Translate

Friday, October 9, 2020

THOU SHALT BE POLITICALLY CORRECT? I PASS ON THAT, THANKS.


"This is MY 'Tea Room'!" 
(Couldn't resist)** 




We are living '1984'. 
History erased, individualism damned, national pride is a sin.
Lies become truths. Truths become lies. 
Many are MORE "equal" than others. 
Trust only THE PARTY. 





Terminology is a favorite of the world stage political con artists who know that they can cover up any ulterior motives with well-chosen confusing words.

The use of words as euphemisms, inoffensive synonyms, anodyne bureaucratic jargon and political correctness simply serve to socially manipulate the masses into passivity and compliance.


[Yes, that IS a quote by & photo of Ricky Gervais, a British comedian who is an atheist and humanist, two worldviews I do NOT adhere to. I wished to use his quote for 2 reasons: 
#1- That's how I see it. 
#2- I can appreciate some things in those I least admire.]
 

State Dept. to Purge “Non-Inclusive” Language in Agency Materials; Traditional Nuclear Family, Stereotypical Gender Roles

In the latest move by a U.S. government agency to appease leftists, the State Department is quietly overhauling language used in agency materials that may be considered exclusionary or offensive. 

Judicial Watch obtained a copy of a memo from a State Department source asking the agency’s 69,000 employees to report “outdated and non-inclusive language in Department of State policies, documents or webpages.”
The directive was issued [in July] by the State Department’s Office of Civil Rights (S/OCR) and it provides an “outdated form submission” for employees to note specific examples of what amounts to politically incorrect language that is to be “updated.”

DEPT. OF DEFENSE CAVES IN
The State Department is hardly alone in caving into the increasingly powerful leftist mob’s demands for political correctness. 
Just last week Judicial Watch obtained outrageous, anti-bias training materials from the Department of Defense that are used to train service members on 'diversity topics'. 
The material essentially indoctrinates troops with anti-American and racially inflammatory training. 
It features chapters on 'power and privilege' in which cadets are taught that privilege is linked to various forms of identity including sexual orientation ("straights") and religion (mainly Christians). 

Students are also taught that there is “sexual orientation privilege” associated with the “marginalization of non-heterosexual lifestyles and the view that heterosexuality is the normal sexual orientation.” 
[Damn those hetero/white/Christian military members, right?]

The guide also notes that “Statistics show Whites are the majority in senior leadership positions (i.e., flag officers, general officers, and Senior Executive Service) and lend itself [sic] to the perpetuation of racism.” 

COULD THAT POSSIBLY BE BECAUSE MORE WHITES ENLIST IN AND STAY IN THE MILITARY LONGER THAN "OTHER RACES"?
SURELY NOT.


One must BE in the military and STAY in the military in order to ADVANCE IN RANK, period. 


Another section addressing “Cross-Cultural Communication” states: “Gender includes the social construction of masculinity and femininity within a culture and incorporates his or her biological, psychological, and sociological characteristics. 
Sex refers to a person’s biological or physical self. Although sex determines who will bear children, gender accounts for our roles in life and how these life roles affect our communication.


CHANGING AMERICAN LAW TO ACCEPT SHARIA LAW CONCEPTS 

The nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency has also caved into demands from the left. 
Several years ago, Judicial Watch uncovered records showing that the terrorist front group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) got the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to purge anti-terrorism material from their files that CAIR determined to be offensive to Muslims. 

Let's not call a terrorist a terrorist.
WHY?
Because many terrorists are of the Islamic faith and Islam does 'jihad' and other odd things as 'expressions' of that faith. 

Islamic nations engage in public floggings, public stonings, public beheadings, public hangings, public crucifixions, public burnings, public firing squads, throws homosexuals off tall buildings, engage in "honor killings", etc, and, well, that's just the way it is there. 

It isn't considered unusual or horrifying or terrorism over there, so WHY HERE? 
America must not suppress religious BELIEFS...except that of Judeo-Christians, whom CAIR attacks daily.

Judicial Watch obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the shocking arrangement they made with CAIR and subsequently published a special in-depth report on the subject. 

The same Islamic 'activist group' [CAIR] is listed as a terrorist organization in the Middle East by nations like the United Arab Emirate, but CAIR strong-armed the FBI and later demanded an overhaul in the way all law enforcement officers are trained in the United States.

DOUBLESPEAK IN AMERICAN SOCIETY

The word Doublespeak was never used in the 1984 novel but it was a term coined after publication.

Doublespeak combines the language of ‘Newspeak,’ a government- invented way to suppress the ability to develop 'treasonous' ideas (like individuality, free thought, any freedom by the controlled masses), and ‘Doublethink,’ a product of Newspeak, which essentially means the people are conned into believing that two contradictory statements can be/are true at the same time… or saying one thing and meaning another.

Doublespeak is therefore purposefully evasive and contradictory to truth. 
In 1984 the government ministries used Doublespeak.
In 2020, our ruling class have all become fluent in it.

Examples in 1984: The Ministry of Truth erases history and disseminates lies.
What are we witnessing in America today if not the same erasing of history and obliteration of facts?

Then there is the Ministry of Peace that creates war, while the Ministry of Love has a place where there’s heinous torture in 'Room 101' and 're-education' of those who repent of their sins against Big Brother.

Doublespeak is, of necessity, purposefully evasive and subtly contradictory.
Doublespeak is a common form of language manipulation today.

CONGRESS is masterful at Doublespeak. 

Since many in Congress were also once attorneys, they also like to use the ancient Latin language in preparing their "bills". 
I'm always amazed by schools NOT teaching Latin as a mandatory part of at least high school curriculum. It was required when I was in school. We HAD to take 2 years of it but many took the full 4 years offered. 
If Americans knew that language well, Congress would have one less way to pull the proverbial wool over citizens' eyes while robbing them of money to fund things like pet projects for their biggest Wall Street campaign contributors and pork barrel spending that each member lines up to "help" their home states. 

The U.S. press probably uses more Doublespeak in a week than COMMUNIST China does in a year.

Our so-called 'educational system' uses it to teach our children to despise moral values, Christian concepts, "whiteness", biological gender identification, to never say there are winners and losers, to never exhibit national pride, to be disgusted by America, to despise free speech, to deny civil liberty for ALL..just to name a few.

In '1984', the 'Ministry of Truth' erased history and truth so well, replacing them with myths and lies so often, that the lies became the accepted truth. 

"A LIE, REPEATED OFTEN ENOUGH BECOMES TRUTH.

Here are some present-day political rhetoric examples of Orwellian 1984 Doublespeak that most Americans have bought into.

1- “More surveillance is needed to stop terrorism…”

In terms of Doublespeak, what this really means is that more surveillance is needed on you and me, i.e. We the people, so that tyranny can grow with less resistance. 
We MUST be constantly watched, closely monitored so too many of us don't get any ideas about bucking the system. 
It's absolutely fine for the government to watch us, but we aren't allowed to watch the government.
"Closed-door sessions" of Congress, secret and top-secret and 'eyes only" documents, classified reports on things like health care studies, environmental catastrophes, spending, dealings with foreign nations, national defense, "homeland security", the payouts from Congress' "hush fund" which pays off those who file complaints against U.S. congressmen and WIN (from sexual harassment to rape allegations) and many other categories relating to CITIZEN-FUNDED GOVERNMENT are hidden from us. 

As we've seen time and time again, the CIA kills civilians, often innocents, like school children, and heads of state in foreign nations by drone strike, and every administration since I've been alive has truly committed war crimes, but we aren't allowed access to that information without filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) form and waiting months to decades for a response, which is often, "NO CAN DO. That info would endanger national security."
No, it's national security that endangers us! 

By the time classified info is due to be released to the public, it's often said to have been "accidentally erased", or "lost". 
BULLS*IT! 
We just aren't allowed to monitor or surveil the government that keeps such close tabs on us.


2- "What you said is (a) HATE SPEECH, or (b) RACIST, or (c) NOT FACTUAL, so you can't say it or write it.  You are censored."  

NO, IT'S FREE SPEECH, EVERY AMERICAN'S 1st AMENDMENT RIGHT, AND THE SUPREME COURT HAS EVEN RULED THAT CROSS-BURNING BY THE KKK IS NOT HATE SPEECH AND IS ALLOWED BY THE CONSTITUTION SO LONG AS IT IS NOT USED AS A DIRECT THREAT OR 'TERRORISTIC IN NATURE'.

In 2003, the United States Supreme Court ruled that KKK member Barry Black could not be convicted of a crime under Virginia's cross-burning statute because of the law's unconstitutional presumption that all cross-burning is intended to intimidate.

Cross-burning, when it is not used as a direct threat, is protected by the Constitution.

Justices Souter, Ginsburg, and Kennedy ruled that the entire Virginia statute is an unconstitutional violation of free speech. Justice Thomas held that the statute is constitutional but his reasoning differed sharply from the majority, finding that the statute did not prohibit any protected speech - only intimidating, terroristic conduct.

When you get down to it, saying one doesn't like white, black, brown, red or chartreuse is all the same. 
We CAN say that, according to the Bill of Rights, Amendment #1. 

Ever listen to 'rap' music? 
'Apache Ain't Sh*t' is the only album released by rapper Apache. It was released in 1993 on Tommy Boy/Warner Bros. Records and featured production by The 45 King, Q-Tip, Large Professor, and Diamond D. The album peaked at number 69 on the Billboard 200 and number 15 on the Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums. One charting single was released from the album, the Q-Tip-produced hit "Gangsta *itch"
Here's a bit of the lyrics:

“Kill the white people; we gonna make them hurt; kill the white people; but buy my record first; ha, ha, ha”
“Kill d’White People”; Apache.

“A fight, a fight, a n*gger and a white, if the n*gger don’t win then we all jump in … smoking all America’s white boys”
“A Fight”; Apache.

How about “Kill Whitey”; by Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records.
Those lyrics are too disgusting, to me, to print here.

All I can say is that if I, a person of Native American descent, or, say, any 'white American' wrote a song with similar lyrics saying "Kill Asians" or blacks, or Latinos, we'd likely see the inside of a jail after all the media and BLM, NAACP, etc, got through screaming "RACIST! HATE SPEECH!" 
We'd also likely see a baseball bat aimed at us from someone nearby.

Even Bill Maher faced the media guns for using the term "house n*gger" on his HBO program.


Ice T is a popular rap artist.
Here's some of his lyrics:
“Now I’m black but black people trip [become upset] ‘cause white people like me; white people like me but I don’t like them … I don’t hate whites, I just gotta death wish for motherfu**ers that ain’t right”
“Race War”; Ice-T, Home Invasion, 1993, Priority Records, Thorn EMI; now called The EMI Group.

Get the point?
It's a ONE-WAY STREET. 

As one of my grandmas often said, "If it's fair for the old goose, it has to be fair for the old gander."

Many who ARE racist are not called racist and many who are NOT racist ARE called racist.
Depends on who uses the word.
Depends on who's judging the situation.
Depends on who is offended.
Being offended is just part of life. 

NOT FACTUAL?
By whose definition of facts?
I've had people look me in the eyes and say, "The world is FLAT and you know it."

I don't argue with them.
If a flat earth pleases them, let them be content.

Many have said to me, "You KNOW there is no God and you can't PROVE there is."

I smile and ask, "Have you searched the Cygnus Constellation for Him yet, or Messier 51a? Be sure to get back to me after you have? "      





3-
"The government is fighting a war on...poverty, illegal drugs, cancer, sex-trafficking...", name it and we've been told we have to fight a war against it.

NONE OF THOSE 'WARS' ARE WINNABLE!
None have been won.
The SAME ones that we were waging in 1950 are still being waged today.
WHY?
Because they're MONEY-MAKER 'WARS'.
One can't change anyone who has no intention or even a desire to change him-/herself. 
It's futile. 
All we can do is enforce the laws.

Instead of WINNING, Congress can "appropriate funds", aka ROB TAXPAYERS, to carry on these "wars" and tax us to fight them, then fail to show how the money was spent, claim they need MORE money to win and start collecting more money from each of us again and again, decade after decade. 

If the U.S. counted all those "wars" along with real ones, like the two world wars, we'd be the losingest nation on earth. 


4- "Don't contribute to 'conspiracy theories' by spreading false information. We will 'fact-check' those FOR you."

That FDR knew Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor was once a conspiracy theory, but he DID know.

Readers' Digest gave a list of 12 PROVEN conspiracy theories.
Here are a few of those. 

-Also now proven was that the U.S government was stealing dead bodies to do radioactive testing.
Yes, they did. That was called 'Project Sunshine'. 

-Another conspiracy theory: During Prohibition, the government poisoned alcohol to keep people from drinking.

The truth: Between 1926 and 1933, the federal government pushed manufacturers to use stronger poisons in 'industrial alcohol' to discourage bootleggers from turning the alcohol into moonshine.

-Theory: A First Lady actually ran the government when her husband became debilitated.

Fact: That was Edith Wilson who literally took over for Woodrow after he had a major stroke and to "protect national security" the government hid the fact from Americans. She basically did his job for over  year. 

When a 'proper' amount of time has passed, we will likely be allowed to know that Nancy Reagan did the same for Ronald when his Alzheimer's disease robbed him of his mental ability to govern.

-Conspiracy Theory: The CIA was testing LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs on Americans in a top-secret experiment on behavior modification and mind control.  
The truth: The program was known as MK-ULTRA, and it was real.

- Conspiracy Theory: The Dalai Lama was a CIA agent.

The truth:
Perhaps the reason the Dalai Lama is smiling in all those photos has something to do with the six-figure salary he pulled down from the U.S. government during the 1960s.  
According to declassified intelligence documents,  in connection with the CIA’s funding of the Tibetan Resistance, the old Dali earned to the tune of $1.7 million per year.
The idea was to disrupt and hamper China’s infrastructure. 

The well-known chef, Julia Child was also a CIA agent.


-Conspiracy Theory: The Gulf of Tonkin incident on August 2, 1964, was faked to provoke American support for the Vietnam War.

The truth: By the time news reached American ears, the facts surrounding the North Vietnamese attack on the American Naval ship Maddox were hidden. 

Do a 'DuckDuckGo' search for "proven conspiracy theories" and find more than you ever thought possible. 
Much of what was unproven 10, 20, 50 years ago is known fact today.


5- "Vaccines are necessary to stop the spread of disease. We need a mandatory vaccine mandate. Denying the efficacy of vaccines, not getting vaccines is anti-American and creates a national hazard."

Let's turn the clock back to 1982. That's when four big drug companies (Merck, Wyeth, Lederle, Connaught) blackmailed Congress by threatening to stop selling vaccines in America unless a law was passed giving them complete immunity from prosecution if anyone was harmed by or died from taking any vaccine.
(See Coulter HL, Fisher BL. DPT: A Shot in the Dark. 1985 and National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (PL99-660).)

The pharmaceutical industry knew they were in big trouble because the old, crude whooping cough vaccine in the DPT shot was causing brain inflammation and death in many children.
(See Institute of Medicine. Adverse Effects of Pertussis & Rubella Vaccines. 1991.

Also, Institute of Medicine. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality. 1994. 
AND Institute of Medicine. DPT Vaccine & Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction: A New Analysis. 1994.}
The live oral polio vaccine was crippling children and adults with vaccine strain polio and was outed for knowingly containing the Simian Virus #40, now known to be present in many human cancers, handed down through parental DNA to generations

Americans were filing lawsuits to hold drug companies responsible for the safety of their products.

In 1996, CNN actually came out AGAINST taking vaccines without questioning their dangers.
Can you believe that? 
It also mentions Simian Virus 40 many times as a 'cancer-causing agent'.

"THE LETHAL DANGERS OF THE BILLION-DOLLAR VACCINE BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT APPROVAL, DRUG COMPANIES SELL VACCINES THAT CAN LEAVE YOUR CHILD BRAIN DAMAGED, CAN SPREAD POLIO FROM YOUR BABY TO YOU--AND CAN EVEN KILL. 
SAFER STUFF IS AVAILABLE. HERE'S WHY YOU HAVEN'T BEEN GETTING IT."

"Stop hiding facts. When federal health officials and pediatricians refrain from warning the public about risks out of fear that parents will stop immunizing their children, they insult parents' intelligence and endanger the public's health. Parents deserve the facts so they can make informed choices. 

Geneticist and former NIH researcher Mark Geier says that when he speaks out publicly about vaccine risks or testifies on behalf of vaccine-damaged children, he is frequently criticized by other physicians. 
Says Geier: "They agree privately that what I say is accurate but warn that if I'm not careful, I'll scare people away from taking vaccines. That's certainly not my goal--my own kids are vaccinated. But if you operate on the premise that you can't tell the public about problems with vaccines because you'll scare them away, then unfortunately, the problems don't get fixed."

READ THE PACKAGE INSERTS FROM THE COMPANIES WHO CREATE VACCINES.

I posted ONE such package insert in its entirety to a social media platform and was censored and warned about posting FAKE FACTS.
The FACTS came from the manufacturer!
Any "denialists" in this controversy come from the denial by vaccine pushers that there have been, are and always will be those who should NOT take vaccines, who deny that vaccines cause harm and who deny that they are far more ineffective than the media and manufacturers say they are. 

The CDC plainly states that vaccines are 'usually' 40% to 60% effective. 
"In general, current flu vaccines tend to work better against influenza B and influenza A (H1N1) viruses and offer lower protection against influenza A (H3N2) viruses. 

See “Does flu vaccine effectiveness vary by type or subtype?” and “Why is flu vaccine typically less effective against influenza A H3N2 viruses?” for more information."

HOWEVER, IN THEIR OWN CHART, CDC SHOWS THAT SOME YEARS THE VACCINE WAS ONLY 19% EFFECTIVE IN 2014-2015, 
ONLY 10% EFFECTIVE IN 2004-2005, and has generally been LESS THAN 50% effective in MOST years since 2004. 

"Along with the CDC, the American Association of Pediatricians supports the use of the nasal spray vaccine for children ages 2 and older, but the spray's effectiveness against the A/H1N1 strain of virus is an unknown.

A high-dose vaccine called Fluzone is recommended for adults age 65 and older when available. The high-dose flu shot contains four times as much active ingredient as a regular flu shot to provide better immunity. 
The effectiveness of a vaccine depends on how vigorously the immune system responds to it. If you have a weak immune system to begin with, a vaccine may just not work as well.

Once a flu season is over, the old vaccine is not as effective, (since flu viruses mutate and a new strain may show up instead of the old strain), so an annual flu shot is needed for optimal protection.
Unfortunately, getting the flu vaccine isn’t a guarantee that you won’t get the flu, but it is thought to provide at least partial immunity. You can catch the flu despite getting the vaccine."

Despite decades of research, there is NO vaccine against the common cold.
The MAIN viruses that cause common cold are Rhinovirus, Coronavirus and Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

There is NO vaccine for Rhinovirus, but we're told there is "progress".
Nothing CURES that virus. 

 As we've learned 'the hard way', there is no vaccine for coronavirus, no medicine that cures it. 
Some doctors and researchers say a coronavirus vaccine is impossible. 

There’s no vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus.
Although palivizumab may help prevent serious complications of RSV infection, doctors don’t use it to treat RSV. No medication treats the virus itself. 

Despite decades of trying, there are still no vaccines against viruses that kill tens of millions of people and cause untold suffering every year: 
the cancer-causing Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, and respiratory syncytial virus.

This is why super-power nations chose VIRUSES as a preferred biological weapon and why those same nations constantly scour the globe to find newer, deadlier viruses.

The U.S. sent a team to dig up the body of an Inuit victim of the Spanish Flu and then revived that strain in an American lab.

They also bio-engineer NEW viruses in often-secret labs in each nation with the capability to do so, often with too little oversight to control their escape into the general population. 

There's just damned little we can do to stop them or control them once they're unleashed. 

Live viruses in the adjutants (ingredients) of vaccines can incorporate into our body’s own cells and alter our DNA. Some people don't want THEIR DNA altered, which is their RIGHT, just like so many claim the "RIGHT" to abortion or to gender-altering drugs.


There is NO DIFFERENCE between the rights of any group of people versus any other group. 
What goes for one MUST go for all. 

The pharmaceutical companies are immune to prosecution should someone be harmed or even killed by the side-effects of or anaphylactic reactions to vaccines. 
The U.S. government, with TAXPAYER money, pays off anyone who manages to prove their case of vaccine harm in "Vaccine Court". 

AGAIN, READ EVERY WORD OF THOSE PACKAGE INSERTS FOR YOURSELVES.
HAS YOUR PHYSICIAN EVER OFFERED THAT TO YOU, A THOROUGH READING, BEFORE YOU'RE INJECTED? 

I had one GP refuse to show me a package insert for a vaccine he was pushing me to have, telling me, "If people read the warnings about plain old aspirin, few would take one of those, either, so just take the vaccine."
I told him to stick in his ...whatever...and found a new GP.

Natural immunity is far more effective than artificial.
"It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines. Whereas immunity from disease often follows a single natural infection, immunity from vaccines usually occurs only after several doses."

YES, there are pros and cons on vaccination, but the bottom line remains, "IF VACCINES ARE INDEED EFFECTIVE, THE VACCINATED HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM THOSE WHO CHOOSE NOT TO BE VACCINATED." 
Have all the vaccines you want.
I'll have none, thanks. 


6- "If you SEE something, SAY something.

UNLESS you're a Julian Assange, an Edward Snowden, a Bradley/Chelsea Manning, maybe a Frank Serpico, etc.

NO, I'm not particularly fond of those first three whistleblowers, but they were no less whistleblowers than the journalist Bob Woodward who uncovered Watergate. 

HOWEVER, Woodward also fell for and defended the VERY FAKE Pulitzer-winning article by Janet Cooke, "Jimmy's World". 
They saw something that was never there, said something, and fooled America. 

Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers. Some said he was 'heroic', some said he was a traitor.
On January 3, 1973, Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 along with other charges of theft and conspiracy, carrying a total maximum sentence of 115 years. Due to governmental misconduct and illegal evidence-gathering, and the defense by Leonard Boudin and Harvard Law School professor Charles Nesson, Judge William Matthew Byrne Jr. dismissed all charges against Ellsberg on May 11, 1973.

How did Ellsberg differ from Assange, Snowden or Manning?

It depends on whom you're reporting, saying something about, whom you see do what.

This is another of those "one size does NOT fit all" scenarios where it seems one should report ONLY SOME, CERTAIN ONES, BUT NOT ALL.

Sometimes people DID say something – but nothing happened, no one listened or cared, and soon it became too late.

SOMETIMES PEOPLE SAW SOMETHING, SAID SOMETHING AND OTHER PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE THEY DID. 

"Since 1922, the National Socialists of Germany had had a youth arm designed to train and recruit members for its paramilitary. As the Nazis became more powerful, their youth arm grew.

In January 1933, there were 50,000 members of the Hitler Youth.

By 1939, over 90 percent of German children were part of the Hitler Youth organization.

For the Nazis, the group had other benefits. Not only did it allow the Third Reich to indoctrinate children at their most impressionable, but it let the Nazis remove them from the influence of their parents, some of whom opposed the regime. The Nazi Party knew that families—private, cohesive groups not usually under political sway—were an obstacle to their goals. The Hitler Youth was a way to get Hitler’s ideology into the family unit, and some members of the Hitler Youth even denounced their parents when they behaved in ways not approved of by the Reich."

Can't we compare what's happening in our U.S. educational system to that?
Our college kids especially are so indoctrinated and "dumbed-down" that they're easily convinced to despise America, themselves and their own families. 
No more free speech, safe zones FROM free speech. 
Ban/burn certain books.
Let's have some of that socialism that Hitler foisted on those German kids. Looks like whites, Christians, 'conservatives' are the bad guys today, but the Jews are still on the list in many parts of America. 

Let's have some Marxism and erase history, tear down statues,send some away to American gulags. 

But, no, no, don't see something/say something that's wrong with a globalist/socialist-leaning pack of wolves in sheep's clothing, out to bring America crumbling down.

See anything, say anything derogatory against national pride, patriotism, ALL BEING CREATED EQUAL?
ALL, NOT JUST SOME. 
NOT JUST WHITE, NOT JUST BLACK, NOT JUST DEMOCRATS, NOT JUST REPUBLICANS, NOT JUST JOB PROVIDERS, ALL.
A-L-L, ALL. 

BETTER NOT. THAT ISN'T "POLITICALLY CORRECT". 

Well, I concluded 'piss on politically correct' and I have the right to imagine doing so. 

I've read books like 1984, Animal Farm, Lord of the Flies, A Nation of Sheep (the ORIGINAL book by Lederer), Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Ruppert, Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, etc, since I was 8 years old...a time span of 65+ years of dedicated, careful reading. 

No one MADE me read any of the 5,000+ books I've read. (I don't count read books classified as fiction, not even 1984, a favorite.) I saw something going wrong in the world, wanted to know WHY, wanted some guidance and started reading all I could find that seemed to address humanity's ills, errors and confusions.
I learned other languages JUST so I could read some books that hadn't been translated to English yet in the late 1950s, 1960s. 

I've read and 'dug' and researched and dived into a lot of "rabbit holes" to find out WHY we're deteriorating into chaos and hate. 
I read books that angered me, enraged me, made me weep, made me sick to my stomach, but I wanted to know...

I wanted to know what the whole world was thinking when we had "world wars", genocides, ethnic cleansings, civil wars, political upheavals, race 'wars', class 'wars', riots, mass murders, communism, socialism, democracy, and why we fought so hard for this REPUBLIC, how we possibly began losing it. 

I've read for as little as 6 hours a day to as many as 24 (I've always been a very happy insomniac) and average about 18 hours a day now that I'm "old" and infirm, mostly homebound and, they say, terminally ill. I've been told that 4 times before...still here. 

I QUESTION EVERYTHING, especially myself, and NO, I AM NOT NOW, NEVER WAS AND HAVE SWORN TO NEVER BE "POLITICALLY CORRECT". 
NOTHING, NO ONE WHO HAS TO BREATHE OXYGEN TO LIVE CAN MAKE ME BOW TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. 

I am of NO damnable political party. 
I think for myself, decide for myself. 
I am in NO popularity contest. 
I can truthfully say that it never crosses my mind whether or not I'm "liked" or "accepted". 
I block 'robots' from crawling/recording this poor blog site, don't allow "counts", don't allow ads, began writing it merely as an outlet for my frequent outrage at the deterioration of KNOWLEDGE, TRUTH and PEACE. 

I DEMAND my RIGHTS, and yours
We ALL have the SAME rights. 
We ALL make our choices. 

It behooves us to be so familiar with our Constitution that we can recognize IN AN INSTANT when anything that anyone does violates it or OUR RIGHTS.
It's a very simple document, NEEDS NO "INTERPRETATION.

We need to know that document like our own faces in a mirror, like the beat of our own hearts.

If we fail to do so, if we ignore our own RESPONSIBILITY to safeguard our rights, freedom, liberty, then let us blame NO ONE but ourselves.

Let us admit that we, ourselves, failed us. 

NO PLAYING THE BLAME GAME, NO PRETENDING WE'RE 'VICTIMS', NO SHIFTING RESPONSIBILITY TO OTHERS FOR FINDING OURSELVES ACCEPTING INFRINGEMENT ON OUR RIGHTS. 

I'm OFFENDED by a helluva lot, but the one thing I'm MOST offended by is IGNORANCE.

IGNORANCE HAS A CURE.
IT'S CALLED KNOWLEDGE. 
WHETHER WE GET KNOWLEDGE OR NOT IS ENTIRELY OUR FREE CHOICE. 

With the invention of the internet, we gained the greatest resource since public libraries for gathering knowledge. 

I watched two young men use the combination of a public library that had computers they could use and this old internet to get A.A. degrees for only the cost of a few used textbooks. 
One made real progress toward a bachelor's degree. 
Yes, it took time and dedication.
NO, it was NOT easy nor convenient. 
But they did it! 

There are colleges in America that offer FREE TUITION. 
A few are listed <HERE>. 
There are Pell Grants that never have to be repaid for low-income families with children, for financially strapped adults, . 

The College Level Examination Program (CLEP) is a series of examinations ('tests') that you can use to get credit for college courses based ONLY on what you have learned on your own over time.

Many colleges and universities will give you credit towards a degree for each CLEP test you pass.

See below at ** in my "end notes" what all you can "CLEP" to get college credits. It's quite a lot.
I used several of those very tests when I began my college years in the 1960s.

I began this blog 8 years ago, OCTOBER 21, 2012. 
I've tried to toss it many times but haven't managed to for long. 

I don't know how many more days are left to me, none of us know that, but ALL that are left to me will be spent demanding "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and justice FOR ALL, EQUALLY. 

TRUTH, AT ANY/ALL COST.
HONOR.

AND I WILL QUESTION EVERYTHING, SO LONG AS I MAY LIVE, WITH NOT A SHRED OF "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS".  

MY Tea Room.
MY way. 

As always, I hope you are well, wherever and whomever you are. 





__________________________

END NOTES: 

** CLEP exams are divided into 5 main subject areas:

Composition and Literature
World Languages
History and Social Sciences
Science and Mathematics
Business

Within each subject area, you can take the following exams:

Composition and Literature
American Literature
Analyzing and Interpreting Literature
College Composition
College Composition Modular
English Literature
Humanities

World Languages
French Language: Levels 1 and 2
German Language: Levels 1 and 2
Spanish Language: Levels 1 and 2

History and Social Sciences
American Government
History of the United States I
History of the United States II
Human Growth and Development
Introduction to Educational Psychology
Introductory Psychology
Introductory Sociology
Principles of Macroeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Social Sciences and History
Western Civilization I: Ancient Near East to 1648
Western Civilization II: 1648 to the Present

Science and Mathematics
Biology
Calculus
Chemistry
College Algebra
College Mathematics
Natural Sciences
Precalculus

Business
Financial Accounting
Information Systems
Introductory Business Law
Principles of Management
Principles of Marketing




--** Here’s 11 examples of political correctness gone stark-raving, lunatic mad.

1. We've dropped the use of the terms Before Christ (BC) and Anno Domini (AD) on  and decided that the terms ‘Before Common Era’ / ‘Common Era’ are "more appropriate". That's a LIE. The name 'CHRIST' simply "offends" millions. The name "Prophet Muhammad" does, too, but we still use that.  

2.  We've 'outlawed' titles stating marital status such as ‘Miss’ and ‘Mrs’ so as not to cause offence. It also meant that ‘Madame’ and ‘Mademoiselle’, ‘Frau’ and ‘Fraulein’ and ‘Senora’ and ‘Senorita’  (and male equivalents) would be banned. 
OFFENDS WHOM?
Mainly feminists and the LGBTQ community, NOT the majority of the known world. 
Just another butt-kissing move approved by some politicians to gain a few hundred or few thousand votes.  

3. Throughout several U.S. 'councils' and organizations, any terms using the word ‘man’ as a prefix or suffix have been ruled as not being politically correct. ‘Manhole’ is now referred to as a ‘utility’ or ‘maintenance’ hole. 
Princeton University is banning the word ‘man’. 
The TRUTH? Same as above in #2. 

4. Loveable cartoon rogue Dennis the Menace has been given a politically correct make-over. We (well, some) decided to take away his 'rough edge' in the remake. Gone are his bombs, catapult, water pistol and pea shooter – and in their place is a simple boyish grin. 
REAL REASON?
"Macho" men are offensive to feminists, who ALONE define that word as well,  and males have to be FEMINIZED, aka, EMASCULATED, so they'll wear those cute pink hats and follow 3 steps behind their WOMEN. Good boys. (pat, pat) 

5. A school in Seattle renamed its Easter eggs ‘spring spheres’ to avoid causing offence to people who did not celebrate Easter. 
Some US schools now have a ‘holiday tree’ every year at Christmas, rather than a Christmas tree.  SAME REASON.   
TRANSLATION? CHRISTIANS, although STILL the majority chosen religion (barely) especially in America, simply must suck-up to and bow to ALL other religions, atheists, "intellectuals", etc, who despise Christianity and love to disparage Christians. 

6. A UK recruiter was stunned when her job advertisement for ‘reliable’ and ‘hard-working’ applicants was rejected by the job center as it could be offensive to unreliable and lazy people. YES, this is for real. Do a search, see for yourselves. 

7. In 2007, Santa Clauses in Sydney, Australia, were banned from saying ‘Ho Ho Ho’. Their employer, the recruitment firm Westaff (that supplies hundreds of Santas across Australia), allegedly told all trainees that ‘ho ho ho’ could frighten children, and be derogatory to women. Why ?  Because ‘Ho Ho Ho’ is too close to the American (not Australian, mind you) slang for prostitute. 
Pssst, ummm, Australia, darlin', NOT ALL Americans use the word "Ho". See, it's mainly the SAME folks here who use the terms "Honky Mo-Fo" . 

8. The Journal of Animal Ethics, in 2011, decided that the word ‘pets’ was insulting to animals. They tried to replace the entire spectrum of words related to owning a cat or dog. The result was a diktat to call pets ‘animal companions’ and owners ‘human carers’.  
My service dog says they're bat-sh*t INSANE. So does the water dragon. And the cockatiels and fish. It's UNANIMOUS! 

9. University of California at Berkeley is so damned confused they can't decide what's offensive.
Saying, “There is only one race, the human race,” is offensive because it denies “the significance of a person of color’s racial/ethnic experience and history.”
But they want history erased, statues pulled down that reminds us who those Confederate generals were...Democrats, all. 
And damn you to the deepest hell if you 'discriminate against another race'. by mentioning their race...well, except the white race, which is the devil, you see. 
Wait, wait, can't use the word devil. 
Also at Burply (intentional misspelling), “America is the land of opportunity,” implies that “People of color are lazy and/or incompetent and need to work harder.”
AMERICA IS A VERY COLORFUL NATION and the word "AMERICA" doesn't signify JUST ONE RACE, O, morons of Burp-Me
See what I mean? Looney Tunes has nothing on old Berkley.

10. Some of the new politically correct words that are often criticized for being rather ridiculous.
Some examples of these are the terms ending in challenged. For example, someone who is very short might be described as "vertically challenged". 
People also say that things that are obviously bad are called by something else which hides the fact that they are bad. For example, young people who are in trouble with the law, instead of being called "juvenile delinquents" became "children at risk". 

Some PC terms may be ambiguous, i.e. have two possible meanings. "Hearing impaired" can also refer to someone who has partial hearing (hard of hearing) and "vision impaired" can also refer to someone who has partial vision. 

BULL-COOKIES!

Ever since Kindergarten, we Americans are taught to cherish the Freedom of Speech that our country provides; it is the very essence of the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness that our founding fathers promised. What many in our country fail to understand, however, is that freedom of speech includes the right to offend other people, no matter their shape, race, accent, gender, sexual orientation, religion, social standing or title of office.

Purely racist, raw sexist remarks and REAL 'hate speech' (such as we often find in especially RAP MUSIC, should be corrected. However, for the most part, it has gone way overboard and has now become a power trip of a few groups attempting to silence other groups. 

The hypocrites will laugh their silly heads off at statements by "celebrities" that mock, demean, call for violence against SOME (conservatives, mainly, and Christians) but screech like banshees if anyone says the EXACT same things about their little cliques. 
Screw that! 
That won't play. 

NOBODY has more or less rights than anyone else in the USA, period. 

If the manure you toss at others gets slung back into your face, if what you dish out is served up fresh for YOU, well, do what you tell others to do...
Suck it up, eat it and smile, and for cryin' out loud, STOP WHINING!








//WW




1 comment:

  1. Let me remind readers that I ceased publishing/okaying ANONYMOUS comments years ago. A few have slipped by me as ONLY I moderate this blog and ONLY I can post comments to it after comments are left.
    If you do't have the guts to use a name, you haven't enough guts to defend your comment.
    I DO accept comments with pseudonyms.
    I DON'T accept extremely VULGAR/OBSCENE comments.
    A few damns, hells, bastards, SOBs ad such are ok, but the 'F-word', the 'MF-word' and slang terms that refer to genitalia won't pass. "Stones", "having a set", is far preferable to the overused word "balls", don't you think?
    The Tea Room uses the word whore(s) fairly frequently in reference to politicians, especially the U.S. Congress, and I use in the context of a hired sex partner, meaning a male or female seller of sex...as in "Congress has whored itself to Wall Street".
    I've used the word 'putz' and failed to clarify I use it with the definition "jerk", "fool", not the original Yiddish meaning of "ornament", NOR the slang meaning that refers to male anatomy.
    I also used the word "bitch" a few times in reference to politicians, I believe, maybe even to Adam Schiff, Lindsey Graham & possibly Mittens Romulus (Mitt Romney) and Teddy Bear Cruz, but regretted it because I love my female service dog like I love my children and it repented me that I had probably offended female dogs by using that word on the humans I assigned it to. Dogs deserve more respect than that.

    I also don't allow hyperlinks to ads, porn sites, porn period, or blogs that promote any of that. NO AD LINKS...forget it "Movers in India", give up trying after 8 years, for cryin' out loud!
    I have REJECTED 11 comments so far today and it's not looking like any will pass muster.
    Just be aware that the Tea Room is a ONE-PERSON endeavor and I DO read everything you submit.
    I created the Tea Room and I ALONE decide what's published here.
    Do I care if that's offensive?
    Not even a shred.
    Have a cup of Hemlock?

    ReplyDelete