Pictured below, Michael Tellinger showing the world close-up looks of what appears to be a giant footprint that’s been etched into granite rock in South Africa.
Despite all of the efforts to debunk it, what you see is actually real.
It’s hard to believe (almost impossible) that the granite would take on this shape through simple erosion
Apart from the footprint you see above, there are many examples of
physical evidence of giants throughout history.
One great example is part of an upper leg bone with a hip joint of a giant that would have stood about 12 feet or 3.5 metres tall.
This bone has been in the vaults of of the medical school at WITS University, Johannesburg since the early 1960’s, when it was found by miners in a mine in northern Namibia.
It is one of the most precious and rare specimens available today that clearly indicate the existence of giants in Southern Africa more than 40,000 years ago.
One great example is part of an upper leg bone with a hip joint of a giant that would have stood about 12 feet or 3.5 metres tall.
This bone has been in the vaults of of the medical school at WITS University, Johannesburg since the early 1960’s, when it was found by miners in a mine in northern Namibia.
It is one of the most precious and rare specimens available today that clearly indicate the existence of giants in Southern Africa more than 40,000 years ago.
Above, a comparison of actual skeletons found across the globe.
“The
Spartans uncovered in Tegea the body of Orestes which was seven cubits
long — around 10 feet. In his book, ‘The Comparison of Romulus with
Theseus’ Plutarch describes how the Athenians uncovered the body of
Theseus, which was of more than ordinary size. The kneecaps of Ajax were
exactly the size of a discus for the boy’s pentathlon, wrote Pausanias.
A boy’s discus was about twelve centimetres in diameter, while a normal
adult patella is around five centimetres, suggesting Ajax may have been
around 14 feet tall.” – Herodotus in Book 1, Chapter 68
Pliny Makes A Reference To Giants
“The Arabian giant Gabara was 9 feet 9 inches. This Arabian giant was the tallest man seen in the days of Claudius.” – Pliny
CULTURES ALL OVER THE WORLD HAVE LEGENDS, ORAL HISTORIES OF GIANTS LIVING AMONG THEIR PEOPLE.
THERE ARE MANY WELL-DOCUMENTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES THAT POINT TO THE EXISTENCE OF ACTUAL GIANTS WHO WALKED THE EARTH, BUT MANY DENY THAT OR MAKE LIGHT OF IT.
A RECENT DISCOVERY OF YET ANOTHER VERY LARGE IRON-LIKE SPHERE, RESEMBLING A CANNONBALL, IN BOSNIA HAS SET OFF NEW DEBATES ABOUT ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS.
BELOW IS A PHOTO OF THE LATEST SPHERE FOUND IN BOSNIA.
Osmanagich, a controversial figure in the archaeological community, says that this stone ball is one of several near a town called Zavidovici, and that at one time, there were as many as 80 of them. This newest discovery could be the largest such sphere in Europe, he says.
While Osmanagich says the sphere could be the work of an ancient civilization, other experts think it is just the result of natural processes.
The Bosnian sphere invites comparison to stone spheres in Costa Rica, which occupy four sites that were given a UNESCO world heritage designation in 2014 and are said to be the inspiration for a scene in the film “Raiders of the Lost Ark.”
The Costa Rican spheres range in diameter from 2 to over 8 feet.
Their “meaning, use and production remain largely a mystery,” UNESCO says.
John Hoopes, chair of the department of anthropology at the University of Kansas and an expert on the Costa Rican spheres, said, "There is no question but that the stone spheres in Costa Rica, the largest of which measures 2.57 m in diameter, were made by human hands.”
SO, WHY IS ANYONE DISPUTING THAT THOSE IN BOSNIA ARE MAN-MADE?
ABOUT THOSE GIANTS....
Is
there any evidence that giants once walked the earth, as so many myths
and legends claim? - See more at:
http://ministerfortson.com/?p=35059#sthash.g966Lv7P.dpuf
Is
there any evidence that giants once walked the earth, as so many myths
and legends claim? A few years back I stumbled onto a vintage Wisconsin newspaper articles that bore the headline "Giant skeletons unearthed".
Back in 1912 the New York Times heralded a discovery of “an unknown race of men”.
The unearthed skulls were much larger than those of any race known to science.
Peculiar features of the skulls where also described, which were also significantly different from modern-day human heads.
The skeletons were found by the Peterson brothers on Lake Lawn Farm in southwest Wisconsin.
Photos of the giants were also in the New York Times (NYT).
THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER SUCH DISCOVERIES PUBLISHED IN YEARS GONE BY, ALSO WITH PHOTOS:
NYT release May 25, 1882 – “Abnormally large body bones”.
NYT release May 5, 1885 – “Skeletons seven feet (213 cm) long”.
NYT release December 20, 1897 – “Man over nine feet (274 cm) high”.
Marietta Daily Reader release September 10, 1899 – “Bones of a giant over eight feet (243 cm) high”.
The Saint Paul Globe release January 24, 1904 – “Bones of a human skeleton eleven feet (335 cm) high”.
NYT release September 7, 1904 – “Gian Indians’ bones found”.
“In
February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the Humboldt
lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two skeletons found
measured 8 1/2 feet tall and appeared to have been wrapped in a
gum-covered fabric similar to the Egyptian manner. The second skeleton
was almost 10 feet long.” – Review – Miner, June 19th, 1931 - See more
at: http://ministerfortson.com/?p=35059#sthash.g966Lv7P.dpuf
“9′
8″ skeleton was excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana
(Indianapolis News, Nov 10, 1975) - See more at:
http://ministerfortson.com/?p=35059#sthash.TzYQOhWu.dpuf
“9′ 8″ skeleton was excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana (Indianapolis News, Nov 10, 1975)
“In February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the Humboldt lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada.
The first of these two skeletons found measured 8 1/2 feet tall and appeared to have been wrapped in a gum-covered fabric similar to the Egyptian manner.
The second skeleton was almost 10 feet long.” – Review – Miner, June 19th, 1931"
THE GOLDEN GIANTS
Glenn
Kimball photographed the mummies of two of these giant men in Lima Peru
in 1969. These giants are still in the gold museum in Lima Peru today
and can be seen by anyone who visits. They were mummified because their
golden robes are prominently on display. Their crowns could fit around
Glenn’s waist. Their golden gloves have fingers ten inches long. Their
mummies can be measured with a tape and they were both around nine and a
half feet tall. There were other personal items fit for a giant king,
that wouldn’t have been useful to a man of normal size. The actual
bodies are there encased in glass for all to see. - See more at:
http://ministerfortson.com/?p=35059#sthash.g966Lv7P.dpuf
"Glenn
Kimball photographed the mummies of two giant men in Lima Peru
in 1969. These giants are still in the gold museum in Lima Peru today and can be seen by anyone who visits.
They were mummified because their golden robes are prominently on display.
Their crowns fit around Glenn’s waist.
Their golden gloves have fingers ten inches long.
Their mummies can easily be measured and they were both around nine and a half feet tall.
There were other personal items fit for a giant king, that wouldn’t have been useful to a man of normal size.
The actual bodies are there encased in glass for all to see."
“In Clearwater Minnesota, the skeletons of seven giants were found in mounds. These had receding foreheads and complete double dentition (Childress 1992, p. 468).”
20 IN ONE MOUND
“A mound near Toledo, Ohio, held 20 skeletons, seated and facing east with jaws and teeth “twice as large as those of present day people,” and besides each was a large bowl with “curiously wrought hieroglyphic figures.” (Chicago Record, Oct. 24, 1895; cited by Ron G. Dobbins, NEARA Journal, v13, fall 1978).”
MANY DOCUMENTED FINDS IN CALIFORNIA
"The mummified remains of an ancient race of giants have been chronicled throughout the State of California.
The claims of the finding of giant human remains were pursued by the Smithsonian Institute with the intention of seizing the remains to be taken to Washington D.C.
More important than the seizure was the intent of Smithsonian scientists to dismiss the claims as hoaxes or frauds.
The magnitude of hundreds of claims of finding giant human remains and the Smithsonian sending its scientist out to claim all of these skeletons hints at the fact that they were not hoaxes, but actual giant skeletons.
One has to ask the question, that if they were in fact hoaxes, why would the Smithsonian, go to the great expense of sending its agents across the country to retrieve them?
One of the most baffling cases of giant human remains taken by the
Smithsonian comes from California. The first newspaper record described
the find that was analyzed by Prof. Thomas Wilson, Curator of the
Department of Prehistoric Anthropology in the Smithsonian Institution,
and by other scientists.
The
World, October 7, 1895
Nine Feet High and Probably a California Indian
Measurement Well Authenticated
Other Big Men and Women of Fact and Fable Who Are Famous Types of Gigantism
"The corpse of the biggest man that ever lived has been dug up near San Diego California. At all events there is no satisfactory read in ancient or modern history of any human being nearly so tall. The mummy-for in such a condition the remains were found-is that of a person would have been about nine feet high in life. This makes allowances for the shrinkage, which may be pretty closely calculated.
As to the accuracy in the estimate there can no question, as the cadaver has been carefully inspected and measured by Prof. Thomas Wilson, Curator of the Department of Prehistoric Anthropology in the Smithsonian Institution, and by other scientists."
TODAY, THE SMITHSONIAN CLAIMS TO HAVE "LOST" MOST OF THOSE CALIFORNIA FINDS....INDEED, MOST OF ALL FINDS FROM WORLDWIDE SOURCES.
HOW COULD THEY HAVE "LOST" HUNDREDS OF SUCH REMAINS?
One can find over a thousand newspaper articles exposing unearthed Giant human skeletons.
So the logical conclusion Is, if the evidence is out there (and it IS), they MUST have been real, they did exist, just as ancient cultures have told us all along.
Skeptics will say that neither NYT nor other regular newspapers (especially local ones) should be treated as a source of credible scientific information as they lack resources to verify the information properly.
But what if such information came from a respected, household name, like Scientific American?
Here is a VERBATIM quote from Scientific American issue of August 14, 1880, page 106, regarding several large remains, none under 8-feet tall:
"...the opening of an interesting mound in Brush Creek Township, Ohio. The mound was opened by the Historical Society of the township, under the immediate supervision of Dr. J. F. Everhart, of Zanesville. It measured sixty-four by thirty-five feet at the summit, gradually sloping in every direction, and was eight feet in height.
There was found in it a sort of clay coffin including the skeleton of a woman measuring eight feet in length. Within this coffin was found also the skeleton of a child about three and a half feet in length, and an image that crumbled when exposed to the atmosphere.
In another grave was found the skeleton of a man and woman, the former measuring nine and the latter eight feet in length.
In a third grave occurred two other skeletons, male and female, measuring respectively nine feet four inches and eight feet.
Seven other skeletons were found in the mound, the smallest of which measured eight feet, while others reached the enormous length of ten feet.
They were buried singly, or each in separate graves.
Resting against one of the coffins was an engraved stone tablet (now in Cincinnati), from the characters on which Dr. Everhart and Mr. Bowers are led to conclude that this giant race were sun worshipers."
For those interested, the entire issue of the magazine in the pdf format can be viewed here: Scientific American, August 14, 1880 (page 106)
MANY NATIVE AMERICAN PETROGLYPHS EXIST THAT APPEAR TO SHOW GIANTS INTERACTING WITH NORMAL-SIZED HUMANS, SUCH AS THE ONE ABOVE, WHICH ALSO SEEMS TO
CALL OUR ATTENTION TO GIANT FOOTPRINTS.
THE PETROGLYPH ABOVE SEEMS TO EMPHASIZE THAT MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF 'GIANT' EXISTED AT THE TIME.
SIMPLY DO A GOOGLE SEARCH FOR THESE PICTORIAL RECORDS, AS I DID, FINDING HUNDREDS
GIANT UNEXPLAINABLE STRUCTURES
Apart from bones and the historical writings of giants in our ancient past, it’s noteworthy to mention there are many giant structures on Earth that still confuse archaeologists and scientists today, those which have no explanation as to how they were built, or who built them.
One great example is the valley temple of Khafre, in Egypt.
Its core structure was built entirely of gigantic limestone, each measuring approximately 18 feet long by 10 feet tall and 8 feet high.
Some were as large as 30 feet long by 12 feed wide and 10 feet high.
With each stone exceeding 200 tons in weight, a monument that is made up of hundreds of such blocks, it’s truly mind-altering to think how these buildings were achieved, especially when you think about the precise placement and mathematical precision.
These blocks had to be lifted more than 40 feet.
Think about that for a second.
“At present there are only two land-based cranes in the world that could lift weights of this magnitude.
At the very frontiers of construction technology, these are both vast, industrialized machines, with booms reaching more than 220 feet into the air, which require on board counterweights of 160 tons to prevent them from tipping over.
The preparation time for a signle lift is around six weeks and calls for the skills of specialized teams of up to 20 men.”
– Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of the Gods: Canada: Anchor Canada, 2005
In Peru, this massive fortress displays a knowledge of stonework that modern man is simply unable to duplicate.
IT WAS BUILT WITHOUT MORTAR OF ANY KIND, THE HUGE STONES CUT SO PRECISELY AND FIT TOGETHER SO TIGHTLY THAT ONE CANNOT INSERT A SHEET OF PAPER BETWEEN THEM.
IT WAS BUILT WITHOUT MORTAR OF ANY KIND, THE HUGE STONES CUT SO PRECISELY AND FIT TOGETHER SO TIGHTLY THAT ONE CANNOT INSERT A SHEET OF PAPER BETWEEN THEM.
45 miles west of La Paz high in the Andes mountains, lie the mysterious ancient ruins of Puma Punku.
The megalithic stones found here are among the largest on the planet, measuring up to 26 feet long and weighing more than 100 tons each.
Puma Punku is a large temple complex or monument group that is part of the Tiwanaku Site near Tiwanaku, Bolivia.
Puma Punku is so unique in the way that it was constructed, shaped and positioned, that it is the most intriguing ancient site on the planet.
Incredible stones with perfect right angles, some interlocking, almost as smooth as glass, intricate bore holes that go all the way through some stones, as though they used machine tools or even lasers.
Tiahuanaco is located near Puma Punku, less than a quarter mile northeast.
It’s said that Tiahuanaco with its many carvings of heads, etc, displays ALL THE RACES OF MANKIND, even elongated skulls, people wearing turbans, people with broad noses, people with thin noses, people with thick lips, people with thin lips, and some of the statues are particularly unusual, unlike any found in the nearby area.
One of the most important archaeological artifacts ever discovered in Tiahuanaco or Puma Punku is the famous Fuente Magna Bowl.
The ceramic bowl has Sumerian cuneiform and Proto-Sumerian hieroglyphic written on it.
THE NAZCA CULTURE, ONE OF THE MOST ADVANCED IN ALL THE WORLD
From the famous giant geoglyphs we call "Nazca Lines" to the newly explored aqueduct system called Puquios, which drew water up from beneath the desert floor and which still functions today, the people of Nazca lived way beyond the technology in use by most other cultures on earth at that time.
x
(As seen from high above, the puquios stretch across the desert.)
Today there are approximately 36 active Puquios –and another 20 remain unused.
The Plain of Jars is a megalithic archaeological landscape in Laos.
It consists of thousands of stone jars scattered around the upland valleys and the lower foothills of the central plain of the Xiangkhoang Plateau.
The jars are mostly arranged in clusters ranging in number from one to several hundred.
The Xieng Khouang Plateau is located at the northern end of the Annamese Cordillera, the principal mountain range of Indochina.
A French researcher in the early 1930s concluded that the jars were associated with prehistoric burial practices.
Excavation by Lao and Japanese archaeologists in the intervening years has supported this interpretation with the discovery of human remains, burial goods and ceramics around the jars.
The Plain of Jars is dated to the Iron Age (500 BC to AD 500) and is one of the most important prehistoric sites in Southeast Asia.
TEXAS GIANT, 1919
ABOVE: A MUSEUM IN ECUADOR IS HOME TO A RECONSTRUCTED SKELETON OF A HUMAN THAT WAS SEVEN (7) TIMES THE SIZE OF MODERN MAN.
THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY ARCHAEOLOGISTS.
Several fragments were sent to the Smithsonian Institution in the United States, so they are studying their density, age, and weight.
THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY ARCHAEOLOGISTS.
Several fragments were sent to the Smithsonian Institution in the United States, so they are studying their density, age, and weight.
[WE MAY NEVER SEE THOSE AGAIN, GIVEN THE SMITHSONIAN'S NOTORIETY FOR LOSING SUCH THINGS!]
“The
Spartans uncovered in Tegea the body of Orestes which was seven cubits
long — around 10 feet. In his book, ‘The Comparison of Romulus with
Theseus’ Plutarch describes how the Athenians uncovered the body of
Theseus, which was of more than ordinary size. The kneecaps of Ajax were
exactly the size of a discus for the boy’s pentathlon, wrote Pausanias.
A boy’s discus was about twelve centimetres in diameter, while a normal
adult patella is around five centimetres, suggesting Ajax may have been
around 14 feet tall.” – Herodotus in Book 1, Chapter 68 - See more at:
http://ministerfortson.com/?p=35059#sthash.g966Lv7P.dpuf
AMONG OTHER HUGE TOOLS LISTED ON THAT WEBSITE (WITH PHOTOS) ARE...
~ A 27.5 POUND STONE AXE HEAD FROM MANITOBA.
~ An altogether remarkable and gigantic hand-axe, discovered embedded in the beach below Beeston Hill, Sheringham, of about 14 pounds.
~ A 39 POUND COPPER AXE HEAD FROM OHIO.
~ GIANT MEGA-TOOLS FOUND IN AUSTRALIA BY REX GILROY. ASSOCIATED WITH THE MEGANTHROPUS AND GIGANTOPITHECUS ARCHAIC HOMINIDS.
THEY INCLUDE A 21 POUND STONE CLUB.
In 1950 Dr Louis Burkhalter, former French delegate to the Prehistoric Society, wrote in the Revue du Musee de Beyrouth: “I want to make it clear that the existence of gigantic men in the Acheulian age [ie between about 75,000 and 150,000 years ago] must be considered a scientifically proven fact.”
In his paper, “A Report On Gigantic Implements Found In South Morocco”, Dr Burkhalter refers to ‘gigantic’ stone tools unearthed at Sasnych [Syria], located five miles from Safitah in the alluvial ground of Nohr Abrach.
These included bifaces of ‘abnormal’ dimensions weighing 2.5kg to 3.5kg.
These finds were followed by similar discoveries made by Captain R Lafanechere in south Morocco – biface tools of Acueulean manufacture weighing 4.150kg, while one specimen was over 8kg.
The stone mega-tools recovered from Australia to date appear to be the largest and heaviest, reaching weights of up to and over 20kg, tools which only beings of 3 to 4 metres or more height would have been capable of using.
DID GIANTS EXIST?
OF COURSE THEY DID, AND STILL DO.
FINDING HUMANS TODAY WHO ARE UP TO 8 FEET IN HEIGHT IS NOT AS UNCOMMON AS ONE MIGHT THINK.
SUCH MODERN HUMANS EXIST ON ALL CONTINENTS.
HOWEVER, WE SEE NO MODERN 12-FOOTERS, AND CERTAINLY NO HUMANS OF 24 TO 36 FEET IN HEIGHT.
WHERE DID THOSE SKELETONS COME FROM?
AND WHERE DID THOSE GIANTS GO?
_______________________
ALSO SEE:
The Giants Who Ruled America
CITIES LOST AND FOUND
Read more?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.disclose.tv/forum/the-nephilim-chronicles-t95151.html