UNINVESTIGATED AUTO ACCIDENT. 

REPORT: CAPTIVE NATIONS COMMITTEE, INC.
“In the Communist newspaper Pravda of September 7, 1945, (serial number 214 9935) Russian General Golekov thanked his Western allies for returning the many men, women and children who had fled their Russian occupied homelands (previously independent nations). The return of these human beings to what was known as The Red Hell was carried out in the course of an atrocity called ‘Operation Keelhaul.’

‘In a period of about three months, May 25 to September 7, 1945, a total of 2,229,552 people from Yalta-surrendered nations were delivered to the Red Army.  

England took the lead in the deportation of millions of civilians until 1947. By then, 5,115,709 Europeans, mostly civilians had been rounded up by the Allies and sent to the Soviet Union and to certain death. ~ [Cossack National Liberation Movement, Major General Nicholas G. Nazerenko, Retired: National President. Blauvelt, New York. The U.S.]

As the tragedy can neither be disclaimed nor explained, details of Operation Keelhaul and numerous other acts of genocide committed by the Allies have been removed from the public domain.

Patton made reference to "EISENHOWER's DEATH CAMPS", referring, most likely to the secret orders by Ike to not feed or shelter German POWs? 

The untold story of “Eisenhower’s Rhine Meadows Death Camps – A Deliberate Policy of Extermination” of the Surrendered German forces by the Allies, in post-war Germany ('Rheinwiesenlager') has been documented, but Ike was never charged by anyone for anything. 

WHAT IF PATTON HAD BLOWN THE WHISTLE ON THAT BACK IN 1945 BEFORE HE DIED?
WOULD AMERICA HAVE ELECTED IKE?


In August 1944 Dwight D. Eisenhower came up with the Morgenthau Plan to inflict collective punishment upon the German people following the end of the Second World War.

This was, basically, a plan to starve millions of Germans, mostly citizens, to death.

Although the plan was officially cancelled, it was in fact implemented. Between 1945 and 1953 it is estimated between 9 to 15 million ethnic Germans died, mainly civilians.

Dissident authors like Nikolai Tolstoy and Nicholas Bethell are subject to the same isolation as that suffered by Alexander Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet Union, all because they accused top military and government officials of war crimes. 





In one incident of many, in June 1945, 50,000 refugees, mainly Cossacks surrendered themselves to the British Armed Forces in southern Austria.  

In outright defiance of international law, even that of the deplorable Yalta Agreements, Britain acted quickly and illegally.

Tens of thousands of civilians and their children were hunted down, shot or captured by British soldiers assisted by units of the Soviet terror police, the NKVD...and by American military men like General Dwight D. Eisenhower.




Left to right: Generals Montgomery, Eisenhower, Zhukov and de Gaulle  
All betrayed their own troops and nations in Operation Keelhaul.

And smiled......

WHY?
The excuse was that the Soviets had custody of tens to hundreds of thousands of American and British POWs they claimed to have "rescued" from German prison camps.
All were in Soviet hands, with Stalin setting terms for their repatriation to their home countries. 
Stalin made a deal to return all Allied POWs to their countries of origin IF the Allies would help round up dissidents who had fled Russia and her satellite states during the war. 
HE LIED. 


Eisenhower and other top generals, FDR, Churchill and the Brits' military brass all knew he was lying, knew better than to trust him, but once the deed was done, secretly agreed upon at Yalta, and our American POWs were NOT returned but were taken to labor camps in Russia or parted out to Red China or North Korea and disappeared, the whole sordid thing had to be covered up, hushed, hidden for decades. 

[Sanders, James D; Sauter, Mark A; Kirkwood, R. Cort (1992). Soldiers Of Misfortune: Washington's Secret Betrayal of American POWs in the Soviet Union. National Press Books] 


[Nikolai Tolstoy (1977). The Secret Betrayal. Charles Scribner's Sons. 
Victims Of Yalta (1977) and The Minister And The Massacres (1986)]


[Hummel, Jeffrey Rogers (1974). "Operation Keelhaul—Exposed". San Jose State University ScholarWorks.]
[OPERATION KEELHAUL By Julius Epstein. Old Greenwich: The Devin·Adair Co. 1973]

[Epstein, Julius. Operation Keelhaul, Devin-Adair, 1973.]
 

Eisenhower's political aspirations would have been ruined had Americans known that perhaps more than 100,000 american soldiers had been abandoned to Russia to do with as they pleased.

Rather than being welcomed home as a hero, Eisenhower would have been met by anxious, angry Americans who wanted their missing sons, brothers, husbands, fathers back from the communists.
They would have damned him for abandoning them to certain death.

The communist-leaning FDR wasn't ready to cede his incredible power and his successor Truman was as determined as FDR to keep the whole thing secret from the American public.

Both their political careers and FDR's "legacy" would have been obliterated. We might have seen an immediate World War 3 to get those men back.
America would have been outraged.


ONLY ONE U.S. GENERAL HAD SAID AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT WE SHOULD MARCH ON RUSSIA, THAT EISENHOWER'S MISHANDLING OF THE WAR HAD COST TOO MANY AMERICAN LIVES, THAT FDR SHOULD NEVER HAVE MADE A PACT WITH STALIN.

THAT GENERAL WAS GEORGE S. PATTON, Jr.


HE HAD DECIDED TO QUIT, NOT RESIGN, BUT QUIT THE MILITARY IN ORDER TO TAKE HIS CASE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WITHOUT BEING SUPPRESSED BY "IKE" OR FDR.
HE SAID AMERICANS NEEDED TO KNOW A FEW SECRETS THAT HE KNEW.

HE HAD TOLD A FEW CLOSE MILITARY FRIENDS AND HIS WIFE AND HAD WRITTEN IN HIS PERSONAL DIARY THAT THOSE WERE HIS PLANS.

AND THEN, SUDDENLY, HE WAS DEAD, FOLLOWING AN UNINVESTIGATED, VERY STRANGE "ACCIDENT" THAT LEFT NO ONE INJURED BUT HIM, AN ACCIDENT HE WAS SLOWLY RECOVERING FROM, AN ACCIDENT AFTER WHICH THOSE INVOLVED SORT OF "DISAPPEARED" FOR YEARS, WITH NOT EVEN THE MAN WHO CAUSED THE ACCIDENT CHARGED, ALTHOUGH THAT MAN WAS DRIVING A STOLEN MILITARY VEHICLE AND WAS A KNOWN THIEF.    

AFTER PATTON'S DEATH, NO AUTOPSY WAS PERFORMED, AND ALTHOUGH HIS WIFE WANTED TO BRING HIM BACK TO THE U.S. FOR BURIAL, SHE WAS CONVINCED TO LET HIM BE BURIED IN EUROPE.

AN AMERICAN MEMBER OF THE OSS, PRECURSOR TO THE CIA, 
DOUGLAS BAZATA HAS STATED SEVERAL TIMES, PUBLICLY, THAT HE WAS TOLD TO ASSASSINATE PATTON AND THAT, WHEN HE FAILED, THE TASK WAS ASSIGNED TO THE RUSSIAN SECRET POLICE, THE SAME 'NKVD ' INVOLVED IN THE CAPTURE OF ALL THOSE INNOCENTS WHO WERE MURDERED BY OPERATION KEELHAUL.

ANOTHER MILITARY MAN, AIDE TO EISENHOWER, BERT ROOSEN, HAS STATED THAT HE HEARD IKE SAY AFTER AN ARGUMENT WITH PATTON THAT THEY HAD TO GET RID OF PATTON AND HEARD ANOTHER TOP BRASS SAY THAT HE WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT.

STILL NO INVESTIGATION, TO THIS DAY...NONE.

Three volumes of records, entitled "Forcible Repatriation of Displaced Soviet Citizens-Operation Keelhaul," were classified Top Secret by the U.S. Army on September 18, 1948, and bear the secret file number 383.7-14.1.

Americans would have never known about the secret Patton spoke about if not for an investigative journalist named Epstein.



A Case for Suppression
By Julius Epstein

New York Times
Dec. 18, 1970

"Doing research on forced repatriation. of anti‐Communist prisoners of war and displaced persons during and after World War II, I discovered early in 1954 in the Army's Historical Records. Branch in Alexandria, Va., an index card marked “Forcible Repatriation of Displaced Soviet Citizens— Operation Keelhaul‐383‐7‐14.”

When I asked for the dossier, I was told that it was Top Secret and that the index card should not be in a public catalogue. It was immediately removed. Since then, I have tried to have the “Operation Keelhaul” files declassified and released.

What does “keelhaul” mean? According to Webster, Second Edition, “keelhaul” means: “To haul under the keel of a ship, either athwart-ships or from bow to stern by ropes attached to the yardarms on each side. It was formerly a punishment in the Dutch and British Navies and a method of torture used by pirates.” The Army chose “Operation Keelhaul” as the code‐name for a collection of documents dealing with the forcible repatriation of millions of anti‐Communists to Stalin's Soviet Union. 

Through my study I became convinced that forced repatriation, as carried out by the American and British military authorities, was a violation of the Geneva Convention of 1929.
That forced repatriation of anti Communists to Stalin's slave labor camps was in violation of international law as well as in violation of the American tradition of asylum for political exiles can be documented by statements made by President Eisenhower, General Marshall, Dean Acheson and many others.

To give just one example: When the North Koreans demanded forced repatriation of North Korean and Chinese prisoners of war, Acheson said in his speech before the United Nations Oct. 24, 1954: “It was quite unthinkable to the United Nations Command that it should use force to drive into the hands of the Communists, people who would be resisting that effort by force. Finally, they say that the Geneva Convention and international practice require this forcible repatriation. We, on the other hand, have said that we have lived up to the humanitarian principles of the Geneva Convention.”


Soon after the “Freedom of Information Act” went into force on July 4, 1967, I filed a lawsuit against Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor for release of “Operation Keelhaul.” 
Congressman John E. Moss declared in sworn affidavit that it was the intent of Congress to give the courts the “broadest latitude” in examining secret documents—in camera—in order to find out whether they have been properly classified.

If the judge finds that disclosure would not endanger foreign policy or national defense, he has the duty to enjoin the government agency from withholding the documents. Although it was clear that the Keelhaul documents could never endanger American foreign policy or national security, the courts found that they had not the power to subpoena the documents and that classification was “appropriate.” How they could decide that classification of ‘about 300 documents was appropriate without having seen a single one, is hard to explain.

The Supreme Court denied my petition. for a writ of certiorari. The only Justice in favor of granting certiorari was Justice Douglas. Since the courts declared the “Freedom of Information Act” a dead letter, Congress will have to amend the act in order to revive it.

On Oct. 22, 1970, the White House informed me that President Nixon has removed the main obstacle for declassification of the Keelhaul files. 

The letter states: “The U.S. Government has absolutely no objections (based on the contents of the files) to the declassification and release of the ‘Operation Keelhaul’ files. However, given the joint origin of the documents, British concurrence is necessary before they can be released and this concurrence has not been received. Thus, we have no alternative but to deny your request.”


Since the Keelhaul files contain many purely American documents, classified by American military authorities, I hope that I shall still succeed in persuading the Administration that these American documents should be released. 

If this should finally be denied, it would amount to the admission that a foreign government has still the power to prevent the American people from learning their own history based on American evidence."

[Times note: Julius Epstein is a scholar working at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University]


Operation Keelhaul is significant for two reasons.

First, it represents an instructive case study of the fantastic power that even a supposedly democratic state can ruthlessly wield during wartime. Not only were the Allied governments able to perpetrate the crime, but afterwards, they were able to impose what Harry Elmer Barnes has appropriately called an "historical blackout" so effective that it lasted for nearly '30 years.


Secondly, it is a chilling comment on the motives of those who ran the U.S. Government at the time and, by implication, on those who run it now. It is fashionable, even among libertarians, to laugh off' explanations which ascribe evil and deceitful (as opposed to well-meaning but misguided) motives to our political masters in Washington as "conspiracy theory. "

However, no one has yet produced a satisfactory explanation of how Operation Keelhaul resulted from misguided idealism or liberal blindness, It seems, at least to me, that any explanation that falls short of including clandestine Soviet-American collusion at some level is obviously inadequate.


Be that as it may, it is interesting in conclusion to observe that the Soviets do not share the U.S. Government's reticence about publicizing Keelhaul.


When the U.S.S. R. Government released several hundred survivors of forced repatriation in 1955-after 10 years in Siberian slave-labor camps, a Russian newspaper carried the following: "'We have let "them" out [referring to the old Cossack emigres] and we have forgiven "our own" [referring to the Vlasov soldiers] . Whether they were Vlasov men or prisoners of war who did not want to return to the mother· land does not matter 'now. All their sins have been forgiven . . But the English and American bayonets, truncheons, machine guns and tanks used against them will never be forgotten.'"

Field Marshal Harold Alexander, by order of Harold Macmillan, Churchill's "resident minister" for the Mediterranean, turned over all the 70,000 or so ex-Soviet Cossacks, ex-Yugoslavs who had fought against the Russians by joining the Nazi army, most of whom had been placed in Allied POW camps when the Allies conquered Germany, and an estimated 11,000 women and children in order to secure the return of British prisoners liberated from German POW camps by both Russia and Yugoslavia.

THAT DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE AMERICAN AND OTHER ALLIED PRISONERS IN GERMAN CONCENTRATION/POW CAMPS THAT THE RUSSIANS "LIBERATED".  

A SHAEF  [Supreme Headquarters of the Allied European Forces] PRISONER OF WAR ACCOUNTING DONE IN MARCH, 1945, PUT THE NUMBER OF AMERICANS HELD AS POWs BY THE GERMANS AT 123,507.

WAS IT ONLY 20,000 THAT AMERICA ALLOWED RUSSIA TO KEEP AND REMOVE TO THE SOVIET UNION? 

ONE AMERICAN SOLDIER WHO MADE IT OUT OF A RUSSIAN GULAG HAS STATED:
"I WAS PREPARED TO FIGHT, TO BE WOUNDED, TO BE CAPTURED, EVEN TO DIE, BUT I WAS NOT PREPARED TO BE ABANDONED." 
["AMERICA'S ABANDONED SONS", PAGE 300, ROBERT S. MILLER AUTHOR]


Approximately 1.5 million Jews served in the regular Allied militaries during World War II.

Approximately 550,000 American Jews served in the various branches of the United States armed services. Roughly 52,000 received U.S. military awards.

Another 500,000 served in the Red Army, and more than 160,000 earned citations, with over 150 receiving the Hero of the Soviet Union award.

Some 100,000 Jews served in the Polish Army during the German invasion, and thousands served in the Free Polish Forces, including about 10,000 in Anders' Army.

Over 60,000 Jews served in the British Armed Forces (excluding dominion or colonial personnel), including 14,000 in the Royal Air Force and 15,000 in the Royal Navy.

About 30,000 Jews from what is now Israel also served in the British military.

WHO KNOWS HOW MANY OF THOSE JEWISH ENLISTED MEN WERE CAPTURED BY THE GERMANS THEN ABANDONED IN RUSSIA?

NEITHER ALLIED NATION INVOLVED IN THIS WILL OPEN STILL-CLASSIFIED FILES OF THIS ALLIED-CREATED HOLOCAUST AFTER 70 YEARS. 

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS MADE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ARE DENIED, CITING "NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS". 

IN A SEARCH OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES, ONLY THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE OFFERED THAT MENTION "KEELHAUL":

ND 13-3 CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/forresearchers/find/textual/central/subject/nd.php

Includes safeguarding; procedures; security reports; Dr. Edward Teller; transmittal; control and protection; the "Pentagon Papers"; the New York Times; declassification; "Keelhaul" documents; access; the State Department's "Foreign Relations of the United States" series; Executive Order #11652 "Classification and Declassification of National Security Information and Material"; British Official Secrets Act; National Security Council Directive Governing the Classification, Downgrading, Declassification and Safeguarding of National Security Information; classification markings; Interagency Classification Review Committee; petitions.

SEVERAL RECORDS IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES REGARDING THE KATYN FOREST MASSACRE: SEE: 
https://search.archives.gov/search?query=Katyn+Massacre&submit=&utf8=&affiliate=national-archives


AMERICAN TROOPS PERISHED INSIDE RUSSIA WONDERING WHY RESCUE NEVER CAME.
WE WOULD KNOW NOTHING OF THIS HAD NOT A FEW SURVIVED.


GREAT BRITAIN LEFT AT LEAST 30,000 OF HER TROOPS TO DIE THERE AS WELL, EACH NATION KNOWING WHERE THOSE GOOD MEN, THEIR OWN BRAVE SOLDIERS WERE, NEITHER NATION WILLING TO RESCUE THEM BY FORCE.

KEEP IN MIND ALWAYS THAT NEITHER THE U.S. NOR UK ATTEMPTED TO RESCUE THEM OR EVEN MAKE THEIR PLIGHTS KNOWN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

70 YEARS LATER THEY ARE STILL TRYING TO KEEP THIS QUIET, 70 YEARS!

Germans were prosecuted at Nuremberg for similar crimes but control of the news ensured that Eisenhower, and those under his command who took part in this outrage, the British counterparts, the Russians, NONE were ever even officially accused of these heinous crimes.
This entire "operation" was rolled up and tucked away by each government involved, perhaps for all time.

The ALLIES ruthlessly carried out 'Operation Keelhaul', deporting innocent refugees from eastern Europe into Stalin's clutches, sacrificing their own military men to the Russian's lies and twisted whim. 

WOULD PATTON HAVE REVEALED THIS? 

WHAT IF HE HAD?  


Few realize that Patton was deeply anti-Semitic, that he preferred the Germans over the Russians.

In a letter to his wife, September 14, 1945, he said: “I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union’s Gulags), where many will be starved to death.“
[ISN'T THAT WHAT "KEELHAUL" DID?]

Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife, he commented: “I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.“

"There is simply no doubt that this "great American hero" was also a vile and crude anti-Semite
who, in letters home to his wife and in personal diary entries, was blunt about his feelings regarding Jews. More important, his actions reflected those views.

In his September 15, 1945 diary entry:

"Evidently the virus started by [FDR’s treasury secretary Henry] Morgenthau and [financier and presidential adviser Bernard] Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working…. Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.

He went on to complain that the Jews had “no sense of human relationships” and lived in filth like “lazy locusts.” He wrote that “I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared – not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe – lost to all decency.”

BUT HE WANTED TO FIGHT THE RUSSIANS, STOP COMMUNISM, "LIBERATE" THE COMMUNIST COUNTRIES STALIN HAD MADE 'SATELLITE' NATIONS OF. 


'Operation Unthinkable' was the name given to two related possible future war plans by the British Chiefs of Staff against the Soviet Union in 1945. The plans were never approved or implemented. The creation of the plans was ordered by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in May 1945 and developed by the British Armed Forces' Joint Planning Staff in May 1945 at the end of World War II in Europ

The initial primary goal of the operation was declared as "to impose upon Russia the will of the United States and the British Empire. Even though 'the will' of these two countries may be defined as no more than a square deal for Poland, that does not necessarily limit the military commitment".


'Operation Dropshot' was the United States Department of Defense code name for a contingency plan for a possible preemptive nuclear and conventional war with the Soviet Union and its allies in order to counter the anticipated Soviet takeover of Western Europe, the Near East and parts of Eastern Asia.


The plan was prepared in 1949 during the early stages of the Cold War and declassified in 1977.
Dropshot included mission profiles that would have used 300 nuclear bombs and 29,000 high-explosive bombs on 200 targets in 100 cities and towns to wipe out 85 percent of the Soviet Union's industrial potential at a single stroke. 

[See Ross, Steven T. (1996). American War Plans, 1945-1950: Strategies for Defeating the Soviet Union. Frank Cass.]  

In the terrible summer of 1945, the U.S. Army had just completed the destruction of Europe and had set up a government of military occupation amid the ruins to rule the starving Germans and deal out victors' justice to the vanquished. 

General George S. Patton, commander of the U.S. Third Army, became military governor of the greater portion of the American occupation zone of Germany. 

It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military governor of Germany -- after he had gotten to know both the Germans and America's "gallant Soviet allies" -- that Patton's understanding of the true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many letters to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government officials, he expressed his new understanding and his apprehensions for the future.  


On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert Patterson. 

Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army. 

Patton said to Patterson: 
"Let's keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect." 

Patterson replied, "Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture." 

Patton rejoined: "I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!" 

On May 18 Patton noted in his diary: 
"In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these.
If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better." 

Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: "If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger."

SOON AFTER, HE DIED DURING RECOVERY FROM THAT STRANGE ACCIDENT.


Stalin himself is said to have remarked that one death is a tragedy, and a million is a statistic.
At this moment of reflection on the problems in the resolution to the Second World War, there are victims who are politically palatable, and others who are conveniently forgotten.

Back in 2009, I read the story of one Cossack family who escaped the aftermath of the secret Yalta agreements, Operation Keelaul, and it haunts me still. 

Galena Tkacenko showed the author, William Dritschilo, where a wooden footbridge once crossed the River Drau. Tkacenko was 13 years old when her family escaped the massacre at Lienz by crossing the bridge and hiding in the woods. Others, who were not so lucky, jumped off the bridge and drowned.

Theirs is just one of MILLIONS of such instances of human suffering, betrayal and fear. 

IN "FOOTNOTE TO YALTA", JEREMY MURRAY-BROWN WROTE: 

"In the National Archives in Washington there exists a short clip of film which would appear to be the only one of its kind ever made. It is the unedited footage taken by an American army camera unit at a prisoner of war camp in southern Germany in February 1946. A card, headed "Return of Russian Prisoners to Russia," identifies the subject matter of the film and the location where it was taken.

Of all this, the public in the democracies knew nothing.
For three decades the subject remained a closely guarded secret.
Western eyewitnesses were obliged by official policy to keep silent.
A few journalists knew that some handing over was taking place, but not its scale.
But Alexander Solzhenitsyn had met some of the surviving Russians in Soviet prison camps and learned about their history. His account of their fate and that of their leader, General Vlasov, which appeared in the first volume of The Gulag Archipelago, published in 1973 - itself a sensation - was the first the general public in the west heard of the subject and the phenomenon, as Solzhenitsyn put it, of so many young Russians joining in a war against their own Fatherland. "



My personal interest in this was piqued when, about age 18, I listened to my dad tell a story of an Appalachian family who had gotten word that their kin who had been taken prisoner by the Germans was found alive in a Nazi POW camp and would be coming home. 

HE NEVER ARRIVED AND ALL THEIR ATTEMPTS TO FIND WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM WERE MET WITH DENIALS THAT HE WAS EVER LISTED AS FOUND ALIVE. 

ONCE DAD LEARNED OF KEELHAUL, HE ASSUMED "DANIEL" DIED IN RUSSIA. 

HOW MANY MORE DID?
WHY HAS NO ONE MADE IT A NUMBER ONE HIGH PRIORITY TO FIND OUT? 

HOW CAN THERE NOT BE TRIALS FOR THESE CRIMES, EVEN IF ALL WHO CARRIED OUT KEELHAUL ARE DEAD NOW?  

IF WE SIMPLY LET IT GO, WON'T IT JUST HAPPEN AGAIN AND AGAIN?
HASN'T IT ALREADY HAPPENED AGAIN?

LOOK AT THE 12,000 IRAQUI SOLDIERS BURIED ALIVE BY A U.S. TANK BRIGADE UNDER ORDERS FROM COLONEL LON MAGGART. 

THE NEW YORK TIMES REPORTED THAT "INCIDENT":   
September 15, 1991  
"Army officials said the Iraqi soldiers who died remained in their trenches as plow-equipped tanks dumped tons of earth and sand onto them, filling the trenches to insure that they could not be used as cover from which to fire on allied units that were poised to pour through the gaps. Avoiding Hand-to-Hand Combat

The Army said it knew the operation would kill Iraqis who did not surrender or otherwise get out of the way, but said the tactic spared the lives of American soldiers who would have had to leave the safety of their armored vehicles and fight Iraqi troops hand to hand in the trenches. 

"People somehow have the notion that burying guys alive is nastier than blowing them up with hand grenades or sticking them in [the] gut with bayonets," said Col. Lon Maggart. "Well it's not."

Colonel Maggart, commander of one of two brigades that led assaults on a key line of Iraqi defenses, said in a telephone interview from Fort Riley, Kan., that between 80 and 250 Iraqis had been buried alive.  
[HE LATER WOULD ADMIT TO "MAYBE 1,000"]   

At a news conference here on Thursday, the Pentagon spokesman, Pete Williams, defended the tactic and said it did not violate the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of warfare. "I don't mean to be flippant, but there's no nice way to kill somebody in war," Mr. Williams said."   

He said that the daytime breaching operation, including the ditch filling, had been completed in about three hours, and that the brigade had continued its advance after securing its breach zone, an area of roughly 35 square miles.

[NO, IT WAS MORE LIKE 70 MILES OF TRENCHES, 70 MILES, NOT 35, ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY OF SOLDIERS THERE AND A PHOTOJOURNALIST.]


ACCORDING TO THE WASHINGTON POST, SEPT. 13, 1991:

"In June, the Pentagon disclosed that U.S. forces had buried
corpses of more than 570 Iraqi soldiers.


U.S. officials acknowledged this was only a tiny fraction of
any credible estimate of the total number of Iraqis who had
probably been killed, but the Pentagon declined to reveal how
many Iraqis had been buried [alive] by other allied forces, including
British troops or Saudi "burial teams" operating under U.S.
and allied command. The Saudi government has also
declined to disclose a tally."

1991 massacre of thousands of fleeing Iraqi troops was part of U.S. 'total war'
BY Mike Buckingham, 8 Febuary 2003
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27c/069.html




On March 2, deep inside Iraq, a five-mile-long retreating column of Iraqis approached the causeway across Lake Hammar, near the Rumaila oil field west of Basra. They ran into the U.S. forces McCaffrey had deployed right across the line of retreat. McCaffrey ordered a devastating attack. The U.S. military forces sealed off the causeway with Apache attack helicopters and artillery fire, pinned the Iraqi column on the road, and pounded them for five hours with wave after wave of bomb, tank, artillery, and missile attacks.

At least 400 Iraqis were killed. Some 700 Iraqi tanks, armored cars, and trucks were destroyed. 

   
IT WAS CALLED "THE HIGHWAY OF DEATH". 

Among them was a bus with civilians and children that was hit by a rocket. No shots were fired at the U.S. forces, and there were no serious U.S. combat casualties.

No reporters were allowed in the area at the time. During the Gulf War no media representatives were permitted on the battlefields without military escorts.

The massacre of unresisting Iraqis and the deaths of children deeply disturbed many U.S. soldiers. One platoon sergeant remarked, 'We've blown away a busload of kids.'

An officer in the 124th Military Intelligence Battalion said a captured Iraqi tank commander asked his U.S. interrogators several times, 'Why are you killing us? All we were doing was going home.' "


YOU SEE THAT IT"S BEEN DONE AGAIN...AND AGAIN...AND AGAIN...WAR CRIMES, BUT NO ONE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. 
IT'S THE NEW "NORM".



Soviets held U.S. POWS after WWII Yeltsin aide says some Americans still live in Russia
New York Times News Service
THE BALTIMORE SUN
Nov. 12, 1991                           


"A high-ranking Russian official says that thousands of U.S. prisoners of war captured by the Germans had been transferred to the Soviet Union after World War II and that some were still living in Russia.

The official, Dmitri Volkogonov, a military adviser to President Boris N. Yeltsin of Russia, told a U.S. Senate committee yesterday that more than 22,000 U.S. soldiers had been taken to the Soviet Union from German prisoner-of-war camps.

The Russian official said most of the U.S. servicemen were returned to the United States shortly after the war, but that 119 U.S. citizens with Russian, Ukranian or Jewish names were kept behind.


In addition to those soldiers from World War II, Mr. Volkogonov said that 730 U.S. aviators, forced down over Soviet and Soviet-bloc territory during the Cold War, had been interned in Russian prison camps. Those men were also sent back to the United States."



POWs HELD IN USSR

Gulag Study Forces U.S. to Admit Unthinkable: MIAs Were Abandoned by U.S. Government

A recently released report by the Pentagon reveals, and confirms, what American Free Press, and populist, America-first publications have been reporting for nearly three decades.

American POWs and MIAs from World War II, the Korean War and the Cold War were sent to the USSR, where they were imprisoned. 

Called “The Gulag Study,” it concludes: “Americans including American servicemen, were imprisoned in the former Soviet Union.”

For all of those years, the U.S. government has had in its possession information that Americans were being held but did nothing to save them.

The National Alliance of Families, which is still fighting to get the U.S. government to determine the fate of these Americans, which might also include American servicemen from the Vietnam War, is furious.

Upon learning of “The Gulag Study” the alliance released this comment: “Volumes of documentation unearthed over the last 50 years by family members and researchers convinced us long ago,” (but) “official Pentagon policy dismissed not only our conclusions, but the conclusions of their own investigators.


Norman Case, executive secretary of the Pentagon’s Defense Prisoner of War and Missing Personnel Office’s Joint Commission Support Directorate, had this to say about the study’s findings:

“I’m not comfortable with any hard and fast numbers. Our job is to try to find these Americans or their remains and bring them home.”

Case continued: “We’ve been in business for 12 or 13 years. . . . We’ve kept these reports on the burner of unsolved issues.”

However, critics cynically note: Obviously, it was the back burner."


THE CIA RELEASED A FRAGMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON KNOWN SLAVE  LABOR CAMPS IN THE USSR IN 1983,  A "SANITIZED VERSION" OF THE ORIGINAL.  

WE WILL LIKELY NEVER KNOW ALL OF WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, BUT IT MUST HAVE BEEN FAR WORSE THAN PERHAPS WE CAN IMAGINE. 

THE POWERS THAT BE HERE IN THE USA SIMPLY EITHER GAVE UP ON GETTING OUR AMERICAN TROOPS BACK OR THEY BECAME PART OF THAT SECRET YALTA DEAL AND NO EFFORTS WERE MADE TO RESCUE THEM.  

JUST AS I WON'T EVER FORGET 9/11, I WILL NEVER FORGET THOSE WHO WERE "KEELHAULED".  

DAMN THOSE RESPONSIBLE! DAMN THEM ALL! 








//WW

Thursday, September 3, 2020

MANDATORY QUARANTINE AND MASKS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL. ANTIBODY TESTING IS THE ANSWER.



IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO FORCE HEALTHY PEOPLE TO QUARANTINE AND/OR WEAR MASKS? 

We begin our analysis with the observation of the truism that freedom is the default position.

The language of the Declaration of Independence, as well as various amendments in the Bill of Rights, unambiguously reflects the views that those who wrote, ratified and amended the U.S. Constitution recognized that our rights — to think, speak, publish, worship, defend ourselves, travel, own property, be left alone — are natural to our humanity.

These rights pre-existed the government. Their source is our humanity. Government does not grant these rights.
Rather, its primary purpose — as stated in the Declaration of Independence, its sole purpose — is to protect these rights.

Though the courts have interpreted the Constitution to possess lamentable exceptions, the framers and ratifiers arguably accepted the non-aggression principle — articulated in the modern era by the late Professor Murray Rothbard — which declares that all aggression against persons and property even by government is immoral.

In the case of the federal government, it is one of limited, delegated powers.

Of course, 230 years of legislation and litigation have blown its powers outside the confines of the Constitution and, invariably, in the direction of expanding federal power at the expense of personal liberty and the states.

The states formed the federal government and not the other way around. Yet today, the feds stay in power by bribing the states with cash grants, the rich with bailouts, the middle class with tax breaks and the poor with transfer payments. Notwithstanding all this, the courts continue to recognize the concept of personal liberty in a free society.

All this is background to the issue lurking beneath the headlines this week. 

Can the government quarantine people without proof of contagion and imminent assault?

The short answer is no.


We know that, under the Fifth Amendment, if any government — state or federal — wants to impair the life, liberty or property of any person, it must follow due process. 

Due process has two components — substantive and procedural. The substantive component asks if the impairment of liberty is proper to the government that seeks the impairment, and the procedural component asks if the impairment has come about fairly.

Now back to what the feds can do and what the states can do in a public health crisis. There are no emergency provisions or triggers in the Constitution; yet, Congress gave itself the power to regulate public health and safety under various pretexts. The pretexts exist because the nanny state urge of members of Congress to regulate is confronted by the reservation in the Tenth Amendment of health and safety to the states. Those pretexts are regulating commerce and all that affects commerce, and paying the states to do Congress’ will.


Stated differently, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that both the federal government and the states can confine a person who has not committed a crime, or one who has but has served one’s full sentence, in order to protect society from the person’s intentional or uncontrollable harmful tendencies.

It is contrary to the plain meaning of the Constitution for Congress to give itself powers that were not delegated to it by the Constitution, but the courts have permitted this.

Yet, even in the case of a lunatic who has committed a crime and served his full sentence but remains dangerous, the courts have recognized constitutional safeguards to protect his natural rights.

Now back to our question of whether the government — state or federal — can confine persons against their will in order to protect public health.

The short answer is yes, BUT the Constitution requires procedural due process. 
That means a trial for every person confined.

Thus, a government-ordered quarantine of all persons in a city block or a postal ZIP Code or a telephone area code would be an egregious violation of due process, both substantive and procedural.
Substantively, no government in America has the lawful power to curtail natural rights by decree.

Procedurally, notwithstanding the fear of disease contagion, the states and feds may only quarantine those who are actively contagious and will infect others imminently. And it must present evidence of both at a trial at which it bears the burden of proof.

That means a trial before any quarantine, no matter the public danger, and a fair trial, not one animated by mass hysteria or government-generated fear."


PROVING MASS EXPOSURE IS NOT POSSIBLE

If you are ordered to "quarantine," that means you have been exposed to an infectious disease and thus must isolate yourself from other people until you are no longer contagious.

HOW CAN ANYONE PROVE UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT ANY OR ALL OF A POPULATION HAS DEFINITELY EACH BEEN PERSONALLY EXPOSED TO CV-19? 

CASE-BY-CASE, THAT WOULD TAKE YEARS, DECADES.


The Constitution gives you the right not to be denied liberty without due process of law.


OR, UNTIL YOU PROVE YOU DO NOT HAVE THE DISEASE OR HAVE HAD THE DISEASE AND NOW HAVE IMMUNITY TO THAT DISEASE AND CANNOT INFECT OTHERS. 

Given the risk of constitutional violations posed by the quarantine regulations, the federal government should only exert its quarantine powers in cases where disease transmission risks are high and life-threatening, argue Boston University’s Michael R. Ulrich and Wendy K. Mariner. 

Instead, they say the federal government should implement initiatives that empower Americans to make preventive health decisions on their own, without fear of coercive government action.


Once U.S. officials place a person under quarantine, the regulations require HHS and the CDC to appoint a medical expert charged with examining whether or not the person has an infectious disease.

Yet, under the regulations, the allegedly infected person may wait for an indefinite period of time before interacting with a medical professional, claim Ulrich and Mariner. 

Assuming HHS and the CDC do complete the prescribed medical review, the agencies have no deadline by which they must decide whether to keep people quarantined or release them back into the community.

According to Ulrich and Mariner, the regulations fail to meet constitutional due process standards.

These constitutional standards would require the federal government to substantiate decisions to quarantine people involuntarily by making “prompt” and “periodic” assessments of the infectious disease risks they pose, maintain Ulrich and Mariner. But, by bypassing these standards, the regulations leave room for the unjustified—and unconstitutional—quarantining of Americans.


The state supreme-court decision strikes a blow for separation of powers.

The decision found the order by Democratic governor Tony Evers, his “safer-at-home” emergency order, issued by his designee for secretary of the Department of Health Services (“DHS”), Andrea Palm, to be "immediately unenforceable".

The court found emphatically that the “order” was in fact a rule and therefore it should have gone through the rule-making process, or at least the emergency rule-making process.

The Court employed the “constitutional doubt” principle — it disfavored statutory interpretations that unnecessarily raise serious constitutional questions about the statute under review.

This decision continues a clear trend, both in Wisconsin and elsewhere throughout the country, of courts reasserting the prerogatives of both the judiciary to review the legality and constitutionality of administrative actions and the legislature to employ robust tools for reining in administrative agencies that have flexed too much policy-making muscle.

The court found that the issuance of criminal penalties can attach only to rules, and that therefore DHS was in error for attaching criminal penalties to an order that bypassed the administrative rule-making process.


It has long been the law in Wisconsin that in order for the violation of an administrative agency’s directive to constitute a crime, the directive must have been properly promulgated as a rule.

Is it constitutional for an unelected and unconfirmed secretary to essentially have limitless authority, with no legislative oversight, while the popularly elected governor can only issue an order that runs for 60 days? 

It turns out the DHS secretary does not possess as much authority as she thinks.

Similar to decisions such as Tetra Tech, the 2011 landmark legislation reset the relationship between state agencies and the legislature. 
Gone are the days of implied authority.

As Justice Kelly observed in Tetra Tech (a decision that would seem to carry even more weight following yesterday’s decision), “We must be assiduous in patrolling the borders between the branches. This is not just a practical matter of efficient and effective government. We maintain this separation because it provides structural protection against depredations on our liberties. The Framers of the United States Constitution understood that ‘[t]he accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.’”


NATIONAL QUARANTINE IS NOT LEGAL

FROM NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO: 
Fact Check: A Blanket National Quarantine Is Likely Not Legal   
Could the president order a national lockdown or place states under quarantine?

Legal experts say not really.

Polly J. Price, a professor of law and public health at Emory University, tells NPR: "If you're talking about quarantine in terms of encouraging people to stay home or closing businesses — and that's what public health folks talk about as social distancing measures, really — I think from the White House that can be advisory only and that those are exclusively state powers."

She says though that the federal government does have other tools at its disposal to limit people from traveling between states, including controlling who can fly.

And, as was done after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the Federal Aviation Administration can ground air travel altogether.

President Trump has used his authority to require foreign nationals arriving from China to be quarantined and has prevented foreign nationals from Europe from flying into the U.S., as well as limiting border crossings from Canada and Mexico.

Options limited

But there's not much more he can do within the country, says Bradley Moss, a Washington attorney specializing in national security issues.

"It is unclear, absent congressional approval or every state in the union collectively agreeing to it, how any president would have the authority to impose a federal or national quarantine," Moss says.


The federal law on this, he says, "is clearly aimed at individuals or specifically identified groups, not the entire country writ large."

Moss says the president would have to "either personally determine, or get the CDC director to state in writing, that the entire country is reasonably believed to have been exposed to the coronavirus," which Moss says would be "politically treacherous" and "turn the federal law on its head."

The only Supreme Court ruling on the issue, Price says, came a century ago, and that involved whether states could limit travel during a yellow fever epidemic.

She says the court suggested that states can do so and can impose quarantines on incoming travelers, "so long as it's for a valid public health measure."

INCOMING TRAVELERS, NOT LEGAL, RESIDENT CITIZENS. 

During the yellow fever epidemic in the late 19th century, some areas imposed a "shotgun quarantine," Price says, with states, local governments and counties "basically barricading themselves against people coming from infected places."

Trains were stopped in some locations. The government set up refugee camps for people "trying to flee Pensacola and Mobile and New Orleans," but who couldn't go anywhere because places farther north wouldn't let them in. In Arkansas, she says, armed guards prevented people trying to cross the Mississippi River from Memphis.

"That's what fear will do to you," Price says.


Under the Constitution, individuals have rights in quarantine and isolation conditions. 

Under the 5th and 14th Amendment’s rights of Due Process and Equal Protection, public health regulations used to impose such conditions can’t be “arbitrary, oppressive and unreasonable.”

There are precedents where courts have ruled that states or local governments didn’t meet a burden of proof to justify a quarantine. 

Under the Court’s current understanding of the Commerce Clause, Congress’s power to protect the physical safety of people who are NOT engaged in interstate or international travel is very limited
And accordingly, federal law does not provide for quarantines of individuals who remain within a single state.


THIS IS WHERE TESTING BECOMES OF CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE. 

THIS IS ALSO WHERE MANY QUESTION WHY WE DON'T SEE THE CDC AND THE WHO OFFERING FREE ANTIBODY TESTS. 


THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR ALL TO CONSIDER. 

I RECENTLY LEARNED OF THIS FIRST-HAND BECAUSE OF MY OWN FRAGILE HEALTH AND AFTER BEING TESTED REPEATEDLY FOR THE CORONAVIRUS. 

AFTER SEVERAL NEGATIVE "SWAB TESTS", I ASKED FOR AND GOT AN ANTIBODY TEST, A SEROLOGICAL TEST THAT PROVED THAT I HAD AT ONE TIME HAD "COVID-19". 
AT 70-PLUS YEARS OLD, DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER, CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND COPD, I HAD THE VIRUS BUT WAS COMPLETELY ASYMPTOMATIC. 

I RECALL A BRIEF PERIOD THAT I ASSUMED POLLEN WAS MAKING ME SNEEZE AND COUGH, BUT THAT PASSED QUICKLY AND I NEVER HAD A FEVER.

WITH A SECOND ANTIBODY TEST, ALSO STRONGLY POSITIVE, AND A FINAL 'SWAB TEST', AGAIN NEGATIVE, LIFE CHANGED DRAMATICALLY. 

NOW, I KNOW AND CAN PROVE THAT I HAVE AN IMMUNITY TO CV-19.
I CANNOT SPREAD THE VIRUS, CANNOT BE INFECTED BY SOMEONE WITH THE VIRUS. 

BEFORE, I HAD TO CLAIM MY RIGHT TO NOT WEAR A MASK UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. 
NOW, I MERELY STATE MY IMMUNITY. 
I AM A DANGER TO NO ONE. 

I AM ALSO EXEMPT FROM ANY MANDATORY CV-19 VACCINE.  


IN FACT, I HAVE BEEN INVITED BY TWO MAJOR MEDICAL CLINICS TO DONATE MY PLASMA FOR TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CV-19...UNTIL THEY LEARNED OF MY CANCER DIAGNOSIS. 

AND, AS HAMLET SAID, "THERE'S THE RUB."

IF ALL OF US HAD PROOF THAT WE ARE IMMUNE BY WAY OF A RECOVERY FROM CV-19, IF WE WERE NO LONGER A DANGER TO OTHERS, NO LONGER HAD TO 'FEAR' BEING INFECTED BY THIS OVER-HYPED VIRUS, NO LONGER WERE TARGETS FOR MANDATORY VACCINES, THEN THIS FEAR-MONGERED BULLS**T WOULD COME TO A GRINDING HALT.  

MANDATORY QUARANTINE, LOCKDOWN, ECONOMIC RUIN, SCREAMS TO WEAR MASKS AND SOCIAL DISTANCE OR FACE FINES AND/OR JAIL WOULD EVAPORATE. 

CHURCHES, BUSINESSES, SCHOOLS COULD ALL SAFELY REOPEN TO ALL WHO WERE IMMUNE AND AMERICANS COULD GET BACK TO WORK AND TO LIFE. 

COVID BE DAMNED!
POLITICAL WRANGLING BE DAMNED!
THREATS BE DAMNED! 
MASS HYSTERIA BE DAMNED!
WE'D BE FREED! 

BENEATH ONE OF THE ARTICLES CITED ABOVE, SOMEONE LEFT THE FOLLOWING COMMENT: 

"Yet every day there's another person on the news in handcuffs, WELL (HEALTHY) CITIZENS, WITHOUT ANY DISEASE OR ILLNESS WHATSOEVER, who is dragged away in front of their kids for playing on the playground, hitting baseballs at parks, [using] public facilities which THEY PAID FOR!
If not legal, which obviously it IS NOT, then how do they keep getting away with it? QUARANTINE IS FOR SICK PEOPLE, NOT WELL PEOPLE!
WE LIVE IN AMERICA, THE GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK FOR NOT AGAINST US!
WHY DO WE CONTINUE TO STAND BY & WATCH THIS OBVIOUS ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR - FROM GOVERNMENT, POLITICIANS & PUBLIC SERVANTS - AND DO NOTHING?
Doesn't ANYONE care?
Why isn't ANYONE QUESTIONING?
Why does the MEDIA KEEP REPORTING ON, WITHOUT ANY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WHATSOEVER OF THE OBVIOUS, FREQUENT VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS, AND FEDERAL LAW?
"STAY HOME, OR BE ARRESTED/GET FINED?" QUARANTINES ARE FOR SICK PEOPLE! REFUSE TO SUBMIT!"



I AGREE.

THIS HAS ALL LED TO INFRINGEMENTS OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
WE HAVE BEEN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY CONTROLLED. 

ONCE OUR POLITICIANS HAVE HAD A GOOD TASTE OF THEIR IMAGINED NEW POWERS OVER US, THEY WILL NOT GIVE UP SUCH FINE NEW POWERS. 

WE CAN ROLL OVER, BELLY-UP AND BE HERDED AND CONTROLLED LIKE SHEEP OR WE CAN POINT TO THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THIS DAMNABLE THING AND REFUSE TO SUBMIT TO IT ANOTHER DAY.  

ONE WAY TO DO THIS IS TO HAVE PROOF THAT WE ARE A HEALTH HAZARD, A DANGER TO NO ONE.

WE CAN DO THIS BY BEING TESTED IN THE OFFICES OF OUR PRIVATE PHYSICIANS AND HAVING THAT PROOF TO REFUSE TO BE HERDED AND CONFINED AND SUBJUGATED ANYMORE. 

WE CAN HAVE NEGATIVE "SWAB TESTS" EVERY BLOODY DAY AND STILL BE SUBJECT TO QUARANTINE, BUT POSITIVE ANTIBODIES PROVING OUR IMMUNE SYSTEM FOUGHT AND WON AGAINST THE "KILLER VIRUS" ENDS THAT UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUBJUGATION. 

EACH OF US CAN EXTEND OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR POSITIVE ANTIBODY TEST RESULTS LIKE A BIG MIDDLE FINGER TO THESE POWER-MAD CONTROL FREAKS AND END THIS INSANITY IN OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL 'INDEPENDENCE DAY'.  

THIS IS AMERICA.
AMERICANS WANT TO BE FREE.  








//WW

MAIL-IN VOTES CAN CHANGE ELECTION 2020 FOR EITHER PARTY



ANYONE WHO HAS READ MY BLOG FOR AWHILE KNOWS HOW I ABHOR ANY/ALL POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR POLITICIANS. I AM OF NO PARTY.

I HAVE BEEN READING POST-ELECTION HEADLINES FOR ALMOST 70 YEARS AND I ASSURE YOU THAT DEMOCRATS ARE THE UNDISPUTED "KINGS" OF VOTER FRAUD. 
HOWEVER, ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING I WRITE AND DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. 

There’s little doubt that, as the number of mail-in ballots increases, so does fraud. 

A 2012 report in The New York Times noted that voter fraud involving mail-in ballots “is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say. 
In Florida, absentee-ballot scandals seem to arrive like clockwork around election time.” 


According to a Wall Street Journal report on voter exploitation in Hispanic communities in Texas, mail-in ballots have “spawned a mini-industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques.” Poor, elderly, and minority communities are most likely to be preyed upon by so-called ballot “brokers.”

An academic study done in 2008 from Reed College flagged various concerns related to absentee voting and conceded there is a “great deal of literature on turnout” but when it comes to mail-in ballots there is “a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud.”

Concerns about fraud in mail-in ballots were serious enough that a 2008 report produced by the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project recommended that states “restrict or abolish on-demand absentee voting in favor of in-person early voting.”

Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah, and Hawaii now do all elections exclusively by mail. 
Supporters point to smooth elections in these states as proof that it works. 

But PILF obtained voter data from Oregon, the first state to adopt voting by mail exclusively, for the 2012 and 2018 elections and checked it against census data. 

Of the 7 million ballots the state sent out in those two elections, some 871,000 ballots are totally unaccounted for.

Oregon would not reveal its data for the 2014 and 2016 elections for reasons the state would not disclose.



Regardless, U.S. Census data confirms that 11% of Americans move every year, and voters on the lower end of the economic scale are especially transient. 


Without implementing some extensive, and likely problematic, government surveillance program, there’s no way for election administrators to reliably get ballots to tens of millions of Americans every election cycle without a large percentage of ballots going to the wrong address.

THOSE BALLOTS ARRIVING AT INVALID CURRENT ADDRESSES CAN BE FILLED OUT AND RETURNED BY WHOMEVER GETS THEM. 


Use of mail-in ballots more than doubled from 24.9 million in 2004 to 57.2 million in 2016, and around 40% of U.S. votes are now done by mail. 

Along with this dramatic increase there have been virtually no new safeguards, scrutiny, or additional research on the risks of vote by mail. 

If the current pandemic is going to force the issue during a presidential election, proponents of voting by mail may have to address obvious risks that come with proposing that more than 200 million ballots be mailed out this fall.

“I really think the only reason vote-by-mail problems are not getting more attention on a regular basis, is that it's kind of an embarrassing problem and people just aren’t paying attention,” says Logan Churchwell of PILF (Public Interest Legal Foundation
). 



DEMOCRATS ARE COUNTING ON IT 

HawkFish CEO Josh Mendelsohn said in an interview with Axios on HBO, according to a “scenario” modeled by his firm, the results on election night could show Trump winning 408 electoral votes

HawkfFish is a political data and technology agency founded by former New York City mayor and billionaire Michael Bloomberg.

We are sounding an alarm and saying that this is a very real possibility, that the data is going to show on election night an incredible victory for Donald Trump,”

One scenario modeled by Mendelsohn’s polling firm even shows Trump prevailing in the Electoral College on election night, winning 408 electoral votes compared to just 130 for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

But Mendelsohn is anticipating that only about 15 percent of all mail-in votes will be counted by election night, and he believes that once all of the mail-in votes are counted that Biden will be declared the true winner


That scenario accounts for the idea that just 15 percent of mail-in votes will be counted by election night. In that event, the model suggests, Biden could prevail days later — if counting goes smoothly — by 334 electoral votes to 204 for Trump.

“When every legitimate vote is tallied and we get to that final day, which will be some day after Election Day, it will in fact show that what happened on election night was exactly that, a mirage,” Mendelsohn said.

Even if there was no vote fraud, and even if every single vote was counted accurately, tens of millions of people would still be absolutely convinced that the election was stolen from Trump.

OR FROM BIDEN...BOTH SIDES WOULD CLAIM FRAUD AFTER A LOSS. 

And even Mendelsohn is admitting that the outcome he is projecting would “shake the losing side’s faith in the integrity of the election”.

SEE THE FULL VIDEO INTERVIEW <HERE>


New Narrative Being Pushed: Trump Will Lead Big On Election Night, But Biden Will Eventually Win Because Of Mail-In Ballots

(by Michael T. Snyder, a graduate of the University of Florida law school and an attorney in Washington D.C. for a number of years.
Today, Michael is best known for his work as the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog.) 

"Personally, I think that mail-in voting is a bad idea no matter which party it favors. It opens up so many opportunities for potential vote fraud, and the delay in getting the results is very bad for our nation.

"I believe that we will see some precincts in some swing states with a voter participation rate of more than 100 percent this year. 
 In other words, I believe that in some precincts the number of votes cast will actually outnumber the true number of actual voters.

Let’s keep a close eye on the results as they come in throughout the month of November and see if I am actually correct. In my opinion there is going to be quite a bit of monkey business going on with mail-in ballots, and President Trump has been greatly concerned about mail-in ballots as well. In fact, on Wednesday he once again expressed his concern that the upcoming election could be rigged
        
I have always believed that voters should be required to vote in person as much as possible and that paper ballots should always be used. 

 Those two measures alone would certainly not completely fix our system, but they would definitely go a long way toward restoring integrity to the voting process.

As it stands now, we are heading into a nightmare election. We all know that it is exceedingly unlikely that Trump will concede on election night, and Hillary Clinton continues to insist that Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances

So we are probably going to have to wait for weeks before every vote is finally counted.

And then if it is still very close, there will probably be legal challenges which will have to work their way through the courts.

If things are tight enough, we may not have a formal winner until some time in 2021.

No matter who ends up being victorious, I believe that the election of 2020 is going to be a nightmare for America."


FORBES lays it out rather simply.

Will your vote count in 2020?
Will your neighbors’ vote count?
That might depend on whether you vote in person or try to vote by mail.

In states with a significant vote by mail component, hijacking mail-in ballots is the tool of choice for those trying to steal elections.

In 18 states, a photo identification is needed to vote on Election Day, with another 17 states requiring at least a non-photo ID. 

In the 2016 General Election, about a quarter of all the votes cast were by mail. But unlike when voting in person, voting by mail almost never requires an ID.

Voting by mail, while convenient for the voter, lacks the protections that voting in person provides. The ballot can get lost in the mail. The mail-in ballot application can be completed by others, sometimes with false information. 

Ballots, when they arrive in the mail, can be intercepted by political operators. And, in some cases, largescale fraud can take place where, through nominal gifts of food or alcohol, voter intimidation, or deception, a professional ballot harvester can simply substitute his vote for the voter’s and turn in the ballot.  

Ballot harvesting got so egregious in 2018 in North Carolina—where it’s illegal (as it is in Texas)—that Republican Congressional candidate Mark Harris saw his 905-vote victory annulled in early 2019, with a redo ordered.

Ballot harvesters can get aggressive, they can cut corners, and they can guarantee votes for the politician or group that hired them by taking physical possession of ballots and voting in place of the legal voter.

And in Texas, vote harvesting is illegal, at least to the extent where state law prohibits a voter’s absentee ballot being completed and mailed by someone other than a close relative.

The practice is more widespread and problematic than most people believe.

As Texas tightened its mail-in ballot laws in 2017, California weakened them by the same measure. This unleashed a massive deployment of ballot harvesters on a statewide and partisan scale, resulting in the largest historical victories for California’s Democrats since the blowout Watergate aftermath elections in 1974.

But just because a law was passed in Texas doesn’t mean the practice of illegal ballot harvesting has ended or has even been curtailed.

The 2018 General Election in Texas was highly competitive, shaped largely by the most costly U.S. Senate race in American history between incumbent Senator Ted Cruz and then-U.S. Representative Robert (Beto) O’Rourke. 
Thus, typical electoral losses for the party controlling the White House were amplified by a larger-than-usual turnout.
 In the aftermath, Republicans lost two congressional seats, two state senate seats, and 11 state house seats, and had very close calls in many others.  

The statistical evidence tying mail-in balloting to competitive Texas races in 2018 suggests that campaign operatives might have been testing out tactics—some potentially illegal—to boost the mail-in vote. 

If Texas is seen as a battleground again in 2020, how many votes might be purchased for the ballot harvesters to reap? 

It behooves election officials, party volunteers, campaign workers, and law enforcement to be on the lookout for improper harvesting of mail-in ballots."


RECAP: 28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections

Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing ballots amount to nearly one in five of all absentee ballots and ballots mailed to voters residing in states that do elections exclusively by mail.States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed – and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency’s survey questions. 

The city's old "reputation is true, or at least partially true," said Dick Simpson, a political science professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

History of Voter Fraud | The Other Half of History


This 28,000,000 figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.


Although there is no evidence that the millions of missing ballots were used fraudulently, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, which compiled the public data provided from the Election Assistance Commission, says that the sheer volume of them raises serious doubts about election security.

A significant increase in mail-in voting this fall could greatly incentivize “ballot harvesting,” where third parties collect mail-in ballots on behalf of voters and deliver them to election officials. There’s long been a consensus that such a practice incentivizes fraud, and ballot harvesting is illegal in most of the country.

The fact that millions of unused mail-in ballots are floating around in every election cycle “is not a secret type data here – it's sitting there on the Internet, and you're paying for the server cost,” notes Logan Churchwell, a spokesman for PILF. “So what do people that really focus on the election process do about that? They go into ballot harvesting. 

If there's so many ballots out there in the wind unaccounted for by election officials, surely some manpower could be dedicated to go bring them in. And that's another part of the system where you have weaknesses and risk.”

The potential to affect elections by chasing down unused mail-in ballots and making sure they get counted – using methods that may or may not be legal – is great.


A brief history of election “rigging” in the United States

Professor Adam Smith from the University of Oxford investigates America's history of election 'rigging'.
"America's politics have always been rude and rumbustious – and, on occasion, rigged..."
Much of the history of election fraud – or alleged election fraud – in American history has been prompted by the fear that 'alien' masses would steal an election.

OR, THE OTHER PARTY. 



IF MAIL-IN BALLOTS COME BACK IN FAVOR OF TRUMP, AGAINST THE GIDDY, HOPEFUL DEMOCRAT SCENARIO, EVEN IF THOSE RESULTS ARE FOUND TO BE VALID BY THE SUPREME COURT, MY PREDICTION IS THAT WE WILL SEE BLOOD IN THE STREETS ON A FAR LARGER ORDER OF MAGNITUDE THAN BLM AND ANTIFA AND ANARCHISTS ARE SPILLING NOW. 

IF WE DID A LIVE-TELEVISED, ROLL-CALL TYPE VOTE AND WE SAW EVERY VOTER IN AMERICA VERBALLY CAST A VOTE AND THE MAJORITY VOTED FOR TRUMP, DEMOCRATS WOULD GO HOWLING INTO THE STREETS LIKE THEY DID IN 2016, RIOT, BURN, ATTACK TRUMP SUPPORTERS, DEMAND TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT AND/OR HANGING/ASSASSINATION AS THEY HAVE FOR 4 LONG YEARS.  

IF TRUMP LOSES AND IT IS PROVEN WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT THAT HE LOST BY FRAUD, THAT HE ACTUALLY WON, NO MATTER IF "DEMOCRAT LEADERS CONCUR" THAT THERE WAS DEEP FRAUD, MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WOULD DEMAND TRUMP VACATE THE WHITE HOUSE SO THAT BIDEN CAN TAKE OFFICE AND THEN STEP ASIDE SO KAMALA HARRIS CAN BE CROWNED QUEEN.

WE FACE UTTER CHAOS AND MADNESS IF "ORANGE MAN BAD" GETS REELECTED. 


IF MY ASSESSMENT AS A NO-PARTY AMERICAN OFFENDS ANYONE, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT I DON'T GIVE A TINY DAMN. 

I AM SICK OF LIES AND POLITICS WHICH ARE SYNONYMOUS. 
PERIOD.  
THE END.  

GOD, SAVE THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM POLITICS! 







//WW