Translate

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

HOW WE GOT AL-QAEDA: FROM THE TALIBAN TO KARZAI, THE OPIUM TRAIL

Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Monday (APRIL 29, 2013) acknowledged that his office has been receiving money from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency over the past 10 years, dismissing the monthly cash payments as a "small amount."

SMALL AMOUNT?
WHAT IS A SMALL AMOUNT TO KARZAI, HAND-PICKED "PRESIDENT" OF THE "NEW" AFGHANISTAN?
WELL, HE CALLED THE SEVERAL MILLION HE'D GOTTEN FROM IRAN OVER THE SAME PERIOD OF TIME (MILLIONS, JUST AS HE SAID THE CIA PAID HIM, MILLIONS) "SMALL" TOO, AND SAID IT TOOK THAT AND MUCH MORE TO RUN THE PRESIDENCY.

CHINA IS KNOWN TO HAVE "CONTRIBUTED" TO AFGHANISTAN AS WELL.
WHO ELSE?

THE BBC REPORTED IN 2010 THAT KARZAI WAS ON THE TAKE FROM IRAN, BUT THE AMERICAN-CHOSEN KARZAI SAID "MANY NATIONS MAKE GIFTS TO AFGHANISTAN IN THIS WAY, INCLUDING THE U.S."
MANY? HOW MANY?

WHO KNEW THE PRESIDENCY OF AFGHANISTAN WAS A TOOL TO PUT MONEY IN YOUR OWN PERSONAL POCKET?
<Tongue-in-cheek comment, that. WE KNOW OUR CONGRESS DOES IT!>

<<"The government of Iran has been assisting us with five or six or seven hundred thousand euros once or twice every year, that is an official aid," he told reporters.>>

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11618969

THAT WASN'T TOTALLY TRUE...

The New York Times report said that last August, at the end of an official visit to Iran by Mr Karzai, a large bag of euro notes had been passed to his chief of staff, Umar Daudzai, PERSONALLY,  by Iran's ambassador to Afghanistan, Feda Hussein Maliki.
"It was part of a "secret, steady stream of Iranian cash to buy the loyalty of Mr. Daudzai and promote Iran's interests in the presidential palace", the report said, citing Afghan and Western officials.

BUY LOYALTY?
WHAT A POOR INVESTMENT!
A HIGHER BIDDER ALWAYS COMES ALONG.


The officials alleged that the payments, totaling millions of dollars, had been used to pay [BRIBE?] Afghan politicians, tribal elders and even Taliban commanders to secure their loyalty.
The payments to Mr. Daudzai illustrate the degree to which the Iranian government has penetrated Mr. Karzai’s inner circle despite his presumed alliance with the United States and the other NATO countries, which have sustained him with military forces and billions of dollars since the Taliban’s ouster since 2001.
OR HAS KARZAI PENETRATED THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT?
WHAT DID HE LEARN AT THE "SCHOOL OF THE AMERICAS"?
IRAN SHOULD THINK TWICE
Earlier IN 2010, Mr. Karzai invited the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to the presidential palace, where Mr. Ahmadinejad gave a virulently anti-American speech. When Mr. Ahmadinejad visited Kabul, he brought two boxes of cash, an Afghan official said. “One box was for Daudzai personally, the other for the palace,” the official said.

BUT, IT WAS A "FAMILY AFFAIR" AS KARZAI'S BROTHER, WALI, WAS ALSO ON THE DOLE... UNTIL HE WAS POSSIBLY TAKEN OUT BY THE CIA {???}. RUMORS DID FLY AFTER THAT "ASSASSINATION"!
October 27, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/asia/28intel.html?hp
<<KABUL, Afghanistan — Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan president and a suspected player in the country’s booming illegal opium trade, gets regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency, and has for much of the past eight years, according to current and former American officials.

The agency pays Mr. Karzai for a variety of services, including helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the C.I.A.’s direction in and around the southern city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai’s home.

Critics say the ties complicate America’s increasingly tense relationship with President Hamid Karzai, who has struggled to build sustained popularity among Afghans and has long been portrayed by the Taliban as an American puppet.
The C.I.A.’s practices also suggest that the United States is not doing everything in its power to stamp out the lucrative Afghan drug trade, a major source of revenue for the Taliban.
More broadly, some American officials argue that the reliance on Ahmed Wali Karzai, the most powerful figure in a large area of southern Afghanistan where the Taliban insurgency is strongest, undermines the American push to develop an effective central government that can maintain law and order and eventually allow the United States to withdraw.>>

WITHDRAW?
WHY, "HAMI" ALL BUT KICKED THE U.S. OUT OF THE COUNTRY A SHORT WHILE BACK!
IS THE OPIUM HARVEST IN ALREADY THERE, OR WHAT?
IS CHINA OR IRAN GOING TO GUARD ALL THOSE POPPY FIELDS NOW?
MAYBE OUR TROOPS CAN GET A BREAK FROM THAT, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS!
FOR OVER 40 YEARS, THE USA HAS BEEN VERY FOND OF THAT OPIUM, AND HAS GONE TO GREAT LENGTHS TO PROTECT IT AND MAKE SURE IT'S HARVESTED.

LET'S FOLLOW THE OPIUM TRAIL...


26 March 2010 | Issue 4358
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/natos-refusal-to-destroy-opium-criticized/402559.html
NATO's Refusal to Destroy Opium Criticized

<<Federal Drug Control Agency chief Viktor Ivanov lashed out Thursday at NATO for refusing to destroy opium poppy fields in Afghanistan because this would increase poverty in the war-ravaged country.

"Such a humane approach is surprising at the very least," Ivanov said, Itar-Tass reported.
"If NATO is going to continue to show such care, then — with the price for opium falling from $90 to $60 per kilogram — perhaps it should double the number of [Afghan] fields," he said.
NATO on Wednesday rejected Russian calls for it to eradicate opium poppy fields in Afghanistan, saying the best way for Moscow to help control the drug would be to give more assistance against the insurgency.
Earlier this week, Ivanov met NATO ambassadors in Brussels and proposed that NATO troops be given a UN mandate and an obligation to eradicate Afghan opium crops, which Russia says are killing 30,000 Russians a year. 
>>

SO, WHAT DOES IT ALL ADD UP TO?
BLOODY LITTLE FOR THE AFGHAN PEOPLE!
Despite receiving billions of dollars in aid, Afghanistan remains one of the poorest countries in the world.
WHERE'S THE MONEY GOING?
THAT'S SOME PRESIDENTIAL PALACE, BUT SURELY IT DOESN'T TAKE BILLIONS A YEAR TO PAY THE ELECTRIC BILL, HMMM?


America's choice, Karzai, will have to admit, things look bad for him being in it for SELF...HIMSELF. Then again, admission will do little to reassure some of his "foreign supporters", who, by the way, have been concerned at the blatant corruption within his "government", and Tehran's growing influence in the country.
And his lack of precision didn't help matters - "once or twice in a year, Iran has given five hundred, or six hundred, or seven hundred thousand euros," he said, remember?
So, did ANY OF THOSE MILLIONS-BILLIONS make its way into the finance ministry's coffers, into AID FOR THE COMMON CITIZENS?

"Iranian influence in Afghan affairs is a growing concern to the U.S."
SURE, SURE...SOME OTHER NATION MAY GET THE POPPY HARVEST NEXT YEAR!
WHAT WILL THE CIA-DEA DO FOR A "CASH CROP" THEN?
MEXICO, MAYBE...SOUTH AMERICA...INDIA?
HOME-GROW IT? CALIFORNIA? FLORIDA? TEXAS?
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE OPIUM, THOSE PRETTY, PRETTY POPPIES!

HISTORY LESSON: HOW WE GOT AL-QAEDA:

In 1998, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser, said in an interview with a French publication, Le Nouvel Observateur, that the US intervention in the Afghan-Soviet war did not begin in the 1980s, but that, “it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul,” which precipitated the Soviet invasion into Afghanistan.
From the Soviet invasion, a bloody ten-year war followed.
Amazingly, “Before 1979 Pakistan and Afghanistan exported very little heroin to the West,” but by 1981, “trucks from the Pakistan army’s National Logistics Cell arriving with CIA arms from Karachi often returned loaded with heroin – protected by ISI [Pakistan’s internal security service] papers freeing them from police search.”
This change occurred in 1981 when then CIA Director William Casey, Prince Turki bin Faisal of Saudi intelligence and the ISI worked together to create a foreign legion of jihadi Muslims or so-called "Arab Afghans". More than 100,000 Islamic militants were trained in Pakistan between 1986 and 1992 in camps overseen by the CIA and [British] MI6. The SAS [British special forces] trained future "Al-Qaida" and Taliban fighters in bomb-making and other black arts" while their leaders were trained at a CIA camp in Virginia.
Further, “CIA aid was funneled through [Pakistani President] General Zia and the ISI in Pakistan.”
In the mid-1990s, an obscure group of “Pashtun country folk” had become a powerful military and political force in Afghanistan ..AND BECAME KNOWN AS THE TALIBAN.
STEP 1: NAMED "THE TALIBAN"

REMEMBER HOW MUCH REAGAN ADMIRED AND SUPPORTED THOSE "NEW" GUYS? CALLED THEM "FREEDOM FIGHTERS"...


Under Reagan, U.S. support for the mujaheddin evolved into an official U.S. foreign policy, known as the Reagan Doctrine, which included U.S. support for anti-Soviet movements in Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua, and elsewhere. Ronald Reagan praised the mujaheddin as "freedom fighters". The United States Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 65, even designated March 21, 1983 as "Afghanistan Day" and requested the President issue a proclamation in observance of that day. Reagan did just that.

<<Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby designate March 21, 1983 as Afghanistan Day.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and seventh. ~ Ronald Reagan>>

In 1982, Ronald Reagan dedicated the Space Shuttle Columbia to the resistance fighters in Afghanistan. <<"Just as the Columbia, we think, represents man's finest aspirations in the field of science and technology so too does the struggle of the Afghan people represent man's highest aspirations for freedom. I am dedicating, on behalf of the American people, the March 22nd launch of the Columbia to the people of Afghanistan".>>

AMERICA DID LOVE THAT TALIBAN...UNTIL THEY BEGAN TO CUT OFF OPIUM PRODUCTION.
YES, THE TALIBAN ALL BUT SHUT DOWN ALL OPIUM FIELDS IN AFGHANISTAN AND THE UNITED NATIONS EXPRESSED 'SHOCK AND AWE"! IT HAD NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE!
BUT, MAYBE THAT WAS WHEN THE U.S. GOT TICKED-OFF?
Just as in the Afghan war against the Soviet Union in the previous decade, the ISI looked to SAUDI intelligence to provide the funding for the Taliban, and the ties between the ISI and Saudi intelligence grew much closer.
The Taliban’s rise to power in Afghanistan was also aided by the CIA, which worked with the Pakistani ISI.
EVERYBODY KNEW THAT!
BUT THE TALIBAN HATED OPIUM!
REAGAN DIDN'T KNOW THAT...

A few years after the Taliban came to power they began a campaign to eradicate Afghanistan’s opium crops, and “The success of Afghanistan’s 2000 drug eradication program under the Taliban government was recognized by the United Nations” as a monumental feat, in that “no other country was able to implement a comparable program.” In October of 2001, the UN acknowledged that the Taliban reduced opium production in Afghanistan from 3300 tons in 2000 to 185 tons in 2001.
In July 2000, Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, collaborating with the United Nations to eradicate heroin production in Afghanistan, had declared that growing poppies was un-Islamic, resulting in one of the world's most successful anti-drug campaigns. The Taliban enforced a ban on poppy farming via threats, forced eradication, and public punishment of transgressors. The result was a 99% reduction in the area of opium poppy farming in Taliban-controlled areas, roughly three quarters of the world's supply of heroin at the time.

IN SPITE OF THIS, THE BUSH2 'ADMINISTRATION' CONTINUED REAGAN'S COURTSHIP OF THE TALIBAN. YES, BUSH2, JUST LIKE REAGAN AND BUSH1.
In June of 2001, a few months before 9/11, it was reported that a “recent gift of $43 million to the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan” was announced “by Secretary of State Colin Powell, in addition to other recent aid, [which] made the United States the main sponsor of the Taliban.”
[SOURCE: Robert Scheer, 'Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban'. The Nation: June 4, 2001]
THE GIFT DIDN'T DO THE TRICK...THE TALIBAN WAS STILL AGAINST OPIUM PRODUCTION.
In December 2001, a number of prominent Afghans met in Bonn, Germany, under United Nations (UN) auspices to develop a plan to reestablish the State of Afghanistan, including provisions for a new constitution and national elections. As part of that agreement, the United Kingdom (UK) was designated the lead country in addressing counter-narcotics issues in Afghanistan. Afghanistan subsequently implemented its new constitution and held national elections. On December 7, 2004, Hamid Karzai was formally sworn in as president of a 'democratic' Afghanistan (AMID A LARGE OUTCRY THAT THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED).
“Immediately following the October 2001 invasion, opium markets were restored. Opium prices spiraled. By early 2002, the domestic price of opium in Afghanistan (in dollars/kg) was almost 10 times higher than in 2000.”[15] The Anglo-American invasion of Afghanistan successfully restored the drug trade. The Guardian recently reported that, “In 2007 Afghanistan had more land growing drugs than Colombia, Bolivia and Peru combined.”[16].
[SOURCE: Michel Chossudovsky, 'America’s War on Terrorism', 2nd ed. Center for Research on Globalization: Qu├ębec, 2005. pgs. 226-228]

THE TALIBAN WAS OFFENDED...THE TALIBAN WAS ANGRY AT THE COMPLICITY OF THE U.S. IN HELPING START UP THE OPIUM PRODUCTION AGAIN.
In 2005 it was reported by the Independent that Afghanistan’s Interior Minister had resigned, “amid reports he had quit because of the involvement of senior government officials in the illegal drug trade.”  He had "been outspoken over the involvement of officials in the drug trade and is believed to have had differences with President Karzai over the appointment of Provincial officials.”[17] In 2006, the Independent reported that, “British intelligence officers and military commanders accused the US of undermining British policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, after the sacking of a key British ally in the Afghan province of Helmand.” The British “blamed pressure from the CIA for President Hamid Karzai's decision to dismiss Mohammed Daud as governor of Helmand.” Mr. Daud “had survived several Taliban assassination attempts, was seen as a key player in Britain's anti-drugs campaign in Helmand,” and was fired after Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan’s President, “listened to advice from ‘other powerful Western players’.”
[SOURCE: Justin Huggler, "Afghan minister quits over opium trade". The Independent: September 28, 2005]
Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, wrote in a 2007 article in the UK Daily Mail, that what has been achieved in Afghanistan is “the highest harvests of opium the world has ever seen.”[SOURCE: Craig Murray, Britain is protecting the biggest heroin crop of all time. UK Daily Mail: July 21, 2007] Murray elaborated that, “Our economic achievement in Afghanistan goes well beyond the simple production of raw opium. In fact Afghanistan no longer exports much raw opium at all. It has succeeded in what our international aid efforts urge every developing country to do. Afghanistan has gone into manufacturing and 'value-added' operations.” This means that Afghanistan “now exports not opium, but heroin.">>

DO WE CELEBRATE THAT HEROIN INSTEAD OF OPIUM? REALLY?

WELL, IT ISN'T "COINCIDENCE" THAT AFTER THE TALIBAN SHUT-DOWN OPIUM PRODUCTION, BUSH FOUND A WAY TO GO INTO AFGHANISTAN, AND "HELP" THINGS GET BACK TO NORMAL!
THE CASH CROP WAS RESTORED, THE TALIBAN BECAME OUR ENEMY, AND FROM THAT TALIBAN WAS CREATED, YES, CREATED, AND BY THE CIA AND PALS BEFORE THE 9/11 THING, THE ALL NEW, BIG, BAD MONSTER ON THE BLOCK...."AL-QAEDA".

WE WERE WARNED! OTHERS KNEW THE SCORE AND SAID SO IN THE PRESS!

In 2002, former Additional Secretary in the Cabinet Secretariat of the Government of India wrote that, in regard to the failure to combat the rise in opium production, <<“this marked lack of success in the heroin front is due to the fact that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the USA, which encouraged these heroin barons during the Afghan war of the 1980s in order to spread heroin-addiction amongst the Soviet troops, is now using them in its search for bin Laden and other surviving leaders of the Al Qaeda.”>>
[SOURCE: B. Raman, 'Assassination of Jaki Abdul Qadeer in Kabul'. South Asia Analysis Group: Paper no. 489, August 7, 2002]

RUSSIA KNEW:
The Hindu reported in 2008 that, “90 per cent of the heroin sold in Russia comes from Afghanistan,” and Putin was quoted as saying, “Unfortunately, they (NATO) are doing nothing to reduce the narcotic threat from Afghanistan even a tiny bit,” and that the coalition forces were “sitting back and watching caravans haul drugs across Afghanistan to the former Soviet Union and Europe.” The article then reported that, “according to unconfirmed reports the U.S. military transport aviation is used for the delivery of drugs from Afghanistan to the American airbases, Ganci in Kyrgyzstan and Incirlik in Turkey,” and that, “It has been reported earlier that the CIA is involved in Afghanistan’s opium production, or is at least protecting it.” One Russian journalist quoted anonymous Afghan officials as saying, “85 per cent of all drugs produced in southern and southeastern provinces are shipped abroad by U.S. aviation.”
[SOURCE: Vladimir Radyuhin, 'Russia: victim of narco-aggression.' The Hindu: February 4, 2008]

BRITAIN GOT IN ON THE ACT:
The Independent reported in 2008 that “Britain planned to build a Taliban training camp for 2,000 fighters in southern Afghanistan, as part of a top-secret deal to make them swap sides. The plans were discovered on a memory stick seized by Afghan secret police in December.” Further, “The camp would provide military training for 1,800 ordinary Taliban fighters and 200 low-level commanders.”
[SOURCE: Jerome Starkey, 'Revealed: British plan to build training camp for Taliban fighters in Afghanistan." The Independent: February 4, 2008]
“Officially, the British embassy remains tight-lipped, fueling speculation that the plan may have been part of a wider clandestine operation.”

Who Profits from the Drug Trade?
MAINLY WALL STREET...BIG GLOBAL BANKERS.
As an example of the interest of Wall Street and London bankers in the international drug trade, we can look to Colombia and the FARC rebel group.
In “1999, NYSE [New York Stock Exchange] Chairman Dick Grasso traveled to Colombia and met with the leader of the FARC rebels controlling the southern third of the country.” “Grasso had asked the Colombian rebels to invest their profits in Wall Street.” The Associated Press reported that Grasso told the rebel leader to, “make peace and expect great economic benefits from global investors,” and invited the rebel leader to visit Wall Street.
[SOURCE: CBS MarketWatch, "NYSE's Grasso met with Colombia's FARC". AP: June 29, 1999]
To allow for drug investment in Western financial institutions, major banks like Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, and JPMorgan Chase all offer private client services for the very wealthy with very few questions asked. This is common knowledge and few care.
Making money, or laundering money, is the bottom line, right?
DRUGS ARE MONEY IN A VERY BIG WAY!
AMERICA'S WAR ON DRUGS IS TO FIGHT TO KEEP THEM FLOWING!
 BACK TO THE TALIBAN BECOMES AL-QAEDA...
In a 2004 BBC article entitled "Al-Qaeda's origins and links", the BBC wrote:
<<Al-Qaeda, meaning "the base", was created in 1989 as Soviet forces withdrew from Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden and his colleagues began looking for new jihads.
The organisation grew out of the network of Arab volunteers who had gone to Afghanistan in the 1980s to fight under the banner of Islam against Soviet Communism.
During the anti-Soviet jihad Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding. Some analysts believe Bin Laden himself had security training from the CIA.>>
[SOURCE: Al-Qaeda's origins and links, BBC News, July 20, 2004]

 Both Bin Laden and the CIA "held accounts in the Bank for Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)."
[SOURCE:  Forgotten Coverage of Afghan 'Freedom Fighters', Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, January/February 2002.]
Author David N. Gibbs, quoted  Le Monde  [SEE Le Monde (9/15/01] as saying bin Laden was "recruited by the CIA" in 1979, Associated Press as saying a former bin Laden aide told them that in 1989 the U.S. shipped high-powered sniper rifles to a Mujaheddin faction that included bin Laden [SEE  (AP, 10/16/01)], and Jane’s Intelligence Review as stating Bin Laden "worked in close association with U.S. agents" in raising money for the Mujaheddin from "vast family connections" near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
[SEE:Jane’s Intelligence Review, 10/1/98 ]

WE ALSO KNOW THAT THE BUSH FAMILY AND THE BIN LADEN FAMILY WERE LINKED IN BUSINESS THROUGH THE CARLYLE GROUP FOR DECADES.
'DADDY' BUSH , LEST WE FORGET, WAS CIA.
In 1976, Ford brought Bush back to Washington to become Director of Central Intelligence, replacing William Colby. He served in this role for 357 days, from January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.
"In October 2003, Vanity Fair magazine disclosed information that had not previously been made public, in an in-depth report entitled 'Saving the Saudis.' The story that emerged about the relationship between the Bush family, the House of Saud, and the bin Laden family" (outlined) relationships that went back at least to the time of the Saudi Arabian Money-laundering Affair which began in 1974, and to George H.W. Bush's terms as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (1971-1973) and then as head of the CIA (1976-1977).
 
"Vanity Fair concluded: 'The Bush family and the House of Saud, the two most powerful dynasties in the world, have had close personal business, and political ties for more than 20 years'."

THERE ARE EVEN QUESTIONABLE PHOTOS OF ZBIGNIEW  BRZEZINSKI WITH A YOUNG USAMA (OSAMA) BIN LADEN.


                                     COMPARE WITH THIS KNOWN PHOTO OF OBL
                                                   AS A YOUNGER FIGHTER.


Al Qaeda was created by the CIA, in their offices in Washington D.C.
"AL-CIA-DA'
It was created for Saudi Arabia to bankroll Osama bin Laden, through the House of Saud, "in the Afghan war against the Soviet Union during the 1980's and Riyadh and Washington together contributed an estimated $3.5 billion to the mujahideen."
  "In late 2003, U.S. News & World Report conducted an exhaustive study titled. 'The Saudi Connection.' Its findings included the following."
  "The evidence was indisputable: Saudi Arabia, America's longtime ally and the world's largest oil producer, had somehow become, as a senior Treasury Department official put it, 'the epicenter' of terrorist financing'.U.S. intelligence officials knew about Saudi Arabia's role in funding terrorism by 1996, yet for years Washington did almost nothing to stop it.>>
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/031215/15terror.htm
 THE ABOVE IS A VERY LENGTHY, THOROUGH, WELL-DOCUMENTED ARTICLE, RICH WITH HISTORY OF THE MIDDLE EAST AND THE INFAMOUS "HOUSE OF SAUD". IF YOU READ NOTHING ELSE, DO READ THAT ARTICLE.

THIS ARTICLE QUESTIONS THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE OF 'AL-QAEDA', AS OTHERS HAVE, WITHOUT POINTING FINGERS IN SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0523/p11s02-coop.html

I LIKE FINGER-POINTING ONLY WHEN WE CAN BE CERTAIN THAT WE POINT IN THE RIGHT DIRECTIONS, AND THIS SITE IS BY A MAN WHO CAN OFFER EXCELLENT DOCUMENTATION AS TO WHERE 'AL-QAEDA' CAME FROM:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO405E.html
OPEN YOUR MIND AND HAVE A READ!

IF THERE HAD NOT BEEN AN "AL-QAEDA", BUT ONLY A TALIBAN WHICH 4 PRESIDENTS FROM REAGAN TO BUSH2 PAID HOMAGE TO AND HELPED FUND, IF THERE HAD BEEN NO "BOOGEY MONSTER", JUST REAGAN'S "FREEDOM FIGHTERS", WE WOULDN'T HAVE HAD A REASON FOR SUCH A "WAR"!
THINK ABOUT IT...
No Al Qaeda,
No war on terrorism
No rogue States which sponsor Al Qaeda
No pretext for waging war.
No justification for invading and occupying Afghanistan and Iraq
No justification for sending in US special forces into numerous countries around the World.
No justification for developing tactical nuclear weapons to be used in conventional war theaters against Islamic terrorists, who according to official statements constitute a nuclear threat.WE HAD TO CREATE A "MONSTER", AND WE DID.

PLEASE TAKE NOTE: ONE YEAR BEFORE 9/11, the 'Project for a New American Century' (PNAC) called for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor," which would serve to galvanize US public opinion in support of a war agenda.

 BUT THAT'S NOT ALL!
The PNAC's reference to a "catastrophic and catalyzing event" echoes a similar statement by David Rockefeller to the United Nations Business Council in 1994:
"We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
Similarly, in the words Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand Chessboard:.
 "…it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus [in America] on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."
COINCIDENCE, ALL?
LOOK AT THE TIME FRAME OF EACH OF THOSE STATEMENTS!
LOOK AT THE RAPID 'ORIGIN' OF THAT NEW THREAT, THAT 'NEW PEARL HARBOR', THAT 'RIGHT MAJOR CRISIS', THAT 'TRULY MASSIVE AND WIDELY PERCEIVED EXTERNAL THREAT'!
AL-CIA-DA...AL-QAEDA.
STARTED AS A CIA FILE, JUST A FILE, JUST AN ACCOMMODATION FOR OUR BUDDIES, THE HOUSE OF SAUD.
IT WAS JUST A "CODE NAME", AND THAT'S WHAT IT STILL IS TODAY.
THEY TURNED THE TALIBAN INTO AL-QAEDA ALMOST OVERNIGHT!
THEY CREATED A REASON FOR WAR.
AND WE CAN FOLLOW THE OPIUM TRAIL FROM THEN UNTIL NOW.

KARZAI HAS OBVIOUSLY FOUND NEW POPPY FIELD TENDERS, NEW GUARDS FOR THAT CASH CROP, AND HE'S PUSHING AMERICA OUT.
JUST LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN, MUBARAK, GADDAFI, NORIEGA, CASTRO, AND HUNDREDS MORE ACROSS TIME WHOM AMERICA FUNDED, SUPPORTED, AND CALLED FRIEND AND ALLY, KARZAI IS TURNING ON HIS HANDLERS....
AND THAT CAN GET HIM KILLED IN A FLASH!


No comments:

Post a Comment