HOW MANY "FAKE NEWS" STORIES HAVE OUR OWN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WRITTEN?
HOW MANY FALSE FLAGS, OR SCANDALS THAT WERE COVERED UP, AND HOW MANY LIES WERE TOLD TO US THROUGH THE MEDIA THAT WILL NOW BE USED TO ROB US OF EVEN OUR RIGHT TO BE OUTRAGED?
HILLARY CLINTON MAY NEED HELP GETTING A GRIP ON LIFE AGAIN, SANS FANTASIES.
SHE IS COMPLETELY OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY, AS ARE ALL OF OUR MEDIA PUNDITS AND POLITICIANS.
THEY'VE ALL BELIEVED THEIR OWN LIES FOR SO LONG THAT THEY JUST CAN'T RESOLVE WHAT JUST HAPPENED THIS ELECTION YEAR.
CLINTON AND HER TEAM MAY BE A WEE BIT AHEAD OF THE TRUMP CROWD IN THEIR DENIAL OF WHAT JUST HIT THEM IN THE FACE BUT JUST AS MANY AMERICANS ALSO REJECTED TRUMP.
THE 'MOUSE' THAT WAS THE MAJORITY OF VOTER-AGED AMERICANS HAS ROARED.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE POLITICOS ON THE HILL ARE STILL VIBRATING FROM THAT SHOCK WAVE.
THE HALF OF AMERICANS WHO WERE FULLY ABLE TO VOTE AND CHOSE NOT TO PLUS THOSE WHO SPOKE OUT AND SAID THEY DIDN'T LIKE THEIR OWN PARTY'S CANDIDATE HAVE SHOCKED THE BIG PROPAGANDA MACHINE.
CLINTON'S STATEMENTS YESTERDAY ABOUT A "FAKE NEWS BEING EPIDEMIC" SURELY CANNOT BE CONSTRUED AS ANYTHING BUT "SOUR GRAPES" MIXED WITH A GENEROUS PORTION OF HYPOCRISY.
HOW MUCH "FAKE NEWS" DID THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN GENERATE IN JUST THIS PAST ELECTION?
HOW MUCH "FAKE NEWS" HAD CLINTON HERSELF TRIED TO FEED AMERICA IN ALL OF HER POLITICAL CAREER?
COULD WE EVEN BEGIN TO COUNT ALL THE TIMES THAT FAKE NEWS WAS FOISTED ON US ALL?
WHAT ABOUT THOSE IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHO PRINTED OR AIRED ALL THOSE CLINTON AND TRUMP LIES AND SCAMS AND MAYBE, AT BEST, HALF-TRUTHS?
LET US EXAMINE "FAKE NEWS", MAINSTREAM MEDIA BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA.
LET'S START WITH THE WASHINGTON POST, WHICH, AS ALWAYS, MADE CLINTON'S REMARKS INTO HEADLINES.
HAS THE WASHINGTON POST AIRED "FAKE NEWS"?
YES!
LET US COUNT THE WAYS!
WELL, I WANT TO COUNT MAYBE 3 OR 4 FROM EACH, SO, STARTING WITH THE MOST RECENT:
1~ Facing unprecedented blowback following Craig Timberg's November 24 Washington Post story “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say“, on Wednesday a lengthy editor’s note appeared on top of the original article in which the editor not only distances the WaPo from the “experts” quoted in the original article whose “work” served as the basis for the entire article (and which became the most read WaPo story the day it was published) but also admits the Post could not “vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s finding regarding any individual media outlet”.
In effect, the Post is admitting the entire story may have been, (insert drumroll) “fake news” and they concede that the Bezos-owned publication may have engaged in defamation by smearing numerous websites – Anti-Media included – with patently false and unsubstantiated allegations.
It was the closest the Washington Post would come to formally retracting the story, which has now been thoroughly discredited not only by outside commentators, but by its own editor.
As Adrian Chen wrote for the New Yorker, its methods were themselves suspect, hinting at counter-Russian propaganda – ostensibly with Ukrainian origins – and verification of its work was nearly impossible.
Chen wrote, “the prospect of legitimate dissenting voices being labelled fake news or Russian propaganda by mysterious groups of ex-government employees, with the help of a national newspaper, is even scarier.”
NO DIFFERENT FROM "FAKE NEWS SITES" IS IT?
TSK, TSK, TSK!
Now, at least, the “national newspaper” has taken some responsibility, however the key question remains: by admitting it never vetted its primary source, whose biased and conflicted “work” smeared hundreds of websites, just how is the Washington Post any different from the “fake news” it has been deriding on a daily basis ever since its endorsed presidential candidate lost the elections?
DAMAGE ALREADY DONE, WHY BOTHER WITH RETRACTION?
2~ The Washington Post was duped by a fake Pfizer press release claiming the pharmaceutical company wasn’t going to raise any of its drug prices.
In a statement on the newspaper’s website, the Washington Post retracted the story and said its story was “briefly published” and “based on a false press release produced by an unknown person or group.”
"BRIEFLY"?
"UNKNOWN"?
OH...DOUBLE-SPEAK.
YEAH, WE'RE FLUENT IN DOUBLE-SPEAK BY NOW.
CALL IT WHAT IT WAS...MISINFORMATION... FAKE NEWS.
3~ On March 27, 2016, the Post published a 5,000-word article detailing the FBI's investigation into Clinton's use of a private email and personal Blackberry device during her time as secretary of state. The original story reported: "One hundred forty-seven FBI agents have been deployed to run down leads, according to a lawmaker briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey." The Post's claim spread throughout the media, with outlets frequently highlighting the 147 figure in their headlines and some using the report to attack Clinton.
4~ THE REALLY LUDICROUS, SAVED FOR LAST:
A blogger for the Washington Post reported—wrongly—that Sarah Palin, the former Republican candidate for vice president who recently parted way with Fox News, had moved on to the Al-Jazeera network to reach millions of "devoutly religious people."
Oops.
As surfaced by Politico, Washington Post blogger Suzi Parker cited the Daily Currant as her source for a “She the People” column under the headline “Sarah Palin tries to stay relevant.”
THE DAILY CURRANT, LIKE THE ONION, 'SPOOFS' THE NEWS.
IT JOKES ABOUT WHAT MAINSTREAM MEDIA "REPORTS", AND IT SHOULD.
The former Alaskan governor, however, tweeted her own fake scoop in response:
"Hey @washingtonpost, I'm having coffee with Elvis this week. He works at the Mocha Moose in Wasilla."
THE NEW YORK TIME...WHERE TO START?
1~ The New York Times issued two corrections on stories claiming Clinton was the subject of a "criminal probe," based in part on unnamed "Capitol Hill" sources, but let's treat those 2 as just one.
2~ March 23rd, 2015, New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan retracted her criticisms over the Times’ early Ferguson reporting, calling her initial critique “substantially flawed.”
Sullivan’s retraction follows the Department of Justice’s report earlier this month essentially vindicating officer Darren Wilson’s side of the story in the shooting of Michael Brown.
The report concluded that Brown did not have his hands raised when Wilson shot him
Sullivan’s was the second retraction, after Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart retracted his earlier columns on Ferguson earlier that week.
HOW MANY COPS' LIVES DID THOSE FAKE NEWS STORIES ENDANGER?
DOES THE NYT OR 'WaPo" CARE?
AS ONE COMMENT DARED MENTION: "Al Sharpton had encouraged protests that led to millions of dollars of loss, two police officers shot in Ferguson, two killed in New York, while Sharpton swore to crowds that "someone must pay for this."
3~ "OVER A SPAN OF MANY YEARS"...FAKE NEWS!
In 2003, the Times admitted that Jayson Blair, one of its reporters, had committed repeated journalistic fraud over a span of several years. The general professionalism of the paper was questioned, though Blair immediately resigned following the incident.
HOW SOON WE FORGET, YES?
4~ PANDERING TO CORPORATE AMERICA.
In their book Manufacturing Consent, Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky analyzed a variety of major U.S. media outlets, with an emphasis on the New York Times. They concluded that a bias exists which is neither liberal nor conservative, but aligned towards the interests of corporate conglomerates, which own most of these media outlets and also provide the majority of their advertising revenue.
The authors explained that this bias functions in all sorts of ways: "...by selection of topics, by distribution of concerns, by emphasis and framing of issues, by filtering of information, by bounding of debate within certain limits.
THEY determine, they select, they shape, they control, they restrict — in order to serve the interests of dominant, elite groups in the society.
SEE THE BOOK FOR MANY EXAMPLES.
READ THE ARTICLES CITED FOR YOURSELVES.
"LA-LA LAND"...AMERICAN "NEWS".
WHAT ABOUT TELEVISION, THAT BASTION OF MIND-ROBBING DISINFORMATION, THE GREAT AMERICAN PROPAGANDA MACHINE'S FINEST?
STARTING WITH THE OLDER NETWORKS....
NBC'S FAKE NEWS
ABOUT 44% OF NBC "NEWS" CAN BE DISCREDITED.
1~ On December 6, 2012, George Zimmerman filed a defamation lawsuit against NBC, alleging that the 911 phone call which was presented on NBC's TODAY SHOW, was edited intentionally to give the impression that he targeted Martin because he was black and to "create the myth that Zimmerman was a racist and a predatory villain".
2~ On January 27, NBC’s Jim Miklaszewksi reported Bowe Berghdal “will be charged with desertion” adding that charges “could be referred within a week.” The Pentagon vehemently denied the report. That night on “Nightly News” Brian Williams softened the language saying that Bergdahl “will likely soon be charged with desertion,” adding “no final decisions have been made.”
3~ About Brian Williams, lest we forget...
Williams came under fire for the error-filled retelling of a story during his coverage in the early days of the Iraq War.
He claimed the chopper he was in was hit by an RPG.
It wasn’t.
He's out of there.
4~ Perhaps the most egregious mistake in the history of the news division happened in November 1992, when “Dateline NBC” staged an explosive test crash of a GM pickup truck. General Motors sued NBC News, and the two sides settled. But it cost the president of NBC News at the time, Michael Gartner, his job.
CBS COOKS UP THE NEWS
1~ CBS Duped by author of “Embassy House”:
Security officer Dylan Davies admitted that he lied to a superior in September 2012 about his whereabouts the night of the Benghazi attack. Still, without checking into matters, his latest version of events was told on CBS' "60 Minutes".
PERHAPS OVERLY EAGER TO PAINT OBAMA AND/OR HILLARY CLINTON IN A 'NEW' LIGHT, CBS WENT FULL THROTTLE WITH THIS "NEWS" BUT WAS CLEVER ENOUGH TO APOLOGIZE FOR IT LATER.
Benghazi was just one of at least 157 attacks on our diplomatic facilities over a 15-year period, 9 of which resulted in U.S. fatalities, most of which you've forgotten because they were not covered hourly for 14 months on Fox News like Benghazi was...and still is
In trying to show that it was "fair and balanced" and could report a story on an issue being pushed by conservatives, CBS contorted itself to a point where it was completely unfair and unbalanced, abandoning the basic journalistic tenet of following the truth, no matter how inconvenient.
2~ GEORGE W. BUSH...THOU SHALT NOT SAY HE WAS AWOL, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS.
DAN RATHER STILL MAINTAINS THE STORY WAS FACTUAL
When "60 Minutes" got it wrong nine years ago on the details of George W. Bush leaving the Texas Air National Guard, people lost their jobs.
Four CBS News employees, including three executives, have been ousted for their role in preparing and reporting a disputed story about President Bush's National Guard service.
The action was prompted by the report of an independent panel that concluded that CBS News failed to follow basic journalistic principles in the preparation and reporting of the piece. The panel also said CBS News had compounded that failure with a "rigid and blind" defense of the 60 Minutes Wednesday report.
"We deeply regret the disservice this flawed 60 Minutes Wednesday report did to the American public, which has a right to count on CBS News for fairness and accuracy," said CBS President Leslie Moonves.
RATHER 'STEPPED DOWN'.
3~January 30, 2012
"A CBS News investigation found earlier this month that a dozen green-energy companies - which in total received at least $6.5 billion in stimulus money from the federal government - have filed for bankruptcy protection."
NOPE.
The CBS "investigation" found no such thing.
CBS ran an error-ridden report by Sharyl Attkisson which purported to reveal 11 "New Solyndras." Attkisson said these clean energy companies were "having trouble" or had "filed for bankruptcy" after receiving a total of $6.5 billion in federal assistance (making no distinction between loan guarantees and grants.) The deeply flawed report has been eagerly repeated by conservative media;
Bill O'Reilly managed to use it to falsely claim "We gave France 1.2 billion."
But CBS is counting companies that didn't even receive federal funds, companies that haven't actually gone bankrupt, and companies that have sold the government-backed projects to other firms. CBS hasn't even identified 4 of the 11 companies it claimed are endangering taxpayer money. And instead of issuing a correction, CBS is doubling down on this shoddy reporting in a way that recalls the editorial standards of Fox News.
4~ "Congress has cut funding, has slashed funding, for veterans' benefits over these last years."
May 21st, 2014
Congress hasn’t "cut" or "slashed funding to the VA health care system. This VA budget summary sheet shows that, far from being "slashed," discretionary spending on the VA has risen each year over the last decade. In fact, on Obama’s watch, the VA’s discretionary budget has risen from $47.8 billion in 2009 to $63.4 in 2014 -- a one-third increase over five years.
Katrina van den Heuvel acknowledged that the words she had used on Face the Nation made her statement inaccurate.
ABC NEWS... OR NOT...
1~Democratic activist James Carville...
"Jeb Bush has released 10 percent of his emails," Carville said on ABC’s This Week, March 15, 2015. "He had a private email server. He destroyed his emails."
Under Florida law, most of Bush's emails to his government accounts are a public record and accessible to people who request them, said Barbara Petersen, president of Florida’s First Amendment Foundation.
...close to 90 percent of the universe of 3 million emails are public in some form. If you look at just Bush's private emails, about 50 percent are public.
Neither number is close to the one Carville cited.
2~ It started with this screw-up by ABC's Jon Karl.
AGAIN, IT WAS REPORTED AS VALID NEWS TO THE TUNE OF "BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI"
“The story was wrong. The attribution was wrong. And he’s still not characterizing the source as a Republican source, even though other news organizations are already doing that. So I just think the problems continue for ABC News in all of this,” David Shuster said.
CBS News’ Major Garrett said that it was congressional Republicans who fed the misleading quotes to Karl.
BUT OLD KARL DIDN'T CHECK HIS FACTS AND REPORTED "FAKE NEWS".
3~ May, 2014, on ABC's "This Week", Laura Ingraham restated a debunked talking point about Ambassador Christopher Stevens, claiming that the body of the Ambassador to Libya was "dragged through the street" following the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
The most recent summary of the events came from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in January 2014. In an appendix, the report provides a timeline. It has this entry for 1 a.m. Sept. 12, 2012:
"Local Libyans found the Ambassador at the Mission Facility and brought him to a local hospital. Despite attempts to revive him, Ambassador Stevens had no heartbeat and had perished from smoke inhalation."
Two other government bodies said much the same thing. An Accountability Review Board, headed by former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen and veteran diplomat Thomas Pickering, declared that Stevens was brought to the hospital by six civilians.
This claim was debunked long ago and the truth has been widely available.
4~ The now-discredited bentonite-anthrax story in 2001.
The attacks were of domestic origin and the anthrax came from within U.S. government facilities. This leads us to ask, who were the “four well-placed and separate sources” who told ABC News that tests conducted at Fort Detrick showed bentonite in the anthrax sent to Sen. Tom Daschle, causing ABC News to connect the attacks to Iraq in multiple reports over a five day period in October, 2001?
A substantially false story that helps make the case for war by raising fears about enemies abroad attacking the United States is released into public debate because of faulty reporting by ABC News. How that happened and who was responsible is itself a major story of public interest.
FOX NEWS...
NO, LET'S DON'T COUNT THE THOUSANDS OF FAKE FOX STORIES.
I MEAN, SUFFICE IT TO SAY THAT IT IS A WELL-KNOWN AND PROVEN FACT THAT FOX NEWS JUST ISN'T NEWS.
‘Pants On Fire’: Analysis Shows 60% Of Fox News ‘Facts’ Are Really Lies.
Analysis of Fox News suggests that the TV news network is a leader in lying to the American public, beating out CNN and MSNBC for the amount of falsehoods broadcasted.
WELL, TWO PAIRS OF WORDS, NAMES, ACTUALLY, SHOULD SUFFICE TO SHOW THE WORLD WHAT FOX WAS MADE FROM... "RUPERT MURDOCK"... AND THEN "KARL ROVE".
WE COULD CONTINUE AND LIST FAKE NEWS FROM MAINSTREAM MEDIA FOR MONTHS, LIKE CNN's BUT THE CURRENT CRY FOR AN END TO "FAKE NEWS SITES" IS A PLOY, A NEW MEANS TO STOP FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
THIS PUSH FOR SILENCING CERTAIN WEBSITES, PUBLICATIONS, NEWS CHANNELS, ETC, IS A PUSH TO END DISSENT, TO FORCE AMERICANS TO HAVE NO CHOICE BUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA, AND IT JUST MAY WORK.
IT COULD BECOME A REALITY JUST LIKE WHEN WE WERE FORCED TO HAVE FLUORIDE IN OUR WATER, FORCED TO VACCINATE OUR CHILDREN AND PETS, FORCED TO LIVE BY ZONING LAWS, FORCED TO PAY A FEDERAL INCOME TAX, FORCED TO TAG OUR VEHICLES AND LICENSE OURSELVES TO DO EVERYTHING FROM GETTING MARRIED TO DRIVING A VEHICLE OR HUNTING AND FISHING.
FORCED...AMERICANS ARE ALWAYS FORCED...BUT WE'VE ALLOWED IT.
WE ALLOWED THE PATRIOT ACT TO FORCE US INTO BEING FELT-UP BY THE TSA, INTO BEING FORCED TO ACCEPT WARRANTLESS SEARCH AND SEIZURE, FORCED TO BE JUST FINE, THANKS, WITH HAVING OUR PRIVATE PHONE CONVERSATIONS AND EMAILS EXAMINED BY THE NSA, FBI, ANY AGENCY WHO WANTS IN ON THAT.
WE WERE FORCED INTO TRADE DEALS, INTO SENDING MILLIONS OF AMERICAN JOBS OVERSEAS, ACROSS OUR BORDERS.
WE'VE BEEN FORCED TO ACCEPT GENETICALLY MODIFIED AND UNLABELED FOOD, UNPROVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES, POLLUTED RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, ANTIBIOTICS AND GROWTH HORMONES IN OUR MEATS, CARCINOGENS IN OUR FERTILIZERS, WEED KILLERS THAT ARE KILLING US.
HELL, WE'VE BEEN FORCED TO THE POINT THAT, ALMOST, WE HAVE TO SAY, "MAY I?" TO BREATHE.
WE AREN'T RULED BY THE CONSTITUTION ANYMORE, BUT BY FORCE.
WHEN THE PRESENT ADMINISTRATION TURNED OVER OUR INTERNET AND JUST ABOUT EVERY FACET OF AMERICAN LIFE TO THE UNITED NATIONS FOR THEM TO DICTATE EVERYTHING WE DO OR SAY OR READ OR WRITE OR BELIEVE, WE HANDED OVER NOT ONLY OUR FREEDOM TO CHOOSE, OUR FREEDOMS, PERIOD, BUT ALSO OUR OUTRAGE, OUR ABILITY TO PROTEST SUCH THINGS AS THESE.
AND NOW OLD CLINTON AND OTHERS OF HER ILK WANT US TO GO BELLY-UP ABOUT "FAKE NEWS"?
TO HELL WITH WHAT SHE OR ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT WANTS!
WE, THE PEOPLE, ARE THE 'BOSS SUPREME' HERE.
IT'S "OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, AND BY THE PEOPLE", BYTHEGODS, AND WE NEED TO REMIND THE BASTARDS WHO WANT US TO GIVE THEM THIS LAST LITTLE THING THAT THERE IS NO WAY ON EARTH WE WILL HAND THEM OUR RIGHT TO BE OUTRAGED!
WE NEED TO SEND THEM A "NEWSFLASH"... "SCREW YOU! GO TO HELL!"
WE DON'T NEED A DONALD TRUMP TO "TAKE AMERICA BACK" OR AN OBAMA FOR "CHANGE", AND WE BLOODY WELL DON'T NEED THE LIKES OF OUR SOLD-OUT CHEAP WHORES ON THE HILL TO EVEN ASSUME WE WILL ALLOW THEM TO DICTATE ONE MORE "COMMANDMENT" TO US.
WE ARE AMERICAN CITIZENS, SOVEREIGN TO THE CORE, AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE MUST BECOME THE WILL OF THE ELECTED ONES OR WE CAN KICK THEM ALL OUT.
WE CAN YANK THEM OUT OF THEIR COZY LITTLE SLOTS AND REPLACE THEM LIKE WE DO LIGHTBULBS.
WE DON'T HAVE TO BE SUBJECTED TO FORCE.
WE ARE OVER 300 MILLION STRONG AND WE OUTNUMBER THEM.
WHEN AMERICANS ROAR, EVEN THE DEAF CAN HEAR US.
THE COLLECTIVE VOICE OF MILLIONS OF FED-UP 'VOTERS' WILL SHAKE THEIR BONES AND RATTLE ALL THEIR CAGES.
THEY'RE IN FIGHT-OR-FLIGHT MODE, TRYING TO SURVIVE OUR STANDING UP TO THEM, AND THIS LAST PUSH ON THEIR PART IS A PUSH TOO FAR, AT LAST!
THE LOOK OF ABJECT FRIGHT ON THE FACES OF THE "NEWS" PUNDITS ON ELECTION NIGHT WHEN 'JOHN AND JANE Q. PUBLIC' PLANTED THEIR FEET AND SURPRISED THEM ALL WAS PRICELESS!
I WATCHED NBC, CNN, FOX, ALL OF THEM GET TERRIFIED BY WHAT WAS HAPPENING.
THEY MELTED DOWN BEFORE MY EYES.
IT WASN'T THAT WE VOTED THE WAY WE DID, OR WHOM WE VOTED FOR....IT WAS THAT WE FOOLED THEM ALL.
JUST AS THE 'POWERS THAT BE' THOUGHT THEY HAD US WHIPPED INTO SUBMISSION, WE LET THEM KNOW THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
THAT MORE THAN HALF OF AMERICA REJECTED BOTH OF THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES' CANDIDATES AND THAT WE SAID SO, LOUDLY AND CLEARLY, TROUBLED MORE THAN THEIR MINDS...IT SCARED THEM INTO A BLIND PANIC, AND THIS CRAP BY CLINTON IS EVIDENCE OF THAT.
SHE AND THE OTHERS WHO ARE ON THE RUN REALIZE THAT WE'VE TURNED AWAY FROM MAINSTREAM MEDIA AFTER WITNESSING THE BIAS AND THE LIES WE WERE TOLD ALL DURING THOSE "CAMPAIGNS".
WE'VE FIGURED IT OUT... MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS AN ASS-KISSING CONGLOMERATE OF CORPORATE MONKEYS.
BOTH MAJOR PARTIES ARE CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH.
WE "GET IT", AND WE JUST SHOWED THEM HOW WELL WE GET IT.
THEY'VE CRUCIFIED AND DEMONIZED "ALTERNATIVE NEWS SOURCES" FOR OVER 2 DECADES NOW, EVER SINCE THE FIRST SUCH NEWS SOURCE CAME INTO BEING ON THIS WONDROUS OLD INTERNET.
THEY KNOW THAT WE HAVE SMELLED THE RAT THAT THEY ARE AND THEY WANT US BLINDED AND DUMBED-DOWN TO THE FACT THAT WE CAN FIND THE TRUTH IF AND WHEN WE CHOOSE TO LOOK FOR IT.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT "FAKE NEWS".
IT'S ABOUT US SEEING HOW FAKE THE "NEWS" IS AND CALLING THEM OUT ON IT.
NO, HELL, NO, WE DON'T ALL BELIEVE WHAT THE LIKES OF ALEX JONES SAYS, OR LIMBAUGH OR BECK ... OR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON OR DONALD JOHN TRUMP.
NO, WE WON'T EVER AGAIN BELIEVE EVERY WORD THAT FOX TRIES TO SELL US, OR CNN, OR THE TIMES OR THE TRIBUNE OR ANY OTHER NEWS SOURCE THAT WE CAN SEE HAS LIED AND MANIPULATED FACTS UNTIL FACTS ARE BURIED SO DEEPLY WE HAVE TO DIG FOR DAYS TO FIND ONE REAL TRUTH.
ALMOST HALF OF ALL AMERICANS WHO COULD HAVE VOTED REFUSED TO VOTE.
THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS WHAT'S REALLY SCARING THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES AND THE MEDIA PROSTITUTES.
THAT COUPLED WITH THOSE "POLLS" THAT SHOWED HOW FEW AMERICANS WERE HAPPY WITH THEIR PARTY'S CHOICE OF CANDIDATES HAS SHAKEN THE CRUMBLY OLD FOUNDATION OF THE CORPORATE-CONTROLLED MEDIA AND THEY ARE SCRAMBLING TO TRY TO RECOVER THEIR CONTROL OVER US.
WE THREW THEM A CURVE AND THEY WERE SO BAFFLED BY US THAT THEY DIDN'T EVEN SWING AT THE BALL.
SO NOW THE CRY HAS GONE UP THAT THIS WHOLE THING WAS THE FAULT OF "FAKE NEWS SITES".
NO, IMBECILES, SELLERS OF PROPAGANDA, THIS WHOLE THING IS HAPPENING BECAUSE MOST AMERICANS HAVE SEEN YOU AND THE POLITICIANS YOU'VE BEEN SELLING US AS LIARS AND CONS!
WE SEE THAT A VERY FEW 'NAMES' OWN YOU ALL.
WE'VE DECIDED THAT WE DON'T WANT TO BE OWNED...OR FORCED TO DO ONE WEE THING THAT WE DON'T WANT TO DO ANYMORE.
THE LION HAS ROARED.
IF YOU ADD THE NUMBERS OF AMERICANS WHO DID NOT VOTE TO THOSE WHO VOTED "AGAINST THE MACHINE", LOOK WHAT YOU COME UP WITH!
BOTH MAJOR PARTIES HAVE SHAFTED THEIR 'MEMBERS' LONG ENOUGH AND HARD ENOUGH THAT THOSE MEMBERS HAVE BALKED AT BEING SHAFTED.
FAKE NEWS SITES ARE YOU!
NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, THE NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, CHICAGO TRIBUNE, ALL OF YOU MAINSTREAMERS!
AMERICANS HAVE BEGUN THE BIG WAKE-UP AND NOTHING CAN STOP IT.
WE'VE HAD OUR TASTE OF FREEDOM AND WE LIKE IT!
WE'LL READ WHAT WE PLEASE, WHERE WE PLEASE, WHEN WE PLEASE AND YOU DON'T PLEASE US ANYMORE.
A THINKING PEOPLE WITH THE ABILITY WE HAVE TO FIND THE TRUTH IN SPITE OF YOU WILL NEVER GO BACK INTO THAT MINDLESS BONDAGE AGAIN OF DEPENDING ON SELL-OUTS FOR ANYTHING, FACE IT.
THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL IS SHINING BRIGHTER EVERY DAY.
SUGGEST YOU BUY SOME SHADES...
No comments:
Post a Comment