BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING: ODD REPORTS OF BOMB DRILLS

THIS STORY IS FULL OF ODDITIES. I DO WONDER AT IT.

There was no word on the motive or who may have launched the attack, and authorities in Washington said there was no immediate claim of responsibility.

A third incident at the John F. Kennedy Library a few miles away and more than an hour later was initially believed to be another explosive device, but library and police officials later said it was an unrelated fire. No one was injured.

CBS News senior correspondent John Miller reports that a Saudi national is being questioned by authorities. He was seen "acting suspiciously" running from the explosion, and a civilian chased him down and tackled him. He was turned over to Boston police and is being questioned by the FBI. He is being cooperative and denies any involvement.
[PLEASE NOTE, THIS WAS NOT AS REPORTED....NO SAUDI NATIONAL.]
HOWEVER....
Miller reported earlier that authorities are also reviewing surveillance video that shows a man from behind carrying two backpacks near the site of the explosions. Authorities are not sure whether the subject in the video is linked to the blasts.The above reported by CBS, which, if you follow the 2nd link, has real-time videos of the explosions.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57579671/deadly-bombs-rock-boston-marathon/
and the videos link here: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50144906n

THE ODDEST REPORTS WERE MADE BY RUNNERS, INTERVIEWED SHORTLY AFTER THE DETONATIONS. RUNNERS REPORTED THE POLICE TELLING THEM ALONG THE ROUTE, BY MEGAPHONE, THAT THEY WOULD BE CONDUCTING DRILLS, THAT THE BOMB-SNIFFING DOGS AND BOMB SQUADS PRESENT WERE DUE TO ONGOING, PLANNED DRILLS. THEY WERE TOLD NOT TO BE ALARMED!
http://room101radio.net/2013/04/15/boston-marathon-runner-police-said-boston-explosions-were-training-exercise/
Boston marathon runner Alastair Stevenson says that before the explosions erupted at the Boston Marathon this morning, he was told by police over the loud speaker that bomb squads and bomb sniffing dogs were part of a ‘training exercise’.
n the article, Stevenson is recorded as saying:

    “They kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed, that they were running a training exercise.”
In fact, the eyewitness runner says that there were already a major presence of bomb sniffing dogs and even a bomb squad.

ACTUAL PRINTED STORY OF RUNNER'S STATEMENTS, IN CASE THE OTHER PAGE DISAPPEARS...
http://cdn.storyleak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/bombsniffingdogs.png

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15 News, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

The news station also reports that Stevenson “thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.”

Stevenson then describes hearing the explosions as he ran away from the scene, having just completed the marathon.

If this report is accurate, it clearly suggests there could have been some degree of prior knowledge of the bombing SOMEWHERE.

ALSO VERY ODD....
TWO HOURS BEFORE EITHER OF THE BOSTON MARATHON EXPLOSIONS, BOSTON GLOBE TWEETED THERE WAS TO BE A DRILL WITH "CONTROLLED EXPLOSIONS" ON THE 600 BLOCK OF BOYLSTON.
https://twitter.com/BostonGlobe/status/323886829596205056
 12:53 PM - 15 Apr 13
    Bob DeCastro Bob DeCastro ‏@BobbyDtv 23h
 “@BostonGlobe: BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street”
    Details
   
    Hayat Alvi Hayat Alvi ‏@HayatAlvi 23h
 “@BostonGlobe: BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street”
    Details
      
Hayat Alvi Hayat Alvi ‏@HayatAlvi 23h
@BostonGlobe Please spread the word
    Details
  
 Dante Dante ‏@DanteTheDon 23h
 “@BostonGlobe: BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street” -- wtf??? everybody stay inside
    Details

THE NEW YORK TIMES STATED THAT THE FIRST BOMB EXPLODED IN A TRASH CAN AT 2:50 PM EDT....IN A GARBAGE CAN...ON BOYLSTON...WHERE THE BOSTON GLOBE HAD TWEETED "CONTROLLED EXPLOSIONS" WOULD BE SET OFF 2 HOURS PRIOR.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/us/explosions-reported-at-site-of-boston-marathon.html?pagewanted=all
<<Almost three-quarters of the 23,000 runners who participated in the race had already crossed the finish line when a bomb that had apparently been placed in a garbage can exploded around 2:50 p.m. in a haze of smoke amid a crowd of spectators on Boylston Street, just off Copley Square in the heart of the city. Thirteen seconds later, another bomb exploded several hundred feet away. There were conflicting reports about how many devices there were. One law enforcement official said there had been four: the two that exploded at the marathon and two others that were disabled by the police. The official said that the devices appeared to have been made with black powder and ball bearings, but that investigators were unsure how the two that exploded had been set off. >>

It is important to emphasize that the New York Times recently reported that most of the recent domestic terror plots in the United States “were facilitated by the F.B.I.,” suggesting that today’s incident in Boston may have been part of such an operation.
[YOU MAY READ THAT REPORT HERE:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 ]

It remains to be seen how the media and the Obama administration will exploit this incident, depending on who gets the blame, but Rahm Emanuel’s saying, “never let a serious crisis go to waste” advise is sure to be heeded.
It may also be interesting to note here that on the day of the Sandy Hook School shootings, there were also several "drills" scheduled in the area for just such a situation.
And on the day of 9/11, military "drills" were being played-out for a hijacked plane assault on the USA. Those "drills" were blamed for the military's slow response to the hijacked planes that were about to strike Washington D.C.

    A TIMELINE, EARLIEST FIRST, FROM THE DAY'S EVENTS, WITH SEVERAL VIDEOS.
PLEASE NOTE THIS WAS REPORTED IN GREENWICH MERIDIAN TIME, NOT EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME.
http://rt.com/usa/boston-marathon-explosions-updates-911/
17:01 GMT: A person, who briefed on the Boston Marathon investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that the explosives were hidden in 6-liter pressure cookers and placed in black duffel bags, AP reported. The explosives contained nails, ball bearings and shards of metal, but it is still unclear what was used to trigger them. Some of the bomb components are now in the hands of investigators.

15:09 GMT: US Airways Flight 1716 was stopped on the ground at Boston's Logan Airport as a precaution, Bloomberg also reported following the news from New York.

15:08 GMT: The central terminal of NY’s LaGuardia Airport has been evacuated after a suspicious package was found, Bloomberg reports.

20:35 GMT: Police are now getting reports of multiple other unexploded devices around Boston.

20:20 GMT: FAA imposes partial no-fly zone following Boston marathon explosions.

20:13 GMT: An intelligence official working on the scene told the Associated Press that two additional explosive devices were found near the site, and are being dismantled by a bomb squad.

IF YOU DON'T SEE THE ODDITY IN ALL THIS, YOU MAY HAVE NOT READ CAREFULLY.

BUT LET ME REPEAT SOMETHING, SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY SUGGESTED SUCH THINGS AS THESE BOMBINGS...A PROVEN LIST OF PLANS DEVISED BY AMERICA'S MILITARY TO DESTROY AIRPLANES, SHIPS, BUILDINGS, EVEN PEOPLE IN ORDER TO CREATE PUBLIC OUTRAGE AGAINST ANOTHER NATION.

SECRET OPERATION 'NORTHWOODS', WHICH GAVE RISE TO OPERATIONS 'MONGOOSE', 'BINGO' AND 'DIRTY TRICKS'. THESE ALL CREATED FALSE FLAG EVENTS, BUT NO ONE WAS AWARE OF THEM FOR OVER 40 YEARS. THE DOCUMENT WAS DECLASSIFIED WITH REDACTION.

OPERATION NORTHWOODS, A MILITARY PLOT TO FRAME CUBA AND INCITE WAR:
AMONG THE LIST OF THINGS THE MILITARY ADVISED PRESIDENT KENNEDY COULD BE TRIED:
The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. Then these acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro
It stated:

    "'The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.'"

More specifically, the plan called for the following:

        "'Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33  c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
        A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.

            a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
                Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
                Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
                Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
                Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]
                Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
                Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
                Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
                Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
                Capture militia group which storms the base.
                Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—naphthalene.
                Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
            b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
            c. Commence large scale United States military operations.

        A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms:

            a. We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
            b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The United States could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by U.S. fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

        We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.
        The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
        A "Cuban-based, Castro-supported" filibuster could be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation (in the vein of the 14 June invasion of the Dominican Republic). We know that Castro is backing subversive efforts clandestinely against Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and Nicaragua at present and possible others. These efforts can be magnified and additional ones contrived for exposure. For example, advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. "Cuban" B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane-burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with "Cuban" messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and "Cuban" shipments of arm which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach.
        Use of MIG type aircraft by U.S. pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of U.S. military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from U.S. resources in about three months.
        Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
        It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

            a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
            b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the United States what has happened to the aircraft instead of the United States trying to "sell" the incident.

        It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.

            a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
            b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.
            c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.'"

IT DID NOT STOP THERE...RELATED "OPERATIONS", LIKE MONGOOSE AND BINGO ALSO CAME UP WITH DIRTY TRICKS AND CRAZY SCHEMES THAT INCLUDED PEOPLE ACTUALLY DYING, BEING INJURED JUST TO PROVOKE THE PUBLIC TO DEMAND WAR WITH CUBA.
THERE IS NO END TO THESE IDEAS, APPARENTLY, AND ALL U.S. CITIZENS ARE SEEN AS "EXPENDABLE"....WE ARE ALL EXPENDABLE IF IT FURTHERS THE "CAUSE", IF IT PLEASES THE MILITARY AND/OR OUR "GOVERNMENT".
WHO WILL BE EXPENDABLE TODAY, TOMORROW, NEXT TIME?

Operation Bingo was a plan to fake an attack on the United States Guantanamo Bay military base as a pretext for a devastating U.S. military assault on Havana.
Operation Dirty Trick was a plan to kill two birds with one stone if something went wrong with the manned 1962 Mercury space flight, carrying John Glenn:
Forged documentation and doctored photos were readied in order to blame any mission disaster not on NASA but on the Cuban government.

[THINK: IF THEY COULD FORGE SUCH THINGS 50 YEARS AGO, DARE WE IMAGINE WHAT CAN BE FORGED NOW?]

As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted:

    '"Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation.'"
WHO ARE THESE "MOST HIGHLY TRUSTED COVERT PERSONNEL" WHO WOULDN'T HESITATE TO CARRY OUT SUCH THINGS?
WHERE ARE THEY?

James Bamford wrote on Northwoods:

    Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.

SOUND FAMILIAR?
IT SHOULD...
INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD ON THE STREETS OF AMERICA...
WAVES OF TERRORISM...
PLANES HIJACKED...
BLAME IT ALL ON SOMEONE ELSE.
ALMOST 40 YEARS LATER, BEGINNING IN THE 1990s, THE MILITARY MAY HAVE PULLED NORTHWOODS OUT OF THE DUSTY FILES ... AND IS GOING DOWN THE LIST IN EARNEST.
OKLAHOMA CITY, 9/11, COLORADO THEATER SHOOTING, SANDY HOOK, BOSTON MARATHON...
WHO CAN SAY WITH 100% CERTAINTY WHO REALLY CONCEIVED OF AND CARRIED OUT SUCH THINGS?
WHO CAN SAY IF MARTIAL LAW, OR A MILITARY DICTATORSHIP IS STILL HOPED AND PLANNED FOR?
WHO CAN SAY?
WHO?

FROM ABC NEWS ON NORTHWOODS
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1#.UW24qUq3OSo
 <<The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.

"These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so embarrassing," James Bamford told ABCNEWS.com.

"The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but that nobody else wants."

Gunning for War

The documents show "the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government," writes Bamford.

The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba, the documents show.

Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba [sic]."

The plans were motivated by an intense desire among senior military leaders to depose Castro, who seized power in 1959 to become the first communist leader in the Western Hemisphere — only 90 miles from U.S. shores. >>

IT WAS A LUNATIC SCHEME, KENNEDY REJECTED IT....AND THEN...

Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and it would now be the Joint Chiefs' turn to incur his displeasure. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale memo) dated 16 March 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force.
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis.

ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963, JOHN F. KENNEDY WAS KILLED.


 “@BostonGlobe: BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street”

@BostonGlobe Please spread the word
      
 “@BostonGlobe: BREAKING NEWS: Police will have controlled explosion on 600 block on Boylston Street” -- wtf??? everybody stay inside

AT 2:50 PM...FIRST EXPLOSION...


FROM A MOVIE PRODUCED IN 1972: STATE OF SIEGE
UNABLE TO POST VIDEO HERE, BUT GO WATCH...IT MAY OPEN YOUR EYES A BIT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuOjLq7rLts