HOW COULD WORLD POPULATION BE REDUCED "HUMANELY"?
WHO WOULD DECIDE WHICH PARTS OF THE POPULATION WOULD BE "REDUCED"?
NO ONE TO FEW WOULD VOLUNTEER TO BE "REDUCED", WOULD THEY?
WOULD YOU?
SO HOW COULD THIS BE DONE WITHOUT ANYONE KNOWING THAT WAS WHAT WAS GOING ON?
WHAT WOULD BE THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE AND EASIEST WAY TO ACCOMPLISH THIS AND RAISE THE LEAST AMOUNT OF SUSPICION, ALARM, FEAR, PANIC?
SLOWLY POISON THE FOOD SUPPLY?
INFECT THE FOOD WITH COMPOUNDS THAT SUBTLY, BUT SURELY, CAUSE DISEASE, ORGAN FAILURE, DESTROY THE IMMUNE SYSTEM, CAUSE GENETIC DAMAGE, AND BRING ABOUT PREMATURE DEATH?
BUT HOW, AND WHO WOULD DO SUCH A THING?
PERHAPS THE COMPANY THAT CREATED AGENT ORANGE, DDT, OTHER KILLERS?
MAYBE IF THEY GOT INTO THE BUSINESS OF FOOD PRODUCTION....
You who do not live in America will likely be completely unaware of a "PLAN" contrived in the mid-1970s to reduce the population of "third-world countries", the poorest nations, some of the nations with the highest populations.
That plan was suggested by a man who is easily recognizable throughout the world, a former SECRETARY OF STATE....DR. HENRY KISSINGER.
In "National Security Memo 200", dated April 24, 1974, and titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests," this same Dr. Henry Kissinger wrote:
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."
According to a National Security Council (NSC) spokesman at the time, the United States shared the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the "population crisis is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation."
In 1975, Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department's Office of Population Affairs.
The depopulation "GLOBAL 2000" document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared.
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that "population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline," even if such measures were adopted.
Another measure was curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: "There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."
"Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now," the document continued, adding, "Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?"
READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT HERE: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM200.htm
YES, A PLAN TO DEPOPULATE THE WORLD, "FOR THE GOOD OF HUMANITY", TO "REDUCE THE DRAIN ON FOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCES"!
In several previous blogs, I have touched on this subject...
"HE WHO CONTROLS THE FOOD WILL CONTROL THE WORLD."
http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/02/toxic-farms-toxic-food-control-food.html
WHO CONTROLS THE FOOD?
NOT THE AMERICAN FARMER ANY LONGER!
NOT AFTER RECENT LEGISLATION PASSED IN AMERICA THAT AFFECTS ANY NATION THAT DEPENDS ON US FOR FOOD!
SO, WHO CONTROLS THE FOOD?
WOULD A CORPORATION WHO OWNS 80% OF THE WORLD'S SEED SUPPLY?
WOULD A GIANT CORPORATION THAT HAS CREATED CROPS THAT HAVE BEEN SO GENETICALLY MODIFIED AND SO CLEVERLY BIO-ENGINEERED THAT 'NORMAL' TRADITIONAL CROPS CANNOT COMPETE AGAINST THEM, CROPS THAT CAN BE PLANTED NEXT TO ORGANIC CROP FIELDS AND CONTAMINATES THEM WITH LAB-CREATED "SUPER-FOODS" POLLEN?
WOULD A COMPANY THAT BEGAN AS A CHEMICAL COMPANY, A COMPANY THAT DEVELOPED BIOCHEMICAL WEAPONS FOR THE USA LIKE 'AGENT ORANGE', OR THE INFAMOUS CHEMICAL THAT CAUSED SO MANY BIRTH DEFECTS IN BOTH ANIMALS AND HUMANS (DDT), OR PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl, a persistent organic pollutant that was BANNED by the United States Congress in 1979 and by the Stockholm Convention in 2001), OR RECOMBITANT BOVINE SOMATOTROPIN (rBST) (which is BANNED on the market in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel and all European Union countries)?
WOULD A COMPANY SUCH AS THIS BE SKILLED IN SUBTLE "HUMAN DEPOPULATION" ? HOW WOULD THEY PULL IT OFF?
IF YOU LOVE YOUR CHILDREN, YOUR FAMILY, YOUR FRIENDS, YOUR OWN LIVES, WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW, AN EXTREMELY WELL-DOCUMENTED FILM.
THE COMPANY HAS NOT SUED THE FILM-MAKERS, IT HAS NOT ISSUED ANY ACTUAL REBUTTAL THAT I CAN FIND, OTHER THAN ITS USUAL ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS VIDEOS. THIS IS A TOPIC I HAVE RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN ABOUT FOR OVER 30 YEARS. I ASSURE YOU, I OFFER NOTHING BUT THE BEST-DOCUMENTED FACTS ON THIS.
I WANT YOU AND YOUR LOVED-ONES TO LIVE!
Before you watch the film, however, please acquaint yourself with the terminology used.
A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. Organisms that have been genetically modified include micro-organisms such as bacteria and yeast, insects, plants, fish, and mammals. GMOs are the source of genetically modified foods, and are also widely used in scientific research and to produce goods other than food. The term GMO is very close to the technical legal term, 'living modified organism' defined in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which regulates international trade in living GMOs (specifically, "any living organism that possesses a novel combination of genetic material obtained through the use of modern biotechnology").
This video focuses on which organisms have been genetically engineered, and for what purposes. The section on genetic engineering focuses on the history and methods of genetic engineering, and on applications of genetic engineering and of GMOs.
HUMAN POPULATION CONTROL IS NOT A NEW CONCEPT, BUT IT IS BECOMING AN INCREASINGLY "POPULAR" SUBJECT, WITH MORE AND MORE ADVOCATES EACH YEAR.
MANY WORLD GOVERNMENTS ARE FRANTIC TO FIND A WAY TO LOWER POPULATION LEVELS...."LEGALLY"...OR AT LEAST SUBTLY AND QUIETLY.
As early as 1798, Thomas Malthus stated in his 'Essay on the Principle of Population' that population control needed to be implemented into society. Around the year 1900, Sir Francis Galton said in his publication called "Hereditary Improvement" that, "The unfit could become enemies to the State, if they continue to propagate."
These and others who want to see, even FORCE population reduction are a part of the "EUGENICS MOVEMENT"...EUGENICS is defined as "'The science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics.
DOES THAT SOUND HARMLESS TO YOU?
DOES THE TERM ALARM YOU AT ALL?
PERHAPS YOU REMEMBER IT FROM THE NAZI HOLOCAUST?
A "EUGENICS MOVEMENT" was quietly begun in America when Margaret Sanger opened a family planning and birth control clinic at 46 Amboy St. in the Brownsville neighborhood of Brooklyn on October 16, 1916.
This became the 'organization' we know as "PLANNED PARENTHOOD".
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ADMIRE AND ADVOCATE PLANNED PARENTHOOD, READ ON FOR A FEW SENTENCES.
As part of her efforts to promote birth control, Sanger found common cause with proponents of eugenics, believing that they both sought to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit."
You see, Sanger believed that lighter-skinned races were superior to darker-skinned races. SHE SAID SO OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN HER PROLIFIC WRITINGS AND SPEECHES.YOU MAY READ THEM FOR YOURSELVES ON MANY WEBSITES, BUT HERE ARE 2 LINKS TO START YOU OUT....IN HER OWN WORDS, HER OWN PUBLISHED WRITINGS.
Source: Birth Control Review, Oct. 1921, 5 , Margaret Sanger MicrofilmS70:913 .
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/search/aboutwed.html
SEE ALSO: http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/documents/documents_by_others.html
In her book The Pivot of Civilization, she advocated COERCION to prevent the "undeniably feeble-minded" from procreating.
In 1926, Sanger gave a lecture on birth control to the women's auxiliary of the Ku Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey.
In "A Plan for Peace", a 1932 essay, she proposed a congressional department to address population problems, and recommended that immigration exclude those "whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race," and that sterilization and segregation be applied to those with incurable, hereditary disabilities.
SANGER'S 'PLANNED PARENTHOOD' TARGETED THE POOR, THE "RACIALLY UNFIT", THOSE WITH LOWER INTELLIGENCE, AND "UNDESIRABLE GENETIC TRAITS".
IN HER OWN WORDS: From her 1920 book, Woman and the New Race, Sanger explicitly called her work "nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or those who will become defectives." As she wrote in The Birth Control Review, "the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the overfertility of the mentally and physically defective."
[ For further reading on Sanger's eugenics beliefs, go here: http://www.nrlc.org/news/2004/NRL07/margaret_sanger_and_planned_pare.htm]
NOW YOU KNOW...
Paul R. Ehrlich, a US biologist and environmentalist, considered population growth a CANCER.
He published The Population Bomb in 1968, advocating stringent population control policies. His central argument on population is as follows:
<<A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. Treating only the symptoms of cancer may make the victim more comfortable at first, but eventually he dies - often horribly. A similar fate awaits a world with a population explosion if only the symptoms are treated. We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparent brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance to survive. >>
In his concluding chapter, Ehrlich offered a partial solution to the "population problem," "[We need] compulsory birth regulation... [through] the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired family size"
READ THAT AGAIN!
"'...THROUGH THE ADDITION OF TEMPORARY STERILANTS TO WATER SUPPLIES OR STAPLE FOOD.'"
ISN'T THAT WHAT THE DOCUMENTARY POSTED ABOVE CLEARLY SHOWS?
GMO FOODS CAUSE STERILITY IN ANIMALS...WE ARE IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM, MY FRIENDS!
The head of the UN Millennium Project (YES, THE U.N. IS DEFINITELY ON BOARD WITH POPULATION REDUCTION!) Jeffrey Sachs is also a heavy proponent of decreasing the effects of overpopulation. In 2007, Jeffrey Sachs gave a number of lectures (2007 Reith Lectures) about population control and overpopulation. In his lectures, called "Bursting at the Seams", he featured an integrated approach that would deal with a number of problems associated with overpopulation and poverty reduction.
The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT[A]) is an environmental movement that calls for all people to abstain from reproduction to cause the gradual voluntary extinction of humankind. VHEMT supports human extinction primarily because, in the group's view, it would prevent environmental degradation. The group states that a decrease in the human population would prevent a significant amount of man-made human suffering.
THERE IS THE BASIS FOR POPULATION CONTROL, FOR "SELECTIVE BREEDING", FOR FILTERING OUT THE "RIFF-RAFF", FOR RIDDING MANKIND OF THE "USELESS EATERS", FOR EXTERMINATING THE "TAKERS" , FOR GETTING RID OF THOSE "HOPELESSLY IMPOVERISHED", THE "LESS INTELLIGENT", THE "LOW-LIFE" OF THE PLANET.
DO YOU SEE THE AGENDA?
CAN YOU SEE THE CONNECTION NOW BETWEEN GMO FOODS AND POPULATION REDUCTION?
NO?
READ ON THEN!
By the Institute for Responsible Technology
'The Truth Is Out on Genetically Modified Foods - And It's Not Pretty'
http://foodmatters.tv/articles-1/the-truth-is-out-on-genetically-modified-foods-and-its-not-pretty
In May, 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) called on “Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM (genetically modified) foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks.” They called for a moratorium on GM foods, long-term independent studies, and labeling. AAEM’s position paper stated, “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food,” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. They conclude, “There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation,” as defined by recognized scientific criteria. “The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.”
More and more doctors are already prescribing GM-free diets. Dr. Amy Dean, a Michigan internal medicine specialist, and board member of AAEM says, “I strongly recommend patients eat strictly non-genetically modified foods.” Ohio allergist Dr. John Boyles says “I used to test for soy allergies all the time, but now that soy is genetically engineered, it is so dangerous that I tell people never to eat it.”
Dr. Jennifer Armstrong, President of AAEM, says, “Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions.” World renowned biologist Pushpa M. Bhargava goes one step further. After reviewing more than 600 scientific journals, he concludes that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a major contributor to the sharply deteriorating health of Americans.
Pregnant women and babies at great risk!
Among the population, biologist David Schubert of the Salk Institute warns that “children are the most likely to be adversely effected by toxins and other dietary problems” related to GM foods. He says without adequate studies, the children become “the experimental animals.”
The experience of actual GM-fed experimental animals is scary. When GM soy was fed to female rats, most of their babies died within three weeks—compared to a 10% death rate among the control group fed natural soy. The GM-fed babies were also smaller, and later had problems getting pregnant.
When male rats were fed GM soy, their testicles actually changed color—from the normal pink to dark blue. Mice fed GM soy had altered young sperm. Even the embryos of GM fed parent mice had significant changes in their DNA. Mice fed GM corn in an Austrian government study had fewer babies, which were also smaller than normal.
Reproductive problems also plague livestock. Investigations in the state of Haryana, India revealed that most buffalo that ate GM cottonseed had complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uteruses. Many calves died. In the US, about two dozen farmers reported thousands of pigs became sterile after consuming certain GM corn varieties. Some had false pregnancies; others gave birth to bags of water. Cows and bulls also became infertile when fed the same corn.
In the US population, the incidence of low birth weight babies, infertility, and infant mortality are all escalating.
Food designed to produce toxin
GM corn and cotton are engineered to produce their own built-in pesticide in every cell. When bugs bite the plant, the poison splits open their stomach and kills them. Biotech companies claim that the pesticide, called Bt—produced from soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis—has a history of safe use, since organic farmers and others use Bt bacteria spray for natural insect control. Genetic engineers insert Bt genes into corn and cotton, so the plants do the killing.
The Bt-toxin produced in GM plants, however, is thousands of times more concentrated than natural Bt spray, is designed to be more toxic, has properties of an allergen, and unlike the spray, cannot be washed off the plant.
In India, animals graze on cotton plants after harvest. But when shepherds let sheep graze on Bt cotton plants, thousands died. Post mortems showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts). Investigators said preliminary evidence “strongly suggests that the sheep mortality was due to a toxin. . . . most probably Bt-toxin.” In a small follow-up feeding study by the Deccan Development Society, all sheep fed Bt cotton plants died within 30 days; those that grazed on natural cotton plants remained healthy.
In a small village in Andhra Pradesh, India, buffalo grazed on cotton plants for eight years without incident. On January 3rd, 2008, the buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for the first time. All 13 were sick the next day; all died within 3 days.
Bt corn was also implicated in the deaths of cows in Germany, and horses, water buffaloes, and chickens in The Philippines.
In lab studies, twice the number of chickens fed Liberty Link corn died; 7 of 20 rats fed a GM tomato developed bleeding stomachs; another 7 of 40 died within two weeks.
Monsanto’s own study showed evidence of poisoning in major organs of rats fed Bt corn, according to top French toxicologist G. E. Seralini.
Worst finding of all—GMOs remain inside of us
The only published human feeding study revealed what may be the most dangerous problem from GM foods. The gene inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function. This means that long after we stop eating GMOs, we may still have potentially harmful GM proteins produced continuously inside of us. Put more plainly, eating a corn chip produced from Bt corn might transform our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories, possibly for the rest of our lives.When evidence of gene transfer is reported at medical conferences around the US, doctors often respond by citing the huge increase of gastrointestinal problems among their patients over the last decade. GM foods might be colonizing the gut flora of North Americans.
Warnings by government scientists ignored and denied
Scientists at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had warned about all these problems even in the early 1990s. According to documents released from a lawsuit, the scientific consensus at the agency was that GM foods were inherently dangerous, and might create hard-to-detect allergies, poisons, gene transfer to gut bacteria, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged their superiors to require rigorous long-term tests.
But the White House had ordered the agency to promote biotechnology and the FDA responded by recruiting Michael Taylor, Monsanto’s former attorney, to head up the formation of GMO policy. That policy, which is in effect today, denies knowledge of scientists’ concerns and declares that no safety studies on GMOs are required. It is up to Monsanto and the other biotech companies to determine if their foods are safe.
Mr. Taylor later became Monsanto’s vice president.
[PLEASE BE AWARE, Secretary of Defense DONALD RUMSFELD was president of Searle Pharmaceuticals, a company owned by Monsanto... Rumsfeld is believed to have earned around US $12 million from the sale of Searle to Monsanto. RUMSFELD PUSHED THROUGH THE FDA's ACCEPTANCE OF ASPARTAME IN AMERICAN FOODS.
[There is a tidy article on this here: http://rense.com/general33/legal.htm]
In 1987, Dr Louis Elsas, Professor of Pediatrics & Genetics at Emory University, testified before Congress; "Aspartame is in fact a well known neurotoxin and teratogen [triggers birth defects] which in some undefined dose will irreversibly produce adverse effects in the developing child or fetal brain. I am particularly angry at this type of advertising that is promoting the sale of a neurotoxin in the childhood age group." [Nov 2, 1987]
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, declares Aspartame is a toxin like arsenic and cyanide that causes confusion, disorientation, seizures, cancer, pancreatic, uterine, ovarian and brain tumors and leads to Alzheimer's. [Read 'Excitotoxins, the Taste That Kills' [505-474-0303].]
Dangerously few studies, untraceable diseases
AAEM states, “GM foods have not been properly tested” and “pose a serious health risk.” Not a single human clinical trial on GMOs has been published. A 2007 review of published scientific literature on the “potential toxic effects/health risks of GM plants” revealed “that experimental data are very scarce.” The author concludes his review by asking, “Where is the scientific evidence showing that GM plants/food are toxicologically safe, as assumed by the biotechnology companies?”
Famed Canadian geneticist David Suzuki answers, “The experiments simply haven’t been done and we now have become the guinea pigs.” He adds, “Anyone that says, ‘Oh, we know that this is perfectly safe,’ I say is either unbelievably stupid or deliberately lying.”
Dr. Schubert points out, “If there are problems, we will probably never know because the cause will not be traceable and many diseases take a very long time to develop.” If GMOs happen to cause immediate and acute symptoms with a unique signature, perhaps then we might have a chance to trace the cause.
This is precisely what happened during a US epidemic in the late 1980s. The disease was fast acting, deadly, and caused a unique measurable change in the blood—but it still took more than four years to identify that an epidemic was even occurring. By then it had killed about 100 Americans and caused 5,000-10,000 people to fall sick or become permanently disabled. It was caused by a genetically engineered brand of a food supplement called L-tryptophan.
If other GM foods are contributing to the rise of autism, obesity, diabetes, asthma, cancer, heart disease, allergies, reproductive problems, or any other common health problem now plaguing Americans, we may never know. In fact, since animals fed GMOs had such a wide variety of problems, susceptible PEOPLE may react to GM food with multiple symptoms. It is therefore telling that in the first nine years after the large scale introduction of GM crops in 1996, the incidence of people with three or more chronic diseases nearly doubled, from 7% to 13%.
Eating genetically modified food kills cells in your body
September 13, 2011
Corn, soy, canola, and cottonseed oil are the genetically modifed (GM) ingredients often unknowingly eaten by most Americans daily, yet these seemingly innocuous foods are killing cells in your body.
The dangers of eating GM food have been more conjecture than science, until now.
In a study published in the Journal of General Physiology, three Canadian researchers studied the effects of GM ingredients on cell membranes, and found a surprising result.
GM seeds are created to lock insecticide chemicals into the structure of plant cells to make them less attractive to the insects who want to eat them. Companies such as Monsanto, DuPont, and Syngentia make billions of dollars annually selling seeds that contain a bacteria that has had its genes manipulated by scientists. The European Union banned GM food ingredients, yet American government agencies, such as the FDA, have been willing to allow GM corn, soy, canola, and cottonseed oil to enter the human food supply, and have decided that GM ingredients do not need to be labeled or highlighted on food packaging. This leaves consumers unaware of whether they're eating GM ingredients.
The New Research
Science started to cast doubt on these two Pro-GM arguments earlier this year when research showed that proteins from GM food are absorbed by the human intestinal tract, and are even passed from a mother to her child during pregnancy.
In this new study, researchers discovered that a toxin protein (Cry1Aa), created from genetically-manipulating a bacteria used to create GM food seeds, has devastating effects on cell health. After ingestion, the toxin protein perforates cell membranes, causing minerals to leak out, and then kills the cells' energy producing organ, which in humans is called the mitochondria. In their experiment, the researchers constructed an artifical cell membrane, similar to a human cell, and hopefully researchers will try to use actual human cells, if possible, in future research.
What This Means
Scientists have observed GM proteins being carried into the human circulation system after they've been eaten through ingestion of GM food. When you eat GM food, the proteins that were designed to kill insects are transported around your body. The effects of the toxic genetic material causes your cells to leak, run out of energy, and die, whch is not healthy behavior; it is a sign of ill health.
Eating GM food is like stabbing yourself (perforating the cell wall), allowing yourself to lose blood (the leakage of minerals), and then do nothing about it so your organs - and you - die (which in your cells' case is the death of the mitochondria). Food is meant to nourish and sustain our life, not shorten it. The role of the immune system in counteracting the effects of these toxin proteins is unknown.
[Source:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-09/uom-pdm091211.php
"Eurekalert: Physicist detects movement of macromolecules engineered into our food"]
It's Decision Time
If you eat GM food now, you have to ask yourself these questions:
1~ Do you want to continue to eat toxic proteins and gamble with your health?
2~ Are you prepared to lose the gamble and witness the quality of your health and life deteriorate faster than it needs to because you want to eat GM foods?
3~ Knowing that GM foods contain harmful proteins, are you happy to continue indirectly funding companies who make GM food products and sell GM seeds?
What you can do to safeguard yourself and your family:
Increase your awareness of which of the foods you eat contain GM ingredients. Visit web sites such as www.truefoodnow.org and instantly download their free guide to knowing which brands are GM and which aren't.
http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/cfs-shoppers-guide%281%29_94012.pdf
Look through the GM-Free guide and when you go to the grocery store, look for the brands that are GM-free (remember that "all-natural" means nothing, and can still be GM).
You may need to take the guide with you to identify the brands to purchase.
Buy organic food as much as you can afford. Organic foods are tested annually for the presence of GM contamination; by eating them you are investing in quality and in your health. Would you rather pay more for health insurance premiums and get sicker, or pay more for your food and have a healthier and happiper quality of life?
Throw out the foods containing GM ingredients in your home, and look for GM-free replacements. If you can't find a replacement then it was probably an unhealthy junk food and you can cope without it.
You don't have to write to congress and become an anti-GM person to create change. Non-violent actions you can take include voting with your dollars and buying foods that create health, not death. When sales go down and stay down, companies change their product lines to reflect the healthier products that people are buying.
America, as always, puts corporate profits ahead of the health of its people, and with the collusion of the bought and paid for FDA, mainstream media, and sold-out politicians, allows GMO foods to be sold to its unsuspecting citizens.
The following articles,websites and videos show that this alarming situation is not new. It goes back decades, and the bad guys seem to be winning.
I hope you will share what you learn with everyone you love, every chance you get.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!
1~ New evidence of harm from GM food triggers call for immediate ban
Press Notice 25th November 2005
Immediate Release
Source: GM Free Cymru [Wales]
"NEW EVIDENCE OF HARM FROM GM FOOD TRIGGERS CALL FOR IMMEDIATE BAN"
UK Government and EC accused of criminal negligence and willful
suppression of facts
http://www.connectotel.com/gmfood/cy251105.txt
2~ 22 May 2005, The Independent can today reveal details of secret research carried out by Monsanto, the GM food giant, which shows that rats fed the modified corn had smaller kidneys and variations in the composition of their blood.
According to the confidential 1,139-page report, these health problems were absent
from another batch of rodents fed non-GM food as part of the research project.
http://www.connectotel.com/gmfood/in220505.txt
3~ This is a great summary of the GM situation. Lots of facts. No hysteria.
http://www.bangmfood.org/images/stories/gm-cropsgm-watch-version.pdf
Here are videos, which are a good introduction to the subject of GM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htQkVRF68qg&feature=related
MONSANTO DEVELOPED AGENT ORANGE AND BEGAN AS A CHEMICAL COMPANY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIJYO2q4Ck0&feature=related
<<Once GE plants are released into the environment, they are out of control. If anything goes wrong - they are impossible to recall.
GE contamination threatens biodiversity respected as the global heritage of humankind, and one of our world's fundamental keys to survival.>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H9WZGKQeYg&feature=related
GMOs CAUSE ORGAN FAILURE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpq6C4VND0A
Truth About Monsanto
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=NYliLZWrsn4&feature=endscreen
MONSANTO WILL OWN ALL SEEDS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtJDZmwh5Bc
BUY HERITAGE SEEDS WHILE YOU CAN, I IMPLORE YOU!
THEY WILL NOT BE AROUND AFTER AMERICA SHIFTS TO THE U.N.'s MANDATORY 'CODEX ALIMENTARIUS'!
"Monsanto trying to take over world seed supply, nation by nation"
Monday, June 27, 2011
http://www.naturalnews.com/032826_Monsanto_seed_supply.html#ixzz2OiNtPIAv
He who controls the seed controls the food supply; and he who controls the food supply controls the world.
There is no question that Monsanto is on a mission to monopolize the conventional seed market. In fact, they are steadfastly working towards the goal of creating a world where 100% of all commercial seeds are genetically modified and patented- basically a world where natural seeds are extinct.
Unfortunately for the global community Monsanto is accomplishing their purpose. They currently own 90% of the world's patents for GMO seed including cotton, soybeans, corn, sugar beets and canola.
Monsanto literally takes farmer seeds, creates genetically engineered copycat versions, and then retains all intellectual property rights.
Dr. Vandana Shiva, Executive Director of the Navdanya Trust, an Indian organization committed to organic biodiversity, states that "the MoU's will in effect, facilitate bio-piracy of Rajasthan's rich biodiversity of draught -resilient crops .... by failing to have any clauses that respect the Biodiversity Act and the Farmers' Rights Act, the MoU's promote bio-piracy and legalize the great seed robbery."
Farmers that sign up for Monsanto's seeds of destruction find themselves hooked. Year after year, no matter what prices are being charged, they are dependent on GMO seeds for new crops because GMO seeds - the bastardized versions they are - don't regenerate.
GMO SEEDS DO NOT REGENERATE...THEY MUST BE PURCHASED ANEW EACH PLANTING!
Conventional and organic farmers in both Canada and the U.S., who have the misfortune of having lands that border GMO farms, often end up with trace contamination in their crops, making them (if organic), unsuitable for sale. Monsanto actually uses this situation against farmers and files patent infringement claims that they often win.
The result is that farm owners are left with exorbitant legal bills and fines often forcing them to shut down: clearing away Monsanto competition.
How Lies, Dirty Tricks and $45 Million Killed GMO Labeling in California
11/08/2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-simon/prop-37-defeated_b_2087782.html
<<...the opposition has waged a deceptive and ugly campaign, fueled by more than $45 million, mostly from the leading biotech, pesticide, and junk food companies. >>
PEPSI ADDS ABORTED HUMAN FETAL CELLS AS A FLAVOR ENHANCER TO THEIR PRODUCTS!
http://www.naturalnews.com/035276_Pepsi_fetal_cells_business_operations.html
The issue began in 2011 when the non-profit group Children of God for Life (CGL) first broke the news about Pepsi's alliance with Senomyx, which led to massive outcry and a worldwide boycott of Pepsi products. At that time, it was revealed that Pepsi had many other options at its disposal to produce flavor chemicals, which is what its competitors do, but had instead chosen to continue using aborted fetal cells -- or as Senomyx deceptively puts it, "isolated human taste receptors".
A few months later, Pepsi' shareholders filed a resolution petitioning the company to "adopt a corporate policy that recognizes human rights and employs ethical standards which do not involve using the remains of aborted human beings in both private and collaborative research and development agreements." But the Obama Administration shut down this 36-page proposal, deciding instead that Pepsi's used of aborted babies to flavor its beverage products is just business as usual, and not a significant concern.
I WANT YOU ALL TO LIVE AND NOT DIE A SLOW, POISONED DEATH.
I WANT US ALL TO HAVE FREE CHOICE OF FOODS AND I WANT THOSE FOODS TO BE FREE OF TOXINS.
PLEASE, LEARN FROM THESE EXTREMELY WELL-DOCUMENTED FACTS!
LEARN, SO YOU AND THOSE YOU LOVE DO NOT UNNECESSARILY PERISH.
BE WELL....LIVE!
No comments:
Post a Comment