AFTER RUSSIA ATTEMPTED TO NEGOTIATE A CEASEFIRE AND THOSE AMERICA IS FUNDING AND ARMING REJECTED IT, AFTER RUSSIA HAS SAID A NEW DEMOCRATIC ELECTION SHOULD BE HELD SO THE SYRIAN PEOPLE CAN DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO KEEP ASSAD, SOMETHING AMERICA ONCE CLAIMED IT ALSO WANTED BUT IS NOW "AFRAID THAT WOULDN'T WORK", RUSSIA HAS BEATEN AMERICA TO THE PUNCH AND CALLED FOR A NO-FLY ZONE IN SYRIA SO THAT NO ONE ATTACKS ASSAD'S FORCES.
DO THE RUSSIANS REALLY MEAN IT?
TIME WILL TELL.
DO THE RUSSIANS REALLY MEAN IT?
TIME WILL TELL.
***UPDATE: OCTOBER 13, 2016: THINGS REALLY BREAK DOWN, WE HAVE PROGRESSED BEYOND "COLD WAR" STATUS....
RUSSIA TELLS ITS STUDENTS IN AMERICA TO COME HOME.
EX-RUSSIAN PREMIER GORBACHEV WARNS THAT CURRENT US/RUSSIAN STATUS IS DANGEROUS
10 October 2016, The Telegraph, UK:
"The former Soviet leader’s intervention came amid a collapse in East-West relations over the war in Syria that has seen the Kremlin openly threaten to shoot down Western aircraft, drawing comparisons with the worst crises of the Cold War. "
RUSSIAN/AMERICAN DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS TANK
BOTH AMERICA AND RUSSIA AMASS NUCLEAR WEAPONS NEAR RUSSIAN BORDER.
BACK IN APRIL OF 2016:
"NATO’s encirclement of Russia with forces hostile to it is supposedly defensive — not an offensive operation — against Russia and is presented as such by our media. During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, J. F. Kennedy didn’t consider Nikita Khrushchev’s plan to base nuclear missiles in Cuba to be ‘defensive’ on the USSR’s part — and neither does Russia’s President Vladimir Putin consider America’s far bigger operation of surrounding Russia with such weapons to be ‘defensive’.
The U.S. government, and NATO, act as if Russia is threatening them rather than them threatening and encircling Russia."
BACK IN APRIL OF 2016:
"NATO’s encirclement of Russia with forces hostile to it is supposedly defensive — not an offensive operation — against Russia and is presented as such by our media. During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, J. F. Kennedy didn’t consider Nikita Khrushchev’s plan to base nuclear missiles in Cuba to be ‘defensive’ on the USSR’s part — and neither does Russia’s President Vladimir Putin consider America’s far bigger operation of surrounding Russia with such weapons to be ‘defensive’.
The U.S. government, and NATO, act as if Russia is threatening them rather than them threatening and encircling Russia."
IT IS ABOUT FAR MORE THAN THE OUSTING OF SYRIAN PRESIDENT ASSAD AND WHO ESTABLISHES A SYRIAN NO-FLY ZONE.
.
WE ARE POISED ON THE VERY BRINK OF WAR AND OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS PLAYING IT DOWN.
WHY?
WHEN THE TEA ROOM INITIALLY POSTED THIS ARTICLE, IT WAS THE RECENT NO-FLY ZONE THAT SEEMED TO POINT TO A GREATER CONFLICT BETWEEN OUR TWO NATIONS.
AS OF TODAY, OCT. 13, 2016, IT IS MUCH, MUCH DEEPER AND DISTURBING THAN THAT.
WHAT FOLLOWS WAS MY 'TAKE' ON THINGS BEFORE I REALIZED ALL OF THE ABOVE.
.
WE ARE POISED ON THE VERY BRINK OF WAR AND OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS PLAYING IT DOWN.
WHY?
WHEN THE TEA ROOM INITIALLY POSTED THIS ARTICLE, IT WAS THE RECENT NO-FLY ZONE THAT SEEMED TO POINT TO A GREATER CONFLICT BETWEEN OUR TWO NATIONS.
AS OF TODAY, OCT. 13, 2016, IT IS MUCH, MUCH DEEPER AND DISTURBING THAN THAT.
WHAT FOLLOWS WAS MY 'TAKE' ON THINGS BEFORE I REALIZED ALL OF THE ABOVE.
TODAY, WHAT FOLLOWS SEEMS ALMOST INSIGNIFICANT IN COMPARISON.
ALMOST...
WHO CAN STOP THIS PLUMMET, THIS INSANE SPIRAL INTO A GLOBAL NIGHTMARE?
CAN WE CITIZENS OF EITHER NATION, WE WHO DON'T WANT WAR, DO ANYTHING TO MAKE OUR "LEADERS" PAUSE AND REFLECT AND DECIDE A NUCLEAR WINTER WILL BENEFIT NO ONE?
I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE HAVE TO TRY, DON'T WE?
(END UPDATE)
ALMOST...
WHO CAN STOP THIS PLUMMET, THIS INSANE SPIRAL INTO A GLOBAL NIGHTMARE?
CAN WE CITIZENS OF EITHER NATION, WE WHO DON'T WANT WAR, DO ANYTHING TO MAKE OUR "LEADERS" PAUSE AND REFLECT AND DECIDE A NUCLEAR WINTER WILL BENEFIT NO ONE?
I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE HAVE TO TRY, DON'T WE?
(END UPDATE)
BELOW, A VIDEO OF LITTLE LINDSEY GRAHAM WHIPPING THE CONGRESS INTO A FUNDING FRENZY TO KEEP US IN SYRIA....
ATTABOY, LINDSEY!
"MO' MONEY, MO' MONEY!"
LOOKING GOOD TO YOUR WALL STREET CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTORS!
OCTOBER 7,2016
"Russia to Take Down any Airplane or Missile Targeting Syrian Army"
"Chief of the Directorate of Media service and Information of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Major General Igor Konashenkov promised that no U.S. aircraft would be immune from the threat the S-300 and S-400 air defense batteries pose in case of military strikes on the government-controlled areas.
Konashenkov pointed to the airstrikes against Syrian government forces in Der ez-Zor as one of the primary motivating factors in importing the potent weapon systems."
"Moscow warns US against striking Syria to avoid ‘unpleasant surprises"
OCT. 7, 2016
"Moscow has warned the West against striking any missile or aviation blows on the territories controlled by the Syrian government. Russia will see such actions as a threat to Russian military men in Syria, Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said Thursday, RIA Novosti reports."
OCT. 7, 2016
"Russia has beaten the United States to a key strategy in Syria with its new ability to create a no-fly zone, delivered by a new S-300 surface-to-air missile system, according to military analysts.
Word of the development comes in a report from Reuters, which cited its own analysis of “publicly available tracking data.”
THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEW OF WHOM HAVE HAD ANY MILITARY TRAINING OR UNDERSTAND MILITARY STRATEGY, HAVE TALKED FOR YEARS ABOUT IMPOSING A NO-FLY ZONE IN SYRIA.
SOME IN THE MILITARY'S TOP BRASS TRIED TO GET THE BOZOS ON CAPITOL HILL TO COMPREHEND WHAT THAT WOULD MEAN, BUT OTHERS OF THOSE MILITARY MEN SOUNDED LESS THAN SURE OF FACTS, EVEN ADMITTING THEY DON'T HAVE THE FACTS.
September 23, 2016
"Speaking to the US Senate, the Pentagon’s leaders blamed Russia for the Aleppo aid convoy attack, but admitted they “had no facts.”
“I don’t have the facts,” General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said when asked about the convoy attack by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut).
Only US coalition planes should be allowed over Syria, they said, though that would require war against both Syria and Russia.
The Pentagon had “no intention” of sharing intelligence with Russia when it came to Syria, Dunford told the lawmakers unequivocally.
HE FORGOT TO TELL THE 'LAWMAKERS' THAT WE DIDN'T WANT A CEASEFIRE NOR PEACE IN SYRIA, BUT THEY PROBABLY ALREADY KNEW THAT SINCE THEY OKAYED THE BIG MONEY TO KEEP THINGS GOING THERE.
Secretary Ash Carter explained that the joint implementation councils envisioned by the ceasefire proposal negotiated in Geneva wouldn’t share intelligence, just coordinate efforts.
[EFFORTS TO KEEP BOMBING THE HELL OUT OF SYRIAN CIVILIANS, THAT IS.]
“Right now… for us to control all of the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia,” Dunford replied, drawing a rebuke from committee chairman John McCain (R-Arizona), who argued a no-fly zone was possible without war.
[McCAIN SHOULD BE SENT AWAY TO A NICE SANITARIUM TO GET IN TOUCH WITH REALITY.]
Asked about the video of US-backed Syrian rebels insulting US Special Forces in Al-Rai and running them out of the northern Syrian town, Carter and Dunford shrugged it off.
A “very small minority took verbal action” against US troops, said Dunford, who admitted he did not watch the video.
Defense Secretary Ash Carter and General Dunford faced the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday to report on the ongoing military operations and “national security challenges” faced by the US.
They also asked the senators for more reliable funding, saying the uncertainty was hurting the defense industry.
"KA-CHING!"
"IT'S ABOUT THE FUNDING, STUPID"?
"IF YOU WANT A WAR, SHOW ME THE MONEY"???
“We have a plan,” Dunford said, but described it as “not resourced.”
[ENGLISH TRANSLATION: IT'S HARD TO FIND PROXY FIGHTERS WHO WANT ASSAD DESTROYED.]
Dunford agreed with Graham’s assertion that the US had two objectives – to destroy IS and to “remove Assad,” referring to the Syrian president – but admitted the Kurds were not interested in the latter.
“If the main fighting force inside of Syria is not signed up to take Assad out, where does that force come from?” Graham asked.
Neither Dunford nor Carter had an answer to that.
SO, WE USE THE KURDS JUST AS WE DID IN IRAQ, THEN, THEIR JOB DONE, WE TURN ON THEM, JUST AS WE DID IN IRAQ.
AND WE TURN TO THE ARAB WORLD'S CURRENT "VILLAGE IDIOT", ERDOGAN OF TURKEY, WHO, NOT SO LONG AGO, LOCKED DOWN A U.S. MILITARY BASE IN HIS COUNTRY AND TEMPORARILY, AT LEAST, HAD CONTROL OF AT LEAST 60 U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
YEAH, THAT MAKES SENSE....IN AN ASYLUM, MAYBE.
EVEN HILLARY CLINTON REALIZED THE DANGERS OF THAT AMERICAN-IMPOSED NO-FLY ZONE THAT THE CRAZY CONGRESS WANTED..
IN JUST-RELEASED QUOTES FROM A PAID, PRIVATE 2013 SPEECH, CLINTON WARNED THAT SUCH A NO-FLY ZONE WOULD "KILL A LOT OF SYRIANS".
YOU WON'T FIND THE NEW WIKILEAKS IN MANY, IF ANY, AMERICAN MEDIA, SO WE MUST GO TO FOREIGN SOURCES, AS USUAL, TO SEE WHAT'S HAPPENING AT HOME.
"One of the problems with the no-fly zone, which Western hawks have long insisted should be imposed over Syria, would be the need to “take out” the country’s “very sophisticated” air defenses, Hillary Clinton noted in a Wall Street speech posted by WikiLeaks in the latest trove of classified emails.
“To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defenses, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk— you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians,” Clinton admitted.
[ NOTE: WikiLeaks, on Friday, October 7, 2016, opened a Pandora’s box of emails leaked from the account of Clinton’s campaign chairman, unleashing thousands of messages with excerpts of her paid speeches for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank and others in between her job as secretary of state and the current presidential campaign. The above was taken from a paid speech she made to Wall Street. She made many speeches in 2013 about the Syrian crisis. ]
Another challenge mentioned by Clinton was for the West to “develop covert connections with the Syrian opposition to gain insight,” she said during a 2013 speech to Goldman Sachs.
“So the problem for the US and the Europeans has been from the very beginning: What is it you – who is it you are going to try to arm? And you probably read in the papers my view was we should try to find some of the groups that were there that we thought we could build relationships with and develop some covert connections that might then at least give us some insight into what is going on inside Syria.”
"WHO IS IT YOU ARE GOING TO TRY TO ARM?"
WE'VE ARMED EVERYONE, INCLUDING ISIL/ISIS, BUT THAT WAS AN "ACCIDENT", OF COURSE, RIGHT?
AS I WROTE BEFORE, AMERICA IS FIGHTING AMERICA IN SYRIA!
IT'S THE PENTAGON-ARMED "REBELS" AGAINST THE CIA-ARMED "REBELS" AGAINST "HOW DID THE ISLAMIC STATE GET ALL THOSE AMERICAN WEAPONS?", AND WE'RE KICKING OUR OWN BUTT IN SYRIA, ACTUALLY.
WELL, RUSSIA BEAT THE U.S. TO ESTABLISHING THAT NO-FLY ZONE, AND PUTIN WARNED AMERICA HE'S SERIOUS ABOUT FIRING ON ANY AND ALL AIRCRAFT WHO FLY THERE AND TRY TO ATTACK ASSAD'S FORCES WITHIN THAT ZONE.
LET'S JUST FACE IT, WHO IS TRYING TO AVOID FURTHER CIVILIAN DEATHS THERE?
THE U.S.?
NOPE....
"On October 6, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad repeated a guarantee of safe passage to the rebels holed up in Aleppo.
However, this offer from the legitimate government of Syria was overshadowed by a highly publicized statement from United Nations Syrian Envoy Staffan de Mistura in which he volunteered to personally accompany some Jabhat al Nusra fighters from the city as a human shield.
The unprecedented offer was bluntly rejected by Jabhat al Nusra, which reaffirmed its collective desire to continue attempts to break the siege instead of making peace.
GUESS WHO ARMED JABBAT al NUSRA?
YES, YES, IT WAS AMERICA, AND al NUSRA JOINED THE U.S.-BACKED 'MILITIA' QUITE MERRILY, THANKS!
SEPT. 27, 2016
"Jabhat Al-Nusra Joins US-backed Militants Attacking Government Forces in Northern Hama"
"The joint forces of the US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) and Jund al-Aqsa (a terrorist group with links to Al Qaeda and Jabhat al-Nusra) announced that they have seized Qarah, al-Sha’tha and the hill of Bayt al-Aswad since the start of the offensive against the Syrian government forces in northern Hama on today morning.
Meanwhile, another well-known moderate opposition group, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra or Al-Nusra Front) annoounced that it is participating in the ongoing offensinve of the US-backed ‘opposition':"
"OH, WHAT TANGLED WEBS WE WEAVE..."
WE HAVE ARMED EVERY "TERRORIST ORGANIZATION" WE EVER NAMED IN SYRIA OR THE REST OF THE MIDDLE EAST JUST TO GET RID OF ASSAD, WHOM, APPARENTLY, THE SYRIAN PEOPLE WERE NOT KEEN ON REPLACING, ELSE THEY THEMSELVES WOULD HAVE DONE SO WITHOUT THE INTERVENTION OF THE "SUPER POWERS".
WHY?
WHY ARM "THE ENEMY"?
A PROXY WAR WITH IRAN AND RUSSIA MAYBE?
PERISH THE THOUGHT, RIGHT?
THIS HAS ESCALATED WAY BEYOND THE OLD "COLD WAR", FOLKS.
WE ARE AT THE VERY BRINK OF GLOBAL WAR OVER THERE WITH RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN AND OTHERS READY AND ABLE TO TAKE THIS THING TO THE NUCLEAR STAGE.
WHILE RUSSIA HAS MADE GREAT EFFORTS TO PROVIDE ITS PEOPLE WITH ENORMOUS UNDERGROUND BUNKERS IN CASE OF NUCLEAR STRIKE, THE TEA ROOM CHALLENGES YOU TO FIND ENOUGH UNDERGROUND FACILITIES FOR EVEN A MILLION AVERAGE, "MAN-ON-THE-STREET" AMERICAN CIVILIANS TO TAKE SHELTER IN SHOULD IT SUDDENLY RAIN NUKES HERE.
The United States and Russia Are Prepping for Doomsday
"The US political establishment, particularly hardliners from both parties, does not want to see democracy in action in Syria since popular voting is unpredictable, meaning that there is a chance people will keep Bashar al-Assad in power.
In other words, the US president denies Syria's right to democracy because it does not suit Washington's needs.
Democracy – supposedly one of the US government's goals for Middle East countries – can be the answer to the problem. However, since democracy can be an unpredictable process, it might not guarantee 'regime change' which apparently makes democracy an unsuitable solution for Syria," investigative journalist Robert Parry has asserted.
Now, even though the Syrian crisis has become a tsunami threatening to engulf Europe with a refugee crisis and the United States with anti-Muslim hysteria, Obama can’t accept the most obvious solution: compel all reasonable sides to accept a ceasefire and hold an internationally supervised election in which anyone who wants to lead the country can stand before the voters."
[NOTE: Robert Parry, author of the above article, broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s.]
OUR CRAZIES IN THE PENTAGON AND IN CONGRESS AND IN THE OVAL OFFICE ARE GAMBLING WITH ALL OUR LIVES AT THE BEHEST OF SAUDI ARABIA AGAIN AND WE DID NOT GET A VOTE ON THIS THING, AS USUAL, NOR WILL CONGRESS MAKE THIS "LEGITIMATE" BY DECLARING WAR.
WHY THE HELL DID AMERICA GET INVOLVED IN SYRIA AND WHY DO WE CARE WHO RULES THERE?
THREE WORDS.... HOUSE OF SAUD.
SAUDI ARABIA WANTS ASSAD OUT BECAUSE HE HAS A RELATIONSHIP WITH IRAN, THE SAUDIS' NIGHTMARE.
HOUSE OF SAUD DOESN'T HAVE THE 'SET OF STONES' NECESSARY TO GO AGAINST IRAN ON ITS OWN, SO THE SAUDI MONARCHS WHISTLED AND THEIR LITTLE DOG, OBAMA, WENT RUNNING TO LICK THEIR BOOTS AND INVOLVE US IN SOMETHING THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NONE OF OUR BLOODY BUSINESS.
AND IF YOU LOOK, AS SOON AS OBAMA WENT RUNNING, HOUSE OF SAUD STARTED SLOWLY BACKING OUT OF SYRIA SO IT CAN CONCENTRATE ON BOMBING YEMEN INTO POWDER, KILLING CIVILIANS THERE INSTEAD OF WASTING RESOURCES IN SYRIA.
WHY IS SAUDI ARABIA BOMBING YEMEN?
BECAUSE YEMEN WAS AIDED BY IRAN.
WHO IS ALSO USING DRONES AND OTHER RESOURCES IN YEMEN TO AID SAUDI'S CONTINUED MASSACRE THERE?
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
WHO SET UP A WHINE AND HOWLED FOR SADDAM HUSSEIN TO BE TAKEN OUT IN THE 1990s AND AGAIN IN 2001?
SAUDI ARABIA, BECAUSE THEY WERE SCARED OUT OF THEIR WEE MINDS THAT THEY'D GET INVADED, SO THEY WHISTLED THEN AS WELL, AND THE TWO BUSHES WENT FLYING TO THE RESCUE!
NO MATTER WHO SAUDI'S TREMBLING MONARCHS SEE AS A THREAT, ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS WHISTLE AND THEIR LAP DOGS IN AMERICA GO RUNNING TO THEIR SIDE.
LOOK AT HOW AMERICA HAS TURNED ON ISRAEL.
HOUSE OF SAUD IS SCARED OF ISRAEL, SO WE HAVE TO ASSUAGE THEIR FEAR.
WHEN ISIS VOWED TO THEIR 'GOD' TO BEHEAD ALL SAUDI MONARCHS AND OBLITERATE MECCA, WHO WENT FLYING OVER THERE TO TAKE ON ISIS?
AMERICA.
OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, ALL THE WAY BACK TO 1953 AND THE TIME AMERICA COVERTLY TOOK OUT IRAN'S ELECTED PRESIDENT AND SET THE STAGE FOR ALL THAT HAS HAPPENED SINCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
1953 UNTIL TODAY....63 YEARS OF KISSING SAUDI ARABIA'S SANDY BUTT, RESCUING HOUSE OF SAUD FROM THOSE SCARY BOGEYMEN....EVERY PRESIDENT, FOR 63 YEARS!
HOW MANY AMERICAN LIVES HAS SAUDI ARABIA'S NIGHTMARES COST US?
HOW MANY RESCUES HAVE WE MADE FOR THE OILY NATION?
HOW FAR WILL AMERICA GO TO APPEASE THE OPEC KING?
AFTER THIS LAST PUSH IN SYRIA, SAUDI AGREED TO STOP PUMPING CRUDE AS IT HAS FOR YEARS, TO CUT BACK SO OIL AND GAS PRICES WOULD RISE AGAIN AND MAKE WALL STREET HAPPY.
DID YOU MISS THAT?
DID YOU MISS THE VIDEO OF THE SAUDI PRINCE LITERALLY RUNNING INTO THE WHITE HOUSE A FEW MONTHS BACK TO A CLOSED-DOOR, NO PRESS MEETING WITH OBAMA, AFTER OBAMA SWORE TO VETO THE BILL THAT WOULD ALLOW FAMILIES OF THE 9/11 VICTIMS TO SUE SAUDI ARABIA?
OBAMA'S REWARD AFTER THAT COZY LITTLE MEETING WAS WHEN HOUSE OF SAUD ANNOUNCED A CUT-BACK IN CRUDE, REMEMBER?
SIMPLE ADDITION...ONE PLUS ONE IS TWO.
AMERICA'S POLITICIANS ARE HOUSE OF SAUD LAP DOGS.
AND NOW WE'RE ON THE VERY BRINK OF WAR WITH RUSSIA OVER A SANDLOT NATION THAT DOESN'T MATTER A HILL OF BEANS TO US.
SYRIA NEVER HAS POSED A MILITARY THREAT TO AMERICA, UNTIL AMERICA CREATED TERRORISTS THERE, WHO MAY NOW BE ARRIVING IN THE U.S. DISGUISED AS "SYRIAN REFUGEES".
BUT EVEN THAT, TERRORISTS INSIDE AMERICA, WOULD SERVE THE AGENDA OF OUR DAMNABLE POLITICIANS, TO INSTILL FEAR IN AMERICAN MINDS, TO KEEP US DEPENDENT ON "HOMELAND SECURITY", TO GIVING UP FREEDOMS SO WE CAN BE "SAFE", TO CONVINCE AMERICANS THAT "ONLY CONGRESS AND THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CAN SAFEGUARD AMERICA", EVEN IF IT MEANS SPENDING ANOTHER $4 TRILLION TO $9 TRILLION TO MAKE IT SO.
NO, ONLY CONGRESS AND THE PENTAGON AND THE PRESIDENT CAN TAKE US TO WAR!
WAR, AFTER ALL, MEANS HUGE PROFITS FOR THOSE WHO MANUFACTURE THE MACHINERY OF WAR...WEAPONS-MAKERS, ETC.
WALL STREET LOVES WAR.
CONGRESS LOVES WALL STREET.
AND EVERY PRESIDENT SINCE 1953 HAS LOVED SAUDI MONARCHS ENOUGH TO RISK TAKING US TO WORLD WAR THREE.
HANG TIGHT, AMERICA, IT'S ANOTHER BUMPY RIDE.
MAKE GOOD PLANS TO SURVIVE IT, IF YOU CAN.
Why Are The Elite Building Doomsday Bunkers?
WHY AREN'T WE ALL?
_________________________
FOR A SHORT LIST OF ONLY 6 OTHER GOVERNMENTS, BESIDES IRAN, THAT THE U.S. HAS OVERTHROWN OF ITS OWN ACCORD, SEE Mapped: The 7 Governments the U.S. Has Overthrown.
WE MUST ASK OURSELVES WHAT WE WOULD DO IF WE WERE INVADED BY SOME FOREIGN NATION SET ON OVERTHROWING OUR PRESIDENT.
WHILE MANY OF US MIGHT BE DELIGHTED TO BE RID OF OBAMA, MOST AMERICANS WOULD FIGHT HELL TO DRIVE OUT SUCH AN ATTEMPT, LET'S BE HONEST.
SO WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR CONGRESS AND THE REST OF AMERICA TO SEE WHY WE'VE BECOME KNOWN AS THE BULLY OF THE WORLD?
WHAT IS THE REAL REASON OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS ON FOREIGN SOIL FACE SUCH HATE AND DANGER JUST BEING THERE?
WE NEED TO STOP PLAYING 'POLICEMAN' TO THE WORLD AND LET ALL NATIONS TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN BUSINESS... LIKE WE DID STARTING ABOUT 1776.
No comments:
Post a Comment