.
I THOUGHT I'D SEEN IT ALL IN MY 7 DECADES ON THIS PLANET BUT I HAVE NEVER SEEN THE LIKES OF THE LATEST FROM THE 'RED LIGHT DISTRICT' WE CALL WASHINGTON, D.C.
EVEN THOUGH "EXPERTS" AT STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS AND AT LEAST ONE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) 'WHISTLEBLOWER' HAVE STATED THAT THE HACK OF THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (DNC) PROBABLY CAME FROM INSIDE THE NSA, OBAMA'S RECENT DEMAND FOR A 'DEEP-DIVING INVESTIGATION' HAS CAUSED SOME OF THE ELECTORS TO DEMAND A BRIEFING TO PROVE HOW MUCH THE VOTE WAS AFFECTED BY THE DNC'S OWN SHAMEFUL INTERNAL EMAILS.
IF THE ELECTORS SEE THAT THE LEAKS "UNDULY INFLUENCED AMERICAN VOTERS" THEN SEVERAL HAVE VOWED TO "DO THE RIGHT THING" AND REFUSE TO CAST THEIR VOTES FOR TRUMP.
A TEXAS ELECTOR HAS ALREADY RESIGNED, SIX HAVE PUBLICLY STATED THEY WILL NOT VOTE AS THEIR STATE MANDATES, AND OTHERS ARE TEETERING ON BECOMING "FAITHLESS ELECTORS".
IT WOULD TAKE ONLY 38 ELECTORS BAILING OUT ON TRUMP TO POSSIBLY MAKE CLINTON THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THIS ASYLUM WE CALL AMERICA.
BUT WHY WOULD THE NSA HAND WIKILEAKS THOSE EMAILS?
BECAUSE THE DEMS, AND HILLARY IN PARTICULAR, PISSED SOMEONE OFF THERE?
REVENGE?
BECAUSE 'SOMEBODY' STOPPED THE FBI INVESTIGATION INTO HILLARY'S EMAILS AGAIN, AFTER THE SEX SCANDAL THING BY HER CLOSEST FRIEND'S HUSBAND, AND MAYBE SOMEBODY IN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT WAS PISSED OFF OR SCARED ABOUT THAT?
WE CAN HOPE SO.
TAKING A BREAK FROM ISRAEL-BASHING, EVEN THE NEW YORK TIMES WROTE,
"...the leaked cache also included thousands of emails exchanged by Democratic officials and party fund-raisers, revealing in rarely seen detail the elaborate, ingratiating and often bluntly transactional exchanges necessary to harvest hundreds of millions of dollars from the party’s wealthy donor class.
The emails capture a world where seating charts are arranged with dollar totals in mind, where a White House celebration of gay pride is a thinly disguised occasion for rewarding wealthy donors and where physical proximity to the president is the most precious of currencies.
Some messages suggest efforts by donors to gain access to prominent Democratic officials on behalf of clients. In May, Lester Coney, an executive at a Chicago-based financial services firm, emailed a party finance staff member seeking a contact with “clout within the administration.” Mr. Coney appeared to be referring to Gov. Mark Dayton, the governor of Minnesota.
“I have a very importance client/friend needed access with someone within the administration,” Mr. Coney wrote. “So I promise him I would investigate.”
YES, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY...
As is common in national politics, Democratic staff members kept detailed track of every dollar contributed by targeted donors, aiming to get each of the wealthiest givers to “max out,” or contribute the maximum legal amount to each party account. The biggest national donors were the subject of entire dossiers, as fund-raisers tried to gauge their interests, annoyances and passions.
“Jon has an off and on again relationship with the DNC. He does not like DWS and feels we don’t invite him to enough things,” read one memo, about Jon Stryker, a prominent gay donor and heir to a medical supply fortune, referring to the committee’s chairwoman, Ms. Wasserman Schultz.
DON'T ALL AMERICANS CARE ABOUT WHAT WAS REVEALED IN THOSE EMAILS?
SHOULDN'T WE BE DELIGHTED THAT SOMEONE, ANYONE WAS WILLING TO EXPOSE THINGS LIKE THIS FOR US?
SHOULD IT MATTER WHICH PARTY WAS HACKED, OR SHOULD IT MATTER MORE THAT WE AMERICANS CAN NOW SEE WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH WHEN WE SIGN UP TO SUPPORT EITHER PARTY?
WHY ISN'T MAINSTREAM MEDIA INTERVIEWING THE MAN WHO HELPED CREATE THE NSA EMAIL "SURVEILLANCE" DATABASE?
HE SAYS THE HACKING AND SUBSEQUENT LEAKS WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
"Former NSA official William Binney, an architect of the agency's surveillance program, says that it is more likely that a disgruntled member of the U.S. intelligence community leaked the emails.
Binney also revealed some information related to the Clinton's highly controversial private email server: the NSA has a database that likely has all of Clinton’s deleted emails, and the FBI could access them if it wanted to.
He explained that the agency has access to "sophisticated, searchable databases" to track down terrorists, which essentially means that they can track everyone's emails.
That means that not only do they have access to Clinton's emails - deleted or not - but they could find out who hacked and leaked the DNC emails, if they actually wanted to.
"All of that is available in the network log," Binney said. "All they'd have to do is go in the network log and see who was accessing it. The IP addresses and all the MAC numbers coming in tell you the devices and where they are in the world."
DO YOU BELIEVE IN UNICORNS?
"You have to believe in unicorns," former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee said of the possibility that Russians or other entities directly changed election results.
He said he was "ashamed" for the Democratic Party and the mainstream press:
"Eight weeks ago it was terrible that [President-elect] Donald Trump was saying something [about rigged elections]," he said, "Exposure of the DNC [showed] that [the primary] was rigged toward Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders."
[THE LEAKED DNC EMAILS PROVE TRUMP WAS RIGHT!]
Huckabee said Clinton lost the election because of her exposed "contempt" for the working class.
[AND CONTEMPT FOR PEOPLE OF COLOR, FOR THE SECRET SERVICE AND THE MILITARY, EVERYBODY SHE DOESN'T CONSIDER IN HER "CLASS"?
THEN AGAIN, IS TRUMP ANY BETTER? WAS ROMNEY? NOPE.]
From a man I consider to be the author of two of the best exposés on how our government really operates
[See: 'The Constitution in Exile' and 'Suicide Pact'] :
"Judge Andrew Napolitano reacted to former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's support for 2016 Electoral College electors to receive an intelligence briefing prior to casting their official vote for president on December 19.
Napolitano said he shares Trump's view that Podesta's and select electors' concerns about Russian hacking of the election are not based in fact, but in an "emotional unwillingness to accept the outcome of the election."
"The law does not guarantee a perfect election, [it] guarantees a fair election," he said.
He noted that Russia's alleged hacking and leaking of Podesta's emails-- many of which involved Clinton allies and aides-- would not be an example of the Kremlin hacking the actual vote totals in each state.
Instead, such actions might have swayed voter's support for or against a certain candidate, he said."
REPEAT: NOBODY HACKED INTO VOTER MACHINES THIS PAST ELECTION.
AS EDWARD SNOWDEN HAS REPEATEDLY STATED, THE NSA CAN TELL EXACTLY WHERE 'HACKS' COME FROM, SO WHERE'S THE PROOF THIS WAS PULLED OFF BY RUSSIA?
Alex McGeorge, head of threat intelligence at the Miami-based cybersecurity firm Immunity Inc.,
"It is actually very reasonable to conclude that the NSA does know the answer to this question without any real ambiguity."
SO, PUBLISH THE PROOF FOR AMERICA TO SEE!
WHY WOULDN'T THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE THE ABSOLUTE PROOF AND ALSO ADMIT THAT VOTERS THEMSELVES DECIDED WHOM TO VOTE FOR?
THAT DNC EMAILS WERE LEAKED IS A GIVEN, BUT THERE WAS NO TAMPERING WITH VOTER MACHINES AS ALL STATES HAVE NOW PROVEN.
AMERICANS VOTED, THE END.
YES, CLINTON TOOK THE POPULAR VOTE, BUT SO DID AL GORE AND OTHERS WHO LOST BY ELECTORAL VOTES.
WE HAVE FOUR LONG YEARS TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM IF WE AGREE THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN.
WE'VE HAD OVER 200 YEARS TO FIX IT, ACTUALLY, AND HAVE LET IT STAND, ALLOWED A SMALL GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS, WHOSE NAMES MOST OF US DON'T KNOW, TO DECIDE WHO WILL BE PRESIDENT.
IF WE DIDN'T AGREE WITH THAT, WE, THE PEOPLE, WOULD HAVE CHANGED IT, YES?
BE HONEST, AMERICA... WE DESERVED MUCH BETTER THAN THE TWO MAJOR CANDIDATES WE HAD RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT THIS YEAR.
WHILE TRUMP IS A TWO-BIT CROOK, CLINTON (BOTH CLINTONS) ARE CROOKS ON A GRAND SCALE, IN MY OPINION.
A CURSORY LOOK AT THEIR HISTORY PROVES THEIR 'TENDENCIES'.
I DON'T WANT EITHER TRUMP OR CLINTON IN THE OVAL OFFICE.
NEITHER OF THEM ARE FIT TO FEED SWINE, AS ONE FRIEND SAID.
BUT THE ELECTION WAS HELD, THE VOTES ARE IN AND WE NEED TO STOP THIS LUNACY AND CONCENTRATE ON THE HIGHER ISSUES...
WILL EITHER TRUMP OR CLINTON EVEN WANT TO ADDRESS THE REAL ISSUES?
EACH MADE A THOUSAND EMPTY CAMPAIGN PROMISES THAT BOTH KNOW THEY COULD NEVER KEEP AND WOULDN'T IF THEY HAD THE REAL POWER TO.
AMERICA IS IN REAL TROUBLE, IN ALMOST EVERY WAY THAT A NATION CAN BE IN TROUBLE.
IT TOOK ALL THREE BRANCHES OF OUR GOVERNMENT TO CREATE THIS MESS, WITH OUR AIDING AND ABETTING THEM TO MAKE A MESS OF IT ALL.
IT MAY BOIL DOWN TO A FIGHT IN CONGRESS AND IN THE SUPREME COURT.
"On January 6, senators and representatives will gather in joint session in the House chamber to receive the votes of the states, with the vice president presiding (that’s why Richard Nixon, Hubert Humphrey, and Al Gore all presided over the ceremony that declared them the losers).
They meet to decide whether the votes of each state were “regularly given.”
If one senator and one House member objects in writing to the announced vote, the two houses retire to their respective chambers to debate the issue.
Is there any basis to believe that a GOP-controlled House and Senate would accept the vote of a defecting elector as “regularly given”?
If this process somehow left Trump short of 270 votes, the decision would then move to the House of Representatives. In that body, each state—not each representative—would have one vote (to be determined by a majority of the delegation). In a remarkably undemocratic process, Wyoming’s one member would have the same power as the 53 from California. To become president, a candidate would need a majority of state delegations, or 26. In the new House, Republicans will hold a majority in 30-plus delegations.
Do the math."
WE HAVE FOUR MORE YEARS TO CONSIDER HOW BADLY WE SCREWED-UP THIS TIME.
WE HAVE FOUR MORE YEARS TO EITHER WATCH IN SILENCE AS OUR NATION SINKS LOWER AND LOWER, OR WE CAN STAND UP AND BE THE "BOSS" AND DEMAND THAT CONGRESS VOTES THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, NOT THE WILL OF THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, THEIR BENEFACTORS.
WE HAVE ONE MORE CHANCE TO RAISE OUR VOICES AND MAKE THE TOP DOGS TAKE NOTICE.
WILL WE?
YOU SEE, WHEN YOU FACE THE FACTS, IT IS US, IT''S "COMMON MAN" WHO CONTROLS THE RUDDER ON THIS OLD SHIP OF STATE, AND WE CAN STEER ONCE MORE TOWARD THE ROCKS OR WE CAN HEAD HER OUT TO A FINE, OPEN SEA AND SAVE HER.
IT'S UP TO US.
IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN.
STOP THE LUNACY...SAVE OUR NATION!
No comments:
Post a Comment