THE TRUTH ABOUT CANCER...MY 4TH BATTLE AGAINST THIS DISEASE BEGINS

THIS AUTHOR WAS RECENTLY DIAGNOSED WITH MY #4 CANCER AND I JUST WANT TO TRY TO MAKE PUBLIC SOME VERY GOOD, STRAIGHTFORWARD, REALISTIC AND HONEST INFORMATION FOR THOSE FACING THIS DISEASE.

A CANCER DIAGNOSIS CAN BE FRIGHTENING, BUT CANCER HAS CURES!

THERE ARE OTHERS 'OUT THERE' WHO HAVE DISCOVERED THE TRUTH ABOUT CANCER AND ARE VERY WILLING TO SHARE THIS TRUTH WITH ALL OF US.

MY FIRST DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER WAS IN 1969, AGAIN IN 1995, AND YET AGAIN OVER A DOZEN YEARS AGO.

AS I OFTEN WRITE HERE, KNOWLEDGE IS POWER....WE LEARN SO WE DO NOT PERISH FROM IGNORANCE OF THINGS THAT CAN PRESERVE US.

ONE OF THE BEST WEBSITES FOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CANCER GOES BY THE NAME OF THE TITLE OF THIS BLOG... "THE TRUTH ABOUT CANCER", AND THAT AMAZING GROUP JUST DECIDED TO MAKE AVAILABLE THEIR INCREDIBLE DOCUMENTARY ONCE AGAIN...FOR FREE...TO ALL WHO WISH TO SIGN UP FOR IT.

THEY MAKE NO PROFITS FROM THIS, BUT JUST WISH TO EDUCATE THE WORLD TO THE TRUTHS ABOUT "THE BIG BUSINESS CALLED CANCER".

WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS ABOUT OUR CANCER TREATMENT OPTIONS, WHERE TO TURN, WHO TO TRUST?

WHEN I GOT THEIR ANNOUNCEMENT IN EMAIL THAT THEY WILL ONCE AGAIN OFFER THIS, I WANTED TO SHARE IT HERE, ALONG WITH A FEW OTHER WEBSITES AND SOME LITTLE-KNOWN CANCER FACTS

"Beginning April 12, we're going to re-release "The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest" 9-part documentary series for a limited time (for free) ..."

SCHEDULE:

Episode 1:

The True History of Chemotherapy & The Pharmaceutical Monopoly (April 12th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 2:

Cancer Facts and Fictions, Breast Cancer, Hormones, Skin Cancer & Essential Oils (April 13th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 3:

Cancer-Killing Viruses, Cancer Stem Cells, GMOs, Juicing & Eating the Rainbow (April 14th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 4:

Excitotoxins that Fuel Cancer, Nature’s Pharmacy and Healing Cancer with Sound & Light (April 15th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 5:

Cancer Causing Blindspots, Toxic Vaccines, Homeopathy & The Power of Emotions (April 16th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 6:

The NOCEBO Effect, Healing Vaccines, Advanced Detoxing & Going Inside A German Cancer Clinic (April 17th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 7:

Heal Cancer with Clean Electricity, Unique Water, Natural Sunlight & Combining Superfoods (April 18th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 8:

Cannabis, Nature’s Epigenetic Switches, Peptides & Healing with Micronutrient Therapy (April 19th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

Episode 9:

Cancer Conquerors & Their Powerful Stories of Victory (April 20th 9:00PM Eastern US time)

ANYONE INTERESTED, JUST GO TO THE LINK BELOW AND SIGN UP...NOTHING TO DOWNLOAD, NO PRESSURE TO BECOME PART OF THEIR ORGANIZATION, DONATE, OR SUCH...JUST AN OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN.

https://go.thetruthaboutcancer.com/?ref=3d609197-a987-4f53-a381-691c7bf0b347

ALSO FROM THAT WEBSITE:

"It's the scourge of our time.
Nearly 1/2 of everyone in the developed world today will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in life.

33,000 people will find out they have cancer today.

20,000 people will die from cancer today.

However...
We now know many powerful ways to stop cancer... You can prevent it.
We now know many powerful ways to fight cancer if you or a loved one has it...

You can defeat it.

The first step is to get a clearer picture of your personal cancer risk.

Take this free 42 second quiz now to see your cancer risk.

Then you'll discover how to make just a few small changes in your life to (dramatically) reduce your cancer risk fast.

The questions in this quiz were specifically designed to help
educate and bring awareness to those whom may not know the complete
truth about cancer AND assess their risk based on a very specific set of
behaviors that are known to cause (or increase chances of) getting this
horrible disease.

There are proven cancer remedies that MOST doctors don’t know, or even care to know about.

Did you know:

• Studies show that chemotherapy actually enriches Cancer Stem Cells (which are the cells that “give birth” to cancer cells). Knowing this, why is chemo so widely used to treat and prevent cancer when it’s causing more cancer in the process?

• According to the American Cancer Society, despite popular belief, only 5% of cancers are genetic / hereditary. So much for it being mom or dad’s fault!

• Although most oncologists tell chemo patients NOT to eat foods high in antioxidants believing it will “counteract” the chemotherapy treatments, studies actually indicate the exact opposite. Believe it or not, antioxidants can actually help chemo work even better.

ONE OF MY FAVORITE SECTIONS OF THAT WEBSITE IS THE ONE ON NUTRITION, SUPPLEMENTS, FOUND <HERE>.

I AM GUILTY OF 'DROPPING MY GUARD', ALLOWING JUST A FEW "LITTLE" THINGS INTO MY LIFE THAT I KNEW WERE NOT GOOD FOR ME, BUT WERE OH, SO EASY TO JUST SAY YES TO.
"CONVENIENCE FOODS", EASIER TO PREPARE THAN FROM SCRATCH, AND TOO MANY NON-ORGANICS CREPT IN.

I'M ALSO GUILTY OF NEGLECTING TO DAILY TAKE SOME OF THE VERY SUPPLEMENTS THAT I BELIEVE KEPT ME CANCER-FREE FOR SO MANY YEARS.

I OUTLINED SOME OF THOSE "PROTOCOLS" IN A PREVIOUS BLOG,
CANCERS CAN BE CURED, WITHOUT CHEMO AND/OR RADIATION.

COMPLACENCY CAN BE DEADLY.
SELF-DISCIPLINE IS AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY IF ONE WANTS TO BE HEALTHY.
IT REQUIRES WORK.
IT'S WORTH IT!

BECAUSE I WANT TO SHARE THIS NEW WAR AGAINST MY OLD ENEMY, I CAN TELL YOU THAT, ONCE AGAIN, IT'S SPRUNG UP IN YET ANOTHER "REMOVABLE ORGAN", AND IS, YET AGAIN, 'ENCAPSULATED' SO THAT SURGERY TO  REMOVE MY SPLEEN SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THINGS NICELY.

IT WAS NOT THERE IN APRIL 2015 WHEN I HAD MY (MUCH HATED) CT SCAN, SO IT IS A VERY FAST-GROWING INVADER AND MUST COME OUT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

I WILL LOSE A LOT OF MY 'IMMUNE SYSTEM' AT A FAIRLY ADVANCED AGE OF NOT QUITE 70 YEARS OLD.
REMOVAL WILL PUT A HUGE BURDEN ON OTHER ORGANS TO COMPENSATE.
I WILL NEED PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS TO HELP WARD OFF COMMON INFECTIONS FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE...OR SO THEY SAY.

PET/CT SCAN OF 4 DAYS AGO REVEALS NO OTHER CANCEROUS SITES, SO MY BONES, LUNGS AND BLOOD ARE NOT YET AFFECTED BY THIS LYMPHOMA, BUT BEING IN THE SPLEEN, THROUGH WHICH TRAVELS ALL MY BLOODFLOW, THE SOONER WE DRAG THAT OUT OF THERE, THE BETTER.

TO ASSURE THE CANCER REMAINS CONTAINED WITHIN THE SPLENIC MEMBRANE, A RATHER LARGE INCISION MUST BE MADE SO THAT THE ENLARGED ORGAN CAN BE LIFTED OUT COMPLETELY INTACT.
I REALLY DREAD THAT.
I TRULY LOATHE SURGERY.
THE OLDER I GET, THE LONGER THE RECOVERY TIME.

I HAVE NO ANEMIA, NO THROMBOCYTOPENIA, THANKS BE!
I WANT TO KEEP IT THAT WAY!

ANOTHER WEBSITE WITH PEER-REVIEWED DOCUMENTATION ON CANCER STUDIES ACROSS THE GLOBE IS SAYER JI's REMARKABLE 'GREENMEDINFO'.

JUST A SMALL 'TASTE' OF THAT RESEARCH-EMPOWERED WEBSITE AT
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/cancers-all

"The time has come to shift the conceptual framework away from the idea that cancer is something bad that happens to the body, to something the body does to survive vis-à-vis an increasingly toxic and nutrient-deprived environment. "

THE WEALTH OF INFORMATION, STUDIES, IN-DEPTH RESEARCH THAT SAYER JI IS FAMOUS FOR IS WORTH MORE THAN GOLD!

CONSIDER THE DATABASE FOR JUST DATA ON CANCER STEM CELLS!
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/keyword/cancer-stem-cells
THE TEA ROOM IS ETERNALLY GRATEFUL FOR SAYER JI AND HIS DEDICATION TO TRUTH.


'CANCER DEFEATED'  AT http://www.cancerdefeated.com/
IS ANOTHER FAVORITE GO-TO SITE FOR ME.

WHILE THAT SITE SELLS A LOT OF 'PRODUCT', AS IN BOOKLETS, ETC, DIG INTO ITS MANY PAST NEWSLETTER ARTICLES, LIKE THIS ONE FROM 2016 ON THE FINDINGS OF A NOBEL PRIZE WINNER...
"Cancer cells feed on glucose at a rate up to 50 times higher than healthy cells. While ordinary cells utilize glucose through oxidative metabolism mainly for energy, cancer uses glucose through non-oxidative metabolism (the Warburg effect) – that is cancer cells ferment glucose.."

WE DON'T HAVE TO AGREE WITH ANYONE'S WORLD VIEW, OR WITH SOME OF THEIR IDEOLOGY TO FIND BENEFIT IN THEIR RESEARCH AND ADVICE.

SUCH IS MY 'RELATIONSHIP' WITH THE DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA WEBSITE.

LIKE ALL WHO REMOTELY SUGGEST NON-TRADITIONAL, i.e. "ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS" FOR CANCER, MERCOLA HAS BEEN WELL CRUCIFIED IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA.

ARTICLES LIKE THE FOLLOWING ALWAYS CREATE ATTACKS BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA, WHICH ACT AS PROPAGANDA MACHINES FOR WALL STREET, AND THEREFORE BIG PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.

Is the USDA Just a Corporate Lobbyist Group?

March 22, 2016 | 149,250 Views

There's an underbelly inside the USDA, and it's coming under increasing scrutiny following charges of harassment and censorship from a former scientist.

BIG PHARMA AND THE WESTERN MEDICAL COMMUNITY THAT BACKS BIG PHARMA AND ALLOWS ITSELF TO BE DICTATED TO BY THE NEED FOR THEM TO MAKE HIGH PROFITS ALWAYS MOUNTS A CAMPAIGN TO SMEAR AND DISCREDIT EVEN FORMER NOBEL LAUREATES SUCH AS OTTO WARBURG, LINUS PAULING, BRIAN JOSEPHSON, LUC MONTAGNIER AND OTHERS.

In an interview for the AIDS-documentary "House of Numbers", Dr. Luc Montagnier – Recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – spoke out for nutrition and micronutrients in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

THAT SAME ATTENTION TO NUTRITION AND MICRONUTRIENTS CAN HELP IN ANY FIGHT AGAINST CANCER!
PAULING VINDICATED!

"Linus Pauling's claim, that he knew a cure for heart disease, cancer and infections, was greeted with ridicule. His remarkable health claims concerned the substance we know as vitamin C. Now, ten years after his death on 19th August 1994, his revolutionary ideas are finally on the way to vindication. Given his history, it should not surprise us if Pauling was right all along. He was, after all, the leading chemist of the last century and, arguably, the greatest ever American scientist. He remains the only person to have won two unshared Nobel Prizes, the first for Chemistry (1954) and the second for peace (1962). In addition to being one of the greatest scientists ever, he was a renowned humanitarian.

By the time of his death, the medical establishment had branded Pauling a quack, because he advocated the use of high doses of vitamin C to treat many diseases. Irwin Stone first introduced Pauling to vitamin C, and explained that it wasn't really a vitamin at all, but an essential substance we could no longer manufacture in our bodies. Most animals make their own vitamin C, in large amounts. In humans, the gene for this ability has mutated and no longer works properly.

When Pauling looked into Stone's claims, he found that conventional medicine had long ignored evidence from respected physicians and scientists. This research suggested that high doses of vitamin C might be a cure for many illnesses, including cancer and heart disease. 

However, when he explained these findings in his wonderfully constructed books "Vitamin C and the Common Cold" and "How to Live Longer and Feel Better", the medical profession was incensed, implying that a mere chemist could not possibly understand the intricacies of medical science.

Pauling had performed a series of trials with Dr Ewan Cameron, a Scottish cancer specialist, showing that intravenous vitamin C allowed cancer patients to live much longer than expected. Numerous other studies confirmed this effect, particularly the work of Dr Abram Hoffer and Dr Hugh Riordan. The Mayo Clinic tried to refute this research but failed, as they used low, oral doses, making their results invalid. In their own cancer paper, the NIH researchers claimed that Pauling and Cameron's use of the IV route was "serendipitous", implying that Pauling did not know the difference between injected and oral doses. In fact, Pauling had written explicitly about this difference, so the NIH criticism was misplaced.

A new scientific theory, called the dynamic flow model, explains all the observed responses to vitamin C in the literature. This model is described in the book "Ascorbate", mentioned above. According to the model, people should ideally be in a state of dynamic flow, which means they should ingest more vitamin C than they need, in the form of divided dose supplements. The extra ascorbate flows through the body and is excreted in the urine. It is not wasted, however, as the excess acts as a reservoir when extra vitamin C is required. Dynamic flow is the closest we humans can get to restoring our physiology to how it was before we lost the ability to make vitamin C in our bodies, as most other animals still do.

It is difficult to imagine what Linus Pauling would have made of all this had he lived. Hickey and Roberts like to think that he would have pointed out the NIH errors earlier. He might have had fun explaining that the NIH could not perform a simple experiment, yet tried to blame him for the deficiencies in the Mayo Clinic's research. It is now 10 years since Pauling's death. Biologist Rene Dubos suggested that the mainstream converges with Pauling twenty years later. If so, we only have another decade to wait until the medical establishment can admit that Pauling was right all along." 

CANCER IS BIG BUSINESS!

The cancer industry is spending virtually nothing of its multi-billion dollar resources on effective PREVENTION strategies, such as dietary guidelines, exercise and obesity education. Instead, it pours its money into treating cancer, NOT PREVENTING OR CURING IT!

PLEASE, LISTEN TO THOSE WHO HAVE SO MUCH "INSIDE INFORMATION", WHO HAVE REALIZED CANCER ISN'T BEING CURED OR PREVENTED FOR MONETARY REASONS.

FROM NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS TO PHYSICIANS FRUSTRATED BY THEIR KNOWLEDGE THAT CURES ARE OUT THERE BUT ARE BEING STRONGLY SUPPRESSED, MOCKED, DISCREDITED, THIS MANY TRUE EXPERTS, THIS MANY SHOULD NOT, MUST NOT BE IGNORED.


IN THE DAYS AHEAD, I HOPE TO SHARE MORE, HOPE TO DO MORE, TO MAKE AS MANY AS POSSIBLE AWARE OF THIS "BIG BUSINESS" APPROACH TO CANCER AND HOW IT IS LITERALLY KILLING MILLIONS.

"Treating cancer is BIG business in America -- in fact, it's a $200 billion a year business. Yet 98 percent of conventional cancer treatments not only FAIL miserably, but are also almost guaranteed to make cancer patients sicker.

What's worse: The powers are suppressing natural cancer cures that could help tens of thousands of people get well and live cancer free with little or no dependence on drugs, surgery and chemotherapy.

The treatment of cancer in the U.S. is one of the most bald-faced cover-ups in medical history. Enough is enough! You deserve to know the truth!

A rigorous review of chemotherapy revealed that it fails for 98% of people. And when chemotherapy was tested against no treatment, no treatment proved the better option. What's more is only two to four percent of cancers respond well to chemotherapy.

In a German study of women over age 80 with breast cancer, those who received no treatment lived 11 months longer on average than those who received conventional cancer treatments.

A 14-year study by two oncologists in Australia reported in the film "A Shocking Look at Cancer Studies" that conventional treatment such as chemotherapy for all of our major cancers is totally ineffective -- far below a 10% success rate. - See more at: http://www.cureyourowncancer.org/exposing-the-fraud-and-mythology-of-conventional-cancer-treatments.html#sthash.bnhNLY6X.dpuf

In a German study of women over age 80 with breast cancer, those who received no treatment lived 11 months longer on average than those who received conventional cancer treatments.

A 14-year study by two oncologists in Australia reported in the film "A Shocking Look at Cancer Studies" that conventional treatment such as chemotherapy for all of our major cancers is totally ineffective -- far below a 10% success rate." 
[I DO HOPE YOU READ MORE AT THAT SITE... http://www.cureyourowncancer.org/exposing-the-fraud-and-mythology-of-conventional-cancer-treatments.html]

DOES AMERICAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA EVER MENTION SUCH STUDIES?
NO!

WHY NOT?

WE NEED REAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS LIKE THIS!
WE AREN'T GETTING ANY FROM "TRADITIONAL" SOURCES.

HOW CAN THAT BE ACCEPTABLE TO ANYONE?

Treating cancer is BIG business in America -- in fact, it's a $200 billion a year business. Yet 98 percent of conventional cancer treatments not only FAIL miserably, but are also almost guaranteed to make cancer patients sicker.

What's worse: The powers are suppressing natural cancer cures that could help tens of thousands of people get well and live cancer free with little or no dependence on drugs, surgery and chemotherapy.

The treatment of cancer in the U.S. is one of the most bald-faced cover-ups in medical history. Enough is enough! You deserve to know the truth - See more at: http://www.cureyourowncancer.org/exposing-the-fraud-and-mythology-of-conventional-cancer-treatments.html#sthash.bnhNLY6X.dpuf

SOME POLITICIANS KNOW THE TRUTH!
"Ten years ago a former New York State assemblyman, Daniel Haley, wrote a scathing exposé on how the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) systematically shuts the door on effective and non-toxic products, many for cancer.

The FDA is the chief agency in charge of protecting and promoting Americans' health and safety. But in 10 stunning, true stories in his book, "The Politics of Healing," Haley describes how the FDA has suppressed and banned natural health cures – eight of them for cancer.

He later wrote about two additional cancer cures that worked, which the FDA also disallowed.

The FDA even admitted that one of these treatments, discovered by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, was successful with some of the most incurable forms of cancer.
I shared this with you in a recent article that showed his film, but stories like this are far too common, and you can't help but wonder how many people have died while the FDA denied them cancer treatments that work.

Haley brazenly calls the FDA a rogue, out of control agency that has lied in Congressional testimonies, deliberately falsified data, and destroyed evidence to prohibit cures like Burzynki's from coming to market. The FDA's loyalties are to the drug industry, not to individuals, Haley says.

His claims mirror those of Dr. David Graham, who once worked in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety. In 2004 Dr. Graham blew the whistle on six drugs that were harming people, including Vioxx, but instead of acting on his warnings, Graham's superiors pulled him off his job. He fought back in a PBS television special when he told how he'd been chastised at the FDA for thinking the FDA served the public.

The "FDA is there to serve the drug industry," Graham said his supervisors told him.

ISN'T THIS CRIMINAL, THIS FAILURE OF OUR PROTECTION AGENCIES TO ACTUALLY PROTECT US, THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SELL US OUT?

TO ME, IT'S JUST THAT....CRIMINAL!


According to the New York Times:

"Virtually every large pharmaceutical company seems to have discovered cancer, and a substantial portion of the smaller biotechnology companies are focused on it as well. Together, the companies are pouring billions of dollars into developing cancer drugs."

Note they said drugs, not cures. That's because this industry isn't set up for a cure, even though they say that's what they're looking for. It's also why economic forecasts predict 20 million new cancers by 2025, with the $50 billion-a-year cancer treatment business increasing by 15 percent a year.




Pfizer alone projects its annual cancer drug returns will be $11 billion by 2018.



PFIZER PROFITS, BUT WHAT DO THEIR DRUGS "PROFIT" THOSE OF US WITH CANCERS THAT JUST DON'T RESPOND TO THEIR DRUGS?


THEY PROFIT US NOTHING, BUT COST SOME OF US OUR LIVES BECAUSE THEY FAIL...AND FAIL...AND FAIL.


Just last November, British drug maker GlaxoSmithKline agreed to pay a record $3 billion settlement to the U.S. government over allegations of improper sales and marketing practices involving numerous drugs, including the diabetes medication Avandia. 

Federal prosecutors also accused GlaxoSmithKline of paying doctors and manipulating research to promote the drug, which has been linked to heart problems.

This editorial written and published in the British Medical Journal does a good job of explaining why criminal settlements against pharmaceutical companies do NOT stop criminal behavior in the pharmaceutical industry.
20% of all corporate crime is now committed by pharmaceutical companies, and those are just the cases that are litigated and settled. The problem with corruption in scientific studies that are used to approve drugs do not even come up in litigation.
As Sidney M Wolfe points out in this article published last month in the British Medical Journal, the fines and penalties levied against corporations are just to0 small, and they are simply considered as part of the “cost of doing business” which lead to higher drug prices passed on to the consumers.
- See more at: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bmj-escalating-criminal-behavior-by-pharmaceutical-companies-due-to-insufficient-penalties/#sthash.HZsdtzOI.dpufThis editorial written and published in the British Medical Journal does a good job of explaining why criminal settlements against pharmaceutical companies do NOT stop criminal behavior in the pharmaceutical industry.

An editorial written and published in the British Medical Journal does a good job of explaining why criminal settlements against pharmaceutical companies do NOT stop criminal behavior in the pharmaceutical industry.

20% of all corporate crime is now committed by pharmaceutical companies, and those are just the cases that are litigated and settled. The problem with corruption in scientific studies that are used to approve drugs do not even come up in litigation.

As Sidney M Wolfe points out in this article published last month in the British Medical Journal, the fines and penalties levied against corporations are just to0 small, and they are simply considered as part of the “cost of doing business” which lead to higher drug prices passed on to the consumers.


[SEE http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bmj-escalating-criminal-behavior-by-pharmaceutical-companies-due-to-insufficient-penalties/]

In the past three and a half years alone (2009 to mid-2012), criminal and civil penalties have totaled $18bn, well over half the total for the past 21 years. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) topped the list of repeat offenders with total criminal and civil penalties of $7.56bn since 1991, comprised six different federal settlements and an additional number with states.

Pfizer was the second highest with $2.96bn.

Overall, since 1991, 11 other companies also had criminal or civil settlements or both exceeding $50m on at least two occasions.

An analysis of several of the repeat civil payments and criminal penalties by GSK and Pfizer based on publicly available government documents illustrates the failure of such large penalties and the parallel failure of the accompanying CIAs to curb such behavior.

These escalating patterns of repeated criminal violations and civil settlements to resolve serious allegations of civil lawlessness hardly bespeak corporate integrity for GSK, Pfizer, or the many other companies who are also repeat offenders.

We are forced to conclude that neither the current level of penalties nor corporate integrity agreements are effective and that there is a pathological lack of corporate integrity in many drug companies.

Read the Full Article Here.

THE TOP 6 THUGS OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL WORLD.


"When I set out to investigate some of the criminal activities that the 12 largest pharmaceutical companies had been convicted of lately, I had a general idea of the hornet's nest I would be stepping into.
But the amount of gross misconduct, fraud and deceit I found was so insidious, so massive, and so overwhelming that I decided to narrow my original 12 picks down to just five for the purposes of this article.
Because of the uniqueness of one particular company's offense – a felony guilty plea to conspiring with the Arab League – I added a sixth.
The six companies I'm highlighting, in descending order of their annual revenues, are:

1. Johnson & Johnson
2. Pfizer
3. Roche
4. GlaxoSmithKline
5. Novartis
6. Baxter International

PEOPLE, WE MUST LOOK INTO SUCH THINGS AND DEMAND THAT OUR CONGRESS, MANY OF WHOSE MEMBERS GET HUGE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THESE COMPANIES, DO SOMETHING TO STOP THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR!

IF NOT US, THEN WHO WILL CARE ENOUGH TO FORCE A CHANGE?

AND ISN'T IT SAD, ISN'T IT WRONG THAT WE HAVE TO FORCE CONGRESS TO ACT?

IS ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
I CAN'T FIND MANY!



[SPECIAL NOTE: FORMATTING ISSUES STILL PLAGUE THE TEA ROOM....THIS BLOG HAS SO MANY ISSUES THAT I HESITATED TO PUBLISH IT, BUT I HOPE IT'S READABLE ENOUGH THAT YOU DERIVE BENEFIT FROM IT. BEST I CAN DO FOR NOW.]