Translate

Monday, November 18, 2013

RADIOACTIVE PLUTONIUM RELEASED FROM FUKUSHIMA

'Release of plutonium isotopes from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident'
by Jian ZHENG, Keiko TAGAMI, and Shigeo UCHIDA
Research Center for Radiation Protection
National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Inage, Chiba, Japan

1. Introduction
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident has caused serious contamination in the environment from the atmospheric fallout and the direct discharges of highly radioactive liquid wastes.

In addition to the massive release of highly volatile fission products, such as 127m-Tellurium (Te) , 132-Te, 131-Iodine, 133-Xenon, 134-Cesium (Cs) , 136-Cs and 137-Cs, the possible release of non-volatile Plutonium isotopes attracted considerable public attention following the FDNPP accident. 

It is known that Pu (Plutonium) isotopes present a large risk for internal radiation exposure via ingestions of contaminated agricultural crops, particularly for 241-Pu (a beta-emitter, T 1/2 (half life) = 14.4 years). As it decays, the ingrowth of 241-Am ( an alpha and gamma-emitter, T1/2 =
432.7 years) will present an additional radiation risk.

Plutonium is generally produced in reactor fuel as a mixture of isotopes.
The predominant isotope, 239-Pu is produced by neutron capture by 238-U.

If a fuel element containing 239-Pu is left in a reactor for any length of time, further neutron capture can occur, yielding isotopes with higher mass such as 240-Pu, 241-Pu, and 242-Pu.
In addition, small quantities of two other isotopes, 236-Pu and 238-Pu, are produced during the irradiation.

To date, information on the release of Pu isotopes from the FDNPP accident into the environment is very limited.
Several studies on the determination of Pu isotopes in environmental samples, such as soil, litter, sediment, seawater, and aerosols, CONFIRMED THE RELEASE OF PLUTONIUM ISOTOPES FROM THE FDNPP ACCIDENT.

Recently, core inventory calculation results of Pu isotopes within the FDNPP reactors using
the ORIGEN model simulation HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

These studies suggest that the damaged reactors were the major contributor of Pu to the
environment. However, the release of Pu from the spent fuel pools remains unknown.

.
It was found that... the inventories of Pu isotopes in the reactors in the Fukushima DNPP were ca. (about) 3.5 times higher than those in the Chernobyl reactor.
Schwantes, et al, reported an estimation that roughly 2  X 10 to the third power % of the total plutonium inventory from Units 1 and 3 WAS released into the environment, which is two orders of magnitude higher than those of  Zheng et al, and Grambow and Poinssot.
<end quote>

Plutonium 238, 239 and 240 are highly radioactive.

Plutonium has 15 isotopes. The longest-lived is plutonium 244, which takes 80.8 million years to decay to half its level of radioactivity. The most commonly-used isotopes -- and those found at Fukushima -- are plutonium 238, with a half life of 88 years; plutonium 239, with a half life of 24,000 years; and plutonium 240, with a half life of 6,500 years.
Around four tons of plutonium were released into the global environment before nuclear weapons atmospheric testing ended.

Where the Plutonium isotopes are most highly dangerous is when they are inhaled.
Their radiation causes DNA damage in tissue, which then boosts the risk of cancer. The bone marrow and liver, where plutonium is transported through a blood protein called transferring, are especially vulnerable. Just a dozen milligrams of plutonium are lethal for a human, according to tests on lab animals cited by France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN). 

Plutonium is only eliminated from the body very slowly, though excretion.
It takes around 50 years for plutonium to be biologically removed from the skeleton and about 20 years for it be eliminated from the liver, says the IRSN, all the while subjecting surrounding organs and tissues to a continual bombardment of alpha radiation and greatly increasing the risk of cancer, especially lung cancer, liver cancer and bone sarcoma. 
Scientists say plutonium may be the worst of all the fission byproducts that has entered the environment as a result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster. That's why MOX fuel rods that are piled up in spent fuel pools near the Unit 3 reactor, which consist of a mix of plutonium and uranium isotopes, have become the number one concern of workers at the plant.
Plutonium-239, the isotope found in the spent MOX fuel, is much more radioactive than the depleted Uranium-238 in the fuel. Alpha rays from Plutonium sent out from within cells cause somewhere between 10 and 1,000 times more chromosomal damage than beta or gamma rays.
Radioactive contaminants are dangerous for 10 to 20 times the length of their half-lives, meaning that dangerous plutonium released to the environment today will stick around for the next half a million years.   

HERE IS A LIST OF MAJOR POISONS IN OUR DAILY RADIOACTIVE "COCKTAIL" FROM JAPAN:  

<Pu 239 is an alpha emitter, has a half life of 240,000 years, mimics iron and goes to the liver, spleen and bone marrow. It causes 10 to 1000 times more chromosome damage than the same amount of gamma or beta radiation. It is pyrophoric (combusts upon contact with oxygen) and changes its volume and density with temperature change. Its heat makes it highly toxic when ingested, glows in the dark (Pu 238), and currently fuels the Curiosity rover on Mars. Caesium 137, a gamma emitter, is the most abundant fission product in nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. Its half-life of 30 yrs, high-energy decay, chemical reactivity and high solubility (Ci), means that Cs 137 will be present for roughly 300 years after Fukushima. It attracts to muscle tissues (prostate/ovary/breast cancer) and causes malignant muscle cancers (rhabdomyosarcomas, heart arrhythmias and cardiac arrests, muscle seizures, loss of consciousness, memory loss). Strontium (Sr89-90) mimics calcium, goes to the bone and teeth, causes bone cancers and leukemia and is radioactive for 300 years. Along with the above, there are many other radionuclides in the inventory of nuclear reactors: alpha – thorium, radium, neptunium, curium 244, americium 241, californium, polonium 210 (transuranic and actinides); gamma – Cobalt 60, Irridium 92, Barium 137, Iodine 131, Lanthanum 140; Beta – Tritium, Phosphorous, Nickel, Carbon; Alpha and Beta – Strontium 90, Cadmium 113, Europium 155, Krypton 85, Tin 121 (Sn), Samarium 90; noble gases – Xenon and Iodine 131. As the weight or chemical mass of a radionuclide causes most damage to internal structures, when ingested, heavy alpha particles (PLUTONIUMS ESPECIALLY) are even more destructive than beta and gamma emitters.>

AS WE AWAIT THE OUTCOME OF THE YEAR-LONG REMOVAL OF THE FUEL RODS FROM THE TOPPLING REACTOR #4 AND HOLD OUR BREATHS IN HOPE NOTHING GOES WRONG, WE MUST CONSIDER WHAT IS ALREADY DONE, AND WHAT CONTINUES TO BE DONE TO POISON US AND THIS PLANET WE ALL SHARE.
[ SEE http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/11/most-dangerous-moment-in-all-history.html ]

IS THERE ANY WAY TO SAVE OURSELVES, ANY WAY AT ALL?
AFTER ALMOST 3 YEARS, IT WILL BE 3 YEARS IN MARCH, 2014, WE ARE STILL ACCEPTING NOTHING BEING DONE TO STOP THIS MADNESS.
WHY IS NOTHING BEING DONE?
WHY HAS THIS BEEN ALLOWED TO CONTINUE? 
DO OUR GOVERNMENTS WANT US DEAD?
IF NOT WHY AREN'T THEY DOING SOMETHING TO STOP THIS? 

'BILLIONS MAY DIE IF THERE IS ONE MISTAKE'


NOWHERE TO RUN TO, NOWHERE TO HIDE
It is a nightmare of unimaginable proportions, and there is nowhere in the northern hemisphere that you will be able to hide from it.

TEPCO's "LIVE" camera?
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/f1-np/camera/index-e.html

MORE THAN A FEW HAVE QUESTIONED IF THESE ARE  INDEED LIVE CAMS. 

http://radioactive.eu.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&layout=category&task=category&id=1&Itemid=184

Harvey Wasserman: We are now [facing] what may be humankind’s most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis. 
The clock is ticking. The hand of global nuclear disaster is painfully close to midnight.  

Even the tiniest mistake during this operation to extract over 1,300 fuel rods at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan could lead to a series of cascading failures with an apocalyptic outcome. The process of removing each rod will have to be repeated over 1,300 times without incident. The operation to begin removing fuel from such a severely damaged pool has never been attempted before. The rods are unwieldy and very heavy, each one weighing two-thirds of a ton. But it has to be done, unless there is some way to encase the entire building in concrete with the pool as it is. I don't know of anyone discussing that option, but it would seem much 'safer' than what they are about to attempt...but not without its own set of risks.  [THE RADIATION SEEPING INTO THE GROUND WATER BENEATH THE CRIPPLED REACTORS, AND INTO THE AQUIFER AND INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN.]
~ Fallout researcher, nuclear expert Christina Consolo.

Renowned theoretical physicist Michio Kaku stated in an interview a few weeks after the initial accident that “TEPCO is literally hanging on by their fingernails.” They still are, and always have been.
[SEE TWO VIDEOS BY DR. KAKU BELOW. EYE-OPENING!]

Michael Friedlander, a nuclear engineer and former U.S. power plant operator, told CNN in September that, "The thing that keeps me up late at night is that they’re getting ready to unload the spent fuel in unit 4. It has the potential if it doesn’t go well to create a very, very serious accident. Beyond the emergency response, TEPCO has demonstrated no long-term vision for dealing with the problem."

Arjun Makhijani, President of the US-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research: [He] remained concerned about the positioning of the fuel rods in the pool after the initial tsunami and subsequent hydrogen explosions at the plant, and said he hoped the plan was based on more than just Tepco’s assessment.  “I hope that there has been some level of independent scrutiny on the transfer operation, and on the way the spent fuel is sitting in the pool currently,” he told a Berkeley California radio station. “But the lack of independent outside advisors is very troubling.”

"We are extremely lucky that this apocalyptic scenario hasn't happened yet, considering the state of Reactor 4. But for many, it is already too late. The initial explosions and spent fuel pool fires may have already sealed the fate of millions of people. Time will tell. Anyone who tells you otherwise is not being honest, because there is just no way to know. "

Hiroaki Koide, a nuclear scientist working at the University of Kyoto: [H]e was very worried about an accident, given the magnitude of the task. “I’m worried about whether Tepco can treat all the 1,331 [spent-fuel] assemblies without any problem and how long it will take,” he said.

Thomas Cochran, Natural Resource Defense Council’s nuclear program senior scientist stated that a dropped fuel assembly was unlikely to cause wide spread contamination.

NYTimes: Countries increasingly worried about Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel — Experts: Concern over potential cracks in pool walls — Professors: “In deteriorating condition”; “This is a critical global issue”; “Could have fatal consequences for Japan”

 If a fuel rod is dropped, breaks or becomes entangled while being removed, possible worst case scenarios include a big explosion, a meltdown in the pool, a large fire. This is literally a matter of national security – another mistake by TEPCO could have incredibly costly, even fatal, consequences for Japan. 

Richard Tanter, expert on nuclear power issues and professor of international relations at the University of Melbourne:" Well, the first one, and the most immediate one, is the news that the Reactor Unit 4, the one which has a very large amount of stored fuel in its fuel storage pool, that is sinking. According to former prime Minister Kan Naoto, that has sunk some 31 inches in places and it’s not uneven. This is really not surprising given what’s happened in terms of pumping of water, the aftermath of the earthquake and the tsunami, the continuing infusions of water into the groundwater area. This is an immediate problem, and if it is not resolved there is an extraordinary possibility we really could be back at March 2011 again because of the possibility of a fission accident in that spent fuel pond in Unit No. 4."

At any time, following any of these possible events, or even all by itself, nuclear fuel in reactor 4's pool could become critical, mostly because it will heat up the pool to a point where water will burn off and the zirconium cladding will catch fire when it is exposed to air.
Once the integrity of the pool is compromised that will likely lead to more criticalities, which then can spread to other fuel. The heat from this reaction would weaken the structure further, which could then collapse and the contents of the pool end up in a pile of rubble on the ground. This would release an enormous amount of radioactivity, which Arnie Gundersen has referred to as a “Gamma Shine Event” without precedence, and Dr. Christopher Busby has deemed an “Open-air super reactor spectacular.”

SO, WE WAIT, HOLD OUR BREATHS, AND MANY ARE PRAYING...
THIS AFFECTS THE ENTIRE PLANET....YOU, ME, ALL OF US.

EVEN IF THIS IS SUCCESSFUL, WHICH NO ONE EXPECTS WILL BE THE CASE, FUKUSHIMA WILL CONTINUE CONTAMINATING OUR WORLD FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL CENTURIES.
THE HALF-LIFE OF JUST THE RADIOACTIVE IODINE-129 IS 15.7 MILLION YEARS.
THE HALF-LIFE OF PLUTONIUM-240 IS 6,563 YEARS.
THE HALF-LIFE OF PLUTONIUM-239 IS 24,100 YEARS.
Plutonium-239 is used as an explosive in nuclear weapons.

After much international pressure, Tepco had collected data from 522 workers last December and announced that 178 of them had suffered radiation as high as 11,800 millisieverts . The safe limit is 100 millisieverts. This finding was submitted to the World Health Organization and revealed last December.
TEPCO LIES....TEPCO HAS ALWAYS LIED.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SAFE LIMITS.

SINCE NOAA AND HUNDREDS OF OTHER SCIENTISTS SAID LAST YEAR THAT THE U.S. WOULD FACE RADIATION LEVELS 10 TIMES THAT OF JAPAN, WHAT CAN WE LOOK FORWARD TO???

Just how profound the effect will be on down-winders in North America, or the entire northern hemisphere for that matter, will literally depend on where the wind blows and where the rain falls, the duration and extent of a nuclear fire or chain-reaction event, and whether or not that reaction becomes self-sustaining. At least the northern half of Japan would be uninhabitable, and some researchers have argued that it already is.

There is no example historically to draw from on a scale of this magnitude. Everything is theory. But anyone who says this can't happen is not being truthful, because nobody really knows how bad things could get.

The most disturbing part of all of this is that Fukushima has been this dangerous, and precarious, since the second week of March 2011. The ante will definitely be upped once the fuel removal starts.
'The mainstream media, world governments, nuclear agencies, health organizations, weather reporters, and the health care industry has completely ignored three ongoing triple meltdowns that have never been contained'

The nuclear industry needs to come clean. If this leads to every reactor in the world being shut down, so be it. If the world governments truly care about their people and this planet, this is what needs to be done. 
11 Facts About The Ongoing Fukushima Nuclear Holocaust That Are Almost Too Horrifying To Believe
Every single day, 300 tons of radioactive water from Fukushima enters the Pacific Ocean.  The radioactive material that is being released will outlive all of us by a very wide margin, and it is constantly building up in the food chain.  Nobody knows for sure how many people will eventually develop cancer and other health problems as a result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, but some experts are not afraid to use the word “billions”. 

It is a nightmare of unimaginable proportions, and there is nowhere in the northern hemisphere that you will be able to hide from it.

#1 Because of all of the damage that has taken place, computer-guided removal of the rods will not be possible.  Manual removal is much riskier, and it is absolutely essential that the removal of each of the 1,331 rods goes perfectly because a single mistake could potentially lead to a nuclear chain reaction.

#2 According to Reuters, the combined amount of cesium-137 contained in those nuclear fuel rods is 14,000 times greater than what was released when the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima at the end of World War II.  Other estimates put this number far higher.

#3 Officials in Japan admit that 300 tons of radioactive water from Fukushima is entering the Pacific Ocean every 24 hours.

#4 According to a professor at Tokyo University, 3 gigabecquerels of cesium-137 are flowing into the port at Fukushima Daiichi every single day…

#5 According to Tepco, a total of somewhere between 20 trillion and 40 trillion becquerels of radioactive tritium have gotten into the Pacific Ocean since the Fukushima disaster first began.

#6 Something is causing fish along the west coast of Canada to bleed from their gills, bellies and eyeballs.  Could Fukushima be responsible?

#7 150 former sailors and Marines say that they now have radiation sickness as a result of serving on U.S. Navy ships near Fukushima and they are suing for damages.

#8 The Iodine-131, Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 that are constantly coming from Fukushima are going to affect the health of those living the the northern hemisphere for a very, very long time.

#9 The Fukushima nuclear facility originally contained a whopping 1760 tons of nuclear material.

#10 It is being projected that the entire Pacific Ocean will soon “have cesium levels 5 to 10 times higher” than what we witnessed during the era of heavy atomic bomb testing in the Pacific many decades ago.

#11 According to the Wall Street Journal, it is being projected that the INITIAL cleanup of Fukushima could take up to 40 years to complete.

"And all this collateral damage will continue for decades, if not centuries, even if things stay exactly the way they are now. But that is unlikely, as bad things happen like natural disasters and deterioration with time…earthquakes, subsidence, and corrosion, to name a few. Every day that goes by, the statistical risk increases for this apocalyptic scenario. No one can say or know how this will play out, except that millions of people will probably die even if things stay exactly as they are, and billions could die if things get any worse." 

An initial offer of zeolite absorbent from Rosatom, the Russian nuclear power corporation, in the first few months after the explosions, repeated in August 2013, was rebuffed by TEPCO. 
Contaminated water and soil storage reached the maximum space available THIS MONTH!

The adoption of the [SHODDY, NON-EXISTENT] decontamination method without planning the logistics for permanent storage facilities at the NPP, suggests that eventual discharge of contaminated water into the ocean or air has been and remains anticipated by TEPCO. 
THEY KNEW BETTER, BUT DID NOTHING TO PREPARE FOR THIS.

The post facto raising of safety limits for radiation exposure on 19 April 2011 (from 1 to 20mSv) and reduction of the evacuation zone to less than 30 km from the NPP, driven by an unapologetic ‘logic’ of optimal growth, ignored the passage of radioactive concentrations beyond the official concentric circles emanating from the crippled plant. These were to denote the 20km mandatory exclusion zone (greater than 50mSv) and the 30km voluntary exclusion zone (20-50mSv).

The continued dispersal of radioactive contaminant from the stricken and leaking NPP, waste incineration, the relaxation of food testing and re-circulation of irradiated fish from the Fukushima coast (Sōma, Iwaki), and re-use of contaminated areas by fast food chains for cheap food production, for example, contributes to the creation of a surplus population of humans and other living beings through the bio-accumulation of radioactive materials.

This means that due to institutional policies adopted with regard to the hazard of radiation, a certain portion of the population has been factored in as part of the ‘costs’ of maintaining nuclear power in Japan.
PEOPLE OF JAPAN, AND THE REST OF OUR WORLD,  HAVE BEEN RULED TO BE EXPENDABLE!!!
THE ECONOMY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN HUMAN LIVES!!!

While funds for new military hardware, technological innovation, public works and public relations operations seem to be readily available to the Abe administration, it shrinks from the costs required to return the water, food and air to a ‘safe’ legal radiation limit (1 mSvy).

Despite being an advanced industrial nation, its government seems incapable of taking appropriate measures to protect people. ABE REFUSES to close all schools which measure above 1 mSvy in affected areas, REFUSES to assist all citizens that wish to be evacuated from areas within a 80km radius from the NPP with sufficient subventions for their moving, living and schooling costs, ABE REFUSES to prevent the consumption of contaminated foods nationally and internationally, providing a nationalised course of medical treatment commensurate with the actual danger posed by the toxicity of radiation exposure, and storing radiation contaminated materials. 

The abstraction of material conditions to justify the protection of and maintain the confidence in sovereign assets and illusory growth, is incurring real and mounting costs in human and non-human life. If unchecked, this system will continue to do so into the future until exhaustion and potential collapse. Either way, the situation is likely to get worse before significant change is achieved, which depends on the ability of people in Japan and the international community to grasp the urgency of the crisis and to demand an end to delay in preventing further contamination of the ocean and regenerating one of the most vital structures supporting life on the planet. In the short-term, the formula for measuring the risk posed by nuclear power must be re-adjusted to reflect the health of living beings in the biosphere as a non-negotiable factor. This will have immediate effects on public health, food safety and evacuation from contaminated areas. In the long term, while the debate over the choice of energy sources is critical, the systemic and astigmatic prioritization of profit has to be revised, so that state-corporate interests can no longer hijack the core values which sustain life.
[SOURCE: http://www.globalresearch.ca/fukushima-and-the-transnationality-of-radioactive-nuclear-contamination-visualizing-radiactivity-and-its-impacts-on-humanity/5354238 ]


AND HERE, IN AMERICA?
ONE GROUP OF ACTIVISTS SUMMED IT UP THIS WAY...
28 Signs That The West Coast Is Being Absolutely Fried With Nuclear Radiation From Fukushima 

OUR DAILY "COCKTAIL" BEING EMITTED INTO OUT ATMOSPHERE AND OCEANS FROM FUKUSHIMA CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: 
<Pu 239 is an alpha emitter, has a half life of 240,000 years, mimics iron and goes to the liver, spleen and bone marrow. It causes 10 to 1000 times more chromosome damage than the same amount of gamma or beta radiation. It is pyrophoric (combusts upon contact with oxygen) and changes its volume and density with temperature change. Its heat makes it highly toxic when ingested, glows in the dark (Pu 238), and currently fuels the Curiosity rover on Mars. Caesium 137, a gamma emitter, is the most abundant fission product in nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. Its half-life of 30 yrs, high-energy decay, chemical reactivity and high solubility (Ci), means that Cs 137 will be present for roughly 300 years after Fukushima. It attracts to muscle tissues (prostate/ovary/breast cancer) and causes malignant muscle cancers (rhabdomyosarcomas, heart arrhythmias and cardiac arrests, muscle seizures, loss of consciousness, memory loss). Strontium (Sr89-90) mimics calcium, goes to the bone and teeth, causes bone cancers and leukaemia and is radioactive for 300 years. Along with the above, there are many other radionuclides in the inventory of nuclear reactors: alpha – thorium, radium, neptunium, curium 244, americium 241, californium, polonium 210 (transuranic and actinides); gamma – Cobalt 60, Irridium 92, Barium 137, Iodine 131, Lanthanum 140; Beta – Tritium, Phosphorous, Nickel, Carbon; Alpha and Beta – Strontium 90, Cadmium 113, Europium 155, Krypton 85, Tin 121 (Sn), Samarium 90; noble gases – Xenon and Iodine 131. As the weight or chemical mass of a radionuclide causes most damage to internal structures, when ingested heavy alpha particles are even more destructive than beta and gamma emitters.
>




AND THAT'S A WRAP ...



































Saturday, November 16, 2013

SILENT WAR: AMERICA 10X MORE CONTAMINATED THAN JAPAN!!

“There is no safe amount of radiation.  Even small amounts do harm.”

~Linus Pauling PhD, Nobel Laureate 

It is becoming clear that the consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster could be catastrophic because the system protecting the more that 11,000 spent fuel rods that must be constantly cooled has been jeopardized. Just one curie can be fatal and there is a total of 336 million curies of energy in these rods; 134 million is in the form of cesium 137.

Last year, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and 3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences showed that radiation on the West Coast of North America could end up being 10 times higher than in Japan:

'This is somewhere between 10 and 85 times what happened in Chernobyl. Almost no cleanup has been done and none is planned that we know about. '

"The fallout is poisoning our food, water, air, soil, sea and sea life. It is imperative that we prepare to protect ourselves and our loved ones from this potential radiation damage."

[NOTE: THERE ARE SOME VERY IMPORTANT LINKS AND VIDEOS NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THIS BLOG, BUT TRY TO READ THROUGH EVERYTHING. IF YOU DO NOTHING ELSE, DOWNLOAD THE BOOK, 'THE CODE KILLERS', AT THE LINK PROVIDED AND WATCH THE VIDEOS.] 

C-137 is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in nature due to the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts.

ON AUGUST 19, 2013, TEPCO went from reporting 2600 / 3800 becquerels per liter of contaminated leakage to 80 million becquerels of radiation per liter in ground water at Fukushima.
80 MILLION Bq/L... THIS WAS REPORTED BY REUTERS, VOICE OF AMERICA, AND OTHER MAJOR NEWS SOURCES....BRIEFLY...
JAPAN TODAY NEWS DID THE CALCULATION ON THAT 300,000 LITERS RELEASED INTO THE GROUND AND OCEAN:
Calculations: Roughly 300 metric tons = Roughly 300,000 liters × 80 million Bq of beta radiation per liter = Roughly 24,000,000,000,000 Bq of total beta radiation (24 trillion Bq)

24 TRILLION Bq TOTAL RADIATION RELEASED IN A MATTER OF DAYS! JUST DAYS!
IN APRIL OF 2013, PRIOR TO THIS, TEPCO ADMITTED TO ANOTHER 120,000 LOST LITERS OF CONTAMINATED WATER FROM ITS TANKS.


That 80 MILLION Bq/L translates to roughly 0.08 GRAYS...per liter...and they released over 300,000 liters...every day...or more.
That area is off-the-charts toxic...lethal...deadly.

How much radiation does it take to make us sick?
Six Gray units (one gray unit is equivalent to one Sievert or 100 RADS) can be lethal and just one Gray is enough to cause acute radiation sickness that is characterized by nausea and vomiting within 6 hours of exposure. 
A curie (Ci) is a huge denomination—one curie equals 37 billion becquerel

One Gray = 1000 millisieverts or 1 Sievert

SOME HAVE SAID, "Oh, you get higher radiation doses on a long airplane flight."
0.05 mSv = 0.00005 Bq
IS ANY RADIATION A GOOD THING?
1500+ LEADING WORLD SCIENTISTS THINK NOT!

Perhaps you've swallowed this deception, but realize that it is a deception, a RED HERRING of the worst degree, and ignores Pauling and over 1500 leading scientists who began raising the alarm over our radiation-contaminated environment way back in the 1970s!

According to a 1972 study that examined the effect of injected C-137 in small dogs, a dose of merely 3800 Ci/kg is absolutely LETHAL to beagles -- within three weeks, no less.
[NOTE:1 Ci = 37,000,000,000 Bq]
A human baby is about the size of a beagle!!!

Assuming that the average ADULT human is, say, five to ten times the mass of a fully-grown beagle, one would infer that a breathtakingly lethal dose to a human being would require no more than 38,000 Ci/kg. 

California Rain Water Sample of March 27, 2011, by UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKLEY:   0.46 Bq/L.

THE MISCONCEPTION OF "LOWER THAN YOU GET ON AN AIRPLANE FLIGHT" GOES STRAIGHT DOWN THE SEWER WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ACTUAL NUMBERS, DOESN'T IT?
 0.46 Bq/L in rain water, found just days after the Fukushima disaster, is a hell of a lot more than 0.00005 Bq...face it!
AND THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATING, GROWING EVERY DAY!

IN SPITE OF WHAT YOU MAY HAVE READ/HEARD: "'C-137 has only ever been released into the environment a handful of times in the ENTIRE history of the planet.'"

C-137 IS NOT "NATURALLY-OCCURRING IN THE ENVIRONMENT"!!!
WE HUMANS PUT IT THERE WITH OUR NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING!
IT CAN ONLY FORM FROM FISSION REACTIONS!

REMEMBER..."'C-137 is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in the environment due to the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts.'"

SO, WHAT ARE CURRENT LEVELS FROM FUKUSHIMA?
HERE ARE THE NUMBERS FROM THE PAST WEEK:

A record high level of 710,000 becquerels PER LITER of beta-ray sources, such as radioactive strontium, was detected per liter of water in an observation well at the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.
The previous high reading of 550,000 becquerels per liter was found in water sampled Nov. 9 at the same well.
TEPCO detected 400,000 becquerels per liter at the same well on Oct. 17. The level  has been rising in recent days. 

GO BACK TO WHAT BERKELEY FOUND IN 2011:
0.46 Bq/L IN RAIN WATER.
COMPARE THAT TO 710,000 Bq/L AT FUKUSHIMA LAST WEEK.
DO YOU SEE WHERE WE ARE IN THIS?

Radiation Measurements
Radioactivity Absorbed Dose Dose Equivalent Exposure
Common Units curie (Ci) rad rem roentgen (R)
SI Units becquerel (Bq) gray (Gy) sievert (Sv) coulomb/kilogram (C/kg)

The danger of C-137 is deceptively profound.
Its true lethality is very much a function of its AGGREGATION -- in quantities of water, in food, and, most perilously, in the human body, which is manifestly UNABLE to expel C-137 (except in cases where Prussian Blue has been administered in a timely fashion, which is clearly NOT taking place -- or even being seriously discussed, insofar as I can tell -- here in the U.S., or, for that matter, anywhere, NOT EVEN IN FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE.)  


PLEASE NOTE: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission still requires plants to report radiation releases in rem, while the rest of the world uses sieverts. For the record, one rem is equivalent to one-hundredth of a sievert. 
WHY NOT REPORT LIKE THE REST OF THE WORLD REPORTS? 

Just six days after the disastrous meltdowns struck four reactors at Fukushima on March 11, 2011, scientists detected the plume of toxic fallout had arrived over American shores.  Subsequent measurements by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found levels of radiation in air, water, and milk hundreds of times above normal across the U.S.  The highest detected levels of Iodine-131 in precipitation in the U.S. were as follows (normal is about 2 picocuries I-131 per liter of water):  Boise, ID (390); Kansas City (200); Salt Lake City (190); Jacksonville, FL (150); Olympia, WA (125); and Boston, MA (92).

“Fukushima fallout appeared to affect all areas of the U.S., and was especially large in some, mostly in the western part of the nation,” wrote researchers with the Radiation and Public Health Project in their peer-reviewed paper published in Open Journal of Pediatrics. 


An interesting fact for people living on the US west coast is also included in the UNSCEAR [United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation] report: only about 5% of the directly discharged radiation was deposited within a radius of 80 km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station. The rest , 95%, was distributed in the Pacific Ocean.
3-D simulations had already been carried out for the Pacific basin, showing that the emissions would reach the North American coastline, with uncertain consequences for food safety and health of the local population.
BUT OUR GOVERNMENT SOUNDED NO REAL ALARMS!!!
WHY NOT?


Last year, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory and 3 scientists from the GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences showed that radiation on the West Coast of North America could end up being 10 times higher than in Japan:
AMERICA WILL BE 10 TIMES AS POLLUTED AS JAPAN !!!
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT. 


 (ii) The subsequent pace of dilution is strongly reduced, owing to the eastward advection of the main tracer cloud towards the much less energetic areas of the central and eastern North Pacific. (iii) The magnitude of additional peak radioactivity should drop to values comparable to the pre-Fukushima levels after 6–9 years (i.e. total peak concentrations would then have declined below twice pre-Fukushima levels). (iv) By then the tracer cloud will span almost the entire North Pacific, with peak concentrations off the North American coast an order-of-magnitude higher than in the western Pacific.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Fuku1.jpg

The half life of cesium-137 is so long that it produces more damage to humans. Figure 4 gives the examples of the distribution of the impact strength of Cesium-137 at year 1.5 (panel (a)), year 3.5 (panel (b)), and year 4 (panel (c)).  It is worth noting that [because] the current near the shore cannot be well reconstructed by the global ocean reanalysis, some nuclear pollutant particulate tracers may come to rest in near shore areas, which may result in additional uncertainty in the estimation of the impact strength.

SLATE MAGAZINE REPORTED:
< If the radiation leaves the air and enters a person, animal, or object, the units switch again. The raw amount of radiation that an object absorbs is expressed in either rad (customary) or gray (SI). As with sieverts and rem, one gray equals 100 rad.
So where do sieverts and rems fit into this whole picture? They provide a measure of the potential harm caused by radiation in a sample of living tissue. That's different from measuring the amount of energy or rate of emission, because different types of radiation affect the body in different ways. Alpha particles, for example, are 20 times more dangerous to human tissue than gamma rays at the same dosage level. And certain tissue types are more sensitive to radiation than others. A blast of radiation to the spleen, for example, will cause more damage than the same dose to the brain, because splenic tissue divides and multiplies much faster. Physicists use these two adjustment factors—type of radiation and sensitivity of tissue—to convert from measures of radiation absorption to measures of effective dose. Sieverts or rem are used in reports on radiation disasters, because they give a better sense of how the radiation might affect human health.  

While effective dose is a great step forward from the days when we simply measured the quantity of radiation absorbed by a patient, it's still a rather inexact science. Researchers can't perform randomized trials on the effects of radiation, because it's unethical to give people cancer. As a result, the tables health physicists use to convert between gray and sieverts (or between rad and rem) are constantly changing to reflect new data. >

“Not much time remains before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity are immeasurably diminished.  We, the undersigned senior members of the world's scientific community, hereby warn all of humanity of what lies ahead.  A great change in the stewardship of the earth is required.”
~Warning to Humanity
issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists
signed by 1500 scientists, from 69 nations 


Epidemiologist Joseph Mangano and internist/toxicologist Janette Sherman have published a peer reviewed study  - primarily of infants - in the U.S. in the first 14 weeks after the Fukushima Daiichi mass meltdowns, explosions and fires in the December 2011 edition of the International Journal of Health Services.
The authors say the statistically significant increase in deaths is comparable to the 16,500 excess deaths recorded in the U.S. in the 17 weeks following the Chernobyl accident in 1986.

The authors issued an early alert back in April about what they were finding after just a few weeks of beginning the study, which was dismissed by the usual suspects as mere statistical anomalies that had nothing to do with levels of iodine-131 (and cesium-134, cesium-137 and strontium-90) in contamination plumes from northeastern Japan. Yet the EPA, during its few weeks of monitoring of fallout as the plumes transversed North America, found high levels in air, water and milk in many places. For instance, iodine-131 was detected in precipitation falling on Boise, Idaho at nearly 200 times 'normal'.
"Deaths are seen across all ages, but we continue to find that infants are hardest hit because their tissues are rapidly multiplying, they have undeveloped immune systems, and the doses of radioisotopes are proportionally greater than for adults."

Dr. Sherman, an adjunct professor at Western Michigan University, was a contributing editor of 'Chernobyl - Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment', published by the NY Academy of Sciences in 2009. 

Venerated Canadian scientist David Suzuki recently issued perhaps the most ominous warning yet about Fukushima's contamination of the planet.

   “Fukushima is the most terrifying situation I can imagine,” he said.
   “You have a government that is in total collusion with TEPCO, the energy company. They're   lying through their teeth.”
   “They don't know what to do The Japanese government has too much pride to admit that.”


Suzuki cited Tokyo University research pegging the chance of another 7+ magnitude earthquake by 2016 at 70 percent.
“If, in fact, the fourth plant goes under an earthquake, and those rods are exposed, it's bye-bye Japan,” he warned, “and everybody on the west coast of North America should evacuate. Now if that isn't terrifying, I don't know what is.”

Australian physician Dr. Helen Caldicott says that the nuclear industry has friends in high places and a vested interest in distorting the facts.
“I don't care if they criticize us,” she told me. “David (Suzuki) has hesitated to get into the whole nuclear debate, but he's a careful scientist.
“TEPCO is trying to move those damaged rods by crane manually, which has never, ever been done before; usually fuel rods are moved by computer control. If two fuel rods happened to touch, there could be a fission reaction releasing huge amounts of radioactive gases. This would be a catastrophe. The radiation would circle the Northern Hemisphere.”
“Pro-nuclear advocates... make guesses about radiation exposure using OLD data, not the newest scientific information we have. They underestimate it grossly to keep their industry going. The predictions are so dire that no one wants to face them. They want to practice psychic numbing.”

Dr. John Apsley reported on increased deaths in North America that he believes are associated with the Fukushima catastrophe, and the leaking of radiation. Dr.Apsley has long spoken about the effects of radioactive iodine exposure on thyroid function. Once radioactive iodine hits the thyroid its function is permanently impaired which in turn suppresses the immune system, he explained. CDC data shows a significant increase in death rates attributable to radioactive iodine given off by the Fukushima disaster, he added.

Apsley is concerned that moving unit 4 may cause another criticality event involving radioactive iodine.
'Should this happen the West Coast will be hit in six days followed by the East Coast within nine days, he cautioned, noting that increase deaths in infants and the elderly will follow wherever rain dumps the radioactive iodine.'

At least 14,000 Deaths Suspected Due to Radiation From Fukushima.
There was a spike in infant mortality rates within the first 10 weeks of the catastrophe in cities across the US, and the radiation contamination likely came through rainfall, he said, adding that infants were particularly susceptible because of their reduced thyroid function.

It's in the rain and in the wind...it will continue to be in the rain and wind because the contamination just keeps leaking into our atmosphere, our ocean, getting into our food chain.
 
Because of the prevailing winds at the time of the Fukushima incident, the west coast of the United States has been exposed to serious levels of radioactive fall-out. Hardest hit were Colorado and Wyoming. Surprisingly, Jacksonville, Florida falls into this category, too, due to wind currents.
One of the hardest hit states in the nation is Pennsylvania because of the intense rainfall they had in the area approximately 3 weeks after the explosion. This rainfall carried tremendous amounts of radiation into the area.

Vancouver, Canada has also experienced a 60% increase in infant death rates.

The radiation that's made its way to North America is settling into the ground and being absorbed into the food we eat.

THE OCEAN DOES NOT DILUTE RADIATION OF THIS LEVEL!!!
While many people assume that the ocean will dilute the Fukushima radiation, a 1955 U.S. government report concluded that the ocean does NOT adequately dilute radiation from nuclear accidents, and there could be “pockets” and “streams” of highly-concentrated radiation.
CITING THAT FINDING, nuclear expert Robert Alvarezsenior policy adviser to the Energy Department’s secretary and deputy assistant secretary for national security and the environment from 1993 to 1999 – wrote yesterday:

    "'According to a previously secret 1955 memo from the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission regarding concerns of the British government over contaminated tuna, “dissipation of radioactive fall-out in ocean waters is not a gradual spreading out of the activity from the region with the highest concentration to uncontaminated regions, but that the process results in scattered pockets and streams of higher radioactive materials in the Pacific. We can speculate that tuna which now show radioactivity from ingested materials [this is in 1955, not today's exact same findings] have been living in or have passed through, such pockets; or have been feeding on plant and animal life which has been exposed in those areas.'”

 [PLEASE ALSO VISIT THIS 'READING ROOM' TO LEARN MORE ABOUT EFFECTS OF "LOW-LEVEL" RADIATION: http://www.radiation.org/reading/index.html on excess deaths]

Because of the huge amounts of radioactive water Tepco is dumping into the Pacific Ocean EVERY SINGLE DAY, NON-STOP, and the FACT that the current pushes water from Japan to the West Coast of North America, at least some of these radioactive “streams” or “hot spots” WILL, WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, end up impacting the West Coast...OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

IT WILL ALSO CONTINUE TO SHOW UP IN OUR RAIN AND IN THE JET STREAM OVER NORTH AMERICA.

NOTHING ANY "EXPERT" CAN SAY WILL MAKE THAT GO AWAY.
FUKUSHIMA CONTINUES CONTAMINATING ALL OF US EVERY DAY!

THERE IS NOTHING 'NATURAL' ABOUT THIS MUCH RADIATION, NOR IS ANY LIVING ORGANISM "EVOLVED' TO HANDLE THESE LEVELS.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "SAFE LEVELS" OF ANY RADIATION.
RADIATION CHANGES THINGS IN A VERY BAD WAY AT THE CELLULAR, AT THE DNA LEVELS!
THIS IS NOT LIKE SWALLOWING SALT WATER, THROWING UP, AND BEING OKAY!
THIS STUFF STAYS IN OUR BONES, IN OUR VERY HUMAN CELLS.


An animated graphic from the University of Hawaii’s International Pacific Research Center shows the projected dispersion of debris from Japan:


In addition to radioactive debris, MIT says that seawater which is itself radioactive HAS BEGUN hitting the West Coast.

SO, WHY WON'T OUR GOVERNMENTS STEP IN WITH SOME TRUTH FOR ALL OF US?
ARE THEY TRYING TO KEEP US FROM PANICKING?
DO THEY SIMPLY NOT GIVE A TINKER'S EARTHEN DAM?

The Congressional Research Service HAS admitted:
Transport by ocean currents is much slower, and additional radiation from this source might eventually also be detected in North Pacific waters under U.S. jurisdiction, even months after its release. Regardless of slow ocean transport, the long half-life of radioactive cesium isotopes means that radioactive contaminants could remain a valid concern for YEARS." 

PACIFIC OCEAN BECOMING DEVOID OF LIFE

1~ NOAA DECLARES UNUSUAL MORTALITY EVENT IN CALIFORNIA, MAY, 2013
California Sea Lion Unusual Mortality Event in California
Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (as amended), an Unusual Mortality Event (UME) has been declared for California sea lions in California from January 2013 through the present.
Elevated strandings of California sea lion pups have been observed in Southern California in the following counties:
    Santa Barbara County
    Ventura County
    Los Angeles County
    Orange County
    San Diego County  
Sea lions will eat a lot of different prey items: octopus, squid, small sharks. But their bread and butter is herring. Herring catches have also plummeted.
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/health/mmume/images/csl_strandings_graph_may19.jpg  

2~ Sea turtles are washing up dead on the PACIFIC beaches of Central America and scientists don't know why.
In one area of El Salvador's coast, dogs that started eating dead turtles stopped breathing and died almost instantly.
Fertility is yet another issue: in September scientists in Honduras said turtles on one beach laid 40 per cent fewer eggs. 

3~ Giant Oarfish washing ashore in California. Scientists testing for radiation levels.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-23/oar-fish/5039218
Oct. 23, 2013
After the Fukushima nuclear disaster, there were accounts of several of the animals washing ashore.
“One dead oarfish is odd,” California Sea Grant Director James Eckman said. “Two is a pattern.”
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/oct/23/la-jolla-scientists-look-mystery-giant-sea-serpent/ 

4~ IF EVERYTHING IS FINE, WHY AREN'T THE WORLD'S GOVERNMENTS TESTING FOOD FISH?
Tuna, salmon, herring, shad, sardines, anchovies...ALL NUMBERS HAVE DRASTICALLY DECREASED, MANY SHOW DISEASE COMMON TO RADIATION POISONING.

Associated Press reports that both scientists and native elders in British Columbia say that sockeye numbers have plummeted:
Sockeye salmon returns plunge to historic lows. 

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/08/is-fukushima-irradiating-tuna-salmon-and-herring-on-the-west-coast-of-north-america.html

“We’ve never seen anything like this in all these years I’ve done this. I’ve asked the elders and they have never seen anything like this at all.” [said Chief Wilf Adam]
Mel Kotyk, North Coast area director for the Department said department scientists don’t know why the return numbers are so low…. “When they went out to sea they seemed to be very strong and healthy and in good numbers, so we think something happened in the ocean.” 


The Globe and Mail, Aug 13, 2013 : Independent fisheries scientist Alexandra Morton is raising concerns about a disease she says is spreading through Pacific herring causing fish to hemorrhage. “Two days ago I did a beach seine on Malcolm Island [near Port McNeill on northern Vancouver Island] and I got approximately 100 of these little herring and they were not only bleeding from their fins, but their bellies, their chins, their eyeballs. “It was 100 per cent … I couldn’t find any that weren’t bleeding to some degree. "

Vancouver 24 hrs, Aug 11, 2013: [Morton] says Fisheries and Oceans Canada [FOC] is ignoring the problem. According to emails from FOC, the federal authority had asked the marine biologist to send in 20 to 30 herring in September 2011, saying that would be “more than sufficient for the lab to look for clinical signs of disease and provide sufficient diagnostics.” She did, and hasn’t heard back since. FOC officials did not respond to a request for comment by the 24 hours presstime. 

5~ Major news outlets have reported that large numbers of sea stars living off of the west coast of North America appear to be "melting"…
     Divers were out in Puget Sound waters Saturday to see if they can help solve a mystery. Scientists are trying to figure out what’s causing one species of starfish to die in parts of Puget Sound and the waters off of Canada.

    Seattle Aquarium biologists Jeff Christiansen and Joel Hollander suited up in scuba gear in their search for answers.  “We’re going to look for both healthy and potentially diseased sea stars,” Christiansen explained. “We’ve got some sea stars that look like they’re melting on the bottom.”

    The same thing is happening in the waters near Canada and nobody’s sure why.

6~ KILLER WHALE POPULATIONS DYING
Something is also causing a huge spike in the death rate for killer whales living off of the coast of British Columbia…

    A Vancouver Aquarium researcher is sounding the alarm over “puzzling” changes he’s observed in the killer whale pods that live off the southern British Columbia coast.

    Dr. Lance Barrett-Lennard says he fears changes in the ocean environment are prompting odd behaviour and an unusually high mortality rate.

    Barrett-Lennard says the southern resident orca pod, which is found in the Salish Sea between Vancouver Island and the B.C. mainland, has lost seven matriarchs over the past two years, and he’s noticed a lack of vocalizations from the normally chatty mammals.

Once again, scientists do not know why this is happening.

7~ LARGE SEA MAMMALS FOUND WITH SKIN LESIONS AND MISSING FUR IN ALARMING NUMBERS
-Polar bears, seals and walruses along the Alaska coastline are suffering from fur loss and open sores…

    Wildlife experts are studying whether fur loss and open sores detected in polar bears in recent weeks is widespread and related to similar incidents among seals and walruses.

    The bears were among 33 spotted near Barrow, Alaska, during routine survey work along the Arctic coastline. Tests showed they had “alopecia, or loss of fur, and other skin lesions,” the U.S. Geological Survey said in a statement. 

WALRUSES RECENTLY CROWDED ONTO A SMALL ISLAND AND STOPPED FEEDING RATHER THAN SWIM IN THE PACIFIC.
SOME MIGRATORY WHALES ARE USING THE FAR NORTH NEWLY OPENED ARCTIC WATERS TO GET TO THE ATLANTIC RATHER THAN USE TRADITIONAL ROUTES AROUND THE TIP OF SOUTH AMERICA.

EVERYTHING THAT LIVES IN THE PACIFIC KNOWS IT'S TOXIC!

8~ PLANKTON SHOWS HIGH LEVELS OF RADIOACTIVE CESIUM 
Experts have found very high levels of cesium-137 in plankton living in the waters of the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and the west coast.

9~ Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…

• 73 percent of mackerel tested
• 91 percent of the halibut
• 92 percent of the sardines
• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish 

10~ North America's most common birds are vanishing. "NATURE CANADA" HAS LONG REPORTED ON NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS.
HERE'S WHAT THEY'VE NOTICED:
1. Egg laying is occurring earlier.
2. Migration times are shifting.
3. Bird behaviour and their environment are becoming mismatched.
4. Distributions are changing.
5. Ecological communities are disrupted
6. Extinction risks are on the rise. Migratory birds are particularly vulnerable. 

Is it really so unreasonable to wonder if Fukushima could be causing ALL of this?

According to the New York Times
, the latest releases from Fukushima contain “much more contaminated water than before”, and the flow of contaminated water will not stop until 2015 at the earliest…

    "The latest releases appear to be carrying much more contaminated water than before into the Pacific. And that flow may not slow until at least 2015, when an ice wall around the damaged reactors is supposed to be completed."

And that same article explained that cesium-137 is entering the Pacific at a rate that is “about three times as high” as last year…

The magnitude of the recent spike in radiation, and the amounts of groundwater involved, have led Michio Aoyama, an oceanographer at a government research institute who is considered an authority on radiation in the sea, to conclude that radioactive cesium 137 may now be leaking into the Pacific at a rate of about 30 billion becquerels per year, or about three times as high as last year. He estimates that strontium 90 may be entering the Pacific at a similar rate.

VERY SHORT AND TO-THE-POINT, HERE ARE A FEW THINGS THAT "LOW-LEVEL" RADIATION DOES TO THE HUMAN BODY:
http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter1.html
~ Radiation causes infertility. The global fertility rate has dropped by nearly half since 1955.

~ Radiation weakens the immune system. A hundred nation study on quality of health found the United States was number 1 in 1943. By 1992, the United States was number 100, according to a U.S. Public Health Statistics Report. Globally, health is deteriorating with the incidence of cancer, heart disease, allergies and infectious diseases increasing.

~ Even at low levels radiation may increase mutations of bacteria and virus. Mutations are causing the appearance of new diseases such as Reye's Syndrome, Legionnaires' Disease and Lyme Disease.

~ Large-scale breakdown of the protective ozone layer in the  stratosphere was initiated in 1958 by high atmosphere bomb tests, and continues due to releases from nuclear power plants and reprocessing plants. Radioactive Krypton-85 goes to the stratosphere where it greatly enhances CFC ozone damage. THIS ALLOWS OUR SUN'S HARMFUL RAYS TO PENETRATE TO US.
IT ALSO DEPLETES OUR OXYGEN LEVELS.

~ WE GET LESS OXYGEN. WE HAVE LESS FOOD.
Trees and other land plants provide about half our oxygen, and plankton provides the rest. Phytoplankton, the base of the marine food chain, is declining.
In The Petkau Effect, Ralph Graeub describes how radioactivity has harmed the natural balance.

LIKE IT OR NOT, WE DEPEND ON "LOWER LIFE FORMS" TO LIVE!
WHEN THEY GO, WE GO!



The duty to endure
gives us the right to know.
                    -JEAN ROSTAND


http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/ 
"'The nation could survive if there were a few more infants that died shortly before or after birth. It could even survive if there were many more adults who would die of cancer or heart disease at age seventy rather than at eighty. But no nation could survive in the long run if it continuously damaged the mental ability of its newborn children, especially in an age where verbal and mathematical skills were increasingly essential to the functioning of a high-technology society. And since fewer children were being born, and the advances of modern medicine had increased greatly their chances of survival to adulthood even if they were physically and mentally handicapped, it would not take much more than a few generations for a nation with nuclear plants near its cities or sources of milk and water to destroy its health, its productivity, and thus its ability to compete with others who used less biologically damaging ways to meet their needs for energy. '"

TRUTH SLOWLY COMES OUT OF JAPAN
A recent report explains that the Japanese government deceived and withheld pertinent information from the mayor of a city 12 miles downwind of the nuclear plant — the mayor literally had to take matters into his own hands and bravely urge an evacuation of his city just last night for the people’s own protection — and he did this in direct opposition to the official government position  
Mayor Katsunobu Sakurai, Mayor of Minamisoma, population 71,000, says that immediately after the earthquake and tsunami, government officials ignored his calls asking for advice on how to handle the situation. Minamisoma, which sits a mere 12 miles downwind from the Fukushima plant, was devastated by the tsunami, and many of its residents are still missing, according to a recent report in the UK Daily Mail.

Japanese doctors who have been treating those afflicted by the massive radiation released when the plant was damaged by a major earthquake-caused tsunami on March 11, 2011, know that their patients have radiation sickness, but they are being prevented from discussing it publicly. 

Japan is offering pregnant women and their children “a new, very good house” — for free!  The only problem?  IT’S IN FUKUSHIMA! 
Back in 2011 and 2012 some high ranking Japanese bureaucrats decided it was safe to truck radioactive debris and incinerate them in the City Council incinerating plants in and around Tokyo. Their over zealous desire for cleanliness but under appreciation of radioactive isotopes have left a horrendous legacy for Tokyo residents and beyond.

Dr. Christopher Busby, British scientist, PhD in chemical physics at the University of Kent, researching Raman spectro-electrochemistry:
Analysis and findings of radioactivity in apartment in central Tokyo. 2012

 It shows the presence of 130000Bq/kg radio Caesium in the dust plus enriched Uranium and, for the first time, Lead-210/Polonium-210. The apartment was evacuated from the Tuesday after the catastrophe and the machine switched off; and the family returned 5 months later.



DO, PLEASE DO, DOWNLOAD THIS FREE BOOKLET.
'THE CODE KILLERS'
THOUGH IT IS A LARGE DOWNLOAD DUE TO GRAPHICS, IT IS LESS THAN 60 PAGES OF READING.
AND NOTE THAT IT IS FREELY DISTRIBUTED AND THE AUTHOR INVITES YOU TO DO SO.
IT WILL HOPEFULLY SHOW YOU HOW WE'VE ALL BEEN LULLED INTO COMPLACENCY ON THE NUCLEAR EFFECTS ON OUR FRAGILE HUMAN BODIES.
NO RADIATION LEVEL IS "SAFE"...THAT'S JUST AN ABOMINABLE DAMNED LIE!
http://www.acehoffman.org/books/TheCodeKillers.pdf

JAPANESE ACTIVISTS ARE TRYING TO LET THE WORLD KNOW HOW THEIR GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO COVER-UP THIS DISASTER. 
MOTHERS ARE BEGGING PEOPLE TO TAKE THEIR CHILDREN TO SAFETY.
PARENTS REPORT HAVING TO WATCH THEIR CHILDREN SUFFER BECAUSE DOCTORS CAN'T CALL WHAT THEY HAVE "RADIATION SICKNESS".
DOCTORS ARE BESIDE THEMSELVES TRYING TO TREAT WHAT THEY ARE TOLD BY THEIR PRIME MINISTER DOES NOT EXIST.


IN THE VIDEO BELOW, THIS SCIENTIST REITERATES THAT THERE IS NO SAFE RADIATION...THE CHILDREN ARE AFFECTED THE WORST...AND ARE AFFECTED FOREVER.
THAT GOES FOR OUR OWN CHILDREN, OUR GRANDCHILDREN!!!!

FUKUSHIMA, ACCORDING TO THOSE WHO HAVE STUDIED IT EVEN BRIEFLY FOR A FEW MONTHS, IS MANY TIMES WORSE THAN CHERNOBYL.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO CALCULATE HOW HORRIBLY DEADLY IT IS TO ALL OF US.

BELOW, Dr. Helen Caldicott...

Dr. Helen Caldicott, AUSTRALIAN PHYSICIST, on how the Fukushima cover-up is CRIMINAL in scope...

Uploaded on Apr 18, 2011
Stream of radioactive clouds from 11 March - 5 April, 2011, YES, 2011.
THIS IS HOW FAST THE RADIATION MOVED...IT ARRIVED HERE IN LESS TIME THAN WE'VE BEEN TOLD.
IT'S STILL ARRIVING HERE, EVERY DAY...EVERY DAY.

HIGH LEVELS OF RADIATION IN RAIN,  Aug 14 2011.
THESE LEVELS WERE DANGEROUS JUST 5 MONTHS AFTER THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER.
HIGHER LEVELS THAN THESE WERE MEASURE BY INDEPENDENT SOURCES ALL ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, BEGINNING IN MARCH, 2011.
AREAS OF HEAVY RAIN RECEIVED HIGHER DOSES OF RADIATION.

THE VIDEO ABOVE AND THE ONE BELOW WILL HOPEFULLY BETTER EXPLAIN THE DANGER OF RADIATION DOSES TO OUR HUMAN BODIES.  WHILE WE'RE TOLD NOT TO WORRY, NOT TO BE THE LEAST CONCERNED, AFTER WATCHING THESE VIDEOS, YOU MAY JUST DECIDE HOW MUCH WE'VE BEEN LIED TO... AND DEMAND CHANGES IN REPORTING RADIATION LEVELS HERE IN AMERICA, INC...?

What is really happening when radiation damages the body, in large or small doses, is a very complex microscopic assault on living tissue.  Certain elements concentrate in certain organs: Iodine in the thyroid, strontium in bones, astatine in the brain, etc..  If the percentage of radioactive strontium isotopes goes up compared to non-radioactive strontium isotopes (as it is in Japan today), the radioactive strontium will concentrate in bones and teeth.  And, sometime in the future, the incidence of bone cancer and leukemia will increase.

THIS IS A WAR WITHOUT A DECLARATION OF WAR, AND WE ARE THE VICTIMS OF THIS SILENT WAR, ALL OF US. 
OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING ALMOST NOTHING BUT COVERING THIS UP, HIDING FACTS AND TRUTH FROM ALL OF US.
WE ARE ON OUR OWN IN THIS WAR. 
OUR ONLY ALLIES ARE EACH OTHER. 
PLEASE SPREAD THE TRUTH TO ALL YOU LOVE. 
EVERYONE DESERVES TO KNOW. 














Thursday, November 14, 2013

AMERICA'S SECRET "BLACK BUDGET"

FROM THE WASHINGTON POST,

"The $52.6 billion “black budget” for fiscal 2013, obtained by The Washington Post from former ­intelligence contractor Edward Snowden, maps a bureaucratic and operational landscape that has never been subject to public scrutiny. Although the government has annually released its overall level of intelligence spending since 2007, it has not divulged how it uses the money or how it performs against the goals set by the president and Congress.  

Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. wrote in response to inquiries from The Post.
“Our budgets are classified as they could provide insight for foreign intelligence services to discern our top national priorities, capabilities and sources and methods that allow us to obtain information to counter threats,” he said.

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT OTHERS HAVE STATED THE "BLACK BUDGET" HAS EXCEEDED $1 TRILLION PER YEAR!

COULD THAT BE WHERE THE MISSING PENTAGON FUNDS WENT THAT RUMSFELD WAS SO INTENT ON FINDING THE DAY BEFORE 9/11? 

IS THAT WHERE MUCH OF THE PENTAGON'S "BIG MONEY" GOES?

WE KNOW ABOUT $52+ BILLION, BUT WHAT WE DON'T KNOW WOULD FILL AN OCEAN. 

FROM 1997, THIS ARTICLE:
"IN WHAT REMAINS ONE OF THE MOST significant yet elusive developments in this era of deficit reduction and budget slashing, top-secret phantoms have emerged from the rubble of the Cold War to perpetuate an impenetrable, unaccountable and mystifying $30 billion shroud: the Pentagon's black budget.

This budget, both a cover for vital national secrets and a wasteful proving ground for theoretical world wars, conceals hundreds of programs, many of which propel the economic engines of Silicon Valley.  


The black budget operates without constitutional authority or broad congressional oversight and is a hive of absurdly speculative and astonishingly expensive hallucinations, including the notion of "winning" a full-tilt, six-month nuclear war synchronized by a satellite network that charts the progress of the apocalypse. 

"The immediate problem with secret budgets is that you lose a great degree of oversight and accountability," says Steve Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists. 
"In the best of cases you end up wasting money. In the worst of cases you have abuses of power."

Similar concerns inspired Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time."   

"If you look back to the 1950s and 1960s, the only programs which were 'black' were those that dealt with reconnaissance," Sweetman says. 
"With the stealth [aircraft] programs in the 1970s, you started to see the 'black' world overlapping more with the world of regular military operations."  

THE ABOVE IS A VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE. I HOPE YOU FIND THE TIME TO READ ALL OF IT. 


FROM 1995

"The black budget is the government's illusory and tangled accounting of what it spends on intelligence gathering, covert operations, and - less noticeably - secret military research and weapons programs. 

Documented - vaguely - in funding requests and authorizations voted on by select committees of the US Congress, the black budget is published with omitted dollar amounts and blacked-out passages.


 It hides all sorts of strange projects, not just from enemies, foreign and domestic, but from the public and elected officials as well. 
Last year, for instance, it was revealed that the National Reconnaissance Office had for several years used the black budget to hide from Congress the cost and ownership of a $300 million office building, even though the structure was plainly visible from Route 28 west of Washington, DC.  

Blank Check: 

'The Pentagon's Black Budget', was a 1990 book by reporter Tim Weiner. 
 Now at The New York Times, Weiner covered the CIA's Aldrich Ames scandal and won a Pulitzer Prize in 1988 for his exposé of black budget programs for The Philadelphia Inquirer.

In 'Blank Check', Weiner argued that the black budget represented an entire culture of deception - "the realm of nukes and spooks," he called it.

Take a program such as element number 207248F. 
The program behind the number was called STUDS, for "special tactical unit detachments." 
It is hard to believe that any overtones of this acronym are other than intentional.

In one year this program went from $885,000 to $20 million. 
Budget readers know from the program number that STUDS is operational - not just a research project but a working unit, that it is tactical (rather than strategic), and that it is Air Force.

President Clinton issued a long-awaited executive order on secrecy reform. 

The order will declassify hundreds of millions of pages of Cold War documents. 

Under the new policy, most current secret documents will be automatically declassified after 25 years, and classification from now on will automatically expire after a decade - approximately the same length of time that has passed since government officials began drafting the new order.  

There are loopholes, however, that will keep many sensitive documents under lock and key, including those relating to the president and to foreign government involvement. 
And it will be the unenviable task of something called the Information Security Oversight Office to handle the laborious duty of declassification.

IT ISN'T JUST THE PENTAGON...WALL STREET GETS IN ON THE 'BLACK BUDGET' DEALS!

THIS NEWS APPEARED 4 YEARS BEFORE THE BIG HOUSING BUBBLE BURST AND TOOK OUT OUR ECONOMY IN 2008!

America's Black Budget & the
Manipulation of Mortgage & FinancialMarkets

THE FOLLOWING IS FROM AN INTERVIEW IN 2004 WITH  Catherine Austin Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing, president of Solari, Inc., the publisher of 'The Solari Report', managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC., and managing member of Sea Lane Advisory Services, LLC.

"Investors benefit from understanding the federal budget, credit policies and covert intervention that drive markets -- often overriding fundamental economics. 


How has the US governmental apparatus become so powerful in the marketplace and what does it mean to the health of our economy? 
How unstable is the mortgage bubble and where are the opportunities for investors if the bubble bursts?

[THE BUBBLE DID BURST! AND OUR ECONOMY HASN'T RECOVERED FROM THAT YET!] 


When I became Assistant Secretary of Housing, I left Wall St. and went to Washington in 1989, and I walked into the FHA, which at the time was a $300 billion portfolio of mortgage insurance, about 80% of that was single family.

I said, “How much are we making or losing in the single family fund?”
And they said, “We’re losing $11 million a day.”

...so I said, “Well we have 10 regions and 80 field offices, where are we making or losing money?”
And they said, “We don’t know that.” 

 ...they always need more money, but they can’t account for where the money that they have goes.  

In fact, in 2001 we did an estimate, and it turned out that 85% of the first Bush administration budget [was] going to agencies that weren’t in compliance with the audited financial statements rules and reliable financial systems.

...there were reports of not only failure to produced audited financial statements, but about $3.4 trillion of undocumentable adjustments. Very, very significant. That works out to about $11,000 per American resident. 

Now, when people say to me “What is $3.3 trillion of undocumentable adjustments?”, let me give you an example.
In fiscal 2000, the Department of Defense had $2.3 trillion in undocumentable adjustments.
OK now, there’s no way for us to know how much of that translates into cash.
Because $2.3 trillion is more than total taxes paid in a year by … say tax payers in that year would have paid taxes of about $1.6 trillion. So, there’s no way to know if $2.3 trillion translates into how much cash, or how much cash is missing.

Now when the fellow came to see me, I thought he was crazy because what he was saying was that the U.S. Treasury and the FHA were engaged in significant securities fraud.
In other words, what he was saying was that there was a significant amount of FHA & Ginnie Mae (or FHA related) securities outstanding than was shown in the financial statements. 

What has been evidenced over the last 7 years, is that there is a pattern that suggests there is very significant financial fraud in the mortgage markets.
We’ve had a complete implosion of internal financial controls in the governmental apparatus. $3.3 trillion missing from government is a financial coup-d’etat.

You can keep a bubble going as long as you can finance it. And my guess is, again very much credited to Bill Murphy, what we’re watching is a securities operation both with the Federal agencies, the mortgage agencies, and the U.S. Treasury, which are financing a political economy.

The money that comes in from those debt operations are being used for other than their lawful purposes."

$40 TRILLION MISSING!

ANOTHER 2004 ARTICLE

"For the past several decades, there have been an unbroken chain of government scandals involving over-billing and multiple-invoicing for items ranging from toilet seats to bombers. Inevitably the media portray these scandals as unscrupulous corporations taking advantage of an inept government bureaucracy.

 

Sadly these incidents are more pervasive than media reporting indicates, and the truth is far more ominous than mere government incompetence or corporate greed. 

When the clandestine diversion of tax revenue was no longer sufficient to satisfy the requirements [OF COVERT OPERATIONS], a second method was instituted. 

American jobs were outsourced to other countries, thereby allowing the government to repatriate nearly 100% of product and/or service revenue through the foreign purchase of American government bonds.

 

Since the early 1960s, the American citizenry have been the unwitting victims of government fraud, perpetrated on a scale so vast that it staggers the imagination. 

 When figured in 2004 dollars, the total amount exceeds 40 trillion dollars.

January 29, 2002
Defense Department Cannot Account For 25% of Funds - $2.3 Trillion
CBS NEWS

"To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.

"We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

Minnery, a former Marine turned whistle-blower, is risking his job by speaking out for the first time about the millions he noticed were missing from one defense agency's balance sheets.

 

Minnery tried to follow the money trail, even crisscrossing the country looking for records.

"The director looked at me and said 'Why do you care about this stuff?' It took me aback, you know? My supervisor asking me why I care about doing a good job," said Minnery.

He was reassigned and says officials then covered up the problem by just writing it off.

"They have to cover it up," he said. "That's where the corruption comes in. They have to cover up the fact that they can't do the job."

The Pentagon's Inspector General "partially substantiated" several of Minnery's allegations but could not prove officials tried "to manipulate the financial statements."

Twenty years ago, Department of Defense Analyst Franklin C. Spinney made headlines exposing what he calls the 'accounting games'."

SEPT. 10, 2005
<In the U.S. you only have 3 types of classification

Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret
That's it. 
 But this doesn't matter, since the true power of the classification system is the famous 'need to know' policy. 
Just because you have a Top Secret clearance doesn't mean you can gain access to all the different Top Secret documents of the CIA, Army, Navy, and Air Force.
However, this 3-tiered classification system is not enough to protect some of the more sensitive information. 

Therefore additional levels of compartmentalization have been created. 

After a very intensive background check, someone with a Top Secret clearance might obtain an additional Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) clearance, under which information is buried that needs to be restricted to even fewer individuals. 
This TS-SCI clearance had been introduced mainly to stop some higher ranking officers from looking into Top Secret files they don't have any business with.

But even the TS-SCI clearance doesn't provide the secrecy needed for some of the most sensitive projects. 

This is the reason that Special Access Programs (SAP) are created all the time. 

In this case only a predetermined list of authorized personnel has access to the project and additional security measures can be taken to keep outsiders away from it. 
Different congressional committees are informed about these SAPs, but there is very little time for questions.

Most SAPs start out as Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAP), better known as Black Projects

The F-117A Nighthawk and the B-2 Spirit are examples of projects that started out as Unacknowledged SAPs.
 

A DOD manual describes a USAP as follows :

"Unacknowledged SAPs require a significantly greater degree of protection than acknowledged SAPs... A SAP with protective controls that ensures the existence of the Program is not acknowledged, affirmed, or made known to any person not authorized for such information. All aspects (e.g., technical, operational, logistical, etc.) are handled in an unacknowledged manner."
"Additional security requirements to protect these special access programs can range from mere upgrades of the collateral system’s requirements (such as rosters specifying who is to have access to the information) to entire facilities being equipped with added physical security measures or elaborate and expensive cover, concealment, deception, and operational security plans.">


Eisenhower created DARPA (then simply Advanced Research Projects Agency - ARPA) in 1958 "for the purpose of forming and executing research and development projects to expand the frontiers of technology and science, and able to reach far beyond immediate military requirements."

HOW MUCH MONEY DOES DARPA GET AND WHAT FOR?
WE MAY NEVER KNOW.
DARPA is organized under the Pentagon, which is organized under the Dept, of Defense, which is an agency of the executive branch, which means the White House, which refers to the President, where the buck stops.

 So that’s the chain of command.

Here is a key quote from one  of the 'darkest' DARPA proposals:CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF HUMAN DNA 
“…the successful development of technologies for rapid introduction of large DNA vectors into human cell lines will enable the ability to engineer much more complex functionalities into human cell lines than are currently possible.”

DARPA plans to insert a 47th chromosome into human cell lines
That chromosome will serve as a kind of platform that will make subsequent delivery of new genetic information much easier.

New genetic information means alterations in the body, at the level of DNA: Engineering humans.

DARPA will justify these experiments on the basis of improving soldiers’ performance on the battlefield, their general health, their capacity to recover from illness, injury, exhaustion.

 

They can justify it any way they want to, but it adds up to the same thing.

“We will change you. We will make you better. And, ahem, uh, easier to control.”

But this isn’t a debate about how a human could be made better or what “better” should mean or who should decide. 
It’s an argument that the whole program is a violation of the Constitution - because if we don’t stand on that, we don’t stand on anything."

AND WE, THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS, ARE PAYING FOR ALL THESE "BLACK PROGRAMS", THIS "BLACK BUDGET" IS COMING OUT OF OUR POCKETS.
HOW MANY PROGRAMS?
THAT'S CLASSIFIED...

HOW MUCH MONEY?
THAT'S CLASSIFIED...

FOR HOW LONG?
SINCE AT LEAST 1918...

REMEMBER THE  1918 'SPANISH FLU PANDEMIC'?


GO SEE HOW THAT WAS IMPLEMENTED!TRY FORT DIX...