W.H.O. SAYS NO MORE LOCKDOWNS. SO DO >18,000 PHYSICIANS.

Above: The WHO had said no lockdowns back in April, praising Sweden's response.

Now, it's NO MORE LOCKDOWNS, again.

Watch how this plays out in the media. 

WHO was the darling of the press when it said we ought to quarantine the healthy, destroy the economies of nations, make millions of people jobless, when farmers were destroying fields of food because restaurants were closed, killing millions of food animals because processing plants shut down, creating food shortages, hungry people, stressing-out the world's population, feeding fears, trapping the healthy elderly in 'care homes' where they died. 

ALL THAT WAS GREAT PRESS, BOLD HEADLINES. 

This latest, well, hardly any in the accursed MSM even ran the story. 

Watch mainstream media turn on the organization again after this. 
They'll swear to every 'god' ever known that Trump made the WHO say this, that he pressured them, etc. 

I'd wager that WHO will once again capitulate, turn back to mandatory lockdown, maybe as soon as right before the election, BECAUSE IF THERE'S NO LOCKDOWN, PEOPLE CAN GO VOTE. 
THE ECONOMY WILL RECOVER FASTER, THE STOCK MARKET WILL RISE AS THE WHEELS OF INDUSTRY SPIN BACK TO...NORMAL. 

From 'USA Today', October 11, 2020
 
"WHO discourages lockdowns as US hospitalizations climb; 11 states set records for new COVID-19 cases"

[WHAT A TILTED, MANIPULATIVE HEADLINE!
Just SAY "Damn the WHO for turning on the Left!", you gutless asshats!"] 

USAT runs on and on about how horrible and dangerous and lethal COVID is and Bill Gates said, blah, blah, blah...until almost the very end of their "article", which was SUPPOSED to be about WHO's announcement.
Finally, they get to it.

"Dr. David Nabarro, the World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19, urged world leaders this week to STOP “using lockdowns as your primary control method" for blunting a virus surge.

“We in the World Health Organization do NOT advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Nabarro told 'The Spectator'. 

Nabarro said lockdowns can only be justified "to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted. But by and large, we’d rather not do it.” 

Then, right back they go to how many have died, are dying, will die. 
"YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIE! THE SKY IS FALLING!" 

ACTUALLY, the 'WHO' made their newest statement TWO days ago on the 9th, but mainstream media barely touched it.

MSN did a better job than USA Today, which gave it 2 short paragraphs surrounded by a lot of "Orange Man Bad" innuendo and yet some more fear-mongering. 
I hope nobody at 'USAT' choked while banging out those two lousy paragraphs. 

MSN 'borrowed' an article from a better news source, which went into more detail. 

"Nabarro went on to point out several of the negative consequences lockdowns have caused across the world, including devastating tourism industries and increased hunger and poverty.

"Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said. “Look what’s happened to small-holder farmers all over the world. ... Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”

Earlier this week, thousands of medical health experts signed their names to a petition calling for the end of coronavirus lockdowns, citing the “irreparable damage” they’ve caused.

"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” read the petition, known as the Great Barrington Declaration. "Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."

They address protecting the elderly and vulnerable members of society:

"Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals."   

IF WE DID MORE ANTIBODY TESTING, WE COULD FIND THOSE HEALTHCARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE ACQUIRED IMMUNITY, JUST AS THE DECLARATION SUGGESTS.

AND, BTW, YES, TRUMP HAS ANTIBODIES.
So do I; IgG and IgM.

This means I don't need a damned vaccine, that I'm not a "spreader", that I had the virus without one symptom and survived, at age 70+.
I've been asked to donate plasma.
WHY?
To help treat Covid patients. 

TRUMP IS CORRECT. 
He will be (or is now) IMMUNE to CV-19 and any doctor knows this.

 
 "Doctor" NBC found a chap who said immunity wasn't a given. 

"Whether Trump's IgG antibodies came from a lab or his own immune system may not make much of a clinical difference in the long run, Rice said. Indeed, the purpose of the monoclonal antibody treatment is to jumpstart a patient's immune response to the virus."

[Pssst, Dr. NBC! Underline "NOT make much difference" and then EDIT that to say, "It doesn't make ANY difference. He HAS the antibodies.."

BTW, NBC. I have  former colleagues who can/will diagnose your journalists with about 15 types of 'mental illness'. I also know a few who will testify that your medical analyses are anything but valid. 
You guys are flying over the cuckoo's nest...as usual.

Will you EVER AGAIN report the REAL news like you once did when Huntley & Brinkley were there? ]

In the United States, lockdowns have been tied to increased thoughts of suicide from children, a surge in drug overdoses, an uptick in domestic violence, and a study conducted in May concluded that stress and anxiety from lockdowns could destroy seven times the years of life that lockdowns potentially save."

Let's flesh that out a bit.

"Just Facts compiled mental health studies showing that one-third to one-half of all U.S. adults have been “substantially compromised” by reactions to the pandemic, citing several examples including a survey from the American Psychiatric Association, showing that at least 36% of adults say the coronavirus is “is having a serious impact on their mental health.”

A Kaiser Family Foundation study put that number even higher, showing that at least 45% of adults believe the virus has negatively affected their mental and physical health.

After reviewing the results of all the different studies, researchers concluded that the smallest risk of increased death was 20%, with a margin of error from 13% to 27%. The lower end of 13% translates to an average of about 1.3 years of lost life per person.

“Those who suffer serious mental repercussions from responses to Covid-19 will lose an average of more than a year of life,” the study reads."

That's what the lockdowns have done.

"Mighty brave of WASHINGTON EXAMINER social media producer/journalist Andrew Mark Miller to write that. 

Rather chintzy of MSN just to reprint from the Examiner instead of writing their OWN article, but their coming out with even ONE honest bit of news beats hell out of NONE.

[Are you okay over there, Andrew?
Did you let MSN know that telling the TRUTH didn't hurt at all?]   

BTW, Andrew also wrote about this on the 9th:

'Pro-lockdown' advocates 'submit hoax signatures' to an anti-lockdown declaration signed by thousands of medical experts.

A petition signed by thousands of medical professionals calling for an end to coronavirus lockdowns has received several fraudulent signatures.

“So the Great Barrington Declaration - an open letter/petition signed by thousands of medics and scientists who oppose the lockdown - has been hijacked by pro-lockdown fanatics who are signing it with fake names in a frantic attempt to discredit it. Desperate stuff!” journalist Isabel Oakeshott tweeted Friday morning. 

Economic and political historian and senior research fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), Phil Magness, tweeted that Nafeez Ahmed, a British journalist, was one of the people responsible for a fake submission and that it was being deleted.

“‘Journalist’ @NafeezAhmed has a thread this morning openly boasting about how he attempted to submit fraudulent signatures,” Magness tweeted Friday. “Needless to say, his submission and others like it are being actively deleted.”

Now AHMED tweeted like he'd successfully submitted to the petition, trying to show how easily "fakes" could sign on.

He lied.
He was BUSTED.

Phil Magness said that others online are “intentionally submitting hoax signatures” to the declaration, with names like “Mickey Mouse,” speaking to the “juvenile opposition” of those who disagree with the thousands of health experts who have signed the letter opposing lockdowns and urging governments across the country [to] push for “herd immunity.”

The document, known as the Great Barrington Declaration, was co-authored by Harvard professor of medicine Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Oxford professor Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and Stanford Medical School professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

"Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal," the petition says.

"The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk," the petition reads. "We call this Focused Protection."

Once he was called out, Ahmed then tried back-tracking so that he didn't look like what he IS, a politically motivated lying FRAUD.

Ahmed told the Washington Examiner that he does not "have an ax to grind" with the scientists behind the declaration and that he himself has been critical of "draconian" lockdowns in the past but was "surprised" at what he perceived as an "opaque" verification process to sign the declaration.

Looks like it blew Ahmed's mind that over 5,000 physicians (at that time) agreed with that 'evil devil' Trump and other 'murdering devils' who said all along that lockdowns weren't the way to go.

That petition/declaration now has over 300,000 signatures, over 18,000 medical practitioners, and almost 8,000 'medical scientists'.

Time will tell how any signatures are fakes... like naughty little Ahmed's was. 

"In response, Magness told the Washington Examiner that "rather than engaging with the scientific debate over the most serious public health crisis in our lifetime, lockdown supporters such as Nafeez Ahmed have resorted to submitting fraudulent signatures to the Great Barrington Declaration in an attempt to distract attention away from its message."

"Such actions amount to academic misconduct, serving no other purpose than to manufacture a controversy out of Ahmed's own admittedly deceitful and juvenile twitter antics," Magness continued. 

"Despite the brazenness with which Ahmed admits and even boasts of his fraud, his efforts are for naught as the fictitious signatures he and his supporters generated were almost immediately removed and blocked. Sadly, his behavior only distracts from the pandemic at hand, showing that he's willing to play politics when millions of human lives and livelihoods are at stake."

Magness also pointed out that other "pro-lockdown" academics joined in on the "spam campaign."

Magness’s colleague at the AIER pointed out another apparent attempt to discredit the study by tweeting an article suggesting the Guardian newspaper is engaging in an attempt to link supporters of the declaration to racism.

“Like clockwork, the smears are next,” AIER editorial director Jeffrey Tucker tweeted.

"White House Coronavirus Task Force member Dr. Anthony Fauci said in September that Americans should prepare to “hunker down” until 2021 in order to combat the spread of the coronavirus in the fall and winter."

WHAT DOES FAUCI SAY AFTER THE W.H.O. CONTRADICTED HIM? 
Did he soil himself? 
"Hunker down"?
Fauci won't have to stoop very far to hunker WAY down. 

REMEMBER WHEN all those frontline physicians gathered in D.C. and did live broadcasts trying to make this and other points? 

I believe there were about 600 of them that had joined ranks back then to stop the media's scare tactics and show that some 'experimental drugs' were actually cutting down the time people spent in hospital recovering from CV-19.

REMEMBER how mainstream media 'crucified' them, how some of them were fired for taking their stance?  
Wonder what the employers who fired them think now? 

And, being honest, that one physician who called the hydroxychloroquine cocktail a CURE was wrong. 

We know of nothing, past or present, capable of CURING a virus. 
But a few things HELP. 


NURSING HOMES were locked-down very tightly. 

CHURCHES and businesses were forced to close. 

FAMILIES were forced to spend an unusual amount of time together in the same space. 

AND WHAT DID THAT ACCOMPLISH? 

THE ELDERLY quickly began dying by the tens of thousands. 

Children, kept home from school, have only recently begun being infected in larger numbers, probably by their parents. 

Church members and those who USED to shop at now-closed business and those businesses' owners are STILL getting infected by the virus. 
They bloody well didn't get it AT church or AT closed restaurants. 

A STATE whose governor still refuses to go on lockdown sees some of the state's mayors issuing lockdowns and mandatory masks orders.
That state, South Dakota, has fewer TOTAL cases than comparatively-sized states that DID mandate 'stay-at-home'/lockdown.  

South Dakota governor Kristi Noem refused to implement a lockdown order for her entire state, despite intense national media pressure.

While refusing a statewide lockdown, Noem has consistently pushed social distancing practices and good hygiene to the citizens of South Dakota since February.

South Dakota's governor is still doubling down on her controversial stance against state-wide lockdown measures even as the local positivity rate continues to soar.

HIGHER NUMBER TESTED = MORE POSITIVES ARE CERTAIN. 
We see that in ALL states that finally began seriously testing residents.

STILL, S.D. HAS ONE OF THE LOWEST TOTAL CASE NUMBERS IN THE NATION. 

NUMBERS WILL RISE AS WE TEST MORE PEOPLE. 


Noem said during a special legislative session on Monday, October 6, "Earlier this week, one very prominent national reporter sent me a note that said, 'Governor, if you hadn't stood against lockdowns, we'd have no proof of just how useless they really have been.'"

Noem said she hopes to show other states that there are ways to navigate the pandemic without enforcing harsh government mandates.

ARKANSAS, another state that initially refused to lock down, also has a lower number of cases/deaths than most of the nation. 

By October 10, Arkansas passed 92,000 cumulative cases.

By mid April this year, nearly 300 million people, or about 90 per cent of the population, were under some form of lockdown in the United States.

I still cannot imagine WHY the CDC and WHO keep pushing for people to get that almost useless nasal swab test (PCR) when a serum antibody test would likely reveal that millions have ALREADY had 

CV-19 and have RECOVERED.

If everyone KNEW if they were recovered, a LOT of anxiety/stress/fear could be relieved and we wouldn't be wasting time and tests on people who have already developed antibodies to this virus. 

We could see where we REALLY are on this pandemic time frame, know better what to expect as winter approaches and have access to more serum of those who have recovered in order to help those who may be ill tomorrow. 

Mainstream media, instead, keeps going for the BIG SCARE. 
Ask yourselves WHY.






//WW