THE NEED FOR A DEPOPULATION OF PLANET EARTH HAS BEEN MUCH DISCUSSED AND RESEARCHED BY BOTH THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES SINCE THE 1960s.
FRANKLY, THERE IS HARDLY A GOVERNMENT ON EARTH THAT HAS NOT WRITTEN ABOUT THE NEED FOR REDUCING WORLD POPULATION.
I HAVE WRITTEN MUCH ON THIS, BUT PLEASE REVISIT THE MAIN ARTICLES ON WHAT WE'VE LEARNED <HERE> AND <HERE>.
THE MAIN EXCUSE GIVEN FOR SUCH A CHILLING CONCEPT IS THAT WE CANNOT FEED NOR SUPPLY CLEAN WATER AND OTHER RESOURCES TO SO MANY HUMANS.
USING THAT, IT MAY SEEM THAT THE CONCERN OF THE U.N. AND U.S. IS A "HUMANITARIAN" ONE.
THAT'S A LIE.
WHAT ALL WHO PLAN FOR POPULATION REDUCTION ARE ACTUALLY DOING IS PLANNING TO CARRY OUT ANOTHER "HOLOCAUST SCENARIO", A CONTINUATION OF THE OLD EUGENICS IDEA... GET RID OF THE RIFFRAFF, THE "UNDESIRABLES", THE "USELESS EATERS"
JUST AS IN HITLER'S GERMANY, THE GLOBAL ELITE OF TODAY HAVE NO DESIRE TO CONTINUE ALLOWING THE 'BREEDING' OF THOSE THEY CONSIDER "UNFIT", THOSE WHO ARE UNDESIRABLE.
THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS, THE ONLY "DESIRABLES" ARE THE GLOBAL ELITE, THOSE IN POWER, THOSE WHO RUN THE SHOW ON EVERY LEVEL OF HUMAN EXISTENCE.
THE REST OF US ARE UNWELCOME "PARASITES" AND MUST BE ELIMINATED.
THAT, I ASSURE YOU, IS THE REAL AGENDA BEHIND ALL THAT WE WILL READ ABOUT TODAY.... FROM BIOWARFARE TO LEGALIZED EUTHANASIA AND ABORTIONS ON DEMAND, FROM SO-CALLED FAILING RESOURCES TO CONTROL OF THE WORLD'S FOOD SUPPLIES, FROM THE CHEMICALS USED ON CROPS AND IN BUSINESS TO THE FLUORIDATION AND CHLORINATION OF WATER SUPPLIES, IT'S ALL ABOUT POPULATION REDUCTION, AND, MORE OFTEN NOW, IT'S NOT A HIDDEN AGENDA.
IT TOOK ME ALMOST 40 YEARS TO COME TO THIS CONCLUSION AND IT DID NOT COME EASILY.
BUT THE FACTS DON'T LIE, AND THE FACTS ARE NOW EVIDENT AND EASY TO FIND THANKS TO THIS THING WE CALL 'THE WORLDWIDE WEB'.
ELIMINATE THIRD WORLD POPULATIONS FIRST.
Henry Kissinger wrote: "Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."
The above is from National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests."
It is no longer a "secret" memo.
Anyone can access it.
KISSINGER SUGGESTED WITHHOLDING FOOD SUPPLIES AS ONE MEANS OF LOWERING POPULATIONS DEPENDENT ON FOOD IMPORTS AND FOOD AID.
HE ALSO SUGGESTED COVERT STERILIZATION IN THIRD WORLD NATIONS.
THE U.N. WAS BUSTED FOR THAT NOT LONG AGO, REMEMBER?
“Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine
UNICEF: A History of Taking Advantage of Disasters to Mass Vaccinate.Health Impact News reported last year that UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine in the Philippines after a Super Typhoon devastated Tacolban and surrounding areas.
Are UNICEF Live Polio Vaccines Causing Polio Among Syrians? 1.7 Billion Polio Vaccines Purchased by UNICEF
A very similar mass vaccination with the live oral polio vaccine occurred among Syrian refugees in 2013, when 1.7 million doses of polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that no cases of polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program started, cases of polio began to reappear in Syria.
PUSHING THE AGENDA...
Depopulation policy became the top priority under the National Security Council (NSC) agenda and U.S. policymakers like Gen. Alexander Haig, Cyrus Vance, Ed Muskie and Kissinger.
According to one NSC spokesman at the time, the United States shared the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the "population crisis is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation".
In 1975, Henry Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department's Office of Population Affairs.
The depopulation "GLOBAL 2000" document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared.
"On December 10, 1974, it promulgated a top secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200, also called The Kissinger Report.
Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”
This document, published shortly after the first major international population conference in Bucharest, was the result of collaboration among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State, Defense and Agriculture.
Although the United States government has issued hundreds of policy papers dealing with various aspects of American national security since 1974, NSSM-200 continues to be the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government. It therefore continues to represent official United States policy on population control. NSSM-200 also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations—specifically the Pathfinder Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation (IPPF) and the Population Council—to do its dirty work."
It further identified 13 key countries as being the most important to target for population reduction
“Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia.”
“The U.S. will look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U.S. contributions.”
Recognizing that “No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion.”
Kissinger had help on this from Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Brzezinski is a long-time proponent of population reduction and U.S. world dominance and is currently a top advisor to Barack Obama, but he has been a very strong presence in Washington since the 1960s, as has Kissinger, who has also made many trips to the Obama White House.
Brzezinski recently complained in a short interview with Germany’s DW News that "the growing inefficiency of war is due to the increased political knowledge of the public".
Brzezinski’s call of warning to the “global political awakening” has only intensified in recent years.
Last year during a speech in Poland, Brzezinski noted that it has become “increasingly difficult to suppress” and control the “persistent and highly motivated populist resistance of politically awakened and historically resentful peoples.”
“[The] major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality: while the lethality of their military might is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low.
To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people,” said Brzezinski during a 2010 Council on Foreign Relations speech in Montreal.
FROM KENNEDY TO OBAMA, THESE TWO MEN HAVE PLAYED MAJOR ROLES IN U.S. POLICY-MAKING FOR OVER 40 YEARS NOW.
LET US ASSUME THAT ALL THOSE PRESIDENTS AGREED WITH KISSINGER'S AND BRZEZINSKI'S IDEOLOGY ON THE NEED FOR POPULATION REDUCTION AND POPULATION CONTROL....BECAUSE THEY DID AGREE.
THERE IS A NEW POPULATION REDUCTION PUSHER IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.
White House science advisor John P. Holdren co-authored the textbook "Ecoscience"
in 1977 with "Population Bomb" scaremonger Paul Ehrlich that controversially discussed adding a sterilant to the drinking water in order to curb population.
They discussed in this encyclopedic textbook the possible role of a wide variety of formulations to address human overpopulation.
These included some extreme measures such as forced sterilization, compulsory abortion, contraceptives in the food and water supply, reproductive licenses, and more.
Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility to well below replacement in the United States, because "210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many."
Holdren is now the senior advisor to President Barack Obama on science and technology issues through his roles as Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST).
SEE ALSO: A History Timeline of Population Control
HERE ARE THE STATISTICS THESE PROPONENTS OF DEPOPULATION CITE TO CONVINCE US THIS IS NECESSARY:
World Birth and Death Rates, Estimated 2011:
Birth Rate Death Rate
• 19 births/1,000 population • 8 deaths/1,000 population
• 131.4 million births per year • 55.3 million people die each year
• 360,000 births per day • 151,600 people die each day
• 15,000 births each hour • 6,316 people die each hour
• 250 births each minute • 105 people die each minute
• Four births each second of every day • Nearly two people die each second
Average life expectancy at birth is approximately 67 years.
Sources: Population Reference Bureau & The World Factbook (Central Intelligence Agency)
SINCE BIRTHS FAR OUTNUMBER DEATHS, WE'RE TOLD THERE NEEDS TO BE FEWER BIRTHS.
THEY DON'T SAY THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE DEATHS, NOT ALOUD IN PUBLIC, AT LEAST, NOT YET.
ONE-THIRD OF THE WORLD POPULATION DO NOT CONTRIBUTE "WORK", ARE DEPENDENT ON OTHERS....THE CHILDREN, THE DISABLED AND THE ELDERLY.
• 1.8 billion people under age 15 years (26%)
• 4.4 billion people age 15-64 years (66%)
• 516 million people are 65 years and over (8%)
Sources: Population Reference Bureau & The World Factbook (Central Intelligence Agency)
IT MIGHT SEEM TO EUGENICISTS BEST TO START REDUCTION IN THE ABOVE GROUPS, HENCE THE NEW PUSH TO LEGALIZE EUTHANASIA, EVEN IN INFANTS. LOOK AT THE CDC's RECENT FRANTIC WARNINGS ON THE ZIKA VIRUS HOAX: "DON'T HAVE SEX, DON'T GET PREGNANT!"
THAT'S A FRIST FOR A VIRUS WARNING.
ALSO A FIRST IS THE DOOR-TO-DOOR CAMPAIGN TO COLLECT SPERM, DNA AND URINE FROM CITIZENS TO "IDENTIFY" POSSIBLE CARRIERS.
THINK ABOUT THAT!
HARD AT WORK TO REDUCE GLOBAL POPULATION....HERE'S HOW:
Scientists Are Creating New, Incurable Diseases in Labs.
Is that reasonable? From The Atlantic, May, 2014
Swine flu, or H1N1, had been dead for 20 years when it suddenly re-emerged in 1977 with a curious twist.
The new strain was genetically similar to one from the 1950s, almost as though it had been sitting frozen in a lab since then. Indeed, it eventually became clear that the late-70s flu outbreak was likely the result of a lowly lab worker’s snafu.
Lab accidents like that are extremely rare. Still, two scientists are now arguing that it’s not worth continuing to create new, transmissible versions of deadly viruses in labs because the risk that the diseases will escape and infect the public is too great.
The H5N1 avian flu killed two dozen people in Hong Kong in 1997. It has only killed about 400 people worldwide since then, though, because it doesn’t pass easily from human to human.
In recent years, scientists have found a way to make H5N1 jump between ferrets, the best animal model for flu viruses in humans. They say they need to create a transmissible version in order to better understand the disease and to prepare potential vaccines.
That worries people like Marc Lipsitch and Alison P. Galvani, two epidemiologists who write in a PLoS Medicine editorial (This is a PDF download) that creating these types of new infectious agents puts human life at risk.
They estimate that if 10 American laboratories ran these types of experiments for a decade, there would be a 20 percent chance that a lab worker would become infected with one of these new super-flus and potentially pass it on to others.
“The concern is that you're making something that doesn't exist in nature and combines high virulence for people with the ability to transmit efficiently,” Lipsitch told me.
Accidents involving lab-grown pathogens aren’t just the stuff of sci-fi movies.
A Singaporean lab worker was inadvertently infected with SARS in 2003. In 2004, a Russian scientist died after accidentally sticking herself with a needle contaminated with Ebola at a Siberian lab.
In April, Paris’ Pasteur Institute lost 2,000 vials containing the SARS virus.
And in March, the Galveston National Laboratory in Texas lost a vial containing Guanarito virus, which causes "bleeding under the skin, in internal organs or from body orifices like the mouth, eyes, or ears.”
The medical world seems perpetually torn between the desire to eliminate horrific diseases entirely and the need to preserve them for future study.
Thanks to vaccination, smallpox was eradicated in 1980, but there are still two samples of it living in labs—one in the U.S. and one in Russia. Some scientists argue that those vials should be destroyed because there’s a chance they could be used in bioterrorism. There is no cure for smallpox, and it kills a third of its victims. The rest suffer permanent scarring from the thousands of “pox,” or fluid-filled cysts.
“The hazard is, could it ever by accident or by evil design leave those two containments and actually be introduced into the population again and spread?” William Schaffner, chair of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville told ABC News.
The World Health Assembly is deciding this week whether to destroy the vials.
Most labs have near-bulletproof safety standards, with workers wearing plastic hoods and working behind heavy steel doors. Still, leaks can happen because of failures in respiratory equipment, Lipsitch said, or if a worker accidentally touches their eyes or nose with a contaminated glove.
“We have data from past experience in various labs that human infection in those labs are not a common event, but with enough labs working for enough years, it's been observed over and over again,” Lipsitch said. “Marburg and Ebola viruses have both infected lab workers at a higher level of containment than these [H5N1] experiments.”
“The concern is that you're making something that doesn't exist in nature with the ability to transmit efficiently."
He added that past lab accidents haven’t resulted in worldwide spread partly because the viruses weren’t as contagious in those cases.
“In the case of Ebola and Marburg—they aren't that readily transmissible,” he said. “In the case of SARS, which has been involved in at least three separate lab accidents, there was onward transmission in one case, but it was contained, so we got lucky.”
Lipsitch suggests that, rather than breed the new mammal-transmissible viruses, scientists just use pieces of the H5N1 strain for their research or work on ancestors of the virus.
The scientists conducting the ferret-based H5N1 experiments went through a year-long voluntary moratorium after a controversy over the studies’ safety flared in 2011.
In January 2013, they declared that the experiments would resume because the lab conditions for the experiments met the necessary safety checks.
“Because H5N1 virus transmission studies are essential for pandemic preparedness and understanding the adaptation of influenza viruses to mammals,” they wrote in Science, “researchers who have approval from their governments ... have a public health responsibility to resume this important work.”
[No, it was because viruses are very big business and many governments will pay big money to those who can ofer new or incurable viruses.
Biowarfare upmanship is of major importance.
Every nation likes to think they have bigger, better biological agents with which to "destroy the enemy".]
The swine flu H1N1 virus had three parents from two continents and appeared suddenly without warning, evading all routine flu surveillance and quarantine; sequence data suggest it may have been created from a faulty vaccine given to pigs in North America.
The CDC isolated and genetically altered (engineered) the H1N1 flu virus so that it could be used to make hundreds of millions of doses of the bio-terrorism agent.
The new genetically engineered (novel) A-H1N1 virus then contained a lethal combination of bacteria, viruses, and toxins.
The CDC has also conducted experiments in which they infected ferrets with both the H1N1 swine virus and the H5N1 bird flu virus to see if they would "reassort" and create a new hybrid flu virus.
(Read: CDC Playing With Fire: Mixing H1N1 Swine Flu and H5N1 Bird Flu To Create Super Flu )
Biological Warfare Diseases & Agents Listing
will perhaps help you understand how many of these biological agents exist which can be applied to biowarfare by ay nation that can grow them.
DID YOU EVER SAKE YOURSELF, AFTER READING THE NEWS OF A "NEWLY-DISCOVERED VIRUS IN SIBERIA" (OR IN THE AMAZON) WHY THE HELL OUR SCIENTISTS ARE COMBING THE GLOBE FOR VIRUSES AND THEN TAKING THEM BACK TO LABS TO TRY TO PROPAGATE THEM?
WHY DO THAT?
BIOWEAPONS, THAT'S WHY.
"SELECT" AGENTS AND TOXINS LIST
The following biological agents and toxins have been determined to have the potential to pose a severe threat to both human and animal health, to plant health, or to animal and plant products.
An attenuated strain of a select agent or an inactive form of a select toxin may be excluded from the requirements of the Select Agent Regulations.
Here is a list of excluded agents and toxins:
HHS and USDA Select Agents and Toxins7CFR Part 331, 9 CFR Part 121, and 42 CFR Part 73
~ HHS SELECT AGENTS AND TOXINS:
Abrin
Botulinum neurotoxins*
Botulinum neurotoxin producing species
of Clostridium*
Conotoxins (Short, paralytic alpha conotoxins
containing the following amino acid sequence
X1CCX2PACGX3X4X5X6CX7)1
Coxiella burnetii
Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus
Diacetoxyscirpenol
Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus3
Ebola virus*
Francisella tularensis*
Lassa fever virus
Lujo virus
Marburg virus*
Monkeypox virus3
Reconstructed replication competent forms of the
1918 pandemic influenza virus containing any portion of the coding regions of all eight gene segments (Reconstructed 1918 Influenza virus)
Ricin
Rickettsia prowazekii
SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
Saxitoxin
South American Haemorrhagic Fever viruses:
Chapare
Guanarito
Junin
Machupo
Sabia
Staphylococcal enterotoxins A,B,C,D,E subtypes
T-2 toxin
Tetrodotoxin
Tick-borne encephalitis complex (flavi) viruses:
Far Eastern subtype
Siberian subtype
Kyasanur Forest disease virus
Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus
Variola major virus (Smallpox virus)*
Variola minor virus (Alastrim)*
Yersinia pestis*
*Denotes Tier 1 Agent
~ OVERLAP SELECT AGENTS AND TOXINS
Bacillus anthracis*
Bacillus anthracis Pasteur strain
Brucella abortus
Brucella melitensis
Brucella suis
Burkholderia mallei*
Burkholderia pseudomallei*
Hendra virus
Nipah virus
Rift Valley fever virus
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus3
USDA SELECT AGENTS AND TOXINS
African horse sickness virus
African swine fever virus
Avian influenza virus3
Classical swine fever virus
Foot-and-mouth disease virus*
Goat pox virus
Lumpy skin disease virus
Mycoplasma capricolum3
Mycoplasma mycoides3
Newcastle disease virus2,3
Peste des petits ruminants virus
Rinderpest virus*
Sheep pox virus
Swine vesicular disease virus
~USDA PLANT PROTECTION AND QUARANTINE (PPQ)
SELECT AGENTS AND TOXINS
Peronosclerospora philippinensis
(Peronosclerospora sacchari)
Phoma glycinicola (formerly Pyrenochaeta glycines)
Ralstonia solanacearum
Rathayibacter toxicus
Sclerophthora rayssiae
Synchytrium endobioticum
Xanthomonas oryzae
1 -C = Cysteine residues are all present as disulfides, with the 1st and 3rd Cysteine, and the 2nd and 4th Cysteine forming specific disulfide bridges; The consensus sequence includes known toxins α-MI and α-GI (shown above) as well as α-GIA, Ac1.1a, α-CnIA, α-CnIB; X1 = any amino acid(s) or Des-X; X2 = Asparagine or Histidine; P = Proline; A = Alanine; G = Glycine; X3 = Arginine or Lysine; X4 = Asparagine, Histidine, Lysine, Arginine, Tyrosine, Phenylalanine or Tryptophan; X5 = Tyrosine, Phenylalanine, or Tryptophan; X6 = Serine, Threonine, Glutamate, Aspartate, Glutamine, or Asparagine; X7 = Any amino acid(s) or Des X and; “Des X” = “an amino acid does not have to be present at this position.” For example if a peptide sequence were XCCHPA then the related peptide CCHPA would be designated as Des-X.
2 -A virulent Newcastle disease virus (avian paramyxovirus serotype 1) has an intracerebral pathogenicity index in day-old chicks (Gallus gallus) of 0.7 or greater or has an amino acid sequence at the fusion (F) protein cleavage site that is consistent with virulent strains of Newcastle disease virus. A failure to detect a cleavage site that is consistent with virulent strains does not confirm the absence of a virulent virus.
3 -Select agents that meet any of the following criteria are excluded from the requirements of this part:
Any low pathogenic strains of avian influenza virus, South American genotype of eastern equine encephalitis virus , west African clade of Monkeypox viruses, any strain of Newcastle disease virus which does not meet the criteria for virulent Newcastle disease virus, all subspecies Mycoplasma capricolum except subspecies capripneumoniae (contagious caprine pleuropneumonia), all subspecies Mycoplasma mycoides except subspecies mycoides small colony (Mmm SC) (contagious bovine pleuropneumonia), and any subtypes of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus except for Subtypes IAB or IC, provided that the individual or entity can verify that the agent is within the exclusion category. 9/10/13
THOSE "EXCLUSIONS" GIVE SCIENTISTS A LOT TO 'PLAY WITH', YES?
Introduction to Biological Weapons
Biological weapons (BWs) deliver toxins and microorganisms, such as viruses and bacteria, so as to deliberately inflict disease among people, animals, and agriculture. Biological attacks can result in destruction of crops, temporarily discomforting a small community, killing large numbers of people, or other outcomes.
Potential Biological Weapons Threats , A "PRIMER" FROM THE CDC.
Gives a few more, but not ALL...
REMEMBER, IT WAS THE CDC THAT SENT ALL THOSE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS-GRADE BACTERIA SAMPLES TO SADDAM HUSSEIN DURING REAGAN'S AND BUSH #1'S TERMS IN OFFICE.
IT ISN'T JUST BIOLOGICAL OR CHEMICAL WEAPONS THAT ARE BEING STUDIED FOR USE AS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.
WE'VE EXAMINED MANY TIMES HERE IN THE TEA ROOM WHAT LONG AND OFTEN FATAL EFFECTS RADIATION HAS ON ALL LIFE, SO WE'LL NOT DIVE BACK INTO THAT RIGHT NOW.
BUT DID YOU KNOW THAT MICROWAVE AND RADIO WAVES CAN KILL?
COMMITTEE ON ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE HEALTH EFFECTS OF GROUND WAVE EMERGENCY NETWORK
BOARD ON RADIATION EFFECTS RESEARCH
WHILE THE "BOARD ADMITTED IN THAT 'STUDY' THAT EVIDENCE EXISTS THAT ALL RF/ELF WAVES AND MICROWAVES CAN CAUSE CANCERS, ETC, IT ENDS BY SAYING "MORE RESEARCH IS NEEDED"....
THIS GIVES THE GREEN LIGHT FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SO THE U.S. CAN ADD THESE TO ITS ARSENAL IN GLOBAL POPULATION REDUCTION.
THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, AN ARM OF THE UNITED NATIONS, ON THE OTHER HAND PRACTICALLY GUARANTEES THAT THOSE CAN CAUSE HUMAN AND ANIMAL "HARM".
In vivo studies should focus on the potential for cancer promotion, co-promotion and progression, as well as possible synergistic, genotoxic, immunological, and carcinogenic effects associated with chronic low-level RF exposure. Research is needed to determine whether low-level RF exposure causes DNA damage or influences central nervous system function, melatonin synthesis, permeability of the blood brain barrier (BBB), or reaction to neurotropic drugs.
Reported RF-induced changes to eye structure and function should also be investigated.
Epidemiological studies should investigate: the use of mobile telephones with hand-held antennae and incidence of various cancers; reports of headache, sleep disturbance, and other subjective effects that may arise from proximity to RF emitters, and laboratory studies should be conducted on people reporting these effects; cohorts with high occupational RF exposure for changes in cancer incidence; adverse pregnancy outcomes in various highly RF exposed occupational groups; and ocular pathologies in mobile telephone users and in highly RF exposed occupational groups.
Studies of populations with residential exposure from point sources, such as broadcasting transmitters or mobile telephone base stations have caused widespread health concerns among the public, even though RF exposures are very low. Recent studies that may indicate an increased incidence of cancer in exposed populations should be investigated further.
THERE IS CONSIDERABLE EVIDENCE OF THE GENOTOXICITY OF THE ABOVE.
Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic: The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac, neurological and reproductive effects
In assessing genotoxicity, any evidence of genetic damage, cell death or neoplastic transformation is evidence of genotoxicity. The genetic material is fundamentally the double helix of the DNA molecule. During the cell cycle the helix unwinds and clones itself. They then fold themselves into the set of chromosomes that are so large that they can be seen in powerful microscopes. In the second half of the cell cycle the chromosomes clone themselves so that at mitosis, cell division, each cell has a full set of chromosomes. They then unfold themselves to form the DNA strands.
Any substance that damages DNA or chromosomes, or changes genetic activity, is genotoxic because it is acting on the same material, i.e. the DNA molecule. A genotoxic substance is mutagenic, carcinogenic and teratogenic.
The Bioelectrical nature of biology:
The bioelectrical nature of brains, hearts and cells is poorly appreciated but it is extremely well documented. Frey (1993, 1995) advocates a change in mind-set from that which he describes as the toxicological approach of treating EMR as an external disease agent, to one that considers EMR as an intrinsic feature of cells and bodies.
Neurological Electrical Sensitivity:
Coherent thoughts and synchronized biological processes involve a structured set of low frequency electrical signals that are monitored as the electroencephalogram (EEG).
Electromagnetic activity in cells:
The outside surface of the cell membrane, its receptors and ion channels, is negatively charged, and the inside is positively charged. This creates a membrane potential. The negative charge on the receptors helps to attract positively charged first messengers to them, Figure 5. A first messenger entering its specific receptor, y-shaped protein on the alpha-helix protein. This initiates an amplification process that generates a cascade of second messengers into the cell. The signal is amplified with a gain of between 100,000 and 1 million.
One of the types of structures that helps to regulate cell activity is the voltage-gated ion channels. They act like transistors, regulating a current flow of ions within voltage ranges
ELF induced calcium ion efflux from (A) an ELF modulated 147 MHz signal and (B) an ELF signal, Bawin and Adey (1976)
Given the fundamental bioelectrical nature of cells and the ability of imposed electrical signals to alter the voltage of the outsides of cells, the opening or closing the ion channels, is an obvious biological mechanism for altering the nature and future of every cell.
Calcium ion efflux from pinealocytes is a plausible mechanism for EMR induced melatonin reduction. In this, and other ways, alteration of cellular calcium ions and melatonin reduction both strongly suggest that EMR is likely to be genotoxic.
Cardiac Electrical Sensitivity:
Hearts are obviously bioelectrical organs. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental monitoring tool of cardiologists in diagnosing the state of the heart muscle. The heart-beat occurs as a series of regular electrical pulses Each electric pulse initiates a cascade of calcium ions to flood the heart muscle and cause it to contract. Interference with this regular electrical pulse leads to heart disease and heart attack of the Arrhythmic kind. We would therefore expect electromagnetic radiation to cause arrhythmia and heart attack.
Genotoxicity:
Enhanced DNA strand breakage leads to enhanced DNA repair. Hence enhanced DNA repair rates are also used as evidence of DNA damage, Meltz (1995).
Many studies have shown that radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) radiation and extremely low frequency (ELF) fields cause increased DNA strand breakage and chromosome aberrations.
This has been shown in cell lines, human blood, animals and living human beings. This means that epidemiological studies of people exposed to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) are likely to show increased cancer, miscarriage and reproductive adverse effects. In fact many epidemiological studies have shown these effects, Goldsmith (1995, 1996, 1997, 1997a), Szmigielski (1991, 1996).
Two plausible biological mechanisms involving free radicals are involved in this effect. The first involves increased free radical activity and genetic damage as a response to exposure. The second involves increased free radical activity and genetic damage because of an induced reduction of a free radical scavenger, e.g. reduced melatonin, Reiter (1994).
It is clear however, that both mechanisms have the same effect of damaging the DNA and chromosomes.
Another established biological mechanism, EMR-induced alteration of cellular calcium ion homeostasis, Blackman (1990), is also involved in cell regulation, cell survival and apoptosis, DNA synthesis and melatonin regulation.
Chromosome damage from RF/MW exposure:
The first identified study that showed that pulsed RF radiation cause significant chromosome aberrations was Heller and Teixeira-Pinto (1959). Garlic roots were exposed to 27 MHz pulsed at 80 to 180 Hz. for 5 min and then they were examined 24 hrs later. The concluded that this RF signal mimicked the chromosomal aberration produced by ionizing radiation and c-mitotic substances. No increased temperature was observed.
Blood samples were taken from the staff of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. They had been chronically exposed to a low intensity radar signal. Significant increases in chromosome damage was reported, Tonascia and Tonascia (1966) cited in Goldsmith (1997a).
Garaj-Vrhovac et al. (1990) noted the differences and similarities between the mutagenicity of microwaves and VCM (vinyl chloride monomer). They studied a group of workers who were exposed to 10 to 50 m W/cm2 of radar produced microwaves. Some were also exposed to about 5 ppm of VCM, a known carcinogen.
Exposure to each of these substances (microwaves and VCM) produced highly significant (p<0.01 to p<0.001) increases in Chromatid breaks, Chromosome breaks, acentric and dicentric breaks in human lymphocytes from blood taken from exposed workers.
The results were consistent across two assays, a micronucleus test and chromosome aberration assay.
Chromosome aberrations and micronuclei are significantly higher than the controls, (p<0.05, p<0.001, p<0.0001), for each of the exposure intensity.
This is very strong evidence of genotoxic effects from RF/MW exposures.
When chromosomes are damaged one of the primary protective measures is for the immune system natural killer cells to eliminate the damaged cells. Alternatively the cells can enter programmed cell suicide, apoptosis. Garaj-Vrhovac, Horvat and Koren (1991) measured the cell survival rates. They found that cell survival reduced and the cell death increased in a time dependent and exposure dose response manner
Note that the general public ICNIRP guideline for microwaves above 2 GHz is 1 mW/cm2, and for workers is 5 mW/cm2. Even at 100 times below the public exposure guideline a 60 minute exposure kills 28% of the cells and 30 minutes kills 8 % of the cells. Garaj-Vrhovac et al. (1992) exposed human lymphocytes and showed that microwave radiation produced a dose response increase in chromosome aberrations, Figure 12.
Figure 12: The relation of total chromosome aberrations. micronuclei and specific chromosome aberrations for each cell in human lymphocyte cultures in the dose of microwave radiation in vitro, Garaj-Vrhovac et al. (1992).
EVER SINCE THE FIRST ATOMIC TESTS, DEATHS, CANCERS, HEART DISEASE, ETC, HAVE INCREASED WORLDWIDE.
DEATHS AND CANCERS AND BIRTH DEFECTS HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED NEAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AS WE SHOWED BY MANY "PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES" IN PREVIOUS BLOGS.
IN THE BLOG JUST BEFORE THIS ONE, WE SAW HOW RUSSIA AND THE USA LEAD THE CROWD IN DEVELOPMENT OF WEAPONS THAT CAN EITHER KILL OR CONTROL HUMAN POPULATIONS.
THERE ARE OVER 80,000 KNOWN POISONS USED IN OUR ENVIRONMENT BY COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENTS WHO KNOW THEY ARE POISONS.
WHY?
Do You Like Being Exposed to 80,000 Unregulated Chemicals?
DID YOU GET ANY SAY-SO ABOUT ANY OF THOSE?WHY NOT?
Babies are polluted at birth, new report says
IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU?Killing Us Softly » Killing Us Softly
BUT KILLING US, NONETHELESS.
“Conspiracy Theorists” Are Vindicated: US Senate Reports
SOON, BUT NOT SOON ENOUGH, EVERYONE WILL DECIDE TO SEARCH OUT THE TRUTH AND THEY WILL FIND IT.
WE ARE SCHEDULED FOR POPULATION REDUCTION AND THE MULTIPLE MEANS AVAILABLE FOR DOING SO HAVE BEEN DISGUISED AS "PROGRESS", AS BRINGING HELP TO HUMANITY.
SLOWLY, THE FACTS, THE TRUTH IS REVEALED.
THEY WEREN'T HIDDEN VERY DEEPLY AT ALL BECAUSE THOSE WHO WANT TO ELIMINATE ALL THE "USELESS EATERS" JUST DON'T CARE MUCH ANYMORE WHAT WE UNCOVER.
AFTER ALL, WHAT CAN ORDINARY PEOPLE DO ABOUT IT?
Global Population Reduction: Confronting the Inevitable
"That there will be a large-scale reduction in global human numbers over the next two or three centuries appears to be inevitable. The primary issue seems to be whether this process will be under conscious human control and (hopefully) relatively benign, or whether it will turn out to be unpredictably chaotic and (perhaps) catastrophic.We must begin our new manner of thinking about this critically important global issue now, so that Einstein's prescient and legitimate concerns about human and civilizational survival into the 21st century and beyond may be addressed as rapidly, fully, and humanely as possible. "
CHILLING WORDS...NIGHTMARISH ASSESSMENT....
BECAUSE MOST OF US ARE THE "TARGETS"...
.
No comments:
Post a Comment