[He looks a lot like his father, doesn't he?]
THERE HAVE BEEN MANY STUDIES THAT HAVE SHOWN THE ILL EFFECTS OF SEVERAL VACCINES ON YOUNG CHILDREN, BUT MOST ARE DISMISSED BY OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA WITH A FEW SCOFFING WORDS, THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES MOUNT AD CAMPAIGNS AND PAY FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS EXPERTS TO QUICKLY REPAIR THEIR IMAGE, AND PEOPLE ARE LULLED BACK TO SLEEP WITH THE "CROSS MY HEART AND HOPE TO DIE" ASSURANCES OF THOSE WHO MANUFACTURE VACCINES, THE CDC, AND A HOST OF PAID PERFORMERS WITH THAT "M.D." AT THE END OF THEIR NAMES.
SHHHH, HUSH NOW, ALL IS WELL.
WE PROMISE YOU THAT VACCINES ARE SAFE, NECESSARY, GOOD FOR YOUR CHILD.
AND PARENTS, WANTING TO BELIEVE, NOT WANTING TO BEAR ANY GUILT IF OR WHEN THEIR PRECIOUS CHILD IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY A VACCINE, OR, HEAVEN FORBID, DIES AFTER BEING VACCINATED, EMBRACE EACH NEW STUDY THAT REASSURES THEM EVERYTHING IS FINE.
AFTER ALL, THERE ARE FAR MORE STUDIES PUBLISHED THAT TELL US HOW SAFE VACCINES ARE, WHAT MIRACLES THEY ARE.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW WHY THERE ARE FEWER "NEGATIVE" STUDIES PUBLISHED?
IT'S BECAUSE MOST "JOURNALS" ARE FINANCIALLY AND IN OTHER WAYS "BACKED" BY THE BIG PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, WHO WILL NOT PUT UP WITH NEGATIVE COMMENTS/STUDIES ABOUT THEIR HIGH-DOLLAR, PROFIT-MAKING PRODUCTS.
THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION IS ANOTHER GROUP WHO VERY MUCH DISLIKE ANY STUDY THAT DISAGREES WITH THEIR MEMBERS.
JUST THE FACTS.
BUT WE DON'T GET THE REAL FACTS MUCH OF THE TIME FROM THESE "PEER-REVIEWED" GLOSSY STUDIES.
JAMA’s editor calls fraudulent medical research a ‘scar on the moral body of science’. But it’s really just part of an entire system of fraud in medicine.
According to Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet:
A single paper in Lancet and you get your chair and you get your money. It’s your passport to success.
It’s all about money.
DR. WILLIAM THOMPSON WAS A SENIOR SCIENTIST AT CDC AND, IN SPITE OF BLOWING THAT WHISTLE,AS FAR AS I KNOW, REMAINS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CDC TODAY.
WHEN THE CDC HAD HIS STUDIES PUBLISHED, THEY INTENTIONALLY LEFT OUT MANY OF HIS FINDINGS. SINCE THAT HAS BEEN REVEALED THOSE STUDIES HAVE BEEN RETRACTED AND RENDERED USELESS.
WE SHOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL TO THOMPSON FOR COMING FORWARD WITH THE TRUTH.
ROBERT KENNEDY, JR, HAS KNOWN THAT VACCINES DO HARM FOR A LONG TIME AND HAS DONE MORE THAN MOST OF US COULD EVER DO TO SPREAD THE TRUTH, TO REVEAL THE FACTS, AND TO HELP CHILDREN AVOID LIFELONG SUFFERING BECAUSE OF THESE VACCINES.
I INVITE ALL TO GIVE A CAREFUL READING OF MR. KENNEDY'S ARTICLE...
"African-American autism and vaccines"
by ROBERT F. KENNEDY
07/09/2015
"Dr. William Thompson confessed that the CDC has known since 2001 that Black boys exposed to the MMR vaccine have a disproportionate risk of autism.
[This was in August, 2014 that Thompson came forward.]
Thompson released the raw data sets that he says his bosses at the CDC ordered him to conceal. Those data show that Black boys who received the MMR vaccine before 3 years of age, as the CDC recommends, were 3.36 times more likely to receive an autism diagnosis than those who received the vaccine after 3 years of age. This effect was not observed in other race categories. Nevertheless, when the CDC scientists published their results in the journal Pediatrics in 2004, they omitted the damaging data, fraudulently declaring there was no risk of autism from the MMR vaccination.
The buried data were disturbing, but hardly surprising. The most reliable studies in the scientific literature indicate that African-Americans are more susceptible to vaccine injury and may also have increased susceptibility to neurological disorders such as autism.
A 2010 nationwide study of the CDC’s Autism and Developmental Disability Monitoring Network found autism incidence about 25 percent higher in African-Americans than Caucasians. A 2014 study published in Pediatrics showed higher rates of all categories of autism among African-Americans in Los Angeles County compared with Caucasians, with the incidence of severe autism elevated by 263 percent among foreign-born Blacks and 152 percent for U.S.-born Blacks as compared with U.S.-born whites.
A 2010 study in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health showed that Blacks were at significantly greater risk for regressing into autism after receiving the thimerosal-containing Hepatitis B vaccination series as infants. When analyzed further, the data showed that Black boys receiving the HepB series were 53 percent more likely to have autism than those Black boys not receiving any HepB shot.
On the basis of all the population data and the CDC’s most recent autism incidence estimates, at least 100,000 African-American male children could have been spared debilitating neurological injury if the CDC scientists had told the truth when the increased risk was first known to them in 2001.
It’s not the first time the CDC has concealed vaccine risks from African-Americans. Less than 10 years ago, in June 1996, African-Americans in Los Angeles learned that the CDC had been conducting vaccine experiments in their communities. Beginning in 1989, the CDC conducted an experiment on nearly 1500 Black and Hispanic infants using an unlicensed measles vaccine without disclosing to parents that the drug was a high-potency experimental vaccine designed to overwhelm the baby’s maternal immune system. The CDC only halted its secret experiment in 1991, when companion clinical trials conducted in Africa and Haiti showed an increased death rate and severe immune-system disorder among female infants who received the vaccine. Those children died within two years after the vaccination.
“A mistake was made,” then CDC Director Dr. David Satcher told the LA Times. “It shocked me. We need to move to a new level of assurance so people can trust what we’re doing.” The CDC denies that any Los Angeles Black children were injured by the unlicensed vaccine but has not produced any studies to confirm that claim.
In 1972, a government whistleblower, Peter Buxton, revealed that for the previous 40 years, beginning in 1932, both the CDC and the U.S. Public Health Service conducted the so-called Tuskegee Experiment to study the progression of untreated syphilis in impoverished African-American men in rural Alabama. Public health regulators lured illiterate sharecroppers with the promise of hot meals, funeral costs and free health care from the U.S. government. According to the CDC, which took over the study in the early 1960s, none of 299 syphilitic sharecroppers were ever told they had the disease. The CDC purposefully withheld penicillin after the antibiotic became a proven treatment in 1947. The CDC actively prevented participants from accessing syphilis treatment programs elsewhere. The CDC’s victims in that study included numerous men who died of syphilis, 40 wives who contracted the disease and 19 children born with congenital syphilis.
By concealing the link between vaccines and autism in African-American boys, the CDC had once again violated that public trust. But this fraud is not just about African-Americans. The fraudulent 2004 study has been cited in 91 subsequent studies as one of the principle proofs of the CDC’s claim that vaccines are not linked to the autism epidemic. The CDC’s fraud in this study calls into question the validity of the entire body of research that families, medical professionals and policymakers rely on when making decisions for the health of children." I SINCERELY HOPE YOU WILL READ THE REST OF MR. KENNEDY'S ARTICLE AND JUST THINK ABOUT THIS.
HERE IS THE CDC, AN AGENCY THAT IS SUPPOSED TO HELP US MAINTAIN OUR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, AND, INSTEAD, IT HIDES THE TRUTHS WE NEED TO BE WELL!
HERE IS THE CDC AND ALL WHO HAVE BEEN COMPLICIT IN THIS FOR DECADES NOW CONSPIRING TO KEEP THE FACTS FROM PARENTS WHO HAVE TRUSTED THEM, VACCINATED THEIR PRECIOUS CHILDREN, AND WATCHED THE DISMAL AFTERMATH.
I WILL BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT THAT RACE WARS EXIST IN AMERICA, THAT THERE IS BIGOTRY AND MISTRUST AMONG ALL RACES HERE, THAT RACISM EXISTS IN EVERY SMALL TOWN IN THIS NATION, FROM ALL SIDES!
BUT WHEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS, AGAIN, AFTER IT HAPPENED MANY TIMES BEFORE, I HAVE TO QUESTION IF THE CDC IS ON THE "MARGARET SANGER AGENDA", TO ERADICATE "UNDESIRABLE RACES", AS SANGER HERSELF ADVOCATED IN HER OWN WRITTEN AND SPOKEN WORDS.
IF I WERE AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN, I WOULD CERTAINLY WONDER!
IF IT HAD BEEN REVEALED THAT THE CDC WAS CONCEALING THIS SAME INFORMATION, BUT IT APPLIED TO ONLY WHITE CHILDREN, NOT BLACK CHILDREN, HOW MANY WHITE PARENTS WOULD WONDER WHY?
HOW MANY THEN WOULD DEMAND THE PROSECUTION OF ALL WHO WERE COMPLICIT IN THIS?
WILL THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN PEDIATRICS NOW BOLDLY STATE THAT THE MMR IS KNOWN TO CAUSE AUTISM MORE OFTEN IN AFRICAN-AMERICAN MALE CHILDREN?
NO.
NO IT WILL NOT, NOR WILL ANY OTHER MEDICAL JOURNAL THAT PUBLISHED THE LIES TOLD BY THE CDC.
IF THEY ADMITTED THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE TO ADMIT IT JUST MIGHT BE POSSIBLE THAT COUNTLESS OTHER "STUDIES" BY THE CDC ARE NULL AND VOID.
THE MAKERS OF VACCINES WOULD NOT STAND FOR SUCH A THING!
MOST MEDICAL DOCTORS WOULD SCREAM FOUL!
NONE OF THEM CARE THAT OTHER CHILDREN MAY FACE A DIAGNOSIS OF AUTISM, OR EVEN DEATH BY VACCINE.
THEY ARE STUCK IN THE OLD RUT OF FORCING VACCINES ON THE UNSUSPECTING MASSES.
IT'S JUST GOOD BUSINESS.
VACCINES ARE MONEY-MAKERS.
DON'T UPSET WALL STREET.
DON'T ANGER THE 'SACRED COWS' OF MEDICINE AND THE BIG PHARMA COMPANIES WHO PAY OUT SO MUCH TO HAVE THEIR PRODUCTS PUSHED TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.
LET'S GO BACK AND READ SOMETHING MR. KENNEDY SAID AGAIN:
"The CDC only halted its secret experiment in 1991, when companion clinical trials conducted in Africa and Haiti showed an increased death rate and severe immune-system disorder among female infants who received the vaccine. Those children died within two years after the vaccination."
IS THAT ACCEPTABLE TO ANYONE READING HERE?
AFRICAN AND HAITIAN CHILDREN DIED.
EVEN IF ONLY ONE HAD DIED, I CAN'T FIND THAT ACCEPTABLE.
OUR CHILDREN, ALL CHILDREN, ARE THE HOPE OF THE FUTURE!
WE MUST PROTECT THEM AS MUCH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE.
IF THERE IS A MODICUM OF DOUBT ABOUT SOMETHING THAT WE MAY THINK TO INJECT OR FEED INTO A CHILD'S FRAGILE SYSTEM, LET US STOP AND RESEARCH THAT UNTIL NO DOUBT REMAINS!
OUR CHILDREN ARE WORTH THE TIME AND THE EFFORT!
ALL CHILDREN ARE PRICELESS!
I SEE PEOPLE LIKE THE POLITICIANS IN CALIFORNIA AND ELSEWHERE WHO ARE BASICALLY TELLING PARENTS THAT THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND/OR FEAR FOR THE HEALTH OF THEIR CHILDREN, THEIR DESIRE TO PROTECT THEM FROM HARM IS SO MUCH PISS IN THE WIND AND THAT THEY WILL SUBMIT THEIR BELOVED CHILDREN TO VACCINES, COME HELL OR HIGH WATER.
TO SUCH AS THOSE I CAN ONLY SAY, "GO TO HELL!"
LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!
NO ONE GAVE A DAMNED POLITICIAN THE RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR ANY PARENT WHAT THEIR CHILD MUST HAVE!
WE'VE ALLOWED TOO MUCH INTERFERENCE IN OUR LIVES BY THE LIKES OF "CONGRESSES" AND PAID-UNDER-THE-TABLE UNETHICAL "EXPERTS" WHO ARE LATER FOUND TO BE LIARS.
JUST A QUICK LOOK AT THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY AND THOSE WHO GAVE US ASBESTOS, DDT, AND THALIDOMIDE SHOULD CONVINCE ANYONE THAT WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO BEFORE, SO CHANCES ARE VERY, VERY GOOD WE ARE NOW, OR WILL BE, LIED TO AGAIN.
AGAIN I MUST SAY THAT ANY UNVACCINATED CHILD SHOULD PRESENT NO THREAT TO A VACCINATED CHILD, IF, BIG FAT IF, THE VACCINES ACTUALLY WORK.
IF YOUR VACCINATED CHILD CONTRACTS A DISEASE, AN ILLNESS THAT HE/SHE HAS BEEN VACCINATED AGAINST, THE FAULT LIES WITH THAT VACCINE.
DOESN'T IT?
I APPLAUD THE EFFORTS OF MR. KENNEDY AND ALL LIKE HIM WHO PUT THE WELFARE OF OUR CHILDREN FIRST.
I CONDEMN THE LOATHSOME CDC, VACCINE MANUFACTURERS, ANYONE WHO WOULD ALLOW HARM TO COME TO ANY CHILD BY FORCING, COERCING, OR MANDATING BY SOME THEFT OF LAW ANY PARENT TO SUBMIT THEIR OFFSPRING TO VACCINATION,
WHEN AMERICANS GET SICK ENOUGH OF POLITICIANS AND 'SNAKE OIL SALESMEN' DICTATING EVERY MOVE WE MAKE, AMERICANS WILL STOP THEM FROM DOING SO.
WE CAN DO THAT.
WE ARE THE RIGHTFUL "SOVEREIGNS" HERE.
WE NEED NO KING!
MAYO CLINIC, IN 2011, HAD TO THROW OUT 10 YEARS OF CANCER RESEARCH STUDIES BECAUSE OF FRAUD.
THAT WAS DEVASTATING TO ME AS A CANCER SURVIVOR, BUT BETTER THE TRUTH THAN FALSE HOPE.
" In a scandal that has reverberated around the world of cancer research, the Office of Research Integrity at the U.S. Department of Health found that a Boston University cancer scientist fabricated his findings. His work was published in two journals in 2009, and he's been ordered to retract them. But important studies by other scientists like those at the Mayo Clinic, who based their work on his findings, could now make 10 years of their studies worthless."
I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE HUMAN SPIRIT...PROBLEMS DEMAND SOLUTIONS AND WE WILL FIND THEM... BUT WITHOUT LIES AND WITHOUT HAMMERING AT ONE ANOTHER TO GET WHERE WE NEED TO GO.
THERE IS NO HOPE IN DISHONOR.
FIRST...DO NO HARM!
12th-century Byzantine manuscript of the HIPPOCRATIC OATH
The phrase, "first, do no harm" is NOT found in the OATH, but from a translation of the Hippocratic writing Epidemics.
Here is the original oath translated:
Here is the original oath translated:
I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius the surgeon, likewise Hygeia and Panacea, and call all the gods and goddesses to witness, that I will observe and keep this underwritten oath, to the utmost of my power and judgment.
I will reverence my master who taught me the art. Equally with my parents, will I allow him things necessary for his support, and will consider his sons as brothers. I will teach them my art without reward or agreement; and I will impart all my acquirement, instructions, and whatever I know, to my master's children, as to my own; and likewise to all my pupils, who shall bind and tie themselves by a professional oath, but to none else.
With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage.
Nor shall any man's entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so.
Moreover, I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child.
Further, I will comport myself and use my knowledge in a godly manner.
I will not cut for the stone, but will commit that affair entirely to the surgeons.
Whatsoever house I may enter, my visit shall be for the convenience and advantage of the patient; and I will willingly refrain from doing any injury or wrong from falsehood, and (in an especial manner) from acts of an amorous nature, whatever may be the rank of those who it may be my duty to cure, whether mistress or servant, bond or free.
Whatever, in the course of my practice, I may see or hear (even when not invited), whatever I may happen to obtain knowledge of, if it be not proper to repeat it, I will keep sacred and secret within my own breast.
If I faithfully observe this oath, may I thrive and prosper in my fortune and profession, and live in the estimation of posterity; or on breach thereof, may the reverse be my fate!
[Copland, James (1 March 1825). "The Hippocratic Oath". The London Medical Repository 23 (135): 258.]
No comments:
Post a Comment