U.S. GOVERNMENT HID RADIATION LEVELS IN PACIFIC OCEAN

BOTH JAPAN AND ENGLAND MADE SEVERAL INQUIRIES AFTER THE U.S. TESTED NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE PACIFIC, AFTER DROPPING THE BOMBS ON JAPAN AT THE END OF WORLD WAR II.
THEY ASKED THE U.S. IF THE NUKES HAD POISONED THE FISH, IF THERE WAS DANGER TO HUMAN POPULATIONS, IF THE OCEAN WAS RADIOACTIVE FOREVER.

TURNS OUT THEY NEVER GOT HONEST ANSWERS, THAT AMERICA WAS, INDEED, HIDING THE FACTS FROM THE WHOLE WORLD "TO AVOID WORLDWIDE PANIC"...AND WE HAVE THAT IN WRITING!

THE NEW YORK TIMES WROTE AN ARTICLE IN MARCH OF LAST YEAR (2014) EXPOSING HOW TIGHT A LID IS BEING KEPT ON "FULL DISCLOSURE" OF HOW SERIOUS THE RADIATION LEAKS AND CONTAMINATION IS FROM JAPAN, AND YOU CAN BET THE FARM IT'S ALL STILL HAPPENING.

EVERYTHING POINTS TO OUR GOVERNMENT PUTTING RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT OTHERS, AS WELL AS OUR OWN, MONITORS HAVE FOUND OUT THERE, AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW.

PLEASE NOTE WHAT THE U.S. 'OFFICIALS' WERE SAYING BEFORE, IN THE 1940s AND 1950s...AND THEN CONSIDER THE SILENCE AND CENSORING GOING ON NOW, BUT, THIS TIME, JAPAN IS ALSO KEEPING MOUTHS SHUT, KEEPING FACTUAL DATA FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND FROM ALL OF US, ALL THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH.

THE QUESTION REMAINS...WHY?
WHY ARE THEY HIDING PERTINENT, EVEN LIFE-SAVING INFORMATION FROM US?

WHY IS THE U.S. DOING SO, AFTER THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAST TIME?

EXECUTIVE ORDERS DETERMINE WHAT WE, THE PUBLIC, CAN ACCESS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.
THEREIN LIES THE PROBLEM WITH LEVELS OF SECRECY.

Executive Order 13526 was issued on December 29, 2009 by United States President Barack Obama. 

It is the latest in a series of executive orders from US Presidents outlining how classified information should be handled. It revokes and replaces the previous Executive Orders in effect for this, which were EO 12958 (text) and EO 13292 (text).

There was a large backlog of documents scheduled to be automatically declassified on December 31, 2009. 
These latest regulations, at the time, went into full effect 
on June 25, 2010 except for sections 1.7, 3.3, and 3.7, 
which were effective immediately on December 29, 2009.

HOW CONVENIENT, YES?

ONE OF THOSE DOCUMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED, REGARDING DECLASSIFICATION, SOON AFTER IT WAS WRITTEN.
IT WAS A DOCUMENT ON THE SECRET EXPERIMENTS CARRIED OUT ON BOTH UNSUSPECTING AND AWARE AMERICANS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF "EXCESSIVE RADIATION".
HERE IS A NOTE ABOUT THAT:

J. C. Franklin, Manager, Oak Ridge Operations, to Carroll L. Wilson, AEC General Manager, 26 September 1947
("Medical Policy") (ACHRE No. DOE-113094-B-3), 2-3.

"We note that the documentation available does not permit a definitive understanding of the relationship between the rationale employed for keeping data on human radiation experimentation (and other human radiation data gathering) secret and the particular level of security classification to which the data were assigned.

As quoted in the text, documents talk in terms of the need to keep secret information that, while not endangering national security, could nonetheless be damaging to the government. 

As also quoted in the text, the category of Confidential provided for classification on this basis. 

However, as indicated in the text, documents invoking the "adverse effect on public opinion" language also call for the classification of human radiation experimentation data as Secret, a higher level of classification. 

Thus, while it is clear that the rules provided for classification on bases other than national security, and it also seems clear that those calling for continued keeping of radiation experiments secret saw a need for secret keeping independent of national security impact, there also may have coexisted the view that an "adverse effect on public opinion" could equate to endangering national security.

Holland to the Chairman, Classification Board, 12 September 1947, 2.

Holland had proposed that the definition of Unclassified include

'All medical and biological documents, reports and research not directly relating to experimental human administration, process hazards, contamination hazards or public health hazards, and which will not result in mass hysteria on the part of employees or the public, or in idle speculation or [illegible] adverse claims against the Atomic Energy Commission or its contractors.'

(Special committee created by Executive Order of the President of the United States), 1994: The [Department of Defense] engaged in fallout data gathering. In the fall of 1954, the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project established a “Fall-out Study Group“… )

A December 16, 1954, memorandum from the chief of the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project stated… 

“The actual data obtained are SECRET and the sample collection should be discreetly handled.”…

 Another contemporary instance of selective disclosure of fallout-related research… is discussed in a February 1955 letter… Willard Libby, acting AEC chairman [reporting] on a proposed marine radiobiological survey in the Pacific… 

“The classification ‘Secret’ Defense Information has been assigned to the survey in order to avoid… unwarranted recrudescence [i.e. recurrence] of fears in Japan of radioactive contamination of fish…

The fact of an oceanographic survey in the Pacific, however, is regarded as unclassified so long as purpose, content, and results are not revealed.”

HOW CAN IT BE "UNCLASSIFIED" IF THE RESULTS CAN NEVER BE REVEALED?

THE PAGES ON JUST THE HANFORD NUCLEAR SITE, AND JUST THE TIMELINE EVENTS OF THE UNLEASHING OF HELL ON UNSUSPECTING RESIDENTS WITHIN RANGE OF HANFORD'S "SECRET HUMAN EXPERIMENTS" READ LIKE A NIGHTMARE.

OVER AND OVER AGAIN, THOSE PEOPLE WERE BOMBARDED WITH INTENTIONAL RELEASES OF RADIOACTIVE POISONS..INTENTIONAL BECAUSE THOSE OVERSEEING HANFORD KNEW ABOUT THEM!

"ALTHOUGH THE GREEN RUN was not as direct as handing a patient orange juice laced with radioactivity, or giving someone an injection, The Green Run was every bit as intentional, every bit as experimental, every bit as unethical and immoral..."  
— Lynne Stembridge, executive director of Hanford Education Action League at the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.   

Early in the evening of December 2nd, 1949, General Electric officials in conjunction with representatives from the Department of Defense and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) unleashed the largest single known incident of intentional radioactive contamination at the Hanford site. 

Known as the "Green Run," this fuel processing experiment utilized raw, irradiated uranium fuel elements cooled for only sixteen days only before dissolving in acid. 

Under normal conditions, irradiated fuel would be cooled for at least 83 to 101 days to allow short-lived radioactive materials (such as iodine-131) to sufficiently decay before processing and subsequent release into the environment. 

The formally classified report Dissolving of Twenty Day Metal at Hanford states that Hanford officials initially planned to release approximately 4,000 curies of iodine-131 and 7,900 curies of xenon-133 but ended up releasing in actuality 7,780 curies of iodine-131, along with 20,000 curies of xenon-133 into the surrounding area's atmosphere within a seven-hour period. 
 The Department of Defense (headed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower) insisted that the run take place and at 8 p.m. on December 2nd, 1949, the material was released from a spare dissolver at Hanford's T plant. 

The Health Instruments Deputy Chief, Carl Gamertsfleder was quoted in saying that along the Columbia River between Hanford and The Dalles, Oregon, the radioiodine cloud "probably got as many people as it could."

Although specific reasons for the operation remain classified, it is generally acknowledged that the Department of Defense was attempting to simulate production capabilities of one of the Soviet Union's secret plutonium processing plants. 

There are some indications contained in the documents released by the FOIA requests that many other tests were conducted in the 1940s prior to the Green Run, although the Green Run was a particularly large test. 

July 1951
Iodine filters at Hanford processing plant fail. HEDR estimates 34,360 curies of radioiodine released in 1951 alone.

1954
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 allows nuclear weapons facilities to operate without independent oversight.

February 1955
300 curies of ruthenium-106 released from REDOX Plant. 300 curies of ruthenium-106 released from REDOX Plant.

December 1955Startup of KW and KE Reactors—one of which experiences a partial fuel melt-down at startup. 

April 1962
"Accident" at Plutonium Finishing Plant releases 1,200 curies of radioactive gasses.

[ A SECOND "GREEN RUN"?]

May 1973
Seattle Post Intelligencer reports billions of gallons of low-level wastes were discharged into ground for 30 years at Hanford.
(JUST LIKE AT FUKUSHIMA!)  

June 1973
Hanford officials publically announce a 115,000 gallon leak in tank 106-T.

1990
Hanford officials reveals tank explosion threat known since 1979.  

September 1991
Government investigators and press corroborate harassment of Hanford whistleblowers.

October 1992
HEDR announces 70 percent increase in iodine-131 releases than previously estimated.

THE HANFORD AREA TODAY IS VERY MUCH LIKE THE 'EXCLUSION ZONE' OF CHERNOBYL, ONLY NO ONE WAS TOLD TO EVACUATE, PEOPLE STILL LIVE THERE...AND ARE PAYING THE PRICE FOR THAT, EVEN AFTER SO LONG A TIME SINCE THE WORST OF THE RELEASES.

COME, LET US REASON TOGETHER.

SINCE WE KNOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES INTENTIONALLY HID DATA REGARDING HOW BADLY THEY HAD IRRADIATED THE PACIFIC OCEAN FROM BOTH ENGLAND AND JAPAN IN THE LATE 1940s TO EARLY 1950s, AND SINCE THAT SAME GOVERNMENT, AFTER ALMOST 70 YEARS, STILL REFUSES TO DECLASSIFY DATA FROM THEIR ILLEGAL,  SECRET TESTS INVOLVING RADIATION OVER-EXPOSURE ON AMERICAN CITIZENS, WHO WERE, FOR THE MOST PART, UNAWARE THEY WERE GUINEA PIGS, JUST HOW MUCH DO YOU, CAN ANY OF US, IMAGINE IS BEING WITHHELD FROM US NOW, TODAY, AFTER WHAT IS CALLED THE WORST NUCLEAR ACCIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND?  

RECENT 'STUDIES' FROM THE PACIFIC MUST HAVE ALSO BEEN 'CLASSIFIED SECRET' AS WE HAVE SEEN ALMOST NOTHING, NO RESULTS, FROM ALL THOSE TESTS THE FEDS SWORE THEY WERE DOING ON MARINE MAMMALS AND PACIFIC FISH! 
i CAN'T FIND ANY THAT HAVE BEEN RELEASED IN FULL, JUST VAGUE REFERENCES TO "LOW LEVELS" IN SALMON, TUNA, ETC. 

THAT'S DAMNED ODD SINCE SOME SCIENTISTS WERE OVERJOYED TO FIND THE SHORT-LIVED CESIUM-134 IN TESTED FISH WAY BACK IN 2013 OFF OUR WEST COAST, AND HAD BIG PLANS TO TEST DOZENS OF SPECIES OF MARINE ANIMALS, EVEN TURTLES, TO SEE IF THE C-134 WAS PRESENT.

““This knowledge (FROM THE PRESENCE OF C-134) will give us a better understanding of the habits and life cycles of migrating marine animals. We will be able to better manage the fisheries as a result of this,” said Dan Madigan.

The use of the Cs-134 is better than tagging in many ways because it gives us the ability to know where and when a migratory marine animal has been, plus it costs a lot less,” said Heidi Dewar, a tagging expert with the National Marine Fisheries Service who worked on the study with Madigan. 

“There was a 1,323 pound mako shark recently caught off of Huntington Beach that we are going to [test with] the cesium analysis to get an idea of where it has been. We are looking to expand cesium tracing to study the migratory habits and patterns of marine mammals, albacore, blue sharks, salmon sharks, swordfish, albatross, turtles and other marine migratory animals we know very little about.”

SO, WHAT HAPPENED WITH THAT?

MAYBE THEY DON'T WANT TO TEST NOW AND KNOW THAT ANY, ABSOLUTELY ANY, C-134 THEY FIND NOW WILL MEAN THAT WE ARE STILL BEING CONTAMINATED BY ONGOING, PRESENT-DAY LEAKS?

THAT MIGHT "UNDULY ALARM THE PUBLIC", SINCE C-134 HAS A HALF-LIFE OF ONLY 2 YEARS, AND IS THE ONLY 100% POSITIVE 'MARKER' FOR FUKUSHIMA RADIATION! 

YOU SEE, CESIUM-137 WAS ALREADY PRESENT IN PACIFIC WATERS, THANKS TO NUCLEAR BOMB TESTING IN THE PACIFIC AFTER WORLD WAR II, BUT NOT C-134. 

C-137 HAS A HALF LIFE OF 32 YEARS, AND WILL REMAIN IN THE PACIFIC TO SHOW US THE U.S. NUKED THE HELL OUT OF THAT BODY OF WATER FOR A LONG TIME.

SO WILL THE NEW BATCH OF C-137 FROM JAPAN! 
BUT THE C-134, LIKE THE MAN SAID, IS THE FUKUSHIMA MARKER, ONE OF A KIND, NO MISTAKE!

NOTICE HE SAID IT'S CHEAP TO TEST FOR C-134!
SO WHY NOT DO SO ON AT LEAST A FEW OF THE DEAD BILLIONS OF SEA CREATURES WE'VE BEEN COUNTING SINCE 2011? 

IF WE ONLY TESTED A DOZEN EACH AND ALL OF THE DOZEN SHOWED C-134, WE'D HAVE THAT "NEW KNOWLEDGE" THE SCIENTIST SPOKE OF, RIGHT?
RIGHT?

YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT!

BUT THE FEDS WON'T FUND THAT? 

THEY'LL FUND A STUDY THAT COST $2 MILLION ON ONE SPECIES OF CRICKETS TO SEE HOW FAR THEY WALK IN A DAY, BUT NOTHING TO SEE WHAT'S KILLING 200 SPECIES OF SEA LIFE?
(THAT STUDY WAS CONTINUED, ADDING TO THE INITIAL FUNDING.)

THAT DEFIES LOGIC, DOESN'T IT?

WHY HIDE THE RESULTS ON THE C-134?
WE REALLY NEED TO KNOW!
WE REALLY DESERVE TO KNOW!

IN 2012, WE WERE INVITED TO ACCESS A WEBSITE FOR UPDATES ON THE RADIATION TESTING OF SOME SEALS AND WALRUSES FOUND WITH MANY SIGNS OF RADIATION CONTAMINATION UP IN ALASKA.

THAT WEBSITE HAS STILL NOT REPORTED ON ONE SEAL, NOT ONE WALRUS! 
CLICK HERE TO SEE THAT THE LATEST "UPDATE"  FROM 2014, 2 YEARS LATER, WAS ...LACKING THAT PROMISED DATA ON RADIATION COMPLETELY!
FOR THE SEALS:
"Future work : Testing continues for a wide range of possible factors in this disease, including immune system-related diseases, fungi, man-made and bio-toxins, radiation exposure, contaminants, and other stressors related to sea ice change. Scientists are investigating the possibility that radiation could have been one of many factors that contributed to the illness in these animals. Preliminary radionuclide testing conducted by the University of Alaska Fairbanks found radiation levels within the typical background range. "

WHAT WERE THE LEVELS FOR CESIUM-134, BOYS, EH? 
SHOW US THE NUMBERS!

AND WHAT ABOUT THE WALRUSES?
OH...THAT WAS CALLED OFF!
NO NEED TO TEST THEM, UMMM, NOPE.

"Although the cause of the skin lesions in walruses remains unknown, the lack of new cases suggests that the specific criteria under which the UME was declared (i.e. elevated levels of skin lesions and mortality in walruses) are no longer applicable. 
A request to remove walruses from the UME investigation was submitted in spring 2014, and has recently been approved." 

YOU BETCHA IT WAS APPROVED!
SWEEP IT UNDER THE RUG AND FORGET IT!  

"Q: What caused the disease symptoms in ice seals and walruses? 

We still do not know. 
Despite extensive analytical investigations for infectious disease agents and bio-toxins from tissue samples collected from affected seals and walruses, no known (or new) infectious viral or bacterial agent(s), harmful algae toxins, or industrial pollutants have been identified that can explain the observed disease symptoms."   

NO INFECTIOUS DISEASE, NO BIOTOXINS/INDUSTRIAL POLLUTANTS, NO BACTERIAL OR VIRAL AGENTS, NO HARMFUL ALGAE, NONE OF THOSE ARE FOUND IN THE WALRUSES, AND, OBVIOUSLY, THE SAME APPLIES TO THE SEALS.

WHAT COULD THAT LEAVE AS THE CAUSE?
TRY RADIATION!
JUST TELL US THE AMOUNTS!  
A NICE, CALMING ARTICLE EXPLAINING THE IMPORTANCE OF TESTING FOR CESIUM-134 CAN BE FOUND <HERE>.
"In fact, ¹³⁷Cs has been measured for decades in the Pacific Ocean, and the pre-Fukushima levels off the California coast are approximately 1–3 Becquerels per cubic meter (Bq/m³) [Hirose & Aoyama 2003]. (One Becquerel is one nuclear decay per second.) 
For comparison, models of the dispersion of ¹³⁷Cs from Fukushima Dai-ichi predict a maximum of about 2–3 Bq/m³ on the West Coast in the next few years [Behrens et al. 2012, Povinec et al. 2013], although some models predict as high as 10–30 Bq/m³ [Rossi et al. 2013]. 
So how are we going to tell ¹³⁷Cs from Fukushima Dai-ichi apart from "legacy" ¹³⁷Cs?" 
NOW, HERE IS THE INTERESTING, ALTHOUGH PROBABLY UNINTENTIONAL, BEAUTY OF THE ABOVE ARTICLE...READ CAREFULLY:
"Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 were also released from the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors. With a half-life of 29 years, ⁹⁰Sr can remain in the environment for a relatively long period of time. However, the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors released orders of magnitude less ⁸⁹Sr and ⁹⁰Sr than ¹³⁴Cs and ¹³⁷Cs [Steinhauser et al. 2014].

Measurements of radiostrontium in the ocean off the coast of Japan in 2011 showed radiostrontium had less than 3% the radioactivity of ¹³⁷Cs [Casacuberta et al. 2013].
There were many other radioactive elements released by the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors, including Silver-110m, Barium-140, and Molybdenum-99 [Le Petit et al. 2012]. Some even have evidence that Plutonium isotopes were released in small quantities [Zheng et al. 2012]. 

Most of these isotopes are too short-lived to remain today, and all were released at levels orders of magnitude below radiocesium [Le Petit et al. 2012]."  
THE MILLION-DOLLAR QUESTION THEN IS, 
IF WE FOUND THOSE ISOTOPES, THOSE ELEMENTS, IN PACIFIC WATER NEAR OR ALONG THE WEST COAST, MIGHT WE NOT ASSUME WE ARE STILL BEING CONTAMINATED BY THE ONGOING LEAKS FROM THE JAPANESE NUCLEAR FACILITY? 

AND, AGAIN, IF WE FIND ANY CESIUM-134 IN THE TISSUE OF NON-MIGRATORY (TO/FROM JAPAN) MARINE LIFE ALONG OUR COAST, WOULDN'T THAT SCREAM WE'RE SEEING LETHAL LEVELS "OUT THERE" SOMEWHERE NEARBY? 

LEVELS THAT ARE KILLING LIVING CREATURES MAY HARDLY AFFECT KELP.
WE USE KELP AND OTHER SEAWEEDS TO HELP DETOXIFY FROM RADIATION!KELP IS GREAT FOR THAT!

BY THE WAY, THE ARTICLE ABOVE, WAS WRITTEN IN 2015, WE ASSUME BY ITS TITLE, "KELP WATCH 2015", BUT FAILED TO MENTION THAT THE WOODS HOLE GROUP DID INDEED FIND CESIUM-134 OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST IN 2014... THREE YEARS, NOT TWO, BUT THREE YEARS AFTER THE DISASTER IN JAPAN.
C-134 ALSO TURNED UP IN CANADIAN WATERS...THIS YEAR... OVER FOUR YEARS AFTER 3/11!

THE SITE THAT IS SUPPOSED TO GIVE US THE LATEST UPDATES ON THE ONGOING, CROWD-FUNDED TESTING FOR C-134 IN OUR WATERS?
GO SEE IF IT LOADS FOR YOU...IT OFTEN DOES NOT FOR ME, AND UPDATES ARE SPORADIC...
<CLICK HERE> 
NICE LITTLE SPINNING BALL WITH A RADIATION SYMBOL ON IT...

WHAT WE DON'T KNOW WON'T HURT US, RIGHT, BOYS AND GIRLS?

WRONG!

FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES:

"Concerns Over Measurement of Fukushima Fallout" 

"TOKYO — In the chaotic, fearful weeks after the Fukushima nuclear crisis began, in March 2011, researchers struggled to measure the radioactive fallout unleashed on the public. Michio Aoyama’s initial findings were more startling than most.  

As a senior scientist at the Japanese government’s Meteorological Research Institute, he said levels of radioactive cesium 137 in the surface water of the Pacific Ocean could be 10,000 times as high as contamination after Chernobyl, the world’s worst nuclear accident.

Two months later, as Mr. Aoyama prepared to publish his findings in a short, non-peer-reviewed article for 'Nature', the director general of the institute called with an unusual demand — that Mr. Aoyama remove his own name from the paper. 
He said there were points he didn’t understand, or want to understand,” the researcher recalled. “I was later told that he did not want to say that Fukushima radioactivity was worse than Chernobyl.” 

The head of the institute, who has since retired, declined to comment for this article. 

Mr. Aoyama asked for his name to be removed, he said, and the article was not published.
The pressure he felt is not unusual — only his decision to speak about it. 

Off the record, university researchers in Japan say that even now, three years after the triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, they feel under pressure to play down the impact of the disaster. Some say they cannot get funds or university support for their work. In several cases, the professors say, they have been obstructed or told to steer clear of data that might cause public “concern.” 

“Getting involved in this sort of research is dangerous politically,” said Joji Otaki, a biologist at Japan’s Ryukyu University who has written papers suggesting that radioactivity at Fukushima has triggered inherited deformities in a species of butterfly. 

His research is paid for through private donations, including crowdfunding, a sign, he said, that the public supports his work. “It’s an exceptional situation,” he said.

Ken Buesseler, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s department of marine chemistry and geochemistry, in Massachusetts, who has worked with Mr. Aoyama, said he has spent much of his professional energy fighting the rumor mill. The cause is not helped, he added, by institutional attempts to gag Japanese professors. 

“Researchers are told not to talk to the press, or they don’t feel comfortable about talking to the press without permission,” Mr. Buesseler said.
A veteran of three post-earthquake research trips to Japan, he wants the authorities to put more money into investigating the impact on the food chain of Fukushima’s release of cesium AND STRONTIUM.
“Why isn’t the Japanese government paying for this, since they have most to gain?”  

Professors, meanwhile, say that rather than simply defend what is a piecemeal approach to studying the disaster, the government should take the lead in creating a large, publicly financed project. 

“If we’re ever going to make any headway into the environmental impact of these disasters, statistical power, scientific power, is what counts,” said Mr. Mousseau of the University of South Carolina. “We get at it with massive replication, by going to hundreds of locations. That costs money.”  

HOW MUCH WOULD ANOTHER CHERNOBYL, ANOTHER FUKUSHIMA COST, EH, GUYS?
MORE THAN A FEW STUDIES?
A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE VOLUNTEERED, BUT YOU WON'T TAKE THEM UP ON IT....WHY???

WE KEEP HEARING ABOUT "NORMAL BACKGROUND RADIATION, BUT THAT NORMAL HAS GROWN AND GROWN OVER TIME BECAUSE OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OTHER NUCLEAR TESTING , PLUS NUCLEAR FACILITY LEAKS, PLUS MEDICAL FACILITY LEAKS AND "NECESSARY" MEDICAL TESTING AND "TREATMENTS" THAT USE GAMMA RADIATION, ALL PLACING ENORMOUS AMOUNTS INTO THE ENVIRONMENT.

IF YOU THINK THAT "NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVELS" OF ALL COMBINED RADIATION WAS THE SAME IN 1935 THAT IT IS NOW, PLEASE THINK AGAIN! 

EVEN WHEN SOIL IS EXCAVATED FOR BUILDING, RADIATION IS RELEASED.
WHEN COMPUTERS ARE SCRAPPED, RADIATION IS RELEASED.
ALMOST EVERYTHING IN OUR WORLD LIVES IN AN EVER-INCREASING AMOUNT OF "BACKGROUND RADIATION"!

OUR GOVERNMENTS JUST KEEP UPPING THE "ACCEPTABLE LEVELS"! 
THAT SAVES NO ONE...EXCEPT THE LEAKY NUKE FAILITIES, AND THEIR OWNERS!

SEE THIS PDF: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/wilson-lecture.pdf

IT WILL SHOW YOU THE EXTREME SENSITIVITY AND REMARKABLE ABILITY OF INSTRUMENTS DETECTING GAMMA RADIATION, 'COSMIC RAYS'. 

THE FILE IS A NOBEL LECTURE DELIVERED DECEMBER 8, 1978, BY ROBERT W. WILSON.  

DARE WE IMAGINE THAT WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE FAR MORE SENSITIVE INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURE EARTH'S "BACKGROUND RADIATION", THE RADIATION IN JUST THE PACIFIC OR ATLANTIC, AND THAT NO RESULTS EXIST PRIOR TO THE CHERNOBYL AND FUKUSHIMA AND HANFORD RELEASES? 

LET US THINK...WHILE WE YET HAVE VIABLE BRAIN CELLS!


OUR GOVERNMENT HID THE FACTS FROM ALL NATIONS REGARDING THE LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVITY IN THE PACIFIC 70 YEARS AGO.

JAPAN, WITH THE BLESSINGS AND EVEN THE AID OF THE USA, IS HIDING THE SAME INFORMATION FROM US TODAY. 

PEOPLE WHO COULD MOVE OUT OF HARM'S WAY WON'T BECAUSE NO ONE IS CONFESSING THAT THE HARM EXISTS! 

THE PEOPLE OF JAPAN AND THE PEOPLE ALL ALONG OUR WEST COAST ARE IN HARM'S WAY! 
FOR HOW LONG THIS HAS BEEN TRUE AND HOW MUCH HARM IS ALREADY DONE, WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW. 

ALL WHO DIE, BECAUSE OF THE WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION, WILL BE, IN MY OPINION, VICTIMS OF PREMEDITATED MURDER.

AND WHO WILL HAVE MURDERED THEM?  
????????????







[FURTHER READING:DOE Openness: Human Radiation Experiments: Roadmap to the Project
ACHRE Report
 FOR AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT THE SECRECY FACTOR, AT THE HUMAN EXPERIMENTS OUR GOVERNMENT CONCEALED FOR DECADES, AT LONG-WITHHELD INFORMATION THAT MAY HAVE SAVED THOUSANDS TO PERHAPS MILLIONS OF LIVES, HAD WE BUT KNOWN, GO TO THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE...

https://ehss.energy.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/intro.html

AND READ THIS TO SEE THE NON-DISCLOSURE AFTER HIROSHIMA-NAGASAKI:
https://ehss.energy.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/intro_6.html