Translate

Thursday, July 30, 2015

FOOD PRICES HIGHEST IN 4 YEARS, STILL RISING

WHO HASN'T NOTICED BOTH THE HIGHER COST OF FOOD AND NON-FOOD ITEMS AND THE SUDDEN REDUCTION IN THE CHOICES WE HAVE TODAY IN THE MARKET?

WITH THE PRICE OF CRUDE OIL DOWN, WITH REPORTS OF "BUMPER CROPS", WITH GRAIN PRODUCTION AT A PEAK, ONE MIGHT THINK, HOPE, THAT SINCE IT COSTS LESS TO TRANSPORT FOOD TO US AND MORE IS BEING GROWN THAN FARMERS CAN SELL, WE'D CATCH A BREAK AT CHECKOUT.


THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE!


BLOOMBERG SPILLED THE BEANS ABOUT HOW MUCH FOOD IS OUT THERE, HOW LITTLE FARMERS ARE GETTING FOR IT, BUT FAILED TO EXPLAIN THE COST OF FOOD TO CONSUMERS.

"The UN data showed high global production and cheaper crude oil led to declines across the five commodities surveyed, with sugar and dairy prices down over 30 percent year-to-year, and meat, cereals, and oils at least 15 percent cheaper.
Meanwhile, of the corresponding categories in the U.S. consumer price index, only dairy is giving shoppers some relief on a year-over-year basis, driven by a 7.4 percent drop in milk amid a global surplus.
So while falling agricultural commodity prices around the world might not be cutting U.S. consumers much of a break, the decline could be good news for shoppers in less developed countries where food goes through fewer processes and is purchased in closer-to-raw forms."

WHAT???
THAT'S JUST CRAZY!
THAT'S JUST A LAME EXCUSE!
JUST SAY THE "MIDDLE MEN HAVE DECIDED TO SCREW AMERICAN CONSUMERS!"


AND BLOOMBERG IS WRONG ON WHAT A NICE BREAK POOR NATIONS ARE GETTING!
THE SAME SKYROCKETING FOOD PRICES IS A GLOBAL PHENOMENON.
EVERY NATION IS FEELING THE PINCH, IT SEEMS.


According to EVEN the World Bank, the rise in food prices is hardly an isolated event; worldwide, internationally traded food prices have risen again by a steep 4.0%. 
Corn and wheat, in particular, contributed to the rise as each increased 12% and 18% worldwide THIS year, respectively. 
Economists say that the increases come despite bumper crops in 2013 and “continued projections of record grain harvests and stronger stocks expected for 2014,” according to Business Insider.
This sizable shift in food prices is worrying as it recalls the food crises days of 2012, though the numbers are still a far cry from the shortages experienced in that year, or in past food crises, such as the one which occurred in 2008.

The World Bank cautions that “such a steep price increase has not occurred since the months leading to the historical peak in the summer of 2012,”
BUT HOW TO EXPLAIN THE STEADY INCREASE IN FOOD PRICES THAT BEGAN IN 2005 AND HAVE CONTINUED FOR A DECADE...NO MATTER WHAT THE ECONOMY OR OIL PRICES OR CROP PRODUCTION DID?
OIL PRICES, AND THEREFORE GAS AND DIESEL PRICES, HIT RECORD LOWS THIS YEAR!
BUT WE ALL HAVE TO EAT, AND THAT'S WHERE WE GET NAILED!

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average American spends about 10% of their annual income on food, but most other countries spend more!
A citizen in Indonesia, for instance, spends almost 50% of their income on food, an average 43% of every cent earned.

Workers in Azerbaijan also see almost half of their take-home pay go for food, according to the USDA Economic Research Service’s 
Food Expenditures report.
HOW CAN PEOPLE AFFORD NUTRITIOUS FOOD IF THIS KEEPS UP?

SOME HAVE OUTRIGHT LIED TO EXPLAIN RISING FOOD PRICES!

THOSE WHO HAVE BLAMED IT ON AN "INCREASINGLY EMPLOYED, GROWING MIDDLE CLASS ABLE TO AFFORD MORE FOOD" SIMPLY LIED.

UNEMPLOYMENT IS UP, GLOBALLY, AND JOBS THAT DO EXIST DO NOT PAY ENOUGH TO EXPLAIN A SUDDEN RISE IN DEMAND.
ESPECIALLY IN THE U.S. AND OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS, WAGES JUST HAVE NOT KEPT UP WITH EVER-INCREASING PRICES.
THAT STUPID EXPLANATION IS JUST "BS".


Unemployment rate: 8.4% (2013 est.) 
7.5% (2012 est.) 

Note: 30% combined unemployment and underemployment in many non-industrialized countries; developed countries typically 4%-12% unemployment.[Source: CIA World Factbook - This page was last updated on June 30, 2015]

EVEN THE DETERMINED LIARS AT THE WORLD BANK OFFERED STATS THAT CONTRADICT THAT "PEOPLE CAN AFFORD MORE FOOD AND MORE ARE EMPLOYED" BALONEY!

ANYONE CAN GO SEE THE GROWING NUMBERS OF PEOPLE LIVING BELOW THE "POVERTY LINE" HERE AND IN OTHER NATIONS AROUND THE GLOBE...ALL HAVE STEADILY RISEN SINCE 2004!

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?v=69&c=us&l=en

IN AMERICA THE INCREASE IN POVERTY WAS FROM A 12% INCREASE IN 2004 TO OVER 15% IN 2010.

AND IN ANOTHER BLOG HERE, WE SAW THAT FAR TOO MANY AMERICANS JUST DON'T MAKE A "LIVING WAGE", HAVE NOTHING LEFT FOR "EXTRAS" AND HAVE TO CUT BACK ON EVERYTHING!

IN THE U.K., ANOTHER "WEALTHY" NATION, THE NUMBERS OF THOSE BELOW POVERTY LEVEL HAS INCREASED STEADILY SINCE 2006 AND STANDS AT OVER 16%.

SO IT'S NOT OIL PRICES, IT'S NOT HIGHER DEMAND BECAUSE THE WHOLE WORLD HAS MORE MONEY TO SPEND ON FOOD.

WHAT'S THE NEXT REASON GIVEN?


FOR THE U.S., THE LOSS OF CHEAP LABOR, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT WORKERS IS MENTIONED BY MANY.

IF THAT'S TRUE, THEN THAT MEANS THERE ARE MANY, MANY MORE JOBS FOR "AMERICANS", RIGHT?
WITH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, WOULDN'T IT MAKE SENSE THAT "AMERICANS" WERE RUSHING TO GRAB THOSE JOBS, ANY JOBS?
WITH SO MANY YOUNG PEOPLE LEAVING COLLEGE, UNABLE TO FIND WORK, WOULDN'T AT LEAST SOME OF THEM TAKE THOSE JOBS?
NO?
NO, NO THEY DON'T WANT FARM JOBS.

IF NOT, WHAT DOES THAT TELL US?
THAT IT WAS A LIE THAT THOSE ILLEGALS WERE ROBBING AMERICANS OF JOBS, RIGHT?


WELL, WERE THEY OR NOT?
IF THEY WERE, ONCE WE CLEARED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF JOBS FOR AMERICANS TO STEP INTO, THEN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS WENT TO WORK THE NEXT DAY, DIDN'T THEY?

ASK AMERICAN GROWERS!
THEY CAN'T FIND AMERICANS WHO WANT TO WORK FARMS!


WHY BLAME THE LACK OF ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS FOR HIGHER FOOD PRICES IF AMERICANS GOT THOSE JOBS?

DIDN'T AMERICANS WANT THOSE JOBS PLANTING AND HARVESTING OUR FOOD?

SHOULD WE BELIEVE THAT AMERICANS DON'T WANT TO GET OUT THERE AND DO WHAT ILLEGALS WERE DOING?


LOOKS THAT WAY!

A March, 2014 report released by the Partnership for a New American Economy and the Agriculture Coalition for Immigration Reform found that “labor challenges faced by U.S. farmers and the inadequacies of the H2-A visa program are a key reason why American farmers have been unable to maintain their share of the domestic market. Labor alone can explain as much as $3.3 billion in missed GDP growth in 2012,” the report reads, adding that labor shortages have resulted in $1.4 billion in unrealized farm income for 2014 alone. 
Timothy Richards, a professor of agribusiness at Arizona State University adds that labor shortages work in tandem with other factors to create a difficult environment for farming. “It’s like a perfect storm,” he said, 
per CNBC. “We don’t have enough water or enough workers to pick crops. So much food is left in the fields. It’s just adding to the woes.”
HOLD ON!
SO MUCH FOOD WAS GROWN THEY HAD TO LET SOME ROT IN THE FIELDS?
I THOUGHT DROUGHT WAS BEING BLAMED FOR LESS FOOD GROWN!


DROUGHT...LET'S BLAME DROUGHT, SAY SOME "EXPERTS".

NOPE. STATES WITH DROUGHT PROBLEMS STILL RAISED BUMPER CROPS.
FROM CALIFORNIA, HARDEST HIT BY DROUGHT.

"Despite the severity of the drought and California’s dominant market shares in many foods – especially fruits, vegetables and tree nuts – consumers saw only small food price effects last year and are unlikely to notice much price impact in 2015. "
 
GO DO A GOOGLE SEARCH AND USE THE SEARCH TERM "BUMPER CROP 2015".
YOU'LL FIND FARMERS ALL OVER AMERICA BRAGGING ABOUT BUMPER CROPS OF EVERYTHING FROM CORN AND SOYBEANS TO BLUEBERRIES, PEACHES, AND EVEN TREE SEEDS, LIKE ALMONDS, PECANS, WALNUTS, ETC.


BUY LOCALLY FROM THE FARMERS THEMSELVES!
SEE THE DIFFERENCE!

THOSE OF US WHO SHOP LOCAL FARMERS' MARKETS CAN TELL YOU WHAT A BUMPER CROP OF MELONS, LETTUCE, TOMATOES, ONIONS, PEPPERS, CABBAGE, SPINACH AND OTHER FRUITS AND VEGETABLES WE SEE SPREAD BEFORE US EVERY WEEKEND.

GO EARLY AND GET IN ON THE "PRICE WARS" AS EACH FARMER VIES FOR CUSTOMERS BY DROPPING PRICES EVERY FEW MINUTES.
WE RECENTLY PICKED UP HUGE CANTALOUPES FOR $1, 20-30 POUND WATERMELONS FOR $3, CABBAGES BIGGER THAN ONE'S HEAD FOR 50 CENTS EACH, BOK CHOY, 3 STALKS FOR $1, GORGEOUS RED ONIONS, $1.50 FOR 3 POUNDS, AND NOT A BLEMISH ON THEM!
AND WE ONLY SHOP IN THE ORGANIC FARMERS' SHED!
BUT IT'S A HELLUVA LOT DIFFERENT IN THE GROCERY STORES!
WHILE ONE CAN BUY A LARGE BOX OF MIXED GREEN AND RIPE TOMATOES (FROM 8 TO 12 POUNDS, DEPENDING ON TYPE) FOR $8 TO $10 AT THE FARMERS' MARKET ( $5 AT END OF THE DAY ON SATURDAY!), AND THE MOST BEAUTIFUL OAK LEAF LETTUCE FOR $1 TO $1.25 PER VERY LARGE HEAD, GREENHOUSE ROMA TOMATOES (USUALLY THE CHEAPEST TYPE) ARE ABOUT $1.89 A POUND ON A "GOOD" DAY IN STORES, AND YOU CAN'T FIND OAK LEAF THERE ANYMORE! 
WHAT LETTUCES WE'VE RECENTLY FOUND OFFERED IN STORES, ONE WOULDN'T INSULT A PIG BY OFFERING IT TO THEM!

WHY?

WHY THE GLARING DIFFERENCE?


FLORIDA GROWERS RECENTLY BEMOANED THEIR BUMPER CROPS OF VEGETABLES!

It has been a hot winter in South Florida. Great if you’re a tourist, but not so good if you’re a farmer. The fields are overflowing with more fresh vegetables then growers say they can sell."

THEY GET PAID LESS, THEY SAY, BUT GROCERY STORES DO NOT PASS THOSE LOW PRICES ON TO THE CONSUMERS?
WHY NOT?
IF GROCERY CHAINS ARE PAYING LESS, WHY ARE WE PAYING MORE?



INDIA, WITH MANY MORE MOUTHS TO FEED, IS ALSO EXPECTING A GOOD HARVEST!
IN INDIA, MONSOONS CREATED BUMPER CROPS THERE.

TEXAS IS FARING WELL FROM THE PROBLEMS IN SPAIN AND ITALY WITH OLIVE PRODUCTION, LOOKING FORWARD TO A GOOD YEAR FOR TEXAS OLIVE GROWERS.
SAME GOOD NEWS IN TEXAS FOR PEACHES AND PECANS...ALL DESPITE HEAVY RAINS!
IMAGINE THAT

SO, YES, WHILE A FEW PLACES HERE IN THE U.S. ARE SEEING DROUGHT, IT HAS HAD LITTLE EFFECT ON THE PRICES FARMERS ARE GETTING FOR THEIR HARD WORK.
SOMEWHERE, BETWEEN WHEN THE FARMERS HARVEST AND WHEN WE GO TO THE STORE TO BUY THAT FOOD THEY SOLD "DIRT CHEAP", SOMEBODY IS SCREWING THE CONSUMER!

WE'RE BEING HOODWINKED BY "MIDDLE MEN".

BUT IF WE LOOK A LITTLE CLOSER, ANSWERS, REAL ANSWERS, BEGIN TO APPEAR! 


Price pressures from industry consolidation


"Perhaps the largest price pressure stemming from the processors and packagers (the intermediaries) in our food system is consolidation; that is, mergers and acquisitions. As we reported previously, Big Food’s consolidation often indirectly spells higher food prices as a result of a lack of competition in the marketplace. 
It’s predicted that the consolidation process will increase food prices, particularly in the meat processing and packaging industry;

USA Today reported earlier this month that beef and veal prices are expected to rise 6% in the next few months, and around 3.5% this year overall."
AND...
"Sheehan told CNBC. “There will be less incentive to lower prices in stores, and that can be harmful all around.

According to a 2007 study
 by the University of Missouri, “the four largest companies controlled 82% of the beef packing industry, 85% of soybean processing, 63% of pork packing, and 53% of broiler chicken processing. In fact, so much consolidation has taken place throughout the food chain that it can be difficult for any one person to fathom the true effects.”


BAM!
THERE'S THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG THAT'S CREATING "UNEXPLAINABLE" HIGH PRICES AT THE STORE!

THERE IS PLENTY OF FOOD BEING GROWN, THE FARMERS ARE GETTING PAID LESS FOR IT, BUT LOOK WHO BECOMES THE "MIDDLE MAN".

"Every time you visit a grocery store, mini mart, or coffee shop, you’re most likely handing your money over to a member of a powerful food corporation that has quietly and efficiently —  along with a few others — become one of the largest, most powerful, and most damaging in America. Because of that, our food choices have become increasingly narrow, as the industry is dominated by a small handful of companies.
“The grocery industry justifies the size of big-box and merging grocery chains as a way to increase efficiency, lower costs, and pass savings on to consumers. But most supermarkets just pocket any savings in the form of higher profits, while consumers rarely benefit. The dominant supermarkets can charge consumers considerably more than it costs to put groceries on store shelves, and they have little incentive to pass price discounts on to consumers if they have few or no competitors in a local market,” Food & Water Watch reports.
The entire industry is, in many respects, run by a handful of food monopolists who use the illusion of competition to take advantage of consumers. Their influence also allows these companies to narrow choices as to where customers shop and even what they can buy.
In other words: sometimes the free market isn’t as free as we’d like to think."
IT'S ANYTHING BUT FREE! 

ABOUT ESCALATING MEAT PRICES...HERE'S A HINT...
MEAT PRODUCERS ARE WHINING THAT AMERICANS ARE EATING LESS MEAT, AND PARTIALLY BLAME IT ON THOSE "NEGATIVE ADS BY ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUPS"!

SO, SEVEN STATES HAVE PASSED WHAT IS CALLED "AG-GAG" LAWS, WHICH BAN THE PUBLIC FROM FILMING AND DISTRIBUTING FILM THAT SHOWS ANIMAL ABUSE BY BEEF, POULTRY, HOG, SHEEP, ANY FOOD ANIMAL!

NORTH CAROLINA JUST JOINED THOSE STATES TRYING TO KEEP AMERICANS FROM SEEING HOW ABUSED SUCH ANIMALS ARE! 
‘Ag-gag’ bills, short for “agricultural gag,” are meant to protect farmers and agricultural operations from employees or visitors attempting to expose what they deem to be unsafe, unfair, or cruel practices. 
This can include videos taken on private property of animals being abused, or even employees being treated unfairly. 
In effect, these laws are meant to shield agricultural companies from lawsuits resulting from the practices at their respective business locations.
Basically, they’re anti-whistleblower laws.
As of right now, there are seven states that have these ag-gag laws on the books, with many others having had defeated proposed legislation. But the industry’s minions are hard at work crafting new bills, or reworking old ones, in an attempt to get more states on board. Currently, North Carolina is in the midst of a heated debate over whether or not to pass an ag-gag law — but in this particular instance, North Carolina’s legislation goes above and beyond what we’ve seen so far.
Not only are the traditional elements included in this bill, but the anti-whistleblower law could also be applied to a myriad of other businesses, including restaurants, daycare, and even nursing homes."
[NOTE: THE TEA ROOM AUTHOR IS AN OMNIVORE, A HUNTER, A FISHERMAN, AND NOT OPPOSED TO CONSUMING MEAT. 
I AM OPPOSED TO CRUELTY, ANY CRUELTY, ALL CRUELTY, EVERYWHERE, ALL THE TIME!
IF THEY HAD NOTHING TO HIDE, THEY WOULDN'T MIND VISITS OR FILMING, THOSE CRYING THE LOUDEST!]

I HOPE WE CAN ALL LEARN FROM THIS...
MEGA-CORPORATIONS KNOW HOW TO BREAK THE RULES AND "MAKE A KILLING".

THEY ENJOY PROFITS.

THEY KNOW WE WILL PAY WHATEVER THEY CHARGE FOR FOOD.

MAYBE THEY DON'T REALIZE WE HAVE A CHOICE?

BUY FROM LOCAL FARMERS.
YOU WON'T BELIEVE HOW LESS EXPENSIVE, HOW MUCH FRESHER AND BETTER LOCAL FOOD CAN BE!  


AND IT GETS EVEN BETTER WHEN ONE CAN GROW IT THEMSELVES!

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

GOOGLE COOKIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

Google Notifying Searchers In EU That They Use Cookies


LOOK AT THAT DATE...2013.
IT'S VERY OLD NEWS THAT GOOGLE FORCES COOKIES.

HOWEVER, ONLY JUST NOW, ON SIGN-OUT, GOOGLE POPPED UP A NOTICE THAT THE TEA ROOM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING EUROPEAN MEMBER NATIONS' READERS THAT, SINCE THE TEA ROOM IS A "GOOGLE BLOG", COOKIES MAY BE AN ISSUE.

I ASSURE YOU, THE TEA ROOM ITSELF LOATHES COOKIES, BUT GOOGLE, AS WE ALL KNOW, HAS BEEN OFTEN ACCUSED OF HELPING THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY AND OTHER U.S. AGENCIES COLLECT DATA ON USERS, SO THIS MAY HAVE PROMPTED RENEWED EFFORTS BY THE EU TO MAKE SEARCHERS AWARE OF THIS?

THE SAME APPLIES FOR FACEBOOK AND OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA SITES, "HANDY HELPERS" FOR AMERICA'S "BIG BROTHER SYSTEM" THAT WATCHES US ALL.

A REMINDER THEN, FROM 2013:
http://searchengineland.com/google-uk-notifying-searchers-that-they-use-cookies-154833

"If you search for anything at Google UK or on any of the 27 localized versions of Google in the European Union, Google will now prompt you with a notification that they are using cookies to provide search results to you. In fact, Google says that by using Google search you are agreeing to allow Google to place cookies on your computer.
Here is the prompt you will see when searching on Google UK:

Clicking on the “learn more” link takes you to this page where Google explains what cookies are and how they may use them. Google also shares a video which you can watch that explains this, as well. Google says they use cookies to “remember your safe search preferences, to make the ads that you see more relevant to you, to count how many visitors we receive to a page, to help you sign up for our services and to protect your data.   
For more on the EU’s cookie law, see our stories named:

GOOGLE, NOW, 2 YEARS AFTER THIS, NOTIFIES ME THAT YOU SHOULD BE SEEING THAT WHEN YOU VISIT THE TEA ROOM NOW, YOU IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, OR WHEN YOU WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO, OR DO A GOOGLE SEARCH, ETC. WTH???

TRACKING COOKIES SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

THE TEA ROOM IS OF THE OPINION THAT ANYTHING THAT TRACKS A HUMAN BEING WITHOUT HIS/HER EXPRESS CONSENT SHOULD BE PUNISHED WITH A LITTLE PRISON TIME AND A HELLUVA FINE.

Why is this important?

European laws require that digital publishers give visitors to their sites and apps information about their use of cookies and other forms of local storage. In many cases these laws also require that consent be obtained.
This site is produced by Google. We work with lots of publisher partners and, based on that experience, we wanted to provide any publishers with easy-to-implement tools that can help them meet their legal obligations to get user consent.

What do I need to do?

There’s guidance from data protection authorities (see below) across Europe on what is required to comply with relevant laws. We also recommend seeking legal advice on what’s right for your website or app, though we recognize that many publishers don’t have access to legal advice.
There are vendors that offer tools or solutions to add a cookie consent function to your website, some of which are free of charge. For example:

A LIST OF "VENDORS"...

WELL, IT'S NEWS TO ME THAT I MUST BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY WEB PAGE THAT GOOGLE CONTROLS, SO, IF THE TEA ROOM GOES DARK, IT'S BECAUSE OF THIS...

I WILL NOT EXERT EFFORT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE.
IF GOOGLE FAILS TO PLACE ITS OWN WARNING HERE, THEN GOOGLE MAY FEEL FREE TO SHUT DOWN THE HEMLOCK TEA ROOM AND LADIES' EMPORIUM.

I NEVER DID WORK CHEAPLY AND WON'T WORK FOR FREE, SO NOPE...
HERE'S THE NOTICE, THE END...

THE TEA ROOM REFUSES ADS AND EVEN COMMENTS THAT TRY TO DROP LINKS TO BUSINESS SITES.
COMMENTS HERE ARE ALL MODERATED BY ME AND ME ALONE.

COOKIES SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE HERE!
I HAVE NEVER USED ONE!

THIS IS A NO-AD WEB PAGE!

MY CHARGE FOR GOING TO THE TROUBLE EXPOUNDED ON 
https://www.cookiechoices.org/
WOULD BE IN THE $500 TO $1,000 RANGE....

BALL IS NOW IN GOOGLE'S COURT.

HIATUS WHILST WE HASH THIS OUT... MAYBE...

BE WELL, ALL.

WEATHER MODIFICATION ADVANCEMENTS USAF

THE ABILITY TO CONTROL  THE WEATHER HAS BEEN A DREAM FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS, ESPECIALLY AMONG THE MILITARY FORCES AROUND THE GLOBE.
CONTROLLING WEATHER WOULD GIVE WHOMEVER COULD PULL IT OFF A GREAT "STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE"... IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW THE NATION WHO DEVELOPED THE TECHNOLOGY TO DOMINATE NATIONS WHO COULD NOT.

SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER WHEN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WAS FIRST ACCUSED OF USING CONTRAILS AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
I DON'T RECALL WHEN THAT FIRST HAPPENED BUT THEY BROUGHT IT ON THEMSELVES.

"The USAF says these accusations were a hoax fueled in part by citations to a strategy paper drafted within their Air University entitled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025."

I HAD DOWNLOADED THAT PDF WHEN THE MEDIA VERY BRIEFLY DID AN ARTICLE OR MAYBE TWO ON THE RENEWED ACCUSATIONS A FEW YEARS BACK...AND IT'S A REAL PIECE OF WORK!

WHEN I WENT TO RETRIEVE THAT FOR THIS BLOG, THE FULL PDF IS REPLACED BY THIS.
http://fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm

I HAVE THE ORIGINAL ON A THUMB DRIVE (WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE USAF IN 1996!) , SO LOOKING THROUGH ALL OF THESE LITTLE "STICKS" I HAVE AND FINDING THAT WILL TAKE A FEW WEEKS SO WE CAN COMPARE THE TWO...YEAH, I KEEP TOO MUCH "STUFF" AND "ORGANIZE YOUR DATA" ARE FIGHTING WORDS. GRRRR!

MEANWHILE, A FEW EXCERPTS FROM WHAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE, STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S (USAF) MOUTH:

<CUE TRUMPETS>
WEATHER MODIFICATION!

"A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. 
While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. 

From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. 

Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

[BOY-OH-BOY, ARE THEY EVER!]

Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix

DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES              ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES
Precipitation Enhancement                      Precipitation Avoidance
- Flood Lines of Communication             - Maintain/Improve LOC
- Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness      - Maintain Visibility
- Decrease Comfort Level/Morale           - Maintain Comfort Level/Morale
Storm Enhancement                            Storm Modification
- Deny Operations                                   - Choose Battlespace Environment
Precipitation Denial                                 Space Weather
- Deny Fresh Water                                  - Improve Communication Reliability
-- Induce Drought                                     - Intercept Enemy Transmissions
Space Weather                                        - Revitalize Space Assets
- Disrupt Communications/Radar             Fog and Cloud Generation
- Disable/Destroy Space Assets              - Increase Concealment
Fog and Cloud Removal                           Fog and Cloud Removal
- Deny Concealment                                - Maintain Airfield Operations
- Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce    - Enhance PGM Effectiveness
Detect Hostile Weather Activities              Defend against Enemy Capabilities

[I HAD THE DEVIL OF A TIME PASTING THAT TABLE INTO THIS SPACE, AND IT LOOKED OKAY ON PREVIEW, BUT IF IT BECOMES DISTORTED, SOMEBODY LET ME KNOW, PLEASE?]

"Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques.

Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined

In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.

A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES FROM THE DOCUMENT
~"This study by William M. Gray, et al., investigated the hypothesis that "significant beneficial influences can be derived through judicious exploitation of the solar absorption potential of carbon black dust."21 The study ultimately found that this technology could be used to enhance rainfall on the mesoscale, generate cirrus clouds, and enhance cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) clouds in otherwise dry areas.

The technology can be described as follows. Just as a black tar roof easily absorbs solar energy and subsequently radiates heat during a sunny day, carbon black also readily absorbs solar energy. 
When dispersed in microscopic or "dust" form in the air over a large body of water, the carbon becomes hot and heats the surrounding air, thereby increasing the amount of evaporation from the body of water below. 
As the surrounding air heats up, parcels of air will rise and the water vapor contained in the rising air parcel will eventually condense to form clouds. 
Over time the cloud droplets increase in size as more and more water vapor condenses, and eventually they become too large and heavy to stay suspended and will fall as rain or other forms of precipitation.22 
The study points out that this precipitation enhancement technology would work best "upwind from coastlines with onshore flow." Lake-effect snow along the southern edge of the Great Lakes is a naturally occurring phenomenon based on similar dynamics.

Can this type of precipitation enhancement technology have military applications? Yes, if the right conditions exist.

One method we propose would further maximize the technology's safety and reliability, by virtually eliminating the human element. 

To date, much work has been done on UAVs which can closely (if not completely) match the capabilities of piloted aircraft. 
If this UAV technology were combined with stealth and carbon dust technologies, the result could be a UAV aircraft invisible to radar while en route to the targeted area, which could spontaneously create carbon dust in any location. 

However, minimizing the number of UAVs required to complete the mission would depend upon the development of a new and more efficient system to produce carbon dust by a follow-on technology to the afterburner-type jet engines previously mentioned. 

In order to effectively use stealth technology, this system must also have the ability to disperse carbon dust while minimizing (or eliminating) the UAV's infrared heat source.
In addition to using stealth UAV and carbon dust absorption technology for precipitation enhancement, this delivery method could also be used for precipitation suppression.

~ The desirability to modify storms to support military objectives is the most aggressive and controversial type of weather-modification. The damage caused by storms is indeed horrendous. For instance, a tropical storm has an energy equal to 10,000 one-megaton hydrogen bombs,36 and in 1992 Hurricane Andrew totally destroyed Homestead AFB, Florida.

Assuming that the US achieves some or all of the above outlined aircraft technical advances and maintains the technological "weather edge" over its potential adversaries, we can next look at how we could modify the battlespace weather to make the best use of our technical advantage.
Weather-modification technologies might involve techniques that would increase latent heat release in the atmosphere, provide additional water vapor for cloud cell development, and provide additional surface and lower atmospheric heating to increase atmospheric instability. Critical to the success of any attempt to trigger a storm cell is the pre-existing atmospheric conditions locally and regionally. The atmosphere must already be conditionally unstable and the large-scale dynamics must be supportive of vertical cloud development. 

The focus of the weather-modification effort would be to provide additional "conditions" that would make the atmosphere unstable enough to generate cloud and eventually storm cell development. 

The path of storm cells once developed or enhanced is dependent not only on the mesoscale dynamics of the storm but the regional and synoptic (global) scale atmospheric wind flow patterns in the area which are currently not subject to human control.

"The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together; 
in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."

YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN BY THEY DESERVED TO CATCH SOME FLAK OVER THAT?
THEY ADMIT THEY'RE ALREADY MANIPULATING QUITE A FEW WEATHER RELATED THINGS, SO WHY DENY THE CONTRAILS PART?
"WE CAN OWN THE WEATHER"...


DON'T CALL "HOAX" ON PEOPLE WHO BUSTED YOU, USAF GUYS, JUST BECAUSE THEY CALL YOUR CONTRAILS "CHEMTRAILS".

TO GO ALONG WITH THIS "OWNING THE WEATHER", THERE WAS A STUDY DONE AND PUBLISHED ON THIS VERY TOPIC BY THE U.S. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH IN 1992, "POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF GREENHOUSE WARMING: MITIGATION (i.e., CORRECTION), ADAPTATION AND THE SCIENCE BASES".

IN 1992 THOSE GUYS SUGGESTED THAT THE EASIEST AND CHEAPEST WAY TO "MITIGATE" CLIMATE WARMING WAS TO DELIVER STRATOSPHERIC SULFATE AEROSOLS (SOOT AND DUST) INTO THE ATMOSPHERE, AND EVEN STATED THAT IF WE BEGAN THAT AND THEN STOPPED, IT WOULD TAKE ABOUT 6 MONTHS FOR ALL THE "DUST" TO SETTLE BACK TO EARTH AND THE TEMPERATURES WOULD AGAIN INCREASE!

WHO KNEW, RIGHT?

THAT REPORT APPEARED IN THE BOOK "WEATHER WARFARE" AND THE PARTICULAR PAGE IT IS FOUND ON (PAGE 271) CAN BE VIEWED <HERE>.

OR YOU CAN BEGIN READING FROM THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT ON PAGE 48, AT
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1605&page=48.

ON PAGE 54, THE STUDY OFFERS SEVERAL "OPTIONS" TO REDUCE THE EFFECTS OF GREENHOUSE GASES:


"Table 6.3 presents what the panel calls geoengineering options. The geoengineering options in this preliminary analysis include several ways of reducing temperature increases by screening sunlight (e.g., space mirrors, stratospheric dust, multiple balloons, stratospheric soot, and stimulating cloud condensation nuclei) as well as stimulation of ocean uptake of CO2." 

THOSE SUGGESTIONS ARE EXPANDED IN THE TABLE PRESENTED ON PAGE 55, <HERE>, AND CONTINUING THROUGH PAGE 59.

THEN WE FIND, ON PAGE 59, THIS WARNING:


"Geoengineering options appear technically feasible in terms of cooling effects and costs on the basis of currently available preliminary information. But considerably more study and research will be necessary to evaluate their potential side effects, including the chemical reactions that particles introduced into the atmosphere might cause or alter."

Geoengineering options have the potential to affect greenhouse warming on a substantial scale. 
However, precisely because they might do so, and because the climate system and its chemistry are poorly understood, these options must be considered extremely carefully. 
Efforts by societies to restrain their greenhouse gas emissions might be politically infeasible on a global scale, or might fail. 


In this eventuality, other options may be incapable of countering the effects, and geoengineering strategies might be needed. 

Some of these options are relatively inexpensive to implement, but all have large unknowns concerning possible environmental side-effects. They should not be implemented without careful assessment of their direct and indirect consequences."

READY FOR MY "THEORY"?

AMERICA DEPENDS ON LARGE CORPORATIONS NOT ONLY TO DRIVE THE ECONOMY BUT ALSO TO OIL THE POLITICAL MACHINES.

WE'VE SEEN EXCEPTIONS AND EXCUSES BE HANDED TO EVERY MAJOR POLLUTER IN INDUSTRY.


WE'VE SEEN CONGRESS MAKE ALLOWANCES AND FALL ALL OVER EACH OTHER TO COME UP WITH NEW WAYS TO BLOCK THE EPA OR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM FINING BIG CO2 EMITTERS, KEEP THEM FROM CITING THEM FOR FLAGRANT VIOLATIONS, OR RUNNING THEM OUT OF TOWN ON RAILS.

BIG BUSINESS IS BUSINESS AND THE ECONOMY, AS WE HAVE SEEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN, IS MORE IMPORTANT TO WALL STREET THAN HUMAN LIVES, AND SO BIG BUSINESSES BECOME MORE IMPORTANT TO CONGRESSMEN, ALL WHO SEEK "OFFICE" THAN HUMAN HEALTH.

IF THE "LAWMAKERS" CAN MAKE LAWS TO HELP OUT THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE TO CAMPAIGN CHESTS, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY'LL DO, AND THOSE WHO FIND THE MOST WAYS TO PUT BIG BUSINESS ABOVE THE LAW GETS ELECTED!

SO, I THINK THAT, KNOWING THEY CAN'T FORCE INDUSTRIES TO STOP EMITTING ENOUGH NOXIOUS GASES TO KILL BULL ELEPHANTS, AS THAT WOULD JUST PISS INDUSTRIES OFF, OUR 'GOVERNMENT' DECIDED TO JUST GO AHEAD AND COVER ALL THE A$$ES THEY COULD BY IMPLEMENTING THE CHEAPEST MEANS TO COOL THE CLIMATE IN A "MOP-UP" CAMPAIGN THAT THEY THOUGHT WOULD COUNTERACT THE GREENHOUSE GAS EFFECT ON CLIMATE, SOMETHING THEY IMAGINED WOULD DETER OR EVEN STOP THE WARMING TREND.

THEIR GIFT TO THEIR CAMPAIGN DONORS WAS "WEATHER MODIFICATION" BY THE CHEAPEST MEANS POSSIBLE, "STRATOSPHERIC SOOT AND DUST".

THEY ALSO KNEW THAT, IF AMERICANS (OR ANYBODY WHO CARED) FOUND OUT HOW MUCH THEY'RE COVERING FOR THEIR RICH DONOR PALS, IT JUST MIGHT INCITE RIOT.

ENTER THE USAF, WHO FLIES HUNDREDS (THOUSANDS???) OF PLANES EACH DAY, WHICH AMERICANS ARE USED TO SEEING, WHICH LEAVE THOSE CONTRAILS WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH.

JUST ADD TANKS OF "SHIELDING PARTICULATES", A LITTLE "DUST AND SOOT", TO THOSE AIRCRAFT AND WHAT WAS A CHEAP IDEA ANYWAY GETS EVEN CHEAPER.


IT WOULD GET CHEAPER STILL IF COMMERCIAL AIRLINES COULD BE ENLISTED TO ALSO DELIVER SOME "CLIMATE-SAVING" DUST ON THEIR FLIGHTS BACK AND FORTH ACROSS AMERICA. 


INSTEAD OF, WHAT'S THAT VULGAR TERM SOME USE....OH, YEAH..."BITCH-SLAPPING" THE MAJOR POLLUTERS AND FORCING THEM TO STOP PUMPING OUT A MILLION BAZILLION TONS OF LIFE-THREATENING CRAP EACH DAY, THEY JUST COVER FOR THEM SO THEY AREN'T TROUBLED BY HAVING TO ADD EXPENSIVE TECHNOLOGY TO KEEP THEIR OPERATIONS FROM CHOKING US TO DEATH.

BETTER TO SAVE INDUSTRY THAN AMERICANS.
AMERICANS NEVER CONTRIBUTE ENOUGH TO "WAR CHESTS" AND OUR GOVERNMENT HAS LONG BEEN TRYING TO FIND A POPULATION REDUCTION PLAN ANYWAY.

NOW, IF THIS WAS EVER REALLY PROVEN, IT MIGHT PISS THE SHEEPLE OFF, SO DENIAL IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY AND A FEW MILLION BUCKS YEARLY TO PAY A FEW "EXPERTS" TO GET ON TV AND CONVINCE US CLIMATE CHANGE IS A MYTH, A LIE, A JOKE IS ALSO MONEY WELL SPENT...IT'S TAXPAYER MONEY ANYWAY THAT PAYS FOR IT ALL.

I FOUND A LOT OF PATENTS FOR WEATHER MODIFICATION DEVICES, A FEW FOR DEVICES TO CREATE CONTRAILS, SO THAT ALSO ADDED TO MY CONCERN.
I LIST ONLY A FEW.

CLICK ON THE NUMBER OF THE PATENT TO SEE THE ORIGINAL LISTING AT THE PATENT OFFICE WEBSITE.
LOOK HOW FAR BACK SOME OF THESE PATENTS GO!

SOURCE: United States Patent and Trademark Office  
  • 0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall

  • 1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker

  • 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment

  • 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists

  • 1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft

  • 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device

  • 2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather

  • 2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes

  • 2591988 – April 8, 1952 – Production of TiO2 Pigments – Referenced in 3899144

  • 2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture

  • 2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere

  • 2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device

  • 2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987

  • 2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds

  • 2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet

  • 3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator

  • 3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals

  • 3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions

  • 3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System

  • 3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke

  • 3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump

  • 3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker

  • 3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser

  • 3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds

  • 3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System

  • 3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere

  • 3518670 June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud

  • 3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles

  • 3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding

  • 3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas

  • 3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region

  • 3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions

  • 3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein

  • 3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method

  • 3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process

  • USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

  • 3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material

  • 3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device

  • 3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use

  • 3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere

  • 3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke

  • 3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method

  • 3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System 

  • 6890497 – May 10, 2005 – Method For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

  • 7965488 – November 9, 2007 – Methods Of Removing Aerosols From The Atmosphere

  • 8048309 –  August 28, 2008 – Seawater-Based Carbon Dioxide Disposal

  • 8012453 – October 27, 2008 – Carbon Sequestration And Production Of Hydrogen And Hydride

  • 7645326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation

  • 7655193 – February 2, 2010 – Apparatus For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide

  • 8373962 – February 12, 2013 – Charged seed cloud as a method for increasing particle collisions and for scavenging airborne biological agents and other contaminants

ANOTHER THING I FOUND AND CAN'T LEAVE OUT OF THIS...
CANADA HAS FEWER THAN HALF A DOZEN AIRCRAFT THAT ARE CAPABLE OF REFUELING OTHER AIRCRAFT WHILE IN FLIGHT.
THE U.S. HAS ABOUT 700.


[PLEASE NOTE, THIS INFORMATION WAS READILY AVAILABLE AT 

http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Aircraft-Upgrades/Boeing-707--Omega-Air-Tanker-Transport-United-States.html

NOW ONE JUST FINDS THIS
http://articles.janes.com/notice.html

"The sample news and analysis articles that were previously hosted on these pages have been discontinued. Up-to-date IHS Jane's defence and security news and analysis content can now be found on www.janes.com."]

WHAT THE HELL KIND OF FLEET ARE WE FLYING THAT WE NEED EVEN 200 OF THOSE FOR?
HOW MANY LONG-RANGE MISSIONS DOES AMERICA FLY IN ANY GIVEN DAY?

PUT IT ALL TOGETHER AND I CAN HONESTLY SAY I JUST DO NOT BELIEVE THE USAF WHEN IT DENIES MUCH OF ANYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH WEATHER.


STILL, LET'S LOOK AT CONTRAILS A BIT CLOSER, JUST RAW CONTRAILS, NO ADDED INGREDIENTS LIKE THAT DUST AND SOOT.
THOSE CONTRAILS ARE BY NO MEANS A BOOST TO OUR ENVIRONMENT.
WHAT'S IN COMMON OLD JET FUEL?

WHAT COMES OUT AS A CONTRAIL?
NOT HARMLESS VAPOR!


HERE'S WHAT'S IN THOSE "LINES IN THE SKIES", AGAIN, ACCORDING TO NASA: 

"Persistent contrails are ice clouds, so they are mostly made of ice. 


They also are likely to contain aircraft exhaust products (including soot and dissolved gases like sulfur dioxide) , but they are overwhelmingly made from moisture condensed out of the surrounding air. 

In one example reported by Knollenburg (October 1972, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Pages 1367-1374), the amount of moisture released by the burning of jet fuel from a research aircraft was 1.7 grams of water for every meter of flight path. 

The exhaust products from aircraft are often measured using an emission index (mass (in grams) of exhaust product divided by mass (in kg) of jet fuel burned). 

The sum total of the exhaust products turns out to be greater than one (the mass of the exhaust products is greater than the mass of the fuel burned because the exhaust contains oxygen from surrounding air combined with fuel during combustion).

The emission indices of some of the products of jet fuel combustion are as follows:

Carbon dioxide (CO2): 3150
Water vapor (H20): 1230 (Knollenburg (1972) estimated 1370)
Nitric oxides (NOX): 8 to 20
Sulfur dioxide (SO2): 0.5

The emission indices of most other products such as unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide are likely to be on the order of 2 or less. 
Thus for the Knollenburg example, the research aircraft burned 1.26 grams of fuel per meter of flight, so the concentrations of most constituents (other than CO2 or water/ice) are going to be at most 20*1.26/1000=0.025 gram per meter of flight compared to 21,000 to 41,000 grams for ice.
To learn more about contrails access this repository of articles associated with Contrail Science."  

SO, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE NASA DATA AND WILL SEE IN A PBS/NOVA ARTICLE BELOW, IF YOU GO READ IT, CONTRAILS ALONE ARE NOT HARMLESS.
YOU MAY NOT AGREE, AND THAT'S OKAY BY ME, BUT AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE, I AM A CANCER SURVIVOR AND BLOODY WELL DON'T WANT TO TAKE A REMOTE CHANCE THAT ANYTHING FALLING FROM THE SKY AND INHALED CAN CRANK UP A CHAIN REACTION IN THERE THAT WILL SEE ME ON THE ROAD TO ONCOLOGY EVER AGAIN! 

BUT CAN WE CALL CONTRAILS "CHEMTRAILS"?

ABOUT THOSE "CHEMTRAILS"...

DON'T WE ALL HAVE "CRAZY COUSINS"?
WE CALL OUR FAVORITE ONE "MIKEY", AS IN "MIKEEEEEEE".
HE'S WONDERFUL, BUT HE BELIEVES IN CHEMTRAILS AND HAS, FOR 15 TO 20 YEARS NOW, TRIED TO CONVINCE ME I SHOULD ALSO SEE THEM AS DEADLY HORRORS.
I MENTION THIS ONLY BECAUSE, AS IT TURNS OUT, HE JUST MAY BE ONTO SOMETHING, AS FAR AS USING CONTRAILS FOR WEATHER MODIFICATION GOES.

I FOLLOWED A BROKEN LINK, TOOK IT TO THE "WAYBACK MACHINE" AND WAS SURPRISED IT WAS STILL AVAILABLE, ARCHIVED, THERE IT WAS....

A NASA "STUDY" THAT WAS GETTING SCHOOL KIDS INVOLVED IN TRACKING, PHOTOGRAPHING AND REPORTING... CONTRAILS.

LONG STORY SHORTENED, HOPEFULLY, WHEN THE U.S. GROUNDED ALL FLIGHTS FOR 3 DAYS FOLLOWING THE 9/11 TRAGEDY, NASA AND OTHERS NOTICED THE ABSENCE OF CONTRAILS CORRESPONDED TO A SLIGHT RISE IN TEMPERATURES, MAINLY OVER CALIFORNIA.

THEY WEREN'T 100% CONTENT WITH THAT SHORT STUDY SO THEY IMMEDIATELY TURNED TO THE PUBLIC, SCHOOL KIDS AND INTERESTED CITIZENS.

IT WAS A NICELY DONE ENDEAVOR, BUT I HAVEN'T FOUND THE COMPLETED DATA, AS IN ALL THE DATA, WHICH WAS COLLECTED, BUT DID FIND A FAIR AMOUNT OF OTHER "STUDIES" DONE ON THE EFFECTS OF SIMPLE (???) CONTRAILS ON WEATHER.

[NOTE: IF YOU ARE A DEVOUT REPUBLICAN WARNED ABOUT INDEPENDENT THOUGHT BY YOUR STATE'S CAUCUS, OR ARE AN ANTI-ENVIRONMENTALIST (IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?), PLEASE SAVE YOURSELF THE STRESS AND STOP READING NOW.
I DON'T WANT ANYONE UNDULY STRESSED BY FACTS, WHICH ARE FREE WITH EVERY CUP HERE AT THE TEA ROOM.]

CONTRAILS...

THERE ARE PATENTS FOR DEVICES TO MAKE CONTRAILS AS WE SAW AT THE PATENT OFFICE WEBSITE.

AND THERE'S A NASA STUDY...
YUP.

THAT'S WHERE I STARTED:

http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/contrail-edu/resources/
ABOVE LINK NO LONGER WORKS, ERROR MESSAGE.

ARCHIVED WEBSITE:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120207211455/http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/contrail-edu/resources/

NASA FAIRLY GUSHES OVER HELPING THE KIDDIES (AND INTERESTED OTHERS) GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BURNING QUESTION, "CAN CONTRAILS CAUSE WARMER OR COOLER TEMPERATURES?"
THEY FAVOR THE WARMER TEMPS THEORY AND SHOW THE KIDDIES HOW TO HELP PROVE/DISPROVE THAT.

BELOW, WHEREVER THEY MAY LAND (GOOGLE'S BLOGGER LEAVES MUCH TO BE DESIRED, MUCH) WILL BE SOME NICE HELP TOOLS NASA GAVE THE SCHOOLS PARTICIPATING IN THIS...GLOBAL CONTRAIL CHART, IDENTIFICATION CHART, ARTICLES [SEE https://web.archive.org/web/20120830100322/http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/contrail-edu/resources/articles].  

SO YES, NASA WAS (IS?) CONCERNED ABOUT CONTRAILS AND MAKES IT A POINT TO KEEP SATELLITE IMAGES OF THEM, WHICH THE STUDENTS COULD, AT THAT TIME, ACCESS TO PINPOINT CONTRAILS.

"Can contrails be seen from space?

Yes! If contrails grow large enough, they can be seen from weather satellites orbiting Earth. The images below (click on image to enlarge) show groups of persistent contrails over the southeastern US on January 9, 2003. These pictures show that the number and location of contrails change rapidly."

THEN SWEET NASA GIVES LINKS TO SATELLITE PICS SHOWING A SERIES OF SHOTS IN THEIR STUDY OF CONTRAILS.

[SEE THOSE <HERE>] 


I NOTICED A FEW THINGS ABOUT THOSE IMAGES.


~ 7:14 AM, NOTHING OVER THE ATLANTA, ORLANDO, OR TAMPA AIRPORTS?
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN AT THE ATLANTA AIRPORT AT 7AM?
IT'S A MADHOUSE!
COMMUTERS AND TAKEOFFS IN EVERY DIRECTION!

ORLANDO IS NOT AS BUSY AS ATLANTA, CERTAINLY, BUT A LOOK AT AIRLINE SCHEDULES FOR THAT TIME FRAME SHOULD SHOW CONSIDERABLE AIR TRAFFIC OUT OF ORLANDO.

AND NO TRAILS FROM THE SEVERAL FLORIDA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA AIR BASES?
REALLY?

~ NEXT UP, 10:51 AM

WHAT AN ODD PATTERN THESE MAKE, YES?
BUT NONE OVER ATLANTA?
NONE OVER ORLANDO OR TAMPA?
WHAT AIRPORT LIES NEAR THAT ANTENNA-LOOKING FORMATION?
BY A STRETCH IT COULD BE EGLIN AFB, BUT EGLIN IS A WEE BIT WEST OF THAT.


LOOK AT GEORGIA...THE ATLANTA AIRPORT IS ONE OF THE BUSIEST IN THE NATION.
SEE ANY CONTRAILS?

NONE FOR JACKSONVILLE, EITHER.


~ AT 1:14 PM, ONLY THE AREA NEAR JACKSONVILLE IS SHOWING TRAILS. WHO KNEW J'VILLE WAS THAT BUSY AN HOUR AFTER NOON,YES?

STILL NOTHING FROM ATLANTA, TAMPA, AND MAYBE A COUPLE OUT OF ORLANDO.

THE ONES OUT IN THE ATLANTIC...WHERE DID THOSE TAKE OFF FROM AND WHERE WERE THEY GOING?


~ FINAL PHOTO SHOWS US WHAT THINGS LOOKED LIKE AT 4:20 PM, NOT REALLY A PEAK TIME, NOT AFTER 5PM, BUT ODD HOW LITTLE TRAFFIC.
FINALLY, SOME OVER ATLANTA, A FEW NEAR ORLANDO, BUT STILL NONE OVER TAMPA.

MAYBE A FEW REALLY LONG TRAILS UP FROM WHAT IS LIKELY MIAMI, BUT A LOT MORE TRAILS OUT OVER THE ATLANTIC.

DID THE NAVY HAVE A CARRIER OUT THERE PRACTICING TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS...OR WHAT?


WELL, I LOOKED AROUND A BIT AND THOSE "PERSISTENT CONTRAILS" THAT NASA WAS SO KIND TO EXPLAIN TO US, THOSE HAPPEN AT ALTITUDES ABOVE 35,000 FEET IN THE HIGHER ATMOSPHERE, IT SEEMS.

The Honourable John McCallum, P.C., M.P. Minister of (CANADIAN) National Defence:

"I am advised (by my Air Staff) that the phenomenon you describe is normal and that the Department of National Defence is not delivering any foreign substance into the atmosphere. Condensation trails are formed when water produced by the burning of jet fuel cools very rapidly as it comes into contact with cold air and, in effect, forms a cloud. 
Typically, condensation trails form at higher altitudes where the air is much colder. When the air is stable and there are no strong winds, these vapour trails are persistent, and tend to spread slowly over a long period of time rather than disappear rapidly."

HE SHOULD KNOW,RIGHT?

BUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THE COMPLAINTS BY LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS OF "CONTRAILS" BLANKETING THEIR SKIES AT ALTITUDES OF FROM 5,000 FEET TO 25,000 FEET, AND THEIR DEMANDS TO KNOW WHY SUCH LOW-LEVEL FLIGHTS WERE BEING MADE OVER THEM?
CALIFORNIA HAS A WEBSITE DEVOTED TO THAT.


HOW IS IT THAT ON ANY COMMERCIAL FLIGHT, ONE CAN LOOK DOWN...AS IN DOWN...AND COUNT THE CONTRAILS BELOW?

WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE ANGRY ARIZONA FOLKS WHO SWAMPED THEIR POLITICO WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT CONTRAILS BEING RIGHT ON TOP OF THEM IN THAT DRY DESERT AIR, AND RAINING GOOP DOWN ON THEM?


IF THOSE LOWER LEVEL TRAILS ARE NOT CONTRAILS, WHAT THE HECK ARE THEY?

AS NASA POINTED OUT:  
"The temperature and humidity of the air affects how long contrails last. 

When air is dry, contrails last just seconds or minutes. 

But when the air is humid contrails can be long-lived and spread outward until they become difficult to distinguish from naturally occurring cirrus clouds. 

Satellites have observed clusters of contrails lasting as long as 14 hours, though most remain visible for four to six hours.

The long-lived, spreading contrails are of great interest to climate scientists because they reflect sunlight and trap infrared radiation. 

A contrail in an otherwise clear sky reduces the amount of solar radiation that reaches Earth’s surface, while increasing the amount of infrared radiation absorbed by the atmosphere (as do cirrus clouds).

These opposing effects make it difficult for scientists to pin down the effect contrails have on climate.

 “Overall, contrails create additional cirrus cloud cover,” noted Patrick Minnis, a senior scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center. “Current estimates indicate that contrails have a small warming effect, but the extent of the additional coverage and the amount of warming remain quite uncertain.”

In 2004, Minnis published a study of surface observations that found cirrus cloud cover had increased by 3 percent between 1971 and 1995 over the United States. That's the most recent estimate available, Minnis pointed out, because the network of surface instruments his research group used is no longer available."


"If conditions are right, newly formed contrails will begin feeding off surrounding water vapor. Like vaporous cancers, they start growing and spreading. 
In time, they can expand horizontally to such an extent that they become indistinguishable from cirrus clouds, those thin, diaphanous sheets often seen way up high. 
These artificial cirrus clouds can last for many hours, and the amount of sky they end up covering can be astonishing. 

One study showed that contrails from just six aircraft expanded to shroud some 7,700 square miles." 

NO, ACTUALLY NASA'S OWN PHOTOS SHOW SOME VERY LOW-LEVEL CONTRAILS, NOT "WAY UP HIGH".

NOT THE OLD CHEMTRAIL CONSPIRACY!

SEPT. 10, 2013

"Representative Kerry Bentivolio (R-MI) has recently promised to hold a hearing to investigate whether or not there is a secret program to spray a chemical soup of heavy metals and other toxins — better known as ‘chemtrails’ — into the skies above America without disclosure to the American people.

While an airplane contrail fades and disappears behind the plane after just a few minutes, chemtrails do not disappear like the typical vapor trails do. 

Instead, chemtrails, typically found to contain heavy metals such as barium and aluminum, spread out and hang in the air for hours before settling as a murky haze on the horizon. 
Many people have attributed illnesses, including everything from asthma to Morgellons disease, to the chemtrail phenomenon.

While fellow Republicans have dubbed Rep. Bentivolio ‘Krazy Kerry’ for telling his constituents he will call meetings such as this one, Bentivolio made the promise at an Aug. 21 town hall:"

 WE ALL KNOW HR 2977 WAS "CLARIFIED"....

"Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D) has submitted HR 2977 , which proposes a ban on the weaponization of space.  
One of the weapons systems listed in the bill is “chemtrails”. 

The use of this term is significant because until now, all reported governmental inquiries into this issue have been dismissed or denied.  

Agencies such as the Air Force have routinely called reports of chemtrails a hoax. 

Kucinich, Chemtrails and HR 2977...
KUCINICH LATER STATED HE NEITHER WROTE THE BILL NOR READ IT IN-DEPTH BEFORE IT WENT "OUT THERE".
TWO OF THE AUTHORS ARE  IDENTIFIED IN "DEBUNKING" CIRCLES AS "UFO ENTHUSIASTS".
[ Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin]

[SO? TESLA LOVED A VIOLET-EYED PIGEON, AND RONALD REAGAN AND OTHER PRESIDENTS ALSO BELIEVED IN UFOs.]

A HISTORY OF CONTRAILS, A LA NASA:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130108123633/http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/contrail-edu/history.html

Q:   When did scientists begin to study contrails? 

A:   Contrails remained a seldom-studied scientific curiosity until the beginning of World War II when the detectability of aircraft became an important concern. Pilots were able to use contrails to track down enemy aircraft easily; they sometimes could use the contrails to hide from and to sneak up on the enemy! Contrails also caused occasional visibility problems within large aircraft formations. Thick, persistent contrails made it more difficult to stay in formation, and could even lead to aircraft collisions. As a result of these problems, much research on contrails was conducted by Germany, Britain, and the United States during the war. 

Q:   Why do scientists study contrails today? 

A:   Contrails are studied for many reasons today. These man-made clouds impact the climate in many ways; they modify the energy balance between sunlight and infrared energy in the atmosphere, and they may affect the water vapor content and chemistry of the upper troposphere. As the volume of commercial air travel increases (see A video showing worldwide air traffic in a 24-hour period), these effects will become more important. Scientists today are trying to learn more about the longevity of persistent contrails and how much they may affect the climate in the future.




AND, I HAD TO INCLUDE THIS VIDEO...IT'S FROM COUSIN MIKEY!
[ THE TEA ROOM IN NO WAY, WHATSOEVER, ENDORSES OR AGREES WITH MUCH THAT THE "THRIVE MOVEMENT" OFFERS, BUT THE CLOSE-UPS ARE NICE, AND EVERYONE LOVES MIKEY.]









NASA'S CITED SOURCES:
King, M. (2007) Our Changing Planet: The View from Space. Cambridge University Press.
Minnis, P. (2004, April 15).

Contrails, Cirrus Trends, and Climate. Journal of Climate.

NASA Langley. (n.d). Contrail Education. Accessed June 1, 2012.

NASA image courtesy Jeff Schmaltz, LANCE MODIS Rapid Response Team, Goddard Space Flight Center. 
Caption by Adam Voiland.
Instrument: Aqua - MODIS