"U.S. WAGES WEATHER WARFARE"
I BEGAN UPDATING THAT A FEW MOMENTS AGO, BUT THERE'S JUST TOO MUCH INFORMATION TO ADD, HENCE THIS NEW OFFERING.
FROM THE MOUTH OF A FORMER U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, WHO REALLY OUGHT TO KNOW, YES?
1997
DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen
Presenter: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen
April 28, 1997 8:45 AM EDT
April 28, 1997 8:45 AM EDT
Cohen's keynote address at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. The event is part of the Sam Nunn Policy Forum being hosted by the University of Georgia. Secretary Cohen is joined by Sen. Sam Nunn and Sen. Richard G. Lugar.]
COHEN: There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been
trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very
dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about
this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain
types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just
eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some
sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops.
Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can
alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves.
COHEN: There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been
trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very
dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about
this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain
types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just
eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some
sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops.
Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can
alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves.
"ALTER THE CLIMATE, SET OFF EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES, REMOTELY THROUGH THE USE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES".
NOTICE HE DID SAY "OTHERS"...
HE KNEW WE WERE IN IT IN A BIG WAY!
SO DID MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!
NOTICE HE DID SAY "OTHERS"...
HE KNEW WE WERE IN IT IN A BIG WAY!
SO DID MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!
"Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D) has submitted bill no.HR 2977 IH , which proposes a ban on the weaponization of space. One of the weapons systems listed in the bill is “chemtrails”. The use of this term is significant because until now, all reported governmental inquiries into this issue have been dismissed or denied. Agencies such as the Air Force have routinely called reports of chemtrails a hoax. "
LOOK!
IT REALLY EXISTED AND HE REALLY KNEW WHAT WE'RE INTO!
FROM THE THOMAS WEBSITE WHICH LISTS ALL BILLS EVER BEFORE CONGRESS IN OUR LIFETIME:
THE GOOD CONGRESSMAN JUST LAID IT ALL OUT IN THE OPEN FOR YOU, CADETS.
THERE'S THE SHORT LIST OF WHAT WE HAD AVAILABLE TO US, AS OF 2001, 14 YEARS AGO.
AND HOW DID THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE REACT?
"Status: Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from DOD"
HE BLEW THE WHISTLE ON THEM...BUSTED!
LOOK!
IT REALLY EXISTED AND HE REALLY KNEW WHAT WE'RE INTO!
FROM THE THOMAS WEBSITE WHICH LISTS ALL BILLS EVER BEFORE CONGRESS IN OUR LIFETIME:
- (2)(A)
- The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
- (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object;
- (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
- (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations;
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
THE GOOD CONGRESSMAN JUST LAID IT ALL OUT IN THE OPEN FOR YOU, CADETS.
THERE'S THE SHORT LIST OF WHAT WE HAD AVAILABLE TO US, AS OF 2001, 14 YEARS AGO.
AND HOW DID THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE REACT?
"Status: Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from DOD"
HE BLEW THE WHISTLE ON THEM...BUSTED!
We were headed down this path long, long ago.
John von Neumann noted at the height of the Cold War (1955), with tremendous foresight that:
”Intervention in atmospheric and climatic matters ….will unfold on a scale difficult to imagine at present… [T]his will merge each nation’s affairs with those of every other, more thoroughly than the threat of a nuclear or any other war would have done.” (Quoted in Spencer Weart, Environmental Warfare: Climate Modification Schemes)
Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) were acknowledged by the UN in 1977 upon the signing in Geneva of the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques.
"Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment,
Recognizing, however, that military or any other hostile use of such techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare,
Desiring to prohibit effectively military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind from such use, and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective,"DO BETTER LIARS EXIST THAN AT THE U.N.?
Since then climate manipulation has been amply documented by scientists.
It is acknowledged by the mainstream media including CBS and CBC.
Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of climatic manipulation has been excluded from the Warsaw agenda on climate change (2014).
In excluding it from the debate, the UN is in violation of its own mandate as defined by the 1977 Convention, as you may read at the above-linked website of the UN.
In excluding it from the debate, the UN is in violation of its own mandate as defined by the 1977 Convention, as you may read at the above-linked website of the UN.
LIKE I SAID, BEST LIARS AROUND.
Michel Chossudovsky, The Ecologist, December 2007
[PDF AVAILABLE <HERE>]
Weather Weapons and Earthquake Bombs: World Leaders Condemn Britain and America’s Secret Arsenal
Jan. 5, 2012
"UK Ministry of Defence papers [Developments, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, “Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2040”, Ministry of Defence, 9 February 2010 (4th edition), p. 156.] suggest that the US has plans to use space platforms for weather control.
Earlier in the year, the British Ministry of Defence announced in their thirty-year trends study that “Weather modification will continue to be explored” for military purposes: and not for the first time.
Today, microwave lasers are used in place of dry ice and silver iodide. As far back as 1945, Britain and America created a tsunami bomb, according to the declassified records, which was successfully tested in New Zealand’s waters, and designed for use in the post-WWII era.
[ Eugene Bingham, “Tsunami bomb NZ’s devastating war secret”, New Zealand Herald, 25 September, 1999, ; Also see Eugene Bingham, “Devastating tsunami bomb viable, say experts”, New Zealand Herald, 28 September, 1999.]
Like flood and drought creation, the technology has moved on since then and has now been replaced with microwave pulses.
[T.D.J. Leech, “The Final Report Project “Seal””, Department of Science and Industrial Research, 18 December, 1950, Wellington: Government Printer.]
The same Ministry of Defence document also stated that America may put up space platforms “to harness climatological features in the support of military or strategic advantage.”
[Developments, Concepts and Doctrines Centre, “The DCDC Strategic Trends Programme: 2007-2036”, Ministry of Defence, 23 January, 2007 (3rd edition).]
[Developments, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, “Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2040”, Ministry of Defence, 9 February 2010 (4th edition)]
Besides being listed in Kucinich’s Space Preservation Act (2001), , chemtrails were also mentioned by name by David Drew (MP) in theBritish Parliament after reports of commercial pilot and passenger sickness (i.e., the pilots are forced to take paths polluted with chemtrails [see Nick Owens, Daily Mirror, “Pilots Grounded by Poisonous Fumes”, 11 November, 2007, ).
NASA is predicting major solar flares at the end of 2012, and their probes have discovered holes in the ionosphere (which shields us from such flares) between the North Pole and Equator, which is where the Defense Department has been setting off atomic bombs since the 1950s and is now blasting with HAARP pulsations. Consequently, the super-wealthy have built themselves hundreds of subterranean survival bunkers in preparation for the worst.
© Copyright 2014 by AxisofLogic.com
This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you! "
IT IS VERY HARD TO CONVINCE ME OF ANYTHING.
NOW I ASSURE YOU, I HAVE BEEN IN THE WILDERNESS MANY, MANY TIMES IN MY LIFETIME.
THAT PURDUE PAPER CAME OUT IN 2006.
AFTER 9 YEARS OF LOOKING INTO THAT, I CAN'T SAY I'M 100% CONVINCED, BUT IF SO, THEN MAYBE ANOTHER THING I'VE READ SEVERAL TIMES, IN SEVERAL "SANE, RATIONAL" PLACES, THAT OUR WORLD GOVERNMENTS ARE USING THESE AIR-DROPPED PARTICLES, THESE CHEMICALS TO SLOW DOWN THE EFFECTS OF THE "MYSTERY" THE SUN HAS UNLEASHED.
IF THAT IS NOT THE CASE, THEN SUCH A THING AS CHEMICAL SPRAYING OF OUR SKIES AND OTHER WEATHER MANIPULATIONS CAN ONLY BE FOR ONE THING, AND THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING...IT REALLY IS WARFARE, AND WE MAY HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED "THE ENEMY".
HAS THE U.S.' LONG-HELD AND OFTEN FRANTIC EUGENICS POLICY TURNED TO WEATHER AND CLIMATE MANIPULATION TO TAKE UP SOME OF THE SLACK?
SPRAYING CHEMICALS FROM HIGH-ALTITUDE CAN AND HAS CHANGED WEATHER.
WE SEE THAT EVIDENCED IN SENATE HEARINGS.
IT'S BUT ONE WAY IN WHICH WE DOWN HERE BELOW ARE SUBJECTED TO THESE "WEATHER MODIFICATION TESTS".
THE "TESTS" REMIND ME VERY MUCH OF THE "TESTS" CARRIED OUT BEFORE WE DROPPED THE BOMBS ON JAPAN.
AND OUR CONGRESS KNEW ABOUT IT ALL THIS TIME.
BUT WE DIDN'T...
~ Physicist Dr Bernard Eastlund called it ‘the largest ionospheric heater ever built’. HAARP is presented by the US Air Force as a research programme, but military documents confirm its main objective is to ‘induce ionospheric modifications’ with a view to altering weather patterns and disrupting communications and radar.
[PDF AVAILABLE <HERE>]
“Environmental warfare is defined as the intentional modification or manipulation of the natural ecology, such as climate and weather, earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes) to cause intentional physical, economic, and psycho-social, and physical destruction to an intended target geophysical or population location, as part of strategic or tactical war.” (Eco News)
“[Weather modification] offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary… Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military] technologies.” (US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report)"
THAT PARTICULAR DOCUMENT, AF 2025, LOOKS AT HOW THE U.S. MILITARY MUST "OWN THE WEATHER BY 2025"
THAT PARTICULAR DOCUMENT, AF 2025, LOOKS AT HOW THE U.S. MILITARY MUST "OWN THE WEATHER BY 2025"
World leaders meeting in Copenhagen in December 2009 with a view to reaching an agreement on Global Warming did not so much as hint at weather manipulation as a CAUSE, though all know it has been!
THE GOVERNMENTS OF HAITI, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, VENEZUELA, PAKISTAN, JUST TO NAME THE TOP FEW, HAVE ALL ACCUSED THE U.S. OF CONDUCTING WEATHER WARFARE.
Weather Weapons and Earthquake Bombs: World Leaders Condemn Britain and America’s Secret Arsenal
Jan. 5, 2012
"UK Ministry of Defence papers [Developments, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, “Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2040”, Ministry of Defence, 9 February 2010 (4th edition), p. 156.] suggest that the US has plans to use space platforms for weather control.
Earlier in the year, the British Ministry of Defence announced in their thirty-year trends study that “Weather modification will continue to be explored” for military purposes: and not for the first time.
Today, microwave lasers are used in place of dry ice and silver iodide. As far back as 1945, Britain and America created a tsunami bomb, according to the declassified records, which was successfully tested in New Zealand’s waters, and designed for use in the post-WWII era.
[ Eugene Bingham, “Tsunami bomb NZ’s devastating war secret”, New Zealand Herald, 25 September, 1999, ; Also see Eugene Bingham, “Devastating tsunami bomb viable, say experts”, New Zealand Herald, 28 September, 1999.]
Like flood and drought creation, the technology has moved on since then and has now been replaced with microwave pulses.
[T.D.J. Leech, “The Final Report Project “Seal””, Department of Science and Industrial Research, 18 December, 1950, Wellington: Government Printer.]
The same Ministry of Defence document also stated that America may put up space platforms “to harness climatological features in the support of military or strategic advantage.”
[ Maj Britt Theorin (Rapporteur), “Report on the environment, security and foreign policy”, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, European Parliament, 14 January, 1999, Resolution A4-0005/99, DOC_EN\RR\370\370003 PE 227.710/fin.]
...in Colombia and Bolivia, where US mercenary firms such as Blackwater and DynCorp are employed to spray chemicals on the populations under a counter-narcotics pretext.
[See Jeremy Scahill, 2008, Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, London: Serpent’s Tail, pp.448-9.]
A cheaper alternative is to drive the people out with extreme weather which, as a US Air Force document subtitled “Owning the Weather” recommended, could be blamed on nature.
A SPACECAST 2020 paper advocated “modifying the ionosphere through insertion of gaseous compounds … [which] can also be enhanced by shooting a high energy laser, microwave, or particle beam … [thereby] having a jamming effect on the enemy’s radiowave propagation.”
The purpose of weaponising the weather is simple, and was explained in Navy documents dating back to the nineteen fifties, [Noah Shachtman, “Navy Research Paper: ‘Disrupt Economies’ with Man-made ‘Floods’ and ‘Droughts’”, Wired, 11 February, 2008] namely to ruin crops and infrastructure to cause economic damage.
The Navy recommended ionising the atmosphere, which they, and others, now have the technology to do, and are doing via private companies in the UAE and in Alaska with HAARP (as noted above).
The Navy recommended ionising the atmosphere, which they, and others, now have the technology to do, and are doing via private companies in the UAE and in Alaska with HAARP (as noted above).
The elite can destroy the middle classes of the world by engineering fiscal collapses (as they did in 2007-8), and in countries not so tied to the US economy (such as Australia), or in emerging economies that boast significant natural resources not yet under Anglo-American control (such as BRIC), “natural” devastation can be used in place of conventional warfare. This also enables plausible deniability."
[Developments, Concepts and Doctrines Centre, “The DCDC Strategic Trends Programme: 2007-2036”, Ministry of Defence, 23 January, 2007 (3rd edition).]
[Developments, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, “Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends – Out to 2040”, Ministry of Defence, 9 February 2010 (4th edition)]
Besides being listed in Kucinich’s Space Preservation Act (2001), , chemtrails were also mentioned by name by David Drew (MP) in theBritish Parliament after reports of commercial pilot and passenger sickness (i.e., the pilots are forced to take paths polluted with chemtrails [see Nick Owens, Daily Mirror, “Pilots Grounded by Poisonous Fumes”, 11 November, 2007, ).
Sonoma State University’s Project Censored listed chemtrails as one of the most underreported stories of 1999.
On the use of drones, see “Weather as a Force Multiplier” (note 19 above), which discussed in 1996 the possibility of using drones for weather weaponisation. 1996 is the year that global citizens first reported chemtrails, according to the US Air Force (which denies their existence; though declassified photographs show that they have existed since the 1940s:
On the use of drones, see “Weather as a Force Multiplier” (note 19 above), which discussed in 1996 the possibility of using drones for weather weaponisation. 1996 is the year that global citizens first reported chemtrails, according to the US Air Force (which denies their existence; though declassified photographs show that they have existed since the 1940s:
In 2008, Live Science reported that 60% of the troposphere is now covered in previously undiscovered particles.
What a coincidence.
NASA is predicting major solar flares at the end of 2012, and their probes have discovered holes in the ionosphere (which shields us from such flares) between the North Pole and Equator, which is where the Defense Department has been setting off atomic bombs since the 1950s and is now blasting with HAARP pulsations. Consequently, the super-wealthy have built themselves hundreds of subterranean survival bunkers in preparation for the worst.
© Copyright 2014 by AxisofLogic.com
This material is available for republication as long as reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety, respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you! "
QUITE A SCATHING ARTICLE, YES?
FAIRLY GOOD DOCUMENTATION.
DO READ ALL OF THE ARTICLE <HERE>.
DO READ ALL OF THE ARTICLE <HERE>.
THE CIA WANTS IN ON USING WEATHER AS A WEAPON:
February 18, 2015
"This week, a top American climate researcher – Professor Alan Robock from Rutgers – says that the CIA is looking into weather modification as a form of warfare.
February 18, 2015
"This week, a top American climate researcher – Professor Alan Robock from Rutgers – says that the CIA is looking into weather modification as a form of warfare.
A senior American climate scientist has spoken of the fear he experienced when US intelligence services apparently asked him about the possibility of weaponising the weather as a major report on geo-engineering is to be published this week."
SORRY, ROBOCK, THEY FOOLED YOU!
ASK THEM WHY!
WE HAVE A LAW AND A FORM TO BE FILLED OUT FOR REPORTING "UNAUTHORIZED" WEATHER MODIFICATION!
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/330a
WE HAVE A LAW AND A FORM TO BE FILLED OUT FOR REPORTING "UNAUTHORIZED" WEATHER MODIFICATION!
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/330a
"No person may engage, or attempt to engage, in any weather modification activity in the United States unless he submits to the Secretary such reports with respect thereto, in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may by rule prescribe. The Secretary may require that such reports be submitted to him before, during, and after any such activity or attempt."
BILL AFTER BILL HAS BEEN INTRODUCED BY OUR CONGRESS REGARDING WEATHER MANIPULATION AND CLIMATE MODIFICATION.
S. 3320 (93rd): A bill to extend the appropriation authorization for .....
1974... AND CONGRESS WANTED TO KNOW HOW THAT WEATHER MODIFICATION WAS COMING ALONG!
2005
S. 3320 (93rd): A bill to extend the appropriation authorization for .....
reporting of weather modification activities.
Apr 8, 1974
93rd Congress, 1973–1974
93rd Congress, 1973–1974
Enacted — Signed by the President on Oct 5, 1974
1974... AND CONGRESS WANTED TO KNOW HOW THAT WEATHER MODIFICATION WAS COMING ALONG!
2005
Sponsor: Sen. Kay Hutchison [R-TX]
A bill to establish a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes.
"Upper atmospheric testing continues without public oversight or consent and with little, if any, public notification. Now Global Geoengineering Plans to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reach the Earth (Solar Radiation Management), are beginning to be planned for our future. The use of toxic chemicals and other upper atmospheric particle releases are planned. There have been three hearings by the U.S. House of Representatives Science & Technology Committee since November 5, 2009. Testimony has only been from those, for the most part, promoting Geoengineering. "
Sponsor: Mark Udall
Representative for Colorado's 2nd congressional district
Democrat
2009
S 601 RS
This bill, S 601 RS, was introduced on May 20, 2009, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted. The text of the bill below is as of Jul 22, 2009 (Reported by Senate Committee).
Reported by Mr. ROCKEFELLER, with an amendment...
[Rockefeller struck out quite a lot!]
SEC. 3. FINDINGS. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] Congress finds the following: [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (1) According to a 2003 report by the National Research Council, ‘people in drought- and hail-prone areas willingly spend significant resources on weather mitigation programs, and in 2001 there were at least 66 operational programs being conducted in 10 States across the United States. At the same time, less than a handful of weather mitigation research programs are underway worldwide, and related research in the United States has dropped to less than $500,000 per year from a high of $20,000,000 in the late 1970s.’
The NRC report entitled ‘Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research’ also states that ‘a coordinated national program of weather modification research is needed’. Such a program is supported by States that need a scientific means of evaluating current programs and increasing their effectiveness through applied research. [<-Struck out]
The NRC report entitled ‘Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research’ also states that ‘a coordinated national program of weather modification research is needed’. Such a program is supported by States that need a scientific means of evaluating current programs and increasing their effectiveness through applied research. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (3) Past and recent evaluations of the potential for snowpack augmentation by cloud seeding in the Colorado River Basin indicate a significant yield in runoff can be attained through properly designed projects. A 2006 evaluation by the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior indicates the potential for 800,000 additional acre-feet of water. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (5) The recent Weather Damage Modification Program conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation employed a successful model for combining local, State, and Federal resources in providing a means for scientific evaluation of operational cloud-seeding projects (rainfall and snowfall enhancement and hail suppression) in North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, and California. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (C) Improving cloud seeding-related technologies. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (a) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Office for the purposes of carrying out this Act $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain available until expended. [<-Struck out]
[Struck out->] (b) ALLOCATION- Of the amounts appropriated to the National Science Foundation under subsection (a) for each fiscal year-- [<-Struck out]"
CONGRESS KNEW, CONGRESS SIMPLY DECIDED NOT TO TELL US!
CONGRESS KNEW, CONGRESS SIMPLY DECIDED NOT TO TELL US!
On November 21st, 2014, a diverse panel of experts was assembled in Northern California to discuss the profound environmental and human health dangers posed by the ongoing global climate engineering programs.
Some of those present in the audience also included city officials, county officials, and other public agency personnel.
Why did mainstream media totally ignore this major gathering which presented hard science data on the dire issue of climate engineering?
Because corporate media's job is to block credible data from reaching the public.
Some of those present in the audience also included city officials, county officials, and other public agency personnel.
Why did mainstream media totally ignore this major gathering which presented hard science data on the dire issue of climate engineering?
Because corporate media's job is to block credible data from reaching the public.
Northern California media completely blacklisted this important event and gave it no coverage whatsoever even though they were notified in advance.
High altitude chemical spraying is Illegal Under U.S. Law !
U.S. Legal Code - US House of Representatives / TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, Sec.1520a
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1520a.html
U.S. Legal Code - US House of Representatives / TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, Sec.1520a
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1520a.html
Sec. 1520a. - Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents
A. Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
E. ''Biological agent'' defined
In this section, the term ''biological agent'' means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment
In this section, the term ''biological agent'' means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment
THERE IS A GALLERY OF ACTUAL SATELLITE IMAGES SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHEMICAL SPRAYING OFF OUR WEST COAST.
LOOKING FOR ONE FOR THE REST OF THE U.S.
SEE THE IMAGES <HERE>.
LOOKING FOR ONE FOR THE REST OF THE U.S.
SEE THE IMAGES <HERE>.
IT IS VERY HARD TO CONVINCE ME OF ANYTHING.
I REQUIRE PROOF BEYOND A DOUBT IN ORDER TO ACCEPT SOMETHING AS FACTUAL.
NEEDLESS TO SAY, I DID NOT BELIEVE THIS VIDEO WHEN I FIRST FOUND IT WHILE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING ELSE.
BUT I TRIED WHAT HE DID.
BUT I TRIED WHAT HE DID.
I ASKED FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO TRY IT.
I TRIED IT ON NIGHTS WHEN THE AIR WAS PERFECTLY STILL, NOT A CLOUD IN THE SKY, AND AFTER A RAIN, IN LOW HUMIDITY, HIGH HUMIDITY, COLD WEATHER AND WARM.
PEOPLE IN 7 STATES TRIED IT.
PEOPLE IN 7 STATES TRIED IT.
SAME RESULT.
IT MADE ME SICK.
THEN IT MADE ME ANGRY.
YOU TRY IT, SEE WHAT YOU SEE.
TAKE THE CHEMTRAIL PARTICULATES CHALLENGE:
NOW I ASSURE YOU, I HAVE BEEN IN THE WILDERNESS MANY, MANY TIMES IN MY LIFETIME.
I LIVE IN A VERY RURAL AREA NOW, ALMOST HALF AN HOUR TO THE NEAREST PLACE THAT CAN BE CALLED A TOWN.
OVER THE YEARS, WHAT I NOTICED CHANGING WAS THE SCENT OF THE NIGHT.
WHETHER HUNTING IN THE HIGH MOUNTAINS OF IDAHO AND MONTANA OR FISHING ON A RIVER OR LAKE IN MEXICO, THE SCENT, THE SMELL OF THE NIGHT HAS BECOME DIFFERENT.
OVER THE YEARS, WHAT I NOTICED CHANGING WAS THE SCENT OF THE NIGHT.
WHETHER HUNTING IN THE HIGH MOUNTAINS OF IDAHO AND MONTANA OR FISHING ON A RIVER OR LAKE IN MEXICO, THE SCENT, THE SMELL OF THE NIGHT HAS BECOME DIFFERENT.
I NOTICE IT MOST NEAR ANY COAST.
WHEN I FACTOR IN THIS VIDEO, MY OWN 'EXPERIMENTS'...HOW CAN I NOT BELIEVE MY OWN EYES?
IT'S SOMETHING I HAVE NOT NOTICED PREVIOUSLY, IN MY MANY CAMPING EXPERIENCES, BY FLASHLIGHT OR LANTERN, BY CAMPFIRE OR LED LIGHT.
WHEN I FACTOR IN THIS VIDEO, MY OWN 'EXPERIMENTS'...HOW CAN I NOT BELIEVE MY OWN EYES?
IT'S SOMETHING I HAVE NOT NOTICED PREVIOUSLY, IN MY MANY CAMPING EXPERIENCES, BY FLASHLIGHT OR LANTERN, BY CAMPFIRE OR LED LIGHT.
I'D REMEMBER SOMETHING LIKE THIS!
YES, A FEW MONTHS AGO MARKED THE FIRST TIME IN YEARS I'D STOOD OUTSIDE HOLDING A FLASHLIGHT FOR MORE THAN A FEW MINUTES, BUT, WHO WOULDN'T NOTICE THIS...TONIGHT, A YEAR AGO, 20 YEARS AGO?
I'VE READ THAT OUR SUN HAS CHANGED, THAT IT'S CURRENTLY EMITTING SOMETHING THAT NASA AND OTHER SCIENTISTS CAN'T IDENTIFY BUT THAT IS CHANGING THE ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR HERE ON EARTH.
YES, A FEW MONTHS AGO MARKED THE FIRST TIME IN YEARS I'D STOOD OUTSIDE HOLDING A FLASHLIGHT FOR MORE THAN A FEW MINUTES, BUT, WHO WOULDN'T NOTICE THIS...TONIGHT, A YEAR AGO, 20 YEARS AGO?
I'VE READ THAT OUR SUN HAS CHANGED, THAT IT'S CURRENTLY EMITTING SOMETHING THAT NASA AND OTHER SCIENTISTS CAN'T IDENTIFY BUT THAT IS CHANGING THE ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR HERE ON EARTH.
EVEN DISCOVERY.COM IN 2010 AND OTHER SCIENCE MAGAZINES LIKE POPULAR SCIENCE REPORTED ON THIS IN 2012, YEARS AFTER I FIRST READ IT.
FROM DISCOVERY:
What if a well-known — and apparently constant — characteristic of matter starts behaving mysteriously?
FROM DISCOVERY:
What if a well-known — and apparently constant — characteristic of matter starts behaving mysteriously?
This is exactly what has been noticed in recent years; the decay rates of radioactive elements are changing. This is especially mysterious as we are talking about elements with “constant” decay rates — these values aren’t supposed to change. School textbooks teach us this from an early age.
This is the conclusion that researchers from Stanford and Purdue University have arrived at, but the only explanation they have is even weirder than the phenomenon itself: The sun might be emitting a previously unknown particle that is meddling with the decay rates of matter. Or, at the very least, we are seeing some new physics." THAT PURDUE PAPER CAME OUT IN 2006.
AFTER 9 YEARS OF LOOKING INTO THAT, I CAN'T SAY I'M 100% CONVINCED, BUT IF SO, THEN MAYBE ANOTHER THING I'VE READ SEVERAL TIMES, IN SEVERAL "SANE, RATIONAL" PLACES, THAT OUR WORLD GOVERNMENTS ARE USING THESE AIR-DROPPED PARTICLES, THESE CHEMICALS TO SLOW DOWN THE EFFECTS OF THE "MYSTERY" THE SUN HAS UNLEASHED.
IF THAT IS NOT THE CASE, THEN SUCH A THING AS CHEMICAL SPRAYING OF OUR SKIES AND OTHER WEATHER MANIPULATIONS CAN ONLY BE FOR ONE THING, AND THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING...IT REALLY IS WARFARE, AND WE MAY HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED "THE ENEMY".
HAS THE U.S.' LONG-HELD AND OFTEN FRANTIC EUGENICS POLICY TURNED TO WEATHER AND CLIMATE MANIPULATION TO TAKE UP SOME OF THE SLACK?
SPRAYING CHEMICALS FROM HIGH-ALTITUDE CAN AND HAS CHANGED WEATHER.
WE SEE THAT EVIDENCED IN SENATE HEARINGS.
IT'S BUT ONE WAY IN WHICH WE DOWN HERE BELOW ARE SUBJECTED TO THESE "WEATHER MODIFICATION TESTS".
THE "TESTS" REMIND ME VERY MUCH OF THE "TESTS" CARRIED OUT BEFORE WE DROPPED THE BOMBS ON JAPAN.
"When a free people no longer have a say in the air that they breathe, they are no longer free.
Think about it, someone or some group of persons, non-elected, now have the power over the air we that we breathe in on a daily basis. They are now deciding what to put in the air and therefore are affecting our overall health and wellness. This means that we are potentially “one spray” away from a potential disaster that could kill/contaminate everyone in the U. S. and all NATO countries. What will happen if an enemy country gains control over these toxic sprays? "
Think about it, someone or some group of persons, non-elected, now have the power over the air we that we breathe in on a daily basis. They are now deciding what to put in the air and therefore are affecting our overall health and wellness. This means that we are potentially “one spray” away from a potential disaster that could kill/contaminate everyone in the U. S. and all NATO countries. What will happen if an enemy country gains control over these toxic sprays? "
~ Dane Wigington
THE ABOVE QUOTE ...THE AUTHOR FORGETS TO MENTION THE "NON-ELECTED" ARE OUR MILITARY.
HE ALSO SEEMS NEGLECTFUL TO MENTION HOW MANY NATIONS ALREADY HAVE THE SAME TOXINS AND ARE DOING THE SAME THING OVER THEIR OWN AND OTHERS AIR SPACE.
WHAT ABOUT ALL THE OTHER ANIMAL LIFE AFFECTED, THE PLANT LIFE, OUR WATER SUPPLIES?
HOW SIMPLE TO POISON ALL OUR FRESH WATER SUPPLIES, YES?
WHAT ABOUT ALL THE OTHER ANIMAL LIFE AFFECTED, THE PLANT LIFE, OUR WATER SUPPLIES?
HOW SIMPLE TO POISON ALL OUR FRESH WATER SUPPLIES, YES?
WEATHER WARFARE?
MAYBE ALL-OUT WAR?
MAYBE ALL-OUT WAR?
AND OUR CONGRESS KNEW ABOUT IT ALL THIS TIME.
BUT WE DIDN'T...
____________________________________________
FURTHER READING, VIEWING:
~ Arnold A. Barnes, “Weather Modification: Test technology Symposium ’97: Session B: Advanced Weapons/Instrumentation Technologies”, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, United States Air Force, Air Force Phillips Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, 19 March, 1997.
~ For those who may like photographic proof, or just informative brochures to share,
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ads/
~ Arnold A. Barnes, “Weather Modification: Test technology Symposium ’97: Session B: Advanced Weapons/Instrumentation Technologies”, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, United States Air Force, Air Force Phillips Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, 19 March, 1997.
~ For those who may like photographic proof, or just informative brochures to share,
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ads/
~ Geoengineering drought and record snow , a meteorological perspective.
~ Physicist Dr Bernard Eastlund called it ‘the largest ionospheric heater ever built’. HAARP is presented by the US Air Force as a research programme, but military documents confirm its main objective is to ‘induce ionospheric modifications’ with a view to altering weather patterns and disrupting communications and radar.
~ The above borrowed heavily from this site, Weather Warfare: Beware the US Military’s Experiments with Climatic Warfare
~ Geoengineering dangers, scientists and government officials...
~ A.R. Jerral, “Weather Manipulation”, The Nation, 14 September, 2010,Subsequently removed, but quotes and extensive sources can be found in “Weather Weapons,” Lobster Magazine, Issue 62.
~ See, among other sources, US Military, “Case Study 2: Weather Modification: The Evolution of an R&D Program into a Military Operation”, undated.
No comments:
Post a Comment